The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
;,"llllllllllllllllllllttllllllllllflll'llllllllllllllll111 .. 11'111111111111111' .... ,11111111.111111111111 ...... 1111,1 .. ' .......... ,11' .. 1111.11111.11111111111111111111111 .. 1111111111111111111'"11" .... 111'11".11111111111111111"111111'111'1"''''111' : :'11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . 1111111111111111111111111111111111111"111"'111"1111111'1111111111'11'1111111111111'11111111111111111111'111111111"'111111111111111111111111111111111,11111111,11111111111111111111111111111111111,.1111,' MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS c. C. WALSH, CHAS. C. HALL-W. J. EVANS, Chairman and . Federal ae..e"e AlI'ent Assistant Federal Rese"e Acenla (Compiled December 15, 1926) : ':.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'1 11111111111111111111111111111111111 .... 1111111111111 .... 111111.11111111111.,1.1 •• 1111111111111111111111lI.dlll •• ,llllllllllllltlllllllllllllllll .IIIIIIIII U'"IIIII1I1I"1I1I1I11I1III ..': : :".1111'1"11'1111"1'111'1'1'1'1'1'1"'1'1'1'1'1""1'1'1111"'1'1'1'1'111'1111'111'1'1"111111"1'1'111'111111'111'1'111"'1,,""111'1'11"""""11'1'11"1111'1111"'1'1'1'11""1"'1'1"1111'1111""1'1"'111111 IIII"III'I'IIIIIIII'I'IIIIIII':IIII'I~ Volume 11, No. 11 Dallas, Texas, January 1, 1927 This copy released for pub Iicat'ion in afternoon pavers December 28 DISTRICT SUMMARY (!J ...... IIIIIIII .. 111111 1""1 11111111 III II. III 11111111111111111111 II Iltl 11111. 11111111 " ' 111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .... . .. 111 (!J ~ I _~ _~ E I!l :: ~~~~ $7~:.~~~~~~ _~ : : : ! THE SITUATION AT A GLANCE $83~~:~:,~1~0 Bank debits to individual accounts (at 16 cities ) .................................... ....................................................... Department store sales ................................................................................................................ _ .................... Reserve Bank loans to member banks at end of month ......................................................................... _ $ 18,967,670 $ 19,709,868 Reserve Bank ratic/ at end of month................................................................................................................ 66.0 % 69.5 % Building permit valuations at larger centers ......................... _ ................._ .................................................... $ 4.-160 .407 $ 8,221,006 Commercial failures (number) ................................................................................................ _ ......................... 96 68 Commercial failures (liabilities) ................................................................................................... _ .................. $ 1,648,071 $ 1,181.400 Oil production (barrels ) 20,64 8,7]0 20,287,676 Lumber orders at pine mills (per cent of normal production) ...............................................:.................... 72 % 80 ry. 11111111.111111.1111 111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 1I11111f1l D~c~nc. Dec. Dec. Inc. Dec. Inc. fnc. fll c. Dec. or De~:7% _~ 6.1 % 29.1 % 6.6 points 46.7 % 39.7 % 30.6 % 1.8 % 8 points _~ ~ : : : ~ 1I1I1I1I11I1I1I1I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1"llIllIlIlIlIlllIlIlIlIllItlllllllllllllllllllll.1I1I11I1I HIIIIIIIIIII"lIlIllIlIlItllIllI'"llIlItllllllllllll~ November was a month of adjustment in husiness to the new situation created by the drastic decline in the cotton market during the two preceding months. Following the marked shrinkage in merchandise sales during October, dis· tribution at both wholesale and retail in November was maintained at a surprisingly high level, disclosing that the effects of the cotton situation upon this district were not as acute as they were generally expected to be. While Wholesale trade was smaller than in October, due in a large measure to seasonal influences, it compared favorably with that of November last year. Although retailers in rural sections are buying only for immediate delivery, there has been a goodly number of small replacement orders which bulk large in the aggregate. Dep artment store sales showed less than the usual seasonal decline from October and exceeded those of November a year ago by 11 per cent. Late reports indicate that business durin g December is proving to be very satisfactory. The volume of payment by check declined seasonally from the previous month but was 3 per cent larger than last year. The peak in the demand for credit appears to have passed and loans at banks in reserve cities and at the Federal Reserve Bank have shown a substantial decline. Federal Reserve Bank loans Lo member banks declined approximately $11,000,000 between October 31 and December 15 and on the latter date stood at $8,689,84,2, or approximately $500,000 less than on the same date last year. The deposits of member banks rose $9,891.,000 during the month but on November 24,th they were $4,0,000,000 less than a year earlier. The apparent easy condition of the money market of this district was disclosed by the heavy oversubscription for the December 15 issue of 314 per cent United States Treasury Certificates of Indebtedness. · Total' subscriptions to this issue amounted to $26,326,500 and allotments to the extent of $4,367,500 ·were made. Farm work during the month made good progress under the stimulus of generally favorable weather. The picking of cotton and the seeding of small grains are well advanced and farmers in many sections are making fair progress with plowing operations. There is a good season in the ground in practically every section of the district. Ranges and livestock are in excellent condition. Livestock are general! y fat and there is an abundance of feed and pasturage to carry them through the winter. The November production of crude oil in this district again established a new high record but drilling operations showed a tendency to decline toward the latter part of the month. The total output of crude oil for the month exceeded 20,000,000 barrels, as compared to 13,000,000 barrels in the same month last year and indicates the extent to which the district's income from this source has increased . Construction activity reflected a marked decline during November. The valuation of permits issued at principal cities was not only 48 per cent less than in October but was the smallest reported for any month in four years. Production, shipments, and new orders for lumber and the production and shipments of cement showed a seasonal decline. There was a general decline in employment during t.he month which resulted in a surplus of some classes of labor. A reduction in working forces was registered in such industri es as lumber, iron and steel, stone, glass and alay products, food and kindred products, and paper and prmting establishments. On th e other hand, increased forces were noted at department stores, chemical manufacturing plants, oil refineries and cottonseed oil mills. There is still a sl)6rtage or farm labor in some sections but the demandTor this class of labor is gradually declining. This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org) MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW 2 CROP CONDITIONS Weather conditions have been