View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

513

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System on Thursday, March 31, 1955.

The Board met in the Board

Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Vardaman
Mills
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Nelson, Assistant Director, Division
of Examinations

The following matters, which had been circulated to the members
the Board, were presented for consideration and the action taken in
ea.ch instance was as indicated:
sion of Memorandum dated March 24, 1955, from Mr. Young, Director, DiviResearch and Statistics, recommending an increase in the basic
LarY of Lucile R. MacLean, Librarian in that Division, from ,T)4,160 to
v4,30 per
annum, effective April 10, 1955.
Approved unanimously.
sion of Memorandum dated March 24, 1955, from Mr. Young, Director, DiviResearch and Statistics, recommending that the resignation of
.;"111,E Schweiger, Economist in that Division, be accepted effective March

Approved unanimously.
Of

New

Letter to Mr. Treiber, First Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank
York, reading as follows:

The Board of Governors approves the payment of
.,!alarY to Mr. Gerald H. Greene, Assistant Cashier,
'Ilffalo Branch, for the period March 21, 1955 through
December
31, 1955, at his present rate of ,I2.0,250 per




514

3/31/55

-2-

annum, which is the rate fixed by the Board of Directors
as indicated in your letter of March 22, 1955.
Approved unanimously.
to the Board of Directors, The Connecticut Bank and Trust
C 'Pany,
anY, Hartford, Connecticut, reading as follows:.
Pursuant to your request submitted through the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, the Board of Governors approves the establishment of a branch by The Connecticut
Bank and Trust Company, Hartford, Connecticut, in the
Town of East Hartford, Connecticut, at the northwest
corner of Main and Garvan Streets, known as 809 Main
Street, provided the branch is established within nine
months from the date of this letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston.
Letter to Mr. Wiltse, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of New
Y°r1t, reading as follows:
Reference is made to your letter of March 22,
1955, regarding the request of the Asbury Park and
Ocean Grove Bank, Asbury Park, New Jersey, for an extension of time within which to establish a branch on
the west side of Railroad Avenue, between Bangs Avenue and Summerfield Avenue, Asbury Park, New Jersey.
After consideration of the information available,
the Board concurs in your recommendation and extends
m
to "aY
18, the time within which the Asbury Park and
n
ucean Grove Bank may establish the above branch, as
originally approved in the Board's letter of October
18, 1954.
Approved unanimously.
PEtn.

Letter to the Board of Directors, Federation Bank and Trust CornNew York, Uew York, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves the




3/31/55

-3-

establishment of a branch by
Company, New York, New York,
New York, New York, provided
Within one year from date of

Federation Bank and Trust
at 10 Columbus Circle,
the branch is established
this letter.

Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.
Letter to the President and Directors of the Manhattan Company,
(Bank
-- of the Manhattan Company), New York, New York, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors approves the establishment of a branch by President and Directors of the Manhattan Company (Bank of
the Manhattan Company), New York, New York, at 711
Third Avenue, in the Borough of Manhattan, New York,
New York, provided the branch is established within 18
months from the date of this letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.
New

Letter to the Board of Directors, State Bank of Albany, Albany,
York, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Board of Governors hereby gives its written consent, under the provisions of Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, to the merger of Merchants National Bank
in Plattsburg, Plattsburg, New York, into State Bank
of Albany, Albany, New York, and also approves the establishment of a branch at 24 Brinkerhoff Street,
Plattsburg, New York, provided (a) the transaction is
effected substantiarly in accordance with the Plan
and Agreement of Merger dated February 23, 1955, as
presented through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York;
(b) the bank premises to be acquired in the transaction are not placed on the books of the continuing
bank at an amount in excess of the depreciated value
4S computed for income tax purposes; (c) that formal




3/31/55
approval is obtained from appropriate State authorities;
and (d) the merger and establishment of the branch is
accomplished within six months from the date of this
letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.
Letter to the Board of Directors, The Easton Trust Company, Easton,
-,,sYlvania, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the Board of
Governors approves the establishment of a branch by
The Easton Trust Company, Easton, Pennsylvania, at 516
March Street, Easton, Pennsylvania, provided the branch
is established within six months from the date of this
letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Peoples Bank and Trust Company,
Cedar,
Rapids,
Iowa, reading as follows:

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves the application of Peoples Bank and Trust
Company, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for stock in the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, subject to the numbered conditions hereinafter set forth:
1. Such bank at all times shall conduct its
business and exercise its powers with due
regard to the safety of its depositors, and,
except with the permission of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
such bank shall not cause or permit any
change to be made in the general character
of its business or in the scope of the corporate powers exercised by it at the time
of admission to membership.




