View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BIE September 2014
Atlanta Fed Survey of Business Inflation Expectations
For immediate release: September 19, 2014
Contact: Jean Tate, 404-498-8035 or jean.tate@atl.frb.org
The year-ahead inflation expectations of businesses were 2.1 percent in September, according to the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s most recent business inflation expectations (BIE) survey. The survey
was conducted September 8–12 with 190 firms responding to questions about their business conditions,
inflation outlook, and potential pricing pressures. The results are summarized below.

Year-ahead inflation expectations and current conditions
Respondents indicated that, on average, they expect unit costs to rise 2.1 percent over the next 12 months.
Inflation uncertainty was up slightly at 2.5 percent. Firms also report that, compared to this time last year,
their unit costs are up 1.8 percent. Respondents’ sales levels compared to what they consider “normal”
conditions were virtually unchanged, with approximately 59 percent of respondents indicating current
sales levels are at or above normal. Profit margins showed no improvement, with roughly 48 percent of
respondents indicating their profit margins are at or above normal, compared to 47 percent in August.

Quarterly question: Percent above/below normal sales levels*
On average (weighed by industry share of GDP), respondents indicated their unit sales gap (percentage
below normal unit sales) was approximately 3.6 percent below normal compared to 3.4 percent below
normal in August.
On average, both large firms (500 or more employees) and small firms (fewer than 100 employees)
indicated growth in their unit sales gaps, from 1.2 to 2.2 percent below normal and 6.1 to 7.6 percent
below normal, respectively. Midsize firms’ (100-499 employees) reported about “normal” conditions (a
unit sales gap of -0.1 percent), on average.

Special question: Year-ahead expected change in “prices…overall in the economy”
This question assessed firms’ expectations regarding potential changes in “prices…overall in the
economy.” Firms’ median year-ahead price change expectation was 3.0 percent.
Please see page 3 for a breakdown of the results.

*Note: Due to a programming error, the unit sales gap quarterly question was asked out of turn in August. It was asked again this
month.

For more information and interactive charts, visit the BIE survey site at www.frbatlanta.org/research/inflationproject/bie/.
1

Monthly Questions
Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations and Uncertainty
(percent)

3.0
2.5

2.5

2.0

2.1

1.5
1.0

Uncertainty
Year-ahead inflation expectations

0.5
0.0

Sep-12

Nov-12

Jan-13

Mar-13

May-13

Jul-13

Sep-13

Nov-13

Jan-14

Mar-14

May-14

Jul-14

Sep-14

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

Sales Levels and Profit Margins
Compared to Normal Times

Year-over-Year Unit Cost Change
(percent)

(diffusion index, 0+ = greater than normal times)

10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40

3.0
2.5

above normal
below normal

Sales levels

-14

Profit margins

1.5

-24

1.0
0.5
0.0

-2.5 (38)
Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

Quarterly Question
4
2
0

1.8

2.0

-3.4 (208)

########
########
########
Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

Mean Percent Above/Below Normal Sales Levels
Large firms
(500+ employees)

Midsize firms
(100–500 employees)

Small firms
(1–99 employees)

-2

All firms
(weigthed by sector GDP contribution)

-0.1
-2.2
-3.6

-4
-6

-7.6

-8
-10
-12
-14

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

2

Special Question
Expectations for Year-Ahead Change
in "Prices...Overall in the Economy"
percent, distribution of responses

35

Percentage of responses

30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

3

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

How do your SALES LEVELS compare with sales levels during what you consider to be “normal” times?
Much less

Somewhat
less

Somewhat
greater

About normal

Much
greater

Diffusion
index*

July

13%

33%

38%

16%

0%

-21

August

10%

33%

34%

21%

3%

-13

September

9%

32%

38%

18%

3%

-14

How do your current PROFIT MARGINS compare with “normal” times?

July

Much less

Somewhat
less

About normal

Somewhat
greater

Much
greater

Diffusion
index*

11%

41%

36%

12%

1%

-25

August

12%

42%

34%

12%

1%

-26

September

11%

41%

34%

13%

1%

-24

Up moderately
(3.1% to 5%)

Up a lot
(>5%)

Mean

Looking back, how do your UNIT COSTS compare with this time last year?
Down
(<-1%)

About
unchanged
(-1% to 1%)

Up somewhat
(1.1% to 3%)

July

3%

20%

61%

12%

3%

1.8%

August

4%

22%

58%

11%

5%

1.8%

September

2%

23%

61%

9%

4%

1.8%

Projecting ahead, to the best of your ability, please assign a percent likelihood to the following changes to unit costs
over the next 12 months.

July

Down
(<-1%)

About
unchanged
(-1% to 1%)

Up
somewhat
(1.1% to 3%)

Up
moderately
(3.1% to 5%)

Up a lot
(>5%)

Mean
(Variance)

5%

26%

44%

17%

8%

1.9% (2.3%)

August

6%

23%

45%

19%

8%

2.0% (2.3%)

September

5%

24%

43%

19%

9%

2.1% (2.5%)

Quarterly Question: By roughly what percent are your firm's sales levels above/below “normal,” if at all?
Average percent above/below normal
(number of responses)

Firm size
Sep-13

Dec-13

Mar-14

Jun-14

Aug-14

Sep-14

Small (1–99 employees)

-7.4 (92)

-8.6 (85)

-9.1 (83)

-7.8 (131)

-6.1 (117)

-7.6 (89)

Midsize (100–499 employees)

-6.6 (48)

-2.2 (49)

-5.6 (46)

-2.5 (44)

-2.5 (38)

-0.1 (39)

Large (500+ employees)

-2.5 (66)

-3.8 (69)

-3.0 (67)

-1.7 (61)

-1.2 (53)

-2.2 (57)

All

-5.6 (206)

-4.8 (203)

-5.7 (196)

-3.7 (236)

-3.4 (208)

-3.6 (185)

Note: Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

*The diffusion index is calculated as an average response such that each response of much less is assigned a value of –100; somewhat
less is assigned a value of –50; about normal, 0; somewhat greater, 50; and much greater, 100. Therefore, a positive index value implies
that the indicator is greater, on average, and a negative index value implies that the indicator is lower, on average.

4