generally favorable for field work during the past thirty days. As the picking of cotton is nearing completion in many sections of the dis· trict farmers are turning their efforts to the seeding of small grains and to the preparation of the soil for 1927 crops. Seeding of wheat and oats made good progress and in most sections this work is well advanccd. Reports indicate that the acreage sown to these crops is being considerably increased this year. Farmers, generally, are progressing rapidly with plowing operations. Wheat and oats made good growth in nearly all sections although their growth was retarded in a few localities by dry weather. However, the general rains during the first week of December supplied the needed moisture and considerable improvement is taking place in these localities. There is now a good season in the ground in practically all sections of the district. Movements and Prices Receipts of cattle and calves at the Fort Worth Market during November showed a moderate gain over those for the previous month but were less than a year ago. Hog receipts showed but little change. There was a heavy decline in sheep receipts as compared to October and receipts were considerably less than in November last year. Cattle prices evidenced a mixed trend during November. Fat cows were in demand throughout the month and prices WOl ked to a higher level but prices on canners and cutters were slightly lower. There was a weak demand for beef steers and the market reflected a downward trend. Calf prices, after declining during the first three weeks of the month, turned upward due to the smaller receipts and a stronger demand. The downward trend in the hog market which developed during the last half of October continued throughout November. Sheep and lamb prices were slightly lower. P1" .... UIlIlIlIlIl ...... lIllIlIlIlIl1l1l1l1l1lllll1l.IUIlIII.IIIIUIlItUI ...... ,1Itllll'J.ltllllllllllllllitIUII'II ' @ Citrus fruits are maturing favorably and large shipments of both citrus fruits and vegetables are moving out of the Ri1> Grande Valley. The final cotton report issued by the Department of Agriculture placed the 1926 Texas cotton crop at ~,900, 000 five hundred-pound gross weight bales which exceeds by 948,000 bal es the largest crop previously harvested. The average yield of this year's crop is estimated at 154 pounds per acre, which compares to 113 pounds per acre in 1925, and is the largest per acre yield for any year since 1920. The yield during the latter year averaged 174, pounds per acre. Picking has made good progress and is now about completed in all sections except in North and Northwest Texas. Prior to December 1, there had been ginned in Texas 4,,64,7,920 running bales. It is estimated that 81.3 per cent of the crop had been ginned prior to December 1, as compared to 89.4, per cent in 1925 and 82.5 per cent in 1920. Late in I ovember the high winds damaged much of the cotton remaining in the fields in Northwest Texas. In nearly all sections, due to the scarcity of pickers, a large proportion of the remaining cotton is being snapped and in the Northwest many of the farmers arc sledding the cotton. In the lalter section gins arc running day and night. Practically all of the remaining cotton will be of a 1m\' grade. Colton picking is about completed in North Louisiana and is making good progress in Southeastern Oklahoma. LIVESTOCK There was a slight deterioration in ranges in some sections of the Eleventh dish·ict during November on account of the dry weather, high winds and frosts. The dry weather affected a few counties in West, Central West, Central and South Texas and parts of Southwestern New Mexico, but the heavy general rains early in December supplied the needed moisture. Winter weeds and grasses have a good start and small grain pastures and fields are furnishing an abundance of pasturage. Every section of the district has a surplus of feed. In fact, it is reported that the feed situation is the best in many years. The condition of cattle showed a further improvement and nearly all classes are fat. Trading on the ranges has been active due to the demand for re-stocking purposes. Prices at which cattle 0!1. the ranges have been changing hands have been steadil y nsmg. E FOR'l1 WORTH LIVESTOCK RECEIPTS ; !i~ -~::~rm ~~l ;~fl! ifni f~i!! I o , 'IIIIIH IIIIIIII IriU II 11111111111111'"11111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III II 11111 1111 II II. II .. Ui!l i: "'''''''''''''''''''~~:'~:~~~~'~'';~;'''~~~'~~~.~~:'';~~~:.''''''''''~.~~......m 1926 Bee! steers ..... _ ..._........................ . ............. $ 8.75 Stocker steers .................... ........ ..... _.. ...... 7.65 Butcher cows ...... _................. _... _.................... 6.00 Stocker cows .... ........ . ...... _. .... .... .... 6.00 Cnlves .. ..... ... ..................................................... 9.76 Hogs ....................._............ _......... _................. 13.60 Shee) ........ ....... .............................•............. ... 8.00 Lnmb. . ......... ........... ...... ........... ........... .. 18.25 GJ. "111111 t "'IIIIIIIIIIIII"'IIIIU'IIIIIIIIIIIIII"""II IIII IIII 'I IIIIII 1925 $ 7.50 7.65 5.25 8.~5 8.50 12.50 9.25 1(j.00 1926 $ 9.00 7.75 0.00 6.00 11.25 14.70 8.25 18.25 J 1111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 I!l Cotton Movements Receipts of cotton at Houston and Galves· ton during November continued to show large gains over those of a year ago. The combined exports from these ports also reflected a substantial gain over the corresponding month last year. The November exports from the United States totaled 1,486,224 bales which was 23.2 per cent large. than those for Novem· ber, 1925. Domestic consumption of cotton in November was 2.7 per cent greater thau in the previous month and 7.4, per cent larger than in the same month last year. Cotton held in consuming establishments on November 30 showed a substantial gain over that heid un October :11 and was slightly greater than on November 30, 1925. rpllUllIUIIUUlIllIlIlIlIIUlIlIlIHllllllltllIUUIIHIIUlIlIlIlIllIlHltlltllllUHlIlIlIlI1I 1I1I11I1I1'IIUIfIl"I~ -:~ : - COTTON MOVEMENTS THROUGH THE POR'l1 OF GALV~STON Nov. Nov. __~ Aug. 1 to Nov. 80 : This Lnst: l.. ~~~;~:~~~~~~"::~~~:,. ,. ,:,:~:~ :. ,. . :,:~ \j~,. , . :,:~~1~~. 1 [!] 1oIIIIIIIIIIIIUII::II,IIIIUI:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIt 1111111I1111'"I1II"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII"IIIIIIIIII'III~ I~~~~~,~~:~~~~:~~;~O~r[t~n~~!~ :1iiil I w Gl'"IIIH I I IIIIIHHUUI Il:llllItIIlIlI I UlllllllllIlIlIlIIlItHU ~ II1 : III1I1I111 111 1 11111":1 1111"1 1111111111111111 .. 8 MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW 3 l¥Jllltlllll t lllO IIlIIIUIIIIOUOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIII U Hll llll llfll . 11 111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I1I1I1I11I1I1I1I1I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11I . . . . . IIIIIIIIIIU ...... UIUIlU .... COTIo~~:a~:::::GO:~:: I::::::: Nov. 1926 Nov. 1925 A ug us t 1 to November 30 This Las t Season Senson UIlIl.1!J UNITED STATES N Aug us t 1 to N ovember 30 ov This Last 1925 Senson Senson Nov. 1926 2 01 3 8 n S ' ," ~ 1,04 6,260 1,008.02l ............ .....__. 