3/31/55

-5-

The net capital and surplus funds of such
bank shall be adequate in relation to the
character and condition of its assets and
to its deposit liabilities and other corporate responsibilities.
3. Prior to admission to membership the bank
shall submit satisfactory evidence that
paragraph Second of the trust agreement
dated November 17, 1926, between stockholders of the bank and certain named
trustees, has been amended to eliminate
the requirement that stock of the bank
may not be transferred unless a proportionate share of the stockholders' beneficial interest in stock of Peoples Mortgage and Investment Company is transferred, and the endorsement on the stock
certificates of the bank to this effect
has been eliminated.
4. Prior to admission to membership, the bank
as trustee of its employees' Retirement
Fund shall eliminate from the assets of
such fund the mortgage of Peoples Mortgage
and Investment Company in the amount of
y55,000.
In connection with the foregoing conditions of membership, particular attention is called to the provisions
Of the Board's Regulation H, as amended effective September 1, 1952, regarding membership of State banking institutions in the Federal Reserve System, with especial
reference to Section 7 thereof. A copy of the regulation
is enclosed.
If at any time a change in or amendment to the bank's
Charter is made, the bank should advise the Federal Reserve Bank, furnishing copies of any documents involved,
in order that it may be determined whether such change affects in any way the bank's status as a member of the Federal Reserve System.
Acceptance of the conditions of membership contained
14 this letter should be evidenced by a resolution adopted
by the Board of Directors and spread upon its minutes, and
a certified copy of such resolution, together with advice
Of compliance with the conditions to be complied with
Prior to admission to membership, should be filed with the
Federal Reserve Bank. Arrangements will thereupon be made
to accept payment for an appropriate amount of Federal
2.




518

3/31/55

-6-

Reserve Bank stock, to accept the deposit of the required reserve balance, and to issue the appropriate
amount of Federal Reserve Bank stock to the bank.
The time within which admission to membership in
the Federal Reserve System in the manner described
may be accomplished is limited to 6o days from the
date of this letter, unless the bank applies to the
Board and obtains an extension of time. When the
Board is advised that all of the requirements have
been complied with and that the appropriate amount of
Federal Reserve Bank stock has been issued to the bank,
the Board will forward to the bank a formal certificate
of membership in the Federal Reserve System.
.
The Board of Governors sincerely hopes that you
Will find membership in the System beneficial and your
relations with the Reserve Bank pleasant. The officers
of the Federal Reserve Bank will be glad to assist you
in establishing your relationships with the Federal Reserve System and at any time to discuss with representatives of your bank means for making the services of
the System most useful to you.
Approved unanimously, together with a letter to Mr. Young,
President, Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago, reading as follows:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approves the application of Peoples Bank and Trust
Company, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for membership in the Federal Reserve System, subject to the conditions prescribed in the enclosed letter, which you are requested
tO forward to the board of directors of the institution.
Tw° copies of such letter are also enclosed, one of
Which is for your files and the other of which you are
requested to forward to the Superintendent of Banking
for the State of Iowa, for his information.
.
The report of examination of the trust department
discloses exceptions excessive in volume indicating a
g?neral laxity in the discharge of fiduciary responsibilities which cannot be condoned. In addition, the
acquisition from the affiliated Peoples Mortgage and Investment Company for investment of funds of the bank's




