View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
12 CFR Part 35
Docket No. 00-11
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 207
Regulation G; Docket No. R-1069______
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 346
OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION
12 CFR Part 553
Docket No. 2000-44
Disclosure and Reporting of CRA-Related Agreements
AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC); Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC);
Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
ACTION: Joint notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The OCC, Board, FDIC, and OTS (collectively, the agencies) are
requesting comment on a proposed rule that implements provisions of the recently
enacted Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act or the Act). These provisions require
nongovernmental entities or persons, insured depository institutions, and affiliates of
insured depository institutions that are parties to certain agreements that are in fulfillment
of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to (1) make the agreements available to the
public and the appropriate agency and (2) file annual reports concerning the agreements
with the appropriate agency. These provisions are contained in section 711 of the Act
and are codified as section 48 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act).
The rule identifies the types of written agreements that are covered by
section 711 of the GLB Act (referred to as covered agreements) and defines many of the
terms used in the statute. The rule also describes how the parties to a covered agreement
must make the agreement available to the public and the appropriate agencies and
explains the type of information that must be included in the annual report filed by a
party to a covered agreement.

-1-

The agencies solicit comments on all aspects of the proposed rule, including
the specific areas discussed below. The agencies will issue a final rule after considering
comments received.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 21, 2000.
ADDRESSES:
OCC: Comments should be addressed to Communications Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20219, Attention:
Docket No. 00-11. In addition, comments may be sent by facsimile transmission to FAX
number (202) 874-5274 or by Internet mail to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. Comments
will be available for public inspection and photocopying at the same location.
BOARD: Comments directed to the Board should refer to Docket No. R-1069 and may
be mailed to Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551 or mailed
electronically to regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Comments addressed to
Ms. Johnson also may be delivered to the Board’s mailroom between 8:45 a.m. and
5:15 p.m. and, outside those hours, to the security control room. Both the mailroom and
the security control room are accessible from the Eccles Building courtyard entrance,
located on 20th Street between Constitution Avenue and C Street, NW. Members of the
public may inspect comments in room MP-500 of the Martin Building between 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
FDIC: Written comments should be addressed to Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments/OES, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20429. Comments may be hand delivered to the
guard station at the rear of the 550 17th Street Building (located on F Street) on business
days between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (Fax number: (202) 898-3838). Comments may be
inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public Information Center, Room 100,
801 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on business
days.
Comments may be submitted electronically over the Internet at www.fdic.gov.
Further information concerning this option may be found below at the “FDIC’s Electronic
Public Comment Site.” Comments also may be mailed electronically to
comments@fdic.gov.
OTS: Send comments to Manager, Dissemination Branch, Information Management &
Services Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC
20552, Attention Docket No. 2000-44. Hand deliver comments to Public Reference
Room, 1700 G Street, NW, lower level, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on business days.
Send facsimile transmissions to FAX number (202) 906-7755 or (202) 906-6959 (if the
-2-

comment is over 25 pages). Send e-mails to public.info@ots.treas.gov and include your
name and telephone number. Interested persons may inspect comments at 1700 G Street,
NW, from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Michael S. Bylsma, Director, Community and Consumer Law (202) 874-5750; or
Karen O. Solomon, Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities (202) 874-5090.
BOARD: Scott G. Alvarez, Associate General Counsel (202) 452-3583,
Kieran J. Fallon, Senior Counsel (202) 452-5270, or Andrew Miller, Senior Attorney
(202) 452-3428, Legal Division; Glenn E. Loney, Deputy Director (202) 452-3585, or
James H. Mann, Attorney (202) 452-3667, Division of Consumer and Community
Affairs; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20551. For users of Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf (“TDD”) only, contact Janice Simms at (202) 452-4984.
FDIC: Deanna S. Caldwell, Community Affairs Officer (202) 736-0141;
A. Ann Johnson, Counsel, Regulation and Legislation Section (202) 898-3573; or
Joan M. Bateman, Review Examiner (202) 736-0187.
OTS: Richard Bennett, Counsel (Banking and Finance), (202) 906-7409;
Karen Osterloh, Assistant Chief Counsel, (202) 906-6639; or Richard R. Riese, Director,
Compliance Policy, (202) 906-6134, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary of Proposed Rule
Section 711 of the GLB Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (1999))
added a new section 48 to the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y) entitled “CRA Sunshine
Requirements.” Section 711 applies to written agreements that (1) are made in
fulfillment of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA),1 (2) involve funds or
other resources of an insured depository institution or affiliate with an aggregate value of
more than $10,000 in a year, or loans with an aggregate principal value of more than
$50,000 in a year, and (3) are entered into by an insured depository institution or affiliate
of an insured depository institution and a nongovernmental entity or person. Section 711
does not, however, cover any agreement with a nongovernmental entity or person that has
not had a CRA contact with the insured depository institution or affiliate or a banking

1

12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.
-3-

agency, such as agreements entered into by entities or persons that solicit charitable
contributions or other funds without regard to the CRA. Under section 711, the parties to
a covered agreement must make the agreement available to the public and the appropriate
agency. The parties also must file a report annually with the appropriate agency
concerning the disbursement, receipt and use of funds or other resources under the
agreement.
The proposed rule defines various terms necessary for determining which
agreements are covered agreements and provides guidance for determining when a CRA
contact has been made for purposes of identifying the parties whose agreements are
covered by the rule. The proposed rule also describes the manner and scope of the Act’s
disclosure and annual reporting requirements.
Section 711 and the proposed rule apply only to agreements that are in writing.
To be covered, a written agreement may be an understanding or agreement and need not
be a legally binding contract.
Importantly, section 711 applies only to written agreements that are “made
pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of the Community Reinvestment Act.”
Section 711 defines “fulfillment” of the CRA as a “list of factors” that the appropriate
agency determines have a material impact on the agency’s decision to approve or
disapprove an application for a deposit facility under the CRA or to assign a CRA
examination rating. The agencies propose to adopt for this purpose the list of factors
identified by the agencies in the CRA regulations jointly issued by the agencies (CRA
Regulations).2 These factors include providing the types of loans considered in
evaluating CRA performance, providing community development services, making CRA
qualified investments, fulfilling a CRA strategic plan, providing retail banking services as
described in the CRA Regulations, and providing or refraining from providing comments
or testimony to an agency concerning the CRA performance of an insured depository
institution.
The GLB Act exempts specific types of agreements from coverage, even if
these agreements would otherwise meet the definition of a covered agreement. In
particular, the Act and the proposed rule do not apply to any individual mortgage loan.
The Act and proposed rule also do not apply to any specific contract or commitment for
any type of loan or extension of credit to individuals, businesses, farms or other entities if
the funds are loaned at rates that are not substantially below market rates and the purpose
of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending of the borrowed funds
to third parties.

See 12 CFR 25.21-25.29 (OCC); 12 CFR 228.21-228.29 (Board); 12 CFR 345.21-345.29
(FDIC); 12 CFR 563e.21-563e.29 (OTS).
2

-4-

In addition, as noted above, the Act exempts from coverage any agreement
with a nongovernmental entity or person that has not commented on, testified about, or
discussed with the insured depository institution, or otherwise contacted the institution,
concerning the CRA. The proposed rule adopts the exemption as written in the statute
and includes several examples of contacts that would be exempt under this provision as
well as contacts that would not qualify for this exemption. An example of a contact that
would qualify for this exemption is the dissemination of a similar fundraising letter to
insured depository institutions and other businesses in the community encouraging all
businesses in the community to meet their obligation to assist in making the community a
better place to live and work. A CRA contact would be made, and a related agreement
would not be exempt under this provision, if the entity or person had, for example,
submitted comments to an agency concerning the CRA performance of the insured
depository institution, contacted the institution or any affiliate about providing (or
refraining from providing) CRA-related comments to an agency concerning the
institution, or contacted the institution or any affiliate about the CRA performance of the
institution.
The GLB Act requires those agreements that are covered by section 711, and
that are not exempt, to be made available to the public and the appropriate agency.
Section 711 provides that these disclosure obligations apply only to covered agreements
entered into after November 12, 1999. Section 711 also requires that the agencies’ rules
for ensuring compliance with the Act’s requirements not impose undue burden on the
parties. Accordingly, the rule proposes to require disclosure of covered agreements and
to define the scope of annual reports in a manner that fulfills the requirements of section
711 while at the same time adopting simple procedures that reduce duplicative reporting
and rely on existing reports prepared by the parties for their own use or to fulfill other
requirements.
The rule proposes that each party to a covered agreement be allowed to fulfill
the public disclosure requirement of section 711 by making the agreement available to
any member of the public on request, and allows each party to recover reasonable
copying and mailing costs in responding to these requests. An insured depository
institution may fulfill its public disclosure obligation by placing a copy of the agreement
in the institution’s CRA public file and making it available in the same manner as other
information in the CRA public file.
The proposed rule also requires that each insured depository institution or
affiliate that enters into a covered agreement file a complete copy of the agreement with
the appropriate agency within 30 days of entering into the agreement. To avoid
duplication of efforts and reduce burden, the rule would allow a nongovernmental entity
or person to fulfill its obligation to make a covered agreement available to the appropriate
agency by providing a copy to the agency upon the agency’s request.

-5-

In addition to making covered agreements available, the GLB Act requires that
annual reports be filed regarding resources provided and used under the agreement.
These annual reporting obligations apply only to covered agreements entered into on or
after May 12, 2000. For nongovernmental entities or persons, the type of information
required to be included in an annual report depends on how the entity or person used the
funds or resources received under the covered agreement. If a nongovernmental entity or
person allocates and uses the funds or resources received under a covered agreement for a
specific purpose, the person’s annual report would have to provide a description of the
specific purpose and state the amount used for the specific purpose. If the entity or
person uses the funds or resources received under the covered agreement for other or
general purposes (e.g., general operating expenses), the rule proposes that the annual
report provide the detailed, itemized list described in section 711 of how such funds were
used during the year. This list involves disclosure of the total amount of resources used
by the person or entity for compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
administrative expenses; travel expenses; entertainment expenses; consulting and
professional fees; and other expenses or uses.
In keeping with section 711, the proposed rule includes a number of provisions
designed to reduce the potential reporting burden of nongovernmental entities or persons.
For example, the rule requires a nongovernmental entity or person to file an annual report
only for a year in which the entity or person has received funds under a covered
agreement. In addition, the annual report filed by a nongovernmental entity or person
may consist of, or incorporate, a report that the entity or person has prepared for other
purposes— such as a Federal or state tax return or annual financial statements— if the
report provides the information required by the rule. To facilitate the use of reports that
are prepared for other purposes, the rule would allow parties to file their annual reports
on either a fiscal year or calendar year basis. If a nongovernmental entity or person is a
party to 5 or more covered agreements, the entity or person may file a single,
consolidated annual report relating to all of the agreements. Furthermore, a
nongovernmental entity or person may fulfill its annual reporting requirements by sending
its annual reports to the insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the
agreement with a request that the institution or affiliate file the reports with the
appropriate agency.
Under the GLB Act, the annual report filed by an insured depository institution
or affiliate generally must include information on the amount, terms and conditions of
any payments, fees, or loans provided by the institution or affiliate under the covered
agreement, as well as payments, fees or loans received by the institution or affiliate under
the agreement. The annual report of an insured depository institution or affiliate also
must provide aggregate data on any loans, investments, or services provided under the
covered agreement by each party to the agreement. The rule includes these requirements.
The rule would allow an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to 5 or
more covered agreements to file a single, consolidated annual report for all of the
-6-

agreements. In addition, if an insured depository institution and affiliate are parties to the
same covered agreement, the institution and affiliate may file a consolidated annual report
for the agreement.
Section 711 does not authorize any agency to enforce the provisions of any
covered agreement, and the proposed rule adopts this provision. The GLB Act, however,
provides that a covered agreement may become unenforceable if the appropriate agency
determines that a nongovernmental entity or person that is a party to the agreement has
willfully failed to comply in a material way with the Act’s disclosure and reporting
requirements and the entity or person, after receiving notice, fails to comply with the Act
after a reasonable period of time. The proposed rule includes this provision and clarifies
that, in these circumstances, the covered agreement becomes unenforceable only by the
nongovernmental entity or person that has willfully and materially failed to comply with
section 711.
The Act requires the agencies to consult and coordinate with each other in
drafting the proposed rule to assure, to the extent possible, that the regulations of each
agency are consistent and comparable. The agencies have gone beyond these
requirements and have developed the proposed rule on an interagency basis. The
agencies believe the adoption of a uniform rule should assist the public in complying with
the requirements of the Act. Furthermore, as required by the Act, the agencies have
sought to ensure that the proposed rule does not place an undue burden on the parties to
covered agreements and protects proprietary and confidential information to the
maximum extent consistent with the language and purpose of the Act.
The agencies request comment on all aspects of the proposed rule, including
the specific provisions and issues highlighted in this preamble, and will incorporate
comments received into the final rule as appropriate. The agencies recognize that insured
depository institutions, affiliates, and nongovernmental entities and persons can not
identify agreements that are covered by section 711 until, in particular, the agencies adopt
the list of factors that are considered to be in “fulfillment” of the CRA. Accordingly, the
agencies propose to act expeditiously to adopt a rule in final form following conclusion
of the comment period. Once a final rule is adopted, the parties to covered agreements
will be expected promptly to disclose any agreement that is covered by section 711 and
was entered into after November 12, 1999, and file an annual report for any covered
agreement entered into on or after May 12, 2000, in accordance with the requirements of
the final rule. The agencies request comment on how the parties to covered agreements
entered into after these dates, but before issuance of the final rule, should be required to
comply with the requirements of the final rule.

-7-

II. Detailed Explanation of Proposed Rule
This section provides a more detailed discussion of the proposed rule and
includes examples that are designed to assist users in understanding the scope and
application of the proposed rule. The examples included in the preamble are not
exclusive. The agencies request comment on whether the examples included in the
preamble are useful and whether additional examples would prove helpful. The proposed
rule includes examples only of situations that would and would not constitute a CRA
contact by a nongovernmental entity or person. These examples relating to CRA contact
are part of the rule. The agencies request comment on whether examples illustrating
other parts of the rule should be incorporated into the text of the regulation.
In keeping with the goal of consistency among the agencies’ rules and to
facilitate compliance, the proposed rule uses the term “insured depository institution”
rather than “bank” or “savings association.” As discussed below, the rule identifies the
specific agency or agencies with whom a covered agreement and its related annual reports
should be filed, and the agency or agencies that would be considered a relevant
supervisory agency for a covered agreement.
For ease of reference, the rule and the remaining portions of this preamble refer
to a “nongovernmental entity or person” as a “person.”3 The terms “nongovernmental
entity or person” and “person,” as well as several other terms used in the rule, are defined
in section __.8 of the proposed rule. The rule generally defines a nongovernmental entity
or person to mean any company or individual other than the Federal government, a state,
local or tribal government, or an insured depository institution or affiliate. The agencies
request comment on whether users would find it more helpful to have this section of
definitions at the beginning of the rule
The following description applies to each agency’s proposed rule. Since the
rule of each agency will be codified at a different part of the Code of Federal
Regulations, the following description references the proposed rule using only the
proposed rule’s section numbers.
A. Definition of Covered Agreement
Section __.2 of the proposed rule defines which agreements are covered by the
rule and the term “fulfillment of the CRA.” The Act’s exemptions from the definition of
a covered agreement also are set forth in section __.2.

3

The OTS rule, however, refers to a “nongovernmental entity or person” as a “NGEP.”
-8-

1. Covered Agreements
The proposed rule defines a covered agreement as any contract, arrangement,
or understanding that meets all of the following four criteria:
• the agreement is in writing;
• the agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of the
CRA, as defined in section __.2(c) of the proposed rule;
• the parties to the agreement include (1) an insured depository institution or an
affiliate of an insured depository institution, and (2) a person; and
• the agreement provides for the insured depository institution or affiliate to
provide cash payments, grants, or other consideration (other than loans) having
an aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year, or to make loans
in an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any calendar year.
The proposed rule clarifies that an agreement may be a covered agreement even
if the agreement is not legally binding on the parties. Under the proposed rule, an
exchange of written correspondence reflecting a mutual agreement or a written agreement
that lacks the consideration necessary for it to be a legally binding contract would
constitute a covered agreement if the agreement meets the four criteria discussed above.
Moreover, to be covered, an agreement may be with an insured depository institution or
any affiliate of an insured depository institution, including a bank holding company or a
nonbank affiliate.
The following examples illustrate when a written contract, arrangement or
understanding may exist under the rule. The proposed rule does not attempt to
specifically define what constitutes a “contract,” “arrangement,” or “understanding.”
Example 1: An organization sends a letter to an insured depository institution
requesting that the institution provide a $15,000 grant to the organization. The insured
depository institution responds in writing and agrees to provide the grant in connection
with its annual grant program. The exchange of letters constitutes a written
understanding. This written understanding would be a covered agreement under the
proposed rule if the agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment
of the CRA and the agreement is not otherwise exempt under section __.2(b).
Example 2: An organization issues a general, written solicitation for charitable
contributions to businesses in its local community. An insured depository institution
makes a $20,000 charitable contribution by check to the organization in response to the
solicitation. The insured depository institution does not have any written contract,
-9-

arrangement or understanding with the organization concerning the donation. The
general request for funds and the check are not themselves a contract, arrangement or
understanding. Since there is no other written agreement between the insured depository
institution and the organization, there is no covered agreement between the entities.
Example 3: A bank holding company unilaterally issues a press release
announcing that its subsidiary banks have established a goal of making $100 million of
community development grants in low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods over
the next 5 years. The unilateral pledge is not a contract, arrangement or understanding
entered into with a person and, therefore, is not a covered agreement.
Example 4: An association of community groups and an affiliate of an insured
depository institution orally agree that the affiliate will seek to make $100,000 in grants
available to the organization’s constituent members over the next year. The oral
agreement is not reduced to writing. Oral agreements are not within the scope of the
statute and, accordingly, the agreement is not a covered agreement.
The agencies invite comment on whether the rule should define the terms
“contract,” “arrangement” and “understanding” and, if so, what those definitions should
be. The agencies also request comment on whether any of the examples provided above
should be modified or amended, and whether additional examples would be useful.
2. Exemptions for Certain Agreements
Section 711 specifically exempts certain types of agreements from coverage
even if they otherwise meet the definition of a covered agreement. Section __.2(b) of the
proposed rule implements these exemptions.
a. Qualifying Loans
The first statutory exemption is for any individual mortgage loan. Under this
exemption, any mortgage loan made by an insured depository institution or affiliate to
any individual or entity is exempt from the requirements of section 711. This exemption
is available for any mortgage loan, regardless of the identity of the borrower, the type of
real estate securing the loan, or the rate charged on the loan.
The statute also exempts from coverage “any specific contract or commitment
for a loan or extension of credit to individuals, businesses, farms, or other entities if the
funds are loaned at rates [that are] not substantially below market rates and if the purpose
of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending of the borrowed funds
to other parties.”4 Under the statute, this exemption is available for any type of loan to
4

12 U.S.C. 1831y(e)(1)(B)(ii).
-10-

any individual or entity if the loan meets the market rate and re-lending restrictions of the
statute.
The agencies request comment on the application of this exemption to
agreements that involve a commitment to make one or more loans or extensions of credit
that meet the market rate and re-lending restrictions of the statute. In particular, comment
is requested on whether this exemption provides an exemption only for a specific
commitment to make a loan or extension or credit. Under this interpretation, the
exemption would be available for a commitment by an insured depository institution or
affiliate to provide a specific loan or extension of credit to one or more individuals or
entities that is on market terms and not for purposes of re-lending, such as a loan
commitment typically made in the course of providing a line of credit to a small business.
The agencies also request comment on whether this exemption includes an exemption for
a commitment to make multiple loans that meet the Act’s restrictions. Under this
interpretation, a commitment to make any number or amount of loans that meet the Act’s
restrictions over a period of time would be exempt from coverage. The agencies request
comment on which interpretation of the exemption is more consistent with the language
and purposes of the Act.
To be entirely exempt under the proposed rule, an agreement must be
exclusively a loan, extension of credit or loan commitment that meets the requirements of
the exemption. However, as discussed further below, if an agreement includes a loan,
extension of credit or loan commitment that meets the rule’s requirements to be exempt
and also provides for the insured depository institution or affiliate to provide other funds
or resources, the value of the exempt loan, extension of credit or loan commitment may
be excluded in determining whether the agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA and meets
the Act’s dollar thresholds.5
The following examples illustrate these provisions of the proposed rule:
Example 1: An insured depository institution provides a $1 million mortgage
loan to an organization pursuant to a written agreement. The agreement is an individual
mortgage loan and is exempt from coverage under the rule, regardless of the interest rate
on the loan or whether the purpose of the loan was for re-lending.
Example 2: An affiliate of an insured depository institution provides a
$500,000 working capital loan to a small business pursuant to a written agreement. The
loan is made on market terms and the purposes of the loan do not include re-lending. The
agreement is exempt from coverage under the rule.
5

The agencies note, however, that if the other consideration is provided to reduce the effective
interest rate paid on the loan or extension of credit to a rate that is substantially below the market
rate, the loan or extension of credit would not itself be exempt from coverage.
-11-

Example 3: An insured depository institution enters into a written agreement
with a community development organization to make $250 million in small business
loans in the community over the next five years. The loans would be made on market
terms and not for purposes of re-lending. Each small business loan made by the insured
depository institution pursuant to the agreement is exempt from coverage. The agreement
by the insured depository institution with the association, however, is not a commitment
to make a specific loan or extension of credit and would not be exempt under one
interpretation of the exemption. This commitment to make loans would be exempt under
the other interpretation of the exemption.
Example 4: A business organization receives a mortgage loan from an affiliate
of an insured depository institution pursuant to a written agreement. The agreement also
provides that the affiliate will make a $12,000 investment in a local community
development corporation the following month. The agreement is not an exempt
agreement under the rule because it is not exclusively a mortgage loan. Although the
mortgage loan may be excluded when considering if the agreement meets the Act’s dollar
thresholds, the agreement would meet these thresholds because it provides for the affiliate
to make other payments in excess of $10,000 in a calendar year.
The agencies request comment on these exemptions. In particular, comment is
invited on whether a mortgage loan includes any loan secured by real estate, or only a
loan that is secured by real estate and made for the purchase or improvement of the real
estate or for the refinancing of such a loan. Comment also is invited on whether the
agencies should define when loans are made at “substantially below market rates” and, if
so, what that definition should be. For example, should the agencies provide that the
relevant market rate for a loan is the rate that would be charged on a comparable
transaction (e.g., a construction loan, permanent financing, a small business loan, or an
unsecured consumer loan) with a comparable person (e.g., a person with similar financial
resources and credit history) that is not a party to the agreement? In addition, should the
agencies provide a formula for determining whether a loan bears a rate that is
substantially below the market rate? Such a formula could provide, for example, that a
rate is substantially below the market rate if it is more than a specified percentage (e.g.,
10 percent) or number of basis points (e.g., 200 basis points) below the rate that would be
charged in a comparable transaction.
The agencies also request comment on whether the rule should provide
guidance on when a loan is made “for purposes of re-lending” and what constitutes “relending” under the rule. For example, should the rule provide that the purposes of a loan
are determined by reference to the underlying loan documents or by whom the documents
refer to as the lender?

-12-

b. Agreements with Persons Who Have Not Made a CRA Contact
Section 711 also exempts from coverage any agreement entered into by an
insured depository institution or affiliate with a person who has not commented on,
testified about, or discussed with the institution, or otherwise contacted the institution,
concerning the CRA. This provision broadly exempts from all of the provisions of
section 711 any agreement by an insured depository institution or affiliate with a person
that has not had a contact concerning the CRA (a CRA contact). The Conference Report
for the Act indicates that a wide range of organizations that solicit funds without regard to
the CRA may benefit from this exemption, including civil rights groups, community
groups providing housing or other services in low-income neighborhoods, the American
Legion, and community theater groups.6
The proposed rule adopts the exemptive language contained in section 711. In
addition, the proposed rule provides examples of actions by a person that would
constitute a CRA contact under the rule and examples of actions that would not constitute
a CRA contact under the rule. These examples are intended to illustrate different types of
actions that are or are not CRA contacts based on the wording and purpose of the
exemption and the scope of the statutory exemption. These examples are not exclusive.
For ease of reference, the proposed rule divides the examples of actions that constitute a
CRA contact into two categories: contacts with an agency and contacts with an insured
depository institution or affiliate.
As discussed below, the agencies request comment on various aspects of this
exemption. In particular, the agencies invite comment on whether the rule should provide
a more detailed definition of the exemption. The agencies also request comment on
whether the examples provided are appropriate and useful and, if so, whether other
examples should be included or areas addressed with examples.
CRA Contact with an Agency. As a general matter, a person has made a CRA
contact if the person submits written or oral comments or testimony to an agency
concerning the record of performance or future performance under the CRA of an insured
depository institution or CRA affiliate.7 If a person had this type of contact with an
agency and subsequently enters into an agreement with the insured depository institution
or any affiliate of the insured depository institution that meets the requirements of section
711, the agreement is not exempt.