1.497,844 1.457 ,46 6 : : ........... . ............ 6,292,149 6,074, 084 ............ .... _.... 6,517,565 6,206 ,562 E (!J ... UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ........ UII ...... IIIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIU .. II .. 1111 1111 II II HII II II II I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 11111111111111 1I11I1I1I1I1tllIlIlIlIlIlIllIlIlIlIlIllIlIlIlIlIlIlIlIllIlIlIl~ Cotton consumed ............. ................... ...... ......... ..... ......... ....... Cotton on hand November 80 (a) in consuming establishments..................... ... ........ (b) in public storage nnd ccimprcsscs..... ....... ........ 425.490 382 ,438 1,600,673 I!~:; :_-·"~F :.· 'o:"r:""""""""""~~·~~~~;~;"'~;~~~·"~~~~~;;:""""""~~;~~~~',,,.rn Great Brita in ................................................. 82,6 00 France .......... .............._....................................... 25,000 other f oreign ports .................. ..................... 91,000 For coa stw ise ports ......_................... .................. 2 ,00 0 In compres ses and depots ._ ..........................._ .. 570,91 6 ~ Total ........................:...... _.... ................. _... _.... 72 1,4 16 2,000 1,800 18,800 3.000 1,383.4 66 683.960 543.4 83 2.224 ,239 ~:!:::::~::::~:;~;~;~~:~. ~~~~;;;:. m:::! .... G79, 95 7 604,657 : 8"111111111111"111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 II 1111 II II II 11111111 II II II I (!J (!J: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'I'IIIII'IIIIII"IIII"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIIIIIIII'~ SEASON'S RECEIPTS. EXPORTS, AND STOCKS AT ALL UNITED S,!ATES PORTS A u g u. t 1 to November 80 This SeMon Last Season R eceip ts .... ........... .. ....._................ _...... 6,74 0.1 85 6.212,711 1.088.798 E x ports : Greut nri tain ....._................... 1.081,867 Frltnce ......... _...................... _ 451,810 417.685 Continent ......... _....... __ ........... 1,926,496 1,706,6tl ;rapnn- -China .................._.. 52H, 678 454,650 Mex ico . ....... .......... ..... 8.156 18.44 8 ...... 8,936.907 8,681.1 92 T otal foreign ports : :: : Cot t onseed crush ed ( tons) ............. _.. 775.000 Cot tonseed 011 hand (tons l .. _.............. 478.000 Crude oil produced (pound. ) . .........._219.104,000 Cake and Meal produ c~d (tons ) ..... 36 8,000 Hulls llr oduced (tons ) 22 6,000 Linters produced (600-lb. bales). _ 128, 000 Stocks on hand Nov. 80: Crude oil (pounds ) 26,988.000 32 ,000 Oake and meal (tons ) Hulls (tons ) 106.000 Linters (500-lb. bnles ) 55 ,000 620,000 2 , 4~ 7,0 0 0 ::::! 3.563.000 2.22 7,000 384.000 1.387,000 1,867,000 174,064,000 796.637.000 642,988,000 292,000 176,000 1.102,000 701,000 1,088.000 616,000 11 6, 000 409.000 416,000 15, H 2.000 52 ,000 72 .000 32.000 8'6, 614,000 176,008 22 6.000 192,000 69 ,94 9,000 221,000 E 187,000 E 127,000:: (!]"UtlUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .. t l I l I l I I l I l I l I I l I l I I l I l I l I t I l I l I H t l1l II I 1111 111111 IIIIIIIIJI IUJI II II I It II II 11111111 [!) GlIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1I1I1I1II1IIfItIlIIlIIIllI'II1I1I1I1I I I1I1I1I1I1IJ!l TEXTILE MILLING ~ I IIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11I1I1I1I1I1I'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII"I~ g : SPOT COTION PRICES (Middling B_a.sls) E E I~~&~~~~:':i:~:~-~D:=: ~-;:_~:~ ilf "ml! Dlj'~! ~IIIIIIII'III"IIIIIIII'I'_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'I ,111'11,11"1,1,1111,,,1111111111111111111111'111"1"111.1111.1110 COTTONSEED PRODUCTS As the crushing season advances, an in creasing volume of cottonseed products is being shi'pped out by reporting rottonseed oil mills of this distri ct. Due to the exceedingly large supply of cottonseed, pri ces of both cottonseed and cottonseed products showed a furth er declin e during No· vember. The crude oil shipped by reporting mills declined fr om $.0804, per pound in October to $.0734 per pound in Novemb er; cake and meal dropped from $24,.20 per ton to $23.4.2 IJer ton; hulls declined from $5.07 per ton to $3.85 P CI' ton, and linters declined from $.0319 per pound to $.0248 per pound. There were 17] ,024, tons of cottonseed purchased by these mill s during November at an average price of $21.41 per ton, as compared to 185,923 tons pur· chased in October at an average pri ce of $23.36 per ton. Jncre.lsed activity 'at the reporting textile mills of this district was in evidence during November. These mills' consumed 2,582 bales of cotton during the month, as compared to 2,340 in October and 2,24,2 in November last year. Their production am ounted to 1,164,182 pounds which reflected a gain of 6. 3 per cent over the previous month and 8.4 per cent over the corresponding month last year. Unfilled orders on hand at the end of the month showed but lillIe change from th ose on hand a month earli er, but f<lo cks 0 '1 hand increased. £;1 1 111111111111"' : 1lIllIllIllIllIllIllIlIlIlIllIlIlIlIllIlIlIlIlIlIlIhllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllf .. 1I "'II'~ : :; _- -: it~~· N urn ber b u Ies consumed .......... _........ 2,682 Numbe r s pindles active ....... 78,680 Number pounds cloth produced ... 1,164,1 82 ~~~. 2.242 79,788 1,074,068 E ~9~t6i 2.340 72,580 1.094,796 _E_- -: 8111111.111.111 •• 1111111111111111111111111111"11111111111111111IIIII111 1 11111111'11111111111111"IIIIIIIIIItI'IIIIIIIII@ G:: 111I11I11111111111I11. ,r llllll l lllllIII I IIIUIIIIIIIIIII 1 111111111'111111111111111111111""1'"111111111'111'11111111_0 I~~::S:;"O:OU:CT;;~~~li~::~i!;~;ri~ I WIIIIIIIIIIII.I •• IIIII'IIIIIII ••• III.,.'.II IJII'.II ••• 1 11'11 1 1111111111.,.11111,1111111111111111111111111·,.1111111111110 TEXTILE MJLLING STATISTICS WHOLESALE TRADE A general decline in the distribution of merchandise at wholesale due largely to seasonal influences was noticeable during November. However, sales in Lwo reporting lines of trade- drugs and hardware- were larger than in November last year, and those for dry goods and groceries were only slightly less. Reports indi cate that retailers are proceeding very cautiously and are restri cting orders to actual needs. Nevertheless consumer bu ying has remained at such a level as to make necessary a s ubstantial amount of replacement business. While the size of each order is small, the total volume of these orders is large. In fact, the volume of trade is being maintained at a higher level than was generally expected foll owing the slumJD in cotton prices, showing that the buying power of this distri ct has not been impaired to the exteul that the ueclinc ill t.he pri ce of cottOil at first seemed to indicate. There i. a growing COll- MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW 4 fidence in the soundness of the present business situation and dealers generally are becoming more optimistic regarding the outlook for trade after the turn of the year. ments to those actually needed for current operations. Prices continued steady. The demand for drugs during November was in a modThe distribution of dry goods at wholesale reflected a erate volume. Sales of reporting firms were 5.2 per cent decline of 7_1 per .cent as compared to the previous month less than in the previous month but were 