The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
M E R C H A N T S ’ M A G A Z IN E AND COMMERCIAL REVIEW. JU L Y , 1861. COTTON AND COTTON M A N U F A C T U R E . I. V alu e of B ritish C otton G oods in 1860.— II. P rogress of tiie C otton M anufactu re from 1S36 to 1860.— III. C otton T r ad e of G r eat B r it a in a t S i x D ecenn ial P eriods , a n d W eek ly Consumption since 1847.— IV . I mports of C otton in to G r eat B r it a in , 18201859, from the U nited States , B r azil , M editer ra n e a n , B ritish E ast I ndies , B ritish W est I ndies , w it h the A n n u a l A v er ag e P rice of U n ited States U pla n ds , B r a z il a nd E ast I n d ia S u ra t C otton .— V. C a pa c it y of the Cotton B a le .— V I. Stock of Cotton at L ive rpo ol , 1844-1860.— V II. T he C hief M a n u fac tu r in g C ountries of E urope compared w it h the U n ited S tates .— V III. C otton M a nu factu re of F ran ce .— IX . H ollan d a nd the N eth erlan ds .— X . L a bo r a n d W ages in E n g l an d .— X I. S pindles a n d P roduction in TnE U nited States .— X II. E xports of C otton M anu factu res from G rea t B r it a in , a n d A v e r a g e P rice of G oods, 1815-1860. I. VALU E OF B R IT IS H CO TTON G O O D S. W e have before expressed the opinion, that the value o f British manu factured goods exceeds annually four hundred and fifty millions o f dollars; while the total cost o f the raw material being only one hundred and fifty millions of dollars, (£34,550,000 sterling,) there is a resulting profit to England of three hundred millions of dollars, in round numbers. This is confirmed by a recent statement in U r e ’ s History o f the Cotton Man ufacture, (London, H. G. B o h n , 1861,) where it is stated: “ The total cotton manufacture for home and foreign use, according to Mr. P o o l e , ( Statistics o f British Commerce,) may be reasonably assumed at twice the value o f the raw material consumed. And this assumption is borne out by the estimate given upon the authority o f Messrs. Du F a y & Co., o f Manchester. Hence, as we paid more than £30,000,000 for the raw cotton we consumed in 1859, this would give an aggregate value o f £90,000,000 for the cotton manufacture at present, including the price of both raw material and finished products. “ W e know, from the official returns, that more than one-third o f our entire exports in 1859 consisted o f cotton. Besides which, there has to V O L . x l v .— n o . i . 1 2 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. be added the proportion o f cotton which forms part of £12,000,000 more exported in the shape of mixed woollens, haberdashery, millinery, silks, apparel and slops. The home consumption o f cottons, which a few years ago.was calculated to average £25,000,000 annually, must have greatly increased, so as to bear a close approximation to the quantity exported, £48,000,000. The amount o f actual capital invested in the cotton trade of the kingdom is believed to be now about £60,000,000 sterling.” II. RAPID PROGRESS OF THE COTTON MANUFACTURE IN ENGLAND. In the year 1846, only fifteen years ago, the total value o f British manufactured cottons was only forty-four millions sterling; whereas, in 1860, the value is officially reported at £92,013,000. The growth o f these manufactures since the year 1836 is shown in the following tabular statement: V alue of the H ome and E xport T rade in B ritish M anufactured C otton G oods.. 1836-1860. Years. 1836,___ 1831,___ 1 8 3 8 ,.... 1839,___ 1840,___ 1841........ 1842,___ 1843,___ 1844,. . . . 1845,___ 1846,___ 1847,___ 1848,___ 1849,___ 1850,___ 1851,___ 1852,___ 1853,___ 1854,___ 1855,___ 1856........ 1 8 5 7 ,.... 1 8 5 8 ,.... 1859,___ I 8 6 0 ,.,.. D ecla red va lu e o f cotton m anu fa c tu r e s ex p orted . Computed value o f the cotton consumed. ...£ 1 5 ,0 8 1 ,0 1 1 . . . 10,777,351 . . . 13,132,102 . . . 12,692,165 . . . 13,243,773 . . . 12,089,309 . . . 10,664,723 . . . 11,382,861 . . . 11,621,328 . . . 11,400,319 .. . 13,018,609 . .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. . ... ... ... 13,004,679 10,280,939 13,859,999 17,937,100 16,225,429 16,641,239 18,425,879 18,251,081 19,619,888 22,129,599 25,925,228 26,254,800 27,530,774 .. ,. £24,632,058 20,596,123 24,147,726 24,550,375 24,668,618 23,599,478 21,679,348 23,447,971 25,805,348 26,119,331 25,599,826 23,333,225 22,681,200 26,775,135 28,257,401 30,088,836 29,878,087 32,712,902 31,745,857 34,779,141 38,232,741 39,073,420 43,001,322 48,208,444 52,013,482 Computed value o f home con sum ption. . £19,059,600 15,505,018 20,970,133 11,951,943 24,948,037 16,244,807 15,540,963 19,822,940 17,060,290 20,868,763 18,974,766 13,113,489 16,422,693 16,666,441 17,569,591 18,210,520 21,278,107 22,860,293 23,348,190 19,957,379 18,842,111 21,084,283 17,385,712 23,164,770 40,000,000 Total value o f the B ritish cotton m anu fa ctu re. . . £43,691,658 36,101,141 .. 45,117,859 .. 36,502,318 .. 49,616,655 .. 39,744,285 .. .. 37,220,311 43,270,911 .. .. 42,865,638 46,988,094 .. 44,674,592 .. 36,446,714 .. 39,103,893 .. 43,441,576 .. 45,826,992 .. 48,299,356 .. 51,256,194 .. .. 55,573,195 .. 55,094,047 .. 54,736,520 .. 67,074,852 .. 60,157,703 .. 60,387,034 .. 71,373,214 .. 92,013,482 3 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. III. COTTON' TRADE OF GREAT BRITAIN AT SIX DECENNIAL PERIODS. There is a constantly increasing demand for cotton, not only for clothing, <fcc., arising from the growth of population and the diffusion o f wealth, but also for admixture with wool, as well as in the manufacture o f cordage, twine and sail-cloth, which are new branches o f trade to which cotton has recently been applied. The production o f cotton ought to increase much greater than the population; for as civilization and commerce extend, the number that will consume cotton fabrics, and the annual consumption o f each person, by reason o f the greater productive power, will extend in a still greater ratio. The following is the C otton T rade of G reat B ritain , showing the S ources of S ufply in D ecennial P eriods. 1806. 1816. 1826. 1836. American,___ 124,939 . . 166,077 . . 395,852 . . Brazil,............. 51,034 . . 123,450 .. 55,590 . . Egyptian,.............................................. 4 7 ,2 6 1 .. East Indies,.. . 7 ,7 8 7 .. 3 7 ,6 7 0 .. 6 4 ,6 9 9 .. West Indies,. . 7 7 ,9 7 8 .. 4 2 ,2 3 5 .. 1 8 ,1 8 8 .. 1846. 1856. 764,707 . . 932,000 . . 1,758,295 148,715.. 8 4 ,0 0 0 .. 122,411 3 4 ,9 5 3 .. 5 9 ,6 0 0 .. 111,960 219,193.. 4 9 ,5 0 0 .. 463,932 3 3 ,5 0 6 .. 9 ,0 0 0 .. 11,320 Bales,.......... 261,738 . . 369,432 . . 581,590 . . 1,201,074 . . 1,134,100 . . 2,467,918 The cotton manufacture has been everywhere extending in the past quarter of a century, and consumption steadily gaining upon production. The weekly deliveries o f cotton for consumption from the stocks ware housed in British ports have nearly doubled in the last ten years. In 1847 the consumption was but 20,259 bales per week; in 1859 it averaged 46,699 bales weekly. The consumption in the United States in 1847 was 427,967 bales ; in 1857 it was 702,138 bales. The quantity o f cotton taken for consumption in the United Kingdom has been as follows \* S ales of 400 1847,................. 1848,................. 1849,................. 1850,................. 1851,................. 1852,................. 1853,................. 1854,................. 1855.................. 1856.................. 1857,................. 1858,................. 1859,................. Year. 1,053,492 1,479,294 1,568,861 1,461,176 1,622,566 1,875,002 1,837,287 1,954,355 2,085,766 2,303,764 1,962,829 2,241,785 2,428,358 1,105,998 bales of 381 lbs. 1,505,331 393 “ 395 i t 1,586,608 386 it 1,513,007 1,662,585 “ 390 (( 1,911,558 393 i t 1,854,610 396 a 401 t t 1,949,327 2,099,298 398 a 2,263,899 « 407 “ 1,960,566 “ 401 t t 2,174,559 412 it 2,294,310 423 i t lbs. Week. 20,259 28,448 30,170 28,100 31,203 36,058 35,533 37,583 49,111 44,303 37,749 43,111 46,699 R e v ie w of C otton a n d Spin d le s .. N o. o f p ersons em p lo y ed i n c o t t o n m i ll s . In crea se. C o tto n c o n s u m e d . lbs. A vera ge c o n s u m p tio n In crea se. o f c o tto n p er hand. lbs. lbs. 1856 .. 879,213 ................. 891,400,000 .. 1859 .. 415,423 . 86,210 .. 976,600,000 .. 85,200,000 1860 .. 446,999 . . 81,576 ..1,050,895,000 .. 74,295,000 N o. o f s p in d le s. A v e r a g e w e ig h t o f c o tto n con su m ed a n n u a lly p e r s p in d le . lbs. . 2,351 .. 2S,010;217 .. 31% tt “ .. 80,759,368 tt “ .. 33,099,056 * U re ’ s History, Yol. II., p. 375. STATISTICAL HISTORY OF THE COTTON TRADE, ( Commencing at the Peace o f 1815.) S howing the E xports of C otton M anufactures and Y arns, ( exclusive of L ace, H osiery and T hread ,) as compared w ith the T otal E x p o r ts ; the A verage P rice of G oods per yard and Y arn per lb ., as compared w ith the P rice of Cotton in each Y ear . £ 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49,653,245 40,328,940 40,349,235 45,180,150 34,252,251 35,569,077 35,523,127 36,176,897 34,589,410 37,600,021 38,077,330 30,847,528 37,181,335 36,812,756 35,842,623 38,271,597 37,164,372 Q u a n tity. Yds. £ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,822,193 14,937,527 15,489,715 18,103,487 14,234,290 16,035,643 15,498,734 16,551,544 15,606,591 17,579,651 17,439,739 13,357,961 16,493,613 16,078,654 16,493,121 18,253,511 16,111,532 B ea l value. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 252,884,029 189,263,731 236,987,669 255,321,695 202,514,682 350,956,541 266,495,901 304,379,691 301,816,254 344,651,133 336,466,698 267,060,534 365,492,804 363,328,431 402,517,196 444,578,498 421,385,303 A vera ge p e r ya rd . 18,158,172 12,309,079 13,475,534 15,708,183 11,714,507 13,209,000 13,192,904 13,853,954 12,980,644 14,444,255 14,233,010 9,866,623 12,948,035 12,483,249 12,516,247 14,119,770 12,136,513 . . . . . . . • . 17* 15f 13* 14} 15* 9 11* 10* HI n 10* 8* 8* . ■ ■ ■ n n n 6* . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21* 18* 20* 20* 13* 11* 9* 8* 8* 8* 11* 6* 6* 6* 5* 6* 6 A vera ge p r ic e o f bowed C otton Y a r n . Q uantity. d. d. £ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. A vera ge p r ic e o f bowed cotton at close o f year. lbs. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9,241,548 . . 15,740,675 . . 12,717,382 . . 14,743,675 . . 18,085,410 . . 23,032,325 . . 21,526,469 . . 26,595,468 . . 27,378,986 . . 34,605,510 . . 32,641,604 . . 42,179,521 . . 44,878,774 . . 50,506,751 . . 61,441,251 . . 64,645,342 . . 63,821,440 . . B ea l value. A verage a t close p e r lb. o f yea r. £ 1,674,021 2,628,448 2,014,181 2,395,304 2,519,783 2,826,643 2,305,830 2,697,590 2,625,947 3,135,396 3,206,729 3,491,338 3,545,578 3,595,405 3,976,874 4,133,741 3,975,019 d. d. .. .. .. .. .. .. 43* 40 38 38* 33* 29* 21* 18* 20* 20* 13* •• .. .. .. .. .. 25* 24* 93* 21* 23* 19* .. .. .. .. .. 18* 17* 15* 15* 14* .. 11* 9* 8* 8* 8* 11* 6* 6* 6* 5* 6* 6 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. Total B ritish exp orts o f a ll description s. Years. C otton M anu fac tu r es . E xp orts o f cotton m anu fa c tu r e s and ya rn . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 36,450,594 39,667,347 41,649,191 47,372,270 53,368,572 42,070,744 50,060,970 53,233,580 51,406,430 51,634,623 47,381,023 52,279,709 58,584,292 60,111,082 57,786,876 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 58,842,377 54,849,445 63,596,025 71,367,885 74,448,722 78,076,854 98,933,781 97,184,726 95,688,085 115,826,948 122,066,107 116,608,756 130,411,529 135,842,817 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16,223,389 17,155,084 19,338,367 20,888,020 23,303,533 19,683,931 22,986,602 23,236,638 23,403,528 22,252,778 20,658,684 22,362,435 24,600,730 24,993,843 24,583,680 22,165,083 21,638,688 26,775,135 28,257,401 30,088,836 29,878,087 32,712,902 30,101,030 33,247,592 36,446,118 37,342,929 41,537,354 46,496,650 50,217,892 . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 461,045,503 496,352,096 555,705,899 557,515,701 637,667,627 531,373,663 690,077,622 731,450,123 790,631,997 751,125,624 734,098,809 918,040,205 1,046,670,823 1,091,686,069 1,065,460,589 942,540,160 1,096,751,823 1,337,536,116 1,358,182,941 1,543,161,789 1,524,256,914 1,594,591,659 1,690,653,209 1,935,180,506 2,031,282,913 1,974,283,869 2,321,540,622 2,562,545,476 2,775,450,905 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11,500,630 12,451,060 14,127,352 15,181,431 17,183,167 12,727,989 15,544,733 16,378,445 16,302,220 14,985,810 12,887,220 15,168,464 17,612,146 18,030,608 16,701,632 16,207,103 15,710,857 20,071,046 21,873,697 23,454,810 23,223,432 25,817,249 23,409,700 26,047,197 28,417,543 28,642,340 31,957,875 37,038,538 40,342,819 5f 6 6 1-16 .. 6* H 5| 54 5 5-16 .. 4 15-16 .. 44 4 3-16 3 15-16 3 15-16 3 15-16 34 4i 3 7-16 3 9-16 3 13-16 3 9-16 3* 34 3 3-16 3 3-16 34 3 7-16 3i 3 7-16 H .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 f .. 84 . . H .. 104 . . 94 . . .. 7 .. 7 74 . . 6 .. 64 . . 5f . . 44 . . 44 . . 44 . . 44 . . 6f .. 44 . . 54 . . *4 . . 54 . . 54 . . 54 . . 54 . . 54 . . 6 .. 74 . . 64 . . 64 . . 74 . . 75,667,150 70,626,168 76,478,468 83,214,198 88,191,046 103,455,138 114,596,602 105,686,442 118,470,223 123,226,519 137,466,892 140,321,176 138,540,079 135,144,865 160,554,673 119,489,554 135,831,162 148,275,885 124,241,100 131,587,577 129,385,924 129,190,507 147,128,498 165,493,598 181,495,805 176,821,338 200,016,902 192,206,643 197,364,947 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4,722,759 . . 4,704,024 . . 5,211,015 . . 5,706,589 . . 6,120,366 . . 6,955,942 . . 7,431,869 . . 6,858,193 . . 7,101,308 . . 7,266,968 . . 7,771,464 . . 7,193,971 . . 6,988,584 . . 6,963,235 . . 7,882,048 . . 5,957,980 . . 5,927,831 . . 6,704,089 . . 6,383,704 . . 6,634,026 . . 6,654,655 . . 6,895,653 . . 6,691,330 . . 7,200,395 . . 8,028,575 . . 8,700,589 . . 9,579,479 . . 9,458,112 . . 9,875,073 . . 144 .. 64 154 .. 84 164 •• 104 16 4 •• 164 .. 94 7 154 •• 7 154 .. 74 6 164 84 144 144 .. 64 134 •• 54 124 •• 44 12 .. 44 124 .. 44 114 .. 44 11 4 •• 64 10 4 104 •• .. 44 124 •• 74 12 .. 54 12 4 •• 54 12 4 .. 54 104 •• 10 4 10 •• .. 54 54 6 11 4 .. 74 11 4 .. 64 114 12 .. .. 74 54 6i Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 IV . TH E IM P O R T OF C O TTO N IN T O G R E A T B R IT A IN . The progress o f the cotton culture throughout the world, as shown by the importations into Great Britain, is curious. The imports from the United States have increased from eighty-nine millions o f pounds, in the year 1820, to nine hundred and sixty millions, in 1859 ; while from Brazil, the imports in 1859 were less than in 1820 ; from the Mediterranean, (Egypt mainly,) it has increased from one million to thirty-eight millions o f pounds ; from the British East Indies, from twenty-three millions to two hundred and fifty millions ; from other countries, from two to ten millions ; while from the British W est Indies the product has declined from ten millions of pounds to less than half a million. The extraordinary fluctuations in this history are demon strated in the following table, showing, 1. The imports in pounds from the United States; 2. From Brazil; 3. From the Mediterranean; 4. From the British East Indies; 5. From the British W est Indies and British Guiana; 6. From all other sources, for each year, from 1820 to 1860. This history is rendered more interesting by the addition o f the annual average prices o f three qualities of cotton in the British market during this long period. The comparative real values of these exports were not fully recorded until the year 1854, since when they amounted as follow : 1854, 1855, 1856, £20,175,000 20.848.000 26.448.000 1857, 1858, 1859, £ 29,288,000 30.106.000 34.559.000 T able showing the Q uantity and V alue of R a w Cotton imported into toe U nited K ingdom from each source, with the A nnual A verage P rice of U nited S tates U plands, B razilian and P ernambuco, and E ast I ndia S urat Cotton, in tiie L iverpool M arket, since 1820. A n n u a l A v er a g e P rice . Years. 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 . . . . . . . United States. lbs. 89,999,174 93,470,745 101,031,766 142,532,112 92,187,662 139,908,699 130,858,203 M ed iterra nean. B razil. lbs. . . 29,198,155 . . 19,535,786 . . 24,705,206 . . 53,514,641 . . 24,849,552 . . . . . 33,180,491 . . . 9,871,092 . . lbs. 472,684 1,131,567 518,804 1,492,413 8,699,924 22,698,075 10,308,617 B ritish East Indies. . . . . . . . lbs. 23,125,825 8,827,107 4,554,225 14,839,117 16,420,005 20,005,872 20,985,135 B ritish West Indies. . . . . . . . lbs. 6,836,816 7,138,980 10,295,114 7,034,793 6,269,306 8,193,948 4,751,070 Grand to ta l—quantities. Other countries. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. lbs. 2,040,001 2,432,435 1,732,513 1,989,427 953,673 4,018,206 833,284 Uplands. B razil. Surat. . . . . . . . lbs. 151,672,655 132,536,620 142,837,628 191,402,503 149,380,125 228,005,291 177,607,401 .. .. . . .. .. .. .. tons. 67,711 59,168 63,767 85,448 66,688 101,788 79,289 at p. lb. . 11 J d. . 91 . 81 . 81 . . . . . 8i •H I . 6| . • . atp. lb. atp. lb. 15|d. . . 8Jd. 12| • • a ! HI ..6| 12 . . 6| 11| . . 6| 151 •• H 101 •• 51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 6 ,9 2 4 ,8 1 2 1 5 1 ,7 5 2 ,2 8 9 1 5 7 ,1 8 7 ,3 9 6 2 1 0 ,8 8 5 ,3 5 8 2 1 9 .3 3 3 ,6 2 8 2 1 9 ,7 5 6 ,7 5 3 2 3 7 ,5 0 6 ,7 5 8 2 6 9 ,2 0 3 ,0 7 5 2 8 4 ,4 5 5 ,8 1 2 2 8 9 ,6 1 5 ,6 9 2 3 2 0 ,6 5 1 ,7 1 6 4 3 1 ,4 3 7 ,8 8 8 3 1 1 ,5 9 7 ,7 9 8 4 8 7 ,8 5 6 ,5 0 4 3 5 8 ,2 4 0 ,9 6 4 4 1 4 ,0 3 0 ,7 7 9 5 7 4 ,7 3 8 ,5 2 0 5 1 7 ,2 1 8 ,6 2 2 6 2 6 ,6 5 0 ,4 1 2 4 0 1 ,9 4 9 ,3 9 3 3 6 4 ,5 9 9 ,2 9 1 6 0 0 ,2 4 7 ,4 8 8 6 3 4 ,5 0 4 ,0 5 0 4 9 3 ,1 5 3 ,1 1 2 5 9 6 ,6 3 8 ,9 6 2 7 6 5 ,6 3 0 ,5 4 4 6 5 8 ,4 5 1 ,7 9 6 7 2 2 ,1 5 1 ,3 4 6 6 8 1 ,6 2 9 ,4 2 4 7 8 0 ,0 4 0 ,0 1 6 6 5 4 ,7 5 8 ,0 4 8 8 3 3 ,2 3 7 ,7 7 6 9 6 1 ,7 0 7 ,2 6 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 ,7 1 6 ,1 6 2 2 9 ,1 4 3 ,2 7 9 2 8 ,8 7 8 ,3 8 6 3 3 ,0 9 2 ,0 7 2 8 1 ,6 9 5 ,7 6 1 2 0 ,1 0 9 ,5 6 0 2 8 ,4 6 3 ,8 2 1 1 9 ,2 9 1 ,3 9 6 2 4 ,9 8 6 ,4 0 9 2 7 ,5 0 1 ,2 7 2 2 0 ,9 4 0 ,1 4 5 2 4 ,4 6 4 ,5 0 5 1 6 ,9 7 1 ,9 7 9 1 4 ,7 7 9 ,1 7 1 1 6 ,6 7 1 ,3 4 8 1 5 ,2 2 2 ,8 2 8 1 8 ,6 7 5 ,1 2 3 2 1 ,0 8 4 ,7 4 4 2 0 ,1 5 7 ,6 3 3 1 4 ,7 4 6 ,3 2 1 1 9 ,9 6 6 ,9 2 2 1 9 ,9 7 1 ,3 7 8 3 0 ,7 3 8 ,1 3 3 3 0 ,2 9 9 ,9 8 2 1 9 ,3 3 9 ,1 0 4 2 6 ,5 0 6 ,1 4 4 2 4 ,1 9 0 ,6 2 8 1 9 ,7 0 3 ,6 0 0 2 4 ,5 7 7 ,9 5 2 2 1 ,8 3 0 ,7 0 4 2 9 ,9 1 0 ,8 3 2 1 8 ,6 1 7 ,8 7 2 2 2 ,4 7 8 ,9 6 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ,3 7 2 ,5 6 2 7 ,0 3 9 ,5 7 4 6 ,0 4 9 ,5 9 7 3 ,4 2 8 ,7 9 8 8 ,4 6 0 ,5 5 9 9 ,1 6 3 ,6 9 2 1 ,0 2 0 ,2 6 8 1 ,6 8 1 ,6 2 5 8 ,4 5 1 ,6 3 0 8 ,2 2 6 ,0 2 9 9 ,3 2 6 ,9 7 9 6 ,4 0 9 ,4 6 6 6 ,4 2 9 ,6 7 1 8 ,3 2 4 ,9 3 7 9 ,0 9 7 ,1 8 0 4 ,4 8 9 ,0 1 7 9 ,6 7 4 ,0 7 6 1 2 ,4 0 6 ,3 2 7 1 4 ,6 1 4 ,6 9 9 1 4 ,2 7 8 ,4 4 7 4 ,8 1 4 ,2 6 8 7 ,2 3 1 ,8 6 1 1 7 ,3 6 9 ,8 4 3 1 8 ,9 3 1 ,4 1 4 1 6 ,9 5 0 ,5 2 5 4 8 ,0 5 8 ,6 4 0 2 8 ,3 5 3 ,5 7 5 2 3 ,5 0 3 ,0 0 3 3 2 ,9 0 4 ,1 5 3 3 4 ,6 1 6 ,8 4 8 2 4 ,8 8 2 ,1 4 4 3 8 ,2 4 8 ,1 1 2 3 8 ,1 0 6 ,0 9 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 ,9 3 0 ,5 4 2 3 2 ,1 8 7 ,9 0 1 2 4 ,8 5 7 ,8 0 0 1 2 ,4 8 1 ,7 6 1 2 5 ,8 0 5 ,1 5 3 3 5 ,1 7 8 ,6 2 5 3 2 ,7 5 5 ,1 6 4 3 2 ,9 2 0 ,8 6 5 4 1 ,4 2 9 ,0 1 1 7 5 ,9 4 9 ,8 4 5 5 1 ,5 3 2 ,0 7 2 4 0 ,2 1 7 ,7 3 4 4 7 ,1 7 2 ,9 3 9 7 7 ,0 1 1 ,8 3 9 9 7 ,3 8 8 ,1 5 3 9 2 ,9 7 2 ,6 0 9 6 5 ,7 0 9 ,7 2 9 8 8 ,6 3 9 ,7 7 6 5 8 ,4 3 7 ,4 2 6 3 4 ,5 4 0 ,1 4 3 8 3 ,9 3 4 ,6 1 4 8 4 ,1 0 1 ,9 6 1 7 0 ,8 3 8 ,5 1 5 1 1 8 ,8 7 2 ,7 4 2 1 2 2 ,6 2 6 ,9 7 6 8 4 ,9 2 2 ,4 3 2 1 8 1 ,8 4 8 ,1 6 0 1 1 9 ,8 3 6 ,0 0 9 1 4 5 ,1 7 9 ,2 1 6 1 8 0 ,4 9 6 ,6 2 4 2 5 0 ,3 3 8 ,1 4 4 1 3 2 ,7 2 2 ,5 7 6 1 9 2 ,3 3 0 ,8 8 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 ,1 6 5 ,8 8 1 5 ,8 9 3 ,8 0 0 4 ,6 4 0 ,4 1 4 3 ,4 2 9 ,2 4 7 2 ,4 0 1 ,6 8 5 2 ,0 4 0 ,4 2 8 2 ,0 8 4 ,8 6 2 2 ,2 9 3 ,7 9 4 1 ,8 1 5 ,2 7 0 1 ,7 1 4 ,3 3 7 1 ,5 9 5 ,7 0 2 1 ,5 2 9 ,3 5 6 1 ,2 4 8 ,1 6 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 6 ,1 5 7 1 ,5 3 3 ,1 9 7 5 9 3 ,6 0 3 1 ,2 6 0 ,4 4 4 1 ,7 0 7 ,1 9 4 . . . . . 1 ,3 9 4 ,4 4 7 1 ,2 0 1 ,8 5 7 7 9 3 ,9 3 3 6 4 0 ,4 3 7 9 4 4 ,3 0 7 2 2 8 ,9 1 3 4 4 6 ,5 2 9 7 0 3 ,6 9 6 3 5 0 ,4 2 8 4 0 9 ,1 1 0 4 6 8 ,4 5 2 4 6 2 ,7 8 4 1 ,4 4 3 ,5 6 8 3 6 7 ,8 0 8 5 9 2 ,2 5 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ,3 3 8 ,9 5 0 1 ,7 4 3 ,7 9 9 1 ,1 5 3 ,8 1 8 6 4 4 ,2 1 6 9 7 8 ,0 6 7 5 8 3 ,4 6 7 1 ,8 2 5 ,9 6 4 1 ,4 8 4 ,6 7 0 2 ,5 6 4 ,8 3 1 3 ,9 5 1 ,8 8 2 3 ,2 4 0 ,1 6 9 3 ,7 9 1 ,6 2 8 5 ,9 7 6 ,0 0 8 3 ,6 4 9 ,4 0 2 5 ,0 6 1 ,5 1 3 4 ,4 4 1 ,2 5 0 3 ,1 3 5 ,2 2 4 3 ,0 5 4 ,6 4 1 7 2 5 ,3 3 6 1 ,1 4 0 ,1 1 3 5 9 8 ,5 8 7 8 2 7 ,0 3 6 1 ,0 7 4 ,1 6 4 2 ,0 9 0 ,6 9 8 1 ,3 7 7 ,6 5 3 3 ,9 6 0 ,9 9 2 2 ,0 8 4 ,1 6 2 1 ,7 3 0 ,0 8 1 6 ,9 9 2 ,7 5 5 6 ,4 3 9 ,3 2 8 7 ,9 8 6 ,1 6 0 1 1 ,1 4 8 ,0 3 2 1 0 ,7 7 3 ,6 1 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 7 2 ,4 4 8 ,9 0 9 2 2 7 ,7 6 0 ,6 4 2 2 2 2 ,7 6 7 ,4 1 1 2 6 3 ,9 6 1 ,4 5 2 2 8 8 ,6 7 4 ,8 5 3 2 8 6 ,8 3 2 ,5 2 5 3 0 3 ,6 5 6 ,8 3 7 3 2 6 ,8 7 5 ,4 2 5 3 6 3 ,7 0 2 ,9 6 3 4 0 6 ,9 5 9 ,0 5 7 4 0 7 ,2 8 6 ,7 8 3 5 0 7 ,8 5 0 ,5 7 7 3 8 9 ,3 9 6 ,5 5 9 5 9 2 ,4 8 8 ,0 1 0 4 8 7 ,9 9 2 ,3 5 5 5 3 1 ,7 5 0 ,0 8 6 6 7 3 ,1 9 3 ,1 1 6 6 4 6 ,1 1 1 ,3 0 4 7 2 1 ,9 7 9 ,9 5 3 4 6 7 ,8 5 6 ,2 7 4 4 7 4 ,7 0 7 ,6 1 5 7 1 3 ,0 2 0 ,1 6 1 7 5 5 ,4 6 9 ,0 1 2 6 6 3 ,5 7 6 ,8 6 1 7 5 7 ,3 7 9 ,7 4 9 9 2 9 ,7 8 2 ,4 4 8 8 9 5 ,2 7 8 ,7 4 9 8 8 7 ,3 3 3 ,1 4 9 8 9 1 ,7 5 1 ,9 5 2 1 ,0 2 3 ,8 8 6 ,3 0 4 9 6 9 ,3 1 8 ,8 9 6 1 ,0 3 4 ,3 4 2 ,1 7 6 1 ,2 2 5 ,9 8 9 ,0 7 2 . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . 1 2 1 ,6 2 9 1 0 1 ,6 7 9 9 9 ,4 4 9 1 1 7 ,8 4 0 1 2 8 ,8 7 3 1 2 8 ,0 5 0 1 3 5 ,5 6 1 1 4 5 ,9 2 7 1 6 2 ,3 6 7 1 8 1 ,6 7 8 1 8 1 ,8 2 4 2 2 6 ,7 1 9 1 7 3 ,8 3 8 2 6 4 ,5 0 4 2 1 7 ,8 5 4 2 3 7 ,3 8 8 3 0 0 ,5 3 3 2 8 8 ,4 4 3 3 2 2 ,3 1 2 2 0 8 ,8 6 4 2 1 1 ,9 2 3 3 1 8 ,3 1 3 3 3 7 ,2 6 3 2 9 6 ,2 3 9 3 3 8 ,1 1 6 4 1 5 ,0 8 1 3 9 9 ,6 7 8 3 9 6 ,1 3 1 3 9 8 ,1 0 4 4 5 7 ,0 9 2 4 3 2 ,7 3 2 4 6 1 ,7 6 0 5 4 7 ,3 1 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 6f 5f 61 6 6f 81 8f 10J n 7 7 n 6 6J H I 141 12J 91 9f 10 91 81 5f 71 H H «f 6f 6f 71 71 6 4f . 9} 8f 71 81 71 9 101 41 6f 41 51 71 51 5f 51 51 • 5f . 6 ■ 71 ■ 61 . 61 51 71 71 7 7 7 7 71 81 81 81 •• .. .. .. ■• .. .. 4f 4 5 4f 5 61 . . 61 . . 71 . . 61 ..4 1 .. 5 . . 51 ■•41 .. 4 f .. 4 .. 3 f . . 31 .. 3 . . 31 . . 44 . . 31 • • 31 . . 51 . . 4 . . 31 . . 31 . . 31 -• 3 1 ••41 . . 51 •• 4 f •• 4 1 Imports Cotton--1 7 8 1 , 5,198,778 lbs.; 1791, 28,706,675 lbs.; 1801, 56,004,305 lbs.; 1811, 91,576,535 lb s .; 1821 132,536,620 lb s .; 1831, 288,674,853 lb s .; 1841, 487,992,355 lb s.; 1851, 757,379,749 lb s .; 1859, 1,225,989,072 lbs. Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 1827 1828 1829 1830 1 83 1 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1 85 1 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 8 V. CAPACITY OF THE COTTON BALE. The smallest bales known to the trade are those o f W est Indies and Brazil, about 180 lbs., (formerly 200 to 210.) Those o f Egypt have increased from 245 to 369 lb s.; East Indian has maintained a uniform weight of 380 to 387 lbs., and the United States from 418 to 447 lbs. In Mr. U ke ’ s recent work it is stated that the commercial standard o f quantity in the cotton trade is generally the bale. The weight o f the bale, however, is by no means uniform. Indeed, scarcely any weight, measure or standard o f capacity may be considered less so. It varies, from different causes, in different countries, and in different sections o f the same country, at different periods, and according to the different kinds or qualities of the article. Improvements in pressing or packing, to diminish expense in bagging and freight, tend constantly to augment the weight of the bale. Thus, in 1790, the United States bale was com puted at only 200 lbs. In 1824 the average weight o f bales imported into Liverpool was 266 lb s .; but, increasing constantly, twelve years later the average was 319 lbs. M ’ C u l l o c h , however, in 1832, con sidered 300 to 310 lbs. a fair average, and B u r n s 310. A t the same time the Upland cotton bale was estimated at 320 lbs., and the Sea Island at 280 lbs. According to P i t k i n s , the Egyptian bale weighed at one time but 90 lbs., though it now weighs more than three times as many. A t the same period the Brazilian bale contained 180 lbs., though it now contains but 160 lb s.; while the West Indian bale weighed 350 lbs., and the Columbian bale 100 lbs., or the Spanish quintal. According to B u r n s , the United States bale at Liverpool averaged 345 lbs., the Brazilian 180 lbs., the Egyptian 220 lbs., the West Indian 300 lbs., and the East Indian 330 lbs. A t the Lowell factories, in 1831, according to P i t k i n s , the bale averaged 361 lbs. In 1836 the bale o f the Atlantic Cotton States was estimated at 300 and 325 lbs., and that of the Gulf States at 400 and 450 lbs. In Liverpool, at the same time, the estimate for the bale o f Upland or short staple cotton was 321 lbs., for Orleans and Alabama 402 lbs., for Sea Island 322 lbs., for Brazil 173 lbs., for Egyptian 218 lbs., for East Indian 360 lbs., and for West Indian 230 lb s .; while, according to B u r n s , bales imported into France were com puted at only 300 lbs. each. W a t e r s t o n ’ s “ Manual o f Commerce,” a reliable British publication, (1850,) gave the Virginia, Carolina, Georgia and West Indian bale at 300 to 310 lbs., that o f New-Orleans and Alabama at 400 to 500 lbs., that of the East Indies at 320 to 360 lbs., that of Brazil at 160 to 200 lbs., that of Egypt at 180 to 280 lbs. A l e x a n d e r ’ s “ Universal Dictionary o f Weights and Measures,” pub lished at Baltimore in 1850, gives the mean weight o f the bale o f Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi at 500 lbs., that of Georgia at 375 lbs., and that of South Carolina at 362^ lbs. A t Rio Janeiro the Brazil bale is estimated at 160 lbs. Prior to 1855, the United States “ Commerce and Navigation” returns gave exports of cotton in pounds only. They are now given in bales as well as in pounds, the aggregate amount the year ending June 30, 1855, being 2,303,403 bales, or 1,008,424,601 lbs., the bale accord ingly averaging about 438 lbs. Some bales, however, are evidently much heavier and some much lighter than this. For example, the 210,113,809 lbs. o f cotton exported to France gives 446 lbs. to each of Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 9 the 470,293 bales, and the 955,114 lbs. exported to Austria gives 492 lbs. to each o f the 1,939 bales; while the 7,527,079 lbs. exported to Mexico gives only 290 lbs. to each o f the 25,917 bales in which they were contained. In the great cotton marts o f Liverpool and Havre, as in those o f NewOrleans and Mobile, the article is almost invariably treated o f by mer chants, brokers and commercial men by the bale. Thus, a report on the trade of Liverpool gives the imports o f cotton into Great Britain in 1852 at 2,357,338 bales. The aggregate o f cotton imported that year is given, in the official report by the Board of Trade, at 929,782,448 lbs., the bales averaging, accordingly, 395 lbs. each. In 1853 the cotton bales imported into Liverpool from North America averaged 435 lbs., from the East Indies 383 lbs., Brazil 180 lbs. The North American bale, as usually spoken of, implies a mean of 400 lbs. By reference to the figures given at page 3, it will be seen that there has been a gradual increase in the average weight o f the bales o f cotton received at Liverpool; for whilst the mean weight of all the bales in 1843 was 376 lbs., in 1847 it was 381 lbs., and in 1859 it reached as high as 423 lbs. Much more attention seems now to be paid to the packing and compression of the bales by screw presses. The relative average weights and cubical contents o f bales o f cotton imported into Liverpool in 1850 were as follow s: D escrip tion o f bales. Mobile,.................... New-Orleans,........ Upland,................... Sea Island,............. A vera ge Content8 w eight i n cubic in pounds. fe e t . . . . 604 . . 33 . . . 455 . . 32 ...390 . 27 ...383 . 35 D escrip tion o f bales. East Indian,.......... E gyptian,............... West Indian,.......... Brazilian,................ A verage Contenta w eight in cubic in paunds. fe e t . ...383 . . . 245 . . . 210 . . . 182 . . . . . . . . 15 27 25 17 These figures show not only the great variety o f bales that enter Liver pool, but that the most eligible form of bale is that o f the East Indies, double the weight being packed within the same compass than in any other description o f bale. Mr. J. A. M anst, in his recent work on the Cotton Trade o f Great Britain, gives the following table, showing the average weight of each description o f cotton bale imported annually into the United Kingdom since 1850 : Years. I 8 6 0 ,.. . 1 8 5 1 ... . 1 8 5 2 ,... 1 8 5 3 ,.. . 1 8 5 4 ,.. . 1 8 5 5 ,.. . 1 8 5 6 ,.. . 1 8 5 7 ,.. . 1 8 5 8 ,.. . 1 8 5 9 ,.. . United States. B razil. West In d ia . E gyp t. lbs. lba. lbs. lbs. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. 425 418 425 430 422 445 443 445 447 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. 182 182 180 182 182 182 181 181 181 181 .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. 210 210 210 210 210 210 175 175 180 180 .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. 245 245 250 248 295 306 308 313 355 369 East In d ia . A ll kinds. lbs. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 383 384 385 380 383 383 385 .. .. .. 387 387 385 lbs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 399 392 398 408 396 414 404 420 421 Taking the weight of a bale at 560 lbs., and supposing 1 lb. to produce 400 hanks, 1 hank to contain 840 yards, the whole quantity o f cotton imported by Great Britain and her dependencies, during the year 1855, would produce two hundred and eighty-eight billions nine hundred and Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 10 eighty thousand seventy-nine millions three hundred and sixty thousand yards, or one billion one hundred and forty-one thousand nine hundred and thirty-two millions two hundred and sixty-nine thousand and ninety miles. If this thread were placed in a straight line, it would take a man two hundred and sixty-two millions two hundred and eighty-nine thou sand four hundred and eighty-three years to walk from one end to the other, at the rate of twenty miles a day, Sundays excepted. It would encircle the globe sixty-five millions six hundred and seventy thousand two hundred and ninety times. It would reach more than seventeen thousand two hundred and eighty-three times the distance between the earth and the sun. Again, supposing a man to weigh 140 lbs., the cotton imported would weigh as much as six millions one hunched and forty-three thousand two hundred and eighty-four men. Let a man work eight hours a day, Sundays excepted, and measure twenty yards a minute, it would take him above one thousand and seventy-four million seven hundred and seventy-nine thousand four hundred and sixty-six times the age allotted to man by the Royal Psalmist. A t the London Exhibition, one manufacturer furnished samples of a pound o f cotton spun into 900 hanks of 840 yards each, making about 450 miles. Another firm exhibited 420 hanks o f the same number of yards each, making 2,000 miles from a single pound of cotton. The above amount, multiplied only by 410, the length o f thread that a single cop of cotton could make, gives 607,000,000,000 of miles, or sufficient for a stout web o f calico a yard wide, and containing 85 threads to the inch— more than enough to reach from us to the sun. V I. STOCK OF COTTON IN LIVERPOOL, 1844-1860. The largest stock o f cotton on hand in Liverpool, in any year, from 1844 to 1860, was 1,057,375 bales in 1845, and 1,015,868 bales in April, 1860. The following table gives the day in each year, from 1844 to 1860, on which there was the largest stock o f cotton in Liverpool: Year. Bate. 1844,.. 1845,.. 1846,.. 1847,.. . . April 20,........ 1848,.. 1849,.. . . July 6,............ 1850,.. . . April 12,........ 1851.. . . ..July 18,.......... 1852.. . No. Bales. .. 998,405 . . 1,057,375 .. 894,838 .. 539,719 .. 657,750 .. 752,480 .. 571,166 .. 735,497 . . 694,794 Year. 1 8 5 3,... 1 8 5 4,... 1855,.. 1856,.. 1 8 5 7 ,... 1 8 5 8 ,... 1 8 5 9 ,... I 8 6 0 ,... Bate. No. Bales. ... 879,650 ... 970,107 . . . 666,688 ... 813,266 . . . 693,509 ... 678,636 ... 754,109 . . . 1,015,868 In April, 1861, the stock on hand at Liverpool was 884,000 bales; April, 1860, 955,000 bales. V II. THE COTTON MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS OF EUROPE. The following is a comparative estimate o f the quantities of raw cotton consumed in the chief manufacturing countries, from 1837 to 1858, in millions of pounds w eight: 11 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. Countries . 1837. 1838. 1839. 1 8 4 0 . 1841. 1 8 4 2 . 1 8 4 3 . 1 8 4 4 . 1845. 1 8 4 6 . 1847. Great Britain,............... 869 .. 435 .. 362 .. 473 .. 422 .. 462 .. 531 .. 543 .. 597 .. 604 .. 425 Russia, Germany, Hol land and Belgium,... 5 8 . . 6 1 . . 4 8 . . 7 2 . . 0 5 . . 7 8 . . 8 2 . . 8 6 . . 9 6 . . 97 .. 105 France, (including ad jacent countries,).. . . 121 .. 133 .. 110 .. 157 .. 154 .. 163 .. 152 .. 146 .. 158 .. 159 .. 126 Spain,............................................................................................................................................................ Countries bordering on the Adriatic,............. 32 .. 26 .. 26 .. 28 .. 29 .. 38 .. 44 .. 26 .. 88 .. 39 .. 31 United States of North America,.................... 82 .. 92 .. 103 .. I l l .. 115 .. 105 .. 181 .. 143 .. 158 .. 175 .. 175 Sundries, Mediterrane an, & c.,...................................................................................................................................................... Total,........................ # C ountries . 662 747 1848. 1849. 649 841 785 846 940 944 1,047 1,074 862 185 0. 1851. 1852. 1853. 1 85 4. 1855. 1856. 1857. 1858. Great Britain,................ 591 .. 627 Eussia, Germany, Hol land and Belgium,... 112 .. 160 .. 133 .. France, (including ad jacent countries,).. . . 127 .. 186 .. 142 .. S pain,.................................................... 29 .. Countries bordering on the Adriatic,............... 29 .. 47 United States of North America,.................... 209 .. 205 .. 188 .. Sundries, Mediterrane an, & c.,......................................................... .. 584 .. 648 .. 745 .. 734 .. 780 .. 835.. 920.. 78 118 .. 172 .. 185 .. 190 .. 144 .. 256 .. 210 .. 230 149 .. 199 .. 194 .. 201 .. 190 .. 211.. 34 .. 44 .. 42 .. 43 .. 45 .. 48.. .. 45 .. 45 .. 55 .. 45 220 .. 240 60 .. 67 .. 158 .. 237 .. 265 .. 243 .. 236 .. 265 .. 320 .. 238 23 .. 29 .. 38 .. 37 .. 69 .. 56.. 40 .. 60 Total,......................1,068 1,225 1,132 1,175 1,481 1,503 1,539 1,553 1,795 1,602 1,781 V III. COTTON MANUFACTURES OF FRANCE. The annual “ Commercial Revue," of Havre, gives the number o f bales o f cotton imported into France in the year 1852 at 462,000, in round numbers. The ‘■'■Tableau General” states the imports at 188,917,099 lb s.; the bales averaging, accordingly, about 409 lbs each. The follow ing table, compiled from the Havre “ Commercial Revue" for 1855, shows the quantities of cotton, in bales, imported into France, and the countries whence imported, for a period o f five years, from 1851 to 1855, both inclusive: Years. B ra zil. bales. United States. bales. 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 295,400 392,700 389,000 403,300 418,600 .. .. .. 7,700 6,000 2,800 2,000 2,500 E gyp t. bales. .. 18,500 86,700 33,000 21,400 30,700 Elsewhere. bales. .. 38,000 26,900 29,200 16,300 11,800 A ll countries. bales. .. 359,600 462,300 454,000 470,000 463,000 Estimating the bale at 400 lbs., we have the following result, some of the figures of which, contrasted with those derived from official sources, present striking discrepancies: Tabular Comparative Statement, showing the quantities o f Cotton, in round numbers, imported into France, and the countries whence imparted, fo r a period o f five years, from 1851 to 1855, both inclusive. Years. 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 United States. lbs. .. .. .. .. .. 118,160,000 157,080,000 155,600,000 172,120,000 167,440,000 B ra zil. lbs. .. .. .. .. .. 3,080,000 2,400,000 1,120,000 800,000 1,000,000 E gypt. lbs. Elsewhere. lbs. A l l countries. lbs. . . 7,400,000 . . 15,200,000 . . 143,840,000 . . 14,680,000 . . 10,760,000 . . 104,920,000 . . 13,200,000 . . 11,680,000 . . 181,600,000 . . 8,560,000 . . 6,520,000 . . 188,000,000 . . 12,280,000 . . 4,720,000 . . 185,440,000 Affgreg., 770,400,000 . . 8,400,000 . . 56,120,000 . . 48,880,000 . . 803,800,000 Average, 154,080,000 . . 1,680,000 . . 11,224,000 . . 9,776,000 .,. 160,760,000 45 .. 39.. 39.. 5 12 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. IX . THE NETHERLANDS AND HOLLAND. The Netherlands.— In 1859, the quantity o f cotton submitted by the Netherlands Trading Company to public competition consisted o f 20,834 bales of American and 7,583 bales o f East India cotton, against 15,232 and 14,620 bales respectively in 1859. The total imports into Holland in 1859 comprised 101,197 bales o f all descriptions, and the stock in first hands on the 1st of January, 1860, amounted to 6,959 bales. The company brought to market at Rotterdam, during 1858, 4,909 bales Wew-Orleans, 1,358 “ Mobile, 8,965 “ Georgia, 11,203 bales Surat, 1,417 “ Tinnevelly, being a total o f 27,852 bales, against 24,288 bales in 1857. These quantities, offered to the public periodically, begin to attract a good deal of attention, and many buyers from Germany and other parts are in the habit of attending these sales, when they can afford to pay the full equivalent of the rates current in Liverpool and Havre, on account o f the saving of freight in summer and transhipment charges. The total imports into Holland in 1858 amounted to 101,909 bales, and the stock, January 1 , 1859, was 7,755 bales. T he Cotton T rade of H olland. I mports . Years. 1852,........... 1853,........... 1854,........... 1855,........... 1856............ 1857............ 1858,........... 1859,........... Rotterdam. bales. ......... 50,876 ......... 52,895 ......... 55,300 ......... 54,266 ......... 73,842 ......... 73,342 ......... 80,124 ......... 74,038 Amsterdam. bales. 12,972 8,400 10,228 12,481 20,117 36,519 21,785 27,160 . Total. Sales. 63,848 61,295 65,528 66,746 93,459 109,861 101,909 101,107 61,243 60,858 67,821 66,885 93,816 101,041 106,237 102,013 It will be seen that the demand for cotton, as evidenced by the sales in Holland, has nearly doubled in seven years, having risen from 61,243 bales in 1852, to 102,013 bales in 1859. The price of the colonial cotton, the produce of Surinam and Nickerie, was quoted at 6d. to 8-Jd. free on board in Rotterdam, in January, 1860. The quantity submitted by the Netherlands Trading Company, at their periodical sales in 1859, con sisted o f 20,834 bales American and 7,583 East Indian. X. LABOR AND WAGES. One feature o f the cotton manufacture o f England, which claims atten tion, is the large number o f minors employed in their mills, viz., 20,000 under twelve years of age, 144,000 between twelve and eighteen. This was in the year 1835, viz. : P roportion . Males. Under 12 years of a g e ,.. . . “ 18 “ “ ___ Over 18 “ “ ___ 10,087 . . 61, 169. . 87,299 . . Females. Totals. Males. Females. 10,501 . . 20,588 . . 6.4 p. c. 82,906 . . 144,075 .. 38.5 “ 103,411 . . 190,710 . . 55.1 “ . . 5.3 p. c. . . 42. 1 “ . . 52. 6 “ Totals,............................... 158,555 . . 196,818 . . 355,373 .. 44.6 “ . . 55.4 “ Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 13 T otal of Children , Y oung P ersons and A dults in all the C otton F actories of G reat B ritain and I reland IN THE YEAR 1835. England. Number of factories at work,. . . . Between 8 and 12 years, m ales,..,. . " “ “ females,.,.. 2,555 . . 9,292 . . 9,536 . . T ota l,..................................... . . Between 12 and 18 years, males,. . . “ “ “ females, .. 18,828 .. 53,114 .. 65,218 . . Wales. 90 . 47 . 29 . Scotland. Ireland. 425 .. 690 . . 842 . . Total. 90 . . 58 . . 94 . . 3,160 10,087 10,501 76 . . 1,532 .. 152 . . 485 . . 6,420 .. 1,150 . . 403 . . 14,722 .. 2,563 . . 20,548 61,169 82,906 T otal,..................................... ... 118,332 . . Totals, males under 18 years,.... 62,406 . . .. 74,754 . . “ females “ “ 888 . . 21,142 . . 3,713 . . 144,075 532 . . 7,110 . . 1,208 . . 71,256 432 . . 15,564 .. 2,657 . . 93,407 T ota l,....................................... .. 137,160 . . Above 18 years, males,................ . . 75,848 . . “ “ females,............. . . 80,685 . . 964 . . 22,674 . . 3,865 . . 164,663 448 . . 8,904 . . 2,099 . . 87,299 524 . . 19,117 . . 3,085 . . 103,411 T ota l,..................................... .. 156,533 . . Total persons, m ales,................... 138,254 . . “ “ females,............... . 155,439 . . 972 . . 28,021 . . 5,184 . . 190,710 980 . . 15,818 . . 3,503 . . 158,555 956 . . 34,362 . . 6,061 . . 196,818 Totals, year 1835,..................... . “ year 1860,....................... 1,936 . . 50,180 . . 9,564 . . 355,373 . 500,000 The position of the cotton industry o f Great Britain, and o f the countries with which she carries on her commercial transactions, is very different now from what it was twenty-five years ago. The increase o f population, the progress of colonization, the improvements in machinery, the spread of wealth consequent upon the gold discoveries and other causes, and the facilities of transport by means of rail-roads and steam navigation, have effected more in the last quarter of a century, especially for the commerce of Great Britain, than has been realized in any previous half century; and this prosperity has been fully shared by their cotton manu factures, as will be seen in the following table : P opulation, Cotton I mports , Cotton G oods E xported , N umber of F actories and S pindles, R evenue, <Stc., of G reat B ritain in the tears 1835 and 1860. 1835. Population of Great Britain,................................... “ Manchester,...................................... Cotton production, United States, bales,.............. Cotton imported into Great Britain, lbs.,............. Cotton worked up in Great Britain, lbs.,............. Cotton manufactures exported, declared value,. . Cotton manufactures consumed in the United Kingdom, estimated,............................................ Capital embarked in cotton industry in England, Spindles at work in United Kingdom,................... Number of persons employed in cotton factories in the United K ingdom ,...................................... Aggregate value of the gross imports of United Kingdom,................................................................ Aggregate value of exports of British produce and manufactures,........ , ..................................... Revenue of the United Kingdom,......................... 1 86 0. 17,564,138 170,000 1,254,328 363,702,000 333,043,000 £22,128,000 . 27,435,325 . 450,000 . 4,675,770 . . 1,390,938,000 . . 1,105,965,000 . . £ 52,013,000 £29,504,000 £35,000,000 9,350,000 . . £ 69,350,000 . . £100,000,000 . 33,000,000 216,858 . 500,000 £48,911,000 . . £214,000,000 £47,372,000 £51,347,000 . . £135,892,000 . . £71,967,000 14 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. X I. COTTON MANUFACTURES OF THE UNITED STATES. Statistics relating to the cotton manufactures o f this country are not to he had of a recent or reliable character. The latest in reference to New-England have been furnished by Mr. S a m u e l B a t c h e l d e r , Treasurer o f the York Manufacturing Company, (of Saco, Maine,) for publication in the annual report o f the Boston Board o f Trade for 1861. From this statement we copy as follows : It is very difficult to obtain any accurate information as to the extent o f the cotton manufacture in the United States at the present time, or any data from which to estimate its increase. The census of the United States gives the quantity of cotton consumed, an estimate o f capital in vested and some other particulars, hut neither the number o f looms nor spindles. O f that in 1850 we had an “ abstract” in 1853, and in 1854 a “ compendium,” but it was not till 1858 that we had, by authority of an act of Congress, a “ Digest of the Statistics o f Manufactures,” prepared by Mr. K e n n e d y , no copy o f which can be found either in the library at the State House, or the Athenaeum, or the Board o f Trade; and if found, at this late day, in this progressive age, it would he something like an old almanac, and all the different branches o f business would have outrun the figures before the public could get the benefit o f them. As to the condition of the cotton manufacture in Massachusetts, I have been able to obtain, by favor o f a member of the Valuation Committee, a statement of the number o f spindles and looms in every town in the State in 1860, amounting to 1,688,471 spindles and 41,620 looms. From various other sources I collect the following particulars respecting the manufactures of Massachusetts at former periods: From a report of a committee o f Congress appointed in 1832, to inquire into the progress of the manufacture of cotton goods, (D b Bow’s Industrial Kesources, Yol. I., pp. 215, 216,) it appears that in 1831 there were in Massachusetts............. From a statement (su pra, V ol.I.,p.2 2 0 ) based, as quoted, partly on the official census of 1840,...................................................... From another document, perhaps more reliable, the number is stated at........................................................................................... From the “ Statistics of Massachusetts” for 1845, the number appears to b e ................................................................................... In 1850, from the foregoing statement of D e Bow, p. 220,........ From the Massachusetts Statistics for 1855,................................. From the Valuation Committee, as before stated, in 1860,......... Spindles. Loom s. 339,777 8,981 665,095 __ _ 624,540 .... 817,483 1,288,091 1,519,527 1,688,471 ___ 32,635 41,620 In the foregoing statements, where we have an opportunity to com pare the number o f spindles with the looms, the proportion is 38, 39 and 40 spindles to the loom, which would confirm the general accuracy o f the figures. From the above statements we obtain the following results as to the progressive increase o f the number o f spindles in Massachusetts: Spindles. In 1831,........................... ....................... 1840,........................... ....................... 1845,........................... 1850,........................... 1855,........................... 1860,........................... 339,777 624,540 Increase. .. .. . .. .. 284,763 191,143 470,608 231,436 168,944 P er Cent. .. .. .. .. .. 83 30 57 18 11 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. 15 From 1850 to 1860, the number has increased 400,380, being 31 per cent, upon the number in 1850, in ten years. In the Massachusetts Statistics for 1845, the annual consumption of cotton is stated at 56,851,654 lbs., which, divided by the number o f spin dles, 817,483, gives per spindle, per year, 69.54 lbs. According to the census of 1850, the consumption is estimated at 223,607 hales, which, multiplied by 425 lbs., the average weight o f bales at that time, gives 95,032,975 lb s.; this, divided by 1,288,091, the number o f spindles at that time, gives, per year, 73.70 lbs. According to Massachusetts Statistics o f 1855, the number of pounds of cotton was 105,851,749, which, divided by the number o f spindles, 1,519,527, gives 69.66 lbs. In Massachusetts, b y the “ Statistics of 1845,” the value was $11,264,212, which, divided b y 817,483 spindles, gives for value per spindle,...............$13 65 By census of 1850, $19,712,461, divided by 1,288,091 spindles,..................... 15 30 By Massachusetts Statistics, 1855, $24,359,212, divided b y 1,519,527 spindles, 16 03 These results agree very nearly with the actual value derived from the accounts o f several mills in Massachusetts, New-IIampshire and Maine, varying from $12 75 to $16 60 per spindle for the value o f product, or cost o f material and labor per year, the variation being much less than in the pounds of cotton per spindle, because where the labor is less on the coarser article, the quantity and cost o f material will be more. As to the present extension of the business, we have a list from the Merchants' Magazine, Yol. 43, p. 378, of mills in progress in NewEngland and New-York since September, 1859, amounting to 273,500 spindles, proposed to be put in operation during 1860 and 1861. In some cases, the numbers in this list are under-estimated, so that about 350,000 would probably be the correct number, unless some o f these enterprises should be reduced by the discouragements o f the times. There is much uncertainty in the estimates o f the consumption of cotton for factory purposes. D e B o w (supra, p. 2 1 0 ) sets down the spindles, in 1840, at 2,112,000, and estimates the pounds o f cotton consumed at 106,000,000. This would be only 50 lbs. to the spindle. On the con trary, a statement in the Merchants' Magazine (March, 1859, p. 375) gives 67,500 as the number of spindles in Maryland, and 50,000 lbs. per day for the consumption of cotton, amounting to 15,000,000 lbs. per year, which would give 222 lbs. for the yearly consumption per spindle. D e B o w (supra, p. 233) gives the number of spindles and consumption in the following States in 1850 : Spindles. Tennessee,................................................................................... Alabajna,. . . ............................................................................... Georgia,....................................................................................... South Carolina,........................................................................... 36,000 16,962 51,140 36,500 140,602 Bales. .. .. .. .. 12,000 6,000 2*7,000 15,000 .. 60,000 The report of the Philadelphia Board o f Trade for 1860, p. 81, gives the consumption of cotton, o f the crop o f 1858-9, as follows : The manufacturing States north of Virginia,................................. bales, 760,218 “ “ “ south “ “ ............................................ 164,700 924.918 16 Cotton and Cotton Manufacture. And says: “ The quantity manufactured north of Virginia is deduced from the comparison of receipts with shipments abroad.” On the whole, the estimated consumption in the cotton factories is probably too high, as it must include all that is used in combination with wool, and for various other purposes, but would probably be, at this time, nearly 900,000 bales. It is difficult to make any satisfactory estimate of the number o f spin dles at this time in different parts o f the country. The Philadelphia Board of Trade gives the number within the business circuit of Phil adelphia, probably including a considerable part of New-Jersey, at 420,968. The number in Maryland is stated at 67,500. The Chamber o f Commerce Report o f New-York, for 1858, gives the number of cotton factories at 86, and states the number of hands em ployed, capital invested and other particulars, but nothing by which any calculation can be made o f the number of spindles; these matters must be left to be revealed with the mysteries o f the census o f 1860. THE INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION OF 1862. Every succeeding day tends further to demonstrate the great interest which is felt in the forthcoming international exhibition, as shown by the fact that the guarantee fund now amounts to £369,200, progressively advancing about £10,000 per day, and there can be little doubt that in a few days it will reach £400,000. Some o f the foreign powers have sent replies to communications addressed to them, stating that their gov ernments will in every way in their power lend their assistance to pro mote the interests of the Exhibition, and friendly assurances from most o f the ministers o f the other countries who are resident in London have also been received, but as yet the time has not been sufficient to obtain answers to the notifications forwarded by them to their respective coun tries. In those foreign countries from which answers have been received local commissioners will be appointed similar to those who were chosen previous to the Exhibition of 1851, who will superintend the arrange ments as to the mode o f transit and other regulations to be carried out in concurrence with their respective governments. As the 12tli o f Feb ruary is the first day for receiving goods, and the 31st of March the latest period at which they will be received, it is necessary that the commis sioners should be appointed wdthout much delay, as no article will be admitted from any foreign country without the sanction o f such commis sioners, and through whom all communications o f her Majesty’ s Commis sioners will take place. The portion o f the building devoted to archi tecture, paintings in oil and water-colors and drawings, sculpture, etch ings and the fine arts generally, is required by the contract to be roofed in by October, and the entire building to be finished and put into the possession o f the commissioners by the end o f December. Already in the provinces plans are being organized to facilitate the visit o f persons to the Exhibition, and clubs for that purpose are contemplated, so that there is every reason to believe that the Exhibition o f 1862 will be equally well attended as that o f 1851. The Southern Harbors o f the United States. 