6

See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-434 at 179 (1999).
As discussed further below, a contact concerning the performance of a “CRA affiliate” of an
insured depository institution is considered to be a contact concerning the CRA performance of
the insured depository institution.
7

-13-

“Comments” and “testimony” refer to any type of written submission or oral
statement by a person to an agency. The terms include the submission of written
materials to an agency in connection with an application by an insured depository
institution or company for a deposit facility or an examination of an insured depository
institution under the CRA, and oral statements made by a person to an agency during a
public or private meeting held concerning a transaction or CRA examination.
The rule provides two examples of contacts with an agency that would not
constitute a CRA contact. The first example involves a person that provides written or
oral comments or testimony to an agency in response to a direct request by the agency for
comments or testimony from that person. In such circumstances, the contact would result
due to an action by the agency and imposing the rule’s requirements on the person might
impede the agency’s ability to obtain necessary or useful information. This example of a
direct request for comments or testimony does not apply, however, to comments or
testimony that are provided in response to a general invitation by an agency for public
comments (e.g., a Federal Register notification) in connection with a CRA performance
evaluation or an application for a deposit facility.
The second example provides that a person does not make a CRA contact with
an agency by making a statement concerning an insured depository institution at a widely
attended conference or seminar on a general topic, even if representatives of an agency
were in attendance at the conference or seminar when the statement was made. A public
or private meeting or hearing relating to one or more insured depository institutions or a
transaction to acquire a deposit facility is not considered a widely attended conference or
seminar on a general topic.
CRA Contact with Insured Depository Institution or Affiliate. Contacts by a
person with an insured depository institution or affiliate will not cause an agreement to
become subject to the requirements of section 711 unless the contact is a CRA contact.
The rule provides several examples of the types of contacts with an insured depository
institution or affiliate that are CRA contacts and that would make the exemption
unavailable.
The first example involves a contact with an insured depository institution or
affiliate about providing (or refraining from providing) written or oral comments or
testimony to an agency concerning the record of performance or future performance
under the CRA of the insured depository institution.
The second example involves a contact with an insured depository institution
or affiliate about providing (or refraining from providing) written comments to the
institution that would have to be included in the institution’s CRA public file. Under the
agencies’ CRA Regulations, a written comment generally must be placed in an
institution’s CRA public file if it specifically relates to the institution’s performance in
-14-

helping to meet community credit needs.8 Because this information is intended for
consideration by the agencies in the course of a CRA examination or evaluation of an
application for a deposit facility, the submission of comments for inclusion in an
institution’s CRA public file is considered a CRA contact.
The third example involves a contact with an insured depository institution or
affiliate concerning the CRA rating of the insured depository institution, or the CRA
record of performance of the insured depository institution.
The fourth example involves a contact with an insured depository institution or
affiliate concerning actions that should be taken to improve the CRA performance of the
insured depository institution.
The fifth example involves a contact with an insured depository institution or
affiliate concerning any obligation or responsibility that the insured depository institution
may have to meet the banking needs of its community. In this example, the contact
occurs while the insured depository institution or an affiliate of the institution has an
application for a deposit facility pending before an agency or is undergoing a publicly
announced CRA performance examination.
If a person has one of the contacts described above and subsequently enters
into a covered agreement with the insured depository institution or any affiliate of the
insured depository institution, the agreement is not exempt under the rule. The rule and
the examples do not contemplate that a discussion or contact must include any particular
words or phrases, such as “Community Reinvestment Act,” “CRA” or “CRA rating” in
order to be a CRA contact. Instead, the substance and context of the discussion or
contact are the controlling factors.
Under the examples included in the rule, a person would not have a CRA
contact by sending a similar fundraising letter to an insured depository institution or
affiliate and other businesses in the community encouraging all businesses in the
community to meet their obligation to assist in making the local community a better place
to live and work. In addition, a person would not make a CRA contact by sending a
general offering circular to financial institutions offering to sell a portfolio of loans and
having discussions with a particular insured depository institution concerning the loan
portfolio if no reference to the CRA or the institution’s CRA performance is made in the
offering circular or in the parties’ discussions.9 A person also would not make a CRA

8

See 12 CFR 25.43(a)(1) (OCC); 12 CFR 228.43(a)(1) (Board); 12 CFR 345.43(a)(1) (FDIC);
12 CFR 563e.43(a)(1) (OTS).
9
A CRA contact would occur under the proposed rule, however, if the offering materials
indicated that the loans in the mortgage pool would receive favorable consideration by the
agencies under the CRA, or if the parties discussed how the transaction would improve the
-15-

contact with an insured depository institution or affiliate by making a statement
concerning the institution or affiliate before a widely attended conference or seminar on a
general topic, even if representatives of the institution or affiliate were in attendance at
the conference or seminar when the statement was made.
The agencies request comment on whether the proposed rule should more
specifically define the terms of the exemption for persons that have not made a CRA
contact or more specifically define when a CRA contact has occurred and, if so, how a
CRA contact should be defined. The agencies also request comment on the examples of a
CRA contact included in the rule, including whether any of the examples should be
amended or deleted or whether additional examples should be provided. For example,
the agencies request comment on whether a CRA contact under the Act includes a general
discussion about the CRA that does not involve any discussion of the performance of an
insured depository institution under the CRA or obligation of the institution to serve the
banking needs of its community.
In addition, the agencies request comment on whether the rule can and should
be limited to exclude from the scope of CRA contacts discussions with an insured
depository institution or affiliate concerning whether particular loans, services,
investments or community development activities are generally eligible for consideration
by an agency under the CRA Regulations. The marketing of products and services to
insured depository institutions frequently may include a general statement of whether the
product or service is eligible for credit under the CRA. If the rule were limited in this
manner, then the situation described in section __.2(b)(2)(iii)(D) of the rule would not be
a CRA contact even if the offering circular included a statement that the loans included in
the loan pool were of the type that could be considered by an agency under the CRA
Regulations. A discussion of whether or how loans, services, investments or activities
would impact a particular institution’s CRA rating or performance would, however,
continue to be considered a CRA contact.
The agencies also request comment on whether the rule can and should be
limited to cover only contacts that involve providing CRA-related comments or testimony
to an agency or discussions with an insured depository institution or affiliate about
providing (or refraining from providing) such comments or testimony to an agency. If the
rule was limited in this fashion, the actions described in section __.2(b)(2)(ii)(B)(3), (4)
and (5) would not constitute a CRA contact because the person did not submit CRArelated comments or testimony to an agency or discuss with or contact the insured
depository institution or any affiliate about providing (or refraining from providing)
CRA-related comments or testimony to an agency.

institution’s CRA performance.
-16-

Additionally, the agencies request comment on whether there should be a
temporal relationship between a CRA contact and when an agreement is made. In this
regard, under the proposed rule, a covered agreement entered into in 2001 between an
insured depository institution and a person would not be exempt if the person had
submitted a comment to an agency concerning the CRA performance of the institution
several years earlier. Section 711, however, appears to have been intended to apply to
agreements that result from, or were influenced by, a CRA contact. Where a CRA
contact occurs a significant period of time before the negotiation of an agreement,
however, there may be no link or influence between the CRA contact and the agreement.
Furthermore, the passage of time may make it difficult for the parties to a covered
agreement to determine or effectively track whether a CRA contact occurred at all.
For these reasons, the agencies specifically request comment on whether the
rule should require that a CRA contact occur within a specified period, such as 2 years
(or a shorter or longer period), before the parties entered into the agreement. Similarly,
the agencies request comment on whether a CRA contact should include a contact that
occurs after the parties enter into an agreement, such as within 90 days after the
beginning of the term of the agreement, at any time during the term of the agreement, or
some other period of time. For example, if a person provides comments or testimony to
an agency concerning the CRA performance of an insured depository institution after
entering into an agreement with the institution, would the person’s actions suggest that
the agreement and the comments or testimony were linked?
The agencies also request comment on how the rule and the exemption
discussed above should apply in circumstances where a covered agreement involves
several parties and a CRA contact has been made by or concerning only one of the
parties. For example, how should the rule apply where several nongovernmental entities
or persons enter into a covered agreement with an insured depository institution and only
one of the entities or persons has made a CRA contact? Similarly, how should the rule
apply where a nongovernmental entity or person has a CRA contact concerning one
insured depository institution and subsequently enters into a covered agreement jointly
with the institution and several other unaffiliated insured depository institutions? In
addition, how should the rule and exemption apply where a person has a CRA contact
with an agency but the relevant insured depository institution or affiliate does not know
the contact occurred?
c. Request for Comment on Additional Exemptions
The agencies recognize that the language of section 711 and, accordingly, the
types of agreements captured under the proposed rule are broad. The agencies are
concerned that, in light of this breadth, certain agreements that were not intended to be
covered by the Act may be considered covered agreements under the proposed rule. For
example, supervisory experience suggests that insured depository institutions enter into a
wide variety of contracts in their normal day-to-day operations that, directly or indirectly,
-17-

relate to activities considered by the agencies in connection with a CRA evaluation.
During the negotiation of these contracts and as an incident to the underlying business
transaction, the parties may discuss whether the activities contemplated by the contract
are viewed favorably under the agencies’ CRA Regulations, involve loans within the
institution’s CRA assessment area, or would otherwise improve the institution’s CRA
performance. These types of contacts would be CRA contacts under the proposed rule
and a related business agreement would be covered if the agreement was in fulfillment of
the CRA and met the other criteria to be a covered agreement.
The Act grants the Board the ability to determine, by regulation, that specific
types of contacts are exempt and, consequently, that a related agreement is not covered
by section 711. The agencies specifically invite comment on whether and how the Board
should exercise its exemptive authority in this area, including whether there are particular
types of CRA contacts that occur and that, given their context and purpose, do not
implicate the concerns of the Act. For example, if the proposed definition of CRA
contact is retained in the final rule, should the Board exercise its discretion in this area to
provide an exemption for CRA contacts that occur in connection with the purchase of
loans by an insured depository institution or affiliate on an arm’s length basis in the
secondary market even where the negotiation of the agreement included a general
discussion of the effect of the transaction on the CRA performance of the insured
depository institution? Are there other types of contacts that occur in connection with the
ordinary day-to-day business of an insured depository institution or affiliate that should
be exempted from coverage because, for example, the CRA contact does not involve any
coercive aspect or was initiated by the insured depository institution? If so, how could
such an exemption or exemptions be framed narrowly to exclude only those types of
contacts (and related agreements) that are not within the intended scope of the Act?
3. Fulfillment of the CRA
Under the GLB Act, a written agreement is a covered agreement only if it is
“made pursuant to, or in connection with the fulfillment of the Community Reinvestment
Act of 1977.”10 The Act defines “fulfillment” of the CRA to mean “a list of factors that
the appropriate Federal banking agency determines have a material impact on the
agency’s decision to (A) approve or disapprove an application for a deposit facility
[under the CRA]; or (B) to assign a rating to an insured depository institution [under the
CRA].”11
The Conference Report for the GLB Act indicates that the list of factors should
include “a full enumeration of the relevant factors that [an] agency reviews and considers
in examining the performance of an insured financial institution in connection with the

10
11

12 U.S.C. 1831y(e)(1)(A).
Id. at 1831y(e)(2).
-18-

CRA, including any and all items a regulator would attach importance to in determining
the evaluation under the [CRA] of the performance of a financial institution.”12 The
agencies’ CRA Regulations set forth the criteria that the agencies consider in evaluating
the CRA performance of an insured depository institution for purposes of assigning a
CRA rating to an institution and evaluating an application by an institution or company
for a deposit facility under the CRA.13 These regulations permit the agencies to consider
broadly the lending, investment and service activities of an insured depository institution
in evaluating the institution’s performance under the CRA.
For these reasons, the proposed rule would define the list of factors for
purposes of section 711 generally by reference to the criteria enumerated in Subpart B of
the CRA Regulations jointly issued by the agencies. These criteria reflect the factors that
the agencies previously have determined have a material impact on an agency’s
assignment of a CRA rating and assessment of the CRA factor in decisions to approve or
disapprove an application for a deposit facility. These factors are summarized in the
proposed rule as follows:
(1)

Home purchase, home improvement, small business, small farm,
community development, and consumer lending as described in the lending test
portion of the CRA Regulations, including loan purchases, loan commitments,
and letters of credit;

(2)

Making investments, deposits, or grants, or acquiring membership shares
that have as their primary purpose community development, as described in the
investment test portion of the CRA Regulations;

(3)

Delivering retail banking services, as described in the service test portion of
the CRA Regulations;

(4)

Providing community development services, as described in the service test
portion of the CRA Regulations;

(5)

For a wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository institution,
community development lending, qualified investments, and community
development services, as described in the community development test portion
of the CRA Regulations for wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository
institutions;

H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-434 at 179 (1999).
See 12 CFR 25.21-25.29 (OCC); 12 CFR 228.21-228.29 (Board); 12 CFR 345.21-345.29
(FDIC); 12 CFR 563e.21-563e.29 (OTS).
12

13

-19-

(6)

For small insured depository institutions, the lending and other activities
described in the small insured depository institution performance standard of
the CRA Regulations;14

(7)

For an insured depository institution whose CRA performance is evaluated
on the basis of a strategic plan, any element of that plan as described in the
strategic plan portion of the CRA Regulations;

(8)

Providing or refraining from providing written or oral comments or
testimony to any agency concerning the record of performance or future
performance under the CRA of an insured depository institution that is a
party to the agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement; and

(9)

Providing or refraining from providing written comments to an insured
depository institution that is a party to the agreement or an affiliate of a
party to the agreement that would have to be included in the institution’s
CRA public file.

An activity is within the factors enumerated in paragraphs (1) through (7) if it
would be considered by the agencies under the relevant performance test or standard in
the CRA Regulations.15 These activities may be conducted by an insured depository
institution that is a party to the agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement.16 In

The terms wholesale insured depository institution, limited-purpose insured depository
institution, and small insured depository institution refer to a wholesale, limited-purpose or small
bank or savings association as defined in Subpart A of the relevant agency’s CRA Regulations.
See 12 CFR 25.12(o), (t) and (w) (OCC); 12 CFR 228.12(o), (t), and (w) (Board); 12 CFR
345.12(o), (t), and (w) (FDIC); and 12 CFR 563e.12(n), (s), and (v) (OTS). An agreement that
involves the performance of activities by a wholesale, limited-purpose or small insured depository
institution is in fulfillment of the CRA only if the agreement involves the performance of one of
the activities within the scope of the relevant performance test or standard for the particular type
of institution.
15
Thus, for example, an agreement that relates to the consumer lending activities of an insured
depository institution would be considered to be in fulfillment of the CRA if the institution’s
consumer lending activities were considered by the appropriate agency at the institution’s most
recent CRA examination. Under the CRA Regulations, an institution’s consumer lending
activities are considered in certain circumstances by an agency if such lending constitutes a
substantial majority of the institution’s business or the institution has elected to have its consumer
lending activities considered by the appropriate agency. See 12 CFR 25.22(a) (OCC); 12 CFR
228.22(d) (Board); 12 CFR 345.22(a) (FDIC); 12 CFR 563.22(a) (OTS).
16
As discussed further below, a “CRA affiliate” of an insured depository institution is viewed as
part of the insured depository institution. Accordingly, activities performed by a CRA affiliate of
an insured depository institution are considered to be performed by the insured depository
institution.
14

-20-

addition, an agreement would be considered in fulfillment of the CRA if any of these
activities is performed by a nongovernmental entity or person that is a party to the
agreement and an insured depository institution receives favorable consideration for the
activities under the CRA.
The proposed rule’s list of factors also includes providing (or refraining from
providing) CRA-related comments or testimony to an agency or written comments to an
insured depository institution that must be included in the institution’s CRA public file.
The agencies’ CRA Regulations generally require the agencies to consider comments
received from the public or included in an insured depository institution’s CRA public
file when evaluating the CRA performance of the institution.17 The CRA Regulations
also require an agency to consider written or oral comments submitted to the agency
when acting on applications for a deposit facility.18 Accordingly, such comments and
testimony are among the factors that may have a material impact on an agency’s decision
to assign a CRA rating or evaluation under the CRA of an application for a deposit
facility.
While the level of activity that will have a material effect on a CRA rating or
an application decision varies with the circumstances involving the particular insured
depository institution, the GLB Act by its terms requires that the agencies identify the list
of factors that have a material impact on an agency’s decision to assign a CRA rating or
to approve an application for a deposit facility under the CRA. The Act does not appear
to incorporate a quantitative threshold for the agencies to use in defining the list of factors
that are material to such a decision. Instead, the GLB Act explicitly sets a threshold
dollar level for the minimum amount of activities that must be performed in order for an
agreement to be covered by section 711. As discussed below, these value thresholds are
$10,000 in cash payments, grants or other consideration and $50,000 in loans. For these
reasons, the proposed rule provides that an agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA if it
pertains to a “factor” that the agencies determine is “material” to an institution’s rating or
application–such as the institution’s lending–rather than to a level of performance that the
agencies determine is material to the CRA evaluation of that insured depository
institution.
The agencies request comment on this reading of section 711 and on whether
the list of factors properly identifies the “factors” that are material to a CRA evaluation.
The agencies also request comment on whether the agencies have interpreted the statutory
mandate to identify the “list of factors that . . . have a material impact” on an agency’s

See 12 CFR 25.21(b)(6) and 25.43(a)(1) (OCC); 12 CFR 228.21(b)(6) and 228.43(a)(1)
(Board); 12 CFR 345.21(b)(6) and 345.43(a)(1) (FDIC); 12 CFR 563e.21(b)(6) and
563e.43(a)(1) (OTS).
18
See 12 CFR 25.29(c) (OCC); 12 CFR 228.29(b) (Board); 12 CFR 345.29(c) (FDIC); 12 CFR
563e.29(c) (OTS).
17

-21-

decision to assign a CRA rating and to approve or disapprove an application under the
CRA in a manner consistent with the language and purposes of section 711. In particular,
comment is invited on whether the proposed list of factors that are considered to be in
fulfillment of the CRA can and should be expanded, restricted, or altered consistent with
the language and purpose of the Act. For example, although the agencies consider an
insured depository institution’s lending in all geographic areas and to borrowers of all
income ranges for certain purposes in evaluating the institution’s CRA performance, can
and should the rule’s list of factors focus on those types of lending (and other activities)
that are reasonably likely to receive favorable consideration under the CRA Regulations,
such as certain types of lending in LMI areas or to LMI borrowers?
The terms of a written agreement generally determine whether the contract,
arrangement or understanding is in fulfillment of the CRA. However, the parties to a
written agreement may not evade coverage under the Act by reaching an oral
understanding that a party will submit (or refrain from submitting) oral or written CRArelated comments or testimony to an agency or written comments to an insured depository
institution that would have to be included in the institution’s CRA public file and
excluding this understanding from the terms of the written agreement. In addition, if an
agreement includes a loan, extension of credit or loan commitment that, if done
separately, would be exempt from coverage and also provides for the insured depository
institution or affiliate to provide other funds or resources, the parties may exclude the
exempt loan, extension of credit or loan commitment when determining if the agreement
is in fulfillment of the CRA.
The following are examples of agreements that would be in fulfillment of the
CRA under the proposed rule. Unlike the examples of CRA contacts, these examples are
not included in the proposed rule. Each example illustrates only the fulfillment criteria of
the rule and assumes that the agreement meets the other requirements necessary to be
considered a covered agreement. In this regard, even if an agreement is in fulfillment of
the CRA, it may still be exempt from coverage under the rule if it is an exempt loan or
loan commitment, or if the person that is a party to the agreement has not had a CRA
contact.
Example 1: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
local business organization that provides for the institution to make $500,000 in small
business loans to third parties in the institution’s assessment area in the next two years.
The agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA because an institution’s small business
lending activity is considered as part of the lending test under the CRA Regulations. The
agreement might still be exempt from coverage depending on the scope of the exemption
for loan commitments.
Example 2: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
development corporation to invest $1 million in a project the purpose of which is the
revitalization of an LMI neighborhood within the institution’s assessment area. The
-22-

agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA because the investment is a qualified investment
under the CRA Regulations and would be considered as part of the investment test under
the CRA Regulations.
Example 3: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
supermarket chain that provides for the institution to open a branch in certain of the
chain’s stores. The agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA because an institution’s record
of opening and closing branches is evaluated in the context of the distribution of its
branches as part of the service test under the CRA Regulations.
Example 4: An insured depository institution enters into a written agreement
with an organization to provide the organization with a $25,000 donation to assist in
covering the organization’s general operating expenses. A representative of the
organization orally agrees that, in return for the contribution, the organization will submit
a comment to or testify before the appropriate agency in support of the institution’s
recently announced proposal to merge with another insured depository institution. The
written agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA because the organization orally agreed in
connection with the agreement to provide comments or testimony to an agency
concerning the CRA record of performance of the institution.
The following are examples of agreements that would not be in fulfillment of
the CRA under the proposed rule:
Example 5: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
local theater company for the institution to make a $20,000 charitable donation to the
company for each of the next five years. The agreement is not in fulfillment of the CRA
because the donation does not have community development as its primary purpose and,
thus, would not be considered a qualified investment under the CRA Regulations.
Example 6: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
neighborhood association to donate 100 hours of employee time to the organization’s
annual effort to clean up the neighborhood. The agreement is not in fulfillment of the
CRA because the services are not considered community development services or other
qualifying services under the CRA Regulations.
The agencies note that the proposed rule’s list of factors does not include
performance of activities designed to ensure compliance with Federal laws that prohibit
discriminatory or other illegal credit practices, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act
(15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq.) and the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.). Although the
agencies consider evidence of these practices in evaluating an insured depository
institution’s performance under the CRA, the agencies are concerned that including such
activities in the list of factors could have an unintended and detrimental impact on

-23-

compliance and enforcement of the fair lending laws.19 The agencies specifically request
comment on whether this view is correct, or whether the list of factors should be
expanded to include activities designed to ensure compliance with the fair lending laws.
Comment also is solicited on whether the list of factors should be expanded to
include other activities. For example, the proposed rule’s list of factors does not
specifically include the provision of advisory or consulting services concerning CRArelated activities. Should the rule include a reference to these or other activities?
4. Value
A written agreement is a covered agreement only if it calls for an insured
depository institution or affiliate to provide to one or more persons cash payments, grants,
or other consideration of more than $10,000 in any calendar year, or to make loans that
have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any calendar year. The
statutory threshold is based on the total value of payments and loans provided under the
agreement and does not require that these payments or loans be made to a party to the
agreement.20 Accordingly, under the proposed rule, all cash payments, grants,
consideration or loans provided by an insured depository institution or affiliate under the
agreement, including amounts provided to individuals or entities that are not parties to the
agreement, would be considered in determining whether an agreement meets the rule’s
dollar thresholds. However, if an agreement includes a loan, extension of credit or loan
commitment that, if done separately, would be exempt from coverage and also provides
for the institution or affiliate to provide other funds or resources, the parties may exclude
the exempt loan, extension of credit or loan commitment when determining if the
agreement meets the dollar thresholds of the rule. See discussion under II.A.2.a. above
concerning qualifying loans.
Under the proposal, an agreement that provides for payments to be made in any
calendar year in excess of the dollar thresholds established by the statute is a covered
agreement for its entire term. The agencies believe that using a calendar year period for
these calculations should facilitate compliance with the rule by providing all parties to a
covered agreement a uniform basis for determining whether the agreement is covered by
the rule and because the terms of an agreement may not coincide with the parties’ fiscal
years. The agencies invite comment on whether another 12-month period would provide
a more appropriate basis for these calculations.

