View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
"
Res
System on Wednesday, May 23, 1951.
(IA 1
am
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Evans
Powell
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Vest, General Counsel
Young, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Wayne, Acting Director, Division of
Examinations
Horbett, Assistant Director, Division
of Bank Operations
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Hackley, Assistant General Counsel
Sloan, Assistant Director, Division of
Examinations
Anderson, Economist, Division of Research
and Statistics

In

the teetirt€ accordance
.ctsterclay,with the request of the Board at the conclusion of
44c1

there had been prepared under date of May 22, 1951

distributed to
the members of the Board before this meeting a draft
bi"provid,„
supplemental authority over bank reserves which would
tha
„
uri
ne any period specified by the Board every insured bank
61cet.
ziatual
must maintain a reserve balance, in a
savings
4qftila
bank)
specified
Percentage, against that amount of its "loan assets"
illttcess of
ho per
cent of its total assets, with the proviso that the

7




5/23/51
stated

-2-

percentage of total assets could be varied in either direction

irlthe discretion of
the Board to the extent of five percentage points.
draft bill included
provision for a sliding scale of reserve percelltaee, but there were also presented alternative paragraphs which
14)/114 Provide for a
flat reserve percentage if desired. Loan assets,
referred 4.
vo in this bill as "adjusted assets", would include all assets
cept
cash) balances due from banks, and direct obligations of the
lkited states.
Balances required under the bill would be carried with
PeCietal

Reserve Bank except that a nonmember bank would have the privi-

leCt c
ounting a balance carried with any insured bank if maintained
81)ecial account
not utilized for other purposes, and the reserve
recluiteillerite Of
the bill would be in addition to all other requirements
or state
or
Federal law.
There had also
been distributed to the members of the Board
ber°te this

fleeting a memorandum dated May 23, l9)1, from Messrs. Young

441

liorbett c
ommenting on the adjusted asset base provided in the draft
bill,
the de
sirability of providing a period of adjustment in connection
Vith 411Y
suPplemental reserve requirement Imposed by the Board under the
terza
the bill,
scale,
and the advantages and disadvantages of a graduated
Of

euPplemental reserve requirements as opposed to a flat rate.

Chairman Martin said that in a conversation with Senator Maybank,
C411411144 of
the Senate
Banking and Currency Committee, he had informed




5/23/51

-3-

the Setor

that the Board would endeavor to have some bill ready for

1)1'esentation to the Congress next week.

He went on to say that after

44181(10ring the draft of bill prepared following yesterday's meeting,
he
vas i
-Lhelined to believe that it would not provide a satisfactory

441,4s or
restraining expansion of credit and that, if this were the
4.8e
'it should not be presented to the Congress by the Board. Chairtrisja
Itrtill then called upon Mr. Riefler for an expression of his views,
ezamr.
Riefler said that he questioned this type of bill because it
volaa
Dermit banks with adjusted asset ratios below the national average
to ex
PaIA their
loans up to that ratio without penalty, it would probably
e6,1180 b
anks with high adjusted asset ratios to sell Government securities
t° beet
th

additional reserve requirements and this would militate against

Drs
seat °Pen market policy, and it would. affect all banks with high
10411r
4ti°8 equally despite the fact that some of these might be located
eX1(1
Drerere

areas where there were deficiencies of capital.

He expressed

144 41. nee for the draft of loan expansion reserve requirement bill which
a C1101.

%

'eQ at the meeting yesterday and which incorporated a base°4 r°rmula,
re,toria,
saying that he believed that that bill would meet satisthe objections to the draft bill based on a current loan-ratio

g

1)111 _

There

followed a general discussion of the merits of the two

"bvt
otsensus as to the form of the legislation was agreed upon.




5/23/51

-4-

The meeting recessed for luncheon and reconvened at 2:3') p.m.
withi.,11Le
same attendance as at the morning meeting except that Mr. Eccles
'
eserit and Mr. Sloan was not present.
There was presented a memorandum from Mr. Viayne, dated May 10,
'Pre
senting

certain views, opinions, and recommendations, based on
411aie
8 illade by him in connection with his assignment as Acting Director
or the
Board's Division of Examinations, of the responsibilities of the
Ilecieral

Reserve System in the field of bank supervision with particular

Niarli to
the relationships between the System, State banking authorities,
414Other
Federal agencies with statutory responsibilities including bank
Nervision.