5.5 per cent larger and was 2.6 per cent less than in the same month last year. than in the corresponding month last year. Some dealers Merchants arc buyin g in small amounts but they are report that they are receiving a large volume of orders but making a large number of replacement orders which indi- ' that the size of the orders is smaller than at this time a cates that retailers' stocks generally are not burdensome and year ago, indicating that retailers are buying only as the that consumer buying is being maintained at a very satis- consumer demand develops. Prices showed no material factory level under present conditions. November collec- change. Collections generally continued slow. tions were substantially greater than in October. The November sales of hardware at wholesale reflected The November sales of reporting wholesale grocery firms a seasonal decline of 3.8 per cent as compared to October were 9.9 per cent less than in October and 1.8 per cent less but were 11.3 per cent greater than in the corresponding than in NovemJ)er, 1925. ,The slackening in demand was month last year. The demand for hardware seems to be fairly general over the district but in some sections busi- holding up well throughout the district. ness was better than a year ago. Collections during Novem- 8 11··, ··· ••• ,.......... ,1111 ••••••• ,111,.,1111 ••••••••• ,1"' •• ,1, •••• 1"'''1''1.,1 ••• ''.,1,.,1,.,1,.,111.,111111IIII"'[!] ber were slow. § CONDITION OF WHOLESALE TRADE DURING NOV., 1926 :: The poor demand for farm implements evident during the latter part of September and throughout October continued during November. Sales reflected a decline of 35.8 per cent as compared to the preceding month and were 54.2 per cent less than in the same month last year. Sales for the five-month period from July 1 to November 30 this year were 5.0 per cent less than during the same period last year. Farmers appear to be restricting purchases of imp le- -Net S&I08- -Net Sales- -StocksNov. 1926 July 1 to Date, Nov. 1926 eompared with Compared with compared with Nov. Oct. Same Period Nov. Oct. 1925 1926 Last Year 1925 1926 Groceries ...................... - 1.8 - 9.9 +.3 + 1.1 - 5.4 Dry Goods . ... .. ...... - 2.6 - 7:1 -11.0 - 13.1 -16.4 Farm Implements ..... -54.2 -35.8 - 5.0 + 1.4 + 1.8 Dru gs ............ . ........... + 5.5 - 5.2 + 5.8 +.1 - 4.4 Hardware .................... + 11.3 - 3.8 + 6.9 + 1.3 - 4.2 [!I .............................. ,•• ,III.III.,.,.,IIIIIIIIII1111111111'111111111.,,11111111'11'11111111111"11"11"111,. , 8 RETAIL TRADE The appearance of more seasonable temperatures and the increased tide of Christmas shopping were reflected in the Noyember volume of business at the district's department stores. Sales of twenty-four reporting firms were 5.1 per cent below lhose for October but were 10.8 per cent greatcr than in November a year ago. The decline from October, however, was considerably less than is usually shown at this season. Late reports indicate that buying during the first half of December was in a large volume. Some of the departments showing substantial increases as compared to a year ago were: leather goods; men's furnishings ; women's skirts; waists and blouses; furs; misses' ready-to-wear; juniors' and girls' ready-to-wear; gloves; women's and childrens' hosiery; knit underwear; and infants' wear. Stocks on hand at the end of November werc 2.4 per cent less than at the close of October and were 9.9 less than on November 30, 1925. While the sales of reporting department stores during the first eleven months of 1926 have averaged 4,.4 per cent larger than during the same period in 1925, stocks carried by these firms have been smaller, resulting in a substantial increase in the turnover of stocks. The percentage of sales to average stocks from January 1 to November 30, 1926, was 238.7 as compared to 219.0 in 1925. Collections reflccted a seasonal decline in November. The ratio of November collections to accounts receivable on Novemher 1 was 36.9 as compared to 38.3 in October. !!J'IIIII'III.III.I.IIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIIIIIIII'III'1'1111111"11'111"1"11"11'11111'1"11'1111,1"11111111111111111111111111 1 111 111111111, •• 1111,.1.,111111111,1.,11111111,111'111"111.,11,1111111,111.11,1,11",,111.lllllfl'IIIIIII.,IIIIIIII.,III.[!] To"~::::b". "... .om,.", November, Jan. 1 to date, Credit Sales: November, November, Jan. 1 to date, Stocks: November, w;" No••mb". ",::~=_::_D_EPAR;+:12~:1{ ~:++s:1231~ H::t~-7'59 °i:~._-I:1 ~:5~ D1:0~+rih~':8~ ..40:tb 1926, comp"red with O ctober, 1926 ..................................._ compared with same period last year ..................... _........... _ ..675 192Q. compared with November, 1925 ............ _........_.... _..... 1926, compared with Octobe r, 1926 ..................................... " compared with same p eriod last year .................................... - 1.'1 - 12.2 + 1.7 +21.2 None + 19.8 -1- 22.6 -1- 10.3 + 8.9 +12.7 - 4.7 + 5.1 + 9.4 - 4.9 + 5.8 1926, compared with Nove mber, 1925 .............................. _... 1926, compured with October, 1926 ................... __ ............... Perce ntage of sales to average stocks in November. 1925 ...................... " ......................... _....................... _..... _...... _ N ovembe r. H126 ........................................................................................__.. - 16.8 - 4.1 -- 6.9 .- 1.0 - - - 20.4 23.6 16.9 21.1 23.8 29.4 19.8 201 .8 19.9 24.1 210.4 231.1 5.3 224.7 232.0 3.2 234.6 256 .5 7.6 219.0 242 .8 4.3 219.0 238.7 5.0 32.0 87.8 42.3 42.2 86.9 Novemb~r, Percentage of sales to average stock January 1 to November SO, 1925 ................. ........... __ ........__ .. ____..........._ January 1 to November 30, 1926 ....... __ ...__ ..... __ ,, ____ ..... __.. ____ .. ______ .__ ..____ __ Ratio of outstanding orders to las t year's purchases ...____... _______ ...___ .. __ ... _. __ R atio of November collections to accounLs r eceivable due and outs tanding November 1. 1926 ................................ "........... _._,, __... ............. - 3.1 .8 8.3 2.4 :.i::::: 9.9 2.4 ~11I1I .. 1I1I1I11I1I1t1l11f1IItIlIlIlIIlIl . . UII1II1II.IIIIIIIIIf"1111I111f1l11l1111 11 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111""111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIUIUIlIIlIIlIlIIlItIlIlIIlIlIlIlIlItIIlIlIlIlIlIlIlIlIl'UIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,1!l FINANCIAL The volume of checks charged to depositors accounts at November reflected a decline of 5.7 per cent as compared banks in sixteen of the larger cities in the district during to the previous month but was 3.1 per cent larger than in 1 \ ( MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW the corresponding month last year. As compared to a year ago there were nine cities which registered increases, while seven registered a decrease. DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS (In Thousands of Dollars) Nov. Nov. Inc. or Oct. 1926 1925 Dec. 1926 Austin .................. $ 22,814 $ 19,082 $ 22,704 + 19.9 Beaumon t ............. 22,471 16,722 28,991 +84.4 Cors icana ............ 6,629 6,656 7,405 -1 0.5 Dallas .................... 226,271 285,195 286,908 - 8.8 EI Paso .................. 