Full text of 2003 Annual Averages : Text File, USDL 04-289
The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Technical information: (202) 691-6392 USDL 04-289
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
For release: 10:00 A.M. EST
Media contact: 691-5902 Friday, February 27, 2004
STATE AND REGIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT, 2003 ANNUAL AVERAGES
Annual average unemployment rates edged up in three regions and rose in
about two-thirds of the states in 2003. Meanwhile, employment-population
ratios again declined in all four regions and in the majority of states,
the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported
today. At the national level, the jobless rate edged up by 0.2 percentage
point to 6.0 percent, while the employment-population ratio declined by 0.4
percentage point to 62.3 percent.
Regional Unemployment
Among the four regions, the Midwest experienced the largest jobless rate
increase from 2002 (+0.4 percentage point), the Northeast and South both re-
corded smaller increases (+0.2 point each), and the West reported no rate
change from the year before. For the 12th consecutive year, the West regi-
stered the highest regional unemployment rate, 6.5 percent. The Northeast
and South each reported the lowest jobless rate, 5.8 percent, little dif-
ferent from the 5.9 percent rate in the Midwest. The range between the
highest and lowest regional rates narrowed from 1.0 percentage point in 2002
to 0.7 point last year, despite generally higher rates.
In 2003, the New England and West South Central divisions posted the
largest annual unemployment rate increases (+0.6 percentage point each),
followed by the East North Central and West North Central divisions (+0.4
point each) and the East South Central (+0.3 point). For the 12th year in
a row, the Pacific division reported the highest unemployment rate, 6.9 per-
cent. The next highest rate was recorded in the West South Central division,
6.6 percent. The West North Central division, at 5.0 percent, posted the
lowest rate for the second consecutive year, followed by the South Atlantic
and New England divisions, at 5.2 and 5.4 percent, respectively.
State Unemployment
Annual average unemployment rates rose in 34 states and the District of
Columbia from 2002 to 2003, declined in 11 states, and were unchanged in 5
states. The largest rate increases were in Connecticut and Oklahoma (+1.2
percentage points each), Michigan (+1.1 points), and New Mexico (+1.0 point).
Thirteen additional states and the District of Columbia registered over-the-
year rate increases of at least one-half percentage point. All four states
in the West South Central division and four of the six states in New England
recorded increases of 0.5 percentage point or greater. Arizona reported the
largest annual unemployment rate decline from 2002 (-0.6 percentage point),
followed closely by Mississippi and Utah (-0.5 point each). The Mountain
division had the largest number of states reporting annual average unemploy-
ment rate decreases in 2003, as four of its eight states had declines, rang-
ing from 0.3 to 0.6 percentage point. (See table 1.)
- 2 -
States in the Pacific division continued to record the highest jobless
rates in the nation in 2003: Oregon, 8.2 percent, Alaska, 8.0 percent, and
Washington, 7.5 percent. The lowest jobless rates for the year were reported
in three West North Central states--South Dakota, 3.6 percent, and Nebraska
and North Dakota, 4.0 percent each. Overall, 32 states had unemployment
rates below the national average of 6.0 percent, 17 states and the District
of Columbia had rates above it, and one state had a rate equal to it. All
seven states in the West North Central division and all six in New England
posted rates below that of the Nation. In contrast, four of the five Pacific
states and three of the four West South Central states recorded rates above
the U.S. figure.
Regional Employment-Population Ratios
All four regions recorded declines in their annual employment-population
ratios--the proportion of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years
and over with a job. The Northeast posted the largest over-the-year decline
(-0.8 percentage point), followed by the West (-0.6 point). The Midwest
(64.6 percent) and West (62.4 percent) continued to report employment-popula-
tion ratios above the U.S. average of 62.3 percent in 2003, while the North-
east (61.1 percent) and South (61.3 percent) had ratios below it.
Of the nine geographic divisions, the Middle Atlantic, New England, and
Pacific registered the largest decreases in their employment-population
ratios from 2002 (-0.8 percentage point each). The next largest decrease
was in the West North Central division (-0.5 percentage point). The other
five divisions had smaller annual average declines. The West North Central
division, which in recent years has had high levels of agricultural employ-
ment and part-time workers, again recorded the highest employment-population
ratio (68.2 percent). The East South Central division continued to have the
lowest proportion of employed persons (59.1 percent).