19

For example, a requirement that an insured depository institution publicly disclose an
agreement to use “mystery shoppers” to test the institution’s compliance with the fair lending laws
or to settle a fair lending complaint could deter the institution from entering into such agreements.
20
See 12 U.S.C. 1831y(e)(1)(A)(i).
-24-

The following are examples of the value provisions of the proposed rule.
These examples illustrate only the application of the dollar thresholds of the proposed
rule.
Example 1: An insured depository institution enters into an agreement with a
small business investment company pursuant to which the institution will invest $25,000
in the company. The agreement meets the dollar threshold criterion to be a covered
agreement because the institution will provide more than $10,000 in funds (other than
loans) under the agreement.
Example 2: An insured depository institution and a community organization
enter into a written agreement pursuant to which the institution will invest $1 million in a
state-sponsored investment fund that supports affordable housing initiatives for LMI
individuals. The community organization will not receive any funds or other resources
from the insured depository institution or its affiliates under the agreement. The
agreement meets the dollar threshold criterion for a covered agreement under the
proposed rule.
Example 3: An affiliate of an insured depository institution provides a
$100,000 loan to an association of small businesses pursuant to a written agreement. The
loan is on market terms and not for purposes of re-lending. The agreement also provides
for the affiliate to make a $5,000 grant to the local chamber of commerce’s small
business incubator. Because the loan is made on market terms and not for purposes of relending, the loan would be an exempt agreement under the proposed rule if it were a
separate agreement. Accordingly, the value of the loan may be excluded in determining
the value of the agreement. After excluding the loan, the agreement would not meet the
dollar criterion of the rule.
Example 4: An insured depository institution and a community development
corporation enter into a written agreement that requires an affiliate of the insured
depository institution to provide the organization with a grant of $5,000 in 2000, $8,000
in 2001, and $11,000 in 2002. The agreement exceeds the dollar threshold criterion of
the rule because the agreement provides for payments in excess of $10,000 during 2002.
Assuming the agreement meets the other requirements of the rule and is not otherwise
exempt, the agreement is a covered agreement for its entire term.
The agencies request comment on how the dollar thresholds in the statute
should be applied in situations where an agreement does not have a specific term or does
not specify a timetable for the disbursement of funds or resources under the agreement.
For example, if an agreement provides that an insured depository institution will make
$40,000 in grants over a 5-year period, but does not specify the years in which the grants
will be made, should the rule create a presumption that the entire sum ($40,000) is
provided in the first year of the agreement or assume that the value is paid in equal yearly
installments of $8,000? An alternative approach would rely on how the payments are
-25-

actually made under the agreement. Under this alternative approach, if the payments
under the agreement actually exceeded $10,000 in a calendar year, the agreement would
then become a covered agreement.
The agencies also invite comment on whether the rule should provide guidance
on how to determine the value of an agreement that does not specify the amount of
payments, grants, loans or other consideration to be provided under the agreement, such
as an agreement for an insured depository institution to open a branch or to begin offering
a new loan product.
5. Related Agreements Considered a Single Agreement
In two circumstances, section 711 of the GLB Act requires that separate
agreements or contracts be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the
agreements–taken as a whole–meet the definition of a covered agreement.21 Section __.3
of the rule implements these requirements. If separate agreements are considered a single
agreement under section __.3, the combined agreement must still meet the criteria to be a
covered agreement to be covered by the rule. Loans, extensions of credit and loan
commitments that are specifically excluded from the definition of covered agreement
under ___.2(b) of the rule are not required to be aggregated with other agreements.
a. Agreements entered into by the same parties
Section __.3(a) provides that all written contracts, arrangements, or
understandings that are entered into by an insured depository institution or affiliate of an
insured depository institution will be considered to be part of a single agreement if the
contracts, arrangements, or understandings are entered into with the same person within a
12-month period and each agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA. This aggregation rule
applies to all written agreements entered into during the 12-month period by the same
person on the one hand, and any part of the same organization, including an insured
depository institution and any of its affiliates, on the other hand.
Example 1: In April, an insured depository institution enters into a written
agreement with Community Development Organization, Inc. pursuant to which the
institution makes an $8,000 investment in the organization. In November of the same
year, an affiliate of the insured depository institution and Community Development
Organization, Inc. enter into a written agreement under which the affiliate makes an
additional $8,000 investment in the organization. For purposes of this example, both
investments are assumed to be qualified investments under the CRA Regulations and
considered in the evaluation of the institution’s CRA performance. The separate
agreements must be aggregated under the rule and the combined agreement meets the

21

See 12 U.S.C.1831y(e)(1) and (2).
-26-

$10,000 dollar threshold of the rule. Accordingly, the agreements are jointly considered
a covered agreement.
Example 2: In September, an insured depository institution orally agrees to
donate $15,000 of computer equipment to a local housing organization. In December, the
institution and organization enter into a written agreement for the institution to make a
$5,000 CRA qualified investment in local housing project that is eligible for low-income
housing tax credits. The agreements do not need to be aggregated under the rule because
the September agreement was not in writing.
Example 3: In February, an insured depository institution enters into a written
agreement with Partnership A for the institution to make a $9,000 grant to Partnership A
for the purpose of rehabilitating affordable-housing units. In August of the same year, an
affiliate of the insured depository institution enters into a written agreement with
Partnership A under which the affiliate makes a payment of $9,000 so that its employees
may have access to the child care center operated by Partnership A. The August
agreement is not in fulfillment of the CRA. Accordingly, the two agreements would not
be aggregated under the rule.
b. Substantively related contracts
Section 711 requires the aggregation of separate but “substantively related
contracts” even where the contracts are entered into with different persons.22 Unlike the
aggregation rule discussed above, the rule aggregating “substantively related contracts”
applies only to separate, written contracts and does not apply to other types of written
arrangements or understandings.
The rule defines written contracts entered into by an insured depository
institution or any of its affiliates as “substantively related” if the contracts were
negotiated in a coordinated fashion. The rule does not require that the separate contracts
each be in fulfillment of the CRA or that the parties to the contracts (other than the
banking organization) be the same. Thus, the rule prevents parties from evading the
disclosure and reporting obligations of the statute by separating out from an agreement
payments or grants that may not themselves be in fulfillment of the CRA.
Example 1: Two housing organizations jointly approach an insured depository
institution to obtain funding. A representative of the insured depository institution meets
with both organizations at the same time to discuss their funding needs. The institution
enters into a written contract with one organization to provide it with $9,000 for the
purpose of rehabilitating affordable housing units. The institution enters into a separate
written contract with the other organization to provide the organization with an

22

See 12 U.S.C. 1831y(e)(1)(A)(ii).
-27-

unrestricted grant of $9,000. Because the contracts were negotiated in a coordinated
fashion, the contracts must be aggregated under the rule. When aggregated, the contracts
would meet the statute’s $10,000 dollar threshold and each contract would be a covered
agreement.
Example 2: A bank holding company announces its intention to acquire an
insured depository institution. A Florida-based group and a California-based group
independently approach the bank holding company to seek funding for specific projects
and separately negotiate written contracts with the bank holding company. The contracts
would not be aggregated under the rule, and each contract would be a covered agreement
only if that contract on its own met the requirements of the rule.
The agencies request comment on the aggregation rules included in section
__.3, including the proposed definition of “substantively related contracts” and whether
there are alternative definitions that would achieve the purposes of the statute. The
agencies also request comment on how these aggregation rules should apply when a CRA
contact has not occurred prior to one of the agreements or was made by only one of the
persons that is a party to the agreements. For example, when a single person enters into
two agreements with an insured depository institution during a 12-month period, but
engages in a CRA contact between the first and second agreement, should the first
agreement be excluded from aggregation because a CRA contact had not occurred at the
time it was entered into? Alternatively, should the agreements be aggregated because a
CRA contact occurred prior to the second agreement and the agreements otherwise meet
the requirements for aggregation under the rule? Similarly, should substantively related
contracts entered into by separate persons be aggregated under the rule only if each
person had engaged in a CRA contact?
6. CRA Affiliate Treated as Insured Depository Institution
The CRA Regulations provide that an insured depository institution, at its
election, may request that an agency consider certain activities conducted by an affiliate
in evaluating the CRA performance of the insured depository institution.23 In these
circumstances, the selected activities of the affiliate are viewed as activities of the insured
depository institution.
The proposed rule generally considers a contact concerning this type of
affiliate, referred to as a “CRA affiliate,” of an insured depository institution to be the

See CRA lending test (12 CFR 25.22(c), 228.22(c), 345.22(c) and 563e.22(c)), CRA
investment test (12 CFR 25.23(c), 228.23(c), 345.23(c) and 563e.23(c)), CRA service test (12
CFR 25.24(c), 228.24(c), 345.24(c) and 563e.24(c)), CRA community development test for
wholesale and limited-purpose institutions (12 CFR 25.25(d), 228.25(d), 345.25(d) and
5632.25(d)); and CRA strategic plans (12 CFR 25.27(c), 228.27(c), 245.27(c) and 563e.27(c)).
23

-28-

equivalent of a contact concerning an insured depository institution (see section
__.2(b)(2)). Similarly, an agreement is considered to be in fulfillment of the CRA if it
concerns the performance of any of the activities listed in section __.2(c) by a “CRA
affiliate” of an insured depository institution (see section __.2(c)).
The proposed rule defines a “CRA affiliate” as any company that is an affiliate
of an insured depository institution and whose activities were considered by an agency in
assessing the CRA performance of the institution at the institution’s most recent CRA
examination.24 Under the rule, a company is considered a CRA affiliate only to the extent
its activities were taken into account in the CRA evaluation of an affiliated insured
depository institution.
Example 1: A person submits a written comment to an agency concerning the
lending performance under the CRA of a mortgage company that is affiliated with an
insured depository institution. The insured depository institution elected, in accordance
with the agencies’ CRA Regulations, to have the lending activities of the mortgage
company considered in the institution’s most recent CRA performance evaluation. The
mortgage affiliate, therefore, is considered a CRA affiliate with respect to its lending
activities. Accordingly, the agreement is in fulfillment of the CRA for purposes of
section 711 and the person has engaged in a CRA contact under section __.2(b)(2)
because the selected activities of a CRA affiliate and contacts with an agency regarding a
CRA affiliate are considered activities of and contacts concerning an insured depository
institution.
Example 2: An affiliate of an insured depository institution engages in
mortgage lending and provides credit counseling services. The insured depository
institution elected to have only the mortgage lending activities of the affiliate considered
in its most recent CRA performance evaluation. The affiliate and a community group
enter into an agreement that provides for the affiliate to provide credit counseling services
in the local community. The agreement is not in fulfillment of the CRA because the
affiliate is not considered a CRA affiliate with respect to its credit counseling activities.
To assist persons in complying with the rule, section __.2(e) of the rule
requires that an insured depository institution or affiliate inform the other parties to a
covered agreement if the agreement concerns the activities of a CRA affiliate. The
institution or affiliate must provide this notification not later than the time the agreement
is entered into if the affiliate is a CRA affiliate at that time.
Because the status of an affiliate of an insured depository institution may
change, an agreement that concerns the activities of an affiliate may become a covered
agreement after the date the parties enter into the agreement. For example, a person may

24

See Proposed Rule, section ___.8(c).
-29-

enter into an agreement that concerns the lending activities of a newly formed affiliate. If
an insured depository institution subsequently elects to have the lending activities of the
new affiliate considered during its next CRA performance examination, the affiliate
would become a CRA affiliate. In such circumstances, the rule requires the insured
depository institution or affiliate to inform the other parties to the agreement that the
affiliate has become a CRA affiliate within a reasonable period of time after the change
of status occurs.
Where an agreement concerns the activities of an affiliate that becomes a CRA
affiliate, the agreement would be in fulfillment of the CRA only once the affiliate
becomes a CRA affiliate. If the agreement met the other requirements of the rule, the
agreement would become a covered agreement at that time. Section __.2(e) clarifies that
in these circumstances the parties to the agreement have no disclosure or reporting
obligations under the rule until the agreement becomes a covered agreement. In applying
the disclosure and reporting requirements of the rule, the agreement would be considered
to have been entered into on the date it became a covered agreement.
The agencies request comment on the proposed rule’s treatment of CRA
affiliates, including whether the requirement that an insured depository institution or
affiliate inform the other parties when an agreement concerns a CRA affiliate is useful
and practicable. The agencies also request comment on whether the rule should provide a
similar notice procedure for agreements that involve an activity of an insured depository
institution, such as consumer lending, that the institution elects for the first time to be
considered under the CRA during the term of the agreement.25 In addition, the agencies
request comment on whether there is an appropriate and less burdensome way for the rule
to determine whether an affiliate is a CRA affiliate at the time the parties enter into an
agreement.
B. Disclosure of Covered Agreements
Section 711 requires that each party to a covered agreement fully disclose the
agreement in its entirety and make the full text of the agreement available to the public
and the appropriate agency with supervisory responsibility over the relevant insured
depository institution.
1. Disclosure to the public
The proposed rule requires that each party to a covered agreement make a
complete copy of the agreement available to any member of the public upon request. The
rule would permit an insured depository institution to fulfill its public disclosure
obligation by placing a copy of a covered agreement in the institution’s CRA public file

25

See footnote 15 above.
-30-

and making it available in accordance with the procedures set forth in the CRA
Regulations relating to public files.26
A party may make a covered agreement available to any individual or entity
that requests the agreement by mailing it to the requestor, and the proposal would
specifically permit the party to charge the requestor for the costs of copying and mailing
the agreement, so long as the fees are reasonable. The proposal does not otherwise
specify or require a party to employ any particular method in responding to requests from
the public for a covered agreement. For example, a party also could make an agreement
available to an individual or entity with access to the Internet by posting the agreement on
a publicly accessible website or to members of the public within a local geographic area
by making the agreement available for inspection at an office within that area.
The rule provides that a party’s obligation to make a covered agreement
available to the public terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the covered
agreement. The agencies believe that this time period would permit interested members
of the public adequate time to obtain a covered agreement from the parties, while not
placing an undue recordkeeping burden on the parties to covered agreements. Members
of the public would continue to be able to obtain copies of a covered agreement from the
relevant supervisory agency under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.)
after this 12-month period.
The agencies request comment on all aspects of the rule’s public disclosure
requirements. Comment is sought on whether the rule should include illustrative
examples of how a party may make an agreement available to a member of the public
and, if so, whether there are additional methods (other than those discussed above) that
should be allowed for making an agreement available to the public. For example, should
the rule explicitly allow a person to arrange for another entity or individual to make the
person’s covered agreements available to the public, or allow a party to recover
reasonable fees for searching its records for a covered agreement? Comment also is
requested on whether affiliates of insured depository institutions should be permitted to
disclose an agreement to the public by placing the agreement in the CRA public file of an
affiliated insured depository institution. In addition, comment is invited on whether it is
reasonable, appropriate and consistent with the statute to rely on access to covered
agreements through the agencies for public disclosure requests made more than 12
months after the term of the agreement and whether this period should be longer or
shorter.

See 12 CFR 25.43 (OCC); 12 CFR 228.43 (Board); 12 CFR 345.43 (FDIC); 12 CFR 563e.43
(OTS).
26

-31-

2. Filing of Covered Agreement by Insured Depository Institutions with
Agencies
The rule requires each insured depository institution and affiliate that is a party
to a covered agreement to provide a complete copy of the agreement to each relevant
supervisory agency (as defined below) within 30 days after the parties enter into the
agreement. If two or more insured depository institutions or affiliates are parties to the
same agreement, the institutions and affiliates may jointly file a copy of the agreement
with the relevant supervisory agencies.
3. Persons Must Make Covered Agreements Available to Agency
Section 711 requires each party to a covered agreement to make the agreement
available to the appropriate agency. Because the relevant supervisory agencies would
receive a copy of any covered agreement from the insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to the agreement, the rule provides that a nongovernmental entity
or person may fulfill its statutory obligation in this area by providing, upon request from
the relevant supervisory agency, a complete copy of the agreement to the agency. The
copy must be provided to the agency within 30 days of the agency’s request. As with
disclosure to the public, the rule provides that a person’s obligation to make an agreement
available to an agency terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the agreement.
The agencies believe this procedure will reduce regulatory burden and avoid
duplicative filings. At the same time, this procedure requires persons to make copies of
covered agreements available to the agencies consistent with the statute.
4. Relevant Supervisory Agency
The Act requires that parties to a covered agreement make the agreement
available to, and file annual reports with, the appropriate Federal banking agency with
supervisory responsibility over the relevant insured depository institution. The rule uses
the term “relevant supervisory agency” to identify the appropriate agency for a particular
covered agreement.
Under the rule, the “relevant supervisory agency” is–
! The OCC in the case where–
* the parties to the agreement include a national bank or subsidiary of a
national bank; or
* a national bank or subsidiary or CRA affiliate of a national bank provides
funds or resources under the agreement;
-32-

! The Board in the case where–
* the parties to the agreement include a state member bank, subsidiary of a
state member bank, bank holding company, or subsidiary of a bank holding
company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary thereof); or
* a state member bank or subsidiary or CRA affiliate of a state member bank
provides funds or resources under the agreement;
! The FDIC in the case where–
* the parties to the agreement include a state nonmember bank or subsidiary of
a state nonmember bank; or
* a state nonmember bank or subsidiary or CRA affiliate of a state nonmember
bank provides funds or resources under the agreement; or
! The OTS in the case where–
* the parties to the agreement include a savings association, subsidiary of a
savings association, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary of a
savings and loan holding company; or
* a savings association or subsidiary or CRA affiliate of a savings association
provides funds or resources under the agreement.
The agencies believe this definition will ensure that a covered agreement and its related
annual reports are filed with the agency or agencies that have supervisory authority over
the insured depository institution or affiliate that is involved with the agreement, either as
a party or as a source of funds or resources paid under the agreement.
More than one agency may be the relevant supervisory agency with respect to a
single covered agreement. For example, if a national bank, state nonmember bank, and a
savings association provide funds pursuant to a covered agreement entered into by their
parent bank holding company, the OCC, FDIC, OTS, and Board would each be a relevant
supervisory agency for the agreement. The agencies solicit comment on the proposed
rule’s definition of “relevant supervisory agency,” including whether there are alternative
definitions that might reduce the filing burdens of parties while ensuring the appropriate
agencies receive the filings contemplated by the Act.
5. Treatment of Confidential or Proprietary Information
Covered agreements may contain confidential or proprietary information the
disclosure of which may cause competitive or other harm to one or more of the parties to
-33-

the agreement. Section 711 of the Act directs the agencies to ensure that the
implementing regulations “do not impose an undue burden on the parties [to a covered
agreement] and that proprietary and confidential information is protected.”27 This
provision must be read in harmony with other provisions of section 711 that require that a
covered agreement “shall be in its entirety fully disclosed, and the full text thereof made
available . . . to the public.” Other provisions of section 711 require the reporting of the
terms and value of covered agreements, the identity of the parties to the agreement, and
the uses of funds and resources provided under covered agreements.
In light of these provisions, and in order to ensure the uniform disclosure of
covered agreements under the Act by the parties and the agencies, the proposed rule
would allow a party to a covered agreement to request a determination from the relevant
supervisory agency whether the agency could withhold specific portions of the agreement
from public disclosure. In considering these requests, the agencies will apply the
procedures and standards of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.)
(FOIA), which governs public access to all records of an agency, including documents
filed with the agency by third parties. If the relevant supervisory agency determines that
it could withhold specific portions of the covered agreement from public disclosure under
FOIA, the proposed rule would permit the parties to the agreement to also withhold those
specific portions of the agreement from any copies of the agreement directly made
available to the public. A party could withhold from public disclosure only those limited
portions of a covered agreement determined to be exempt from public disclosure under
FOIA by the relevant supervisory agency.
In applying the standards under FOIA, the agencies note that section 711 may
require disclosure of some types of information that an agency might normally be able to
withhold from disclosure under FOIA. In light of the directive of section 711, the
agencies may not be able to withhold under FOIA–or permit a party to withhold from
public disclosure–many of the provisions contained in a covered agreement. For
example, the agencies might not be able to permit a party to withhold the amount of
payments or loans to be made under the agreement, the persons receiving such payments
or loans, and the terms of any such payments or loans. It may be possible that only
limited types of information could be withheld from public disclosure under the proposed
rule. Such information might include, for example, individual account numbers or
information detailing a particular institution’s proprietary underwriting criteria.
The agencies welcome comment on whether covered agreements are likely to
contain confidential or proprietary information the disclosure of which would harm the
parties to the agreement given the definition of covered agreements. The agencies also
request comment on whether, and if so to what degree, such information may be withheld
from public disclosure under section 711. If covered agreements typically contain

27

12 U.S.C. 1831y(h)(2)(A).
-34-

particular types of information that may properly be withheld from public disclosure
under section 711, should the rule specify these types of information and allow the parties
to withhold this information without seeking prior agency review or in lieu of the agency
review process? The agencies also invite comment on whether the proposed agency
review process is useful and practicable and whether there are alternative or additional
procedures that the agencies can and should implement under section 711 to protect
confidential and proprietary information. The agencies also invite comment on whether
the rule should specifically permit a party that has requested agency review of a covered
agreement to delay disclosing the agreement to the public until the agency rules on the
request.
6. Disclosure Limited to Covered Agreements Entered into After
November 12, 1999
The rule’s disclosure obligations apply only to covered agreements entered into
after November 12, 1999, the effective date of section 711 of the GLB Act. Under the
rule, a written modification, amendment, renewal, or extension of an agreement creates a
new agreement. Thus, if an agreement entered into before November 12, 1999, is
modified, amended, renewed or extended after that date, the parties must disclose the
entire new agreement if it otherwise meets the criteria to be a covered agreement.
Disclosure is not required if the pre-November 12, 1999, agreement expressly provided
for the renewal or extension and established the terms of the agreement during the
renewal or extension period.
Example: An insured depository institution and a community organization
enter into a written agreement in January 1999 that calls for the institution to place an
ATM in the local community by December 2000. In September 2000, the parties enter
into a written modification of the agreement that calls for the institution to establish a
full-service branch rather than an ATM. If the modified agreement meets the criteria to
be a covered agreement, the modified agreement must be disclosed in accordance with the
rule.
C. Annual Reports
The Act requires each person, insured depository institution, or affiliate of an
insured depository institution that is a party to a covered agreement to file a report
relating to the covered agreement. These annual reporting obligations apply only to
covered agreements entered into on or after May 12, 2000.28

See the discussion above concerning the treatment of agreements entered into prior to May 12,
2000, that are modified, amended, renewed, or extended after that date.
28

-35-

1. No Report Required by Person that does not Receive Funds or
Resources
The proposed rule requires that each party to a covered agreement file an
annual report for the fiscal years during the term of the agreement. The rule does not,
however, require a nongovernmental entity or person to file an annual report with respect
to a particular covered agreement for any fiscal year during which the person did not
receive any funds under the covered agreement. The agencies believe that requiring an
annual report in such circumstances would not further the purpose of the statute because
the person would not have received any funds or resources under the agreement during
the fiscal year. Under the proposed rule, however, each insured depository institution
and affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement must file an annual report each year
during the term of the agreement. The agencies request comment on whether this
reporting exemption for persons is appropriate.
Example 1: A savings association and a community development organization
that rehabilitates affordable housing in the association’s assessment area enter into a
covered agreement pursuant to which the association will invest $100,000 in the
organization over 3 years. The investment will be used to support a rehabilitation project
that is expected to take 3 years to complete. If the savings association provides the full
$100,000 in the first year of the agreement, the organization must file an annual report
with the OTS for the fiscal year in which it received the $100,000. The organization is
not required to file an annual report with the OTS for its subsequent fiscal years during
the term of the agreement.
Example 2: A state non-member bank enters into a covered agreement with a
community organization to make $1 million in community development grants in the
community over the next two years. The community organization will not receive any
funds or other resources under the agreement (including under the grants as they are
made). The agreement is a covered agreement and must be made available to the public
and the FDIC. In addition, the state non-member bank must file annual reports
concerning grants made and actions taken under the agreement. The community
organization is not required, however, to file any annual reports concerning the agreement
because the organization receives no funds or resources under the agreement.
Example 3: An insured depository institution and an organization enter into a
written agreement pursuant to which the institution commits to make $10 million in small
business loans in the local community over the next 3 years. The loans would be made at
market rates and would not be for purposes of re-lending. The organization would not
receive any funds or resources under the agreement, including under the loans as they are
made. Even if a commitment by an insured depository institution to make multiple loans
on market terms and not for purposes of re-lending is a covered agreement (see Part I.A.2
above), the organization would not have to file any annual report concerning the
agreement because it would receive no funds or resources under the agreement. Under
-36-

the proposed rule, the institution would have to file an annual report during the term of
the agreement indicating the aggregate amount and number of loans made during the year
under the agreement. Each individual loan made pursuant to the commitment would be
exempt from coverage and, accordingly, each borrower would have no reporting
obligation under the rule.
2. Contents of Annual Report filed by Persons
Section 711 requires that the annual report filed by a nongovernmental entity or
person provide a detailed, itemized accounting of how the person used any funds or
resources received under the covered agreement during the previous year. The proposed
rule would allow this detailed accounting to be provided in two ways: a description of
the specific purpose or purposes for which the funds were used, or a segmentation of
funds used for general purposes in a pre-defined list of expense categories.
a. Specific Purpose Funds and Resources
The first reporting method applies to funds or other resources that a person
receives under a covered agreement and allocates and uses for a specific purpose.
Specific purpose funds or resources are those that a person targets and uses for a distinct
program, the purchase of a distinct asset, or the payment of a distinct expense. For
example, a person would use this reporting method if, pursuant to the terms of the
covered agreement or otherwise, the person specifically allocated and used the funds
received under a covered agreement for a particular loan program, to purchase computers,
to sponsor a particular seminar, or to pay the salary of a particular person. A specific
purpose must be a purpose that is more limited than the categories of expenses
enumerated below for the reporting of general purpose funds. In other words, funds or
resources are not allocated or used for a specific purpose if they are allocated or used for
general operational expenses, to support the organization’s general activities in the
community, or to cover general compensation, administrative, travel, entertainment,
consulting or professional expenses.
Under the proposed rule, funds or resources allocated and used for a specific
purpose must be segregated in the annual report from funds used for general purposes.
For funds received under a covered agreement and allocated and used for a specific
purpose, a person’s annual report must provide the following information: (i) a
description of each specific purpose for which the funds or resources were used during
the fiscal year; and (ii) the amount of funds or resources used for each specific purpose
during the fiscal year.
Example 1: An organization receives $15,000 from an insured depository
institution under a covered agreement. The organization allocates and uses the $15,000
to sponsor a seminar on affordable housing initiatives. The organization’s annual report
for the fiscal year would report that it received $15,000, that it used the $15,000 to
-37-

sponsor the seminar, and provide a brief description of the seminar.
Example 2: A community group receives $50,000 from an insured depository
institution under a covered agreement. During its fiscal year, the community group
specifically allocates and uses $45,000 of the funds to purchase computer equipment and
the remaining $5,000 is used for general operating expenses. The group’s annual report
for the fiscal year must state that the group received $50,000 under the agreement during
the fiscal year and that $45,000 was used to purchase computer equipment. In addition,
the annual report must provide the detailed, itemized list of expenses described below
because some funds were used for general purposes.
b. All Other Funds and Resources
Funds or other resources received under a covered agreement may be used for
general purposes or unspecified purposes. The second reporting method addresses funds
or resources that are received under a covered agreement and that are not allocated and
used for a specific purpose. Under this method, the reporting person must provide a
detailed, itemized list of how the reporting person has used its funds during the fiscal
year. This list must include, at a minimum, the amount of funds used during the fiscal
year for—
• Compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
• Administrative expenses;
• Travel expenses;
• Entertainment expenses;
• Payment of consulting and professional fees; and
• Other expenses and uses.
The annual report may reflect the total amount of funds from all sources that the person
used during the fiscal year for the types of expenses listed above. The annual report
must, however, specify the total amount of funds that the person received under the
covered agreement and that were used for general or unspecified purposes. The agencies
may determine from this information the proportion of general purpose funds received
under the covered agreement that were used for each category of expenses listed above.
Example: In March, a person receives an unrestricted grant of $15,000 under a
covered agreement. The person includes the funds in its general operating budget and
does not allocate and use the funds for a specific purpose. The person’s annual report for
-38-

the fiscal year must state that the person received $15,000 of general purpose funds. The
annual report also must indicate the total amount of funds and resources that the person
used during the fiscal year for compensation, administrative expenses, travel expenses,
entertainment expenses, consulting and professional fees, and other expenses and uses.
c. Use of Other Reports
As noted above, section 711 directs the agencies to ensure that regulations
implementing that section “do not impose an undue burden on the parties.” The
legislative history also indicates that the agencies should allow reporting parties to use
reports prepared for other purposes to fulfill the annual reporting requirements.29
Accordingly, the proposed rule does not require that a person’s annual report be prepared
on a special form or in a particular format. Instead, the rule provides that a person’s
annual report may consist of or incorporate reports or documents that the person has
prepared for public, internal or other purposes so long as the documents filed with the
relevant supervisory agency contain all of the information required by the rule. For
example, a person’s annual report may consist of a Federal or state tax return, a report
prepared for the person’s members or shareholders, or the person’s financial statements if
such documents provide the information required by the rule.
In this regard, the agencies have reviewed several tax forms commonly filed by
tax-exempt nonprofit organizations. Internal Revenue Form 990, which is the Federal tax
return form for certain tax-exempt nonprofit organizations, requires the filing
organization to provide information that is at least as detailed, and in some cases more
detailed, than the list of expenses contained in section 711. In particular, Form 990
requires a tax-exempt organization to separately state the amount that the organization
spent during the tax year on compensation of officers, directors, trustees and key
employees; salaries and wages of other employees; professional fundraising fees;
accounting fees; legal fees; supplies; telephone; postage and shipping; occupancy;
printing and publications; travel; conferences, conventions and meetings; and an itemized
list of other uses. Since these categories of expenses include and are more specific than
the list of expenses required to be provided for general purpose funds, a person may use a
properly completed Form 990 to fulfill the rule’s reporting requirements for general
purpose funds. Other forms or reports also may be used, separately or in combination, to
fulfill the rule’s reporting requirements so long as they contain, in total, the information
required by the rule.
d. Consolidated Annual Reports Permitted
The GLB Act requires the agencies to permit persons that are parties to a large
number of covered agreements to file a consolidated annual report relating to all of the

