View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J -v - i

U.S. Department of Labor
Elaine L. Chao, Secretary
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Lois L. Orr, Acting Commissioner
The Monthly Labor Review ( usps 987-800) is published
monthly by the Bureau o f Labor Statistics o f the U.S.
Department o f Labor. The Review welcomes articles on the
lab o r fo rce , la b o r-m an a g e m en t re la tio n s , b u sin ess
c o n d itio n s , in d u stry p ro d u c tiv ity , co m p e n sa tio n ,
occupational safety and health, demographic trends, and
other economic developments. Papers should be factual
and analytical, not polemical in tone. Potential articles, as
well as communications on editorial matters, should be
submitted to:
Editor-in-Chief
Monthly Labor Review
Bureau o f Labor Statistics
Washington, DC 20212
Telephone: (202) 691-5900
E-mail: mlr@bls.gov
Inquiries on subscriptions and circulation, including address
changes, should be sent to: Superintendent of Documents
G overnm ent P rin tin g O ffice W ashington, dc 20402
Telephone: (202) 512-1800
Subscription price per year— $45 domestic; $56.25 foreign.
Single copy— $13 domestic; $16.25 foreign. Make checks
payable to the Superintendent of Documents.
Subscription prices and distribution policies for the Monthly
Labor Review ( issn 0098-1818) and other government
publications are set by the Government Printing Office, an
agency o f the U.S. Congress.
The Secretary of Labor has determined that the publication of
this periodical is necessary in the transaction o f the public
business required by law o f this Department. Periodicals
postage paid at Washington, dc, and at additional mailing
addresses.
U nless stated o th erw ise, artic le s ap p earin g in this
publication are in the public domam and may be reprinted
without express permission from the Editor-in-Chief. Please
cite the specific issue o f the Monthly Labor Review as the
source.
Information is available to sensory impaired individuals
upon request:
Voice phone: (202) 691-5200
Federal Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339.
P ostmaster :
Send address changes to M onthly Labor
Review, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, dc
20402-0001.

Cover designed by Keith Tapscott.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

MONTHLY LA B OR

REVIEW
Volume 125, Number 1
Januaiy 2002

W h a t is a n e m p lo y e e ? T h e a n s w e r d e p e n d s on th e la w

3

Whether a worker is classified as an ‘employee’ or as an
‘independent contractor’could cause significant legal consequences
Charles J. Muhl

C h a n g e s in S ta te la w s d u r in g 2 0 0 1 :
L abor

12

Minimum wage rates, youth peddling, genetic discrimination, and workplace
harassment and violence were among major legislation enacted or revised
Richard R. Nelson

W o r k e r s ’ c o m p e n sa tio n

31

Coverage was extended to certain law enforcement and other public
safety officers, but was excluded for some sports officials and inmates
Glenn Whittington

U n e m p lo y m e n t in s u r a n c e

37

Enactments included maximum weekly benefit amounts,voluntary quit
provisions, and extension of coverage to Indian tribes
Loryn Lancaster and Anne Vogel

D e p a r tm e n ts
Labor month in review
Précis
Current labor statistics

2
46
47

Editor-in-Chief: Deborah P. Klein • Executive Editor: Richard M. Devens • Managing Editor: Anna Huffman Hill • Editors: Brian I. Baker,
Bonita L. Boles, Richard Hamilton, Leslie Brown Joyner, Lawrence H. Leith • Book Reviews: Roger A. Comer, Richard Hamilton
• Design and Layout: Catherine D. Bowman, Edith W. Peters


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Labor Month in Review
The January Review
Once again, our January issue marks an
excursion out o f labor economics and
labo r sta tistic s and into lab o r law.
Charles J. Muhl investigates the legal
definition o f an employee. Although
this might seem to be an obvious ques­
tion, it is actually quite a vexing issue in
the law. Defining the concept o f em­
ployee is likely to become an increas­
ingly important question in a labor mar­
ket in which about a tenth o f workers
are already in an alternative work ar­
rangem ent and technological trends
may make such arrangements even more
attractive in the future. It is instructive
to see that one o f MuhPs “independent
contractor” cases involved not software
engineers or technical wizards, but work­
ers who were assigned the information
drudge work o f looking up telephone
numbers.
Richard R. Nelson has contributed
his annual summary o f developments in
general labor law in the States. As usual,
the issues range widely from the broad
application of State minimum wage laws
to exceptions to certain child labor re­
strictions for soccer referees.
Glenn Whittington updates develop­
ments in w orkers’ compensation law.
Much o f the focus over the past year was
on coverage issues, especially the cover­
age o f law enforcement and other public
safety workers. In one special case, both
the paid officers and law enforcement and
public safety volunteers working at the
Winter Games in Utah will be covered
under workers’ compensation.
Loryn Lancaster and Anne Vogel re­
port on legislation affecting unemploy­
ment insurance programs. The Federal
enactment o f the Economic Growth and
Tax R elief Reconciliation Act o f 2001
changes the voluntary Federal tax with­
holding rate as it applies to unemploy­
ment insurance benefits and the treat­
ment o f training reimbursements in the
calculation o f wages. At the State level,
most States increased their maximum
weekly benefits, either through legisla­

2

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

tio n o r an a u to m a tic a d ju s tm e n t
mechanism.

Working youths
More than four-fifths o f 17-year-olds
work in some capacity. Most o f these
jobs are employee jobs in which there is
a formal relationship with a particular
employer such as a restaurant or super­
market. About 65 percent of 17-year-olds
have an employee job only. Another 12
percent have both an employee job and
a “freelance” job. Those with freelance
jobs perform tasks such’ as babysitting
or yard work, but have no formal job
arrangem ent. Only 5 percent had a
freelance job only. For more information,
see news release USDL 01-479, “Employ­
ment Experience O f Youths: Results
From The First Three Years O f A Longi­
tudinal Survey.”

Injury rate fell in 2000
The incidence rate for on-the-job inju­
ries and illnesses declined to 6.1 cases
per 100 equivalent full-time workers in
2000, from 6.3 cases in 1999. In the 5
years between 1995 and 2000, the inci­
dence rate dropped from 8.1 cases per
100 equivalent full-time workers to 6.1
cases, a 25-percent decline.
There was a total o f 5.7 million inju­
ries and illnesses reported in private in­
dustry workplaces during 2000. Employ­
ers reported about the same number of
cases in 1999. An increase in hours
worked yielded the lower incidence rate.
See news release USDL 01—472, “Work­
place Injuries and Illnesses in 2000,” for
more information.

food went up less than the overall change
o f 2.8 percent in 2000, rising by 2.2 per­
cent and 2.5 percent, respectively. Within
the food category, spending on food at
home rose 3.6 percent, while spending at
restaurants, carryouts, vending machines,
and other sources of food away from home
rose 1.0 percent.
Spending on apparel and services,
transportation, and health care rose by
5.5 to 6.5 percent in 2000. In contrast, en­
tertainment and personal insurance and
pensions expenditures decreased by 1.5
percent and 2.1 percent, respectively.
Consumer Expenditure Survey data also
include the expenditures and income o f
consumers, as well as their demographic
characteristics. For more information,
see news release USDL 01-480, “Con­
sumer Expenditures in 2000.”

New data tables
This issue o f Monthly Labor Review
contains four new tables in the Current
Labor Statistics section. The tables are
from the Bureau o f Labor Statistics Cov­
ered Employment Statistics program and
pertain to workers and establishments
covered by State or Federal unemploy­
ment statistics programs. The ES-202
program serves as a near census o f es­
tablishments, employment, and wage
payments by four-digit industry at the
national, State, and county levels. The
four tables we have selected provide
these elements for the most recent 10year period available and for the 50
States, D istrict o f Colum bia, Puerto
Rico and the Virgin Islands, em ploy­
ment by establishm ent size, and em ­
ploym ent and wages for the 316 larg­
est counties.
□
C o m m u n ic a tio n s re g a rd in g the

Consumer spending
patterns varied in 2000
The changes in expenditures from 1999 to
2000 varied among the major components
of spending. Expenditures on housing and

Jan u a ry 2002

M onthly L abor Review m ay be sent
to th e E d ito r - in - C h ie f a t th e a d ­
dresses on the inside front cover, or
(202) 6 9 1 -5 8 9 9 . N ew s releases dis­
cussed in this issue are available at:

www.bls.gov/bls.newsrels.htm

What Is an Employee?

What is an employee? The answer
depends on the Federal law
In a legal context, the classification o f a worker
as either an employee or an independent contractor
can have significant consequences
Charles J. Muhl

Charles J. Muhl is an
attorney in th e firm of
G o ld b erg , Kohn, Bell,
Black, Rosenbloom &
Moritz, Ltd., C h ic a g o ,
Illinois. E-mail:
Charles.muhl®
goldbergkohn.com


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

n the American workplace today, a full-time,
40-hour-a-week employee who stays with the
same employer performing the same job over
the course o f an entire worklife would be viewed
as a rarity, or at least as a person found in lesser
proportion in the U.S. workforce than in decades
past. Today’s workplace includes a variety of
workers in contingent arrangements— independ­
ent contractors, leased employees, temporary em­
ployees, on-call workers, and more— perceived
to be a result o f employers’ desire to reduce labor
costs and employees’ desire to increase their flex­
ibility, among other things. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics recently reported that in February 2001
the contingent workforce, or those workers who
do not have an implicit or explicit contract for
ongoing employment and who do not expect their
current job to last, totaled 5.4 million people,
roughly 4 percent o f the U.S. workforce.1 Accord­
ing to the BLS survey, millions more were em­
ployed in alternative work arrangements:2 8.6 mil­
lion independent contractors (representing 6.4
percent o f total employment), 2.1 million on-call
workers, 1.2 million temporary help agency work­
ers, and 633,000 contract company workers. The
B ureau treats these contingent workers and
workers in alternative work arrangements as part
o f total U.S. employment, and although they are
in a typical em ploym ent situation, m ost o f the
general public w ould probably consider them
em ployees.
But how does Federal law treat workers in con­
tingent and alternative work arrangements? That
is, are such workers viewed as employees who
are entitled to legal protections under Federal leg­
islation? As is frequently the case with legal ques­

I

tions, the answer depends— in this case, on the
Federal law at issue. In general, though, courts
evaluate the totality o f the circumstances sur­
rounding a worker’s employment, with a focus on
who has the right— the em ployer or the em­
ployee— to control the work process.
The question “Is a worker an employee?” may
seem like a simple one to answer on its surface.
The dictionary definition o f “employee” says
succinctly that an employee is “a person who
works for another in return for financial or other
compensation.”3 Under that definition, independ­
ent contractors would appear to be employees.
However, the legal definition o f “employee” is
concerned with more than the pay received by a
worker for services provided. B lack’s Law Dic­
tionary defines “employee” as “a person in the
service o f another under any contract o f hire,
express or implied, oral or written, where the em­
ployer has the power or right to control and di­
rect the employee in the material details o f how
the work is to be performed.”4 In contrast, an
“independent contractor” is one who, “in the ex­
ercise o f an independent employment, contracts
to do a piece o f work according to his own meth­
ods and is subject to his employer’s control only
as to the end product or final result o f his work.”5
This legal distinction as to how a worker must be
classified has broad implications— and poten­
tially negative consequences for mischaracterization— for both employers and workers alike.
This article examines how the legal determina­
tion is made that a worker is either an employee or
an independent contractor, beginning with a dis­
cussion o f why the determination is important
and then discussing the tests used by courts to

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

3

W h a t Is an Em ployee?

make the determination and the laws pursuant to which each
test applies.

Employee or independent contractor?
Employers have used independent contractors and other con­
tingent workers more frequently in recent times for a variety
o f reasons, including reducing the costs associated with sala­
ries, benefits, and employment taxes and increasing the flex­
ibility o f the workforce.6 Under U.S. law, employers are re­
quired to pay the employer’s share, and withhold the w orker’s
share, o f employment taxes for employees, but not for inde­
pendent contractors. Employment taxes include those col­
lected pursuant to the Federal Insurance Contributions Act
(FICA)7 for the U.S. Social Security system; those collected
pursuant to the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA),8
which pays unemployment benefits to displaced workers; and
income tax withholding.9
U.S. law imposes other obligations on employers with re­
spect to employees that are not imposed on independent con­
tractors.10 The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)11 requires
employers to meet minimum-wage and overtime obligations
toward their employees. Title VII o f the Civil Rights Act of
196412 prohibits employers from discriminating against their
employees on the basis o f race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin, while the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
( a d e a ) 13 prohibits employers from discriminating against em­
ployees on the basis o f their age. The Employment Retirement
Security Act (ERISA)14 sets the parameters o f qualified em­
ployee benefit plans, including the level o f benefits and
amount o f service required for vesting o f those benefits, typi­
cally in the context o f retirement. The Americans with Disabili­
ties Act (ADA)15 prohibits employers from discriminating
against qualified individuals who have disabilities. The Fam­
ily and M edical Leave Act (FMLA)16 requires employers to
provide eligible employees with up to 12 weeks o f unpaid
leave per year when those employees are faced with certain
critical life situations. The N ational Labor Relations Act
(n l r a ) 17 grants employees the right to organize and governs
labor-management relations.
Clearly, then, some incentive exists for employers to clas­
sify their workers as independent contractors rather than em­
ployees, in order to reduce costs and various legal obliga­
tions. However, the failure o f an employer to make the proper
determination as to whether workers are employees or inde­
pendent contractors can have dire consequences. Employers
who are careless in their labeling o f workers as independent
contractors risk exposure to substantial liability in the future
under Federal law if the workers are mischaracterized. The
U.S. Government— in particular, the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS)— can seek to recover back taxes and other contributions
that should have been paid by the employer on the employee’s

4

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

behalf,18 and the workers themselves can seek compensation
for job benefits that the employer denied them on the basis o f
their supposed status as independent contractors.
One o f the m ost striking exam ples o f the danger o f
mischaracterizing workers as independent contractors rather
than employees occurred in Vizcaino v. Microsoft,19 a case in
which the U.S. Court o f Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that
a class of workers for the leading U.S. computer software com­
pany were employees who were entitled to participate in
M icrosoft’s various pension and welfare plans, despite the
fact that the workers had signed an agreement that labeled
them as independent contractors.
Prior to 1990, Microsoft hired “freelancers” to perform vari­
ous services for the company over a continuous period, in
some cases extending in excess o f 2 years. Upon joining
Microsoft, the former freelancers executed agreements which
specifically stated that they were independent contractors
and not employees and that nothing contained in the agree­
ment would be construed to create an employer-employee
relationship. Despite the agreements, the workers were fully
integrated into M icrosoft’s workforce, working under nearly
identical circumstances as M icrosoft’s regular employees.
The erstwhile freelancers worked the same core hours at the
same location and shared the same supervisors as regular
employees. The only distinction between the freelancers and
regular employees was that the freelancers were hired for spe­
cific projects. Microsoft neither paid the employer’s share,
nor withheld the worker’s share, o f FICA taxes and did not
allow the workers to participate in the company’s pension
plans, on the basis o f the agreements the workers had signed
stating that they were independent contractors.
The IRS investigated M icrosoft and determined that the
workers were employees, not independent contractors, and
that Microsoft should have been withholding taxes for them.20
Accepting the IRS’ determination, Microsoft conferred em­
ployee status on certain o f the workers, but dismissed others
from employment. Those who were dismissed then filed a
class-action suit seeking to have the court declare that they
were eligible to participate in M icrosoft’s pension plans. The
district court determined that the workers were employees,
not independent contractors.21 On appeal, M icrosoft con­
ceded that the workers were employees, but argued (1) that
they had waived their right to participate in the company’s
pension plans by executing the agreements which specifi­
cally stated that they were independent contractors and not
employees and (2) that nothing contained in the agreement
could be construed to create an employer-employee relation­
ship. The court o f appeals rejected M icrosoft’s argument,
finding that the company’s pension plan administrator had
acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying the workers’ claim
that they were entitled to participate in the pension plans. The
court found that the administrator should have focused on

the actual circumstances surrounding the freelancers’ employ­
ment and not the labeling o f the workers by the agreements.
In December 2000, Microsoft settled the case for $97 million.
There are circumstances in which the classification o f a
worker as an independent contractor is detrimental to em­
ployers and beneficial to workers. When the services being
performed result in a copyrightable work, employers may wish
to establish that a worker is an employee in order to obtain
authorship o f the copyright. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Com­
munity fo r Creative Non-Violence, et al. v. Reid,22 held that
an employer is the owner o f a copyright if the employer had
contracted for a creative “work for hire”— that is, if work pre­
pared by an employee is within the scope o f employment. If
the worker is an independent contractor, the worker, and not
the employer, is the owner o f the copyright for the work per­
formed. Thus, in the context o f intellectual property rights,
employers are protected by establishing an employer-em­
ployee relationship with a worker.

Determining a worker’s status
The potential benefits to both employers and workers o f the
proper characterization o f the working relationship raises the
question, How is the legal determination made as to whether a
worker is an employee or an independent contractor? Gener­
ally, the totality o f the circum stances— that is, all the con­
ditions under which a person is working— governs the char­
acterization o f that person as an employee or an independent
contractor; the label a company places on the w orker has
no bearing on the matter. Again generally, a person is an em­
ployee if the employer has the right to control the person’s
work process, whereas a worker is classified as an independ­
ent contractor if the employer does not control the process,
but dictates only the end result or product o f the work. Note
that the employer does not actually have to control the work
process: the mere ability o f the employer to take control is
sufficient to create an employer-employee relationship.
The courts have developed three tests to be used in deter­
mining a w orker’s status: the common-law test, the economic
realities test, and a hybrid test that incorporates various ele­
ments o f both o f those tests. Because the tests have been
applied to different Federal statutes, the characterization o f a
worker as an employee or an independent contractor can vary,
depending on which statute is being applied. As a result, the
same person can be classified as an employee under one test
and the relevant Federal laws to which that test is applied, but
as an independent contractor under another test and its rel­
evant Federal laws. Furthermore, different tests are applied to
the same Federal law, depending on which jurisdiction a case
is heard in. However, because each o f the tests evaluates the
totality o f the circumstances behind the employment relation­
ship, the overlap in the tests is substantial. Exhibit 1 offers a


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

brief summary o f the three tests.

Common-law test. The common-law test was developed on
the basis o f the traditional legal concept o f agency, which, in
an employment context, consists o f a relationship wherein
one person (the employee) acts for or represents another (the
employer) by the employer’s authority.23 The common-law
test involves the evaluation o f 10 factors to determine whether
a worker is an employee, with no one factor dispositive, but
with the determination centering on who has the right to con­
trol the work process. Exhibit 2 shows the 10 factors used in
the common-law test.
The IRS uses a derivation o f the common-law test in assess­
ing whether a worker is an employee, taking into account some
o f the common-law test’s factors as part o f the IRS’s own 20factor test.24 In addition to evaluating employment tax obliga­
tions under the Federal income tax law, FICA, and FUTA, the
common-law/iRS test has been applied to the National Labor
Relations Act, which governs labor-management relations and
collective bargaining for unionized employers, and to the Im­
migration Reform and Control Act. Furthermore, in Nation­
wide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden,25 the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that, for Federal laws that do not contain a clear
definition o f “employee,” the relationship between employer
and worker should be evaluated on the basis o f the commonlaw test, focusing on who had the right to control the worker.
In a vast number o f cases throughout the U.S. Federal court
system, some going back several decades, the common-law
test has been applied to determine whether workers are em­
ployees or contractors. For example, in Walker v. Altmeyer,26
decided in 1943, the U.S. Court o f Appeals for the Second
Circuit found that an attorney who was given office space at
$100 per month in return for services performed was an em­
ployee pursuant to the Social Security Act, because his land­
lord, another attorney, had the right to control what the worker
did and to supervise the method used to complete the work.
John E. Walker rented office space from another attorney, Pliny
W illiam son, beginning in 1927 and was also hired by
Williamson to perform legal services for a fixed monthly sal­
ary. In April 1938, the two attorneys established a new com­
pensation arrangement under which Walker would pay his
rent by providing legal services and would receive additional
compensation when his services were valued at more than
$ 100 per month. Upon reaching the age o f 65 in 193 8, Walker
applied for Social Security benefits, including monthly insur­
ance benefits, under the Social Security Act. Although the
Social Security Administration initially paid Walker the insur­
ance benefits on the basis o f his representation that he was
not an employee making more than $ 15 per month, the Agency
subsequently ceased payments upon learning o f W alker’s
arrangement with Williamson. The court found Walker to be
an employee because, despite the change in the manner o f

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

5

W h a t Is a n Em ployee?

1 Tests for determining whether a worker is an employee
Test

Description

Common-law test (used by
Internal Revenue Service (irs))

Employment relationship exists
if employer has right to control
work process, as determined by
evaluating totality o f the
circumstances and specific
factors

Laws under which test has been applied by courts
Federal Insurance Contributions Act
Federal Unemployment Tax Act
Income tax withholding
Employment Retirement and Income Security Act
National Labor Relations Act
Immigration Reform and Control Act (irs test)

Economic realities test

Employment relationship exists
if individual is economically
dependent on a business for
continued employment

Fair Labor Standards Act
Title V n
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Americans with Disabilities Act
Family and Medical Leave Act (likely to apply)

Hybrid test

Employment relationship is
evaluated under both commonlaw and economic reality test
factors, with a focus on who
has the right to control the
means and manner o f a work­
er’s performance

compensation beginning in 193 8, the kind o f work that Walker
did for Williamson did not change at all. Walker still performed
work as an attorney at the direction o f Williamson. That right
to control was dispositive for the court.
Similarly, in United States v. Polk,21 the U.S. Court o f Ap­
peals for the Ninth Circuit found that an employer could be
convicted o f a criminal offense for failure to pay FICA employ­
ment taxes, despite the employer’s declaration that its work­
ers were all subcontractors. Polk was notified by an IRS agent
that he was required to establish a separate bank account to
be used to deposit employees’ tax withholdings. Prior to re­
ceiving this notice, Polk paid his workers on an hourly or
weekly basis, had them work fixed hours, supervised the work­
ers, and supplied them with the tools and materials necessary
to perform their work. Furthermore, with the exception o f one
individual, all o f the workers worked exclusively for Polk.
These conditions did not change after the IRS served Polk
with notice that his workers were employees, but thereafter,
Polk represented to the irs that he no longer had employees
and employed only subcontractors. Polk was convicted o f a
criminal offense for failure to withhold wages to pay FICA

6

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

Title VII
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Americans with Disabilities Act

taxes. The appeals court sustained Polk’s conviction, finding
that the jury had properly considered, under the common-law
test, the totality o f the circumstances o f the working relation­
ship between Polk and his workers and also had properly
focused on Polk’s right to control the workers, both with re­
spect to the product o f the work and the means by which the
product was produced.
To summarize, then, under the common-law test, an em­
ployee is a worker whose work process and work product are
controlled by the employer. In determining who has the right
to control in a particular case, courts look to such factors as
supervision, skill level, method o f payment, whether the rela­
tionship is ongoing, who supplies the tools and materials for
the work, whether the relationship between the worker and
the employer is exclusive, and the parties’ intent, as well as
other, related factors.

Economic realities test.

The economic realities test, which
is most significantly applied in the context o f the Fair Labor
Standards Act28 governing minimum-wage and overtime obli­
gations, focuses on the economic relationship between the

worker and the employer. A worker is an employee under the
test if the worker is economically dependent upon the em­
ployer for continued employment. The test examines the na­
ture o f the relationship in light o f the fact that independent
contractors would typically not rely on a sole employer for
continued employment at any one time, but would work for,
and be compensated by, many different employers, whereas
most employees hold a single job and rely on that one em­
ployer for continued employment and for their primary source
o f income. The economic reality test is generally applied to
laws whose purpose is to protect or benefit a worker, because
courts view the protection o f a worker who is financially de­
pendent on a particular employer as important.29 Because of
its broader scope, the economic reality test has a greater like­
lihood o f finding workers to be employees than does the com­
mon-law test. Accordingly, a worker could be classified as an
employee for the purposes o f dealing with one Federal law,
such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, but as an independent
contractor under another, like FICA. In evaluating whether a
worker is an employee under the economic realities test, courts
look to the factors listed in exhibit 3, some o f which are similar
to those considered under the common-law test.
In Donovan v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc.,™ the Third

i^g na iM

Circuit Court o f Appeals demonstrated the precise applica­
tion o f the economic realities test, as well as the different
results that can be reached regarding workers o f the same
corporation, even w hen ju s t one legal test is applied.
DialAmerica’s principal business was the sale o f magazine
renewal subscriptions by telephone to persons whose sub­
scriptions had expired or were nearing expiration. In pursuit of
renewing subscriptions, the company hired workers to locate
subscribers’ phone numbers by looking names up in tele­
phone books and calling directory assistance operators. In
certain years, DialAmerica operated a program in which these
workers were permitted to work from their homes. When they
were hired, DialAmerica made the workers, called “home re­
searchers,” sign an “independent contractor’s agreement”
that supposedly established their status as independent con­
tractors. A worker would be given a box o f 500 cards with
names to be researched, and the company expected the cards
to be returned within 1 week. The home researchers were free
to choose the weeks and hours they worked; DialAmerica
had little supervision over the workers, but placed certain
conditions on how the work process was to be conducted,
including stipulating the method for reporting back the re­
sults on each card and the ink to be used when doing so.

Factors used to determine a worker’s status under the common-law test

Factor

Worker is an employee if—

Worker is an independent contractor if—

Right to control

Employer controls details o f the work

Worker controls details o f the work

Type o f business

Worker is not engaged in business or
occupation distinct from employer’s

Worker operates in business that is distinct from
employer’s business

Supervision

Employer supervises worker

Work is done without supervision

Skill level

Skill level need not be high or unique

Skill level is specialized, is unique, or requires substantial
training

Tools and materials

Employer provides
instrumentalities, tools, and
location o f workplace

Worker provides instrumentalities and tools o f
workplace and works at a site other than the
employer’s

Continuing relationship Worker is employed for extended,
continuous period

Worker is employed for specific project or for limited time

M ethod o f payment

Worker is paid by the hour, or other
computation based on time worked
is used to determine pay

Worker is paid by the project

Integration

Work is part o f employer’s regular
business

Work is not part o f employer’s regular business

Intent

Employer and worker intend to create
an employer-employee relationship

Employer and worker do not intend to create an employeremployee relationship

Employment by more
than one firm

Worker provides services only to
one employer

Worker provides services to more than one business


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

7

W h a t Is an Em ployee?

Exhibit 3.

Factors used to determine a worker’s status under the economic realities
test
Worker is an employee if—

Worker is an independent contractor if—

Integration

Worker provides services that are a
part o f the employer’s regular business

Worker provides services outside the regular business
o f the employer

Investment in facilities

Worker has no investment in the work Worker has a substantial investment in the work
facilities and equipment
facilities and equipment

Right to control

Management retains a certain type and
degree o f control over the work

Risk

Worker does not have the opportunity Worker has the opportunity to make a profit or incur a
loss from the job
to make a profit or incur a loss

Skill

Work does not require any special or
unique skills or judgm ent

Factor

Continuing relationship Worker has a permanent or extended
relationship with the business

DialAmerica also employed workers as “distributors,” per­
sons who gave the cards with names to the home researchers.
The Department o f Labor sued DialAmerica for paying the
home researchers and distributors less than the minimum
wage for the work they did, arguing that they were employees
under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The court o f appeals ruled that, under the econom ic re ­
alities test, the home researchers were employees. First, the
court found that the workers did not make a great investment
in their work, they had little opportunity for profit or loss, and
the work required little skill. Second, the court ruled that
DialA m erica’s lack o f control over the manner in which the
home researchers did their work did not support a finding
that they were independent contractors, because the very
nature o f home w ork dictated that the tim es w orked would
be determ ined by the workers and they would be subjected
to very little supervision when working. The fact that a per­
son works from home does not, on its own, determine whether
the person is an employee under the Fair Labor Standards
Act, the court said. Third, the court found that the home
researchers had a continuous w orking relationship with
DialAmerica under which they did not work for other em­
ployers. Finally, the court held that the home researchers
were an integral part o f DialAmerica’s business because they
did the very work— locating phone numbers— that was es­
sential to DialAm erica’s ability to renew subscriptions, de­
spite the fact that they located only approxim ately 4 per­
cent to 5 percent o f the num ber o f phone num bers the
com pany sought to be retrieved. After analyzing these fac­
tors, the court ruled that the home researchers were economi­
cally dependent on DialAmerica for continued employment
8

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

Management has no right to control the work process o f
the worker

Work requires a special skill, judgment, or initiative
Work relationship is for one project or a limited duration

and, therefore, were employees under the economic realities
test.
In contrast, the appellate court held that the distributors o f
the research work were independent contractors under the
Fair Labor Standards Act. The court found that DialAmerica
exhibited minimal control over the distributors’ work provid­
ing cards to the home researchers, because the distributors
maintained records o f the work and were permitted to recruit
home researchers. The court also noted that the distributors
risked financial loss if they did not manage the distribution
network properly, because their transportation expenses could
exceed their revenue. The transportation expenses also re­
quired the distributors to make an investment in the business,
the court found. Finally, the distributors required somewhat
specialized managerial skills in operating the distribution net­
work, according to the court. Although the distributors were
typically employed for a long period, the Court found that
factor insufficient to overcome the weight o f the remaining
circumstances indicating that the distributors were independ­
ent contractors.
In Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.,31 the U.S. Court o f A p­
peals for the Second Circuit found that an employer had vio­
lated the Fair Labor Standard A ct’s overtime-pay protections
by not paying overtime to nurses who were employees under
the Act. Superior Care referred nurses for temporary assign­
ments to hospitals, nursing homes, and individual patients.
The company would assign nurses as work opportunities
became available, and the nurses were free to refuse an as­
signment for any reason. If a nurse accepted an assignment,
the nurse reported directly to the patient, and Superior Care
provided minimal supervision through visits to job sites ap-

proximately once or twice a month. Patients contracted di­
rectly with Superior Care, which paid them an hourly wage.
The nurses could hold other jobs, including jobs with other
health care providers.
The court found that the nurses were employees under the
economic realities test. As a preliminary matter, the court re­
jected the company’s contention that the trial court had used
evidence outside o f the six factors that make up the test. Su­
perior Care had two sets o f payrolls, one for taxed employees
and one for nontaxed employees, despite the fact that the
nurses on both payrolls did exactly the same work. The work­
ers on the nontaxed payroll did not receive overtime pay for
their work. The trial court relied in part on that evidence in
finding that those workers were not independent contractors.
The appeals court noted that the factors o f the economic real­
ity test are not exclusive and that any relevant evidence can
be considered as part o f the totality o f the circumstances sur­
rounding the employment relationship. The court also stated
that an em ployer’s “self-serving” labeling o f workers as inde­
pendent contractors is not controlling. Turning to the appli­
cation o f the economic reality factors, the court found that (1)
the nurses had no opportunity for profit or loss, because Su­
perior Care set their wages and prohibited them from entering
into privately paying contracts with patients, (2) the nursing
services that were provided were the most integral part o f
Superior Care’s business o f providing health care personnel
on request, and (3) despite a quantitatively calculated lack o f
visits by Superior Care supervisors, the company retained the
right to supervise the nurses and exerted control over them in
that regard. Although the nurses obviously were skilled work­
ers and also had the opportunity to work for other health care
employers besides Superior Care, the court found those fac­
tors nondispositive. According to the court, the weight o f the
evidence indicated that when all the circumstances o f the
employment relationship were considered, the nurses were
employees and not independent contractors.
In Brock v. Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. 31 the Court o f Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit found that operators o f fireworks stands
in south Texas were employees under the economic realities
test, subject to the protections o f the Fair Labor Standards
Act, because (1) Mr. W controlled the method o f selling fire­
works and made a substantial investment in the business op­
erations, (2) the operators lacked skill and independent initia­
tive, and (3) the duration o f the employment relationship was
lengthy. According to the parties’ testimony, Mr. W acquired
land for fireworks stands, procured materials to build the
stands, hired workers to construct the stands at its warehouse,
recruited operators to run the stands during the two short
periods in each year that Texas permits the sale o f fireworks,
employed workers to supply the stands with fireworks, and
advertised the sale o f fireworks through the stands. Mr. W
paid the operators o f the stands on a commission basis.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The appeals court rejected the trial court’s finding that the
operators were independent contractors, ruling that Mr. W
exerted control over the operators by determining the location
and size of the stands, by suggesting the retail price o f the
fireworks and preprinting price tags, by requiring operators to
attend to the stands for 24 hours a day to avoid the loss of
inventory, by providing display instructions that were almost
uniformly followed by the operators, by supplying a substantial
portion o f advertising, and by determining how the operators
would be paid. The court also found that the operators had little
opportunity to determine their own profit or loss, because the
commission for the sale o f the fireworks was set by Mr. W; that
the operators made little or no investment in the operation o f the
stands, whose construction was always financed by Mr. W;
and that the operators, while good salespersons, did not exhibit
a degree of independent skill or initiative sufficient to conclude
that they were independent contractors. Finally, the fact that the
fireworks stands were seasonal was simply an operational char­
acteristic unique to the particular business, and the permanency
o f an employment relationship could accordingly be determined
by whether the operators worked for the entire operative period
o f a particular season. Because the operators were economically
dependent on Mr. W for their continued employment as sellers
o f fireworks, the operators were deemed employees under the
economic realities test, entitled to the protections o f the FanLabor Standards Act.
In conclusion, the economic realities test, while similar to
the common-law test, focuses on the ultimate concern o f
whether the economic reality, as illuminated by several fac­
tors, is that a worker depends on someone else’s business for
his or her continued employment, in which case the worker is
an employee. If a worker operates an independent business,
the worker is classified as an independent contractor under
the economic realities test.

Hybrid test. The hybrid test combines elements of the commonlaw test and the economic realities test, in keeping with the ac­
cepted view of all courts that the totality of the circumstances
surrounding the relationship between worker and employer
should be examined to determine whether the worker is an em­
ployee or an independent contractor. In practice, the hybrid test
considers the economic realities of the work relationship as a
critical factor in the determination, but focuses on the employer’s
right to control the work process as a determinative factor.
The hybrid test is applied frequently in cases brought un­
der Title VII o f the Civil Rights Act o f 1964, which prohibits
employers from discriminating against employees on the ba­
sis o f race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. For example,
in Diggs v. Harris Hospital—Methodist, Inc.,33 the U.S. Court
o f Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Jacqulyn Diggs, a
black female physician, could not sustain a claim under Title
VII for discrimination on the basis o f race or sex or in retalia-

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

9

W h at Is a n Em ployee?

tion for a prior charge o f discrimination against the hospital. The
court found that, although she was appointed to the hospital’s
provisional medical staff and enjoyed the privileges associated
with that appointment, including the ability to treat patients
through hospital facilities, Diggs was an independent contrac­
tor, not an employee, o f the hospital under the hybrid test.
Noting first that the hybrid test takes into account both the
economic realities o f the working relationship and the extent to
which the employer is able to control the details and means of
the work being done, the court then specified additional factors
to be considered under the test. Certain o f those factors, includ­
ing supervision, skill level, method o f payment, who supplies
the tools and materials, the duration o f the employment relation­
ship, the extent to which the work is integrated into the
employer’s business, and the intention o f the parties, are con­
sidered under both the common-law test and the economic reali­
ties test. Beyond these factors, the court also considered the
manner in which the work relationship was terminated (that is,
by one or both parties and with or without notice or explana­
tion), whether annual leave was provided to the workers, whether
retirement benefits were provided to them, and whether the em­
ployer paid Social Security taxes for the workers.
In concluding that Diggs was not an employee, the court
found that physicians’ privileges at Harris Hospital were not
necessary to Diggs’ practice; that is, if Diggs were denied
those privileges, her ability to obtain them at other area hos­
pitals would not have been restricted. Focusing on the con­
trol factor, the court also found that, although the hospital both

supplied the tools and materials to make it possible for Diggs to
provide medical care and imposed standards o f care upon those
with privileges, the hospital did not, in fact, direct the manner or
means by which medical care was to be provided by the physi­
cian. Diggs treated patients without direct supervision and
merely required the presence of a sponsor during surgical pro­
cedures to attest to the physician’s qualifications. Furthermore,
the hospital did not pay a salary to Diggs, nor did it pay her
licensing fees, professional dues, insurance premiums, taxes, or
retirement benefits. These considerations cemented the court’s
conclusion that Diggs was an independent contractor who was
not protected by Title VII.
The hybrid test seeks to combine the general and specific
factors o f both the common-law test and the economic reali­
ties test, recognizing that, in each legal determination o f
whether a worker is an employee or an independent contrac­
tor, a court may consider each and every circumstance o f the
employment relationship.
T h e p r o p e r c l a s s if ic a t io n o f a w o r k e r as an employee
or independent contractor at the beginning o f an employ­
ment relationship is important to both employers and work­
ers with respect to their obligations and protections under
Federal law. Although the classification does depend on the
Federal law being applied, the overriding factor is who has
the “right to control” the work process, and the relationship
is based upon all o f its characteristics, regardless o f what
label the employer applies to the worker.34
□

Notes_______________________________________
1 The figures reported are for the broadest of the Bureau’s three
measurements of the contingent workforce. For additional informa­
tion, see the bls news release, “Contingent and Alternative Work Ar­
rangements,” February 2001.

11 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.

2 By the criteria of the survey, a worker may be in both a contin­
gent and an alternative work arrangement, but is not automatically
so, because contingent work is defined separately from alternative
work arrangements.

14 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.

3 American Heritage Dictionary o f the English Language, 1978.
4 Henry Campbell Black, Black’s Law Dictionary (St. Paul,
Publishing Co, 1991), p. 363.

mn,

West

5 Ibid., p. 530.
6 See, for example, Mark Diana and Robin H. Rome, “Beyond Tra­
ditional Employment: The Contingent Workforce,” 196 apr n .j. Law 8,
*9 (April 1999).
7 26 U.S.C. 3101 etseq.
8 26 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.

10 In many cases, an independent contractor’s true employer is the
contracting agency, which would be subject to these Federal laws. In
addition to the Federal laws that protect employees, additional State
laws, including those which provide workers’ compensation benefits,
typically protect employees, but not independent contractors.

10

M onthly Labor R eview

13 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq.

15 42 U.S.C. 12101 etseq.
16 29 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
17 29 U.S.C. 151 etseq.
18 Federal law provides employers with a safe-harbor provision to
avoid a retroactive irs reclassification of workers as employees where
an employer had a “reasonable basis” for treating a worker as an inde­
pendent contractor. An employer’s good faith in making the determi­
nation is required for the safe harbor to apply.
19 The case has an extensive procedural history throughout the
1990s. For the opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regard­
ing the status of the Microsoft workers focused on in this article, see
120 F.3d 1006.
20 The irs used its “20-factor test” in making its determination
regarding the employees’ status. (For details of the test, see next sec­
tion in the text.)

9 26 U.S.C. 3401 et seq.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

12 42 U.S.C. 2000(e) et seq.

J an u ary 2002

21 The District Court used the “common-law test” in making its
determination regarding the employees’ status. (For details of the test,
see next section in the text.)
22 490 U.S. 730 (1989).

23 Black’s Law Dictionary, p. 62.
24 See irs Revenue Ruling 87^11; see also “Summary of irs 20-Factor
Test,” from HRnext.com, on the Internet at http://www.hrnext.com/
tools/view.cfm?articles_id=1470&tools_id=2.
25 112 S.Ct. 1344, 1348-49 (1992).
26 137 F.2d 531 (2nd Circuit 1943).
27 550 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1977).
28 The Fair Labor Standards Act uses the following uninformative
definition of “employee” in the statutory language: “any individual
employed by an employer.” However, Congress and the courts have
recognized that, because of its primary focus on protecting workers,
the definition of “employee” under the Act is the broadest one used
pursuant to the economic realities test.
29 See Myra H. Barron, “Who’s an Independent Contractor? Who’s
an Employee?” 14 Lab. Law 457, 460 (winter/spring 1999).


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

30 757 F.2d 1376 (3rd Cir. 1985).
31 840 F.2d 1054 (2nd Cir. 1988).
32 814 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1987).
33 847 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1988).
34 For additional discussions of the classification of workers as em­
ployees or independent contractors and the ramifications for employ­
ers, see John C. Fox, Is That Worker an Independent Contractor or Your
Employee? (Palo Alto, ca , Fenwick and West, March 1997); Barron,
“Who’s an Independent Contractor?” Diana and Rome, Beyond Tradi­
tional Employment; and William D. Frumkin and Elliot D. Bernak,
“Cost Savings from Hiring Contingent Workers May Be Lost if Their
Status Is Challenged,” New York State Bar Journal, special edition on
labor and employment law, New York State Bar Association, September-October 1999.

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

11

State Labor Laws, 2001

State labor legislation
enacted in 2001
Increases in minimum wage rates, restrictions on youth peddling,
bans on discrimination because o f genetic information,
and protection from workplace harassment and violence
were among major subjects o f State labor legislation
Richard R. Nelson
tate labor legislation enacted in 2001 covered a wide
variety o f employment standards and included several
significant developm ents.1 Minimum wage rates were
increased in a number o f States, child labor measures were
enacted, governing employment in the entertainment indus­
try and placing limits on children selling products door-todoor, and employment discrimination on the basis o f genetic
information or other reasons was banned in several States.
Laws also were enacted in the emerging areas o f regulating
employee monitoring in the workplace, allowing breaks for
nursing mothers, providing benefits for domestic partners,
and addressing workplace harassment and violence.
This article summarizes significant State labor legislation en­
acted in 2001. It does not, however, cover legislation on occupa­
tional safety and health, employment and training, labor rela­
tions, employee background clearance, economic development,
and local living wage ordinances. Changes in unemployment
insurance and workers’ compensation laws appear elsewhere
in this issue.

S

Wages. Legislation to increase minimum wage rates was intro­
duced in more than one-half o f the States and at the Federal level.
New legislation increased minimum wage rates in Georgia, Ha­
waii, Maine, Texas, and Wyoming; rates also increased in Cali­
fornia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Washington
as the result o f previous laws. A bill proposing an increase in the
minimum wage was vetoed in New Mexico. A bill to increase the
Richard R. Nelson is a State standards advisor in the Division of
External Affairs, Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
e-mail: rrn@fenix2.dol-esa.gov

12

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

Federal minimum wage was pending at press time. If enacted,
this will affect 25 jurisdictions where rates are linked to the Fed­
eral rate.2
As of January 1,2002, minimum wage rates were higher than
the Federal standard in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Dela­
ware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts,
Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. O f the 43
States with minimum wage laws, only 3 have rates lower than the
Federal rate of $5.15 per hour.
Utah passed a measure prohibiting cities, towns, and coun­
ties from establishing minimum rates that exceed the Federal rate,
and Oregon passed a law barring local governments from estab­
lishing minimum wage requirements for private sector employers
in their jurisdictions.
Provisions that allow employers to use employee tips to meet
a portion o f the minimum wage were revised in Connecticut,
Hawaii, Texas, Vermont, and Wyoming.
Other significant minimum wage legislation was enacted in
Arkansas where civil penalties replaced criminal penalties for
violation, in the District o f Columbia where civil penalties were
authorized for minimum wage and wage payment violations,
and in Oregon where civil penalties were authorized for willful
minimum wage law violations. Idaho brought agricultural em­
ployment under coverage, Nevada eliminated a sub-minimum
wage rate for minors, Vermont abolished its wage board, and
Wyoming eliminated exemptions for minors under age 18 and
part-time workers. Wyoming will allow a sub-minimum wage
rate for employees under age 20 during the first 90 days of
employment.
Laws were enacted in Maine and Oregon placing limits on
mandatory overtime for nurses.

Prevailing wage laws pertaining to public works projects
currently exist in 31 States and the Federal Government. In
2001, as usual, there was a mix o f reform legislation enacted.
Laws enacted in California, Illinois and Rhode Island expanded
coverage to include additional authorities or agencies, while
the Oregon law was amended to provide a new exemption. The
dollar threshold amount for coverage was increased adminis­
tratively in Ohio and Wisconsin and by legislation for certain
projects in West Virginia.
Rate determination methodology was changed in Montana
and Wyoming. Wyoming also revised its hearing procedures.
Nevada changed penalty provisions, Oregon made changes
in requirements for the submission o f certified payroll records,
and in California, “public works” will now include installation
work.
Other significant wage legislation granted the Nevada la­
bor commissioner rule-making authority, authorized the labor
commissioner in Oregon to assess civil penalties for final pay
and seasonal farmworker payment violations, increased pen­
alties for pay day violations in Wyoming, and permitted pay­
ment by direct deposit in South Dakota.
A Utah Voluntary Contributions Act requires that labor orga­
nizations may only make expenditures for political activities if
they establish separate segregated funds for this purpose and
requires that employee contributions to the fund be voluntary.
Coverage o f the Michigan reciprocal agreement law was
expanded to include Canada.

Family issues. Again this year, several States tried, but were
unsuccessful in passing legislation that provides unemploy­
ment benefits for individuals on family and medical leave. A
task force was created in Oregon to study the issue o f paid
family leave and funding mechanisms including the use of
unemployment insurance.
While no traditional leave provisions were enacted, Cali­
fornia, Illinois, and Washington passed measures pertaining
to break time for nursing mothers.
Domestic partners were given rights to benefits in Califor­
nia and Maine.

Child labor. At the beginning o f 2001, a tight labor market drew
considerable attention to child labor issues. A large number of
bills were introduced and a variety o f laws were enacted.
Vermont granted the labor department rulemaking author­
ity, conformed State hours and hazardous occupations restric­
tions to Federal law, and increased penalties for law violations.
Tennessee also increased penalties for violations. Maine
adopted new rules governing prohibited hazardous occupa­
tions, including adding restrictions on selling door-to-door,
operating amusement rides, working alone in cash-based busi­
nesses, and working in places having nude entertainment (all


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

occupations). N evada superseded adm inistrative actions
taken last year prohibiting youth under age 16 from peddling,
by limiting applicability to counties o f 100,000 or more popula­
tion. Minnesota and Tennessee revised requirements for ac­
ceptable proof o f age.
Indiana will now require rest breaks for minors under age
18, and Nebraska will more closely regulate detasseling work.
Also, Maine will ease a prohibition on work in theaters to
allow specified work, Michigan will permit longer and later
hours o f employment for minors aged 16 or older, and Oregon
will exempt soccer referees from coverage.
In the entertainment industry, Nevada employers who em­
ploy minors for more than 91 school days are to provide tutor­
ing or equivalent educational services. A new Texas law limits
contract duration for minors and provides that a court may
require that a portion o f earnings be set aside in a trust for
those employees.

Equal employment opportunity.

The trend to enact legisla­
tion banning employment discrimination against individuals
based on genetic characteristics, genetic information, or test
results accelerated this year, with new laws passed in Arkan­
sas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South
Dakota, and with a revision to the Texas law. More than half o f
the States now have laws o f this kind.
Among other measures that w ere enacted, banning vari­
ous forms o f employment discrim ination, M aryland made it
an unlawful em ploym ent practice to discrim inate on the
basis o f sexual orientation, and Rhode Island enacted a
related measure banning employment discrim ination on the
basis o f gender identity or expression. C onnecticut added
mental disability and m arital status to lists o f prohibited
forms o f discrim ination for purposes o f hiring and other
personnel decisions involving State em ployees. M ontana
am ended its ban on m arital status discrim ination to allow
an em ployer to em ploy a person for a position and to also
em ploy the person’s spouse. N orth Carolina passed a law
to protect board o f education em ployees from sexual ha­
rassm ent.

Drug and alcohol testing.

Tennessee will now require cov­
ered employers to notify the parents or guardians o f a minor
o f the results o f any drug or alcohol-testing program con­
ducted pursuant to the drug-free workplace act. Other laws
require the testing o f nuclear storage facility employees in
Utah, and revise the drug testing policy requirements for
nursing homes in Texas.

Worker privacy. The recent trend continued among States
adopting legislation providing immunity from civil liability to
employers who furnish information about a current or former

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

13

State Labor Laws, 2001

employee’s job performance to a prospective or current em­
ployer. Such measures were adopted in Florida for law en­
forcement officers and in Arizona for mortgage bankers and
brokers. Other significant measures include a Delaware law
requiring employers who monitor employee telephone calls,
electronic mail, or Internet access to give prior written notice
to the employees, a new M innesota requirem ent that em­
ployee-assistance records be maintained separate from per­
sonnel records and not included in an em ployee’s personnel
file, and a Vermont amendment adding the Department o f
Motor Vehicles to the list o f employers permitted to require
polygraph examinations for certain applicants as a condition
o f employment.

Private employment agencies.

The M innesota Department
o f Labor and Industry will cease regulating search firms be­
ginning July 1,2003. Employment agencies will continue to be
regulated. New legislation was enacted in Arizona regulating
the activities o f day labor service agencies. Other laws limit
the payroll deduction o f applicant fees in Louisiana, and
change coverage o f the Texas law regulating talent agencies.
California will require the annual licensure o f private duty
nursing agencies.

Workplace violence. In an emerging area addressing the is­
sue o f workplace violence, legislation was adopted in a few
States. The Rhode Island Workplace Violence Protection Act
o f2001 was enacted, permitting employers to seek a temporary
restraining order and an injunction prohibiting further unlaw­
ful acts by an individual at the work site. Nevada also passed
legislation allowing employers to seek court orders to prevent
harassment in the workplace. California extended the time given
to investigate hate crime law violations.
Agriculture.

California made several changes concerning farm
labor contractor regulation, including increasing civil penalties

Arizona
C h ild labor. The Department of Health Ser­
vices may not adopt any rule that prohibits an
administrator of a nursing care institution from
employing a person age 16 or older, who pro­
vides direct care to residents and who meets
certification and qualification requirements.

The law was amended
that, permits banks, savings and loan asso­
ciations, credit unions, and escrow agents to
provide written employment references to
similar businesses, upon request, which ad­
vise of the applicants’ involvement in any
theft, embezzlement, misappropriation, or
other misuse of funds (which has been re­
W o rk er p r i v a c y .

14
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

for violation and establishing a system for the verification of
licenses. Other California laws address use of surety bonds to
pay awards and the authority to collect monetary relief.

Discharge.

The Montana law placing limits on an employer’s
right to discharge employees was amended to clarify rights
during a probationary period. Changes were also made in the
Minnesota law concerning the right to be informed o f the rea­
son for termination. Protection from discharge or discrimina­
tion was afforded to volunteer fire fighters in Washington and
to emergency medical service attendants in West Virginia.

Other laws. Among other laws o f interest, a no-sweatshop
act was passed in New York permitting local school boards to
consider labor standards and working conditions, including
the use o f child labor, in purchasing apparel. Connecticut en­
acted a law prohibiting employment exploitation o f immigrant
labor, and California made it an unlawful employment practice
for an employer to have a policy that prohibits the use o f any
language in the workplace unless the policy is justified by
business necessity. West Virginia added knowingly employ­
ing a person not having a legal right to be employed in the
United States to the list o f causes for disciplinary action under
the State Contractor Licensing Act.
Time off from work was authorized for State employee vet­
eran funeral details in Delaware, for members o f the State leg­
islature in Nevada, for Native American employees to vote in
New Mexico, for precinct officials in North Carolina, for Vir­
ginia State employees to donate bone marrow or organs, and
in New York for American Red Cross disaster volunteers.
Oregon employers are to provide workplaces free o f to­
bacco smoke.
Oklahoma became a “right-to-work” State as the result o f a
measure placed on the ballot by the legislature and approved
by the voters.

ported to Federal or State authorities). It now
also applies to commercial mortgage bank­
ers, mortgage bankers, and mortgage brokers.
The protection from civil liability for provid­
ing an employment reference will extend to
these businesses as well, unless false informa­
tion is provided with knowledge and malice.
P riv a te e m p lo y m e n t agen cies. New legis­
lation was enacted regulating the activities of
day-labor service agencies (defined as enti­
ties that provide day laborers to third-party
employers and charge those employers for
this service). Service agencies are to pay day
laborers for work performed in negotiable in­
struments that are redeemable in cash at a
financial institution, and, at the time of pay­

J an u a ry 2002

ment, are to provide each day laborer with an
itemized statement showing in detail all de­
ductions from wages. Deductions, other than
those required by Federal or State law, are
not to bring wages below the Federal mini­
mum wage for hours worked. Agencies are
not to restrict the right of a day laborer to
accept a permanent position with a thirdparty employer to whom he or she has been
referred to for work. The law does not apply
to farm labor contractors, labor union hiring
halls, temporary help services engaged in
supplying white-collar employees, secre­
tarial employees, clerical employees, or
skilled laborers, or to labor bureau or em­
ployment offices operated by a business that
employs individuals for its own use.

Arkansas
W ages. Among amendments to the mini­
mum wage act, the Labor Board was elimi­
nated and its powers and duties transferred
to the Director of the Department of Labor
who now has the authority to make and re­
vise regulations under the law. Criminal pen­
alties for violation were eliminated and re­
placed with civil penalties of not less than
$50 and not more than $1,000 for each viola­
tion. The exemption from the law for em­
ployers of fewer than four employees was
amended to specify that this exemption ap­
plies to employment of fewer than four em­
ployees in any workweek. In addition, the
general exemption for employers covered by
the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act was
amended to limit the exemption to employ­
ers who are subject to the minimum wage and
overtime provisions of the Federal Act.
The law setting maximum salary limits
for officers, agents, or employees of hospital
and medical corporations was repealed.
G e n e tic testin g .
A new Genetic Informa­
tion in the Workplace Act makes it unlawful
for an employer to require a genetic test, or
to seek to obtain, or to use a genetic test or
genetic information from an employee or job
applicant for the purposes of distinguishing
between individuals or discriminating against
or restricting any right or benefit otherwise
due to an employee or applicant. An em­
ployer in violation will be guilty of a misde­
meanor and may be subject to a fine of up to
$25,000, imprisonment for up to 1 year, or
both a fine and imprisonment.

California
W ages.
As the result of previous action by
the State Industrial Welfare Commission, the
State minimum wage rate increased from $5.75
per hour to $6.25 per hour on January 1,2001,
and to $6.75 per hour on January 1, 2002.
The Labor Code was amended to codify
minimum wage, hours, and working condi­
tions for sheepherders adopted by the State
Industrial Welfare Commission (Order Num­
ber 14-2001, effective July 1, 2001). Effec­
tive July 1, the minimum wage for all sheepherders was set at $1,050 per month, with an
increase to $ 1,200 per month scheduled for
July 1, 2002. After July 1, 2002, the amount
of the monthly minimum wage required will
be increased each time that the State hourly
minimum wage is increased by the same per­
centage as the hourly minimum wage increase.
Wages paid to sheepherders may not be off­
set by meals or lodging provided by the em­
ployer. Other provisions specify that sheep­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

herders are to receive a 30-minute meal pe­
riod for a work period of more than 5 hours
except when such a break cannot reasonably
be provided because the sheepherder is work­
ing alone, are to receive 10 minutes of rest
period per 4 hours of work, and are to be
provided with the tools or equipment neces­
sary for the performance of the job unless
the sheepherder earns more than two times
the required minimum wage. Civil penalties
were specified for law violations.
An employee who is a licensed physician
or surgeon, earning more than $55 per hour,
who is primarily engaged in performing du­
ties for which licensure is required, will be
exempt from overtime payment requirements.
The hourly rate will be adjusted annually,
effective on January 1, based on changes in
the California Consumer Price Index for Ur­
ban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. The
exemption will not apply to employees em­
ployed in medical internship or resident pro­
grams or to physician employees covered by
valid collective bargaining agreements.
Public works projects financed through
Industrial Development Bonds issued by the
California Infrastructure and Economic De­
velopment Bank will be subject to the State
prevailing wage law. The definition of “pub­
lic works” for purposes of law coverage was
amended to add installation work to con­
struction, alteration, demolition and repair
work. The definition of “paid for in whole or
in part out of public funds” was amended to
specify that this includes payments, trans­
fers of assets for less than fair market price,
credits, reductions, waivers, and perfor­
mances of work.
Joint labor-management committees, es­
tablished pursuant to the Federal Labor Man­
agement Cooperation Act of 1978, were au­
thorized to bring civil court action against
any employer who fails to pay prevailing
wages as required by law. Courts may award
restitution to employees and attorney’s fees
to the committee.
The Commission on the Status of Women
is to conduct a study on gender based com­
pensation and classification inequities in the
State civil service and in certain specified
higher educational institutions. A report on
findings is due to the legislature by January
1,2003.
A comprehensive domestic
partners law was enacted. Among several em­
ployment-related provisions, a registered do­
mestic partner may use sick leave to care for
a partner or a partner’s child and discrimina­
tion against an individual who uses sick leave
for those purposes is prohibited. It also en­
titles a domestic partner to receive unemploy­
F a m ily issu es.

ment benefits for job loss if his or her partner
is transferred to a remote location and com­
muting to work is impractical and a transfer
of employment is not available. A domestic
partner, and his or her child, will be eligible
for continued health coverage upon the death
of the employee or annuitant if the domestic
partner is receiving a beneficiary allowance.
A domestic partner also may file a claim for
disability benefits on behalf of a partner.
Every employer, including the State and
any political subdivision, is to provide a rea­
sonable amount of break time to an employee
who desires to express breast milk for her
infant child. If possible, the break time is to
run concurrently with any break time already
provided to the employee. Break time that
does not run concurrently with authorized
leave will be unpaid. Reasonable efforts are
to be made to provide a room or other loca­
tion, near the work area, other than a toilet
stall, where the employee can express her
milk in privacy. The break time need not be
given if to do so would seriously disrupt the
employer’s operations. An employer in vio­
lation will be subject to a civil penalty of
$100 for each violation.
Several changes were made
concerning farm labor contractor regulation
including establishment of a three-tier esca­
lating penalty system for those contractors
who knowingly fail to pay wages or who
continue to operate after their licenses are
revoked or suspended. Penalties for a first
offense after January 1,2003, will range from
$ 1,000 to $5,000, a minimum of $ 10,000 for
a second offense within 3 years, and a mini­
mum $25,000 fine for a third offense com­
mitted within 5 years of the second viola­
tion. In addition, license revocation is re­
quired upon conviction of an offense for 1
year in the case of a first offense, 2 years in
the case of a second offense, and permanently
in the case of a third offense. A system was
also established for the verification of farm
labor contractor licenses including creation
of a Farm Labor Contractor License Verifica­
tion Unit at the Department of Industrial Re­
lations to certify the status of licenses. A
grower has an affirmative obligation to in­
spect the license of any person contracted as
a farm labor contractor and to verify that the
license is valid. A copy of the license is to be
retained for 3 years following termination of
the contract or agreement.
Farm labor contractor surety bonds and
funds held for farm workers may be used to
pay awards of monetary relief due to an agri­
cultural worker because of a violation of la­
bor laws or regulations. Payments will also
be allowed for penalties on nonpayment or
A g ric u ltu re .

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

15

State Labor Laws, 2001

late payment of wages to employees who are
discharged or quit.
It was clarified that the Agricultural La­
bor Relations Board has authority to collect
monetary relief it orders paid by employers
who violate labor laws and to transfer the
money to employees on whose behalf it was
collected. If, after 2 years, the board cannot
locate employees who are owed money, the
money collected will be placed in an Agricul­
tural Employees Relief Fund to pay other
workers who are owed monetary relief and
for whom the board was otherwise unable to
collect from an agricultural employer.
The provi­
sion for the filing of complaints by persons
who believe they have been discharged or
otherwise discriminated against in violation
of labor code provisions under the jurisdic­
tion of the Labor Commissioner was ex­
panded to cover any law under the jurisdic­
tion of the Labor Commissioner. Another
change provides that when the Labor Com­
missioner has decided to dismiss a complaint
and the complainant has then brought court
action and filed a complaint against the State
program with the U.S. Department of Labor,
the filing of a timely complaint will stay the
dismissal until the U.S. Secretary of Labor
makes a determination regarding the alleged
violation. Within 15 days of receipt of that
determination, the Labor Commissioner is
required to notify the parties as to whether
he or she will reopen the complaint or reaf­
firm the dismissal.
Protections against discrimination, for fil­
ing wage claims or instituting other actions,
which had previously applied only to em­
ployees, were extended to job applicants. An
unsuccessful job applicant or a person not
selected for ajob-training program may now
file a complaint against an employer for re­
fusal to hire based on lawful off-duty con­
duct including political activities. The law
will not invalidate any requirement restrict­
ing the use o f tobacco products by
firefighters. Claims of alleged discrimination
will be filed with the State labor commis­
sioner. The law excludes law enforcement
agencies and nonprofit religious organiza­
tions.
The Fair Employment and Housing Act
was amended to provide that a nonprofit
public benefit corporation formed by, or af­
filiated with a particular religion, that oper­
ates an educational institution as its sole or
primary activity, may restrict employment,
including promotion, in any or all categories
of employment, to individuals of the par­
ticular religion. In all other respects, these
religious affiliated educational institutions

E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity.

16

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

will remain subject to the State’s prohibitions
against employment discrimination.
The California Fair Employment and
Housing Act was amended to make existing
provisions prohibiting workplace harassment
applicable to nonprofit hospitals and health
care facilities affiliated with or owned by re­
ligious institutions for persons employed to
perform other than religious duties. These
hospitals and health care facilities have been
subject to the other unlawful employment
practice provisions of the law.
It was made an unlawful employment
practice for an employer to adopt or enforce
a policy that limits or prohibits the use of
any language in the workplace, unless the lan­
guage restriction is justified by a business
necessity and the employer has notified em­
ployees of the circumstances and the time
when the restriction is required to be ob­
served and of the consequences for violations.
A law was
enacted requiring the annual licensure of pri­
vate duty nursing agencies that provide or
arrange for the provision of private duty nurs­
ing services, and making it a crime to violate
the licensure provisions. Each private duty
nursing agency is to provide a plan of treat­
ment for patients receiving private duty nurs­
ing services, maintain clinical records on all
patients, maintain policies regarding the de­
livery and supervision of patient care that
are subject to annual professional review, and
meet all applicable Federal, State, and local
requirements.
Employment agencies that procure tem­
porary employment for long-term health care
employers may not refer certified nurse as­
sistants or licensed nursing staff for any em­
ployment without first conducting a personal
interview, and verifying the individual’s ex­
perience, training, and references.
P riv a te e m p lo y m e n t a g e n c ie s.

W h istleb lo w ers.
Provisions of the Report­
ing by Community College Employees of Im­
proper Governmental Activities Act were ex­
panded to authorize community college em­
ployees to file retaliation complaints with
the State Personnel Board. This will be in
addition to the prior protection from retalia­
tion for disclosing improper activities to a
community college administrator, member of
the governing board of a community college
district, or the Chancellor of the California
Community Colleges.

The time given to the
Department of Fair Employment and Hous­
ing to investigate civil violations of the State’s
hate crimes law (concerning the right to be
W orkplace vio le n c e.

J a n u a ry 2002

free of violence or intimidation) was extended
from 1 to 2 years.
O th e r la w s. A Displaced Janitor Opportu­
nity Act was enacted requiring contractors
and subcontractors who are awarded new
contracts or subcontracts to provide janito­
rial or building maintenance services at a par­
ticular job site or sites, and who employ 25
or more janitors to retain the janitors em­
ployed by the former contractor or subcon­
tractor for at least 60 days. At the end of the
60-day transition period, the employees who
are retained are to be offered continued em­
ployment if their performance during the 60day period was satisfactory. The written of­
fer of employment is to be made in the
employee’s primary language or another lan­
guage in which the employee is literate.
Pursuant to regulations adopted by the
Department of Personnel Administration, and
subject to the collective bargaining agreement
between the State and the employee’s exclu­
sive representative, with supervisory ap­
proval, a State employee may receive full pay
from the State while taking time off from
work to serve as a member of a precinct board
on election day.

Colorado
Obsolete
provisions related to the U.S. Department of
Labor review of Colorado law regarding work
refusal by temporary employees and notifi­
cation to the General Assembly of any con­
flicts were repealed.

P r iv a te e m p lo y m e n t a g e n c ie s.

A resolution was adopted rec­
ognizing April 28, 2001 as Workers’ Memo­
rial Day in the State in remembrance of those
who were killed, disabled, or injured on the
job.
March 31st of each year will be recognized
as “Cesar Chavez Day”, and appropriate ob­
servances may be held by the public and by
public schools in the State in tribute to his
commitment to the principles of social jus­
tice and respect for human dignity. Employ­
ees of State agencies may take the day off
from work as a paid holiday in lieu of any
other paid legal holiday to which they would
otherwise be entitled.
O th e r law s.

Connecticut
W ages. As the result of prior legislation,
the State minimum wage rate rose to $6.40
from $6.15 per hour on January 1,2001, and
to $6.70 on January 1, 2002.
The requirement that the labor department,

by regulation, freeze until January 1,2003, the
minimum hourly wage for tipped hotel and
restaurant industry employees, other than bar­
tenders, at $4.74 and for bartenders at $6.15
was eliminated. Anew provision increased the
tip credit and raised the minimum wage for
bartenders and waitpersons. It creates a tip
credit for hotel and restaurant industry em­
ployees of 26 percent during 2001 and 29.3
percent during 2002, except for bartenders
who customarily and regularly receive tips. For
these bartenders, the credit is 3.9 percent dur­
ing 2001 and 8.2 percent during 2002.
Regulations exempting bona fide executive,
administrative, and professional employees
from overtime payment requirements were re­
vised administratively. The minimum weekly
salary required to qualify for the exemption
was increased to $400 ($475 for high-salaried
employees).
The Hu­
man Rights Law was amended to add mari­
tal status and mental disability to the lists
of factors that are to be disregarded by State
officials and supervisory personnel when
making hiring and other personnel decisions
involving State employees, and by State
agencies in administering apprenticeship and
on-the-job training programs. In addition,
marital status, mental disability, and learn­
ing disability are not to be considered in
granting, denying, or revoking licenses or
charters. State agencies that provide em­
ployment referrals or placement services are
now not to accept job orders that indicate an
intention to exclude workers based upon
marital status or mental disability in addi­
tion to previously banned forms of discrimi­
nation. “Mental disability” refers to an in­
dividual who has a record of, or who is re­
garded as having one or more mental disor­
ders. The ban on discriminatory practices by
employers, government agencies, or labor or­
ganizations was enacted to replace the term
“mental disorder” with “mental disability.”
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity .

W orker p riv a c y .
Medical records, if kept
by an employer, are now to be retained for at
least 3 years following termination of an em­
ployee. Previously, these records were re­
quired to be kept for at least 1 year after
termination.
O th e r la w s. As part of a measure to pro­
hibit employment exploitation of immigrant
labor, the labor commissioner is to prevent
illegal advantage being taken of such laborers
because of their lack of information about
their rights, credulity or lack of proficiency
in the English language. Material describing
the rights of these laborers under the State
contracts, wage payment, minimum wage,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

and unemployment compensation laws is to
be printed in Spanish, French, and those lan­
guages determined to be spoken by the pri­
mary groups of immigrant laborers in the
State. The commissioner was also authorized
to request the Attorney General to bring court
action for injunctive relief requiring compli­
ance with any award, decision or judgment
issued by the commissioner under the stat­
ute barring retaliation against employees who
file claims or testify in proceedings. The act
also makes anyone who violates any of the
employment regulation laws on hours and
employee protection liable to the labor de­
partment for a $300 civil penalty for each
violation.
Delaware
W ages. The penalty section of the prevail­
ing wage law was amended to provide that a
worker who is paid less than the prevailing
wage rate has a right of action against the
employer in court to recover treble the dif­
ference between the amount paid and the pre­
vailing wage rate. Previously, the right of ac­
tion was for an amount of up to treble the
difference.

The Director of the State Emer­
gency Management Agency was authorized
to grant exemptions from the Federal Rules
governing the number of hours a motor car­
rier may be on duty during any consecutive 7
or 8 day period, for a period not exceeding 3
consecutive days, based upon criteria estab­
lished by the Department of Administrative
Services.
H o u rs.

The Gov­
ernor issued an executive order affirming the
State’s commitment to equal employment
opportunity. It directs each entity within
the Executive Branch to pursue the recruit­
ment and promotion of qualified women and
minorities and to comply with the laws pro­
hibiting discrimination in employment. Each
Executive Branch Agency is to maintain an
affirmative action plan, which is to be filed
annually. The Governor’s council on Equal
Employment Opportunity is continued and
will assist in the monitoring and evaluation
of executive branch agencies’ implementa­
tion and compliance with the executive or­
der. The council will provide written reports
on the State’s progress in improving work
force diversity and recommend any addi­
tional actions that it believes should be un­
dertaken. The executive order is not intended
to create an individual right or legal cause of
action not already existing under State or
Federal law. A previous executive order is­
sued in 1995 was repealed.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t opportu n ity.

W orker p riv a c y .
Any employer who moni­
tors any telephone calls, electronic mail, or
Internet access of or by employees must give
prior written notice of such monitoring ac­
tivities to the employees. Violators will be
subject to a civil penalty of $100 for each
violation. This requirement will not apply to
processes designed to manage the type or
volume of incoming or outgoing electronic
mail, telephone voice mail, or Internet usage,
that are not targeted to monitor usage of a
particular individual, and that are performed
solely for the purpose of computer system
maintenance or protection, or both.
O th e r la w s. Any State employee who is a
veteran or a member of the National Guard
Reserve may serve on one veteran funeral
detail per calendar year without loss of pay,
vacation, sick leave, or personal leave credit.

District of Columbia
W ages. The minimum wage and wage pay­
ment laws were amended to provide for the
assessment and collection of civil adminis­
trative penalties for violations in addition to
the previously authorized criminal penalties.
The Mayor is authorized to assess civil pen­
alties of up to $300 for first violations, and
up to $500 for each subsequent violation.
The history of previous violations by the
employer, the administrative costs of the pro­
ceedings to collect, and the size of the
employer’s business are to be considered in
determining the amount of the penalty. More
than one administrative penalty may be as­
sessed against an employer for the same ad­
versely affected employee if the employer
has violated more than one provision of the
law. Employers may request an informal
hearing if a penalty is assessed.

The Chief Procurement Officer
and each District of Columbia Contracting
Officer are to include in each governmentassisted project, totaling $100,000 or more, a
provision that 51 percent of the new em­
ployees hired for the project will be District
residents. Nonprofit organizations are ex­
empt from this requirement. It also may be
waived in certain circumstances including
where it can be shown that there was a good
faith effort to comply. Violation may result
in penalties, including monetary fines of 5
percent of the total amount of the direct and
indirect labor costs of the contract.
P referen ce.

Florida
W orker p r iv a c y .
Procedures were estab­
lished relating to the release of the prior em­
ployment records of applicants for employ-

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

17

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

ment or appointment as law enforcement of­
ficers, correctional officers, or probation of­
ficers. The applicant’s current or former
employer is to provide employment infor­
mation upon being presented with proper
credentials and an authorization form that,
among other items, contains the applicant’s
approval for the information release. Injunc­
tive relief is provided in the event of an
employer’s failure to disclose the informa­
tion. Employers who disclose the required
information are immune from civil liability
for the disclosure or its consequences.
The law exempting personal identifying
information of various categories of employ­
ees from public records disclosure require­
ments was amended. With respect to county
and municipal code inspectors, the Social Se­
curity numbers, photographs, and informa­
tion on spouses and children of these indi­
viduals were added to the previous exemp­
tions of home addresses and telephone num­
bers. The law was also amended to add local
governm ent or water management district
human resource, labor relations, or employee
relations directors, assistant directors, man­
agers and assistant managers to those eligible
for these disclosure exemptions.

the list of those records in which public dis­
closure is not required those records that re­
veal the home address and phone number,
Social Security number, or insurance or medi­
cal information about teachers and employ­
ees of a public school.
Hawaii
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate from $5.25 to $5.75 per
hour on January 1, 2002, with a further in­
crease to $6.25 per hour scheduled for Janu­
ary 1,2003. A tip credit against the minimum
wage is permitted if the tipped employee is
paid not less than 25 cents below the basic
minimum wage (a change from 20 cents), and
the combined amount that the employee re­
ceives from his or her employer and receives
in tips is at least 50 cents more than the mini­
mum wage.

The dislocated worker law
was amended to increase to 60 days from 45
days the advance written notice that an em­
ployer in a covered establishment is to give
to each employee and the director of labor
and industrial relations prior to a closing,
partial closing, or relocation of the business.

P la n t closin g.

Georgia
Wages. Legislation was adopted raising the
State minimum wage rate to $5.15 from $3.25
per hour on July 1, 2001. Certain individu­
als, employed by non-profit child-caring in­
stitutions or long-term care facilities serving
children or mentally disabled adults, were
added to the list of those exempt from the
law. The exemption for employers subject to
the Federal minimum wage was amended to
now apply only when the Federal minimum
wage rate is greater than the State rate.

The State stat­
ute regarding testing related to drug-free
workplace programs was amended. The stat­
ute now stipulates that testing at the em­
ployer worksite, with on-site testing kits that
satisfy testing criteria, shall be deemed suit­
able and acceptable post-offer testing as long
as the employers use chain of custody pro­
cedures to ensure proper recordkeeping, han­
dling, labeling, and identification of all speci­
mens to be tested. Positive test results must
be confirmed by a confirmation test con­
ducted in a laboratory in accordance with
specific requirements that govern laboratory
approval, written procedures that establish a
chain of custody, and proper quality control
procedures are followed.
D r u g a n d a lc o h o l testin g .

W orker p riv a c y .
The law, relating to public
disclosure of records was amended to add to

18

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Idaho
Wages. The State minimum wage law now
applies to agricultural labor except for fam­
ily members of the employer; seasonal har­
vest workers who spend less than 13 weeks
in the fields, live locally, and are paid on a
piece-rate basis; children 16 years of age or
younger who work with their parents as
harvest laborers and are paid at the same
piece-rate as employees older than age 16;
and employees principally engaged in the
range production of livestock.

Illinois
W ages. The section of the minimum wage
law authorizing the Director of the Depart­
ment of Labor to bring any legal action nec­
essary to recover unpaid minimum wages,
unpaid overtime compensation, punitive
damages, and court costs, was amended to
specify that the action is to be brought
within 5 years from the date of the failure to
pay the wages or compensation.
Anew Illinois Sports Facilities Authority
Act provides that all public works projects,
financed in whole or part with bonds issued
under the act, are to be subject to the State
prevailing wage law.
H ours.

J an u a ry 2002

The State vehicle code was amended

to add a requirement that contract carriers
limit the hours of service of drivers trans­
porting employees, in the course of their
employment, on State roads or highways, in
vehicles designed to carry 15 or fewer pas­
sengers, to 12 hours of vehicle operation per
day, 15 hours of on-duty service per day,
and 70 hours of on-duty service in 7 con­
secutive days. A driver who has 12 hours of
vehicle operation per day or 15 hours of onduty service per day is to have at least 8
consecutive hours off duty before operating
a vehicle again. Other provisions require reg­
istration and safety testing of these vehicles
designed to carry 15 or fewer passengers,
and proof of the financial responsibility of
the contract carrier.
A Nursing Mothers in the
Workplace Act was enacted. It requires em­
ployers of more than 5 employees, who are
not the employer’s family members, to pro­
vide reasonable unpaid break time each day
to an employee who needs to express breast
milk for her infant child. Reasonable efforts
are to be made to provide a room or other
location, near the work area, other than a toi­
let stall, where the employee can express her
milk in privacy. If possible, the break time is
to run concurrently with any break time al­
ready provided to the employee. The break
time need not be given if to do so would un­
duly disrupt the employer’s operations.
F a m ily issu es.

O th e r la w s . A Broadcast Industry Free
Market Act was adopted providing that
broadcasting industry employers may not
require, in an employment contract, that an
employee or job applicant refrain obtaining
employment in a specific geographic area for
a specified period of time after termination
of employment. The law does not prevent
the enforcement of a covenant not to com­
pete during the term of an employment con­
tract or against an employee who breaches an
employment contract.

Indiana
The child labor law was
amended to exempt from coverage those par­
ents or guardians employing their own chil­
dren. These individuals must still comply
with those provisions concerning minimum
ages for employment, employment during
school hours, and prohibitions on work in
hazardous occupations. However, they will
no longer be required to comply with other
sections of the law, including the need to ob­
tain an employment certificate. Another
amendment requires most employers to pro­
vide a 30-minute continuous rest break, be­
tween their third and fifth hours of work, to
C h ild la b o r .

minors under 18 years of age who are sched­
uled to work 6 or more hours. Minors em­
ployed as farm laborers, domestic service
workers, golf caddies, and newspaper carri­
ers are exempt from the break requirement as
are those minors employed by a non-profit
camp or other facility that provides health,
recreational, educational, or sectarian-related
activities. Also exempt are those minors who
have completed an approved vocational or
special educational program, and those who
are not enrolled in a regular school term. Ini­
tial violations of the break requirement will
result in a warning letter. Civil money penal­
ties of $100 per instance will be assessed for
second violations, $200 per instance for third
violations, and $400 per instance for fourth
or subsequent violations in which the viola­
tions occurred not more than 2 years after a
prior violation.
Iowa
The gover­
nor issued an executive order rescinding an
earlier executive order that had been voided
by court order. The new executive order reaf­
firms the State policy of providing equal op­
portunity in State employment to all per­
sons. The State Department of Personnel is
to create and administer a workforce diver­
sity program that will create an inclusive
work environment, which values the contri­
butions of each employee, and promotes
awareness of and respect for employee dif­
ferences. Additionally, a Task Force for Equal
Opportunity in Employment was created to
advise the Department of Personnel of po­
tential problems that could impede the
State’s progress toward full utilization of the
State’s residents and diversification of the
State’s workforce, monitor the State’s
progress in meeting affirmative action goals,
and submit recommendations to the Gover­
nor on how to meet its goals.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o pportu n ity.

Kentucky
The legislature con­
firmed an Executive Order, issued in 2000,
creating an Office of Information Technol­
ogy within the Labor Cabinet headed by an
Executive Director.

L a b o r d e p a r tm e n t.

Louisiana
W ages. The time period within which a dis­
charged employee must be paid was changed
from not later than 3 days following the date
of discharge to the earlier of the employee’s
next regular payday or 15 days following the
date of discharge.
The law making it unlawful for employ­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ers to assess employees fines or to deduct
fines from their wages was amended to per­
mit such deductions in cases in which the
employee is convicted of or has plead guilty
to the theft of employer funds.
A resolution was adopted urg­
ing the United States Congress and the Presi­
dent to institute and enforce legislation and
diplomatic action toward the eradication of
child slavery internationally.
C h ild la b o r.

A resolu­
tion was adopted asking the governor to is­
sue a proclamation directing all State agen­
cies to fully implement and enforce State and
Federal law prohibiting employment dis­
crimination based on disability.

E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity .

G e n e tic testin g . A new law was enacted
providing that no otherwise qualified person
is to be subjected to employment discrimina­
tion on the basis of protected genetic infor­
mation. Specifically, employers, labor orga­
nizations, employment agencies, and train­
ing programs may not discharge, refuse to
hire, exclude or expel from membership, seg­
regate, classify, or otherwise discriminate
against any employee with respect to the
compensation, terms, conditions, or privi­
leges of employment because of that
individual’s genetic information. It was also
made unlawful to require, collect, or purchase
protected genetic information, or to disclose
genetic information except to the employee,
upon request, to an occupational or other
health researcher, if required by Federal or
State law, or as part of an investigation into
compliance with the act.

The law regulat­
ing drug testing was amended to specify that
it will not be applicable to employers who
use on-site screening tests to test employees
or job applicants when there are no conse­
quences provided for in the law. An “on-site
screening test” is defined as a test that is eas­
ily portable and can be administered in a lo­
cation outside a laboratory such as a work
site or elsewhere. The test must be certified
by the United States Food and Drug Admin­
istration for commercial distribution and it
must meet generally accepted cutoff levels,
such as those in the mandatory guidelines for
Federal workplace drug-testing programs.
A resolution was adopted urging the gov­
erning authority for each public elementary
and secondary school to develop, adopt, and
implement a policy providing for pre-em­
ployment drug screening and in-service test­
ing of any school employee who might be
placed in a position of supervisory or disci­
plinary authority over students. The in-ser­

vice testing for illegal substances should be
limited to those instances which result in a
reasonable suspicion that drugs are being
used, or as part of a monitoring program es­
tablished by the employer to assure compli­
ance with the terms of an employee’s reha­
bilitation program.
A private
employment agency may not enter into a
written contract with an applicant that pro­
vides for the direct payroll deduction of any
applicant fee through a payment schedule
which exceeds 20 percent of an applicant’s
gross wages per pay period.
P r iv a te e m p lo y m e n t a g e n c ie s .

