View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Repeal of the Sherman Act*




Friday, August 18 > 189$.

The House having under consideration the bill
R. 1) to repeal a part of
an act, approved July 14,1890, entitled "An act directing the purchase of
silver bullion and the issue of Treasury notes thereon, and for other purposes"—

Mr. HAINES said:
Mr. SPEAKER: It is with the greatest diffidence that I rise to
address the House on the great question under consideration.
I am not unfamiliar with the unwritten law of the House that
a new member " should be seen and not heard." I am not unaware of my deficiencies, my inexperience, and the difficulties
involved? in a question on which so many able men of the same
party, and in both parties, differ. I do not flatter myself that I
can add much that is material to what has already been ,said
and written on the subject, or that I can anticipate anything
yet to be said by the eminent men whom we are to hear before the
close of the debate.
But this question is one of such vital importance to my State,
and my own immediate constituents take so keen, so anxious, and
so active an interest in its proper settlement that I feel consjirained
to express myself here in regard to it, however conscious I may
be of my inability to fully cope with the great and intricate matters involved in the discussion. While the district I have the
honor to represent is not by any means the most populous in
the State of New York, yet its population is nearly as great as
the aggregate population of three Western States which will
have six votes in parsing on this bill when it reaches the Senate. It is a district that has given to the country two of the
greatest Americans of the nineteenth century—Martin VanBuren and Samuel J. Tilden: it exercises within its limits almost
all the industries to which the country owes its wealth"—agriculture, manufacture, shipping; interests entitled^ to every consideration and respect. A t the present moment its agriculture
and its commerce are languishing, its factories are shutting

down, its mechanics and laboring men are suffering in enforced
idleness, and their families are m want.
This distress is the result of the semipanic which has prevailed throughout the country for the past six weeks. It is the
universal belief in my State that this panic has resulted largely,
if not altogether, from the operation of the law which the bill
under consideration proposes to repeal. I was amazed when I
heard the distinguished member from Missouri [Mr. BLAND] say
that this panic is afactitious panic, manufactured by Wall street
for the purpose of having Congress pass a measure that would
demonetize silver. These attacks on Wall street are pure demagogism, and are unworthy so eminent and so upright a Democrat as the member from Missouri. These attacks are read with
amazement in my State, where the operations of Wall street are
known and understood and under constant observation.
An attack, on Wall street is an attack on the financial system
of the country. Wall street is the savings bank of the nation.
It is to Wall street that the various sections of the country send
their loanable surplus, and from there that surplus is redistributed throughout the country where capital is needed for the development of every industry. It is from Wall street that the
silver men of the West procured the capital with which to open
up their mines; and it is there they procured rdany millions of
dollars to open up mines which they af terwards forgot to open up.
It is curious that if Wall street is responsible for the prevailing panic that panic should have commenced in the West! It is
in the West that nearly all the great failures have taken place.
It is there that great commercial houses, innumerable banks,
and bankers have closed their doors; and it is to Wall street
3hat those which still remain standing look for aid to save them
Arom disaster. The greater part of the securities of the railroads of the United States are held in Wall, street, if by Wall
street is meant the money centers of the East, New York, Boston,
and Philadelphia. Within the last three months those securities have constantly bsen depreciating, until now they are down
many hundreds of millions below the values they had last April.
To say that the great financiers, the men most vitally and directly interested in such matters, should deliberately undertake
to create a panic by which such vast losses should accrue to
them and their clients, seems to me a monstrous absurdity. I
think, therefore, that these senseless attacks should be discontinued. They serve no useful purpose; they do not enlighten us
in regard to the questions we have to dispose of, and they tend
to create a sectional feeling which every honest Representative
should deplore.
It makes very little difference, however, what may be the section from which the panic started and what may be the cause of
it, except in so far as by regarding the cause we may thereby
the better be enabled to consider the wisest way out of it. As I
have said, in the East it is considered that the principal cause
of this condition of things is the enforced purchase of silver by
the United States Treasury, pursuant to the Sherman act, and
the consequent decrease in the quantity of gold held by the
Government and by the banks of the country to meet our obligations which we tave undertaken to pay in gold.

