View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

Making Monetary Policy
During A Financial Crisis
Eric S. Rosengren
President & Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

U.S. Monetary Policy Forum
The University of Chicago Booth School of Business
and Brandeis International Business School

New York, New York
February 27, 2009

I am pleased to participate in this important forum again this year, and welcome the
opportunity to discuss monetary policy during the current financial crisis. Thank you for inviting
me to be here with all of you and with Charles Plosser and Rick Mishkin.
As you know, what began as a problem involving securitized subprime mortgages in the
United States has become a problem of global reach and historic proportions. The problem grew
in scope and severity as investors became skeptical of financial statements, and as the ability to
value and trade a wide variety of financial instruments became severely impaired.
1

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

Problems in financial markets spilled over into the real economy and contributed to
deteriorating economic conditions. The U.S. economy lost 1.8 million jobs over the past three
months. With the economy likely to shrink significantly in the first half of this year, the
unemployment rate rising higher than 8.5 percent is, unfortunately, very likely.1
Unlike in some previous periods of financial disruption, this time around most countries
are well aware of the precarious financial circumstances and have taken action to mitigate the
problems. While the responses have varied, in most countries the monetary authorities have
eased interest rates, the regulatory authorities have taken actions to shore up financial
intermediaries, and the fiscal authorities have adopted more expansionary or “stimulative”
policies than previously were planned.
In combination, these actions – along with lower energy prices – will, I hope, provide a
foundation for positive economic growth in many countries in the latter half of this year.
However, I believe that below-potential growth is likely to persist until financial markets and
financial institutions can resume more normal functioning. So in addition to the other steps
being taken to stimulate the economy, we need to be sure that actions to support the stability of
the financial system are taken without delay – and, in the slightly longer term, that regulatory
frameworks are thoughtfully reformed.

Monetary Policy During the Crisis
Figure 1 highlights a striking feature of this financial crisis – the rather rapid movement,
at least by central banking standards, to a federal funds rate only a little above zero. The Federal

2

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

Reserve has moved with commendable speed in lowering the interest rate target to address
problems in financial markets and the real economy.
Of course, one year ago many observers were critical of the Federal Reserve’s rapid
interest rate cuts. Total inflation was above the “comfort zone” of many, as rapid increases in oil
and commodity prices were occurring despite unsettled financial markets. In retrospect, it is
fortunate that the Federal Reserve moved as quickly as it did. While the rapid reduction in
interest rates did not prevent a recession, it has mitigated the depth of the downturn and
cushioned the economy against some of the shocks experienced over the past year.
However – with the federal funds rate bounded by zero, the forecast one of continued
weakness, and challenges in the transmission of funds-rate changes into borrowing rates in the
marketplace – the Federal Reserve has turned to some alternative approaches to monetary policy.
I would like to take a moment to highlight some key steps we have taken in this regard, and some
of their implications.
First, the Federal Reserve has taken pains to make clear in communications that it will
take all necessary actions to stabilize the economy. At the same time the FOMC has increased
transparency by providing longer-range forecasts of growth, inflation, and unemployment –
given the current structure of the economy, the presence of appropriate monetary policy, and an
absence of unexpected shocks.2 Chairman Bernanke addressed this topic in his speech at the
National Press Club last week.3
The added transparency should help the Fed attain its goals of full employment and price
stability. Currently, significant excess capacity in the economy risks lowering inflation and
inflation expectations. Since short-term interest rates are effectively zero, reductions in inflation
3

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

expectations imply a higher real interest rate – and, effectively, tighter monetary policy. So the
additional clarity on the long-run intentions of monetary policy (as reflected in the longer-range
forecasts) might keep inflation expectations well anchored4 and real interest rates low enough to
help get the economy moving again.
An important consideration involves what the long-run goal for inflation should be, given
recent experience. Twice this decade, short-term interest rates have approached zero, and the
probability of possible deflation has risen significantly. In light of this experience, some might
conclude that the implicit inflation target has been too low. A fruitful area for future research
would be to re-consider the likelihood and the cost of hitting the zero lower bound, and what that
cost implies for setting inflation targets.5
But now I would like to spend a bit of time discussing a second, alternative approach to
monetary policy that the Fed has been pursuing. Since the fall of last year the Federal Reserve
has rapidly increased its balance sheet, from $880 billion in July 2007 to $1.9 trillion as of last
Wednesday, February 18. While this expansion of the balance sheet is unprecedented, and gives
some observers pause, it is worth taking the time to understand the sources of that growth, the
goals behind that growth, and how the Federal Reserve balance sheet can be expected to
eventually return to a more normal size, due to market developments and Federal Reserve
actions.