O th e r la w s. The law protecting certified
volunteer firefighters, who are employed by
the State, from discharge or denial of leave
was amended to specify that the protection
applies to absences from work for the pur­
pose of emergency response rather than for
any other official duties.
Two resolutions were adopted in the wake
of the terrorist attacks of September 11 and
the subsequent activation of military reserv­
ists and National Guard members. One re­
quests all employers who have employees
who are members of the National Guard or
reserves, and who are called to active duty, to
continue to pay those employees, either their
entire salary or an amount equal to the differ­
ence between their civilian and military pay.
The other urges all employers in the State to
ensure continued compensation and benefits
for military personnel called to active duty if
funds are available. It also requests post-sec­
ondary education institutions to ensure mini­
mal academic impact on students called to
active duty.

D r u g a n d a lc o h o l testin g.

Maine
Wages. New legislation increased the State
minimum wage rate from $5.15 to $5.75 per
hour on January 1, 2002, with a further in­
crease to $6.25 per hour scheduled for Janu­
ary 1, 2003. In addition, the provision that
provides for matching any Federal minimum
wage increases above the State rate was
amended to limit any such increase to no
more than $1.00 per hour above the current
legislated State rate.
The exemption from the State overtime
pay requirement for automobile mechanics,
automobile parts clerks, and automobile
salespersons was amended to specify that
the interpretation of these terms is to be con­
sistent with the interpretation of the same
terms under Federal overtime law.
The law placing limits on mandatory
overtime was amended to provide that a
nurse may not be disciplined for refusing to

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

19

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

work more than 12 consecutive hours except
in the event of an unforeseen emergent cir­
cumstance when overtime is required as a last
resort to ensure patient safety. Any nurse
who is required to work more than 12 con­
secutive hours must be allowed at least 10
consecutive hours of off-duty time immedi­
ately following the worked overtime. This
provision will not apply to overtime worked
in response to an emergency declared by the
governor or to work that is necessary to pro­
tect the public health or safety, when the ex­
cess overtime is required outside the normal
course of business.
The governor is to annually issue a procla­
mation designating the first Tuesday in April
as Equal Pay Day. Also, annually, on this date,
the Department of Labor is to report to the
legislature on progress made in Maine to com­
ply with the State’s equal pay law.
A resolution was adopted asking that the
President and the U.S. Congress strengthen
efforts to ensure that women are paid fairly
for their work.
C h ild labor. New rules were adopted ef­
fective May 14, 2001, governing prohibited
hazardous occupations for minors. Among
these, minors under age 16 are prohibited
from selling products door-to-door (except
when the minor is selling candy or merchan­
dise as a fund-raiser for school or for an orga­
nization to which the minor belongs, such as
the Girl Scouts of America). They are also
prohibited from working in a traveling crew,
and operating amusement rides (all occupa­
tions relating to amusement rides, including
ticket collection or sales).For minors under
age 18, the hazardous occupations rule pro­
hibits minors from working alone in a cashbased business and from all occupations in
places having nude entertainment.
The work permit section of the law pro­
viding that permits are issued by the Direc­
tor of the Bureau of Labor Standards rather
than the Superintendent of Schools was clari­
fied. The work permit is issued upon verifi­
cation of the proper approval by the super­
intendent and verification that the employ­
ment conforms with the provisions of the
child labor law. The work permit is only valid
for the employer and the positions listed on
the permit as issued by the bureau. The
superintendent’s office will distribute the
work permit to the minor.
The current policy regarding cases that
are actually prosecuted was codified by
amending the child labor law to provide that,
absent a pattern of knowing and intentional
conduct, the Bureau of Labor Standards may
disregard certain d e m in im is hours of employ­
ment violations for minors under age 16 and
under age 18. Violations of the restrictions on
the starting and ending times, and daily hours

20

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

that may be worked by both categories of
minors may be disregarded if they do not
exceed 10 minutes per day. Additionally, it
will be considered a d e m in im is violation of
the number of hours worked in a week as
long as the violation is not greater than 50
minutes in a week.
The section of the child labor law prohib­
iting the employment of minors, who are
under 16 years of age, in theaters was
amended to permit these minors to perform
work for a nonprofit organization that pre­
serves film and other moving images and that
provides education and research opportuni­
ties for the public or for a theater that is op­
erated by such an organization as an integral
part of its mission.
Legislation
was enacted mandating the offer of domestic
partner insurance benefits in individual or
group contracts issued by any nonprofit or
medical service organization, in individual,
group or blanket health insurance policies or
contracts issued by any private insurer, and
in individual or group policies or contracts
issued by any health maintenance organiza­
tion. Domestic partner is defined as the part­
ner of a subscriber or member who 1) is a
mentally competent adult as is the subscriber
or member; 2) has been legally domiciled with
the subscriber or member for at least 12
months; 3) is not legally married to or legally
separated from another individual; 4) is the
sole partner of the subscriber or member and
expects to remain so; and 5) is jointly re­
sponsible with the subscriber or member for
each other’s common welfare as evidenced
by joint living arrangements, joint financial
arrangements or joint ownership of real or
personal property.
E q u a l em p lo ym en t opportun ity.

O th e r law s. A resolution was adopted pro­
claiming April 28, 2001 as Workers Memo­
rial Day in the State and encouraging resi­
dents to remember those workers killed or
injured on the job.

training program to discriminate because of
the sexual orientation of an individual. Ex­
emptions were adopted for religious organi­
zations and for the Boy Scouts of America
and the Girl Scouts of America. Employers
are not to be required to offer health insur­
ance benefits to unmarried domestic partners.
In addition, employers will be immune from
liability arising out of reasonable acts to verify
the sexual orientation of an employee or ap­
plicant taken in response to a charge filed
against the employer on the basis of sexual
orientation.
The Washington Suburban Sanitary
Commission is prohibited from discriminat­
ing against a person on the basis of sex, race,
creed, color, age, mental or physical handi­
cap, sexual orientation, or national origin.
This prohibition also applies to the
commission’s contractors and subcontrac­
tors when they are engaged on design/build
contracts and construction contracts.
It was made an unlawful
employment practice for an employer to
refuse to hire, discharge, or otherwise dis­
criminate against an individual because of
the individual’s genetic information, or be­
cause of the individual’s refusal to submit to
a genetic test or to reveal the results of a
genetic test.
G e n e tic testin g.

Employers who
require job applicants to be tested for the use
of controlled substances were authorized to
designate a medical laboratory to perform
preliminary screening of the applicants, pro­
vided that approved procedures to collect,
handle, store, ship test specimens, and main­
tain records are followed. The employer must
have procedures in place relating to volun­
tary disclosure and documentation by job
applicants taking legally prescribed medica­
tion. A medical review officer must review
positive tests after laboratory confirmation.
This law does not apply to employers who
are parties to collective bargaining agreements
that prohibit such preliminary screening.
D r u g a n d a lc o h o l testin g.

Maryland
Employers were authorized to de­
duct voluntary contributions to political ac­
tion committees from employee wages.
W ages.

It was
made an unlawful employment practice for
an employer to refuse to hire, discharge, or
otherwise discriminate against an individual
in compensation or in terms or conditions of
employment because of that person’s sexual
orientation. It is also now an unlawful em­
ployment practice for an employment
agency, labor organization, or employee­

E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o r tu n ity .

J a n u a ry 2002

An Advisory Council on Of­
fender Employment Coordination was es­
tablished in the Department of Public Safety
and Correctional Services. The council is to
be composed of members from the legisla­
ture, State government including State
courts, Baltimore City, the business com­
munity, faith-based or nonprofit communi­
ties, and the labor trades. The council is to
provide guidance on ways to expand em­
ployment opportunities for offenders both
in institutional and community settings;
provide more extensive employment coun­
seling; increase job placement and job reten-

In m ate la b o r

tion rates; improve the overall coordination
of employment services; and develop and
implement a business mentoring program. A
report on activities and recommendations is
to be made annually to the governor and leg­
islature.
Members of the Department
of labor, Licensing, and Regulation police
force were added to the definition o f ‘police
officer’ under the law relating to arrests made
without warrants. The law details when such
arrests may be made with probable cause and
defines probable cause.
O th e r la w s.

Massachusetts
W ages. As the result of prior legislation,
the State minimum wage rate increased to
$6.75 from $6.00 per hour on January 1,
2001. The $2.63-per-hour cash wage that was
required to be paid to employees who re­
ceive part of their compensation from tips
was frozen at that level.
C h ild la b o r. Sections of the child labor law,
regulating hours of work by children under
age 16, work permit requirements, work in
public exhibitions, and license requirements
for theatrical exhibitions or shows, were sus­
pended, thereby allowing the theatrical group
Cirque du Soleil to employ children under 16
years of age, including employment as acro­
bats, contortionists, or in any feat of gym­
nastics, provided each child performs in no
more than 10 shows per week and no more
than 2 shows per day.

Michigan
W a g e s. The law authorizing reciprocal
agreements with other States for the collec­
tion of claims for wages, fringe benefits, and
penalties was amended to expand coverage
to include Canada, and Canadian provinces
and territories.
C h i l d la b o r .
The child labor law was
amended to now permit minors (who are 16years of age or older, and who are enrolled in
school) to work until 11:30 p.m. on Friday
and Saturday nights in addition to during
school vacation periods and other periods
when the minor is not regularly enrolled in
school, as was previously authorized. In ad­
dition, the section of the law permitting longer
work hours for minors age 16 and older in
agricultural processing was amended to also
apply to these minors who are employed in
farming operations involved in the produc­
tion of seed. Two changes were made in the
provision permitting these minors to be em­
ployed up to 62 hours a week when school is


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

not in session. The first of these eliminated a
4-week limit on the number of 62-hour weeks
that could be worked, and the second pro­
vides that the minor must agree to work more
than 48 hours during any week.
O th e r la w s . A resolution was adopted
commemorating April 28,2001, as Workers’
Memorial Day in the State in remembrance
of those who lost their lives while working or
as a result of work-related conditions.

Minnesota
Wages.
A section of the law dealing with
unlawful acts relating to the payment of wages
was amended to prohibit an employer or a
person, firm, corporation or association from
altering the method of, or timing of payment,
or procedures for payment of commissions
earned through the last day of employment,
after the employee has resigned'or been termi­
nated, if the result is to delay or reduce the
amount of payment. Civil action was autho­
rized in the event of violation.
C h ild labor. A United States Department
of Justice Immigration and Naturalization
Service Employment Eligibility Verification
Form 1-9 was added to the list of those docu­
ments that an employer may accept as the
proof of the age of any minor employee or
job applicant.

A current,
former, or prospective employee of the
State who is aggrieved by the State’s viola­
tion of the Federal Age Discrimination in
Employment Act, the Federal Family and
Medical Leave Act, or the Federal Ameri­
cans with Disabilities Act, may now bring a
civil action against the State. In addition, a
current State employee who is aggrieved by
the State’s violation of the Federal Fair La­
bor Standards Act also may bring a civil ac­
tion against the State.
Among amendments to the Human
Rights law, it is no longer required for sexual
harassment in employment that the em­
ployer knows or should have known of the
existence of harassment and fails to take
timely and appropriate action. Additionally,
national origin was added to the prohibited
forms of business discrimination on which
basis it is an unfair discriminatory practice
to intentionally refuse to do business with,
to refuse to contract with, or to discriminate
in the basic terms, conditions, or perfor­
mance of the contract. If the commissioner
determines that there is no probable cause
to pursue an allegation upon appeal, the
options of vacating or remanding for further
consideration were added to those of reaf­
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p ortu n ity.

firming or reversing a decision.
G e n e tic testin g.
It was made unlawful for
an employer or employment agency to either
administer a genetic test or to request, re­
quire, or collect protected genetic informa­
tion regarding a person as a condition of em­
ployment, or to affect the terms or condi­
tions of employment or terminate the em­
ployment of any person based on protected
genetic information. Civil action may be
brought in the event of a violation with the
court authorized to award up to three times
actual damages, punitive damages, costs and
attorney fees, and injunctive or other equi­
table relief.
W orker p riv a c y .
The law relating to public
information was amended to specify that
State employee identification numbers are
considered to be public data. These identifi­
cation numbers must not be the employees’
Social Security numbers.
Employee-assistance records are to be
maintained separate from personnel records
and must not become part of an employee’s
personnel file. These records, or participa­
tion in employee-assistance services may
not be disclosed to a third person, including
the employer, without the prior written au­
thorization of the person receiving services,
except pursuant to State or Federal law or
judicial order, as required in the normal
course of providing the requested services,
or if necessary to prevent physical harm or
the commission of a crime. Employee-assis­
tance services are services paid for or pro­
vided by an employer and offered to em­
ployees or their family members on a volun­
tary basis to help resolve personal issues,
such as emotional concerns, alcohol or drug
use, family, relationship or financial issues,
that may affect job performance.

The Depart­
ment of Labor and Industry will cease regu­
lating job search firms beginning July 1,
2003. Employment agencies will continue to
be regulated.

P riv a te e m p lo y m e n t agen cies.

P la n t clo sin g . Legislation increased to 2
years from 1 year the period of time that the
owner or operator of an iron mine or related
facility must maintain the mine or facility in
salable operating condition, after discontinu­
ing operation, to allow the State and other
interested public and private bodies to seek
new ownership.

An employee who has been in­
voluntarily terminated will now have 15
rather than 5 working days following termi­
nation to make a written request to the emD isc h a rg e.

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

21

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

ployer to be informed of the reason for ter­
mination. The employer will now have 10
rather than 5 working days following receipt
of the request to provide a written response
specifying the reason for termination.
O th e r la w s.
Public sector employers of 20
or more employees must grant paid leaves
of absence to an employee who seeks to
donate an organ or partial organ to another
person. The combined length of the leave
periods will be determined by the employee,
but may not exceed 40 work hours for each
donation, unless agreed to by the employer.
The employer may require verification by a
physician of the purpose and length of each
leave period requested. An employer may
not retaliate against an employee for re­
questing or obtaining leave.

Montana
Wages.

The State minimum wage and over­

time law was amended to specify that the
overtime payment requirement for the em­
ployment of firefighters and law enforcement
officers by the State must be consistent with
the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act ( flsa )
and its regulations. Additionally, an exemp­
tion from the overtime pay requirement of
the State or its political subdivisions was
added for an employee who is employed, at
his or her option, on an occasional or spo­
radic basis in a capacity other than the
employee’s regular occupation. In these in­
stances, only the hours that the employee
was employed, in a capacity other than his
or her regular occupation, may be excluded
from the calculation of hours to determine
overtime compensation. Finally, in those in­
stances in which the State or political subdi­
vision employer, or a private sector employer
subject to the flsa fails to pay the correct
minimum wage and overtime rates, liquidated
damages as determined under the flsa do ap­
ply. However, the penalty provisions for the
assessment of 110 percent of the wages due
and unpaid under State law do not apply. In
all other claims not involving the Federal
minimum wage or overtime, the 110 percent
penalty of Montana law is to be applied.
In response to the A ld en v. M ain e court
decision, an amendment was enacted allow­
ing public employees to use the cumulative
remedies in Montana law to sue for overtime
compensation if it was not paid by their pub­
lic sector employer.
Provisions in the State minimum wage and
overtime law excluding various outside sales­
persons from coverage were repealed and re­
placed with a provision adopting the exclu­
sion for outside salespersons provided for
under the flsa .

22

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

A resolution was adopted urging the De­
partment of Labor and Industry to review
State laws and administrative rules to sim­
plify and clarify laws related to the compens­
ability of employee travel time and to meet
with representatives of the U.S. Department
of Labor and other interested employer and
employee representatives in order to discuss
streamlining and reducing the complexity of
Federal and State laws governing this sub­
ject. Following the meetings, a report is to be
sent to the Montana congressional delega­
tion and to the U.S. Secretary of Labor.
The use of a weighted average to establish
wage rates under the prevailing wage law was
modified. Rates will now be computed by
the Department of Labor and Industry based
on work performed by registered State con­
tractors and reported in an annual survey.
The survey must include information per­
taining to the number of skilled craftspersons
employed in the employer’s peak month of
employment and the wages and benefits paid
for each craft. In setting prevailing wage rates,
the weighted average for each craft will be
used, except where the survey shows that 50
percent of the craftspersons are receiving the
same wage. When 50 percent are receiving
the same wage, that wage is the prevailing
wage for that craft. Other changes in the pre­
vailing wage law require contractors and em­
ployers to maintain payroll records for 3
years after completion of work on a project,
and require that fringe benefits be posted in
addition to the wage scale as previously re­
quired.
The law
barring discrimination in employment was
amended to provide that it will not be a vio­
lation of the prohibition against marital sta­
tus discrimination for an employer to em­
ploy or offer to employ a person who is
qualified for a position and to also employ or
offer to employ the person’s spouse.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity.

The law establishing rights and
remedies with respect to wrongful discharge
was amended to clarify that during a proba­
tionary period, employment may be termi­
nated by either the employer or the employee
on notice to the other for any reason or for no
reason. If an employer fails to establish a
specific probationary period or provide that
there is no probationary period prior to or at
the time of hire, there will be a presumptive
probationary period of 6 months from the
date of hire.
D isch a rg e.

closely regulated under the child labor law.
Employment under age 12 will not be al­
lowed. Work from ages 12 to 15 will be per­
mitted if it is outside of school hours during
June, July or August; the employer obtains
written parental permission; the child lives
within 75 miles of the work site; and the child
does not work more than 48 hours a week,
more than 9 hours a day, or before 6 a.m.
Minors under age 14 may not work after 8
p.m. and those between the ages of 14 and 16
may not work after 10 p.m. Transportation
time will not count as time worked nor will
work breaks. Employment certificate and
hours requirements for other work by chil­
dren under age 16 will not apply to
detasseling. At least two supervisors age 18
or older must be at each location where
detasseling is being performed by children
under age 16, and parents are to be given in­
formation sheets specifying the terms of em­
ployment. Other child labor law changes au­
thorize the Department of Labor to approve
employment certificates for children from
adjoining States who seek to work in Ne­
braska, and change law violations from class
5 to class 2 misdemeanors.
G e n e tic testin g.
It was made unlawful for
an employer to require an employee or ap­
plicant for employment to submit to a ge­
netic test or provide genetic information as a
condition of employment or promotion. In
addition, employers may not fail or refuse
to hire, recruit or promote an employee or
applicant because of genetic information that
is unrelated to the ability to perform job
duties; may not discharge or otherwise dis­
criminate with respect to compensation, or
the terms, conditions, or privileges of em­
ployment; and may not limit, segregate, or
classify an employee or applicant in a way
which deprives the individual of employ­
ment opportunities or otherwise adversely
affects the status of an employee because of
genetic information unrelated to the ability
to perform job duties. This law does not
apply to the employment of an individual
by his or her parent, spouse, or child, nor
does it apply to any individual employed in
the domestic service of any person.

A resolution was adopted des­
ignating April 28,2001 as Workers Memorial
Day to honor and mourn for those workers
who sacrificed their lives for the safety of all
workers.
O th e r law s.

Nevada
Nebraska
Detasseling work, for some­
one other than a parent, will now be more
C h ild labor.

J an u a ry 2002

W a g e s.
The minimum wage law was
amended to eliminate a sub-minimum wage
rate for minors (85 percent) and to specify

that the labor commissioner is, in accordance
with Federal law, to establish the minimum
wage by regulation.
The authority of the labor commissioner
was expanded by providing authorization to
adopt regulations to enforce all State labor
laws, the enforcement of which is not vested
elsewhere. The authority to take wage as­
signments has been deleted, but in addition
to prosecuting wage claims as before, the
commissioner may now commence any other
action to collect wages. Additionally, the com­
missioner has been provided with subpoena
power in wage claim cases. Upon complaint
of the labor commissioner, the attorney gen­
eral rather than the district attorneys of the
several counties will prosecute all criminal
violations of law.
Among several changes in the State pre­
vailing wage law, the labor commissioner may
now establish a sliding scale based on the
severity of the violation and may assess a
fine not to exceed $5,000 for each violation.
The Attorney General rather than the Dis­
trict Attorney of the county where the viola­
tions occurred is now responsible for the
prosecution of violators. Recordkeeping vio­
lations were added to the definition of “of­
fense” for penalty purposes. It was speci­
fied that public bodies are to investigate pos­
sible law violations and inform the labor com­
missioner of any violations found. The time
that violators will be debarred from public
works was increased from 2 to 3 years for a
first offense, and from 3 to 5 years for a sec­
ond or subsequent offense. A contractor en­
gaged on public works who violates the law
shall be fined not less than $20, nor more
than $50 for each calendar day each work­
man was engaged on the project. This is an
increase from the previous range of $ 15 to
$25. Payroll records will no longer be sent to
the labor commissioner; they must now be
kept by the public body for 2 years rather
than 1 year.
The law authorizing the Director of Juve­
nile Services to create and administer a fund
to finance a program of restitution through
court-ordered work, for minors 14 years of
age or older, was amended to specify that the
director may not require that more than 50
percent of the wages of a child be deducted to
pay restitution.
A resolution was adopted declaring April
3, 2001, as Equal Pay Day in the State. State
and local governments, along with private em­
ployers were urged to compensate all em­
ployees in a fair manner based upon objec­
tive evaluations of theirjobs, considering fac­
tors such as skill, effort, responsibility, and
working conditions. Additionally, it was re­
solved to recognize those firms that promote
and support policies to ensure fairness and
equity for their employees.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

C h ild la b o r. In 2000, the labor commis­
sioner issued a rule declaring youth ped­
dling to be a hazardous occupation and ban­
ning it for children under age 16. New legis­
lation was enacted superseding this rule. The
new law directs the labor commissioner to
adopt regulations prohibiting the employ­
ment of children under age 16 in connection
with the solicitation for sale or selling of
any product, good, or service at any time or
place or in any manner the commissioner
determines to be dangerous to the health or
welfare of children. The law will not apply
to the sale of any product, good or service in
a county of less than 100,000 population,
or to the retail sale of any agricultural prod­
uct at a fixed location directly to consumers.
Any person employing or permitting a child
to work in violation of this law will be liable
for a civil penalty of up to $2,500 for each
violation in addition to any other penalty
provided by law.
Entities, including motion picture com­
panies or production companies hired by a
casino or resort hotel, that employ children
to work in the entertainment industry, pur­
suant written contract for a period of more
than 91 school days, must, upon the request
of the child’s parent or legal guardian, pay
the costs for the child to receive at least 3
hours of tutoring per day for at least 5 days
per week or other equivalent educational or
instructional services. The child must be ex­
empt from compulsory school attendance
requirements because he or she is either 1)
receiving equivalent, approved instruction, 2)
is 14 years of age or older and must support
himself or herself or a parent, or 3) is be­
tween 14 and 17 years of age, has completed
the 8th grade, and has a written permit for
employment or apprenticeship.
It was made unlawful for a business, in­
cluding a gaming establishment, a saloon, a
resort, or a restaurant to employ, allow, or
use a person younger than age 18 to distrib­
ute promotional materials that include an of­
fer for alcoholic beverages.

An em­
ployer who reasonably believes that harass­
ment in the workplace has occurred may file
a verified application for a temporary court
order for protection against the person who
allegedly committed the harassment, and for
an extended order prohibiting further harass­
ment. Workplace harassment occurs when a
person knowingly threatens to cause or
commits an act that causes bodily injury to
the person or another person, damage to the
property of another person, or substantial
harm to someone’s physical or mental health
or safety; the threat is made or the act is
committed against an employer, an em­
ployee on the job, or a person present at the
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o r tu n ity .

employer’s workplace; and the threat would
cause a reasonable person to fear that the
threat is viable. An employer is immune from
civil liability, both for seeking a temporary
or extended order for protection, if acting in
good faith, or for failing to seek a temporary
or extended order for protection against ha­
rassment in the workplace. The law will not
be construed as prohibiting a person from
engaging in any activity that is part of a la­
bor dispute.
W orker p r iv a c y . The law regarding conse­
quences of a peace officer’s refusal to sub­
mit to polygraphic examinations was
amended to provide that it will now be vol­
untary rather than mandatory, for an officer,
against whom an allegation of misconduct is
made, to submit to a polygraphic examina­
tion concerning such activities. No disci­
plinary action may be taken if the officer
refuses the examination and no record is to
be made of the refusal.
O th e r la w s. Private sector employers of
50 or more employees and public sector em­
ployers who employ members of the State
legislature are to grant them either paid or
unpaid leave so that they may attend certain
specified committee meetings held during the
legislative interim. In addition, the protec­
tion from loss of seniority provided for State
legislators who miss work while attending
regular or special sessions of the legislature
was extended to apply to attendance at these
interim committee meetings.

New Hampshire
A com­
mittee was established to study various top­
ics involving the Department of Corrections,
including an investigation of allegations of
sexual harassment, sexual assault, or other
allegations of sexual misconduct perpetrated
by department personnel on other depart­
ment personnel, or inmates. A report on find­
ings and any recommendations for proposed
legislation is to be made to the legislature by
November 1, 2002.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity .

New Jersey
Penalties for violation of the State’s Law
Against Discrimination were increased from
up to $2,000 for a first violation and up to
$5,000 for a second or any subsequent viola­
tion. The maximum fines are now $10,000 if
the violator has not committed any prior vio­
lation within the 5-year period preceding the
filing of the discrimination charge; $25,000
for violators who have committed one other

M o n th ly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

23

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

violation within the previous 5 years; and
$50,000 for violators who have committed
two or more violations within the previous
7 years. The law bars discrimination in em­
ployment, housing and public accommoda­
tion on the basis of race, creed, color, na­
tional origin, nationality, ancestry, age sex,
marital status, sexual orientation, atypical
hereditary cellular blood trait, genetic infor­
mation, liability for military service, or men­
tal or physical disability.
New Mexico
O th e r law s.
An employee who is enrolled
as a member of an Indian nation, tribe, or
pueblo and who is qualified to vote in a tribal
or pueblo election is to be given 2 hours off
from work without penalty for voting pur­
poses. Employers may specify the hours in
which the voters may be absent, and the timeoff requirement will not apply to an em­
ployee whose workday begins more than 2
hours after the polls open, or ends more than
3 hours before the polls close. An employer
in violation will be guilty of a misdemeanor
and may be fined from $50 to $100.

New York
W a g e s.
The prevailing wage law was
amended by adding a provision requiring the
industrial commissioner to ensure that all re­
tirement, insurance, vacation and other
supplements due under the law be paid to or
on behalf of an employee. The commissioner
is to require proof that the pension plan for
which any supplement has been paid is quali­
fied as a bona fide plan by the United States
Internal Revenue Service.
G a r m e n t in d u s tr y . Local school boards
may now consider labor standards and work­
ing conditions, including the use of child la­
bor, in purchasing apparel. School boards
may determine that apparel companies are
not responsible bidders if they either fail to
meet certain labor standards including em­
ployee compensation, working conditions,
employee rights to form unions, and the use
of child labor, or if they fail to provide the
boards of education with sufficient labor stan­
dards compliance information.

North Carolina
Local
boards of education were authorized to
adopt policies addressing the sexual harass­
ment of board employees by students, other
local board employees, or school board
members. At a minimum, these policies may
set out the consequences of harassing school

E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o r t u n i ty .

24

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

employees and establish a procedure for re­
porting such incidents. The ban on disci­
plining an employee of the school board be­
cause he or she files a sexual harassment
complaint was amended to specify that pro­
hibited discipline means to discharge,
threaten, or otherwise retaliate against an
employee regarding his or her compensation,
terms, conditions, location or privileges of
employment.
O th e r la w s. It was made unlawful for an
employer to discharge or to demote any em­
ployee because he or she has been appointed
as a precinct official and takes leave to serve
in that capacity on election day or canvass
day, provided the employee has given the
employer at least 30 days written notice of
the intention to take the leave.

North Dakota
W ages.
Sections of the State law provid­
ing for the payment of wages were amended
to provide that the wages of an employee
who is terminated, who quits voluntarily, or
whose employment is suspended because
of an industrial dispute, are due and payable
on the regularly scheduled payday estab­
lished in advance by the employer for the
periods worked by the employee. This
change makes the handling of the final paychecks for all employees consistent regard­
less of the reason for separation.
The running of the 2-year statute of limi­
tations for the processing of claims for un­
paid wages will now stop at the time a claim
is filed with the Labor Department. In cases
in which the department dismisses the claim
or refers the claim back to the claimant, the
statute of limitations will resume running.

The State law relating to exemp­
tions from Federal hours of service provi­
sions for intrastate drivers was amended by
deleting the provision that following 24 con­
secutive hours off, an intrastate driver would
begin a new 7 consecutive day period and
on-duty time was reset to zero.
As the result of extreme weather condi­
tions, short supplies of propane and diesel
products, and high customer demand, the
governor issued an Executive Order on Janu­
ary 24, 2001. This order declared a state of
emergency and therefore permitted him to
exempt drivers of commercial motor vehicles
from hours limits, established under Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, while
transporting heating and motor fuels to cus­
tomers. The order, which expired on Febru­
ary 22, 2001, did not relieve carriers from
those regulations pertaining to driver quali­
fications or the safe operation of vehicles, or
H ou rs.

J an u ary 2002

require or allow fatigued drivers to work.
A resolution was adopted di­
recting the Legislative Council to study the
benefits and risks associated with the use of
contracts in agricultural production, includ­
ing labor arrangements, growing and sales
provisions, chemical usage, and provisions
necessitated by emerging technologies. Find­
ings, recommendations, and any legislative
proposals are to be reported to the next Leg­
islative Assembly.

A g ric u ltu re .

Legislation
was enacted which expanded the authority of
the Human Rights Division of the Depart­
ment of Labor beyond responsibility for en­
forcing employment and housing discrimi­
nation protections to include responsibility
for discrimination protection provisions for
public accommodations, public services, and
nonhousing related lending. Additionally, the
legislation provided that the Department
hold administrative hearings on cases in
which there is reasonable cause to believe
that a discriminatory practice has occurred
and provided that the department report on
the progress of its human rights programs at
the beginning of the 2003 legislative session.
The human rights act was amended to
clarify that filing a minimally sufficient com­
plaint with the State Department of Labor
constitutes the filing of an employment dis­
crimination complaint for purposes of es­
tablishing the timeframe for remedy for back
pay. In addition, the Department of Labor
was authorized to provide necessary case
file documents to the U.S. Equal Employ­
ment Opportunity Commission for pur­
poses of processing and closure.
E q u a l e m ploym en t opportunity.

O th e r la w s.
A telecommuting incentive
program was adopted for employees of the
State. Under the program, a State agency
head may submit a proposal, to the sugges­
tion incentive committee, to locate a State
employee away from a central office setting
of the agency. The proposal must include a
comparison of the estimated annual costs of
locating the employee away from the cen­
tral office to the costs of the employee re­
maining. A State agency head who submits a
proposal that is approved and implemented
is entitled to receive 10 percent of any sav­
ings resulting from implementing the
telecommuting program for the first 12months up to a maximum payment of
$2,000. The employee who participates in
the program is entitled to receive 20 percent
of any savings identified, up to a maximum
payment of $2,000. The State agency head
may also use 20 percent of any savings for
one-time technology, equipment, or capital

improvement costs.
Ohio
W ages. By law, threshold amounts for con­
tract coverage under the State prevailing wage
law are adjusted every 2 years according to
the change in the Census Bureau’s Implicit
Price Deflator for Construction, provided
that no increase or decrease exceeds 6 per­
cent for the 2-year period. As a result, effec­
tive January 1, 2002, the threshold amount
for new construction rose from $58,958 to
$62,549, and the threshold amount for re­
construction, remodeling, or renovation in­
creased from $17,687 to $18,764.

Oklahoma
O th er law s. A right-to-work Constitutional
Amendment was approved by the voters in a
September 25,2001 election. The amendment
bans any new employment contract that re­
quires employees to resign from or belong to a
labor organization, pay union dues, or make
other payments to a union. Payroll deductions
to labor organizations may only be made with
employee authorization. Contributions to
charity or any other third party required in
lieu of payment to a labor organization are pro­
hibited. The measure was placed on the ballot
as the result of the passage of ajoint resolution
by the legislature.

Oregon
W ages. Legislation was enacted barring lo­
cal governments from establishing minimum
wage requirements for private sector employ­
ers in their jurisdictions. Local governments
are allowed to set minimum wage rates for
their own employees, for employees of firms
that perform contract work for the local gov­
ernment, and as a condition of providing di­
rect tax abatements or subsidies for private
employers with 10 or more employees.
A restriction on the number of manda­
tory overtime hours that can be required is
among provisions of a law relating to hospi­
tals and staffing plans for registered nurses.
Hospitals are to develop staffing plans that
include a list of qualified on-call nurses who
can serve as replacement workers on a regu­
lar basis. Registered nurses cannot be re­
quired to work more than 2 hours of manda­
tory overtime beyond a regularly scheduled
shift and may not work more than 16 hours
in any 24-hour period. These restrictions
will not apply during a national or State
emergency, in emergency circumstances
identified by the Health Division, or when
the hospital has made reasonable efforts to
provide replacement staff and has been un­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

able to do so in a timely manner. Provisions
were enacted prohibiting retaliation and pro­
viding a civil cause of action in the event of
violation. Hospitals were authorized to re­
quire registered nurses to provide notice of
any outside employment that may interfere
with job requirements.
The State’s prevailing wage law was
amended to exempt from coverage those
projects for which no funds of a public
agency are directly or indirectly used. It was
specified that funds of a public agency do
not include funds provided in the form of a
government grant to a nonprofit organiza­
tion, unless the grant is issued for construc­
tion purposes.
The notification to the Commissioner of
the Bureau of Labor and Industries that is
required of public contracting agencies,
whenever a contract subject to the prevail­
ing wage law has been awarded, is now to
include a copy of the contractor’s disclosure
of first-tier subcontractors.
Changes were made regarding the sub­
mission of certified payrolls on public works
projects. Contractors and subcontractors are
to prepare weekly certified payroll state­
ments and submit them monthly by the fifth
business day of the following month.
The Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor
and Industries was authorized to assess civil
penalties of up to $1,000 for willful minimum
wage law violations and for final pay and sea­
sonal farm worker payment violations. In ad­
dition, the remedy for failure to pay final wages
was amended to provide that penalty wages
may not exceed 100 percent of unpaid wages
unless the employer fails to pay the full amount
of unpaid wages within 12 days of written
notice or unless the employer has willfully vio­
lated final pay provisions one or more times
within a year of the employee’s termination.
The section of the wage payment law bar­
ring special contracts or other arrangements
exempting employers from liability or penal­
ties for failure to pay wages, unless approved
by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor
and Industries, was amended. It now provides
that a settlement reached between an employee
and employer of a claim, which has arisen un­
der any statute relating to the payment of
wages, does not require the commissioner’s
approval, if the settlement does not provide
for the employee to relinquish a claim for
additional or future violations.
The section of law relating to attorney
fees in actions for the collection of wages, in
which wages are not paid within 48 hours
after they become due and payable, was
amended to provide that a sum for attorney
fees will not be awarded if the court finds
that the plaintiff’s attorney unreasonably
failed to give written notice of the wage claim
to the employer before filing the action.

Nurses who provide acute care in
hospital settings are now exempt from meal
and rest period rules, issued by the Com­
missioner of the Bureau of Labor and Indus­
tries, if they are covered by a collective bar­
gaining agreement that prescribes rules con­
cerning meal and rest periods.

H o u rs.

ATask Force on Paid Fam­
ily Leave and Unemployment Insurance was
created. The task force is to study the feasi­
bility of providing paid family leave to al­
low parents to take paid leave after the birth
or adoption of a child, and investigate
mechanisms for funding the leave through
unemployment insurance and other poten­
tial funds. A report on findings is to be made
to the legislature by September 1, 2002.
F a m ily issu es.

C h ild la b o r .
The child labor law was
amended to exempt from coverage soccer ref­
erees and assistant referees under age 18
when refereeing youth or adult recreational
soccer matches. A separate provision, of gen­
eral application, classifies referees and as­
sistant referees of these matches as inde­
pendent contractors.

The Housing and Community
Services Department is to disburse the funds
credited to the newly created Farmworker
Housing Development Account to expand
Oregon’s supply of housing for low and
very low income farmworkers. Monies to
be credited to the account include civil pen­
alties assessed for workplace safety and
health violations in farmworker camps, and
civil penalties assessed for violations of the
farm labor contractor registration law.
The law permitting private nonprofit
corporations, whose primary purpose is to
provide education or training, to obtain farm
labor contractor licenses was expanded. The
law now also applies to those private non­
profit corporations designated as exempt
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev­
enue Code who have been authorized to do
business in Oregon for at least 5 years and
who are primarily engaged in recruiting, so­
liciting, supplying, or employing workers.
These corporations must post a corporate
surety bond approved by and payable to
the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor
and Industries in the amount of $30,000
when submitting the application for the farm
labor contractor license.

A g ric u ltu re .

The State’s
civil rights statues were reorganized. Addition­
ally, it was made an unlawful employment
practice to discriminate against an applicant or
employee for holding a degree with a title in
theology or religious occupations.

E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p ortu n ity.

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

25

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

An advisory Task force on Promotional
and Career Opportunities for Women in Or­
egon was established. It is to issue a report
that documents the manner in which laws
related to pay equity are enforced in the
State; the earnings of Oregon women by in­
come levels, occupation, education, length
of employment, age, race and ethnicity and
number of persons in a household in com­
parison to equivalent categories for Oregon
men. The report is to document the number
and type of businesses owned by women in
Oregon and business resources available to
women; the amount and type of public edu­
cation conducted concerning issues about
pay for women in the workforce; the impact
of domestic violence on women in the
workforce; and the availability of workplace
child care options and resources. The task
force is to make recommendations to the leg­
islature for any necessary corrective action
by March 1, 2003.
O th e r la w s. Employers are to provide a
place of employment that is free of tobacco
smoke for all employees. Exceptions include
retail businesses primarily engaged in the
sale of tobacco products, bowling centers,
and certain restaurants, bars or taverns. Vio­
lations will be punishable by fines of not
more than $50 per day, not to exceed $1,000
in any 30-day period.

Pennsylvania
A resolu­
tion was adopted declaring the week of April
29 through May 5, 2001, as “Persons with
Disabilities Employment Week” in recogni­
tion of the policy of the Commonwealth to
encourage and assist individuals with dis­
abilities to achieve maximum independence
through productive and gainful employment.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o rtu n ity .

Rhode Island
W ages.
Coverage under the State prevail­
ing wage law was expanded to include pub­
lic works contracts let by public agencies
and quasi-public agencies in addition to the
previously covered contracts let by the State
and its political subdivisions.
A resolution was adopted declaring April
3, 2001 to be “Rhode Island Pay Equity
Day” and asking all Rhode Islanders to join
in urging all other States to establish equi­
table compensation that eliminates sex and
race based wage discrimination.

The ban on the employment
of persons under age 18 to manufacture,
transport, carry, or sell a controlled sub­
stance was amended to exempt individuals
C h ild labor.

26

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

enrolled in an approved pharmacy training
program.
It was
made an unlawful employment practice for
an employer, employment agency or labor
organization to refuse to hire, discharge, im­
properly classify, deny membership rights,
or otherwise discriminate against an indi­
vidual on the basis of gender identity or ex­
pression. “Gender identity or expression”
is defined as a person’s actual or perceived
gender, as well as a person’s gender identity,
gender-related self-image, gender-related ap­
pearance, or gender-related expression;
whether or not that gender identity, genderrelated self image, gender-related appear­
ance, or gender-related expression is differ­
ent from that traditionally associated with
the person’s sex at birth.
The law requiring employers to adopt a
written policy against sexual harassment in the
workplace was amended to specify that a copy
of the policy is to be kept at the business pre­
mises, and is to be made available to any State
or Federal employment discrimination enforce­
ment agency upon request.
E q u a l e m p lo y m e n t o p p o r tu n ity .

W o rk p la c e v io le n c e .
The Rhode Island
Workplace Violence Protection Act of 2001
was enacted. It provides that if an employer
or an employee has suffered unlawful vio­
lence, received a credible threat of violence,
or been stalked or harassed at the worksite,
the employer may (in addition to, or instead
of, filing criminal charges against the indi­
vidual) seek a temporary restraining order
and an injunction prohibiting further unlaw­
ful acts by that individual at the worksite.
An employer who takes action as provided
in this law will be presumed to be acting in
good faith and, unless lack of good faith is
shown, will be immune from civil liability
for actions taken. An employer who does
not take action as provided in this law will
not be liable for negligence.

South Carolina
Wages. A resolution was adopted declaring
April 3, 2001, to be “Equal Pay Day” and
urging the citizens of the State to recognize the
full value of women’s skills and significant con­
tributions to the labor force. April 3, symbol­
izes the day on which the wages paid to Ameri­
can women so far in 2001, when added to
women’s earnings for all of 2000, equal the
2000 earnings ofAmerican men.

South Dakota
W ages.
Employers are now authorized to
pay employee wages by direct deposit to

Jan u a ry 2002

the employee’s bank account as an alterna­
tive to payment by cash or check.
G e n e tic testin g .
It was made an unlawful
employment practice for an employer to
discriminate against employees or job ap­
plicants on the basis of genetic information
or to restrict any right or benefit otherwise
due or available to them. Genetic informa­
tion may be obtained or used if the employer
is a law enforcement agency conducting a
criminal investigation. Such information may
also be used if the employer relies on the
test results from genetic information ob­
tained by law enforcement through a crimi­
nal investigation, legally acquires the test
results, keeps the test results confidential
except as otherwise required by law, and uses
the test results for the limited purpose of
taking disciplinary action against the em­
ployee based only on the alleged miscon­
duct. Any employee or applicant claiming
to be aggrieved by a violation may bring a
civil suit for damages in circuit court.

Tennessee
C h ild labor.
The State child labor law was
amended. Among the amendments, violation
of the ban on employing minors under age
14, who are not exempt from coverage of the
law, was made a Class D felony. An em­
ployer who employs a child under age 14
will now also, at the discretion of the labor
commissioner, be subject to a civil penalty
of from $1,000 to $10,000 for each viola­
tion. Other changes specify that each in­
stance of a person’s violation of the law con­
stitutes a separate violation for purposes of
civil penalties, and provide that violation of
the youth peddling provisions is a Class D
felony. Baptismal certificates will no longer
be accepted as proof of age, but driver’s li­
censes and State issued identification were
added to birth certificates and passports as
valid documentation of proof of age for em­
ployment purposes.

An addition to
the policy statement section of the drugfree workplace programs law requires a cov­
ered employer to notify the parents or
guardians of a minor of the results of any
drug or alcohol-testing program conducted
pursuant to the law. The confidentiality of
the records section also was amended to
specify that any notice required by the law
will inform minors who are tested that their
parents or guardians will be notified of the
test results. An employer who discloses
test results will not be liable for the disclo­
sure.
D r u g a n d a lc o h o l testin g .

Texas
W ages. The State minimum wage law was
amended to adopt the Federal minimum wage
rate by reference. Therefore, the State rate
rose from $3.35 per hour to $5.15, effective
September 1, 2001. The tip credit provision
was also changed to adopt the Federal rate
by reference (currently a $2.13 per hour cash
wage). The State law previously permitted a
50-percent credit towards the minimum
wage.
The section of the payment of wages law
relating to the enforcement of a lien, by the
Workforce Commission, against an
employer’s property for unpaid wages or
penalties was amended by adding a provi­
sion that a lien established under this law is
superior to any other lien on the same prop­
erty, with the exception of a lien for ad valo­
rem taxes.
C h i l d la b o r .
The child labor law was
amended to limit contracts binding minors in
the arts, sports, and entertainment field to
not longer than 7 years. Upon the petition of
the minor’s guardian, the courts may approve
the contract only after the guardian has pro­
vided to the other party notice of the peti­
tion and the opportunity to request a hear­
ing. The court may require, in an order ap­
proving a contract, that a reasonable portion
of the net earnings of the minor under con­
tract be set aside and preserved for the minor
in a trust.

The Health and Human Ser­
vices Commission is to study the feasibility
of contracting with existing networks of
health care providers to establish a migrant
care network to provide health care services
to children of those migrant or seasonal agri­
cultural workers who are State residents,
who intend to return to Texas at the end of
temporary or seasonal employment in an­
other State, and who are enrolled in certain
specified medical assistance programs. The
commission is to consider work patterns to
determine in which States the network is
most needed; examine the necessity and fis­
cal effect of entering into interstate agree­
ments to establish the migrant care network;
and determine if ensuring the provision of
health care services for children of migrant or
seasonal agricultural workers while a child is
out of the State is necessary to maintain con­
tinuity of care. If establishment of a migrant
care network is deemed feasible, a pilot pro­
gram is to be developed. Findings and rec­
ommendations are to be reported to the gov­
ernor and legislature.

A g ric u ltu re .

G e n e tic testin g .

The State revised the stat­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ute banning employment discrimination on the
basis of genetic information by expanding the
definition of “genetic information” to include
information obtained from or based on a sci­
entific or medical determination of the pres­
ence or absence in an individual of a genetic
characteristic or a family history obtained from
an individual. The definition of “genetic test”
was expanded to include a presymptomatic
laboratory test of an individual’s genes or gene
products to identify the individual’s genetic
variations or compositions associated with an
increased health risk. Employers are prohib­
ited from discriminating on the basis of certain
genetic information or genetic tests, or on the
basis of family health information, which may
contain details that could be used to determine
an individual’s genetic predisposition to cer­
tain diseases.
D r u g a n d a lc o h o l testin g . The law con­
cerning employment drug and alcohol test­
ing policies for nursing homes and related
institutions was amended. These institutions
may establish their own drug testing policy,
use a policy from another entity, or use the
model drug testing policy adopted by the
Texas Board of Human Services. The board
is to adopt a model for use by institutions
that is designed to ensure the safety of resi­
dents and to protect the rights of the em­
ployees. The model policy must include at
least one scheduled drug test each year for
each employee who has direct contact with
residents, and also authorize random, unan­
nounced drug testing for these employees.

The law
regulating talent agencies will now apply
only to the employment of actors or models.
Coverage of musicians, writers, cinematog­
raphers, composers, lyricists, arrangers of
musical compositions, and other individuals
who perform analogous professional services
in motion pictures, theatrical, radio, televi­
sion, or other entertainment productions was
eliminated.
P r iv a te e m p lo y m e n t a g e n c ie s .

Utah
Wages. The State minimum wage law was
amended to prohibit cities, towns, and coun­
ties from establishing a minimum wage rate
that exceeds the Federal minimum wage rate.
These jurisdictions also may not require that
a person who contracts with the city, town,
or county pay that person’s employees a
wage in excess of the Federal rate. These re­
strictions do not apply when Federal law
requires the payment of a prevailing or mini­
mum wage to persons working on projects
funded in whole or in part by Federal funds.
A Voluntary Contributions Act was en­
acted. This law requires that covered labor
organizations may only make expenditures

for political activities if they establish sepa­
rate segregated funds for this purpose. The
funds are to be registered as political action
committees. In soliciting contributions for a
fund, the labor organization is to clearly dis­
close that the fund is a political fund and will
be expended for political activities; that
union dues are not to be used for political
activities, transferred to the fund, or inter­
mingled in any way with fund monies; that
the cost of administering the fund is paid
from fund contributions and not from union
dues; and that each contribution is volun­
tary. Employees are also to be informed, in
writing, of their right to refuse to contribute
without fear of reprisal or loss of member­
ship in the labor organization. Public em­
ployees are prohibited from authorizing de­
ductions from their paychecks for fund con­
tributions. Violation of the law is a class A
misdemeanor. Organizations governed by the
National Labor Relations Act and the Rail­
road Labor Act are excluded from coverage.
For workers, in underground
mines, smelters, and other institutions that
reduce or refine ores or metals, the law, which
had limited their work period to no more
than eight hours a day was repealed.

H o u rs.

D ru g a n d a lc o h o l testin g.
Several changes
were made in provisions related to the regu­
lation of high-level nuclear waste. Among
these, any organization that operates a stor­
age facility or transfer facility that is engaged
in the transportation of high-level nuclear
waste within the State is to establish a man­
datory drug and alcohol testing program for
job applicants and employees as a condition
of hiring or of continued employment for
any employee. Testing standards are to be
established by the Department of Environ­
mental Quality, in consultation with the La­
bor Commission, and are to address the pro­
tection of the safety, health, and welfare of
the public.
W orker p riv a c y .
Provisions regarding ac­
cess and management of State government
records were amended to allow current or
former employees of a government entity to
provide written notice of the employee’s sta­
tus, as a government employee, to each
agency of a government entity holding
records that would disclose the employee’s
home address, phone number, Social Secu­
rity number, insurance coverage, marital sta­
tus, or payroll deductions in order that the
employee may have the information classi­
fied as private. Neither the government en­
tity or political subdivision, or employees
of those entities, will be liable for damages
arising from the negligent disclosure of private

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

27

State Labor Laws, 2001

records, unless the disclosure was of employ­
ment records maintained by the government
entity or the disclosure was of non-employ­
ment records and the current or former em­
ployee had filed the required notice.
Vermont
Wages. As the result of prior legislation,
the state minimum wage rate rose from $5.75
per hour to $6.25 per hour on January 1,
2001. The minimum cash wage for tipped
employees is $3.44 per hour, with a maxi­
mum tip credit allowance of $2.81.
The State minimum wage law was
amended, eliminating the wage board and
transferring its duties and responsibilities
to the Commissioner of Labor and Indus­
try. Additionally, employers covered by a
wage order must now comply within 10
days of receiving notification of a violation,
or the commissioner may take court action
to enforce the order. Finally, any employee
paid less than the applicable wage rate shall
recover, in a civil action, twice the amount
of the minimum wage, less any amount ac­
tually paid together with costs and reason­
able attorney fees.
Resolutions were adopted recognizing
the continuing problems that women encoun­
ter in their efforts to achieve equal pay for
equal work and urging that Equal Pay Day,
April 3,2001, serve as a reminder to all Ver­
monters that this fundamental economic goal
has yet to be achieved.
C h ild labor.
Several significant changes
were made in the child labor law. Among
these, the Commissioner of Labor and In­
dustries is to adopt rules to carry out the
purpose and intent of the law, provided the
rules are consistent with Federal child labor
laws and rules. Among changes conforming
to the Federal law for children under age 16,
the earliest staring time was changed from 6
a.m. to 7 a.m., work was limited to 40 hours
a week when school is not in session, and
employment was restricted to no more than
3 hours on schooldays and to no more than
18 hours on school weeks. These children
will now be permitted to work until 9 p.m.
from June 1 through Labor Day. The ban on
employment by children under age 14 was
amended to add the Federal exemptions for
newspaper carriers and for employment by
a parent. The list of occupations considered
to be hazardous and prohibited for minors
under age 16 was repealed and replaced by
adopting, by reference, the Federal prohib­
ited hazardous occupations for minors un­
der age 18. Other changes eliminated hours
restrictions in manufacturing and mechanical
establishments for minors age 16 to 18, and

28

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

made major increases in penalties for viola­
tion of the law and for the sale of goods made
in violation of the law.
W orker p riv a c y .
The Department of Mo­
tor Vehicles was added to the list of employ­
ers permitted to require polygraph examina­
tions forjob applicants as a condition of em­
ployment. For the Department of Motor Ve­
hicles, this authority is limited to applicants
for law enforcement positions.
O th er law s. The governor, by executive or­
der, transferred the Division of Occupational
Health from the Department of Health to
the Department of Labor and Industry.

Virginia
The section
of the Fair Employment Contracting Act pro­
hibiting discrimination in the awarding of con­
tracts was amended to adopt the definition of
unlawful discriminatory practice used in the
State Human Rights Act. This change adds
discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, child­
birth or related medical conditions, age, mari­
tal status, or disability to the previously pro­
hibited discrimination because of race, religion,
color, sex, or national origin.
E qu al em ploym en t opportunity.

W h istle b lo w e r.
The time period was in­
creased, from 30 to 60 days after a violation
occurs, for an employee to file a complaint
with the Commissioner of Labor and Indus­
try, alleging that discharge or discrimination
occurred as the result of filing a safety or health
complaint, testifying, or otherwise acting to
exercise his or her rights under the safety and
health provisions of the State Labor and Em­
ployment laws.
O th e r la w s.
Full-time employees of the
Commonwealth of Virginia will be allowed
up to 30 days of paid leave a year to serve as
bone marrow or organ donors.

Washington
Wages. The State minimum wage rate is
adjusted for inflation annually in September
by a calculation using the Consumer Price
Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers for the previous year. As a result,
the rate for employees over age 18 increased
from $6.50 per hour to $6.72 per hour on
January 1, 2001, and to $6.90 on January 1,
2002. Sixteen- and 17-year-olds also receive
these rates as the result of an administrative
rule requiring that they earn the same mini­
mum wage as adults.
The prevailing wage law was amended to

Jan u a ry 2002

provide that civil penalties collected for vio­
lations of the act are to be deposited in the
public works administration account.
An employer may use the
designation “infant-friendly” on its promo­
tional materials if the employer has a work­
place breastfeeding policy, approved by the
Department of Health, that addresses issues
including flexible work scheduling; provid­
ing breaks for breastfeeding or the expres­
sion of breast milk; providing a facility al­
lowing privacy for breastfeeding or express­
ing milk; and providing clean-up and storage
facilities.

F a m ily issu es.

W orker p riv a c y . Financial and proprietary
information collected from any person and
provided to the Department of Community,
Trade, and Economic Development, as part
of the department’s research and survey ef­
forts, was made exempt from public disclo­
sure requirements.
O th e r law s.
An employer, of 20 or more
full-time employees, may not discharge or
otherwise discipline an unpaid volunteer
firefighter because of leave taken while re­
sponding to a fire alarm or an emergency call.
The protection from discharge or discipline
applies in cases in which the volunteer is not
already at his or her place of employment
when called to serve (unless agreed to by the
employer) and in which the volunteer has
been ordered to remain at his or her position
by the commanding authority at the scene.
The statute dealing with the employment
and re-employment rights of veterans was
amended to ensure employment rights pro­
tections for State-activated members of re­
serve and National Guard units similar to
those provided by Federal law for Federalactivated personnel. Employers are pro­
hibited from denying initial employment,
employment retention, promotion, or em­
ployment benefit on the basis of member­
ship, application for membership, perfor­
mance of service, application for service, or
service obligation to or in any of the mili­
tary services. Proof of service or required
future service must be provided to the em­
ployer within specified time frames. Provi­
sion is made for the continuation of health
insurance and pension benefits during the
period of active service.

West Virginia
Wages. The section of the prevailing wage
law relating to the attachment of wage rates
to construction contracts was amended to
permit the schedule of wages to be pub-

lished in an electronic or other medium and
incorporated into the contract by reference.
The threshold amount for the prevailing
wage payment requirement for projects of
the West Virginia Infrastructure and Jobs De­
velopment Council was raised to $50,000
from $25,000 for work that is performed on
construction or repair projects by regular full­
time employees of the State or its subdivi­
sions. To be exempt, no more than $50,000
may be expended on an individual project in
a single location in a 12-month period.
Knowingly employing a per­
son or persons who do not have the legal
right to be employed in the United States
was added to the list of causes for disciplin­
ary action under the State Contractor Li­
censing Act.
The law prohibiting employers from dis­
charging employees for time lost from work
as members of volunteer fire departments
while their squad responds to emergencies
was amended. It now also provides protec­
tion from other forms of disciplinary action
and expands the scope of the protection to
include emergency medical service atten­
dants. Motor vehicle accidents were added
to the definition of “emergency,” and the
restoration of an employee’s lost seniority
was added to the remedies provided in the
event of violation by an employer.
O th e r la w s.

Wisconsin
W ages. Effective July 1, 2001, the thresh­
old amount for coverage under the State pre­
vailing wage laws for State and municipal
contracts was changed administratively
from $168,000 to $172,000 for contracts in
which more than one trade is involved and
from $34,000 to $35,000 for contracts in
which a single trade is involved. On January
1, 2002, these amounts were changed ad­
ministratively to $175,000 for contracts in
which more than one trade is involved, and
$36,000 for contracts in which a single trade
is involved.

Employ­
ers must allow all employees, with certain
exceptions, to return to employment after
service in the National Guard or State de­

E q u a l E m p lo ym en t O pportu n ity.

fense force without loss of rights or benefits
including seniority. Employees who are de­
nied re-employment, or are about to be de­
nied, may file a complaint with the Equal
Rights Division of the Department of
Workforce Development, either directly or
through the adjutant general.
Wyoming
W ages.
Legislation was adopted raising
the state minimum wage rate from $ 1.60 per
hour to $5.15 per hour on April 1, 2001. A
minimum cash wage of $2.13 per hour must
be paid to employees receiving tips and who
regularly receive more than $30.00 a month
in tips. Additionally, employers must make
up the difference between this wage and the
applicable minimum wage if the employee’s
tips received during a given pay period added
to the $2.13 per hour fail to equal the mini­
mum wage. The law was amended to remove
exemptions for all minors u’nder age 18, parttime workers (defined as persons working
20 hours or less a week), and individuals
who are enrolled and participating in any
educational training or apprenticeship pro­
gram approved by the Commissioner of La­
bor and Statistics. In lieu of the $5.15 per
hour minimum wage, employers may pay
any employee under age 20 a wage that is
not less than $4.25 per hour during the first
90 consecutive days after the employee is
initially employed by the employer. Em­
ployers may not take action to displace
employees for purposes of hiring employ­
ees at this sub-minimum wage.
Among several changes in the State pre­
vailing law, references to the commissioner
of labor and statistics were replaced by ref­
erences to the director of the Department of
Employment ( doe ). The definition of “lo­
cality” is now the same for public building
projects as it has been for heavy and high­
way projects. The doe, rather than the pub­
lic bodies awarding contracts, will now de­
termine prevailing wage rates. The prevail­
ing rates within the State shall be determined
on an annual basis for all occupations, crafts,
or types of workers expected to be required
for public works in the State. The most cur­
rent hourly wage survey is to be considered
in setting rates. Periods for various actions

were extended: 1) written objections may
now be filed within 15 days of publication
and notification^) within 10 days of receipt
of an objection, the director shall set a hear­
ing date that must be held within 30 days of
receipt of the objection,3) objectors must
receive written notice, of the hearing time
and place, 5 days prior to the hearing, and 4)
the director must rule within 10 days of the
conclusion of the hearing.
As a result of reorganization, references
to the “commissioner of labor” have been
replaced with the “department of employ­
ment” which has the same duties and re­
sponsibilities. Penalties for violation of
semimonthly payment requirements were
increased from a fine of from $25 to $100
and/or up to 90 days imprisonment to a fine
of up to $750 and imprisonment for up to 6
months. A ban on paying female workers
less than is paid to male employees by the
same employer for the same work was elimi­
nated. It was replaced with a provision that
employers may not discriminate in paying
wages on the basis of gender for equal work
on jobs for which the performance requires
equal skill, effort, and responsibility under
the same working conditions. There are ex­
ceptions if the pay is based upon seniority,
the merit system, production quality or
quantity, or a differential based on any fac­
tor other than gender. When the department
collects back wages for employees it must
attempt to make payments of the collected
wages to the persons entitled to the back
wages for a period of not less than 4 months
(previously 2 years), whereupon the wages
now will become unclaimed property. These

funds previously reverted to the general
fund of the State.
A Department of Workforce
Services is to be created as part of a reorga­
nization of the State government by July 1,
2002 following approval of a reorganization
plan by the legislature. The reorganization
plan is to consider transferring several func­
tions or programs to the new department
including displaced worker education and
training, public employment offices, veter­
ans’ employment services, the school-tocareers program, and the unemployment in­
surance program.
□
O th e r law s.

Notes
1 All of the State legislatures met in regular
session in 2001. Alabama, Alaska, Kansas, Mis­
sissippi, and Missouri did not enact significant
legislation in the fields covered by this article.
Information about Guam, Puerto Rico, and the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Virgin Islands was not received in time to be
included in the article, which is based on infor­
mation received by November 9, 2001.
2 Laws in 25 jurisdictions link changes in the

State rate to changes in the minimum wage
rate under the Federal Fair Labor Standards
Act ( flsa). Linkage provisions are of several
types:
a) Laws in 14 jurisdictions do not contain

M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

29

S tate Labor Laws, 2001

State rate automatically increases to 10 cents
their own rates, but replace the State rate
current dollar minimums. Instead, these 14
above the flsa rate if the Federal minimum
with the flsa minimum if it is higher than the
statutes adopt the flsa rate by reference, or
equals or becomes higher than the State mini­
State minimum.
mandate or authorize matching the flsa rate
c)
In Alaska, Connecticut, the District ofmum.
by administrative action, thereby conforming
d)
Another type of linkage is in Califor­
Columbia and Massachusetts, the rates rise
to Federal changes on a continuing basis.
nia. The California rate matches any higher
above the Federal rate by a fixed differential
These 14 jurisdictions are Guam, Illinois,
Federal rate on a continuing basis. In Califor­
on a continuing basis. In Alaska, the rate is
Kentucky, M aryland, M issouri, M ontana
nia, the Industrial Welfare Commission sets
automatically set at 50 cents above the flsa
(mandates adm inistrative action), Nevada
rates administratively by issuance of industry
rate. In Connecticut, the State rate automati­
(mandates administrative action), New Jer­
wage orders. If the Federal rate is scheduled to
cally increases to 0.5 percent above the flsa
sey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylva­
exceed the State rate, the Commission is di­
rate if the Federal minimum equals or be­
nia, Texas, Utah (authorizes, but does not
rected to adopt, in a public meeting, an order
comes higher than the State minimum. In the
mandate, administrative action) and Virginia.
matching the higher rate, without the neces­
b)
Laws in Delaware, Iowa, Maine, NewDistrict of Columbia, the rate is set at $1.00
sity of convening a wage board.
above the flsa rate. In Massachusetts, the
H ampshire, New York and Vermont have

Where are you publishing your research?
The Monthly Labor Review will consider for publication studies o f the labor force,
labor-management relations, business conditions, industry productivity, compensa­
tion, occupational safety and health, demographic trends, and other economic devel­
opments. Papers should be factual and analytical, not polemical in tone.
We prefer (but do not require) submission in the form o f an electronic file in
Microsoft Word, either on a diskette or as an attachment to e-mail. Please use separate
files for the text o f the article; the tables; and charts. We also accept hard copies of
manuscripts.
Potential articles should be mailed to: Editor-in-Chief, Monthly Labor Review, Bu­
reau o f Labor Statistics, Washington, DC 20212, or by e-mail to mlr@bls.gov

M onthly Labor R eview
30

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

Workers’ Compensation, 2001

Changes in workers’ compensation
laws during 2001
Workers ’compensation coverage was extended
to certain law enforcement and public safety officers,
but excluded from some sports officials, inmates,
musicians, and horse trainers
Glenn Whittington

f | ^he issue of coverage under workers’ compensation laws
received a great deal o f attention in 2001. For example,
extending presumptions o f coverage for certain dis­
eases suffered by law enforcement officers or firefighters, or
both, occurred in Arizona, California, Florida, Maryland, and
Virginia. On the other hand, sports officials, State prisoners
and county inmates in Florida, musicians in Louisiana, horse
trainers in Montana, and soccer referees in Oregon were ex­
cluded from coverage.
In gearing up for the Winter Olympic games, Utah is pro­
viding workers’ compensation coverage for law enforcement/
public safety volunteers and paid officers who provide public
safety services.
In Idaho, infectious hepatitis and tuberculosis are now con­
sidered “occupational diseases” in any occupation involving
exposure to human blood or body fluids.
In Nevada, if a person contracts a contagious disease dur­
ing the course and scope o f his employment that results in a
Arizona
Any party to a claim for partial disability
and permanent total disability now has 90
days (previously 60 days) from the time the
Commission mails a copy of its determina­
tion to all parties to request a hearing.

Glenn Whittington is Chief, Branch of Planning
Policy and Standards, Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs, Employment Standards
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
e-mail: gaw@fenix2.dol-esa.gov


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

temporary or permanent disability or death, the disease is
deemed to be an occupational disease and compensable if
certain conditions are met.
In G eorgia, the weekly maximum benefit for tem porary
total disability increased to $400 and the minimum to $40
(up from $375 and $37.50, respectively). Also in Georgia,
the weekly maximum for tem porary partial disability was
increased to $268 from $250. In Louisiana, the am ount o f
benefits paid to each surviving parent in a no-dependency
death claim was increased to $75,000 from $20,000. In Wyo­
ming, the amount o f perm anent total disability and death
benefits awarded to dependent children was increased to
$150 from $100 per month. Future paym ents are to be ad­
ju sted annually for inflation.
Maximum burial allowances increased to $3,500 in North
Carolina.
The following is a State-by-State summary o f significant
changes to workers’ compensation laws.

Any disease, infirmity, or impairment
of a firefighter’s health that is caused by
brain, bladder, rectal or colon cancer, lym­
phoma, leukemia, or aden carcinoma or
mesothelioma of the respiratory tract that
results in disability or death is presumed
to be an occupational disease and is
deemed to arise out of the employment if
certain requirements are met. Among them
are that the firefighter must have passed a
physical examination before employment
and that the examination did not indicate
evidence of cancer; the firefighter was as­

signed to hazardous duty for at least 5
years; and that the firefighter was exposed
to a known carcinogen as defined by the
International Agency for Research on Can­
cer, informed the department of this expo­
sure, and the carcinogen is reasonably re­
lated to the cancer.
Arkansas
Personnel assigned to the Workers’ Com­
pensation Fraud Investigation Unit, upon
meeting the qualifications established by

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

31

Workers' C om pensation, 2001

the Arkansas Commission on Law En­
forcement Standards and Training, shall
have the powers of specialized law en­
forcement officers of the State for the pur­
pose of conducting investigations.
The burden of proof connecting em­
ployment with an occupational disease is
now established by a “preponderance” of
evidence rather than “clear and convinc­
ing” evidence.
A hospital, physician, or healthcare pro­
vider is prohibited from billing or attempt­
ing to collect any fee for services rendered to
an employee due to a workers’ compensa­
tion injury when a claim has been filed and
notification of filed claim has been provided.
Such provider is also prohibited from re­
porting to any credit reporting agency the
employee’s failure to make the payment.
When an injury has been found to be noncompensable, any unpaid portion of a bill
may then be pursued.
The schedule for attorneys’ fees was
changed from the sliding scale, based on
the amount of compensation awarded, to
a set 25 percent of compensation for in­
demnity benefits payable to the injured
employee or dependents of a deceased
employee.
California
The presumption that a hernia, heart
trouble, or pneumonia arose out of and in
the course of employment was extended
to members of the California Highway
Patrol. For law enforcement officers and
fire department employees, the definition
of “injury” was extended to include a
blood-borne infectious disease.
For active lifeguards employed for more
than 3 consecutive months in a calendar year
by certain local agencies and the Department
of Parks and Recreation, the term “injury”
now includes skin cancer that develops or
manifests itself during the period of the
lifeguard’s employment.
A healthcare provider or licensed
healthcare facility can now contract with
a contracting agent, employer, or insur­
ance carrier for reimbursement rates that
are different from the official medical fee
schedule.
Whenever an employer or insurer em­
ploys an individual or contracts with an en­
tity to conduct a review of a billing submit­

32
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ted by a physician or medical provider, the
employer or insurer must make available to
that individual or entity all documentation
submitted together with that billing by the
physician or medical provider.
Medical treatment for a work-related
injury may be provided by a State-licensed
physician assistant or nurse practitioner.
This includes the authority to authorize
the patient to receive time off from work
for a period not to exceed 3 calendar days
if that authority is included in a standard­
ized procedure or protocol approved by
the supervising physician.
Connecticut
The mileage reimbursement rate for the use
of a privately owned vehicle necessary for an
employee to receive medical attention will
now be at the rate equal to the Federal mile­
age reimbursement rate.
The State’s Attorney General is now au­
thorized to bring action in Superior Court
against any employer, carrier, or risk man­
agement agency that fails to comply with the
Second Injury Fund reporting requirements.
An employer- or insurer-sponsored medi­
cal plan must contain a list of all pharmacies
that will provide services under the plan.
The time limit for appealing a
commissioner’s decision was extended to 20
days, up from 10.
Delaware
The time for either party to appeal a notice
of award was increased to 30 days from 20.
The “cap” on attorneys’ fees that can be
awarded by the Industrial Accident Board
was changed from $2,250 to a sliding scale
based upon the average weekly wage as an­
nounced annually by the State’s Secretary of
Labor. This presently places the “cap” at
$6,744.
An employer or its carrier is to notify
the Department and claimant, in writing, of
its acceptance or denial of an employee’s
claim within 15 days from the date of its
receipt of knowledge that the employee sus­
tained a work-related injury. Also, all medi­
cal expenses are to be paid by the employer
or carrier within 30 days of receipt unless
notification is provided that the expenses
are being contested or further verification is
required.

J an u ary 2002

Florida
The definition of “employee” excludes a per­
son who performs services as a sports offi­
cial for interscholastic sports events, or ama­
teur sports events sponsored by nonprofit
organizations. The term “employment” ex­
cludes services performed by state prison­
ers or county inmates, except those perform­
ing services for private employers.
For a public employer to be eligible for
special premium rates, they must have a
workplace safety program. If authorized
by the employee, compensation payments
may be deposited directly into the
employee’s account at a financial institution.
Upon written request, the employee is en­
titled to one change of physician during the
course of treatment for any one accident.
If lost wages from concurrent employ­
ment are used in calculating the average
weekly wage, the employee is responsible
for providing information concerning the loss
of earnings from the concurrent employment.
A claimant, represented by counsel, may
waive all rights to benefits by entering into a
settlement agreement releasing the employer
and carrier from liability in exchange for a
lump-sum payment to the claimant. In such
settlements, only the attorney’s fee is sub­
ject to approval by the judge of compensa­
tion claims. The exemption of workers’ com­
pensation claims from creditors does not ex­
tend to claims based on an award of child
support or alimony.
An injury to a law enforcement officer
while on duty or while going to or coming
from work in an official law enforcement ve­
hicle shall be presumed to be an injury arising
out of and in the course of employment un­
less the injury occurred during a distinct de­
viation for a non-essential personal errand.
Georgia
The weekly maximum for temporary total
disability benefits increased to $400 from
$375, and the minimum to $40 from $37.50.
The weekly maximum for temporary partial
disability was increased to $268 from $250.
Upon determining that proceedings were
brought, prosecuted, or defended without
reasonable grounds, the administrative law
judge or the board may, in addition to reason­
able attorney’s fees, award to the adverse
party reasonable litigation expenses against
the offending party.

The list of physicians the employer
must maintain who are reasonably acces­
sible to employees increased to 6 from 4.
All reasonable charges for medical, surgical,
hospital, and pharmacy goods and services
are payable by the employer or its work­
ers’ compensation insurer within 30 days
from the date the employer or insurer re­
ceives the charges and reports.
Idaho
Infectious hepatitis and tuberculosis are
now considered “occupational diseases” in
any occupation involving exposure to hu­
man blood or body fluids.
Iowa
A limited liability partner may elect to be
covered by the workers’ compensation law.
Kansas
“Usual charge” means the amount most
commonly charged by healthcare providers
for the same or similar services while “cus­
tomary charge” means the usual rates or
range of fees charged by healthcare provid­
ers in a given locale or area.
The average gross weekly wage of a per­
son serving on a volunteer basis as a duly
authorized law enforcement officer, ambu­
lance attendant and driver, or firefighter,
who receives no wages for such services, or
who receives wages that are substantially
less than the usual wages paid for such ser­
vices, is now computed on the basis of the
dollar amount closest to but not exceeding
112.5 percent of the State average weekly
wage. The average weekly wage of any
other volunteer who receives no wages for
such services, or who receives wages that
are substantially less than the usual wages
paid for such services by comparable em­
ployers to employees who are not volun­
teers, are to be computed on the basis of
the usual wages paid by the employer for
such services to employees who are not
volunteers.
Louisiana
The amount of benefits to be paid to each
surviving parent in a no-dependency


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

death claim was increased to $75,000
from $20,000.
If upon release by a physician to re­
turn to work, the employee fails a drug
test, benefits, with the exception of rea­
sonable and necessary medical treatment,
may be terminated subject to the terms
and conditions established in the
employer’s promulgated drug testing
policy and program.
In calculating an employee’s wage, any
amount withheld by the employer to fund
any health insurance benefit provided by
the employer, and which was elected by
the employee in lieu of taxable earnings, is
to be included.
Constitutional challenges to the Work­
ers’ Compensation Act are now recog­
nized if they meet established filing pro­
cedures. An award of temporary total
disability benefits may be modified by
the filing of a motion for modification
with the same court that awarded the ben­
efits and under the same caption and
docket number without the necessity of
filing a new dispute and appearing at a
mediation conference.
The time limit for filing a claim for
disability arising from an occupational
disease was increased to 1 year from 6
months.
Musicians and performers who are
rendering services pursuant to a perfor­
mance contract are exempt from workers’
compensation coverage.
For purposes of determining an
employee’s average weekly wage in an oc­
cupational disease claim, the date of the
“accident” shall be the date of the
employee’s last employment with the
employer from whom benefits are being
claimed or the date of last injurious expo­
sure to employment conditions, which­
ever date occurs later.
Maine
The amount of medical insurance cover­
age required for an agricultural employer
to be exempt from workers’ compensa­
tion coverage was increased to $5,000
from $1,000.
The Supplemental Benefits Fund was
created to provide reimbursement for the
payment of workers’ compensation ben­
efits in excess of 260 weeks. Previously,

these reimbursements were made from
the Employment Rehabilitation Fund.
Maryland
A decision rendered by the Workers’ Com­
pensation Commission is to be sent to each
party’s attorney of record or, if the party is
unrepresented, to the party.
For purposes of workers’ compensa­
tion coverage, the definition of “public
safety employee” was expanded to in­
clude a Prince George’s County deputy
sheriff.
If an award of permanent partial dis­
ability compensation is reversed or modi­
fied by a court of appeal, the payment of
any new compensation awarded shall be
subject to a credit for compensation pre­
viously awarded and paid.
Each employer that self-insures must
establish a toll-free telephone number
through which an employee or claimant,
or a representative of an employee or
claimant, may make direct telephone in­
quiries during regular business hours.
Michigan
In response to a request that pertains to a
specific employer and includes the
employer’s address and the date of injury
of the claim for which information is re­
quested, the bureau may disclose the name
and address of the insurer that, according to
the records of the bureau, provided cover­
age on the date of injury, but shall not dis­
close the effective date or expiration date of
the policy.
Montana
The Workers’ Compensation Act does not
apply to employment of a trainer, assis­
tant trainer, exercise person, or pony per­
son who is performing services under a li­
cense issued by the board of horseracing
while on the grounds of a licensed race meet.
The waiting period for receiving tem­
porary total disability benefits was re­
duced from 6 to 5 days, and for shift work
from 48 to 40 hours.
A worker requalifies for temporary to­
tal disability benefits if a modified or alter­
native position is no longer available to the

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

33

Workers' C om pen sation, 2001

worker for any reason, except for the
worker’s incarceration, resignation, or ter­
mination for disciplinary reasons caused by
a violation of the employer’s policies that
provide for termination of employment.
If an employee is intentionally injured
by an intentional and deliberate act of the
employee’s employer or by the inten­
tional and deliberate act of a fellow em­
ployee while performing the duties of
employment, the employee or, in case of
death, the employee’s heirs have a cause
of action for damages against the person
whose intentional and deliberate act
caused the intentional injury.
Nevada
An officer or manager of a quasi-public or
private corporation, or a limited liability
company who owns the entity, operates it
exclusively from his primary residence, and
receives pay for services performed, may
elect to reject coverage for himself by filing
written notice with the insurer.
If a person employed in the State con­
tracts a contagious disease during the course
and scope of his employment that results
in a temporary or permanent disability or
death, the disease is deemed to be an occu­
pational disease and compensable if certain
conditions are met. “Contagious disease”
means hepatitis A, B, and C, tuberculosis,
the human immunodeficiency virus or ac­
quired immune deficiency syndrome.
If a treating physician or chiropractor
refers an injured employee to a specialist
for treatment, the treating physician or chi­
ropractor must provide to the injured em­
ployee a list that includes the name of each
physician or chiropractor with that spe­
cialization who is available pursuant to the
terms of the contract with the organization
for managed care or with providers of
healthcare services. The injured employee
may select someone from that list.
New Hampshire
Scheduled permanent impairment awards
can now be given for an injury to the brain or
from scarring, disfigurement, or other skin
impairment resulting from a bum or bums.
A mental injury is not compensable un­
der the Workers’ Compensation Act if such
mental injury results from any disciplinary

34
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

action, work evaluation, job transfer, lay­
off, demotion, termination or similar action,
taken in good faith by the employer.
Any State employee injured in the line
of duty by a hostile or overt act that causes
hospitalization or renders the employee
temporarily unable to perform the duties
of his or her position shall remain on active
payroll and not be charged annual or sick
leave for the time lost due to the injury.
When an insurance carrier, self-insurer,
or payor, acting on behalf of such carrier or
self-insurer, disputes the causal relation­
ship of a medical bill to the claimant’s in­
jury, and denies payment of such bill, and
is after a hearing ordered to pay or reim­
burse the bill by the Commissioner, the
employee shall be entitled to reimbursement
of reasonable counsel fees and costs as ap­
proved by the Commissioner.
North Carolina
Burial expenses were increased to $3,500
from $2,000.
An insurer that covers an employee
under a health benefit plan, a disability
income plan, or any other health insur­
ance plan is not a real party in interest
and shall not participate in any proceed­
ing or settlement agreement to determine
compensability of a claim. The insurer
that covers an employee under a health
benefit plan or any other health insur­
ance plan may seek reimbursement from
the employee, employer, or carrier that
is liable or responsible for the specific
medical charge according to a final adjudi­
cation of the claim or an order of the Com­
mission approving a settlement.

between the employee’s wage-loss ben­
efits and the employee’s regular pay.
For purposes of workers’ compensa­
tion, a “preferred worker” means a worker
who has incurred a compensable injury that
resulted in a disability that poses a sub­
stantial obstacle to employment. The bu­
reau may provide assistance as deemed ap­
propriate to employers who employ a pre­
ferred worker, and employers who apply
for and are approved as a preferred worker
employer may not be assessed premiums
on a preferred worker’s salary for 3 years
from the date of hiring. Also, the bureau
may not charge claims costs incurred as a
result of an injury sustained by a preferred
worker against the account of the preferred
worker’s employer during the first 3 years
after the worker is hired.
The award for the amputation of more
than one finger on one hand may not exceed
an award for the amputation of a hand. The
award for the amputation of more than one
toe of one foot may not exceed an award for
the amputation of a foot.
An employer may not employ any
person, or receive the fruits of the labor
of any person, in a hazardous employ­
ment, without first applying for work­
ers’ compensation insurance coverage by
notifying the bureau of the intended em­
ployment, the nature of the intended em­
ployment, and the estimated payroll ex­
penditure for the coming 12-month pe­
riod. An employer who willfully misrep­
resents the amount of payroll upon which
a premium is based, or who willfully fails
to secure coverage for employees, is li­
able to the State in the amount of $2,000
plus three times the difference between
the premium paid and the amount of pre­
mium the employer should have paid.