17 T I I E S O U T H E R N H A R B O R S OF T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S . THE SOUTHERN ATLANTIC AND GULF COAST, FROM CAPE H ENRY TO THE MOUTH OF THE RIO GRANDE. BY AN OFFICER OF THE C. S. COAST SURVEY. I. A lbem arle a n d P a m plico Sound . II. B eau for t , N. C. III. W ilm ington , N. C. IY . G eorge to w n , S. C. Y. B ull ’ s B a y . V I. C harleston , S.C. V II. B eau fort , S.C. V III. S a v a n n a h , G a . IX . B r u n sw ick , G a . X . F e r n a n d in a , F l a . X I. St . J ohn ’ s, F l a . X II. St . A ugus t in e , F l a . X III. K ey W est , F l a . X IV . F ort J efferso n , F l a . X Y . T a m pa B a y . X V I. C e d a r K eys . X V II. St . M a r k ’ s, F l a . X V III. S t . G eorge ’ s Sound . X IX . P ensacola , F la . X X . M obile , A l a . X X I. M ouths of the M ississippi . X X II. G alv esto n , T e x a s . X X III. B razos R iv e r . X X IV . M a ta g o rd a B a y . X X V . B razos Sa n t ia g o . X X V I. M outh of the R io G r an de . X X V II. E spir itu S anto B a y . X X V III. S a n A ntonio B a y . X X IX . M ission B a y . X X X . H ines B a y . T h e important cities o f Virginia and Maryland have an access to the ocean only through the Chesapeake Bay, which, at its entrance from the shoals of Cape Charles to those o f Cape Henry, measures eight miles in width. A single man-of-war could close the bay against the exit or en trance of the merchant marine, provided there was no naval armament to act against it. It is probable that one of our larger vessels, with the aid o f a small war-sloop like the P e r r y , could close the bay against all com merce, especially while Fort Monroe, which is not far from the entrance, remains in the possession o f the United States government. N C a r o l in a . orth I. Albemarle and Pamplico Sound.— After passing Cape Henry, for two hundred miles, low sand islands and shoals lie between the shore and ocean, forming the Currituck, Albemarle, Pamplico and Core Sounds, navigable for vessels of light draft. The Dismal Swamp Canal connects the Chesapeake with these sounds ; the first practicable ocean inlet is one hundred and thirty-five miles from Cape Henry, a narrow and difficult entrance, known as Hatteras Inlet, with only seven feet water on the bar. A single vessel of light draft wrould be sufficient for the closing o f this channel. Eighteen miles southwest o f it is Ocracoke Inlet, o f the same character; both open into Pamplico Sound. Ocracoke Bar gives ten feet at mean low water. The only opening into Albemarle Sound is by a shallow, winding chan nel through Oregon Inlet, about forty miles north o f Cape Hatteras. The depth of water at the bar o f the inlet is probably about five feet. II. Beaufort.— Following the coast southward for fifty-five miles below' Ocracoke Inlet there are no connections with the interior sounds until the old Topsail Inlet is reached, which leads to the harbor o f Beau fort, North Carolina. This harbor is about eight and a half miles westnorthwmst from Cape Lookout. It is a fine haven, having full fifteen feet o f water on the bar at the entrance o f the channel, at low tide, or eighteen at high water. The town o f Beaufort is commercially impor tant, having a rail-road connection with Raleigh, and at that point with the v o l . x l v .— n o . 1. 2 18 The Southern Harbors o f the United States. various roads of the North and West. The entrance is defended by Fort Macon, a work o f the same class as Fort Carroll. There are several inlets for vessels drawing six and seven feet o f water to the interior sounds, viz.: Bogue Inlet, with eight feet on the ba r; New Topsail Inlet, with ten feet on the bar, and Deep Inlet, with seven feet on the bar, all o f which are unimportant, as they lead to no ports o f entry or rail-road towns. A vessel stationed at the entrance to Beaufort, by look ing down the coast occasionally, could effectually guard these minor straits. It is proper to state that in giving the depth o f water, when the extreme highest figure is used, it indicates the depth only at a special point. The average depth will be found nearer the lower figure employed. W ith this explanation, we proceed to III. Wilmington.-— The next harbor o f importance is that o f W il mington, North Carolina, on Cape Fear River. This port has a single channel with two inlets, fifteen miles in length, rather tortuous and narrow in places, with a depth o f seven and a half feet to eight on the bars in low water, which could be easily blockaded by two vessels. Wilmington is connected by rail-road with the interior, and is thus important as a commercial entrepot. Near the mouth of Cape Fear River are Forts Johnson and Caswell, recently seized hy the seces sionists. Fort Johnson is rather a collection of barracks, with a block house, than a fort. Fort Caswell is a third-class work. S outh C a r o l in a . IV. Georgetown.— The next accessible harbor is that of Georgetown, South Carolina, seventy-two miles southwest from Cape Fear, having a single winding channel, ten miles in length, running among shoals. The depth of channel varies from seven feet to thirty. The Pedee River con nects Georgetown with the interior, being, navigable as far as Con wayboro, by brigs. The blockade o f the entrance to this harbor would be easy. Further down the coast empties the Santee River, whose mouth is obstructed by shoals, on which the depth o f water is only from two to two and a quarter feet. V . Bull's Bay.— This is a good harbor o f refuge from southeast winds, and very accessible. Tire depth on the bar at mean low water is thirteen feet, and the anchorage is good in twenty-one feet, inside. Capers’ and Dewees’ Inlets, below Bull’s Bay, admit vessels drawing six feet water. VI. Charleston.— The harbor o f Charleston has six entrances, which, be ginning with the one furthest north, are in order: MafBtt’s, or the Sullivan’ s Island Channel, with eleven feet; the North Channel, with eight fe e t; the Swash, with nine feet; the Overall Channel, which is not now used ; the main Ship Channel, with eleven feet; and Lawford Channel, which gives eleven feet at mean low water. The entrance hy North Channel is extremely precarious to vessels drawing seven feet of water, and impassable at low tides to any other. Swash Channel varies in depth from seven to ten feet. Maffitt’s Channel is narrow at the bulkhead near Fort Moultrie jettee. The entrances to Charleston are such that a single vessel could easily blockade the harbor, without being molested from possible fortifi cations on shore. Charleston is connected with the interior by the Ashley and Cooper Rivers, and by two rail-roads that join the national net-work. The entrance to Charleston is perfectly protected by Forts Moultrie and Sumter, the latter on a shoal near the channel. There are The Southern Harbors o f the United States. 19 also military works on Morris Island and Cumming’s Point. The city, lying at the confluence o f two rivers and surrounded by low rice marshes, is difficult of approach. There is an approach through Elliott’s Cut, from Stone River. North Edisto River, between Charleston and St. Helena Sound, has nine feet of water on its bar at mean low tide. This and the Stono and South Edisto River entrances are good harbors of refuge from northeast winds for vessels of light draft. VII. Beaufort.— Following the coast downward, the next seaport of any importance is Beaufort, South Carolina. This place, situated on St. Helena Island, is accessible by two inlets, viz., the south channel of St. Helena Sound, in depth seventeen feet; the second inlet, of twenty feet, being the southeast channel of Port Royal entrance. Beaufort River has an average depth of sixteen feet at low water, to a point within two miles of the city, and nearly fifteen up to Beaufort. The entrance to this port is easier than that o f Charleston, but as there are no rail road or river communications with the interior, the importance o f the place as a port o f entry is limited. G e o r g ia . VIII. Savannah.— The city o f Savannah furnishes the next accessible harbor, to which there is a single entrance, with a depth o f water o f eleven feet at mean low water on the bar. A t high water, vessels drawingfifteen feet can reach the city, and those drawing eighteen feet, can anchor within two miles o f the city. Savannah is one o f the most important southern Atlantic cities, having connection with the interior both by lines o f railway and the Savannah River. The city is entirely surrounded by rice swamps; would be difficult of approach b y land, and the entrance by sea is effectually guarded by Fort Pulaski, on Cockspur Island, under whose guns all vessels have to pass in entering. Fort Jackson is three miles below the city. Wassaw, not far from Savannah, is reached by an intricate entrance, with ten feet o f water on the bar. The place has no connections nor importance, except its proximity to Savannah. Ossabaw Inlet, off the mouth o f the Ogeocliee River, has a depth of fourteen feet on the bar. St. Catharine’s Channel has eight and half feet on the bar, and is not more than two hundred yards wide. Sapelo Inlet has from eighteen to twenty feet o f water. These three channels lead to Sunbury and other insignificant places on the sounds, not connected by rail-road or navigable rivers with the interior. Darien, on the Altamaha River, has a single inlet, with thirteen feet on the bar, called D oboy Inlet. The place has no rail-road or other commercial connection with the inland towns. IX . Brunswick.— The entrance to the harbor o f Brunswick is by St. Simon’s Inlet and Sound, which has a depth o f seventeen feet at mean low water. The channel o f Turtle River, leading from St. Simon Sound, has twenty-one feet o f water up to the town. Brunswick has a rail-road partly finished, which is intended to connect it with the greatnational roads. A t present it could not be made an important port o f entry. F l o r id a . X. Fernandina.— The first important seaport after leaving Savannah is Fernandina, near the entrance o f St. Mary’s River, the boundary between 20 The Southern Harbors o f the United States. Georgia and Florida. The entrance is by a cbannel between Cumber land and Amelia Islands, with fourteen feet of water on tbe bar. Fernandina is connected by a railway, one hundred and thirty-five miles in length, running across the State, with Cedar Keys, on the Gulf of Mexico, and is thus an important commercial point. It was proposed to make this road part o f a great communication between New-York and NewOrleans. X I. St. John's River.— The St. John’s River is a broad arm o f the sea, extending almost parallel with the coast for a distance o f one hun dred and sixty miles, affected by the tide almost to its source. There is a depth of seven feet at mean low water on the bar. The channel up to Jacksonville affords about twenty-three feet of water. There is a great deal o f uncertainty in the navigation of most o f those inlets, as the bars are constantly shifting. Ossabaw and St. Simon’s, Georgia, have been tolerably constant in depth, and the channel o f Sapelo quite so, the changes being favorable in depth and position. A single vessel could effectually blockade the St. John’s River. On this river is Jacksonville, which is about twenty-seven miles from the bar at tbe entrance of the St. John’s. X II. St. Augustine.-—The last place o f any importance on the Atlan tic coast o f the Southern States is St. Augustine. The entrance to this harbor is by two inlets, with only five to six feet of water on the bar at low tide. The harbor is commanded by Fort Marion, an old Spanish work, which has been recently renovated. The commercial facilities of St. Augustine are limited, and the place is of small importance as a port of entry. Southward from St. Augustine there is a stretch o f seventy miles of shoal and sand-bar before another inlet opens a passage for ships of even the lightest draft. This inlet has less than five feet of water at low tide, eight in high water, and leads only to a few small fish ing towns. Indian River Inlet, one hundred and ten miles to the southward, has a channel of barely three feet water, leading to Fort Pierce and Fort Capron, established during the Indian wars. X III. — K ey West.— Key W est is a harbor on the island of that name at the southern extremity o f Florida. A well-constructed fort (Fort Taylor) guards the town and various entrances, which is in the hands of the United States government, rendered safe by recent reinforcements and supplies. It is o f great importance as a naval station and strategic point, being one o f the keys to the Gulf o f Mexico. X IY . Fort Jefferson.— W est of Key W est lie the Tortugas Islands, at the largest of which is Tortugas harbor, guarded by Fort Jefferson. This fortification, recently garrisoned and fully provisioned, may be considered safe for almost any contingency. The harbor is a valuable strategic point, as, together with Key West, it commands the entrances to the Gulf of Mexico. On the Gulf coast o f Florida, coasting northward, there are a few shallow and unimportant inlets leading to small fishing towns, surrounded by wilderness. The harbors thus opened up are valuable only as affording safe anchorage in a storm. Among these are Charlotte Harbor and Tampa Bay. Boca Grande is the proper entrance to Char The Southern Harbors o f the United States. 21 lotte harbor. The bar is five miles west o f the entrance, and has ten to twelve feet o f water. X V . Tampa Bay.— The south entrance of Tampa Bay has a depth o f nineteen feet, and the north entrance a depth o f seventeen feet at mean low water. X Y I. Cedar Keys.— The first port on the Gulf coast, o f commercial value, is Cedar Keys, situated ten miles south o f the debouchment of the Suwanee River. This is one o f the termini o f a rail-road which crosses Florida, connecting with roads north and west. The entrances to Cedar Keys harbor are narrow; the best has a depth of only eleven feet over the bar. The bar of the Suwanee River, ten miles above, has but five feet o f water. X V II. St. Mark's.— One hundred miles up the coast, after turning to the west, St. Mark’s is reached, a town commercially important on ac count of its connection by rail-road at Tallahassee, both with the northern and western interior. St. Mark’s harbor is connected with Appalachee Bay by a single narrow entrance, eight miles in length, with nine feet of water on the bar, but only seven up to Fort St. Mark’s. The blockade of St. Mark’s by a single vessel o f moderate size would be easy. X V III. St. George's Sound.— Fifty-five miles to the westward is Apa lachicola, a small town at the mouth of Apalachicola River, on the bay of the same name. This river admits vessels drawing six feet of water. Those vessels drawing seven and a half feet only can approach near the town. The entrances to the bay and harbor are such that a single vessel could blockade it, if such a blockade were considered necessary. As the town is cut off from the interior by long reaches o f dense swamp, through which a straggling post road is kept up, it will be considered of no importance. Next in value to Pensacola, as a capacious and safe harbor, is the Bay of St. Joseph. It is nearly land-locked, and has an anchorage depth of twenty-five to thirty-three feet, its entrance measuring seventeen feet of water on the bar. There is an unimportant fishing town called St. Joseph on this bay, and a tolerable road from it to Apalachicola. The Bay o f St. Andrew’s, the next harbor on the coast, though a shel ter for ships in bad weather, has only one small town upon its shores. Equally a wilderness is the country about St. Rosa Bay, which has a narrow entrance, with but six feet o f water on the bar. Connecting this bay with the Bay o f Pensacola, is St. Rosa Sound, navigable only for vessels drawing less than four feet of water. X IX . Pensacola.— One o f the most important points, in many respects, upon the Gulf, is Pensacola, the next approachable harbor to the West. Rail-roads connect it with Montgomery, the capital o f the State o f Ala bama, at which point it is connected with the great net-work o f national roads. The location near Pensacola of a United States navy yard adds to its importance. The Bay of Pensacola, on which the town lies, affords the finest harbor on the Gulf. The water on the bar at the entrance measures twenty-two fe e t; within the bay it is still deeper, but the depth is only twenty-one feet off the wharves of Pensacola. Santa Rosa Island, nearly forty miles in length, throws its western extremity across the mouth of the bay, leaving a single entrance one and a quarter miles wide. Near the extreme western end o f the island is Fort Pickens, so 22 The Southern Harbors o f the United States. situated that the entrance channel sweeps around it in a semi-circle; and vessels entering are exposed in turn to the fire from three sides of the fort, within a range o f less than a mile. Santa Rosa Island is scarcely a quarter o f a mile wide at its broadest portion, and so low that heavy seas sometimes break entirely across some parts o f it. Opposite Fort Pickens, on the main land, is Fort McRae, and a little to the south o f the latter is the water battery. The Warrington Navy Yard and Fort Barrancas lie on a point of the main land within the bay, about one and two-thirds miles from Pickens. Fort Pickens can alone maintain a blockade o f Pensacola, so long as it remains in the hands o f the United States government. A short distance west from Pensacola is Perdido Bay, with a bar on which lies hut four feet o f water. A labam a. XX. Mobile.— Forty miles west from Pensacola, on a bay of the same name, lies Mobile entrance, the second place o f entry on the Gulf after New-Orleans. Two rail-roads connect it with the great national routes. The Mobile River and its branches, the Tombigbee and Alabama, naviga ble for steamboats several hundred miles, also make important connec tions with the interior. The population o f Mobile is twenty-five thou sand ; its business wholly commercial. The entrance to the bay lies be tween Sand Island, on which the light-house stands, and a shoal making off from Mobile Point, a long narrow spit projecting from the main land, nearly fifteen miles in length. On the bar of the deepest channel the water lies twenty feet in depth. Fort Morgan guards the entrance, a fortification on Mobile Point, and all heavy draft vessels have to pass im mediately under its guns in entering the bay. This fort is in the hands of the secessionists. The vessels blockading this port will experience some difficulty in finding safe anchorage during heavy weather, as the fort will prevent their using the bay as a refuge. The pass between Petit Bois and Horn Island, having sixteen feet, is the nearest refuge from southeast or southwest gales. From Mobile Bay, westward, a line o f low sand islands lies parallel to the coast, forming Mississippi Sound, which is navigable for coasters drawing six feet o f water. Through this sound considerable trade is carried on with New-Orleans, by way of Bayou St. Jean and Lake Pontchartrain. The sound communicates with Mobile through a narrow chan nel o f five feet at low w’ater, called Grant’s Pass. There are several connections between Mississippi Sound and the Gulf, viz. : between Dauphine and Petit Bois Islands, between Petit Bois and Horn Islands, and be yond Horn Island. The coast communication between New-Orleans and Mobile could be cut oft' by a small cutter, cruising between Horn Island and Chandeleur Reef, a distance of thirteen miles, cutting off at the same time the communication o f New-Orleans with the Gulf, through Lake Pontchartrain. The latter body o f water is navigated by vessels drawing seven feet of water. Cat and Ship Islands have good harbors, the first at its northeast end and the last at the northwest end. Their channels afford, respectively, seventeen and nineteen feet. L o u is ia n a . X X I. Mouths o f the Mississippi.— There are three main passes to the Mississippi, the Northeast Pass, the Southeast Pass and the Southwest The Southern Harbors o f the United States. 23 Pass. These, at their widest divergence, are about twenty-two miles apart. The Southwest Pass has usually thirteen feet of water on the ba r; the depth varies considerably, so that vessels drawing but fourteen and a half feet sometimes lie weeks in the mud, before being able to pass over. The other passes arc - still more fickle and changeable, although admitting heavy draft vessels. The land at the entrance to the Missis sippi River is nothing but mud banks, continually increasing, with reeds and rushes growing upon it, at the height of ten or twelve feet above the water. From the bar to New-Orleans is one hundred and twenty miles. The various passes converge, forming the delta, about twelve miles from the Gulf. A t this point in the river two or three steamers could obstruct the navigation o f the river for any length of time, and against an enemy approaching from any direction, except by a similar marine from the sea. The city o f New-Orleans, wholly commercial, finds its only available access to the Gulf through the Mississippi. Below the city are two forts on either bank o f the river, in the hands of the secessionists, but not con sidered o f much protective value. New-Orleans has rail-road connections with the whole Union. A rail way line, partly finished, connects it with Houston and Galveston, Texas. A t the point where this road nearly approaches the Gulf is the only important harbor in Louisiana west of the Mississippi, Atchafalaya Bay, which has an entrance with but seven feet o f water on the bar. The mouth o f the Sabine River has from six to eight feet of water on the bar. The sounds and channels along the coast from the Mississippi to the Sabine are navigable for vessels o f three or four feet draft, and at certain seasons small steamers run for long distances up the various bayous that lead to the interior. There are no towns on the coast of any importance. T exas. X X II. Galveston.— The town o f Galveston is built upon the northern extremity o f Galveston Island. The entrance to the bay of the same name, which forms its harbor, lies between Point Oliver on the north and eastern extremity of Galveston Island on the south. It has a width of two miles, broken by shoals into four channels, which have a depth of from nine to twelve feet on the bar. The blockade o f this city would be easily effected by a single vessel. The same blockade cuts off Houston, whose communication with the Gulf is through Buffalo Bayou and Gal veston Bay. X X III. Brazos River.— This entrance is about fifty miles southwest of Galveston. A channel with eight feet leads to Quintana and Velasco, which lie on opposite sides o f the entrance, a mile and a half above the bar. X X IV . Matagorda Bay.—-Passing the shallow mouth o f the Brazos River, and a long stretch o f coast, the Pasa del Cavallo, a narrow entrance to Matagorda Bay, is reached. This inlet, something less than two miles ' wide, has a depth of nine feet o f water on the bar. On the Bay of Ma tagorda are the towns of Matagorda and Indianola, the former at the mouth of the Colorado River, the latter on the San Antonio. One hun dred and ninety miles o f coast are shut in by four long, narrow islands, viz., Matagorda, San Jose, Mustang and Padre Islands. Aranzas Pass, 24 The Southern Harbors o f the United States. between tlie first two, gives a narrow inlet for light draft vessels to the bay of the same name. The pass of Corpus Cliristi, between the second and third, has but four feet of water, leading up to a town of the same name. XXV. Brazos Santiago.— The pass of Brazos Santiago has a width o f about two miles, and seven feet o f -water on the bar. X X Y I. MOuth o f the B io Grande.