29

See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-434 at 179 (1999).
-39-

covered agreements.30 Accordingly, section __.5 of the proposed rule permits a person
that is a party to 5 or more covered agreements to file a single consolidated report
covering all of the person’s covered agreements. A person’s consolidated report must
identify the person filing the report and each agreement covered by the report. All other
information required by the rule may be provided on an aggregate basis for all agreements
covered by the annual report. Any consolidated report must be filed with all of the
relevant supervisory agencies for the covered agreements included in the report.
Example: A community development organization is a party to six separate
covered agreements with six unaffiliated insured depository institutions. Under each
agreement, the organization receives $15,000 to fund the rehabilitation of a specific lowincome housing project identified in the agreement. The organization allocates and uses
all of the funds for the specified purpose. If the organization elects to file a consolidated
annual report, the consolidated report must (i) identify the organization and the six
covered agreements, (ii) state that the organization received $90,000 under the
agreements, and (iii) state that the person allocated and used the $90,000 to fund the
rehabilitation project and provide a description of the project.
e. Specific request for comments
The agencies invite comment on all aspects of the proposed rule’s annual
reporting requirements for nongovernmental entities and persons. The agencies also
specifically request comment on the following:
• Are the rule’s reporting requirements for specific purpose funds and resources
reasonable and appropriate? Would the proposed rule limit the burden
associated with reporting funds or resources received for a specific purpose?
Should the regulation provide additional guidance as to when a person has
allocated and used funds or resources for a specific purpose or allow, rather
than require, a person to use this reporting method when it allocates and uses
funds for a specific purpose?
• Should the detailed, itemized list of uses contained in the proposed rule be
expanded to include other categories of uses or expenses, such as grants or
loans made, or services provided, to others?
• Are there additional information items that should be included in annual
reports? For example, should a person be required to state in each annual
report the aggregate amount of funds or resources that the person has received
to date under the covered agreement?

30

See 12 U.S.C. 1831y(h)(2)(B).
-40-

• Should the agencies permit a person to file a consolidated annual report if the
person is a party to 2 or more covered agreements?
• Where a covered agreement provides for an institution or affiliate to take
several actions including making a specific loan that, if agreed to separately,
would be exempt from coverage under the rule, can and should the agencies
allow the person’s annual report to exclude information concerning the loan
that would otherwise be exempt under the rule?
• Are there additional ways that the agencies could reduce the reporting burden
on persons consistent with the language and purposes of the Act? For
example, should the agencies issue optional sample reporting forms that might
be used by a person, insured depository institution or affiliate?
3. Contents of Annual Report of Insured Depository Institutions And
Affiliates
The annual reporting requirements for insured depository institutions and
affiliates are largely specified in section 711. The annual report for an insured depository
institution or affiliate must identify the entity filing the report and identify the covered
agreement to which the annual report relates. In addition, the annual report must
provide—
• The aggregate amount of payments, fees and loans (listed separately) provided
by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the agreement to any
other party during the fiscal year;
• The aggregate amount of payments, fees and loans (listed separately) received
by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the agreement from any
other party during the fiscal year;
• A description of the terms and conditions of any payments, fees, or loans
provided to, or received from, another party under the agreement; and
• The aggregate amount and number of loans, amount and number of
investments, and amount of services provided under the covered agreement to
any person that is not a party to the agreement–
* by the insured depository institution or affiliate; and
* by any other party to the agreement, unless such information is not known
to the insured depository institution or affiliate or will be contained in an
annual report filed by a person.
-41-

These informational requirements track those established by the statute.
The rule would allow an insured depository institution and an affiliate that are
parties to the same covered agreement to file a single, consolidated report for the
agreement. In addition, to reduce burden, the proposed rule would allow an insured
depository institution or affiliate that is a party to 5 or more covered agreements to file a
single consolidated report relating to all of the agreements.
The agencies request comment on whether an insured depository institution or
affiliate should be permitted to file a consolidated report if it is a party to 2 or more
covered agreements, and whether the rule can and should allow an insured depository
institution or affiliate to not file an annual report for any fiscal year in which the
institution or affiliate did not provide or receive any payments, fees or loans under the
agreement. The agencies invite comment on whether the rule should provide additional
guidance concerning the level of detail required to be provided in the annual report of an
insured depository institution or affiliate, and whether there are additional ways the
agencies could reduce the reporting burden of insured depository institutions and
affiliates consistent with the Act. For example, are there ways the agencies could reduce
the reporting burden for agreements that involve loans that are themselves exempt from
coverage?
4. When and Where Must Annual Reports be Filed
The proposed rule provides that each party to a covered agreement must
prepare and file an annual report with the relevant supervisory agency for the fiscal year
in which the party enters into the agreement and each subsequent fiscal year during the
term of the covered agreement.31 The agencies have adopted a fiscal year reporting
period to allow the parties to coordinate preparation of their annual reports with other
documents or reports that typically are prepared on a fiscal year basis, such as income tax
returns and financial statements. However, to provide parties with maximum flexibility,
the rule also permits a party to elect to use the calendar year as their fiscal year for
purposes of the rule.32 The agencies request comment on whether providing the option of
fiscal year or calendar year reporting would reduce regulatory burden or whether the rule
should require reporting on a calendar year basis. In addition, the agencies request
comment on whether a person should be required to file an annual report after the end of
a covered agreement’s term if, by that time, the person has not completely used all the
funds or resources received under the agreement.

31

As discussed above, the proposed rule would not require a nongovernmental entity or person
to file an annual report during the term of a covered agreement if the entity or person did not
receive any funds or resources under the agreement in that fiscal year.
32
See Proposed Rule section __.8(f). The rule also provides that the “fiscal year” for an
individual or entity that does not have a fiscal year is the calendar year.
-42-

Each party to a covered agreement must file its annual report for a fiscal year
with each relevant supervisory agency within 6 months of the end of the party’s fiscal
year. Under section 711 and the rule, a person may fulfill this filing requirement by
providing its annual report to the insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party
to the agreement within 5 months of the end of the person’s fiscal year with instructions
for the institution or affiliate to file the report with all of the relevant supervisory agencies
on behalf of the person. An insured depository institution or affiliate that receives an
annual report from a person in this manner must forward it to the relevant supervisory
agencies within 30 days.
This method of filing allows the annual reports of a person and an insured
depository institution or affiliate that relate to the same covered agreement to be filed
together. It also reduces the likelihood that annual reports will be filed with the wrong
agency because the insured depository institution or affiliate will know its relevant
supervisory agency while the nongovernmental entity or person may not.
The agencies invite comment on the filing requirements of the rule. In
particular, the agencies request comment on whether the 5- and 6-month filing windows
will provide the parties sufficient time to prepare their annual reports and whether there
are additional ways that the agencies might reduce the filing burdens of parties consistent
with the Act.
D. Compliance Provisions
Section 711 specifically provides that nothing in that section authorizes the
agencies to enforce the provisions of any covered agreement. The proposed rule
incorporates this provision. (See section __.7(e)) This is consistent with the longstanding policy of the agencies that CRA-related agreements entered into between insured
depository institutions (or their affiliates) and persons are private matters between the
parties and are not enforced by the agencies.
The agencies may enforce compliance by insured depository institutions and
affiliates with the disclosure and reporting requirements of section 711 using the cease
and desist and other enforcement powers granted in section 8 of the FDI Act.33 Section 8
of the FDI Act, however, applies only to insured depository institutions, affiliates and
institution-affiliated parties, as defined in the FDI Act. The provisions of section 8 of the
FDI Act, therefore, generally do not apply to nongovernmental entities or persons that are
parties to a covered agreement. Section 711 instead includes special compliance
provisions applicable to nongovernmental entities or persons that are party to a covered

33

See 12 U.S.C. 1818.
-43-

agreement.34
Under these provisions, the material and willful failure of a person to comply
with section 711 may cause the related covered agreement to be unenforceable. In
particular, under the Act, if the appropriate agency determines that a person has willfully
failed to comply with section 711 in a material way, and the person does not comply with
the law after receiving notice and a reasonable period of time, the agreement thereafter is
unenforceable by operation of section 711. The Act specifically provides that
inadvertent or de minimis reporting errors will not subject the filing party to any penalty.
The rule requires the agencies to provide a person written notice and an opportunity to
respond before determining the person has not complied with the rule, and allows the
person at least 90 days to correct a willful and material violation. The agencies request
comment on whether this written notice should be sent to all the parties to the agreement.
The rule also clarifies that, in these circumstances, the agreement becomes
unenforceable only by the party that has willfully and materially failed to comply with
the rule. Any other party to the agreement may continue to enforce the agreement against
the noncomplying party. The agencies believe this construction is the most consistent
reading of the language and purpose of the Act. The agencies note that an alternative
construction could encourage persons to violate the statute in an attempt to avoid
performance under a legally binding contract, thereby frustrating the purpose of the
statute. If the insured depository institution or affiliate elects not to enforce the covered
agreement against the noncomplying person, the appropriate agency may assist the
institution or affiliate in identifying a successor person to assume the responsibilities of
the person under a covered agreement that has become unenforceable.
Section 711 also provides that, if an individual diverts funds or resources
received under a covered agreement for his or her personal financial gain and contrary to
the purposes of the agreement, the appropriate agency may order the individual to
disgorge the funds and/or prohibit the individual from being a party to any covered
agreement for up to 10 years. As noted above, the Act specifically provides that it does
not authorize the agencies to enforce any provision of a covered agreement. If, however,
a court or other body of competent jurisdiction determines that an individual has diverted
funds or resources for personal financial gain and contrary to the purposes of the
agreement, the agencies may take one of the actions specified in the statute.

34

Other Federal statutes outside the banking laws also may provide for penalties if an
insured depository institution, affiliate, or person fails to comply with the disclosure and
reporting requirements of the Act. See 18 U.S.C. 1001.
-44-

E. Other Definitions and Rule of Construction
Section __.8 of the proposed rule defines other terms used in the rule. Because
section 711 amended the FDI Act, the rule provides that the terms “insured depository
institution,” “control,” “Federal banking agency” and “appropriate Federal banking
agency” have the same meaning as in the FDI Act.35
1. “Person” and “Nongovernmental entity or person”
Section 711 of the GLB Act applies only to agreements entered into by a
“nongovernmental entity or person” with an insured depository institution or affiliate.
For ease of reference, the rule uses the term “person” instead of the phrase
“nongovernmental entity or person.” (The OTS rule, however, refers to a
“nongovernmental entity or person” as a “NGEP.”) As a general matter, the rule defines
a “person” to mean any individual or entity other than the U.S. government, a state
government, a unit of local government, an Indian tribe, or any department, agency, or
instrumentality of such a governmental entity. A “person” does not include a federally
chartered public corporation that receives federal funds appropriated specifically for that
corporation. A nongovernmental entity that is affiliated with, or receives funding from,
such a federally chartered public corporation, however, would be considered a “person”
under the rule, unless the entity independently qualified for an exclusion.
The proposal also would not treat insured depository institutions and their
affiliates as persons. Section 711 appears to draw a distinction between insured
depository institutions (and their affiliates) and nongovernmental entities and persons and
imposes separate obligations on insured depository institutions (and their affiliates) and
nongovernmental entities or persons.
The agencies request comment on the proposed definition of “nongovernmental
entity or person,” including whether specific types of entities should be added or removed
from the list of entities and individuals excluded from the definition of the term.
2. Affiliate and control
The term “affiliate” is defined in the FDI Act by reference to the Bank Holding
Company Act. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, an affiliate is any company that
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another company. A

The agencies note that the definition of “insured depository institution” in the FDI Act includes
special-purpose insured depository institutions that are not subject to the CRA. See, e.g., 12 CFR
228.11(c)(3). An agreement that relates to the activities of a special-purpose insured depository
institution, however, would not be in fulfillment of the CRA and, thus, would not be a covered
agreement under the rule.
35

-45-

company generally is considered to control another entity if it owns or controls 25
percent or more of any class of the other entity’s voting securities.
The proposed rule creates a special rule of construction that would apply in
situations where an insured depository institution has filed an application with an agency
to become affiliated or merge with another entity. In such circumstances, a person may
have a CRA contact and enter into an agreement with the acquiring insured depository
institution (or holding company thereof) concerning the CRA performance of the target
institution. The agencies believe these types of contacts constitute a CRA contact under
section 711 and that any agreement resulting from such contact is a covered agreement if
it otherwise meets the requirements of section 711. Accordingly, the rule provides that an
insured depository institution is deemed to be an affiliate of any company that would be
under common control or merged with the institution pursuant to a transaction that is
pending before an agency. This rule of construction applies only where the agency
application is pending at both the time an agreement is entered into and the time when a
triggering CRA contact occurs.
Example: A bank holding company files an application with the Board to
acquire control of an additional insured depository institution. While the application is
pending, an organization contacts the bank holding company to discuss perceived
deficiencies in the CRA performance record of the insured depository institution to be
acquired. The bank holding company and the organization enter into a written agreement
that provides for the target institution to increase its level of community development
grants by $1 million per year for the next three years. The target institution would be
considered an “affiliate” of the bank holding company under the proposed rule.
Accordingly, the agreement would be a covered agreement because the organization had a
CRA contact with the holding company concerning the CRA record of performance of an
affiliated insured depository institution.
3. Term of agreement
Under the rule, the duration of a party’s obligation to make a covered
agreement publicly available and to file annual reports concerning the agreement is based
on the term of the covered agreement. As a general matter, the term of an agreement ends
on the agreement’s termination date established by the parties. Agreements that do not
establish a termination date are deemed for purposes of the proposed rule to terminate on
the last date on which any party makes any payments or provides any loan or other
resources under the agreement. The rule gives the agencies discretion, in appropriate
circumstances, to determine that the term of such an agreement is a shorter or longer
period. The appropriate agency could exercise this discretion, for example, where a onetime grant is made to a person late in a year with the clear expectation that the funds
would be used in the next year. In such circumstances, the agency could require the
person to file an annual report for the next year.
-46-

III. Placement of Proposed Rule
The agencies propose to implement section 711 by adding a new part to their
regulations.36 These new parts would be separate from the agencies’ CRA Regulations.
The agencies believe this placement is appropriate because section 711 of the GLB Act
amended the FDI Act, and not the CRA, and is independent of the CRA and the CRA
Regulations. The agencies note, however, that because section 711 concerns CRArelated agreements, the proposed rule includes several cross-references to the CRA
Regulations. The agencies request comment on whether users would find it more
convenient if the proposed rule was incorporated into the agencies’ existing CRA
Regulations and, if so, how the agencies could make clear that the rule does not in any
way affect the CRA.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
OCC: In accordance with section 3(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 603(a)), the OCC is publishing the following initial regulatory flexibility analysis
with this proposed rulemaking.
The proposed rule would implement provisions of section 711 of the GLB Act.
A description of the reasons why action by the OCC is being considered and a statement
of the objectives of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule are contained in the
Supplementary Information.
The proposed rule includes reporting requirements that would apply to all
insured depository institutions, including national banks, affiliates of insured depository
institutions, including national bank subsidiaries, and persons that enter into covered
agreements (as defined by the proposed rule). The proposed rule requires insured
depository institutions, affiliates, and persons that enter into a covered agreement to make
the agreement available to members of the public and to the appropriate agency, and to
file an annual report with the appropriate agency concerning the disbursement and use of
funds under the agreement.
These reporting provisions are required by section 711 of the GLB Act and
apply regardless of the size of the insured depository institution, affiliate, or person.
Section 711 does not authorize the OCC to provide an exemption for covered agreements
based on the size of any entity within the scope of its provisions. The Act, however,
directs the OCC and the other agencies to ensure that the proposed rule does not impose
an undue burden on the parties to covered agreements. The proposed rule includes
several provisions, described in detail in the Supplementary Information that are
See 12 CFR Part 35 (OCC); 12 CFR Part 207 (Board); 12 CFR Part 346 (FDIC); and 12 CFR
Part 533 (OTS).
36

-47-

designed to limit the potential impact of the proposed rule on insured depository
institutions, affiliates and persons or entities of any size. For example, the rule gives
entities and persons flexibility in determining how to make a covered agreement available
to the public. In addition, the proposed rule would allow persons to use reports that have
been prepared for other purposes, such as tax returns and financial statements, to fulfill
the annual reporting requirement. The rule also allows an insured depository institution,
affiliate, or person that is a party to 5 or more covered agreements to prepare a single,
consolidated annual report relating to all of the agreements.
As noted above, the proposed rule applies to insured depository institutions,
affiliates, and persons that enter into covered agreements. These agreements are entered
into by private parties, are not enforced by the OCC and, to date, have not been required
to be disclosed to the OCC. In addition, the OCC and the other agencies have
specifically requested comment on the scope of the proposed rule and will issue a final
rule after review of public comments. Accordingly, the OCC cannot estimate at this time
the total number of national banks or their subsidiaries that would be subject to the
requirements of the rule and the number of such entities that would be considered small
entities. Similarly, the OCC cannot estimate at this time the total number of persons that
may enter into a covered agreement with these entities, and therefore be subject to the
requirements of the rule.
The OCC specifically seeks comment on the likely burden that the proposed
rule would impose on national banks and other entities within the OCC’s supervisory
jurisdiction that are subject to it and on persons who enter into covered agreements with
those entities.
Board: In accordance with section 3(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 603(a)), the Board must publish an initial regulatory flexibility analysis with this
proposed rulemaking. The proposed rule would implement provisions of section 711 of
the GLB Act. A description of the reasons why action by the Board is being considered
and a statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule are contained
in the supplementary material provided above.
The proposed rule includes reporting requirements that would apply to all
insured depository institutions, affiliates of insured depository institutions, and persons
that enter into covered agreements (as defined by the proposed rule). The proposed rule
requires insured depository institutions, affiliates, and persons that enter into a covered
agreement to make the agreement available to members of the public and to the
appropriate agency, and to file an annual report with the appropriate agency concerning
the disbursement and use of funds under the agreement.
These reporting provisions are required by section 711 of the GLB Act and
would apply regardless of the size of the insured depository institution, affiliate, or
person. The Act does not authorize the Board to provide an exemption for covered
-48-

agreements based on the size of the insured depository institution, affiliate or person that
enters into the agreement.
The Act, however, directs the Board and the other agencies to ensure that the
proposed rule does not impose an undue burden on the parties to covered agreements and
the proposed rule includes several provisions that are designed to limit the potential
impact of the proposed rule on insured depository institutions, affiliates and persons,
including small institutions, affiliates and persons. For example, the rule gives entities
and persons flexibility in determining how to make a covered agreement available to the
public. In addition, the proposed rule would allow persons to use reports that have been
prepared for other purposes, such as tax returns and financial statements, to fulfill the
annual reporting requirement. The rule also allows insured depository institutions,
affiliates, and persons that are a party to 5 or more covered agreements to prepare a
single, consolidated annual report relating to all of the agreements.
As noted above, the proposed rule applies only to insured depository
institutions, affiliates, and persons that enter into covered agreements. These agreements
are entered into by private parties, are not enforced by the Board and, to date, have not
been required to be disclosed to the Board. In addition, the Board and the other agencies
have specifically requested comment on the scope of the proposed rule and will issue a
final rule after review of public comments. Accordingly, the Board cannot estimate at
this time the total number of state member banks, bank holding companies, and nonbank
subsidiaries of a bank holding company that would be subject to the requirements of the
rule and the number of such entities that would be considered small entities. Similarly,
the Board cannot estimate at this time the total number of persons that may enter into a
covered agreement with the types of entities listed above and, thereby, be subject to the
requirements of the rule or the number of such persons that would be considered small
entities.
The Board specifically seeks comment on the likely burden that the proposed
rule would impose on insured depository institutions and affiliates within the Board’s
supervisory jurisdiction and on persons who enter into covered agreements with such
entities.
FDIC: Consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
(RFA), the FDIC is required to publish an initial regulatory flexibility analysis relating to
the proposed rule. The proposed rule would implement provisions of section 711 of the
GLB Act and would apply to all insured depository institutions, affiliates of insured
depository institutions, and persons that enter into the types of covered agreements
described in section 711 and in the proposed rule.
Material contained in the Supplementary Information section of this document
contains statements about the legal basis for and objectives of the FDIC in proposing this
rule. The GLB Act incorporates disclosure and reporting requirements applicable to all
-49-

insured depository institutions, affiliates, and persons that enter into covered agreements.
Insured depository institutions, affiliates, and persons must make the covered agreements
available to the general public and to the appropriate supervisory agency. They must also
file an annual report with the appropriate supervisory agency describing the
disbursement, receipt, and use of the funds under the agreement. The GLB Act does not
provide exemptions for the reporting or disclosure requirements based on the size of the
insured depository institution, affiliate, or person; similarly the GLB Act does not
authorize the FDIC to provide for exemptions.
Because the GLB Act requires the agencies to ensure that the proposed rule
does not impose an undue burden on the parties to a covered agreement, the proposed
rule contains provisions that limit the potential impact on insured depository institutions,
affiliates, and persons. For example, the proposed rule provides flexibility to entities and
persons regarding the way a covered agreement is made available to the public. Insured
depository institutions are permitted to disclose covered agreements to the public by
placing it in their CRA public files, and parties may satisfy their obligation to make
covered agreements available to the public, in part, by posting the agreement on a
publicly available Internet website. Although the GLB Act states that parties to a covered
agreement must make the agreement available to an agency, the proposed rule requires a
person that is a party to an agreement to disclose the covered agreement to an agency
upon the agency’s request for a copy of the agreement. In addition, the proposed rule
would allow persons to use reports that have been prepared for other purposes, such as
tax returns and financial statements, to fulfill the annual reporting requirement.
Recognizing that many tax returns and financial statements are based on fiscal year
reporting periods, the proposed regulation permits either a fiscal or calendar year
reporting period so that parties may coordinate their required annual report with other
reports or filings. The rule also would permit insured depository institutions, affiliates,
and persons that are parties to 5 or more covered agreements to file a single, consolidated
report relating to all of the agreements and would allow insured depository institutions
and affiliates that are parties to the same covered agreement to file a single consolidated
report. Finally, the proposed rule does not require annual reports to be prepared on a
special form or in a particular format. All of these provisions were developed to
minimize the impact and burden the proposed rule would have on parties to a covered
agreement.
Before passage of the GLB Act, parties to covered agreements were not
required to disclose the agreements to the FDIC; therefore, at this time, the FDIC cannot
estimate the total number of insured state non-member banks, affiliates of state nonmember banks, or persons that would be subject to the requirements of the proposed rule.
Similarly, the FDIC cannot predict which parties to covered agreements may be classified
as small businesses or entities. Although the FDIC and the other agencies have requested
comment on the scope of the proposed rules, presently, the FDIC cannot determine
whether the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The FDIC requests comment on the likely significance of the
-50-

economic impact the proposed rule would impose on FDIC-supervised banks and
affiliates and on persons who enter into a covered agreement.
OTS: The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires federal agencies to either
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) with a proposed rule or certify
that the proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. OTS cannot, at this time, determine whether this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, OTS includes the following IRFA.
A description of the reasons why OTS is considering this action and a
statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for, this proposed rule, are contained in the
supplementary materials provided above.
A. Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rule Would Apply
The proposed rule would apply to the following types of entities if they are a
party to a covered agreement: (1) savings associations; (2) certain affiliates of savings
associations;37 and (3) nongovernmental entities or persons that enter into covered
agreements with savings associations or affiliates of savings associations. The proposed
rule would apply regardless of the size of the savings association, affiliate, or persons.
OTS is unable to estimate how many covered agreements exist, how many
savings associations, affiliates of savings associations, or persons are parties to such
covered agreements, or how many parties to covered agreements are “small businesses”
or “small organizations” under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. To date, parties to such
agreements have not had to disclose or report the agreements to OTS. Generally, neither
OTS nor any other Federal agency is a party to covered agreements. Finally, OTS does
not enforce such agreements. Thus, OTS does not have information about these
agreements.
OTS has very limited information that would assist in an estimate. According
to December 31, 1999 data, OTS calculates that of the approximately 1,100 savings
associations, a maximum of 486 are small savings associations. Small savings
associations are generally defined, for Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes, as those with
assets under $100 million. 13 CFR 121.201, Division H (1999). OTS also calculates that
these 486 savings associations hold approximately 100 subordinate organizations that
could possibly qualify as small entities. OTS further calculates that a maximum of 205
savings and loan holding companies could possibly qualify as small entities. OTS does
not have data on how many of these subordinate organizations or holding companies may