The memorandum, copies of which had been furnished the mem-

bers °I' the
Board for their consideration prior to discussion at a meet-

14cluded a
the
Board's

review of the organization, functions, and purposes of

Division of Examinations, a review of the organization and

Nactions of
the Reserve Banks as they relate to bank examination and

Nervis
.erve
kere

ion: and a
review of the relationships between the Board and the

banks in this
field. The recommendations contained therein
48 f°110w8:
(1)
That unless and until the Congress directs
otherwise
the Board assure itself that thorugh examinations are made of all member
uanks at least annually, in the case of
1,tiona1 banks by the Comptroller of the
Currency
and in the case of State member
A
banjç8 %,
uY the Federal Reserve Banks;




that the staff of the Division of Examinations
be enlarged by the creation of three addtional
Assistant Directorships, the primary functions
Of the persons filling these positions being
to establish and maintain a regular schedule
of conferences at the Iteserve Banks and their
time to be divided about equally between Washington and the districts assigned to their special
attention;
that the Director and Assistant Directors be
called into consultation with the Board either
at regular meetings or otherwise In recognition
of the fact that bunk examination and supervision
is an integral part of the over-all responsibilities
of the Federal Reserve System and that a more
constant contact between the Division and the
Beard is essential in order that members of the
Division's staff visiting the Reserve Banks and
Other supervisory agencies may intelligently
represent the views of the Board in the course
Of these contacts;
that the Board appoint an Advisory Committee on
Bank Supervision consisting of the Director of
the Division of Examinationd and four senior
officers of the Reserve Banks, with the Director
serving as permanent Chairman;
that appointments of the Reserve Bank officers
serving on this Advisory Committee be arranged
sc) as to provide for the expiration of at least
one term each year so as to insure continuity
of membership but, at the same time, regular
changes in the personnel of the Committee;
that the Advisory Committee constitute the body
through which the Board would seek advice and
1-Ince1 concerning appropriate activities of the
eystem in the field of bank supervision and
ex
amination;
that in addition to such other duties as the
!
)
, ard might see fit to delegate to this Committee,
"'zilch would be required to meet in Washington
regularly
(not less than once each quarter), its
res
res-po
ponsibilities specifically include the following:
(a) recommending a minimum scope of
examination for adoption and use
throughout the Federal Reserve
System and maintaining a regular




5/23/51

-6-

(8)

review of this procedure in order
that it might from time to time
propose appropriate improvements
and modifications;
(b)
recommending ways and means of maintaining appropriate cooperative relationships between the Federal Reserve System
and other bank supervisory agencies parti
cularly State banking authorities;
(c)
suggesting ways and means of maintaining
close working relationships between the
Board's Division of Examinations and the
Bank Examination Departments of the Reserve Banks to the end that uniformly
high standards and practices might be
maintained; and
(d)
suggesting, for submission to the Reserve
Banks, appropriate training programs designed to assure high standards of performance by examiners and assistants;
that Mr. George S. Sloan, presently Assistant Director of
the Division of Examinations, be appointed Director of the
Division effective at the termination of the present
appointment of the Acting Director.
Powell stated that he had carefully reviewed the memorandum

14 hi

ca.PacitY hs member of the Board whose assignments include examination
at- IneMber
banks) that the Personnel Committee also had reviewed the

teraor

4.141
;an
Nat
414e(1

that he would recommend the adoption of the recommendations

in it.




Thereupon, upon motion by Mr. Powell,
the recommendations contained in the memorandum were approved unanimously with the
understanding that Mr. Sloan's appointment
as Director of the Division of Examinations
would become effective June 1, 19)1, and
that Mr. Wayne would remain with the Board
in the capacity of adviser to the Board, for
such time as would allow him to visit all of

5/23/51

_7_
the Reserve Banks and discuss with the
appropriate officers the contemplated
changes in examinations policies and procedures.
Approval was also given to reimbursement to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
for (1) the salary of Mr. Wayne during such
time as was spent by him in his capacity as
adviser to the Board and (2) for travel and
other official expenses incurred by him including hotel accommodations on such basis as is
approved by the Board's Personnel Committee.
The above actions were taken with the
understanding that, if Mr. Vardaman wished,
his position with respect to the actions
would be recorded in the minutes of the
Board,
There Was a further extended discussion of the two draft bills