— The Rio Grande, forming the line o f boundary with Mexico, has a shifting bar of from five to seven feet in depth. X X Y II. Espiritu Santo Bag is about fifteen miles long, northeast and southvVest, by about five miles in width. It communicates with the Gulf o f Mexico through two small bayous at the northeast end, and connects also with Matagorda Bay at Pass Cavallo. Through one o f the bayous ( M c H e n r y ' s ) the State authorities o f Texas have caused a channel to be opened affording a depth o f four and a half feet at average high water, and the digging o f a channel o f ten feet from the bayou into Pass Ca vallo, to form a harbor or dock for steamers and other sea-going vessels, has been undertaken by private enterprise. The town of Saluria is situ ated at the east end o f this bayou. Throughout the bay there is an average depth of seven feet, the bottom being generally soft mud and shells, except in one locality, known as the “ Middle Ground,” which is sand, and a portion of which is usually bare at low water. The shores are low and marshy on all sides. X X Y III. San Antonio B ay is of an irregular and somewhat triangular shape, the greatest length being, from north to south, about twenty miles, and the width ranging from four to eighteen miles. It has no direct communication with the Gulf o f Mexico, and is, therefore, but little affected by the Gulf tides. Frequently the water is made fresh by the discharge from the Guadalupe River, which enters at its northeast end, and it is almost always muddy. X X IX . Mission Bag is a small, shallow sheet o f water, cut off from the head of San Antonio Bay, on the east side, by the delta of the Gua dalupe River, and having not over eighteen inches of water into or through it. A small bayou, entering on its east side, drains Green Lake, which is a small sheet o f fresh water lying some miles further up the delta. X X X . Hines Bay, on the west side of the delta, is of the same cha racter, but is larger, being about three and a half miles in diameter and shaped like a liorse-slioe. It is also deeper than Mission Bay, affording about three feet of water to its head. On the north side is the swamp o f the delta, but on the south a prairie bluff twenty feet high bounds the shore, and here, within a space o f three miles, some twenty or thirty houses form what is called “ Crescent Village.” — In the August No. o f T h e M e r c h a n t s ’ M a g a z i n e a n d C o m R e v i e w we propose to publish a fu ll list o f all the harbors and rivers o f the United States— showing the least water in the channels o f the harbors, rivers and anchorages.on the coasts o f the United States, with the limits between which depths are given. From the Report o f the Superin tendent o f the United States Coast Survey. Revised, with additions and tidal data. N ote. m e r c ia l Marine Statistics o f the United States. MARINE STATISTICS OF T H E UNITED 25 STATES. F r o m carefully compiled tables o f marine disasters, the relative value of the risks between different ports may be correctly deduced. An analy sis at the end o f the year, showing the whole number o f voyages be tween any two ports, in connection with the disasters occurring on such voyages, would be the best criterion o f the value o f risks in that trade. So, again, the whole number o f disasters, taken in connection with the whole number o f vessels o f each class, would enable us to set a proper value on hull risks. There are also lucky and unlucky vessels, and it only needs a reference to the disasters o f the past few years to show an extraordinary recur rence of disasters to the same vessels and under the same masters. The mere tabulating and printing of these facts serve to impress them on the memory o f those to whom it is very important to recollect at all times such fortuitous chances. The bare recollection of a single name may be the means o f saving thousands. It is an axiom, that a perfect knowledge o f details is essential to the thorough working o f any theory, and we need not go out o f the annals o f marine insurance to forcibly illustrate this idea. One o f the most important public documents to the mercantile com munity, which are annually presented to the British Parliament, is the “ abstract o f the returns o f the wrecks and casualties which occur on and near the coast o f the United Kingdom.” A description o f its con tents will serve both to show the importance attached to this subject on the other side of the water, and will also be useful as a model for similar efforts for the collection of like data, which wo may hope will one day be made in our own country. The United States has already set a noble example to the world, in the munificent patronage it has afforded to the efforts of [the late] Commander M a u r y , at the extension of our know ledge of all that relates to the physical geography o f the sea. Ilis “ charts and sailing directions ” have been distributed with a lavish hand, and thousands o f sailors, guided by the information contained in them, have contributed in their turn intelligent observations, made in the navigable waters o f all parts o f the world, to swell the vast fund o f nauti cal knowledge already obtained. The importance o f this enterprise is universally admitted, but the necessity o f collecting, arranging and pre serving for future use a record o f facts about shipwrecks, is not so gene rally appreciated. The reasons for this indifference are easily understood; Mr. M a u r y ’ s observations have a practical value that is readily appre ciated, and while, with the aid o f the mercantile marine, they are gradu ally forming a great addition to our scientific knowledge, they also serve as a daily guide to the operations o f the navigator, while statistics of disasters at sea, though o f immense value (when made for a sufficient length o f time and collected by proper methods) in the regulation of insurance premiums, possess no particular interest for the community at large. It is true that the whole commercial world are interested in the fair distribution of insurance charges, but the excess o f one rate or the diminution of another, which a more exact system might cause, would 26 Marine Statistics o f the United States. affect mercantile transactions so slightly that business men, engrossed in their private concerns, can hardly be expected to feel much interest in dull collections o f facts and figures, which must he patiently tabulated for many years before they become o f practical importance. It is true that the great facts of science have only been arrived at by similar labo rious efforts; it is true, that year after year, and age after age, patient workers have accumulated, step by step, that vast fund of knowledge which is at the basis of our modern civilization ; and it is also true, that those who have done the world most service have been the worst re warded for their pains. W e do not always learn by experience, or we would not so readily condemn labors, the importance o f which cannot be appreciated in a hasty glance, nor dismiss as useless collections of marine statistics, because we cannot form exact conclusions from limited observations o f this k in d ; and because, if carelessly collected or arranged without method, they are not worth the paper they are printed on. In every branch o f science instances can be shown where apparently insig nificant and unimportant facts, collected together, form the basis from which we discover some o f the important laws o f nature, and these, in their turn, practically applied, add greatly to the comforts and happiness . o f life. When a sufficient number o f tables are collected about wrecks and accidents at sea, we will be able to discover the law which governs them, just as surely as the life-underwriter is now able to discover, from the facts in his possession, the law upon which the duration of human life depends, and we will then be able to make calculations about marine insurance just as exact as those which are now made about life risks. For the past two months the pages of this magazine have contained a series o f tables relating to casualties and wrecks which are well worth the attention of underwriters; they consist of an alphabetically arranged list of steamers, ships, barks, brigs and schooners, the masters’ names, when and where built and owned, the voyage on which the disaster occurred, its nature, locality and date, and the estimated amount o f loss on hulls and cargoes. These risks form the basis from which many im portant tables might be made, and, with the assistance of the published registers of ships made in this country, in England and France, and also o f the commercial documents of exports and imports published by the governments of the three countries, a mass o f information on the subject might be digested, the value o f which can easily be conceived. The undertaking, however, is an expensive one, and unless its importance can be made evident to undenvriters, and their sympathies and assistance secured, it cannot possibly be prosecuted. If the thing is undertaken at all, it should be done thoroughly. The basis o f the doctrine of chances is to ascertain how often a certain event occurs in a given number of trials. It is evident, then, that the losses themselves are of no impor tance, unless they are compared with the whole number o f ventures. If it could be proved by statistics, that year after year one ship was lost out of every sixty-seven that made a particular voyage, and supposing that they were all of equal value, it would be mathematically certain that one and one-half per cent, on the value o f each ship would make good the loss. But if we merely know that there are ten ships on an average lost in this trade, and five in that, we have only ascertained that one business is twice as dangerous as the other; but without knowing the number exposed to loss in either case, we could make no calculation as Marine Statistics o f the United States. 21 to the exact loss o f the one or the other. It is evident, then, that it is necessary to have a basis o f comparison in some trades, although it is unnecessary, and indeed it would be impossible to make the same series o f observations for every voyage that could be undertaken. A description o f the British Board of Trade report, alluded to in the beginning of this article, will, as we have said, show how important these statistics are considered in England, and may, perhaps, serve as an in centive to similar efforts on this side of the water. The prominent feature o f the work is a chart o f the British Islands, on which the spots where wrecks have occurred, and the nature of the various disasters, are designated by appropriate symbols, thus showing at a glance where the dangerous places are. Next in order is a detailed de scription o f the various tables made in the work, and a summary and commentary on their contents. This is followed by an article on the gales o f October and November, o f 1859, made by Rear-Admiral F i t z r o y . After this we have twenty-one tables o f wrecks and disasters, the contents of which may be summed up as follows : The first table contains the wrecks and casualties for five years, giving the number and tonnage o f vessels and the number o f hands employed. The second contains the same matter, distinguishing British from foreign ships, sailing ships from steamers, and coasters from over-sea. The third contains the same matter as the second, with the addition o f the numbers o f voyages made by all ships of each class, and the per centage o f losses as compared with the voyages. The fourth, wrecks and casualties, dis tinguishing the cargoes of the ships. The fifth, the same, distinguishing the ages o f the ships. The sixth, the safne, distinguishing the descrip tion and tonnage o f the ships. The seventh, the points o f the coast on which they happened. The eighth, according to the direction o f the wind. The ninth, according to the force o f the wind. The tenth and eleventh tables, according to the certificates held by the masters and ac cording to insurance respectively. The twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth, distinguishing the kind o f losses. The seven teenth, distinguishing collisions and noting the time and the state o f the weather when each collision happened. And finally, the remaining four tables contain the localities where the accidents happen, the number o f lives lost, and general summaries o f the preceding tables. This is followed by a description of the life-saving apparatus on the British coast, and the number of lives lost and saved. And finally, comes an inquiry into the causes o f the disaster. These investigations are only made where there is reason to doubt the capacity or trustworthiness of the master or mate, and upon their results it depends whether he is deprived of his certificate or not. This latter branch of the report is certainly a matter of practical rather than theoretical interest; and as so much depends upon the skill and intelligence o f masters o f ships, it is well that they should have an opportunity o f clearing themselves against unfounded suspicions before such a court o f inquiry, and it is also well, that when, by their ignorance or wickedness, they have sacrificed human life or valuable property, that they should, by the same agency, be held up to the scorn and contempt they deserve, and should also be deprived of the means o f committing the like crimes again. 28 Marine Statistics o f the United States. MARINE STATISTICS OF TIIE PAST TWO YEARS. M emoranda 1,067 Disasters reported in 1859. 828 to American vessels. 239 to foreign vessels. 444 vessels, or 41 per cent., total losses. for 1839. 400 vessels, or 38 per cent. “ 8 87 “ 8 “ 87 34 " 3 23 « 2 stranded. abandoned. fires. collisions. missing. Proportion o f Disasters to whole number o f Vessels. 1,830 American ships,................................. 1,290 “ barks,................................. 1,175 b rig s ,................................. 4,890 schooners,....................... 222 disasters, or 12 per cent. 104 “ 135 “ 12 139 266 * “ H “ 9,185 762 “ vessels,............................... 8J “ “ Total amount of estimated losses for 1859,.......... Of which were foreign, say one-quarter,............... • $ 37,626,070 9,406,517 Total amount of American losses,.................. • 8 28,219,553 .• . . . . $ 10,582,352 7,054,889 4,703,259 3,527,444 2,351,629 For New-York,.......................................................... Boston................................................................. Philadelphia,.................................................... New-Orleans,..................................................... Other places,................................................. ... tt tt tt ft 9-24 6-24 4-24 3-24 2-24 8 28,219,553 M emoranda for 1860. In 1860 there were 1,029 disasters of all kinds: 344 stranded,.. . 62 collisions,................... 99 abandoned, 74 fires,........................... 32 missing, . . . 120 bound from N. Y ...... 342 total losses,. 113 « to N. Y „ ........ 889 American vessels,. . . 190 foreign “ ... 6 per cent. 7 12 11 81 18 Proportion o f Disasters to whole number o f Vessels. 1,920 American ships,................................................ ft barks,............................. ................. 1,340 “ 1,225 b r ig s ,............................. ................. ft 4,950 schooners,..................... ................. 9,435 ft vessels,........................... ................. 210 disasters, or 11 per cent. If 12 “ 162 “ 10 “ 123 tt 6 “ 277 772 tt 8 Total amount o f estimated losses for 1860,............................................. Of which were foreign, say one-quarter,.................................................. 8 28,675,900 7,168,975 8 21,506,925 Total amount of American losses,, For N ew -Y ork,,.. Boston,.......... Philadelphia,. New-Orleans,, Other places,. “ say 9-24 6-24 ft 4-24 it 3-24 ft 2-24 .. .. .. .. .. § 8,065,097 5,376,732 3,584,488 2,688,365 1,792,243 8 21,506,925 e ANNUAL S T A T E M E N T S OF T I I E M A R I N E C O M P A N I E S OF N E W - Y O R K , E xpenses. R etu rn ‘ rem ium s. p $ 609,212 55 . Incld. in ex. 269,363 20 . $328,173 88 81,753 70 . 89,095 37 70,606 52 . . 44,457 34 99,023 18 . 56,4S9 52 t 47,188 56 . 52,137 52 112,502 39 . . 127,901 51 1 46,563 42 . . 53,242 08 124,193 68 . . 87,3S3 40 86,312 36 . . 45,308 57 71,345 59 . 13,206 96 46,058 23 . 5,328 93 dCC. In terest on in vestm ents, d e c . N et p rofits. $1,512,479 32 .. $ 79,991 35 .. * 7S7,273 70 2S3,157 73 141,5S6 43 247,6S1 41 114,260 63 loss 86,271 69 139,816 67 178,309 99 . 27,016 74 .. 144,455 34 61,362 11 .. 13,287 0 1 .. 6,548 4S .. 33,249 37 In t. on Scrip Stock. Interest scrip. d i r. and dividend . p e r ct. p r . ct. p e r cent. .. 6 . 35 cash, . .. 6 ..2 0 . 7@13 .. 6 . 25 . 6 . 7 . . 7 ® 4 cash, .. . 30 . .. 6 .. 6 . 12 . 7 .. 6 . 15 . 6 . 36 . 8)4 scrip, .. . 6 . IS * . . new, . 15 . . 7 ® 4 cash, .. . new, . 15 . 7 ® 3 cash, .. F isca l y ea r ends Dec. 31,1S60. Dec. 31,1860. Oct. 4 ,1S60. Dec. 31,1860. Dec. 31,1860. June30,lS60. Oct. 81,1860. June 30,1860. Dec. 31,1860. Feb. 28,1861. Dec. 31,1S60. Dec. 31, I860. $ 13,737,004 03 . $ 13,547,280 42 . $ 8,263,817 51 . $ 1,664,123 38 . . $ 902,725 13 .. $ 126,843 58 .. $ 3,643,632 75 ASSETS. R ea l Estate. Atlantic,................................................ ............... $ 200,000 00 .. Great Western,................................... Sun,....................................................... Mercantile,........................................... Pacific,.................................................. New-York,........................................... Columbian........................................... Commercial,......................................... U nion,.................................................. Orient,................................................. Neptune,............................................... Washington,........................................ Stocks, Bond 8, ike. $ 2,666,378 42 1,119.447 61 §281,018 29 339,504 10 2S1,150 00 250,500 00 363,300 00 § 438,786 17 453,575 00 410,321 50 83,000 00 60,500 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 891,811 42 .. $ 6,757,481 09 .. * Including reserve o f last year. t Expenses partially included in losses. Loans on Stocks, dec. $ 1,190,152 05 .. 406,350 00 .. 140,490 00 .. 197,623 01 .. 201,7S3 80 .. 395,S74 20 129,350 00 43,650 00 30,000 00 .. .. .. .. Cash. $106,154 67 169,777 IS 123,274 76 71,572 31 78,577 22 26,259 19 67,681 33 70,154 00 95,741 10 25,255 05 77,733 39 62,510 26 D ivid en d s Subscription P rem iu m N otes and Claims. Notes. B ills Rec., dec. Total Assets. . $ 105,190 12 . $ 2,378,416 S4 .. $ 6,646,292 10 8S,S04 41 . 1,620,261 19 .. 3,854,640 39 35,362 50 . 772,066 52 .. 1,761,222 07 . 77,OSS 21 . 512,368 55 .. 1,140,973 17 . 58,S5S 07 . 414,163 55 .. $ 35,878 87 .. 1,060,750 72 . 62,594 48 . 427,967 45 .. 1,036,416 34 . 82,833 77 . incl’ d in p’ m ,.. 709,S69 67 .. 1,228.684 77 . 89,S28 60 . 476,5S6 23 .. 1,025 355 06 . 179,881 81 . 454,825 95 .. 1,659,348 06 . 16,646 49 . T 600,000 00 .. 244,872 02 .. 1,426,445 00 26,6S0 66 . 86,575 32 .. 170,460 18 .. 4S3,099 55 . 96,019 09 .. . 26,2S9 14 . 275,31 S 49 $2,735,273 06 .. $ 974,690 46 . $ 744,458 26 . %Including bonds and mortgages. $ 721,95419 .. $ S,277,S77 24 .. $ 21,103,545 92 § Including loans on stocks, &c. ^ Stock capital notes. Marine Insurance Prem ium s Prem iu m s reLosses f o r ceived d u rin g earned du rin g the year. the year. the year. A tlantic,......... $4,602,725 77 . $4,541,133 5 9 . $ 2,419,443 72 . . Great Western, 2,171,291 SO . 2,418,110 84 . 1,827,192 49 . Sun,................ 1,316,113 39 . 1,221,692 65 . 767,635 85 Mercantile,.. . 789,377 S4 . 824,314 35 . 567,664 06 . Pacific,........... 815,579 32 . 816,304 69 . 413,110 58 . N e w -Y o rk ,... 806,202 54 . 799,053 50 . 5S5,466 74 . . Columbian,. . . 969,820 64 . . 779,99S 99 . 625,866 78 . Commercial,... 630,480 01 . 632,405 S3 . 392,7S3 66 . . Union,............ 549,915 10 . 5S7,193 60 . 197,306 53 . Orient,............ 500,416 76 . 517,342 21 . 26S.2S2 68 . Neptune,....... 392,775 25 . 267,560 14 . 134,932 49 . Washington,.. 192,305 61 . 142,170 03 . 64,031 93 . N am e of C o m pa n y . INSURANCE I n T a b u l a e F obm , fob t o e Y e a e 1S60. >1 a SI Jo to O 30 Marine Insurance Statistics. Statement showing the comparative loss on Vessels and Freight, and on Cargoes, during the year 1860. I. Loss ox V essels M on ths. J a n .,... Feb., . . March,. April, . May, . . June,. . July, . . A u g .,.. Sept.,.. O c t.,... N o v .,.. Dec., .. Steamers. $26,500 306,000 524,000 110,000 70,500 144,000 306,000 70,000 240,000 750,000 836,500 330,000 Total,.. $3,713,500 Ships. Barks. $38,000 342,300 696,000 242,000 61,000 19,000 1,013,000 15,000 140,000 150,000 613,000 50,000 F r e ig h t . $ 5,878,000 $2,029,950 Schooners. Brigs. j . . $ 677,000 . . $319,200 . . $95,000 . . 571,500 . . 272,000 . . 47,000 . . 552,000 . . 253,500 .. . 105,250 . . 379,000 . . 161,000 . . 57,500 . . 640,500 . . 105,500 . . 52,500 . . 288,000 . 98,700 . . 57,000 . . 225,000 . . 129,200 ,. . 38,100 . . 200,000 . . 133,000 ,. . 50,600 . . 553,000 . 58,100 .. 54,500 . . 666,000 . . 199,000 .. 71,600 . . 536,000 . . 190,500 . . 50,500 . . 590,000 . . 110,250 . . 62,200 II. Loss ox Jan.,... . Feb.,.. . March,. A pril,.. M ay,... June, .. J u ly ,... A u g.,. . Sept., .. O ct.,. . . N o v .,.. D e c .,... and $741,750 .. .. . .. .,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Total. $60,600 98,500 102,700 75,600 77,300 25,600 50,900 40,300 71,000 72,400 186,600 100,300 . . $1,178,300 . . 1,295,000 . . 1,537,450 . 783,100 . 946,300 613,300 . 749,200 . 493,900 . . 976,600 . . 1,759,000 . . 1,800,100 .. 1,192,750 $961,800 $ 13,325,000 Cargoes. . . $545,800 . . $867,500 . .$126,000 . . $73,600 . . $1,650,900 . . 420,000 . . 264,500 ... 11,600 . . 75,600 . . 1,114,000 . . 492,000 . . 386,000 . . 186,100 . . 134,400 . . 1,894,500 . . 720,000 . . 376,600 .,. 66,400 . 75,700 . . 1,480,700 .. 972,200 71,000 ., . 56,200 . . 83,100 . . 1,243,500 .. 542,000 . . 158,500 ,. . 43,500 . . 96,000 . 859,000 .. 241,000 . . 292,000 . . 105,000 ... 11,000 . . 1,662,000 . 91,000 . . 160,000 .,. 147,000 . . 49,400 . 462,400 .. 665,500 55,000 .. 66,000 ... 33,100 . 959,600 .. 687,000 . . 113,000 .. 35,000 .,. 28,000 . . 1,013,000 .,. 525,000 . . 187,500 .. 27,900 . . 63,500 . . 1,416,900 . . 1,076,500 76,300 ... 24,900 . . 72,800 . . 1,300,500 Cargoes, $ 3,379,300 $ 6,978,000 $ 3,007,900 Vessels, 3,713,500 5,878,000 2,029,950 $895,600 741,750 $796,200 961,800 $ 15,057,000 13,325,000 $7,092,800 $12,856,000 $5,037,850 $1,637,350 §51,758,000 $28,382,000 $ 309,000 .. $ 1,906,000 . . $419,500. .$146,600 . .$150,000 427,200 .. 1,137,500 . . 472,500. . 148,800 . . 217,700 169,500 .. 1,142,800 .. 548,200. . 340,300 . . 447,700 786,800 . . 347,900. . 196,800 . . 238,550 47,500 . . . . $2,931,100 . . 2,403,700 . . 2,648,500 . . 1,617,550 1861. Jan.,.. . F e b .,. . March,. A p ril,. 4 inos., 1861. Total,.. $ 953,200 $4,973,100 $1,788,100 $832,500 $1,053,950 $ 9,600,850 4 mos., 1860. Total,.. 2,284,800 4,357,300 2,900,300 694,850 696,700 10,933,950 1859. Cargoes, $5,939,500 Vessels, 5,322,000 $9,904,160 $2,438,100 1$ 1,312,800 950,400 7,252,252 2,097,800 $958,860 $ 20,553,420 1,080,300 16,702,752 Year 1859. Total,. .$ 11,261,500 $17,156,412 $4,535,900 $2,263,200 $2,039,160 $37,256,172 Statistics o f Population , dtc. 31 S T A T I S T I C S OF P O P U L A T I O N , &c. AGGREGATE POPULATION OF THE STATE AND CITY OF N EW -YORK, From 1790 to 1860, with the increase every five years, and per centage o f increase fo r each period. St a t e of N e w - Y ork . Year. P op ula tion . 1790........ . . 340,120 .. 1 8 0 0 ,.... 1 8 1 0 ,.... 1 8 1 4 ,.... 1 8 2 0 ,.... 588,603 .., 1825........ 1 8 3 0 ,.... 1 8 3 5 ,.... 1 8 4 0 ,.... 1 8 4 5 ,.... 1 8 5 0 ,.... .. .. 961,888 ... . . 1,035,910 . . . . 1,372,812 . . .. .. .. .. .. 1,614,456 1,913,131 2,174,517 2,428,921 2,604,495 ... .,. .. .. .. 1 8 5 5 ,.... . . 3,466,212 ... I 8 6 0 ,.... . . 3,887,542 . . Increase. C it y of N e w - Y ork . P e r centage P op u la tion . Increase. P er centage o f increase. o f increase. 3 3 ,1 3 1 ........................ 248,483 373,285 74,022 336,902 .. .. .. .. 73.05 63.42 7.69 32.52 241,644 298,675 261,386 254,404 175,574 492,899 368,818 421,330 .. .. .. 17.60 .. 18.50 . . 13.66 . . .. 11.70 7.22 18.92 11.91 12.15 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 60,489 . . 27,358.. . 96,373 . . 35,884 . . 9 5 ,5 1 9 ......................... 123,706 . . 28,187 . . 166,086 . . 42,380 . . 197,112 . . 31,026 . . 270,089 . . 72,977 . . 312,710 . . 42,621 . . 371,223 . . 58,513 . . 515,547 . . 629,904 . . 813,668 . . 144,324 . . 114,357 . . 183,964 .. 82.57 59.32 29.51 34,26 18.68 37.02 15,78 18.71 38.87 22.18 29.17 THE POPULATION OF THE CITY OF NEW -YORK. . . W hite. Colored. Ward I .,........... 17,260 .. 113 .. I I .,........... 2,442 .. 65 .. III. , 3,733 .. 24 .. 69 .. IV . , ........... 21,925 .. V . . . . . . . . . 20,934 .. 1,502 .. V I .,........... 26,372 .. 824 .. V I I .,........... 39,841 .. 141 .. V I I I .,........... 36,640 .. 2,766 .. I X .,........... 43,961 .. 424 .. X .,........... 28,808 .. 196 .. X I .,........... 59,346 .. 224 .. X I I .,........... 26,695 .. 263 .. X III. . 33,410 .. 307 .. X IV . , ........... 27,001 ' . . 1,079 .. X V .,........... 26,821 .. 764 .. X V I . . . . . . . . . 44,56S .. 609 .. Total. 17,271 2,507 3,757 21,994 22,336 26,696 39,982 39,409 44,385 29,004 59,570 27,958 32,917 28,0S0 27,585 45,177 Ward X V I I .. ... . X V I I I ... ... X I X .. ... . X X ...... X X I ...... X X I I ... ... W hite. 72,650 57,070 27,607 66,109 48,651 61,587 Colored. .. 303 .. .. 392 .. .. 557 .. .. 1,410 .. .. 366 .. .. 138 .. Total. 72,953 57,462 28,254 67,519 49,017 61,725 Total,......... 793,521 .. 12,136 .. 805,657 Blackwell’ s Island, 4,512 .. 69 .. 4,581 Ward’ s “ 772 772 4 Bedloe’ s “ 4 ........................ Ellis’ “ 5 ........................ 5 Governor’ s “ 696 696 Randall’ s “ 1,922 .. 21 .. 1,953 T otal,......... 801,422 ..12,226 OFFICIAL CENSUS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS FOR 818,668 1860. W c have received from Mr. K e n n e d y , the Superintendent of the Census Bureau at Washington City, the following complete official returns of the recent census of Illinois. The results it presents are truly astonishing to all who have not been familiar with the vast and rapid increase of population in the Prairie State, which now stands fourth in the list, having outstripped, in the last decade, seven o f her sister States, viz., Massachu- 32 Statistics o f Population, d'C. setts, Indiana, Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Ken tucky, each of which exceeded her population in 1850. There are now seventeen counties, each containing a population of over 25,000. Counties. Adams,____ Alexander,., B o n d ,....... B oon e,....... Brown,....... B ureau,___ Calhoun,... . Carroll,........ Cass,............ Champaign,. Christian,... Clark,.......... Clay,............ C linton,___ C oles,......... ♦Cook,......... Crawford,... Cumberland, De K alb,.. B e W itt,... Douglas,... Du Page,.. Edgar,....... Edwards,.. Effingham,. Fayette,.... F o rd ,........ Franklin,.. Fulton,___ Gallatin,.... Greene,.. . . Grundy,— Hamilton, . H ancock,.. Hardin,___ Henry, . .. Henderson, Iroquois, .. Jackson,.... J asper,...... Jefferson,.. Jersey,........ Jo Daviess,. Johnson, ... K a n e,......... Kankakee,.. Kendall,.. . . Knox,.......... Lake,........... La Salle,___ Lawrence,.. L ee,............. Livingston,. Logan, . . . . Pop. Counties. . 