State Employment-Population Ratios
In 2003, 29 states posted declines in their proportion of employed
persons from 2002, 18 states reported increases, and 3 states and the
District of Columbia had no change. The largest employment-population
ratio drop from 2002 was recorded in Iowa (-2.9 percentage points).
Arkansas reported the second largest decrease (-1.7 points). Ten
additional states had declines of at least 1.0 percentage point, and
10 others had decreases of one-half point or more. Four states report-
ed increases in employment-population ratios of more than a full percent-
age point for the year: Rhode Island (+1.4 points), Alabama and Wyoming
(+1.2 points each), and Georgia (+1.1 points). Another seven states post-
ed increases of at least 0.5 percentage point from 2002. (See table 2.)
West Virginia continued to have the lowest employment-population ratio
among all states in 2003, 51.3 percent, a decline of 1.3 percentage points
from the previous year. Louisiana had the next lowest ratio, 56.9 percent.
Overall, 8 of the 10 states with employment-population ratios below 60 per-
cent were located in the South. Minnesota continued to report the highest
proportion of employed persons, 71.3 percent, despite a decline of 1.1 per-
centage points from 2002. Two other Midwestern states--Nebraska and South
Dakota--registered the next highest ratios, 71.1 percent each, and were the
only other states with ratios over 70.0 percent. Thirty states recorded em-
ployment-population ratios higher than the U.S. figure of 62.3 percent, while
20 states and the District of Columbia posted lower ratios. All states in
the New England and West North Central divisions again had employment-popu-
lation ratios above that of the Nation, while all states in the Middle
Atlantic and East South Central divisions continued to have ratios below it.
- 3 -
NOTE: All estimates presented in this release, except those for Puerto
Rico, were derived from the Current Population Survey, a sample survey con-
ducted monthly for the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the U.S. Census Bureau.
A description of the survey and information about the reliability of the
state estimates appear in Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment,
2002, Bulletin 2564, available on the Internet at http://stats.bls.gov/opub/
gp/laugp.htm. Annual averages for regions, divisions, states, and the
District of Columbia, shown in tables 1 and 2, reflect updated Census 2000-
based population controls. Data for Puerto Rico are not included in the U.S.
totals.
The length of the annual series varies by state and ranges from 28 to 34
years. The region and division annual series begin in 1976.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired
individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral
phone number: 1-800-877-8339.
Table 1. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years of age and over by region, division, and state,
2002-03 annual averages
(Numbers in thousands)
Population Civilian labor Employed Unemployed Unemployment
force rate Error range of
Region, division, and state rate, 2003 (1)
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003