The genilem n from Missouri [Mr. BLAND] admits that every
piece of p iper money issue J in this country to-day, every bond,
every certit:c te is to be redeemed in gold, and th i,t we must
procure the gold for their redemption. How it is possible we
can p iy these oblitf tions in gold, in view of the rate at which
gold h is bean 1 J i vmg the country for the last six years, is something which thus fat* nobody h is undertaken to show. Three
tim- s more gold h is been t iken out of the country during that
period than has been imported, notwithstanding that in the meantime the aver ge b iLmce of trade lias baan enormously in favor
of the United St tes.
The expert financiers of the country, men whose whole lives
have been p ssed in studying these questions, who were led to
study them not for the purpose of fulfilling the duties of a Representativa in Congress, but because their most vit^l interests
are involved in them, together with the interests of their clients
and patrons^-these men, whose opinions, it seems to me, are entitled to as much weight as the opinions of the most eminent
experts in this House, un nimously attribute this condition of
things to the operation of the Sherman law.
Statistics show that we will be unable to j)ay our obligations
in gold if that law continues. They also show that the capitalists
and investors in Europe who had placed their money in our securities, believe that we will be unable to meet Our obligations
and pay them in gold; and hence they have been disposing of
their securities and getting rid of American stocks and bonds
before the time comes when, as it is considered inevitable, the
American Government and th3 American railroad companies
will be unable to meet the demands made upon them, to fulfill
their obligations by the payment of them in the coin which,
among capitalists and investors, is considered the only standard
of value.
It seems to me that the first thing for this House to - do is to
repeal the law which has brought about this distrust of American securities. Whether silver shall be demonetized; whether
we shall have a single standard or a double standard: whether
the United States shall be monomet ;llist or bimetullist, and,
if bimetallism what shrill be the ratio between gold and silver,
and how the defects in the currency shall be remedied, are all
questions which can be determined at the proper time. This
extra session was not called for the purpose of determining all
these questions. As the immediate cause of the distrust now
prevailing is the operation of the Sherman act, it was for the,
purpose of considering whether or not the purchasing clause of
the Sherman act should be repealed that the session was called,
and the country regards that as the principal purpose for which
this extra session is pending.
The people of my section of the country are for the repeal of
the purchasing clause of that act absolutely and without condition; and all these questions collateral to the main issue which
have been raised here can be settled in due time. It may be
that the repeal of the purchasing clause of this act is an insufficient remedy, and will not bring the country back to the state of
prosperity it was in a short time ago. But inasmuch as, whether
rightly, or wrongly, the people regard the operation of that clause

as the main cause of the present distress, the first thing to do is
to restore confidence by stopping- its operation, and thereby at
least take one step towards bringing the country back to a sound
financial condition.
The main objection to the bill now before the House, raised by
the gentleman from Missouri and those who think with him, is
that the result will be to demonetize silver. That is the burden
of their remarks, and they threaten to secede from the Democratic party if the platform of the party in that respect is not
adhered to. I have been unable to see upon what ground it is
claimed by those gentlemen that the Democratic party seeks to
demonetize silver. The operation of the Sherman act has been
. disastrous. The business men of, the country, whether Democrats or Republicans, whether monometallists or bimetallists,
are clamoring for its repeal; and it seems to me singularly unfortunate that these gentlemen who are acting with the gentleman from Missouri should involve the simple question of repeal
or no repeal by calling upon us to discuss their pet theories in
regard to silver and gold as standards of value.
These gentlemen may be right or they may be wrong in their
ideas in regard to whether gold or silver should be kept upon a
parity, and what may be the ratio of value between them; but
this is not the time to consider such questions. The Democratic
party is not seeking to demonetize silver beeluse it seeks to repeal an act which both Republicans and Democrats consider
unjust and monstrous; and while the country is waiting for relief
from this iniquitous measure these gentlemen are tuking up the
time and bewildering the country by raising questions, some of
which are not disputed and all of which are out of place in this
discussion, as bearing only slightly or collaterally on the main
Question to be considered.
There are so many people in this country and so many Representatives in Congress, among both Republicans and Democrats, opposed to the demonetization of silver that the fears of the member for Missouri in this respect are altogether unfounded. That
gentleman undertakes to say that if this bill is passed it will be
regarded by the people of the country as a demonetization of
silver, and that thereby the people of the vast regions west of
the Mississippi will be deprived of the money to open up new
railroads, to establish new factories, to operate new places of
business, and to inaugurate new industries; that they will, in
fact, be deprived of money and be ruined.
With all due respect to that distinguished gentleman rthis talk
seems to me absurd; and it would appear to me to be entitled to no
consideration at all, if it did not come from a person of his weight
eminence. The capital necessaiy to build up the new industries of the West must come from the East, and the East is clamoring for the repeal of the law, the repeal of which the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. BLAND] thinks will beggar the West.
Is not the prosperity of the East largely dependent upon the prosperity of the West? Has not Wall street vast sums of money invested in the West? Is not Wall street affected by financial disturbances in the West? Is not Wall street bound to uphold the
We^t and to aid it whenever it is in financial distress, for its own
sake, if not for the sake of the West?