-°flsideration to provide supplemental authority over bank reserves,
liklely
"the draft dated May 18, 1951 providing for a.loan asset base for
b
allk and for maintenance of supplemental reserves against any increase
14 the b
loans above that base and the draft dated May 22) 19')1 pro0r.
hoee oar"

POsit10of a supplemental reserve requirement on any bank

a8sets exceeded some specified percentage of total assets.
At the
cono1usion of the discussion, Chairman Martin suggested
theA sirice
there continued to be a difference of opinion among the members
"thell°ard as to
the type of authority which would be suitable, the dis1181be continued
be
t°1Q(I

lc''
x esent,




at a meeting on May 28 when all members of the Board

r71

5/23/A

-8This suggestion was approved unanimously.
Mr. Eccles suggested that it would be helpful at the discussion

ne4tMondaY to have the opinions of the Presidents of the Federal Reserve
448
11-th respect to the two draft bills.
This suggestion was approved unanimously
With the understanding that drafts of the
bills and memoranda relating thereto would be
mailed to the Reserve Banks today and that
telegrams requesting their views would be sent
tomorrow as follows:
stated at the recent meeting of the Board and the
eesiaents, the Board expects to present to the Congress
rel7Y shortly proposed legislation relating to supplemental
1,„serve requirements. Since Presidents were here matter
been
discussed by the Board and staff and yesterday
0
;sent to you
by air mail copies of memoranda and drafts
:°
e.
bills now being considered as possible standby
Etb,2ritY during national defense emergency. Board would
4reiate very much if you would review this material
r°
,4.114arcl your comments by wire to reach the Board as
prom,
considered
noon
1Y as Possible rilld in sny event not later than
StIng'
and
reproduced
MaY 27, so that they may be
TheTn""e Board takes the matter up again on Monday morning.
dlrat'iri eipal difference between the two bills is that the
May 18 would provide for a loan asset base for
agaillualak and for maintenance of supplemental reserves
The'jt anY increase in a bank's loans above that base.
l'esel;ft °f May 22 would permit imposition of a supplemental
sot '' requirement on the bank whose loan assets exceed
Such 2!°ified percentage, say 40 per ceut of total assets.
volo.,4-`uaitional reserve requirements under May 22 draft
be
computed either on a sliding scale related to
1)erceT0 of loan assets to total assets or on a flat
your
n°14slic:,ge basis. Board is primarily interested in
4301 7.'which form the bill should take on this point
14 mind that plan adopted (a) should be as effective
4.`"SSble
it restraining further loan expansion, (b) should

j




5/23/51
have minimum adverse effects on the Government securities
!rket, and (c) should be as equitable as possible and at
"e same time achieve the objective of restraining loan
apansion. Your views on which form of bill would encounter
eas legislative opposition would be helpful.
rizitY
sTIr comments are also desired on the following collateral
(1) is it desirable to authorize the Board to
e.adjustments to meet abnormal temporary or seasonal flue(see definition of adjusted asset base on page 2 of
1Y 18 draft of bill), (2) should provision be made In May
draft for a minimum ratio of loan assets to total assets
below4
Which supplemental reserve requirements would not
121)1Y) (3) would it be desirable and would the legislation
to effective
as to nonmember banks if they were permitted
'
arrY the required reserves with correspondent banks."

T
T

j

At this
point all of the members of the staff with the exception
'Carpenter, Sherman, and Kenyon withdrew, and the action stated
r8
the ze.ct to
each of the matters hereinafter referred to was taken by

lieaerve

Minutes of
actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
6Ystem on May 22, 1951, were approved unanimously.
MeIll°randum dated May

7,

1951, from Mr. Noyes, Director of the

b41.

4 °f S
elective Credit Regulation, recommending an increase in the
Selective
e a1
of Theodore
A. Veenstra, Analyst in that Division, from $3,100
tc)3)22r),
ver annum,
effective May 27, 1951.
Approved unanimously.

or

Le tc.,,
xevy t--' to

• Bilby, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank

°rk, readi
ng as follows:
lette

pview of the circumstances described in your
1,4_ay 17, 1951, the Board of Governors approves
ttl° rvL.
salaries to the following employees at




5/23/51

-10-

"the rates indicated which are in excess of the maximums
established for
the grades in which their respective positions are classified.
Salary
Name
Dolan, Mary
$3513
3600
English, Mary
Miles, Catherine
3)89
VanNote, Helen
3)86
Bell, harry W 3885
Duffy, George F.
3885
Ricks, Francis J.
388)
Swift, James T.
3801
O'Connor, Chas.
3711
Schnears, John
3899
Fleming, John
8685
5812
Rumphreys, Wm.
O'Brien, Helen
3062"
Approved unanimously.
Of

Telegram to Mr. Slade, Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank

au.