37

OTS’s rule applies to the following affiliates: savings and loan holding companies and
companies that are controlled by savings associations or savings and loan holding companies.
-51-

actually qualify as small entities. Nor does OTS have data on how many other affiliates
of savings associations exist (e.g., companies that are under common control with a
savings association), how many of these affiliates are affiliates of small savings
associations, or how many of these affiliates are themselves small entities. OTS does not
know how many persons have entered into covered agreements with savings associations
or affiliates of savings associations or how many of these persons are small entities.
OTS specifically seeks comment on the number and size of savings
associations, affiliates of savings associations, and persons that are parties to covered
agreements. OTS also seeks comment on how many covered agreements may currently
exist and approximately how many will be entered into each year in the future.
B. Requirements of the Proposed Rule
As described more fully in the supplementary material provided above, the
proposed rule contains new disclosure and reporting requirements. Most of the
requirements are mandated by section 711 of the GLB Act. The GLB Act, however,
directs the Federal banking agencies to ensure that the regulations prescribed by the
agency do not impose an undue burden on the parties.
The primary requirements under the proposed rule involve disclosure and
reporting of covered agreements. The proposal would require each party to a covered
agreement to disclose the agreement to the public by making a complete copy available to
any individual or entity upon request. It would also require each savings association or
affiliate that is a party to the covered agreement to provide a copy to each relevant
supervisory agency (as defined in the proposal) and would require each person that is a
party to provide a copy to each relevant supervisory agency upon request.
To minimize the disclosure burden, the proposal would:
• Terminate the public disclosure requirement and the requirement for a person
to provide a copy to the relevant supervisory agencies upon request 12 months
after the end of the term of the covered agreement;
• Not mandate any particular method for disclosing the agreement to the public;
• Allow each party to charge reasonable copying and mailing fees when it
discloses an agreement to the public;
• Allow a savings association to publicly disclose by placing a copy of the
covered agreement in its CRA public file and making it available under the
public file procedures;
• Require a person to provide a copy to the relevant supervisory agencies only if
the agency requests a copy; and
• Allow two or more insured depository institutions or affiliates that are parties
to a covered agreement to jointly file with each relevant supervisory agency.
-52-

The proposal would require each party to a covered agreement to file an annual
report with each relevant supervisory agency concerning the disbursement, receipt, and
uses of funds or other resources under the covered agreement. To minimize the reporting
burden, the proposal would:
• Not mandate any particular form for the annual report;
• Allow each party to report on its own fiscal year basis;
• Exempt a person from filing a report for a fiscal year if the person does not
receive any funds or resources during that year;
• Provide simplified reporting procedures for persons that allocate and use funds
or other resources under a covered agreement for a specific purpose;
• Allow a person’s report to consist of, or incorporate, reports prepared for other
purposes, such as tax forms and financial statements;
• Permit a savings association, affiliate, or person that is a party to five or more
covered agreements to file a single consolidated annual report covering all of
the covered agreements, aggregating certain information;
• Allow a savings association and its affiliates that are parties to the same
covered agreement to file a single consolidated report; and
• Allow a person to file its report with the insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to the agreement (rather than with the relevant
supervisory agency).
It is possible that savings associations, affiliates, and persons have already
established recordkeeping and other policies and practices that would already enable
them to partly or fully meet the requirements of this proposed rule. To the extent that
existing practices and available resources are insufficient, parties to covered agreements
would need professional skills to comply with this proposed rule. To disclose covered
agreements, parties may need clerical and computer personnel. To prepare required
reports, parties may need personnel with these skills, as well as personnel skilled in
financial and legal matters. Some degree of personnel training may be necessary, such as
to enable employees to determine when they enter into covered agreements, and how to
retain, record, and compile information about agreements to disclose and report them.
OTS does not have a practicable or reliable basis for quantifying the costs of
this proposed rule, or of any alternatives to the rule. The requirements are too new for
those subject to the law to have learned what the law requires and decide how to proceed.
OTS cannot predict how savings associations, affiliates, and persons would comply with
the proposed rule. For example, OTS cannot assess the extent to which savings
associations, affiliates, and persons would avoid entering into covered agreements as a
result of a final rule.

-53-

Rather than merely guess at the regulatory burden of this proposed rule, OTS
solicits comment on these burdens and on ways to minimize the burdens, consistent with
the GLB Act.
C. Significant Alternatives
The requirements in the proposed rule parallel those in the GLB Act. The
proposed rule would clarify the statutory requirements in some areas and restate the
requirements in a more understandable manner in other areas. It would not impose any
substantially different requirements.
Congress has decided that “each” insured depository institution, affiliate, or
person that is a party to a covered agreement must disclose and report the agreement.
The GLB Act does not expressly authorize OTS to exempt small savings associations,
affiliates, or persons from these requirements. OTS does not interpret the statute to
permit such an exemption.
The supplementary material provided above describes and solicits comment on
a number of alternatives that would reduce the regulatory burden. These include:
• Limiting the types of agreements that are covered by the rule (e.g., defining
“CRA contacts,” “fulfillment of CRA,” and the calculation of value more
narrowly, or defining the statutory exemptions for certain types of loans,
extensions of credit and commitments more broadly);
• Simplifying the procedures for parties to delete proprietary and confidential
information;
• Limiting which parties to an agreement must comply with the disclosure and
reporting requirements in multi-party agreements (e.g., not applying the
requirements to parties that have not made CRA contacts, have not been the
subject of CRA contacts, or do not know that CRA contacts have occurred);
and
• Providing more flexible reporting requirements (e.g., allowing parties to two or
more agreements to use consolidated reporting procedures, permitting affiliated
persons that are parties to the same covered agreement to file a consolidated
report, allowing persons to elect to report on specific purpose funds or
resources under the itemized reporting procedures, and exempting savings
associations and affiliates from filing a report for a fiscal year if the savings
association or affiliate has not had transactions to report).
OTS requests comment on whether these or other alternatives would reduce the
burdens and whether any exceptions for small institutions would be appropriate.

-54-

D. Other Matters
These proposed requirements do not appear to duplicate or overlap with any
other Federal rules. To the extent that required information is already contained in
reports prepared for other purposes, the proposed rule allows a person’s report to consist
of, or incorporate, these existing reports.
OTS lacks sufficient information about the contents of covered agreements,
however, to conclude whether the proposed requirements conflict with other Federal
rules. One area of potential conflict is the rule’s requirement to make a “complete copy”
of a covered agreement available to the public and to the relevant supervisory agencies.
OTS solicits specific comment on whether covered agreements contain information that
savings associations, affiliates, or persons may be barred from disclosing under other
Federal rules (e.g., private customer information), or may be permitted to refrain from
disclosing to the public or a Federal banking agency under other Federal rules (e.g.,
proprietary information). OTS also generally seeks comment on any Federal rules that
may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposal.
V. Executive Order 12866 Determination
OCC: The Comptroller of the Currency has determined that this proposed rule
does not constitute a significant regulatory action for the purpose of Executive Order
12866. Reporting and disclosure are mandated by section 711 of the GLB Act. The
proposed rule closely follows the requirements of that statute. As described in the
Supplementary Information, however, the proposal also contains regulatory options
designed to minimize costs and burdens, where feasible and consistent with the statute.
The OCC invites national banks and the public to provide specific cost estimates and
related data that would contribute to the accuracy of the OCC’s evaluations of the costs
of the requirements in the rule.
OTS: OTS has determined that this proposed rule does not constitute a
significant regulatory action for the purpose of Executive Order 12866. Reporting and
disclosure are mandated by section 711 of the GLB Act. Many of the proposed
provisions closely follow the requirements of this section. OTS has exercised its
discretion, to the extent possible, to propose regulatory options to minimize costs and
burdens. Nevertheless, OTS acknowledges that the rule would impose costs on insured
depository institutions, affiliates, and nongovernmental entities or persons by requiring
these entities to disclose and report on agreements. Therefore, OTS invites the thrift
industry and the public to provide any cost estimates and related data that they think
would be useful to the agency in evaluating the overall costs of the rule.

-55-

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection and reporting requirements of the proposed rule are
described in detail above. In summary, the proposed rule requires persons, insured
depository institutions, and affiliates of insured depository institutions that are parties to
covered agreements (as defined by the proposed rule) to make the agreements available to
the public and the relevant supervisory agencies and to file annual reports relating to the
agreements with the relevant supervisory agencies. These reporting and disclosure
requirements are required under Title VII of the GLB Act (Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat.
1465 (1999)), which adds new section 48 to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C.
1831y).
The proposed rule requires each person, insured depository institution, and
affiliate of an insured depository institution that is a party to a covered agreement to make
a complete copy of the agreement available to the public on request at any time during the
term of the agreement and 12 months after the term of the agreement (proposed __.4(b)).
Accordingly, each party must retain a copy of the agreement for that period. Any party to
a covered agreement may request that the relevant supervisory agency determine whether
certain portions of the agreement may be exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.) prior to making the agreement available to the
public (proposed __.4(b)(1)(ii)).
An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository
institution that enters into a covered agreement must file a copy of the agreement with the
supervisory agency within 30 days of entering into the agreement (proposed
__.4(c)(2)(i)). A person must make the agreement available to the relevant supervisory
agency upon request (proposed __.4(c)(1)).
The proposed rule also requires each person, insured depository institution, or
affiliate of an insured depository institution that is a party to a covered agreement to file
an annual report that relates to the agreement for each fiscal year during the term of the
agreement with the relevant supervisory agency of the insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to the agreement (proposed ___.5(b)). The annual report of a
person must include (1) the name and address of the person filing the report, (2) the
names of the parties to the agreement, and (3) the amount of funds or resources received
during the fiscal year (proposed __.5(d)). The annual report of an insured depository
institution or affiliate must include (1) the name and principal place of business of the
institution or affiliate, (2) sufficient information to identify the covered agreement for
which the annual report is being filed, and (3) information on payments and other
resources provided or received under the agreement (proposed __.5(e)). The proposed
rule allows a person to send its annual report either to the relevant supervisory agency of
each insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement or to an
insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement. The insured
-56-

depository institution or affiliate must send the annual report of a person to the relevant
supervisory agency within 30 days of receiving the report (proposed ___.5(f)(2)(ii)).
Finally, an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to a covered
agreement that concerns the performance of any activity of a CRA affiliate (as defined in
__.8(c)) is required to notify each person that is a party to the agreement that the
agreement concerns a CRA affiliate (proposed __.2(d)).
The agencies request public comment on all aspects of the collections of
information contained in this proposed rule, including how burdensome it would be for
persons, insured depository institutions, and affiliates to comply with each of the
reporting and disclosure requirements of the proposed rule.
The estimated total annual reporting and disclosure burden of the proposed rule
will depend on the number of covered agreements. The agreements that trigger the
disclosure and reporting requirements of the proposed rule, however, are entered into by
private parties on a voluntary basis, are not enforced by the agencies and, to date, have
not been required to be disclosed to the agencies. As a result, the agencies cannot
accurately estimate at this time the total number of insured depository institutions,
affiliates or persons that are parties to covered agreements or the total number of covered
agreements that may be subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the rule.
The agencies also are unable to identify a reasonable proxy for estimating the number of
covered agreements. Solely for purposes of complying with the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, each agency has computed the estimate of annual paperwork
burden assuming that 50 percent of the insured depository institutions it regulates are
parties to one covered agreement. In addition, the agencies have assumed that one person
is a party to each of these agreements. The agencies specifically request comment on
these assumptions, the total number of persons, insured depository institutions, and
affiliates that may be parties to covered agreements, and the total number of covered
agreements that may be subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the rule.
The agencies also invite comment on:
(1) Whether the collections of information contained in the notice of proposed
rulemaking are necessary for the proper performance of each agency's functions,
including whether the information has practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of each agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collections;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected;

-57-

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
(5) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and
purchases of services to provide information.
The agencies will revisit these estimates when they have more information on
the scope of the rule and the number of potential respondents and covered agreements.
The revised estimates will also reflect all comments received concerning the burden
estimates. Respondents/recordkeepers are not required to respond to these collections of
information unless the agencies display a currently valid Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) control number. The agencies are currently requesting their respective
control numbers for these information collections from OMB.
OCC: The collection of information requirements contained in the Regulation
will be submitted to the OMB in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507). Comments on the collections of information should be sent to the
Communications Division (1557-to be assigned), Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, 250 E Street, SW, Third Floor, Washington, DC 20219, with a copy to the
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1557- to be assigned),
Washington, DC 20503.
The potential respondents include national banks, subsidiaries of national banks,
and nongovernmental entities or persons.
Estimated number of financial institution respondents: 1,200.
Estimated number of nongovernmental entity or person respondents: 1,200.
Estimated average annual burden hours for all disclosure and reporting
requirements of the proposed rule per financial institution respondent per agreement: 6
hours.
Estimated burden hours for all disclosure and reporting requirements of the
proposed rule per nongovernmental entity or person per agreement: 4 hours.
Estimated total annual reporting and disclosure burden: 12,000 hours.
Board: In accordance with section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Ch. 35; 5 CFR 1320, appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the Regulation under
the authority delegated to the Board by the OMB. Comments on the collections of
information should be sent to Mary M. West, Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer,
Division of Research and Statistics, Mail Stop 97, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551, with a copy to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (7100-to be assigned), Washington, DC 20503.

-58-

The potential respondents are state member banks, bank holding companies,
affiliates of bank holding companies other than savings associations, national banks,
insured nonmember banks, and subsidiaries of such associations and banks, and
nongovernmental entities or persons.
Estimated number of financial institution respondents: 507.
Estimated number of nongovernmental entity or person respondents: 507.
Estimated average annual burden hours for all disclosure and reporting
requirements of the proposed rule per financial institution respondent per agreement: 6
hours.
Estimated burden hours for all disclosure and reporting requirements of the
proposed rule per nongovernmental entity or person per agreement: 4 hours.
Estimated total annual reporting and disclosure burden: 5,070 hours.
FDIC: The collections of information contained in the Regulation will be
submitted to the OMB in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507). The FDIC will use any comments received to develop its new burden
estimates. Comments on the collections of information should be sent to Steven F. Hanft,
Assistant Executive Secretary (Regulatory Analysis), Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, F-4080, 550 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20429, with a copy to the
Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064- to be assigned),
Washington, DC 20503.
The potential respondents are insured nonmember banks, subsidiaries of insured
nonmember banks, and nongovernmental entities or persons.
Estimated number of financial institution respondents: 2,850.
Estimated number of nongovernmental entity or person respondents: 2,850.
Estimated average annual burden hours for all disclosure and reporting
requirements of the proposed rule per financial institution respondent per agreement: 6
hours.
Estimated burden hours for all disclosure and reporting requirements of the
proposed rule per nongovernmental entity or person per agreement: 4 hours.
Estimated total annual reporting and disclosure burden: 28,500 hours.
OTS: The collection of information requirements contained in the Regulation will
be submitted to the OMB in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507). The OTS will use any comments received to develop its new burden
estimates. Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the
Dissemination Branch (1550-to be assigned), Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street,
NW, Washington, DC 20552, with a copy to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (1550-to be assigned), Washington, DC 20503.

-59-

The potential respondents are savings and loan holding companies, savings
associations, companies controlled by savings and loan holding companies and savings
associations, and nongovernmental entities or persons.
Estimated number of financial institution respondents: 552.
Estimated number of nongovernmental entity or person respondents: 552.
Estimated average annual burden hours for all disclosure and reporting
requirements of the proposed rule per financial institution respondent per agreement: 6
hours.
Estimated burden hours for all disclosure and reporting requirements of the
proposed rule per nongovernmental entity or person per agreement: 4 hours.
Estimated total annual reporting and disclosure burden: 5,520 hours.

VII. Solicitation of Comments Regarding the Use of "Plain Language"
Section 722 of the GLB Act requires the agencies to use "plain language" in all
proposed and final rules published after January 1, 2000. The agencies invite comments
about how to make the proposed rule easier to understand, including answers to the
following questions:
(1) Have the agencies organized the material in an effective manner? If not, how
could the material be better organized?
(2) Are the terms of the rule clearly stated? If not, how could the terms be more
clearly stated?
(3) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is unclear? If so, which
language requires clarification?
(4) Would a different format (with respect to the grouping and order of sections
and use of headings) make the rule easier to understand? If so, what changes to the format
would make the rule easier to understand?
(5) Would increasing the number of sections (and making each section shorter)
clarify the rule? If so, which portions of the rule should be changed in this respect?
(6) What additional changes would make the rule easier to understand?
The agencies also solicit comment about whether it would be appropriate and
useful to include in the rule the examples discussed in this preamble. The agencies note
that creating safe harbors in the rule may generate certain problems over time due to
changes in technology or business practices. Are there alternatives that the agencies
should consider to illustrate the terms in the rule?
-60-

VIII. FDIC’s Electronic Public Comment Site
The FDIC has included a page on its web site to facilitate the submission of
electronic comments in response to this general solicitation (the EPC site). The EPC site
provides an alternative to the written letter and may be a more convenient way for you to
submit your comments. Commenting through the EPC site will assist the FDIC to more
accurately and efficiently analyze comments submitted electronically. If you submit your
comments through the EPC site your comments will receive the same consideration that
they would receive if submitted in hard copy to the FDIC s street address. Information
provided through the EPC site will be used by the FDIC only to assist in its analysis of
the proposed regulation. The FDIC will not use an individual’s name or any other
personal identifier of an individual to retrieve records or information submitted through
the EPC site. Like comments submitted in hard copy to the FDIC s street address, EPC
site comments will be made available in their entirety (including the commenter’s name
and address if the commenter chooses to provide them) for public inspection.
The EPC site will be available on the FDIC’s home page at
http://www.fdic.gov. You will be able to provide comments directly on any of the
sections of the proposed regulation as well as the specific questions that have been asked
in the preceding Supplementary Information section. You will also be able to view the
regulation and Supplementary Information sections that related to your comments directly
on the site. Because the GLB Act requires promulgation of this regulation, the FDIC
encourages you to provide written comments in the spaces provided. Written comments
enable the FDIC to thoughtfully consider possible changes to the proposed regulation.
The FDIC is also interested in your feedback on the EPC site. We have provided a
space for you to comment on the site itself. Answers to this question will help the FDIC
evaluate the EPC site for use in future rulemaking.
At the conclusion of the EPA site you will have an opportunity to provide us with
your name, indicate whether you are an individual, insured depository institution,
financial holding company, community-based organization, trade association, government
agency, or other, and provide the name of the organization you represent, if applicable.
Whether you choose to respond to these questions is entirely up to you. Any responses
received may help the FDIC to better understand the public comments it receives.
IX. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
OCC: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532 (Unfunded Mandates Act), requires that an agency prepare a budgetary impact
statement before promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. If a budgetary impact statement is
-61-

required, section 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Act also requires an agency to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The proposed rule would not apply to state, local or tribal governments.
Although the proposed rule would apply to insured depository institutions, affiliates, and
nongovernmental entities and persons, OCC is not required to assess the effects of its
regulatory actions on the private sector to the extent such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law. 2 U.S.C. 1531. Many of the proposed
provisions closely follow the requirements of Section 711 of the GLBA. Moreover, the
proposal contains regulatory options designed to minimize costs and burdens. Therefore,
the OCC has determined that this proposed rule will not result in expenditures by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. Accordingly, the OCC has not prepared a budgetary impact
statement or specifically addressed the regulatory alternatives considered.
OTS: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532 (Unfunded Mandates Act), requires that an agency prepare a budgetary impact
statement before promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. If a budgetary impact statement is
required, section 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Act also requires an agency to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The proposed rule would not apply to state, local or tribal governments.
Although the proposed rule would apply to insured depository institutions, affiliates, and
nongovernmental entities and persons, OTS is not required to assess the effects of its
regulatory actions on the private sector to the extent such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law. 2 U.S.C. 1531. Many of the proposed
provisions closely follow the requirements of section 711 of the GLB Act. Moreover,
OTS has exercised its discretion, to the extent possible, to propose regulatory options to
minimize costs and burdens. Therefore, the OTS has determined that this proposed rule
will not result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Accordingly, the OTS has
not prepared a budgetary impact statement or specifically addressed the regulatory
alternatives considered.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 35
Community development, Credit, Investments, Freedom of information, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, National banks.