. How, then, can it be truthfully said that the Eastern Democrats,
who represent the c vpital of the E ist, have been guilty of a
trick upon the Democrats of the West and Southwest, in presenting the measure now before the Ho us 3 before tariii reform
,is brought forward for consideration ? The business troubles
of the country have an apparent ciuse, visible to every one.
This cause should first be removed before other questions are
brought up for consideration; and it will be time enough for the
gentleman from Missouri and those who think with him to condemn the Democrats of the East when they put themselves upon
record in this House, by the presentation of measures or opposition to measures presented by others, in contravention of the
pledges of the Chicago platform. It does not appear that these
gentlemen, who threaten the Democratic pirty with secession
under certain contingencies, are opposed to the me isure before
the House, in so; far as it repeals the purchasing clause of the
Sherman act.
The gentleman from Missouri, in his remarks, either directly
or impliedly admitted over and over again that the Sherman
act is bad in principle. He admits, for instance, that the value
of silver, like that of every other commodity, should be governed by the law of supply and demand; and hence a law which
compels the Government, without regard to the law of supply
and demand, to purchase a certain quantity of a given commodity
is radically vicious. He failed to explain upon what principle
he claims that we are bowing our necks meekly to the yoke of
Wall street because we are seeking to repeal a law which the
gentleman himself condemns. His principal argument, and the
principal argument of all those who are of the same opinion, is
that the demonetization of silver, which they assume willreSult
from the passage of this act, will contract the currency, to an.
extent that the conduct of the business of the West and the
opening up of new enterprises in thatseetion of the country will
be no longer possible, and widespread ruin will be the result.
In answer to this argument, it is sufficient to point out the
condition of things at present in the principal money centres of
the United States. At this moment banks in the city of New
York of world-wide reputation, possessing assets which even in
times like these are valued at from five hundred to a thousand
cents on the dollar, have refused to honor the checks of their
depositors by paying them in currency, without regard to the
accountsof their depositors. In other words, banks of undoubted
responsibility, banks whose assets entitle- them to claim thai;
they are able to pay dollar for dollar with as much confidence
as the United States can claim that they are able to pay dollar
for dollar of their bonds, have in effect suspended payment by
reason of a lack of currency to meet the demands made upon
If this condition of things has taken place at this date, when
silver has not been demonetized, when the Democrats of tho E ist
have not yet acted inamannertole id these gentlemen to believe
that they are going to go back on their platform pledges, and
when this has apparently been brought about by the operation
of a law which these gentlemen concede to be unjust, yet place
obstacles in the way of its repeal, it is plainly a deduction sugges ted