United States (2)......... 217,570 221,168 144,863 146,510 136,485 137,736 8,378 8,774 5.8 6.0 5.9 - 6.1
Northeast...................... 41,960 42,264 27,531 27,415 25,984 25,815 1,547 1,599 5.6 5.8 5.6 - 6.0
New England................. 11,007 11,092 7,548 7,554 7,182 7,145 366 409 4.8 5.4 5.1 - 5.7
Connecticut.............. 2,651 2,680 1,792 1,803 1,714 1,704 78 99 4.3 5.5 5.0 - 6.0
Maine.................... 1,025 1,039 680 693 650 658 30 35 4.4 5.1 4.6 - 5.6
Massachusetts............ 5,018 5,028 3,467 3,416 3,283 3,217 184 198 5.3 5.8 5.3 - 6.3
New Hampshire............ 990 1,005 706 719 673 688 33 31 4.7 4.3 3.9 - 4.7
Rhode Island............. 835 844 553 573 525 543 28 30 5.1 5.3 4.8 - 5.8
Vermont.................. 489 494 349 351 336 335 13 16 3.7 4.6 4.2 - 5.0
Middle Atlantic............. 30,953 31,173 19,984 19,860 18,803 18,671 1,181 1,190 5.9 6.0 5.8 - 6.2
New Jersey............... 6,563 6,619 4,353 4,375 4,099 4,118 254 257 5.8 5.9 5.5 - 6.3
New York................. 14,789 14,891 9,345 9,315 8,773 8,726 572 589 6.1 6.3 6.0 - 6.6
Pennsylvania............. 9,601 9,663 6,286 6,170 5,930 5,826 356 344 5.7 5.6 5.2 - 6.0
Midwest........................ 49,563 49,929 34,099 34,291 32,222 32,267 1,878 2,024 5.5 5.9 5.7 - 6.1
East North Central.......... 34,723 34,963 23,411 23,553 22,025 22,063 1,386 1,491 5.9 6.3 6.1 - 6.5
Illinois................. 9,510 9,583 6,369 6,330 5,955 5,908 414 422 6.5 6.7 6.3 - 7.1
Indiana.................. 4,648 4,679 3,170 3,188 3,007 3,024 163 163 5.1 5.1 4.6 - 5.6
Michigan................. 7,650 7,706 5,001 5,042 4,691 4,674 310 368 6.2 7.3 6.8 - 7.8
Ohio..................... 8,729 8,771 5,847 5,915 5,515 5,552 332 363 5.7 6.1 5.7 - 6.5
Wisconsin................ 4,186 4,224 3,025 3,078 2,858 2,905 167 174 5.5 5.6 5.0 - 6.2
West North Central.......... 14,841 14,966 10,689 10,737 10,196 10,204 492 533 4.6 5.0 4.7 - 5.3
Iowa..................... 2,271 2,286 1,663 1,612 1,596 1,540 67 72 4.0 4.5 4.0 - 5.0
Kansas................... 2,035 2,049 1,410 1,434 1,338 1,357 72 77 5.1 5.4 4.9 - 5.9
Minnesota................ 3,851 3,896 2,915 2,923 2,787 2,778 128 145 4.4 5.0 4.5 - 5.5
Missouri................. 4,318 4,352 2,982 3,021 2,818 2,850 164 170 5.5 5.6 5.1 - 6.1
Nebraska................. 1,305 1,318 956 976 921 937 34 39 3.6 4.0 3.5 - 4.5
North Dakota............. 489 490 344 346 330 333 14 14 4.0 4.0 3.5 - 4.5
South Dakota............. 571 576 419 425 406 410 13 15 3.1 3.6 3.2 - 4.0
South.......................... 77,583 78,692 50,551 51,228 47,711 48,277 2,840 2,951 5.6 5.8 5.6 - 6.0
South Atlantic.............. 40,706 41,345 26,642 26,995 25,218 25,586 1,424 1,409 5.3 5.2 5.0 - 5.4
Delaware................. 617 625 420 417 402 399 18 18 4.2 4.4 3.9 - 4.9
District of Columbia..... 458 454 303 302 284 281 19 21 6.4 7.0 6.3 - 7.7
Florida.................. 12,943 13,211 8,095 8,164 7,653 7,744 443 420 5.5 5.1 4.8 - 5.4
Georgia.................. 6,318 6,431 4,280 4,414 4,060 4,207 220 207 5.1 4.7 4.2 - 5.2
Maryland................. 4,124 4,181 2,897 2,904 2,771 2,773 126 131 4.4 4.5 4.0 - 5.0
North Carolina........... 6,254 6,328 4,166 4,230 3,885 3,957 281 273 6.7 6.5 6.0 - 7.0