-62-

12 CFR Part 207
Banks, Banking, Community development, Federal Reserve System, Holding
Companies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 346
Banks, Banking; Community development; and Reporting and recordkeeping.
12 CFR Part 533
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, Community
development, Confidential business information, Credit, Freedom of information,
Holding companies, Investments, Mortgages, Nonprofit organizations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set out in the joint preamble, the OCC proposes to amend Title 12,
Chapter I, of the Code of Federal Regulations by adding a new part 35 to read as follows:
PART 35 – DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING OF CRA RELATED
AGREEMENTS
Sec.
35.1 Purpose and scope.
35.2 Definition of covered agreement.
35.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
35.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
35.5 Annual reports.
35.6 Release of information under FOIA.
35.7 Compliance provisions.
35.8 Other definitions and rules of construction.
-63-

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1831y.
§ 35.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) General. This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12
U.S.C. 1831y). That section requires any nongovernmental entity or person, insured
depository institution, and affiliate of an insured depository institution that enters into a
covered agreement to:
(1) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate
Federal banking agency; and
(2) File an annual report with the appropriate Federal banking agency concerning
the covered agreement.
(b) The provisions of this part are enforced by the OCC with respect to national
banks and their subsidiaries.
§ 35.2 Definition of covered agreement.
(a) General definition. A covered agreement is any contract, arrangement, or
understanding (whether or not legally binding) that meets all of the following criteria:
(1) The agreement is in writing.
(2) The parties to the agreement include:
(i) An insured depository institution or an affiliate of an insured depository
institution; and
(ii) A nongovernmental entity or person (referred to hereafter as a person).
(3) The agreement provides for the insured depository institution or any affiliate
to:
(i) Provide to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) cash payments, grants, or other consideration (except loans) that have an
aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year; or
(ii) Make to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) loans that have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any
calendar year.
(4) The agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) (CRA), as defined in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Agreements that are not covered agreements. (1) Certain loans. A covered
agreement does not include:
(i) Any individual mortgage loan; or
(ii) Any specific contract or commitment for a loan or extension of credit to
individuals, businesses, farms, or other entities if:
(A) The funds are loaned at rates not substantially below market rates; and
-64-

(B) The purpose of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending
of the borrowed funds to third parties.
(2) Agreements where there has not been a CRA contact. (i) General. A covered
agreement does not include any agreement entered into by an insured depository
institution or affiliate of an insured depository institution with a person who has not
commented on, testified about, or discussed with the institution, or otherwise contacted
the institution, concerning the CRA.
(ii) Examples of CRA contact. The following are examples of CRA contacts.
These examples are not exclusive and other actions by a person may also make the
exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section unavailable. If a person engages in any of
the following actions and subsequently enters into an agreement with the insured
depository institution or any affiliate of the institution, the agreement is not exempt under
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
(A) CRA contact with a Federal banking agency. (1) The person submits a written
comment to a Federal banking agency that discusses the record of performance or future
performance under the CRA of an insured depository institution or any CRA affiliate of
the institution.
(2) The person provides oral testimony or comments to a Federal banking agency
concerning the record of performance or future performance under the CRA of an insured
depository institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(B) CRA contact with insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) The person
has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository institution or any
affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing) written or oral
comments or testimony to any Federal banking agency concerning the record of
performance or future performance under the CRA of the institution or any CRA affiliate
of the institution.
(2) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing)
written comments to the institution that must be included in the institution’s CRA public
file.
(3) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning the CRA rating of the institution,
or the CRA record of performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the
institution.
(4) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning actions that should be taken to
improve the CRA performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(5) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning any obligation or responsibility
that the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution may have to meet the banking
needs of its community and the discussion or contact occurs while the institution or any
affiliate has an application for a deposit facility pending at a Federal banking agency or is
undergoing a publicly announced CRA performance examination.
-65-

(iii) Examples of actions that are not CRA contacts. The following are examples
of actions that are not CRA contacts. The actions described in these examples would not,
by themselves, cause the exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section to be
unavailable. These examples are not exclusive.
(A) A person provides comments or testimony concerning an insured depository
institution or affiliate to a Federal banking agency in response to a direct request by the
agency for comments or testimony from that person. Direct requests for comments or
testimony do not include a general invitation by a Federal banking agency for comments
or testimony from the public in connection with a CRA performance evaluation of, or
application for a deposit facility by, an insured depository institution or an application by
a company to acquire an insured depository institution.
(B) A person makes a statement concerning an insured depository institution or
affiliate at a widely attended conference or seminar regarding a general topic. A public or
private meeting, public hearing, or other meeting regarding one or more specific
institutions or affiliates or transactions involving an application for a deposit facility is
not considered a widely attended conference or seminar.
(C) A person sends a similar fundraising letter to insured depository institutions
and to other businesses in its community. The letter encourages all businesses in the
community to meet their obligation to assist in making the local community a better place
to live and work.
(D) A person sends a general offering circular to financial institutions offering to
sell a portfolio of loans. An insured depository institution that receives the offering
circular discusses with the person whether the loans are in the institution’s local
community. No reference to the CRA or the institution’s CRA performance is made in
the offering circular or in the discussions of the parties.
(c) Fulfillment of the CRA. (1) General. Fulfillment of the CRA means the list of
factors that the Federal banking agencies have determined have a material impact on an
agency’s decision:
(i) To approve or disapprove an application for a deposit facility (as defined in
section 803 of the CRA (12 U.S.C. 2902)); or
(ii) To assign a rating to an insured depository institution under section 807 of the
CRA (12 U.S.C. 2906).
(2) List of factors. The list of factors referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
means the performance of any of the following activities by an insured depository
institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the agreement or that is an affiliate of a party
to the agreement or by any person that is a party to the agreement:
(i) Providing or refraining from providing written or oral comments or testimony to
any Federal banking agency concerning the record of performance or future performance
under the CRA of an insured depository institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the
agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement or written comments that are
required to be included in the CRA public file of any such insured depository institution;

-66-

(ii) Home-purchase, home-improvement, small business, small farm, community
development, and consumer lending, as described in § 25.22, including loan purchases,
loan commitments, and letters of credit;
(iii) Making investments, deposits, or grants, or acquiring membership shares, that
have as their primary purpose community development, as described in § 25.23;
(iv) Delivering retail banking services, as described in § 25.24(d);
(v) Providing community development services, as described in § 25.24(e);
(vi) In the case of a wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository institution,
community development lending, including originating and purchasing loans and making
loan commitments and letters of credit, making qualified investments, or providing
community development services, as described in § 25.25(c);
(vii) In the case of a small insured depository institution, any lending or other
activity described in § 25.26(a); or
(viii) In the case of an insured depository institution that is evaluated on the basis
of a strategic plan, any element of the strategic plan, as described in § 25.27(f).
(d) Agreements relating to activities of CRA affiliates. An insured depository
institution or affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement that concerns the performance
of any activity of a CRA affiliate described in paragraph (c) of this section must notify
each person that is a party to the agreement that the agreement concerns a CRA affiliate.
The insured depository institution or affiliate must provide this notice prior to the time
the agreement is entered into if the affiliate is a CRA affiliate at that time, or within a
reasonable time after the affiliate becomes a CRA affiliate if the affiliate is not a CRA
affiliate at the time the agreement is entered into.
(e) Disclosure and reporting of certain existing agreements that become covered
agreements. An agreement that concerns the performance of any activity described in
paragraph (c) of this section by an affiliate may become a covered agreement after it is
entered into if the affiliate subsequently becomes a CRA affiliate. In that event, the
disclosure and reporting obligations under §§ 35.4 and 35.5 begin on the date that the
agreement becomes a covered agreement and do not apply to the period prior to that date.
§ 35.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
The following rules must be applied in determining whether a written contract,
arrangement, or understanding is a covered agreement under § 35.2.
(a) Contracts, arrangements, or understandings entered into by same parties. All
written contracts, arrangements, or understandings to which an insured depository
institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement if the contracts, arrangements, or understandings:
(1) Are entered into with the same person;
(2) Were entered into within the same 12-month period; and
-67-

(3) Are each in fulfillment of the CRA.
(b) Substantively related contracts. All written contracts to which an insured
depository institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement, without regard to whether the other parties to the
contracts are the same or whether each such contract is in fulfillment of the CRA, if the
contracts were negotiated in a coordinated fashion and a person is a party to each
contract.
§ 35.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into
after November 12, 1999.
(b) Disclosure of covered agreements to the public. (1) Disclosure required. (i)
Each person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that enters into a covered
agreement must make a complete copy of the covered agreement available to any
individual or entity upon request.
(ii) In disclosing a covered agreement to the public under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section, a person, insured depository institution, or affiliate may withhold from
disclosure only those portions of an agreement that the relevant supervisory agency
determines are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552 et seq.).
(2) Duration of obligation. The obligation to disclose a covered agreement
terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the agreement.
(3) Reasonable copy and mailing fees. Each person and each insured depository
institution or affiliate may charge an individual or entity that requests a copy of a covered
agreement a reasonable fee not to exceed the cost of copying and mailing the agreement.
(4) Use of CRA public file by insured depository institution. An insured
depository institution may fulfill its obligation under this paragraph (b) by placing a copy
of the covered agreement in the insured depository institution’s CRA public file and
making the agreement available in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 25.43.
(c) Disclosure of covered agreements to the relevant supervisory agency. (1)
Disclosure by person. Each person that is a party to a covered agreement must provide a
complete copy of the agreement to the relevant supervisory agency within 30 days of
receiving a request from the agency for the agreement. This obligation terminates
12 months after the end of the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Disclosure by insured depository institution or affiliate. (i) Filing with the
relevant supervisory agency. Each insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement must provide a copy of the agreement to each relevant
supervisory agency within 30 days after the date the insured depository institution or
affiliate enters into the agreement.
-68-

(ii) Joint filings. In the event that two or more insured depository institutions or
affiliates are parties to a covered agreement, the insured depository institution(s) and
affiliate(s) may jointly file a copy of the covered agreement with each relevant
supervisory agency. Any joint filing must identify the insured depository institution(s)
and affiliate(s) for whom the covered agreement is being filed.
(d) Relevant supervisory agency. For purposes of this section and § 35.5, the
“relevant supervisory agency” for a covered agreement means the appropriate Federal
banking agency for—
(1) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the
covered agreement;
(2) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) or CRA affiliate that
makes payments or loans or provides services that are subject to the covered agreement;
and
(3) Any company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary
thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement.
§ 35.5 Annual reports.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into on
or after May 12, 2000.
(b) Annual report required. Each person and each insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement must file an annual report with each
relevant supervisory agency concerning the disbursement, receipt, and uses of funds or
other resources under the covered agreement.
(c) Duration of reporting requirement. (1) General. An annual report under this
section must be filed with each relevant supervisory agency for:
(i) The fiscal year in which the parties enter into the covered agreement; and
(ii) Each fiscal year during the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Exception for person that has not received any funds or resources. A person is
not required to file an annual report for a covered agreement for any fiscal year during the
term of the agreement in which the person did not receive any funds or other resources
under the agreement.
(d) Annual reports filed by person. (1) General. The annual report filed by a
person under this section must include the following:
(i) The name and mailing address of the person filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;

-69-

(iii) The amount of funds or resources received under the covered agreement
during the fiscal year; and
(iv) The information required by paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section
concerning the use of funds received under the covered agreement.
(2) Reporting for funds or resources allocated and used for a specific purpose. For
funds or other resources that the person received during the fiscal year under the covered
agreement and allocated and used for a specific purpose during the fiscal year, the annual
report must:
(i) Describe each specific purpose for which the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year; and
(ii) State the amount of funds or resources used during the fiscal year for each
specific purpose.
(3) Funds or resources used for other purposes. For all funds or resources that the
person received during the fiscal year under the covered agreement and did not use for a
specific purpose, the annual report must:
(i) State the amount received during the fiscal year; and
(ii) Provide a detailed, itemized list of how the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year, including the total amount used for:
(A) Compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
(B) Administrative expenses;
(C) Travel expenses;
(D) Entertainment expenses;
(E) Payment of consulting and professional fees; and
(F) Other expenses or uses.
(4) Use of other reports. The annual report filed by a person may consist of, or
incorporate, a report prepared for any other purpose, such as an Internal Revenue Service
form, a state tax form, a report to members or shareholders, financial statements, or other
report, so long as the annual report contains all of the information required by this
paragraph (d).
(5) Consolidated reports permitted. A person that is a party to five or more
covered agreements may file with each relevant supervisory agency a single consolidated
annual report covering all the covered agreements. Any consolidated report must contain
all the information required by this paragraph (d). The information required to be
reported under paragraph (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section may be reported on
an aggregate basis for all covered agreements.
(e) Annual report filed by insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) General.
The annual report filed by an insured depository institution or affiliate must include the
following:
(i) The name and principal place of business of the insured depository institution
or affiliate filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
-70-

(iii) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans provided by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement to any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(iv) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans received by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement from any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(v) A general description of the terms and conditions of any payments, fees, or
loans reported under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and (iv) of this section, or, in the event such
terms and conditions are set forth:
(A) In the covered agreement, a statement identifying the covered agreement and
the date the agreement was filed with the relevant supervisory agency; or
(B) In a previous annual report filed by the insured depository institution or
affiliate, a statement identifying the date the report was filed with the relevant supervisory
agency; and
(vi) The aggregate amount and number of loans, aggregate amount and number of
investments, and aggregate amount of services provided under the covered agreement to
any individual or entity not a party to the agreement:
(A) By the insured depository institution or affiliate during its fiscal year; and
(B) By any other party to the agreement, unless such information is not known to
the insured depository institution or affiliate filing the report or such information is or
will be contained in the annual report filed by a person under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Consolidated reports permitted. (i) Party to large number of agreements. An
insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to five or more covered
agreements may file a single consolidated annual report with each relevant supervisory
agency covering all the covered agreements.
(ii) Affiliated entities party to the same agreement. An insured depository
institution and its affiliates that are parties to the same covered agreement may file a
single consolidated annual report relating to the agreement with each relevant supervisory
agency for the covered agreement.
(iii) Content of report. Any consolidated annual report must contain all the
information required by this paragraph (e). The amounts and data required to be reported
under paragraph (e)(1)(iii), (iv), and (vi) of this section may be reported on an aggregate
basis for all covered agreements.
(f) Time and place of filing. (1) General. Each party must file its annual report
with each relevant supervisory agency for the covered agreement no later than six months
following the end of the fiscal year covered by the report.
(2) Alternative method of fulfilling annual reporting requirement for a person. (i)
A person may fulfill the filing requirements of this section by providing the following
materials to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement
no later than five months following the end of the person’s fiscal year:
(A) A copy of the person’s annual report required under paragraph (d) of this
section for the fiscal year; and
-71-

(B) Written instructions that the insured depository institution or affiliate promptly
forward the annual report to the relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the
person.
(ii) An insured depository institution or affiliate that receives an annual report
from a person pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section must file the report with the
relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the person within 30 days.
§ 35.6 Release of information under FOIA.
The OCC will make covered agreements and annual reports available to the public
in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.) and the OCC’s
Rules Regarding the Availability of Information (12 CFR part 4). A party to a covered
agreement may request confidential treatment of proprietary and confidential information
in a covered agreement or an annual report under those procedures.
§ 35.7 Compliance provisions.
(a) Willful failure to comply with disclosure and reporting obligations. (1) If the
OCC determines that a person has willfully failed to comply in a material way with §§
35.4 or 35.5, the OCC will notify the person in writing of that determination and provide
the person a period of 90 days (or such longer period as the OCC finds to be reasonable
under the circumstances) to comply.
(2) If the person does not comply within the time period established by the OCC,
the agreement shall thereafter be unenforceable by that person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y).
(3) The OCC may assist any insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement that is unenforceable by a person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y) in identifying a successor to
assume the person’s responsibilities under the agreement.
(b) Diversion of funds. If a court or other body of competent jurisdiction
determines that funds or resources received under a covered agreement have been
diverted contrary to the purposes of the covered agreement for an individual’s personal
financial gain, the OCC may take either or both of the following actions:
(1) Order the individual to disgorge the diverted funds or resources received under
the agreement;
(2) Prohibit the individual from being a party to any covered agreement for a
period not to exceed 10 years.
(c) Notice and opportunity to respond. Before making a determination under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or taking any action under paragraph (b) of this section,
the OCC will provide written notice and an opportunity to present information to the
OCC concerning any relevant facts or circumstances relating to the matter.
-72-

(d) Inadvertent or de minimis errors. Inadvertent or de minimis errors in annual
reports or other documents filed with the OCC under §§ 35.4 or 35.5 will not subject the
reporting party to any penalty.
(e) Enforcement of provisions in covered agreements. No provision of this part
shall be construed as authorizing the OCC to enforce the provisions of any covered
agreement.
§ 35.8 Other definitions and rules of construction.
(a) Affiliate. “Affiliate” means:
(1) Any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with
another company; and
(2) For the purpose of determining whether an agreement is a covered agreement
under § 35.2, an “affiliate” includes any company that would be under common control
or merged with another company on consummation of any transaction pending before a
Federal banking agency at the time:
(i) The parties enter into the agreement; and
(ii) The person that is a party to the agreement makes a CRA contact, as described
in § 35.2(b)(2).
(b) Control. “Control” is defined in section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company
Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)).
(c) CRA affiliate. A “CRA affiliate” of an insured depository institution is any
company that is an affiliate of an insured depository institution to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the activities of the affiliate were considered by the appropriate Federal
banking agency when evaluating the CRA performance of the institution at its most recent
CRA examination.
(d) CRA public file. For purposes of this part, “CRA public file” means the public
file maintained by an insured depository institution and described in § 25.43.
(e) Federal banking agency; appropriate Federal banking agency. The terms
“Federal banking agency” and “appropriate Federal banking agency” have the same
meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(f) Fiscal year. (1) The fiscal year for a person that does not have a fiscal year
shall be the calendar year;
(2) Any person, insured depository institution, or affiliate that has a fiscal year
may elect to have the calendar year be its fiscal year for purposes of this part.

-73-

(g) Insured depository institution. “Insured depository institution” has the same
meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(h) Nongovernmental entity or person. (1) General. A “nongovernmental entity or
person” is any partnership, association, trust, joint venture, joint stock company,
corporation, limited liability corporation, company, firm, society, other organization, or
individual.
(2) Exclusions. A nongovernmental entity or person does not include:
(i) The United States government, a state government, a unit of local government
(including a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general-purpose
subdivision of a state) or an Indian tribe or tribal organization established under Federal,
state or Indian tribal law (including the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands), or a
department, agency, or instrumentality of any such entity;
(ii) A federally-chartered public corporation that receives federal funds
appropriated specifically for that corporation;
(iii) An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository
institution; or
(iv) An officer, director, employee, or representative (acting in his or her capacity
as an officer, director, employee, or representative) of an entity listed in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Party. The term “party” with respect to a covered agreement means each
person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that entered into the agreement.
(j) Person. For purposes of this part, a “person” is any nongovernmental entity or
person.
(k) Term of agreement. An agreement that does not by its terms establish a
termination date is considered to terminate on the last date on which any party to the
agreement makes any payment or provides any loan or other resources under the
agreement, unless the appropriate Federal banking agency otherwise notifies each party in
writing.
DATED: May , 2000

(Signed)
John D. Hawke, Jr.
Comptroller of the Currency

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance

-74-

For the reasons set out in the joint preamble, Title 12, Chapter II, of the Code of
Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended by adding a new part 207 to read as
follows:
PART 207 – DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING OF CRA-RELATED
AGREEMENTS (REGULATION G)
Sec.
207.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
207.2 Definition of covered agreement.
207.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
207.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
207.5 Annual reports.
207.6 Release of information under FOIA.
207.7 Compliance provisions.
207.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1831y.
§ 207.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
(a) General. This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
That section requires any nongovernmental entity or person, insured depository
institution, and affiliate of an insured depository institution that enters into a covered
agreement to—
(1) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate
Federal banking agency; and
(2) File an annual report with the appropriate Federal banking agency concerning
the covered agreement.
(b) The provisions of this part are enforced by the Board with respect to state
member banks, bank holding companies, and affiliates of bank holding companies, other
than banks, savings associations and subsidiaries of banks and savings associations.
§ 207.2 Definition of covered agreement.
-75-

(a) General definition. A covered agreement is any contract, arrangement, or
understanding (whether or not legally binding) that meets all of the following criteria—
(1) The agreement is in writing.
(2) The parties to the agreement include—
(i) An insured depository institution or an affiliate of an insured depository
institution; and
(ii) A nongovernmental entity or person (referred to hereafter as a person).
(3) The agreement provides for the insured depository institution or any affiliate
to—
(i) Provide to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) cash payments, grants, or other consideration (except loans) that have an
aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year; or
(ii) Make to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) loans that have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any
calendar year.
(4) The agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) (CRA), as defined in
paragraph (c) of this section
(b) Agreements that are not covered agreements--(1) Certain loans. A covered
agreement does not include—
(i) Any individual mortgage loan; or
(ii) Any specific contract or commitment for a loan or extension of credit to
individuals, businesses, farms, or other entities if—
(A) The funds are loaned at rates not substantially below market rates; and
(B) The purpose of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending
of the borrowed funds to third parties.
(2) Agreements where there has not been a CRA contact. (i) General. A covered
agreement does not include any agreement entered into by an insured depository
institution or affiliate of an insured depository institution with a person who has not
commented on, testified about, or discussed with the institution, or otherwise contacted
the institution, concerning the CRA.
(ii) Examples of CRA contact. The following are examples of CRA contacts.
These examples are not exclusive and other actions by a person may also make the
exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section unavailable. If a person engages in any of
the following actions and subsequently enters into an agreement with the insured
depository institution or any affiliate of the institution, the agreement is not exempt under
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
(A) CRA contact with a Federal banking agency. (1) The person submits a written
comment to a Federal banking agency that discusses the record of performance or future
performance under the CRA of an insured depository institution or any CRA affiliate of
the institution.
-76-

(2) The person provides oral testimony or comments to a Federal banking agency
concerning the record of performance or future performance under the CRA of an insured
depository institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(B) CRA contact with insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) The person
has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository institution or any
affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing) written or oral
comments or testimony to any Federal banking agency concerning the record of
performance or future performance under the CRA of the institution or any CRA affiliate
of the institution.
(2) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing)
written comments to the institution that must be included in the institution’s CRA public
file.
(3) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning the CRA rating of the institution,
or the CRA record of performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the
institution.
(4) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning actions that should be taken to
improve the CRA performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(5) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning any obligation or responsibility
that the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution may have to meet the banking
needs of its community and the discussion or contact occurs while the institution or any
affiliate has an application for a deposit facility pending at a Federal banking agency or is
undergoing a publicly announced CRA performance examination.
(iii) Examples of actions that are not CRA contacts. The following are examples
of actions that are not CRA contacts. The actions described in these examples would not,
by themselves, cause the exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section to be
unavailable. These examples are not exclusive.
(A) A person provides comments or testimony concerning an insured depository
institution or affiliate to a Federal banking agency in response to a direct request by the
agency for comments or testimony from that person. Direct requests for comments or
testimony do not include a general invitation by a Federal banking agency for comments
or testimony from the public in connection with a CRA performance evaluation of, or
application for a deposit facility by, an insured depository institution or an application by
a company to acquire an insured depository institution.
(B) A person makes a statement concerning an insured depository institution or
affiliate at a widely attended conference or seminar regarding a general topic. A public or
private meeting, public hearing, or other meeting regarding one or more specific
institutions or affiliates or transactions involving an application for a deposit facility is
not considered a widely attended conference or seminar.
(C) A person sends a similar fundraising letter to insured depository institutions
and to other businesses in its community. The letter encourages all businesses in the
-77-

community to meet their obligation to assist in making the local community a better place
to live and work.
(D) A person sends a general offering circular to financial institutions offering to
sell a portfolio of loans. An insured depository institution that receives the offering
circular discusses with the person whether the loans are in the institution’s local
community. No reference to the CRA or the institution’s CRA performance is made in
the offering circular or in the discussions of the parties.
(c) Fulfillment of the CRA--(1) General. Fulfillment of the CRA means the list of
factors that the Federal banking agencies have determined have a material impact on an
agency’s decision—
(i) To approve or disapprove an application for a deposit facility (as defined in
section 803 of the CRA (12 U.S.C. 2902)); or
(ii) To assign a rating to an insured depository institution under section 807 of the
CRA (12 U.S.C. 2906).
(2) List of factors. The list of factors referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
means the performance of any of the following activities by an insured depository
institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the agreement or that is an affiliate of a party
to the agreement or by any person that is a party to the agreement—
(i) Providing or refraining from providing written or oral comments or testimony to
any Federal banking agency concerning the record of performance or future performance
under the CRA of an insured depository institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the
agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement or written comments that are
required to be included in the CRA public file of any such insured depository institution;
(ii) Home-purchase, home-improvement, small business, small farm, community
development, and consumer lending, as described in § 228.22 of Regulation BB (12 CFR
228.22), including loan purchases, loan commitments, and letters of credit;
(iii) Making investments, deposits, or grants, or acquiring membership shares, that
have as their primary purpose community development, as described in § 228.23 of
Regulation BB (12 CFR 228.23);
(iv) Delivering retail banking services, as described in § 228.24(d) of Regulation
BB (12 CFR 228.24(d));
(v) Providing community development services, as described in § 228.24(e) of
Regulation BB (12 CFR 228.24(e));
(vi) In the case of a wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository institution,
community development lending, including originating and purchasing loans and making
loan commitments and letters of credit, making qualified investments, or providing
community development services, as described in § 228.25(c) of Regulation BB (12 CFR
228.25(c));
(vii) In the case of a small insured depository institution, any lending or other
activity described in § 228.26(a) of Regulation BB (12 CFR 228.26(a)); or
(viii) In the case of an insured depository institution that is evaluated on the basis
of a strategic plan, any element of the strategic plan, as described in § 228.27(f) of
Regulation BB (12 CFR 228.27(f)).
-78-

(d) Agreements relating to activities of CRA affiliates. An insured depository
institution or affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement that concerns the performance
of any activity of a CRA affiliate described in paragraph (c) of this section must notify
each person that is a party to the agreement that the agreement concerns a CRA affiliate.
The insured depository institution or affiliate must provide this notice prior to the time
the agreement is entered into if the affiliate is a CRA affiliate at that time, or within a
reasonable time after the affiliate becomes a CRA affiliate if the affiliate is not a CRA
affiliate at the time the agreement is entered into.
(e) Disclosure and reporting of certain existing agreements that become covered
agreements. An agreement that concerns the performance of any activity described in
paragraph (c) of this section by an affiliate may become a covered agreement after it is
entered into if the affiliate subsequently becomes a CRA affiliate. In that event, the
disclosure and reporting obligations under §§ 207.4 and 207.5 begin on the date that the
agreement becomes a covered agreement and do not apply to the period prior to that date.
§ 207.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
The following rules must be applied in determining whether a written contract,
arrangement, or understanding is a covered agreement under § 207.2.
(a) Contracts, arrangements, or understandings entered into by same parties. All
written contracts, arrangements, or understandings to which an insured depository
institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement if the contracts, arrangements, or understandings—
(1) Are entered into with the same person;
(2) Were entered into within the same 12-month period; and
(3) Are each in fulfillment of the CRA.
(b) Substantively related contracts. All written contracts to which an insured
depository institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement, without regard to whether the other parties to the
contracts are the same or whether each such contract is in fulfillment of the CRA, if the
contracts were negotiated in a coordinated fashion and a person is a party to each
contract.
§ 207.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into
after November 12, 1999.
(b) Disclosure of covered agreements to the public--(1) Disclosure required. (i)
Each person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that enters into a covered
-79-

agreement must make a complete copy of the covered agreement available to any
individual or entity upon request.
(ii) In disclosing a covered agreement to the public under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section, a person, insured depository institution, or affiliate may withhold from
disclosure only those portions of an agreement that the relevant supervisory agency
determines are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552 et seq.).
(2) Duration of obligation. The obligation to disclose a covered agreement
terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the agreement.
(3) Reasonable copy and mailing fees. Each person and each insured depository
institution or affiliate may charge an individual or entity that requests a copy of a covered
agreement a reasonable fee not to exceed the cost of copying and mailing the agreement.
(4) Use of CRA public file by insured depository institution. An insured
depository institution may fulfill its obligation under this paragraph (b) by placing a copy
of the covered agreement in the insured depository institution’s CRA public file and
making the agreement available in accordance with the procedures set forth in section
228.43 of Regulation BB.
(c) Disclosure of covered agreements to the relevant supervisory agency.
(1) Disclosure by person. Each person that is a party to a covered agreement must
provide a complete copy of the agreement to the relevant supervisory agency within
30 days of receiving a request from the agency for the agreement. This obligation
terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Disclosure by insured depository institution or affiliate. (i) Filing with the
relevant supervisory agency. Each insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement must provide a copy of the agreement to each relevant
supervisory agency within 30 days after the date the insured depository institution or
affiliate enters into the agreement.
(ii) Joint filings. In the event that two or more insured depository institutions or
affiliates are parties to a covered agreement, the insured depository institution(s) and
affiliate(s) may jointly file a copy of the covered agreement with each relevant
supervisory agency. Any joint filing must identify the insured depository institution(s)
and affiliate(s) for whom the covered agreement is being filed.
(d) Relevant supervisory agency. For purposes of this section and § 207.5, the
“relevant supervisory agency” for a covered agreement means the appropriate Federal
banking agency for—
(1) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the
covered agreement;
(2) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) or CRA affiliate that
makes payments or loans or provides services that are subject to the covered agreement;
and
(3) Any company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary
thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement.
-80-