North Dakota
The bureau may now pay for preventa­
tive treatment for significant exposures
documented by emergency medical ser­
vice providers or employees of licensed
facilities, and for exposure to rabies oc­
curring in the course of employment.
An employer may not require an em­
ployee to use sick or annual leave, or other
employer-paid time off work, before ap­
plying for or receiving workers’ compen­
sation benefits. However, an employer
may allow an employee to use sick or
annual leave to make up the difference

J an u ary 2002

Oklahoma
The name of State Insurance Fund was
changed to “CompSource Oklahoma.”
Oregon
A person serving as a referee or assistant
referee in a youth or adult recreational soc­
cer match whose services are retained on a
match-by-match basis is exempt from work­
ers’ compensation coverage. Firefighters and
police employees of any city having a popu-

lation of more than 200,000 that provides a
disability and retirement system by law are
also exempt from coverage.
“Preexisting condition” means, for all
occupational disease claims, any injury,
disease, congenital abnormality, person­
ality disorder or similar condition that
contributes to disability or need for treat­
ment and that precedes the onset of the
claimed occupational disease.
For purposes of determining entitle­
ment to temporary disability or perma­
nent total disability benefits, “worker”
does not include a person who has with­
drawn from the workforce during the pe­
riod for which such benefits are sought.
The maximum for temporary total dis­
ability was increased to 133 percent of
the State’s average weekly wage, up from
100 percent. For workers employed in
more than one job at the time of injury, all
the worker’s earnings will be considered
in determining the temporary total dis­
ability compensation rate. For the per­
manent loss of use or function of an in­
jured member of the body, benefits for
each degree of disability was increased to
$511.29 from $454. Beginning January
1, 2002, through December 31, 2004, the
worker will receive $559 for each degree
of disability.
An offer of modified employment may
be refused by a worker, without the ter­
mination of temporary total benefits, if
the offer does not meet an established set
of requirements.
An injured worker may pursue a civil
negligence action for a work-related in­
jury that has been determined to be not
compensable because the worker has
failed to establish that a work-related in­
cident was the major contributing cause
of the worker’s injury—only after an or­
der determining that the claim is not com­
pensable has become final. Such action
must occur within the later of (1) 2 years
from the date of injury or (2) 180 days
from the date the order affirming that the
claim is not compensable on such grounds
becomes final.
Rhode Island
Any person who is appointed a corpo­
rate officer between January 1, 1999 and
December 31, 2001, and was not previ­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ously an employee of the corporation,
will not be considered an employee un­
less a notice is filed to elect coverage by
the workers’ compensation provisions.
The penalty for an employer failing to
post a summary of the workers’ compen­
sation act provisions was increased to
$250 from $100. The payment of medi­
cal services required by the employer
shall not include hearing aids or other am­
plification devices.
An injured employee who accepts
suitable alternative employment will re­
ceive a weekly compensation equal to 66
2/3 percent of the difference between the
employee’s average weekly wage, earn­
ings or salary before the injury and his/
her weekly wages, earnings, or salary
from the suitable alternative employment.
For total occupational deafness in one
ear, 75 weeks of compensation will be
paid; for total occupational deafness of
both ears, 244 weeks of compensation
will be paid (previously 17 and 100
weeks, respectively).

South Dakota
No local prisoner, State inmate, or Fed­
eral inmate providing services to the State
or any of its political subdivisions may
be considered a volunteer worker for
workers’ compensation purposes.

Tennessee
In cases where an injury occurs as the re­
sult of gradual or cumulative events or
trauma, the injured employee, or represen­
tative, needs to provide notice to the em­
ployer of the injury within 30 days after
the employee knows or reasonably should
know that he/she has suffered a work-re­
lated injury resulting in permanent physi­
cal impairment, or is rendered unable to
continue to perform his/her normal work
activities as the result of the work-related
injury, and the employee knows or reason­
ably should know that the injury was
caused by work-related activities.
Before any proposed settlement is con­
sidered final in cases involving benefits
from the second injury fund, it must have
the written approval of the Commissioner
of Labor and Workforce Development.

If an injury or illness requires the
treatment of a physician or surgeon who
practices orthopedic or neuroscience
medicine, the employer may appoint a
panel of physicians or surgeons practic­
ing orthopedic or neuroscience medicine
for the employee to choose. The injured
employee is entitled to have a second
opinion on the issue of surgery, impair­
ment, and a diagnosis from that same
panel of physicians.
The representative of the employee,
employer, or employer’s insurer attend­
ing a benefit review conference must have
authority to settle any disputes. Failure
to provide such a person at the confer­
ence, without good cause, by the em­
ployer or insurer, shall subject them to a
penalty of not less than $50 nor more
than $5,000.

Texas
The requirements for being on the
Commission’s approved list of doctors
licensed in the State who are approved to
provide healthcare services were signifi­
cantly revised. Regional Health Care De­
livery Networks may now be established
by the Commission, as fee-for-service
networks designed to improve the qual­
ity and reduce the cost of healthcare. An
insurance carrier or a self-insurer, certi­
fied to provide workers’ compensation
coverage in the State, may elect to par­
ticipate or not participate, by contract,
in a regional network. A public employer,
with certain exceptions, are required to
participate in a regional network.
An employer shall notify an em­
ployee, treating doctor, and insurance
carrier of the existence or absence of op­
portunities for modified duty or a modi­
fied duty return-to-work program avail­
able through the employer. An insurance
carrier shall, with the agreement of a par­
ticipating employer, provide the em­
ployer with return-to-work coordination
services as necessary to facilitate an
employee’s return to employment.
The Texas Workers’ Compensation In­
surance Fund was changed to a domestic
mutual insurance company and now op­
erates as the Texas Mutual Insurance
Company.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

35

Workers' C om pensation, 2001

Utah

Virginia

Wyoming

Law enforcement and public safety volun­
teers and paid officers who provide public
safety services during the Olympic Winter
Games of 2002 and the Paralympic Winter
Games o f2002 are covered under workers’
compensation. For purposes of comput­
ing compensation, the average weekly wage
rate of a public safety volunteer is consid­
ered to be $400.

The presumption as to disability or death
from respiratory disease, hypertension or
heart disease was extended to special
agents of the Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control.
Premium discounts insurers provide to
employers for drug-free workplace pro­
grams are no longer limited to 4 years.

For purposes of workers’ compensation
coverage, the definition of “State em­
ployee” was clarified.
The amount of permanent total disability
and death benefits awarded to dependent chil­
dren was increased to $150 per month, up
from $100, for payments made after July 1,
2001. In the future such payments are to be
adjusted annually for inflation.
□

Fax-on-demand
Users o f data from the Bureau o f Labor Statistics can request a fax o f news releases,
historical data, and technical information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, from the
Bureau’s fax-on-demand system.
Users can receive news releases o f major economic indicators (see schedule on back
cover) at 8:45 a.m. on the morning the data are released. The number to obtain data from
the national office is:
( 202) 691-6325

Use a touch-tone telephone and follow the voice instructions for entering document
codes and your fax telephone number. The fax-on-demand catalog, containing a list of
available documents and codes, can be obtained by entering code 1000. You may
request up to four documents with each call. Faxes are sent immediately following the
request. If your fax line is busy, the system attempts to send the requested material four
_______________________________________
times before disconnecting.

36
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

Unemployment Insurance Laws,2001

Changes in unemployment
insurance legislation in 2001
At the State level, enactments included increases o f maximum
weekly benefit amounts, modifications to voluntary quit
provisions, and extensions o f coverage to Indian tribes;
one Federal bill enacted will affect the Federal-State
unemployment insurance program
Loryn Lancaster
and Anne Vogel

uring 2 001, one F ederal en actm en t affected the
Federal-State unemployment insurance program. The
“Economic Growth and Tax R elief Reconciliation
Act o f 2001” (RL. 107—16) will affect the unemployment
insurance program in two ways. First, the voluntary with­
holding rate o f Federal income taxes on unemployment in­
surance benefits has been reduced from 15 percent to 10 per­
cent. The amendment applies to amounts paid after the 60th
day after enactment, which pertains to payment made on and
after August 7, 2001. Those States that contain generic lan­
guage in their unemployment insurance State laws, as regards
the withholding requirement, can implement the new percent­
age without a law change. However, the five States that have
provisions that include the 15-percent rate language will need
to amend their State unemployment insurance laws before
the withholding rate can change. Second, the exclusion of
employer-provided educational assistance from the Federal
Unemployment Tax Act definition o f wages has been extended
to graduate education and the exclusion is permanent for both
undergraduate and graduate education courses. This amend­
ment is effective with respect to courses that students began

D

Loryn Lancaster and Anne Vogel are unemployment insurance
program specialists in the Division of Legislation, Office of
Workforce Security, Employment and Training Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor. E-mail: llancaster@doleta.gov


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

after December 31, 2001. The States have the option of
amending their unemployment insurance State laws to include
this provision.
The “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001,” requires
those States that have federally recognized Indian tribes within
their borders amend their laws to treat Indian tribes similarly
to State and local governments. O f the 34 States under man­
date to amend their laws, 22 had done so by December 18,
2001. Although not required, Arkansas enacted legislation
about Indian tribes. In addition, one State is operating under
an Executive Order and another under a savings clause.
As was noted in last year’s article, 15 State legislatures
introduced bills generally following the guidelines set forth
in the “Birth and Adoption-Unemployment Compensation”
final rule, effective August 14, 2000; none o f the bills were
enacted. Eighteen State Legislatures followed suit in 2001,
with the same result o f zero enactments.
Enactments o f State unemployment insurance laws include
the majority o f States (approximately 43) increasing their
maximum weekly benefit amounts either through legislation
or automatic provisions; some other States modifying the vol­
untary quit provision for circumstances related to domestic
violence, and many States expanding coverage to service
performed for an Indian tribe.
Following is a summary o f some significant changes in
State unemployment insurance laws during 2001.
Monthly Labor Review

January 2002

37

U nem ploym ent Insurance Laws, 2001

Arizona
C o v e r a g e . An Indian tribe includes a tribal
unit, a subdivision or subsidiary of an In­
dian tribe, and a business wholly owned by
an Indian tribe. The definition of “employ­
ment” includes service performed for an In­
dian tribe, resulting in unemployment insur­
ance coverage of such services and to ex­
clude coverage of certain services. An In­
dian tribe may either pay contributions or
elect to make reimbursements. Under cer­
tain circumstances, the reimbursement elec­
tion will be terminated when a tribe fails to
make the required payments; provides for
reinstatement when the failure is corrected.
Extended benefits not reimbursed by the
Federal Government must be financed 100
percent by the Indian tribe.

Reimbursable employers are ex­
empt from the Job Training Tax. The Job
Training Tax is imposed under certain con­
ditions.

F in a n cin g .

Arkansas
The disclosure of wage and
unemployment insurance information to the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (h u d ) and to representatives
of public housing agencies concerning ap­
plicants for or participants in housing assis­
tance programs administered by h u d will be
allowed. The disclosure of employee unem­
ployment insurance information to the State
of Arkansas Disability Determination for
Social Security Administration and, pursu­
ant to a subpoena, the Arkansas Insurance
Department Workers’ Compensation Fraud
Investigation Unit will be allowed. Begin­
ning July 1, 2001, applications for review
and redeterminations must be made the first
time charges appear on an employer’s ac­
count; subsequent charges for the same
claimant in the same benefit year may not
be challenged. The director will be required
to report to the Employment Security De­
partment Advisory Council on a quarterly
basis as to any uses of stabilization tax pro­
ceeds deposited into the Employment Secu­
rity Special Fund. Changes reference from
appeal referee to appeal hearing officer. The
term of office for members of the Board of
Review has been changed from 2 to 4 years,
and 4-year terms are to run concurrently with
A d m in istra tio n .

38

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

the term of the Office of the Governor. The
Chairman of the Board of Review will be
required to have a 4-year term beginning
with the 2003 appointment.
Testing positive for illegal drugs
under a Department of Transportation quali­
fied drug screening program, in accordance
with the employer’s bona fide written drug
policy will be considered misconduct that
can lead to a disqualification for benefits.
Work offered to an individual by a baseperiod or last employer at earnings equal to
or greater than the individual earned from
the base-period or last employer will be
deemed suitable work, unless certain factors
are applicable (such as, failure to meet pre­
vailing conditions, risk to heath, safety,
morals, and so forth) and it would be con­
trary to good conscience to deem such work
suitable. A “seasonal industry” is defined as
an industry in which, among other things, it
is customary to lay off 40 percent or more
of the average monthly number of workers
for at least 4 consecutive months during a
regularly recurring period of each year.
Vacation payments received due to a per­
manent separation from employment may
not be disqualifying nor deductible from un­
employment insurance. The application pe­
riod of a disqualification for willful false
statement changes from 2 to 5 years. Be­
ginning, July 1, 2001, overpayments can
be collected only by deduction from future
benefits after 10 years; interest will be im­
posed on overpayments due to fraud; and a
10-percent penalty will be assessed on fraud
overpayments not repaid within 1 year.
B en efits.

C o v e ra g e . The definition of “employer”
and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in
unemployment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe can either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements.
Under certain conditions, the reimburse­
ment election and coverage will be termi­
nated when a tribe fails to make the required
payments; provides for reinstatement when
the failure is corrected. Extended benefits
not reimbursed by the Federal Government
must be financed by the Indian tribe.

An employer doing business outof-State may elect a 2.9-percent new em­
ployer rate or an in-State experience rate

F inan cing.

January 2002

based on its experience in the other State(s),
provided the employer: has at least 3 years
of experience in the other State(s); pro­
vides an authenticated account history from
the other State(s); and conducts business
in Arkansas of the same nature as in the
other State(s), as defined by the North
American Industry Classification System.
The provision requiring deposit of stabili­
zation tax proceeds equal to 0.05 percent of
taxable wages, collected from January 1,
2001 to December 31, 2002, into the Em­
ployment Security Special Fund has been
renewed.

California
The provision regarding eligibil­
ity of student with part-time availability has
been repealed. An unemployed worker will
not be disqualified for eligibility for unem­
ployment compensation benefits solely on
the basis that he or she is only available for
part-time work. Specifies that if an indi­
vidual restricts his or her availability to
part-time work, such individual may be con­
sidered able to work and available for work
if it is determined that all of the following
conditions exist: a) the claim is based on the
part-time employment; b) the claimant is ac­
tively seeking and is willing to accept work
under essentially the same conditions as ex­
isted while the wage credits were accrued;
and c) the claimant imposes no other re­
strictions and is in a labor market in which
a reasonable demand exists for the part-time
services he or she offers. Payments received
from an employer who has failed to provide
the advance notice of facility closure re­
quired by the Federal Worker Adjustment
Renotification and Training Act will not be
construed to be wages or compensation for
personal services for eligibility determina­
tion purposes. Benefits payable will not be
denied or reduced because of the receipt of
payments related in any way to an
employer’s violation of the Federal law.
The base period determination changes as
follows: benefit year beginning: January,
February, or March—4 quarters ending the
previous September; April, May, or June—
4 quarters ending the previous December;
July, August, or September—4 quarters end­
ing the previous March; October, Novem­
ber, or December—4 quarters ending the
previous June. New maximum benefit
B en efits.

amount (m b a ) tables have been established
for claims filed with an effective date be­
ginning: on or after January 1, 2002 and
prior to January 1, 2003 with a specified
m ba of $330; and on or after January 1,
2003 and before January 1, 2004 with a
specified m b a of $370; on or after Janu­
ary 1, 2004 and before January 1, 2005
with a specified m ba of $410; on or after
January 1, 2005 with a specified m ba of
$450. The Department is required to study
the most effective and efficient means of cap­
turing recent employee wages for the pur­
poses of establishing eligibility for unem­
ployment insurance benefits including
implementing an alternative base period. Re­
quires the study to also identify Federal
and State resources that may be used to
administer the unemployment insurance
program. The study is required to be com­
pleted and submitted to the Legislature by
December 31, 2002.
C o v e r a g e . An “American employer” in­
cludes any Indian tribe. The definition of
“employment” and “employing unit” in­
cludes service performed for an Indian
tribe, resulting in unemployment insurance
coverage of such services. An Indian tribe
can either pay contributions or elect to make
reimbursements. An Indian tribe that elects
to make reimbursements will be required to
file a surety bond. Under certain circum­
stances, the reimbursement election will be
terminated and coverage may be terminated
when a tribe fails to make the required pay­
ments; provides for reinstatement when fail­
ure is corrected. Any Indian tribe may elect
unemployment compensation disability
coverage for certain employees, provided
the election is the result of a negotiated
agreement between specific parties. Ex­
tended benefits not reimbursed by the Fed­
eral Government must be financed by the
Indian tribe.

Colorado
References concerning as­
signment of tax rates for new employers in
the construction industry will be shifted from
the Standard Industrial Classification codes
to the North American Industry Classifica­
tion System codes.

A d m in is tra tio n .

C overage.

The definition of “employer”


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe may either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements.
An Indian tribe that elects to make reim­
bursements may be required to execute and
file a surety bond or deposit money or secu­
rities. Under certain circumstances, the re­
imbursement election and coverage will be
terminated when a tribe fails to make the
required payments; provides for reinstate­
ment when the failure is corrected.
On and after July 1, 2001, mon­
ies from the statewide indirect cost al­
location agreement with the Federal Gov­
ernment must be used to supplement mon­
ies in the employment support fund. The
deduction requirement from an employer’s
refund of excess unemployment insurance
taxes, an amount equal to the benefits the
Division has paid to employees upon
whose wages the taxes were based, is elimi­
nated. An employer is relieved of obligation
to pay unemployment insurance taxes in a
calendar quarter if the amount due is less
than $5.
F in an cin g.

Connecticut
“Willful misconduct,” in the case
of absence from work, is clarified to mean
an employee must be absent without ei­
ther good cause for the absence or notice
to the employer which the employee could
reasonably have provided under the circum­
stances for 3 separate instances within an
18-month period. The definition of “just
cause” is eliminated.
B en efits.

Delaware
The maximum weekly benefit
amount increased from $315 to $330 for all
new claims effective January 1, 2002, and
thereafter, as long as the balance in the un­
employment insurance Trust Fund is equal
to or greater than $275 million.
B e n e fits.

The supplemental assessment
was reduced from 0.3 percent to 0.2 percent
effective January 1, 2002, and thereafter,
whenever the unemployment insurance Trust
Fund balance is equal to or greater than $300
million.

F in a n cin g .

Hawaii
The law now makes clear
that Reed Act monies may be requisitioned
and used for the payment of benefits and for
the payment of expenses incurred for the
administration of Hawaii’s unemployment
compensation law and public employment
offices pursuant to a specific appropriation
of the legislature. Monies credited to the ac­
count in Federal fiscal years ending in 2000,
2001, and 2002 must be used solely for the
administration of the unemployment com­
pensation program and the monies are not
subject to specific appropriation require­
ments. (This will be retroactive for fiscal
years 2000 and 2001.) The appropriation,
obligation, and expenditure or other dispo­
sition of Reed Act money must be accounted
for in accordance with standards established
by the U.S. Secretary of Labor.
A d m in istra tio n .

Idaho
The penalty that employ­
ers lose their appeal rights if they fail to pro­
vide separation information without good
cause within 10 days of a request from the
Department was repealed.

A d m in istra tio n .

The definition of “employ­
ment” includes service performed for an
Indian tribe, resulting in unemployment
insurance coverage of such services. An
Indian tribe can either pay contributions
or elect to make reimbursements. An In­
dian tribe that elects to make reimburse­
ments may be required to execute and file
a surety bond or deposit money or securi­
ties. Under certain conditions, the reim­
bursement election will be terminated and
coverage may be terminated when a tribe
fails to make the required payments; pro­
vides for reinstatement when the failure
is corrected.
C overage.

The State interest payment pro­
visions on Federal loans were modified to
change from a requirement to an option: for
the director to pay interest charges due and
payable from the Federal advance interest
repayment fund; to levy on experience-rated
employers a Federal advance interest re­
payment tax; and at the director’s sole
discretion, to assess a Federal advance in­
terest repayment on each covered employer
F in an cin g.

Monthly Labor R eview

January 2002

39

U nem ploym ent Insurance Laws, 2001

development may adjust the employer’s es­ ment benefits.
timated contribution rate, after the period for
the employer to provide a timely payroll re­ C o v era g e. The definition of “employment”
port, if the employer or other interested includes service performed for an Indian
Illinois
party: shows reasonable cause for failure to tribe, resulting in unemployment insurance
file the payroll report on time, and submits coverage of such services. An Indian tribe
A d m in is tra tio n . Determinations related to
back pay awards and wrongfully withheld accurate and reliable payroll reports. The can either pay contributions or elect to make
wages may be reconsidered. The time pe­ amount of contributions estimated by the reimbursements. Under certain conditions,
riod for reconsidering determinations has commissioner when an employer fails to file the reimbursement election will be termi­
a report or files an incorrect report will be nated and coverage may be terminated when
been changed from 2 to 3 years.
considered prima facie correct. Adjustment a tribe fails to make the required payments;
of such estimated amount of contribution on provides for reinstatement when the failure
C o v e ra g e . If certain conditions are met, ser­
vice performed by a full-time student in the the basis of information ascertained after the is corrected.
employment of an organized camp will be expiration of the notice period will be al­
excluded from employment. Service will be lowed if the employer or other interested F in an cin g. Employers’ accounts will not be
excluded from employment if performed on party shows reasonable cause for untimely charged for unemployment benefits directly
or after January 1, 2002, in the employ of a failure to file any payroll report and submits caused by a major natural disaster declared
governmental entity as an election official accurate and reliable reports. A skills train­ by the President.
or election worker and the amount of remu­ ing program from January 1, 2002 to De­
neration received for such service during the cember 31, 2004 has been established. A Kansas
0.09 percent skills training assessment upon
calendar year is less than $1,000.
a contributing employer’s previous year’s C o v e r a g e . The definition of “employer”
taxable wages was established; the assess­ and “employment” includes service per­
Indiana
ment will not be credited to the employer’s formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
experience account, and will not affect the employment insurance coverage of such ser­
B en efits. Waiver of liability for repayment
of benefits upon the request of the individual contribution rate computation. The skills vices. An Indian tribe can either pay contri­
will be allowed if the benefits were received training assessment will be deposited in the butions or elect to make reimbursements for
without fault of the individual’s, the ben­ skills training fund that has been established. the full amount of regular benefits and ex­
efits were the result of payment made dur­ If the unemployment fund ratio is less than tended benefits. Under certain conditions,
ing the pendency of an appeal under which a specified amount, the funds assessed for the reimbursement election and coverage
the individual is determined to be ineligible, or deposited in the skills 2016 training will be terminated when a tribe fails to make
and repayment would cause economic hard­ fund must be directed or transferred to the the required payments; provides for rein­
ship. The provisions reducing the maximum unemployment insurance benefit fund. Un­ statement when failure is corrected. An In­
benefit amount for a separation under dis­ employment benefits will not be charged to dian tribe that elects to make reimbursements
qualifying conditions and for failure to ap­ the experience account of a base period em­ may be required to file a surety bond or in
ply for or accept suitable work are modified ployer when unemployment is a direct re­ lieu of a surety bond, to deposit money or
by providing that the maximum benefit sult of the condemnation of property by a securities, or to purchase and deliver a cer­
amount may not be reduced by more than municipal corporation, the State, or the Fed­ tificate of deposit to guarantee payment.
25 percent during any benefit or extended eral Government, a fire, flood, act of nature,
benefit periods. The pension deduction pro­ when at least 50 percent of employees, in­ Louisiana
visions do not preclude an individual from cluding the claimant, became unemployed
delaying a claim to pension, retirement, or as a result. This exception will not apply A d m in isira tio n . The appeal “tribunal” is
annuity payments until the individual has re­ when the unemployment was an intentional changed to “referee” and the option that the
ceived the benefits otherwise eligible. result of the employer or a person acting on tribunal consist of a body of three members,
Weekly benefits received before the elected behalf of the employer. A new tax rate table is eliminated. The authority to appoint ref­
retirement date will not be reduced by any for 2002 through 2004 with rates ranging erees and their alternates is changed from
pension, retirement, or annuity payment re­ from 0.15 percent to 5.4 percent under the the board of review to the Secretary of the
ceived on or after the elected retirement most favorable schedule and from 1.1 per­ State Department of Labor.
date. A 20-day time period has been es­ cent to 5.6 percent under the least favorable
B en efits. The amount an individual may
tablished for an employing unit, includ­ schedule was established.
elect to deduct and withhold from benefits
ing an employer, to notify the department
for Federal income tax is changed from 15
o f any facts which may affect an Iowa
percent to an amount equal to the amount
individual’s eligibility or right to waiting
allowable under Federal law.
B en efits. Federal Social Security pensions
period credits or benefits.
to which an individual has made contribu­
tions will not be deducted from unemploy­ C o v e r a g e . The definition of “employer”
F in a n cin g . The commissioner of workforce
if the estimated interest payable is more
than zero.

40

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

January 2002

and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such ser­
vices. An Indian tribe can either pay contri­
butions or elect to make reimbursements.
Under certain conditions, the reimburse­
ment election and coverage will be termi­
nated when a tribe fails to make the re­
quired payments.

the individual establishes that the voluntary
leaving was due to domestic violence.
Benefits paid to an individual
who voluntarily quits due to domestic vio­
lence are charged to the solvency account.

F in an cin g.

Maine
C o v e r a g e . Services provided by an owneroperator of a truck or truck tractor while
leased to a motor carrier, as long as that
employment is not subject to Federal un­
employment taxes, will be excluded from
employment. The definition of “employing
unit” and “employment” includes service
performed for an Indian tribe, resulting in
unemployment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe can either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements.
An Indian tribe that elects to make reim­
bursements may be required to execute and
file a surety bond or deposit money or secu­
rities. Under certain circumstances, the re­
imbursement election and coverage will be
terminated when a tribe fails to make the
required payments; provides for reinstate­
ment when the failure is corrected.

Maryland

An individual on a voluntary leave
of absence will not be eligible for benefits
for the duration of the leave of absence.
An individual who quits because of do­
mestic abuse will not be disqualified from
benefits under certain conditions. An indi­
vidual who, without good cause, fails to af­
firmatively request an additional job assign­
ment after completion of a temporary job as­
signment from a staffing service employer
will be considered to have quit employment
under certain conditions.
C o v e ra g e . Services performed for an In­
dian tribe are considered to be in employ­
ment, resulting in unemployment insurance
coverage of such services-effective retroac­
tive to December 31, 2000. An Indian tribe
can either pay contributions or elect to make
reimbursements. Under certain circum­
stances, the reimbursement election will be
terminated when the tribe fails to make the
required payments. An Indian tribe whose
election has been terminated becomes a taxpaying employer and will be assigned the
new employer tax rate until qualified for a
rate based on experience.

Mississippi
Social Security payments to which
an employee has made contributions shall
not be deducted from unemployment com­
pensation; such payments were previously
deductible. Maximum weekly benefit
amount increases from $190 to $200, effec­
tive July 1, 2001, and from $200 to $210,
effective July 1, 2002.
B enefits.

A municipal police officer ap­
pointed by the Carroll County sheriff as a
special deputy sheriff for the county remains
an employee of the municipal corporation
for unemployment insurance purposes.
C overage.

Massachusetts
The definition of domestic vio­
lence and what abuse includes is added to
the law. A nondisqualification for dis­
charge is imposed provided the individual
establishes that the reason for the discharge
was due to circumstances resultirg from do­
mestic violence. A nondisqualification for
voluntary leaving work is imposed provided
B en efits.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The maximum weekly benefit
amount increases from 60 percent to 63 per­
cent of the State average weekly wage for
claims filed on or after July 1, 2001. An in­
dividual who is otherwise eligible for ben­
efits may not be denied benefits because the
individual left work or was discharged be­
cause of circumstances resulting from the
individual or a child of the individual being
a victim of domestic violence, or due to an
individual’s attempt to protect himself or
herself or child from domestic abuse. The
conditions under which an individual must
be treated as a victim of domestic violence
have been specified. The duration of these
benefits is limited to 10 weeks within a 12month period. This provision terminates July
1, 2003.
B e n e fits.

Minnesota
B enefits.

Reference from the Standard In­
dustrial Classification system is changed to
the North American Industrial Classification
System with respect to variation from stan­
dard rates.
F in a n cin g .

on the unemployment benefits applied for
and granted under the domestic violence
provision. The report must include informa­
tion on applicant demographics and benefit
costs.

Employer contributions are due
and payable on a calendar quarterly basis, at
the end of the month succeeding each quarter.
F in an cin g.

C o v e ra g e . Services performed by election
judges who receive less than $1,000 in re­
muneration in a calendar year are exempt
from employment. The definition of “em­
ploying unit” includes service performed for
an Indian tribe, resulting in unemployment
insurance coverage of such services. An In­
dian tribe can either pay contributions or
elect to make reimbursements. Under cer­
tain conditions, the reimbursement election
and coverage are terminated when a tribe
fails to make the required payments. The ex­
clusion from employment for real estate
agents has been narrowed down to “quali­
fied” agents as defined in 26 U.S.C. 3508,
meaning those whose entire remuneration is
substantially directly related to sales or other
output and who, by written contract, are not
employees. The former exclusion applied to
all agents licensed under State law. An ex­
clusion from employment has been added
for insurance salespeople who are paid
solely on a commission basis and who
work without a guarantee of minimum
earnings.

Employers will not be charged
for the payment of unemployment benefits
to an individual who left work due to cir­
cumstances stemming from domestic vio­
lence.
F in an cin g.

Montana
The Department of Labor
and Industry must report to the legislature

A d m in istra tio n .

Monthly Labor R eview

January 2002

41

U nem ploym ent Insurance Laws, 2001

Nebraska
Language authorizing the
Department of Labor to utilize a three-mem­
ber tribunal to hear unemployment insurance
appeals was eliminated. The unemployment
insurance appeal tribunal will in each case
consist of an administrative law judge. The
law now reflects the independence of appeal
tribunals from the State Department of La­
bor in making decisions about a claimant’s
eligibility for unemployment insurance. An
employer appeal concerning the rate of com­
bined unemployment tax or amount due will
be directed to an unemployment insurance
appeal tribunal, rather than to the Commis­
sioner of Labor. The Commissioner of La­
bor will be permitted to appeal the appeal
tribunal’s decision regarding an employer’s
rate. Fraud prosecutions involving receipt
of unemployment insurance benefits may be
brought in any county where any part of the
crime was committed, including the county
in which the person received the benefits.

A d m in istra tio n .

The law has been clarified to make
sure that employer-provided supplemental
unemployment insurance benefits are not
wages for unemployment benefit or tax
purposes and are not deductible from Stateprovided unemployment insurance. This
ensures that employees will not be disquali­
fied from receiving State-provided unem­
ployment insurance and will not have
State-provided unemployment insurance re­
duced while receiving supplemental unem­
ployment insurance.

B en efits.

and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe can either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements
for regular benefits and all of extended ben­
efits. Under certain conditions, the reim­
bursement election will be suspended when
the tribe fails to make the required payments;
provides for reinstatement when the failure
is corrected.

New Jersey
An employee leasing firm
(or professional employer organization) and
a client company are both responsible for
meeting the requirements of the State un­
employment insurance law.

A d m in istra tio n .

The 12 times statewide average
weekly wage option for purposes of de­
termining eligibility for benefits for other
than agricultural workers was eliminated.
The 1,000 times the minimum wage re­
placed the 12 times statewide average
weekly option for agricultural workers.
The 20 percent times statewide average
weekly wage option was eliminated from
the definition of base week for unemploy­
ment benefits. The 20 times the minimum
wage replaced the 20 times statewide aver­
age weekly wage in the definition of base
week for temporary disability benefits. The
1,000 times the minimum wage replaced the
12 times statewide average weekly wage
option in determining entitlement to tempo­
rary disability benefits.

B en efits.

C o v era g e. The definition of “employer” and
“employment” includes service performed
for an Indian tribe, resulting in unemploy­
ment insurance coverage of such services.
An Indian tribe can either pay contributions
or elect to make reimbursements. An Indian
tribe that elects to make reimbursements will
be required to file a surety bond or deposit
money or securities on the same basis as
other employers with the same election op­
tion. Under certain conditions, the reim­
bursement election and coverage will be
terminated when a tribe fails to make the
required payments.

C o v e ra g e . The definition of “employer”
and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe can either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements.
Under certain conditions, the reimbursement
election and coverage will be terminated
when a tribe fails to make the required pay­
ments and reinstated when the failure is cor­
rected.

Nevada

North Carolina

C overage.

42

The definition of “employer”

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

New Mexico

A d m in istra tio n .

January 2002

Language that would allow

certain but not all employers of specific do­
mestic service employees to file reports an­
nually was eliminated.
Effective September 1, 2001, the
age limit for a minor child under the undue
family hardship provision is eliminated.
Undue family hardship arises when an indi­
vidual is unable to accept a particular shift
because the individual is unable to obtain
care for any disabled member of that
individual’s immediate family. “Immediate
family” is defined as an individual’s wife,
husband, mother, father, brother, sister, son,
daughter, grandmother, grandfather, grand­
son, granddaughter, whether the relationship
is a biological, step-, half-, or in-law rela­
tionship.

B en efits.

Coverage. The definition of “employer” and
“employment” includes service performed
for an Indian tribe, resulting in unemploy­
ment insurance coverage of such services.
An Indian tribe can either pay contributions
or elect to make reimbursements. Under cer­
tain conditions, the reimbursement election
and coverage will be terminated when a tribe
fails to make the required payments and re­
instated when the failure is corrected. Ex­
tended benefits not reimbursed by the Fed­
eral Government must be financed by the
Indian tribe.
An employer’s account will not
be charged if the discharge of the claim­
ant was solely for a bona fide inability to
do the work for which he was hired but only
where the claimant’s period of employ­
ment was 100 days or less. The noncharging
provisions related to hiring pursuant to a
job order placed with a local office of the
Commission and the Work First Program
was eliminated.
F in an cin g.

North Dakota
An individual is not considered to
have left employment voluntarily without
good cause if the individual leaves his/her
most recent employment to accept a bona
fide job offer with a base period employer
who laid off the individual and with whom
the individual has a demonstrated job attach­
ment.

B en efits.

C o vera g e.

The definition of “employer” and

“employment” includes service performed
for an Indian tribe, resulting in unemploy­
ment insurance coverage of such services.
An Indian tribe will be allowed either to pay
contributions or elect to make reimburse­
ments. An Indian tribe that elects to make
reimbursements will be required to file a
surety bond. An Indian tribe that fails to
make required payments within 90 days will
result in loss of option to make reimburse­
ments and that further failure of the tribe to
make payments will cause loss of coverage
of services performed for the Indian tribe. A
manager of a limited liability company is
included within the definition of “employee”
only if the company is treated as a corpora­
tion for purposes of Federal income taxation.
Service performed by an owner of a general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liabil­
ity partnership, limited liability limited part­
nership, or a limited liability company, is
included within the definition of “employ­
ment” only if the organization will be treated
as a corporation for purposes of Federal in­
come taxation. The optional exclusion from
“employment” for managers with one-fourth
or greater ownership interest in a limited
liability company will not apply to lim­
ited liability companies wholly owned by
or operating as an Indian tribe, State or lo­
cal government, or nonprofit organization
for which services performed are required by
Federal law to be covered by the State’s un­
employment insurance law.

to make payments in lieu of contributions.
The requirement for a hearing when a pre­
decessor files a timely written protest of a
transfer of experience was eliminated and
no such transfer will occur if the predeces­
sor files a timely written protest. An employ­
ing unit’s experience record is prohibited
from being transferred in an amount that
results in the successor and predecessor por­
tions totaling more than 100 percent of the
predecessor’s history. The prohibiting of
a negative employer, who was a negative
employer the previous year, from making ex­
cess contributions to the State’s unemploy­
ment fund to become a positive employer
was eliminated. The procedures for posting
a bond or irrevocable letter of credit on con­
struction projects were changed to ensure
the payment of all benefits claimed by em­
ployees working on the project. The thresh­
old for estimated cost of a construction
project that requires posting a bond or letter
of credit was raised from $25 million to $50
million. In determining new employer rates,
employer industrial classification codes were
changed from the 2-digit major group in the
Standard Industrial Classification (sic) sys­
tem to the 3-digit major group code in the
North American Industrial Classification
System (naics). Employers who are liable
for coverage before August 1, 2002, how­
ever, will remain under the sic unless they
are classified (according to the SIC) within
the construction industry.

ment will be provided. The director may re­
fer claimants to jobs plus Program jobs for
which the claimant does not have adequate
skills or experience when such job is likely
to result in an upgrade in the claimant’s skills
and experience. The Employment Depart­
ment is assigned, as appropriate, certain re­
sponsibilities in connection with the JOBS
plus Program. The Adult and Family Ser­
vices Division was removed from being con­
nected with the jobs plus Program.

F in a n cin g . During the building of the trust
fund reserve for calendar years 2000, 2001,
and 2002, a negative employer that was a
negative employer the previous year may not
make excess contributions to become a posi­
tive employer. Limitations imposed during
the building of the trust fimd reserve for cal­
endar years 2000, 2001, and 2002 that the
rate assigned to an employer may not ex­
ceed 130 percent of the previous year’s rate
for that employer and that an employer may
not receive more than a 10-percent decrease
in rate from the previous year’s rate, on
the following employers were removed: an
experience-rated employer that was a new
employer the previous year; a negative em­
ployer that was a positive employer the pre­
vious year; a positive employer that was a
negative employer the previous year; an
employer that has failed to file a report; a
new employer; and an employer that chose

Oregon

C o v e r a g e . The definition of “employer”
and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such ser­
vices. An Indian tribe can either pay contri­
butions or elect to make reimbursements.
Under certain conditions, the reimbursement
election and coverage will be terminated
when a tribe fails to make the required pay­
ments; provides for reinstatement when the
failure is corrected. An Indian tribe that
elects to make reimbursements may be re­
quired to execute and file a surety bond or
deposit money or securities. Extended ben­
efits not reimbursed by the Federal Govern­
ment will be financed in their entirety by the
Indian tribe.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

An individual may not be disquali­
fied from unemployment benefits if the in­
dividual is a victim of domestic violence and
certain conditions are met. The Employment
Department will be required to provide un­
employment insurance applicants with a
JOBS PLUS Program brochure at the time of
application. The Employment Department
will be required to refer unemployment in­
surance recipients: to available unsubsidized
and subsidized jobs within a certain time
period if certain conditions are met; and to
the jobs plus Program if appropriate and
reassess the recipient’s reemployability un­
der certain conditions. The time period limi­
tations for a recipient’s participation in the
job plus Program has been established. As
reimbursement to employers participating in
the jobs plus Program, subsidized employ­
B en efits.

C o v e r a g e . The definition of “employer,”
“employment,” and “employing unit” in­
cludes service performed for an Indian tribe,
resulting in unemployment insurance cov­
erage of such services. An Indian tribe can
either pay contributions or elect to make re­
imbursements for regular benefits and all
extended benefits. Under certain conditions,
the reimbursement election and coverage
will be terminated when a tribe fails to make
the required payments; provides for rein­
statement when the failure is corrected.

A business entity that has a
single owner and is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for Federal tax pur­
poses will be deemed to be the same em­
ploying unit as its owner for unemployment
compensation tax purposes. Applies to tax
years beginning on or after January 1, 2002.

F in a n c in g .

Rhode Island

South Dakota
A d m in istra tio n .

The employer rate assign-

Monthly Labor Review

January 2002

43

U nem ploym ent Insurance Laws, 2001

ment provision is changed to reflect the shift
from the Standard Industrial Classification
system to the North American Industry Clas­
sification System.

Tennessee
The maximum weekly benefit
amount increased from $255 to $275 on or
after August 5,2001. The provision concern­
ing the treatment of back pay awards was
amended to provide that for unemployment
insurance benefit purposes, the amount of
back pay constitutes wages paid in the pe­
riod for which it was awarded. Employers
who are a party to a back pay award settle­
ment must report whether such settlement
was arrived at by subtracting the amount of
unemployment benefits received. The re­
quirements have been established for pay­
ments to the unemployment fund by such
employers in the event the settlement was
or was not reduced by the amount of unem­
ployment benefits received.

B e n e fits.

The total number of premium
rate tables decreased from 10 to 6. Varia­
tions from the standard rate of premiums for
certain employers must be determined, be­
ginning July 1, 2001 by the reserve ratio of
each employer in accordance with the pre­
mium rate tables 1-6, depending on the bal­
ance in the unemployment compensation
trust fund. Under the most favorable table,
rates range from 0 percent to 10 percent.
Under the least favorable table, rates range
from 0.5 percent to 10 percent.
F in a n cin g .

Texas
Garnishment for the pur­
poses of spousal maintenance will not ap­
ply to unemployment insurance benefit
payments. The Government Code Chapter
will be applicable unless and to the extent:
another State law specifically states that this
chapter does not apply; or a Federal law or
regulation imposes an unconditional require­
ment that irreconcilably conflicts with the
code; or imposes a condition on the State’s
eligibility to receive money from the Fed­
eral Government that irreconcilably conflicts
with the code.

A d m in is tra tio n .

The computation of the maximum
weekly benefit amount changed from a com­

B en efits.

44

Monthly Labor Review


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

putation based on the change in the 1976
average weekly wage to 47.6 percent of the
preceding year’s annual average weekly
wage. The computation of the minimum
weekly benefit amount changed from a
computation based on the change in the
1976 average weekly wage to 7.6 percent
of the preceding year’s annual average
weekly wage. A benefit amount that is not
a multiple of $1 must be increased to the
next multiple of $1.
Services will be excluded from
employment if performed by an individual
who is blind while the individual is in train­
ing at a sheltered workshop operated by a
charitable organization under a rehabilita­
tion program that includes: an individual
plan for employment; a timeline for comple­
tion of the training; and a planned employ­
ment outcome. Service will be included as
employment if performed by an individual
who is blind and who, after training, is work­
ing for a sheltered workshop operated by a
charitable organization: temporarily while
awaiting placement in a position of employ­
ment in the competitive labor market; or
permanently because the individual is un­
able to compete in the competitive labor
market. An Indian tribe includes a tribal unit,
a subdivision or subsidiary of an Indian tribe,
and a business wholly owned by an Indian
tribe. The definition of employment includes
service performed for an Indian tribe, result­
ing in unemployment insurance coverage of
such services and to exclude coverage of cer­
tain services. An Indian tribe may either pay
contributions or elect to make reimburse­
ments. Under certain circumstances, the
reimbursement election will be terminated
and coverage may be terminated when a tribe
fails to make the required payments; pro­
vides for reinstatement when the failure is
corrected. Extended benefits not reimbursed
by the Federal Government must be financed
100 percent by the Indian tribe.
C overage.

Certain employers of domestic
workers will be permitted to annually report
quarterly wages and pay contributions.
Such employers must make the reporting and
paying election not later than December 31
of the year before the first calendar year
reported; an election by such employer is
not revocable by the employer before the
second anniversary of the date of the elec­

F in an cin g.

January 2002

tion. Contributions must be reported and
paid by January 31 with respect to wages
for employment paid in the preceding cal­
endar year. Requires the commission to es­
timate the rate taking effect during the
preceding calendar year subject to correc­
tion when a final computation is made. On
the request of the commission, those elect­
ing employers must file reports at other times
as necessary to adjudicate a claim or to es­
tablish wage credits. Any penalty or interest
imposed on the elected employer must be
computed in the same manner as for other
types of employment. In computing the ben­
efit ratio for employers of domestic workers
only and who have elected to file reports an­
nually, only taxable wages for which contri­
butions have been paid to the commission
on or before January 31 may be used. An
employer who reports annually has the same
computation date as other employers, but the
final computation of a rate for the employer
may not occur before February 1 of the year
following the computation date. A special
unemployment compensation tax rate for
employers engaged in agriculture classified
as crop preparation services for market was
provided. Such employers must pay a con­
tribution at the lowest of the following rates:
5.4 percent; the general tax rate applicable
to that employer, with the deficit tax rate and
replenishment tax rate; or any other tax
rate applicable to that employer. The re­
quirement to notify the Commission of an
election will be required. The definition
of manual changes from the Standard In­
dustrial Classification Manual to the North
American Industrial Classification System
Manual.

Utah
The Division of Workforce
Information and Payment Services pre­
scribes rules providing standards for deter­
mining which contribution reports must be
filed on magnetic media or in other machinereadable form. The rules may not require
any employer to file contribution reports
on magnetic media unless the employer is
required to file wage data on at least 250
employees during any calendar year. Devel­
oping the rules requires the Division to take
into account the ability of the employer to
comply at reasonable cost. The Division may
require employers to post a bond for failure

A d m in istra tio n .

to comply with the rules. For the purpose of
accessing records, disclosure of personallyidentifiable information about an individual
can be or may be granted to: an employee of
the Department of Workforce Services (De­
partment) administering programs other than
the unemployment insurance program; a
government employee or workers’ compen­
sation insurer to the extent the information
will aid in the detection or avoidance of du­
plicate, inconsistent, or fraudulent claims
against a workers’ compensation program or
the recovery of overpayments of workers’
compensation funds; an employee or con­
tractor of the Department or an educational
institution or other governmental entity en­
gaged in workforce investment and devel­
opment activities pursuant to the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998 for the purpose of
coordinating services with the Department,
evaluating the effectiveness of those activi­
ties, and measuring performance; the public
for any purpose following a written waiver
by all interested parties of their rights to non­
disclosure; and an individual whose wage
data has been submitted to the Department
by an employer, so long as no informa­
tion other than the individual’s wage data
and the identity of the party who submit­
ted the information is provided to the in­
dividual.

Virginia
A fee may not be deducted
from unemployment insurance that is sub­
ject to child support withholding.
A d m in istra tio n .

Employers are not charged
benefits paid to an inmate participating in
a work-release program when the inmate’s
separation from work arose from conditions
of release or parole from such program.
F in a n cin g .

Washington
Individuals who serve in a princi­
pal administrative, research, or instructional
capacity in a community or technical col­
lege, but who are between "terms, do not have
“reasonable assurance” of continued em­
ployment when an offer is conditioned upon
enrollment, funding, or program changes.
Benefits based on any and all service in an
instructional, research, or principal admin­
istrative capacity for any and all educa­
tional institutions will not be paid to an
individual for any week of unemployment
which commences during the period be­
tween two successive academic years or
terms if the individual has reasonable assur­
ance of continued employment.
B en efits.

The definition of “employment”
and “employing unit” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such
services. An Indian tribe can either pay con­
tributions or elect to make reimbursements.
Under certain conditions, the reimbursement
election and coverage will be terminated
when a tribe fails to make the required pay­
ments; provides for reinstatement when the
failure is corrected. May require an Indian tribe
that elects to make reimbursement to execute
and file a surety bond or deposit money or se­
curities. Extended benefits not reimbursed by
the Federal Government will be financed in
their entirety by the Indian tribe.
C o v era g e.

Unemployment insurance cov­
erage extends to services performed in the
employ of an Indian tribe or tribal unit. In­
dian tribes and tribal units may either pay
contributions or make reimbursements. Fail­
ure of any Indian tribe or tribal unit to make
required payments within 90 days of receipt
of a billing will cause the Indian tribe to lose
the reimbursement option. Reimbursing In­
dian tribes or tribal units may establish group
accounts.
C overage.

Vermont
Effective with the calendar
quarter ending March 31,2001, the require­
ment for employers to report worker’s aver­
age weekly hours worked during the quar­
ter was eliminated. An individual is not
deemed to be “partially unemployed” if the
individual performed less than full-time
work only because there was a holiday in
that week for which the individual was en­
titled to holiday pay.

A d m in is tra tio n .


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Wisconsin
Coverage. The definition o f‘employer” and
“employment” includes service performed
for an Indian tribe, resulting in unemploy­
ment insurance coverage of such services.
An Indian tribe can either pay contributions
or elect to make reimbursement financing.

An Indian tribe that elects to make reim­
bursement financing must file assurance of
reimbursement for the election to be valid;
failure to file such assurance terminates
pending election. An Indian tribe may ter­
minate the election and pay a contribution
rate of 2.7 percent for 3 years; under certain
conditions, may reelect reimbursement fi­
nancing. Under certain conditions, the re­
imbursement financing and the assurance
will be terminated when the tribe fails to
make the required payments and any pend­
ing election that fails to meet the require­
ments to file an assurance of reimbursement
will be terminated; under certain conditions,
reimbursement financing may be reelected.
The Department may consider the Indian
tribe not to be an employer and may con­
sider services performed for the tribe not to
be employment for failure to make required
payments.

Wyoming
A Department of Workforce
Services was created and the new director
of that Department has been instructed to
prepare a plan for reorganizing various agen­
cies and functions, including the possible
transfer of unemployment insurance and
other functions to the Department of
Workforce Services. The plan was to have
been submitted to and approved by the
Governor and submitted to the joint labor,
health and social services interim commit­
tee of the legislature no later than Octo­
ber 15, 2001.

A d m in istration .

C o v e r a g e . The definition of “employer”
and “employment” includes service per­
formed for an Indian tribe, resulting in un­
employment insurance coverage of such ser­
vices. An Indian tribe can either pay contri­
butions or elect to make reimbursements. An
Indian tribe that elects to make reimburse­
ments may be required to file a surety bond.
Under certain circumstances, the reimburse­
ment election will be terminated and cover­
age may be terminated when a tribe fails to
make the required payments; provides for
reinstatement when the failure is corrected.

For calendar year 2002, contri­
bution rates were lowered by 30 percent for
experience-rated employers and employers
at the base rate of 8.5 percent.
D
F in an cin g.

Monthly Labor Review

January 2002

45

Précis

W h y b e flexible?
About one in every ten or eleven workers
reports participating in an altemative-toregular-employee work arrangements and
almost one in five works part time. While
the concept o f “regular employee” may
be hard to define, as Charles Muhl points
out in this issue, and alternative arrange­
ments and part-time work are intertwined
in complex ways, as pointed out by Marisa
DiNatale last March, more flexible ap­
proaches to organizing work seem to be
increasingly important.
Susan H ousem an’s article, “ Why
Employers Use Flexible Staffing Ar­
rangements: Evidence From an Estab­
lishment Survey,” in the October 2001
I n d u s tr ia l a n d L a b o r R e la tio n s R e v ie w

brings us new, survey-based evidence
on the dem and for flexible workers.
Houseman found that seven out o f ten
em ployers rep o rted using part-tim e
workers and almost four out o f five used
at least one form o f flexible arrangement
other than part time.
The most common reasons employ­
ers gave for using alternative arrange­
m ents pertained to specific staffing
needs such as unexpected fluctuations
in workload, seasonal demands, or the
need to cover for vacations or other ab­
sences o f regular employees. Among
those using part-time workers, the most
common reasons reported were to cover
either peak-load hours or to extend the
estab lish m en t’s hours beyond those
covered by full-time shifts.
On the contentious issue o f cost sav­
ings, Houseman noted that, “Although
few employers said they used workers in
flexible staffing arrangements in order to
save on wage and benefit costs, employ­
ers typically do save, primarily on benefit
costs, by using these arrangements.”

Forecasting w o rker
q u a lity
Im provem ents in the q u ality o f the
workforce have been among the forces

46
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

boosting labor productivity in the past
couple o f decades. In fact, bls figures
show that in the first h alf o f the 1990s,
about one-fourth o f labor productivity
growth in private nonfarm business was
due to increases in labor quality, where
quality is measured using education and
work experience. This dropped by half
between 1995 and 1999, to about oneeighth o f labor productivity growth.
(See “M ultifactor productivity trends,
1999,” USDL news release 01-125 at
h t t p : / / w w w .b l s . g o v / n e w s .r e l e a s e /
p ro d 3 .n r0 .h tm for further details.)

Among the causes o f gains in labor
quality are rising levels o f educational
attain m ent am ong w orkers and in ­
creases in work experience that are as­
sociated with higher productivity. The
m ovem ent o f baby-boom ers towards
their peak earnings years has been a
factor in increasing experience levels
and increasing labor quality in recent
years.
What can we project the contribu­
tion o f worker quality to productivity
growth (and hence output growth) to
be in th e co m in g y e a rs? D an iel
Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan o f the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago tackle
this question and others in “Growth in
Worker Quality,” E c o n o m i c P e r s p e c ­
t i v e s (fourth quarter 2001). Among their
data sources is the M arch C urrent
Population Survey ( cps), from which
they analyze data on earnings, weeks
worked, and usual hours worked per
week.
Other researchers who have studied
U.S. labor quality have also used the
cps as a data source— among them are
Mun Ho and Dale Jorgenson and the
bls Office of Productivity and Technol­
ogy. The methodology used by Aaronson
and Sullivan resembles those of these
other researchers in some ways, with
certain differences.
Aaronson and Sullivan report that
their findings about past labor quality
growth are “broadly similar” to those o f
Ho and Jorgenson and those o f bls .
L ik e bls fin d in g s, A aro n so n and

Jan u a ry 2002

Sullivan’s results show a decline in the
contribution o f labor quality to produc­
tivity growth in the 1990s.
Turning to the future, Aaronson and
Sullivan forecast a continued decline in
the contribution o f labor quality to pro­
ductivity and output grow th as we
move towards 2010. According to their
forecast, improvements in worker skills
will account for only about 0.05 percent­
age point o f labor productivity growth
and output growth in 2010, down from
their estimated contribution in the late
1980s and early 1990s o f about 0.40 per­
centage point.

N ew econom y,
n e w w o rk fo rc e
“A century ago, the overwhelming major­
ity o f people in developed countries
worked with their hands,” wrote Peter
Drucker in a recent E c o n o m is t magazine
survey. Today, in contrast, the fast-grow­
ing group is the “knowledge workers” in
jobs that require formal, advanced school­
ing. His analysis of these trends closely
parallels that of bls projections we have
published in the R e v ie w .
Drucker further divides knowledge
workers into the traditional professions
and a new class of “knowledge technolo­
gists” such as com puter program m ers,
m anufacturing technicians, m edical
technologists, and paralegals. W hat
makes these jo b s different is that de­
spite time often spent on routine du­
ties, w hat identifies the w ork is the
part that applies formal learning to the
w ork situation.
These workers, according to Drucker,
will need both the formal education that
starts their careers in knowledge-based
w ork and co n tin u in g ed u catio n as
“knowledge” becomes obsolete more
quickly than “skill.” Drucker believes
that a larger measure o f potential up­
ward m obility marks the know ledge
workforce. He also warns, however, that
that mobility comes at a high price in
terms o f competitive pressure.
□

C urrent Labor Statistics

1

Notes on labor statistics

48

Labor com pensation and collective
bargaining data—continued

60

28. Employment Cost Index, private nonfarm workers,
by bargaining status, region, and area size...................
29. Participants in benefit plans, medium and large firms.....
30. Participants in benefits plans, small firms
and government................................................................
31. Work stoppages involving 1,000 workers or more..........

Wi

C om parative indicators
1. Labor market indicators...........................
2. Annual and quarterly percent changes in
compensation, prices, and productivity
3. Alternative measures of wages and
compensation changes..........................

61
61

Labor force d ata
4. Employment status of the population,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
5. Selected employment indicators,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
6. Selected unemployment indicators,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
7. Duration of unemployment,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
8. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
9. Unemployment rates by sex and age,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
10. Unemployment rates by States,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
11. Employment of workers by States,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
12. Employment of workers by industry,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
13. Average weekly hours by industry,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
14. Average hourly earnings by industry,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
15. Average hourly earnings by industry..........................
16. Average weekly earnings by industry.........................
17. Diffusion indexes of employment change,
seasonally adjusted.................................................
18. Establishment size and employment covered under ui,
private ownership, by major industry....................
19. Annual data establishment, employment, and wages,
covered unless ui and ucfe, by ownership.............
20. Annual data: Establishments, employment,
and wages covered under ui and UCFE, by State.....
21. Annual data: Employment and average annual pay of
ui- and uCFE-covered workers, by largest counties ..
22. Annual data: Employment status of the population ...
23. Annual data: Employment levels by industry............
24. Annual data: Average hours and earnings level,
by industry............................................................

90
91

Price d ata
62
63
64
65
65
66
67
67
68
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
82
83
83

Labor com pensation and collective
bargaining data
25. Employment Cost Index, compensation,
by occupation and industry group............................... 84
26. Employment Cost Index, wages and salaries,
by occupation and industry group............. ................. 86
27. Employment Cost Index, benefits, private industry
workers, by occupation and industry group................ 87

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

88
89

32. Consumer Price Index: U.S. city average, by expenditure
category and commodity and service groups............... 92
33. Consumer Price Index: U.S. city average and
local data, all items....................................................... 95
34. Annual data: Consumer Price Index, all items
and major groups.......................................................... 96
35. Producer Price Indexes by stage of processing................ 97
36. Producer Price Indexes for the net output of major
industry groups............................................................ 98
37. Annual data: Producer Price Indexes
by stage of processing.................................................. 99
38. U.S. export price indexes by Standard International
Trade Classification...................................................... 100
39. U.S. import price indexes by Standard International
Trade Classification...................................................... 101
40. U.S. export price indexes by end-use category..................102
41. U.S. import price indexes by end-use category.................103
42. U.S.international price indexes for selected
categories of services..................................................... 103

Productivity data
43. Indexes of productivity, hourly compensation,
and unit costs, data seasonally adjusted........................104
44. Annual indexes of multifactor productivity...................... 105
45. Annual indexes of productivity, hourly compensation,
unit costs, and prices.................................................... 106
46. Annual indexes of output per hour for selected
industries....................................................................... 107

International comparisons data
47. Unemployment rates in nine countries,
data seasonally adjusted...............................................110
48. Annual data: Employment status of the civilian
working-age population, 10 countries.......................... 111
49. Annual indexes of productivity and related measures,
12 countries................................................................... 112

Injury and illness d ata
50. Annual data: Occupational injury and illness
incidence rates..............................................................113
51. Fatal occupational injuries by event
or exposure....................................................................... 115
M onthly Labor R ev ie w

J an u a ry 2002

47

Notes on Current Labor Statistics

This section of the R e v ie w presents the prin­
cipal statistical series collected and calcu­
lated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
series on labor force; employment; unem­
ployment; labor compensation; consumer,
producer, and international prices; produc­
tivity; international comparisons; and injury
and illness statistics. In the notes that follow,
the data in each group of tables are briefly
described; key definitions are given; notes
on the data are set forth; and sources of addi­
tional information are cited.

General notes
The following notes apply to several tables
in this section:
Seasonal adjustment. Certain monthly
and quarterly data are adjusted to eliminate
the effect on the data of such factors as cli­
matic conditions, industry production sched­
ules, opening and closing of schools, holi­
day buying periods, and vacation practices,
which might prevent short-term evaluation
of the statistical series. Tables containing
data that have been adjusted are identified as
“seasonally adjusted.” (All other data are not
seasonally adjusted.) Seasonal effects are es­
timated on the basis of past experience.
When new seasonal factors are computed
each year, revisions may affect seasonally
adjusted data for several preceding years.
Seasonally adjusted data appear in tables
1-14,16-17,39, and 43. Seasonally adjusted
labor force data in tables 1 and 4-9 were re­
vised in the February 2001 issue of the R e ­
v ie w . Seasonally adjusted establishment sur­
vey data shown in tables 1, 12-14 and 1617 were revised in the July 2001 R e v ie w and
reflect the experience through March 2001. A
brief explanation of the seasonal adjustment
methodology appears in “Notes on the data.”
Revisions in the productivity data in table
49 are usually introduced in the September
issue. Seasonally adjusted indexes and per­
cent changes from month-to-month and
quarter-to-quarter are published for numer­
ous Consumer and Producer Price Index se­
ries. However, seasonally adjusted indexes
are not published for the U.S. average AllItems CPI. Only seasonally adjusted percent
changes are available for this series.
Adjustments for price changes. Some
data-—such as the “real” earnings shown in
table 14—are adjusted to eliminate the ef­
fect of changes in price. These adjustments
are made by dividing current-dollar values
by the Consumer Price Index or the appro­
priate component of the index, then multi­
plying by 100. For example, given a current
hourly wage rate of $3 and a current price
index number of 150, where 1982 = 100, the
48

M o n th ly Labor R e v ie w


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

hourly rate expressed in 1982 dollars is $2
($3/150 x 100 = $2). The $2 (or any other
resulting values) are described as “real,”
“constant,” or “1982” dollars.

C o m p a riso n s o f U n em ploym ent, BLS Bulle­
tin 1979.
Detailed data on the occupational injury
and illness series are published in O c c u p a ­

Sources of information

tio n a l In ju rie s a n d Illn e sse s in th e U n ite d
S tates, b y In dustry, a BLS annual bulletin.
Finally, the M o n th ly L a b o r R e v ie w car­

Data that supplement the tables in this sec­
tion are published by the Bureau in a variety
of sources. Definitions of each series and
notes on the data are contained in later sec­
tions of these Notes describing each set of
data. For detailed descriptions of each data
series, see b l s H a n d b o o k o f M eth o d s, Bul­
letin 2490. Users also may wish to consult
M a jo r P ro g ra m s o fth e B ureau o f L a b o r S ta ­
tis tic s, Report 919. News releases provide

the latest statistical information published by
the Bureau; the major recurring releases are
published according to the schedule appear­
ing on the back cover of this issue.
More information about labor force, em­
ployment, and unemployment data and the
household and establishment surveys under­
lying the data are available in the Bureau’s
monthly publication, E m p lo ym en t a n d E arn ­
ings. Historical unadjusted and seasonally
adjusted data from the household survey are
available on the Internet:
http://www.bls.gov/cps/

Historically comparable unadjusted and sea­
sonally adjusted data from the establishment
survey also are available on the Internet:
http ://www.bls.gov/ces/

Additional information on labor force data
for areas below the national level are pro­
vided in the bls annual report, G e o g ra p h ic
P ro file o f E m p lo y m en t a n d U n em ploym en t.

For a comprehensive discussion of the
Employment Cost Index, see E m p lo ym en t
C o s t In dexes a n d L evels, 1 9 7 5 -9 5 , bls Bul­
letin 2466. The most recent data from the
Employee Benefits Survey appear in the fol­
lowing Bureau of Labor Statistics bulletins:
E m p lo y e e B e n e fits in M e d iu m a n d L a rg e
F irm s; E m p lo y e e B en efits in S m a ll P riv a te
E sta b lish m en ts; and E m p lo y e e B e n e fits in
S ta te a n d L o c a l G o vern m en ts.

More detailed data on consumer and pro­
ducer prices are published in the monthly
periodicals, The CPI D e ta ile d R e p o r t and
P ro d u c e r P ric e In d ex es. For an overview of
the 1998 revision of the CPI, see the Decem­
ber 1996 issue of the M o n th ly L a b o r R eview .
Additional data on international prices ap­
pear in monthly news releases.
Listings of industries for which produc­
tivity indexes are available may be found on
the Internet:
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/

For additional information on interna­
tional comparisons data, see In te rn a tio n a l

J a n u a ry 2002

ries analytical articles on annual and longer
term developments in labor force, employ­
ment, and unemployment; employee com­
pensation and collective bargaining; prices;
productivity; international comparisons; and
injury and illness data.

Symbols
n.e.c. = not elsewhere classified,
n.e.s. = not elsewhere specified.
p = preliminary. To increase the time­
liness of some series, preliminary
figures are issued based on repre­
sentative but incomplete returns,
r = revised. Generally, this revision
reflects the availability of later
data, but also may reflect other ad­
justments.

Comparative Indicators
(Tables 1-3)
Comparative indicators tables provide an
overview and comparison of major BLS sta­
tistical series. Consequently, although many
of the included series are available monthly,
all measures in these comparative tables are
presented quarterly and annually.
Labor market indicators include em­
ployment measures from two major surveys
and information on rates of change in com­
pensation provided by the Employment Cost
Index (ECl) program. The labor force partici­
pation rate, the employment-to-population
ratio, and unemployment rates for major de­
mographic groups based on the Current
Population (“household”) Survey are pre­
sented, while measures of employment and
average weekly hours by major industry sec­
tor are given using nonfarm payroll data. The
Employment Cost Index (compensation), by
major sector and by bargaining status, is cho­
sen from a variety of bls compensation and
wage measures because it provides a com­
prehensive measure of employer costs for
hiring labor, not just outlays for wages, and
it is not affected by employment shifts among
occupations and industries.
Dataon changes in compensation, prices,
and productivity are presented in table 2.
Measures of rates of change of compensa-

tion and wages from the Employment Cost
Index program are provided for all civil­
ian nonfarm workers (excluding Federal
and household workers) and for all private
nonfarm workers. Measures of changes in
consumer prices for all urban consumers;
producer prices by stage of processing;
overall prices by stage of processing; and
overall export and import price indexes are
given. Measures of productivity (output per
hour of all persons) are provided for major
sectors.
Alternative measures of wage and com­
pensation rates of change, which reflect the

overall trend in labor costs, are summarized
in table 3. Differences in concepts and scope,
related to the specific purposes of the series,
contribute to the variation in changes among
the individual measures.

Notes on the data
Definitions of each series and notes on the
data are contained in later sections of these
notes describing each set of data.

Employment and
Unemployment Data
(Tables 1; 4-24)

Household survey data
Description of the series
Employment data in this section are ob­
tained from the Current Population Survey,
a program of personal interviews conducted
monthly by the Bureau of the Census for the
Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sample con­
sists of about 60,000 households selected to
represent the U.S. population 16 years of age
and older. Households are interviewed on a
rotating basis, so that three-fourths of the
sample is the same for any 2 consecutive
months.

Definitions
Employed persons include (1) all those who
worked for pay any time during the week
which includes the 12th day of the month or
who worked unpaid for 15 hours or more in
a family-operated enterprise and (2) those
who were temporarily absent from their regu­
lar jobs because of illness, vacation, indus­
trial dispute, or similar reasons. A person
working at more than one job is counted only
in the job at which he or she worked the
greatest number of hours.
Unemployed persons are those who did
not work during the survey week, but were
available for work except for temporary ill­
ness and had looked for jobs within the pre­
ceding 4 weeks. Persons who did not look


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

for work because they were on layoff are
also counted among the unemployed. The
unemployment rate represents the num­
ber unemployed as a percent of the civilian
labor force.
The civilian labor force consists of all
employed or unemployed persons in the
civilian noninstitutional population. Persons
not in the labor force are those not classified
as employed or unemployed. This group
includes discouraged workers, defined as
persons who want and are available for ajob
and who have looked for work sometime in
the past 12 months (or since the end of their
last job if they held one within the past 12
months), but are not currently looking,
because they believe there are no jobs
available or there are none for which they
would qualify. The civilian noninstitu­
tional population comprises all persons 16
years of age and older who are not inmates
of penal or mental institutions, sanitariums,
or homes for the aged, infirm, or needy. The
civilian labor force participation rate is the
proportion of the civilian noninstitutional
population that is in the labor force. The
employment-population ratio is employ­
ment as a percent of the civilian nonin­
stitutional population.

Notes on the data
From time to time, and especially after a
decennial census, adjustments are made in
the Current Population Survey figures to
correct for estimating errors during the
intercensal years. These adjustments affect
the comparability of historical data. A de­
scription of these adjustments and their ef­
fect on the various data series appears in the
Explanatory Notes of E m p lo y m e n t a n d
E a rn in g s.

Labor force data in tables 1 and 4-9 are
seasonally adjusted. Since January 1980,
national labor force data have been season­
ally adjusted with a procedure called X -ll
arima which was developed at Statistics
Canada as an extension of the standard X11 method previously used by bls . A de­
tailed description of the procedure appears
in the X -ll ARIM A S e a s o n a l A d ju s tm e n t
M e th o d , by Estela Bee Dagum (Statistics
Canada, Catalogue No. 12-564E, January
1983).
At the beginning of each calendar year,
historical seasonally adjusted data usually
are revised, and projected seasonal adjust­
ment factors are calculated for use during
the January-June period. The historical sea­
sonally adjusted data usually are revised for
only the most recent 5 years. In July, new
seasonal adjustment factors, which incorpo­
rate the experience through June, are pro­
duced for the July-December period, but no
revisions are made in the historical data.

For additional information on na­
tional household survey data, contact the
Division of Labor Force Statistics: (202)
691-6378.

Establishment survey data
Description of the series
Employment, hours , and earnings data

in this section are compiled from payroll
records reported monthly on a voluntary ba­
sis to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and its
cooperating State agencies by about 300,000
establishments representing all industries
except agriculture. Industries are classified
in accordance with the 1987 S ta n d a r d In ­
d u s tr ia l C la ssific a tio n (SIC) M an u al. In most
industries, the sampling probabilities are
based on the size of the establishment; most
large establishments are therefore in the
sample. (An establishment is not necessar­
ily a firm; it may be a branch plant, for ex­
ample, or warehouse.) Self-employed per­
sons and others not on a regular civilian
payroll are outside the scope of the sur­
vey because they are excluded from estab­
lishment records. This largely accounts for
the difference in employment figures be­
tween the household and establishment
surveys.

Definitions
An establishment is an economic unit which
produces goods or services (such as a fac­
tory or store) at a single location and is en­
gaged in one type of economic activity.
Employed persons are all persons who
received pay (including holiday and sick
pay) for any part of the payroll period in­
cluding the 12th day of the month. Per­
sons holding more than one job (about 5
percent of all persons in the labor force)
are counted in each establishment which
reports them.
Production workers in manufacturing
include working supervisors and nonsupervisory workers closely associated with pro­
duction operations. Those workers men­
tioned in tables 11-16 include production
workers in manufacturing and mining; con­
struction workers in construction; and
nonsupervisory workers in the following in­
dustries: transportation and public utilities;
wholesale and retail trade; finance, insur­
ance, and real estate; and services. These
groups account for about four-fifths of the
total employment on private nonagricultural payrolls.
Earnings are the payments production
or nonsupervisory workers receive during
the survey period, including premium pay
for overtime or late-shift work but exclud-

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

49

Current Labor Statistics

ing irregular bonuses and other special
payments. Real earnings are earnings
adjusted to reflect the effects of changes in
consumer prices. The deflator for this series
is derived from the Consumer Price Index
for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPi-W).
Hours represent the average weekly
hours of production or nonsupervisory work­
ers for which pay was received, and are dif­
ferent from standard or scheduled hours.
Overtime hours represent the portion of av­
erage weekly hours which was in excess of
regular hours and for which overtime premi­
ums were paid.
The Diffusion Index represents the
percent of industries in which employment
was rising over the indicated period, plus
one-half of the industries with unchanged
employment; 50 percent indicates an equal
balance between industries with increasing
and decreasing employment. In line with Bu­
reau practice, data for the 1-, 3-, and 6-month
spans are seasonally adjusted, while those
for the 12-month span are unadjusted. Data
are centered within the span. Table 17 pro­
vides an index on private nonfarm employ­
ment based on 356 industries, and a manu­
facturing index based on 139 industries.
These indexes are useful for measuring the
dispersion of economic gains or losses and
are also economic indicators.

Notes on the data
Establishment survey data are annually ad­
justed to comprehensive counts of employ­
ment (called “benchmarks”). The latest ad­
justment, which incorporated March 2000
benchmarks, was made with the release of
May 2001 data, published in the July 2001
issue of the R eview . Coincident with the
benchmark adjustment, historical seasonally
adjusted data were revised to reflect updated
seasonal factors. Unadjusted data from April
2000 forward and seasonally adjusted data
from January 1997 forward are subject to
revision in future benchmarks.
In addition to the routine benchmark re­
visions and updated seasonal factors intro­
duced with the release of the May 2000
data, all estimates for the wholesale trade
division from April 1998 forward were re­
vised to incorporate a new sample design.
This represented the first major industry
division to convert to a probability-based
sample under a 4-year phase-in plan for the
establishment survey sample redesign
project. For additional information, see the
the June 2000 issue of E m p lo y m e n t a n d
E a rn in g s.

Revisions in State data (table 11) occurred
with the publication of January 2000 data.
Beginning in June 1996, the bls uses the
X-12 arima methodology to seasonally ad­
just establishment survey data. This proce­
50

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

dure, developed by the Bureau of the Cen­
sus, controls for the effect of varying sur­
vey intervals (also known as the 4- versus
5-week effect), thereby providing improved
measurement of over-the-month changes and
underlying economic trends. Revisions of
data, usually for the most recent 5-year pe­
riod, are made once a year coincident with
the benchmark revisions.
In the establishment survey, estimates
for the most recent 2 months are based on
incomplete returns and are published as pre­
liminary in the tables ( 12-17 in the R eview ).
When all returns have been received, the es­
timates are revised and published as “final”
(prior to any benchmark revisions) in the
third month of their appearance. Thus, De­
cember data are published as preliminary in
January and February and as final in March.
For the same reasons, quarterly establish­
ment data (table 1) are preliminary for the
first 2 months of publication and final in the
third month. Thus, fourth-quarter data are
published as preliminary in January and
February and as final in March.
For additional information on estab­
lishment survey data, contact the Division
of Monthly Industry Employment Statis­
tics: (202) 691-6555.

Unemployment data by
State
Description of the series
Data presented in this section are obtained
from the Focal Area Unemployment Statis­
tics (LAUS) program, which is conducted in
cooperation with State employment secu­
rity agencies.
Monthly estimates of the labor force,
employment, and unemployment for States
and sub-State areas are a key indicator of lo­
cal economic conditions, and form the basis
for determining the eligibility of an area for
benefits under Federal economic assistance
programs such as the Job Training Partner­
ship Act. Seasonally adjusted unemployment
rates are presented in table 10. Insofar as
possible, the concepts and definitions under­
lying these data are those used in the national
estimates obtained from the cps.

Notes on the data
Data refer to State of residence. Monthly data
for all States and the District of Columbia are
derived using standardized procedures
established by bls. Once a year, estimates are
revised to new population controls, usually
with publication of January estimates, and
benchmarked to annual average CPS levels.
For additional information on data in
this series, call (202) 691-6392 (table 10) or
(202)691-6559 (table 11).

J a n u a ry 2002

Covered employment and
wage data (ES-202)
Description of the series
E mployment, wage, and establishment

in this section are derived from the
quarterly tax reports submitted to State
employment security agencies by private
and State and local government employ­
ers subject to State unemployment in­
surance (ui) laws and from Federal, agen­
cies subject to the Unemployment Com­
pensation for Federal Employees ( ucfe)
program. Each quarter, State agencies edit
and process the data and send the infor­
mation to the Bureau o f Labor Statistics.
The Covered Employment and Wages
data, also referred as ES-202 data, are the
most complete enumeration o f employ­
ment and wage information by industry
at the national, State, metropolitan area,
and county levels. They have broad eco­
nomic significance in evaluating labor
market trends and major industry devel­
opments.
data

Definitions
In general, es -202 monthly employment
data represent the number o f c o v e re d
w o rk ers who worked during, or received
pay for, the pay period that included the
12th day o f the month. C o v er ed p riv a te
in du stry em p lo y m en t includes most cor­
porate officials, executives, supervisory
personnel, professionals, clerical work­
ers, wage earners, piece workers, and
part-time workers. It excludes proprietors,
the unincorporated self-employed, un­
paid family members, and certain farm and
domestic workers. Certain types o f non­
profit employers, such as religious orga­
nizations, are given a choice o f coverage
or exclusion in a number of States. Work­
ers in these organizations are, therefore,
reported to a limited degree.
Persons on paid sick leave, paid holi­
day, paid vacation, and the like, are in­
cluded. Persons on the payroll o f more
than one firm during the period are
counted by each ui-subject employer if
they meet the employment definition
noted earlier. The employment count ex­
cludes workers who earned no wages
during the entire applicable pay period
because o f work stoppages, temporary
layoffs, illness, or unpaid vacations.
F e d e r a l em p lo y m e n t d a ta are based
on reports o f monthly employment and
quarterly wages submitted each quarter
to State agencies for all Federal installa-

tions with employees covered by the Un­
employment Compensation for Federal
Employees ( ucfe) program, except for cer­
tain national security agencies, which are
omitted for security reasons. Employment
for all Federal agencies for any given month
is based on the number of persons who
worked during or received pay for the pay
period that included the 12th of the month.
An establishment is an economic unit,
such as a farm, mine, factory, or store, that
produces goods or provides services. It is
typically at a single physical location and
engaged in one, or predominantly one, type
of economic activity for which a single in­
dustrial classification may be applied. Occa­
sionally, a single physical location encom­
passes two or more distinct and significant
activities. Each activity should be reported
as a separate establishment if separate records
are kept and the various activities are classi­
fied under different four-digit sic codes.
Most employers have only one establish­
ment; thus, the establishment is the predomi­
nant reporting unit or statistical entity for
reporting employment and wages data. Most
employers, including State and local govern­
ments who operate more than one establish­
ment in a State, file a Multiple Worksite Re­
port each quarter, in addition to their quar­
terly ui report. The Multiple Worksite Re­
port is used to collect separate employment
and wage data for each of the employer’s es­
tablishments, which are not detailed on the ui
report. Some very small multi-establishment
employers do not file a Multiple Worksite
Report. When the total employment in an
employer’s secondary establishments (all
establishments other than the largest) is 10
or fewer, the employer generally will file a
consolidated report for all establishments.
Also, some employers either cannot or will
not report at the establishment level and thus
aggregate establishments into one consoli­
dated unit, or possibly several units, though
not at the establishment level.
For the Federal Government, the report­
ing unit is the installation: a single location
at which a department, agency, or other gov­
ernment body has civilian employees. Fed­
eral agencies follow slightly different criteria
than do private employers when breaking
down their reports by installation. They are
permitted to combine as a single statewide
unit: 1) all installations with 10 or fewer
workers, and 2) all installations that have a
combined total in the State of fewer than 50
workers. Also, when there are fewer than 25
workers in all secondary installations in a
State, the secondary installations may be com­
bined and reported with the major installa­
tion. Fast, if a Federal agency has fewer than


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

five employees in a State, the agency head­
quarters office (regional office, district of­
fice) serving each State may consolidate the
employment and wages data for that State
with the data reported to the State in which
the headquarters is located. As a result of
these reporting rules, the number of report­
ing units is always larger than the number of
employers (or government agencies) but
smaller than the number of actual establish­
ments (or installations).
Data reported for the first quarter are tabulated into size categories ranging from
worksites of very small size to those with
1,000 employees or more. The size category
is determined by the establishment’s March
employment level. It is important to note
that each establishment of a multi-establish­
ment firm is tabulated separately into the
appropriate size category. The total employ­
ment level of the reporting multi-establish­
ment firm is not used in the size tabulation.
Covered employers in most States report
total wages paid during the calendar quarter,
regardless of when the services were per­
formed. A few State laws, however, specify
that wages be reported for, or based on the
period during which services are performed
rather than the period during which compen­
sation is paid. Under most State laws or regu­
lations, wages include bonuses, stock options,
the cash value of meals and lodging, tips and
other gratuities, and, in some States, employer
contributions to certain deferred compensa­
tion plans such as 401(k) plans.
Covered employer contributions for oldage, survivors, and disability insurance
( oasdi ), health insurance, unemployment in­
surance, workers’ compensation, and private
pension and welfare funds are not reported
as wages. Employee contributions for the
same purposes, however, as well as money
withheld for income taxes, union dues, and
so forth, are reported even though they are
deducted from the worker’s gross pay.
Wages of covered Federal workers rep­
resent the gross amount of all payrolls for all
pay periods ending within the quarter. This
includes cash allowances, the cash equiva­
lent of any type of remuneration, severance
pay, withholding taxes, and retirement de­
ductions. Federal employee remuneration
generally covers the same types of services
as for workers in private industry.
Average annual wages per employee for
any given industry are computed by divid­
ing total annual wages by annual average em­
ployment. A further division by 52 yields
average weekly wages per employee. Annual
pay data only approximate annual earnings
because an individual may not be employed
by the same employer all year or may work

for more than one employer at a time.
Average weekly or annual pay is af­
fected by the ratio of full-time to part-time
workers as well as the number of individuals
in high-paying and low-paying occupations.
When average pay levels between States and
industries are compared, these factors should
be taken into consideration. For example, in­
dustries characterized by high proportions
of part-time workers will show average wage
levels appreciably less than the weekly pay
levels of regular full-time employees in these
industries. The opposite effect characterizes
industries with low proportions of part-time
workers, or industries that typically sched­
ule heavy weekend and overtime work. Aver­
age wage data also may be influenced by work
stoppages, labor turnover rates, retroactive
payments, seasonal factors, bonus payments,
and so on.