88,409 88,066 - 12.2 81,572 Fort Worth .......... 93,075 80,070 91,981 +16.2 58,890 Galveston ............ 54,125 62 ,7 68 - 8.1 Houston ............... 162,078 150,561 184,154 7.6 Port Arthur .......... 9,344 9,454 9,487 - 1.2 8,755 Roswell ................ 8,904 8,775 + 3.4 48,185 36,476 San Antonio ........ 42,783 +17.8 Shreveport ........ . 39,272 41,907 39,880 .3 10,819 Texarkana .......... 8,895 8,844 + .6 'l'ucson .................. 9,897 9,871 9,799 1.0 19,886 Waco ........... ........ 19,076 21,786 - 4.1 33,782 Wichita Falls ...... 82,957 29 ,6<11 + 11.2 § Total, 11 th : District ......... 786 ,990 763,196 + 8.1 884,216 + + Inc. or Dec. + - .5 6.3 .4 4.5 5.8 1.2 18.8 12.0 1.5 4.0 .S 6.3 18.8 5.6 12.2 2.4 - 5.7 - + + - The volume of these acceptances outstanding on November 30 amounted to $5,395,091.04" as compared to $5,110,722.4.5 on October 31, and $41,884~ 772.86 on November 30, 1925. Acceptances executed against import and export transactions rose from $853,056.65 on October 31 to $3,511,040.80 on November 30, while those based on the domestic ship. ment and storage of goods declined from $4,257,665.80 on th e fonner date to $1,884,050.24 on the latter date . . Condition of Member Banks in Selected Cities The loans and investments of member banks in selected cities showed a substan· tial decline during November. Their investments on December 1 were $1,84,7,000 less than on November 3 and loans during the same period declined $3,176,000, the decrease being about equally divided between commercial loans and loans on corporate securities. The deposits of these banks also showed a decline of $1,850,000, but their reserve deposits with the Federal Reserve Dank rose $1,643,000, Their bills payable and rediscounts with the Federal Reserve Bank amounted to $11,211,000 on December 1, as compared to $14,775,000 on November 3 and $9,54,3,000 on December 2, 1925. + - 5 + !!I'.,"I •• ,III • • ••••••••••••••• • •••••••••••••• I ••• II •••• • , •• , ••• ,1111., ••• 1111 •••••••• ,1,.,11111.11111,.".,1111.,llllll lm There was a further slight increase during November in the volume of acceptances executed by accepting banks of this district and which were outstanding at the close of the month. Acceptance Market Su .IIIIU I II.I .,111111.1 •• U 111.111 ....... " U,.II fill 11111 III II .. 1111 ...... 111111111 ...... 1111111 .. 111111111111111111111111111.1 • • 11 1"11111 11111111111 .......... "'111111111111111111 ..... 1111111111 11 11.111 , ••• 111111 § § § f III f IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .. IIIIIIIII[!I CONDITION STATISTICS OF MEMBER DANKS IN SELElC'l1ED CITIES Dec. I, 192G 1. Numbel' of reporting bnnks ...................................................................................... .................... _ : Nov. 3, 1926 47 Dec. 2, 1925 47 48 ~_i: I: g:~?,~&.}:~~~~~?t,~ffo~1i,&;~~.;~~~;:,~,,~~,;~~ ·,;nll:l!! •,;i:I!l:!!! 7. Net demand depo.its..................................................................................................... .................... 8. Time dcposits ..........................................................................................._.................. . ....................... 9. Reserve with Federal Reserve Banlc........................................................ _.................................... 10. Dills payable and rediscounts with Fedcral Reserve Bank.................................................... • : : ~ 11. ~ 271,870 ,000 99,815,000 30,282,000 11 211 000 " 91 % Ratio of loans· to net demand deposits........................................................................................ ·Loans include only items 4 and 6. ,;H~:!lI 272,266,000 100,769,000 28,689,000 14 775 000 " 91 % 284,792,000 96,168,000 80,817,000 9 548 000 "86% - § : ~ I!l were 6.2 per cent larger than on November 30, 1925. There Savings Deposits 8 _:1 : (!]1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I11I1I1I11I11I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1I1f 1 1111 U I" 11 11 H 111f 11l U 11'11'11 1 1111 H 11111 1' '111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111""111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Repprts from 92 banks in this district which operate a savings department show that on November 30 savings deposits were lhree-ten Lhs of one per cent less than on October 31, but § E were 256,884 savings depositors on November 30 as against 255,993 a month ago and 239,770 a year earlier. 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111 1 1111111 1 11111111111111111111'11111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"111 11111111I 11 111111 11111 1 1111111111 11111[!l § • ~: .: SAVINGS DEPOSI'l'S : Number of November 30, 1926 Novembel' 80, 1925 R.cportinll'Number of Amount of Number of Amount of Banks Savings Savings Snvings Savin gs Depositors Deposits Depositors Deposits B ~aumont Dallas ........................................................................ .................................. ....._................. ................... £1 PRS/) ........ ...... ..................................................... Fort Wortn .................................................................... Galvt'8ton .............................................. _........................ Hcuston ........................ _................................................ San Antonio .................................................................. ~~~;~~.~~.~ . . :::::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::: Wichita Falls ................................................................ All Others ...................................................................... TcJtaL ................._.................................................... _ ~_ bank. i n Bcoumolll" 12 ban!<R in Hous toll , 4· 6 3 3 2 13· (; 6,563 49,118 17,459 14,496 11.213 61,178 27,486 2 45· 6,812 85 ,1 95 ~. 2~:m 92 a banks $ 2,312,442 18,039 ,475 5,726,183 5,861 ,654 6,942,541 26,942,396 12.851,763 J 4,865 44,280 17,083 13,768 11,383 65,681 24,371 ~:~~~:~~~ 2~:i~~ 2.008,081 16,726,151 5,145 35,424 $ Inc. or Dec. October 31, 1926 Number Oof Amount of Savings Savings DeJ)Ollitors Deposits 2,302,918 16,591,752 5,547,796 5,298,294 6,577,068 24,880,407 11,667,392 + .4 + 8.7 + 3.2 +1 0. 6 5.6 + 8.3 + 10.2 2,098 ,489 16,707,752 + 28.9 + .1 6,265 48,893 17,884 14,448 11,218 62,073 27 ,192 + 1~:m:m "+ 4:~ 2~:m 5,384 35,088 $ I~:. 2,317,714 17,848,046 6,948,568 5,690,462 7,048,807 26, 889,432 12,821,890 .2 + 1.1 - 3.7 + 8.0 - 1.5 + .2 + .2 2,636,865 17,804,987 + 2.3 - 1.8 1k~~~',~~~ ~ Dec. ..f°t~ 256,884 $118 ,467,896 289,770 $106 ,888,867 -I- 6.2 255,998 $118,817,759 - .8 in Shreveport a nd 42 banks in "All other." reported the number of savings depositors. § [EJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU.,.IIIII.IIIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111 ... 111 .. 1111 .... 1 ........... 111111111 '1.1 ... 1111111111111 .. 111111111111111 .. 1.111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111119 (!) : IIIItIlHIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIU'U U'UI:lII •• III"IIIIIIIII1II1I1I1U'1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 ""111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIII III'II IIIIIJI(!) ~ DECEMBER DISCOUNT RATE g !lnllas EI PMc! Houston San An ton io ~ Rate cha~gcd customers on prime commercial paper such § R~"!