519

3/31/55
Retirement Fund of a mortgage secured in part by a portion of the bank building and in part by adjoining
vacant lots utilized for bank customer parking, all
under lease to the bank, involves a conflict of interest and an element of self-serving which is not compatible with sound trust administration. While it is
noted that improvement in administration of the bank's
fiduciary affairs may be expected as a result of the
appointment early this year of Trust Officer Sagers,
a first step to ensure satisfactory attention to trust
operations and the adoption of policies wholly consistent with recognized principles involved in the fiduciary relationship would seem to require elimination of
the virtual one-man control of fiduciary activities by
President Welch and assumption by the directors of
their proper responsibilities in this area. Close
supervisory attention to the administration of this
bank's trust business would seem essential.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Old Kent Bank, Grand Rapids,
•
M
Ichlgan, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors
approves the establishment of a branch on Wealthy
Street, S. E., between Lovett Avenue, S. E., and Lakeside Drive, S. E., in East Grand Rapids, Michigan, by
the Old Kent Bank, provided the branch is established
within one year from the date of this letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Manager, American Bankers
Asso • Letter to Mr. James E. Baum, Deputy
elation, 12 East 36 Street, New York, New York, reading as follows:
Reference is made to your letter of February 16,
1955, requesting a list of defalcations amounting to
$10,000 or more reported by State member banks during
the six months ended December 31, 1954.
There is enclosed a list showing five cases reported by the Board of Governors to the Attorney General of the United States involving possible criminal




520

3/31/55

-8-

violations where the amounts were 4a0,000 or more. It
is hoped that this information is in such form as to
be suitable for the purposes of your Insurance and Protective Committee.
Approved unanimously.
Bank

Telegram to Mr. Mangels, First Vice President, Federal Reserve
of San Francisco, reading as follows:
Board will interpose no objection to your Bank's
calling for bids for the proposed alterations to the
head office building as described in your letter of
March 2, 1955 and the related plans and specifications.
In accordance with customary procedure, a summary
report of bids should be forwarded to Board, together
with recommendation of Bank as to acceptance.
Your letter reports that on advice of its architect, Bank is contemplating a contract with fixed fee
and guaranteed maximum cost. Board will interpose no
objection to that type of contract if Directors determine that such type of contract would be to best interest of Bank, provided principle of competitive bidding is maintained.
Approved unanimously.
Mr. Nelson then withdrew from the meeting.

There had been circulated to the members of the Board a draft
f letter to the Honorable Warren Olney III, Assistant Attorney General,
Cl'inlinal Division, United States Department of Justice, (Attention:
D. McLean), reading as follows:
Receipt is hereby acknowledged of your letter of
March 21, 1955 enclosing a copy of Mr. Atterbury's letter of March 1, 1955 to you regarding the prosecution
Of Personal Finance Company of New York for alleged
violations of Regulation W. Your letter to the Board
asks for information on the legislative history of Regulation W, as well as any comments we may have on the dein United States v. Universal Credit Corporation,
344 U. S. 218, on which the defendant is relying.




M.

3/31/55
Regulation W was originally issued August 21, 1941
Pursuant to Executive Order 3843 dated August 9, 1941.
That Executive Order was issued pursuant to section 5(b)
Of the Trading With The Enemy Act of October 6, 1917.
Section 5(b) provided:
"That the President may investigate, regulate,
or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as
he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, export or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or
bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any
form (other than credits relating solely to transactions to be executed wholly within the United
States), and transfers of evidences of indebtedness or of the ownership of property between the
United States and any foreign country, whether
enemy, ally of enemy or otherwise, or between
residents of one or more foreign countries, by
any person within the United States; and he may
require any such person engaged in any such transaction to furnish, under oath, complete information relative thereto, including the production of
any books of account, contracts, letters or other
papers, in connection therewith in the custody or
control of such person, either before or after
such transaction is completed."
The authority to issue the regulation was terminated
bY the Act of August 8, 1947.
The Joint Resolution of August 16, 1948 authorized the
Board to reinstate consumer credit controls under Executive
Order 8843. The relevant part of the Resolution provided:
"Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Conress assembled, That in order to protect the
Nation's monetary, banking, and credit structure,
and interstate and foreign commerce against increased inflationary pressures, the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System are authorized, notwithstanding the Act of August 8,
1947 (Public Law 386, Eightieth Congress), to
exercise, up to and including June 30, 1949, consumer-credit controls, in accordance with and to
carry out the purposes of Executive Order Numbered 8843 (August 9, 1941) insofar as it relates
to installment credit.