Notes on the data
To insure the highest possible quality of data,
State employment security agencies verify
with employers and update, if necessary, the
industry, location, and ownership classifica­
tion of all establishments on a 3-year cycle.
Changes in establishment classification codes
resulting from the verification process are in­
troduced with the data reported for the first
quarter of the year. Changes resulting from
improved employer reporting also are intro­
duced in the first quarter. For these reasons,
some data, especially at more detailed geo­
graphic levels, may not be strictly compa­
rable with earlier years.
The 1999 county data used to calculate
the 1999-2000 changes were adjusted for
changes in industry and county classification
to make them comparable to data for 2000.
As a result, the adjusted 1999 data differ to
some extent from the data available on the
Internet at:
http://www.bls.gov/cew/home.htm.

County definitions are assigned accord­
ing to Federal Information Processing Stan­
dards Publications as issued by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology. Areas
shown as counties include those designated
as independent cities in some jurisdictions
and, in Alaska, those areas designated by the
Census Bureau where counties have not been
created. County data also are presented for
the New England States for comparative pur­
poses, even though townships are the more
common designation used in New England
(and New Jersey).
For additional information on the cov­
ered employment and wage data, contact the
Division ofAdministrative Statistics and La­
bor Turnover at (202) 691-6567.

M o n th ly Labor R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

51

Current Labor Statistics

Compensation and
Wage Data
Compensation and wage data are gathered
by the Bureau from business establishments,
State and local governments, labor unions,
collective bargaining agreements on file with
the Bureau, and secondary sources.

wages and compensation. For the bargaining
status, region, and metropolitan/non-metropolitan area series, however, employment
data by industry and occupation are not
available from the census. Instead, the 1980
employment weights are reallocated within
these series each quarter based on the cur­
rent sample. Therefore, these indexes are not
strictly comparable to those for the aggre­
gate, industry, and occupation series.

Employment Cost Index

Definitions

Description of the series

Total compensation costs include wages,

(Tables 1-3; 25-31)

The Employment Cost Index (ECl) is a quar­
terly measure of the rate of change in com­
pensation per hour worked and includes
wages, salaries, and employer costs of em­
ployee benefits. It uses a fixed market
basket of labor—similar in concept to the
Consumer Price Index’s fixed market basket
of goods and services—to measure change
over time in employer costs of employing
labor.
Statistical series on total compensation
costs, on wages and salaries, and on benefit
costs are available for private nonfarm work­
ers excluding proprietors, the self-employed,
and household workers. The total compensa­
tion costs and wages and salaries series are
also available for State and local government
workers and for the civilian nonfarm economy,
which consists of private industry and State
and local government workers combined. Fed­
eral workers are excluded.
The Employment Cost Index probability
sample consists of about 4,400 private non­
farm establishments providing about 23,000
occupational observations and 1,000 State
and local government establishments provid­
ing 6,000 occupational observations selected
to represent total employment in each sec­
tor. On average, each reporting unit provides
wage and compensation information on five
well-specified occupations. Data are col­
lected each quarter for the pay period includ­
ing the 12th day of March, June, September,
and December.
Beginning with June 1986 data, fixed em­
ployment weights from the 1980 Census of
Population are used each quarter to
calculate the civilian and private indexes and
the index for State and local governments.
(Prior to June 1986, the employment
weights are from the 1970 Census of Popu­
lation.) These fixed weights, also used to
derive all of the industry and occupation
series indexes, ensure that changes in these
indexes reflect only changes in compensa­
tion, not employment shifts among indus­
tries or occupations with different levels of

52

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

salaries, and the employer’s costs for em­
ployee benefits.
Wages and salaries consist of earnings
before payroll deductions, including produc­
tion bonuses, incentive earnings, commis­
sions, and cost-of-living adjustments.
Benefits include the cost to employers
for paid leave, supplemental pay (includ­
ing nonproduction bonuses), insurance, retire­
ment and savings plans, and legally required
benefits (such as Social Security, workers’com­
pensation, and unemployment insurance).
Excluded from wages and salaries and em­
ployee benefits are such items as payment-in­
kind, free room and board, and tips.

Notes on the data
The Employment Cost Index for changes in
wages and salaries in the private nonfarm
economy was published beginning in 1975.
Changes in total compensation cost—wages
and salaries and benefits combined—were
published beginning in 1980. The series of
changes in wages and salaries and for total
compensation in the State and local govern­
ment sector and in the civilian nonfarm
economy (excluding Federal employees) were
published beginning in 1981. Historical in­
dexes (June 1981=100) are available on the
Internet:
http://www.bls.gov/ect/
F or additional information on the

Employment Cost Index, contact the Office
of Compensation Levels and Trends: (202)
691-6199.

Employee Benefits Survey
Description of the series
Employee benefits data are obtained from
the Employee Benefits Survey, an annual
survey of the incidence and provisions of
selected benefits provided by employers.
The survey collects data from a sample of
approximately 9,000 private sector and
State and local government establishments.

J a n u a ry 2002

The data are presented as a percentage of em­
ployees who participate in a certain benefit, or
as an average benefit provision (for example,
the average number of paid holidays provided
to employees per year). Selected data from the
survey are presented in table 25 for medium
and large private establishments and in table
26 for small private establishments and State
and local government.
The survey covers paid leave benefits
such as holidays and vacations, and personal,
funeral, jury duty, military, family, and sick
leave; short-term disability, long-term dis­
ability, and life insurance; medical, dental,
and vision care plans; defined benefit and
defined contribution plans; flexible benefits
plans; reimbursement accounts; and unpaid
family leave.
Also, data are tabulated on the inci­
dence of several other benefits, such as
severance pay, child-care assistance, well­
ness programs, and employee assistance
programs.

Definitions
Employer-provided benefits are benefits
that are financed either wholly or partly by
the employer. They may be sponsored by a
union or other third party, as long as there is
some employer financing. However, some
benefits that are fully paid for by the em­
ployee also are included. For example, long­
term care insurance and postretirement life
insurance paid entirely by the employee are
included because the guarantee of insurabil­
ity and availability at group premium rates
are considered a benefit.
Participants are workers who are covered
by a benefit, whether or not they use that benefit.
If the benefit plan is financed wholly by
employers and requires employees to complete
a minimum length of service for eligibility, the
workers are considered participants whether or
not they have met the requirement. If workers
are required to contribute towards the cost of
a plan, they are considered participants only
if they elect the plan and agree to make the
required contributions.
Defined benefit pension plans use pre­
determined formulas to calculate a retirement
benefit (if any), and obligate the employer to
provide those benefits. Benefits are generally
based on salary, years of service, or both.
Defined contribution plans generally
specify the level of employer and employee
contributions to a plan, but not the formula
for determining eventual benefits. Instead,
individual accounts are set up for partici­
pants, and benefits are based on amounts
credited to these accounts.
Tax-deferred savings plans are a type of

defined contribution plan that allow par­
ticipants to contribute a portion of their sal­
ary to an employer-sponsored plan and defer
income taxes until withdrawal.
Flexible benefit plans allow employees
to choose among several benefits, such as
life insurance, medical care, and vacation
days, and among several levels of coverage
within a given benefit.

Definitions
Number of stoppages: The number of
strikes and lockouts involving 1,000 work­
ers or more and lasting a full shift or longer.
Workers involved: The number of
workers directly involved in the stoppage.
Number of days idle: The aggregate
number of workdays lost by workers in­
volved in the stoppages.

Notes on the data

Days of idleness as a percent of estimated
working time: Aggregate workdays lost as a

Surveys of employees in medium and large
establishments conducted over the 1979-86
period included establishments that
employed at least 50, 100, or 250 workers,
depending on the industry (most service
industries were excluded). The survey
conducted in 1987 covered only State and
local governments with 50 or more
employees. The surveys conducted in 1988
and 1989 included medium and large
establishments with 100 workers or more in
private industries. All surveys conducted
over the 1979-89 period excluded
establishments in Alaska and Hawaii, as well
as part-time employees.
Beginning in 1990, surveys of State and
local governments and small private
establishments were conducted in evennumbered years, and surveys of medium and
large establishments were conducted in oddnumbered years. The small establishment
survey includes all private nonfarm
establishments with fewer than 100 workers,
while the State and local government survey
includes all governments, regardless of the
number of workers. All three surveys include
full- and part-time workers, and workers in all
50 States and the District of Columbia.
F or additional information on the
Employee Benefits Survey, contact the Of­
fice of Compensation Levels and Trends on
the Internet: http://www.bls.gov/ebs/

percent of the aggregate number of standard
workdays in the period multiplied by total
employment in the period.

Work stoppages
Description of the series
Data on work stoppages measure the num­
ber and duration of major strikes or lockouts
(involving 1,000 workers or more) occurring
during the month (or year), the number of
workers involved, and the amount of work
time lost because of stoppage. These data are
presented in table 27.
Data are largely from a variety of pub­
lished sources and cover only establishments
directly involved in a stoppage. They do
not measure the indirect or secondary effect
of stoppages on other establishments whose
employees are idle owing to material short­
ages or lack of service.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Notes on the data
This series is not comparable with the one
terminated in 1981 that covered strikes in­
volving six workers or more.
For additional information on work
stoppages data, contact the Office of Com­
pensation and Working Conditions: (202)
691-6282, or the Internet:
http:/www.bls.gov/cba/

Price Data
(Tables 2; 32-42)
P rice data are gathered by the Bureau
of Labor Statistics from retail and pri­
mary markets in the United States. Price
indexes are given in relation to a base pe­
riod— 1982 = 100 for many Producer Price
Indexes, 1982-84 = 100 for many Con­
sumer Price Indexes (unless otherwise
noted), and 1990 = 100 for International
Price Indexes.

Consumer Price Indexes
Description of the series
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a mea­
sure of the average change in the prices paid
by urban consumers for a fixed market bas­
ket of goods and services. The cpi is calcu­
lated monthly for two population groups,
one consisting only of urban households
whose primary source of income is derived
from the employment of wage earners and
clerical workers, and the other consisting of
all urban households. The wage earner index
(CPi-w) is a continuation of the historic in­
dex that was introduced well over a halfcentury ago for use in wage negotiations. As
new uses were developed for the cpi in re­
cent years, the need for a broader and more
representative index became apparent. The
all-urban consumer index (CPI-U), introduced
in 1978, is representative of the 1993-95

buying habits of about 87 percent of the
noninstitutional population of the United
States at that time, compared with 32 per­
cent represented in the CPI-W. In addition to
wage earners and clerical workers, the CPi-u
covers professional, managerial, and techni­
cal workers, the self-employed, short-term
workers, the unemployed, retirees, and oth­
ers not in the labor force.
The cpi is based on prices of food, cloth­
ing, shelter, fuel, drugs, transportation fares,
doctors’ and dentists’ fees, and other goods
and services that people buy for day-to-day
living. The quantity and quality of these
items are kept essentially unchanged between
major revisions so that only price changes
will be measured. All taxes directly associ­
ated with the purchase and use of items are
included in the index.
Data collected from more than 23,000 re­
tail establishments and 5,800 housing units
in 87 urban areas across the country are used
to develop the “U.S. city average.” Separate
estimates for 14 major urban centers are pre­
sented in table 33. The areas listed are as
indicated in footnote 1 to the table. The area
indexes measure only the average change in
prices for each area since the base period, and
do not indicate differences in the level of
prices among cities.

Notes on the data
In January 1983, the Bureau changed the
way in which homeownership costs are
meaured for the cpi-u . A rental equivalence
method replaced the asset-price approach
to homeownership costs for that series. In
January 1985, the same change was made in
the CPi-w. The central purpose of the change
was to separate shelter costs from the in­
vestment component of home-ownership so
that the index would reflect only the cost of
shelter services provided by owner-occu­
pied homes. An updated CPI-U and CPi-w
were introduced with release of the January
1987 and January 1998 data.
F or additional information on con­
sumer prices, contact the Division of Con­
sumer Prices and Price Indexes: (202)
691-7000.

Producer Price Indexes
Description of the series
Producer Price Indexes (PPI) measure av­
erage changes in prices received by domestic
producers of commodities in all stages of
processing. The sample used for calculating
these indexes currently contains about 3,200
commodities and about 80,000 quotations

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

53

Current Labor Statistics

per month, selected to represent the move­
ment of prices of all commodities produced
in the manufacturing; agriculture, forestry,
and fishing; mining; and gas and electricity
and public utilities sectors. The stage-ofprocessing structure of ppi organizes prod­
ucts by class of buyer and degree of fabrica­
tion (that is, finished goods, intermediate
goods, and crude materials). The traditional
commodity structure of ppi organizes prod­
ucts by similarity of end use or material com­
position. The industry and product struc­
ture o f ppi organizes data in
accordance with the Standard Industrial Clas­
sification (SIC) and the product code exten­
sion of the Sic developed by the U.S. Bu­
reau of the Census.
To the extent possible, prices used in
calculating Producer Price Indexes apply
to the first significant commercial transac­
tion in the United States from the produc­
tion or central marketing point. Price data
are generally collected monthly, primarily
by mail questionnaire. Most prices are ob­
tained directly from producing companies
on a voluntary and confidential basis. Prices
generally are reported for the Tuesday of
the week containing the 13th day of the
month.
Since January 1992, price changes for the
various commodities have been averaged
together with implicit quantity weights
representing their importance in the total net
selling value of all commodities as of 1987.
The detailed data are aggregated to obtain
indexes for stage-of-processing groupings,
commodity groupings, durability-of-product
groupings, and a number of special composite
groups. All Producer Price Index data are
subject to revision 4 months after original
publication.
F or additional information on pro­
ducer prices, contact the Division of In­
dustrial Prices and Price Indexes: (202)
691-7705.

International Price Indexes
Description of the series
The International Price Program produces
monthly and quarterly export and import
price indexes for nonmilitary goods traded
between the United States and the rest of the
world. The export price index provides a mea­
sure of price change for all products sold by
U.S. residents to foreign buyers. (“Resi­
dents” is defined as in the national income
accounts; it includes corporations, busi­
nesses, and individuals, but does not require
the organizations to be U.S. owned nor the
individuals to have U.S. citizenship.) The

54
M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

import price index provides a measure of
price change for goods purchased from other
countries by U.S. residents.
The product universe for both the import
and export indexes includes raw materials,
agricultural products, semifinished manufac­
tures, and finished manufactures, including
both capital and consumer goods. Price data
for these items are collected primarily by mail
questionnaire. In nearly all cases, the data are
collected directly from the exporter or im­
porter, although in a few cases, prices are
obtained from other sources.
To the extent possible, the data gathered
refer to prices at the U.S. border for exports
and at either the foreign border or the U.S.
border for imports. For nearly all products,
the prices refer to transactions completed dur­
ing the first week of the month. Survey re­
spondents are asked to indicate all discounts,
allowances, and rebates applicable to the re­
ported prices, so that the price used in the
calculation of the indexes is the actual price for
which the product was bought or sold.
In addition to general indexes of prices for
U.S. exports and imports, indexes are also
published for detailed product categories of
exports and imports. These categories are
defined according to the five-digit level of
detail for the Bureau of Economic Analysis
End-use Classification (SiTC), and the four­
digit level of detail for the Harmonized
System. Aggregate import indexes by coun­
try or region of origin are also available.
bls publishes indexes for selected catego­
ries o f internationally traded services, calcu­
lated on an international basis and on a balance-of-payments basis.

Notes on the data
The export and import price indexes are
weighted indexes of the Laspeyres type.
Price relatives are assigned equal importance
within each harmonized group and are then
aggregated to the higher level. The values as­
signed to each weight category are based on
trade value figures compiled by the Bureau
of the Census. The trade weights currently
used to compute both indexes relate to 1995.
Because a price index depends on the same
items being priced from period to period, it is
necessary to recognize when a product’s
specifications or terms of transaction have
been modified. For this reason, the Bureau’s
questionnaire requests detailed descriptions of
the physical and functional characteristics of
the products being priced, as well as informa­
tion on the number of units bought or sold,
discounts, credit terms, packaging, class of
buyer or seller, and so forth. When there are
changes in either the specifications or terms of

J a n u a ry 2002

transaction of a product, the dollar value of
each change is deleted from the total price
change to obtain the “pure” change. Once this
value is determined, a linking procedure is em­
ployed which allows for the continued repric­
ing of the item.
For the export price indexes, the preferred
pricing is f.a.s. (free alongside ship) U.S. port
of exportation. When firms report export
prices f.o.b. (free on board), production point
information is collected which enables the
Bureau to calculate a shipment cost to the
port of exportation. An attempt is made to
collect two prices for imports. The first is
the import price f.o.b. at the foreign port of
exportation, which is consistent with the ba­
sis for valuation of imports in the national
accounts. The second is the import price
c.i.f.(costs, insurance, and freight) at the U.S.
port of importation, which also includes the
other costs associated with bringing the
product to the U.S. border. It does not, how­
ever, include duty charges. For a given prod­
uct, only one price basis series is used in the
construction of an index.
For additional information on inter­
national prices, contact the Division of Inter­
national Prices: (202) 691-7155.

Productivity Data
(Tables 2; 43-46)

Business sector and major
sectors
Description of the series
The productivity measures relate real output
to real input. As such, they encompass a fam­
ily of measures which include single-factor
input measures, such as output per hour, out­
put per unit of labor input, or output per
unit of capital input, as well as measures of
multifactor productivity (output per unit of
combined labor and capital inputs). The Bu­
reau indexes show the change in output rela­
tive to changes in the various inputs. The
measures cover the business, nonfarm busi­
ness, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corpo­
rate sectors.
Corresponding indexes of hourly compen­
sation, unit labor costs, unit nonlabor pay­
ments, and prices are also provided.

Definitions
Output per hour of all persons (labor pro­

ductivity) is the quantity of goods and ser­
vices produced per hour of labor input. Out-

put per unit of capital services (capital
productivity) is the quantity of goods and
services produced per unit of capital ser­
vices input. Multifactor productivity is the
quantity of goods and services produced per
combined inputs. For private business and pri­
vate nonfarm business, inputs include labor
and capital units. For manufacturing, inputs
include labor, capital, energy, non-energy ma­
terials, and purchased business ser-vices.
Compensation per hour is total com­
pensation divided by hours at work. Total
compensation equals the wages and salaries
of employees plus employers’ contributions
for social insurance and private benefit plans,
plus an estimate of these payments for the
self-employed (except for nonfinancial cor­
porations in which there are no self-em­
ployed). Real compensation per hour is
compensation per hour deflated by the
change in the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers.
Unit labor costs are the labor compensa­
tion costs expended in the production of a unit
of output and are derived by dividing com­
pensation by output. Unit nonlabor pay­
m ents include profits, depreciation,
interest, and indirect taxes per unit of out­
put. They are computed by subtracting
compensation of all persons from current-dollar value of output and dividing by output.
Unit nonlabor costs contain all the
components of unit nonlabor payments ex­
cept unit profits.
Unit profits include corporate profits
with inventory valuation and capital con­
sumption adjustments per unit of output.
Hours of all persons are the total hours
at work of payroll workers, self-employed
persons, and unpaid family workers.
Labor inputs are hours of all persons ad­
justed for the effects of changes in the edu­
cation and experience of the labor force.
Capital services are the flow of services
from the capital stock used in production. It
is developed from measures of the net stock
of physical assets—equipment, structures,
land, and inventories—weighted by rental
prices for each type of asset.
Combined units of labor and capital
inputs are derived by combining changes in

labor and capital input with weights which
represent each component’s share of total
cost. Combined units of labor, capital, energy,
materials, and purchased business services are
similarly derived by combining changes in each
input with weights that represent each input’s
share of total costs. The indexes for each input
and for combined units are based on changing
weights which are averages of the shares in the
current and preceding year (the Tornquist
index-number formula).


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Notes on the data
Business sector output is an annually-weighted
index constructed by excluding from real gross
domestic product ( g d p ) the following outputs:
general government, nonprofit institutions,
paid employees of private households, and the
rental value of owner-occupied dwellings.
Nonfarm business also excludes farming. Pri­
vate business and private nonfarm business
further exclude government enterprises. The
measures are supplied by the U.S. Depart­
ment of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic
Analysis. Annual estimates of manufacturing
sectoral output are produced by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Quarterly manufacturing out­
put indexes from the Federal Reserve Board
are adjusted to these annual output measures
by the bls . Compensation data are developed
from data of the Bureau of Economic Analysis
and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Hours data
are developed from data of the Bureau of La­
bor Statistics.
The productivity and associated cost
measures in tables 43^16 describe the rela­
tionship between output in real terms and
the labor and capital inputs involved in its
production. They show the changes from pe­
riod to period in the amount of goods and
services produced per unit of input.
Although these measures relate output to
hours and capital services, they do not mea­
sure the contributions of labor, capital, or any
other specific factor of production. Rather,
they reflect thejoint effect of many influences,
including changes in technology; shifts in the
composition of the labor force; capital invest­
ment; level of output; changes in the utiliza­
tion of capacity, energy, material, and research
and development; the organization of produc­
tion; managerial skill; and characteristics and
efforts of the work force.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this
productivity series, contact the Division of
Productivity Research: (202) 691-5606.

Industry productivity
measures

measures of compensation and unit labor
costs for three-digit industries and measures
of multifactor productivity for three-digit
manufacturing industries and railroad
transportation. The industry measures differ
in methodology and data sources from the
productivity measures for the major sectors
because the industry measures are developed
independently of the National Income and
Product Accounts framework used for the
major sector measures.

Definitions
Output per hour is derived by dividing an index

of industry output by an index of labor input.
For most industries, output indexes are de­
rived from data on the value of industry out­
put adjusted for price change. For the remain­
ing industries, output indexes are derived from
data on the physical quantity of production.
The labor input series consist of the hours
of all employees (production workers and non­
production workers), the hours of all persons
(paid employees, partners, proprietors, and
unpaid family workers), or the number of em­
ployees, depending upon the industiy.
Unit labor costs represent the labor
compensation costs per unit of output pro­
duced, and are derived by dividing an index
of labor compensation by an index of out­
put. Labor compensation includes pay­
roll as well as supplemental payments, in­
cluding both legally required expenditures
and payments for voluntary programs.
Multifactor productivity is derived by
dividing an index of industry output by an
index of the combined inputs consumed in
producing that output. Combined inputs
include capital, labor, and intermediate pur­
chases. The measure of capital input used
represents the flow of services from the
capital stock used in production. It is devel­
oped from measures of the net stock of
physical assets—equipment, structures,
land, and inventories. The measure of in­
termediate purchases is a combination of
purchased materials, services, fuels, and
electricity.

Notes on the data

Description of the series
The bls industry productivity data
supplement the measures for the business
economy and major sectors with annual
measures of labor productivity for selected
industries at the three- and four-digit levels
of the Standard Industrial Classification
system. In addition to labor productivity,
the industry data also include annual

The industry measures are compiled from
data produced by the Bureau of Labor Statis­
tics and the Bureau of the Census, with addi­
tional data supplied by other government
agencies, trade associations, and other
sources.
For most industries, the productivity
indexes refer to the output per hour of all
employees. For some trade and services in-

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

55

Current Labor Statistics

dustries, indexes of output per hour of all
persons (including self-employed) are con­
structed. For some transportation indus­
tries, only indexes of output per employee
are prepared.
FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION On this se­
ries, contact the Division of Industry Pro­
ductivity Studies: (202) 691-5618.

International Comparisons
(Tables 47-49)

Labor force and
unemployment
Description of the series
Tables 47 and 48 present comparative meas­
ures of the labor force, employment, and un­
employment— approximating U.S. con­
cepts—for the United States, Canada, Aus­
tralia, Japan, and several European countries.
The unemployment statistics (and, to a
lesser extent, employment statistics) pub­
lished by other industrial countries are not,
in most cases, comparable to U.S. unemploy­
ment statistics. Therefore, the Bureau ad­
justs the figures for selected countries, where
necessary, for all known major definitional
differences. Although precise comparability
may not be achieved, these adjusted figures
provide a better basis for international com­
parisons than the figures regularly published
by each country. For further information on
adjustments and comparability issues, see
Constance Sorrentino, “International unem­
ployment rates: how comparable are they?”
M o n th ly L a b o r R e view , June 2000, pp. 3-20.

Definitions
For the principal U.S. definitions of the labor
force, employment, and unemployment, see
the Notes section on Employment and Unem­
ployment Data: Household survey data.

Notes on the data
The adjusted statistics have been adapted to
the age at which compulsory schooling ends
in each country, rather than to the U.S. stan­
dard of 16 years of age and older. Therefore,
the adjusted statistics relate to the popula­
tion aged 16 and older in France, Sweden, and
the United Kingdom; 15 and older in Austra­
lia, Japan, Germany, Italy from 1993 onward,
and the Netherlands; and 14 and older in Italy
prior to 1993. An exception to this rule is
that the Canadian statistics for 1976 onward
56

M o n th ly L a b o r R e v ie w


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

are adjusted to cover ages 16 and older,
whereas the age at which compulsory school­
ing ends remains at 15. The institutional
population is included in the denominator of
the labor force participation rates and em­
ployment-population ratios for Japan and
Germany; it is excluded for the United States
and the other countries.
In the U.S. labor force survey, persons on
layoff who are awaiting recall to their jobs
are classified as unemployed. European and
Japanese layoff practices are quite different
in nature from those in the United States;
therefore, strict application of the U.S. defi­
nition has not been made on this point. For
further information, see M o n th ly L a b o r R e ­
v ie w , December 1981, pp. 8-11.
The figures for one or more recent years
for France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
and the United Kingdom are calculated using
adjustment factors based on labor force sur­
veys for earlier years and are considered pre­
liminary. The recent-year measures for these
countries, therefore, are subject to revision
whenever data from more current labor force
surveys become available.
There are breaks in the data series for the
United States (1990,1994,1997,1998,1999,
2000), Canada (1976) France (1992), Ger­
many (1991), Italy (1991, 1993), the Neth­
erlands (1988), and Sweden (1987).
For the United States, the break in series
reflects a major redesign of the labor force
survey questionnaire and collection method­
ology introduced in January 1994. Revised
population estimates based on the 1990 cen­
sus, adjusted for the estimated undercount,
also were incorporated. In 1996, previously
published data for the 1990-93 period were
revised to reflect the 1990 census-based
population controls, adjusted for the un­
dercount. In 1997, revised population con­
trols were introduced into the household sur­
vey. Therefore, the data are not strictly
conparable with prior years. In 1998, new
composite estimation procedures and minor
revisions in population controls were intro­
duced into the household survey. Therefore,
the data are not strictly comparable with data
for 1997 and earlier years. See the Notes sec­
tion on Employment and Unemployment
Data of this R eview .
BLS recently introduced a new adjusted
series for Canada. Beginning with the data
for 1976, Canadian data are adjusted to more
closely approximate U.S. concepts. Adjust­
ments are made to the unemployed and labor
force to exclude: (1) 15-year-olds; (2) pas­
sive jobseekers (persons only reading news­
paper ads as their method of job search); (3)
persons waiting to start a new job who did
not seek work in the past 4 weeks; and (4)
persons unavailable for work due to personal

J a n u a ry 2002

or family responsibilities. An adjustment is
made to include full-tine students looking for
full-time work. The impact of the adjust­
ments was to lower the annual average unem­
ployment rate by 0.1-0.4 percentage point
in the 1980s and 0.4-1.0 percentage point in
the 1990s.
For France, the 1992 break reflects the
substitution of standardized European Union
Statistical Office (eurostat) unemployment
statistics for the unemployment data esti­
mated according to the International Labor
Office (ilo) definition and published in the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (oecd) annual yearbook and
quarterly update. This change was made be­
cause the eurostat data are more up-to-date
than the OECD figures. Also, since 1992, the
eurostat definitions are closer to the U.S.
definitions than they were in prior years. The
impact of this revision was to lower the un­
employment rate by 0.1 percentage point in
1992 and 1993, by 0.4 percentage point in
1994, and 0.5 percentage point in 1995.
For Germany, the data for 1991 onward
refer to unified Germany. Data prior to 1991
relate to the former West Germany. The im­
pact of including the former East Germany
was to increase the unemployment rate from
4.3 to 5.6 percent in 1991.
For Italy, the 1991 break reflects a revi­
sion in the method of weighting sample data.
The impact was to increase the unemploy­
ment rate by approximately 0.3 percentage
point, from 6.6 to 6.9 percent in 1991.
In October 1992, the survey methodol­
ogy was revised and the definition of unem­
ployment was changed to include only those
who were actively looking for a job within
the 30 days preceding the survey and who
were available for work. In addition, the
lower age limit for the labor force was raised
from 14 to 15 years. (Prior to these changes,
bls adjusted Italy’s published unemploy­
ment rate downward by excluding from the
unemployed those persons who had not
actively sought work in the past 30 days.)
The break in the series also reflects the incor­
poration of the 1991 population census re­
sults. The impact of these changes was to
raise Italy’s adjusted unemployment rate by
approximately 1.2 percentage points, from
8.3 to 9.5 percent in fourth-quarter 1992.
These changes did not affect employment
significantly, except in 1993. Estimates by
the Italian Statistical Office indicate that em­
ployment declined by about 3 percent in
1993, rather than the nearly 4 percent indi­
cated by the data shown in table 44. This
difference is attributable mainly to the incor­
poration of the 1991 population benchmarks
in the 1993 data. Data for earlier years have
not been adjusted to incorporate the 1991

census results.
For the Netherlands, a new survey ques­
tionnaire was introduced in 1992 that allowed
for a closer application of ilo guidelines.
EUROSTAT has revised the Dutch series back
to 1988 based on the 1992 changes. The 1988
revised unemployment rate is 7.6 percent;
the previous estimate for the same year was
9.3 percent.
There have been two breaks in series in
the Swedish labor force survey, in 1987 and
1993. Adjustments have been made for the
1993 break back to 1987. In 1987, a new
questionnaire was introduced. Questions
regarding current availability were added
and the period of active workseeking was
reduced from 60 days to 4 weeks. These
changes lowered Sweden’s 1987 unem­
ployment rate by 0.4 percentage point,
from 2.3 to 1.9 percent. In 1993, the mea­
surement period for the labor force sur­
vey was changed to represent all 52 weeks
of the year rather than one week each
month and a new adjustment for popula­
tion totals was introduced. The impact
was to raise the unemployment rate by
approximately 0.5 percentage point, from
7.6 to 8.1 percent. Statistics Sweden re­
vised its labor force survey data for 1987—
92 to take into account the break in 1993.
The adjustment raised the Swedish unem­
ployment rate by 0.2 percentage point in
1987 and gradually rose to 0.5 percentage
point in 1992.
Beginning with 1987, bls has adjusted the
Swedish data to classify students who also
sought work as unemployed. The impact of
this change was to increase the adjusted un­
employment rate by 0.1 percentage point in
1987 and by 1.8 percentage points in 1994,
when unemployment was higher. In 1998,
the adjusted unemployment rate had risen
from 6.5 to 8.4 percent due to the adjustment
to include students.
The net effect of the 1987 and 1993
changes and the bls adjustment for students
seeking work lowered Sweden’s 1987 unem­
ployment rate from 2.3 to 2.2 percent.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION on this se­
ries, contact the Division of Foreign Labor
Statistics: (202) 691-5654.

Manufacturing productivity
and labor costs
Description of the series
Table 49 presents comparative indexes of
manufacturing labor productivity (output per
hour), output, total hours, compensation per
hour, and unit labor costs for the United
States, Canada, Japan, and nine European


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

countries. These measures are trend compari­
sons—that is, series that measure changes
over time—rather than level comparisons.
There are greater technical problems in com­
paring the levels of manufacturing output
among countries.
BLS constructs the comparative indexes
from three basic aggregate measures—output,
total labor hours, and total compensation.
The hours and compensation measures refer
to all employed persons (wage and salary
earners plus self-employed persons and un­
paid family workers) in the United States,
Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Norway,
and Sweden, and to all employees (wage and
salary earners) in the other countries.

Definitions
Output, in general, refers to value added in
manufacturing from the national accounts of
each country. However, the output series
for Japan prior to 1970 is an index of indus­
trial production, and the national accounts
measures for the United Kingdom are essen­
tially identical to their indexes of industrial
production.
The 1977-97 output data for the United
States are the gross product originating (value
added) measures prepared by the Bureau of
Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of
Commerce. Comparable manufacturing out­
put data currently are not available prior to
1977.
U.S. gross product originating is a chaintype annual-weighted series. (For more in­
formation on the U.S. measure, see Robert E.
Yuskavage, “Improved Estimates of Gross
Product by Industry, 1959-94,” S u rv e y o f
C u rre n t B u sin e ss, August 1996, pp. 133—
55.) The Japanese value added series is based
upon one set of fixed price weights for the
years 1970 through 1997. Output series for
the other foreign economies also employ
fixed price weights, but the weights are up­
dated periodically (for example, every 5 or
10 years).
To preserve the comparability of the U.S.
measures with those for other economies, BLS
uses gross product originating in manufac­
turing for the United States for these com­
parative measures. The gross product origi­
nating series differs from the manufacturing
output series that bls publishes in its news
releases on quarterly measures of U.S. pro­
ductivity and costs (and that underlies the
measures that appear in tables 43 and 45 in
this section). The quarterly measures are on
a “sectoral output” basis, rather than a valueadded basis. Sectoral output is gross output
less intrasector transactions.
Total labor hours refers to hours worked

in all countries. The measures are developed
from statistics of manufacturing employment
and average hours. The series used for France
(from 1970 forward), Norway, and Sweden
are official series published with the national
accounts. Where official total hours series are
not available, the measures are developed by
bls using employment figures published with
the national accounts, or other comprehen­
sive employment series, and estimates of an­
nual hours worked. For Germany, bls uses
estimates of average hours worked developed
by a research institute connected to the Min­
istry of Labor for use with the national ac­
counts employment figures. For the other
countries, BLS constructs its own estimates
of average hours.
Denmark has not published estimates of
average hours for 1994—97; therefore, the bls
measure of labor input for Denmark ends in
1993.
Total compensation (labor cost) includes
all payments in cash or in-kind made directly
to employees plus employer expenditures for
legally required insurance programs and con­
tractual and private benefit plans. The mea­
sures are from the national accounts of each
country, except those for Belgium, which are
developed by bls using statistics on employ­
ment, average hours, and hourly compensa­
tion. For Canada, France, and Sweden, com­
pensation is increased to account for other sig­
nificant taxes on payroll or employment. For
the United Kingdom, compensation is reduced
between 1967 and 1991 to account for em­
ployment-related subsidies. Self-employed
workers are included in the all-employed-persons measures by assuming that their hourly
compensation is equal to the average for wage
and salary employees.

Notes on the data
In general, the measures relate to total manu­
facturing as defined by the International Stan­
dard Industrial Classification. However, the
measures for France (for all years) and Italy
(beginning 1970) refer to mining and manu­
facturing less energy-related products, and
the measures for Denmark include mining and
exclude manufacturing handicrafts from 1960
to 1966.
The measures for recent years may be
based on current indicators of manufacturing
output (such as industrial production in­
dexes), employment, average hours, and
hourly compensation until national accounts
and other statistics used for the long-term
measures become available.
For additional information on this se­
ries, contact the Division of Foreign Labor
Statistics: (202) 691-5654.

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

57

Current Labor Statistics

both, because of an occupational injury or
illness, bls measures of the number and
incidence rate of lost workdays were dis­
continued beginning with the 1993 survey.
The number of days away from work or
days of restricted work activity does not
include the day of injury or onset of illness
or any days on which the employee would
not have worked, such as a Federal holi­
day, even though able to work.
Incidence rates are computed as the
number of injuries and/or illnesses or lost
work days per 100 full-time workers.

Occupational Injury
and Illness Data
(Tables 50-51)

Survey of Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses
Description of the series
The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Ill­
nesses collects data from employers about their
workers’ job-related nonfatal injuries and ill­
nesses. The information that employers pro­
vide is based on records that they maintain un­
der the Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970. Self-employed individuals, farms with
fewer than 11 employees, employers regulated
by other Federal safety and health laws, and
Federal, State, and local government agencies
are excluded from the survey.
The survey is a Federal-State coopera­
tive program with an independent sample
selected for each participating State. A strati­
fied random sample with a Neyman alloca­
tion is selected to represent all private in­
dustries in the State. The survey is stratified
by Standard Industrial Classification and
size of employment.

Definitions
Under the Occupational Safety and Health
Act, employers maintain records of nonfatal
work-related injuries and illnesses that in­
volve one or more of the following: loss of
consciousness, restriction of work or motion,
transfer to another job, or medical treatment
other than first aid.
Occupational injury is any injury such as
a cut, fracture, sprain, or amputation that re­
sults from a work-related event or a single, in­
stantaneous exposure in the work environment.
Occupational illness is an abnormal con­
dition or disorder, other than one resulting from
an occupational injury, caused by exposure to
factors associated with employment. It in­
cludes acute and chronic illnesses or disease
which may be caused by inhalation, absorp­
tion, ingestion, or direct contact.
Lost workday injuries and illnesses are
cases that involve days away from work, or
days of restricted work activity, or both.
Lost workdays include the number of
workdays (consecutive or not) on which
the employee was either away from work
or at work in some restricted capacity, or

58

M o n th ly L ab o r R e v ie w


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Notes on the data
The definitions of occupational injuries and
illnesses are from R e c o rd k ee p in g G u id elin es
f o r O c cu p a tio n a l In ju ries a n d Illn esses (U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Sta­
tistics, September 1986).
Estimates are made for industries and em­
ployment size classes for total recordable cases,
lost workday cases, days away from work
cases, and nonfatal cases without lost work­
days. These data also are shown separately for
injuries. Illness data are available for seven cat­
egories: occupational skin diseases or disorders,
dust diseases of the lungs, respiratory condi­
tions due to toxic agents, poisoning (systemic
effects of toxic agents), disorders due to physi­
cal agents (other than toxic materials), disor­
ders associated with repeated trauma, and all
other occupational illnesses.
The survey continues to measure the num­
ber of new work-related illness cases which
are recognized, diagnosed, and reported during
the year. Some conditions, for example, long­
term latent illnesses caused by exposure to
carcinogens, often are difficult to relate to the
workplace and are not adequately recognized
and reported. These long-term latent illnesses
are believed to be understated in the survey’s
illness measure. In contrast, the overwhelming
majority of the reported new illnesses are
those which are easier to directly relate to
workplace activity (for example, contact der­
matitis and carpal tunnel syndrome).
Most of the estimates are in the form of
incidence rates, defined as the number of inju­
ries and illnesses per 100 equivalent full-time
workers. For this purpose, 200,000 employee
hours represent 100 employee years (2,000
hours per employee). Full detail on the avail­
able measures is presented in the annual bulle­
tin, O c c u p a tio n a l In ju r ie s a n d I lln e s s e s :
C ounts, R ates, a n d C h aracteristics.

Comparable data for more than 40 States
and territories are available from the BLS Of­
fice of Safety, Health and Working Condi­
tions. Many of these States publish data on
State and local government employees in ad­

J a n u a ry 2002

dition to private industry data.
Mining and railroad data are furnished to
bls by the Mine Safety and Health Adminis­
tration and the Federal Railroad Administra­
tion. Data from these organizations are in­
cluded in both the national and State data
published annually.
With the 1992 survey, bls began publish­
ing details on serious, nonfatal incidents re­
sulting in days away from work. Included are
some major characteristics of the injured and
ill workers, such as occupation, age, gender,
race, and length of service, as well as the cir­
cumstances of their injuries and illnesses (na­
ture of the disabling condition, part of body
affected, event and exposure, and the source
directly producing the condition). In general,
these data are available nationwide for de­
tailed industries and for individual States at
more aggregated industry levels.
For additional information on occu­
pational injuries and illnesses, contact the Of­
fice of Occupational Safety, Health and Work­
ing Conditions at (202) 691-6180, or access
the Internet at:
http://www.bls.gov/iip/

Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries
The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
compiles a complete roster of fatal job-re­
lated injuries, including detailed data about
the fatally injured workers and the fatal
events. The program collects and cross
checks fatality information from multiple
sources, including death certificates, State
and Federal workers’ compensation reports,
Occupational Safety and Health Administra­
tion and Mine Safety and Health Adminis­
tration records, medical examiner and au­
topsy reports, media accounts, State motor
vehicle fatality records, and follow-up ques­
tionnaires to employers.
In addition to private wage and salary
workers, the self-employed, family mem­
bers, and Federal, State, and local govern­
ment workers are covered by the pro­
gram. To be included in the fatality cen­
sus, the decedent must have been em­
ployed (that is working for pay, compen­
sation, or profit) at the time of the event,
engaged in a legal work activity, or
present at the site of the incident as a
requirement of his or her job.

Definition
A fatal work injury is any intentional or un­

intentional wound or damage to the body re-

suiting in death from acute exposure to energy,
such as heat or electricity, or kinetic energy
from a crash, or from the absence of such es­
sentials as heat or oxygen caused by a specific
event or incident or series of events within a
single workday or shift. Fatalities that occur
during a person’s commute to or from work
are excluded from the census, as well as workrelated illnesses, which can be difficult
to identify due to long latency periods.

Notes on the data
Twenty-eight data elements are collected,
coded, and tabulated in the fatality program,
including information about the fatally in­
jured worker, the fatal incident, and the ma­
chinery or equipment involved. Summary
worker demographic data and event charac­
teristics are included in a national news re­
lease that is available about 8 months after

the end of the reference year. The Census of
Fatal Occupational Injuries was initiated in
1992 as a joint Federal-State effort. Most
States issue summary information at the time
of the national news release.
For additional information on the
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries con­
tact the bls Office of Safety, Health, and
Working Conditions at (202) 691-6175, or
the Internet at: http://www.bls.gov/iip/

Bureau of Labor Statistics Internet
The Bureau o f Labor Statistics World Wide Web site on the Internet contains a range o f
data on consumer and producer prices, employment and unemployment, occupational com­
pensation, employee benefits, workplace injuries and illnesses, and productivity. The
homepage can be accessed using any Web browser:
h ttp ://w w w .b ls.g o v

Also, some data can be accessed through anonymous FTP or Gopher at


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

stats.b ls.gov

M o n th ly L a b o r R e v ie w

J a n u a ry 2002

59

Current Labor Statistics:

C om parative Indicators

1. Labor m arket indicators
Selected indicators

1999

1999

2000
III

2000
IV

I

II

2001
III

IV

1

II

III

Em ploym ent data
Em ployment status of the civilian noninstitutionalized
population (household survey):1
Labor force participation rate................................................................
Em ployment-population ratio................................................................
U nem ploym ent rate.................................................................................
M en...........................................................................................
16 to 24 years......................................................................................
25 years and over...............................................................................
W om en.....................................................................................................
16 to 24 years......................................................................................
25 years and over...............................................................................
Em ployment, nonfarm (payroll data), in thousands:1
Total..............................................................................................................
Private sector..........................................................................................
G oods-producing.................................................................................
M anufacturing..................................................................................
Service-producing................................................................................

67.1
64.3
4.2
4.1
10.3
3.0
4.3
9.5
3.3

67.2
64.5
4.0
3.9
9.7
2.8
4.1
8.9
3.2

67.1
64.2
4.2
4.1
10.1
3.0
4.3
9.6
3.3

128,916
108,709
25,507
18,552
103,409

131,759
111,079
25,709
18,469
106,050

129,073
108,874
25,459
18,516
103,614

34.5
41.7
4.6

34.5
41.6
4.6

34.5
41.8
4.6

Percent change in the ECI, com pensation:
All w orkers (excluding farm, household and Federal w orkers).....
Private industry w orkers.......................................................................

3.4
3.4

4.1
4.4

67.1
64.3
4.1
4.0
10.3
2.9
4.2
9.4
3.1

67.4
64.6
4.1
3.9
9.7
2.8
4.2
9.5
3.2

67.3
64.6
4.0
3.9
9.8
2.8
4.1
9.0
3.2

67.0
64.3
4.0
3.9
9.8
2.8
4.2
8.6
3.3

67.1
64.4
4.0
4.0
9.6
2.9
4.0
8.6
3.0

67.2
64.4
4.2
4.3
10.6
3.1
4.2
8.6
3.3

66.9
63.9
4.5
4.6
11.2
3.4
4.3
9.2
3.4

66.8
63.6
4.8
4.8
11.4
3.6
4.7
10.1
3.7

130,984
110,456
25,704
18,504
105,280

131,854
110,917
25,711
18,510
106,143

34.5
41.7
4.7

34.5
41.8
4.7

34.5
41.8
4.7

34.4
41.5
4.5

34.3
41.1
4.3

34.3
41.0
4.1

34.2
40.8
3.9

34.1
40.7
4.0

1.1
.9

.9
.9

1.3
1.5

1.0
1.2

1.0
.9

.7
.7

1.3
1.4

.9
1.0

1.2
.9

129,783
109,507
25,524
18,482
104,259

131,927
111,293
25,732
18,487
106,195

132,264
111,669
25,704
18,378
106,560

132,559
111,886
25,621
18,188
106,938

132,483
111,702
25,310
17,882
107,173

132,342
111,362
24,986
17,555
107,356

Average hours:
Private sector..........................................................................................
M anufacturing.......................................................................................
O vertim e.............................................................................................
Em ploym ent Cost Index2

G oods-producing3.............................................................................

3.4

4.4

.9

1.0

1.6

1.2

.9

.6

1.3

.9

.7

Service-producing3...........................................................................
State and local governm ent w orkers................................................

3.4
3.4

4.4
3.0

.9
1.5

.8
1.0

1.4
.6

1.2
.3

1.0
1.3

.7
.7

1.4
.9

1.0
.6

1.0
2.1

W orkers by bargaining status (private industry):
U nion.............................................................................................................
N onunion......................................................................................................

2.7
3.6

4.0
4.4

.9
.9

.7
1.0

1.3
1.5

1.0
1.2

1.2
1.0

.5
.7

.7
1.5

1.1
1.0

1.0
.9

1 Q uarterly data seasonally adjusted.
2 Annual changes are Decernber-to-Decem ber changes. Q uarterly changes are calculated using the last month of each quarter.
3 Goods-producing Industries include mining, construction, and manufacturing. Service-producing industries include all other private sector industries.

60

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

2. A n n u al a n d q u a rte rly p e rc e n t c h a n g e s in c o m p e n s a tio n , prices, a n d produ ctivity
II

I

IV

III

2001

2000

1999

S elected m easures

III

II

I

IV

III

Compensation data1,2
E m plo ym e n t C o st Index— co m p en sa tio n (w ages,
salaries, b en efits):
3.4
3.4

4.1
4.4

1.1
.9

0.9
.9

1.3
1.5

1.0
1.2

1.0
.9

0.7
.7

1.3
1.4

0.9
1.0

1.2
.9

3.5
3.5

3.8
3.9

1.1
.9

.8
.9

1.1
1.2

1.0
1.0

1.1
1.0

.6
.6

1.1
1,2

.9
1.0

1.0
.8

2.7

1.0

1.0

.2

1.7

.7

.8

-.1

1.0

1.0

1.0

2.9
3.8
.3
3.7
15.3

1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2

1.5
2.2
-.4
1.9
10.2

.1
- .2
1.2
.1
- 3 .5

1.4
1.8
.1
1.9
9.1

1.3
1.8
.0
1.6
11.2

.6
.7
.0
1.0
.3

1.0
1.0
I.O
-.1
1.1

1.0
1.0
-.1
1.0
-.1

1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
- 1 .0

2.8
2.6

4.3
4.3

2.9
3.0

7.0
7.4

- .6
- .6

7.3
6.3

1.0
1.4

3.0
2.3

.0
.1

2.3
2.2

2.2
2.7

3.5

4.2

2.8

4.5

4.0

7.1

4.0

1.6

.6

3.4

-

E m plo ym e n t C o st Index— w a g e s and salaries:

Price data1
C o nsum e r Price Index (All U rban C o nsum e rs): All Item s......
P roducer Price Index:

Productivity data3
O u tp u t p er h our of all persons:

N onfinancial c o lo r a tio n s 4...............................................................

1
A nnual ch a ng e s a re D e ce m be r-to -D e ce m b e r changes. Q ua rte rly ch a ng e s are
ca lcu lated using th e last m onth of each quarter. C o m pensation and price data a re not
sea so na lly adju sted , and th e price d ata are not com pounded.

ce n t ch a ng e s reflect a nnual rates of ch a ng e in q ua rte rly indexes. The
data are seaso na lly adjusted.
4 O utpu t p er hour of all em ployees.

2 E xcludes Federal a nd private h ousehold w orkers.
3 A nnual rates o f ch a ng e are co m p uted by com paring a nnual averages. Q ua rte rly per-

3.

A lte rn a tiv e m easu res of w a g e a n d c o m p e n s a tio n c h a n g e s
Four quarters ending

Q uarterly average
2000

C om ponents
III
A verage hourly c o m p e n sa tio n :1
All persons, busine ss se cto r.....................................................................

2000

2001
IV

II

I

III

2001
IV

III

II

I

III

6.5
7.1

9.4
8.9

5.3
5.1

5.3
4.8

4.1
4.5

6.1
6.3

7.6
7.4

7.4
7.2

6.6
6.5

6.0
5.8

1.0
.9
1.2
1.0
1.3

.7
.7
.5
.7
.7

1.3
1.4
.7
1.5
.9

.9
1.0
1.1
1.0
.6

1.2
.9
1.0
.9
2.1

4.3
4.6
4.2
4.7
3.3

4.1
4.4
4.0
4.4
3.0

4.1
4.2
3.4
4.3
3.3

3.9
4.0
3.5
4.2
3.6

4.1
4.0
3.4
4.1
4.4

1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.7

.6
.6
.9
.6
.7

1.1
1.2
.6
1.2
.7

.9
1.0
1.1
.9
.5

1.0
.8
1.0
.8
1.9

4.0
4.1
3.2
4.3
3.5

3.8
3.9
3.4
4.0
3.3

3.8
3.8
3.6
3.9
3.5

3.7
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7

3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.9

E m plo ym e n t C o st Index— com pensation:
C ivilian non farm 2...........................................................................................
P rivate n o n fa rm ..........................................................................................
U n io n ............................................................................................................
N o nu n io n .....................................................................................................
S ta te and local g o v e rn m e n ts.................................................................
E m plo ym e n t C o st Index— w a ge s and salaries:
C ivilian non farm 2...........................................................................................
U n io n ...........................................................................................................
N o nu n io n ....................................................................................................
S tate and local g o v e rn m e n ts.................................................................

1 S ea so n ally a djusted. "Q ua rte rly a verage" is p ercent change from a qua rte r ago, at an a nnual rate.
2 E xcludes Federal a nd h ousehold w orkers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

Jan u a ry 2002

61

Current Labor Statistics:

4.

Labor Force Data

E m ploym ent status of the population, by sex, a g e , ra c e , a n d Hispanic origin, m onthly d a ta seasonally adjusted

[Numbers in thousands]
Em ploym ent status

Annual average
1999

2000

2001

2000

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept

Oct.

Nov.

209,699
140,863
67.2
135,208

210,577
141,136
67.0
135,478

210,743
141,489
67.1
135,836

210,889
141,955
67.3
135,999

211,026
141,751
67.2
135,815

211,171
141,868
67.2
135,780

211,348
141,757
67.1
135,354

211,525
141,272
66.8
135,103

211,725
141,354
66.8
134,932

211,921
141,774
66.9
135,379

212,135
141,350
66.6
134,393

212,357
142,190
67.0
135,181

212,581
142,303
66.9
134,562

212,767
142,244
66.9
134,084

64.5
5,655
4.0
68,836

64.3
5,658
4.0
69,441

64.5
5,653
4.0
69,254

64.5
5,956
4.2
68,934

64.4
5,936
4.2
69,275

64.3
6,088
4.3
69,304

64.0
6,402
4.5
69,592

63.9
6,169
4.4
70,254

63.7
6,422
4.5
70,370

63.9
6,395
4.5
70,147

63.4
6,957
4.9
70,785

63.7
7,009
4.9
70,167

63.3
7,741
5.4
70,279

63.0
8,160
5.7
70,523

91,555
79,104
76.7
67,761

92,580
70,930
76.6
68,580

93,061
71,135
76.4
68,683

93,117
71,289
76.6
68,848

93,184
71,492
76.7
68,916

93,227
71,288
76.5
68,761

93,285
71,261
76.4
68,534

93,410
71,575
76.6
68,706

93,541
71,351
76.3
68,595

93,616
71,346
76.2
68,466

93,708
71,555
76.4
68,745

93,810
71,514
76.2
68,402

93,917
71,894
76.6
68,826

94,015
71,953
76.5
68,481

94,077
71,845
76.4
68,042

74.0
2,028

74.1
2,252

73.8
2,122

73.9
2,232

74.0
2,122

73.8
2,154

73.5
2,150

73.6
2,117

73.3
2,169

73.1
2,035

73.4
2,028

72.9
2,140

73.3
2,175

72.8
2,117

72.3
2.027

65,517
2,433
3.5

66,328
2,350
3.3

66,561
2,452
3.4

66,616
2,441
3.4

66,795
2,576
3.6

66,607
2,527
3.5

66,383
2,728
3.8

66,589
2,869
4.0

66,426
2,756
3.9

66,430
2,880
4.0

66,717
2,810
3.9

66,262
3,112
4.4

66,651
3,069
4.3

66,365
3,472
4.8

66,015
3,803
5.3

population1............................. 100,158
C ivilian labor force...............
60,840
Participation rate..........
60.7
E m ployed..........................
58,555
E m ploym ent-pop58.5
A griculture......................
803
Nonagricultural
industries.................... 57,752
U nem ployed......................
2,285
Unem ploym ent rate....
3.8
Both sexes, 16 to 19 years
C ivilian noninstitutional
population1............................. 16,040
C ivilian labor force..............
8,333
Participation rate..........
52.0
E m ployed..........................
7,172
E m ploym ent-pop44.7
234
A griculture......................
Nonagricultural
industries....................
6,938
U nem ployed......................
1,162
Unem ploym ent rate....
13.9
W hite
C ivilian noninstitutional
population1............................. 173,085
Civilian labor force............... 116,509
Participation rate..........
67.3
Em ployed........................... 112,235
Em ploym ent-pop64.8
ulation ratio2..............
U nem ployed......................
4,273
Unem ploym ent rate....
3.7
Black
C ivilian noninstitutional
population1............................. 24,855
C ivilian labor force..............
16,365
Participation rate..........
65.8
15,056
Employment-prop60.6
ulation ratio2..............
U nem ployed......................
1,309
Unem ploym ent rate....
8.0

101,078
61,565
60.9
59,352

101,533
61,625
60.7
59,506

101,612
61,819
60.8
59,708

101,643
62,126
61.1
59,894

101,686
62,220
61.2
59,932

101,779
62,412
61.3
60,178

101,870
62,132
61.0
59,741

101,938
62,119
60.9
59,766

102,023
61,890
60.7
59,510

102,067
62,145
60.9
59,752

102,165
62,172
60.9
59,562

102,277
62,242
60.9
59,489

102,371
62,252
60.8
59,237

102,438
62,333
60.8
59,259

58.7
818

58.6
797

58.8
822

58.9
852

58.9
839

59.1
819

58.6
847

58.6
822

58.3
752

58.5
773

58.3
766

58.2
826

57.9
853

57.8
862

58,535
2,212
3.6

58,709
2,119
3.4

58,886
2,111
3.4

59,042
2,232
3.6

59,093
2,288
3.7

59,359
2,233
3.6

58,895
2,390
3.8

58,943
2,353
3.8

58,759
2,380
3.8

58,978
2,394
3.9

58,796
2,610
4.2

58,663
2,754
4.4

58,384
3,016
4.8

58,397
3,074
4.9

16,042
8,369
52.2
7,216

15,983
8,376
52.4
7,289

16,014
8,381
52.3
7,280

16,063
8,337
51.9
7,188

16,113
8,243
51.2
7,122

16,108
8,195
50.9
7,067

16,068
8,050
50.1
6,907

16,046
7,802
48.6
6,742

16,086
8,118
50.5
6,956

16,145
8,074
50.0
6,883

16,161
7,664
47.4
6,429

16,163
8,054
49.8
6,867

16,195
8,097
50.0
6,844

16,252
8,065
49.6
6,783

45.4
235

45.6
257

45.5
220

44.7
205

44.2
143

43.9
191

43.0
229

42.0
201

43.2
209

42.6
244

39.8
211

42.5
219

42.3
231

41.7
220

7,041
1,093
13.1

7,032
1,087
13.0

7,060
1,101
13.1

6,983
1,149
13.8

6,980
1,121
13.6

6,876
1,127
13.8

6,678
1,143
14.2

6,541
1,060
13.6

6,748
1,162
14.3

6,638
1,191
14.8

6,218
1,236
16.1

6,648
1,187
14.7

6,613
1,253
15.5

6,563
1,282
15.9

174,428
117,574
67.4
113,475

175,034
117,640
67.2
113,509

175,145
117,945
67.3
113,811

175,246
118,276
67.5
114,015

175,362
118,287
67.5
113,902

175,416
118,243
67.4
113,853

175,533
118,145
67.3
113,434

175,653
117,688
67.0
113,185

175,789
117,733
67.0
113,037

175,924
117,982
67.1
113,237

176,069
117,726
66.9
112,703

176,220
118,290
67.1
113,201

176,372
118,597
67.2
112,900

176,500
118,564
67.2
112,535

65.1
4,099
3.5

64.8
4,131
3.5

65.0
4,134
3.5

65.1
4,261
3.6

65.0
4,385
3.7

64.9
4,389
3.7

64.6
4,711
4.0

64.4
4,503
3.8

64.3
4,696
4.0

64.4
4,745
4.0

64.0
5,024
4.3

64.2
5,089
4.3

64.0
5,696
4.8

63.8
6,029
5.1

25,218
16,603
65.8
15,334

25,376
16,732
65.9
15,485

25,408
16,742
65.9
15,470

25,382
16,773
66.1
15,372

25,412
16,691
65.7
15,440

25,441
16,789
66.0
15,348

25,472
16,666
65.4
15,299

25,501
16,639
65.2
15,311

25,533
16,756
65.6
15,343

25,565
16,693
65.3
15,374

25,604
16,712
65.3
15,195

25,644
16,792
65.5
15,327

25,686
16,735
65.2
15,104

25,720
16,659
64.8
14,980

60.8
1,269
7.6

61.0
1,247
7.5

60.9
1,272
7.6

60.6
1,401
8.4

60.8
1,251
7.5

60.3
1,441
8.6

60.1
1,367
8.2

60.0
1,328
8.0

60.1
1,413
8.4

60.1
1,320
7.9

59.3
1,517
9.1

59.8
1,466
8.7

58.8
1,631
9.7

58.2
1,679
10.1

TO TAL
C ivilian noninstitutional
population1............................. 207,753
C ivilian labor force............... 139,368
Participation rate ..........
67.1
Em ployed.......................... 133,488
Em ploym ent-pop64.3
ulation ratio2..............
U nem ployed......................
5,880
Unem ploym ent rate....
4.2
Not in the labor fo rce ........
68,385
M en, 20 years and over
Civilian noninstitutional
population1.............................
C ivilian labor fo rce ...............
Participation rate..........
Em ployed...........................
Em ploym ent-population ratio2..............
A griculture......................
Nonagricultural
industries....................
U nem ployed......................
Unem ploym ent rate....
W om en, 20 years and over
Civilian noninstitutional

S ee footnotes at end of table.

62

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

4. C ontinued— E m ploym ent status of the population, by sex, a g e , ra c e , a n d Hispanic origin, m onthly d a ta seasonally adjusted
[Numbers in thousands]
Em ploym ent status

2001

2000

Annual average

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

1999

2000

Nov.

21,650
14,665
67.7
13,720

22,393
15,368
68.6
14,492

22,687
15,626
68.9
14,686

22,749
15,671
68.9
14,772

22,769
15,540
68.2
14,612

22,830
15,653
68.6
14,673

22,889
15,770
68.9
14,782

22,957
15,775
68.7
14,747

23,021
15,608
67.8
14,634

23,090
15,570
67.4
14,538

23,157
15,788
68.2
14,843

23,222
15,772
67.9
14,778

23,288
15,813
67.9
14,802

23,351
16,004
68.5
14,858

23,417
15,944
68.1
14,728

63.4
945
6.4

64.7
876
5.7

64.7
940
6.0

64.9
899
5.7

64.2
927
6.1

64.3
980
6.3

64.6
988
6.3

64.2
1,028
6.5

63.6
975
6.2

63.0
1,032
6.6

64.1
945
6.0

63.6
994
6.3

63.6
1,010
6.4

63.6
1,146
7.2

62.9
1,217
7.6

Hispanic origin
C ivilian noninstitutional
population1.............................
C ivilian labor fo rce ................
Participation rate..........
Em ployed..........................
Em ploym ent-popUnem ployed......................
Unem ploym ent rate....

1 The population figures are not seasonally adjusted.
2 C ivilian em ploym ent as a percent of the civilian noninstitutional population.

5.

NOTE: Detail for the above race and H ispanic-origin groups will not sum to totals
becausedata fo r the "other races" groups are not presented and H ispanics are included in
both the white and black population groups.

S elected em p lo ym e n t indicators, m onthly d a ta seasonally adjusted

[In thousands]
Selected categories

Annual average

Persons at work part tim e'
All industries:
Part tim e for econom ic
reasons..................................
Slack w ork or business
conditions.........................
Could only find part-time
w o rk....................................
Part time for noneconomic
reasons.................................
N onagricultural industries:
Part tim e for econom ic
reasons..................................
Slack w ork or business
conditions..........................
Could only find part-time
Part tim e for noneconomic
reasons.................................

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

135,208
72,293
62,915

135,478
72,354
63,124

135,836
72,534
63,302

135,999
72,589
63,410

135,815
72,359
63,456

135,780
72,201
63,578

135,354
72,245
63,109

135,103
71,978
63,125

134,932
71,926
63,006

135,379
72,279
63,100

134,393
71,690
62,703

135,181
72,333
62,848

134,562
71,871
62,691

134,084
71,401
62,683

43,368

43,251

43,293

43,134

43,340

43,385

43,516

43,733

43,428

43,294

43,172

43,091

42,932

42,787

33,708

33,633

33,635

34,249

34,059

34,080

33,662

33,686

33,380

33,603

33,805

33,664

33,160

33,283

8,387

8,495

8,501

8,426

8,373

8,049

8,160

8,319

8,529

8,567

8,323

8,240

8,215

8,319

1,944
1,297
40

2,034
1,233
38

2,005
1,180
25

2,019
1,198
34

1,983
1,182
25

1,839
1,291
29

1,910
1,231
36

1,902
1,223
47

1,958
1,201
38

1,775
1,166
36

1,786
1,256
22

1,850
1,239
29

1,884
1,290
23

1,909
1,299
25

1,853
1,275
11

121,323
18,903
102,420
933
101,487
8,790
95

123,128
19,053
104,076
890
103,186
8,674
101

123,632
19,146
104,486
827
103,659
8,533
128

123,813
19,352
104,461
879
103,582
8,600
121

124,035
18,843
105,192
859
104,333
8,698
110

124,069
19,103
104,966
823
104,143
8,617
142

123,814
19,134
104,680
881
103,800
8,784
138

123,395
18,854
104,541
812
103,729
8,608
93

123,416
19,067
104,349
789
103,559
8,530
103

123,009
18,812
104,197
744
103,453
8,741
94

123,432
18,919
104,513
790
103,723
8,574
88

122,686
19,219
103,467
827
102,640
8,481
113

123,278
19,397
103,881
809
103,072
8,563
102

122,658
19,274
103,384
875
102,509
8,487
105

122,318
19,184
103,134
793
102,341
8,492
74

3,357

3,190

3,416

3,234

3,327

3,273

3,164

3,201

3,371

3,637

3,466

3,326

4,188

4,462

4,241

Characteristic
Employed, 16 years and over.. 133,488
Men............................................ 771,446
W om en...................................... 62,042
Married men, spouse
present.................................... 43,254
Married wom en, spouse
present.................................... 33,450
W omen w ho maintain
8,229
fam ilies...................................
Class of w orker
Agriculture:
W age and salary w orkers.....
Self-em ployed w orkers........
Unpaid fam ily w orkers..........
N onagricultural industries:
W age and salary w orkers.....
G overnm ent.............................
Private industries...................
Private households........
O ther..................................
Self-em ployed w orkers.......
Unpaid fam ily w orkers.........

2000

2000

1999

1,968

1,927

2,183

1,964

2,035

2,043

1,914

2,097

2,215

2,299

2,120

2,086

2,861

3,023

2,864

1,079

944

886

896

954

933

907

873

900

1,025

999

935

1,081

1,134

1,133

18,758

18,722

18,896

18,993

18,568

19,021

18,647

18,713

18,581

18,472

18,845

19,153

18,825

18,595

18,524

3,189

3,045

3,285

3,088

3,227

3,143

3,007

3,061

3,197

3,532

3,336

3,196

4,045

4,342

4,060

1,861

1,835

2,082

1,882

1,971

1,970

1,828

1,985

2,089

2,234

2,059

2,004

2,759

2,953

2,740

1,056

924

871

877

945

910

877

864

876

1,024

985

911

1,070

1,108

1,110

18,197

18.165

18,323

18,437

18,040

18.509

18,132

18,176

18,061

18,039

18,309

18,580

18,278

18,031

17,969

1 Excludes persons "with a job but not at w ork” during the survey period for such reasons as vacation, illness, or industrial disputes.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

63

C urrent Labor Statistics:

6.

Labor Force Data

S e le c te d u n e m p lo y m e n t indicators, m o n th ly d a ta seas o n a lly a d ju s te d

[Unemployment rates]
s e lec ted categories

___________________
Annual average
1999

2000

2000

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

C haracteristic
Total, 16 years and o v e r..................................
Both sexes, 16 to 19 y e a rs .........................
M en, 20 ye a rs a nd o ve r..............................
W om en, 20 ye a rs and o v e r........................

4.2
13.9
3.5
3.8

4.0
13.1
3.3
3.6

4.0
13.0
3.4
3.4

4.0
13.1
3.4
3.4

4.2
13.8
3.6
3.6

4.2
13.6
3.5
3.7

4.3
13.8
3.8
3.6

4.5
14.2
4.0
3.8

4.4
13.6
3.9
3.8

4.5
14.3
4.0
3.8

4.5
14.8
3.9
3.9

4.9
16.1
4 .4
4.2

4.9
14.7
4.3
4.4

5.4
15.5
4.8
4.8

5.7
15.9
5.3
4.9

W hite, to ta l......................................................
Both sexes, 16 to 19 ye a rs ..................
M en, 16 to 19 y e a rs ...........................
W om en, 16 to 19 y e a rs .....................
M en, 20 ye a rs and o ve r........................
W o m en , 20 ye a rs and o v e r.................

3.7
12.0
12.6
11.3
3.0
3.3

3.5
11.4
12.3
10.4
2.8
3.1

11.5
11.7
12.4
10.9
3.0
3.0

3.5
11.5
12.2
10.7
2.9
3.1

3.6
11.7
13.3
9.8
3.2
3.0

3.7
10.9
12.6
9.2
3.2
3.3

3.7
11.6
11.8
11.2
3.3
3.1

4.0
11.8
12.8
10.8
3.5
3.5

3.8
11.8
13.1
10.5
3.3
3.4

4.0
12.6
14.5
10.6
3.6
3.3

4.0
13.3
13.7
13.0
3.4
3.5

4.3
14.3
15.8
12.7
3.8
3.6

4.3
12.7
13.5
11.9
3.8
3.8

4.8
13.1
14.8
11.5
4 .4
4.1

5.1
13.6
16.1
11.0
4.8
4.3

Black, to ta l......................................................
B oth sexes, 16 to 19 ye a rs..................
M en, 16 to 19 ye a rs............................
W o m en , 16 to 19 ye a rs .....................
M en, 20 ye a rs and o v e r........................
W om en, 20 ye a rs a nd o v e r.................

8.0
27.9
30.9
25.1
6.7
6.8

7.6
24.7
26.4
23.0
7.0
6.3

7.5
21.9
22.5
21.3
6.9
6.2

7.6
26.7
30.1
23.4
7.3
5.7

8.4
27.9
26.9
28.9
6.9
7.3

7.5
28.8
31.7
25.7
6.6
5.8

8.6
28.9
27.7
30.2
8.5
6.3

8.2
31.6
34.9
28.6
8.2
5.5

8.0
25.1
30.0
20.3
7.6
6.4

8.4
28.2
30.7
26.0
7.8
6.8

7.9
25.5
26.9
24.3
7.9
6.0

9.1
30.4
32.5
28.1
9.0
6.9

8.7
27.7
30.5
24.8
7.6
7.7

9.7
30.1
31.2
29.0
8.0
8.9

10.1
32.7
31.6
33.7
8.8
8.7

H isp a nic o rigin, to ta l................................

6.4

5.7

6.0

5.7

6.0

6.3

6.3

6.5

6.2

6.6

6.0

6.3

6.4

7.2

7.6

M arried m en, spouse p re se n t...............
M arried w o m en , spouse p re se n t.........

2.2
2.7
6.4
4.1
5.0

2.0
2.7
5.9
3.9
4.8

2.2
2.5
5.2
3.9
4.5

2.2
2.6
5.1
3.9
4.6

2.3
2.5
6.4
4.1
4.9

2.3
2.6
6.1
4.0
4.8

2.5
2.7
6.2
4.2
4.8

2.5
2.9
6.3
4.3
5.5

2.6
2.9
6.2
4.3
4.6

2.6
3.0
6.3
4.4
5.3

2.6
2.8
6.2
4.4
5.1

2.7
3.0
6.7
4.8
5.6

2.7
3.3
7.0
5.0
4.5

3.1
3.7
6.9
5.4
5.6

3.4
3.6
8.3
5.8
5.6

4.3
5.7
7.0
3.6
3.5
3.9
3.0
5.2
2.3
4.1
2.2
8.9

4.1
3.9
6.4
3.6
3.4
4.0
3.1
5.0
2.3
3.8
2.1
7.5

4.0
3.5
6.9
3.6
3.5
3.9
2.6
4.7
1.9
3.7
2.3
9.4

4.0
3.6
6.5
3.6
3.4
4.0
3.2
4.8
2.1
3.6
2.2
8.9

4.3
2.2
6.8
4.2
4.2
4.3
2.8
5.0
2.3
4.0
2.2
9.0

4.5
4.6
7.0
4.5
4.2
5.0
2.9
5.1
2.5
4.2
1.5
9.2

4.5
3.5
6.2
5.0
5.0
5.0
3.1
5.3
2.6
4.1
2.1
11.3

4.6
5.1
7.1
4.6
4.3
5.1
4.1
5.3
2.7
4.1
2.3
9.2

4.5
5.5
6.6
4.8
4.9
4.7
3.8
5.3
2.3
3.9
2.0
8.2

4.8
6.8
6.7
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.4
5.3
2.6
4.4
2.0
9.6

4.7
3.7
6.8
5.1
4.7
5.7
3.3
5.2
3.2
4.3
2.1
10.9

5.1
4.3
7.5
5.7
5.8
5.5
3.5
5.6
2.7
4.9
2.1
10.2

5.2
4.8
7.6
5.6
5.6
5.4
3.9
5.9
2.8
4.8
2.1
7.1

5.9
7.0
8.4
6.2
6.9
5.2
6.0
6.1
2.7
5.7
2.4
8.9

6.1
5.3
9.4
6.5
7.1
5.4
6.5
6.5
3.6
5.5
2.5
9.5

6.7
3.5

6.4
3.5

6.6
3.5

6.3
3.4

6.8
3.8

7.7
3.8

6.9
3.9

6.6
3.8

6.5
3.9

6.8
3.9

6.6
4.1

7.3
4.4

7.8
4.3

7.7
4.7

8.1
5.1

2.8
1.8

2.7
1.7

2.7
1.6

2.7
1.6

3.0
1.6

2.7
1.6

2.7
2.0

3.0
2.3

3.0
2.1

3.2
2.2

3.0
2.1

3.2
2.1

3.5
2.4

4.1
2.7

4.4
3.1

F ull-tim e w o rk e rs .......................................
P art-tim e w o rk e rs .......................................
Ind ustry
N onagricultural w a ge and salary

M a nu factu rin g ................................................
D urable g o o d s ..........................................
N o ndurable g o o d s...................................
T ra nspo rta tio n and public utilitie s..........
W hole sa le and retail tra d e ........................
Finance, in su ra n ce , and real e sta te .....
S ervice s...........................................................
A gricu ltu ral w a ge and sa la ry w o rk e rs ........
E ducatio nal a tta in m e n t1
Less than a high school d ip lo m a ..................
H igh school gra d u ates, no co lle g e ..............
S om e college, less than a b achelor's
C o lle g e g ra d u a te s............................................
1 D ata refer to perso n s 25 years and over.

M onthly Labor R eview
64

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

7.

D uration o f u n e m p lo y m e n t, m o nthly d a ta seaso n ally a d ju s te d

[Numbers in thousands]
W eeks of
unem ploym ent

1999

2001

2000

A nnual average
2000

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

A ug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

5 to 14 w e e k s.........................................
15 w e e k s a nd o v e r...............................
15 to 26 w e e k s ...................................
27 w e eks a n d o v e r...........................

2,568
1,832
1,480
755
725

2,5 4 3
1,803
1,309
6 65
644

2,531
1,796
1,317
713
604

2,440
1,852
1,326
675
651

2 ,613
1,977
1,371
731
640

2,797
1,669
1,490
793
697

2,6 7 4
1,992
1,517
814
703

2,958
1,977
1,499
759
740

2 ,679
2,028
1,484
852
632

2,809
2 ,084
1,540
804
737

2,612
2,150
1,587
935
652

3,004
2,100
1,817
982
835

2,7 6 4
2,361
1,884
1,089
795

3,165
2,570
2,062
1,174
888

3,157
2,600
2,3 9 8
1,230
1,168

M ean d uration, in w e e k s ....................
M edian d uration, in w e e k s................

13.4
6.4

12.6
5.9

12.4
6.1

12.6
6.1

12.6
5.9

12.9
6.0

13.0
6.5

12.6
5.8

12.2
6.5

13.0
6.2

12.5
6.7

13.3
6.5

13.1
7.4

13.0
7.4

14.5
7.7

8.

U n e m p lo y e d persons b y reason for u n e m p lo y m e n t, m o n th ly d a ta s e a s o n a lly a d ju s te d

[Numbers in thousands]
R eason for
unem ploym ent
Jo b lo se rs1...............................................
O n te m p o ra ry la yo ff..........................
N o t on te m p o ra ry la yo ff...................
Jo b le a v e rs ..............................................
N ew e n tra n ts..........................................

A nnual average
2000

1999
2,622
848
1,774
783
2,0 0 5
469

2,492
842
1,650
775
1,957
431

2001

2000
Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

A pr.

M ay

2,501
877
1,624
768
1,936
429

2,514
937
1,577
746
1,899
466

2,742
1,032
1,711
838
1,956
446

2,853
945
1,908
820
1,927
372

2,963
991
1,972
814
1,908
382

3,199
1,053
2,146
749
2,005
462

3,159
1,084
2,075
820
1,801
482

June
3,291
940
2,351
810
1,906
4 77

July
3,252
1,003
2 ,249
7 74
1,912
4 36

Aug.
3,4 0 9
1,079
2,330
894
2,166
495

Sept.
3,600
1,118
2,482
800
2,108
4 76

Oct.

Nov.

4,360
1,360
3,000
893
2,098
462

4,5 9 8
1,172
3,427
842
2,202
509

P erce n t o f u n e m p lo y ed
O n te m p o ra ry la yo ff.........................
N ot on te m p o ra ry la y o ff.................
Jo b le a v e rs .............................................
N ew e n tra n ts .........................................

44.6

44.1

14.4
30.2
13.3
34.1
8.0

14.9
29.2
13.7
34.6
7.6

44.4
15.6
28.8
13.6
34.4
7.6

44.7
16.7
28.0
13.3
33.8
8.3

45.8
17.2
28.6
14.0
32.7
7.4

47.8
15.8
32.0
13.7
32.3
6.2

48.8
16.3
32.5
13.4
31.4
6.4

49.9
16.4
33.5
11.7
31.3
7.2

50.4
17.3
33.1
13.1
28.8
7.7

50.8
14.5
36.3
12.5
29.4
7.4

51.0
15.7
35.3
12.1
30.0
6.8

49.0
15.5
33.5
12.8
31.1
7.1

51.5
16.0
35.5
11.5
30.2
6.8

55.8
17.4
38.4
11.4
26.8
5.9

56.4
14.4
42.0
10.3
27.0
6.2

1.9
.6
1.4
.3

1.8
.6
1.4
.3

1.8
.5
1.4
■3

1.8
.5
1.3
.3

1.9
.6
1.4
.3

2.0
.6
1.4
.3

2.1
.6
1.3
.3

2.3
.5
1.4
.3

2.2
.6
1.3
.3

2.3
.6
1.3
.3

2.3
.5
1.3
.3

2.4
.6
1.5
.4

2.5
.6
1.5
.3

3.1
.6
1.5
.3

3.2
.6
1.5
.4

P ercent of civilian
la b o r force

1 Includes persons w h o co m p leted te m p o ra ry jobs.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

65

Current Labor Statistics:

9.

Labor Force Data

U n e m p lo y m e n t rates by sex a n d a g e , m onthly d a ta seaso n ally adjusted

[Civilian workers]
S ex and age

2000

Annual average
1999

2000

Oct.

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

To ta l, 16 years and over.....................
16 to 24 ye a rs....................................
16 to 19 ye a rs................................
16 to 17 ye a rs............................
18 to 19 ye a rs............................
20 to 24 ye a rs................................
25 years and o ve r............................
25 to 54 ye a rs............................
55 ye a rs and o ve r.....................

4.2
9.9
13.9
16.3
12.4
7.5
3.1
3.2
2.8

4.0
9.3
13.1
15.4
11.5
7.1
3.0
3.1
2.6

3.9
8.9
12.6
15.2
11.1
6.8
2.9
3.0
2.8

4.0
9.1
13.0
15.4
11.4
6.8
3.0
3.0
2.9

4.0
9.2
13.1
15.8
11.6
7.0
3.0
3.0
2.6

4.2
9.6
13.8
17.4
11.5
7.2
3.2
3.2
2.7

4.2
9.5
13.6
17.2
11.0
7.2
3.2
3.2
2.8

4.3
10.0
13.8
16.0
12.3
7.8
3.2
3.4
2.6

4.5
10.4
14.2
16.7
12.6
8.3
3.4
3.5
2.8

4.4
9.9
13.6
15.5
12.2
7.9
3.3
3.5
2.6

4.5
10.4
14.3
16.0
13.1
8.2
3.5
3.6
2.8

4.5
10.1
14.8
19.3
11.8
7.5
3.4
3.6
2.8

4.9
11.5
16.1
19.1
14.7
9.0
3.7
3.9
3.0

4.9
10.7
14.7
16.2
13.9
8.5
3.8
3.9
3.3

5.4
11.6
15.5
17.2
14.4
9.5
4.3
4.4
3.5

M en, 16 ye a rs and o ve r....................
16 to 24 ye a rs.................................
16 to 19 ye a rs..............................
16 to 17 ye a rs..........................
18 to 19 ye a rs..........................
20 to 24 ye a rs..............................
25 ye a rs a nd o v e r..........................
2 5 to 54 ye a rs..........................
55 ye a rs and o ve r...................

4.1
10.3
14.7
17.0
13.1
7.7
3.0
3.0
2.8

3.9
9.7
14.0
16.8
12.2
7.3
2.8
2.9
2.7

3.9
9.4
13.4
17.6
10.7
7.3
2.9
2.9
2.8

4.0
9.5
13.6
17.5
11.3
7.3
3.0
2.9
2.9

4.0
9.7
14.1
18.4
11.7
7.2
3.0
2.9
2.8

4.3
10.3
15.0
20.5
11.8
7.6
3.1
3.1
3.0

4.2
10.8
15.5
18.5
13.1
8.2
3.0
3.0
2.9

4.4
10.9
13.8
15.6
12.7
9.3
3.2
3.3
2.9

4.6
10.9
15.1
18.7
12.8
8.7
3.5
3.5
2.9

4.5
11.0
15.3
17.4
13.9
8.7
3.3
3.5
2.9

4.7
11.8
15.9
18.0
14.5
9.5
3.4
3.5
3.0

4.5
10.4
15.1
19.0
13.0
7.9
3.5
3.6
3.0

5.1
12.4
17.9
22.7
15.4
9.5
3.7
3.9
3.3

4.9
11.3
15.8
18.3
14.3
8.9
3.7
3.8
3.3

5.5
12.4
17.3
20.4
15.2
9.8
4.2
4.3
3.7

W om en, 16 ye a rs and o ve r..............
16 to 24 ye a rs.................................
16 to 19 ye a rs..............................
16 to 17 ye a rs..........................
18 to 19 ye a rs..........................
2 0 to 24 ye a rs..............................
25 ye a rs and o v e r..........................
25 to 54 ye a rs ..........................
55 years and o ve r...................