§ 207.5 Annual reports.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into on
or after May 12, 2000.
(b) Annual report required. Each person and each insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement must file an annual report with each
relevant supervisory agency concerning the disbursement, receipt, and uses of funds or
other resources under the covered agreement.
(c) Duration of reporting requirement--(1) General. An annual report under this
section must be filed with each relevant supervisory agency for—
(i) The fiscal year in which the parties enter into the covered agreement; and
(ii) Each fiscal year during the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Exception for person that has not received any funds or resources. A person is
not required to file an annual report for a covered agreement for any fiscal year during the
term of the agreement in which the person did not receive any funds or other resources
under the agreement.
(d) Annual reports filed by person--(1) General. The annual report filed by a
person under this section must include the following—
(i) The name and mailing address of the person filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The amount of funds or resources received under the covered agreement
during the fiscal year; and
(iv) The information required by paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section
concerning the use of funds received under the covered agreement.
(2) Reporting for funds or resources allocated and used for a specific purpose. For
funds or other resources that the person received during the fiscal year under the covered
agreement and allocated and used for a specific purpose during the fiscal year, the annual
report must—
(i) Describe each specific purpose for which the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year; and
(ii) State the amount of funds or resources used during the fiscal year for each
specific purpose.
(3) Funds or resources used for other purposes. For all funds or resources that the
person received during the fiscal year under the covered agreement and did not use for a
specific purpose, the annual report must—
(i) State the amount received during the fiscal year; and
(ii) Provide a detailed, itemized list of how the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year, including the total amount used for—
(A) Compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
-81-

(B) Administrative expenses;
(C) Travel expenses;
(D) Entertainment expenses;
(E) Payment of consulting and professional fees; and
(F) Other expenses or uses.
(4) Use of other reports. The annual report filed by a person may consist of, or
incorporate, a report prepared for any other purpose, such as an Internal Revenue Service
form, a state tax form, a report to members or shareholders, financial statements, or other
report, so long as the annual report contains all of the information required by this
paragraph (d).
(5) Consolidated reports permitted. A person that is a party to five or more
covered agreements may file with each relevant supervisory agency a single consolidated
annual report covering all the covered agreements. Any consolidated report must contain
all the information required by this paragraph (d). The information required to be
reported under paragraph (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section may be reported on
an aggregate basis for all covered agreements.
(e) Annual report filed by insured depository institution or affiliate--(1) General.
The annual report filed by an insured depository institution or affiliate must include the
following—
(i) The name and principal place of business of the insured depository institution
or affiliate filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans provided by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement to any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(iv) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans received by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement from any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year.
(v) A general description of the terms and conditions of any payments, fees, or
loans reported under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and (iv) of this section, or, in the event such
terms and conditions are set forth—
(A) In the covered agreement, a statement identifying the covered agreement and
the date the agreement was filed with the relevant supervisory agency; or
(B) In a previous annual report filed by the insured depository institution or
affiliate, a statement identifying the date the report was filed with the relevant supervisory
agency; and
(vi) The aggregate amount and number of loans, aggregate amount and number of
investments, and aggregate amount of services provided under the covered agreement to
any individual or entity not a party to the agreement—
(A) By the insured depository institution or affiliate during its fiscal year; and
-82-

(B) By any other party to the agreement, unless such information is not known to
the insured depository institution or affiliate filing the report or such information is or
will be contained in the annual report filed by a person under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Consolidated reports permitted. (i) Party to large number of agreements. An
insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to five or more covered
agreements may file a single consolidated annual report with each relevant supervisory
agency covering all the covered agreements.
(ii) Affiliated entities party to the same agreement. An insured depository
institution and its affiliates that are parties to the same covered agreement may file a
single consolidated annual report relating to the agreement with each relevant supervisory
agency for the covered agreement.
(iii) Content of report. Any consolidated annual report must contain all the
information required by this paragraph (e). The amounts and data required to be reported
under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii), (iv), and (vi) of this section may be reported on an aggregate
basis for all covered agreements.
(f) Time and place of filing--(1) General. Each party must file its annual report
with each relevant supervisory agency for the covered agreement no later than six months
following the end of the fiscal year covered by the report.
(2) Alternative method of fulfilling annual reporting requirement for a person.
(i) A person may fulfill the filing requirements of this section by providing the
following materials to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the
agreement no later than five months following the end of the person’s fiscal year—
(A) A copy of the person’s annual report required under paragraph (d) of this
section for the fiscal year; and
(B) Written instructions that the insured depository institution or affiliate promptly
forward the annual report to the relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the
person.
(ii) An insured depository institution or affiliate that receives an annual report
from a person pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section must file the report with the
relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the person within 30 days.
§ 207.6 Release of information under FOIA.
The Board will make covered agreements and annual reports available to the
public in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.) and the
Board’s Rules Regarding the Availability of Information (12 CFR Part 261). A party to a
covered agreement may request confidential treatment of proprietary and confidential
information in a covered agreement or an annual report under those procedures.

-83-

§ 207.7 Compliance provisions.
(a) Willful failure to comply with disclosure and reporting obligations. (1) If the
Board determines that a person has willfully failed to comply in a material way with §§
207.4 or 207.5, the Board will notify the person in writing of that determination and
provide the person a period of 90 days (or such longer period as the Board finds to be
reasonable under the circumstances) to comply.
(2) If the person does not comply within the time period established by the Board,
the agreement shall thereafter be unenforceable by that person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y).
(3) The Board may assist any insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement that is unenforceable by a person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y) in identifying a successor to
assume the person’s responsibilities under the agreement.
(b) Diversion of funds. If a court or other body of competent jurisdiction
determines that funds or resources received under a covered agreement have been
diverted contrary to the purposes of the covered agreement for an individual’s personal
financial gain, the Board may take either or both of the following actions—
(1) Order the individual to disgorge the diverted funds or resources received under
the agreement;
(2) Prohibit the individual from being a party to any covered agreement for a
period not to exceed 10 years.
(c) Notice and opportunity to respond. Before making a determination under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or taking any action under paragraph (b) of this section,
the Board will provide written notice and an opportunity to present information to the
Board concerning any relevant facts or circumstances relating to the matter.
(d) Inadvertent or de minimis errors. Inadvertent or de minimis errors in annual
reports or other documents filed with the Board under §§ 207.4 or 207.5 will not subject
the reporting party to any penalty.
(e) Enforcement of provisions in covered agreements. No provision of this part
shall be construed as authorizing the Board to enforce the provisions of any covered
agreement.
§ 207.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
(a) Affiliate. “Affiliate” means—
(1) Any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with
another company; and

-84-

(2) For the purpose of determining whether an agreement is a covered agreement
under § 207.2, an “affiliate” includes any company that would be under common control
or merged with another company on consummation of any transaction pending before a
Federal banking agency at the time—
(i) The parties enter into the agreement; and
(ii) The person that is a party to the agreement makes a CRA contact, as described
in § 207.2(b)(2).
(b) Control. “Control” is defined in section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company
Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)).
(c) CRA affiliate. A “CRA affiliate” of an insured depository institution is any
company that is an affiliate of an insured depository institution to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the activities of the affiliate were considered by the appropriate Federal
banking agency when evaluating the CRA performance of the institution at its most recent
CRA examination.
(d) CRA public file. For purposes of this part, “CRA public file” means the public
file maintained by an insured depository institution and described in section 228.43 of
Regulation BB.
(e) Federal banking agency; appropriate Federal banking agency. The terms
“Federal banking agency” and “appropriate Federal banking agency” have the same
meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(f) Fiscal year. (1) The fiscal year for a person that does not have a fiscal year
shall be the calendar year;
(2) Any person, insured depository institution, or affiliate that has a fiscal year
may elect to have the calendar year be its fiscal year for purposes of this part.
(g) Insured depository institution. “Insured depository institution” has the same
meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(h) Nongovernmental entity or person--(1) General. A “nongovernmental entity or
person” is any partnership, association, trust, joint venture, joint stock company,
corporation, limited liability corporation, company, firm, society, other organization, or
individual.
(2) Exclusions. A nongovernmental entity or person does not include—
(i) The United States government, a state government, a unit of local government
(including a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general-purpose
subdivision of a state) or an Indian tribe or tribal organization established under Federal,
state or Indian tribal law (including the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands), or a
department, agency, or instrumentality of any such entity;
-85-

(ii) A federally-chartered public corporation that receives federal funds
appropriated specifically for that corporation;
(iii) An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository
institution; or
(iv) An officer, director, employee, or representative (acting in his or her capacity
as an officer, director, employee, or representative) of an entity listed in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section
.
(i) Party. The term “party” with respect to a covered agreement means each
person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that entered into the agreement.
(j) Person. For purposes of this part, a “person” is any nongovernmental entity or
person.
(k) Term of agreement. An agreement that does not by its terms establish a
termination date is considered to terminate on the last date on which any party to the
agreement makes any payment or provides any loan or other resources under the
agreement, unless the appropriate Federal banking agency otherwise notifies each party in
writing.
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 10, 2000.
(Signed)
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Chapter III
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set out in the joint preamble, Title 12, Chapter III, of the Code of
Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended by adding a new part 346 to read as
follows:
PART 346 – DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING OF CRA-RELATED
AGREEMENTS
Sec.
346.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
-86-

346.2 Definition of covered agreement.
346.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
346.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
346.5 Annual reports.
346.6 Release of information under FOIA.
346.7 Compliance provisions.
346.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1831y.
§ 346.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
(a) General. This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,
Pub. L. 106-102, § 711, 113 Stat. 1338 (1999). That section requires any
nongovernmental entity or person, insured depository institution, and affiliate of an
insured depository institution that enters into a covered agreement to:
(1) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate federal
banking agency; and
(2) File an annual report with the appropriate federal banking agency concerning
the covered agreement.
(b) The provisions of this part are enforced by the FDIC with respect to a state
nonmember insured bank or a foreign bank having an insured branch.
§ 346.2 Definition of covered agreement.
(a) General definition. A covered agreement is any contract, arrangement, or
understanding (whether or not legally binding) that meets all of the following criteria:
(1) The agreement is in writing.
(2) The parties to the agreement include:
(i) An insured depository institution or an affiliate of an insured depository
institution; and
(ii) A nongovernmental entity or person (referred to hereafter as a person).
(3) The agreement provides for the insured depository institution or any affiliate
to:

-87-

(i) Provide to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) cash payments, grants, or other consideration (except loans) that have an
aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year; or
(ii) Make to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) loans that have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any
calendar year.
(4) The agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) (CRA), as defined in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Agreements that are not covered agreements -- (1) Certain loans. A covered
agreement does not include:
(i) Any individual mortgage loan; or
(ii) Any specific contract or commitment for a loan or extension of credit to
individuals, businesses, farms, or other entities if:
(A) The funds are loaned at rates not substantially below market rates; and
(B) The purpose of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending
of the borrowed funds to third parties.
(2) Agreements where there has not been a CRA contact. (i) General. A covered
agreement does not include any agreement entered into by an insured depository
institution or affiliate of an insured depository institution with a person who has not
commented on, testified about, or discussed with the institution, or otherwise contacted
the institution, concerning the CRA.
(ii) Examples of CRA contact. The following are examples of CRA contacts.
These examples are not exclusive and other actions by a person may also make the
exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section unavailable. If a person engages in any of
the following actions and subsequently enters into an agreement with the insured
depository institution or any affiliate of the institution, the agreement is not exempt under
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
(A) CRA contact with a federal banking agency. (1) The person submits a written
comment to a federal banking agency that discusses the record of performance or future
performance under the CRA of an insured depository institution or any CRA affiliate of
the institution.
(2) The person provides oral testimony or comments to a federal banking agency
concerning the record of performance or future performance under the CRA of an insured
depository institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(B) CRA contact with insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) The person
has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository institution or any
affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing) written or oral
comments or testimony to any federal banking agency concerning the record of
performance or future performance under the CRA of the institution or any CRA affiliate
of the institution.
(2) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing)
-88-

written comments to the institution that must be included in the institution’s CRA public
file.
(3) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning the CRA rating of the institution,
or the CRA record of performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the
institution.
(4) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning actions that should be taken to
improve the CRA performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(5) The person has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning any obligation or responsibility
that the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution may have to meet the banking
needs of its community and the discussion or contact occurs while the institution or any
affiliate has an application for a deposit facility pending at a federal banking agency or is
undergoing a publicly announced CRA performance examination.
(iii) Examples of actions that are not CRA contacts. The following are examples
of actions that are not CRA contacts. The actions described in these examples would not,
by themselves, cause the exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section to be
unavailable. These examples are not exclusive.
(A) A person provides comments or testimony concerning an insured depository
institution or affiliate to a federal banking agency in response to a direct request by the
agency for comments or testimony from that person. Direct requests for comments or
testimony do not include a general invitation by a federal banking agency for comments
or testimony from the public in connection with a CRA performance evaluation of, or
application for a deposit facility by, an insured depository institution or an application by
a company to acquire an insured depository institution.
(B) A person makes a statement concerning an insured depository institution or
affiliate at a widely attended conference or seminar regarding a general topic. A public or
private meeting, public hearing, or other meeting regarding one or more specific
institutions or affiliates or transactions involving an application for a deposit facility is
not considered a widely attended conference or seminar.
(C) A person sends a similar fundraising letter to insured depository institutions
and to other businesses in its community. The letter encourages all businesses in the
community to meet their obligation to assist in making the local community a better place
to live and work.
(D) A person sends a general offering circular to financial institutions offering to
sell a portfolio of loans. An insured depository institution that receives the offering
circular discusses with the person whether the loans are in the institution’s local
community. No reference to the CRA or the institution’s CRA performance is made in
the offering circular or in the discussions of the parties.
(c) Fulfillment of the CRA -- (1) General. Fulfillment of the CRA means the list
of factors that the federal banking agencies have determined have a material impact on an
agency’s decision:
-89-

(i) To approve or disapprove an application for a deposit facility (as defined in
section 803 of the CRA (12 U.S.C. 2902)); or
(ii) To assign a rating to an insured depository institution under section 807 of the
CRA (12 U.S.C. 2906).
(2) List of factors. The list of factors referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
means the performance of any of the following activities by an insured depository
institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the agreement or that is an affiliate of a party
to the agreement or by any person that is a party to the agreement:
(i) Providing or refraining from providing written or oral comments or testimony to
any federal banking agency concerning the record of performance or future performance
under the CRA of an insured depository institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the
agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement or written comments that are
required to be included in the CRA public file of any such insured depository institution;
(ii) Home-purchase, home-improvement, small business, small farm, community
development, and consumer lending, as described in 12 CFR 345.22, including loan
purchases, loan commitments, and letters of credit;
(iii) Making investments, deposits, or grants, or acquiring membership shares, that
have as their primary purpose community development, as described in 12 CFR 345.23;
(iv) Delivering retail banking services, as described in 12 CFR 345.24(d);
(v) Providing community development services, as described in 12 CFR 345.24(e);
(vi) In the case of a wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository institution,
community development lending, including originating and purchasing loans and making
loan commitments and letters of credit, making qualified investments, or providing
community development services, as described in 12 CFR 345.25(c);
(vii) In the case of a small insured depository institution, any lending or other
activity described in 12 CFR 345.26(a); or
(viii) In the case of an insured depository institution that is evaluated on the basis
of a strategic plan, any element of the strategic plan, as described in 12 CFR 345.27(f).
(d) Agreements relating to activities of CRA affiliates. An insured depository
institution or affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement that concerns the performance
of any activity of a CRA affiliate described in paragraph (c) of this section must notify
each person that is a party to the agreement that the agreement concerns a CRA affiliate.
The insured depository institution or affiliate must provide this notice prior to the time
the agreement is entered into if the affiliate is a CRA affiliate at that time, or within a
reasonable time after the affiliate becomes a CRA affiliate if the affiliate is not a CRA
affiliate at the time the agreement is entered into.
(e) Disclosure and reporting of certain existing agreements that become covered
agreements. An agreement that concerns the performance of any activity described in
paragraph (c) of this section by an affiliate may become a covered agreement after it is
entered into if the affiliate subsequently becomes a CRA affiliate. In that event, the
disclosure and reporting obligations under §§ 346.4 and 346.5 begin on the date that the
agreement becomes a covered agreement and do not apply to the period prior to that date.
-90-

§ 346.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
The following rules must be applied in determining whether a written contract,
arrangement, or understanding is a covered agreement under § 346.2.
(a) Contracts, arrangements, or understandings entered into by same parties. All
written contracts, arrangements, or understandings to which an insured depository
institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement if the contracts, arrangements, or understandings:
(1) Are entered into with the same person;
(2) Were entered into within the same 12-month period; and
(3) Are each in fulfillment of the CRA.
(b) Substantively related contracts. All written contracts to which an insured
depository institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement, without regard to whether the other parties to the
contracts are the same or whether each such contract is in fulfillment of the CRA, if the
contracts were negotiated in a coordinated fashion and a person is a party to each
contract.
§ 346.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into
after November 12, 1999.
(b) Disclosure of covered agreements to the public -- (1) Disclosure required. (i)
Each person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that enters into a covered
agreement must make a complete copy of the covered agreement available to any
individual or entity upon request.
(ii) In disclosing a covered agreement to the public under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section, a person, insured depository institution, or affiliate may withhold from
disclosure only those portions of an agreement that the relevant supervisory agency
determines are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552 et seq.).
(2) Duration of obligation. The obligation to disclose a covered agreement
terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the agreement.
(3) Reasonable copy and mailing fees. Each person and each insured depository
institution or affiliate may charge an individual or entity that requests a copy of a covered
agreement a reasonable fee not to exceed the cost of copying and mailing the agreement.
(4) Use of CRA public file by insured depository institution. An insured
depository institution may fulfill its obligation under this paragraph (b) by placing a copy
of the covered agreement in the insured depository institution’s CRA public file and

-91-

making the agreement available in accordance with the procedures set forth in 12 CFR
345.43.
(c) Disclosure of covered agreements to the relevant supervisory agency -- (1)
Disclosure by person. Each person that is a party to a covered agreement must provide a
complete copy of the agreement to the relevant supervisory agency within 30 days of
receiving a request from the agency for the agreement. This obligation terminates
12 months after the end of the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Disclosure by insured depository institution or affiliate. (i) Filing with the
relevant supervisory agency. Each insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement must provide a copy of the agreement to each relevant
supervisory agency within 30 days after the date the insured depository institution or
affiliate enters into the agreement.
(ii) Joint filings. In the event that two or more insured depository institutions or
affiliates are parties to a covered agreement, the insured depository institution(s) and
affiliate(s) may jointly file a copy of the covered agreement with each relevant
supervisory agency. Any joint filing must identify the insured depository institution(s)
and affiliate(s) for whom the covered agreement is being filed.
(d) Relevant supervisory agency. For purposes of this section and § 346.5, the
“relevant supervisory agency” for a covered agreement means the appropriate federal
banking agency for:
(1) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the
covered agreement;
(2) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) or CRA affiliate that
makes payments or loans or provides services that are subject to the covered agreement;
and
(3) Any company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary
thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement.
§ 346.5 Annual reports.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into on
or after May 12, 2000.
(b) Annual report required. Each person and each insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement must file an annual report with each
relevant supervisory agency concerning the disbursement, receipt, and uses of funds or
other resources under the covered agreement.
(c) Duration of reporting requirement -- (1) General. An annual report under this
section must be filed with each relevant supervisory agency for:
(i) The fiscal year in which the parties enter into the covered agreement; and
-92-

(ii) Each fiscal year during the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Exception for person that has not received any funds or resources. A person is
not required to file an annual report for a covered agreement for any fiscal year during the
term of the agreement in which the person did not receive any funds or other resources
under the agreement.
(d) Annual reports filed by person -- (1) General. The annual report filed by a
person under this section must include the following:
(i) The name and mailing address of the person filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The amount of funds or resources received under the covered agreement
during the fiscal year; and
(iv) The information required by paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section
concerning the use of funds received under the covered agreement.
(2) Reporting for funds or resources allocated and used for a specific purpose. For
funds or other resources that the person received during the fiscal year under the covered
agreement and allocated and used for a specific purpose during the fiscal year, the annual
report must:
(i) Describe each specific purpose for which the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year; and
(ii) State the amount of funds or resources used during the fiscal year for each
specific purpose.
(3) Funds or resources used for other purposes. For all funds or resources that the
person received during the fiscal year under the covered agreement and did not use for a
specific purpose, the annual report must:
(i) State the amount received during the fiscal year; and
(ii) Provide a detailed, itemized list of how the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year, including the total amount used for:
(A) Compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
(B) Administrative expenses;
(C) Travel expenses;
(D) Entertainment expenses;
(E) Payment of consulting and professional fees; and
(F) Other expenses or uses.
(4) Use of other reports. The annual report filed by a person may consist of, or
incorporate, a report prepared for any other purpose, such as an Internal Revenue Service
form, a state tax form, a report to members or shareholders, financial statements, or other
report, so long as the annual report contains all of the information required by this
paragraph (d).
(5) Consolidated reports permitted. A person that is a party to five or more
covered agreements may file with each relevant supervisory agency a single consolidated
annual report covering all the covered agreements. Any consolidated report must contain
-93-

all the information required by this paragraph (d). The information required to be
reported under paragraphs (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section may be reported on
an aggregate basis for all covered agreements.
(e) Annual report filed by insured depository institution or affiliate -- (1) General.
The annual report filed by an insured depository institution or affiliate must include the
following:
(i) The name and principal place of business of the insured depository institution
or affiliate filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans provided by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement to any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(iv) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans received by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement from any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(v) A general description of the terms and conditions of any payments, fees, or
loans reported under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and (iv) of this section, or, in the event such
terms and conditions are set forth:
(A) In the covered agreement, a statement identifying the covered agreement and
the date the agreement was filed with the relevant supervisory agency; or
(B) In a previous annual report filed by the insured depository institution or
affiliate, a statement identifying the date the report was filed with the relevant supervisory
agency; and
(vi) The aggregate amount and number of loans, aggregate amount and number of
investments, and aggregate amount of services provided under the covered agreement to
any individual or entity not a party to the agreement:
(A) By the insured depository institution or affiliate during its fiscal year; and
(B) By any other party to the agreement, unless such information is not known to
the insured depository institution or affiliate filing the report or such information is or
will be contained in the annual report filed by a person under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Consolidated reports permitted. (i) Party to large number of agreements. An
insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to five or more covered
agreements may file a single consolidated annual report with each relevant supervisory
agency covering all the covered agreements.
(ii) Affiliated entities party to the same agreement. An insured depository
institution and its affiliates that are parties to the same covered agreement may file a
single consolidated annual report relating to the agreement with each relevant supervisory
agency for the covered agreement.
(iii) Content of report. Any consolidated annual report must contain all the
information required by this paragraph (e). The amounts and data required to be reported
-94-

under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii), (iv), and (vi) of this section may be reported on an aggregate
basis for all covered agreements.
(f) Time and place of filing -- (1) General. Each party must file its annual report
with each relevant supervisory agency for the covered agreement no later than six months
following the end of the fiscal year covered by the report.
(2) Alternative method of fulfilling annual reporting requirement for a person. (i)
A person may fulfill the filing requirements of this section by providing the following
materials to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement
no later than five months following the end of the person’s fiscal year:
(A) A copy of the person’s annual report required under paragraph (d) of this
section for the fiscal year; and
(B) Written instructions that the insured depository institution or affiliate promptly
forward the annual report to the relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the
person.
(ii) An insured depository institution or affiliate that receives an annual report
from a person pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section must file the report with the
relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the person within 30 days.
§ 346.6 Release of information under FOIA.
The FDIC will make covered agreements and annual reports available to the public
in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.) and the FDIC’s
rules regarding Disclosure of Information (12 CFR part 309). A party to a covered
agreement may request confidential treatment of proprietary and confidential information
in a covered agreement or an annual report under those procedures.
§ 346.7 Compliance provisions.
(a) Willful failure to comply with disclosure and reporting obligations. (1) If the
FDIC determines that a person has willfully failed to comply in a material way with §§
346.4 or 346.5, the FDIC will notify the person in writing of that determination and
provide the person a period of 90 days (or such longer period as the FDIC finds to be
reasonable under the circumstances) to comply.
(2) If the person does not comply within the time period established by the FDIC,
the agreement shall thereafter be unenforceable by that person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y).
(3) The FDIC may assist any insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement that is unenforceable by a person by operation of section 48
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y) in identifying a successor to
assume the person’s responsibilities under the agreement.