-u'rancisco, reading as follows:
H

Reurtel may 19, 1951. Board approves appointment
Betratlinuaer Deitrick as an examiner for Federal Reserve
Of
.e ase advise when his indebtedFrancisco. !
tless he.e been

Of s

unanimously.

kr. 0.

blenicTandum dated Mey 22, 1951, from Mr. Powell recommending that

Sterling Bunnell, Vice President, The National City Bank of New York,
lilt, New
York, and General Henry C. ;!:vans, Partner, Stein Bros. and

14%1) 6 south Calvert Street, Baltimore, Maryland, be appointed alternate
414114r.

°r

the Voluntary
Credit Restraint Committee for Mr. George S. Moore

William K. Barcl
ay, jr., respectively.




Approved unanimously.

5/23/51

-11Letter to Mr. Peterson, Vice President of the Federal Reserve

Of St.
Louis, reading as follows:
4

41

"In accordance with the recommendation contained
Your letter of May 17, 1951, the Board of Governors

ejtends to September 21, 1971, the time within which
Jefferson-Gravois Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis,
811 15°Uri, may accomplish termination of its memberunder the waiver of six months' notice granted
'” march 21, 1951."

„1,

Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Bryan, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of

ktlezta,

reading as follows:

eon "This refers to your letter of May 11, 1951,
I G cerning the proposed purchase by your bank of the
:
-°rengi
American' property in Atlanta.
"The
terpTheBoard
has considered the matter and will
per °8e no objection to the purchase of this pro1341:;!r at a cost
of $300,000. It is noted that such
Der
!
ilase price would provide for title to the proclev'Y free of an
existing lease, which was made for
el
°Pment of commercial automobile parking facilities."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Roger W. Jones, Assistant Director, Legislative
Bureau of the Budget, Washington, D. C., reading as follows:
"This 15 in
May 14
response to Mr. MacPhail's letter of
a-rait'1951 requesting the views of the Board on a.
rorli °f legislation which would provide compensation
414 d'amage to private property and property owned
,.,e and local
public 'bodies.
the po!h'". araft would establish a War Damage Administration,
011
143;14inistrator of which would have authority to pass
ee 1,.Lmage claims in
the first instance, and a War
l'everu
:
IPPeal Board with power to affirm, modify, or
atY settlement approved by the Administrator.

St?




5123/51

-12-

"Title II authorizes an appropriation in the
81141 of twenty billion dollars for the purpose of procompensation for war damage to private proPayments to be made in accordance with the
Pr
ovisions of that Title.
"Title III of the bill provides for payment to
,!Ette governments, their political subdivisions, and
'rritories and possessions of the United States for
Irttr damage to public property. The administration
Of Title
III is placed directly in the President
1:a4her than the War Damage
Administration. Two billion
0o4-4r8 is authorized to be appropriated for purposes
f this
Title and payments may be made up to 75 per
cent
of the estimated cost of replacement, repair, or
ee
fulaing of damaged public property. The balance
c the cost is to be supplied by the government entity
enerned if financially able to do so. Otherwise,
elltitY may acquire necessary funds through the
utz of its obligations to
the Treasury which is
ap,"Qrtzed to purchase such obligations in the
q°.160regate amount of one billion
dollars.
lati "The Board recognizes that some form of legisres
necessary in advance of actual damage
theZTfle from possible enemy attack, and further,
exie42'he exdgencies of the situation which may (milt" following attack
can not be fully anticipated.
lati°1181Y,
therefore, it is desirable that any legisbe sot
which may be adopted at the present time should
iciently flexible as to be effective in almost
°f emergency. The draft provides considerable
some
Y although an actual emergency may require
reel3e1210dification of its provisions particularly with
be reet to the amount of the appropriation which may
the Taired. The
Board approves the objective of
sorltk
iall and considers
that the draft provides a rea13reEetZ Mr
eo
.:rh to the problem as it exists at the

r




Approved unanimously.