4.3
9.5
13.2
15.5
11.6
7.2
3.3
3.4

4.1
8.9
12.1
14.0
10.8
7.0
3.2
3.3
2.6

3.9
8.4
11.9
12.8
11.6
6.3
3.0
3.1

4.0
8.6
12.3
13.4
11.5
6.3
3.1
3.2

4.0
8.7
12.1
13.2
11.6
6.7
3.0
3.1

4.1
8.8
12.4
14.1
11.3
6.7
3.2
3.4

4.3
8.8
11.8
13.6
10.4
7.1
3.4
3.6

4.4
8.9
12.7
14.0
11.6
6.7
3.5
3.8

4.5
9.7
14.4
19.6
10.6
7.1
3.4
3.6

5.4
10.8
13.6
14.0
13.5
9.1
4.3
4.4

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.2

2.5

2.5

4.8
10.4
14.2
15.5
13.9
8.4
3.7
3.8
2.7

5.0
10.1
13.6
13.9
13.5
8.2
3.9
4.0

2.7

4.2
8.9
13.7
16.4
11.9
6.3
3.2
3.5
2.2

4.4
9.8
13.3
14.5
12.4
7.8
3.3
3.4

2.8

4.2
8.1
11.6
15.7
8.7
6.1
3.4
3.5
2.7

3.3

3.3

66

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

2.8

J an u a ry 2002


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

10.

U n e m p lo y m e n t rates b y S tate, seas o n a lly a d ju s te d
S tate

Oct.
2000

Sept.

Oct.

2001p

2001p

O ct.
2000

State

Sept.

O ct.

2001p

2001p

4.6
6.3
3.8
4.1
4.9

5.0
6.5
4.7
4.9
5.4

5.3
6.0
5.2
4.3
5.8

M o n ta n a ................................................................
N e bra ska ..............................................................
N e va da ..................................................................
N ew H a m pshire ................................................

3.7
4.7
2.9
4.3
2.4

4.2
4.6
3.0
4.8
4.1

4.5
4.5
3.0
6.3
3.8

2.7
2.0
3.9
6.0
3.6

3.7
3.6
3.2
6.6
4.4

4.2
3.2
3.0
6.4
5.1

N ew Je rse y.........................................................
N ew M e xico .........................................................
N ew Y o rk.............................................................
N orth C a ro lin a ...................................................
N orth D a ko ta .......................................................

3.8
5.2
4.5
3.9
2.8

4.5
5.8
4.9
5.3
1.7

4.8
5.9
5.0
5.5
2.0

3.5
4.1
4.8
43
2.8

3.8
4.4
4.9
5.5
4.2

4.1
5.3
4.8
5.6
4.8

O h io ......................................................................
O kla h o m a ............................................................

4.0
2.9
4.7
4.3
3.7

4.4
3.5
6.4
4.6
3.9

4.5
3.8
6.6
5.0
4.2

2.5
3.8
4.1
5.7
3.1

3.2
3.8
4.7
5.5
4.3

3.4
4.0
5.1
5.6
4.3

S outh C a ro lin a ...................................................

3.2
2.3
4.1
4.0
3.2

5.3
3.1
4.1
5.0
4.2

5.5
3.2
4.5
5.3
4.3

3.9
2.4
3.7
3.2
5.4

4.1
3.9
5.1
3.3
5.4

4.4
4.2
5.3
3.7
5.4

2.8
2.2
5.2
5.5
3.3
3.8

3.1
3.1
6.1
4.9
4.0
4.0

3.2
3.7
6.6
44.0
4.5
3.8

T e n n e sse e ...........................................................
U ta h ......................................................................

W e st V irg in ia ......................................................
W yo m in g .............................................................

p = prelim inary

11.

E m p lo y m e n t of w orkers on no n farm payrolls b y S tate, se a s o n a lly a d ju s te d

[In thousands]
S tate

Oct.
2000

Oct.
2000

Sept.

Oct.

2001p

2001p

1,937.5
284.0
2 ,270.7
1 164.3
14 675.9

1,916.9
291.3
2 ,259.7
1 164.0
14,783.4

1,910.0
290.4
2 ,260.9
1,165.3
14,772.5

2 242.8
1,696.3
425.1
646.0
7 119.5

2 ,250.4
1,686.7
422.6
652.9
7,333.2

2 ,239.4
1,684.0
422.7
650.5
7,337.0

4 ,018.5
556.1
566.3
6 025.7
3 010.4

3,996.9
563.7
569.1
6,003.9
2 980.3

3,975.3
551.5
568.2
5,989.6
2 ,966.9

O hio ......................................................
O klah o m a ............................................

1 482.8
1,347.7
1 826.1
1,940.1
610.5

1,490.7
1,369.3
1,839.5
1,941.1
609.7

1,488.3
1,367.6
1,832.4
1,943.2
609.1

S outh C a ro lin a ................................... 1882.51882
380.7
2 ,747.2
9,517.2
T e xa s....................................................
1,086.3
U ta h ......................................................

2 ,472.7
3 342.4
4,693.6
2,675.7
1,155.2

2,4 7 9.4
3,367.8
4,658.1
2,669.7
1,136.4

2 ,473.5
3,354.1
4,660.1
2 ,658.9
1,133.9

V erm o n t...............................................

State
M isso u ri................................................

N ew H a m pshire ................................

N ew M e xico ........................................

W a sh in g to n ........................................
W e st V irg in ia ......................................
W yo m ing .............................................

Sept.

O ct.

200 1 p

2001p

2,7 6 0.6
391.1
909.3
1,042.3
621.8

2,7 3 0.5
395.1
912.3
1,068.3
622 .8

2,7 2 4.4
395.0
909.4
1,056.1
6 19.5

4,015.1
747.2
8 ,670.0
3,963.5
329.0

4,011.0
758 .4
8 ,693.7
3 ,988.7
328.5

4,0 2 5.8
757.5
8,6 2 9.4
3 ,974.8
327.7

5 ,656.7
1,492.2
1,612.4
5 ,724.7
477.2

5 ,633.7
1,506.8
1,583.2
5,719.1
478.3

5 ,636.2
1,505.0
1,582.1
5,715.1
478 .6

1,879.7
379.5
2,7 5 4.3
9 ,681.8
1,089.7

1,882.5
378.8
2,7 5 1.4
9 ,658.9
1,091.3

299.1
3 ,574.5
2,734.1
736 .5
2,8 3 4.7
242.9

2 99.3
3,563.1
2,7 3 1.6
733.3
2,8 3 2.7
245.2

299.2
3 ,530.4
2 ,731.0
735.1
2 ,838.8
239 .3

p = prelim inary
NOTE: S om e data in th is table m ay diffe r from d ata published else w he re because o f th e continual u pdating of th e data base.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

67

C urrent Labor Statistics:

Labor Force D ata

12. Em ploym ent of workers on nonfarm payrolls by industry, m onthly d a ta seasonally adjusted
[In thousands]__________________________________________________
Industry
TO TAL....................................
PRIVATE SECTOR....................
GOODS-PRODUCING....................
Mining ...........................................
Metal mining..................................
Oil and gas extraction................
Nonmetallic minerals,
except fuels...............................

Annual average

2000

2001

1999

2000

Nov

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.p

Nov.p

128,916
108,709
25,507
539
44
297

131,739
111,079
25,709
543
41
311

132,279
111,689
25,711
548
40
319

132,367
111,753
25,688
548
41
320

132,428
111,799

132,595
111,915
25,627
555
39
328

132,654
111,943
25,602
557
38
331

132,489
111,742
25,421
560
37
335

132,530
111,760
25,324
564
37
339

132,431
111,603

132,449
111,517

132,395
111,390

132,230
111,249

131,431
110,437

25,186
565
35
340

25,122
567
34
341

24,963
569
35
342

24,888
569
35
342

131,762
110,762
24,747
569
35
340

113
6,880
1,555

113

113

112

112

6,881
1,556

6,867
1,554

6,861
1,557

112
6,871
1,562

113

6,852
1,548

112
6,864
1,551

113

6,929
1,552

6,854
1,561

113
6,852
1,561

938
4,439
18,116
12,254
10,941
7,358
799
548

915
4,389
18,009
12,166
10,870
7,308
800
543

923
4,402

925
4,388

17,879
12,066

932
4,372
17,533
11,782
10,523
7,022
793
519

932
4,377
17,448
11,705
10,460
6,972
794
513

933
4,360
17,324
11,616
10,363
6,895
789
505

942
4,349
17,161

10,778
7,235
797
540

17,757
11,956
10,692
7,157
798
532

935
4,378
17,688
11,900
10,624
7,102
797
531

25,633
550
39
325

24,580
567
34
339

113

114

114

112

111

6,415
1,458

6,698
1,528

6,781
1,548

6,791
1,543

6,826
1,538

874
4,084
18,552
12,747
11,111
7,596
834
548

901
4,269
18,469
12,628
11,138
7,591
832
558

909
4,324
18,382
12,511
11,120
7,544
817
557

913
4,335
18,349
12,466
11,102
7,517
811
555

921
4,367
18,257
12,394
11,031
7,462
806
552

930
4,395
18,192
12,323
10,997
7,415
799
549

566
699
1,521

579
698
1,537

577
691
1,537

577
686
1,536

579
681
1,526

578
679
1,514

578
671
1,509

577
667
1,503

574
660
1,488

572
654
1,478

569
648
1,478

568
643
1,468

567
638
1,464

566
632
1,453

560
621
1,434

2,136

2,120

2,122

2,119

2,117

2,105

2,084

2,072

2,054

2,031

2,007

1,980

1,965

1,944

1,918

368

361

365

366

369

370

369

367

366

357

353

348

344

343

340

1,672

1,719

1,737

1,738

1,735

1,726

1,715

1,684

1,656

1,624

1,589

1,565

1,551

1,529

1,500

641
1,888

682
1,849

708
1,822

710
1,817

714
1,772

711
1,786

702
1,775

686
1,768

670
1,757

650
1,749

634
1,752

618
1,750

613
1,735

601
1,715

592
1,707

1,018
496

1,013
465

995
462

990
464

952
462

967
464

956
465

950
464

939
465

931
465

936
466

931
465

919
465

903
463

903
456

855

852

865

867

870

871

871

866

865

865

865

858

851

849

847

391
7,441
5,150
1,682
37
559

394

7,101
4,831
1,684
33
480

389
7,065
4,799
1,685
33
472

388
7,064
4,798
1,680
33
471

379
7,010
4,760
1,674
35
465

382

7,175
4,896
1,687
32
494

390
7,139
4,858
1,687
32
489

387

7,226
4,932
1,684
32
505

390
7,195
4,908
1,686
31
496

391

6,988
4,733
1,602
33
459

381
6,961
4,721
1,689
33
453

376
6,914

1,679
33
514

396
7,647
4,949
1,682
32
510

393

7,331
5,038
1,684
34
528

395
7,262
4,967

690
668
1,552
1,035
132

633
657
1,547
1,038
127

611
654
1,540
1,038
127

604
652
1,539
1,039
127

599
651
1,534
1,039
127

595
645
1,529
1,039
127

590
642
1,524
1,039
126

581
641
1,512
1,036
128

579
639
1,502
1,033
127

567
635
1,495
1,033
128

571
632
1,489
1,039
128

554
628
1,483
1,035
127

551
629
1,473
1,031
128

543
628
1,465
1,028
127

532
627
1,452
1,023
127

1,006
77

1,011
71

997
69

987
68

979
68

959
65

953
64

957
64

947
62

106.568

106,795

106,968

107,068

107,206

107,245

107,327

107,432

941
61
107,342

935
60

106,050

973
68
107,052

967
66

SERVICE-PRO DUCING .................. 103,409
Transportation and public
utilities........................................
6,834
Transportation...............................
4,411
Railroad transportation..............
235
Local and interurban
passenger transit.....................
478
Trucking and w arehousing.......
1,810
W ater transportation..................
186
Transportation by air..................
1,227
Pipelines, except natural gas...
13
Transportation services...........
463
C om munications and public
utilities..........................................
2,423
Com m unications.........................
1,560
Electric, gas, and sanitary
services.....................................
863
W holesale trade............................
6,911
Retail trade...................................... 22,848
Building materials and garden
supplies........................................
988
General merchandise stores......
2,798
Department stores.....................
2,459

993
69
106,679

107,015

924
59
106,851

7,019
4,529
236

7,093
4,573
235

7,108
4,583
232

7,106
4,580
229

7,123
4,591
231

7,127
4,591
230

7,119
4,576
230

7,130
4,584
230

7,118
4,571
227

7,108
4,561
226

7,082
4,539
226

7,070
4,528
226

7,017
4,473
225

6,959
4,419
224

476
1,856
196
1,281
14
471

478
1,864
200
1,306
14
476

478
1,866
200
1,316
14
477

479
1,868
201
1,312
14
477

480
1,870
200
1,318
14
478

480
1,872
201
1,316
13
479

477
1,864
202
1,313
14
476

483
1,867
203
1,315
14
472

483
1,867
201
1,310
14
469

485
1,863
203
1,304
14
466

486
1,844
203
1,303
14
463

482
1,838
205
1,300
14
463

479
1,832
207
1,264
14
452

480
1,837
205
1,219
14
440

2,490
1,639

2,520
1,672

2,525
1,678

2,526
1,679

2,532
1,685

2,536
1,690

2,543
1,696

2,546
1,699

2,547
1,700

2,547
1,700

2,543
1,695

2,542
1,695

2,544
1,695

2,540
1,692

851
7,024

847

847
7,064

847

847
7,022

847
7,017

847
6,988

23,472

23,546

23,561

23,606

848
7,010
23,583

849

7,053
23,530

7,038

23,415

846
7,066
23,457

847

7,068
23,406

847
7,067

23,307

848
7,070
23,395

23,536

6,971
23,417

848
6,946
23,403

1,016
2,837
2,491

1,011
2,835
2,492

1,010
2,822
2,480

1,007
2,789
2,448

1,007
2,807
2,462

1,006
2,797
2,451

999
2,804
2,459

1,006
2,821
2,473

1,014
2,818
2,471

1,008
2,810
2,458

1,014
2,800
2,449

1,013
2,793
2,450

1,013
2,763
2,420

1,011
2,761
2,405

C onstruction..................................
General building contractors.....
Heavy construction, except
building........................................
Special trades contractors..........
M anufacturing...............................
Production w orkers...............
Durable goods............................
Production w orkers...............
Lumber and wood products.....
Furniture and fixtures...............
Stone, clay, and glass
products....................................
Primary metal industries...........
Fabricated metal products.......
Industrial m achinery and
equipm ent.................................
Com puter and office
equipm ent...............................
Electronic and other electrical
equipm ent.................................
Electronic components and
accessories.............................
Transportation equipm ent........
Motor vehicles and
equipm ent................................
Aircraft and parts.....................
Instruments and related
products....................................
M iscellaneous manufacturing
industries...................................
Nondurable goods.....................
Production workers...............
Food and kindred products......
Tobacco products......................
Textile mill products...................
Apparel and other textile
products....................................
Paper and allied products........
Printing and publishing.............
Chemicals and allied products.
Petroleum and coal products...
Rubber and miscellaneous
plastics products......................
Leather and leather products...

See footnotes at end of table.

68

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

—

10,247
_

786
498

—

1,690
33
447

12. C ontinued— Em ploym ent of workers on nonfarm payrolls by industry, m onthly d a ta seasonally adjusted
[In thousands]______________________________________________________________________________________________________
In d u s try

A n n u a l a v e ra g e
1999

Food stores....................................
Automotive dealers and
service stations..........................
New and used car dealers.......
Apparel and accessory stores...
Furniture and home furnishings
stores...........................................
Eating and drinking places........
M iscellaneous retail
establishm ents..........................
F inance, in su ra n ce , and
real e sta te .....................................
Finance...........................................
Depository institutions..............
Commercial banks...................
Savings institutions..................
Nondepository institutions.......
Security and commodity
brokers.......................................
Holding and other investment
offices.........................................
Insurance........................................
Insurance carriers......................
Insurance agents, brokers,
and service................................
Real estate.....................................
S e rv ic e s 1........................................
Agricultural services....................
Hotels and other lodging places
Business services.........................
Services to buildings.................
Personnel supply services.......
Help supply services...............
Computer and data
processing services................
Auto repair services
and parking.................................
M iscellaneous repair services....
Amusement and recreation
services.......................................
Health services.............................
O ffices and clinics of medical
doctors........................................
Nursing and personal care
facilities.......................................
Hospitals.......................................
Home health care services......
Legal services...............................
Educational services....................
Social services..............................
Child day care services............
Residential care..........................
M useums and botanical and
zoological gardens....................
Membership organizations.........
Engineering and management
services........................................
Engineering and architectural
services.....................................
M anagement and public
relations....................................
Federal...........................................
Federal, except Postal
Service......................................
State................................................
Education.....................................
O ther State governm ent...........
Local................................................
Education.....................................
O ther local governm ent............

2000

3,497

3,521

2000
Nov.
3,527

200 1
D ec.
3,532

Jan.
3,538

Feb.
3,548

M a r.
3,550

A p r.
3,562

M ay
3,553

June
3,544

J u ly

Aug.

S e p t.

O c t.p

N o v .p

3,536

3,531

3,538

3,542

3,537

2,435
1,133
1,224

2,429
1,133
1,210

2,435
1,139
1,200

2,368
1,080
1,171

2,412
1,114
1,193

2,426
1,123
1,208

2,425
1,123
1,214

2,424
1,124
1,221

2,424
1,124
1,227

2,420
1,124
1,228

2,421
1,122
1,226

2,428
1,126
1,231

2,431
1,128
1,227

2,435
1,131
1,219

2,441
1,133
1,224

1,087
7,961

1,134
8,114

1,144
8,142

1,148
8,149

1,147
8,157

1,146
8,171

1,147
8,158

1,140
8,213

1,136
8,216

1,136
8,241

1,137
8,310

1,137
8,280

1,138
8,242

1,136
8,185

1,138
8,196

2,978

3,080

3,103

3,106

3,132

3,142

3,151

3,165

3,155

3,150

3,151

3,156

3,153

3,139

3,125

7,555
3,688
2,056
1,468
254
709

7,560
3,710
2,029
1,430
253
681

7,575
3,729
2,023
1,420
253
678

7,582
3,735
2,025
1,420
253
677

7,594
3,738
2,024
1,418
253
678

7,609
3,748
2,025
1,417
254
683

7,618
3,755
2,028
1,418
254
686

7,626
3,761
2,032
1,421
255
691

7,644
3,770
2,037
1,426
255
697

7,631
3,767
2,041
1,428
256
699

7,618
3,755
2,039
1,426
255
703

7,623
3,758
2,037
1,423
255
709

7,633
3,758
2,039
1,423
256
706

7,627
3,755
2,035
1,426
256
712

7,636
3,769
2,041
1,428
259
719

689

748

770

774

777

781

781

780

776

766

755

755

755

750

751

234
2,368
1,610

251
2,346
1,589

248
2,340
1,583

259
2,339
1,582

259
2,346
1,588

259
2,351
1,592

260
2,353
1,593

258
2,356
1,596

260
2,358
1,598

261
2,356
1,598

258
2,357
1,599

257
2,357
1,598

258
2,362
1,601

258
2,360
1,602

258
2,356
1,598

758
1,500

757
1,504

757
1,506

757
1,508

758
1,510

759
1,510

760
1,510

760
1,509

760
1,516

758
1,508

758
1,506

759
1,508

761
1,513

758
1,512

758
1,511

39,055
766
1,848
1,226
9,300
983
3,616
3,248

40,460
801
1,912
1,251
9,858
994
3,887
3,487

40,845
811
1,939
1,261
9,933
998
3,869
3,461

40,901
813
1,946
1,265
9,893
1,002
3,816
3,404

40,984
818
1,952
1,261
9,888
1,007
3,779
3,372

41,020
821
1,957
1,261
9,851
1,007
3,731
3,339

41,073
828
1,960
1,265
9,822
1,007
3,694
3,293

40,993
824
1,944
1,267
9,729
1,009
3,600
3,202

41,078
834
1,935
1,277
9,702
1,013
3,590
3,198

41,085
833
1,920
1,279
9,666
1,008
3,556
3,161

41,046
834
1,922
1,281
9,592
998
3,517
3,127

41,129
837
1,912
1,284
9,588
997
3,521
3,113

41,134
838
1,913
1,284
9,581
997
3,488
3,106

40,983
840
1,862
1,280
9,467
995
3,376
3,005

40,913
837
1,855
1,270
9,387
997
3,294
2,918

1,875

2,095

2,152

2,164

2,176

2,186

2,195

2,199

2,200

2,205

2,202

2,194

2,200

2,202

2,196

1,196
372
599

1,248
366
594

1,270
366
593

1,278
365
597

1,291
365
600

1,291
365
600

1,298
364
605

1,300
364
601

1,309
363
587

1,303
361
602

1,312
360
595

1,307
362
589

1,306
363
586

1,298
362
581

1,308
359
579

1,651

1,728

1,755

1,759

1,769

1,772

1,775

1,764

1,787

1,768

1,772

1,777

1,766

1,775

1,750

10,036

10,197

10,164

10,184

10,211

10,236

10,259

10,280

10,296

10,329

10,354

10,384

10,408

10,429

10,461

1,875

1,924

1,941

1,948

1,953

1,958

1,962

1,967

1,973

1,981

1,983

1,990

1,992

1,993

2,001

1,786
3,974
636
996
2,267
2,783
680
771

1,795
3,990
643
1,009
2,325
2,903
712
806

1,800
4,016
644
1,013
2,338
2,958
727
820

1,803
4,025
642
1,015
2,357
2,977
729
823

1,806
4,035
646
1,017
2,363
2,985
732
827

1,808
4,045
645
1,020
2,375
2,997
734
829

1,811
4,055
648
1,022
2,384
3,009
739
831

1,816
4,062
646
1,021
2,388
3,023
743
835

1,814
4,071
645
1,027
2,431
3,039
745
842

1,821
4,086
648
1,027
2,426
3,056
756
845

1,823
4,098
647
1,026
2,432
3,048
760
847

1,825
4,114
653
1,028
2,452
3,076
765
848

1,830
4,124
655
1,030
2,446
3,085
756
851

1,833
4,133
655
1,029
2,439
3,094
756
853

1,838
4,150
656
1,030
2,447
3,095
755
853

99
2,436

106
2,475

108
2,486

108
2,487

109
2,487

110
2,487

110
2,489

109
2,489

110
2,496

111
2,501

111
2,493

111
2,503

112
2,509

112
2,505

110
2,509

3,256

3,419

3,478

3,490

3,496

3,504

3,510

3,517

3,512

3,529

3,540

3,544

3,533

3,536

3,542

957

1,017

1,035

1,040

1,046

1,050

1,052

1,053

1,057

1,059

1,064

1,067

1,067

1,069

1,067

1,031

1,090

1,113

1,116

1,119

1,123

1,125

1,124

1,121

1,124

1,119

1,123

1,122

1,122

1,121

20,206
2,669

20,681
2,777

20,590
2,620

20,614
2,613

20,629
2,613

20,680
2,615

20,711
2,613

20,747
2,615

20,770
2,612

20,828
2,621

20,932
2,626

21,005
2,622

20,981
2,627

21,000
2,623

20,994
2,604

1,796
4,709
1,983
2,726
12,829
7,289
5,540

1,917
4,785
2,032
2,753
13,119
7,440
5,679

1,761
4,798
2,033
2,765
13,172
7,449
5,723

1,754
4,809
2,037
2,772
13,192
7,457
5,735

1,755
4,800
2,028
2,772
13,216
7,468
5,748

1,756
4,825
2,048
2,777
13,240
7,479
5,761

1,754
4,836
2,055
2,781
13,262
7,492
5,770

1,756
4,847
2,065
2,782
13,285
7,495
5,790

1,754
4,854
2,066
2,788
13,304
7,512
5,792

1,772
4,881
2,089
2,792
13,326
7,515
5,811

1,772
4,909
2,117
2,792
13,397
7,575
5,822

1,774
4,913
2,122
2,791
13,470
7,650
5,820

1,776
4,931
2,129
2,802
13,423
7,595
5,828

1,777
4,923
2,116
2,807
13,454
7,607
5,847

1,775
4,913
2,115
2,798
13,477
7,629
5,848

1 Includes other Industries not shown separately.
p - preliminary.
Note : See "Notes on the data” for a description of the most recent benchmark revision.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

69

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force D ata

13. A v e ra g e w e e k ly hours o f p ro d u c tio n or nonsupervisory w orkers on p riv a te nonfarm payrolls, b y industry, m onthly
d a ta s easo n ally a d ju s te d
Industry

A nnual average
1999

2000

2000

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

A pr.

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

O ct.p N ov.p

P R IV A TE S E C T O R .....................................

34.5

34.5

34.3

34.2

34.4

34.3

34.3

34.2

34.2

34.2

34.2

34.0

34.1

34.0

34.1

G O O D S -P R O D U C IN G .....................................

41.0

41.0

40.6

40.1

40.5

40.3

40.5

40.6

40.5

4 0 .4

40.5

40.3

40.2

40.0

40.1

M IN IN G ................................................................

43.2

43.1

43.0

42.5

43.1

43.2

43.8

44.0

43.9

4 3.3

43.3

43.4

43.5

43.0

43.1

M A N U F A C T U R IN G .........................................
O ve rtim e h o u rs.........................................

41.7
4.6

41.6
4.6

41.2
4.3

40.6
4.1

41.0
4.2

40.9
3.9

41.0
4.1

41.0
3.9

40.7
3.9

4 0.7
3.9

40.8
4.0

40.7
4.1

40.6
3.9

4 0.5
3.8

40.3
3.7

D urable goods........................................
O ve rtim e h o u rs........................................
L um b e r and w o od p ro d u cts...................
Furniture a nd fixtu re s...............................
S tone, clay, and g lass p ro d u cts...........
P rim ary m etal in du strie s.........................
B last fu rn a c e s a nd b asic steel
p ro d u cts...................................................
F abricated m etal p ro d u cts.....................

42.2
4.8
41.1
40.3
43.4
44.5

42.1
4.7
41.0
40.0
43.1
44.9

41.6
4.4
40.8
39.4
43.0
4 4.4

41.0
4.1
40.2
38.8
42.3
43.5

41.3
4.1
39.8
39.2
43.0
43.8

41.1
3.9
40.1
39.1
42.8
43.2

41.3
4.0
40.3
39.1
43.7
43.4

41.3
3.9
40.1
39.3
43.2
44.3

41.0
3.9
40.6
38.6
43.9
43.5

4 0.9
3.9
4 0.4
38.4
44.0
4 3.9

41.2
4.0
41.1
39.7
44.0
44.1

41.1
4.1
40.9
39.7
43.9
43.7

40.9
3.8
41.1
38.8
44.0
4 3.7

40.7
3.7
40.5
38.4
43.8
43.2

4 0.5
3.6
40.5
38.4
44.0
42.2

45.2
42.4

46.0
42.6

45.2
42.1

44.7
41.3

44.7
41.7

44.4
41.7

44.4
41.9

45.4
42.0

44.6
41.4

45.1
41.2

44.7
41.6

44.6
41.5

45.5
41.2

43.9
41.0

4 2.8
4 0.8

Industrial m a ch ine ry and equipm ent...
E lectronic a nd o th e r electrical
e q u ip m e n t................................................
T ra nspo rta tio n e qu ip m en t......................
M o to r veh icles and e q u ip m e n t...........
In stru m e n ts and related p ro d u cts........
M isce llan e o us m a nu factu rin g ...............

42.1

42.2

41.7

41.1

41.5

41.0

41.2

41.3

40.7

4 0.4

40.8

40.2

40.3

40.5

40.1

41.2
43.8
45.0
41.3
39.8

41.1
4 3.4
4 4.4
41.3
39.0

40.5
42.5
43.2
41.2
38.4

40.3
41.5
41.5
40.7
38.1

40.3
42.0
42.1
41.0
38.3

40.3
42.0
42.0
41.1
38.2

40.1
42.0
42.3
41.0
38.2

39.8
4 2.4
43.3
41.0
38.2

39.1
42.4
43.6
41.0
37.9

39.3
4 1.9
43.0
40.8
3 8.4

38.9
42.2
43.0
40.8
38.4

39.1
42.8
44.6
40.4
38.2

39.1
41.5
42.3
41.1
37.6

39.0
4 1.3
42.0
4 0.7
37.4

38.9
41.3
42.1
40.7
37.2

N o n d u rab le g o o d s .......................................
O ve rtim e h o u rs........................................
Food and kindred p ro d u cts....................
Te xtile mill p ro d u cts..................................
A pp a rel a nd other textile p ro d u cts......
P aper a nd a llied p ro d u cts......................

40.9
4.4
41.8
40.9
37.5
43.4

40.8
4.4
41.7
41.2
37.8
42.5

40.5
4.2
41.4
40.5
37.6
42.2

40.1
4.1
40.9
40.5
37.2
41.7

40.6
4.3
41.3
40.7
37.6
41.9

40.4
4.0
41.1
40.4
37.6
41.7

40.5
4.1
41.2
40.5
37.5
41.8

40.5
3.9
41.3
40.3
38.0
42.0

40.3
4.0
41.1
40.3
37.8
41.6

4 0.4
3.9
41.2
4 0.4
37.5
4 1.7

40.3
4.0
40.9
39.7
37.7
41.9

40.1
4.1
41.1
39.8
36.9
41.2

40.2
4.1
41.0
39.8
36.9
41.6

40.2
4.1
41.1
39.7
36.7
41.5

40.0
3.9
40.6
39.7
36.6
41.2

P rinting a nd p ub lish ing ............................
C h em icals a nd allied p ro d u cts..............
R ubber and m iscellaneous
plastics p ro d u cts.....................................
L ea the r and le athe r p ro d u cts................

38.1
43.0

38.3
4 2.5

38.2
42.1

3 7 .0
42.1

38.4
42.6

38.4
42.3

38.6
42.3

38.2
42.6

38.0
42.4

38.0
42.2

38.2
42.7

38.0
42.1

38.1
42.2

38.0
42.3

37.8
42.2

41.7
37.4

41.4
37.5

41.0
37.3

40.4
36.8

41.0
36.9

40.9
36.4

41.0
36.1

40.8
36.6

40.6
35.9

40.7
36.2

40.6
35.7

40.5
36.4

40.8
36.3

40.5
36.0

40.8
35.8

S E R V IC E -P R O D U C IN G ...................................

32.8

32.8

32.8

32.7

32.9

32.8

32.8

32.7

32.7

32.8

32.6

32.6

32.6

32.5

32.6

T R A N S P O R T A T IO N A N D
P U B LIC U T IL IT IE S .....................................

38.7

38.6

38.6

38.7

38.7

38.5

38.3

38.1

38.1

38.1

37.8

37.8

37.6

37.6

37.7

W H O L E S A L E T R A D E ....................................

38.3

38.5

38.4

38.3

38.3

38.1

38.3

38.2

38.2

38.3

38.2

38.3

38.3

38.1

38.2

R E TA IL T R A D E .................................................

29.0

28.9

28.9

28.7

29.1

28.9

28.8

28.8

28.8

2 8.7

28.6

28.6

28.7

28.7

28.8

p = p relim inary.
NOTE: S ee "N o te s on th e data" fo r a descriptio n of th e m ost recen t b en ch m a rk revision.

70

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

14. A v e ra g e hourly earn in g s o f p ro d u c tio n or nonsupervisory w orkers on p riv a te nonfarm payrolls, b y industry,
s e aso n ally a d ju s te d
Industry

A nnual average
1999

PRIVATE SECTOR (In current dollars).. $ 13 .24
14.83

T ra nspo rta tio n and pub lic utilitie s........

Finance, in su ra n ce , a nd real estate...

PRIVATE SECTOR (in constant (1982)
dollars).......................................................

2001

2000
A pr.

M ay

June

July

A ug.

Sept.

O ct.p N ov.p

2000

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

$13 .75

$13.97

$14 .03

$14.03

$14.11

$14.17

$14.21

$14 .24

$14.31

$ 14 .34

$14.40

$14 .45

$ 14.47

$14.52

15.67

15.74

15.79

15.78

15.86

15.90

15.93

16.01

16.04

16.05

16.16

17.54
18.22
14.78
14.09

17.73
18.28
14.81
14.13

17.74
18.26
14.86
14.18

17.69
18.35
14.93
14.24

17.67
18.36
14.96
14.28

17.73
18.38
14.97
14.30

17.84
18.51
15.04
14.37

15.40

15.63

15.65

17.05
17.19
13.90
13.17

17.24
17.88
14.38
13.62

17.38
18.16
14.57
13.84

17.43
18.17
14.58
13.88

17.49
18.28
14.54
13.83

17.52
18.30
14.63
13.94

17.55
18.33
14.66
13.96

17.53
18.15
14.72
14.04

12.73

13.24

13.46

13.53

13.54

13.62

13.68

13.73

13.76

13.84

13.87

13.93

13.98

14.01

14.05

16.68
15.68
9.72
15.61
14.40

16.74
15.74
9.74
15.64
14.48

16.76
15.70
9.79
15.74
14.49

16.91
15.86
9.83
15.86
14.54

16.88
15.84
9.84
15.91
14.61

16.95
15.81
9.87
15.99
14.71

17.02
15.95
9.87
16.01
14.76

17.10
15.90
9.92
16.06
14.80

17.14

7 .95

7.94

7.93

7.95

8.00

8.03

8.02

8 .06

8.11

15.69
14.59
9.09
14.62
13.37

16.22
15.20
9.46
15.07
13.91

16.42
15.44
9.61
15.28
14.16

16.50
15.55
9.65
15.35
14.23

16.51
15.53
9.64
15.44
14.25

16.64
15.60
9.69
15.55
14.35

7.86

7.89

7.92

7.94

7.90

7.92

15.91
9.99
16.07
14.83

p » pre lim ina ry.
NOTE: S ee "N o te s on the data" fo r a descriptio n of the m ost recen t ben ch m a rk revision.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

71

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force D a ta

15. A v e ra g e hourly earn in g s o f p ro d u c tio n or nonsupervisory w orkers o n p riv a te no n farm payrolls, b y industry
Industry

A nnual average

2000

2001

1999

2000

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

A pr.

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

O ct.p N ov.p

P R IV A TE S E C T O R ..........................................

$ 13 .24

$13.75

$ 13 .99

$ 14.04

$14.10

$ 14.16

$ 14.19

$ 14.27

$14.22

$14.22

$ 14.27

$14.28

$14.51

$14.50

$ 14 .54

17.59

17.67

17.53

17.67

17.70

17.78

M IN IN G .................................................................

17.05

17.24

17.32

17.54

17.67

17.61

17.57

17.60

17.49

C O N S T R U C T IO N .............................................

17.19

17.88

18.20

18.23

18.17

18.16

18.30

18.07

18.17

18.21

18.32

18.43

18.50

18.55

18.56

M A N U F A C T U R IN G .........................................

13.90

14.38

14.60

14.67

14.59

14.61

14.65

14.74

14.75

14.79

14.84

14.89

15.01

14.97

15.06

D urable g o o d s ..............................................
L um b e r and w o od p ro d u cts...................
Fu rniture a nd fixtu re s ...............................
S tone, clay, a nd g lass p ro d u cts...........
P rim ary m etal in du strie s.........................
B last fu rn aces and b asic steel
p ro d u cts...................................................
F abricated m etal p ro d u cts.....................

14.36
11.51
11.29
13.97
15.80

14.82
11.93
11.73
14.53
16.42

15.05
12.07
11.90
14.76
16.58

15.11
12.12
11.93
14.72
16.65

14.98
12.13
11.92
14.65
16.66

15.03
12.08
12.03
14.68
16.58

15.09
12.08
12.04
14.79
16.63

15.14
12.13
12.07
14.96
16.90

15.19
12.16
12.09
15.03
16.82

15.24
12.19
12.15
15.13
16.96

15.25
12.32
12.24
15.12
17.11

15.37
12.37
12.29
15.17
17.06

15.49
12.45
12.35
15.22
17.27

15.45
12.35
12.38
15.13
17.11

15.53
12.41
12.36
15.11
17.23

18.84
13.50

19.82
13.87

19.71
14.03

19.88
14.09

20.16
13.99

20.05
14.03

20.00
14.08

2 0.37
14.11

20.26
14.23

20.39
14.25

20.48
14.27

20.63
14.34

20.91
14.42

2 0.5 6
14.34

20.8 3
14.43

Industrial m achinery a nd equipm ent...
E lectronic and oth e r electrical
e q u ip m e n t.................................................
T ra nspo rta tio n e q u ip m e n t.......................
M otor veh icles and e q u ip m e n t...........
Instrum ents and related p ro d u cts........
M isce llan e o us m a nu factu rin g ...............

15.03

15.55

15.67

15.81

15.73

15.74

15.77

15.74

15.79

15.82

15.90

15.96

16.05

16.09

16.11

13.43
17.79
18.10
14.08
11.26

13.80
18.45
18.79
14.43
11.63

14.04
19.05
19.43
14.64
11.82

14.17
19.00
19.31
14.80
11.94

14.07
18.57
18.77
14.64
11.98

14.16
18.68
18.91
14.60
11.98

14.26
18.76
19.02
14.73
12.05

14.39
18.77
19.13
14.80
12.04

14.38
18.83
19.18
14.75
12.10

14.51
18.90
19.25
14.81
12.07

14.59
18.80
19.04
14.98
12.12

14.72
19.08
19.39
15.00
12.23

14.84
19.31
19.68
15.06
12.37

14.77
19.38
19.82
15.00
12.27

14.87
19.50
19.95
15.06
12.40

13.21
12.11
19.87
10.81
8.92
15.88

13.69
12.50
21.57
11.16
9.30
16.25

13.89
12.69
21.8 5
11.27
9.33
16.50

13.97
12.71
21.76
11.27
9.37
16.61

12.97
12.70
21.34
11.32
9.39
16.53

13.97
12.65
21.49
11.27
9.36
16.54

13.97
12.68
22.63
11.31
9.46
16.56

14.12
12.79
22.59
11.30
9.44
16.74

14.07
12.83
23.01
11.29
9.39
16.72

14.11
12.86
23.1 7
11.32
9 .45
16.90

14.23
12.93
23.6 3
11.37
9.40
16.99

14.17
12.87
21.90
11.39
9 .44
16.87

14.31
12.95
21.7 0
11.40
9.56
17.12

14.27
12.93
21.70
11.36
9.48
17.12

14.37
13.14
22.4 7
11.45
9 .58
17.16

13.96
17.42
21.4 3

14.40
18.15
22.00

14.56
18.35
2 2.23

14.66
18.47
22.31

14.59
18.34
22.10

14.64
18.41
22.21

14.69
18.33
21.83

14.75
18.64
22.09

14.75
18.52
21.8 3

14.74
18.55
21.78

14.83
18.69
22.02

14.87
18.54
22.20

15.01
18.86
2 2.27

14.96
18.62
2 2 .3 5

14.93
18.63
22.2 9

12.40
9.71

12.85
10.18

13.10
10.32

13.20
10.37

13.24
10.51

13.31
10.35

13.19
10.46

13.33
10.37

13.30
10.26

13.30
10.30

13.38
10.25

13.44
10.35

13.51
10.25

13.48
10.17

13.53
10.28

T R A N S P O R T A T IO N A N D
P U B LIC U T IL IT IE S ......................................

15.69

16.22

16.43

16.53

16.56

16.68

16.65

16.78

16.70

16.83

16.89

16.97

' 17.07

17.10

17.14

W H O L E S A L E T R A D E ...................................

14.59

15.20

15.45

15.58

15.56

15.62

15.58

15.86

15.66

15.77

15.88

15.75

16.03

15.86

15.91

R E T A IL T R A D E ................................................

9.09

9.46

9.61

9.65

9.69

9.72

9 .74

9 .78

9.78

9.77

9.77

9.79

9.92

9 .94

9.99

F IN A N C E , IN S U R A N C E ,
A N D R E A L E S T A T E ....................................

14.62

15.07

15.25

15.32

15.45

15.63

15.67

15.81

15.74

15.75

15.85

15.84

16.05

15.97

16.04

S E R V IC E S ...........................................................

13.37

13.91

14.20

14.33

14.39

14.47

14.48

14.58

14.46

14.39

14.46

14.46

14.78

14.79

14.88

N o n d u rab le g o o d s .......................................
Food a nd kindred p ro d u cts ....................
Te xtile mill p ro d u cts..................................
A pp a rel a nd other te xtile p ro d u cts......
P aper a nd allied p ro d u cts......................
P rinting a nd p ub lish ing ...........................
C hem icals a nd allied p ro d u cts..............
P etroleum a nd coal p ro d u cts................
R ubber and m iscellaneous
plastics p ro d u cts......................................
L eather a nd le athe r p ro d u cts ................

p = pre lim ina ry.
NOTE: S ee "N o te s on the data" fo r a descriptio n of the m ost recen t ben ch m a rk revision.

M onthly Labor R eview
72

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J a n u a ry 2002

16. A verag e w eekly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls, by industry
In d u s try

A n n u a l a v e ra g e
1999

PRIVATE SECTOR
Current dollars............................... $456.78
Seasonally adjusted.................
Constant (1982) dollars.............. 271.25

2000

2000

2001

Nov.

D ec.

Jan.

Fe b .

M a r.

A p r.

M ay

June

J u ly

Aug.

S e p t.

O c t.p

N o v .p

272.16

$479.86
479.17
272.03

$480.17
479.83
272.51

$477.99
482.63
269.74

$481.44
483.97
270.62

$482.46
486.03
270.89

$486.61
485.98
271.70

$484.90
487.01
269.39

$489.17
489.40
271.46

$493.74
490.43
275.22

$491.23
489.60
273.82

$497.69
492.75
275.88

$493.00
491.98
274.50

$495.05
495.13
276.10

$474.38
-

MINING................................................

736.56

743.04

743.03

747.20

750.98

751.95

757.27

765.60

769.56

768.68

772.18

764.31

777.48

771.72

762.76

CONSTRUCTION..............................

672.13

702.68

704.34

694.56

692.28

682.82

702.52

695.70

728.62

728.40

740.13

739.04

736.30

730.87

725.70

MANUFACTURING
Current dollars..............................
Constant (1982) dollars...............

579.63
344.20

598.21
343.21

607.36
344.31

607.34
344.69

596.73
336.76

591.71
332.61

597.72
335.61

588.13
328.38

600.33
333.52

603.43
334.87

598.05
333.36

607.51
338.63

615.41
341.14

609.28
340.15

612.94
342.08

605.99
473.06
454.99

623.92
489.13
469.20

633.61
494.87
474.81

630.09
486.01
476.01

615.68
477.92
464.88

613.22
473.54
461.95

620.20
483.20
467.15

607.11
483.99
457.45

624.31
497.34
462.22

626.36
498.57
468.99

617.63
502.66
481.03

633.24
509.64
491.60

639.74
517.92
489.06

631.91
503.88
479.11

635.18
503.85
478.33

606.30
703.10

626.24
737.26

637.63
746.10

624.13
735.93

613.84
731.37

610.69
716.26

631.53
718.42

638.79
730.08

665.83
731.67

670.26
744.54

669.82
742.57

676.58
743.82

686.42
766.79

670.26
737.44

669.37
737.44

851.57
572.40

911.72
590.86

902.72
597.68

890.62
596.01

901.15
581.98

882.20
580.84

884.00
585.73

920.72
567.22

899.54
589.12

919.59
589.95

919.55
582.22

920.10
595.11

959.77
598.43

898.47
590.81

899.86
595.96

632.76

656.21

658.14

662.44

655.94

648.49

651.30

628.03

644.23

640.71

640.77

640.00

648.42

650.04

650.84

553.32
779.20

567.18
800.73

575.64
821.06

585.22
807.50

567.02
772.51

566.40
775.22

568.97
789.80

554.02
765.82

559.38
804.04

570.24
799.47

558.80
765.16

577.02
814.72

584.70
809.09

580.46
808.15

585.88
815.10

814.50

834.28

852.98

826.47

778.96

786.66

808.35

791.98

840.08

839.30

780.64

858.98

844.27

842.35

849.87

581.50
488.15

595.96
453.57

607.56
457.43

621.72
460.88

603.17
454.04

605.90
454.04

605.40
461.52

594.96
450.30

602.48
458.59

602.77
463.49

605.19
458.14

606.00
468.41

618.97
467.59

609.00
461.35

617.46
463.76

540.29
506.20
763.01
442.13

558.55
521.25
877.90
459.79

569.49
534.25
895.85
460.94

569.98
528.74
892.16
462.07

565.79
520.70
832.26
459.59

560.20
509.80
831.66
449.67

561.59
513.54
893.89
458.06

559.15
510.32
885.53
444.09

564.21
522.18
906.59
454.99

568.63
528.55
956.92
458.46

569.20
528.84
952.29
444.57

571.05
535.39
878.19
456.74

582.42
543.90
885.36
458.28

576.51
539.18
881.02
450.99

581.99
542.68
907.79
458.00

334.50
689.19

351.54
690.63

352.67
706.20

353.25
705.93

349.31
697.57

352.87
683.10

355.70
687.24

346.45
688.01

355.88
690.54

357.21
701.35

349.68
708.48

350.22
695.04

350.85
722.46

346.97
715.62

351.59
717.29

531.88
749.06
908.63

551.52
771.38
932.80

564.93
778.04
955.89

564.41
788.67
952.64

555.88
781.28
987.87

557.78
778.74
957.25

565.57
773.53
936.51

554.60
790.34
965.33

556.08
783.40
910.31

557.17
782.81
934.36

563.54
790.59
953.47

568.03
778.68
954.60

577.89
797.78
955.38

571.47
787.63
938.70

573.31
793.64
931.72

517.08
363.15

531.99
381.75

539.72
390.10

543.84

Leather and leather products....

382.65

544.16
384.67

543.05
373.64

538.15
375.51

529.20
369.17

539.98
370.39

543.97
378.01

535.20
360.80

544.32
379.85

556.61
377.20

548.64
368.15

554.73
372.14

TRANSPORTATION AND
PUBLIC UTILITIES........................

607.20

626.09

632.56

638.06

632.59

637.18

362.70

641.00

632.93

642.91

650.27

646.56

648.66

642.96

644.46

W HOLESALE TRADE......................

558.80

585.20

593.28

596.71

589.72

590.44

592.04

607.44

598.59

603.99

611.38

603.23

620.36

604.27

607.76

RETAIL TRADE.................................

263.61

273.39

274.85

278.89

273.26

276.05

276.62

281.66

280.69

283.33

288.22

286.85

285.70

283.29

284.72

FINANCE, INSURANCE,
AND REAL ESTATE.....................

529.24

547.04

549.00

553.05

556.20

567.37

564.12

580.23

565.78

570.15

581.70

571.82

589.04

573.32

579.04

SERVICES...........................................

435.86

454.86

462.92

467.16

464.80

471.72

472.05

476.77

469.95

471.99

478.63

474.29

483.31

479.20

483.60

Durable goods...................................
Lumber and w ood products......
Furniture and fixtures.................
Stone, clay, and glass
products............... ......................
Primary metal industries............
Blast furnaces and basic
steel products..........................
Fabricated metal products........
Industrial machinery and
Electronic and other electrical
Transportation equipm ent.........
Motor vehicles and
equipm ent...............................
Instruments and related
products.....................................
Miscellaneous manufacturing...
Nondurable goods.........................
Food and kindred products.......

Apparel and other textile

Printing and publishing...............
Chemicals and allied products..
Petroleum and coal products....
Rubber and miscellaneous

p - preliminary.
NOTE: See "Notes on the data" for a description of the most recent benchmark revision. Dash indicates data not available.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

73

C urrent Labor Statistics:

17.

Labor Force Data

Diffusion in d exes o f e m p lo y m e n t c h a n g e , s e a s o n a lly a d ju s te d

[In p e rc e n t]

T im esp an and year

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

Aug. Sept.

Oct.

Nov

Dec.

Private nonfarm payrolls, 356 industries
O ve r 1-m on th span:
1998........................................................
1999........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

63.2
55.1
55.7
53.7

56.2
59.6
59.3
50.4

59.3
52.8
61.0
55.8

60.2
57.2
54.2
45.0

58.9
58.2
47.7
46.6

57.1
54.2
60.5
44.3

55.4
57.1
57.8
45.5

58.4
54.4
55.1
43.5

54.8
55.2
52.0
45.3

55.0
57.9
54.8
39.4

58.2
59.9
55.1
39.2

56.4
56.8
54.2
-

O ve r 3 -m o n th span:
1 99 8 ........................................................
1 9 9 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

65.3
60.8
61.6
51.7

66.1
57.8
63.3
54.1

64.6
58.5
61.9
48.6

65.7
55.8
56.2
49.2

62.2
58.1
55.1
42.5

57.9
57.9
57.9
42.4

57.5
57.2
61.5
40.7

58.4
59.2
56.4
41.5

59.1
59.8
54.1
39.0

59.2
59.1
53.3
36.4

59.3
61.0
55.7
-

59.2
60.6
53.3

O ve r 6-m o n th span:
199 8 ........................................................
199 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

70.4
59.8
63.5
52.0

67.4
59.8
60.6
50.6

65.0
58.2
62.6
48.6

62.5
60.3
63.7
45.3

63.6
56.7
61.5
43.5

60.5
59.2
55.5
39.4

59.2
61.8
56.1
37.4

58.6
60.8
58.6
36.1

57.9
62.2
54.2
-

59.6
61.2
54.8
-

60.6
62.3
51.8
-

59.9
64.9
54.2
-

O ve r 12-m onth span:
1998........................................................
199 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

69.7
61.2
62.5
49.6

67.6
60.2
63.0
47.5

67.4
58.2
61.8
44.8

66.0
60.8
59.5
42.4

64.0
60.8
58.4
39.7

62.7
61.6
56.8
-

61.9
62.2
55.7
-

62.0
61.3
56.5
-

60.9
63.9
54.2
-

59.3
63.0
53.4
-

60.8
61.3
53.0
-

58.8
60.9
51.8
-

-

Manufacturing payrolls, 139 industries
O ve r 1-m on th span:
199 8 ........................................................
1999........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

57.4
46.9
44.9
37.9

51.5
44.5
56.6
32.4

53.7
43.0
55.5
41.5

53.3
42.3
46.7
31.3

43.8
50.4
41.2
29.4

48.2
39.3
54.8
33.1

38.2
51.5
53.7
39.0

51.5
39.3
38.6
28.3

41.9
45.2
34.6
37.5

41.5
46.3
41.5
30.9

41.2
53.3
43.8
25.4

43.4
46.7
44.1
-

O ve r 3 -m o n th span:
199 8 ........................................................
199 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

59.6
41.2
50.0
28.3

59.6
39.0
54.0
29.4

55.9
38.2
52.9
24.6

50.4
41.8
42.3
26.5

46.7
40.8
43.0
22.4

37.9
45.2
48.5
24.6

41.5
39.0
48.2
21.3

41.5
45.2
33.6
22.4

41.9
40.8
28.7
21.0

38.2
44.9
30.5
22.4

36.8
46.3
39.0
-

40.8
46.0
35.7
-

O ve r 6-m o n th span:
1 99 8 ........................................................
1 99 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

63.2
36.0
51.5
26.8

54.4
38.2
44.5
25.4

50.4
37.5
48.5
19.9

40.4
41.2
55.1
20.6

44.5
36.8
43.8
20.6

40.1
39.7
34.9
16.2

37.5
43.0
33.5
15.1

36.4
41.5
34.6
14.7

34.9
46.0
30.1
-

40.1
40.4
29.4
-

37.1
46.3
25.0
-

34.2
51.5
27.9

O ve r 12-m onth span:
1 99 8 ........................................................
199 9 ........................................................
2 0 0 0 ........................................................
2 0 0 1 ........................................................

54.8
38.6
46.3
19.1

52.2
34.6
45.2
16.9

51.8
32.4
41.2
15.1

46.7
36.0
37.9
16.9

40.4
37.9
33.8
14.0

40.1
39.0
31.3
-

38.2
40.1
31.3
-

37.5
40.4
31.3
-

36.4
44.5
27.6
-

34.6
46.0
25.4
-

35.7
44.9
24.3
-

34.2
44.5
21.3
-

Dash in dica te s d ata not available.
N O TE: Fig ure s a re th e p erce n t o f industries w ith em plo ym e n t
in crea sin g plus one -h alf of th e industries w ith unchanged
e m plo ym e n t, w h e re 50 p erce n t indicates an equal balance
betw e en in du strie s w ith in ceasing and decreasing e m ploym ent.

74

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

-

Data fo r th e 2 m ost recen t m onths show n in each span are
prelim inary. S ee the "D efinitions" in th is section. S ee "N otes on
th e d ata ” fo r a descriptio n of th e m ost recen t benchm ark
revision.

18.

E stab lish m en t size and em p lo ym en t covered under Ul, p rivate ow nersh ip, by m ajor industry division, first q u arter 2000
S ize of e stablishm ents
In d u stry , esta b lis h m e n ts, and
e m p lo y m e n t

Total

Few er than
5 w o rk ers'

5 to 9
w orkers

10 to 19
w o rk ers

20 to 49
w orkers

50 to 99
w o rkers

100 to 249
w orkers

250 to 499
w o rk ers

5 00 to 999
w o rk ers

1,000 or
m ore
w o rk ers

T o ta l, all in d u strie s 2
E stablishm ents, first q u a rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

7,544,641
108,219,163

4,425,855
6,833,324

1,302,659
8,617,085

850,579
11,473,999

590,880
17,884,776

206,465
14,216,170

119,188
17,898,597

31,316
10,659,869

11,724
7,9 7 2,44 3

5,975
12,662,900

A g ricu ltu re , fo restry, a n d fishing
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

200,532
1,702,575

124,113
179,162

37,651
249,010

22,736
302,609

11,185
326,736

2,875
196,672

1,472
216,446

370
126,193

106
6 9,476

24
36,271

M ining
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

27,286
524,551

14,100
22,081

4,325
28,9 73

3,730
51,207

3,202
97,241

1,023
69,762

591
89,714

2 14
74,836

76
52,916

25
37,821

C on s tru c tio n
E stablishm ents, first q ua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

750,528
6,311,433

480,477
703,351

126,855
831,472

76,279
1,025,169

46,546
1,389,882

13,238
898,511

5,748
846,989

1,054
3 47,872

272
182,570

59
85,617

M a nufacturing
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

406,405
18,433,652

147,552
251,162

67,397
453,495

61,163
842,917

61,505
1,922,856

30,575
2 ,145,098

24,258
3,738,404

8,644
2 ,976,720

3,601
2,447,483

1,710
3,655,517

T ra n s p o rta tio n and public utilities
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

315,711
6,679,170

174,930
2 72,359

49,171
325,336

36,484
498,681

30,723
945,921

12,953
895,020

7,916
1,190,918

2,126
726,378

892
618,762

516
1,205,795

W h o le s a le tra d e
E stablishm ents, first q u a rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

665,681
6,949,297

401,881
621,889

110,078
729,677

77,360
1,047,490

52,159
1,565,494

15,193
1,035,485

7,023
1,035,929

1,477
496,162

4 14
274 ,98 8

96
142,183

R etail tra d e
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

1,460,044
2 2,811,016

624,884
1,154,935

329,245
2,204,437

235,862
3,188,875

179,189
5,441,488

58,004
3,944,499

26,385
3,881,052

4,982
1,659,908

1,170
764,717

323
571,105

F in ance, in surance, an d real estate
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

671,901
7,385,176

438,944
714,241

114,369
751,347

62,167
827,113

35,553
1,065,414

11,632
798,270

6,021
912,146

1,803
622,912

900
616,408

512
1,077,325

S ervice s
E stablishm ents, first qua rte r ....................
E m ploym ent, M arch ....................................

2,893,865
37,121,452

1,882,763
2,772,286

451,723
2,967,726

271,232
3,644,616

169,884
5,103,419

60,870
4,226,235

39,747
5,983,290

10,644
3 ,628,294

4,292
2 ,944,320

2,710
5 ,851,266

' Includes esta b lishm e n ts th a t reported no w o rkers in M arch 2000.

N O TE:
D ata fo r 2000 are prelim inary and sub ject to revision.
not add to totals d ue to rounding.

D etail m ay

2 Includes d ata fo r n onclassifiable e stablishm ents, not show n separately.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

75

Current Labor Statistics:

19.

Labor Force D a ta

A n n u al data: establishm en ts, em ploym ent, and w ages covered under Ul and UCFE by ow nersh ip
Y ear

A verage
establishm ents

A verage
annual
em ploym ent

Total annual w ages
(in thousands)

A verag e annual
w ages
per em ployee

A verag e
w eekly
w age

Total covered (Ul and UC FE)
1991 .............................................................
1 9 9 2 .............................................................
1 9 9 3 .............................................................
1994 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1996 .............................................................
1 9 9 7 .............................................................
1 9 9 8 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 0 0 0 .............................................................

6,382,523
6,532,608
6,679,934
6,826,677
7,040,677
7,189,168
7,369,473
7,634,018
7,820,860
7,899,243

106,884,831
107,413,728
109,422,571
112,611,287
115,487,841
117,963,132
121,044,432
124,183,549
127,042,282
129,925,813

$2,626,972,030
2,781,676,477
2,884,472,282
3,033,676,678
3,215,921,236
3,414,514,808
3,674,031,718
3,967,072,423
4 ,235,579,204
4,585,814,470

$ 24,578
25,897
26,361
26,939
27,846
28,946
30,353
31,945
33,340
35,296

$473
498
507
518
536
557
584
614
641
679

$24,335
25,622
26,055
26,633
27,567
28,658
30,058
31,676
33,094
35,049

$468
493
501
512
530
551
578
609
636
674

$24,178
2 5,547
25,934
26,496
27,441
28,582
30,064
31,762
33,244
35,305

$465
491
499
510
528
550
578
611
639
679

$27,132
27,789
28,643
29,518
30,497
31,397
32,521
33,605
34,681
36,296

$522
534
551
568
586
604
625
646
667
698

$ 24,595
25,434
26,095
26,717
27,552
28,320
29,134
30,251
31,234
32,382

$473
489
502
514
530
545
560
582
601
623

$32,609
35,066
36,940
38,038
38,523
40,414
42,732
43,688
44,287
46,231

$627
674
710
731
741
777
822
840
852
889

Ul covered
1991 .............................................................
1992 .............................................................
1 9 9 3 .............................................................
1994 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1 9 9 6 .............................................................
1 9 9 7 .............................................................
1 9 9 8 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 0 0 0 .............................................................

6,336,151
6,485,473
6,632,221
6,778,300
6,990,594
7,137,644
7,317,363
7,586,767
7,771,198
7,849,064

103,755,832
104,288,324
106,351,431
109,588,189
112,539,795
115,081,246
118,233,942
121,400,660
124,255,714
127,055,641

$2,524,937,018
2,672,081,827
2,771,023,411
2,918,684,128
3,102,353,355
3,298,045,286
3,553,933,885
3,845,494,089
4 ,112,169,533
4 ,453,123,123

P rivate industry covered
1991 .............................................................
1 9 9 2 .............................................................
1 9 9 3 .............................................................
1994 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1996 .............................................................
1 9 9 7 .............................................................
1 9 9 8 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 0 0 0 .............................................................

6,162,684
6,308,719
6,454,381
6,596,158
6,803,454
6,946,858
7,121,182
7,381,518
7,560,567
7,642,451

89,007,096
89,349,803
91,202,971
94,146,344
96,894,844
99,268,446
102,175,161
105,082,368
107,619,457
110,064,902

$ 2,152,021,705
2,282,598,431
2 ,365,301,493
2,494,458,555
2,658,927,216
2 ,837,334,217
3,071,807,287
3,337,621,699
3,577,738,557
3,885,818,913

S tate g overnm ent covered
1991 .............................................................
1992 .............................................................
1993 .............................................................
1994 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1996 .............................................................
1 9 9 7 .............................................................
1 9 9 8 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 00 0 .............................................................

58,499
58,801
59,185
60,686
60,763
62,146
65,352
67,347
70,538
65,106

4,005,321
4,044,914
4,088,075
4,162,944
4,201,836
4,191,726
4,214,451
4,240,779
4,296,673
4,370,562

$ 108,672,127
112,405,340
117,095,062
122,879,977
128,143,491
131,605,800
137,057,432
142,512,445
149,011,194
158,632,362

Local govern m e nt covered
1991 .............................................................
1 9 9 2 .............................................................
1 9 9 3 .............................................................
1 9 9 4 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1996 .............................................................
1997 .............................................................
1998 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 0 0 0 .............................................................

114,936
117,923
118,626
121,425
126,342
128,640
130,829
137,902
140,093
141,507

10,742,558
10,892,697
11,059,500
11,278,080
11,442,238
11,621,074
11,844,330
12,077,513
12,339,584
12,620,177

$264,215,610
277,045,557
288,594,697
301,315,857
315,252,346
329,105,269
345,069,166
365,359,945
385,419,781
4 08,671,848

Federal G overn m ent covered (U C FE )
1991 .............................................................
1992 .............................................................
1 9 9 3 .............................................................
1 9 9 4 .............................................................
1 9 9 5 .............................................................
1996 .............................................................
1 9 9 7 .............................................................
1998 .............................................................
1999 .............................................................
2 0 0 0 .............................................................

46,372
47,136
47,714
48,377
50,083
51,524
52,110
47,252
49,661
50,178

3,128,999
3,125,404
3,071,140
3,023,098
2,948,046
2,881,887
2,810,489
2,782,888
2,786,567
2,870,173

$102,035,012
109,594,650
113,448,871
114,992,550
113,567,881
116,469,523
120,097,833
121,578,334
123,409,672
132,691,347

N O TE: Data fo r 2000 are prelim inary and subject to revision. Detail m ay not add to totals due to rounding.

76

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

20.

A nnual data: establishm en ts, em ploym ent, and w ages covered under Ul and U CFE, by S tate
A verage
establishm ents
State
2000

A verag e annual
em ploym ent

19992000
change

2000

Total annual w ages
(in thousands)

19992000
change

2000

A v erag e w eekly
w age

19992000
change

2000

19992000
change

T otal U nited S tates ...............................................

7,899,243

78,383

129,925,813

2,883,531

$4,585,814,470

$350 ,2 3 5,2 66

$679

$38

A la b a m a .....................................................................
A la s k a .........................................................................
A riz o n a ........................................................................
A rkan sa s ....................................................................
C a lifo rn ia ....................................................................

113,816
18,848
115,922
72,335
1,038,090

1,942
60
3,340
501
-21,749

1,877,787
275,766
2,221,413
1,130,822
14,887,118

6,735
6,833
70,875
17,681
493,044

54,525,432
9,686,168
72,431,416
2 9,748,658
6 13,261,503

1,957,806
533,535
6 ,786,654
1,506,781
7 2,373,274

558
675
627
506
792

18
21
40
18
69

C o lora d o ....................................................................
C o n n e c tic u t...............................................................
D e la w a re ....................................................................
D istrict of C o lu m b ia ................................................
F lo rid a .........................................................................

148,477
107,903
24,711
28,380
4 45,738

6,276
1,812
544
1,445
10,141

2,186,703
1,676,740
408,933
635,811
7,063,073

81,451
24,375
6,793
20,107
218,424

81,272,401
7 6,199,312
14,998,631
33,709,739
2 15 ,772,868

9,291,399
5,672,870
860,702
2,3 7 9,90 4
17,723,960

715
874
705
1,020
587

57
53
29
41
31

G e o r g ia ......................................................................
H aw aii .........................................................................
Id a h o ...........................................................................
Illin o is ..........................................................................
In d ia n a ........................................................................

227,630
34,022
45,411
322,342
152,947

9,218
1,559
1,140
2,739
-988

3,896,423
553,124
563,015
5,940,495
2,936,489

101,668
15,379
20,607
89,976
29,633

133,188,119
16,941,939
15,600,609
2 26,000,387
91,075,756

10,496,682
920,213
1,473,980
13,651,771
3,790,545

657
589
533
732
596

35
16
32
34
19

I o w a .............................................................................
K ansas ........................................................................
K e n tu c k y ....................................................................
L o u is ia n a ....................................................................
M a in e ..........................................................................

97,118
80,523
107,838
117,427
44,865

2,506
1,082
2,501
760
956

1,442,785
1,313,069
1,762,549
1,869,453
590,818

11,803
14,272
31,082
21,551
17,005

4 0,294,107
38,547,821
50,812,110
52,115,533
16,344,365

1,725,399
2,1 4 0,62 7
2,707,022
1,822,492
9 16,386

537
565
554
536
532

19
26
20
13
15

M aryland ....................................................................
M a s s a c h u s e tts .........................................................
M ic h ig a n .....................................................................
M in n e s o ta ..................................................................
M is s is s ip p i................. ...............................................

146,555
187,401
263,191
155,404
64,109

1,113
354
4,550
4,625
368

2,406,502
3,274,924
4,587,071
2,607,997
1,137,236

59,623
83,282
84,305
57,205
-1,948

87,530,844
145,163,150
169,793,373
92,369,487
28,6 54 ,6 6 4

6,588,302
16,375,342
8,817,850
6,952,226
868,342

699
852
712
681
485

36
76
24
37
16

M is s o u ri......................................................................
M o n ta n a .....................................................................
N e b ra s k a ....................................................................
N evada ........................................................................
N ew H am pshire ......................................................

162,765
38,370
52,456
48,961
46,020

1,988
1,606
622
1,029
590

2,676,614
379,122
884,025
1,017,912
606,061

31,191
7,883
17,415
41,985
14,836

8 4,007,364
9,199,101
2 4,454,268
32,853,672
2 1,049,033

4,7 3 3,26 5
564,255
1,374,587
2,392,199
2,0 4 6,60 6

604
467
532
621
668

28
20
20
21
50

N ew J e r s e y ...............................................................
N ew M exico ..............................................................
N ew Y ork ...................................................................
North C a ro lin a ..........................................................
North D a k o ta ............................................................

269,672
48,013
528,370
222,892
23,281

-16,049
719
4,064
7,928
224

3,878,717
717,395
8,475,567
3,861,729
309,221

86,340
16,491
183,025
57,360
3,261

169,464,775
19,726,620
380,908,938
120,011,633
7,630,932

13,834,368
1,315,800
3 1,139,715
7,926,195
364,043

840
529
864
598
475

51
24
53
31
18

O hio .............................................................................
O k la h o m a ...................................................................
O re g o n ........................................................................
P e n n s y lv a n ia .............................................................
R hode Is la n d ............................................................

281,502
89,227
110,196
315,172
33,337

1,587
1,297
-150
13,155
631

5,514,414
1,451,870
1,607,997
5,560,251
467,542

63,287
29,061
31,995
100,777
10,706

179,272,488
39,171,359
52,686,533
189,040,902
15,250,403

8,134,650
2,4 4 4,58 6
4,032,231
10,540,425
1,011,138

625
519
630
654
627

21
23
36
25
28

S outh C a ro lin a .........................................................
S outh D a k o ta ...........................................................
Te n ne sse e ................................................................
T exas ..........................................................................
Utah ............................................................................

109,330
27,147
125,665
488,114
66,182

-2,033
439
367
6,744
2,320

1,821,033
364,095
2,667,270
9,287,230
1,044,343

28,888
8,310
40,226
270,589
26,719

5 1,303,078
9,030,576
81,507,681
324,566,175
30,522,121

2,678,327
574,769
4,0 6 8,33 6
2 7,938,668
2,135,151

542
477
588
672
562

20
20
21
39
26

V erm o n t .....................................................................
V ir g in ia ........................................................................
W ashington ...............................................................
W e st V ir g in ia ............................................................
W is c o n s in ...................................................................
W y o m in g ....................................................................

23,900
193,285
220,904
46,823
145,792
20,869

835
3,752
8,764
14
898
246

296,354
3,429,323
2,708,125
686,717
2,735,929
230,843

8,365
102,201
64,395
6,109
44,478
5,878

8,570,480
120,543,345
100,360,839
18,463,946
83,984,601
6,195,215

622,830
10,665,369
5,8 8 3,35 6
755,682
4,299,145
425 ,50 5

556
676
713
517
590
516

25
41
26
17
21
23

P uerto R ic o ...............................................................
V irgin Islands ...........................................................

52,159
3,191

-10
-32

1,027,554
42,220

25,164
1,282

19,314,130
1,166,654

716,892
97,695

361
531

4
29

NO TE: D ata fo r 2000 are prelim inary and sub ject to revision. Detail m ay not add to totals due to rounding.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

77

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force Data

21. A nnual data: E m ploym ent and average annual pay fo r all w orkers
covered under Ul and UCFE in th e 316 largest U.S. counties
A verag e annual pay

E m ploym ent
P ercent
change,
19 99-20003

R anked by
percent
change,
1999-20004

20002

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

United S tates5 ...................... 129,925,813

2.3

-

35,296

5.9

Jefferson, A L ........................
M adison, A L ..........................
M obile, A L ..............................
M ontgom ery, A L .................
T uscaloosa, A L ....................
A nchorage, A K ....................
M aricopa, A Z .......................
P im a, A Z ................................
P ulaski, A R ...........................
S ebastian, A R ......................

384,552
154,344
169,477
132,028
76,436
129,828
1,545,451
328,582
243,137
75,188

.5
1.7
-.1
.2
.7
2.1
3.6
3.2
.4
1.0

269
187
292
285
252
157
47
68
275
234

34,015
35,827
28,611
28,893
29,067
36,619
35,099
29,204
30,796
27,025

3.8
4.9
2.4
3.2
2.5
2.6
7.8
3.5
3.8
4.9

W ashington, A R ..................
A lam eda, C A ........................
C ontra C osta, C A ...............
Fresno, CA ...........................
K ern, C A ................................
Los A ngeles, C A .................
M arin, C A ...............................
M onterey, C A .......................
O range, C A ...........................
P lacer, C A ............................

80,009
696,859
337,177
323,438
238,788
4,101,907
112,007
164,623
1,396,170
107,066

3.2
3.1
3.2
2.1
2.3
1.8
2.4
2.5
3.7
8.8

69
83
70
158
139
178
123
115
43
3

26,406
45,062
42,326
26,197
28,536
39,671
42,669
29,986
39,208
33,476

3.8
9.7
3.7
5.0
5.6
5.0
8.6
5.2
4.7
5.5

Riverside, C A ........................
S acram ento, C A .................
S an B ernardino, C A ...........
S an Diego, C A .....................
S an Francisco, C A ..............
S an Joaquin, C A .................
S an Luis O bispo, C A .........
S an M ateo, C A ....................
S anta B arbara, C A ............
S an ta C lara, C A ..................

470,044

5.4

574,101

2.6

528,842
1,197,997
609,626
201,320
94,926
379,195
177,197
1,035,451

3.0
3.3
3.7
3.2
3.7
5.5
3.2
6.6

12
107
86
61
44
71
45
11
72
8

29,1 13
37,725
29,920
37,516
57,626
29,250
28,067
66,943
32,518
76,076

4.7
7.1
3.9
8.0
12.2
4.8
6.1
30.2
8.0
24.5

S an ta Cruz, C A ....................
S olano, C A ...........................
S onom a, C A .........................
S tanislaus, C A .....................
Tulare, C A ............................
V entura, C A ..........................
Y olo, C A ................................
A dam s, C O ...........................
A rapahoe, C O ......................
B oulder, C O ..........................

101,822
117,379
191,062
162,064
133,264
287,744
84,687
144,793
284,254
179,721

3.2
3.9
3.2
2.4
3.8
3.5
1.6
3.5
4.0
8.2

73
38
74
124
41
51
196
52
37
4

35,826
31,646
35,796
28,202
23,722
37,102
33,395
33,427
46,250
45,565

15.5
8.4
11.5
4.4
4.5
9.2
3.2
4.8
7.8
13.9

Denver, C O ...........................
El Paso, C O ..........................
Jefferson, C O ......................
Larim er, C O ..........................
F airfield, C T ..........................
Hartford, C T ..........................
New Haven, C T ..................
New London, C T .................
New Castle, DE ...................
W ashington, DC .................

469,163
237,761
210,529
119,151
4 28,235
501,880
367,661
123,056
284,540
635,811

3.2
3.4
2.6
5.1
1.3
1.2
1.2
.6
.3
3.3

75
57
108
18
216
224
225
259
282
62

44,340
33,036
36,194
32,394
61,105
43,626
38,331
36,727
40,660
53,018

11.6
7.7
5.2
7.9
8.4
6.2
5.3
3.7
5.0
4.2

A lachua, FL ..........................
Brevard, F L ...........................
Brow ard, F L ..........................
C ollier, F L ..............................
Duval, F L ...............................
E scam bia, F L ........................
H illsborough, F L .................
Lee, FL ...................................
Leon, FL ................................
M anatee, FL .........................

117,619
181,273
644,526
103,355
434,284
125,606
588,773
162,425
141,887
(6)

2.5
3.3
3.4
7.0
4.1
.9
2.5
4.5
2.1
( 6)

116
63
58
5
32
242
117
24
159
( 6)

26,150
32,107
33,232
29,941
32,737
26,698
31,694
28,138
29,245
<è )

3.9
7.2
6.5
6.9
4.5
4.4
4.8
6.3
4.0
(6)

M arion, FL ............................
M iam i-D ade, F L ...................
O range, FL ...........................
Palm Beach, F L ...................
Pinellas, F L ...........................
Polk, FL .................................
S arasota, F L .........................
S em inole, FL ........................
V olusia, F L ............................
Bibb, G A ................................

83,350
980,123
611,261
481,712
437,531
183,212
( 6)
139,595
141,793
89,011

1.7
2.3
3.2
4.1

188
140
76
33
28
109
( 6)
23
204
305

24,938
33,328
31,122
35,219
31,166
28,023
( è)
30,842
25,052
29,2 64

3.2
3.9
4.6
7.3
5.1
4.1
(6)
7.0
5.4
3.1

C hatham , G A .......................
C layton, G A ..........................
C obb, G A ...............................

123,110
116,606
302,080

205
297
197

29,568
36,734
38,714

1.6
6.6
5.2

C o u n ty 1
20002

S ee footnotes a t end of table.

78

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

4.4

2.6
( 6)
4.6
1.5
-.9
1.5
-.4

1.6


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

21. C ontinued— A nnual data: E m ploym ent and average a nnual pay for
all w o rkers covered under Ul and U C FE in the 316 larg est U.S.
counties
E m ploym ent
C o u n ty 1
20002

A verag e annual pay

P ercent
change,
19 99-20003

R anked by
p ercent
change,
1999-20004

20002

P ercent
change,
19 99-20003

Dekalb, G A ...........................
Fulton, G A ............................
G w innett, G A .......................
M uscogee, G A .....................
Richm ond, G A .....................
H onolulu, H I ..........................
Ada, I D ....................................

311,673
756,094
282,618
98,516
106,391
406,865
177,684

-.3
2.9
4.5
.1
-.5
2.3
6.5

295
92
25
290
298
141
9

38,517
47,034
39,096
27,727
28,594
31,871
34,470

4.7
8.4
6.1
3.6
3.6
2.8
10.0

C ham paign, I L .....................
Cook, I L .................................
Du Page, I L ...........................
Kane, I L .................................
Lake, I L ...................................
M cH enry, IL ..........................
M cLean, I L ............................
M adison, I L ...........................
Peoria, i L ...............................
Rock Island, I L .....................

90,527
2,687,504
582,104
193,452
310,654
87,243
84,371
94,659
102,860
80,252

2.9
1.3
1.6
3.0
3.0
1.9
.7
.5
.2
.8

93
217
198
87
88
170
2 53
270
286
246

29,158
42,904
42,587
32,184
42,619
32,000
34,226
28,932
31,352
33,538

4.1
5.9
3.6
.1
6.7
2.0
4.0
2.8
1.5
4.6

St. C lair, I L ............................
S angam on, I L ......................
W ill, I L .....................................
W innebago, IL .....................
Allen, I N .................................
Elkhart, I N ..............................
Ham ilton, I N ..........................
L a k e ,IN .................................
M arion, I N ..............................
St. Joseph, I N ......................

89,992
144,408
142,294
143,761
189,403
122,481
77,431
199,418
605,976
129,574

2.2
4.5
3.5
.5
.2
.6
3.0
-.6
1.6
.5

146
26
53
271
287
260
89
299
199
272

26,8 57
34,730
32,315
31,478
32,280
30,353
37,937
31,564
36,465
29,649

2.5
1.6
2.1
1.9
3.1
2.4
7.9
4.0
3.2
3.5

Tippecanoe, IN ....................
V anderburgh, IN .................
Linn, IA ..................................
Polk, IA ..................................
S cott, I A .................................
Johnson, K S .........................
S edgw ick, KS ......................
S haw nee, K S ........................
W yandotte, K S .....................
Fayette, K Y ...........................

77,379
109,918
121,966
263,705
86,879
287,637
249,819
100,237
79,585
171,938

1.1
.7
2.1
1.2
-.7
2.7
.0
2.4
1.6
1.7

231
254
160
226
302
103
291
125
200
189

31,084
29,5 64
34,109
33,662
29,101
37,254
32,692
29,373
34,553
30,686

4.0
3.2
4.9
2.5
4.0
6.7
2.9
3.2
2.7
3.7

Jefferson, K Y ........................
C addo, L A ..............................
C alcasieu, LA ......................
E ast Baton R ouge, L A ......
Jefferson, LA .......................
Lafayette, LA .......................
O rleans, L A ...........................
C um berland, M E .................
A nne A rundel, M D ..............
B altim ore, M D ......................

438,853
119,404
84,060
246,800
214,949
113,933
263,385
166,757
193,861
358,087

1.3
.2
.2
2.9
-.6
2.2
1.9
3.7
5.3
1.2

218
288
289
94
300
147
46
13
227

33,405
28,786
28,179
29,199
28,048
29,932
31,681
30,752
35,454
34,071

4.1
3.2
.7
1.4
2.1
5.6
1.3
1.1
7.3
4.6

Frederick, M D ......................
How ard, M D ..........................
M ontgom ery, M D ................
Prince G eorges, M D ..........
B altim ore City, M D ..............
B arnstable, M A ....................
Bristol, M A ............................
E ssex, MA ............................
Ham pden, M A ......................
M iddlesex, M A .....................

77,415
128,741
447,885
303,380
386,497
88,527
221,519
305,311
204,300
846,989

5.1
3.2
5.2
3.3
.8
3.6
1.3
2.4
1.9
3.1

19
77
17
64
2 47
48
219
126
172
84

30,814
37,861
43,583
37,032
38,584
29,718
30,790
39,155
32,217
52,086

5.8
5.0
5.5
6.8
4.5
.0
4.6
8.9
4.8
11.8

Norfolk, M A ...........................
P lym outh, M A ......................
S uffolk, M A ...........................
W orcester, M A .....................
G enesee, M l .........................
Ingham , M l ............................
K alam azoo, M l .....................
K ent, Ml .................................
M acom b, M l ..........................
O akland, Ml ..........................

325,002
166,481
608,277
321,060
165,615
173,904
118,174
349,719
337,308
768,590

2.4
1.3
3.3
2.4
-1.2
1.7
-.3
2.2
.3
1.0

127
220
65
128
311
190
296
148
283
235

43,371
33,930
56,682
37,659
36,418
34,997
32,652
33,971
40,924
44,469

10.4
6.3
11.5
10.8
1.7
5.7
2.3
2.6
3.6
4.2

O ttaw a, M l ............................
S aginaw , M l ..........................
W ashtenaw , M l ....................
W ayne, Ml ............................
Anoka, M N ............................
Dakota, M N ...........................
Hennepin, M N ......................
O lm sted, M N .........................