,p,
5
°
14
2

3/31/55

-10-

"All the present provisions of sections 21 and
27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (relating to investigations, injunctions,
jurisdictions, and other matters), shall be as
fully applicable with respect to the exercise by
the Board of Governors of consumer installment
credit controls as they are now applicable with
respect to the exercise by the Securities and
Exchange Commission of its functions under that
Act, and the Board shall have the same powers in
the exercise of such consumer installment credit
controls as the Commission now has under the said
sections."
This authority terminated by its own terms on June 30, 1949.
The Defense Production Act of 1950 authorized the Board to
regulate consumer credit again according to Executive Order
8843. The statutory provision read:
"Sec. 601
To assist in carrying out the objectives of this Act, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System is authorized, notwithstanding the provisions of Public Law 386, Eightieth Congress (61 Stat. 921), to exercise consumer
credit controls in accordance with and to carry
out the provisions of Executive Order Numbered
8843 (August 9, 1941) until such time as the President determines that the exercise of such controls
is no longer necessary, but in no event beyond the
date on which this section terminates."
Consequently, there was no legislative history when the
regulation was originally issued in 1941 because there was
no Congressional action at that time. On the two subsequent
occasions when the Board was authorized to regulate consumer
_credit, Congressional action consisted simply in authorizing
the regulation of credit pursuant to Executive Order 8843,
and there is no discussion in the Committee Reports, and in
fact there was no occasion for any discussion of the question of "duplicity", which, as applied to Regulation W, would
mean whether a person who sold two separate articles to two
separate persons, both transactions being in violation of
Regulation W, could be convicted on two counts, or, as is alleged in the case of Personal Finance Company, whether several hundred separate loans to several hundred separate persons, each loan being in violation of the regulation and each
being falsely recorded on the books of the corporation (or
not recorded at all) in an attempt to conceal the violation,
should be regarded as a single violation.




r.41

3/31/55

-11-

In United States v. Universal Credit Corporation the
employer was charged with separate violations for each
week during which it underpaid an employee, but the Court
reasoned that all these underpayments were the result of
a single "erroneous managerial decision" placing the employee in the wrong category. The Court, therefore, held
that the employer should be charged with only one offense.
This reasoning would not seem to be applicable to a series
of violations of the kind alleged in the case of Personal
Finance Company, because each of the loans was a separate
transaction, with a separate customer. Since the alleged
violations occurred in separate transactions they could
not have all been the result of a single "managerial deAs you undoubtedly know, the Board of Governors forwarded eighty Regulation W cases to your Department for
such criminal proceedings as the Attorney General might
deem proper. We understand there were fifty-five or more
convictions and one acquittal, but, as far as we know, the
question of"duplicity" was never raised in any case.
We hope that this information will be of some assistance to Mr. Atterbury.
In response to an inquiry by Governor Balderston concerning the
Practice with regard to prosecution of alleged violations of Regulation
W, Consumer
Credit, reference was made to the position taken by the Board

that after referral of a case to the Department of Justice, it should be
Ifithin the determination of that Department as to what action was taken
in Prosecuting the case and bringing it to a conclusion.

It was noted,

h°1fever, that the Board and the Federal Reserve Banks are expected to give

the

Department of Justice, upon request, any assistance required in geta case ready for trial and that the proposed letter to the Assistant

Attcy,
sneY General was in the nature of providing such assistance.

Mr.

8°1°1110n stated that it had been the practice of the Legal Division not to
Ilrge action on
Regulation W cases after they had been referred to the




3/31/55

-12-

Department of
Justice.
Thereupon, the letter to Mr.
Olney was approved unanimously in
the form set forth above.
Consideration was given to a draft of letter to the Bureau of the
Iludget transmitting
for comment a report to the Honorable J. Percy Priest,
Chai,'Lualof the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, prePared in response to his letter of March 15, 1955, requesting the Board's
VieWs MI

Bill H. R. 4787, which would create a Committee on Railroad Re-

tirement Policy, the membership of which would include the Chairman of
the Board of Governors.
Governor Mills referred to the paragraph in the draft of letter
t° Chairman Priest which took the position that inasmuch as the subject
c)f railroad retirement benefits was not closely related to the Board's
liesPonsibilities, it was not believed that any useful purpose would be
e'ec°mPlished by service of the Chairman of the Board as a member of the
e°Mmittee to be established Pursuant to the bill.