-95-

(b) Diversion of funds. If a court or other body of competent jurisdiction
determines that funds or resources received under a covered agreement have been
diverted contrary to the purposes of the covered agreement for an individual’s personal
financial gain, the FDIC may take either or both of the following actions:
(1) Order the individual to disgorge the diverted funds or resources received under
the agreement;
(2) Prohibit the individual from being a party to any covered agreement for a
period not to exceed 10 years.
(c) Notice and opportunity to respond. Before making a determination under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or taking any action under paragraph (b) of this section,
the FDIC will provide written notice and an opportunity to present information to the
FDIC concerning any relevant facts or circumstances relating to the matter.
(d) Inadvertent or de minimis errors. Inadvertent or de minimis errors in annual
reports or other documents filed with the FDIC under §§ 346.4 or 346.5 will not subject
the reporting party to any penalty.
(e) Enforcement of provisions in covered agreements. No provision of this part
shall be construed as authorizing the FDIC to enforce the provisions of any covered
agreement.
§ 346.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
(a) Affiliate. “Affiliate” means:
(1) Any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with
another company; and
(2) For the purpose of determining whether an agreement is a covered agreement
under § 346.2, an “affiliate” includes any company that would be under common control
or merged with another company on consummation of any transaction pending before a
federal banking agency at the time:
(i) The parties enter into the agreement; and
(ii) The person that is a party to the agreement makes a CRA contact, as described
in § 346.2(b)(2).
(b) Control. “Control” is defined in section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company
Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)).
(c) CRA affiliate. A “CRA affiliate” of an insured depository institution is any
company that is an affiliate of an insured depository institution to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the activities of the affiliate were considered by the appropriate Federal
banking agency when evaluating the CRA performance of the institution at its most recent
CRA examination.
-96-

(d) CRA public file. For purposes of this part, “CRA public file” means the public
file maintained by an insured depository institution and described in 12 CFR 345.43.
(e) Federal banking agency; appropriate federal banking agency. The terms
“federal banking agency” and “appropriate federal banking agency” have the same
meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(f) Fiscal year. (1) The fiscal year for a person that does not have a fiscal year
shall be the calendar year;
(2) Any person, insured depository institution, or affiliate that has a fiscal year
may elect to have the calendar year be its fiscal year for purposes of this part.
(g) Insured depository institution. “Insured depository institution” has the same
meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(h) Nongovernmental entity or person -- (1) General. A “nongovernmental entity
or person” is any partnership, association, trust, joint venture, joint stock company,
corporation, limited liability corporation, company, firm, society, other organization, or
individual.
(2) Exclusions. A nongovernmental entity or person does not include:
(i) The United States government, a state government, a unit of local government
(including a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general-purpose
subdivision of a state) or an Indian tribe or tribal organization established under federal,
state or Indian tribal law (including the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands), or a
department, agency, or instrumentality of any such entity;
(ii) A federally-chartered public corporation that receives federal funds
appropriated specifically for that corporation;
(iii) An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository
institution; or
(iv) An officer, director, employee, or representative (acting in his or her capacity
as an officer, director, employee, or representative) of an entity listed in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Party. The term “party” with respect to a covered agreement means each
person and each insured depository institution or affiliate that entered into the agreement.
(j) Person. For purposes of this part, a “person” is any nongovernmental entity or
person.
(k) Term of agreement. An agreement that does not by its terms establish a
termination date is considered to terminate on the last date on which any party to the

-97-

agreement makes any payment or provides any loan or other resources under the
agreement, unless the appropriate federal banking agency otherwise notifies each party in
writing.
By Order of the Board of Directors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 10th day of May, 2000.
(Signed)
Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Department of the Treasury
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Chapter V
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set out in the joint preamble, OTS proposes to amend Title 12,
Chapter V, of the Code of Federal Regulations by adding a new part 533 to read as
follows:
PART 533 - DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING OF CRA-RELATED
AGREEMENTS
Sec.
533.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
533.2 Definition of covered agreement.
533.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
533.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
533.5 Annual reports.
533.6 Release of information under FOIA.
533.7 Compliance provisions.
-98-

533.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, and 1831y.
§ 533.1 Purpose and scope of this part.
(a) General. This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
That section requires any nongovernmental entity or person, insured depository
institution, and affiliate of an insured depository institution that enters into a covered
agreement to—
(1) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate
Federal banking agency; and
(2) File an annual report with the appropriate Federal banking agency concerning
the covered agreement.
(b) The provisions of this part are enforced by OTS with respect to savings
associations, savings and loan holding companies, and companies that are controlled by
savings associations or savings and loan holding companies.
§ 533.2 Definition of covered agreement.
(a) General definition. A covered agreement is any contract, arrangement, or
understanding (whether or not legally binding) that meets all of the following criteria—
(1) The agreement is in writing.
(2) The parties to the agreement include—
(i) An insured depository institution or an affiliate of an insured depository
institution; and
(ii) A nongovernmental entity or person (referred to as a NGEP).
(3) The agreement provides for the insured depository institution or any affiliate
to—
(i) Provide to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) cash payments, grants, or other consideration (except loans) that have an
aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year; or
(ii) Make to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the
agreement) loans that have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any
calendar year.
(4) The agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) (CRA), as defined in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Agreements that are not covered agreements. (1) Certain loans. A covered
agreement does not include—
-99-

(i) Any individual mortgage loan; or
(ii) Any specific contract or commitment for a loan or extension of credit to
individuals, businesses, farms, or other entities if—
(A) The funds are loaned at rates not substantially below market rates; and
(B) The purpose of the loan or extension of credit does not include any re-lending
of the borrowed funds to third parties.
(2) Agreements where there has not been a CRA contact. (i) General. A covered
agreement does not include any agreement entered into by an insured depository
institution or affiliate of an insured depository institution with a NGEP who has not
commented on, testified about, or discussed with the institution, or otherwise contacted
the institution, concerning the CRA.
(ii) Examples of CRA contact. The following are examples of CRA contacts.
These examples are not exclusive and other actions by a NGEP may also make the
exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section unavailable. If a NGEP engages in any of
the following actions and subsequently enters into an agreement with the insured
depository institution or any affiliate of the institution, the agreement is not exempt under
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
(A) CRA contact with a Federal banking agency. (1) The NGEP submits a written
comment to a Federal banking agency that discusses the record of performance or future
performance under the CRA of an insured depository institution or any CRA affiliate of
the institution.
(2) The NGEP provides oral testimony or comments to a Federal banking agency
concerning the record of performance or future performance under the CRA of an insured
depository institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(B) CRA contact with insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) The NGEP
has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository institution or any
affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing) written or oral
comments or testimony to any Federal banking agency concerning the record of
performance or future performance under the CRA of the institution or any CRA affiliate
of the institution.
(2) The NGEP has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution about providing (or refraining from providing)
written comments to the institution that must be included in the institution’s CRA public
file.
(3) The NGEP has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning the CRA rating of the institution,
or the CRA record of performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the
institution.
(4) The NGEP has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning actions that should be taken to
improve the CRA performance of the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution.
(5) The NGEP has a discussion with, or otherwise contacts, an insured depository
institution or any affiliate of the institution concerning any obligation or responsibility
that the institution or any CRA affiliate of the institution may have to meet the banking
-100-

needs of its community and the discussion or contact occurs while the institution or any
affiliate has an application for a deposit facility pending at a Federal banking agency or is
undergoing a publicly announced CRA performance examination.
(iii) Examples of actions that are not CRA contacts. The following are examples
of actions that are not CRA contacts. The actions described in these examples would not,
by themselves, cause the exemption in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section to be
unavailable. These examples are not exclusive.
(A) A NGEP provides comments or testimony concerning an insured depository
institution or affiliate to a Federal banking agency in response to a direct request by the
agency for comments or testimony from that NGEP. Direct requests for comments or
testimony do not include a general invitation by a Federal banking agency for comments
or testimony from the public in connection with a CRA performance evaluation of, or
application for a deposit facility by, an insured depository institution or an application by
a company to acquire an insured depository institution.
(B) A NGEP makes a statement concerning an insured depository institution or
affiliate at a widely attended conference or seminar regarding a general topic. A public or
private meeting, public hearing, or other meeting regarding one or more specific
institutions or affiliates or transactions involving an application for a deposit facility is
not considered a widely attended conference or seminar.
(C) A NGEP sends a similar fundraising letter to insured depository institutions
and to other businesses in its community. The letter encourages all businesses in the
community to meet their obligation to assist in making the local community a better place
to live and work.
(D) A NGEP sends a general offering circular to financial institutions offering to
sell a portfolio of loans. An insured depository institution that receives the offering
circular discusses with the NGEP whether the loans are in the institution’s local
community. No reference to the CRA or the institution’s CRA performance is made in
the offering circular or in the discussions of the parties.
(c) Fulfillment of the CRA. (1) General. Fulfillment of the CRA means the list of
factors that the Federal banking agencies have determined have a material impact on an
agency’s decision—
(i) To approve or disapprove an application for a deposit facility (as defined in
section 803 of the CRA (12 U.S.C. 2902)); or
(ii) To assign a rating to an insured depository institution under section 807 of the
CRA (12 U.S.C. 2906).
(2) List of factors. The list of factors referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
means the performance of any of the following activities by an insured depository
institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the agreement or that is an affiliate of a party
to the agreement or by any NGEP that is a party to the agreement—
(i) Providing or refraining from providing written or oral comments or testimony to
any Federal banking agency concerning the record of performance or future performance
under the CRA of an insured depository institution or CRA affiliate that is a party to the
-101-

agreement or an affiliate of a party to the agreement or written comments that are
required to be included in the CRA public file of any such insured depository institution;
(ii) Home-purchase, home-improvement, small business, small farm, community
development, and consumer lending, as described in § 563e.22 of this chapter, including
loan purchases, loan commitments, and letters of credit;
(iii) Making investments, deposits, or grants, or acquiring membership shares, that
have as their primary purpose community development, as described in § 563e.23 of this
chapter;
(iv) Delivering retail banking services, as described in § 563e.24(d) of this chapter;
(v) Providing community development services, as described in § 563e.24(e) of
this chapter;
(vi) In the case of a wholesale or limited-purpose insured depository institution,
community development lending, including originating and purchasing loans and making
loan commitments and letters of credit, making qualified investments, or providing
community development services, as described in § 563e.25(c) of this chapter;
(vii) In the case of a small insured depository institution, any lending or other
activity described in § 563e.26(a) of this chapter; or
(viii) In the case of an insured depository institution that is evaluated on the basis
of a strategic plan, any element of the strategic plan, as described in § 563e.27(f) of this
chapter.
(d) Agreements relating to activities of CRA affiliates. An insured depository
institution or affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement that concerns the performance
of any activity of a CRA affiliate described in paragraph (c) of this section must notify
each NGEP that is a party to the agreement that the agreement concerns a CRA affiliate.
The insured depository institution or affiliate must provide this notice prior to the time
the agreement is entered into if the affiliate is a CRA affiliate at that time, or within a
reasonable time after the affiliate becomes a CRA affiliate if the affiliate is not a CRA
affiliate at the time the agreement is entered into.
(e) Disclosure and reporting of certain existing agreements that become covered
agreements. An agreement that concerns the performance of any activity described in
paragraph (c) of this section by an affiliate may become a covered agreement after it is
entered into if the affiliate subsequently becomes a CRA affiliate. In that event, the
disclosure and reporting obligations under §§ 533.4 and 533.5 begin on the date that the
agreement becomes a covered agreement and do not apply to the period prior to that date.
§ 533.3 Related agreements considered a single agreement.
The following rules must be applied in determining whether a written contract,
arrangement, or understanding is a covered agreement under § 533.2.
(a) Contracts, arrangements, or understandings entered into by same parties. All
-102-

written contracts, arrangements, or understandings to which an insured depository
institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement if the contracts, arrangements, or understandings—
(1) Are entered into with the same NGEP;
(2) Were entered into within the same 12-month period; and
(3) Are each in fulfillment of the CRA.
(b) Substantively related contracts. All written contracts to which an insured
depository institution or an affiliate of the insured depository institution is a party shall be
considered to be a single agreement, without regard to whether the other parties to the
contracts are the same or whether each such contract is in fulfillment of the CRA, if the
contracts were negotiated in a coordinated fashion and a NGEP is a party to each
contract.
§ 533.4 Disclosure of covered agreements.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into
after November 12, 1999.
(b) Disclosure of covered agreements to the public. (1) Disclosure required. (i)
Each NGEP and each insured depository institution or affiliate that enters into a covered
agreement must make a complete copy of the covered agreement available to any
individual or entity upon request.
(ii) In disclosing a covered agreement to the public under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section, a NGEP, insured depository institution, or affiliate may withhold from
disclosure only those portions of an agreement that the relevant supervisory agency
determines are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552 et seq.).
(2) Duration of obligation. The obligation to disclose a covered agreement
terminates 12 months after the end of the term of the agreement.
(3) Reasonable copy and mailing fees. Each NGEP and each insured depository
institution or affiliate may charge an individual or entity that requests a copy of a covered
agreement a reasonable fee not to exceed the cost of copying and mailing the agreement.
(4) Use of CRA public file by insured depository institution. An insured
depository institution may fulfill its obligation under this paragraph (b) by placing a copy
of the covered agreement in the insured depository institution’s CRA public file and
making the agreement available in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 563e.43
of this chapter.
(c) Disclosure of covered agreements to the relevant supervisory agency. (1)
Disclosure by NGEP. Each NGEP that is a party to a covered agreement must provide a
complete copy of the agreement to the relevant supervisory agency within 30 days of
receiving a request from the agency for the agreement. This obligation terminates
12 months after the end of the term of the covered agreement.
-103-

(2) Disclosure by insured depository institution or affiliate. (i) Filing with the
relevant supervisory agency. Each insured depository institution or affiliate that is a
party to a covered agreement must provide a copy of the agreement to each relevant
supervisory agency within 30 days after the date the insured depository institution or
affiliate enters into the agreement.
(ii) Joint filings. In the event that two or more insured depository institutions or
affiliates are parties to a covered agreement, the insured depository institution(s) and
affiliate(s) may jointly file a copy of the covered agreement with each relevant
supervisory agency. Any joint filing must identify the insured depository institution(s)
and affiliate(s) for whom the covered agreement is being filed.
(d) Relevant supervisory agency. For purposes of this section and § 533.5, the
relevant supervisory agency for a covered agreement means the appropriate Federal
banking agency for—
(1) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the
covered agreement;
(2) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) or CRA affiliate that
makes payments or loans or provides services that are subject to the covered agreement;
and
(3) Any company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary
thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement.
§ 533.5 Annual reports.
(a) Effective date. This section applies only to covered agreements entered into on
or after May 12, 2000.
(b) Annual report required. Each NGEP and each insured depository institution or
affiliate that is a party to a covered agreement must file an annual report with each
relevant supervisory agency concerning the disbursement, receipt, and uses of funds or
other resources under the covered agreement.
(c) Duration of reporting requirement. (1) General. An annual report under this
section must be filed with each relevant supervisory agency for—
(i) The fiscal year in which the parties enter into the covered agreement; and
(ii) Each fiscal year during the term of the covered agreement.
(2) Exception for NGEP that has not received any funds or resources. A NGEP is
not required to file an annual report for a covered agreement for any fiscal year during the
term of the agreement in which the NGEP did not receive any funds or other resources
under the agreement.
(d) Annual reports filed by NGEP. (1) General. The annual report filed by a
NGEP under this section must include the following—
-104-

(i) The name and mailing address of the NGEP filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The amount of funds or resources received under the covered agreement
during the fiscal year; and
(iv) The information required by paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section
concerning the use of funds received under the covered agreement.
(2) Reporting for funds or resources allocated and used for a specific purpose. For
funds or other resources that the NGEP received during the fiscal year under the covered
agreement and allocated and used for a specific purpose during the fiscal year, the annual
report must—
(i) Describe each specific purpose for which the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year; and
(ii) State the amount of funds or resources used during the fiscal year for each
specific purpose.
(3) Reporting for funds or resources used for other purposes. For all funds or
resources that the NGEP received during the fiscal year under the covered agreement and
did not use for a specific purpose, the annual report must—
(i) State the amount received during the fiscal year; and
(ii) Provide a detailed, itemized list of how the funds or resources were used
during the fiscal year, including the total amount used for—
(A) Compensation of officers, directors, and employees;
(B) Administrative expenses;
(C) Travel expenses;
(D) Entertainment expenses;
(E) Payment of consulting and professional fees; and
(F) Other expenses or uses.
(4) Use of other reports. The annual report filed by a NGEP may consist of, or
incorporate, a report prepared for any other purpose, such as an Internal Revenue Service
form, a state tax form, a report to members or shareholders, financial statements, or other
report, so long as the annual report contains all of the information required by this
paragraph (d).
(5) Consolidated reports permitted. A NGEP that is a party to five or more
covered agreements may file with each relevant supervisory agency a single consolidated
annual report covering all the covered agreements. Any consolidated report must contain
all the information required by this paragraph (d). The information required to be
reported under paragraphs (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section may be reported on
an aggregate basis for all covered agreements.
(e) Annual report filed by insured depository institution or affiliate. (1) General.
The annual report filed by an insured depository institution or affiliate must include the
following—
-105-

(i) The name and principal place of business of the insured depository institution
or affiliate filing the report;
(ii) Information sufficient to identify the covered agreement for which the annual
report is being filed, such as by providing the names of the parties to the agreement and
the date the agreement was entered into or by providing a copy of the agreement;
(iii) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans provided by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement to any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(iv) The aggregate amount of payments, aggregate amount of fees, and aggregate
amount of loans received by the insured depository institution or affiliate under the
covered agreement from any other party to the agreement during the fiscal year;
(v) A general description of the terms and conditions of any payments, fees, or
loans reported under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) and (e)(1)(iv) of this section, or, in the event
such terms and conditions are set forth—
(A) In the covered agreement, a statement identifying the covered agreement and
the date the agreement was filed with the relevant supervisory agency; or
(B) In a previous annual report filed by the insured depository institution or
affiliate, a statement identifying the date the report was filed with the relevant supervisory
agency; and
(vi) The aggregate amount and number of loans, aggregate amount and number of
investments, and aggregate amount of services provided under the covered agreement to
any individual or entity not a party to the agreement—
(A) By the insured depository institution or affiliate during its fiscal year; and
(B) By any other party to the agreement, unless such information is not known to
the insured depository institution or affiliate filing the report or such information is or
will be contained in the annual report filed by a NGEP under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Consolidated reports permitted. (i) Party to large number of agreements. An
insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to five or more covered
agreements may file a single consolidated annual report with each relevant supervisory
agency covering all the covered agreements.
(ii) Affiliated entities party to the same agreement. An insured depository
institution and its affiliates that are parties to the same covered agreement may file a
single consolidated annual report relating to the agreement with each relevant supervisory
agency for the covered agreement.
(iii) Content of report. Any consolidated annual report must contain all the
information required by this paragraph (e). The amounts and data required to be reported
under paragraphs (e)(1)(iii), (e)(1)(iv), and (e)(1)(vi) of this section may be reported on
an aggregate basis for all covered agreements.
(f) Time and Place of Filing. (1) General. Each party must file its annual report
with each relevant supervisory agency for the covered agreement no later than six months
following the end of the fiscal year covered by the report.
-106-

(2) Alternative method of fulfilling annual reporting requirement for a NGEP. (i)
A NGEP may fulfill the filing requirements of this section by providing the following
materials to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement
no later than five months following the end of the NGEP’s fiscal year—
(A) A copy of the NGEP’s annual report required under paragraph (d) of this
section for the fiscal year; and
(B) Written instructions that the insured depository institution or affiliate promptly
forward the annual report to the relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the
NGEP.
(ii) An insured depository institution or affiliate that receives an annual report
from a NGEP pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section must file the report with the
relevant supervisory agency or agencies on behalf of the NGEP within 30 days.
§ 533.6 Release of information under FOIA.
OTS will make covered agreements and annual reports available to the public in
accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.), OTS’s rules (part
505 of this chapter), and the Department of Treasury’s rules (31 CFR part 1). A party to
a covered agreement may request confidential treatment of proprietary and confidential
information in a covered agreement or an annual report under those procedures.
§ 533.7 Compliance provisions.
(a) Willful failure to comply with disclosure and reporting obligations. (1) If OTS
determines that a NGEP has willfully failed to comply in a material way with §§ 533.4 or
533.5, OTS will notify the NGEP in writing of that determination and provide the NGEP
a period of 90 days (or such longer period as OTS finds to be reasonable under the
circumstances) to comply.
(2) If the NGEP does not comply within the time period established by OTS, the
agreement shall thereafter be unenforceable by that NGEP by operation of section 48 of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y).
(3) OTS may assist any insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to a
covered agreement that is unenforceable by a NGEP by operation of section 48 of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y) in identifying a successor to assume the
NGEP’s responsibilities under the agreement.
(b) Diversion of funds. If a court or other body of competent jurisdiction
determines that funds or resources received under a covered agreement have been
diverted contrary to the purposes of the covered agreement for an individual’s personal
financial gain, OTS may take either or both of the following actions—
(1) Order the individual to disgorge the diverted funds or resources received under
the agreement;

-107-

(2) Prohibit the individual from being a party to any covered agreement for a
period not to exceed 10 years.
(c) Notice and opportunity to respond. Before making a determination under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or taking any action under paragraph (b) of this section,
OTS will provide written notice and an opportunity to present information to OTS
concerning any relevant facts or circumstances relating to the matter.
(d) Inadvertent or de minimis errors. Inadvertent or de minimis errors in annual
reports or other documents filed with OTS under §§ 533.4 or 533.5 will not subject the
reporting party to any penalty.
(e) Enforcement of provisions in covered agreements. No provision of this part
shall be construed as authorizing OTS to enforce the provisions of any covered
agreement.
§ 533.8 Other definitions and rules of construction used in this part.
(a) Affiliate. Affiliate means—
(1) Any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with
another company; and
(2) For the purpose of determining whether an agreement is a covered agreement
under § 533.2, an affiliate includes any company that would be under common control or
merged with another company on consummation of any transaction pending before a
Federal banking agency at the time—
(i) The parties enter into the agreement; and
(ii) The NGEP that is a party to the agreement makes a CRA contact, as described
in § 533.2(b)(2).
(b) Control. Control is defined in section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act
(12 U.S.C. 1841(a)).
(c) CRA affiliate. A CRA affiliate of an insured depository institution is any
company that is an affiliate of an insured depository institution to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the activities of the affiliate were considered by the appropriate Federal
banking agency when evaluating the CRA performance of the institution at its most recent
CRA examination.
(d) CRA public file. For purposes of this part, CRA public file means the public
file maintained by an insured depository institution and described in § 563e.43 of this
chapter.

-108-

(e) Federal banking agency; appropriate Federal banking agency. The terms
Federal banking agency and appropriate Federal banking agency have the same meanings
as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(f) Fiscal year. (1) The fiscal year for a NGEP that does not have a fiscal year
shall be the calendar year;
(2) Any NGEP, insured depository institution, or affiliate that has a fiscal year
may elect to have the calendar year be its fiscal year for purposes of this part.
(g) Insured depository institution. Insured depository institution has the same
meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
(h) Nongovernmental entity or person. (1) General. A nongovernmental entity or
person or NGEP is any partnership, association, trust, joint venture, joint stock company,
corporation, limited liability corporation, company, firm, society, other organization, or
individual.
(2) Exclusions. A nongovernmental entity or person does not include—
(i) The United States government, a state government, a unit of local government
(including a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general-purpose
subdivision of a state) or an Indian tribe or tribal organization established under Federal,
state or Indian tribal law (including the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands), or a
department, agency, or instrumentality of any such entity;
(ii) A federally-chartered public corporation that receives federal funds
appropriated specifically for that corporation;
(iii) An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository
institution; or
(iv) An officer, director, employee, or representative (acting in his or her capacity
as an officer, director, employee, or representative) of an entity listed in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i), (h)(2)(ii), or (h)(2)(iii) of this section.
(i) Party. The term party with respect to a covered agreement means each NGEP
and each insured depository institution or affiliate that entered into the agreement.

-109-

(j) Term of agreement. An agreement that does not by its terms establish a
termination date is considered to terminate on the last date on which any party to the
agreement makes any payment or provides any loan or other resources under the
agreement, unless the appropriate Federal banking agency otherwise notifies each party in
writing.
DATED: May 10, 2000
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
(Signed)
Ellen Seidman
Director

-110-