118,812
95,531
195,836
867,244
108,984
153,432
874,606
82,632

1.9
-.7
.6
1.3
3.8
2.7
2.1
3.9

173
303
261
221
42
104
161
39

31,914
34,657
40,182
4 2,424
33,930
34,402
4 3,818
36,111

3.4
2.4
5.3
3.5
4.5
4.9
7.1
3.1

171

S ee footnotes at end of table.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

79

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force D a ta

21. C o n tinued— A nnual data: E m ploym ent and a verage annual pay for
all w o rk e rs covered under Ul and U C FE in th e 316 largest U.S.
counties
A verag e annual pay

E m ploym ent
C o u n ty 1
20002

80

20002

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

Ram sey, M N .........................
St. Louis, M N ........................

333,173
94,950

1.7
1.4

191
211

39,063
28,911

5.8
4.6

S tearns, M N ..........................
H arrison, M S .........................
Hinds, M S ..............................
Boone, M O ...........................
Clay, M O ................................
G reene, M O ..........................
Jackson, M O .........................
St. C harles, M O ...................
St. Louis, M O ........................
St. Louis C ity, M O ...............

76,326
89,737
136,833
75,775
84,076
142,525
393,792
96,010
646,535
250,737

3.2
.4
-1.3
2.8
-.1
2.4
.4
3.4
.8
.4

78
276
312
98
293
129
277
59
2 48
278

27,582
25,443
30,570
27,366
32,228
26,974
36,059
29,538
38,145
38,605

4.2
4.8
4.6
3.1
6.5
3.2
6.2
3.8
5.6
4.1

Douglas, NE .........................
Lancaster, N E ......................
C lark, NV ...............................
W ashoe, NV .........................
H illsborough, NH ................
R ockingham , NH ................
A tlantic, NJ ...........................
B ergen, N J ............................
B urlington, N J ......................
C am den, N J ..........................

330,999
146,267
697,580
189,119
193,312
129,521
140,139
449,031
180,181
199,911

2 .4
1.7
5.3
3.2
2.5
4.1
-.2
.6
.9
-1.0

130
192
14
79
118
34
2 94
262
243
307

32,294
28,511
32,131
32,747
39,198
35,805
31,062
4 6,255
37,664
35,108

3.9
3.9
3.4
4.4
9.0
9.8
3.4
6.9
4.9
3.1

Essex, NJ ..............................
G loucester, N J .....................
H udson, N J ...........................
M ercer, NJ ............................
M iddlesex, N J ......................
M onm outh, NJ .....................
M orris, NJ ..............................
O cean, N J ..............................
P assaic, N J ...........................
S om erset, N J ........................

364,395
86,734
238,580
209,727
392,932
233,217
2 75,593
129,024
178,441
173,343

1.7
.8
3.5
3.1
.7
2.5
2.8
2.4
1.2
3.9

193
249
54
85
2 55
119
99
131
228
40

44,685
32,048
47,5 14
44,576
4 6,464
39,835
60,503
30,368
37,581
54,840

3.6
2.8
10.4
5.0
5.8
5.8
19.0
4.3
1.5
5.2

Union, N J ...............................
B ernalillo, NM ......................
A lbany, N Y ............................
B ronx, N Y ..............................
B room e, N Y ..........................
Dutchess, N Y ........................
Erie, N Y .................................
K ings, N Y ...............................
M onroe, NY ..........................
Nassau, N Y ..........................

235,578
307,817
231,009
213,023
99,594
109,946
4 59,906
4 41,804
399,544
599,477

1.5
2.7
1.4
2.2
1.1
1.8
1.0
2.3
.9
1.8

2 06
105
212
149
232
179
236
142
2 44
180

45,5 95
30,183
35,787
32,846
2 9,603
36,063
31,482
30,561
35,440
40,001

5.6
4.1
6.0
2.7
3.4
2.2
3.0
3.1
1.8
4.4

New Y ork, N Y ......................
Niagara, N Y ..........................
O neida, N Y ...........................
O nondaga, N Y .....................
O range, N Y ...........................
Q ueens, N Y ..........................
Richm ond, N Y .....................
Rockland, N Y ........................
S uffolk, N Y ............................
W estchester, N Y .................

2,383,948
78,351
110,870
252,481
119,607
4 80,695
88,268
106,360
578,530
405,524

3.3
.4
1.6
.7
1.6
1.3
2.0
1.4
2.3
2.4

66
279
201
256
202
222
166
213
143
132

71,115
31,063
2 7,474
32,497
29,340
34,980
32,140
37,588
37,844
47,043

8.1
3.5
4.0
3.4
4.6
4.4
4.2
5.3
6.5
8.2

B uncom be, NC ....................
C ataw ba, N C ........................
C um berland, N C .................
D urham , N C ..........................
Forsyth, NC ..........................
G aston, N C ...........................
G uilford, N C ..........................
M ecklenburg, N C ................
New Hanover, N C ...............
W ake, NC ..............................

106,108
101,347
109,927
167,190
181,682
77,271
2 79,867
512,693
87,193
383,827

.6
2.6
1.3
2.9
1.8
-3.5
.6
3.5
.6
3.3

263
110
223
95
181
314
2 64
55
2 65
67

27,651
28,205
26,098
49,370
33,960
28,298
32,209
40,677
28,552
35,357

3.8
4.0
3.9
12.6
6.1
3.9
2.5
5.7
4.2
7.3

C ass, ND ...............................
Butler, O H ..............................
C uyahoga, O H .....................
Franklin, O H .........................
H am ilton, O H ........................
Lake, OH ...............................
Lorain, OH .............................
Lucas, O H ..............................
M ahoning, O H .....................
M ontgom ery, O H ................

81,831
126,289
817,577
702,098
566,563
102,231
106,155
238,457
112,504
303,551

2.2
2.7
.9
2.3
.7
1.4
2.4
.6
-.6
.4

150
106
245
144
257
2 14
133
266
301
280

27,803
31,520
36,530
35,001
37,590
30,746
32,007
32,291
25,9 85
34,518

4.1
1.8
4.2
4.7
3.9
2.1
1.9
2.4
3.0
2.6

Stark, O H ..............................
S um m it, O H .........................

175,740
266,421

1.8
.5

182
2 73

28,498
32,679

2.1
4.1

S ee footnotes a t e nd of table.

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

R anked by
percent
change,
1999-20004

J an u a ry 2002


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

21. C ontinued— A nnual data: E m ploym ent and a verage annual pay for
all w o rkers covered under Ul and UCFE in th e 316 larg est U.S.
counties
A verag e annual pay

E m ploym ent
C o u n ty '
20002

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

R anked by
percent
change,
19 99-20004

20002

P ercent
change,
19 99-20003

T rum bull, OH ........................
O klahom a, O K .....................
Tulsa, O K ...............................
C lackam as, OR ..................
Lane, O R ...............................
M arion, O R ...........................
M ultnom ah, O R ..................
W ashington, O R .................

94,574
414,012
340,565
132,715
139,742
127,506
453,025
224,091

-1.1
2.8
2.4
1.9
1.1
2.0
2.0
4.3

309
100
134
174
233
167
168
29

32,734
29,189
31,173
32,469
27,867
28,115
36,788
44,395

.8
4.5
3.7
4.0
3.5
2.9
6.2
13.2

A llegheny, P A ......................
Berks, P A ...............................
B ucks, P A .............................
C hester, P A ..........................
C um berland, P A .................
Dauphin, PA .........................
D elaw are, P A ........................
Erie, PA .................................
Lackaw anna, P A .................
Lancaster, P A ......................

711,401
168,431
244,368
216,913
124,070
172,575
2 12,554
131,635
98,426
218,529

1.2
2.1
2.5
2.6
-1.3
2.1
1.0
2.5
-.7
1.9

229
162
120
111
313
163
237
121
304
175

36,743
31,995
34,033
43,768
32,806
33,677
36,831
28,372
27,651
30,711

2.5
3.2
3.3
7.0
3.1
2.2
5.5
1.8
7.4
4.3

Lehigh, P A ............................
Luzerne, P A ..........................
M ontgom ery, P A .................
N ortham pton, P A ................
P hiladelphia, P A .................
W estm oreland, P A ..............
York, PA ................................
P rovidence, R l .....................
C harleston, SC ....................
G reenville, SC .....................

171,288
143,212
481,287
87,857
668,955
134,440
167,817
290,755
182,872
233,035

2.1
2.4
2.4
3.0
1.5
1.0
2.2
1.7
1.4
2.5

164
135
136
90
207
238
151
194
2 15
122

35,258
27,839
43,800
30,813
39,605
27,9 95
30,924
33,411
27,668
31,278

2.4
2.7
6.4
3.3
4.2
1.3
3.3
4.0
4.7
4.0

Horry, S C ...............................
Lexington, S C ......................
Richland, S C .........................
S partanburg, S C .................
M innehaha, S D ....................
Davidson, T N ........................
H am ilton, T N .........................
Knox, T N ................................
R utherford, T N .....................
S helby, T N ............................

99,134
81,324
207,461
119,717
105,822
434,823
188,112
202,718
77,068
500,289

1.7
1.9
.6
.5
3.2
1.5
1.8
3.4
2.6
1.0

195
176
267
274
80
208
183
60
112
239

22,881
2 7,505
29,636
30,595
28,216
34,876
30,581
30,089
31,127
34,358

5.4
3.5
4.1
3.4
3.7
5.4
4.1
4.1
3.6
2.5

Bell, T X ...................................
B exar, T X ...............................
B razoria, T X ..........................
C am eron, T X ........................
C ollin, T X ...............................
Dallas, TX ..............................
D enton, TX ...........................
El Paso, T X ...........................
Fort Bend, T X ......................
G alveston, T X ......................

87,858
648,757
75,415
109,044
167,768
1,566,821
119,606
251,466
87,697
86,822

2.2
2.2
2.8
5.3
5.8
4.1
3.6
1.5
2.3
-1.1

152
153
101
15
10
35
49
209
145
310

25,182
30,061
34,361
21,561
40,499
44,401
29,296
25,067
35,810
29,531

4.0
5.7
3.3
2.7
5.8
7.7
4.0
3.2
5.2
4.0

Harris, TX ..............................
Hidalgo, T X ...........................
Jefferson, TX ........................
Lubbock, TX .........................
M c Lennan, TX ....................
M ontgom ery, T X .................
Nueces, T X ...........................
Potter, TX ..............................
Sm ith, T X ...............................
T arrant, TX ...........................

1,841,672
163,060
120,759
115,376
98,049
76,837
142,277
75,570
83,392
702,884

2.8
6.9
1.0
1.9
1.0
5.0
.8
.7
2.9
3.5

102
6
240
177
241
21
250
258
96
56

41,8 43
21,695
31,281
26,302
27,032
32,115
28,185
26,552
29,485
35,434

7.6
2.8
.8
6.4
2.1
9.6
4.7
2.8
3.5
5.0

Travis, T X ..............................
W illiam son, T X .....................
Davis, U T ...............................
S alt Lake, U T ........................
Utah, U T ................................
W eber, U T ............................
C hittenden, V T .....................
A rlington, V A .........................
C hesterfield, V A ..................
Fairfax, V A ............................

538,098
76,582
84,638
531,434
142,352
86,412
95,283
158,007
107,846
538,044

5.1
9.5
3.2
2.6
4.5
.4
5.0
4.2
2.0
6.8

20
2
81
113
27
281
22
31
169
7

41,330
50,413
27,482
32,216
27,910
26,641
34,302
52,816
31,860
51,464

7.0
-4.5
6.3
5.1
5.1
2.5
4.2
7.0
3.4
10.1

Henrico, V A ..........................
Loudoun, V A .........................
Prince W illiam , V A ..............
A lexandria, V A .....................
C hesapeake, V A .................
N ew port News, VA ............
Norfolk, V A ...........................

165,582
87,323
78,175
91,988
81,308
93,624
145,181

2.4
12.0
4.3
5.3
2.1
1.8
.3

137
1
30
16
165
184
284

36,123
54,178
28,964
42,007
26,052
30,250
32,169

5.8
3.6
5.4
5.8
4.1
5.3
4.9

S ee footnotes at end o f table.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

81

Current Labor Statistics:

Labor Force D a ta
21. C on tin u ed — A nnual data: E m ploym ent and a v erag e annual pay for
all w o rk e rs covered under Ul and U C FE in th e 316 largest U.S.
counties
A v erag e a nnual pay

E m ploym ent
C o u n ty 1
20002

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

R anked by
percent
change,
19 99-20004

20002

P ercent
change,
1999-20003

R ichm ond, V A ......................
R oanoke City, V A ...............
V irg in ia B each, V A ..............

167,023
75,909
165,536

1.5
3.0
3.6

210
91
50

38,641
29,497
25,397

5.1
4.6
4.3

Clark, W A ..............................
King, W A ................................
P ierce, W A .............................
S nohom ish, W A ...................
S pokane, W A ........................
T hurston, W A ........................
Y akim a, W A ..........................
K anaw ha, W V ......................
Brown, W l ..............................
Dane, W l ................................

113,933
1,168,342
2 37,055
2 10,054
188,025
84,466
94,173
112,963
142,442
274,354

1.6
3.2
2.2
-1.0
2.4
1.8
1.8
.8
2.2
2.6

2 03
82
154
308
138
185
186
251
155
114

32,151
4 7,245
30,161
35,055
29,771
31,722
23,2 45
30,149
31,520
32,817

6.0
2.6
5.3
3.4
8.0
6.8
3.8
3.1
2.9
5.5

M ilw aukee, W l .....................
O utagam ie, W l .....................
Racine, W l .............................
W a ukesha, W l .....................
W innebago, W l ....................

528,947
94,319
79,153
222,780
90,213

.6
2.9
-.9
1.2
2.2

268
97
306
230
156

34,746
30,782
32,538
35,768
33,633

3.1
4.4
-.6
5.2
2.8

S an Juan, PR ......................

328,105

4.1

36

21,239

3.2

1 Includes areas not officially designated as
counties.
S ee N otes on C u rre n t Labor
S tatistics.

6 T otals fo r the United S tates do not include
data fo r Puerto Rico.
8 D ata are not ava ila b le fo r release.

2 Data a re prelim inary.

N ote: D ata pertain to w o rkers covered by
U n em ploym ent
Insurance
(Ul)
and
U nem p lo ym e nt C o m pensation fo r Federal
E m ployees (U C FE) program s. T he 315 U.S.
counties co m p rise 70.8 p ercent of the total
covered w o rkers in the U nited S tates

3 P ercent changes w e re com puted from
a nnual em plo ym e n t and pay data adjusted fo r
noneconom ic co u nty reclassifications.
See
Notes on C u rre n t Labor S tatistics.
4 R ankings
fo r
perce n t
change
in
e m ploym ent a re based on the 3 1 4 co u nties that
are co m parable o ve r th e year.

22.

A n n u a l d a ta : E m p lo y m e n t status o f th e p o p u la tio n

[Numbers in thousands]
1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

C ivilian nonin stitution a l p o p u la tio n .............

192,805

194,838

196,814

198,584

200,591

205,220

C ivilian la bo r fo rc e .......................................
Labor fo rce participa tio n ra te ................

128,105
66.4

129,200
66.3

131,056
66.6

132,304
66.6

133,943
66.8

203 ,13 3
136,297
67.1

137,673
67.1

207 ,75 3
139,368
67.1

2 0 9 ,69 9
140,863
67.2

E m plo ye d ..................................................
E m ploym e n t-po p u la tio n ra tio ...........

118,492

120,259

123,060

124,900

N o na g ricultura l in d u strie s..............

61.5
3,247
115,245

61.7
3,115
117,144

62.5
3,409
119,651

62.9
3,440
121,460

126,708
63.2
3,443
123,264

129,558
63.8
3,399
126,159

131,463
64.1
3,378
128,085

133,488
64.3
3,281
130,207

135,208
64.5
3,305
131,903

U n e m p lo ym e nt ra te .............................
N ot in the la bo r fo rc e ...................................

9,613
7.5
64,700

8,940
6.9
65,6 38

7,996
6.1
65,758

7,404
5.6
66,280

7,236
5.4
66,647

6,739
4.9
66,837

6,210
4.5
67,5 47

5,880
4.2
68,385

5,655
4.0
68,8 36

E m ploym ent status

82

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

23. A n n u a l d a ta : E m p lo y m e n t levels b y industry
[In th o u s a n d s ]

Industry

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Total employment................................................
Private sector.....................................................
Goods-producing..........................................
Mining............................................................
Construction................................................
Manufacturing.............................................

108,601
89,956
23,231
635
4,492
18,104

110,713
91,872
23,352
610
4,668
18,075

114,163
95,0 36
23,908
601
4,986
18,321

117,191
97,885
24,2 65
581
5,160
18,524

119,608
100,189
2 4,493
580
5,418
18,495

122,690
103,133
24,962
596
5,691
18,675

125,865
106,042
25,4 14
590
6,020
18,805

128,916
108,709
2 5,5 07
539
6,415
18,552

131,759
111,079
25,7 09
543
6,698
18,469

Service-producing.........................................
Transportation and public utilities.........
W holesale trade.........................................
Retail trade..................................................
Finance, insurance, and real estate....
Services........................................................

85,370
5,718
5,997
19,356
6,602
29,052

87,361
5,811
5,981
19,773
6,757
30,197

90,256
5,984
6,162
2 0,507
6,896
31,579

92,925
6,132
6,378
21,1 87
6,806
33,117

95,115
6,253
6,482
2 1,597
6,911
34,454

9 7,727
6,408
6,648
21,966
7,109
36,040

100,451
6,611
6,800
22,2 95
7,389
37,533

103,409
6 ,834
6,911
22,8 48
7,555
39,0 55

106,050
7,019
7,024
23,307
7,560
40,460

G overnm ent................................................
Federal......................................................
State..........................................................
Local..........................................................

18,645
2,969
4,408
11,267

18,841
2,915
4,488
11,438

19,128
2,870
4,576
11,682

19,305
2,822
4,635
11,849

19,419
2,757
4,606
12,056

19,557
2,699
4,582
12,276

19,823
2,6 8 6
4,612
12,525

2 0,2 06
2,669
4,709
12,829

20,681
2,7 7 7
4,7 8 5
13,119

NOTE: See "N otes on the data" fo r a description of the m ost recen t b en ch m a rk revision.

24. A n n u a l d a ta : A v e ra g e hours a n d earnings of p ro d u c tio n or nonsupervisory w orkers on nonfarm
payrolls, b y industry
Industry

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Private sector:


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

A verage w e ekly h ou rs........................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs).............................
A verage w e ekly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................

34.4
10.57
363.61

34.5
10.83
373.64

34.7
11.12
385.86

34.5
11.43
394.34

34.4
11.82
406.61

34.6
12.28
424 .89

34.6
12.78
442 .19

34.5
13.24
456 .78

34.5
13.75
474 .38

43.9
14.54
638.31

44.3
14.60
646.78

44.8
14.88
666.62

44.7
15.30
683.91

45.3
15.62
707.59

45.4
16.15
733.21

43.9
16.91
742.35

43.2
17.05
736.56

43.1
17.24
743 .04

38.0
14.15
537.70

38.5
14.38
553.63

38.9
14.73
573.00

38.9
15.09
587.00

39.0
15.47
603.33

39.0
16.04
625.56

38.9
16.61
646.13

39.1
17.19
672.13

39.3
17.88
702.68

41.0
11.46
469.86

41.4
11.74
486.04

42.0
12.07
506.94

41.6
12.37
514.59

41.6
12.77
531.23

42.0
13.17
5 53.14

41.7
13.49
562.53

41.7
13.90
5 79.63

41.6
14.38
598.21

38.3
13.43
514.37

39.3
13.55
532.52

39.7
13.78
547.07

39.4
14.13
556.72

39.6
14.45
572.22

39.7
14.92
592.32

39.5
15.31
604 .75

38.7
15.69
607.20

38.6
16.22
626 .09

38.2
11.39
435.10

38.2
11.74
448.47

38.4
12.06
463.10

38.3
12.43
476.07

38.3
12.87
492.92

38.4
13.45
516.48

38.3
14.07
538.88

38.3
14.58
558.80

38.5
15.20
585.20

28.8
7.12
205 .06

28.8
7.29
209.95

28.9
7.49
216.46

28.8
7.69
221 .47

28.8
7.99
230.11

28.9
8.33
240 .74

29.0
8.74
253 .46

29.0
9.09
263.61

28.9
9.46
273 .39

35.8
10.82
387.36

35.8
11.35
406 .33

35.8
11.83
423.51

35.9
12.32
442 .29

35.9
12.80
459.52

36.1
13.34
481.57

36.4
14.07
512.15

36.2
14.62
529 .24

36.3
15.07
547 .04

32.5
10.54
342.55

32.5
10.78
350.35

32.5
11.04
358.80

32.4
11.39
369.04

32.4
11.79
382.00

32.6
12.28
4 00.33

32.6
12.84
4 18.58

32.6
13.37
4 35.86

32.7
13.91
4 54.86

Mining:
A verage w e ekly h ou rs.....................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................
A ve ra g e w e ekly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs).........................

Construction:
A verage w e ekly h ou rs.....................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................
A verage w e ekly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs).........................

Manufacturing:
A verage w e ekly h o u rs.....................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................
A ve ra g e w e ekly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs).........................

Transportation and public utilities:
A ve ra g e w e ekly h o u rs.....................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................
A verage w e ekly earnings (in d o lla rs).........................

Wholesale trade:
A ve ra g e w e ekly h ou rs.....................................................
A verage hourly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................
A verage w e ekly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs).........................

Retail trade:
A verage w eekly h ou rs.....................................................
A verage hourly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................
A verage w e ekly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................

Finance, insurance, and real estate:
A verage w e ekly h ou rs.....................................................
A ve ra g e hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................
A verage w e ekly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................

Services:
A verage w e ekly h ou rs.....................................................
A verage hourly e arn in gs (in d o lla rs)...........................
A verage w e ekly earn in gs (in d o lla rs)..........................

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

83

Current Labor Statistics:

25.

C om pensation & Industrial Relations

E m p lo ym en t Cost In d e x , c o m p e n s a tio n ,1 b y o c c u p a tio n a n d industry g ro u p

[June 1989 = 100]
2000

1999

2001

Series
Sept.

C ivilian w o rk ers 2..................................................................................

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Percent change
12
3
m onths
m onths
ended
ended
Sept. 2001

143.3

144.6

146.5

148.0

149.5

150.6

152.5

153.8

155.6

1.2

4.1

145.0
143.9
147.3
144.7
139.5
143.1

146.3
145.3
148.6
146.1
140.6
144.8

148.4
146.7
150.5
148.6
142.7
146.0

149.9
148.3
151.9
150.1
144.1
147.1

151.5
150.0
153.7
151.8
145.6
148.5

152.5
151.3
154.6
152.8
146.5
150.0

154.4
153.2
156.6
155.3
148.2
152.0

156.0
154.3
158.6
156.8
149.3
153.3

157.7
156.7
159.6
158.8
151.1
155.0

1.1
1.6
.6
1.3
1.2
1.1

1.1
4.5
3.8
4.6
3.8
4.4

P ublic a dm in istra tio n 3....................................................................
N o nm a n u fa ctu ring ............................................................................

141.2
142.1
144.0
145.1
142.7
143.4
144.6
142.4
143.4

142.5
143.6
145.3
146.5
144.3
145.0
145.8
144.4
144.7

144.9
146.0
147.1
148.0
145.9
146.3
146.5
145.7
146.6

146.6
147.5
148.4
149.3
147.5
147.7
146.8
146.1
148.0

148.0
148.7
150.1
151.2
149.0
149.5
149.7
146.9
149.6

148.8
149.3
151.1
152.4
150.7
151.3
150.6
148.3
150.7

150.7
151.3
153.0
154.3
152.5
153.2
151.7
150.6
152.6

152.2
152.6
155.4
155.4
154.6
155.6
152.2
151.9
154.0

153.3
153.3
156.4
158.1
156.7
158.2
156.1
153.8
156.0

.7
.5
1.3
1.7
1.4
1.7
2.6
1.3
1.3

3.5
3.1
4.2
4.6
5.2
5.8
4.3
4.7
4.3

P rivate in d u stry w o rk e rs ................................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s....................................................

143.3
143.2

144.6
144.5

146.8
146.5

148.5
148.2

149.9
149.8

150.9
150.9

153.0
153.0

154.5
154.4

155.9
156.0

.9
1.0

4.0
4.1

Precision p roduction, craft, and repair o ccu p a tio n s........
M achine o perators, asse m b le rs, and in sp ecto rs..............
T ra nspo rta tio n and m aterial m oving o ccu p a tio n s............
H andlers, e q u ip m en t cleaners, helpers, a nd laborers....

145.6
146.0
145.2
147.7
144.1
145.0
139.4
139.6
139.9
134.4
143.2

146.9
147.3
146.7
149.1
145.3
146.2
140.5
140.6
141.4
135.2
144.4

149.3
149.4
148.4
151.1
148.9
149.0
142.6
142.3
144.0
137.5
146.4

151.1
151.3
150.7
152.7
150.3
150.6
144.1
144.1
145.0
138.6
148.1

152.6
152.9
152.2
154.4
151.2
152.3
145.5
145.8
146.0
139.9
149.4

153.6
154.1
153.7
155.3
151.4
153.4
146.4
146.7
146.8
141.1
150.4

155.7
156.5
156.3
157.3
152.3
156.1
148.2
148.7
148.3
142.6
152.2

157.4
158.1
157.5
159.4
154.5
157.7
149.3
149.7
149.1
143.9
153.4

158.7
159.6
159.2
160.2
155.0
159.5
151.0
151.8
150.4
145.6
154.9

.8
,9
1.1
.5
.3
1.1
1.1
1.4
.9
1.2
1.0

4.0
4 .4
4.6
3.8
2.5
4.7
3.8
4.1
3.0
4.1
3.7

S ervice o ccu p a tio n s......................................................................

141.0

142.6

143.9

145.4

146.6

148.1

150.0 ,

151.3

152.6

.9

4.1

141.9

143.1

145.3

146.9

148.4

149.5

151.4

152.7

154.3

1.0

4.0

141.1
140.5
143.9
142.5
139.4
137.9
142.1
144.3
142.5
140.5
142.3
141.5

142.5
141.8
145.5
143.9
140.7
138.7
143.6
145.8
143.8
142.1
144.0
142.8

144.8
144.2
148.1
146.5
142.8
140.8
146.0
148.2
146.2
144.4
146.5
144.9

146.6
145.9
150.1
148.4
144.4
143.2
147.5
150.2
148.2
145.6
148.3
146.0

147.9
147.2
151.3
149.6
145.8
145.1
148.7
151.4
149.3
146.7
149.4
147.5

148.8
148.2
151.9
150.5
146.8
146.7
149.3
151.5
149.7
147.8
150.1
147.7

150.7
150.1
154.5
153.0
148.2
148.2
151.3
154.2
152.2
149.1
151.8
150.4

152.1
151.5
156.5
155.0
149.3
150.3
152.6
156.0
154.0
150.0
153.1
151.6

153.1
152.5
156.8
155.3
150.8
151.7
152.2
156.0
153.8
151.3
154.0
152.0

.7
.7
.2
.2
1.0
.9
.5
.0
-.1
.9
.6
.3

3.5
3.6
3.6
3.8
3.4
4.5
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.1

144.1
144.6
145.8
147.0
139.1
140.8
141.8
138.7
145.7
146.1
145.1
142.2
142.8
146.3
145.8
140.0
137.2
137.0

145.3
145.9
147.0
148.3
139.8
142.4
142.3
139.5
146.1
146.0
146.1
143.5
144.3
148.5
147.4
140.7
138.3
138.1

147.4
147.7
149.3
150.3
141.8
143.6
143.9
140.4
148.6
148.4
148.9
145.6
146.4
150.0
149.6
143.2
139.7
140.1

149.1
149.4
151.0
152.1
143.1
145.1
145.7
141.8
150.9
150.9
151.0
147.3
148.1
151.8
151.1
144.8
141.0
142.5

150.6
151.1
152.6
153.9
144.5
146.3
147.4
142.8
153.5
153.9
152.9
148.3
149.6
152.1
152.7
146.2
142.2
143.4

151.7
152.2
153.7
155.1
145.3
147.9
148.3
143.9
154.1
154.7
153.4
149.4
150.6
154.4
154.9
146.6
144.4
144.5

153.8
154.6
155.8
157.5
147.7
149.6
150.5
145.4
157.3
158.3
156.0
151.0
152.6
155.1
156.9
148.7
147.3
146.1

155.3
156.0
157.4
159.1
148.7
150.8
152.4
146.9
159.8
161.1
158.1
152.6
153.9
157.8
158.5
149.7
149.4
148.2

156.9
157.8
159.0
160.9
150.9
152.2
153.5
148.2
160.7
162.8
158.1
153.7
155.4
158.6
160.0
150.9
149.7
149.7

1.0
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.5
.9
.7
.9
.6
1.1
.0
.7
1.0
.5
.9
.8
.2
1.0

4.2
4.4
4.2
4.5
4.4
4.0
4.1
3.8
4.7
5.8
3.4
3.6
3.9
4.3
4.8
3.2
5.3
4.4

W orkers, by occu p ation a l group:
W h ite -colla r w o rk e rs........................................................................
P rofessional specialty and te ch n ica l.......................................
E xecutive, adm in itra tive , and m a na g e ria l..............................
A dm in istra tive support, including c le ric a l...............................
B lu e -co lla r w o rk e rs ...........................................................................
S ervice o ccu p a tio n s.........................................................................
W orkers, by indu stry division:
G oo d s-p ro d u c ln g ..............................................................................
M a nu factu rin g .................................................................................
S ervice -p ro d u cing .............................................................................
S e rvice s.............................................................................................
Health se rvice s.............................................................................
H o sp ita ls......................................................................................
E ducational se rvice s...................................................................

W o rkers, by occu p ation a l group:
W h ite -colla r w o rk e rs......................................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s.................................................
P rofessional sp e cialty and te chnical o ccu p a tio n s............
E xecutive, adm initrative, and m anagerial occu p ation s..
S ale s o ccu p a tio n s.......................................................................
A dm in istra tive su p p o rt o ccu p ation s, including cle ric a l...

4

P roduction and n on supervisory o c c u p a tio n s ....................
W o rkers, by in du stry division:
G oo d s-pro d ucin g ............................................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s.............................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p ation s.............................................
C o n s tru ctio n .................................................................................
M a nu factu rin g ...............................................................................

E xcluding sales o ccu p ation s.............................................

S ervice o ccu p ation s.................................................................
T ra nspo rta tio n and public u tilitie s..........................................
P ublic u tilitie s.............................................................................
E lectric, gas, and san ita ry se rvice s ................................
W h ole sa le and retail tra d e .......................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s.............................................
W h ole sa le tra d e .......................................................................
Retail tra d e .................................................................................
Food sto re s..............................................................................
S ee fo o tn o te s a t end of table.

84

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u a ry 2002

25. C o n tin u e d — E m p lo y m e n t Cost In d e x , c o m p e n s a tio n ,1 b y o c c u p a tio n a n d industry g ro u p
[June 1989 = 100]______________________________________________________________________________
2001

2000

1999
Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

P ercent change
12
3
m onths
m onths
ended
ended
Sept. 2001

Finance, insu ra n ce , a nd real e sta te ......................................

147.6

148.3

152.0

153.1

155.2

155.7

157.9

159.5

160.9

0.9

3.7

E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s.............................................
B anking, sa vin gs and loan, a nd oth e r cre d it agencies.
In su ra nce ......................................................................................
S ervice s...........................................................................................
B usiness se rvice s.....................................................................
H ealth se rvice s...........................................................................
H o sp ita ls....................................................................................
E ducational se rvice s ...............................................................
C o lle g e s and u n iv e rsitie s.....................................................

151.0
159.3
144.5
146.1
150.7
142.6
143.0
152.2
152.6

151.6
159.8
145.8
147.6
151.9
144.2
144.6
153.0
153.3

154.2
162.7
149.9
149.4
154.2
145.8
145.8
154.0
154.6

155.5
164.2
151.3
151.2
156.3
147.5
147.5
154.9
155.5

157.4
165.8
154.8
152.9
157.5
149.0
149.2
158.8
158.6

158.4
166.5
155.2
154.1
158.4
150.6
151.1
159.9
159.2

161.2
170.8
157.6
156.5
160.5
152.7
153.5
162.3
162.2

163.1
172.7
159.3
157.8
163.0
154.7
155.9
162.6
162.6

164.7
175.4
159.9
160.0
165.2
156.8
158.4
166.4
166.2

1.0
1.6
.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.6
2.3
2.2

4.6
5.8
3.3
4.6
4.9
5.2
6.2
4.8
4.8

N o n m a n u fa ctu rin g .......................................................................

143.4

144.5

146.7

148.4

150.0

151.1

153.1

154.7

156.3

1.0

4.2

W h ite -colla r w o rk e rs .................................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s ............................................
B lu e -co lla r o ccu p a tio n s...........................................................
S ervice o ccu p a tio n s.................................................................

145.6
146.8
138.0
140.7

146.9
148.1
138.7
142.3

149.2
150.2
140.6
143.5

151.0
152.0
142.3
145.1

152.6
153.8
143.9
146.3

153.7
155.1
144.8
147.8

155.8
157.5
146.9
149.5

157.5
159.1
148.1
150.7

159.0
160.9
150.2
152.1

1.0
1.1
1.4
.9

4.2
4.6
4.4
4.0

State and local government workers.....................................

143.1

144.6

145.5

145.9

147.8

148.9

150.3

151.2

154.3

2.1

4.4

142.6
142.0
144.5
143.0
140.9

144.0
143.2
146.1
145.0
142.5

144.9
144.1
147.0
145.9
143.7

145.3
144.5
147.2
146.5
144.2

147.3
146.6
149.2
148.3
145.9

148.3
147.4
150.7
149.4
147.2

149.5
148.4
152.4
150.7
148.6

150.4
149.2
153.7
151.6
149.0

153.7
152.8
156.4
154.2
151.5

2.2
2.4
1.8
1.7
1.7

4.3
4.2
4.8
4.0
3.8

143.2
142.6
144.2
144.8
143.1
143.5
142.9
144.8
142.4

144.5
143.8
145.8
146.3
144.4
144.7
144.1
146.5
144.4

145.2
145.2
147.3
147.9
145.0
145.3
144.5
147.4
145.7

145.5
145.8
147.9
148.4
145.2
145.5
144.7
147.6
146.1

148.0
147.6
150.0
150.7
147.9
148.2
147.3
150.5
146.9

148.9
148.8
151.6
152.0
148.7
149.0
148.1
151.7
148.3

149.9
150.1
152.1
152.2
149.6
149.9
148.5
153.7
150.6

154.4
150.6
154.5
151.9
154.4
157.1
154.7
157.4
154.1
150.1
154.4
150.5
149.0
152.8
154.3 9.0 1 53 .8
151.9
151.9

2.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
3.0
1.3

4.3
4.7
4.7
4.4
4.2
4.2
3.7
5.6
4.7

W orkers, by occu p ation a l group:
W h ite -c o lla r w o rk e rs ........................................................................
P rofessional sp e cialty and te ch n ica l.......................................
E xecutive, adm in istra tive , and m a n a g e ria l...........................

W o rkers, by Industry division:
S e rvice s.............................................................................................
S ervices exclu din g sch o o ls5.....................................................
H ealth se rvice s...........................................................................
H o sp ita ls....................................................................................
E ducational se rvice s................................................................
S ch o o ls......................................................................................
E le m e n ta ry a nd s e co n d a ry .............................................
C o lle g e s and u n iv e rsitie s .................................................
P ublic a dm in istra tio n 3....................................................................

1 C o st (cents p er h our w orked) m easured in th e E m plo ym e n t C o st Index consists of
w ages, salaries, a nd e m plo ye r co st of em plo ye e benefits.
2 C o nsists o f p rivate indu stry w o rkers (excluding farm and household w orkers) and
S tate a nd local g ov e rn m e n t (excluding Federal G overnm ent) w orkers.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

3 C onsists of legislative, judicial, adm in istra tive , and reg u la to ry activities.
4 This series has the sa m e industry and occu p ation a l co ve rag e as th e H ourly
E arnings index, w hich w a s d iscontinued in Ja n ua ry 1989.
5 Includes, for exa m ple , library, social, and health services.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

85

C urrent Labor Statistics:

Com pensation & Industrial Relations

26. E m ploym ent Cost Index, w a g e s a n d salaries, by o c c u p a tio n a n d industry group
[June 1989 = 100] _____________________________________
1999

2000

2001

Series
Sept.
C ivilian w orkers1...............................................................................

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Percent change
3
12
months
months
Sept. __ ended
ended
Sept. 2001

141.3

142.5

144.0

145.4

147.0

147.9

149.5

150.8

152.3

1.0

3.6

143.3
142.6
145.9
142.3
137.0
140.1

144.6
144.0
147.2
143.5
137.9
141.7

146.2
144.9
148 6
145.5
139.2
143 0

147.6
146.4
149 9
146 9
140.6
144 0

149.2
148.3
151 6
148 5
142.0
145.7

150.2
149.6
152 4
149 6
142.9
147 1

151.7
151.1
154 0
151 6
144.7
148.6

153.1
152.155 8
152 7
146.0
149.7

154.5
154.2

.9
1.4

3.6
4.0

147.6
151.2

1.1
1.0

3.9
3.8

W orkers, by industry division:
Q oods-producing...........................................................................
M anufacturing..............................................................................
Service-producing.........................................................................
S ervices.........................................................................................
Health services..........................................................................
Hospitals...................................................................................
Educational services...............................................................

138.6
140.2
142.3
144.1
140.9
140.1
143.7

139.7
141.5
143 5
145.5
142.5
141.6
144.7

141.3
142.9
145 0
146.6
143.8
142.6
145.3

143.0
144.4
146 3
147.9
145.3
143.8
145.6

144.3
145.7
148 0
149.9
146.7
145.6
148.9

145.3
146.5
148 9
151.0
148.3
147.3
149.6

147.0
148.5
150 5
152.6
149.8
148.8
150.5

147,6
150.0
151 7
153.6
151.8
151.2
151.0

149.5
150.7

.6
,5

3.6
3.9

156.2
153.7
15.5
154.6

1.7
1.3
1.5
2.4

4.2
4.8
5.4
3.8

Public adm inistration2.................................................................
N onm anufacturing.........................................................................

139.5
141.5

141.5
142.6

142.5
144.2

142.9
145.5

144.6
147.2

146.1
148.1

147.6
149.7

148.7
149.7

150.3
152.6

1.1
1.1

3.9
3.7

Private industry w orkers..............................................................
Excluding sales o ccupations.................................................

141.0
140.8

142.2
142.0

143.9
143.5

145.4
145.1

146.8
146.5

147.7
147.6

149.4
149.5

150.9
150.8

152.1
152.2

.8
.9

3.6
3.9

W orkers, by occupational group:
W hite-collar w orkers...................................................................
Excluding sales o ccupations...............................................
Professional specialty and technical occupations...........
Executive, adm initrative, and m anagerial occupations..
Sales o ccupations....................................................................
A dm inistrative support occupations, including clerical...
Blue-collar w o rkers.....................................................................
Precision production, craft, and repair occupations.......
M achine operators, assem blers, and inspectors.............
Transportation and m aterial moving occupations............
Handlers, equipm ent cleaners, helpers, and laborers....

143.5
143.9
142.6
146.4
142.1
142.7
136.8
136.7
138.3
131.9
139.4

144.8
145.2
144.1
147.6
143.3
143.8
137.7
137.5
139.5
132.7
140.4

146.6
146.7
145.1
149.2
146.7
146.0
139.1
138.9
140.7
134.1
141.8

148.3
148.5
147.3
150.7
147.9
147.5
140.5
140.6
141.6
135.2
143.6

149.7
149.9
148.6
152.3
149.0
149.1
141.9
142.0
142.9
136.5
145.0

150.6
151.1
150.2
153.0
148.7
150.1
142.8
142.8
143.7
137.6
146.2

152.3
153.0
152.1
154.7
149.2
152.3
144.6
144.6
145.6
139.5
148.0

153.8
154.4
153.2
156.5
151.5
153.6
145.9
145.7
146.9
140.7
149.8

154.8
155.7
154.8
157.2
151.2
155.3
147.5
147.7
148.1
142.1
151.0

.7
.8
1.0
.4
- .2
1.1
1.1
1.4
.8
1.0
.8

3.4
3.9
4.2
3.2
1.5
4.2
3.9
4.0
3.6
4.1
4.1

Service occupations...................................................................

138.0

139.6

141.0

142.5

143.5

144.9

146.4

147.5

148.7

.8

3.6

Production and nonsupervisory occupations3...................

139.3

140.4

142.1

143.7

145.0

146.0

147.7

149.0

150.3

.9

3.7

138.5
137.8
141.7
140.1
136.6
133.0
140.2
142.7
140.8
138.4
140 4
139.7

139.7
138.9
143.0
141.3
137.6
133.6
141.5
144.0
142.0
139.7
141 8
140 9

141.3
140 5
145 0
143 2
139 0
136.0
142.9
145.8
143.7
140 8
143 0
142.7

143.0
142 1
146 8
144 9
140 5
138.0
144.4
147.7
145.6
142 0
144 7
143 9

144.3
143.4
147 9
146 0
142 0
139.4
145.7
148.7
146 6
143 4
146 1
145 0

145.2
144 6
148 7
147 2
143 1
140.7
146.5
149.2
147 5
144 6
147 3
145 4

147.0
146 3
150 5
148 9
144 7
142.1
148.5
151.1
149 9
146 4
149 0
147 5

148.6
147 8
152 3
150 5
146 1
143.9
150.0
152.7
150 5
147 8
150 5
149 0

149.5
148 7
162 6

.6
6

3.6

147 4
145.1
150.7
152.8
160 6
149 1

9
.8
.5
.1
o
9

142 1
142.6
143 8
145.1
137.0
138.0
137.5
134.4
141.5
141.9
140.9
140.7
141.8
144.3
144.8
138.9
135.6
133.9

143 3
143.8
145 0
146.4
137.8
139.6
137.9
134.9
141.8
142.2
141.3
142.0
143.3
146.5
146.4
139.6
136.7
134.9

145 0
145.3
146 9
147 8
139.1
141.1
138 5
134.9
143.2
143.4
143.0
143.8
145.2
147.4
147.9
142.1
137.8
136.7

146 5
146.9
148 5
149 6
140 3
142.5
140 0
136.2
144.9
145.0
144.7
145.5
146.8
149.4
149.7
143.5
138.5
139.5

147 9
148 3
150 0
151 2
141 6
143 5
141.3
137.4
146.4
146.7
145.9
146.4
148.2
149.6
151.3
144 8
139.7
140.2

148 9
149 4
150 9
152 3
142 2
144 8
142 3
138.6
147.1
147.4
146.6
147.4
149.0
151.6
153.2
145 2
142.2
141.6

150 5
151 3
152 5
154 3
144 3
146 1
143 7
139.8
148.7
149.2
148.1
148.4
150.7
151.6
154.9
146 9
143.8
143.3

152 fi
154 0
155 6
145 3
147 2
145 7
141.6
151.0
151.8
149.9
150.1
151.9
154.5
156.5
147 8
145.5
144.5

W orkers, by occupational group:
W hite-collar w orkers.....................................................................
Professional specialty and technical......................................

Blue-collar w o rkers.......................................................................

W orkers, by industry division:
G oods-producing.........................................................................

C onstruction...............................................................................
M anufacturing............................................................................
W hite-collar occupations......................................................

W hite-collar occupations......................................................

Transportation........................................................................
Public utilities...........................................................................
C om m unications................................................................ .
Electric, gas, and sanitary services...............................
W holesale and retail tra d e .....................................................
Excluding sales occupations...........................................
W holesale tra d e ......................................................................
Excluding sales occupations...........................................
G eneral m erchandise stores............................................
Food stores............................................................................
See footnotes at end of table.

86

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

4.1
3.4
2.8

149 3
154 ?
167 2
147 6

10

142.6
152.0
153.3
150.4
150.6
153.1
154.1
157.4
148 8
145.7
145.7

.7
.7
1.0
.3
.3
.8
- .3
.6
.7
.1
.8

3.8
3.8
4.5
3.1
2.9
3.3
3.0
4.0
4.3
3.9

26.

C o n tin u e d — E m p lo y m e n t Cost In d e x , w a g e s a n d salaries, b y o c c u p a tio n a n d industry g ro u p

[June 1989 = 100]

___________________________________________________
1999

2000

2001

P ercent change
3
12
m onths
m onths
ended
ended
S ept. 2001

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

F inance, insurance, and real e sta te ......................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p a tio n s.............................................
B anking, sa vin gs a nd loan, and o th e r cre dit agencies.
In su ra nce ......................................................................................
S e rvice s...........................................................................................
B usin e ss se rvice s.....................................................................
Flealth se rvice s..........................................................................
Flospitals....................................................................................
E ducational se rvice s...............................................................
C o lle g e s a nd u niversitie s.....................................................

144.5
147.5
159.2
140.2
144.5
148.5
140.6
139.3
147.5
147.2

145.2
148.0
159.6
141.5
146.0
149.8
142.2
140.9
148.2
147.9

148.7
150.2
162.0
145.5
147.4
152.0
143.5
141.8
148.9
148.9

149.5
151.5
163.3
146.6
149.1
154.1
145.3
143.3
149.6
149.4

151.7
153.3
165.0
150.7
150.6
155.3
146.6
144.9
153.4
152.5

151.7
154.1
165.7
150.8
151.8
156.0
148.1
146.8
154.3
152.9

153.9
156.6
169.4
152.4
153.8
158.2
149.8
148.5
155.4
154.1

154.6
157.6
170.8
153.3
155.0
160.8
151.8
151.0
156.1
155.0

155.8
159.1
173.2
153.6
157.1
162.8
153.6
153.3
159.6
158.4

0.8
1.0
1.4
.2
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.5
2.2
2.2

2.7
3.8
5.0
1.9
4.3
4.8
4.8
5.8
4.0
3.9

N o nm a n u fa ctu ring .......................................................................
W h ite -c o lla r w o rk e rs ................................................................
E xcluding sales o ccu p ation s............................................
B lu e -co lla r o ccu p a tio n s...........................................................
S ervice o ccu p a tio n s.................................................................

141.0
143.5
144.6
135.1
137.9

142.1
144.7
145.9
135.8
139.5

143.9
146.5
147.4
137.4
140.9

145.5
148.2
149.1
138.9
142.4

146.9
149.6
150.7
140.3
143.4

147.9
150.6
151.9
140.9
144.7

149.5
152.3
153.9
142.8
146.0

150.9
153.8
155.3
143.9
147.1

152.2
155.0
156.9
145.8
148.2

.9
.8
1.0
1.3
.7

3.6
3.6
4.1
3.9
3.3

State and local government workers....................................

142.2

143.5

144.3

144.7

147.2

148.3

150.2

151.2

154.3

1.9

3.9

W orkers, by occu p ation a l group:
W h ite -colla r w o rk e rs........................................................................
P ro fessional specialty and te ch n ica l.......................................
E xecutive, adm inistrative, a nd m a na g e ria l...........................
A dm in istra tive support, in cluding c le ric a l..............................
B lu e -co lla r w o rk e rs ..........................................................................

142.1
142.5
142.7
139.6
139.4

143.4
143.6
144.3
141.7
140.7

144.1
144.3
144.9
142.4
141.5

144.5
144.7
145.1
143.0
142.1

147.1
147.4
147.3
145.0
143.9

148.0
148.2
148.8
146.2
145.1

149.0
149.1
150.1
147.0
146.0

149.8
149.8
151.5
147.6
146.5

152.7
153.0
153.9
149.8
149.1

1.9
2.1
1.6
1.5
1.8

3.8
3.8
4.5
3.3
3.6

W orkers, by indu stry division:
S ervice s.............................................................................................

142.9

144.0

144.6

144.9

147.9

148.7

149.5

150.2

153.7

2.3

3.9

S ervice s exclu din g sch o o ls4.....................................................
H ealth se rvice s..........................................................................
H o sp ita ls...................................................................................
E ducational se rvice s................................................................
S ch o o ls......................................................................................
E le m e n ta ry and se co n d a ry.............................................
C o lle g e s a nd u niversitie s.................................................

142.1
142.8
142.8
142.9
143.1
143.1
142.6

143.2
144.2
144.1
144.0
144.2
144.1
144.4

144.3
145.3
145.3
144.5
144.7
144.5
144.9

144.8
145.7
145.6
144.8
144.9
144.6
145.6

146.7
147.7
147.7
148.0
148.1
147.9
148.3

147.9
149.3
149.2
148.7
148.9
148.5
149.5

149.1
149.9
149.5
149.5
149.7
149.0
151.4

150.7
151.9
151.8
150.0
150.2
149.5
151.8

153.2
154.2
154.2
153.6
153.8
152.8
156.5

1.7
1.5
1.6
2.4
2.4
2.2
3.1

4.4
4.4
4.4
3.8
3.8
3.3
5.5

P ublic a dm in istra tio n 2....................................................................

139.5

141.5

142.5

C onsists of p rivate industry w o rkers (excluding farm and household w orkers) and
S tate and local g overn m e nt (excluding Federal G overnm ent) w orkers.
2 C onsists of le gislative, ju dicia l, a dm inistrative, and reg u la to ry activities.

27.

142.9
144.6
146.1
148.7
147.6
150.3
1.1
3.9
3 This series has th e sam e industry and occu p ation a l co ve rag e as th e H ourly
E arnings index, w h ich w a s d iscontinued in Ja n ua ry 1989.
4 Includes, fo r exam ple, library, social, and health services.

E m p lo ym e n t Cost In d e x , benefits, p riv a te industry w orkers b y o c c u p a tio n a n d industry g ro u p

[June 1989 = 100]____________________________________________
1999

2000

2001

P ercent change
3
12
m onths
m onths
ended
ended
Sept.

Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Private industry workers.........................................................

148.6

150.2

153.8

155.7

157.5

158.6

161.5

163.2

165.2

1.2

4.9

W o rkers, b y occu p ation a l group:
W h ite -colla r w o rk e rs ........................................................................
B lu e -co lla r w o rk e rs ..........................................................................

151.0
144.8

152.5
146.2

156.3
150.0

158.5
151.6

160.4
153.1

161.5
154.1

165.2
155.7

167.4
156.7

169.5
158.3

1.3
1.3

5.7
3.4

W o rkers, b y in du stry division:
G oo d s-pro d uc in g ..............................................................................
S ervice -p ro d u cing ............................................................................
M a nu factu rin g ....................................................................................
N o n m a n u fa ctu ring ...........................................................................

146.3
149.4
145.7
149.4

148.2
150.7
147.8
150.7

152.3
154.0
152.3
154.0

154.2
156.0
153.9
156.1

155.7
157.9
154.9
158.1

156.2
159.4
154.8
159.7

158.5
162.6
157.1
162.9

159.6
164.6
157.9
164.9

160.8
167.1
158.5
167.4

.8
1.5
.4
1.5

3.3
5.8
2.3
5.9


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

87

C urrent Labor Statistics:

28.

Com pensation & Industrial Relations

E m p lo y m e n t Cost In d e x , p riv a te nonfarm w orkers b y b a rg a in in g status, region, a n d a r e a size

[June 1989 = 100]
2001

2000

1999
Series
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

M ar.

June

Sept.

P ercent change
12
3
m onths
m onths
ended
ended
Sept. 2001

COMPENSATION
W o rk e rs , b y b a rg a in in g s ta tu s ’
140.2
139.2
141.0
139.1
140.3

141.2
140.8
141.4
141.0
140.8

143.0
143.3
142.5
144.5
141.7

144.4
144.8
143.9
145.4
143.4

146.1
146.8
145.2
147.1
145.0

146.9
147.3
146.4
147.4
146.2

147.9
147.9
147.6
147.9
147.3

149.5
149.3
149.5
148.8
149.4

151.0
150.6
151.2
149.9
151.1

1.0
.9
1.1
.7
1.1

3.4
2.6
4.1
1.9
4.2

143.8
141.8
144.4
143.0
143.8

145.2
143.1
145.7
144.4
145.1

147.4
145.4
148.0
146.5
147.4

149.1
147.2
149.6
148.2
149.1

150.6
148.4
151.2
149.2
150.7

151.6
149.3
152.3
149.9
151.8

153.8
151.6
154.4
152.4
153.9

155.3
153.1
155.9
153.7
155.4

156.7
154.0
157.5
154.4
157.0

.9
.6
1.0
.5
1.0

4.1
3.8
4.2
3.5
4.2

143.2
141.8
145.0
143.3

144.3
143.0
146.3
144.7

146.3
145.0
148.9
147.0

147.6
146.7
150.7
148.8

149.3
147.6
152.2
150.8

150.3
148.6
153.3
151.8

151.6
151.1
154.8
154.3

153.7
152.3
156.0
156.0

155.2
153.5
157.4
157.6

1.0
.8
.9
1.0

4.0
4.0
3.4
4.5

143.3
143.1

144.7
143.6

146.9
146.0

148.6
147.7

150.1
148.8

151.0
150.3

153.1
152.1

154.6
153.7

156.0
154.8

.9
.7

3.9
4.0

135.7
134.9
136.8
135.8
135.6

136.5
136.1
137.2
137.5
135.9

137.2
137.2
137.6
138.8
136.4

138.5
138.4
138.9
139.7
137.8

140.0
140.2
140.1
141.4
139.2

141.2
141.3
141.5
142.6
140.4

142.1
142.4
142.2
143.9
141.1

143.7
144.2
143.7
145.5
142.7

145.1
145.3
145.4
146.7
144.3

1.0
.8
1.2
.8
1.1

3.6
3.6
3.8
3.7
3.7

142.0
140.0
142.6
141.7
141.8

143.3
141.1
143.9
142.9
143.0

145.1
142.9
145.8
144.4
145.0

146.7
144.7
147.3
146.1
146.6

148.1
145.8
148.7
147.2
148.0

149.0
146.8
149.6
148.0
148.9

150.8
148.8
151.4
150.1
150.7

152.2
150.3
152.7
151.6
152.0

153.4
151.1
154.1
152.2
153.3

.8
.5
.9
.4
.9

3.6
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.6

139.9
140.2
142.4
141.3

140.9
141.5
143.6
142.6

142.3
143.0
145.3
144.7

143.7
144.6
147.1
146.3

145.3
145.3
148.6
148.2

146.0
146.3
149.6
149.2

147.3
148.3
150.9
151.3

149.2
149.3
152.3
152.9

150.6
150.2
153.6
154.3

.9
.6
.9
.9

3.6
3.4
3.4
4.1

141.2
139.8

142.5
140.2

144.1
142.2

145.7
143.7

147.1
144.7

148.0
146.0

149.8
147.4

151.2
148.8

152.4
149.7

.8
.6

3.6
3.5

W o rk e rs , b y r e g io n 1

W o rk e rs , b y a re a s iz e ’

WAGES AND SALARIES
W o rk e rs , b y b a rg a in in g s ta tu s ’

W o rk e rs , b y re g io n ’

W o rk e rs , b y a re a s iz e ’

O th e r a re a s.............................................................................................

1 T h e in de xe s a re calculated diffe re ntly from th o se fo r th e occu p ation and industry groups. For a detailed descriptio n of the index ca lculation, see th e Monthly Labor R eview
T e ch n ical Note, "E stim a tio n pro ce d u re s fo r th e E m plo ym e n t C o st Index," M ay 1982.

88

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

29. Percent of full-tim e e m p lo y e e s participating in em p lo y e r-p ro v id e d benefit plans, a n d in s e le c te d features within plans,
m ed iu m a n d larg e private establishments, sele c te d years, 1980-97
Item
Scope of survey (in 0 00 's)................................................
Num ber of em ployees (in 0 00’s):
W ith m edical ca re ............................................................
W ith life insurance...........................................................

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

21,352

21,043

21,013

21,303

31,059

32,428

31,163

28,728

33,374

38,409

20,711
20,498
17,936

20,412
20,201
17,676

20,383
20,172
17,231

20,238
20,451
16,190

27,953
28,574
19,567

29,834
30,482
20,430

25,865
29,293
18,386

23,519
26,175
16,015

25,546
29,078
17,417

29,340
33,495
19,202

10
75
-

9
25
76
25

9
26
73
26

10
27
72
26
88
3.2
99
10.0
25
3.7
100
70

11
29
72
26
85
3.2
96
9.4
24
3.3
98
69
33
16

10
26
71
26
84
3.3
97
9.2
22
3.1
97
68
37
18

8
30
67
28
80
3T
92
10.2
21
3.3
96
67
37
26

9
29
68
26
83

80

81

3.0

3.3

3.7

91
9.4
21
3.1
97

89
9.1
22
3.3
96
58

89
9.3
20
3.5
95
56

84

93

Time-off plans
Participants with:
Paid lunch tim e ...................................................................
A verage minutes per d a y..............................................
Paid rest tim e ......................................................................
A verage m inutes per d ay..............................................
A verage days per occurrence.....................................
Paid holidays.......................................................................
Average days per ye a r..................................................
Paid personal leave..........................................................
A verage days per ye a r..................................................
Paid vacations....................................................................

U npaid fam ily le a v e .........................................................

-

-

-

99
10.1
20
100
62

99
10.0
24
3.8
99
67

_

_

97

97

97

95

90

92

83

82

77

76

58
-

62
-

46
62
8

66
70
18

76
79
28

75
80
28

81
80
30

86
82
42

78
73
56

85
78
63

26
46
-

27
51
-

36
$11.93
58
$35.93

43
$12.80
63
$41.40

44
$19.29
64
$60.07

47
$25.31
66
$72.10

51
$26.60
69
$96.97

61
$31.55
76
$107.42

67
$33.92
78
$118.33

69
$39.14
80
$130.07

96

96

96

96

92

94

94

91

87

87

69

72

-

-

-

64

74
64

72
10
59

78
8
49

71
7
42

71
6
44

76
5
41

77
7
37

74
6
33

42

43

53

55

99
9.8
23
3.6
99
67

65
60
53

“

Insurance plans
P articipants in m edical care plans..................................
Percent of participants with coverage for:
Home health ca re ...........................................................
Extended care fa cilitie s................................................
Physical exam .................................................................
Percent of participants w ith em ployee
contribution required for:
Self coverage...................................................................
A verage m onthly contribution....................................
Fam ily coverage.............................................................
A verage m onthly contribution....................................
Percent of participants with:
Accidental death and dism em berm ent
insurance..........................................................................
Survivor incom e b enefits...............................................
Retiree protection available...........................................
P articipants in long-term disability
insurance p lan s................................................................
Participants in sickness and accident

-

40

43

47

48

42

45

40

41

54

51

51

49

46

43

45

44

Participants in short-term disability plans ' ...................

Retirement plans
Participants in defined benefit pension plans.............
Percent of participants with:
Normal retirem ent prior to age 6 5 ..............................
Ad hoc pension increase in last 5 ye a rs..................
Term inal earnings form ula...........................................
Benefit coordinated with Social S ecurity...................
Participants in defined contribution plans......................
Participants in plans with tax-deferred savings
arrangem ents....................................................................

84

84

82

76

63

63

59

56

52

50

55
98

58
97

59
98
26
55
62

62
97
22
64
63

52
95

4

10

56
54

52
95
6
61
48

52
96

52
45

64
98
35
57
62

55

53
45

63
97
47
54
56

58
51

56
49

-

-

-

60

45

48

48

49

55

57

-

-

-

33

36

41

44

43

54

55

2
5

5
12

9
23

10
36

12
52

12
38

13
32

5

7

98
7

Other benefits
Em ployees eligible for:

Premium conversion plans.............................................
The definitions for paid sick leave and short-term disability (previously sickness and
accident insurance) w ere changed for the 1995 survey. Paid sick leave now includes only
plans that specify either a m axim um num ber of days per year or unlimited days. Shortterm s disability now includes all insured, self-insured, and S tate-m andated plans available
on a per-disability basis, as well as the unfunded per-disability plans previously reported as
sick leave. Sickness and accident insurance, reported in years prior to this survey, included
only insured, self-insured, and S tate-m andated plans providing per-disability bene­


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

fits at less than full pay.
2 Prior to 1995, reim bursem ent accounts included prem ium conversion plans, which
specifically allow m edical plan participants to pay required plan prem ium s w ith pretax
dollars. Also, reim bursem ent accounts that w ere part of flexible benefit plans w ere
tabulated separately.
NOTE: Dash indicates data not available.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

89

C urrent Labor Statistics:

Com pensation & Industrial Relations

30. P ercent of full-tim e e m p lo y e e s participating in e m p lo y e r-p ro v id e d benefit plans, a n d in s e le c te d features
within plans, small private establishm ents a n d State a n d lo c a l governm ents, 1987, 1990, 19 9 2 ,1 9 9 4 , a n d 1996
Small private establishments

Item

1992

1990
Scope of survey (in 000's)................................................
N um ber of em ployees (in 000’s):
With medical care............................................................
W ith life insurance...........................................................
W ith defined benefit plan...............................................
Tim e-off plans
P articipants w ith:
Paid lunch tim e ...................................................................
A verage minutes per d ay..............................................
Paid rest tim e .....................................................................
A verage minutes pier d ay.............................................
Average days per occurrence.....................................
Paid holidays.......................................................................
A verage days per year1.................................................
Paid personal leave..........................................................
Paid vacations....................................................................
U npaid le ave .......................................................................

1994

Percent of participants w ith employee
contribution required for:
Self coverage...................................................................
A verage m onthly contribution....................................
Fam ily coverage.............................................................
Average m onthly contribution....................................
P articipants in life insurance plans.................................
Percent of participants with:
Accidental death and dism emberm ent
insurance..........................................................................
S urvivor incom e benefits...............................................
Retiree protection available...........................................
P articipants in long-term disability
insurance plans................................................................
P articipants in sickness and accident
insurance plans.................................................................
P articipants in short-term disability p la n s 2...................
Retirem ent plans
P articipants in defined benefit pension plans.............
Percent of participants with:
Normal retirem ent prior to age 6 5 ..............................
Early retirem ent available.............................................
Ad hoc pension increase in last 5 years...................
Term inal earnings form ula...........................................
Benefit coordinated w ith Social S ecurity..................
Participants in defined contribution plans.....................
P articipants in plans with tax-deferred savings
arrangem ents....................................................................

1996

1987

1990

1992

1994

32,466

34,360

35,910

39,816

10,321

12,972

12,466

12,907

22,402
20,778
6,493

24,396
21,990
7,559

23,536
21,955
5,480

25,599
24,635
5,883

9,599
8,773
9,599

12,064
11,415
11,675

11,219
11,095
10,845

11,192
11,194
11,708

8
37
48
27
47
2.9
84

9
37
49
26
50
3.0
82

50
3.1
82

51
3.0
80

17
34
58
29
56
3.7
81

11
36
56
29
63
3.7
74

_
_
62
3.7
73

9.5
11
2.8
88
47

9.2
12
2.6
88
53

7.5
13
2.6
88
50

7.6
14
30
86
50

10.9
38
27
72
97

13.6
39
29
67
95

10
34
53
29
65
3.7
75
14.2
38
29
67
95

17
8

18
7

_

_

57
30

51
33

59
44

47

48

U npaid fam ily leave..........................................................
Insurance plans
P articipants in m edical care plans..................................
Percent of participants with coverage for:
Home health ca re ............................................................

State and local governm ents

11.5
38
30
66
94

93

69

71

66

64

93

93

90

87

79
83
26

80
84
28

-

-

76
78
36

82
79
36

87
84
47

84
81
55

42
$25.13
67
$109.34

47
$36.51
73
$150.54

52
$40.97
76
$159.63

52
$42.63
75
$181.53

35
$15.74
71
$71.89

38
$25.53
65
$117.59

43
$28.97
72
$139.23

47
$30.20
71
$149.70

64

64

61

62

85

88

89

87

78

76
1
25

79
2
20

77

67

67

74

13

55

64
2
46

22

31

27

28

30

14

21

22

21

_

_

_

_

1

19

1

1

1

45

1
46

19

23

20

6

26

26

_

_

_

20

22

15

15

93

90

87

91

54
95
7
58
49

50
95
4
54
46

-

47
92
53
44

92
90
33
100
18

89
88
16
100
8

92
89
10
100
10

92
87
13
99
49

31

33

34

38

9

9

9

9

17

24

23

28

28

45

45

24

5
31

5
50

5
64

_
29

O ther benefits
Em ployees eligible for:
Flexible benefits p lans.....................................................
Reim bursem ent a cco u n ts3............................................
Prem ium conversion plans ..........................................

1

2

3

4

5

8

14

19

12

5

1 M ethods used to calculate the average num ber of paid holidays w ere revised
in 1994 to count partial days more precisely. Average holidays for 1994 are
not com parable with those reported in 1990 and 1992.
2 The definitions fo r paid sick leave and short-term disability (previously
sickness and accident insurance) w ere changed for the 1996 survey. Paid sick
leave now includes only plans that specify either a m axim um num ber of days
pier year or unlim ited days. S hort-term disability now includes all insured, selfinsured, and State-m andated plans available on a pier-disability basis, as well
as the unfunded per-disability plans previously reported as sick leave.

90

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

7
Sickness and accident insurance, reported in years prior to this survey,
included only insured, self-insured, and State-m andated plans providing pierdisability benefits at less than full pay.
3 Prior to 1996, reim bursem ent accounts included prem ium conversion plans,
which specifically allow m edical plan participants to pay required plan
prem ium s w ith pretax dollars. Also, reim bursem ent accounts that w ere part of
flexible benefit plans w ere tabulated separately.
N o t e : Dash indicates data not available.

31. W ork stoppages involving 1,000 workers or m ore
M easure

Annual totals

1999

1999

Dec.

2000

2000
Jan.p

Feb.p

Mar.p

A pr.p

Mayp

Junep

Julyp

Aug.p Sept.p O ct.p

Nov.p

Dec.p

N um ber of stoppages:
Beginning in period..................................
In effect during period............................

17
21

39
40

0
1

0
1

1
2

2
4

6
7

2
4

5
8

3
6

6
8

5
10

7
12

0
3

2
3

W orkers involved:
Beginning in period (in thousands)....
In effect during period (in thousands).

73
80

394
397

.0
3.0

.0
3.0

17.0
20.0

5.7
25.7

26.7
29.7

136.9
141.3

11.4
150.8

7.2
146.9

99.2
237.2

17.8
167.8

60.3
211.6

.0
4.5

8.7
10.3

Days idle:
64.5
58.9
272.2 3,095.3 3,134.0 2,804.4 4,186.6 3,029.3 3,088.6
327.6
298.0
63.0
60.0
1,995
20,419
.11
.13
.11
.10
.10
.10
.01
(2)
(2)
.01
.01
.06
.01
(2)
<2)
Percent of estim ated workina tim e 1....
1 Agricultural and governm ent em ployees are included in the total em ployed and total working tim e; private household, forestry, and fishery em ployees are excluded. An explanation of
th e m easurem ent of Idleness as a percentage of the total tim e worked is found i n " ’Total econom y' m easures of strike Idleness,” Monthly Labor Review, O ctober 1968, pp. 5 4 -5 6 .
2 Less than 0.005.
p = prelim inary.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

91

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

Price Data

32. Consumer Price Indexes for All Urban Consumers and for Urban W age Earners and Clerical Workers: U.S. city average,
by expenditure category and com m odity or service group
[1 9 8 2 - 8 4 = 100, u n le s s o th e rw is e in d ica te d ]___________________________

Annual average

Series

1999
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
FOR A LL URBAN CONSUMERS
All items.......................................................................
All Items (1967= 100)....................................................
Food and beverages......................................................
Food.................................................................................
Food at hom e..............................................................
Cereals and bakery products.................................
Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs................................

166.6
499.0
164.6
164.1
164.2
185.0
147.9

2000

2000

Nov.

2001

Dec.

Jan.

172.2
515.8
168.4
167.8
167.9
188.3
154.5
160.7
204.6

174.1
521.5
169.5
168.9
168.8
189.0
155.5
161.4
207.3

174.0
521.1
170.5
170.0
170.2
190.7
156.6

175.1
524.5
171.4
170.9
171.3
191.1
158.0

161.5
215.1

137.8
155.6
154.0
147.4
172.2

137.9
156.0
153.0
146.5
173.3

165.1
105.2
169.7

107.5
169.0
109.0
174.7

110.0
170.4
111.0
176.4

163.9
187.3
177.5
112.3
192.9
101.3
128.8
113.5
91.4
120.9
126.7

169.6
193.4
183.9
117.5
198.7
103.7
137.9
122.8
129.7
128.0
128.2

131.3
131.1
123.3
129.0
125.7
144.4
140.5
100.1
142.9
152.0
100.7
100.1
100.5
171.9
197.7
250.6
230.7
255.1
229.2
299.5
102.1
100.7
101.2

129.6
129.7
121.5
130.6
123.8
153.3
149.1
100.8
142.8
155.8
129.3
128.6
101.5
177.3
209.6
260.8
238.1
266.0
237.7
317.3

107.0
261.7
308.4
96.0
95.5
100.1

other than teleDhone services1,4....................
Personal computers and peripheral
equipment1,2.................................................
Other goods and services.............................................
Tobacco and smoking products................................

Dairy and related products1...................................
Fruits and vegetables..............................................
Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage
m aterials..................................................................
Other foods at home................................................
Sugar and sweets..................................................
Fats and oils............................................................
Other foods.............................................................
Other miscellaneous foods1,2...........................
Food away from home1...............................................
Other food away from hom e1,2.............................
Alcoholic beverages....................................................
Housing.............................................................................
Shelter...........................................................................
Rent of primary residence......................................
Lodging away from hom e........................................
Owners’ equivalent rent of primary residence3...
Tenants’ and household insurance1, ..................
Fuels and utilities.....................................................
Fuels..........................................................................
Fuel oil and other fuels........................................
Gas (piped) and electricity..................................
Household furnishings and operations.................
A pp a rel.............................................................................
Men's and boys' apparel..........................................
W omen's and girls' apparel....................................
Infants' and toddlers’ apparel1................................
Footwear.....................................................................
Transportation.................................................................
Private transportation.................................................
New and used motor vehicles2...............................
New vehicles............................................................
Used cars and trucks1...........................................
Motor fuel....................................................................
Gasoline (all types).................................................
Motor vehicle parts and equipment.......................
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair.................
Public transportation...................................................
Medical care.....................................................................
Medical care commodities.........................................
Medical care services.................................................
Professional services................................................
Hospital and related services..................................
Recreation2......................................................................
Video and audio1,2.................................................
Education and communication2..................................
Education2.................................................................
Educational books and supplies..........................
Tuition, other school fees, and child care..........
Communication1,2.......................................................
Information and information processing1,2........
Telephone services1,2.........................................
Information and information processing

Personal care1..............................................................
Personal care pro d u cts'.........................................
Personal care services1..........................................

92

M onthly Labor R eview

Mar.

Apr.

May

163.6
212.6

175.8
526.7
171.8
171.3
171.8
191.9
159.5
163.6
211.5

176.2
528.0
172.2
171.7
172.0
191.9
160.1
163.2
211.5

176.9
529.9
172.4
171.9
172.2
192.5
160.7
163.4
213.3

177.7
532.2
172.9
172.5
172.8
193.2
160.8
164.7
213.1

136.7
156.3
153.5
150.2
172.7

139.4
157.8
155.7
153.0
173.8

139.9
157.9
155.8
152.6
174.0

138.9
157.6
154.0
151.5
174.4

171.6
195.2
186.8

108.9
170.8
111.1
176.5
171.9
195.1
187.6

113.9
201.2

108.8
201.8

104.5
142.7
127.7
140.3
132.7
128.9
131.8
131.3
124.8

104.7
145.3
130.6
144.9
135.6
128.6
127.8
128.0
119.7

108.7
171.8
111.4
177.7
174.7
197.6
188.9
119.1
105.4
105.1
152.3
138.0
144.6
144.0
129.1
128.4
126.6
121.0

130.7
125.4
155.2
151.1

128.2
123.8
154.4
150.3

109.0
171.4
111.3
177.2
174.1
196.4
188.2
114.1
202.4
105.0
153.8
139.8
149.1
145.7
128.8
125.4
125.5
115.5
127.4
121.4
154.4
150.3

139.5
158.6
155.7
153.1
175.1
108.4

129.3
122.6
154.9
150.7

101.5
142.7
159.3
133.0
132.2
102.5
179.9
209.1
264.1
240.0
269.8
239.8
324.7
103.7
100.9
103.2

102.1
143.6
160.2
127.8
127.0
103.1
179.9
209.5
264.8
241.1
270.4
240.3
325.3
103.7
100.7
103.6

102.3
143.7
160.4
126.6
125.8
103.6
180.6
210.2
267.1
242.3
273.0
242.6
328.5
104.1
101.2
103.9

102.2
143.3
160.4
127.5
126.8
104.0
181.5
212.1
268.9
243.8
274.9
244.1
331.0
104.3
101.6
104.0

112.5
279.9
324.0
93.6
92.8
98.5

115.4
284.8
332.5
92.3

115.5
285.4
332.7
93.0

91.5
97.5

92.2
98.4

115.8
289.2
333.3
93.3
92.4
98.8

30.5

25.9

24.2

23.8

53.5
258.3
355.8
161.1
151.8
171.4

41.1
271.1
394.9

37.3
276.2
411.0

165.6
153.7
178.1

167.4
153.9
180.6

36.5
274.0
396.6
167.8
155.5
181.3

159.6
203.1
134.3
153.5
152.3
148.3
168.9
104.9

103.3
101.0
102.5

See footnotes at end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Feb.

J an u a ry 2002

172.3
111.6
177.8
175.4
198.9
189.6
124.2
203.6
105.4
150.8
136.3
138.1
142.6
129.1

108.5
172.7
111.8
178.1
175.4
199.2
190.2
121.8
204.2
105.5
149.7
135.1
134.4
141.6
129.1

132.2
127.5
127.8
1316.0
125.2
153.9
149.7

131.9
128.2
127.0
131.4
124)9
156.1
152.1
101.8
142.7
159.7
133.6
132.8
104.2
181.9
208.3
270.8
245.7
276.8
245.6
333.6
105.0
101.7
104.1

116.0
290.4
333.7
93.2
92.2
98.7

101.9
142.8
159.9
124.1
123.3
104.7
181.7
210.0
270.0
244.9
275.9
244.8
332.8
104.3
101.6
104.3
116.1
290.8
334.0
93.7
92.7
99.4

23.2

22.9

35.0
275.9
404.3
168.2
155.3
181.6

June

178.0
533.3
173.4
173.0
173.3
194.2
161.7

July

166.9
211.8

177.5
531.6
174.0
173.5
173.9
194.9
162.3
168.3
210.7

138.1
159.6
155.8
154.7
176.4

138.6
159.5
155.7
156.7
175.7

108.8

107.7
173.6
112.6
179.1
177.3
200.7
191.6
123.7
205.7

173.1
112.4
178.5
175.9
199.6
191.0
120.0
204.9
106.8
151.3
136.8
131.9
143.8
128.9
129.8
129.1
122.3
130.6
124.4
159.2
155.3
101.4
142.3
159.1
146.8
146.0
104.4
182.5
209.3
271.4
246.6
277.3
245.8
335.1

107.Ò
155.7
141.6
129.6
149.4
129.2
126.3
125.8
117.5
127.3
122.1
158.3
154.0
101.1
141.7
158.9
142.0
141.3
104.4
182.7
216.3
272.5
248.1
278.3
246.5
336.6
104.8
101.3
104.4

Aug.

177.5
531.8
174.4
173.9
174.2
195.9
162.4

Sept.

Nov.

168.9
208.8

174.6
174.1
174.3
195.1
162.4
169.4
212.1

177.7
532.2
175.3
174.9
175.2
195.2
163.5
170.8
213.5

171.2
212.9

138.9
160.4
156.1
157.8
176.8

140.0
161.0
156.1
158.5
177.6

139.2
160.2
156.6
158.5
176.2

139.9
160.9
156.4
159.5
177.0

139.5
160.3
154.9
155.6
177.6

109.6
174.1
113.8
179.7

109.5
174.7
114.3
180.0
178.0
202.4
193.1
125.2
207.3
106.6
152.7
138.0
122.1
146.0
129.1

108.9
175.1
115.3
180.4
177.4
202.0
193.9
116.8
208.1
106.7
150.6
135.7
125.3
143.1
129.4
126.8
123.7
120.3

108.9
175.6
115.4
180.8
176.7
202.4
194.7
114.5
209.0
106.9
144.6
129.1
121.5
135.9
129.0
129.5
127.5
122.1

110.6
175.8
115.4
181.2

131.5
124.9
152.3
148.1
100.6
141.0
157.8
116.3
115.6
105.5
186.0
209.1
275.9
250.2
282.0
248.4
344.8
105.3
101.3
107.1

119.5
298.0
343.9
93.5
92.4
99.6

129.3
122.9
155.5
151.2
100.2
140.2
157.3
131.4
130.7
105.2
185.1
212.7
275.0
249.6
281.0
247.9
342.6
105.2
101.3
106.6
121.7
305.4
350.0
93.1
92.0
99.2

122.2
307.2
351.5
93.6
92.5
99.9

122.3
304.7
352.0
93.3
92.2
99.6

177.6
201.4
192.3
124.0
206.3
106.6
154.8
140.5
123.8
148.6
129.2
122.6
122.5
111.6
124.5
121.3
154.4
149.9

122.6
121.4
112.1
126.3
121.9
153.3
148.8
100.5
140.3
158.0
121.9
121.2
104.9
184.0
213.7
274.4
249.1
280.5
247.7
341.2
105.1
101.7

178.3
534.0

Oct.

177.4
531.3
175.2
174.6
174.7
194.9
162.7

176.9
202.9
195.5
111.6
210.1
106.9
143.5
127.8
118.3
134.7
129.1
128.0
127.4
119.4
132.4
123.7
150.2
146.1
101.3
142.6
157.4
104.5
103.8
105.8
186.4
205.1
276.7
250.6
283.0
248.8
347.1

116.1
290.8
334.1
93.3
92.3
99.0

105.0
101.6
104.0
116.4
290.7
335.0
92.9
91.8
98.7

116.9
293.9
336.2
93.1
92.1
99.0

100.8
141.2
158.3
125.6
124.9
105.1
183.4
216.1
273.1
248.5
278.9
246.8
337.9
105.0
101.7
104.8
117.2
295.1
337.2
93.6
92.5
99.6

22.5

22.1

21.7

21.4

21.3

20.7

20 3

20.2

20.0

33.9
277.2
408.5

32.4
277.7
407.7

31.7
277.7
424.2

30.4
281.3
418.7

169.6
155.8
183.4

169.5
153.2
184.1

27.8
283.3
424.6
171.2
154.7
185.2

26.7
287.8
444.0
171.9
155.5
185.5

25.8
289.2
446.7

169.1
155.7
182.2

29.3
285.8
441.2
170.7
155.1
184.8

26.4
285.6
429.9

168.6
155.3
181.9

29.8
281.2
421.0
170.0
154.6
184.1

172.3
155.4
185.9

172.6
155.4
186.8

105.8

105.5
101.4
107.0

32.

Continued— Consumer Price Indexes for All Urban Consumers and for Urban W age Earners and Clerical Workers: U.S. city
average, by expenditure category and com m odity or service group

[1982-84 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]
Series
Miscellaneous personal services......................
Commodity and service group:
Commodities................................................................
Food and beverages................................................
Commodities less food and beverages...............
Nondurables less food and beverages.............
A p p a re l.................................................................
Nondurables less food, beverages,
and apparel.........................................................
Durables..................................................................
Services........................................................................
Transporatation services......................................
Other services.........................................................
Special indexes:
All items less food...................................................
All items less shelter..............................................
All items less medical care...................................
Commodities less food..........................................
Nondurables less food...........................................
Nondurables less food and apparel....................
Nondurables............................................................
Services less rent of shelter3................................
Services less medical care services...................
Energy.......................................................................
All items less energy..............................................
All items less food and energy...........................
Commodities less food and energy................
Energy commodities.......................................
Services less energy.........................................