He raised the question

vhether, if the House Committee felt that the Chairman of the Board could
ril4ke a contribution to the study, the reply should be so specific in sugesting that the bill be changed to exclude him from membership.
This point was discussed and it was the consensus that, for various
eas°118, including the nature of the study and the demands upon the time
or the
Chairman, it would be preferable if he were not called upon to




3/31/55

-13-

serve as a member of the Committee on Railroad Retirement Policy, but
that the letter
to Chairman Priest should be reworded so as to go no
flarther than to raise the question.
Accordingly, unanimous approval
was given to a letter to the Honorable
Rowland R. Hughes, Director, Bureau of
the Budget, reading as follows:
Enclosed is a draft of a proposed letter to the Chairman of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce commenting on H.R. 4787, a bill to create a committee on railroad retirement policy.
Before transmitting the letter, the Board will appreciate advice as to the relationship of the proposed
legislation to the program of the President.
Messrs. Sherman, Kenyon, and Solomon then withdrew from the meetand Messrs. Bethea, Director, Division of Administrative Services,
8.14 j°hnson, Controller, and Director, Division of Personnel Administrat10n, entered the room.
Consideration was given to a memorandum from Mr. Bethea dated
1

March on
", 1955, recommending the appointment of Marjorie B. Beattie as
438°eiate Manager, Cafeteria, in that Division, effective June 1, 1955,
vith
.
basic salary at the rate of e;)5,560 per annum. The memorandum recomnierlded that the
appointment be made with the understanding that Mrs.
13eatt'
le i s title would be changed to Manager, Cafeteria, effective November
1, lne,
J'D, the day following the date of resignation of the present manager
or the
cafeteria.
It was noted that the present manager intended to take about two
41°4ths' annual leave prior to the date of her resignation and the question




3/31/55

-14-

17as raised as to whether Mrs. Beattie's title should not be changed at
the time the present manager entered upon annual leave.
Following a discussion, Mrs.
Beattie's appointment was approved
with the understanding that her title
would be changed to Manager, Cafeteria,
as of the date on which the present
manager enters upon annual leave prior
to the effective date of her resignation.
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System on March 30, 1955, were approved unanimously.
The members of the staff then withdrew and the Board went into
eXecutive session.
Following the executive session,
the Chairman informed the Secretary
that in view of the circumstances mentioned in a memorandum dated March 29,
1955, from Mr. Marget, Director, Division of International Finance, the
Board approved his visiting the Bank
deutscher Lander in Frankfurt, Germany,
for one or two days during the course
of his forthcoming trip to Europe, this
action being taken with the understanding that no travel expense to the Board
would be involved, since Mr. Marget
would arrange to stop in Frankfurt on
his way to or from Basle, Switzerland,
but that, depending on his travel connections and the time spent at the Bank
deutscher Lander, he would be granted,
in addition to the week's leave on official business previously granted to
him to attend the annual meeting of the
Bank for International Settlements and
to visit the Bank of England, additional
leave on official business to cover the
visit in Frankfurt, this being estimated
at three or four days.




.30

55

-15The Secretary also was advised by
Governor Szymezak that during the executive session the Board authorized Mr.
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board,
to proceed to Oslo, Stockholm, and Copenhagen for the purpose of visiting the
Bank of Norway, the Bank of Sweden, and
the National Bank of Denmark, with the
understanding that Nr. Thomas would leave
Washington, D. C., on this assignment
during the early part of July and would
return on or about September 1, 1955/
that a portion of the intervening period
would be used for personal business for
which Mr. Thomas would take from 10 to
15 days' annual leave, and that, while
absent from Washington on official business, Mr. Thomas' actual necessary transportation expenses and per diem in lieu
of subsistence would be paid in accordance
with the Board's travel regulations, as
supplemented by the standardized Government travel regulations.

The meeting then adjourned.