View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

'^¿frelease at lit30 a.m.
¡^ritrai Standard Time
1962

1

•/




OUR CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

Remarks of Harold King
Member of the Board of Governors
of the
Federal Reserve System
before the
75th Anniversary Convention of the
Kansas Bankers Association
Kansas City, Kansas
May it, 1962

OUR CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

Throughout time there has been a question of the relative
importance of heredity and environment.

There are schools of thought

that champion each of these factors as dominant.

But regardless of

their relative importance, time has repeatedly demonstrated that the
interplay of these two factors —

when both are understood —

can

produce good results.
Kansas is one of our great cattle states and you Kansas
bankers have no doubt learned much about the cattle business through
loans to ranchers.

I realize that some of you are ranchers along with

your banking interests.

Nowhere else is the desirability —

word would be profitability —

a better

of combining heredity and environment

more simply or beautifully demonstrated than in the cattle business.
Because I have been a breeder of purebred Herefords for lit years, the
lessons that this experience teaches are still clear in my mind.

As

people who live close to the soil, most of you undoubtedly know the
many simple truths that a cattleman learns.

Because you do, I will

not try to recount them for you.
What I would like to talk about is the relevance of heredity
and environment to us —

as Americans —

in the world of today.

A lady called me a "cracker-barrel philosopher” one time,
perhaps as a compliment or possibly an attempt at sarcasm.
ever the reason, I happily accept the description.

But what­

I have always

found great interest in philosophy, and it has served as a light in
my travel through life.




their fellow

- 2 -

philosophers recorded some of the most penetrating thoughts of which
man has proved capable.
to express simple —

Little improvement has been made in ability

or complex —

truth since their time.

But our

surroundings have changed greatly and continue to change, thus posing
for every generation a new problem as to how heredity and environment
could best be combined to serve man.
While Colonel Glenn and his fellow astronauts are engaged
in space flight, they find new problems that were almost beyond man's
comprehension a mere 100 years ago.

But Colonel Glenn, even though

the master of many new and intricate techniques, is still the same
basic man with the same emotions of hope and fear as was Charles
Lindbergh or Christopher Columbus.

Even though heredity is a tremen­

dous influence, it is still largely the same influence.
within narrow limits in the last 2,000 years.

It has varied

But the other factor,

the environment, keeps changing and does not remain within narrow
limits.
All of this leads to the subject of
which we live today.

w

talk:

the world in

It is hard for me to believe that we Americans

of today are much worse —

or much better —

than our forefathers who

dreamed a bright dream of freedom and proceeded to turn their dream
into reality.
our side.

We can be confident we have a lot of good heredity on

Our problem is to mesh our heredity with changing conditions.
If this is our big problem, then it is obvious that an under­

standing of both ingredients is essential.

Fortunately, the first

factor, heredity, or we might refer to it as human nature, is almost




- 3 constant.

True, it is complex, but whatever knowledge we have gained

of this subject can be depended upon to remain more or less the same.
Lessons learned about a past environment frequently do not apply to
new surroundings.

The lessons the settlers at Jamestown learned have

some relevance today and probably always willj but those lessons
couldn't be of much help to Colonel Glenn while he was strapped in
his capsule in space.

This comparison suggests that we must be con­

stantly learning about environment, even though we can "rest on our
oars" more frequently in regard to the study of human nature.
Frankly, I find unending interest in human nature, and
even though the pursuit of knowledge in this field is far more ab­
sorbing, I know that I should keep prodding myself toward a better
understanding of our current position in the world.
environment is nothing novel for Americans.

Taming a new

Our heritage is a history

that records triumph again and again of American purpose over adverse
conditions.
Now I hope I have placed the spotlight on the things I would
like to say today about our new position in the world.
The end of World War II found much of Europe in economic
ruins as well as in physical ruins.

About this time our national

leaders made a study of our position and decided that we needed strong
friends on whom we could depend for support in the cause of freedom
as opposed to totalitarianism.

One of the actions that followed was

the Marshall Plan, which gave economic aid to many of the European
countries.




Those countries have largely succeeded in building a

-

k

-

sound economic machine on the ruins of the war.

It is inconceivable

that we could have invested so heavily in such a project without count­
ing on success.

Now that their swift recovery has been accomplished

with emphasis on a market economy, they have emerged with great com­
petitive potential in industry.

This is a new development in the world,

and we must chart our course in cognizance of this fact.
We have invested a tremendous amount of money in the European
recovery, even to the point of placing our gold stock under greater
pressure.

We have helped make possible the formation of an economic

and political union of European countries within the framework of each
country's sovereignty.

The unity of these countries within a common

market makes their collective economic strength much greater than has
been the total of their individual strengths.

Our gold stock would be

secure and probably much larger today if we had not undertaken the re­
sponsibility of aiding them.

But it is doubtful that we would actually

be more secure if Europe were plagued with more troubles than it is
today.