Annual average
1999

2000

2001

2000
Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Sept.

Aug.

Oct.

Nov.

243.0

252.3

255.7

255.7

257.3

258.6

259.5

260.2

261.0

261.8

263.2

265.5

266.4

267.3

268.0

144.4
164.6
132.5
137.5
131.3

149.2
168.4
137.7
147.4
129.6

150.6
169.5
139.3
150.2
131.8

150.0
170.5
137.8
147.2
127.8

150.0
171.4
137.4
146.4
125.4

150.6
171.8
138.1
147.7
128.4

150.7
172.2
138.0
147.9
132.2

151.9
172.4
139.7
151.0
131.9

152.9
172.9
140.8
153.5
129.8

152.1
173.4
139.4
151.3
126.3

150.4
174.0
136.5
146.3
122.6

149.8
174.4
135.4
144.8
122.6

151.5
174.6
138.0
149.6
126.8

150.5
175.3
136.1
146.0
129.5

149.5
175.2
134.6
142.8
128.0

146.0
126.0
188.8

162.5
125.4
195.3

165.7
125.5
197.6

163.1
125.9
198.0

163.2
125.9
200.2

161.9
125.5
201.8

170.4
124.5
204.0

164.5
124.2
204.5

162.1
123.6
205.2

167.5
123.4
204.9

160.4
123.6
204.7

156.2
124.2
205.1

201.3
196.1
229.9

203.2
198.0
232.4

203.1
198.3
233.0

204.5
199.1
234.1

207.2
200.2
235.4

167.0
125.4
201.9
207.4
200.1
236.2

172.0
124.9
202.5

195.0
190.7
223.1

163.7
125.9
201.0
205.7
200.3
234.8

207.8
200.4
236.4

209.0
202.0
236.7

209.7
202.6
237.7

210.8
202.7
239.4

210.3
202.8
240.6

210.8
203.4
241.4

211.3
204.2
241.9

167.0
160.2
162.0
134.0
139.4
147.5
151.2

173.0
165.7
167.3
139.2
149.1
162.9
158.2

175.0
167.7
169.2
140.8
151.8
166.0
160.2

174.7
167.5
169.0
139.3
149.0
163.6
159.1

175.9
168.6
170.1
139.0
148.3
163.9
159.1

176.6
169.1
170.8
139.7
149.6
164.3
160..0

177.1
169.2
171.2
139.6
149.8
162.7
160.3

177.8
170.1
171.8
141.2
152.8
167.4
162.0

179.0
171.0
172.9
141.0
153.1
170.6
162.7

179.0
170.9
173.0
139.7
151.5
168.0
162.3

178.2
169.9
172.4
137.8
148.1
161.5
160.8

177.8
169.3
172.0
136.4
145.1
157.7
159.1

202.9
188.9
124.6
178.6
181.3
144.9
129.5
202.1

205.9
191.1
129.0
180.3
183.0
146.0
133.8
204.2

206.9
191.5
128.1
180.2
182.8
145.1
129.3
204.4

210.0
193.6
132.5
181.0
183.5
144.8
128.6
205.7

210.5
194.3
132.0
181.8
184.4
145.9
129.1
206.8

210.6
195.1
129.5
182.6
185.3
146.2
125.4
207.7

210.6
195.2
133.1
182.9
185.6
146.6
133.8
208.0

213.3
197.2
140.5
183.3
185.9
144.9
141.1
209.4

178.2
170.0
172.3
138.2
148.3
165.2
160.3
213.7
197.8
132.4
183.6
186.2
144.4
125.6
210.1

178.2
169.7
172.3
137.2
146.9
163.0
159.7

195.8
182.7
106.6
174.4
177.0
144.1
100.0
195.7

178.6
170.9
172.6
142.4
155.1
172.0
163.6
211.4
195.7
140.1
182.9
185.5
145.7
145.6
208.4

214.0
198.4
129.4
184.1
186.6
143.8
122.0
211.2

213.9
198.1
132.5
184.5
187.1
145.2
131.0
211.2

213.0
197.8
122.1
185.1
187.6
145.6
116.9
211.7

213.3
198.2
116.0
185.4
188.1
146.0
105.8
212.3

163.2
486.2
163.8
163.4
163.0
184.7
147.6
159.4
201.8

168.9
503.1
167.7
167.2
166.8
188.0
154.1

170.7
508.5
169.8
169.3
169.1
190.4
156.3
161.5
213.3

171.7
511.6
170.8
170.3
170.3
190.9
157.9
163.8
210.9

172.4
513.4
171.2
170.8
170.8
191.7
159.2
163.5
210.1

172.6
514.2
171.6
171.1
171.1
191.7
160.0

173.5
516.7
171.9
171.4
171.3
192.2
160.7

173.8
517.8
173.4
173.0
173.0
194.5
162.1

173.8
517.6
173.8
173.4
173.3
195.6
162.0

163.5
211.7

166.9
210.5

168.3
209.5

168.9
208.0

174.8
520.6
174.0
173.5
173.4
194.3
162.3
169.4
211.0

174.0
518.3
174.8
174.3
174.3
195.1
163.2

163.1
209.8

172.3
171.9
171.8
192.9
160.6
164.7
211.5

174.6
520.0
172.8
172.4
172.4
193.9
161.4

160.5
203.4

170.9
509.0
168.8
168.3
167.8
188.6
155.3
161.4
205.8

170.8
212.2

173.7
517.3
174.5
174.1
173.7
194.7
162.6
171.2
211.5

133.2
152.8
152.2
147.9
168.8
104.6

136.9
155.1
153.9
147.2
172.3
107.1

137.1
155.4
152.7
146.3
173.4
109.6

135.8
155.8
153.3
149.9
173.0
108.6

139.3
157.3
155.6
152.4
174.1

138.8
158.2
155.6
153.0
175.4

108.5

108.5

138.2
157.1
153.7
151.4
174.6
108.4

137.2
159.1
155.8
154.3
176.5
108.7

139.3
160.5
156.1
158.0
177.9
109.7

138.4
159.8
156.2
158.1
176.5
109.2

139.2
160.4
156.2
159.1
177.3
109.5

169.0
109.2
173.8
165.4
187 4
183.4
117.3
180.8
103.9
137.4
121.8
128.8
127.5
125.5
128.3
129.7
119.3
132.3
124.2
152.8
150.1
101.4

170.5
111.2
175.6
167.6
189.5
186.2
113.9
183.0
104.7
142.0
126.5
139.3
132.1
126.0
130.5
131.3
122.6
132.7
125.7
154.9
152.2
102.2

170.8
111.4
175.8
168.1
189.6
187.0
108.7
183.5
104.9
144.6
129.3
144.1
134.8
125.6
126.6
128.0
117.5
130.0
124.0
153.9
151.2
102.8

171.8
111.6
177.0
170.5
191.5
188.3
118.5
184.5
105.3
151.5
136.6
145.0
143/0
125.9
127.0
126.9
118.4

172.3
111.8
177.2
171.0
192.6
189.0
123.8
185.2

172.7
112.0
177.6
171.0
192.9
189.6
121.2
185.7

105.6
149.9
134.8
138.0
141.5
125.9
130.6
127.6
125.2
133.3
125.2
153.3
150.5
102.5

105.8
148.8
133.6
133.9
140.4
126.0
130.5
128.3
124.7
133.2
125.2
155.8
153.2
102.4

173.1
112.5
178.0
171.7
193.5
190.4
119.9
186.3
106.9
150.8
135.7
131.5
142.9
125.7
128.5
129.2
120.2
132.0
124.5
159.2
156.6
102.0

137.8
159.1
155.5
156.4
176.0
108.0
173.5
112.8
178.4
173.0
194.4
191.0
123.2
187.0
107.2
155.2
140.5
129.2
148.5
125.9
125.2
126.3
115.6
128.6
122.1
157.9
155.1
101.7

138.0
160.0
156.0
157.4
177.2
109.9

165.0
105.1
168.8
160.0
181.6
177.1
122.2
175.7
101.6
128.7
113.0
91.7
120.4
124.7
130.1
131.2
121.3
130.3
126.2
143.4
140.7
100.4

138.7
157.3
155.4
152.8
174.0
108.5
171.4
111.5
176.5
170.2
190.6
187.7
113.8
184.1
105.2
153.2
138.6
150.1
144.8
125.7
124.1
125.8
113.2
129.0
121.5
154.0
151.2
102.9

174.0
114.0
179.2
173.3
195.0
191.7
123.7
187.5
106.7
154.4
139.5
123.1
147.8
125.8
121.9
122.9
110.2
126.2
121.4
153.4
150.4
101.4

174.7
114.4
179.7
173.5
195.9
192.4
124.4
188.5
106.8
152.2
137.0
121.5
145.2
125.7
121.6
121.6
110.1
128.3
122.0
152.5
149.5
101.0

175.0
115.6
180.1
173.2
196.0
193.3
116.8
189.2
106.8
150.1
134.7
125.3
142.2
126.0
125.6
123.7
118.3
131.1
123.0
155.1
152.3
100.7

175.6
115.7
180.5
172.5
196.6
194.0
114.8
190.0
107.0
144.0
127.9
121.4
135.0
125.5
128.3
127.3
120.2
133.5
124.9
151.4
148.6
101.1

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR URBAN
W AGE EARNERS AND CLERICAL WORKERS
All items.........................................................................
All items (1 9 6 7 - 100).................................................
Food and beverages..................................................
Food..............................................................................
Food at home...........................................................
Cereals and bakery products.............................
Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs............................
Dairy and related products’ ................................
Fruits and vegetables...........................................
Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage
materials...............................................................
Other foods at hom e............................................
Sugar and sweets..............................................
Fats and oils.........................................................
Other foods..........................................................
Other miscellaneous foods1,2.......................
Food away from home1..........................................
Other food away from home1,2.........................
Alcoholic beverages.................................................
Housing........................................................................
Shelter........................................................................
Rent of primary residence...................................
Lodqinq away from home2..................................
Owners’ equivalent rent of primary residence3
Fuels and utilities.................................................
Fuel oil and other fuels....................................
Gas (piped) and electricity.............................
Household furnishings and operations.............

Private transportation.............................................
New and used motor vehicles2..........................
See footnotes at end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

131.0
122.4
154.5
151.7
102.8

174.4
519.4

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

138.7
159.7
154.7
155.1
177.8
110.8
175.8
115.8
180.8
172.8
197.2
194.9
111.8
190.9
107.1
142.8
126.7
118.5
133.7
125.6
127.2
127.3
118.0
134.3
124.2
149.2
146.4
101.7

93

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

Price Data

32. Continued—Consumer Price Indexes for All Urban Consumers and for Urban W age Earners and Clerical Workers: U.S. city
average, by expenditure category and com m odity or service group
[1 9 8 2 -8 4 = 100, u n le s s o th e rw is e in d ica te d ]_________________________________________________

Series

Annual average
1999

2000

2000
Nov.

2001

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

New vehicles.......................................................

144.0

143.9

143.7

144.6

144.8

144.5

143.8

143.8

143.4

142.7

142.3

141.4

141.3

142.1

143.8

Used cars and trucks1........................................
Motor fuel................................................................
Gasoline (all types).............................................
Motor vehicle parts and equipm ent...................
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair.............
Public transportation................................................
Medical care.................................................................
Medical care commodities......................................
Medical care services.............................................
Professional services............................................
Hospital and related services.............................

153.3
100.8
100.2
100.0
173.3
193.1
249.7
226.8
254.9
230.8
295.5
101.3
100.5

157.1
129.5
128.8
100.9
178.8
203.4

160.7
133.2
132.4
101.8
181.4
203.2

161.6
127.7
126.9
102.3
181.5
203.7
263.8
236.5
270.1
242.3
320.9
102.6
100.3
103.7

161.1
124.1
123.4
104.0
183.3
204.2
269.1
240.2
275.7
247.0
328.3
103.0
101.0
104.4

160.9
134.0
133.3
103.5
183.4
202.7
269.9
241.0
276.5
247.8
329.1
103.7
101.2

160.2
147.4
146.7
103.6
184.1
203.5
270.4
241.7
277.0
248.0
330.6
103.7
101.1
104.1

160:0
142.1
141.1
103.6
184.4
209.5
271.5
243.2
278.0
248.7
332.0
103.5
100.7
104.5

159.3
124.9
124.2
104.3
185.0
209.5
272.0
243.6
278.5
249.0
333.5
103.7
101.1
104.9

159.0
122.0
121.3
104.1
185.6
207.7
273.4
244.1
280.2
249.9
337.0
103.9
101.0
'105.8

158.2
132.4
131.7
104.4
186.7
207.0
273.9
244.6
280.7
250.1
338.3
103.8
100.6

101.5

263.1
235.5
269.4
241.7
320.3
102.7
100.6
103.2

161.7
127.8
127.1
103.4
183.1
205.8
268.1
239.1
274.7
246.4
326.6
103.1
101.2
104.1

106.5

158.7
116.2
115.5
104.7
187.5
203.7
274.9
245.2
281.7
250.5
340.5
103.8
100.6
107.1

158.3
104.4
103.8
105.0
187.8
200.4

259.9
233.6
265.9
239.6
313.2
102.4
100.7
102.7

161.7
126.9
126.2
103.0
182.1
204.3
266.3
237.8
272.8
244.9
323.9
103.0
100.8
104.0

107.2
264.1
302.8
96.9

112.8
283.3
318.2
94.6

115.6
288.6
326.3
93.3

115.7
289.2
326.5
94.1

116.0
292.9
327.0
94.4

116.2
294.1
327.4
94.4

116.3
294.7
327.9
94.8

116.4
294.7
328.2
94.4

117.2
298.2
330.3
94.3

117.6
299.3
331.3
94.8

119.6
302.2
337.3
94.7

121.7
309.8
342.9
94.3

122.3
311.7
344.4
94.9

122.3
308.9
344.9
94.5

96.5
100.2

94.1
98.7

92.6"
97.6

93.6
98.6

93.8
99.0

93.7
98.9

94.1
99.5

93.8
99.2

116.7
294.5
329.1
94.0
93.4
98.8

93.6
99.2

94.0
99.7

94.0
99.8

93.6
99.4

94.2
100.1

93.8
99.7

31.6

26.8

25.1

24.6

24.0

23.8

23.3

22.8

22.4

22.2

22.0

21.5

21.2

21.0

20.8

53.1
261.9
356.2

40.5
276.5
395.2

34.3
281.5
404.6
168.1
155.7
182.1
257.0

31.1
288.2
424.8
169.4
156.0
183.9
260.0

29.9
286.8
419.8
169.3
153.8
184.7
260.7

29.4
287.9
421.6
169.9
155.4
184.8
261.6

170.6
155.9
185.4
263.2

27.4
290.0
425.6
170.9
155.5
185.9
264.9

26.6
295.5
444.7

168.5
155.7
182.4
258.4

31.8
283.5
408.5
169.0
155.9
182.8
258,3

28.7
293.8
441.9

165.5
154.2
178.6
251.9

35.9
279.2
396.9
167.7
155.8
181.7
255.3

33.4
283.2
409.2

161.3
152.5
171.7
243.1

36.7
282.3
411.3
167.1
154.2
181.1
255.1

171.4
156.1
186.1
265.6

26.1
292.4
430.9
171.9
156.1
186.5
266.8

25.5
297.3
448.3
172.3
156.1
187.4
267.5

144.7
163.8
133.2
138.1
130.1

149.8
167.7
139.0
149.1
128.3

151.4
168.8
140.8
152.1
130.5

150.6
169.8
139.1
148.6
126.6

150.8
170.8
138.8
148.1
124.1

151.4
171.2
139.5
149.4
127.0

151.4
171.6
139.3
149.3
130.6

152.8
171.9
141.2
153.1
130.5

153.9
172.3
142.6
156.2
128.5

153.0
172.8
141.1
153.6
125.2

151.2
173.4
138.0
148.2
121.9

150.5
173.8
136.9
146.5
121.6

152.5
174.0
139.8
152.0
125.6

151.2
174.8
137.4
147.4
128.3

150.1
174.5
135.9
144.2
127.2

147.2
126.0
185.3

165.3
125.8
191.6

168.8
126.2
194.0

165.5
126.6
194.5

166.0
126.6
196.6

164.4
126.2
197.8

170.5
126.0
198.0

176.3
125.5
198.7

182.5
195.0
228.1

182.6
195.2
228.9

183.6
196.0
229.9

185.5
197.2
231.2

185.8
197.2
231.9

186.3
197.6
232.2

167.3
124.8
200.6
187.8
199.5
233.6

164.8
124.3
201.2
188.7
199.8
235.1

171.4
124.1
201.1
188.7
200.1
235.9

158.2
124.8
201.4

180.5
192.9
225.9

174.1
125.2
200.1
187.2
198.9
232.6

162.7
124.3
201.0

174.9
187.9
219.6

166.5
126.6
197.2
184.4
197.2
230.6

189.3
200.9
236.8

189.9
202.3
237.2

163.1
158.1
159.2
134.6
140.0
148.4
151.3
174.1
179.5
106.1
171.1
173.1
144.3
100.3
192.6

169.1
163.8
164.7
140.4
150.7
165.4
158.9
180.1
185.4
124.8
175.1
177.1
145.4
129.7
198.7

171.3
165.7
166.6
142.2
153.6
168.8
161.0
182.8
187.7
129.0
176.8
179.0
146.7
133.8
200.8

170.9
165.5
166.4
140.6
150.3
165.8
159.7
183.7
188.3
127.6
176.8
178.7
145.8
128.9
201.1

171.9
166.5
167.4
140.3
149.9
166.3
159.9
186.6
190.3
131.8
177.4
179.3
145.5
128.5
202.2

172.5
167.0
168.0
141.0
151.1
166.8
160.8
186.9
190.8
131.3
178.2
180.1
146.2
129.1
203.1

172.8
167.0
168.2
140.8
151.1
164.9
160.9
187.0
191.4
128.6
178.8
180.9
146.8
125.1
204.0

173.8
168.0
169.1
142.7
154.7
170.5
163.0
187.0
191.6
132.9
179.2
181.3
147.3
134.2
204.4

174.7
169.1
170.0
144.1
157.6
175.9
164.8
187.8
192.3
140.6
179.2
181.2
146.4
146.6
204.8

174.9
169.0
170.2
142.6
155.3
173.9
163.8
189.6
193.6
140.3
179.5
181.4
145.6
141.5
205.7

173.9
167.8
169.4
139.6
150.1
167.7
161.2
189.9
194.2
131.3
179.8
181.7
145.4
125.0
206.3

173.7
167.5
169.3
138.5
148.5
165.4
160.5
190.1
194.7
128.6
180.1
181.9
144.6
122.1
207.3

174.9
168.8
170.3
141.3
153.8
171.5
163.5
189.9
194.6
132.6
180.7
182.6
146.0
132.1
207.6

173.8
167.6
169.5
139.0
149.4
163.5
161.5
189.0
194.4
121.2
181.3
183.2
146.3
116.7
208.3

173.4
166.9
169.1
137.6
146.4
159.5
159.7
189.3
194.8
114.8
181.8
183.8
146.9
105.5
209.0

Recreation2.................................................................
Education and communication2..............................
Education2................................................................
Educational books and supplies......................
Tuition, other school fees, and child care......
Communication1,2..................................................
Information and information processing1,2....
Telephone services1,2.....................................
Information and information processing
other than telephone services1,4................
Personal computers and peripheral
equipment ’ ............................................
Other goods and services.........................................
Tobacco and smoking products...........................
Personal care1.........................................................
Personal care products1....................................
Personal care services1.....................................
Miscellaneous personal services......................
Commodity and service group:
Food and beverages...............................................
Commodities less food and beverages..............
Nondurables less food and beverages.............
A p p a re l.................................................................
Nondurables less food, beverages,
and apparel........................................................
Durables..................................................................
Services.......................................................................
Rent of shelter3......................................................
T ra nspo rta tio n services......................................
Other services.........................................................
Special indexes:
All items less shelter.............................................
All items less medical care...................................
Commodities less food..........................................
Nondurables less food..........................................
Nondurables less food and apparel...................
Nondurables............................................................
Services less rent of shelter3...............................
Services less medical care services..................
Energy.......................................................................
All items less energy.............................................
All items less food and energy..........................
Commodities less food and energy................
Energy commodities.......................................
Services less energy.........................................

4 Indexes on a December 1988 = 100 base.
Dash indicates data not available.
NOTE: Index applied to a month as a whole, not to any specific date.

1 Not seasonally adjusted.
2 Indexes on a December 1997 = 100 base.
3 Indexes on a December 1982 = 100 base.

94

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

104.2

Jan u a ry 2002

275.6
245.6
282.6
250.9
342.7
104.0
100.7
106.9

33.

C onsum er Price Index: U.S. city a v e ra g e a n d a v a ila b le lo cal a re a data: all items

[1982-84 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]_______________________________________________________
Area

Oct.
U.S. city a verage......................................................................

Urban W age Earners

All Urban Consumers
2001

2000
Nov.

July

Aug.

Sept.

2000
Oct.

Nov.

Oct.

2001

Nov.

July

174.0

174.1

177.5

177.5

178.3

177.7

177.4

181.2
182.1
108.8
170.1
171.5
108.8

181.5
182.4
108.9
170.3
171.7

185.1
186.5
110.5
173.0
174.8

185.1
186.5
110.4
174.6
176.1

185.0

185.0
186.1
110.9
172.5
174.2

110.3
166.8
171.5
172.3
109.8
170.1
181.9
184.1

110.0
166.3
171.0
172.2
109.4

169.9
182.5
184.6
112.1

168.9
182.3
184.3
112.0

168.8
172.7
172.7

107.9
168.6
172.8
172.7

111.2

111.6
168.8
172.2
173.2
110.2
169.7
182.5
184.7
111.7

186.3
110.6
172.6
174.5
110.0
166.9
171.7
173.1
109.7

108.9

109.1

177.8
111.0

170.6

170.9

173.8

178.0

178.4

178.0
108.4
166.4

178.3
108.6
166.8
167.2

181.8
182.1
110.1
168.4

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

173.8

174.8

174.0

181.7

181.9
182.4
109.9
170.8
171.3
111.8
167.1
170.3
170.9
110.0

181.8

181.8

182.0
110.2
168.4
169.4
109.7
164.9
169.8
170.7
109.4

110.8

170.8
177.6
178.1
111.4

170.8
177.8
178.0
111.8

181.9
110.5
168.2
169.1
109.8
164.1
169.0
169.6
109.0
169.9
M l.6
177.7

173.7

Region and area size2
Northeast urban...............................................................................

164.9
168.5
168.6
108.1
167.6
177.2
179.0
109.0

167.3
177.2
178.8
109.2

185.0
186.2
110.7
172.5
174.3
111.0
166.1
171.6
172.5
109.8
170.1
182.0
184.2
111.4

158.1
108.5
168.7

158.2
108.7
168.6

161.8
110.3
171.0

161.9
110.2
171.2

162.5
110.8
172.0

162.0
110.3
171.5

161.7
110.2
170.8

156.6
108.3
168.1

156.8
108.6
168.1

160.2
109.9
169.8

160.1
109.8
170.0

160.9
110.6
171.1

160.3
110.0
170.4

160.0
109.9
169.7

C h ica go -G a ry-K e n o sh a, IL—IN—W l...........................................
Los A ng e les-R ive rsid e-O ran g e County, C A ...........................

175.4
173.8

176.0
173.5

177.7
178.3

178.1
178.4

179.7
178.8

178.1
178.3

177.4
178.1

169.8
166.9

170.4
166.6

171.7
171.3

172.0
171.1

173.7
171.5

171.9
171.0

171.2
170.7

New York, N Y -N orthern N J-L on g Island, N Y -N J -C T -P A ..

184.6

184.6

187.8

188.1

188.0

187.8

187.8

180.2

180.1

183.5

183.5

183.6

-

187.4
169.4
166.8
108.5

192.1
173.4
171.5
110.8

-

-

192.7

-

186.2
161.6
166.6
108.4

191.3
164.9
171.6
110.6

-

-

192.7
174.6
172.8
111.7

192.0
166.5
172.6
111.6

183.3
-

183.3

B osto n-B rockto n -N a sh u a, M A -N H -M E -C T .........................
C le veland-A kron, O H .....................................................................
D a lla s-F t W orth, T X .......................................................................

-

-

176.9
175.1
158.6
173.5

-

-

174.8
159.4
174.2

-

-

-

-

-

182.9
191.7

-

-

-

182.8
191.0
186.8

-

187.9

-

Size A— More than 1,500,000.................................................
Size B/C— 50,000 to 1,500,000s............................................
Size A— More than 1,500,000.................................................
Size B/C— 50,000 to 1,500,000s............................................
Size D— Nonm etropolitan (less than 50,000).....................
South u rban......................................................................................
Size A— More than 1,500,000.................................................
Size B/C— 50,000 to 1,500,000s............................................
Size D— Nonm etropolitan (less than 50,000)......................
W est urban.......................................................................................
Size A— More than 1,500,000.................................................
Size B/C— 50,000 to 1,500,000s............................................

108.9
165.0
168.6
168.5
108.2

166.9
108.7
163.4
166.8
166.3
107.9

109.1
163.7
166.9
166.2

169.3
109.8
164.2
169.7
170.3
109.5
170.8
177.2

182.2
109.8
168.9
169.8
110.1
164.9
169.4
169.8
109.3
170.7
176.9
177.4

111.8

Size classes:
A5.....................................................................................................
B/C3................................................................................................
D ......................................................................................................

Selected local areas6

W ashinqton-B altim ore, D C -M D -V A -W V 7..............................
Atlanta, G A ........................................................................................
D etroit-A nn A rb o r-F lin t, M l..........................................................
H o uston-G alveston-B razoria, T X ...............................................
M ia m i-F t. Lauderdale, F L .............................................................
P hiladelphia-W ilm ington-A tlantic City, P A -N J -D E -M D ......
San Francisco -O a klan d -S a n Jose, C A ...................................
S eattle-T a co m a -B rem e rto n , W A ................................................

171.9
171.9
157.1
169.6
177.9
183.4
182.1

-

1 Foods, fuels, and several other items priced every month in all areas; most other goods
and services priced as indicated:
M— Every month.
1— January, March, May, July, S eptem ber, and November.
2—
February, April, June, August, O ctober, and December.
2 Regions defined as the four Census regions.

-

172.3
171.5
110.9

176.7

-

169.6
166.5
155.4
167.1
177.2
179.3
177.5

-

-

174.2
169.4

-

-

-

-

157.0
170.9
182.2
186.7

-

-

181.5

-

191.9
164.0
171.1
110.7

-

169.6

-

_

169.1
157.8
171.7

_

-

_
-

-

182.3
187.5
183.1

-

_
-

M O -K S ; M ilw aukee-R acine, W l; M inneapolis-St. Paul, M N -W I; Pittsburgh, PA; Portland-S alem , O R -W A ; St Louis, M O -IL; San Diego, CA; T a m p a-S t. Petersburg-C learw ater,
FL.
7 Indexes on a Novem ber 1996 = 100 base.
Dash indicates data not available.

3 Indexes on a Decem ber 1996 = 100 base.
4 The "North Central" region has been renam ed the "M idwest" region by the Census Bureau.
It is com posed of th e same geographic entities.
5 Indexes on a Decem ber 1986 = 100 base.
6 In addition, the following m etropolitan areas are published semiannually and appear in
tables 34 and 39 of the January and July issues of the c p i Detailed Report : Anchorage, AK;
C incinnati-H am ilton, O H -K Y -IN ; D e nver-B oulder-G reeley, CO; Honolulu, HI; Kansas City,


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

NOTE: Local area CPI indexes are byproducts of the national CPI program . Each local
index has a sm aller sam ple size and is, therefore, subject to substantially m ore sam pling and
other m easurem ent error. As a result, local area indexes show greater volatility than the
national index, although their long-term trends are sim ilar. Therefore, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics strongly urges users to consider adopting the national average CPI for use in their
O Rcalatnr rla iiR fiR

InrlAY anniiAR tn a m o n th a s a w h n lo n n t to a n v R n a n ifir d a ta

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

95

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

34.

Price Data

A n n u a l d a ta : C o n s u m e r Price In d e x , U.S. c ity a v e r a g e , all item s a n d m a jo r groups

[1982-84 = 100]
Series

1992

C o nsum e r Price Index fo r All U rban C onsum ers:
A ll item s:
In d e x.....................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ................................................
Food and beverages:
In d e x.....................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ...............................................................
H ousing:
In d e x......................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ....................................................................
A pparel:
In d e x..............................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ................................................
T ra nspo rta tio n :
In d e x.................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ...........................................................
M edical care:
In d e x................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ...........................................................
O th er g oods and services:
In d e x..................................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ...................................................
C o nsum e r P rice Index fo r Urban W age E arners
a nd C lerical W orkers:
A ll item s:
In d e x......................................................
P erce n t ch a n g e ......................................................

96

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1993

1994

1995

140.3
3.0

144.5
3.0

148.2
2.6

152.4
2.8

138.7
1.4

141.6
2.1

144.9
2.3

148.9
2.8

137.5
2.9

141.2
2.7

144.8
2.5

131.9
2.5

133.7
1.4

126.5
2.2

1996

1997

I J o .y

1998

1999

2000

163.0
1.6

166.6
2.2

172.2
3.4

3.2

161.1
2.2

164.6
2.2

168.4
2.3

148.5
2.6

2.9

160.4
2.3

163.9
2.2

169.6
3.5

133.4
- .2

132.0
- 1 .0

- .2

133.0
.1

131.3
- 1 .3

129.6
- 1 .3

130.4
3.1

134.3
3.0

139.1
3.6

2.8

141.6
- 1 .9

144.4
2.0

153.3
6.2

190.1
7.4

2 01.4
5.9

211.0
4.8

220 .5
4.5

3.5

242.1
3.2

250.6
3.5

260.8
4.1

183.3
6.8

192.9
5.2

198.5
2.9

206 .9
4.2

5.7

258.3
8.7

271.1
5.0

138.2
2.9

142.1
2.8

145.6
2.5

2.9

159.7
1.3

163.2
2.2

168.9
3.5

J an u ary 2002

__

___ Ä
2.9

2.3

35.

Producer Price Indexes, by stage of processing

[1982 = 100]
Grouping

Annual average
1999

Finished goods.................................................
Finished consum er g oods............................
Finished consum er foods..........................
Finshed consum er goods
excluding foods..........................................
Nondurable goods less food..................
Durable goods...........................................
Capital equipm ent........................................

2000

2000

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

133.0
132.0
135.1

138.0
138.2
137.2

140.0
140.5
138.2

139.7
140.1
137.9

141.2
141.9
138.4

141.5
142.5
139.5

141.0
141.9
140.9

141.7
142.7
141.6

142.5
143.8
141.8

142.1
143.3
141.9

140.7
141.5
141.2

141.1
142.0
142.6

141.7
142.9
142.9

139.6
139.9
141.8

138.4
138.4
140.5

130.5
127.9
133.0
137.6

138.4
138.7
133.9
138.8

141.3
142.1
135.4
139.9

140.8
141.5
135.3
139.9

143.3
144.9
135.2
140.2

143.6
145.9
134.2
139.7

142.1
143.8
134.1
139.7

142.9
144.9
134.2
140.0

144.5
147.3
133.8
139.7

143.7
146.5
133.2
139.6

141.4
143.1
133.2
139.8

141.6
143.5
133.0
139.5

142.7
145.1
133.2
139.4

139.0
139.2
134.4
139.8

137.3
136.8
134.5
139.9

123.2

129.2

130.5

130.6

131.5

131.3

130.8

130.6

131.2

131.4

130.3

129.8

130.1

127.6

126.7

124.6

128.0
118.9
133.3
127.5
126.5

128.1
119.8
133.5
128.0
126.1

128.6
120.4
135.0
127.2
126.4

128.8
120.3
136.1
127.0
126.2

128.9
122.3
135.8
126.7
126.4

128.7
122.3
135.2
126.0
126.6

128.6
124.6
134.2
126.9
126.4

128.3
125.7
133.4
126.5
126.4

127.5
126.1
131.9
125.3
126.2

126.9
128.1
130.1
124.6
126.2

126.6
127.5
129.9
124.2
125.9

125.9
126.1
128.7
123.4
125.9

125.2
123.9
127.4

150.7

150.1
108.8
153.0
138.0

149.9
108.3
153.0
138.1

149.6
111.4
153.0
138.9

150.0
109.9
153.0
138.5

150.2
106.9
152.8
138.7

150.4
105.9
153.2
139.0

151.6
108.1
153.9
139.0

151.7
154.1
138.8

151.0
106.8
153.6
138.8

151.0
106.0
153.2
138.7

150.8
108.4
153.0
138.6

150.4
97.4
152.4
138.3

150.3
94.7
152.2
138.3

Interm ediate m aterials,
supplies, and com ponents........................
Materials and com ponents
for m anufacturing...........................................
M aterials for food m anufacturing..............
Materials for nondurable manufacturing..
Materials for durable m anufacturing........
Com ponents for m anufacturing..................

124.9
125.1
125.7

128.1
119.2
132.6
129.0
126.2

M aterials and com ponents
for construction...............................................
Processed fuels and lubricants.....................
C ontainers...........................................................
S upplies..............................................................

148.9
84.6
142.5
134.2

151.6
136.9

Crude m aterials for further
processing.......................................................
Foodstuffs and feedstuffs...............................
Crude nonfood m aterials................................

98.2
98.7
94.3

120.6
100.2
130.4

128.4
100.4
143.0

136.2
103.9
153.5

155.0
105.3
183.5

133.2
104.5
148.2

131.5
108.9
142.2

132.9
109.1
144.5

130.9
110.3
140.4

109.7
127.4

116.1
109.6
116.3

113.4
108.9
112.4

108.0
108.5
103.8

97.7
104.7
89.4

104.8
98.3
105.5

132.3
78.8
143.0
145.2
146.1

138.1
94.1
144.9
147.4
148.0

140.4
98.9
146.1
148.7
149.2

140.1
97.9
145.9
148.5
149.1

141.9
101.9
146.7
149.4
150.0

142.0
103.6
146.6
149.5
149.4

140.9
99.7
147.1
150.2
149.5

141.6

142.6
104.1
147.7
151.6
150.0

142.0
102.7
147.6
150.9
149.9

140.5
97.0
147.5
150.7
149.9

140.5
97.8
147.7
151.1
149.7

141.3

147.5
150.6
149.8

147.9
151.4
149.8

138.8
90.1
147.9
151.3
150.4

137.7
85.5
147.7
151.0
150.6

151.7

154.0

155.4

155.3

156.5

155.9

156.1

156.4

156.9

156.7

156.8

156.6

156.8

157.5

157.8

166.3

169.8

171.2

171.0

173.2

173.2

173.5

174.0

175.4

175.5

175.5

175.3

175.6

175.8

176.4

123.9

131.5
111.7
107.6
135.2

131.5
113.5
107.9
135.3

132.4
115.1
110.9
135.8

132.3
113.6
109.5
135.8

131.7
114.1
106.4
136.0

131.6
114.0
105.5
136.0

132.1
114.9
107.6
136.1

132.3
116.3
109.7
135.9

131.0
117.1
106.3
135.3

130.4
119.4
105.6
134.9

130.7
118.7
107.9
134.7

128.2
117.3
97.1
134.2

127.3
115.5
94.3
133.7

Special groupings:
Finished goods, excluding foods..................
Finished energy goods....................................
Finished goods less energy..........................
Finished consum er goods less energy.......
Finished goods less food and energy........
Finished consum er goods less food
and energy.......................................................
Consum er nondurable goods less food
and energy.....................................................

120.8

102.0

101.2

110.2

122.8

100.1

122.8
125.9

Interm ediate m aterials less foods
and feeds..........................................................
Interm ediate foods and feeds........................
Interm ediate energy goods............................
Interm ediate goods less energy...................
Interm ediate m aterials less foods
and energy.......................................................

84.3
131.7

130.1
111.7
101.7
135.0

133.1

136.6

136.8

136.8

137.1

137.3

137.4

137.4

137.5

137.2

136.5

136.0

135.8

135.3

134.9

C rude energy m aterials...................................
Crude m aterials less energy..........................
Crude nonfood m aterials less energy.........

78.5
107.9
135.2

122.1

140.9
109.9
137.8

154.7
112.4
137.5

193.4
113.7
138.7

148.3
112.4
136.1

141.0
115.2
134.6

145.2
114.3
130.8

139.8
115.3
130.9

123.1
114.8
130.6

109.0
114.3
129.4

104.2
113.6
128.4

93.1
113.3
128.5

75.2
109.8
125.8

96.5
104.8
124.5


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

111.1

111.7
145.2

M onthly Labor R eview

J an u a ry 2002

97

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

36.

Price D ata

Producer Price Indexes for the net output of m ajor industry groups

[December 1984 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]
Annual average

Industry

S IC

-

10
12
13
14

1999

T o ta l m in in g in d u s trie s .........................................
Coal mining (12/85 = 100)..................................
Oil and gas extraction (12/85 = 100)...............
Mining and quarrying of nonmetallic
minerals, except fuels........................................

78.0
70.3
87.3
78.5

2000
113.5
73.8
84.8
126.8

2000

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

128.9
73.3
84.1
147.7

139.6
73 5
84.8
162.0

170.8
73 5
83.6
204.4

138.2
72 4
90.8
159.4

130.7
73 1
90.3
149.3

132.2
7n n
90.6
151.5

127.5

115.5

103.4

100.4

92.6

78.8

93.2

92.2
144.9

87.7
129.6

90.9
112.9

89.9
109.4

92.5
98.3

92.7
79.7

95.5
98.8

134.0

137.0

138.0

138.2

139.3

140.1

140.8

140.8

140.7

141.8

141.6

141.2

141.4

141.9

141.8

T otal m a n u fa ctu rin g in d u s trie s ..........................
Food and kindred products.................................
Tobacco manufactures........................................
Textile mill products..............................................
Apparel and other finished products
made from fabrics and sim ilar materials.......
Lumber and wood products,
except furniture...................................................
Furniture and fixtures...........................................
Paper and allied products...................................

128.3
126.3
325.7
116.3

133.5
128.5
345.8
116.7

134.9
128.8
351.6
117.0

134.4
129.6
351.8
117.5

134.7
130.1
372.4
117.4

134.7
130.4
372.4
117.9

134.6
131.7
372.3
117.0

135.4
132.5
372.1
117.0

136.3
133.2
391.2
117.1

136.0
133.8
391.7
117.2

134.6
133.9
391.1
116.9

134.8
134.7
391.0
116.6

135.6
134.7
391.1
116.5

133.6
133.9
391.1
116.2

132.8
132.4
398.3
116.2

125.3

125.7

125.7

125.9

125.7

125.7

125.7

125.9

125.8

125.7

125.9

126.1

125.9

125.9

125.9

161.8
141.3
136.4

158.1
143.3
145.8

154.5
143.8
147.5

154.2
143.8
147.0

153.2
144.2
147.4

153.8
144.3
147.0

154.5
144.8
147.0

154.7
144.7
147.0

160.5
144.9
146.9

161.3
145.2
146.8

158.2
145.3
146.4

157.5
145.2
145.4

156.9
145.3
145.5

154.3
145.8
145.1

153.8
145.8
144.4

27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34

Printing, publishing, and allied industries........
Chemicals and allied products...........................
Petroleum refining and related products.........
Rubber and m iscellaneous plastics products.
Leather and leather products.............................
Stone, clay, glass, and concrete products......
Primary metal industries.....................................
Fabricated metal products,
except m achinery and transportation
equipm ent.................................

177.6
149.7
76.8

182.9
156.7

185.0
158.3
121.9
126.5
138.8
134.3
119.0

185.1
159.0
114.4
124.8
138.9
134.1
119.2

186.8
160.4
112.5
126.0
139.1
134.4
118.5

187.2
161.6
126.1
140.6
135.0
118.0

187.6
161.9
107.3
126.8
140.9
135.4
117.4

188.4
161.4
114.1
127.4
142.8
135.6
116.8

188.8
160.4
120.9
126.6
142.9
136.0
116.9

188.4
160.0
116.9
126.4
142.6
135.7
116.5

188.6
158.8
103.8
126.5
141.9
135.9
116.1

188.9
156.3
106.8
126.0
142.1
135.9
115.8

188.8
156.4
1154
125.2
141.3
136.4
115.2

189.2
156.0
93.8
125.6
141.0
136.7
114.7

189.6
155.4
87.2
125.3
140.2
137.1
114.3

129.1

130.3

130.5

130.5

130.6

130.7

130.8

131.2

131.1

131.1

131.1

131.1

131.1

131.0

131.0

35
36

Machinery, except electrical..............................
Electrical and electronic machinery,
equipment, and supplies...................................
Transportation.......................................................
Measuring and controlling instruments;
photographic, medical, and optical
goods; w atches and clocks..............................
Miscellaneous manufacturing industries
industries (12/85 - 100)....................................

117.3

117.5

117.7

117.7

117.7

117.8

117.8

118.0

118.0

118.1

118.1

118.0

117.8

117.7

117.8

109.5
134.5

108.3
136.8

107.9
138.6

107.7
138.4

107.7
138.7

107.6
137.6

107.5
137.9

107.5
138.1

107.4
137.4

107.3
137.1

106.9
137.3

106.4
137.2

106.4
137.2

106.5
138.5

106.6
138.5

-

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

37
38

39

122.2
136.5
132.6
115.8

112.8
124.6
137.9
134.6
119.8

112.0

125.7

126.2

121.8

126.4

126.9

127.1

126.9

126.9

127.3

127.4

127.2

127.4

127.5

127.1

127.6

130.3

130.9

131.2

131.3

131.7

131.9

132.3

132.2

132.5

132.5

132.7

132.3

132.6

132.6

132.1

114.8
135.3
113.0
130.8
98.3

119.4
135.2

121.8

121.5
135.2
126.1
154.2
102.7

121.9
141.3
125.8
154.7
109.1

122.5
141.3
127.8
154.0
109.1

122.6

122.7
141.3
125.9
155.4
108.9

123.0
141.3
125.6
156.4
109.0

123.2
141.3
130.3
156.6
109.0

123.3
145.4
131.8
157.6
110.9

123.4
145.4
132.0
159.1

123.6
145.4
140.9
158.6
111.3

123.8
145.4
134.0
159.8
111.5

124.0
145.4
131.2
158.5
111.3

S e rvice in d u s trie s :
42
43
44
45
46

98

Motor freight transportation
and warehousing (06/93 - 100).......................
U.S. Postal Service (06/89 = 100).....................
W ater transportation (12/92 = 100)....................
Transportation by air (12/92 = 100)...................
Pipelines, except natural qas (12/92 = 100)....

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

122.6
147.7
102.3

J an u a ry 2002

135.2
124.2
152.7
102.7

141.3
126.8
155.4
108.9

111.2

3 7.

A n n u a l d a ta : P ro d u cer Price In d e x e s , b y s ta g e o f processing

[1982 = 100]
Index

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1999

1998

2000

Finished goods
123.2
123.3
77.8
134.2

124.7
125.7
78.0
135.8

125.5
126.8
77.0
137.1

127.9
129.0
78.1
140.0

131.3
133.6
83.2
142.0

131.8
134.5
83.4
142.4

130.7
134.3
75.1
143.7

133.0
135.1
78.8
146.1

138.0
137.2
94.1
148.0

114.7
113.9
84.3

118.5
118.5
83.0
127.1

124.9
119.5
84.1
135.2

125.7
125.3
89.8
134.0

125.6
123.2
89.0
134.2

123.0
123.2
80.8
133.5

123.2

122.0

116.2
115.6
84.6
123.8

129.2
119.2
101.7
136.6

100.4
105.1
78.8
94.2

102.4
108.4
76.7
94.1

101.8

102.7
105.8
69.4
105.8

113.8
121.5
85.0
105.7

111.1
112.2

96.8
103.9

87.3
103.5

84.5

98.2
98.7
78.5
91.1

Intermediate materials, supplies, and
components

Crude materials for further processing

O th e r............................................................................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

106.5
72.1
97.0

M onthly Labor R eview

68.6

120.8
84.3
133.1

120.6
100.2
122.1
118.0

J a n u a ry 2002

99

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

38.

Price Data

U.S. export price indexes by Standard International Trade Classification

[1995 = 100]
SITC
Rev. 3

2000

Industry

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Food and live anim als................................................................
Meat and meat preparations..................................................
04
C ereals and cereal preparations...........................................
Vegetables, fruit, and nuts, prepared fresh or dry............
05

88.5
107.6
74.0
89.8

88.7
105.9
75.8
88.9

89.8
105.4
78.8
86.9

107.1
76.4

2
21
22

82.2

102.1

72.2
90.6
76.2

82.6
103.3
85.0
85.9
85.9
73.2
90.6
74.7

162.1
93.1
193.4
59.0

0
01

24
25
26
27
28

Crude m aterials, inedible, except fuels...............................
Hides, skins, and furskins, raw ..............................................
O ilseeds and oleaginous fruits...............................................
Cork and w ood...........................................................................
Pulp and waste paper...............................................................
Textile fibers and their w aste.................................................
Crude fertilizers and crude m inerals....................................
Metalliferous ores and metal scrap......................................

3 M ineral fuels, lubricants, and related products..............
32
Coal, coke, and briquettes......................................................
Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials....
33

79.3
86.5

88.6

4

Mar.

Apr.
109.8
74.7
89.5

110.8

86.2

89.1
107.1
77.2
87.8

82.0
105.6
83.9
85.2
85.8
70.4
90.9
74.1

80.9
106.5
78.1
84.3
83.6
70.6
90.9
74.7

79.7
107.5
79.0
83.5
82.3
67.6
89.9
72.5

78.4
119.2
75.0
81.6
80.6
64.8
89.4
73.0

77.5
123.2
76.0
80.9
75.2
64.1
89.2
72.2

157.4
93.0
183.6

157.5
93.1
181.1

159.5
93.1
185.2

152.4
93.6
172.4

156.0

58.7

61.0

60.8

60.6

92.9
99.6
103.2
91.5
96.5
98.5

88.6

88.6

May

June

87.9

87.8
110.7
73.5
88.4

74.7
87.4

138.8

178.4

153.7
102.5
180.0

61.6

65.0

67.1

69.1

77.9

77.9

93.4
99.4
103.4
92.7
96.7
98.5

92.8
99.7
103.0
91.2
96.8
98.6

91.6
99.6
102.9
89.9
96.1
98.3

91.0
99.7
102.9
89.1
96.5
98.5

89.8
100.4
102.3
86.5
97.1
98.0

99.9
104.0

99.7
104.1

99.3
104.8

87.6
106.6

85.0
107.0
98.5

100.2

101.0

100.6

104.4

104.3

100.4
104.7

100.1

103.8

89.6
105.9
103.4

89.1
105.6
104.9

88.6
106.2
109.1

88.4
106.2
108.1

87.8
106.0
106.5

87.7
106.5
103.1

101.6

87.0
107.0
99.5

97.4
113.7
106.5

97.4
113.7
106.6

97.5
115.2
106.8

97.6
115.2
107.1

97.9
14.7
106.8

97.8
115.0
106.7

97.8
115.0
106.7

97.6
115.0
106.6

108.4
67.8

108.5
67.6

108.6
67.1

108.8
67.1

109.2

109.5
66.7

109.5
' 66.2

Road vehicles............................................................................

96.5
85.3
103.9

96.3
85.4
104.0

96.5
85.2
104.1

96.4
85.2
104.1

96.4
85.2
104.1

96.5
84.8
104.1

87 Professional, scientific, and controlling
instrum ents and apparatu s...................................................

106.9

106.6

107.0

107.0

107.0

106.8

J an u ary 2002

71.7
88.9
74.5
77.3
70.9
56.8
91.4
63.8

68.0

100.4

M onthly Labor R eview
Digitized for 100
FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

72.3
88.3
75.0
77.9
71.0
58.5
91.1
64.9

145.1
101.7
165.4

100.5
104.1

77
78

87.7
103.5
75.3
89.6

144.0
100.7
162.8

103.2
90.0
98.3
99.9

7 M achinery and transport equipm ent....................................
Power generating machinery and equipm ent...................
71
72
M achinery specialized for particular industries.................
74
G eneral industrial m achines and parts, n.e.s.,
and m achine parts..................................................................
C om puter equipm ent and office m achines........................
75
Telecom m unications and sound recording and
76

89.2
112.5
74.4
91.5

153.6
100.7
177.0

103.3
91.2
98.3
99.1

66
68

89.8
112.5
76.2
90.4

159.0
100.4
184.4

93.1
99.7
103.4
90.5
96.6
98.4

Rubber manufactures, n.e.s...................................................
Paper, paperboard, and articles of paper, pulp,
and paperboard.......................................................................
Nonm etallic mineral manufactures, n .e.s............................
N onferrous m etals.....................................................................

74.8
91.8

Nov.

79.9
80.6
73.6
63.0
89.4
71.7

93.0

M anufactured goods classified chiefly by m aterials.....

89.2

111.0

Oct.

74.4
94.5
82.7
78.3
70.6
60.8
91.1
67.1

100.1

6

Sept.

75.7
90.3
87.2
80.7
69.9
61.8
90.5

94.0

62
64

88.5 ‘
110.4
73.2
91.2

Aug.

76.8
104.3
85.7
81.1
71.4
62.6
90.4
69.2

77.0

111.0

100.2

5 Chem icals and related products, n.e.s................................
54
Medicinal and pharm aceutical products..............................
Essential oils; polishing and cleaning preparations.........
55
57
Plastics in prim ary fo rm s ........................................................
Plastics in nonprimary form s..................................................
58
59
Chem ical m aterials and products, n .e.s..............................

July

66.8

104.0

89.0

88.8

131.3

102.6

102.6

153.3

140.4

74.1

75.0

88.7

88.5

101.3
102.3
84.0
96.3
98.4

101.1
102.2

101.0
102.1

84.6
95.1
98.0

84.1
95.0
98.1

98.5

98.4

105.3

105.3

97.5
105.3

96.8
105.2

85.0
107.2
94.5

85.4
107.3
91.6

85.1
107.3
88.3

84.9
107.6
83.1

97.5
115.1
105.9

97.4
115.5
105.8

97.3
115.7
105.9

97.0
115.8
106.9

97.0
117.0
106.9

109.6
65.5

110.1

110.1

110.1

110.0

110.1

65.3

64.8

64.7

64.6

64.3

96.5
84.8
104.1

96.5
84.5
104.1

96.5
84.0
104.1

95.4
84.0
104.1

95.2
83.8
104.1

94.7
82.2
104.2

94.7
82.2
104.1

106.9

107.1

106.9

106.9

107.1

107.1

107.1

101.0
102.2
85.3
96.0
98.0

39.

U.S. im port price indexes by Standard International Trade Classification

[1995= 100]
SITC

Industry

Rev. 3

0
01

Food and live anim als...............................................................
Meat and meat preparations.................................................
Fish and crustaceans, mollusks, and other
03
aquatic invertebrates............................................................
05
Vegetables, fruit, and nuts, prepared fresh or d ry............
07
Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures
thereof......................................................................................

1
11 Beverages..................................................................................
2 Crude materials, inedible, except fuels.............................

2001

2000
Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.
90.8

90.2
95.7

92.4
97.3

92.8
95.5

91.3
96.1

93.0
100.4

109.3
96.8

109.1
104.5

107.4
106.1

105.6
101.7

102.2

100.1

109.5

102.3

102.6

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

May

June

89.8
104.4

88.5
104.3

87.7
107.4

87.5
107.0

87.7
111.5

112.8

87.5
116.0

99.7
100.5

98.8
97.1

95.6
97.8

95.3
97.7

94.8
97.9

92.9
98.5

90.0
101.3

87.4

51.9

50.8

50.5

51.1

51.1

52.1

50.8

49.8

47.2

45.8

46.5

44.9

44.9

113.3
110.7

113.2

113.2
110.5

113.3

113.0
110.4

113.2
110.7

114.8
112.5

114.4

114.4

114.9

114.9

112.2

112.2

112.2

115.5
112.4

93.7
132.7
68.3
95.4
98.6

87.9
117.6
65.5
95.9
85.7

87.3
119.0
. 62.2
94.6

112.2
88.0

115.5
112.4

86.2

83.6
106.9
61.2
91.4
98.9

153.5
149.4

143.3
141.3
170.0

110.6

110.8

87.5
95.6
84.3

86.1

86.6

100.8
102.0

88.9
97.6
82.9
100.9
115.3

97.5
80.4
98.1
97.7

102.9
76.8
98.1
91.8

89.5
114.1
72.5
97.0
100.7

Crude animal and vegetable materials, n.e.s....................

99.1

88.5
101.7
83.4
98.8
97.1

3
33
34

Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials...
Gas, natural and m anufactured...........................................

188.4
183.3
249.3

180.2
163.9
331.8

177.1
152.0
401.0

169.9
153.9
316.9

154.1
144.7
244.5

153.1
143.5
244.4

158.2
150.6
233.5

5
52
53
54
55
57
58
59

Inorganic chem icals.................................................................
Dying, tanning, and coloring m aterials................................
Medicinal and pharmaceutical products.............................
Essential oils; polishing and cleaning preparations.........
Plastics in primary form s........................................................
Plastics in nonprimary form s.................................................
Chemical materials and products, n.e.s.............................

94.7
93.7
86.9
95.7
87.2
95.9
79.5
100.4

• 95.0
94.2
86.9
95.7
86.9
95.8
78.6

95.8
98.5
95.1
87.1
95.5
80.3

96.3
98.9
89.6
94.9

96.6
97.9
89.1
94.6

96.3
95.0
88.4
94.0

88.6

88.1

95.5
84.5

100.6

101.8

101.6

95.8
84.4
101.9

95.8
83.2
101.4

95.7
92.4
87.9
93.8
87.7
95.7
83.1
100.5

93.8
87.4
96.8
82.1
100.3

93.6
90.8
86.5
96.0
87.1
96.8
80.7
99.6

97.2
91.5

97.3
91.8

98.2
91.8

98.7
91.9

97.3
91.8

96.3
91.6

95.5
91.5

95.3
91.2

94.1
91.0

92.4
90.9

92.2
90.9

91.2
90.7

89.9
90.1

92.8
100.5
116.4
94.9

93.7
100.3
110.9
95.7

92.8
100.3
107.0
95.7

100.0

100.0

91.0

101.7
94.9

89.4
99.8
92.9
94.9

88.8

106.1
95.6

99.9
91.6
95.0

88.3
98.2
87.6
95.3

87.3
97.9
82.4
95.2

24
25
28
29

Cork and w ood..........................................................................
Pulp and waste paper.............................................................

87.7
97.7
83.4

100.1

6

Manufactured goods classified chiefly by m aterials.....
Rubber manufactures, n.e.s..................................................
Paper, paperboard, and articles of paper, pulp,
and paperboard.....................................................................
66 Nonmetallic mineral manufactures, n.e.s...........................
68 Nonferrous metals....................................................................
69
M anufactures of metals, n.e.s...............................................
62
64

88.8

88.2

200.0
94.7
91.5

86.1

114.3
60.3
93.1
99.1

145.3
144.1
166.1

145.6
145.3
159.8

122.6
122.1

92.7
89.5

94.3
87.1
95.2
80.7
99.5

92.6
89.7
84.5
94.1
88.5
94.4
79.6
99.4

93.1
90.8
85.2
94.6
88.7
94.5
81.4
99.6

92.2
90.4
84.9
94.4

86.6

134.4

112.1
107.5
155.2

88.6
94.5
81.0
99.1

92.2

100.2

100.2

92.1
100.7

114.3
94.9

114.4
95.0

121.0
95.3

92.6
100.5
124.0
95.0

89.1
95.4

89.0
95.3

88.9
95.9

88.8

88.8

88.1

96.3

88.4
96.0

88.2

96.6

95.8

95.7

87.9
95.1

87.8
95.2

87.7
95.7

87.7
95.8

87.6
95.6

95.3
58.8

95.4
58.7

95.9
58.3

95.9
57.8

95.6
57.5

95.1
56.5

94.7
56.4

94.6
56.2

94.4
55.3

92.4
55.1

94.4
54.1

95.1
53.5

94.5
53.3

Electrical machinery and equipm ent...................................
Road vehicles...........................................................................

83.7
82.5
102.9

83.6
82.2
102.9

83.0
82.1
102.9

82.1
82.1

82.0
82.0
102.4

82.0
81.7

85

Footwear....................................................................................

100.7

100.6

88

Photographic apparatus, equipment, and supplies,
and optical goods, n.e.s......................................................

91.0

90.7

7 Machinery and transport equipm ent...................................
72
M achinery specialized for particular industries................
74
General industrial machines and parts, n.e.s.,
and machine parts................................................................
75
Computer equipment and office machines.......................
76
Telecom m unications and sound recording and
77
78


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

91.9

82.8
81.8

101.0

102.8
101.2

91.2

91.3

82.8
82.5

102.8
101.5

102.6
101.1

91.4

90.6

91.9

86.0

121.9
60.6
94.3
88.9

82.1
81.8
102.4

81.9
81.6
102.4

81.7
81.5
102.7

81.4
81.6
103.0

81.3
81.5
102.9

101.0

102.6
100.8

100.9

101.2

101.1

100.6

100.7

90.6

90.3

89.7

89.7

90.0

90.4

90.3

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

101

C u rren t Labor S tatistics:

Price D ata

40. U.S. e x p o rt p ric e in d e x e s b y e n d -u s e c a te g o ry
[1995 = 100]________________________________________________
2000

C ategory

Nov.

2001
Aug.

Sept.

96.5

96.3

96.5

96.5

96.2

96.1

95.9

95.6

95.3

95.1

95.2

94.5

94.1

Foods, feeds, and b e v e ra g e s .............................................
A gricu ltu ral foods, feeds, a nd b e v e ra g e s...................
N ona g ricultura l (fish, b everages) food p ro d u cts ......

86.7
85.7
98.2

87.4
86.7
96.3

88.2

86.6

86.6

86.2

86.8

85.7
97.0

85.9
95.3

85.9
91.0

86.5
90.9

87.9
87.5
93.1

88.7

87.3
98.6

87.3
86.4
97.6

87.4
87.3
90.2

86.2
86.1

88.5

88.7
88.5
91.2

Industrial supplies and m a te ria ls.......................................

95.8

95.0

95.0

94.9

93.9

93.8

93.1

92.3

90.8

90.0

90.5

88.8

87.7

A gricu ltu ral Industrial supplies and m a te ria ls............

82.0

82.9

82.4

82.6

80.7

80.7

81.0

78.8

78.1

77.1

76.8

74.4

73.0

Fuels a nd lu b rica n ts ...........................................................
N ona g ricultura l supplies and m aterials,
exclu din g fuel and b uilding m a te ria ls.........................
S ele cted build ing m a te ria ls.............................................

150.7

146.2

145.2

147.1

139.8

144.8

147.7

143.2

135.0

136.0

143.8

129.6

122.6

90.7
89.0

90.1
89.0

90.4

90.1

89.2

88.2

88.0

85.7

88.8

89.8
87.4

85.5
85.7

85.2
85.3

84.6
85.6

C a pital g o o d s ...........................................................................
E lectric and electrical g e n e rating e q u ip m e n t............
N one le ctrica l m a ch ine ry...................................................

96.2
99.6
91.5

96.3
99.7
91.5

96.4

100.0
91.5

96.5
100.5
91.5

95.8
100.7
89.9

A utom o tive ve hicles, parts, a nd e n g in e s .......................

104.4

104.4

104.6

104.5

C o nsum e r g oods, e xcluding a u to m o tiv e ........................

102.0
102.0
101.1

102.1
102.0

102.0

D urables, m a nu factu re d ..................................................

102.2
102.2
101.2

A gricu ltu ral co m m o d itie s......................................................
N ona g ricultura l co m m o d itie s.............................................

84.7
97.8

85.7
97.5

J an u ary 2002

Jan.

101.3

86.1
97.7

Feb.

M ar.

A L L C O M M O D IT IE S .................................................................

M onthly Labor R eview
102

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Dec.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

88.8

Oct.

Nov.

89.3

86.8

86.3

87.6
87.0

86.4
87.2

96.6
100.9
91.1

96.4
100.9
90.9

96.3
100.9
90.7

96.1

96.1

100.8

100.8

915.0

96.6
100.5
91.3

90.4

90.4

95.7
100.7
90.0

104.6

104.7

104.7

104.7

104.7

104.7

104.7

104.8

104.7

101.8
101.2

101.7

102.1

102.0

102.1
101.4

101.4

101.5

101.5
101.7

101.3

101.2

101.0

101.8
101.0

101.3

101.2
101.2

101.7
101.3

101.7

101.5
101.5

101.9
101.3
101.5

101.8

101.8

84.9
97.7

85.1
97.5

84.7
97.4

84.7
97.1

84.8
96.9

85.5
96.4

86.4
96.1

84.6
95.7

83.4
95.3

96.7

100.1

86.8

86.1
96.3

4 1 . U.S. im p o rt p ric e in d e x e s b y e n d -u s e c a te g o ry
[1995 = 100]______________________________________________
2000

C ategory

2001

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

A LL C O M M O D IT IE S .................................................................

100.6

100.0

100.0

99.3

97.8

97.2

97.5

97.1

95.6

95.4

95.5

93.2

91.9

Foods, feeds, a nd b e v e ra g e s............................................
A gricultural foods, feeds, and b ev e ra g e s...................
N ona g ricultura l (fish, beverages) food p ro d u cts......

89.4
81.9
109.5

91.0
84.2
109.1

90.8
84.3
107.9

89.8
83.4
106.7

90.6
85.6
103.9

88.9
83.8
102.4

88.7
83.5

86.5
81.9
98.6

86.6

87.1
82.9
98.1

86.6

102.1

87.6
82.2
101.4

87.1
84.3
94.3

Industrial sup plie s a nd m a te ria ls.......................................

126.9

124.5

124.4

122.3

116.1

115.4

116.7

115.6

110.5

110.1

110.1

101.9

97.3

Fuels and lu b rica n ts............................................................
P etroleum and p etroleum p ro d u cts..........................

186.8
183.6

178.7
165.6

176.7
155.7

169.3
156.1

153.3
145.9

152.3
144.2

157.4
151.0

153.1
149.5

142.8
141.4

144.8
144.0

145.1
144.9

122.7
122.7

112.4
108.7

P aper and p a p e r base sto c ks........................................
M aterials a ssociated w ith nondurable
sup plie s and m a te ria ls....................................................
S ele cted b uilding m a te ria ls..............................................
U nfinished m etals asso cia te d w ith dura b le goo d s..
N onm etals asso cia te d w ith dura b le g o o d s................

90.6

91.0

91.0

91.2

90.8

91.1

89.0

87.1

85.3

82.8

81.7

81.0

80.3

92.6
97.2
104.1
87.1

93.3
99.1
103.7
87.2

94.1
95.3
107.2
87.8

94.3
96.0
108.7
88.7

94.4
96.2
103.8

93.9
98.3

93.1
104.8
98.2

92.1
116.3
97.6

88.0

90.0
107.7
91.2
87.6

89.9
108.6
90.9
87.8

90.0
104.6
87.4

100.7
85.8
86.5

C a pital g o o d s...........................................................................
E lectric and electrical gen e rating e q u ip m e n t............
N o nelectrical m a ch in e ry..................................................

80.1
93.1
76.3

80.0
93.1
76.1

79.9
93.1
76.0

79.7
92.9
75.8

68,7
95.2
75.6

79.2
94.7
75.0

88.2
68,1

90.5
107.9
95.3
87.5

94.9
74.8

79.0
94.9
74.7

78.7
94.7
74.3

78.6
94.4
74.1

78.3
94.6
73.8

78.2
94.7
73.7

78.1
94.4
73.6

A utom o tive ve hicles, parts, and e n g in e s........................

102.7

102.7

102.7

102.6

102.6

102.5

102.3

102.3

102.2

102.1

102.4

102.6

102.5

C o nsum e r goo d s, e xcluding a u to m o tiv e ........................
N ondurables, m a n u fa ctu re d ...........................................
D urables, m a n u fa ctu re d ..................................................
N onm a n u fa ctu re d co n su m er g o o d s .............................

96.5
99.8
92.8
99.1

96.4
99.6
92.8
98.8

96.6
92.9
92.9
99.5

96.6
99.8
92.8
101.5

96.6

96.4

96.4

100.0

100.0

92.8
99.1

92.5
98.0

92.3
99.4

96.1
99.9
91.9
97.4

96.1

100.1

96.2
99.8
92.1
99.0

96.0
99.6
92.1
97.7

95.8
99.6
91.8
95.7

95.7
99.6
91.7
95.5

88.8

A pr.

101.1
88.5

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

82.1
98.4

100.0
92.0
97.2

Oct.

82.8
96.6

88.8

Nov.

88.8

4 2. U.S. in tern atio n al p ric e In d e x e s for s e le c te d c a te g o rie s of services
[1995= 100]
1999

C ategory
Sept.

2000
Dec.

Mar.

A ir fre igh t (inb o u nd )...................................................................
A ir fre ig h t (ou tbo u nd )................................................................

87.9
92.7

90.7
91.7

A ir passe ng e r fa re s (U.S. c a rrie rs)......................................

114.2
108.6
148.0

139.4

136.3

O cean liner fre ig h t (inb o u nd ).................................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

June

2001
Sept.

Dec.

Mar.

June

Sept.

88.9
91.7

88.4
92.8

88.5
92.6

87.4
92.6

86.5
92.6

84.0
90.5

83.7
90.1

106.8

107.3

102.2

102.6

113.3
107.9
143.0

115.5
109.1
142.8

111.9
103.2
142.8

114.2
106 4
145.1

119.2
109 7
142.3

116 4
138.0

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

120.6

103

C urrent Labor S tatistics:

4 3.

Productivity Data

In d e x e s of p rodu ctivity, hourly c o m p e n s a tio n , a n d unit costs, qu a rte rly d a ta seas o n a lly a d ju s te d

[1992 = 100]_______________________________________
1998

Item
III

1999
IV

2000

2001

1

II

III

IV

I

II

III

IV

I

112.5
123.0
106.4
109.3
115.1
111.4

112.7
124.3
106.8
110.4
114.2

114.0
125.9
107.4
110.5
114.4
111.9

116.1
127.1
107.6
109.5
116.9

115.0
129.0
108.1

117.1
131.7
109.6
112.5
115.2
113.5

117.4
133.8
110.3
114.0
113.9
113.9

118.2
136.8
115.7

118.2
138.2
112.3
117.2

118.9
140.4
113.0
118.1

119.5
141.8
113.9
118.6

112.1

111.8

111.6

112.0

114.4

115.2

115.7

116.2

123.4
106.0

113.4
125.0
106.6

114.5
128.4
107.6

110.2

115.8

116.1
112.4

116.0
113.5

116.3
130.7
108.8
112.4
116.7
114.0

116.7
133.0
109.7
114.0
115.4
114.5

117.4
135.9
111.3
115.8
113.5
114.9

117.4
137.6
111.5
117.2
113.1
115.7

118.0
139.2

110.2

115.6
126.3
107.0
109.3
118.6
112.7

118.8
140.7
113.0
118.5
113.3
116.6

118.3
123.0
104.2
103.9
104.0
103.4
147.0
114.5
107.5

117.7
124.7
104.5
105.9
106.0
105.5
134.3
112.9
108.3

119.7
127.2
105.8
106.0
106.2
105.3
137.8
113.6
108.7

120.9
129.3
106.6
106.6
106.9
105.6
133.8
108.9

121.4
132.3
108.3
108.2
109.0
106.0
118.5
109.2
109.0

121.5
134.1
108.7
109.6
110.3
107.5
109.2
107.9
109.5

135.0
124.1
105.2
91.9

135.2
125.9
105.5
93.2

137.3
128.1
106.6
93.3

139.4
131.2
108.3
94.1

141.3
135.2
110.7
95.7

140.0
137.2
111.3
98.0

II

III

Business
O utpu t per hour of all p e rso n s ...............................................
C o m pe n sa tio n p er h o u r...........................................................
Real com p en sa tio n per h o u r..................................................
U nit la bo r c o sts............................................................................
U nit non la bo r p a y m e n ts...........................................................
Im plicit price d e fla to r.................................................................

110.8
120.3
105.0
108.6
114.5
110.7

111.8
121.6
105.7
108.8
114.6
110.9

111.8

112.2

112.1
114.2
112.9

112.0

Nonfarm business
O utpu t per hour of all p e rso n s...............................................
C o m pe n sa tio n p er h o u r...........................................................
Real com p en sa tio n p er h o u r..................................................
U nit labor c o sts............................................................................
U n it n on la bo r p a y m e n ts ...........................................................
Im p licit price d e fla to r.................................................................

112.0

110.5
119.8
104.5
108.4
115.7

111.4
120.9
105.1
108.6
115.8

111.0

111.2

111.8

112.2

113.1
116.7

113.7
117.8
102.4
103.2
103.6

115.3
120.3
103.3
103.7
104.3

111.9

122.1
105.6
109.0
116.7

112.1

112.0
117.9
113.0
116.1

Nonfinancial corporations
O utpu t per h our o f all e m p lo ye e s.........................................
C o m pe n sa tio n p er h o u r...........................................................
Real com p en sa tio n per h ou r...................................................
T o ta l u n it c o sts............................................................................
U nit labor c o sts.........................................................................
U n it non la bo r c o sts..................................................................
U nit p ro fits.....................................................................................
U nit non la bo r p a y m e n ts ...........................................................
Im p licit price d e fla to r.................................................................

102.5
103.2
100.7
152.0
113.8
106.7

145.3
113.1
106.8

114.6
119.0
103.0
103.2
103.9
101.3
150.6
113.9
107.2

125.7
118.0
103.0
93.9

126.8
119.0
103.4
93.9

128.9
119.9
103.7
93.0

101.8

102.1

102.2
148.6
114.0
107.5

116.6

121.8
103.9
104.0
104.5
102.9
144.4
113.5
107.5

112.8

109.3
105.6
108.4

_
_
_
_
-

110.2

-

140.3
139.3

140.7
141.1
113.3
100.3

122.6
136.1
109.5

110.6
111.1

Manufacturing
O utpu t p er h our of all p e rso n s...............................................
C o m pe n sa tio n per h o u r...........................................................
R eal com p en sa tio n p er h o u r..................................................
U nit labor c o sts............................................................................

104

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

130.2

131.9

121.2

122.8

104.1
93.1

104.7
93.1

112.1
99.3

44.

A n n u a l in d e x e s of m ultifactor p rodu ctivity a n d re la te d m easures, s e le c te d years

[1996 = 100, unless otherwise indicated]
Item

1960

1970

1980

1990

1992

1991

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Private business
P roductivity:
O u tp u t p er h our of all p e rso n s.............................................
O u tp u t p e r u nit of capital se rvice s.....................................
M u ltifa cto r p ro d u ctivity...........................................................
O u tp u t.............................................................................................
Inputs:
Labor in p u t..................................................................................
C a pital se rvice s........................................................................
C apital p er hour of all p erso n s...............................................

91.3
96.1
94.4
82.6

94.8
97.7
96.6
85.7

95.4
98.5
97.1
88.5

96.6
100.3
98.1
92.8

97.3
99.7
98.4
95.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

88.3

86.0

89.3
87.7

87.5
95.0

97.0

91.8
89.8
91.1
96.8

95.6
92.6
94.6
96.3

98.0
96.0
97.3
97.6

95.6
83.5

91.4
96.6
94.7
82.5

94.8
97.9
96.6
85.5

95.3
98.8
97.1
88.4

96.5
100.3
98.1
92.6

70.7
56.4
65.9
73.1

89.2
83.5
87.3
90.3

88.0
85.4
87.1
94.7

89.0
87.3
88.4
96.8

91.8
89.5
91.0
96.5

54.2
116.5
84.4
56.5

70.1
100.9
75.3

99.3
97.3

95.0
97.5
98.3
9 5.4

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.9

101.6

104.2
48.5
85.4
44.8
48.8
67.0

107.5
74.7
92.5
75.0
73.7
87.0

104.8
95.8
99.9
92.5
92.5
98.0

100.4
97.9

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

80.0
42.0

75.8
101.5
88.3
59.4

90.2
99.3
95.3
83.6

54.0
24.9
42.3
41.3

61.0
37.8
52.4
56.7

71.9
58.6
67.3
74.7

89.4
84.2
87.7
90.8

48.7

64.9
118.3
82.6
41.9

77.3
105.7
90.5
59.6

39.3
40.5

59.3
35.5
50.7
54.8

41.8
124.3
72.7
38.5
92.0
30.9
51.3
38.2
28.2
52.9

45.6
110.4
65.2
27.5

63.0

111.1

88.8

102.0

104.8

105.2

100.1
102.6
110.6

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.7
104.7
104.0
101.5

106.4
110.4
107.7
104.7

97.5
99.9
98.6
95.8

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

101.7

104.5
99.8
102.4

95.4
92.3
94.4
96.3

97.8
95.9
97.2
97.6

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

103.8
104.9
104.2
101.5

108.0
104.7

101.1

105.0
104.0

112.8

100.4
103.3

108.7

109.0
105.0
105.0
113.4

104.5
106.1
116.9

117.1
105.6
109.8
123.5

124.3
106.5
113.2
130.7

105.5
116.9
103.9
120.4
114.2
112.5

105.2

100.5

101.1

P rivate no n farm bus in e s s
P roductivity:
O utpu t per unit of capital se rvice s.....................................
M ultifa cto r p ro d u ctivity...........................................................
O u tp u t.............................................................................................
Inputs:
Labor in p u t.................................................................................
C apital se rvice s........................................................................

120.1
69.1
27.2
50.1

22.6

90.3

100.0

100.2
100.9
105.1

110.6
106.6

110.8

M a n u fac tu rin g (1992 = 100)
Productivity:
O u tp u t p er hour o f all p e rso n s............................................
M ultifa cto r p ro d u ctivity ...........................................................
O u tp u t.............................................................................................
Inputs:
H ours of all p e rso n s................................................................
C a pital se rvice s........................................................................
E ne rg y..........................................................................................
P urchased b usiness se rvice s..............................................
C om bin e d units of all fa cto r in p u ts....................................


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

86.6

92.8

100.1
93.6
92.1
97.0

101.4

102.2
103.7
105.7
103.0
102.9

102.6
103.6
104.5
107.3
111.3
105.1
106.0

104.0
108.0
109.5

112.8
110.0
107.9

M onthly Labor R eview

103.7
111.9
107.0
120.4
108.9

110.2

Jan u a ry 2002

122.8
109.2
127.2
116.8
115.5

105

C urrent Labor Statistics:

4 5.

Productivity data

A n n u a l in d e x e s of p rodu ctivity, hourly c o m p e n s a tio n , unit costs, a n d prices, s e le c te d years

[1992 = 100]
Item

1960

1970

1980

1990

1991

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Business
O u tp u t p er hour o f all p e rso n s.............................................
C o m pe n sa tio n p er h o u r......................................
Real co m p en sa tio n per h o u r..................................
U nit la bo r co sts..........................................
U nit nonlabor p a y m e n ts.....................................................
Im p licit price d e fla to r...........................................................

48.8
13.7
60.0
28.0
25.2
27.0

67.0
23.5
78.9
35.1
31.6
33.9

80.4
54.2
8 9.4
67.4
61.5
65.2

95.2
90.7
96.5
95.3
93.9
94.8

96.3
95.0
97.5
98.7
97.0
98.1

51.9
14.3
62.8
27.5
24.6
26.5

68.9
23.7
79.5
34.4
31.3
33.3

82.0
54.6
90.0
66.5
60.5
64.3

95.3
90.5
96.3
95.0
93.6
94.5

96.4
95.0
97.5
98.5
97.1
98.0

55.4
15.6
68.3
26.8
28.1
23.3
50.2
30.2
28.8

70.4
25.3
84.7
34.8
35.9
31.9
44.4
35.1
35.6

81.1
56.4
93.1
68.4
69.6
65.1

97.7
95.3
97.8
98.8
97.5

68.4

95.4
90.8
96.7
95.9
95.2
98.0
94.3
97.1
95.8

41.8
14.9
65.2
35.6
26.8
30.2

54.2
23.7
79.5
43.8
29.3
34.9

70.1
55.6
91.7
79.3
80.2
79.8

92.8
90.8
96.6
97.8
99.7
99.0

100.5
102.5
99.9
101.9
102.5

102.2

101.9
104.5
99.7

102.6
106.4
104.0

102.6

105.4

106.7
99.3
104.1
109.4
106.0

110.1

107.8
113.5

99.7
104.5
113.3
107.7

105.3
117.1
109.7

100.6

110.8
119.6
104.6
108.0
115.1

113.8
125.1
107.1
109.9
115.1

110.6

111.8

113.6
113.9
113.7

110.4
119.0
104.0
107.7
116.3

113.2
124.2
106.4
109.7
116.8
112.3

116.2
132.0
109.4
113.6
115.4
114.2

116.2

119.9
128.3
106.4
106.7
107.0
105.6
131.0

116.9
132.8

110.1

Nonfarm business
O u tp u t p er hour of all p e rso n s.........................................
C o m pe n sa tio n per h o u r........................................
Real co m pensation p er h o u r.....................................
U n it labor c o sts................................................
U nit non la bo r p a y m e n ts .........................................
Im plicit price d e fla to r.....................................................

100.5

102.2
99.6
101.7
103.0

102.2

101.8

102.8

104.3
99.5
102.5
106.9
104.1

106.6
99.2
103.7
110.4
106.1

105.4
109.8
99.4
104.2
113.5
107.6

103.1
104.2
99.4

104.2
106.2
98.8

107.5
109.0
98.7

101.1
101.0

102.0

101.2

108.4
110.3
97.8
101.5

101.9

101.4

101.8

103.2

100.9
156.9
115.2
106.2

148.9
113.4
106.6

107.5
113.1

100.2
105.2
118.0
109.8

110.8

Nonfinancial corporations
O utpu t per hour of all e m p lo ye e s........................................
C o m pe n sa tio n per h o u r....................................
Real com p en sa tio n p er h o u r.......................................
T otal u n it c o sts...................................................
U n it la bo r co sts.................................................
U nit non la bo r co sts .........................................
U nit p ro fits.......................................................
U nit non la bo r p a y m e n ts........................................
Im p licit price d e fla to r.............................................

68.8
66.0

100.7

102.0
99.5

101.0
101.3

102.1

100.2

93.0
99.7
98.3

113.2
103.5

102.1

101.3
131.7
109.0
103.7

101.9
102.7

105.0
105.6

102.2

100.6

139.0

152.2
113.8
105.5

111.6
105.1

112.3
115.9
101.3

102.6
101.2

121.1
103.7
103.7
104.2
102.5
147.6
114.0
107.4

112.1
108.7

Manufacturing
O u tp u t p er h our of all p e rso n s.............................................
C o m pe n sa tio n per h ou r.....................................................
Real com p en sa tio n p er h o u r.........................................
U nit la bo r c o sts.............................................
U nit non la bo r p a y m e n ts ..................................................
Im plicit price d e fla to r.......................................
Dash indicates data not available.

106
M onthly Labor R eview

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

95.0
95.6
98.1

100.6

100.2
100.8

99.0
99.6

100.9
100.9

100.8
100.7

102.8
102.0

109.0
107.9
100.4
99.0
106.9
103.9

112.8
109.3
99.0
96.9
109.9
104.9

117.1
111.4
98.8
95.1
109.6
104.0

124.3
117.3

129.6

102.6

104.5
94.1
105.5

94.4
104.4
100.5

122.0

101.1

46.3
130.1
107.8
94.1
-

46.

A nnual in dexes of o u tp u t per hour fo r selected 3 -digit s ic industries

[1987 = 100]
Industry

SIC

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

M ining
C o p p e r o re s ..........................................................................
G old and silve r o re s ..........................................................
B itu m in o u s coal and lignite m in in g ...............................
C rud e p etroleum a nd natural g a s .................................
C rushe d a nd broken sto n e ..............................................