South Carolina........... 3,105 3,142 1,944 2,003 1,828 1,866 116 136 6.0 6.8 6.2 - 7.4
Virginia................. 5,451 5,532 3,733 3,773 3,581 3,620 152 154 4.1 4.1 3.6 - 4.6
West Virginia............ 1,435 1,442 804 787 755 739 49 48 6.1 6.1 5.5 - 6.7
East South Central.......... 13,126 13,235 8,248 8,325 7,778 7,828 470 497 5.7 6.0 5.7 - 6.3
Alabama.................. 3,419 3,442 2,095 2,147 1,971 2,023 124 125 5.9 5.8 5.2 - 6.4
Kentucky................. 3,129 3,153 1,932 1,956 1,824 1,836 108 120 5.6 6.2 5.6 - 6.8
Mississippi.............. 2,126 2,138 1,292 1,312 1,204 1,229 88 83 6.8 6.3 5.6 - 7.0
Tennessee................ 4,451 4,501 2,928 2,909 2,779 2,740 150 169 5.1 5.8 5.2 - 6.4
West South Central.......... 23,752 24,112 15,661 15,908 14,715 14,863 946 1,045 6.0 6.6 6.3 - 6.9
Arkansas................. 2,054 2,071 1,281 1,265 1,212 1,186 70 78 5.4 6.2 5.5 - 6.9
Louisiana................ 3,324 3,348 1,998 2,037 1,876 1,904 123 134 6.1 6.6 5.9 - 7.3
Oklahoma................. 2,622 2,646 1,695 1,696 1,618 1,600 76 96 4.5 5.7 5.0 - 6.4
Texas.................... 15,753 16,047 10,686 10,910 10,009 10,173 677 738 6.3 6.8 6.4 - 7.2
West........................... 48,903 49,792 32,948 33,245 30,813 31,070 2,135 2,176 6.5 6.5 6.3 - 6.7
Mountain.................... 14,137 14,433 9,693 9,837 9,135 9,281 558 556 5.8 5.7 5.4 - 6.0
Arizona.................. 4,027 4,131 2,667 2,690 2,503 2,539 165 151 6.2 5.6 5.0 - 6.2
Colorado................. 3,393 3,440 2,437 2,478 2,298 2,328 140 150 5.7 6.0 5.5 - 6.5
Idaho.................... 991 1,013 686 693 646 655 40 37 5.8 5.4 4.8 - 6.0
Montana.................. 705 714 464 475 442 452 21 22 4.6 4.7 4.1 - 5.3
Nevada................... 1,626 1,686 1,129 1,141 1,066 1,082 62 59 5.5 5.2 4.7 - 5.7
New Mexico............... 1,378 1,401 875 897 828 840 48 57 5.4 6.4 5.7 - 7.1
Utah..................... 1,634 1,660 1,165 1,184 1,094 1,118 71 67 6.1 5.6 5.0 - 6.2
Wyoming.................. 383 387 270 278 259 266 11 12 4.2 4.4 3.9 - 4.9
Pacific..................... 34,766 35,359 23,256 23,409 21,678 21,789 1,577 1,620 6.8 6.9 6.6 - 7.2
Alaska................... 450 459 324 332 299 305 25 27 7.7 8.0 7.3 - 8.7
California............... 26,040 26,490 17,376 17,460 16,215 16,283 1,161 1,177 6.7 6.7 6.4 - 7.0
Hawaii................... 927 944 606 618 581 592 26 27 4.2 4.3 3.8 - 4.8
Oregon................... 2,726 2,770 1,840 1,859 1,701 1,707 139 152 7.5 8.2 7.5 - 8.9
Washington............... 4,624 4,697 3,109 3,140 2,883 2,903 227 237 7.3 7.5 6.8 - 8.2
Puerto Rico (3)................ 2,934 2,980 1,356 1,393 1,190 1,226 166 167 12.3 12.0 (4)
1 Error ranges are shown at the 90-percent confidence level.
2 Because of separate processing and weighting procedures, totals for the United States differ from the results obtained by aggregating
data for regions, divisions, or states.
3 The source of these data is the Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources.
4 Not available.
NOTE: Region and division data are derived from summing the component states. Sub-national data except for Puerto Rico incorporate updated
Census 2000-based population controls. Historical data except for Puerto Rico have been revised.