41,323 Macon,.......... . 4,706 Macoupin,. . . . 3,813 Madison,___ . 11,678 Marion,......... . 9,938 Marshall,___ . 26,426 Mason,.......... . 5,145 Massac,......... . 11,733 McDonough,., . 11,325 McHenry, . . . . 14,688 McLean,........ . 10,493 Menard,....... . 14,987 Mercer,......... . 9,386 M onroe,....... . 10,941 Montgomery,. . 14,201 Morgan,....... .144,957 Moultrie,...... , 11,551 Ogle,.............. , 8,311 Peoria,.......... . 19,0S6 Perry,............ 19,819 Piatt,............. , 7,140 Pike,............. 14,701 Pope,............. 16,925 Pulaski,........ 5,454 Putnam,........ 7,816 Randolph,.... 11,1S9 Richland, . . . 1,979 Rock Island,. 9,393 Saline,........... a3,299 Sangamon,... 8,054 Schuyler,___ 16,093 Scott,............. 10,379 Shelby,......... 9,915 Stark,........... 29,061 St. C lair,___ 3,748 Stephenson,.. 20,658 Tazewell,-----9,501 U n ion ,......... 12,354 V erm illion,.. 9,586 Wabash, 8,372 W arren,....... 12,965 Washington, 12,053 Wayne,....... . 27,276 White,......... 9,347 Whiteside,....... 30,058 W ill,................. 15,416 Williamson, . . . 13,074 Winnebago, .. . 2S,663 W oodford,....... IS,256 Total 1S60, 48,322 “ 1850, 9,274 17,651 “ 1840, “ 1S30,, 11,638 14,276 * City o f Chicago, 109,2G3 population. Pop. . . . . . , . , 13,785 24,602 31,215 12,733 13,477 10,933 6,214 20,069 22,088 , 28,749 9,596 15,042 12,832 13,892 22,118 6,385 22,887 36,600 9,552 6,129 27,249 6,742 3,950 5,587 17.205 9,711 21,005 9,331 32,255 14,685 9,070 14,635 9,004 37,694 25,113 21,471 11,182 19,801 7,312 18,339 13,731 12,223 12,403 18,746 29,321 12.205 24,492 13,282 .1,711,738 . 851,470 . 476,143 157,445 The Saving Banks o f New-York. THE SAVINGS BANKS 33 OF N E W - Y O R K . I n New-York city alone there are twenty-one o f these institutions, with aggregate savings of $48,988,000. In Brooklyn, three, with deposits amounting to nearly seven millions. The following table represents the condition of each on 1st January, 1857 to 1861. Three of these institu tions were established in the year 1860, and have but a limited business as y e t : C omparative vie w of tiie S avings B anks on the of tiie City and S tate of N e w -Y ork , 1st January, 1857— 1861. J anuary , 1861. JMU. VJ U Q - Nexo-Yorh City. Jan., 1857. Jan., 1858. Jan., 1859. Jan., 1860. D eposits, p ositors. Bank for Savings,........... $ 8,317,820 $ 8,350,546 $ 8,701,923 $ 9,544,479 $ 10,062,616 .. 52,480 Seamen’ s Bank,.............. 7,179,354 . . 6,765,258 . 7,849,474 . 8,188,715 . . 8,922,634 . 27,292 Bowery Savings,............. 6,645,566 . 6,697,393 . 7,818,143 . 9,573,400 . 10,294,995 . 44,003 Greenwich Savings,....... 3,127,898 . . 3,356,111 . 3,528,851 . . 3,786,125 . 3,898,339 . 18,076 Manhattan Savings,....... 1,394,739 . . 1,373,025 . 1,782,067 . 2,278,609 . . 2,794,984 . 11,346 Emigrant Industrial,___ 1,302,790 . . 1,348,730 . 1,628,754 . . 2,120,505 . 2,563,475 . 10,169 Merchants’ Clerks,......... 1,145,923 . . 1,191,150. 1,505,889 . . 1,826,776 . 2,103,285 . 8,079 Dry Dock Savings,......... 896,360 933,543 . . 1,118,876 . . 1,527,572 . 1,976,064 . 7,121 East River Savings,....... 559,140 626,367 . 785,782 979,451 . 1,161,234 . 5,235 Broadway Savings,......... 662,446 722,830 &41,346 973,478 . 1,102,794 . 4,063 Irving Savings,.............. 500,000 719,498 5S8,627 894,898 . 1,0S6,547 . 4,470 Mariners’ Savings,......... 244,906 288,402 419,689 598,794 768,805 . 3,268 Sixpenny Savings,......... 81,158 85,922 112,361 146,294 176,322 . 8,764 Rose Ilill Savings,......... 20,836 35,306 71,854 105,527 119,019 . 555 Bloomingdale Savings,.. 2,274 668 56,300 125,062 1,005 35 Mechanics and Traders’ , . 310,645 361,612 311,688 438,473 532,933 . 2,738 German Savings,............. 239,912 . 759,367 . 4,669 Union D im e,.................... 62,013 254,244 . 3,016 Atlantic Savings,............. 80,374 610 Citizens’ Savings,........... 27,767 467 Third Avenue Savings,.. 302,073 . 1,508 New-Y ork City,.............. $ 32,452,242 $ 32,615,182 $ 36,806,420 $ 43,410,0S3 $ 48,9SS,826 217,964 Brooklyn Savings Bank,. 2,160,865 . 2,194,553 . 2,660,981 . 3,222,726 .. 3,6S1,339 . 15,479 Williamsburgh Savings,. 662,281 . 769,013 . 1,086,882 . 1,569,551 . 1,905,761 . . 10,423 South Brooklyn Savings, 322,589 346,635 522,350 Brooklyn D im e,............... New-York and Brooklyn,! 35,597,977 Interior towns,................ $ 35,925,383 6,101,525 . 928,953 . 5,484 79,954 . 275,693 . 6,135 $ 41,076,633 $ 49,034,133 $ 55,780,572 5,497,239 . Total State of New-York, $ 41,699,502 $ 41,422,672 751,819 . 7,118,214 . 9,144,027 .. 11,669,825 255,485 55,208 $ 48,194,847 $ 58,178,160 $ 67,450,397 310,693 Since 1st Jauuary, 1860, the number o f savings bank depositors have increased from 196,979 to 217,964 in the city o f New-York alone. VOL. X L V .---- NO. I. 3 34 The Savings Banks o f New- York. S a v in g s D e p o s it s of I n t e r io r C it ie s and T ow n s. 1st J anuary , 1861. Am ount. No. o f Depo8. Am ount 1st Jan., 1860. Albany Savings Bank,................. $ 1,346,998 . . 5,405 . $ 1,164,332 188,282 229,833 . . 798 . City Savings Institution,............. 44,947 56,019 . . 181 . Exchange Savings Bank,............. 338,978 547,505 . . 1,578 . Mechanics and Farmers’ Savings, 14,128 14,752 . . 1,016 . Sixpenny Savings Bank,............. 30,363 Union Savings Bank,................... 44,257 . . 187 . 119,408 166,189 . . 980 . A u b u rn ,......... Auburn Savings Institution,.. . . 2,340 50 . 3,179 . B ro ck p o rt,. . . Brockport Savings B a n k ,........... 988,325 1,177,880 . . 7,238 . B u ffa lo ,......... Buffalo Savings B ank,................. (C 17,786 19,021 . . 182 . Emigrant Savings Bank,............. 641,503 826,251 . . 5,546 . Erie County Savings Bank,......... 85,072 130,760 . . 552 . Western Savings Bank,............... 61,120 78,951 . . 456 . C o h o e s ,......... Cohoes Savings Institution,......... 275,164 312,959 . . 1,074 . S chenectady,. Schenectady Savings Bank, . . . . 3,002 3,580 . . 27 . E lm ira,........... Elmira Savings B ank,................. 36,841 51,223 . . 280 . F ish k ill,......... Fishkill Savings Institution,. . . . 7,898 20,796 . . 482 . Flushing,....... Queens County Savings Bank,. . 66,139 83,686 . . 533 . Hudson,.......... Hudson City Savings Institution, 112,624 177,722 . . 612 . K in g ston ,. . . . Ulster County Savings Institut’n, 1,768 35 . 4,692 . L o ck p o rt,. . . . Niagara County Savings Bank, . 178,335 240,328 . . 1,576 . N ew bu rg h ,.. . Newburgh Savings Bank,........... 10,974 26,389 . . 246 . O sw e g o ,......... Oswego City Savings Bank, . . . . 10,727 21,236 . . 215 . P eekskill,. . . . Peekskill Savings Bank,............... 319,180 407,965 . . 2,372 . Poughkeepsie, Poughkeepsie Savings Bank,. . . . 489,980 . 366,747 . 1,571 . R och ester,. . . Monroe County Savings Institut., 2,166,689 . . 7,272 . . 1,664,443 Rochester Savings Bank,............. 39,554 . 298 . Rome Savings B a n k ,.................. 58,901 . R o m e ,............. 50,198 Sing S in g ,. . . Sing Sing Savings Bank,............. 53,496 . . 302 . 22,241 S outhold,. . . . Southold Savings Bank,............... 37,296 . . 265 . 316,956 426,428 . . 2,101 . Syracu se,. . . . Syracuse Savings Institution,. .. a 186,199 Onondaga County Savings Bank, 282,782 . . 1,616 . 148,905 196,751 . . 816 . T arrytow n, . . Westchester County Savings Bk., 46,020 T r o y ,............. Central Savings Bank,................. 40,361 . . 215 . tt 112,586 Commercial Savings Bank,......... 169,949 . . 810 . Manufacturers’ Savings Bank, . . 129,569 . . 564 . 110,697 Mutual Savings B ank,................. 42,958 48,882 . . 231 . State Savings Bank,..................... 95,449 . . 500 . 78,927 729,024 T roy Savings Bank,..................... 804,032 . . 3,083 . 20,452 U tica ,............. Central City Savings Institution, 19,711 . . 124 . ft Savings Bank,............................... 534,191 . . 2,812 . 412,079 failed. . 8,933 W atertow n,. . Jefferson County Savings Bank,. 67,872 Yonkers Savings Bank,............... 82,115 . 645 . Yonkers, Chenango County Savings Bank, 10,540 . 29 . N orw ich, Corning........... Corning Savings B a n k ,............... 23 . 471 . 7,288 . . 85 . R hin ebeck,. . . Rhinebeck Savings B ank,........... P ierm ont,__ _ Rockland County Savings Bank,. 54 . 23 . . .... Sag H a rb o r,.. Sag Harbor Savings Bank,......... 12,719 . 202 . Albany, (( Totals, 1860— 1861, .$ 11,669,826 58,208 $9,144,021 N ew -York Leather Market. NEW-YORK 35 L E A T H E R M A R K E T FOR 1 8 60. From, the Shoe and Leather Reporter. T he year 1860 will be long remembered by all who derive their income from the various branches of trade connected with the tanner’s art as one o f peculiar hardship. Those o f the leather merchants who have a direct interest in the merchandise in which they deal, have been compelled to submit to loss upon a large portion of the stock which has passed through their hands, while the industrious and hardy tanners have, many o f them, notwithstanding the most strenuous efforts, been obliged to witness the fruits of former and more prosperous seasons disappear as dew before the rising sun. They have been borne along by a current of circumstances, over which they could exercise no control, until ruin may be read in the fate of some whose industry, energy and perseverance should entitle them to a better fortune. The heavy demand for boots and shoes which prevailed for all sections o f the country, through the latter portion of the year 1858, and early the following year, stimulated the manufacturing interest to such an extent, that during the first half of the year 1859, an immense increase in the production called for large additional supplies of leather, which tanners and dealers were, at that time, poorly prepared to supply. In conse quence, stock was hurried in from the tanneries, often badly tanned and worse finished, to supply the pressing demand at high and advancing figures. This elated the tanners, who rushed in the raw material to the fullest capacity of their yards, at the high prices which then prevailed. About the middle o f the year 1859 it became apparent that the increase in manufacturing had far surpassed the requirements of the country, and an immense overstock o f boots and shoes began to burden the market, while manufacturers, many o f them unable to carry their stocks o f madeup goods, soon commenced to curtail operations, thus causing a great decline in the demand for leather, which was now being turned out from the tanneries in increased amounts, and transferring the over-supply from the boot and shoe to the leather trade. Against this over-production, those engaged in the manufacture and sale of leather have had to struggle during the past year, while, as a na tural sequence, prices have declined and business become unhealthy and unsatisfactory. These circumstances have been greatly aggravated by the stubbornness which has characterized the market for hides, both green and dry, during almost the entire year, rendering it almost impos sible for tanners to replace the stock on the market from fresh purchases of hides, without considerable loss at the prices at which they had been forced to sell. A further obstacle against which the trade in this country have been obliged to contend, has been the unhealthy condition o f the hide and leather business in Great Britain, and, to some extent, on the Continent o f Europe. The immense interest which had become centered in these lines through England and Ireland, as is manifest by the great failures of the past summer, had for some time held the prices both o f the raw ma 36 New- York Leather Market. terial and the manufactured article quite above their relative value as compared with other kinds of merchandise, and quite too high for healthy action under the natural law of demand and supply, thus exer cising a great influence on the same branches of trade in this country. Notwithstanding the unsatisfactory condition of the market through the entire year, there has been less speculation in leather, and less varia tion in prices for hemlock sole than for many years before. Buenos Ayres, middle weights, keeping within the range of 21 @ 22-J- cents, and Orinoco, do., of 19 @ 21 cents, through the entire period. Oak sole has also partaken o f the same steadfast characteristics, and shows a variation but a trifle larger than that o f hemlock; while upper leather, particularly heavy finished of hemlock tannage, has passed through several long terms of general neglect, and ranged from 16 to 20 cents per foot. Shortly previous to the commencement o f the present year rather an active demand, partly speculative, was excited for hemlock sole, and prices slightly advanced. This, however, subsided early in January, and a slight reaction was experienced before the close of the month. February passed with a very limited inquiry from the Eastern trade and slight improvement in the market, with fair receipts from tanneries and some accumulation in the stock. Early in March, New-England manufacturers began to visit this market and purchase with some free dom, although in small amounts as compared with former years; still the demand from all sources exceeded the receipts from tanneries, somewhat reducing the heavy supply, with an improvement of about half a cent per pound, and a more cheerful feeling. Before the first o f May the market again became dull and receipts more liberal, causing stock once more to accumulate. Oak sole, meantime, enjoyed a more steady though not active demand, both from the city and country trade. The sales in both oak and hemlock now became light and con fined principally to Eastern customers, and so continued until near August, when Southern merchants began to make their appearance and add their demands to the existing trade. Prices, during this period, were not generally firm, but yielding according to the estimate put upon the paper offered by the purchasers. The month o f August passed under a very limited inquiry, and most of September had ex pired before much activity was visible— hemlock sole still continuing in large supply— much of it held back at the tanneries for want o f a suitable market. Prices, before the close o f the month, under a more animated request from the New-England States, as well as from other sections of the country, and an advancing market for the raw material, realized a slight improvement. Sales, however, were not heavy. Manufacturers, willing to profit by the experience of the previous year, bought only to supply their immediate requirements, leaving tanners and dealers to carry the surplus stock. Trade, in October, during an exciting presidential canvass, which usually interferes to some extent with business affairs, remained dull and unsatisfactory. As soon as the result of the November election was known, and the political agitations increased, the call for leather rapidly subsided, and the market has since shown little indication of a speedy recovery. The stock of hemlock leather (the distinctive feature of this market) now on hand, and in process o f manufacture at the tanneries, is some what less than at the commencement of the year. A smaller quantity Leather Trade. 37 o f the raw material has o f course been put into the vats than during the period of infatuation in 1859; but the future appears little less gloomy than in January last. I m ports and E xports of L eather I N at ew -Y o rk for the Y ear 1860. m ports. 6,826 packages, valued at $2,271,828. E xports. Destination. Quantity. 9,778 sides, 3,450 rolls, 699 sides, L iv erp ool,.................. -j 4,014 rolls, ; 1,021 bales, 163 bdls., L o n d o n ,..................... -j Brit. N. A. C ol.,........ -j G la sgow ,.................... -j G alw ay,........................ H a v r e ,.......................... A n tw erp,...................... Value. ) j ) V ) $ 50,950 211,434 \ 5,506 ) f ? S ) 5,989 4,010 5,250 3,030 109,422 25,171 4,745 J ) J | j ) j 1 f ) V j 1,9S3 2,066 840 Value. Quantity. Hayti,........................ 370 sides, ) 83 rolls, j" 96 rolls, 11 cases, 491 sides, [ 23,863 sides, H a m b u r g ,..................[ 3.543 rolls, \ 5,19S sides, B r e m e n ,..................... L 55 rolls, | S 5p kgs., Australia,.................... [ 17 cases, i 100 sides, Canary Islands,........ j i 43 rolls, ( 25 rolls, C hina,.......................... ■| 11 cases, [ 10 rolls, 2 cases, 1[ 3 p k g s ., N ew -G renada,.......... - I 9 cases, [ 1,250 sides, 99 rolls, British G uiana,........ ( 10 cases, Destination. Brazil,........................... Argentine Republic,..,. Cisalpine Republic,... . Chili,........................... Peru,.......................... [ Cuba,......................... j i Porto R ico,...............-j I[ Dutch West Indies,.. -< [ 1[ Danish West Indies,. ■< [ ( British West Indies,. ( British Honduras, .. ■!1 | Mexico,..... ................. 5 cases, 5 cases, 4 cases, 4 cases, 3 cases, 8 rolls, 1 case, 75 rolls, 111 cases, 14 pkgs., 3 cases, 409 sides, 31 rolls, 8 cases, 99 sides, 79 rolls. 11 cases, S7 sides, 2 rolls, 6 cases, 60 pkgs., 52 rolls, 6 cases, 1,4S0 $705 485 750 1,070 500 ) j ) ) ) j ) V ) ) V i ) V J I ) 343 15,639 484 2,786 4,064 880 1,S24 1,315 $ 469,708 6,984 Total—42,254 sides; 10,665 rolls ; 1,021 bales; 230 cases; 163bundles; 112 packages. Importations o f Boots and Shoes; Japanned Leather; Skins tanned and dressed; Skivers ; Bend, Sole and Upper Leather, at the leading Ports o f the United States, fo r the fiscal year ending June 30 th, 1860. P or ts. N e w -Y o r k ,........................... Ph iladelphia,........................ $ 40,833 53,SIS 359 N ew -O rleans,...................... San F ran cisco,...................... 10,249 27,722 $ 132,940 4,923 413 843 9,806 65 Total, six ports,............ Total, all other ports,.. $ 133,067 1,409 $ 14S,990 218 Total, U nited S tates,.. $ 134,476 86 Skins Tunned. Japanned Leather. Boots and Shoes. . $ 149,208 .. $ 927,495 40,695 4,558 327 140,772 3,246 . Skivers. Sole & Upper Leather. $ 157,862 .. . . . $1,333,562 120,378 17 178 $1,117,093 3,388 $ 157,862 $ 1,454,185 552 $ 1,120,481 $ 157,862 $ 1,454,6ST IMPORTS OF H I D E S A T T H E P O R T OF N E W - Y O R K FOR THE YE AR I 8 6 0. Compiled from the Weekly Official Tables of the Shoe and Leather Reporter. F o r e ig n . Porte-au-Platte,.......................... R io G ra n de,.................... R io H a ch e,.................................. Savanilla,........................ Sierra L eon e,.................... Singapore and P en a n g,.......... W est India, & c.,........................ Sundry South Am erican,.......... “ Central A m erican ,___ F rom Antw erp,.......................... “ H am burg,....................... “ H a vre,.............................. “ L iverpool......................... “ L on don,.......................... “ Marseilles,........................ Sundry foreign ,.......................... Total foreign, 1860,............... Jan. Feb. M arch . 11,460 17,249 130 6,050 25,502 7,188 110 3,164 650 17,035 23 486 826 11,404 3,180 9,425 1,326 3,303 300 6,012 210 3,408 5,142 541 11,151 8,400 3,589 2,629 283 10,192 433 8,513 1,578 2,280 77 1,000 87,211 91,443 A p ril. M ay. June. 7,922 2,2S0 5,975 714 4,328 1,542 14,034 1,221 6,080 3,013 4,394 8,200 55 4,157 803 2,758 5 /3 5 526 1,914 5,310 15,055 8,925 1,662 2,584 .... 983 8,956 159 8,056 800 3,304 1,702 644 2,306 320 51,212 2,618 2,060 529 428 21,977 J u ly . A ug. 3,737 31,790 940 4,239 15,579 3,030 683 3,754 2,796 .... 2,283 2,635 5,355 14 6,318 4,071 6,595 5,635 2.354 6,214 714 2,023 2,5S3 349 401 130 365 4,000 1,000 5S,2S5 .... Sept. 19,3S5 666 6,763 322 840 2,393 2,114 7,837 245 86,197 1,172 1,407 13,206 200 8,328 890 151 590 14,595 Oct. N ov. 100 6,138 2,104 1,733 1,225 1,722 25,678 401 1,8S6 13,827 7,3S9 416 10,776 5,955 4,248 7,884 15,500 160 3,410 2,192 16,899 4,171 2,406 602 23 4,833 1,985 3,SS2 4,509 4,255 26,907 878 3,218 763 539 4,576 1,094 1,737 4,135 2,941 D ec. 1,191 6S0 183 908 2,362 492 2,405 525 3,555 1,913 2,9S8 187 350 1,200 329 800 650 73,322 43,646 99,667 57,217 53,433 96,416 84,845 1860. T o ta l ’59. T o ta l ’58. 130 47,508 15,719 26,542 26,690 304,915 263,364 470,393 8,379 27,821 77,5S2 97,663 5,630 S,043 4,306 20,781 46,324 41,103 42,870 28,S22 22,219 8,087 24,684 66,241 33,071 184,996 72,365 82,264 121,176 2S2,877 202,426 16,800 20,684 4,667 24,352 45,145 25,860 16,936 IS,606 138,883 17S,641 110,523 2,544 12,S08 13,500 49,248 28,547 9,420 36,523 15,718 11,7S3 7,667 12,655 34,117 34,697 10,312 10,932 3,338 16 427 31,133 1,985 6,552 86,647 49,030 126,219 24,369 30,133 42,077 7,068 11,556 11,860 10,089 19,368 5,913 62,840 231,310 T o ta l 992,622 Import o f Hides. B a h ia ,.......................................... Bathurst, (A fr ic a n ,).................. Buenos A y res,............................ Carthagena, .............................. C h a g res,...................................... C u ra coa ,....................................... Honduras,.............................. M aracaibo,........................... M aranham,.................................. M exican,.............................. M onte V id eo,............ O rinoco,.............................. Para,.............................................. Porto C abello,............................ Total foreign, 1859,.................... 134,263 120,570 175,563 200,973 216,443 15S,242 97,718 154,271 181,0S6 71,603 220,243 121,881 1,852,856 .... 57,S9S 82,554 82,S38 66,736 92,172 145,241 California,....................................... New-Orleans,................................. T exa s,............................. Sundry coastwise,......................... By rail,............................................ 31,189 2,966 20,7S5 5,469 23,828 10,433 10,454 11,592 6,174 11,172 10,S23 15,S26 25,S68 15,9S1 23,2S3 13,5S2 23,358 11,188 10,151 10,612 12,173 89,820 8,344 12,041 23,360 15,019 13,495 16,142 2,744 1,440 12,391 1,509 3,005 10,419 5,496 16,764 879 189 22,669 2,909 8,914 6,593 7,134 20,987 28,271 6,266 22,979 37,854 1,941 5,048 23,625 15,S55 7,382 169,150 92,769 212,769 15S,S44 90,103 Total domestic, 1860,................. 723,635 “ “ 1S58..................... 119,0S6 94,006 133,762 272,312 122,694 213,837 1,433,236 D o m e stic . 8,625 2,219 83,737 49,S25 68,49S S6,512 82,990 70,760 IS,345 33,747 86,422 433,628 97,311 51,860 “ “ 1859,................. 82,091 36,511 80,063 46,906 40,730 86,834 8S,322 26,740 37,589 17,458 67,608 34,063 “ “ 1853,................. 8S,632 27,9S2 2S,513 91,443 42,210 74,776 18,262 19,132 39,177 42,883 58,025 85,738 .... 150,744 147,820 1,716,257 “ “ “ “ C a l c u t t a , & c ., 1S59, 216,354 “ in 1858, 96,030 70,689 299,409 541,935 89,061 2S7.851 155,941 516,SOS 2,397,791 60,530 111,351 158,181 134,412 220,020 137,348 113,13S 172,939 315,195 180,719 249,612 1,950,044 B a les. IMPORTS eak s. 1848,........................... ........... 1849,........................... ........... 1850,.......................... 1851,........................... 1852,......................... . 1853,.......................... 1854........................... ........... 1855............................. 1856,.......................... ........... 1857,...................................... 1858,........................... ........... 1859,........................... ........... I860;.......................... ........... 77,393 136,0S9 100,845 157,0S1 255,626 247,879 257,178 195,076 136,040 181,011 218,675 Calcutta and East India,............. 173 From sundry foreign ports, mostly re-shipments of Calcutta,....................... T 137,724 141.275 144,082 103,190 116,710 Jan. 109,324 70,929 173,519 212.103 123.i 09 96.030 216.351 212,612 292 250 14 79 841 24 15 6 35 3S2 207- March. 112,732 112,604 5S,200 134,100 76,000 130,540 130,247 108,500 101,898 120,908111,351 255,626 159,941 April. 113.976 185,448 118,400 186.000 75,500 110,100 108,900 163,S00 203,500 152,697 158,181 247.879 137,724 M ay. 94,160 114,144 144,500 114.150 139,000 117.460 198 956 127,7"0 203,364 210,513 134,412 257,178 141,275 141 110 25 OF H I D E S A T N E W - Y O P v K F O R T H E Feb. 54,400 65,431 141,900 103,000 101,000 78,000 121,753 76,200 113,259 223,190 60,530 157,084 137,036 159 Jane. 26,957 70,502 146,400 73.000 9S,S00 99.000 125,650 140.700 139,212 122,929 220,020 195,076 144,082 PAST THIRTEEN July. 109,761 155,260 113,000 100.000 93,300 111.500 176,700 93,600 91,316 150,144 137,348 136,040 103,190 Aug. 97,435 74,527 117,965 103.480 140,600 150,000 142,035 123,000 129,817 114,729 113,138 181,011 177,393 Sept. 53,962 46,290 169.900 110,900 103,000 105.51 0 142,500 160,800 121,64S 81,742 172,939 218,675 136,089 2,094 1,781 159 823 YEARS, Oct. 58,710 146,584 83,100 110,600 70,000 71,800 135,800 156,700 143,981 171,577 315,195 89.061 100,845 Nor. 40,219 64,946 120,700 118,000 195,000 164,200 125.000 116,000 150.977 164,138 180,719 287,851 150,744 Dec. 101,018 173.025 156,000 142,400 235,000 71,700 98,360 170,800 130,S37 160,477 249.612 155 941 147,S26 Total. 