102
104

122
131
142

126.0
160.8
148.1
112.4
108.7

117.2
144.2
155.9
119.4
105.4

116.5
138.3
168.0
123.9
107.2

118.9
158.5
176.6
125.2

118.3
187.6
188.0
127.4

105.0

118.1
159.8
141.2
105.9
103.6

112.6

110.2

99.6
108.3
99.2
104.9
90.6

104.6
111.4
100.5
107.8
93.8

104.3
109.6
106.8
109.2
94.4

101.2
111.8

102.3
116.4
109.1
115.4
97.3

97.4
116.0
109.2
108.0
95.6

102.5
119.3
110.7
118.2
99.1

102.3
119.3
117.8
126.2

100.8

130.4
107.5

103.2
118.1
117.0
99.2
113.2

102.0
120.1
120.0

99.8
114.1
127.1
101.5

104.5

106.2

112.6

111.8

111.6

126.4
105.2
106.5

130.1
100.9
126.6

123.0
137.3
136.4
112.7
152.2

130.0
156.1
132.4
116.3
135.8

103.1
111.3
96.5
107.5
83.4

111.2

110.3
126.2
112.9
119.3
78.6

117.8
131.7
111.4
127.9
79.3

122.1

116.2
99.6
114.0
79.9

136.2
168.6
117.7
135.9
99.1

138.7
171.9
122.4
144.8

89.2
111.4
104.6
108.4
104.3

96.1
119.6
106.5
109.1
109.4

97.1
126.6
110.4
108.4

113.7
91.1
91.8
100.7

102.6

117.4
93.6
91.3
107.5
108.1

98.0
113.1
103.0
110.5
107.1

99.9
109.4
103.1
114.2
110.5

102.7
122.3
118.7
97.0

115.2
141.6
133.0

102.2

100.5
127.4
122.4
97.9
99.8

97.1
107.3
95.6
105.4
92.7

102.1

M anufacturing
M e at p ro d u cts......................................................................
Dairy p ro d u cts......................................................................
P reserved fru its and ve g etab le s....................................
G rain m ill p ro d u cts.............................................................
B akery p ro d u cts.................................................................

201
202

S ug a r and con fe ctio n ery p ro d u cts ...............................
Fats and o ils .........................................................................
B e vera g es.............................................................................
M iscellaneous food and kindred p ro d u cts ................
C ig a re tte s.............................................................................

206
207
208
209

B roadw oven fa b ric m ills, co tto n .....................................
B roadw oven fa b ric m ills, m a nm a d e ............................
N arrow fa b ric m ills..............................................................
K nitting m ills.........................................................................
Te xtile finishing, e xce p t w o o l..........................................

221
222

C a rp e ts and ru g s................................................................
Y arn a nd th re ad m ills........................................................
M isce llan e o us textile g o o d s ...........................................
M en's and boys' fu rn is h in g s...........................................
W o m en 's and m isses' o ute rw e a r..................................

227
228
2 29
232
233

W o m en 's and childre n 's u nd e rg a rm e n ts...................
Hats, caps, and m illin e ry..................................................
M isce llan e o us a pparel a nd a cce sso rie s....................
M isce llan e o us fa b ricated textile p ro d u cts..................
S aw m ills and planing m ills..............................................

2 34
235
238
239
242

M illw ork, plyw ood, and stru ctura l m e m b e rs.............
W ood c o n ta in e rs................................................................
W o od buildings and m obile h o m e s..............................
M isce llan e o us w ood p ro d u cts........................................
H ousehold fu rn itu re ...........................................................

2 43
2 44
245
249
251

203
204
205

211

2 24
225
226

O ffice fu rn itu re ....................................................................
P ublic building and related fu rn itu re ............................
P artitions and fixtu re s.......................................................
M isce llan e o us fu rn itu re and fix tu re s ............................
P ulp m ills...............................................................................

252
253
2 54
2 59
261

Paper m ills............................................................................
P aperboard m ills................................................................
P aperboard co n ta ine rs and b o x e s ...............................
M isce llan e o us co nverted paper p ro d u cts..................
N e w sp ap e rs.........................................................................

262
263
265
267
271

B oo ks......................................................................................
M iscellaneous p u b lish in g ................................................
M anifold busine ss fo rm s .................................................

B lankbooks and b o o kb in d in g ........................................
Industrial in org a nic ch e m ica ls.......................................

D rug s......................................................................................
S oaps, cleaners, and to ile t g o o d s ...............................
Industrial o rg a n ic ch e m ica ls...........................................
A gricultural c h e m ica ls.....................................................
S ee fo o tn o te s a t end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

93.2

110.2
109.2

102.1
104.1

102.1
89.2
90.6
99.9
99.8
98.0

111.2
103.1
107.7
104.5
95.0
119.8
95.6
103.5
116.7
102.3

100.6
101.3
101.4
90.6

272
2 73
2 74
275
276

93.9
96.6
92.2
102.5
93.0

277
278
279
281
282

100.6
99.4
99.3
106.8
100.9

283
2 84
285
286
287

103.8
103.8
106.3
101.4
104.7

101.7
107.6

94.1

107.6
108.4
96.4

108.3
120.3
133.5
102.9
142.9

113.8

116.7

110.1

120.2

135.0
109.1
147.2

135.5
104.1
147.2

137.3
147.6
126.3
150.3
79.2

131.2
162.2

134.1
81.2

134.0
145.3
118.9
138.3
78.5

121.8

93.3
130.7
118.5
111.7
127.4

95.8
137.4
123.7
123.4
135.5

147.4
123.1
134.7
141.6

124.5
87.2
94.0
108.5
101.9

138.0
77.7
105.5
107.8
103.3

161.3
84.3
116.8
109.2

97.0

94.5
100.9
98.3

100.1
103.8
115.3

110.6

142.5

120.1

111.8
112.5

128.3

102.5
140.6
102.7
99.5
137.3

103.2
161.0
107.4
103.6
122.5

99.2
101.4
103.4
105.3
85.8

103.3
104.4
105.2
105.5
81.5

102.4
108.4
107.9
107.9
79.4

89.5

92.9
97.7
105.8
108.0
94.5

89.5
103.5
104.5
106.9
91.1

81.9
103.0
97.5
106.5
82.0

91.4
98.7
115.3
105.6

89.0
105.4

120.2
93.0

102.1

100.8
95.9

102.0
89.1
92.7
96.1

96.7
103.6

100.6

112.0

109.7

100.0

109.7
107.5

104.5
105.3
104.3
95.8
99.5

99.5
104.4
102.9
94.6
99.5

112.0
99.7
108.7
108.8
92.2
103.8

100.5
157.4
98.9
104.7
128.9

110.2
114.9
108.4

110.6
79.9

111.0
102.3
125.3
104.6

111.2
116.7
99.9
105.0

110.2

100.2

174.5
82.2

120.1
105.6
115.6

110.8
138.0
94.3

105.5

200.0
192.2
132.3
104.8

102.2
114.1

120.0

101.0

100.3
150.4
118.7
162.1
149.9

102.3
153.0
174.7
151.9

97.8
169.5
127.0
187.0
174.5

208 .9
87.1
101.4
119.2
116.9

216 .4
99.5
107.7
117.2
118.7

293.0
108.7
105.8
129.2
125.4

89.1
106.2
100.3
123.4
121.3

91.3
106.6
99.2
131.2
125.8

90.7
105.0
96.8
141.3
128.7

118.3
214.9

113.1
207.6
125.6
121.9

86.6

109.8
2 10.9
127.0
122.7
88.4

120.1

92.7
106.1
97.0
115.4
116.9

92.4
106.7
96.7
114.4

101.1

131.9

106.4
181.5
97.5
113.2
132.6

118.6
119.5
105.1
113.3
79.0

111.6

112.0

118.0
106.3
113.6
77.4

126.7
109.7
119.5
79.0

114.9
127.8
113.5
122.9
83.6

122.7
131.0
113.5
127.3
86.3

89.1
99.3
93.6
108.3
75.2

100.1
102.6

115.0

101.0

114.5
108.8
77.9

119.5
109.9
76.7

115.1
105.4
128.3
115.2
73.6

92.2
114.2
123.3
116.8
135.4

104.2
116.4
126.7
145.8
142.2

103.9
123.3
120.5
170.7
145.7

112.5
120.9
125.6
99.0

112.4
126.4
126.4

110.0

119.8

104.3
122.7
126.8
105.7
117.5

104.8
116.8
125.6
111.3
106.9

173.3

101.2
110.0

87.8

101.6
94.8
107.2
76.9
92.5
108.7
116.7
109.3
128.3
108.7
118.6
118.0
98.6
108.5

121.6

90.8
114.5
126.2

110.1
125.3

M onthly Labor R eview

121.1
110.7
82.3

111.2

J a n u a ry 2002

107

Current Labor Statistics:

Productivity Data

46. C o n tin u ed — A nnual in dexes of output per hour fo r selected 3 -digit s ic in dustries
[1987 = 100]__________________
Industry

S IC

1990

M isce llan e o us ch e m ical p ro d u cts...............................
Petroleum refining..............................................................
A sp ha lt p aving and roofing m a te ria ls.........................
M iscellaneous p etroleum and coal p ro d u cts............
T ires and Inner tu b e s .......................................................

289
291
295
2 99
301

97.3
109.2
98.0
94.8
103.0

96.1
106.6
94.1
90.6
102.4

101.8

107.1

111.3
100.4
101.5
107.8

120.1
108.0
104.2
116.5

H ose and b elting and g aske ts a nd p a c kin g .............
F abricated rub b e r p roducts, n .e .c...............................
M isce llan e o us plastics products, n .e .c......................
F ootw ear, e xce p t ru b b e r.................................................
Flat g la s s...............................................................................

305
306
308
314
321

96.1
109.0
105.7

97.8
115.2
114.4
104.2
92.7

99.7
123.1
116.7
105.2
97.7

120.8

121.0

84.5

92.4
109.9
108.3
94.4
83.6

113.0
97.6

117.1
99.6

G lass and glassw are , p ressed o r b lo w n ...................
P roducts of p urchased g la s s.........................................
C e m en t, h yd ra u lic..............................................................
S tructu ral cla y p ro d u cts ..................................................
P ottery and related p ro d u cts..........................................

322
323
324
325
326

104.8
92.6
112.4
109.6
98.6

102.3
97.7
108.3
109.8
95.8

108.9
101.5
115.1
111.4
99.5

108.7
106.2
119.9
106.8
100.3

112.9
105.9
125.6
114.0
108.4

115.7
106.1
124.3

C oncrete, gypsum , and p laster p ro d u cts..................
M iscellaneous nonm etallic m ineral p ro d u cts............
B last fu rn ace and b asic steel p ro d u cts ......................
Iron a nd steel fo u n d rie s..................................................
P rim ary n on ferro us m e ta ls..............................................

327
329
331
332
333

102.3
95.4
109.7
106.1
102.3

101.2
94.0
107.8
104.5
110.7

102.5
104.3
117.0
107.2
101.9

104.6
104.5
133.6

101.5
106.3
142.4
113.0
105.3

N o nfe rro u s rolling and d ra w in g .....................................
N o nfe rro u s fo u n drie s (ca stin g s)....................................
M isce llan e o us prim a ry m etal p ro d u cts......................
M etal ca n s and shipping c o n ta in e rs............................
C utle ry, handtools, and h ard w a re .................................

335
336
339
341
342

92.7
104.0
113.7
117.6
97.3

91.0
103.6
109.1
122.9
96.8

P lum bing a nd heating, exce p t e le c tric........................
F abricated stru ctura l m etal p ro d u cts...........................
M etal fo rg in g s a nd sta m p in g s........................................
M etal services, n .e .c..........................................................
O rd n a nce and a cce sso ries, n .e .c.................................

343
344
346
347
348

102.6

102.0
100.0

M isce llan e o us fab ricated m etal p ro d u cts ..................
E ngines and tu rb in e s........................................................
Farm and garden m a ch in e ry.........................................
C onstru ctio n and related m a ch in e ry............................
M e talw orking m a ch in e ry..................................................

349
351
352
353
354

97.5
106.5
116.5
107.0

S pecial industry m a ch in e ry............................................
G en e ral industrial m a ch ine ry..........................................
C o m pu ter and o ffice e q u ip m e n t....................................
R efrigeration and se rvice m a ch in e ry...........................
Industrial m achinery, n .e .c..............................................

355
356
357
358
359

107.5
101.5
138.1
103.6
107.3

108.3

106.0

101.6

101.6

149.6
100.7
109.0

E lectric distrib utio n e q u ip m e n t.......................................
E lectrical industrial a pp a ratus
H o usehold a p p lia n c e s.......................................................
E lectric lighting and w iring e q u ip m e n t.........................
C o m m un ica tio n s e q u ip m e n t...........................................

361
362
363
364
366

106.3
107.7
105.8
99.9
123.8

E lectronic co m p on e n ts and a cce sso rie s ...................
M isce llan e o us electrical e q u ip m e n t & su p p lie s........
M otor veh icles and e q u ip m e n t......................................
A ircra ft and p a rts................................................................
S hip and boat building and re p a irin g ..........................

367
369
371
372
373

R ailroad e q u ip m e n t............................................................
M otorcycles, b icycles, and p a rts ...................................
G uid e d m issiles, space ve hicles, p a rts......................
S ea rch and navigation e q u ip m e n t...............................
M easuring a nd con tro llin g d e v ice s ...............................

374
375
376
381
382

M edical in stru m en ts and su p p lie s.................................
O ph th a lm ic g o o d s..............................................................
P ho to g rap h ic e qu ip m en t & su p p lie s ............................
Jew elry, silverw are, and plated w a re ...........................
M usical in stru m e n ts ...........................................................

384
385
386
391
393

S ee footn o te s a t end of table.

M onthly Labor R eview
Digitized for108
FRASER
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

101.1

98.8
95.6
104.7
82.1

1991

92.9
99.4
81.5

1992

1993

112.1
107.9

1994

1995

1996

110.1

105.7
123.8
104.9
96.3
124.1

107.8
132.3
87.4
131.1

142.0
113.1
87.1
138.8

102.7
119.1

104.6
121.5

121.0

111.2

107.4
124.7
126.1
101.5
121.4

122.0

109.3

128.7
119.6
119.3

104.5
107.8
142.6
112.7

107.3
110.4
147.5
116.2

112.6

120.3
149.2
123.1
96.5
149.1

155.7
124.7
98.5
144.2

128.1
169.5
115.7
90.7
145.5

113.5
125.3
129.9
121.4
107.6

112.7
132.3
133.8
110.9
114.0

114.0
140.8
141.2
131.6
127.7

128.3
125.1
133.1
111.9
123.2

135.2

143.6
134.0
139.6
124.0

122.0
134.1
114.8
127.1

112.8

107.6
114.6
155.0

114.7
151.0

120.8

110.8

120.8
112.0

125.8

104.0
122.3
149.6
155.2
118.2

111.3
127.0
136.2
160.3
114.6

115.2
131.5
140.0
163.8
115.7

122.7
130.8
150.4
160.3
123.9

127.3
111.9

126.9
112.7
130.3
127.9
92.2

121.1

101.2
112.1

100.1

98.3
108.5
111.3
132.3
104.0

134.5
140.9
109.2

99.2
117.8
152.2
144.2
111.3

98.4
103.9
103.7

102.0
104.8
108.7

109.1
107.7
108.5
123.0
83.6

109.2
105.8
109.3
127.7
87.6

118.6
106.5
113.6
128.4
87.5

124.4
93.7

130.3
112.7
125.9
127.3
96.6

106.6
122.7
134.7
114.8

108.3
136.6
137.2
123.3
114.9

107.7
136.9
141.2
132.5
119.2

111.5
145.9
148.5
137.5
119.8

110.3
151.2
125.5
137.2
123.5

132.3
109.0
469.4
112.7
138.8

134.0
109.4
681.3
114.7
141.4

131.7

125.1

110.0

111.2

143.0
150.8
127.3
113.7

275.3

96.0
103.6
114.5
127.8

101.1

102.0

103.3
113.9

109.2
118.6
108.2
107.4

103.2
122.3
125.0
117.7
109.9

195.7
104.9
117.0

113.6
104.8
258.6
108.6
118.5

106.7
328.6
110.7
127.4

106.5
107.1
106.5
97.5
129.1

119.6
117.1
115.0
105.7
154.9

132.9
123.4
107.8
163.0

131.8
134.9
131.4
113.4
186.4

200.6

143.9
154.3
127.4
116.9
229.5

133.4
90.6
102.4
98.9
103.7

154.7
98.6
96.6
108.2
96.3

189.3
101.3
104.2
112.3
102.7

217.9
108.2
106.2
115.2
106.2

274.1
110.5
108.8
109.6
103.8

401.5
114.1
106.7
107.9
98.0

514.9
123.1
107.2
113.0
99.2

141.1
93.8
116.5
112.7
106.4

146.9
99.8
110.5
118.9
113.1

147.9
108.4
110.5

151.0
130.9

150.0
120.3

119.9

129.1
124.0

152.5
125.1
118.9
132.1
133.8

116.9

121.2

118.7
125.1

107.8
99.3
97.1

95.8
96.9

123.5
144.5
116.4
96.7
96.0

127.3
157.8
126.9
96.7
95.6

126.7
160.6
132.7
99.5
88.7

110.2

120.6

1999

111.0

120.6

101.1

1998

114.4
114.6
148.9
126.2
131.2

111.6
88.6

97.4
105.8
112.9
99.1
96.4

1997

102.0
104.3

122.1

84.6

122.2

122.1

121.2

122.1

120.2

960.2
115.0
129.3

1350.6
121.4
127.5

139.3
111.4
1840.2
123.2
134.3

142.8
164.2
142.9

147.5
162.3
150.3
129.2
276.0

146.6
162.9
150.2
132.4
327.1

613.4
128.3
116.3
114.7
105.3

768.0
135.3
125.2
140.1

107.0
140.7
136.5
139.6

102.0

112.6

149.5
146.4

148.3
125.5
129.4
142.2
150.5

184.2
120.4
136.5
149.5
142.4

189.1
127.7
142.4
149.1
143.5

205.1
121.4
158.2
139.7
152.9

131.5
167.2
129.5

139.8
188.2
128.7

100.2

102.6

86.9

78.8

147.4
196.3
121.5
114.2
82.9

158.6
199.1
124.8
113.1
81.4

160.2
229.5
147.2
133.9
86.4

121.0

121.8

46. C o n tin u e d — A nnual in dexes of output per hour fo r selected 3 -digit SIC in dustries
[ 1987 =

100]__________________________________
Industry

SIC

To ys and spo rting g o o d s ...............................................
Pens, pencils, office, and a rt su p p lie s........................
C o stu m e je w e lry and n o tio n s........................................
M isce llan e o us m a n u fa ctu re s........................................

394
395
396
399

1990

1991

1992

108.1
118.2
105.3
106.5

109.7
116.8
106.7
109.2

118.5

127.8
116.9
103.7
92.5

139.6
123.4
104.5
96.9

119.8
106.1
87.6
113.4
109.6

127.7
108.3
88.5
115.2

1993

104.9
111.3

114.2

110.8

115.8
107.7

109.5

111.6

1994

1995

I0 9 .7
129.9
129.0
106.1

113.6
135.2
143.7
108.1

119.9
144.1
142.2

4011
4213
431
4 512,13,22 (pts.)

111.1
104.0
92.9

U titlities
T e lep h o ne co m m u n ica tio n s...........................................
Radio a nd tele visio n b ro a d ca stin g ..............................
C able a nd o th e r pay TV se rvice s.................................
E lectric u tilitie s ....................................................................
G as u tilitie s..........................................................................

481
483
484
491,3 (pt.)
492,3 (pt.)

105.8

Lum b e r and o th e r building m aterials d e a le rs ..........
Paint, glass, and w a llp a p er sto re s...............................
H ardw are sto re s.................................................................
Retail nurseries, lawn and g arden supply store s...
D e pa rtm e n t sto re s.............................................................

521
523
525
526
531

104.3
106.8
115.3
84.7
96.8

102.0

V arie ty sto re s.......................................................................
M iscellaneous g eneral m e rchandise s to re s .............
G ro ce ry sto re s....................................................................
M e at and fish (seafood) m a rk e ts..................................
Retail b a k e rie s....................................................................

533
539
541
542
546

154.4
118.6
96.6
98.9
91.2

N ew a nd used car d e a le rs..............................................
A uto and hom e su p ply sto re s........................................
G asolin e se rvice s ta tio n s.................................................
M en's and b oy's w e ar sto re s..........................................
W o m en 's clo th ing s to re s .................................................

551
553
554
561
562

106.7
103.6
103.0
115.6
106.6

Fam ily clothing sto re s ......................................................
S hoe sto re s..........................................................................
Furniture and hom e furn ish in g s sto re s........................
H ousehold applia nce sto re s...........................................
Radio, tele visio n, com puter, and m usic sto re s........

565
566
571
572
573

107.8
107.9
104.6
104.3

E ating and d rinking p la c e s..............................................
Drug and p ro p rietary s to re s ...........................................
Liquor s to re s .........................................................................
Used m e rchandise sto re s................................................
M isce llan e o us sho pp in g g oods sto re s ........................
N onstore re ta ile rs...............................................................
Fuel d e a le rs..........................................................................
Retail stores, n .e .c.............................................................

113.3
104.9
92.6

110.1

Trade
102.3
100.4
108.7
89.3

111.1
106.4
107.6
115.2

145.4
126.6
107.1

150.3
129.5
106.6
105.7

100.2
135.5
106.7
85.3

142.2

120.6
121.8

110.1
83.4
126.8
125.6

112.8

156.2
125.4
106.5
108.6

167.0
130.9
104.7

169.8
132.4
108.3

111.1

111.6

173.3
129.9
109.7
110.7

182.3
131.6
110.3
108.3

148.1
109.6
84.5
135.0
137.1

159.5
105.8
81.9
146.5
145.9

84.7
150.5
158.6

121.6

121.8

133.5
119.5
136.4
123.5

134.8
119.0
127.5
128.8

105.4

117.0
113.4

158.8
124.8
96.3
90.8
96.7

173.7
140.4
96.5
99.2
96.5

191.5
164.2
96.0
97.7
86.5

197.4
164.8
95.4
95.7
85.3

2 11.3
167.3
93.9
94.4
83.0

2 38.4
167.6
92.1
86.4
75.9

104.9

107.4

108.6

100.2

101.6
110.2

100.8

109.7
105.3

121.2

1999
124.0
129.3
150.2

117.8
130.9
115.5
117.4
115.9

101.2

1998
131.6
132.5
131.2
108.5

111.4
114.2
113.9
107.1
110.4

118.9
127.8

1997
125.7
127.5
118.0
109.4

Transportation
R ailroad tra n sp o rta tio n ....................................................
Tru ckin g, e xce p t lo c a l1 ..................................................
U.S. postal s e rv ic e 2 ........................................................
A ir tra n s p o rta tio n ' ...........................................................

1996

160.9

101.1

170.3
100.7
83.5
160.1
144.4

111.2

189.1

101.8
81.5
162.7
145.0

134.2
163.5
137.8
133.7
135.5

142.3
163.2
149.3
151.2
147.4

257 .7
170.3
91.7
90.8
67.6

268.7
185.7
92.2
95.7

68.1

319.5
195.2
95.4
99.3
83.8

109.1
108.2
126.1
129.8
154.2

108.8
108.1
126.1
136.3
157.3

108.7
113.0
133.9
145.2
176.1

111.9
116.0
140.6
154.6
190.5

111.2

122.3
123.6

115.9
119.5
130.0

130.4

108.1
109.1
127.2
121.4
139.9

121.1

111.5
107.8
105.4
106.7
129.8

118.6
115.5
113.9
115.5
139.9

121.5
117.3
113.3
118.0
154.5

127.7
130.7
114.7
121.5
179.1

141.8
139.2
117.4
138.4
199.3

146.9
151.9
123.6
140.7
208.1

150.2
148.4
124.2
153.5
218 .4

153.1
145.0
127.2
181.4
2 60.3

156.5
151.1
134.1
183.9
314.6

581
591
592
593
594

104.5
106.3
105.9
103.0
107.2

103.8
108.0
106.9
102.3
109.0

103.4
107.6
109.6
115.7
107.5

103.8
109.5

102.1

101.6

102.0

101.8

100.1

102.0
111.1

100.6

109.9

116.8
111.5

119.5
117.1

123.1

113.9
113.8
132.7
125.3

119.7
109.9
140.3
129.1

125.6
116.5
163.6
138.8

104.3
129.8
114.6
181.9
145.2

596
598
599

111.1
84.5
114.5

112.5
85.3
104.0

126.5
84.2
112.5

132.2
91.8
118.1

149.0
99.0
125.8

152.4
111.4
127.0

173.3
112.4
140.2

186.5
109.0
147.8

208.0
105.8
157.3

222.2

C o m m ercia l b a n ks.............................................................
H otels and m o te ls...............................................................
Laundry, cleaning, and g a rm e n t se rvice s ..................
P ho to g rap h ic studios, p o rtra it........................................
B eauty sh o p s.......................................................................

602
701
721
722
723

107.7
96.2
102.3
98.2
97.5

110.1

111.0

121.7
109.9
105.0
108.3

126.4
110.5
106.6
116.2
104.8

135.2
113.5

109.8
110.7
107.6

133.0
108.2
109.0
114.1
108.5

132.6

108.0
99.3
95.8
100.9

118.5
106.5
99.9

129.7

99.3
99.9
92.1
95.8

B arber sh o p s.......................................................................
Funeral services and cre m a to rie s.................................
A utom o tive rep a ir sh o p s ..................................................
M otion p icture th e a te rs .....................................................

724
726
753
783

100.7
91.2
107.9
118.1

94.9
89.9

113.2
103.8
105.1
114.8

128.8
97.6
116.1
104.1

150.4
101.9
117.2
103.4

104.8
121.9

Finance and services

' R efers to o utp ut per e m ployee

100.1
118.2

101.8

121.1
121.8

97.0

101.1

121.9
98.7
105.7
113.8

118.8
104.3
114.3
110.4

104.7

120.6

115.7

100.2
121.6
105.0

110.0

111.6
116.2

121.6

115.1
161.0

121.8

110.5

105.1
113.3

157.4
104.2
124.9
106.1

138.0
99.7
127.6
110.5

n.e .c . = not e lse w he re cla ssifie d

Refers to o u p u t per fu ll-tim e e q u iva le n t e m ployee year on fiscal basis.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

Jan u a ry 2002

109

C urrent Labor Statistics:

International Comparison

4 7. U n e m p lo y m e n t rates, a p p ro x im a tin g U.S. c o n c e p ts , in nine countries, q u a rte rly d a ta
s e aso n ally a d ju s te d
Annual average
C ountry

1999

2000

1999
I

II

2000
III

IV

I

II

III

IV

U nited S ta te s ........

4.2

4.0

4.3

4.3

4.2

4.1

4.1

4.0

4.0

4.0

C a n a d a ....................
A u s tra lia ..................
Ja o a n 1.....................
F ra nc e 1....................
G e rm a n y1...............
Ita lv1,2......................
S w e d e n 1..................
U nited K in n d n m 1..

6.8

5.8

7.1
7.5
4.7
11.4

7.1
7.4
4.8
11.3

6.8

6.2

7.1
4.8

7.0
4.7

6.0
6.8

5.8
6.7
4.7
9.7

5.8
6.3
4.7
9.6

5.7
6.5
4.8
9.2

8.8
11.8

8.8

8.3

8.2
10.6

8.1
10.1

5.6
5.4

5.2
-

7.2
4.7

11.2
8.7
11.5
7.1

6.1

6.6
4.8
9.7
8.3
10.7
5.9
-

7.1

6.2

11.7
7.0

6.1

1P relim inary fo r 2000 fo r Japan, France, G erm a ny (unified), Italy,
and S w eden and fo r 1999 onw a rd fo r the U nited Kingdom .
2Q ua rte rly rates are fo r th e first m onth of the quarter.
NOTE: Q ua rte rly fig u re s fo r France and G erm a ny are
ca lcu lated by a pplying a nnual a d ju stm en t fa ctors to cu rre n t
p ublished data, and th e refore should be view ed as less p recise in­

no

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

11.2
8.8
11.5
7.1
5.9

4.8

10.8

10.2

8.7

8.4
11.3
6.7
5.8

11.2
7.1
5.9

10.8
6.0
5.5

dica to rs of u ne m p loym en t u nd e r U.S. con ce pts than th e annual
figures. S ee "N otes on the d ata" fo r inform ation on b reaks in
series. For fu rth e r qualifica tio n s and historical data, see
Com parative Civilian Labor Force Statistics, Ten Coun­
tries, 1 9 5 9 -2 0 0 0 (Bureau o f Labor S tatistics, M ar. 16, 2001).
Dash indicates data n ot available.

48. A nnual d a ta : Em ploym ent status of the w o rk in g -a g e population, a pproxim ating U.S. concepts, 10 countries
[Numbers in thousands]______________________________________________________________________
E m p lo y m e n t s ta tu s a n d c o u n try

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

126,346
14,128
8,490
64,280

128,105
14,168
8,562
65,040

129,200
14,299
8,619
65,470

131,056
14,387
8,776
65,780

132,304

24 570
39,040

24 640
39,140

24 780
39,210

133,943
14,650
9,127
66,450
?5 090
39,180

136,297
14,936
9,221
67,200
?5 p m
39,480

137,673
15,216
9,347
67,240
P5 540
39,520

139,368
15,513
9,470
67,090
P5 «fin
39,630

140,863
15,745
9,682
66,990

24 470
39,130

14,500
9,001
65,990
?4 880
39,100

22,940
6,780
4,591
28,610

22,910
6,940
4,520
28,410

22,570
7,050
4,443
28,310

22,450
7,200
4,418
28,280

22,460
7,230
4,460
28,480

22,570
7,440
4,459
28,620

22,680
7,510
4,418
28,760

22,960
7,670
4,402
28,870

23,130
7,750
4,430
29,090

Civilian labor force
United S ta te s1..........................................................................
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia.....................................................................................
Ja p an ..........................................................................................
G erm any2...................................................................................
Italy..............................................................................................
N etherlands...............................................................................
S w eden......................................................................................
United Kingdom ........................................................................

_
-

-

Participation rate3
1InitoH
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia.....................................................................................
Ja pan..........................................................................................
fio r m a n t/
Italy..............................................................................................
N etherlands...............................................................................
S w eden .................................................................................. .
United Kinqdom ........................................................................
Employed
United S tates1..........................................................................
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia.....................................................................................
Ja pan...........................................................................................
France........................................................................................
i^orm ani/^
Italy..............................................................................................
Netherlands...............................................................................
S w eden.......................................................................................
United K ingdom ........................................................................

66.2
66.7
64.1
63.2
55.9
58.9
47.7
56.8
67.0
63.7
117,718
12,747
7,676
62,920
22,120
36,920
21,360
6,380
4,447
26,090

66.4
65.9
63.9
63.4
55 8
58.3
47.5
57.7
65.7
63.1

66.3
65.5
63.6
63.3
55 6
58.0
47.9
58.2
64.5
62.8

118,492

120,259

12,672
7,637
63,620
22,020
36,420
21,230
6,540
4,265
25,530

12,770
7,680
63,810
21,740
36,030
20,270
6,590
4,028
25,340

66.6
65.2
63.9
63.1
55 5
57.6
47.3
59.0
63.7
62.5
123,060
13,027
7,921
63,860
21,730
35,890
19,940
6,680
3,992
25,550

66.6
64.9
64.6
62.9
55 8
57.3
47.1
58.9
64.1
62.7
124,900
13,271
8,235
63,890
21,910
35,900
19,820
6,730
4,056
26,000

66.8
64.7
64.6
63.0
55 5
57.4
47.1
60.3
64.0
62.7

67.1
65.0
64.3
63.2
55 3
57.7
47.2
60.6
63.3
62.8

67.1
65.4
64.4
62.8

67.1
65.8
64.2
62.4

67.2
65.9
64.7
62.0

57.7
47.6
61.4
62.8
62.7

57.9
47.8
61.5
63.2
62.9

_

126,708
13,380
8,344
64,200
21,960
35,680
19,920
6,970
4,019
26,280

129,558
13,705
8,429
64,900
22,090
35,570
19,990
7,110
3,973
26,740

131,463
14,068
8,597
64,450
22,520
35,830
20,210
7,360
4,034
27,050

133,488
14,456
8,785
63,920
22,970
36,170
20,460
7,490
4,117
27,330

63.8
59.7
58.8
61.0

64.1
60.4
59.2
60.2

64.3
61.3
59.6
59.4

-

135,208
14,827
9,043
63,790
-

_
-

-

Em ploym ent-population ratio4
United S ta te s1..........................................................................
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia.....................................................................................
Ja pan...........................................................................................
G erm any2...................................................................................
N etherlands...............................................................................
S w eden.......................................................................................
United Kinqdom .......................................................................
Unem ployed

61.7
60.2
57.9
61.8
50.6
55.5

61.5
58.9
57.0
62.0
50.0
54.4

61.7
58.5
56.6
61.7
49 0
53.4

62.5
59.0
57.7
61.3
48 7
52.8

62.9
59.4
59.1
60.9
48 8
52.6

63.2
59.1
59.1
60.9
52.2

52.0

52.3

52.8

-

44.5
53.4
64.9
58.0

44.0
54.4
62.0
56.7

43.0
54.4
58.5
56.2

42.0
54.8
57.6
56.5

41.5
54.9
58.3
57.2

41.6
56.5
57.7
57.6

41.6
57.4
56.9
58.3

41.9
58.9
57.6
58.7

42.3
59.4
58.7
59.1

_

G erm any2...................................................................................

8,628
1,381
814
1,360
2,350
2,210

9,613
1,496
925
1,420
2,550
2,620

8,940
1,530
939
1,660
2,900
3,110

7,996
1,359
856
1,920
3,060
3,320

7,404
1,229
766
2,100
2,920
3,200

7,236
1,271
783
2,250
3,130
3,500

6,739
1,230
791
2,300
3,130
3,910

Netherlands...............................................................................
S w eden.......................................................................................
United Kingdom ........................................................................

1,580
400
144
2,520

1,680
390
255
2,880

2,300
460
415
2,970

2,510
520
426
2,730

2,640
510
404
2,480

2,650
470
440
2,340

2,690
400
445
2,020

United S tates1..........................................................................
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia......................................................................................
Ja pan...........................................................................................
France........................................................................................

6,210
1,148
750
2,790
3,020
3,690
2,750
310
368
1,820

5,880
1,058
685
3,170
2,890
3,460
2,670
260
313
1,760

64.5
62.1
60.4
59.0

-

_
5,655
918
638
3,200
_
_
_
-

Unem ploym ent rate
United S tates1..........................................................................
C anada.......................................................................................
A ustralia......................................................................................
Ja p an ...........................................................................................
France.........................................................................................
G erm any2...................................................................................
Italy..............................................................................................
Netherlands...............................................................................
S w eden.......................................................................................
United Kinqdom ........................................................................

6.8
9.8
9.6
2.1
9.6
5.6

7.5
10.6
10.8
2.2
10.4
6.7

6.9
10.7
10.9
2.5
11.8
7.9

6.1
9.4
9.7
2.9
12.3
8.5

5.6
8.5
8.5
3.2
11.8
8.2

5.4
8.7
8.6
3.4
12.5
8.9

4.9
8.2
8.6
3.4
12.4
9.9

4.5
7.5
8.0
4.1
11.8
9.3

4.2
6.8
7.2
4.7
11.2
8.7

4.0
5.8
6.6
4.8
9.7
-

6.9
7.3
10.2
11.8
11.7
11.2
11.9
12.0
11.5
10.7
5.9
5.6
6.5
7.2
7.1
6.3
5.3
3.4
4.0
3.1
5.6
9.3
9.6
9.1
8.4
9.9
10.1
7.1
5.9
8.8
10.1
10.5
9.7
8.7
8.2
7.0
6.3
6.1
' Data for 1994 are not directly com parable with data for 1993 and earlier years. For
3 Labor force as a percent of the working-age population,
additional inform ation, see the box note under "Em ploym ent and U nem ploym ent
4 Employment as a percent of the working-age population.
Data" in the notes to this section.
NOTE: See Notes on the data for Information on breaks in series for th e United
States, France, Germ any, Italy, the N etherlands, and Sweden.
2 Data from 1991 onward refer to unified G erm any. See Comparative Civilian Labor
Dash indicates data are not available,
Force Statistics, Ten Countries, 195 9 -20 0 0 , Mar. 16, 2001, on the Internet at
p = prelim inary.
h ttp ://s ta ts .b ls .g o v /fls d a ta .h tm .


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

111

C urrent Labor Statistics:

international Comparison

49. Annual indexes of manufacturing productivity and related measures, 12 countries
[1 9 9 2 = 100]
Ite m a n d c o u n tr y

1960

1 98 0

1970

1988

1989

1990

1991

1993

199 4

1995

199 7

199 6

1998

1999

O utput per hour
38.7
14.0
18.0
29.9
21.8
29.2
20.2
18.6
36.7
27.3
31.2

56.6
38.0
32.9
52.7
43.0
52.0
37.9
38.1
57.8
52.2
44.7

70.5
75.1
63.9
65.4
90.3
66.5
77.2
65.9
69.2
76.7
73.1
56.1

96.9
90.9
84.8
92.0
94.1
87.5
91.5
86.7
93.7
92.1
90.5
82.3

95.7
93.7
89.5
96.9
99.6
91.9
94.6
89.4
97.1
94.6
93.2
86.2

96.9
95.7
95.4
96.8
99.1
93.5
99.0
92.5
98.6
96.6
94.6
88.3

97.8
95.3
99.4
99.1
99.6
96.9
99.0
95.2
99.6
97.5
95.5
92.2

102.1
104.5
100.5
102.5
104.5
100.6
101.6
102.9
101.4
100.6
107.3
104.0

107.3
109.9
101.8
108.4
108.5
110.1
105.6
112.7
101.4
119.4
106.8

114.5
113.2
109.3
117.7
102.0
121.9
104.8

115.0
116.8
109.5
119.7
102.0
124.5
103.2

122.6
122.4
111.5
125.7
103.0
133.0
104.0

124.0
126.7
111.1
127.8
103.9
135.6
104.6

134.8
115.2
124.1
124.5
128.9
128.5
112.9
103.9
139.5
109.2

-

34.2
10.7
30.7
40.8
31.0
41.5
21.9
31.7
56.5
45.9
67.7

60.6
38.8
57.6
68.0
64.1
70.9
45.8
59.5
89.1
80.7
90.3

75.8
86.0
59.9
78.2
91.3
88.7
85.3
80.4
77.4
103.6
90.7
87.2

103.2
110.1
84.6
93.3
100.8
92.2
90.9
94.5
92.8
105.3
109.8
101.4

102.4
112.6
90.2
99.1
104.3
97.2
94.0
98.1
96.9
101.3
110.9
105.4

101.6
108.6
96.3
101.0
102.7
99.1
99.1
99.6
100.1
100.2
110.1
105.3

98.3
99.0
101.4
100.7
101.7
99.8
102.3
99.2
100.6
98.3
104.1
100.0

103.5
104.6
96.0
97.0
99.0
95.7
92.5
96.4
98.2
102.7
101.9
101.4

111.1
113.2
95.4
101.4
109.3
100.3
95.2
102.2
104.2
106.7
117.1
106.1

118.4
118.1
100.6
104.2
114.7
104.9
95.3
107.2
107.8
109.0
128.4
107.8

121.3
119.8
106.7
105.1
109.7
104.6
93.5
105.6
108.4
110.1
131.1
108.2

127.7
128.1
111.1
109.9
112.6
109.7
96.3
108.3
114.1
115.7
138.6
109.6

133.5
133.1
103.6
111.8
115.3
111.5
100.9
110.3
116.6
117.6
144.6
109.9

139.3
141.3
103.9
113.8
111.5
114.2
102.2
111.4
114.0
150.7
109.7

United States...............................................................
Canada.........................................................................
Japan............................................................................
Belgium........................................................................
Denmark.......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany.......................................................................
Italy................................................................................
Netherlands.................................................................
Norway.........................................................................
Sweden........................................................................
United Kingdom..........................................................

92.1
88.3
76.3
170.7
136.5
142.3
142.3
108.7
170.6
154.0
168.3
217.3

104.4
107.1
102.3
174.7
129.0
149.0
136.3
120.9
156.2
154.3
154.7
202.1

107.5
114.6
93.8
119.7
101.1
133.3
110.5
122.0
111.8
135.0
124.0
155.3

106.6
121.2
99.8
101.5
107.2
105.4
99.3
108.9
99.0
114.3
121.4
123.2

107.1
120.2
100.8
102.3
104.7
105.8
99.3
109.7
99.8
107.1
119.0
122.3

104.8
113.5
100.9
104.3
103.7
105.9
100.1
107.7
101.5
103.7
116.4
119.2

100.4
103.9
102.0
101.5
102.1
103.0
103.3
104.2
101.0
100.8
109.0
108.5

101.4
100.1
95.6
94.7
94.8
95.1
91.0
93.6
96.9
102.1
94.9
97.5

103.6
103.0
93.7
93.6

104.0
106.4
92.0
92.0
91.6
84.2
98.0
91.6
106.9
105.3
102.9

105.5
113.5
91.5
89.8
89.5
78.7
97.1
90.8
112.3
104.2
105.4

105.2
118.3
86.1
90.5
89.9
79.6
99.3
91.2
113.2
106.6
105.0

103.3
122.7
83.8
91.5

92.4
86.5
96.7
92.4
105.2
98.1
99.4

103.7
109.4
92.2
91.0
91.0
80.1
96.5
90.5
107.9
105.3
104.8

Com pensation per h our
United States..............................................................
Canada.........................................................................
Japan............................................................................
Belgium.........................................................................
Denmark......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany......................................................................
Italy................................................................................
Netherlands.................................................................
Norway.........................................................................
Sweden........................................................................
United Kingdom..........................................................

14.9
9.9
4.3
5.4
4.6
4.3
8.1
1.6
6.4
4.7
4.1
3.1

23.7
17.0
16.5
13.7
13.3
10.3
20.7
4.7
20.2
11.8
10.7
6.3

55.6
47.7
58.6
52.5
49.6
40.8
53.6
28.4
64.4
39.0
37.3
33.2

84.0
77.8
79.2
81.1
82.9
81.6
79.1
69.3
87.7
83.3
71.8
67.7

86.6
82.5
84.2
85.9
87.7
86.0
83.2
75.9
88.5
87.2
79.4
72.9

90.8
89.5
90.7
90.1
92.7
90.6
89.4
84.4
90.8
92.3
87.8
80.9

95.6
94.7
95.9
97.3
95.9
96.2
92.1
93.6
95.2
97.5
95.5
90.5

102.7
99.6
104.6
104.8
104.6
103.0
106.1
107.5
103.7
101.5
97.2
104.3

105.6
100.4
106.7
106.1
105.6
112.3
107.8
108.2
104.4
99.8
106.5

107.9
103.6
109.5
109.2
108.4
118.5
112.8
110.6
109.2
106.3
107.4

109.3
102.8
110.9
112.0
110.2
125.2
120.3
113.2
113.6
114.2
108.2

111.4
106.7
113.9
115.2
113.0
128.0
125.4
115.8
118.7
119.7
111.4

117.3
110.8
115.8
116.0
114.9
128.9
123.0
118.3
126.2
123.3
117.0

123.2
110.8
117.7
116.0
119.3
130.8
126.5
133.4
127.4
122.6

25.6
30.9
30.1
15.4
19.5
27.8
7.9
34.4
12.9
15.0
9.8

30.1
43.3
41.7
25.2
24.0
39.8
12.4
52.9
20.4
20.6
14.1

78.8
63.2
91.7
80.3
55.0
61.3
69.4
43.1
93.0
50.8
51.0
59.1

86.7
85.2
93.4
88.1
88.2
93.3
86.5
79.9
93.6
90.4
79.4
82.2

90.5
88.0
94.0
88.7
88.1
93.6
87.9
84.9
91.1
92.2
85.1
84.6

93.7
92.3
95.0
93.0
93.6
96.8
90.3
91.3
92.1
95.6
92.8
91.6

97.7
99.7
96.5
98.1
96.3
99.3
93.1
98.4
95.5
100.0
100.0
98.2

100.6
97.6
104.1
102.3
100.1
102.4
104.5
104.4
102.3
100.9
90.6
100.3

98.5
94.3
104.9
97.9
93.0
97.3
102.0
102.1
96.0
102.9
83.6
99.7

94.8
95.5
100.1
96.4
93.8
94.7
104.7
103.2
94.0
107.1
87.2
102.5

93.5
95.9
95.8
95.6
100.9
95.9
107.2
109.9
94.6
111.4
91.7
104.8

92.0
95.9
93.8
93.3
102.0
92.2
104.6
112.4
92.2
115.2
90.0
107.1

92.4
98.8
96.2
93.7
102.8
92.7
101.8
110.8
92.5
121.5
90.9
111.9

91.4
98.1
94.9
93.4
108.9
92.6
101.8
112.0
128.5
91.3
112.3

78.8
65.3
51.3
88.3
58.9
76.8
59.6
62.0
82.3
63.9
70.3
77.8

86.7
83.6
92.4
77.0
79.0
82.9
76.9
75.6
83.2
86.1
75.4
82.9

90.5
89.8
86.3
72.3
72.6
77.6
73.0
76.2
75.5
82.9
76.8
78.5

93.7
95.6
83.1
89.5
91.3
94.1
87.3
93.8
88.9
95.0
91.3
92.5

97.7
105.1
90.9
92.3
90.8
93.1
87.5
97.6
89.8
95.7
96.3
98.2

100.6
91.4
118.8
95.1
93.2
95.6
98.6
81.8
96.8
88.3
67.7
85.3

98.5
83.4
130.1
94.2
88.3
92.9
98.2
78.1
92.8
90.7
63.1
86.5

94.8
84.1
135.1
105.2
101.1
100.6
114.1
78.0
103.0
105.0
71.2
91.6

93.5
85.0
111.7
99.3
105.0
99.2
111.3
87.8
98.6
107.1
79.7
92.6

92.0
83.6
98.3
83.7
93.1
83.6
94.1
81.3
83.0
101.1
68.6
99.3

92.4
80.5
93.1
83.0
92.6
83.2
90.3
78.6
82.0
100.0
66.6
105.0

91.4
79.8
105.7
79.3
94.1
79.6
86.6
75.9

United States..............................................................
Canada........................................................................
Japan............................................................................
Belgium.........................................................................
Denmark.......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany.......................................................................
Italy................................................................................
Netherlands.................................................................
Nonway..........................................................................
Sweden.........................................................................
United Kingdom..........................................................

-

-

-

113.8
111.0
109.3
113.2
-

117.0
109.5
115.8
115.5
-

121.1
112.8
121.4
122.4
-

127.0
112.5
120.4
123.6
-

O utput
United States...............................................................
Canada.........................................................................
Japan............................................................................
Belgium.........................................................................
Denmark......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany......................................................................
Italy................................................................................
Netherlands.................................................................
Norway.........................................................................
Sweden.........................................................................
United Kingdom..........................................................
Total hours

-

-

-

-

88.6
79.5
98.6
109.8
108.0
100.5

U n it labor costs: National currency basis
Canada.........................................................................
Japan...........................................................................
Denmark.......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany.....................................................................
Italy................................................................................
Netherlands.................................................................
Norway.........................................................................
United Kingdom..........................................................
U nit la bo r costs: U.S. dollar basis
United States..............................................................
Canada.........................................................................
Japan...........................................................................
Belgium........................................................................
Denmark......................................................................
France..........................................................................
Germany.....................................................................
Italy...............................................................................
Nonway.........................................................................
United Kingdom.........................................................

-

32.0
10.9
19.4
13.5
21.1
10.4
15.6
16.0
11.3
16.9
15.6

-

34.8
15.3
27.0
20.3
23.0
17.1
24.4
25.7
17.8
23.1
19.2

NOTE: Data for Germany for years before 1992 are for the former West Germany. Data for 1992 onward are for unified Germany. Dash indicates data not available.

112

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

J an u ary 2002

_

102 2
64.3
102.8

50. O c c u p a tio n a l injury a n d illness rates by industry,' United States
In d u s t r y a n d t y p e o f c a s e
P R IV ATE S EC TO R 5
Total c a s e s .........................................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s................................................................................
Lost w o rk da ys................................................................

Incidence rates per 100 full-tim e w orkers3
1988

1989 1

1990

1991

1992

1993 4

1994 4

19954

1996 4

1997 4

1998 4

1999 4

8.6
4.0
76.1

8.6
4.0
78.7

8.8
4.1
84.0

8.4
3.9
86.5

8.9
3.9
93.8

8.5
3.8
-

8.4
3.8
-

8.1
3.6

7.4
3.4
-

7.1
3.3

6.7
3.1

6.3
3.0

A gricu lture, forestry, and fis h in g 5
Total c a s e s .....................................................................
Lost w o rkda y ca se s........................................................
Lost w o rk da ys................................................................

10.S
5.6
101.8

10.9
5.7
100.9

11.6
5.9
112.2

10.8
5.4
108.3

11.6
5.4
126.9

11.2
5.0
-

10.0
4.7
-

9.7
4.3
-

8.7
3.9
-

8.4
4.1
-

7.9
3.9

7.3
3.4

M ining
Total c a s e s ......................................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s............................................................
Lost w o rk da ys..................................................................

8.8
5.1
152.1

8.5
4.8
137.2

8.3
5.0
119.5

7.4
4.5
129.6

7.3
4.1
204.7

6.8
3.9
-

6.3
3.9
-

6.2
3.9
-

5.4
3.2
_

5.9
3.7
_

4.9
2.9

4.4
2.7

C onstruction
Total c a s e s ...................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases............................................................
Lost w o rk da ys.............................................................

14.6
6.8
142.2

14.3
6.8
143.3

14.2
6.7
147.9

13.0
6.1
148.1

13.1
5.8
161.9

12.2
5.5
-

11.8
5.5
-

10.6
4.9
_

9.9
4.5
_

9.5
4.4
_

8.8
4.0

8.6
4.2

G eneral building contractors:
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost w o rkda y ca se s.................................................................
Lost w o rk da ys.........................................................

14.0
6.4
132.2

13.9
6.5
137.3

13.4
6.4
137.6

12.0
5.5
132.0

12.2
5.4
142.7

11.5
5.1

10.9
5.1

9.8
4.4

9.0
4.0

8.5
3.7

8.4
3.9

8.0
3.7

H eavy construction, except buildlnq:
Total c a s e s ........................................................................
Lost w orkday cases................................................
Lost w o rkda ys.............................................................

15.1
7.0
162.3

13.8
6.5
147.1

13.8
6.3
144.6

12.8
6.0
160.1

12.1
5.4
165.8

11.1
5.1

10.2
5.0

9.9
4.8

9.0
4.3

8.7
4.3

8.2
4.1

7.8
3.8

S pecial trades contractors:
Total c a s e s .........................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases.............................................
Lost w o rkda ys.............................................................

14.7
7.0
141.1

14.6
6.9
144.9

14.7
6.9
153.1

13.5
6.3
151.3

13.8
6.1
168.3

12.8
5.8

12.5
5.8

11.1
5.0

10.4
4.8

10.0
4.7

9.1
4.1

8.9
4.4

13.1
5.7
107.4

13.1
5.8
113.0

13.2
5.8
120.7

12.7
5.6
121.5

12.5
5.4
124.6

12.1
5.3
-

12.2
5.5
-

11.6
5.3
-

10.6
4.9
-

10.3
4.8
_

9.7
4.7
_

9.2
4.6

14.2
5.9
111.1

14.1
6.0
116.5

14.2
6.0
123.3

13.6
5.7
122.9

13.4
5.5
126.7

13.1
5.4
-

13.5
5.7
-

12.8
5.6
_

11.6
5.1
_

11.3
5.1

10.7
5.0

10.1
4.8

Lum ber and w ood products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s............................................................
Lost w orkda ys..........................................................................

19.5
10.0
189.1

18.4
9.4
177.5

18.1
8.8
172.5

16.8
8.3
172.0

16.3
7.6
165.8

15.9
7.6
-

15.7
7.7
-

14.9
7.0
-

14.2
6.8
_

13.5
6.5
_

13.2
6.8

13.0
6.7

Furniture and fixtures:
Total c a s e s .................................................................
Lost w orkday cases.................................................................
Lost w orkda ys...................................................................

16.6
7.3
115.7

16.1
7.2

15.9
7.2

14.8
6.6
128.4

14.6
6.5
-

15.0
7.0
-

13.9
6.4
_

12.2
5.4
_

12.0
5.8

11.4
5.7

11.5
5.9

-

16.9
7.8
-

S tone, clay, and qlass products:
Total c a s e s ...........................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..............................................
Lost w orkda ys..........................................................

16.0
7.5
141.0

15.5
7.4
149.8

15.4
7.3
160.5

14.8
6.8
156.0

13.6
6.1
152.2

13.8
6.3
-

13.2
6.5
_

12.3
5.7
_

12.4
6.0
_

11.8
5.7

11.8
6.0

10.7
5.4

Prim ary m etal industries:
Total c a s e s ............................................................
Lost w orkday cases.........................................................
Lost w o rkda ys..................................................................

19.4
8.2
161.3

18.7
8.1
168.3

19.0
8.1
180.2

17.7
7.4
169.1

17.5
7.1
175.5

17.0
7.3
-

16.8
7.2
-

16.5
7.2
_

15.0
6.8
_

15.0
7.2
_

14.0
7.0

12.9
6.3

Fabricated m etal products:
Total c a s e s ..............................................................
Lost w orkday cases..................................................................
Lost w o rkda ys.........................................................

18.8
8.0
138.8

18.5
7.9
147.6

18.7
7.9
155.7

17.4
7.1
146.6

16.8
6.6
144.0

16.2
6.7

15.8
6.9
_

14.4
6.2
_

14.2
6.4

13.9
6.5

12.6
6.0

-

16.4
6.7
-

Industrial m achinery and equipm ent:
Total c a s e s ..........................................................................
Lost w orkday cases...........................................................
Lost w orkda ys.....................................................................

12.1
4.7
82.8

12.1
4.8
86.8

12.0
4.7
88.9

11.2
4.4
86.6

11.1
4.2
87.7

11.1
4.2
-

11.6
4.4
-

11.2
4.4
-

9.9
4.0
_

10.0
4.1
_

9.5
4.0

8.5
3.7

E lectronic and other electrical equipm ent:
Total c a s e s ..................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s.................................................................
Lost w orkda ys........................................................................

8.0
3.3
64.6

9.1
3.9
77.5

9.1
3.8
79.4

8.6
3.7
83.0

8.4
3.6
81.2

8.3
3.5
_

8.3
3.6
_

7.6
3.3
_

6.8
3.1
_

6.6
3.1
_

5.9
2.8

5.7
2.8

Transportation equipm ent:
Total c a s e s ..............................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s.................................................................
Lost w orkda ys....................................................................

17.7
6.6
134.2

17.7
6.8
138.6

17.8
6.9
153.7

18.3
7.0
166.1

18.7
7.1
186.6

18.5
7.1
-

19.6
7.8
-

18.6
7.9
-

16.3
7.0
_

15.4
6.6
_

14.6
6.6

13.7
6.4

Instrum ents and related products:
Total c a s e s ........................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s ........................................................
Lost w orkda ys...........................................................................

6.1
2.6
51.5

5.6
2.5
55.4

5.9
2.7
57.8

6.0
2.7
64.4

5.9
2.7
65.3

5.6
2.5
-

5.9
2.7
-

5.3
2.4
_

5.1
2.3
_

4.8
2.3
_

4.0
1.9

4.0
1.8

M iscellaneous m anufacturlnq Industries:
Total c a s e s ..................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases........................................................................
Lost w o rkda ys....................................................................

11.3
5.1
91.0

11.1
5.1
97.6

11.3
5.1
113.1

11.3
5.1
104.0

10.7
5.0
108.2

10.0
4.6
-

9.9
4.5
-

9.1
4.3
-

9.5
4.4
-

8.9
4.2
-

8.1
3.9
-

8.4
4.0

M anufacturing
Total c a s e s ...........................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s......................................................
Lost w o rk da ys...............................................................
Durable goods:
Total c a s e s .................................................................
Lost w orkday ca se s.......................................................
Lost w o rk da ys...........................................................

-

S ee footnotes a t end of table.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

M onthly Labor R eview

J an u a ry 2002

113

C urrent Labor Statistics:

Injury and Illness Data

50. Continued— O ccupatio nal injury a nd illness rates by industry,' United States
Incidence rates per 100 full-time workers3
in d u s try a n d ty p e o f c a s e

1988

Nondurable goods:
Total c a s e s ..............................................................................................
Lost workday cases.................................................................................
Lost w orkdays............................................................................................
Food and kindred products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Tobacco products:
T otal c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Textile mill products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Apparel and other textile products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Paper and allied products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Printinq and publishinq:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Chemicals and allied products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Petroleum and coal products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
Leather and leather products:
Total c a s e s ............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..............................................................................
Lost w orkdays........................................................................................
T ra n s p o rta tio n a nd p u b lic u tilitie s
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..................................................................................
Lost w orkdays............................................................................................

1989 1

1990

1991

1992

1 9 9 3 4 1994 4 1 9 9 5 4 1996 4 1997 4 1998 4

1999 4

11.4
5.4
101.7

11.6
5.5
107.8

11.7
5.6
116.9

11.5
5.5
119.7

11.3
5.3
121.8

10.7
5.0
-

10.5
5.1
-

9.9
4.9
-

9.2
4.6
-

8.8
4.4
-

8.2
4.3
-

7.8
4.2
-

18.5
9.2
169.7

18.5
9.3
174.7

20.0
9.9
202.6

19.5
9.9
207.2

18.8
9.5
211.9

17.6
8.9
-

17.1
9.2
-

16.3
8.7
-

15.0
8.0
-

14.5
8.0
-

13.6
7.5
-

12.7
7.3
-

9.3
2.9
53.0

8.7
3.4
64.2

7.7
3.2
62.3

6.4
2.8
52.0

6.0
2.4
42.9

5.8
2.3
-

5.3
2.4
-

5.6
2.6
-

6.7
2.8
-

5.9
2.7
-

6.4
3.4
-

5.5
2.2
-

9.6
4.0
78.8

10.3
4.2
81.4

9.6
4.0
85.1

10.1
4.4
88.3

9.9
4.2
87.1

9.7
4.1
-

8.7
4.0
-

8.2
4.1
-

7.8
3.6
-

6.7
3.1
-

7.4
3.4
-

6.4
3.2
-

8.1
3.5
68.2

8.6
3.8
80.5

8.8
3.9
92.1

9.2
4.2
99.9

9.5
4.0
104.6

9.0
3.8
-

8.9
3.9
-

8.2
3.6
-

7.4
3.3
-

7.0
3.1
-

6.2
2.6
-

5.8
2.8
-

13.1
5.9
124.3

12.7
5.8
132.9

12.1
5.5
124.8

11.2
5.0
122.7

11.0
5.0
125.9

9.9
4.6
-

9.6
4.5
-

8.5
4.2
-

7.9
3.8
-

7.3
3.7
-

7.1
3.7
-

7.0
3.7
-

6.6
3.2
59.8

6.9
3.3
63.8

6.9
3.3
69.8

6.7
3.2
74.5

7.3
3.2
74.8

6.9
3.1
-

6.7
3.0
-

6.4
3.0
-

6.0
2.8
-

5.7
2.7
-

5.4
2.8
-

5.0
2.6
-

7.0
3.3
59.0

7.0
3.2
63.4

6.5
3.1
61.6

6.4
3.1
62.4

6.0
2.8
64.2

5.9
2.7
-

5.7
2.8
-

5.5
2.7
-

4.8
2.4
-

4.8
2.3
-

4.2
2.1
-

4.4
2.3
-

7.0
3.2
68.4

6.6
3.3
68.1

6.6
3.1
77.3

6.2
2.9
68.2

5.9
2.8
71.2

5.2
2.5
-

4.7
2.3
-

4.8
2.4
-

4.6
2.5
-

4.3
2.2
-

3.9
1.8
-

4.1
1.8
-

16.3
8.1
142.9

16.2
8.0
147.2

16.2
7.8
151.3

15.1
7.2
150.9

14.5
6.8
153.3

13.9
6.5
-

14.0
6.7
-

12.9
6.5
-

12.3
6.3
-

11.9
5.8
-

11.2
5.8
-

10.1
5.5
-

11.4
5.6
128.2

13.6
6.5
130.4

12.1
5.9
152.3

12.5
5.9
140.8

12.1
5.4
128.5

12.1
5.5
-

12.0
5.3
-

11.4
4.8
-

10.7
4.5
-

10.6
4.3
-

9.8
4.5
-

10.3
5.0
-

8.9
5.1
118.6

9.2
5.3
121.5

9.6
5.5
134.1

9.3
5.4
140.0

9.1
5.1
144.0

9.5
5.4
-

9.3
5.5
-

9.1
5.2
-

8.7
5.1
-

8.2
4.8
-

7.3
4.3
-

7.3
4.4
-

7.8
3.5
60.9

8.0
3.6
63.5

7.9
3.5
65.6

7.6
3.4
72.0

8.4
3.5
80.1

8.1
3.4
-

7.9
3.4
-

7.5
3.2
-

6.8
2.9
-

6.7
3.0
-

6.5
2.8
_

6.1
2.7
-

7.7
3.8

7.5
3.6

6.6
3.4

6.5
3.2

6.5
3.3
-

6.3
3.3
_

W hole sa le and retail trade
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..................................................................................
Lost workdays............................................................................................
W holesale trade:
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..................................................................................
Lost workdays............................................................................................
Retail trade:
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..................................................................................
Lost workdays............................................................................................

7.6
3.8
69.2

7.7
4.0
71.9

7.4
3.7
71.5

7.2
3.7
79.2

7.6
3.6
82.4

7.8
3.7

7.9
3.4
57.6

8.1
3.4
60.0

8.1
3.4
63.2

7.7
3.3
69.1

8.7
3.4
79.2

8.2
3.3
-

7.9
3.3
-

7.5
3.0
-

6.9
2.8
-

6.8
2.9
-

6.5
2.7
-

6.1
2.5
-

F inance, in su ra n ce , a nd real estate
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost w orkday cases..................................................................................
Lost w orkdays............................................................................................

2.0
.9
17.2

2.0
.9
17.6

2.4
1.1
27.3

2.4
1.1
24.1

2.9
1.2
32.9

2.9
1.2
-

2.7
1.1
-

2.6
1.0
-

2.4
.9

2.2
.9

.7
.5

1.8
.8

-

-

S ervice s
Total c a s e s ...............................................................................................
Lost workday cases..................................................................................
Lost w orkdays............................................................................................

5.4
2.6
47.7

5.5
2.7
51.2

6.0
2.8
56.4

6.2
2.8
60.0

7.1
3.0
68.6

6.7
2.8
-

6.5
2.8
-

6.4
2.8
-

6.0
2.6
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5.6
2.5
-

5.2
2.4
-

4.9
2.2
-

1 Data for 1989 and subsequent years are based on the Standard Industrial Class­
ification Manual, 1987 Edition. For this reason, they are not strictly comparable with data
for the years 1985-88, which were based on the Standard Industrial Classification
Manual, 1972 Edition, 1977 Supplement.

N = num ber of injuries and illnesses or lost workdays;
EH = total hours worked by all em ployees during the calendar year; and
200,000 = base for 100 full-time equivalent workers (working 40 hours per week, 50
weeks per year).

2 Beginning with the 1992 survey, the annual survey measures only nonfatal injuries and
illnesses, while past surveys covered both fatal and nonfatal incidents. To better address
fatalities, a basic element of workplace safety, BLS implemented the Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries.

4 Beginning with the 1993 survey, lost workday estim ates will not be generated. As of
1992, BLS began generating percent distributions and the median number of days away
from w ork by industry and for groups of w orkers sustaining sim ilar w ork disabilities.

3 The incidence rates represent the number of injuries and illnesses or lost workdays per
100 full-time w orkers and w ere calculated as (N/EH) X 200,000, where:

114

M onthly Labor R eview


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Jan u a ry 2002

5 Excludes farm s with fewer than 11 em ployees since 1976.
Dash indicates data not available.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

51. Fatal o c c u p a tio n a l injuries b y e v e n t or exp o su re, 199 4 -2 00 0
F a t a lit ie s
E v e n t o r e x p o s u re 1

1 9 9 4 -9 8

19992

A v e ra g e

N um ber

2000
N um ber

P e rc e n t

T o ta l....................................................................
T ra n s p o rta tio n in c id e n ts ................................................................
H ighw ay in cid e n t....................................................................
C ollision betw een vehicles, m obile e q u ip m e n t..............................
M oving in sam e d ire ction ............................................................
M oving in opp o site directions, o n c o m in g ..................................
M oving in in te rsectio n ..............................................
V ehicle stru ck stationary object or e q u ip m e n t................................
N oncollision in cide n t.................................................
Jackknifed or o verturned— no c o llisio n ....................................
N onhighw ay (farm , industrial prem ises) in cide n t...............................
O ve rtu rn e d ....................................................
A ircra ft............................................................
W o rker stru ck by a ve h icle .......................................................
W ater vehicle in cide n t..................................................
R a ilw a y.......................................................................

2 fu n
1,374
662
113
240
138
272
368
280
387
2 15

A s s a u lts a n d v io le n t a c ts ........................................................
H o m icide s.............................................................
S ho o tin g .....................................................................
S ta bb in g ...............................................................
O ther, including b om b in g ..................................................
S elf-inflicted in ju rie s...............................................................

1,496
714

1,363

23

270

2 43

4

334

2 79

5

322
352
206

399
2 13

7
4
_

382
104
78

102
56

84
71

1
1

1,168
923
748
68
107
215

909
651
509
62
80
2 18

929
677
533
66
78
220

16
11
9
1
1
4

C o n ta c t w ith o b je c ts a n d e q u ip m e n t............................................
S truck by o b je ct.........................................................
S truck by falling o b je ct..............................................
S truck by flying o b je ct.................................................
C a ug h t in or co m pressed by e q u ip m en t o r o b je cts.................
C a ug h t in running e qu ip m en t or m a ch ine ry.............................
C a ug h t in o r crushed in collapsing m a te ria ls....................................

984
564
364
60
281
148
124

1,030
585
358
55
302
163
129

1,005
570
357
61
2 94
157
123

17
10
6
1
5
3
2

F a lls .......................................................................................
Fall to low er le ve l..........................................................
Fall from la d d e r.................................................................
Fall from ro o f.......................................................
Fall from scaffold, sta g in g .................................
Fall on sam e le ve l.............................................................

686
609
101
146
89
53

721
634
96
153
92
70

7 34
659
110
150
85
56

12
11
2
3
2
1

E xpo sure to harm ful s u b stan ces o r e n v iro n m e n ts .........................
C o nta ct w ith electric cu rre n t.............................................
C o nta ct w ith overhead pow er line s............................................
C o nta ct w ith tem p e ra tu re e xtre m es............................................
E xposure to caustic, noxious, or alle rg en ic su b sta n ce s..................
Inhalation of su b sta n ce s..........................................................
O xygen d eficie n cy................................................................
D row ning, su b m e rsio n ............................................................

583
322
136
45
118
66
96
77

533
280
125
51
108
55
92
75

480
2 56
128
29
100
48
93
74

8
4
2

Fires an d e x p lo s io n s ....................................................................

199

216

177

3

21

27

19

-

O th e r e v e n ts o r e xp o su re s 3.....................................
' B ased on the 1992
C lassification S tructures.

b ls

O ccupational Injury and Illness

2 T he bls new s release issued A ug u st 17, 2000, reported a
total o f 6,023 fatal w o rk injuries fo r ca le nd a r year 1999. S ince
then, an additional 31 job-re la te d fata litie s w e re identified,
bringing th e total jo b-re la te d fatality co u n t fo r 1999 to 6,054.

3

2
1
2
1

Includes th e ca te g ory "B odily rea ction and exertion."

NOTE: T o ta ls fo r m ajor ca te g orie s m ay include su b ­
ca te g orie s not show n separately. P erce n ta g es m ay not add to
totals because of rounding. Dash in dica te s less th a n 0.5
percent.

M onthly Labor R eview

J a n u a ry 2002

115

6. S e le c te d u n e m p lo y m e n t indicators, m o n th ly d a ta s e a s o n a lly a d ju s te d
[Unemployment rates]
Annual average
1999

2000

2000

2001

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Characteristic
To ta l, 16 ye a rs a nd o v e r.................................
B oth sexes, 16 to 19 ye a rs........................
M en, 20 ye a rs a nd o ve r..............................
W o m en , 20 ye a rs a nd o ve r........................

4.2
13.9
3.5
3.8

4.0
13.1
3.3
3.6

3.9
12.6
3.3
3.4

4.0
13.0
3.4
3.4

4.0
13.1
3.4
3.4

4.2
13.8
3.6
3.6

4.2
13.6
3.5
3.7

4.3
13.8
3.8
3.6

4.5
14.2
4.0
3.8

4.4
13.6
3.9
3.8

4.5
14.3
4.0
3.8

4.5
14.8
3.9
3.9

4.9
16.1
4.4
4.2

4.9
14.7
4.3
4.4

5.4
15.5
4.8
4.8

W hite, to ta l......................................................
B oth sexes, 16 to 19 y e a rs ..................
M en, 16 to 19 y e a rs ...........................
W o m en , 16 to 19 ye a rs.....................
M en, 20 ye a rs and o v e r........................
W o m en , 20 ye a rs a nd o v e r.................

3.7
12.0
12.6
11.3
3.0
3.3

3.5
11.4
12.3
10.4
2.8
3.1

3.4
11.2
11.8
10.5
2.9
3.0

11.5
11.7
12.4
10.9
3.0
3.0

3.5
11.5
12.2
10.7
2.9
3.1

3.6
11.7
13.3
9.8
3.2
3.0

3.7
10.9
12.6
9.2
3.2
3.3

3.7
11.6
11.8
11.2
3.3
3.1

4.0
11.8
12.8
10.8
3.5
3.5

3.8
11.8
13.1
10.5
3.3
3.4

4.0
12.6
14.5
10.6
3.6
3.3

4.0
13.3
13.7
13.0
3.4
3.5

4.3
14.3
15.8
12.7
3.8
3.6

4.3
12.7
13.5
11.9
3.8
3.8

4.8
13.1
14.8
11.5
4.4
4.1

B lack, to ta l......................................................
Both sexes, 16 to 19 ye a rs..................
M en, 16 to 19 ye a rs............................
W om en, 16 to 19 y e a rs .....................
M en, 20 ye a rs a nd o v e r........................
W om en, 20 ye a rs and o v e r.................

8.0
27.9
30.9
25.1
6.7
6.8

7.6
24.7
2 6.4
23.0
7.0
6.3

7.4
23.9
27.0
21.2
7.0
5.8

7.5
21.9
22.5
21.3
6.9
6.2

7.6
26.7
30.1
23.4
7.3
5.7

8.4
27.9
26.9
28.9
6.9
7.3

7.5
28.8
31.7
25.7
6.6
5.8

8.6
28.9
27.7
30.2
8.5
6.3

8.2
31.6
34.9
28.6
8.2
5.5

8.0
25.1
30.0
2 0.3
7.6
6.4

8.4
28.2
30.7
26.0
7.8
6.8

7.9
25.5
26.9
24.3
7.9
6.0

9.1
30.4
32.5
28.1
9.0
6.9

8.7
2 7.7
30.5
24.8
7.6
7.7

9.7
30.1
31.2
29.0
8.0
8.9

H ispanic o rigin, to ta l................................

6.4

5.7

5.0

6.0

5.7

6.0

6.3

6.3

6.5

6.2

6.6

6.0

6.3

6.4

7.2

M arried m en, spouse p re se n t...............
M arried w o m en , spouse p re se n t..........

2.2
2.7
6.4
4.1
5.0

2.0
2.7
5.9
3.9
4.8

2.1
2.5
5.4
3.8
4.5

2.2
2.5
5.2
3.9
4.5

2.2
2.6
5.1
3.9
4.6

2.3
2.5
6.4
4.1
4.9

2.3
2.6
6.1
4.0
4.8

2.5
2.7
6.2
4.2
4.8

2.5
2.9
6.3
4.3
5.5

2.6
2.9
6.2
4.3
4.6

2.6
3.0
6.3
4.4
5.3

2.6
2.8
6.2
4.4
5.1

2.7
3.0
6.7
4.8
5.6

2.7
3.3
7.0
5.0
4.5

3.1
3.7
6.9
5.4
5.6

4.3
5.7
7.0
3.6
3.5
3.9
3.0
5.2
2.3
4.1
2.2
8.9

4.1
3.9
6.4
3.6
3.4
4.0
3.1
5.0
2.3
3.8
2.1
7.5

4.0
7.1
6.5
4.0
3.8
4.3
2.8
4.8
2.3
3.6
2.0
8.8

4.0
3.5
6.9
3.6
3.5
3.9
2.6
4.7
1.9
3.7
2.3
9.4

4.0
3.6
6.5
3.6
3.4
4.0
3.2
4.8
2.1
3.6
2.2
8.9

4.3
2.2
6.8
4.2
4.2
4.3
2.8
5.0
2.3
4.0
2.2
9.0

4.5
4.6
7.0
4.5
4.2
5.0
2.9
5.1
2.5
4.2
1.5
9.2

4.5
3.5
6.2
5.0
5.0
5.0
3.1
5.3
2.6
4.1
2.1
11.3

4.6
5.1
7.1
4.6
4.3
5.1
4.1
5.3
2.7
4.1
2.3
9.2

4.5
5.5
6.6
4.8
4.9
4.7
3.8
5.3
2.3
3.9
2.0
8.2

4.8
6.8
6.7
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.4
5.3
2.6
4.4
2.0
9.6

4.7
3.7
6.8
5.1
4.7
5.7
3.3
5.2
3.2
4.3
2.1
10.9

5.1
4.3
7.5
5.7
5.8
5.5
3.5
5.6
2.7
4.9
2.1
10.2

5.2
4.8
7.6
5.6
5.6
5.4
3.9
5.9
2.8
4.8
2.1
7.1

5.9
7.0
8.4
6.2
6.9
5.2
6.0
6.1
2.7
5.7
2.4
8.9

6.7
3.5

6.4
3.5

6.4
3.5

6.6
3.5

6.3
3.4

6.8
3.8

7.7
3.8

6.9
3.9

6.6
3.8

6.5
3.9

6.8
3.9

6.6
4.1

7.3
4.4

7.8
4.3

7.7
4.7

2.8
1.8

2.7
1.7

2.4
1.6

2.7
1.6

2.7
1.6

3.0
1.6

2.7
1.6

2.7
2.0

3.0
2.3

3.0
2.1

3.2
2.2

3.0
2.1

3.2
2.1

3.5
2.4

4.1
2.7

Full-tim e w o rk e rs ......................................
P art-tim e w o rk e rs ......................................
In d u s try
N ona g ricultura l w a g e a nd salary
w o rk e rs ................................................................
C o n s tru ctio n ...................................................
M a n u fa ctu rin g ...............................................
N o ndurable g o o d s ...................................
T ra nspo rta tio n and p ublic u tilitie s..........
W hole sa le and retail tra d e ........................
Finance, insurance, and real e sta te .....
S e rvice s...........................................................
A gricu ltu ral w a ge and sa la ry w o rk e rs........
E d u c a tio n a l a tta in m e n t1
Less than a high sch o o l d ip lo m a ..................
H igh school g raduates, no co lle g e ..............
S om e college, less than a bache lo r’s
C o lle g e g ra d u a te s.............................................
' D ata refer to perso n s 25 ye a rs and over.

Due to production error, table 6 was omitted from the Decem ber 2001 issue. W e apologize for the inconvenience.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

O b ta in in g in fo rm a tio n fro m th e B u re a u o f L a b o r S ta tis tic s

Office or topic
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Information services

Internet address
http://www.bls.gov/
http://www.bls.gov/opub/

E-mail
blsdata_staff@bls.gov

E m ploym ent and unem ploym ent

Employment, hours, and earnings:
National
State and local
Labor force statistics:
National
Local
Ul-covered employment, wages
Occupational employment
Mass layoffs
Longitudinal data

http://www.bls.gov/ces/
http://www.bls.gov/sae/

cesinfo@bls.gov
data_sa@bls.gov

http://www.bls.gov/cpshome.htm
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
http://www.bls.gov/cew/
http://www.bls.gov/oes/
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
http://www.bls.gov/nls/

cpsinfo@bls.gov
lausinfo@bls.gov
cewinfo@bls.gov
oesinfo@bls.gov
mlsinfo@bls.gov
nls_info @bis.gov

Prices and liv in g cond itions

Consumer price indexes
Producer price indexes)
Import and export price indexes
Consumer expenditures

http://www.bls.gov/cpi/
http ://w w w.bls.gov/ppi/
http://www.bls.gov/mxp/
http://www.bls.gov/cex/

cpi_info @bis.go V
ppi-info@bls.gov
mxpinfo@bls.gov
cexinfo@bls.gov

C om pensation and w orking conditions

National Compensation Survey:
Employee benefits
Employment cost trends
Occupational compensation
Occupational illnesses, injuries
Fatal occupational injuries
Collective bargaining

http://www.bls.gov/ncs/
http://www.bls.gov/ebs/
http://www.bls.gov/ect/
http://www.bls.gov/ncs/
http://www.bls.gov/iif/
http://www.bls.gov/iif/
http://www.bls.gov/cba/

ocltinfo@bls.gov
ocltinfo@bls.gov
ocltinfo@bls.gov
ocltinfo@bls.gov
oshstaff@bls.gov
cfoistaff@bls.gov
cbainfo@bls.gov

Productivity

Labor
Industry
Multifactor

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/
http ://www.bls.gov/mfp/

dprweb@bls.gov
dipsweb@bls.gov
dprweb@bls.gov

P ro jectio n s

Employment
Occupation

http://www.bls.gov/emp/
http://www.bls.gov/oco/

oohinfo@bls.gov
oohinfo@bls.gov

International

http://www.bls.gov/fls/

flshelp@bls.gov

R eg io n a l centers

Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Dallas
Kansas City
New York
Philadelphia
San Francisco


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

http://www.bls.gov/ro4/
http://www.bls.gov/rol/
http://www.bls.gov/ro5/
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/
http://www.bls.gov/ro7/
http://www.bls.gov/ro2/
http://www.bls.gov/ro3/
http://www.bls.gov/ro9/
Other Federal statistical ag en cies

http://www.fedstats.gov/

B LS info Atlanta @bl s.go v
BLSinfoBoston@bls.gov
BLSinfoChicago @bls.gov
BLSinfoDallas@bls.gov
BLSinfoKansasCity@bls.gov
BLSinfoNY@bls.gov
BLS infoPhiladelphia @bis.go v
BLSinfoSF@bls.gov

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Postal Square B uilding, Rm. 2850
2 M assachusetts Ave., NE
W ashington, DC 20212-0001

P eriodicals
Postage and Fees Paid
U.S. D epartm ent of Labor
USPS 987-800

O fficial Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300
Address Service Requested

MLR
FEDRE442F ISSDUE008R
1
FED RE SERVE BANK OF S' L O U I S
CAROL THAXTON L I B R A R Y U N I T
PO BOX 4 4 2
SAINT ' H ilts
MO
7T7 1 4

S c h e d u le o f re le a s e d a te s fo r B L S s ta tis tic a l s e rie s
Series

Release
date

Period
covered

Release
date

Period
covered

Release
date

Period
covered

MLR table
num ber

Em ployment situation

January 4

December

February 1

January

March 8

February

1; 4 -2 4

U.S. Import and Export
Price Indexes

January 10

December

February 14

January

March 14

February

3 8 -4 2

Producer Price Indexes

January 11

December

February 15

January

March 15

February

2; 3 5 -3 7

Consum er Price indexes

January 16

December

February 20

January

March 21

February

2 ; 3 2 -3 4

Real earnings

January 16

December

February 20

January

March 21

February

14, 16

Em ployment Cost Indexes

January 31

4th quarter

Productivity and costs


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

1 -3 ; 2 5 -2 8
February 6

4th quarter

March 7

4th quarter

2; 4 3 -4 6