~\.~°R'etligible . for redls~oun~~~d~.~... ~~e...~~.~.~.r~~. : Rnte charged on loans tel other banks, secured by bills receivable ...................................................................................... § Rate on lonns secured by prime stock exchange or other : currcnt collateral (not including loans placed in other § markets through correspondent banks) : : (a) demand .................................... _.................. _.................... ~ Rnte (~~ t::~m~·dity j;~P;;;..~~~~;ed .. ;~;~h;;~~.. ;~~i;t;;; g .. b;;.. ~ R:~' o~.. ~~'iti~ ..i~~~~::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: § Prevailing rates Fort Worth Waco - - - - -- 4 V:,-6 8 6-7 6 6-7 6-6 G-7 8 6-7 G-7 8 ~~~ 6:ig 5-G 6-8 6%-7 5-6 5·6 5-6 6-8 6-7 6-7 5-6 6-8 6-7 t~ ~:~ § § § : § § : § t: . .~.~~ : ~ ~ 91111111111 .. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1IIIIII II IIIIIIO,I 1IIIlJI1I 111 111 1" , 1 U IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH,," II1 I""I111 11 111111 11" II I " 11111111111111111111111111111111'''IIIUlllllllllllllllllllllllrE, MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW 6 Deposits oj The co mbined deposi ts of member banks Member Banks showed a further increase of $9,891,000 December loans showed a further decline of $5,277,728 and on the 15th of the month stood at $8,689,84.2 or $508,· 618 below those on the corresponding date a year ago. between October 27th and November 24.th, but on the latter date they were $39,911,000 less than a year earlier. The major portion of the increase in November occurred at banks in cities with less than 15,000 population. Due principally to the large reduction in loans, total bills held by this bank declined from $34,4,75,897.71 on October 31 to $28,005,238.62 on November 30, di stributed as follows: 91111111111 .. lIlIlIlIllIlllIlllllIlllIlIllIllIllIlIllIlIlIlIlIltlllllllllllllllllllllli1111111111111111111111111111111110 :: :~. : :~ Total emand •• g ;: ~ DEPOSITS OF MEMBER BANKS Nov. 25, 1926 .._........ Dec. 28, 1926 ................ Jan. 27. 1926 ............ _ Feb. 24, 1926 ............ __ Murch 24, 1926 ........... April 28, 1926 ............. May 26, 1926 .... _._.... June 28, 1926.... .......... July 28, 1926 . _ ........_ Aug. 25, 1926 _ .. _ Sept. 22, 1926 ................ Oct. 27 , 1926 ................ Nov. 24, 1926 ........... 674,607 668,749 669,818 664,008 687,892 606,846 598,488 588,075 689 ,748 584,468 612,884 626,664 685,704 IBanks in cities Bani,s in cities Total with a popula. with a popul,,tion of lees tion of ove,· Time I than ~?~O._ _.1_~ :.~0 __ Demand Time emnn<li Time 166,8211822,218 168,290 . 816,648 167,880 808,899 171,024 808,860 169,169 287 ,084 166,668 272 ,389 166,099 266,613 166,827 259,630 165,299 262,499 165,277 257,886 165,782 275,780 164,972 281 ,080 165,718 287,418 46,190 H,446 44,722 45,557 46,178 44,633 45,085 44,937 45,628 46,407 46,640 42,998 44,194 852,294 852,106 350,914 360,658 360,808 833,456 382,870 328,445 327,249 826,677 387,054 845,474 348.291 Member bank collateral notes secured by U. S. Governm ent obligations ...... __ ."" .......... ........ _.. .__ ... __ ..... __ .................... $ 4,106,450.00 R ediscounts and all other loans to member bnnks ..................... 9,861,119.87 Open m'!rket purchnses (Banker's AcceptancesL ... __ ........ __ ......... 14,037,668.76 :~ Total bills held ........... ........ __ ..................... __ ............ $28,006,238.62 120,631 118,844 122,608 126,467 128,981 121,035 120,014 121,8UO 119,671 119,870 120,092 121.974 • 121,619 : tElI.IIIIIII ...... IIII.' ••• III .. I.' ••• II.'."IIIII'.'.' ••• II.11111,11111"1111111111'"111'111111111111111111'1111"'1111'0 There was a substantial decline· during November in the borrowings of member banks at the Federal Reserve Bank. Loans on November 30 amounted to $13,967,570 as against $19,· 709858 on October 31 and $10,852,751 on November 30, 1925. The reduction of $5,74,2,288 during November was about equally divided between liquidations of banks in reserve cities and of country banks. At the end of Novem· bel' there were 134 borrowing banks as compared to 221 a month earlier and 67 a year ago. During the first half of Operations of the Federal Reserve Banlc The actual circulation of Federal reserve notes amounted to $4.9,310,490 on November 30, as compared to $50,34.9,715 on October 31 and $4.7,830,620 on November 30, 1925, The daily average of reserve deposits of member banks amounted to $59,577,442 in November as against $59,025,442 in October, FAILURES The di&trict's business mortality rate again showed a sharp increase during November. Failures were more numerous than in any month since January of this year and the indebtedness involved was the largest recorded since May, 1925. While the trend of failures is usually upward at this season, the increase this year was more marked than in the two preceding years. There were 95 failures in November with liabilities amounting to $1,543,071, as compared to' 58 insolvencies in October with an indebtedness of $1,181,071 and 71 defaults in November, 1925, which owed $995,237, PETROLEUM With a gain of more than 30,000 barrels in daily average yield over October's output, production of crude oil in the Eleventh district surpassed all previous monthly records during November. There were 20,54.8,710 barrels of oil produced during the month, as compared to 20,287,676 barrels in October and 12,815,54,5 banels in November of last year. However, a general slowing down occurred in drilling activities, which was due in part to the weakened market with an added effect in some parts of the district of cold weather. Drilling operations in November resulted in 867 completions of which 566 were producers netting 174,604 barrcls of new production, as compared to 1,068 completions in Octob er of which 726 were successful yielding an initial flow of 259,703 barrels. The Texas fields produced 18,829,020 barrels of oil duro ing the month, as compared to 18,510,446 barrels in October, representing an increase of 30,523 barrels in daily average production. North Texas and Central West Texas registered the largest gains in daily average output, and, while East Central Texas and Gulf Coastal fields showed slight increases in daily average, yield due to the shorter month, their total production was below that of October. The Panhandle district reached a new high level in daily produ ction and field work and continued to lead all other sections in total output. However, field work in this area started declining during the latter part of November. Substantial production increases were made in Crane and Upton counties of Central West Texas during November, while production of the Spindletop field, located in the Gulf Coast district, declined slightly from its October fiaUl·e. After showing an increase in October over the previo~s month for the first time in five consecutive months, production of oil in the North Louisiana field again declined in November, the month's yield being 1,719,690 barrels, as compared to ] ,777,230 barrels in October, [!JIHlllltl 1 11111111I L1 I1U'IIIIIIIIIUlIlIlIllIlllIlIllIlIlIlIlllIllIlIlIllIlllI.1I1'IIIIIIII"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIUI(III1I1II1I1II1I1I11 I I I I I I ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I ' ' " I I I I I I I I I I I I I { I I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11111 HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIUI!J :.