Table 2. Employment-population ratio of persons 16 years of age and over by region, division, and
state, 2002-03 annual averages
(Percent)
Employment-population
ratio Over-the- Error range of
Region, division, and state year employment-population ratio,
change 2003 (1)
2002 2003
United States ............ 62.7 62.3 -.4 62.1 - 62.5
Northeast...................... 61.9 61.1 -.8 60.7 - 61.5
New England................. 65.2 64.4 -.8 63.7 - 65.1
Connecticut.............. 64.7 63.6 -1.1 62.1 - 65.1
Maine.................... 63.5 63.3 -.2 61.9 - 64.7
Massachusetts............ 65.4 64.0 -1.4 62.7 - 65.3
New Hampshire............ 68.0 68.5 .5 67.2 - 69.8
Rhode Island............. 62.9 64.3 1.4 63.2 - 65.4
Vermont.................. 68.6 67.7 -.9 66.4 - 69.0
Middle Atlantic............. 60.7 59.9 -.8 59.4 - 60.4
New Jersey............... 62.5 62.2 -.3 61.2 - 63.2
New York................. 59.3 58.6 -.7 57.8 - 59.4
Pennsylvania............. 61.8 60.3 -1.5 59.4 - 61.2
Midwest........................ 65.0 64.6 -.4 64.1 - 65.1
East North Central.......... 63.4 63.1 -.3 62.5 - 63.7
Illinois................. 62.6 61.6 -1.0 60.6 - 62.6
Indiana.................. 64.7 64.6 -.1 63.2 - 66.0
Michigan................. 61.3 60.7 -.6 59.5 - 61.9
Ohio..................... 63.2 63.3 .1 62.0 - 64.6
Wisconsin................ 68.3 68.8 .5 67.3 - 70.3
West North Central.......... 68.7 68.2 -.5 67.5 - 68.9
Iowa..................... 70.3 67.4 -2.9 66.1 - 68.7
Kansas................... 65.8 66.2 .4 64.5 - 67.9
Minnesota................ 72.4 71.3 -1.1 69.8 - 72.8
Missouri................. 65.2 65.5 .3 63.7 - 67.3
Nebraska................. 70.6 71.1 .5 69.7 - 72.5
North Dakota............. 67.5 67.9 .4 66.0 - 69.8
South Dakota............. 71.1 71.1 .0 69.4 - 72.8
South.......................... 61.5 61.3 -.2 60.9 - 61.7
South Atlantic.............. 62.0 61.9 -.1 61.4 - 62.4
Delaware................. 65.1 63.8 -1.3 62.3 - 65.3
District of Columbia..... 61.9 61.9 .0 60.4 - 63.4
Florida.................. 59.1 58.6 -.5 57.6 - 59.6
Georgia.................. 64.3 65.4 1.1 64.0 - 66.8
Maryland................. 67.2 66.3 -.9 64.9 - 67.7
North Carolina........... 62.1 62.5 .4 61.1 - 63.9
South Carolina........... 58.9 59.4 .5 58.0 - 60.8
Virginia................. 65.7 65.4 -.3 63.6 - 67.2
West Virginia............ 52.6 51.3 -1.3 49.6 - 53.0
East South Central.......... 59.3 59.1 -.2 58.2 - 60.0
Alabama.................. 57.6 58.8 1.2 57.1 - 60.5
Kentucky................. 58.3 58.2 -.1 56.3 - 60.1
Mississippi.............. 56.6 57.5 .9 55.7 - 59.3
Tennessee................ 62.4 60.9 -1.5 59.2 - 62.6
West South Central.......... 62.0 61.6 -.4 60.8 - 62.4
Arkansas................. 59.0 57.3 -1.7 55.8 - 58.8
Louisiana................ 56.4 56.9 .5 55.1 - 58.7
Oklahoma................. 61.7 60.5 -1.2 58.9 - 62.1
Texas.................... 63.5 63.4 -.1 62.4 - 64.4
West........................... 63.0 62.4 -.6 62.0 - 62.8
Mountain.................... 64.6 64.3 -.3 63.6 - 65.0
Arizona.................. 62.2 61.5 -.7 59.9 - 63.1
Colorado................. 67.7 67.7 .0 66.0 - 69.4
Idaho.................... 65.2 64.6 -.6 62.8 - 66.4
Montana.................. 62.7 63.3 .6 61.4 - 65.2
Nevada................... 65.6 64.2 -1.4 62.8 - 65.6
New Mexico............... 60.0 59.9 -.1 58.1 - 61.7
Utah..................... 66.9 67.3 .4 65.5 - 69.1
Wyoming.................. 67.6 68.8 1.2 67.2 - 70.4
Pacific..................... 62.4 61.6 -.8 61.1 - 62.1
Alaska................... 66.4 66.5 .1 64.1 - 68.9
California............... 62.3 61.5 -.8 60.9 - 62.1
Hawaii................... 62.7 62.7 .0 61.4 - 64.0
Oregon................... 62.4 61.6 -.8 60.2 - 63.0
Washington............... 62.3 61.8 -.5 60.4 - 63.2
Puerto Rico (2)................ 40.6 41.1 .5 (3)
1 Error ranges are shown at the 90-percent confidence level.
2 The source of these data is the Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources.
3 Not available.
NOTE: Region and division data are derived from summing the component states. Sub-national data
except for Puerto Rico incorporate updated Census 2000-based population controls. Historical data
except for Puerto Rico have been revised.