4

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

Expansion of the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet
Figure 2 shows the composition of the Fed’s balance sheet. While this period of
financial turmoil began in August 2007, much of the initial activity by the Federal Reserve
involved traditional monetary policy – reducing the federal funds rate. Then in 2008, the Federal
Reserve began what became a series of actions that expanded our usual “discount window”
function. While the discount window had traditionally been available to depository institutions,
in the spring of 2008 investment banks gained access to the discount window through the
Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF).
The largest expansion of the balance sheet occurred in the wake of the Lehman Brothers
failure, as a series of actions were taken in response to the increasingly fragile state of financial
markets. The three most significant areas of growth were discount window lending, foreign
swap lines, and actions taken to stabilize financial markets.
The discount window lending I am referring to includes traditional discount window
loans, primary dealer discount window loans, and lending in the Term Auction Facility (TAF).
The largest category of lending in this group is the TAF, which as of February 18 had $448
billion in loans outstanding. This Fed lending has been critical to the reduction in market interest
rates that are charged in the interbank lending market.
These TAF loans are arranged through an auction process, and like regular discount
window lending, are loans to banks that are in satisfactory condition and are also backed by
collateral subject to significant “haircuts,” to mitigate risk to the Federal Reserve. In
considering how we get to a more normal-sized balance sheet, it is important to note that TAF
lending is likely to fall once financial conditions become more normalized, although the Fed
5

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

could also hasten the reduction by holding smaller auctions or charging a higher minimum stopout rate.
The second area of substantial balance sheet growth involves central bank liquidity
swaps. These are loans made to foreign central banks so they can provide dollar funding to their
banks in much the same manner as the U.S. Federal Reserve’s TAF. Why we are doing this?
Because global dollar markets are interlinked, and dollar markets overseas affect our own
domestic financial conditions. Our counterparties are the other central banks, not individual
financial institutions, and the swaps are essentially loans.
As the interbank dollar-lending market has stabilized – and given that the rates on the
loans by foreign central banks are often set to make them less attractive as markets stabilize –
this lending has fallen from a peak of $583 billion on December 17 to $375 billion on February
18. This second area of balance sheet growth also is likely to decline naturally as more normal
market functioning resumes.
The third area of substantial balance-sheet growth involves the Federal Reserve liquidity
facilities designed to provide market support (see Figure 3). These facilities are designed to
improve conditions in short-term credit markets. Some, like the Commercial Paper Funding
Facility (CPFF), provide an alternative funding source to the market when interest rate spreads
become very elevated. With this facility in place, when interest spreads are high firms have an
incentive to issue commercial paper directly to the Federal Reserve. When interest spreads are
low, issuers will get a better rate by going to the market, thus unwinding the facility and
shrinking the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.

6

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

Other facilities like the Asset-backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund
Liquidity Facility (AMLF) serve as a back-up for holders of existing short-term credit
instruments. Both the CPFF and AMLF experienced substantial lending when the programs
were first made available, but loan activity has declined as market conditions have improved.
In general, the various programs that have expanded the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet
should be less attractive to market participants as financial conditions improve. Figure 4 shows
that of late, the rate on asset-backed commercial paper has fallen dramatically, and many issuers
can receive better terms by issuing commercial paper directly to the market. Figure 5 shows that
the prime money market funds have tended of late to have a net inflow of funds, which has
helped stabilize short-term credit markets because money market funds are a key investor in
these markets.
Two new programs should provide additional help to markets. First, the Term AssetBacked Securities Loan Facility (TALF) is designed to provide a financing vehicle for credit
instruments that have been disrupted by poor functioning in securitization markets. This facility,
which will commence operations soon, should make credit more available for student loans,
consumer credit, commercial real estate, and small business loans.
A second program involves the large-scale purchases of mortgage-backed and agency
securities. For a variety of reasons, mortgage rates had not fallen in response to the decline in
the federal funds rate, as is usually the case. As shown in Figure 6, conventional mortgage rates
that had been around 6 percent have declined since the announcement of the program. Mortgage
rates have been between 5 and 5.25 percent recently. Of course, an additional policy action that

7

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

could potentially be undertaken by the Federal Reserve would be to expand this program, to help
further lower the market rates on home financing.