by common sense, without regard to financial learning:, that, as:
suming, as it seems to have been generally assumed, that the
great financial institutions of the city of New York have been
restricted in their operation by reason of a lack of currency
in consequence of this obnoxious law, no worse condition of
things can happen'if the law is repealed; and the repeal, if it
will at least Restore confidence to that section of the country
which has in its possession the largest amoun t of the currency of
the country, th it much will be gained by its repeal, that eontidonco
will be Restored in the East and reflected back upon the West in
a manner that must effectually, if it will accomplish nothing
else, at least stop the disasters which are occurring in the West
from day to day.
The E ast is suffering from a lack of currency arising from the
operation of the Sherman bill. The gentleman from Missouri
anticipates that if the bill is repealed without restriction there
will be a lack of currency in the West. The East is appealing
to Congress to remedy an evil already existing, ahd this gentleman opposas their demand from an anticipation of an evil that
may never exist; and if, instead of attacking the East and the
so-called agencies of the " money kings " of Lombard street, this
gentleman and those who think like him would comprehend that
the United St itss is not only a political entity but a financial
entity too, and that what is injurious to one section must necessarily retiect back injuriously on the other, they must come to
the conclusion that it is just as necessary for the prosperity of
the West that the East should be contented with the financial
condition of things and the laws by which they are governed as
the West itself; and they will then find it easy to come to the
conclusion that it was necessary to the prosperity of all sections
that the East and the West should be in accord on questions of
the character now before us. And where a difference of opinion
might arise it is respactfully submitted that it is that section of
the country which has the moaey to expend that should be first
considered rather than that section of the oountry which has not
the money, but which loolcs to the other as the source of its capital.
The question which presents itself, therefore, it seems to me,
is this: Both the East and the West, with the exception of the
few owners of silver mines, agree that the act which the bill before the House in effect shall repeal is a vicious bill, largely if
not altogether responsible for the disasters under which the
country is suffering. The East asks that the bill shall be repealed. THe West concedes that it ought to be repealed, but
should be repealed with restrictions and provisos. The Eist
says that it is necessary, in order that we shall recover stability,
that shall take place at once. These gentlemen froto
the West s ty: 4 4 No; you must consider these other questions at
the same time.'' And in the meanwhile hundreds and hundreds
of thousands of mechanics ;ind laborers are obliged to be idle,
values are decreasing or are being wiped out altogether, so that
widespread distress is suffered by widows and orphans and by
institutions whose income is derived from the various industries
that are affected by this confusion. While the two parties are

haggling, not over principles, but over questions of expediency,
the people are suffering losses that they can never recover.
These very gentlemen who raise the cry against Wall street
are playing into the hands of professional speculators; they are
wiping out the values on the property of permanent investors
and throwing their earnings and their savings into the hands of
speculators, who will absorb to themselves the results of the beneficial legislation which will ultimately be carried out, but which
is now delayed in order that we may listen to. the harangues of
theorists, of men governed perhaps by principle, but who have
no money at stake, and who are playing to the galleries when
they ought to take a broad and liberal view of the interests of
the whole country, and act in accordance with the dictates of
patriotism and common sense.
It may be asked: If this bill is repealed what shall we do with
these questions that have been raised by those who are opposed
to its repeal without restrictions? These gentlemen provide the
answer themselves, viz: The practice adopted by the most experienced governments of Europe, namely, the appointment of
commissions composed of the most intelligent and expert financiers of their respective countries, to whom shall bo committed
the'task of finding an answer to the questions presented. This
is what should be done here. Let us repeal the purchasing
clause of the Sherman act. Let us appoint a commission composed of the most eminent persons in tuis House and the Senate,
and of the various interests outside Congress to be affected by
such matters.
Let them investigate and report their conclusions, and thus
we may be enabled to get an intelligent idea as to what should
be done for the purpose of maintaining the parity between gold
and silver, of ascertaining whether or not an international agreement may not be reached by the nations affected, and a currency
created and maintained at once staple and elastic, and such r.s
will commmd the confidence of the country and the world.
Thus, at least, we shall restore confidence. We shall bring from
the safes and the safe-deposit vaults the currency which has
been taken from the banks within the last six weeks, and this
money, once more finding its natural course in the channels of
commerce, will place our banks in a normal condition, will open
up our factories, our mines* and set our various, industries once
again in motion. And a wise and conservative Congress, without regard to party affiliations, considering the subsequent questions, not in the face of a panic, but under the normal condition
of things which the natural prosperity of the country warrants,
will find the remedy for all the evil suggested, and find an answer to all the questions raised by those who are to-day presenting obstacles to the fulfillment of the desires of the business
people in all sections of this country—that the purchasing clause
of the Sherman act shall be repealed. [Applause.]