~_ OIL PRODUCTION November North Texns .......................................................... __ .... _ Central·West Texns .................................................... East-Central Texas .................. __ .............. __ ................ . 'Dexas Constal ...................................... __ ...................... . Southwest Texas .................... __ ................................... . Total, Texas ..................................................... .. North Louisiana ....................... __ ...__ ........................... . Total 8.004,190 3,OOl,18U 1,697,220 4,848,490 1,277,940 . 18,829,020 1,119,690 Daily Avg. 266,806 100,039 56,574 161,617 42,598 627,634 57,S2~ Octobe,' Increase or Decrease Total 7,657,780 2,824,720 1,727,196 4,933,a40 1,367,410 Daily Avg. 247,025 Inc. 91,120 [nco 55,716 Dec. 159,140 Dec. 44,110 De" . 18,610,H6 1,777,250 597,111 Inc. fi7,SSO Dc. Total 346,410 176,460 29,976 84 .850 89,470 Inc. l'nc.Inc. Inc. Dec. 318,674 Inc. 07,540 Dec. Daily Avg. g 10.781. ; 8,919: 858: 2,477: 1,512 E ~§ 7; ---: Totnl, DistricL.................................................... 684,957 20.287,676 65-1,441 Inc, 261,03·1 Inc. 30,616 g {!]UIIIIIIIIIJlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIHIIIIIIIIII I II1 1 1IUIIIIIJIIlIlIl1111i 1111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"11"1 II II UII II II 111 ' 11'"11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111 1111.' [EJ -20,548.710 -- MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW per cent below normal in October. Production at the mills, however, was only one per cent less than October production, being 16 per cent below normal in November, as compared to 15 per cent in October. There was a large reduction in new orders received at the miils during November, being equivalent to 72 per cent of normal production as against 80 per cent during October. The decline in shipments and orders was due in part to seasonal influences, as retail establishments generally reduce their stocks to a minimum before the close of the year. Stocks held at the close of the month were 21 per cent below normal stocks for that date, as compared to 25 per cent below normal on October 31. Unfilled orders on the books of 52 mills on November 30 amounted to 4,9,169,050 feet, as compared to 55,4.06,502 feet on the records of 4.9 mills at the close of October. NOVEMBER DRILLING RESULTS Com. Fieldpletiona North Texas 426 Central· West Tcxas ... .. 228 East-Central Texas .... 11 East Texas ................... 6 Texas Coastal ._....... .... 71 Southwest Texas ._...... 20 Tcxas Wildcats ............ 89 Producer. 816 144 8 Total Texas ....... _......... 796 North Louisiana .. ,....... 72 686 81 Nov. Totals. District ... 867 Oct. Totals. District ...1.068 666 726 Gas Well. 9 12 Initial Fall· urea Produ.et40n 101 60.671 67 M.179 8 2.810 4 62 11 1 19 86 71.248 1.586 1.078 84 7 226 84 171.666 8.088 41 89 260 808 174.604 269.708 9 4 ml •• III • • IIIIII.II •••••••••••••••• I.I.I.IIII •••••• • ••• 11111111 •••••••• 111111.11 • • 1111111111,.,.11.,111111".111 111 11 11 " 9 ·[E] I... II ....... UIlIlIlIlIlU .. IIII .... UIlIlIlIU I U .................... UIIlIlI ... II .... 111111111 ..... . 111111 .. 111111 .. Dl~c268. CRUDE OIL PRICES !::::.:. 8 Dti269• Te,,"s Coastal (Grade "A") .............................................$1.40 $1.60 North and Centrlll Texa s a nd North Louis iana (62 gr. and above ) . ................................_............. 2.70 • ·Prices for December 8. 1926. not available on a comparable basis. 001111111111111.111111111111111111111111.,.1.1.11 1 11 ••• 7 9 , 1111I1I1I111I1I11I11I1I1I1111111I 11I1I1I1'''I IUU&lIIIII IIII I IIIIIIIII'11 11 •• UIlI I IIlI •• IIIII .. ItIlI ....... flllIlIlll!] ~:. " '1111'1"1111111' 111 ' 1'11111111111111111'111""11'1III II I'I""~ NOVEMBER PINE MILL STA1'ISTIOS Number of reporting mills................ ...................... 62 Production ........... _.................................................. ..... 98.600.899 Shipments .................................................................... 96.099.411 Orders .......................................................................... 83.912.011 Unfillcd orders. Novembc l' 30............................... 49.169.050 Normal production ........................................ .. .......... 117.015.900 Stocks. November 30 ................................................ 257.486.884 Normnl stocks ..._....................................................... 827.692.688 Shipments below not mal production .................... 21.916.489 Actual production below normal... ..................... .. 18.416.001 Ordcrs below normal production .......................... 88.103.889 Stocks below normal... ............................................... 70.106.804 (Oil statistics compiled by The Oil Weekly. Houston. Texas.) LUMBER There was a sharp decline in shipments of lumber from the Eleventh District pine mills during November, as compared to the previous month. Shipments in November were 19 per cent below normal production, as compared to 13 feet feet fe et feet f eet feet feet feet--19 % feet- 16 % feet- 28 % feet--21 % 011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111".,IIIIIIIIIII .. lIlIh " UttIl I IU IIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIII ' rEI BUILDING Construction activity reflected a sharp decline during November. The valuation of permits issued at twelve principal cities totaled $4,460,4.07, which represents a decline of 4,5.7 per cent from October and 23.6 per cent from November, 1925. In fact, the total value of permits issued at these cities during the past month was the smallest for any month since November, 1922. It will be noted that the va lu ation of permits issued at each reporting city reflected a sub· stantial decline from October, ranging from 7.6 per cent at Beaumont to 78.5 per cent at San AnLonio and only five CItIes showed a gain as compared to November, 1925. The valuation of permits issued at Lhese cities during the eleven months of 1926 was 1.9 per cent greater than for the same period last year. !l.mr,.DING PERMITS November. 1926 November. 1926 No. AusLin ................ . Beaumont ............. Dullas ................... EI Paso ............... Fort Worth ........ . Gnlveston ........... .. Houston ....... _.... .. Port Arthur .......... . Snn Antonio ...... . Shreveport .......... . Waco ..................... Wichita Fall........ ~ Thtal ................ Valua.tion 27 $ 28.084 164 238.224 .78.SM 879 60 39.803 805.400 278 03.962 284 461 1.680.263 66.758 107 484.185 27!l 194.621 24 43.418 110 462.615 - $4 ••160.407 No. Valua.tion $ 187.276 172.871 1.827 .107 81.589 894.240 118.628 1.816.880 88.149 802 889.080 268 804.868 81 86.667 . 428.279 160 29 111 862 66 210 292 893 119 2.888 $6.889.908 October. 