We have been of great help to them in their hours of need,

and we know we can depend on them for cooperation because we have
demonstrated that our strength is their strength.
Within the last year some of our European friends have under­
taken cooperative action in the fields of monetary policy and inter­
national money flows.

This cooperation is all the more noteworthy be­

cause at the moment their actions did not fit their domestic needs
ideally.

There are other acts of cooperation which we can reasonably

expect because our mutual security is involved.




- 5 It is hard to learn to be good neighbors when separated by
barriers of language, distance, and history.

At this point I want

to add that ny concept of neighborliness is just like the neighbor­
liness of two ranchers who operate side by side.

Either is glad to

do a favor for the other, but the future of the relationship rests
on the response the befriended makes when the occasion for reciprocity
presents itself.

Neither is required —

ruin himself as evidence of friendship.

certainly not expected —

to

And neither expects his

neighbor to undertake roundabout solutions to problems that he him­
self could solve.

So we should continue to apply ourselves to the

task of being this type of good neighbor.

This type of neighborli­

ness provides a foundation for long and fruitful friendships.
alternative course of isolation sometimes looks tempting.

The

It requires

less effort at the start, but if we fix our eyes as far down the trail
as we can see, there are obstacles here also.

There are good reasons

to think this latter trail comes to an abrupt end.

Certainly we will

be more likely to be on the right trail if we familiarize ourselves
sufficiently with the environment of our day.
We will tend to insure that correct decisions are made if all
of us become more interested in trying to understand our new environ­
ment.

Those of you who are informed on the subject of international

economics have a responsibility to share your thoughts with others in
your community.

When a member of our electorate does not understand

what he is voting for or against, we have added mere chance to the other
hazards of the road.




As we all know, the democratic process is quite

- 6 -

lavish in according its citizenry voice in government, and this fact
requires the best efforts of all of us to insure adequate public under­
standing of issues and problems.

Thomas Jefferson expressed this idea

eloquently when he said, «If a nation expects to be ignorant and free,
in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
Regardless of what I have said here today, the classical argu­
ment of the relative importance of heredity and environment will continue.
Since World War II we have had a similar argument in this country as to
whether the inflation we have experienced has been brought about by
"demand-pull" pressures or "cost-push" pressures.
both of these factors were contributory.
as to which exerted the greater force.

It is likely that

And there is no absolute proof
But as we look at our industrial

capacity and production today, it is quite apparent that "demand-pull"
inflationary pressure has been reduced drastically, if not to zero.
This can be said because we have more than ample productive capacity
for today's demand.

Perhaps we have excess capacity.

toms of excess capacity is intense competition.

One of the symp­

From my own knowledge,

almost all businesses are finding intense competition.
Certainly the consumer has played a role in this development.
Many had almost forgotten that the total of consumer demand can be used
as a veto power when the consumer is convinced that he is not getting
fair consideration.

The fact that consumer purchases are showing little

increase while savings have been rising more rapidly than usual is an
indication that the consumer is using his veto.

This is an example of

one of the safeguards in a market economy at work.




- 7 With "demand-pull" inflation neutralized for the time being,
we can now turn our attention to the control of "cost-push” inflation.
With all our attention focused on this target, we should be successful
in meeting this pressure.
We should not overlook the fact that markets for all our products —
agricultural as well as industrial —
tional trade.

include a large amount of interna­

Maintenance and expansion of these markets is dependent on

our resistance to inflation from any cause.
If we are as successful in neutralizing "cost-push" inflation
as we have been in neutralizing "demand-pull" inflation through increased
productive capacity, then our future is bright indeed.

For, by so doing,

we will encourage all consumers of American products to proceed with their
purchases in an orderly fashion.

Strong consumer demand is our best hope

for the creation of more jobs, and the need for more jobs is a problem
that will likely become more acute as the large crop of "war babies" reaches
the ranks of workers.

To the extent that we delay meeting our economic

problems, we delay full employment of our labor force.

We also delay our

return to a faster rate of economic growth, which benefits not only all
Americans but all our friends in the freedom camp.
As we apply ourselves to the task of learning more of the world
in which we live, we can believe with confidence that our genetic inherit­
ance is high.

Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are con­

vincing evidence that this is so.

These documents leave no room for defeat

of our system by any other ideology or "ism" —
"defeatism."




except one.

That one is

This is a weight that our system was not designed to bear.

- 8 -

Indeed, it is actually alien to the American concept.
terms of success.

So we think in

As we reflect on the marvelous progress of America

made possible through emphasis on incentive, we should realize that the
edge of incentive must forever be kept sharp.

Even though history is

only a guide for the future, our past clearly reveals that a determined
America has always been a successful America.
I would not claim that we Americans are the chosen few of all
men; but I do believe we possess the additional strength of Divine Provi­
dence so long as we devote our best efforts to those causes which recog­
nize individual man as the centerpiece of our concern.