972,654 1,229,727 1,483,305 1,866.030 1,437,200 1.259,300 1,679.995 1,550.000 1,715,900 1,796,753 1,950,014 2,397,791 1,716,257 Import o f Hides. Total foreign and domestic, 1S60, 272,612 137,086 159,941 160,542 69,498 101,147 122,427 90,321 40 Boot and Shoe Market. N E W - Y O R K B OOT AND SHOE M A R K E T F O R 18 6 0. From the Shoe and Leather Reporter. T h e past year may be noted as one not generally satisfactory to the manufacturing interests of this department of business, while most o f the jobbers have realized fair profits, although the amount of trade has generally fallen short of their anticipations. A t the commencement of the year 1800, the prosperity in the commercial affairs o f the country gave indications of an active and profitable business. The panic of the previous year, caused by over-production o f the New-England manufac turers, had so reduced prices o f many kinds, that during the last half of the year 1859 many of the largo jobbing houses o f this city were induced to purchase on a liberal scale, and thus early secure a stock for the ensu ing spring trade, while the rates at which these supplies were bought were supposed to be, and undoubtedly were, in many instances, lower than the same article could be manufactured, thus encouraging holders to believe they would be able to defy all competition in prices at the early spring sales, which it was generally expected would be heavy, both to the Western and Southern States; to the latter, on account of the great prosperity which that section Jiad enjoyed for some previous years, through her large and remunerative crops ; to the former, on account of the caution manifested by the dealers, and the limited amount o f boots and shoes shipped to that portion of the country since the great com mercial panic of 1857. W ith neither of these sections, however, has the business of the past year equalled expectations, notwithstanding the un precedented harvest and the general prosperity o f the W est during the first ten months of the year. The month of January passed; Southern merchants scarcely began to make their appearance ; and it became a subject of remark that Southern trade was coming in late. Travellers returning from that section o f the country soon intimated that a large surplus of boots and shoes was re maining on hand, and that only moderate requirements for the spring business need be expected. To this was added, as a further discouraging feature, the report that many bills contracted the previous autumn would require an extension until a disposition could be made o f stock on hand. Nearly the middle o f March was reached before there was a moderate representation of the Southern trade in this market. Stocks were full, and prices continued low. For some new styles, however, which were less abundant, an advance was now obtained. The strike which was at this time taking place among the Massachusetts workmen rendered it difficult to obtain, at short notice, a full supply of all descriptions. During the latter part of March and the whole o f April, tradesmen from the Western and Southwestern States came forward to a fair extent; but the lessons of 1857 did not seem to be lost upon them, for their pur chases were characterized by much caution, and a decided preference for good substantial work, rejecting, at almost any price, the lowest class of Eastern manufacture, of which the market had been heavily stocked the Boot and Shoe Market. 41 preceding year. It soon became evident that sales to the West, although trade appeared healthy, and the amount all that could reasonably have been expected, were not approaching the ideas o f our sanguine dealers, and that they would not equal the purchases o f the spring of 1859. Trade with our own State, and some o f those immediately adjoining, wras steady and not below the average o f previous years during the first half of 1860, while the aggregate sales to other sections of the country are variously estimated at 20 @ 25 per cent, less than during the same months in 1859. The wholesale houses and others engaged in manufac turing in this city, profiting by the experience of the previous years, cut up stock much more cautiously, studying more carefully the require ments of their customers, and awaiting, in many instances, actual orders before preparing their goods for market. This caution in management has enabled many of the manufacturers to realize, if not extravagant, at least fair profits during the larger portion of the year. The month of July brought but few orders from any section of the country, and a considerable part o f August passed before the Southern purchasers were fairly in the market. As in the spring, so in the autumn, trade from the Southern States came forward late, and to a much less ex tent than had been generally anticipated, while extensions upon bills previously purchased were not unfrequent, giving considerable anxiety to some o f our dealers, even previously to the presidential election in No vember. Early in September the W est was well represented in this market, and purchases, although made with much confidence and free dom, were devoid o f that recklessness which characterized the operations o f the early part of 1857. Notwithstanding the quantities required for this section were much less than had been estimated by many, a business fully equalling the average of the last five years has been realized. Western merchants extended the time of making their purchases over a somewhat longer period than usual, while from the more Southern coun try there was a gradual diminution of orders after the first o f September, and almost an entire cessation before the first of November, since which date the political affairs o f the country have not been such as to con tribute to any improvement. The year closes with a pressure upon many of our houses, brought about by the agitations of the country, which it is very difficult to with stand. Manufacturers have nearly ceased operations. A more than average stock of boots and shoes for the season remains in the hands of the trade, which, for cash, could generally be purchased at less than the cost of production. Exports of Boots and Shoes from the several ports o f the TJ. S., during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1S60. Ports. Amount. Ports. New-York,................................ $ 241,291 New-Orleans,........................... Boston,...... ............................ 197,150 Vermont.................................... San Francisco............................ 101,555 Philadelphia,............................. Niagara,.................................... 116,281 Salem,........................................ Passamaquoddy,...................... 58,570 Baltimore................................... 27,147 Total, 13 ports...................... Oswegatchie.............................. 11,148 Total, all other,................... New-London,........................... 4,539 Buffalo....................................... 4,798 Total, United States,........... Amount. $4,128 2,697 2,494 2,475 774,273 8,252 $782,525 New- York Hide Market. 42 I m ports and E for the B oots an d Shoes 1860, w it h th e C xports op Y ear I m ports of B oots at the ustom and H P o u se ort of V N ew -Y ork a l u a t io n . S h oes. 223 packages, valued at $35,229. E xports Destination. Quantity. of B Value. oots and S h oes. Destination. Quantity. . 7 British Australia,. . . 1,892 “ W. A. Colonies 268 “ Honduras,........ 112 Mexico,..................... 29 58 Central America,. . . 64 Venezuela................ 558 New-Grenada,......... 75 11 British Guiana,........ Argentine Republic, 671 Cisalpine Republic,.. 204 230 Chili,......................... NEW-YORK (< It it ti it it <( tt It it it it ti 500 59,248 10,020 5,868 1,344 2,270 3,740 31,795 7,795 521 26,657 4,000 13,642 HIDE H ayti,....................... British West Indies, French “ Danish “ Dutch “ Porto Rico,.............. Liverpool,................ Havre,...................... China,....................... Africa,...................... Value. 114 cases. $ 8.651 it 3,594 40 ti 33,186 670 237 10 tt it 10,907 150 1,003 19 tt 11 5,197 91 it 7,470 361 tt 2,058 33 it 7,070 164 it 5,195 117 it 1,609 34 — Total,.............. 6,231 MARKET FOR $137,301 1 8 6 0. From the Slice and Leather R eporter. T h e dry-hide trade o f the past year has called forth, from those en gaged in the importation, not only much energy, perseverance and pa tience, but a heavy outlay o f money, and has been prosperous only by determined effort on the part of importers, excited by the great pecuniary interest which has been centering in this business for the last few years. The high prices to which hides were carried by the expansion and specu lation o f lS o l, attracted the notice o f hide-producing countries, and every available means was brought into requisition to increase the al ready numerous domesticated herds which roam over the pampas of South America; while the rifle and the lasso penetrated still further into the mountains. This stimulus has since gradually but largely in creased the product in many sections both o f the Eastern and Western continents. Notwithstanding the growing requirements for leather in this and other countries, the increase in the production of the raw material has more than kept pace with the demand, leaving a large surplus in the hands of the various branches o f trade between the grower o f hides and the consumer of leather. This surplus, in a country where capital is all fully employed, and money worth from seven to twelve per cent, per annum, must necessarily induce an unhealthy condition in some depart ments of the business, which, from the force o f circumstances and the heavy amounts of capital employed in the importation of dry hides, has unfortunately, during the past year, borne heavily upon that class who are least able to support the loss— the manufacturers o f leather. W et salted hides for the first ten months enjoyed, proportionately, a greater degree o f prosperity. The heavy requirements of some of the European H ew -York Hide Market. 43 countries for this class o f stock created, during the first half of the year, a demand in this city for slaughter hides -which kept the market nearly bare. A t the commencement o f the year there was a'stock o f over 200,000 hides in this market, much of which had cost the importers more than the current selling rates at that time, which were for Buenos Ayres 23 @ 24c., for Orinoco, 21|-@ 22c., and for country and city slaughter, 8-^c. per lb. The demand at first was very moderate, stronger for a conces sion in prices than for quantity; this was steadily resisted by holders, and before the middle of January rates were advanced fully one cent per lb., which had the effect to stimulate quite an active trade for the season. During the month o f February several considerable parcels o f hides were shipped to Europe, a moderate inquiry only existing for tanning purposes. Meantime receipts had been heavy and the stock had accumulated to over 300,000 hides. Towards the middle of March many of the tanners who, on account o f the disparity in prices o f hides and leather, had been working in small amounts of stock through the winter, began to look anxiously about for a further supply, and to purchase more freely from the lower priced hides; leading descriptions being held firmly at extreme rates, while the demand for export continued, to some extent, for dry, and became active for wet salted at 9 cents per lb. cash. Receipts of both domestic and foreign continued steady; still, before the close o f the month, sales in various directions had reduced the stock to 260,000 hides, ancl prices had advanced for Orinoco to 23, and for Buenos Ayres to 25 @ 25-J cents, with still an active trade in slaughter and all the common classes of dry hides. Business from this time held on the even tenor o f its way, the trade and tanners purchasing with great reluctance sufficient to keep their yards in operation, while a heavy stock of leather burdened the market at prices much below the cost of production at ruling rates for the raw ma terial. Towards the middle of May, tanners being anxious to work in a large supply of hides before “ the heated term,” began to purchase in larger amounts, and rates for Buenos Ayres further advanced to 26 cents, and other kinds of dry hides proportionately. Before the close of the month the demand for export ceased for dry hides, because our stock was not suited to European markets, and for slaughter hides on account of the bad condition in which many lots had been shipped, rendering the traffic unprofitable. Sales were light and unsatisfactory, at prices slightly easier, until the middle of July, when intelligence o f the failures and panic in England reached this city, causing, for a time, almost an en tire suspension of business. Receipts, meanwhile, had surpassed the sales, and the supply on hand had again accumulated to over 300,000 hides, and before the close o f the month to 340,305 hides and 474 bales do., the highest number held at any one time during the year. The mar ket now became languid and prices began to recede, which, before the revival of trade, touched the figure o f 21 @ 22 cents for Buenos Ayres, and 19 @ 21 cents for Orinoco. Country and city slaughter also sympa thizing in the general depression, declined to 7-J- @ 8 cents. A limited amount of dry hides, however, were purchased at these low rates. Before the first of September, as it became evident that the heavy stocks o f the suspended firms in England were not to he thrown precipitately upon the market, importers began to strengthen their views, and an advance o f one 44 N ew -York Hide Market. or two cents was readily effected under an increasing demand from the trade. Sales became generally active, and prices further advanced, until near the last of October, when the accepted rates for Buenos Ayres were 24|@ 2 5 cents, and for Orinoco 23|- @ 24 cents. City and country slaugh ter found a ready market at 8-J @ 9 cents per lb. These rates continued with little variation, under an active request, gradually reducing the heavy supply on hand, until after the presidential election and the political agi tations of the country had proved the source of a panic from which trade has not yet recovered. From the middle of November to the middle of December few transactions were effected, and prices declined to 5-^ @ 6 cents for city slaughter, and 20 cents for Buenos Ayres, and proportion ately on other descriptions; since which time an improved inquiry has been manifested, and a slight improvement realized. The year closes with a stock of 205,000 pieces, partly held above the current rates, which are 21 cents for Buenos Ayres, and 6 f cents for wet salted city hides. E xpo r ts of H id e s a n d Destination. S k in s Quantity. from Value. j 2,000 hides, ) $ 9,382 ( 21 pkgs. j Mexico,.......... 1 pkge., 100 Brazil,............ 1 pkge., 178 Chili............... Bristol............ 615 hides, 4,829 G lasgow ,. . . . 200 hides, 1,331 36,101 hides, ) Liverpool,. . . •] 303,721 310 pkgs., j 5,392 hides, 1 London,........ j 258,418 1,038 pkgs., f 55,349 hides, ^ H avre,...........j 298,939 556 pkgs., f Cuban,........... N ew -Y ork d u r in g Destination. Bordeaux,.. . Lisbon,.......... H am burg,.... Rotterdam ,... Antw erp,.. . . Bremen,........ Amsterdam,.. Brit. N. A. Col., the year Quantity. 628 hides, 20 pkgs., 1,188 hides, 1,119 pkgs., 3,855 hides, 60,364 hides, 2,100 hides, 146 pkgs., 240 hides, 260 hides, 5 pkgs., 1860. Value. $ 3,254 250 ) j 139,595 24,802 301,121 ) J 55,612 ) y 2,415 1,601 Total,168,452 hds., 4,283 pkgs., $1,406,214 Exports o f Hides from the United States during the fiscal year, ending June 30,1860. Ports. New-Orleans,............... New-York,.................... Vermont,.................... Philadelphia,............... Charleston,................... ........... Champlain,................. Texas,........................... Oswego......................... Buffalo,......................... Value. Ports. Chicago.............................. Boston,................ Oswegatchie............................. Niagara,................................... Genesee,.................................... 28,593 Oregon...................................... Milwaukie,................................ Passamaquoddy,..................... Value. $6,856 4,310 3,294 2,532 850 800 550 461 Total, United States,... . $ 1,036,260 Wine and Liquor Trade. REVIEW OF T H E W I N E AND LI Q U O R T R A D E 45 FOR 1860. Reported by J. A. S c h m id t , Broker, 8 Old Slip, JY. Y. With importations o f Wines, Brandy, Gin, Bum, Champagne, Porter, Ale, Cordials, Whiskey, Vinegar, Oil, Plums and Prunes, Cherries, Mustard, Sardines, Herrings, Anchovies, Sauce, Pickles, Capers, P re served Fruit. T he year 1860, in regard to the wine and liquor trade, lias not been very favorable, and did not realize the hopes expressed in our report for 1859. W ith the exception o f a short period, when the report o f the reforms in the commercial relations between England and France aroused some speculative feeling— a general tranquillity was the chief feature o f the market through the whole year. The demand for foreign spirits, French and Spanish wines, being light, prices were weak, even at times when they were reported firm and ad vancing in France, and at several periods of the year, by comparing our prices with the quotations in France, it could be seen that goods sold here at the ruling market price could not be replaced but at higher cost. This state of affairs is so much more to be regretted, as the crops of the past year in France— regarding the quality— are far inferior to those of 1857 and 1858, which cannot fail to have a discouraging influence on the trade. But what makes the year 1860, perhaps, a remarkable one in the his tory of our liquor trade, is the first appearance of the M o r r i l l tariff bill, which, although it had not taken effect yet, made an unfavorable impres sion on any house connected with the trade, even by the mere idea of the possibility o f its passing, and when in force will show itself ruinous to trade and importation. Brandies.-—The year opened with a heavy stock of nearly all kinds of liquors, principally of Brandies; but prices were firm, as only a small importation ivas looked for. Prices o f the favorite brands of Cognac were then— Vintage, “ “ Rochelle 1858,........................................................ $ 2 80 @ $ 1857.......................................................... 3 25 @ 1856,........................................................ 3 40 @ Brandies,................................................ 1 60 @ 3 3 3 2 00 50 70 00 The inquiry remaining small through all the month o f January, and some holders exhibiting a desire to realize, prices became weak, until the mid dle of February, when the news o f the reforms in the commercial policy of France, recently proposed by the Emperor of the French, by which it was believed the exportation of Brandy would be greatly increased to Great Britain, and doubtless diminish to this country, induced a specu lative movement, and the sales, which were mostly to arrive; reached a higher figure than for some time past. This speculative feeling lasted till end of March, when market prices were as follows : Cognac, 1858,........................................................ $ 3 00 @ $ 3 25 “ 1857,........................................................ 3 40 @ 3 75 Rochelle Brandies,................................................ 2 00 @ 2 30 Wine and Liquor Trade. 46 From this time the market remained quiet and without any change in prices till the beginning o f September, when, the accounts o f the French vintage being unfavorable, it became more active, and there was a most lively demand, particularly for Brandies of 1858, which had become the favorite vintage on account o f its fine quality. Nearly all the stock of this vintage (imported in 1859) was disposed of. The unfavorable reports o f the crops in France being continued, a fair activity ruled until the middle of November, since when the demand has been moderate till the end o f the year. From the prices named it will be seen that, though at some periods of the year large parcels have been changing hands, prices have appreciated but little, the quantity going into consumption always being small. The current prices o f the favorite brands o f Cognac on the 1st o f Jan uary, in the years named, are as follows : V in ta ge . 1 86 0. 1861 1859,........................... ^ 2 75 (ch. 3 00 ® 1358,'........................... 3 50 ® 1857,........................... 4 00© 1S56,........................... 1850,........................... 5 00® 5 50® 1S4S,........................... Rochelle B r a n d y ,___ 1 75 @ 1858. 1859. .. .. * 3 00 50 . $ 2 80 ® $ 3 00 .. $ 1 65 ® $ 2 00 .. 00 . 3 25 ® 3 50 .. 2 00@ 2 25 .. 25 . . 3 40 ® 3 7 0 . . 2 50 ® 3 00 .. 50 . 5 00 ® 5 25 .. 4 00 ® 4 50 .. 6 50 . . 5 25® 6 0 0 .. 7 50 ® 5 25 .. 2 10 . 1 6 0 ® 2 00 .. 1 15 ® 1 40 .. 3 4 4 5 ® $ 8 50 3 75 5 75 6 00 .. .. @ @ ® ® @ .. .. .. .. 2 00 ® $ 2 50 I mportations or B ra n d t . I860. 1 85 9. Packages. Packages. From Bordeaux, .. “ La Rochelle, u Cette and Marseilles,. “ France,......... 1857. 1858. Packages. Packages 21,482 6,374 9 .. .. 36,080 33,007 12 .. .. .. 12,377 7,160 71 ., 14,379 8,189 292 27,865 .. 69,099 .. 19,608 .. 22,860 Gin has been without any remarkable change, and prices were gen erally corresponding to the quotations from Holland. They were, on the 1st of January, in the years named, as follows: 1 8 5 6 ,............................. 1 S 5 7 ,............................. 1858................................ 1 8 5 9 , ........................... 1 8 6 0 , ........................... 1 8 6 1 , .......................... $1 1 0 0 0 0 SO 20 80 65 60 55 @ $ 1 75 @ 1 50 @ 1 10 @ 0 85 @ 0 85 @ 0 80 .... D u t v 100 per cent. ____ “ "“ SO ““ ““ ““ “ “ “ The importation o f Gin has been increasing from year to year, as will be seen from the table p. 128. Rum.— The importation, although it did not reach that of 1859, ex ceeded those o f former years. I m ported from I8 6 0 . Jamaica,.....................Puncheons, 1,119 St. C roix,....................... “ 1,204 Cuba, .............................. “ 191 Porto R ic o ,................... “ 40 England.......................... “ 121 Sundry ports.................. “ 48 2,723 1859 1858. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1,173 . . 1,139 . . 673 . . 75 . . 98 . . I ll .. .. 3,269 .. 356 868 60 166 74 166 1857. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1,690 . . 826 868 55 28 50 1,827 Prices have been without change, from 90 cents to $1 25 for Jamaica, and 65 cents to 75 cents for St. Croix. The superior qualities o f Jamaica 47 Wine and Liquor Trade. Rum, which are received in smaller quantities from England, were held at $1 15 to $2 50. Whiskey.— The importation was again in excess o f former years, as may be seen by reference to the table appended.- The demand was fair. Scotch from 85 cents to $1 30, and Irish $1 to $1 20. French Wines were not in so good a demand as last year; prices in France w-ere higher on account o f the inferior crops of 1859 and 1860. The common qualities have to he quoted now— B ordeaux claret, in caBks, “ white w in e ,.. Cette claret........................ “ white w in e ,......... Marseilles claret,............. $ SO @ $ 40 Marseilles w hite wine,$ 30 @ 40 Rochelle wines............. 32 @ 40 Claret in cases,............. 32 @ 40 B urgundy p o rt,........... 2S @ 35 28 25 2 1 00 @ $ 3 5 00 00 @ 30 00 25 @ 2 75 00 @ 1 30 The following shows the average prices o f the lower qualities of French wines on the 1st o f January of the years named: Bordeaux Wines. 1856 1857 1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, ............................. ............................. ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ $45 35 30 25 32 30 Cette Wines. @$60 @ 45 @ 45 @ 30 @ 36 @ 40 I m p o r t a t io n W of .. .. .. .. .. .. $ 40 40 30 20 30 32 in e s from From Bordeaux,.................... T,030 “ La R ochelle,................. 20 “ Marseilles and Cette,. . . 12,055 T otal,.................................... 19,105 .. .. .. .. .. .. $ 2 75 2 50 2 25 2 00 2 25 2 25 1859. Bile. Cases. HMs. Bbls. 555 130,229 10,476 .. 120 844 7,226 1,203 10,949 7,781 181,552 21,769 @ $ 3 25 @ 3 00 @ 2 75 @ 2 25 @ 2 50 @ 2 75 F rance. 1 86 0. Wide. Cases. @$55 @ 50 @ 40 @ .30 @ 35 @ 40 1858. Cases. Bhds. Bbls. 1,652 115,482 4,023 108 100 .. 8,607 540 1,812 10,667 116,122 5,885 Cases. 594 49,248 .. 24 1,720 529 2,314 49,801 The importation o f Champagne has exceeded again that of last year, and reached the high figure o f 214,559 baskets, thus exceeding the quan tity of all other wines imported in glass by 63,229 dozen bottles. Of leading brands have been imported by the different agents, 101,132 baskets. German Wines have continued to be a favorite article, and there is hardly any kind of wines imported that met with so ready sale as Hock and Moselle wines. The following shows the extraordinary increase of importations within the last four years: I m p o r t a t io n 1857, 1858, I m p o r t a t io n of Casks. 1857, 1858, ___ 3,790 Casks. ____ 837 .. I m p o r t a t io n 1857.......... 1 8 5 8 ,____ erman W in e s . W in k s from Casks. <o f W in e s from S p a in . Casks. 12,751 20,408 W in e s from Casks. 5,109 1 1859,. 1,288 | I860,. ., .. Cases. 115 608 PoRTCGAL. Cases. 102 1 1859, . 1,288 | I860, . of Cases. 19,561 14,640 10,427 9,147 Cases. 417 I 1859, . 15 | 1860, . .. I m p o r t a t io n 1857, 1858, G of Cases. 13,582 1 1859, . 7,511 | 1860, . Casks. Casks. 744 2,682 M Cases. fi] 7 2,181 alaga. Casks. 2 27fi 3^130 Wine and Liquor Trade. 48 IM P O R T S Vessels from : Spanish Ports,___ 1860,....... 1859......... 1553......... 1S57,....... 1856,....... Vessels fro m : I 8 6 0 .— P O R T Gin. Wines. Pkgs. overage JIhds. or. csks. Cases. 32 galls. Pipes. 7,030 555 130,229 21,482 120 20 6.374 1.045 9,669 2,550 8 2,386 4,676 158 1 3S 158 2.556 S93 244 206 957 697 88S 13 1,142 102 1 154 30 ' 18 2 405 200 647 4 601 405 24 355 186 638 48 6,534 5.209 12,990 260 2,944 125 186 603 1,330 19,078 2,514 168 2,181 1,846 425 152 10 81 16 277 12 706 1,919 5 68 i lio 68 51 138 4 42 151,330 133.005 65,53S 135.363 111,152 29,724 70,480 20.238 24.018 34,017 32,475 36,275 11,776 21,845 13,677 36,950 30,005 11,711 39,718 44,S96 Cordials. W h is key. Csks. C a ses. P u n s . B ord ea u x,.............. La R och elle,.......... Marseilles, .......... Cette......................... H avre....................... L o n d o n ,.................. L iv e r p o o l,.............. G la s g o w ,............ . Irish P orts,............ H a m b u rg ,.............. Bremen, ................ A n tw erp ,................ Amsterdam,............ Rotterdam,.............. Malaga..................... P ortu gal,................ Italian Ports......... Sicily, . . . .............. J a m a ic a ,................ C u b a ,...................... W est Indies,.......... San F rancisco,___ Sundry Ports,........ Total, 1860,....... “ “ “ 1859......... 1853,.... 1S57,....... 1856,....... OF N E W -Y O R K . Brandy. 1 West Indies,......... San Francisco,.... Sundry Ports,....... Total, “ “ “ “ IN 6 1,458 76 1,204 102 543 2 24 10 1,390 76 128 93 15 168 2 Cham Porter, pagne. and Ale Puns. Baskets. Pckgs. 66 40 15 214,559 14,230 3,347 8,703 315 110 100 25i 7,026 1 i ,iia 1,204 40 191 27 21 V in e gar. 7,459 6,947 7,2S4 5,986 4,944 7,277 5,696 5,408 3,944 2,733 2,723 214,559 3.269 175,445 1,561 87,712 1,827 136,402 1,843 12S,S72 Plum s and Prunes. Oils. C ases. Casks. C ases. 1 11.466 21,117 10,016 473 1 23 358 41 72,882 58 51 104 56 4 2 i 26.856 26,513 20,945 25,7S3 21.4S5 Cherries. C a sk s. C a sk s. 375 30 202 482 1,063 500 Casks. Bum. C a sk s. .. 