1926 Inc. or Doc. - 85.0 84.9 - 78.8 - 61.8 +104.8 - 17.2 + 16.2 75.0 - 46.5 - 86.2 - 49.8 8.0 + + + - 28.6 Valua.tion No. 43 171 824 44 842 269 418 119 238 266 88 148 2.899 Eleven Months Inc. or Dec. 64 .175 252.272 1.424.046 52 .288 904 .696 126.236 2.068.147 SM.799 2,256.125 242.952 67.000 684 .422 - 56.2 7.6 66.4 24 .8 11.0 26.6 26.0 24.8 78.5 19.9 28.8 82.4 $8.221.006 - 45.7 $ [!) ...................... 'U.IIII ... ,IIt.III1 .. Ulllltl llll llllllll .. UIU.UIIIlU ...... 1I1IIIIIJlUIlIl .... llt1 ........ •......... IIIIU' ll1 l1l1ll ftf1f1I1I IIUllllllll 1926 No. t 1926 Valuation No. Valuation 468 $ 1.113.918 1.865 1.877.963 8.976 15.640.016 669 1.099.600 8.620 16.044.998 2.882 8.148.200 6.Z07 26.044.692 1.829 1.244.102 8.110 18.808.687 6.207.460 406 1.071.640 1,768 9.118.193 602 $ 1.791.4 69 1.786 1.587 .617 6.098 26.071.780 732 2.1 22.167 2.490 8.279.077 8.212 1.699.782 6.876 ' 29.336.895 1.480 1.016.54 8 8.690 8. 886.306 2.815 6.104.160 626 1.816.091 1.550 6.498.496 $94.91 4.208 29.750 $98.109.228 Inc. or Dea. - 37.8 18.S 40.0 48.2 98.8 96.6 11.2 22.5 40.8 2.0 - 41.0 + 66.8 + + + - + + + + 1.9 § l llll l lIIU .. IIIIIII.11I111111 .. 11I1 .... IIIIIIII II II.IIIII.III'III" .... "111I1111118 CEMENT For the fourLh consecutive month the production of Port- vember were 3.8 per cent less than in the previous month, land cement at Texas mills reflected a decline as compared but were 26.7 pel' cent greater than shipments during Noto the previous month. There were 4.02,000 barrels of vember, 1925. Stocks held at the close of the month concement produced in November, as compared to 4,28,000 bar· tinued to decline, being 6.2 pel' cent below stocks on hand l'els in October and 396,000 barrels in the corresponding at the close of October and 13.6 pel' cent less than on l11.onth of last year. Shipments from the mills during No- November 30, 1925. T·""""·.'"'' '"' '. '''''·"""''''''''·''''''''':~'~~~~;~;.'''~~'~;'~~~;~:"~~~"'~~~~~;. .~;";~~~~~."~~~;;~...;~.~~~~;~;"I"" "I'IIIIIIIII'I'"II'III"I"llllllllllE ~.: § Production at Texas Mill......................... Shipments from Texas mllls .................__ Stocks at .,nd of month at Texas mill.... :: • (!] '1'11 11111 1 111111 .111.111.' 1'11 11 111'1 I. 1111 f •• ,,1'111 •• 111 1.11.1. 11111111111 11 " November. 1926 402.000 42'7.000 881.000 November. 1926 896.000 SS7.000 441.000 Inc. or Dec. + 1.6 + 26.7 - 18.6 October. 1926 428.000 4H .OOO 406.000 Tnc. or Dec. .. - 6.1 - a.8 - 6.2 Eleven Months Inc. or U26 1926 Dec. 4.622.000 4.410.000 + 4.8 4.726.000 4.869.000 + 8.4 11 1 11 1' 11111.1111111 1 111111111111111 utll"" 111'11,1"1111 .1.111 •• 111,111' 11111 •• 1111.'111 "'1111' 111111.1 1II1 11111 1'1 f "1'111111 'I' f,ll, 111111'1 t.11 1 1, ,'1'1 " : : : II 'I' 'I"IE] MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW 8 SUMMARY OF NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS (ComJ)i1~d by the Federal R eserve Doard ns of December 23. 1926) Activity in manufacturing indusLries decreased in November and December, while production of important minerals continued at a high level. Wholesale prices declined to the lowest level in more than two years. Firmer money conditions in December reflected the usual seasonal requirements in connection with holiday and end-of-year activity. PRODUCTION Factory employment and pay-rolls declined in November reflecting decreased activity in many important industries, but owing to the large output of minerals, the Federal Reserve Board's index of production in basic industries advanced somewhat during the month. Production of bituminous coal and petroleum in recent weeks has exceeded all previous records, and output of copper and zinc during the month oJ November was in unusually large volume. Pig iron production also increased slightly in November but steel mill operations in that month and in December were considerably reduced. Automobile production, which is not included in the index of production in basic industries, declined sharply in November for the second consecuLive month and was smaller than in any month since August, 1925. Textile mill activity was maintained dm:ing November at approximately the same rate as in October. The value of building contracts awarded showed less than the usual seasonal decline in November and was slightly larger than in November, 1925. Awards for the first half of December, likewise, exceeded those reported in the corresponding period of last year. AGRICULTURE The Department of Agriculture estimates the value of 55 principal crops raised in 1926, on the basis of December 1st farm prices, at $7,802,000,000 compared with $8,950,000,000 in 1925. Of the decrease in the value of crops the decline in the value of the cotton crop accounts for $580,000,000 and that of the corn crop for about $260,000,000, while the total value of the wheat crop increased by nearly $4 0,000,000. TRADE In November distribution of merchandise at wholesale and retail showed the usual decline from the. activity earlier in the autumn. Compared with a year ago, however, wholesale trade was in about the same volume and retail trade was larger. Sales of department stores were about 7 per cent larger than last year and Lhose of leading mail order houses were six per cent larger. Stocks of merchandise carried by wholesale firms declined further in November and were smaller at the end of the month than a year ago. Inventories of department stores, however, increased slightly more than is usual in November. Freight car loadings declined considerably in November and December from the record high levels of October, although th e movement of coal continued heavy. PRICES The general level of wholesale prices declined in November and prices of many important basic commodities decreased further in the first half of December. The Bureau of Labor Statist!cs Index of wholesale commodity prices for November was 14.8, the lowest level since July, 1924,. Bituminous coal prices increased sharply during October and in the early part of November, but in recent weeks have declined by about two thirds of the previous rise. Petroleum prices have been reduced since early in November, and Lhere have also been declines in pig iron, copper, zinc, lead, and silver. The fall in prices of agricultural commodities, which has lasted with few interruptions for over a year, continued in November. Grains, however, have risen somewhat since the latter part of that month. The clothing materials and house furnishings groups have declined steadily in price during recent months to the lowest levels of the post war period. BANK CREDIT Loans and investments of member banks in leading cities increased by over $100,000,000 during the four weeks ending December 15th, reflecting in part the growth in the demand for cre?it and currency that usually occurs in December. The Increase was in loans on securities while commercial loans declined somewhat from their s~asonal high point in November. The volume of reserve bank credit showed the usual seasonal increase after the middle of November but was lower than in the correspondin rr period of 1925 partly because there was a smaller increas~ this year in the amount of money in circulation. Money market conditions became slightly firmer in December than at the end of November. Commercial paper rales were unchanged but open market rates on bankers acceptances adv~nced one eighth of one per cent and call money on secunty loans averaged slightly higher for Lhe month.