View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BIE December 2014
Atlanta Fed Survey of Business Inflation Expectations
For immediate release: December 19, 2014
Contact: Jean Tate, 404-498-8035 or jean.tate@atl.frb.org
The year-ahead inflation expectations of businesses were 1.9 percent in December, according to the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s most recent business inflation expectations (BIE) survey. The survey
was conducted December 8–12, with 201 firms responding to questions about their business conditions,
inflation outlook, and potential pricing pressures. The results are summarized below.

Year-ahead inflation expectations and current conditions
Respondents indicated that, on average, they expect unit costs to rise 1.9 percent over the next 12 months.
Inflation uncertainty was unchanged at 2.4 percent. Firms also report that, compared to this time last year,
their unit costs are up 1.7 percent. Respondents’ sales levels, compared to what they consider “normal”
conditions, remained steady, with 59 percent of respondents indicating current sales levels are at or above
normal. Profit margins were virtually unchanged, with roughly 48 percent of respondents indicating their
profit margins are at or above normal.

Quarterly question: Percent above/below normal sales levels
On average (weighed by industry share of GDP), respondents indicated their unit sales gap (percentage
below normal unit sales) was approximately 2.7 percent below normal compared to 3.6 percent below
normal in September.
Large firms (500 or more employees) and small firms (fewer than 100 employees) reported sales levels
were 1.2 and 4.6 percent below normal, respectively. For the first time, midsize firms’ (100-499
employees) reported a positive sales gap, with sales levels 0.6 percent above normal.

Special question: Year-ahead change in average price
The median year-ahead price change expectation was 2.9 percent, and the mean expectation was 4.5
percent. Firms, on average, are assigning a small chance that their prices will rise significantly next year.
Otherwise, price adjustments are expected to be more modest. Moreover, on average, respondents were
more uncertain about their average price change expectations than their unit cost change expectation, as
reflected by the average individual’s variance of 4.7 and 2.4, respectively.
Please see page 3 for a breakdown of the results.

For more information and interactive charts, visit the BIE survey site at www.frbatlanta.org/research/inflationproject/bie/.

Monthly Questions
Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations and Uncertainty
(percent)

3.0
2.5

2.4

2.0

1.9

1.5
1.0

Uncertainty
Year-ahead inflation expectations

0.5
0.0

Dec-12

Feb-13

Apr-13

Jun-13

Aug-13

Oct-13

Dec-13

Feb-14

Apr-14

Jun-14

Aug-14

Oct-14

Dec-14

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

Sales Levels and Profit Margins
Compared to Normal Times

Year-over-Year Unit Cost Change
(percent)

(diffusion index, 0+ = greater than normal times)

3.0

10

Sales levels

-10

2.5

above normal
below normal

0

-11

Profit margins

-21

-20
-30

2.0
1.5

1.7

1.0
0.5
0.0

-40
Dec-12

Jun-13

Dec-13

Jun-14

Dec-14

-2.5 (38)

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

-3.4 (208)

Quarterly Question

########
Dec-13
Jun-14
########
########
Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey
Dec-12

Jun-13

Dec-14

Mean Percent Above/Below Normal Sales Levels

4

Large firms
(500+ employees)

2

Midsize firms
(100–500 employees)

Small firms
(1–99 employees)

All firms
(weigthed by sector GDP contribution)

0

0.6
-1.2

-2

-2.7

-4
-6

-4.6

-8
-10
-12
-14

Dec-12

Mar-13

Jun-13

Sep-13

Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

Dec-13

Mar-14

Jun-14

Sep-14

Dec-14

Special Question
Distribution of Year-Ahead Price Change Expectations
9
8

Number of responses

7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Price change expectation (percent)
Source: Atlanta Fed Business Inflation Expectations (BIE) Survey

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

How do your SALES LEVELS compare with sales levels during what you consider to be “normal” times?
Much less

Somewhat
less

Somewhat
greater

About normal

Much
greater

Diffusion
index*

October

11%

33%

35%

19%

2%

-16

November

9%

30%

36%

23%

2%

-11

December

7%

34%

35%

22%

2%

-11

How do your current PROFIT MARGINS compare with “normal” times?

October

Much less

Somewhat
less

About normal

Somewhat
greater

Much
greater

Diffusion
index*

13%

40%

32%

14%

0%

-26

November

11%

40%

34%

13%

2%

-23

December

11%

41%

28%

19%

1%

-21

Up moderately
(3.1% to 5%)

Up a lot
(>5%)

Mean

Looking back, how do your UNIT COSTS compare with this time last year?
Down
(<-1%)

About
unchanged
(-1% to 1%)

Up somewhat
(1.1% to 3%)

October

2%

24%

56%

12%

5%

1.9%

November

3%

20%

59%

14%

4%

1.9%

December

4%

21%

62%

10%

3%

1.7%

Projecting ahead, to the best of your ability, please assign a percent likelihood to the following changes to unit
costs over the next 12 months.

October

Down
(<-1%)

About
unchanged
(-1% to 1%)

Up
somewhat
(1.1% to 3%)

Up
moderately
(3.1% to 5%)

Up a lot
(>5%)

Mean
(Variance)

7%

25%

41%

19%

8%

1.9% (2.4%)

November

7%

24%

41%

19%

9%

2.0% (2.4%)

December

7%

25%

43%

17%

8%

1.9% (2.4%)

Quarterly Question: By roughly what percent are your firm's sales levels above/below “normal,” if at all?
Average percent above/below normal
(number of responses)

Firm size
Dec-13

Mar-14

Jun-14

Aug-14

Sep-14

Dec-14

Small (1–99 employees)

-8.6 (85)

-9.1 (83)

-7.8 (131)

-6.1 (117)

-7.6 (89)

-4.6 (100)

Midsize (100–499 employees)

-2.2 (49)

-5.6 (46)

-2.5 (44)

-2.5 (38)

-0.1 (39)

0.6 (39)

Large (500+ employees)

-3.8 (69)

-3.0 (67)

-1.7 (61)

-1.2 (53)

-2.2 (57)

-1.2 (58)

All

-4.8 (203)

-5.7 (196)

-3.7 (236)

-3.4 (208)

-3.6 (185)

-2.7 (197)

Note: Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

*The diffusion index is calculated as an average response such that each response of much less is assigned a value of –100; somewhat
less is assigned a value of –50; about normal, 0; somewhat greater, 50; and much greater, 100. Therefore, a positive index value
implies that the indicator is greater, on average, and a negative index value implies that the indicator is lower, on average.