614 i. 6 348 245 I4 i C a ses. io 3 40 1ST 4 6 345 223 82 126 60 2,49S 2,519 156 497 8 423 2,343 S9,387 2.9S4 83,708 24,456 4,233 130 i2 350 1.516 200 357 200 6 20 81 226 5,268 146 5,665 2,247 2,096 1.061 1,629 617 6^0 324 315 701 10,6! 7 9,235 153 344 557 1,263 Wine and Liquor Trade. 49 I mports for the Y ear 1859.—{ Continued.) *» Vessels from : Bordeaux,............. La Rochelle,......... Marseilles,............ Cetie,..................... H avre,.................. London,................ Liverpool,............. Glasgow,............... Irish Ports, ......... Hamburg,............. Bremen,................ Antwerp,............... Amsterdam,......... Rotterdam,........... M alaga,................ Spanish Ports,....... Portugal,............... Alicante,.............. Madeira................. Italian Ports,......... Sicily,..................... Jam aica,............... St. Croix,............... Porto R ico,........... Cuba....................... West Indies,......... San Francisco,___ Sundry Ports,....... Total, “ “ “ “ I 860, ....... 1S59......... 1853......... 1857......... 1856,....... Fruits Pressed. Pkgs. 4,798 Sar dines. Her rings. An Sauces. Pickles. Capers. chovy. Cases. 3,445 Cases. 9,753 375 Kegs. Pkgs. 1 2 29 73 8i6 76S Mustard. Casks. Pkgs. io 220 55S Pkgs. 524 gs. 290 2,345 200 23 816 259 25 129 100 500 28,083 50 1,310 ib 5 273 3 i9 15 i 17 24 5,123 6,969 5,573 2,941 3,999 8,573 8,723 778 220 29,839 25,518 10.447 13,351 1,376 225 839 1,728 3 100 2,873 4,441 628 570 I mports of S herry, S icily, R ed , W hite, Champagne and Claret W ines into the SEVERAL PORTS OF THE UNITED STATES DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1860. Sicily. Red. White. New-York,........ $ 347,657 Boston,.............. 47,886 San Francisco,.. 13,466 New-Orleans,.... 9,416 Baltimore,......... 6,430 Charleston,........ 2,311 Detroit,.............. 1,297 Philadelphia,.. . 995 Savannah,.......... 562 Mobile,............... 315 Passamaquoddy, 268 Oswegatchie,.... 230 Texas,................ 175 Chicago,............. 152 Niagara,............. 97 Genesee,............ 30 New -Bedford,. . Norfolk.............. Sandusky,......... Cuyahoga,.. . . . All others,........ $ 20,928 7,115 $ 357,726 3,966 72,136 50,955 299 466 $ 391,328 T otal U . S . , . . $431,287 $ 36,395 P oets. Sherry. V OL. X L V .—-N O . I. .... 5,695 569 .... .... ,. . , 942 1,882 «... 13 41 . • •• $ 1,024,822 49,384 133,575 7,957 59,699 120,340 1,443 1,540 1,430 503 ...» 869 1,740 52 ... 0 168 .... .... .... 950 312 .... .... .... .... 183 28 .... 10,974 — 4 528 250 .... 698 122 $486,999 .... .... IS .... .... .... — Champagne. $462,415 Claret. $ 183,535 932 21,572 203,123 2,753 246 3,070 168 .... .... 1,039 .... .... .... .... 3,062 .... .... 588 975 $ 1,346,925 $ 420,475 Annual Report. 50 REVIEW OF THE IIEBIP MA R K E T FOR 1 8 0 0. F rom W ood & N ic h o l s ’ Market Report. Manilla Hemp.— T h e History of this article for the last three years is characterized by a gradual decline in price, -which, excepting slight and temporary interruptions, has continued through the past year. The de cline was arrested in the spring at 6c., by a speculative feeling, based upon an advance in rates of freight at Manilla, and price was carried to 6^c. This advance was soon lost, and market remained pretty firm at 6c., until late in the summer, when increased demand for consumption stimulated holders, and appreciation followed. The market afterwards again receded, and has been steadily drooping until now. The cause for this decline is sufficiently explained by the constant addition of large car goes to an overstocked market; and, in many instances, the pressure of a heavy surplus has crowded the price below cost of importation. The gathering of this article in the provinces of Manilla was greatly stimulated by a demand for return freight from a rapidly increasing tonnage, con sequent upon the development o f the California trade. As supply was thus augmented, depreciation succeeded; and, in order to realize as much as when hemp commanded better prices, the decline has been fol lowed by increased supply. This process has been going on until confi dence has been weakened; and, as the production is inexhaustible, re quiring no cultivation, the inquiry is suggested as to when it would touch bottom. It is thought that the limit is nearly reached, and that the effect of the present state of the market will bring the price to a point which will effectually stop the supply. Arrivals at Manilla to October 6th, 191,237 bales, against 181,326 do., same time in 1859. Our statement exhibits a large increase upon the consumption o f last year. This increase has been steadily growing, although for several years the shipping interest has been depressed, and the demand for its uses, which, in prosperous times, amounts to nearly one-third of the con sumption, has been small. The low price of the material has undoubt edly contributed to the result. Early in the autumn a great impetus was given to trade by the sudden appreciation of a large crop of cereals; and manufacturers found plenty o f employment with the greatly increased orders, resulting from the favorable turn of fortune at the West. An extraordinary prosperous career was suddenly checked, and the country agitated by a political excitement, that has entered, with its paralyzing influence, into every department of trade and industry. Demand has subsided and values become nominal. The last sale o f hemp was made at a trifling concession from 5 fc. Buyers offer 5-^-c. Stock in the country on the 1st January, 1857, 82,140 bales; same time in 1858, 69,683 bales ; in 1859, 81,396 bales; in 1860, 84,594 bales; in 1861, 86,815 bales. Stock in the country and afloat, January 1, 1858, 74,852 bales ; 1859, 109,009; 1860, 113,513; 1861, 120,922 bales. The Hemp Market. 51 COMPARATIVE P b ICES PER PlCUL IN MANILLA, AND FREIGHTS, FOR FOUR B a LES. PBICE8, HEMP. FREIGHTS, HEMP. Highest Price. Lowest Price. Average Price. 1850,.,................................. $ 6 50 1851...................................... 7 60 1852...................................... 8 12 1853...................................... 8 37 1854...................................... 11 50 1855,..................................... 8 00 1856...................................... 8 25 1857...................................... 8 50 1858...................................... 5 75 1859..................................... 5 25 I860 to October,................ H Average from 1850 to 1859, 11 50 $ 5 62 6 12 6 50 7 00 7 00 6 50 7 00 6 00 4 75 4 50 41 4 50 $ 6 25 6 62 7 12 7 55 8 42 7 25 7 50 7 75 5 37 5 00 4f 6 88 Y ear. Highest Rate. $ 15 10 12 10 20 17 14 13 11 7 10 20 Lowest Rate. 00 00 00 00 00 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 $ 10 6 8 10 14 12 8 5 6 3 5 3 Average Rate. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 % 12 50 7 00 10 00 10 00 17 50 15 25 10 80 8 65 8 00 5 00 7} 10 37 Bales. Stock in all hands January 1st, 1860,.................................................. 84,594 Imports from January 1, 1860, to January 1, 1861,......................... 144,491 *Stock in all hands January 1, 1861,.................................................. 229,085 86,815 Consumption for the year,.................................................................... 142,270 T otal E xports from M anilla to the U nited S tates. From January 1, 1860, to October 6, 1860,..................... Same time in 1859,.............................................................. Showing an increase in 1860 of......................................... Same time in 1858,.............................................................. 115,128 115,128 107,235 7,893 113,619 % Increase in 1860.................................................................... Same time in 1857................................................. 91,122 1,509 T otal E xports from M anilla to G reat B ritain. From January 1, 1860, to October 6, 1860,................... Same time in 1859,.............................................................. Showing a falling off in 1860 o f....................................... Same time in 1858,.............................................................. 34,792 34,792 56,236 21,444 35,913 Decrease in 1860.................................................................. Same time in 1857................................................. 30,458 1,121 C omparative I mports. From January 1, 1S60, to January 1, 1861,..................................... “ “ 1859, to “ 1860....................................... 144,491 132,298 Increase in 1860,................................................................................... From January 1, 1858, to January 1, 1859,.................. 128,782 “ “ 1857, to “ 1858..................... 119,659 12,193 C onsumption in the U nited S tates. 1852. 87,176 1858. ISM. 1855. 1S56. 1S5T. 1858. 1859. 106,376 90,174 100,760 114,203 111,047 110,582 129,100 1860. 142,270 Comparative E xport of H emp to U nited S tates and E urope. B ate. 1850. 1851. 1852. 1853. 18M. 1855. 1856. 1S57. 1358. 1859. T « the United States, 51,097 71,566 110,257 102,292 114,008 107,290 156,193 121,655 144,476 142,828 To Europe,............... 10,608 15,402 13,871 8,467 47,801 11,831 19,699 47,991 52,816 65,336 Bales......................... 61,705 86.96S 124,128 110,759 161,309 119,171 175,892 169,646 197,292 207,664* * Boston, New-York and Philadelphia. 52 Annual Report. A rrivals of M anilla H emp. 1860. Name of Yessel. January 20,.. Comet,...................... “ 2 6 ,.. February 10,. “ 14,. “ 23,. “ 28,. March 8 , . , . . . “ 13........ Josiah L. Hale,........ “ 20.............. tt Where. N ew -Y ork,........... u tt Boston,................... N ew -Y ork,........... <( no April 11,!!.’ .’ .’ May 2 ,......... it “ 10......... “ 15.......... “ 15,......... June 1 . . . . . . “ 12.................. “ 18,......... July 11,......... August 3 0 ,... “ 3 0 ,... September 12, October 2 , . . . “ 5 ,... “ 5 ,... “ 1 2 ,... “ 3 0 ,... November 27, December 10, “ 14, “ 23, “ 29, Winged A rrow ,. . . . New-York,............ Southern Cross,.. . . Boston,................... New-York,............ Sweepstakes,........... tt Belle of the W est,.. Boston,.................. <« Malay,...................... Boston,.................. «( Romance of the Seas, it E. P. Stringer,.......... Kate Howe.............. New-York............. it Bales. 8,239 5,963 3,719 7,407 3,444 3,591 6,267 3,958 5,362 7,342 6,781 1,810 500 4,540 7,844 3,548 6,231 7,179 2,860 5,266 4,185 4,057 1,120 6,430 1,917 4,825 1,666 1,985 285 7,675 6,250 4,245 Sales. 6^ cents. 6 H 6 @ 6i 6i @6 i 6i @ 6| 61 6 1-16 6 1-16 6 6 afloat. 6 6 6 1-16 @ 61 61 6} 6 @ 61 5 f @ 51 "a'l Jute.— The low price of Manilla hemp has brought that article in competition with jute during the past year, and, to some extent, has driven the latter out of the market. In view o f the reduced stock at the commencement of the year, and the large falling off in shipments at Cal cutta, holders were firm at $92 50 @ $95 ; but trade was dull, and manufacturers demanded lower prices. Market gradually yielded until early in the summer, when an unexpected demand came from the South for baling use, to supply the deficiency o f Western rope. W ith mode rate supplies, a gradual reduction of stock ensued, and holders became firmer. Later in the season, a prospective short supply induced manu facturers to buy freely, and the market became quite active. Apprecia tion rapidly followed, and sales were made as high as $110; but the ad vance has been strongly resisted, manufacturers contending that, so long as Manilla continues to decline, they must stop, unless jute can be ob tained at lower rates. During the last month they have done but very little, and will only meet the pressing wants o f the trade until a better chance for profit exists than they now have. A small lot was brought out from England, but her short supplies have not permitted our market to be relieved from that quarter. The crop of 1859 was small and of inferior quality. Good or even fair qualities have been scarce; and a The Hemp Market. 53 very inferior grade, known as jute ends, a new article in this market, has been sent here, and found buyers, because o f its cheapness; but the quality is too poor to work to advantage, and sales are made with great difficulty. The new crop is spoken favorably of, both as regards quality and quantity. The shipments to England have been active, and, when the deficiency is made up, we shall look for lower prices at Calcutta and larger shipments to this country. The stock afloat is 4,562 bales, for Boston, including 2,898 bales o f jute ends ; 605 do. for New-York, and 200 do. for Philadelphia ; altogether, 5,367 bales. Our statement shows a falling off in the consumption from last year, occasioned by the compe tition with Manilla hemp. Stock on hand and afloat, 10,442 bales; same time last year, 13,825 do.; 1858, 26,903 bales. O f the present stock there are but 2,325 bales in New-York, Boston and Philadelphia, in first hands. A t our close, price is nominal and no demand whatever. Balet. 12,100 Stock in all hands January 1, 1860,.................................................. Imports from January 1, 1860, to January 1, 1861, (including arrivals from England,).................................................................... 15,226 Stock in all hands January 1, 1861,.................................................. 27,926 5,075 Consumption for 1860,........................................................................ 22,851 E xports from Calcutta to the U nited S tates. From January 1, I860, to November 1, 1860, (including 3,368 balesjute ends,)................................................................................. From January 1, 1859, to November 1, 1859.................................. 16,021 14,050 Increase in 1860 of................................................................................ 1,971 C omparative I mports. From January 1, 1860, to January 1, 1861,...................................... “ “ 1859, to “ 1860,..................................... 15,026 22,931 Decrease in 1860 o f............................................................................... 7,905 E xports from Calcutta to E ngland. From January 1, 1860, to October 31, 1860,.................................... “ “ 1859, to “ 1859,.................................... 222,928 278,644 Falling off in 1860 of............................................................................ 55,716 Exports to England in 1859......... ...................................................... “ “ in 1858,................................................................. “ “ in 1857,................................................................. 362,357 392,781 202,806 C onsumption in the U nited S tates. 1S5T. 13,641 1853. ___ 16,104 1359. ___ 26,095 1860. ___ 22,851 54 Annual Report. R E V I E W OF T H E T O B A C C O M A R K E T F O R T I I E Y E A R 18 6 0 . B y Messrs. T. & II. M e ss en g e r . T h e stocks held this side of the Atlantic and in Europe on the 1st o f January were placed at 96,000 hhds., an increase o f 12,000 hhds. com pared with same time the year previous. This liberal supply, added to the extreme estimate of the incoming crop, viz., 227,000 hhds., (which subsequent receipts proved to be short of the reality,) acted as an incubus to any advance in the value o f this staple ; and had the crop under culture resulted in a full average, we doubtless should have witnessed a feeble market throughout the year. W e proceed briefly to delineate the prominent features of the season. The demand for the closing winter months proved a fair average, the sales rather exceeding 2,000 hhds. at full quotations for the better grades, while inferior were less firm. The spring opened with a light demand and prices rather drooping, May closing with a declension in prices for inferior and medium o f \ @ -Jc. The market remained inanimate until near the close of summer, with limited sales, inferior grades exhibiting a further decline o f £ @ £c. without leading to increased activity. The chief nota ble circumstance was the rapidly accumulating stock, which now reached the unprecedented total of nearly 15,000 hhds. The prevailing lethargic feeling at length gave way, and ere the opening fall, an active demand sprang up, induced by an apprehension o f a large diminution in the grow ing crop from the effect of drought, resulting in an increased volume of transactions partly speculative, without, however, immediately advancing prices. As the season progressed, additional stimulus was imparted by reiterated statements of damage sustained by the crop, which was followed by large transactions, the sales for September and October reaching nearly 5,000 hhds., with a responding advance of \ @ 1-J- cents, the better classi fications being most favorably affected. W e regret that it is not in our power to follow up this favorable change, the business in the closing fall month being brought to a stand by political vicissitudes, which have had a paralyzing influence on commerce generally. And although tobacco has maintained its position favorably, compared with other staples, and holders appear comparatively firm, there is no disguising the fact that present quotations should be deemed nominal, and will simply indicate to the reader about where the market left off. Regarding the crop we have been treating of, our favorable expecta tions of its quality were far from being realized, there being a sad deficit o f sweet fleshy leaf, as also a very meager supply o f desirable African and W est India sorts. The bulk o f the excessive stock held here consists of medium and nondescript, for which there is but little inquiry, and we apprehend losses will occur in its realization ; while really desirable, from comparative scarcity, will probably be better maintained. A s to the ex tent and quality of the new crop, opinions are somewhat at variance; that there will be a deficiency in length, and an absence of dark rich leaf and choice manufacturing, there remains but little doubt. W e retain our usual practice of rendering the outside estimated growth, as we discover, on referring to many past years, it generally comes within the compass of actual results. 55 Tobacco Trade. The year will open with stocks o f the world, amounting, in the aggre gate, to 146,496 hhds., or an excess beyond those of last year of 50,496 hhds. O f the future course of the market we advance no opinion. W e invite the attention o f the reader to the following statistics : I n s p e c t io n s . Kentucky. Virginia and N. Carolina. 1851............ 1852............ 1853............ 1854............ 1855............ 1856,........... 1857,........... 1858............ 1859,........... 1860............ Hhds. 12,285 20,107 11,284 9,295 8,700 12,683 8,963 16,091 12,666 20,815 Hhds. 635 361 167 295 1,779 2,009 1,376 2,114 1,190 3,474 Ohio. Mid. Total. 1st January. Hhds. 6 1 Hhds. 13,046 20,472 11,457 9,611 10,500 14,701 10,339 18,205 13,867 *24,294 Hhds. 6,374 6.096 9,640 7,555 3,588 2,575 5,747 4,654 9,461 8,644 2 Hhds. 100 3 4 21 21 9 ., 5 11 •• Sto ck s . 1858, 1859. 1860. Julv............................................................................ August...... September,. October....... November,. December,.. Hhds. 4,044 3,967 3,980 3,757 4,403 6,034 8,894 10’ 326 11,595 11,741 10,865 10,210 Hhds. 9,461 8,490 8,049 8,212 8,074 8,216 10,515 12’368 12,413 12,212 9,929 9,148 H7ids. 8,644 8,372 8,11 9 8,303 8 679 10 869 13 368 14^613 14,913 15,283 15,415 15,833 January,.. . February,. . March,........ At>ril........... SA L E S FOR 1 8 5 9 -1 860. 1859. 1860. M o n t h s. Kentucky. January,................... February,................ March,...................... April,........................ May,.......................... June,......................... July........................... August,..................... September............... O ctober,................... November,. December,................ Hhds. 900 300 1,300 650 650 350 800 800 1,200 1,300 1,200 970 Maryland. Hhds. 50 ,, Virginia. Kentucky. Hhds. 50 40 100 75 40 Hhds. 1,425 600 950 600 670 700 700 1,200 2,250 2,000 650 425 25 100 25 25 Maryland. Virginia Hhds. 35 Total..................... 10,420 150 380 12,170 35 January 1st, 1861, stock on hand,............................... 19,048 hhds. * Including all inspections. Hhds. 75 25 100 70 100 50 150 75 500 75 50 1,270 Annual Report. 56 S tocks in W arehouse at the principal marts, J anuary 1st. New- York. New- Orleans. Baltimore. 1 8 5 9 ,... I 8 6 0 ,... . . . 8,644 1 8 6 1 ,... . . . 19,043 *20,858 19,546 13,271 Virginia. Philadelphia. 890 200 22,366 8,500 15,500 24,500 Total, 40,179 hhds. “ 44,633 “ “ 80,033 <( 560 742 853 Stocks in E uropean marts, D ecember 1st. Liverpool. 1858,.. . . . 14,015 + 1859,.. {i8 6 0 ,.. . . . 17,538 London. Bremen. UoUand. \Other Ports. 118,723 >7,020 leaf. +6,295 f 18,829 +7,493 “ +7,000 {■22,445 +6,747 “ +17,094 +3,230 +2,850 +8,329 Total, 44,283 hhds. “ 51,735 (( “ 67,653 “ I nspections for the fiscal year. New-Orleans,, Virginia. 1857-58, 72,696 68,075 1859-59, 68,953 56,450 1859-60, 62,113 76,997 Total receipts at New-Orleans, 1857-58, do. do. 1858-59, do. do. 1859-60, Baltimore. 70,669 62,546 78,291 Total, 211,440 hhds. “ 187,949 “ 217,421 «( . . 87,144 hhds. . . 75,925 “ Manufactured Tobacco.— It will require but a short space to chronicle the prominent characteristics o f the past year’ s transactions, which we regard, as a whole, unfavorable to parties interested. The winter business resulted in sales analogous to those o f the previous season, without change in prices. The spring transactions came short of anticipations, while the market flagged and quotations were scarcely supported. Summer passed without any prominent change either in value or demand, the latter of which continued dormant, with more than usual pressure on the part of the seller to realize. The weighty stock which had run up in August to Y4,000 packages, added much to the embarrassment of the agents at this period. The opening fall offered but little encouragement, and although the sales formed a fair average, a prevailing heaviness was the leading feature, while work suitable for the Southern trade receded in value, owing to the absence o f demand. A returning vitality was observable during the month o f October when free sales were effected with a pro mising future, resulting only in disappointment from local troubles. The market relapsed into a state o f comparative torpor, the year closing with a large diminution in sales. W e regret that it is not in our power to give the official sales and stocks for the past three months, making a break which we have filled by estimate, varying but little, we apprehend, from the true result. It will be discovered that there has been a diminution in receipts compared with last season of about 40,000 packages. W e again repeat that the stock on hand is given by estimate, and is much larger than was anticipated, particularly as the receipts for the closing month were very light; the almost entire cessation o f business has brought about this result. The most favorable feature is the probability that there is less in second hands than for many years past, while the interior is in light supply. Hence the revival o f business would at an early day place the agent in a stronger position. Included in the gross receipts are re-shipments to foreign markets.* * Estimated growth for I860— Kentucky, Tennessee and Missouri, 60,000; V ir ginia, 70,000; Maryland, 45,000; Ohio, 12,000; total, 187,000 hhds. t Latest mail advices. :+ Ports in Great Britain, Ireland and Scotland, assumed to approximate to the stock of December, 1858. Tobacco Trade. SALES. BECEIPTS. F oe 1859 Packages. 1849,... 1 8 5 0,... . . . 1851,. . . 1 8 5 2 ,... . . . 1 8 5 3 ,... . . . 1 8 5 4 ,... .. . 1 8 5 5 ,... . . . 1 8 5 6,... .. . 1 8 5 7 ,... . . . 1 8 5 8 ,... 1 8 5 9 ,... I 8 6 0 ,... . . . 162,341 . . 176,339 215,698 134,007 165,197 260,768 199,878 57 .. .. .. . . .., ... 281,629 . . Total sales,. Packages. January........ 14,727 February,... 15,089 March,.......... 19,254 16,741 May............... 13,148 June,............. 16,037 July,............. 17,276 August.......... 24,047 September,... 26,610 October........ 19,655 Novem ber,.. 14,575 December,... 10,464 and STOCKS. 1860. Packages. 13,184 ... ,. . 17,101 14,376 .. . 16,243 ,. . . •• 13,762 ,. . 12,873 ... 18,627 .. 16,623 .. 25,171 . . *20,500 .,. *9,000 ,. . *6,000 F oe 1859 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Packages. 30,655 30,799 34,895 39,397 45,410 50,162 56,493 53,185 45,240 43,623 48,281 55,202 and I860. Packages. . . 49,024 . . 46,649 . . 55,028 . . 54,562 . . 58,229 . . 61,638 . . 70,677 . . 74,607 . . 62,628 . . *59,961 . . *65,348 . . *67,367 207,623 ... 181,360 Seed Leaf.— W e have seldom witnessed a more unsatisfactory year than the past, both to the producer and dealer, prices having ruled very low compared with former seasons. The market during the winter and spring evidenced but little vitality, while the summer passed with but few transactions, and holders, discovering little prospect of realizing at the home market, commenced exporting on a large scale; but even this relief did not produce any appreciable benefit, and the sluggish feeling con tinued until fall, when a more cheerful aspect ensued. The recorded sales for September o f 5,000 cases, gave an improved tone to the market. Subsequently exporters purchased with freedom, confining their selections more particularly to the inferior grades, the figures for which were low. The season closes with a moderate prospect for the future. Regarding estimates of the crops, we find great discrepancy, and hence defer figures; they will probably result somewhat less than last year’s, but with the old stock on hand will doubtless be ample for all purposes. The crop o f Connecticut is said to be unusually good, but little, if any, o f the different growths has been disposed of. Florida.-—The crops of Florida are becoming each year of less import ance, this season’s production being placed at 1,000 cases, nearly one-half o f which is in port. O f the quality, we simply say that it is decidedly inferior and the color imperfect, hence the article attracts but little atten tion. Foreign Tobacco.