Conclusion
In conclusion, I offer just a few summary thoughts. Over the last year and a half or so,
the Federal Reserve has been proactive and innovative in trying to address problems in financial
markets and the broader economy. While traditional monetary policy had focused on targeting
the federal funds rate, now that this rate has approached the zero-bound the Federal Reserve has
focused on other ways to lower the cost of credit in the marketplace, which had not fallen
commensurate with the decline in the federal funds rate. Federal Reserve programs have
intended to offset disruptions to interbank lending, short-term credit financing, the ability of
money market mutual funds to meet investor redemption requests, and housing finance – to
benefit all participants in the economy.
It is very important to note that the largest components of the expansion of the Federal
Reserve balance sheet are likely to become unappealing to market participants as financial
conditions improve and interest rate spreads decline. Thus, much of the Fed’s balance-sheet
expansion should be reversed as we see the return of more normal trading.
As a student of the Japanese financial crisis, allow me to make one final point. The socalled “quantitative easing” that focused on increasing reserves in Japan during the 1990s, while
well-intentioned, in hindsight suggests that merely increasing reserves when financial
intermediaries are capital-constrained is unlikely to have much impact.6

8

EMBARGOED until Friday, February 27, 2009
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time or upon delivery

In contrast, the Federal Reserve programs I have described today are intended to reduce
the unusually large spreads created by financial disruptions, so that the cost of credit for a variety
of borrowers returns to the level we would expect with more normalized functioning of credit
markets. The Federal Reserve’s recent monetary policy actions, combined with the fiscal
stimulus package that the government recently enacted, should in my view help pull the
economy out of the severe recession we have been experiencing.
Thank you.

NOTES:
1

See the minutes of the January 2009 meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee and the
addendum, a Summary of Economic Projections, available at
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/fomcminutes20090128.pdf

2

See the minutes of the January 2009 meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee and the
addendum, a Summary of Economic Projections, available at:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/fomcminutes20090128.pdf

3

See http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090218a.htm

4

As Chairman Bernanke noted in a speech on February 18 (available at
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090218a.htm), “This further extension of
the quarterly projections should provide the public a clearer picture of FOMC participants' policy strategy
for promoting maximum employment and price stability over time. Also, increased clarity about the
FOMC's views regarding longer-term inflation should help to better stabilize the public's inflation
expectations, thus contributing to keeping actual inflation from rising too high or falling too low.”

5

A number of papers written in the late 1990s provided estimates of the likelihood of hitting and/or being
pinned at the zero lower bound (see, for example, Reifschneider and Williams, “Three Lessons for
Monetary Policy in a Low-Inflation Era,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 32 (November
2000), pp. 936-66). With hindsight, the estimates in these papers appear a bit optimistic.
6

Of course, some observers believe quantitative easing was more appropriate in Japan because of its
more bank-centric financial system.

9

Figure 1
Federal Funds Effective Rate
January 2, 2007 - February 20, 2009

Source: Federal Reserve Board / Haver Analytics

Figure 2
Composition of Federal Reserve System Assets
June 27, 2007 - February 18, 2009

Source: Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.4.1

Figure 3
Federal Reserve System Assets
Held by Market Support Facilities
September 24, 2008 - February 18, 2009

Source: Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.4.1

Figure 4
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Rate
January 2, 2007 - February 20, 2009

Source: Federal Reserve Board / Haver Analytics

Figure 5
Daily Change in Money Market Fund Assets
in Prime Funds
August 1, 2008 - February 20, 2009

Source: iMoneyNet

Figure 6
National Average Mortgage Rates
September 2, 2008 - February 20, 2009

Source: Bloomberg