-—Taken as a whole, the year just terminated has been generally satisfactory to those concerned, results usually proving remunerative, and at no time have the stocks been excessive. Cuba, which has been imported on a larger scale, has met with an improved demand, and prices exceeding last year’ s were realized. In Yara, the dealings have been unusually large, the article being used to some extent as a substitute. The crop of Havana possessed some choice parcels, but the larger portion was deficient in body and flavor. W e commenced the year with a very light.stock, and a demand corresponding. Holders are generally firm.* * Estimated. Annual Report. 58 Importations and Stocks. Importations in do. do. do. do. Dec. 31, stocks, do. do. do. do. 1 8 5 8 ,.. 1 8 5 9 ,.. I 8 6 0 ,.. 18 58,.. 1 8 5 9 ,.. I 8 6 0 ,.. Cuba. Bales. 20,618 5,045 8,207 4,908 522 792 Havana. Bales. 82,179 31,398 85,221 6,997 4,409 5,137 Yara. Other descriptions. Total. Bales. 8,064 14,454 7,149 2,734 5,211 1,964 Bales. 15,319 3,829 270 740 64 75 Bales. 76,180 54,726 50,947 14,379 10,206 7,968 Statement exhibiting the quantity and value o f Tobacco exported annually from the United States from 1821 to 30 th June, 1860. Y e ars. Bales. Cases. Hogsheads. 1821,........................................... 1822,................................ 1823............................................. 1824,........................................... 1825................................. 1826................................. 1827,................................ 1828................................. 1829,................................. 1830................................. 1831................................. 1 8 3 2 ,.............................. 1833,........................................... 1834................................. 1835,................................ 1836................................. 1337,........................................... 1838................................. 1839................................. 1840,................................ 1841,................................ 1842................................. 1843 ............................................ 1844,........................................... 1845 ............................................ 1846 ............................................. 1847,........................................... 1848................................. 1849................................. 1 8 5 0 ,... ........................... 1851.................................. 1852................................. 1853,................................. 1854..................................... 1855.............. ................ 1856................................. 1857,................................ 1858,................................ 1859................................. 1860,................................ 12,913 17,772 14,432 12,640 19,651 17,817 13,366 9,384 5,631 4,841 7,188 15,035 66,858 83,169 99,009 77,883 75,984 64,098 100,025 96,278 77,131 83,810 86,718 106,806 83,153 87,979 94,353 109,042 100,232 100,593 78,995 119,484 147,828 158,710 94,454 163,042 147,168 147,998 135,762 130,665 101,521 145,729 95,945 137,097 159,853 126,107 150,213 116,962 156,848 127,670 198,846 167,274 Total, 39 y e a r s ,. . . . 95,225 55,445 4,601,292 .... .... . . .. . . .. . . .. . ... . . .. . . .. . . .. .... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . Value. 5,648,962 6,222,838 6,2S2,672 4,855,566 6,115,623 5,347,208 6,577,123 5,269,960 4,982,974 5,586,365 4,892,388 5,999,769 5,755,968 6,595,305 8,250,577 10,058,640 5,795,647 7,392,029 9,832,943 9,883,957 12,576,703 9,540,755 4,650,979 8,397,255 7,469,819 8,478,270 7.242,086 7,551,122 5,804,207 9,951,023 9,219,251 10,031,283 11,319,319 10,016,046 14,712,468 12,221,843 20,662,772 17,009,767 21,074,038 15,906,547 $ $ 355,181,067 Currant Trade. TEE A nnual 59 CURRANT TRADE. R e v ie w eor the year 1860. T h e importation o f currants into the United States beginning to be come important, it is necessary to give some information concerning its cultivation and consumption, and duties it is submitted to in foreign countries. The sea provinces o f Peloponnesus, in the Corinthian Gulf, and the shores of Argolide and Messina, and the Ionian Islands, Zante and Cephalonia, are the sole countries which produce this fruit. Several landholders, considering the great increase o f consumption of this article, tried to cultivate it in other parts o f Greece, but they were greatly dis appointed, because the first year the vine produced currants, but the second it produced grapes. During the period that Greece was under the dominion of the Turks the cultivation of currants was very inconsiderable, and during the Greek revolution (1821— 1827) the vines were destroyed by the Turks, and up to the year 1833 the cultivation of this fruit did not make any material progress. But since that year, when a law of donation o f public lands to the inhabitants has been promulgated, the cultivation began to increase steadily, so that to-day the cultivation of currants in the Kingdom of Greece covers an area o f land not less than 300,000 stremas. In the years 1833— 1836 the production of currants scarcely amounted to 6,000,000 @ 10,000,000 pounds. But in the year 1851 the produc tion reached the large amount o f 70,000,000 pounds. The sickness of the vines destroyed the crops o f the years 1852, 1853 and 1854, so that in the year 1855 the crop amounted to 8,000,000 pounds o f excellent quality, produced principally from young branches touching the soil; this experiment and the use o f brimstone improved the culture, and in 1856 the crop amounted to 40,000,000 pounds. I f heavy rains had not oc curred during the collection o f the fruit in 1857, the crop of that year would have reached 60,000,000 pounds. Without the ravages of the oidium and the weather the vines of Greece may produce annually 120,000,000 pounds; to this amount, if we add 30 @ 35,000,000 pounds capable of production in the Ionian Islands, we have an annual production of 150,000,000 pounds, which amount, if ever produced in one year, prices will certainly decline to a point not even covering the expenses o f the cultivation, and in that case many o f the plantations will be abandoned. For this emergency a company has been formed in the city o f Patras for the promulgation o f the consumption o f currants by exporting them to every possible place where there is a probability o f consumption, and another company went into operation for the manufacture of wine out o f currants. But both these companies have failed in their endeavors to promote the interest of the cultivators of currants. Prices.— Although Greece has the monopoly of the production o f cur rants, prices are very irregular, being based on the quantity and quality of the crop and the general demand. During the Greek revolution cur rants, being exported with difficulty and paying irregular duties, were sold at prices varying from $60 @ $120 per 1,000 pounds. In the years 60 Annual Report. 1829— 1833 prices were between $25 and $35, owing to the poor quality o f the crop. Since 1834, when the import duties in England were re duced, and up to the year 1841, prices were varying from $50 @ $80. In the year 1844, the import duty in England being again reduced, cur rants in that year sold at $40, in 1845 at $45, and in 1846 and 1847 at a little above $50. About that time, the production having reached a high figure, and the consumption not being in proportion, prices fell'con siderably, the fruit selling in 1851 as low as $10. That year the sickness in the vines made its appearance and prices went up again, so that in the years 1852 to 1855 from $80 @ $110 were paid. In 1856, the crop being more abundant, prices ranged from $70 to $80 ; in 1857 they were $63, and in 1858-59, $35. In I860 prices opened at $32 per 1,000 pounds, but drooped down to $16, and went up again to $25. W e have no correct return of the last year’ s crop, but it is said to amount to 80.000. 000 pounds from Greece alone. It is calculated that the price o f $25 covers all the expenses of the cultivator and even leaves a small profit. Export.— The principal market for currants is England, where all classes eat them, and the importation there reaches, on an average, annually, 50.000. 000 of pounds; and this year, on account of the reduction of duty to seven shillings per 112 lbs., it is supposed that England will con sume about 80,000,000 lbs. Germany comes next to England, taking about 12 @ 18,000,000 lbs. The United States come after, having imported, for the year ending 31st March, 1861, 4,225,385 lbs. The im portation of the year 1859 was nearly double that o f the present one, and enough to last for the consumption of two years ; but in the month of February, 1860, England having reduced the duty from 15s. 9d. to 7s. per 112 lbs., and therefore the consumption there being on the increase, several importers were induced to export to England, and about 3,000,000 lbs. were exported there, so that it is apparent that the United States cannot consume much above 4,000,000 lbs. In Russia currants are almost unknown. Duties.— The duty in England has been reduced from 15s. 9d. to 7s. per 112 lbs. In Austria the duty is five florins per quintal, (say 120 lbs.,) or $23 per 1,000 lbs. In Holland, where two to three millions lbs. are imported annually, the duty is only $1 83 per 1,000 lbs. In Greece the export duty, up to 1857, was $2 per 1,000 lb s.; in 1858 it was reduced to 83^ cents; but last year it was raised to 19 drachms, or $3 16 per 1,000 lbs. Importation o f Currants into the United States.— About twenty-two years ago currants began to be imported into the United States, and the cheap prices prevailing for a long time made this fruit to be within the reach of all classes, and between 3,000,000 @ 4,000,000 lbs. were an nually consumed, the price being about 4J @ 5 cents per lb .; but since the year 1851, when the sickness o f the vines prevailed, the prices were pushed up from 5 to 25 cents per lb., and the importation into this country was almost stopped, so that in the year 1854 we find that the importations amounted only to 219,118 lbs., which was sold at an aver age price of 20 cents per lb. 61 Currant Trade. I m p o r t a t io n of C urrants in t o t h e V U n it e d alu e at th e P S tates ort of T fo r th e last en 1851........................ 1852......................... 1858...................... ............. 1854....................... 1,039,435 1855....................... '••/J856,..................... ............. .‘.'y'JSb'l...................... “ ”4858...................... r^ 5 9 *................... “ i^ io ....................... C/J■ e a r s , a n d t h e ir ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Value. $ 133,870 143,343 40,893 23,995 94,389 127,089 151,418 342.869 319,326 138,890 ___ $ 1,516,082 Pounds. Year “ “ “ Y E x p o r t a t io n . 1,468,261 30,189,691 ■4 Warrants in New-Yorlc.— The prices from the year 1851 to Ted from 7 @ 10 cents per lb .; but in 1854 to 1855, after the sickness of vines in Greece, prices went up to 25 @ 30 cents, and in 1856 they went down again to 15 cents. In the years 1857 and 1858 they were selling from 6 @ 7 cents; and in 1859 and 1860, the crop being abundant, prices were as low as 4 @ 5 cents per lb. The following table will show the ordinary prices o f currants in NewYork for the last ten years : T ears. 1851,........... 1852............. 1853............. 1854,........... 1855............. 1856............. 1857,........... 1858............. 1859............. 1860............. T eaes. 1851............. 1852............. 1853,........... 1854............. 1855,........... 1856,........... 1857............. 1858............. 1859............. 1860............. January. February. 7f © 6 4f @ 91 @ @ 91 Ol 19 @ © 15 ,@ © 25 15 @ © 25 17 © © — 9 © 10 7 © 8 .7 .© 4 4 i@ Si @ © @ — 9 20 15 12 18 July. 61 5 14 19 15 20 12f 7} 5 4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 7 5} 15 21 25 23 13 9 5} 41 71 5 10J 21 26 ,35 171 10 8 5 August. April. March. 71 7 i 5 41 11 10 21 181 ’16 15 23 22 © — 161 O o © 10 71 @ 41 10 19 14 ?? 17 @ © @ © © 5 ,© 6} 6 16 — 25 23 10 9 51 6 }@ 84 @ 18 @ 25 @ 15 @ 20 @ 11 @ 7} @ 41 @ 4 © 4} 4 @ © © © © © © 0 41 © -5 • G ' @ September. 6 }@ 5j @ 15 @ 25 @ 15 @ 20 @ 9 @ 7} @ 5 }@ © © 71 5 11 21 22 24 17 10 H 5 October. 6 @ 8 @ 19 @ 20 @ 20 @ 22* @ a @ 5} @ 71© 4 } 41 @ 7 9 19 27 24 24 12 9 6 May. 6} 8} 20 30 27 25 — 6} 8 5} 7 U 10 181 15 22 16 June. 6} 41 12 19 15 22 © 16} 16 © 7i 5 © 11 @ 21 © 22 ■A 24 © 8 © 9 © — 5 @ November. 5 }@ 9 @ 19 @ 20 © 20 @ 22} @ 10 @ 8 @ 6 }@ 5 @ 7 5 12} 21 25 23 © 16} 7 @ 81 5 }@ 51 4f 4 @ December. 5 @ 5} 5} 9 @ 9} 9} 18 @ 19 20 20 @ 25 26 12 @ 2 5 27 20 @ 21 23 12 9 @ 10} 8} 7} @ 8} 6} 6 @ 6} 5} * Of this amount, 3,000,000 lbs. were exported to England. @ @ © @ @ © 3 i@ 4} 62 Annual Report. REPORT ON T I I E C A L I F O R N I A T R A D E , F or the Y ear 1860. T h e year 1 8 6 0 was marked with a falling off in the quantity of sup plies sent from Eastern ports to California. The decrease was mainly in articles o f food and in the matter o f cured provisions, the experience of the past year would seem to indicate that the State will need no fur ther supplies from abroad. Notwithstanding the diminished ventures by shippers the past year, the returns have been o f the most unsatisfactory character. Early in the season the emigration to the Washoe silver dis trict completely unsettled trade in nearly every part o f the State. The traders stopped buying goods until their stocks were entirely exhausted, uncertain as.to the number of their customers the excitement would carry away to the new Dorado. The consequences were, that during the first five months of the year there were fewer goods taken out of the San Francisco market than probably ever before during a similar period. A speculation on a large scale, in staple articles, initiated early in the year, and which promised to be successful, finally broke down for the lack of any demand from the country, and was productive of a double injury to the market by inducing large shipments from this side which could not be placed by in voice upon arrival or since, without submitting to large losses. The market for groceries and provisions ruled dull throughout the entire year; in the latter half there was more activity, but the San Francisco jobber and the interior trader alike bought only to supply immediate wants, and the hulk of stocks had to he carried by importers and factors. W ith respect to manufactured goods’ the "State, fvith Its glowing popu lation, buys more- and Kioto largely front the East every year. Importers resident at San ’ Francisco carry on the numerous branches o f trade coming under this head. .They older their .supplies - understanding^, knowing the wants of the State', and their business, one year with another, is fairly profitable. The following statement of the tonnage arriving at San Francisco from Atlantic ports, from 1856 to 1861, will show the extent of the imports from that quarter for a series of years. The statement exhibits— 1. The number of vessels. 2. The aggregate registered tonnage. 3. Estimated tons of cargo at sixty per cent, over register. 4. Total amount o f freight moneys paid in each year : Where from . 1856. No. o f Vessels. New-York.......................... Boston................................ Other ports,..................... New-York,........................ Boston,............................... Philadelphia,.................... Total for 1857, Tons o f Cargo. 165,652 64,320 8,963 Am ount o f Freight Paid. 103,532 42,200 6,602 .. . . 149,334 .. 238,935 . . $ 3,236,869 61 28 1 74,402 33,802 1,219 .. . . 119,043 54,083 1,950 . . $ 1,309,244 . 469,798 .. 22,390 90 109,423 .. 175,076 . . $ 1,801,432 79 37 7 Total for 1856........................... 123 1857. Registered Tonnage. . . $ 2,167,045 . 924,957 . 144,867 63 California Trade. No. o f Am ount o f Freight Paid. Tons o f Cargo. R egistered Tonnage. Vessels. Wherefrom . 31 .. 71,882 32,166 4,345 .. . . . 124,611 51,370 6,952 . . $ 1,503,955 607,329 68,919 Total for 1858,.............. .......... 105 .. 114,333 .. 182,933 .. $2,180,203 . . .. .. . 171,641 71,678 8,002 .. . 107,216 44,799 5,001 $ 2,107,924 892,704 92,582 Total for 1859,.............. ........... 141 .. 157,076 .. 251,321 .. $ 3,093,210 New-York,............ ........... Boston,................... Other ports,........ . 93,240 30,661 6,341 .. . . 149,184 49,057 10,145 .. $1,777,802 624,396 82,988 130,242 .. 208,386 .. $ 2,485,186 .. $ 3,236,869 1,801,432 2,180,203 3,093,210 2,485,186 1858. 1859. 1860. New-York,............ Boston,................... ........... Other ports,........ New-York,............ Boston,................... Other ports,........ ........... 8 16 . Total for 1860,.............. R Y e c a p it u l a t io n ears. Total for 1856..................... “ 1857..................... “ 1858..................... ........ 105 “ 1859..................... ........ 141 “ 1860,................... Grand total for five years,. . Registered Tonnage. No. o f Vessels. . Tons o f Cargo. . 149,334 109,423 114,333 157,076 130,242 . . . . . . 660,408 . 1,056,651 . . . 238,935 175,076 182,933 251,321 208,386 Freight. . . $ 12,796,900 Average freight per ton for 1856............ (( << 1857............ (f t( 1858............ “ “ 1859........... «( «< 1860............ The average tonnage of the vessels employed in the trade between the Atlantic ports and California has, for the last six years, ranged as follows: Tons Reg. 1855,............. 1856',............. ................................. 1,214 1857.............. D is a s t e r s to the Tons Reg. 1858................................... 1859................................... 1860................................... F leet in 1860. The year 1860 was an unusually prosperous one to the fleet; twelve vessels were obliged to touch at way ports, but they were mostly small craft. Only one vessel, the bark Baltic, was lost; she was from Alexan dria, with a cargo o f coal, and was abandoned at sea December lYth. During the preceding year six ships, one coal laden, and the rest with valuable assorted cargoes, were totally lost. The steamship Granada, o f New-York, was lost on the 13th October, in the harbor of San Francisco, near Fort Point, through the culpable negligence o f the pilot. 64 Annual Report. T he C a l if o r n ia . P assage. The year 1860 was signalized by the quickest passage ever made be tween New-York and San Francisco. The medium clipper Andrew Jackson, 1,679 tons, sailed from here in the last of December, and arrived out in eighty-nine days. The quickest time previously made was by the celebrated extreme clipper Flying Cloud, in eighty-nine days and six hours. The average length of passage in 1860 from New-York and Bos ton to San Francisco was, from the former port, somewhat shorter than during the two preceding years. From Boston, the average has scarcely varied for six years. The following is a statement of the average and the shortest passages in six years: F rom N e w - Y 1 EARS. 1855,____ 1856........ 1857,____ 1 8 5 8 ,.... 1859,____ 1860,____ ____124£ ork. F rom B oston . S h o rte s t passa ge. D a ys. A v era g e passa ge. D a ys. .. — 94 91 101 102 89 . . . . 131 ____134 . . . . 139$ . . . . 183$ Steam C Y ears. .... S h o rte s t p a ssage. D a ys. A v era ge passa ge. D a ys. .. 1855......... ____137£ 1856,____ ____131 1857........ ____126 1858,___ ____136 1S59........ ____140J 1860........ ____142 ____ ____ ____ ____ o m m u n ic a t io n via P — 106 104 107 112 97 anam a. The California mails, passengers and treasure, via Panama, have been carried, since the 5th March, by the steamers o f C. V a n d e r b i l t and as sociates on this side, and those of the Pacific Mail Company on the Pacific; these two companies, which had been running opposition previ ously, consolidating their interests at that date, a change was made im mediately thereafter in the number of steamers run; instead of two semi monthly, three were despatched, the dates of sailing being the 1st, 11th and 21st of each month. The rates o f fare were also judiciously reduced, and the beneficial effects to the State are seen in a larger increase of population by seaward arrivals than in any preceding year since 1855. The bold experiment was made early in the year of shipping butter from this market to San Francisco by this route. It proved entirely success ful, the butter arriving out in short of forty days, in every way superior condition to that sent via Cape Horn. The consequence is, that the latter route for transport of this article has been entirely abandoned. Large amounts of valuable light goods are sent by the Isthmus ; the total value of the shipments per steamers in 1860, according to the Custom-House records, was but little short o f eight millions o f dollars. The following figures exhibit the passenger movement o f the port o f San Francisco since 1856 : A r r ivals 1S5T. From Panama.......................... 17,637 “ other countries,............ 6,963 Total arrivals,................. 24,600 ‘ 1858. 1669. ............................... .. 40,739 .. 26,907 11,276 I860. .. .. 20,092 10,619 .. 40,739 .. 38,183 .. 30,711 For Panama............................. 12,367 “ other countries,............... 4,584 .. .. 27,994 .. 19,030 6,751 .. .. 10,084 4,492 Total departures............. 16,951 .. 27,994 .. .. 14,576 D epartu res. 24,781 California Trade. 65 It will be understood that nearly all the passengers, via Panama, were emigrating from or returning to the Atlantic States. The total gain to California, by seaward arrivals, during the five years ending with 1860, amounted to 55,293 souls. F r e ig h t s to C a l if o r n ia Dry Goods, Groceries, per foot. Liquors, &c. Date. from N ew Date. -Y ork. Dry Goods, per foot. Groceries, Liquors, &c. 27} © 27} © 27} © 30 @ 27} @ 25 @ 22} © 25 @ 25 @ 25 @ 25 @ 27} @ 35 35 35 35 32} 32} 32} 30 30 32} 35 32} 27} 27} 27} 30 27} 25 22} 25 25 25 25 27} @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 32} 32} 32} 32} 30 30 30 27} 27} 30 32} 30 27} 30 27} 30 25 25 27} 27} 30 30 32} 30 32} 32} 32} 35 32} 32} 30 32} 35 35 37} 35 27} 27} 25 27} 25 25 27} 25 27} 27} 30 30 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 30 30 32} 30 30 .. 30 32} 32} 32} 32} 1859. 1 85 7 . January,............. February,........... March,................. April,.................. May..................... June,................... July..................... August,............... September,......... October,.............. November,.......... D ecem ber,........ 25 @ 30 25 @ , . 25 @ 25 @ 25 @ 2 7 } 2 2 } @ 26 2 3 } @ 25 25 @ . . 25 @ . . 2 2 } @ 25 25 @ 2 7 } @ 30 25 © 22} © 22} @ 22} @ 25 @ 22} © 22} @ 22} @ 22} @ 22} 0 221 @ 27} @ 30 25 25 25 27} 25 25 25 25 25 25 30 January............... F e b r u a r y ,.......... M arch,................. A pril..................... May,..................... June..................... July ..................... August,................ S eptem ber,......... October,............... N o v em b er,......... D ecem ber............ 1860. 1858. January,............. February,.......... March,................. A p r il,................. May,.................... June,................... July,.................... August................ September,......... October,.............. N ovem ber,......... December,........... 30 32} 27} 80 30 30 30 32} 30 30 27} 30 @ © 0 @ 0 0 0 0 @ @ 0 @ T 35 35 30 30 @ 32} @ 27} @ 30 @ 30 0 3 2 } 30 © 30 @ 35 32} @ 30 @ 30 @ 35 27} @ 35 | 30 @ .. .. .. .. .. he E January,........... F ebruary,........... M arch,................. A p ril,................... M ay...................... 3 2 } Ju n e,.................... Ju ly ...................... August................. 35 S eptem ber,......... October,............... N o v e m b e r,......... 35 35 D ecem ber,........... 35 35 30 .. .. .. .. .. xports of @ @ @ © 0 @ @ @ © @ @ @ C a l if o r n ia . Notwithstanding the Washoe silver excitement leading away many miners from their gold c airns, in the first part o f 1860, the yield o f gold, the great staple product o f California, seems to have suffered no diminu tion. It is true that the exports o f treasure from San Francisco in 1860, as compared with those of 1859, show a decrease o f $5,315,000, but this is no evidence, as might hastily he supposed, o f a diminished pro duct. The export o f gold is simply the standard o f the obligations of the State abroad, and not o f the productiveness of the mines. According to the records at San Francisco of the receipts from the interior (exclu sive of what is brought by private hands) and the exports abroad, it VOL. xlv .— no. i. 5 66 Annual Report. would appear that the product o f the mines in 1860 exceeded the average of the two preceding years. The following figures will show this: 1858. Receipts from interior.......... Imports from abroad,........... 1859. 1860. 540,023,420 2,368,753 .. .. $46,813,159 2,516,152 .. .. $45,211,693 1,809,061 Total,........................... $42,392,173 Exports.................................... 47,548,025 .. .. $49,389,311 47,640,462 .. .. $ 47,020,754 42,325,916 Loss for the year.................. Gain for the year.................. $ 5,155,852 ....... .. .. ___ $ 1,748,849 .. .. ___ $ 4,694,838 As remarked elsewhere in this article, the State has, during the past year, produced all the cured meats needed for its own consumption ; owing also to increased home production, the imports o f Eastern lard and butter (two great staples) have fallen off- fifty per cent. A dd to this the fact that the exports other than treasure in 1860 exceeded those o f 1859 by $3,000,000, and there is ample explanation why upwards o f five mil lions of gold were retained in the State in 1860 more than in the pre ceding year. Considerable progress was made in 1860 in developing the silver mines in Western Utah, commonly known as the “ Washoe Mines.” A t the close of the year twenty quartz mills for crushing the ore, and about as many saw mills were completed or in course of erection. Their cost, owing to the fact that the machinery had to be transported across the Sierra Nevada Mountains, was about double that o f similar works in Cali fornia. The price charged by the owners of these quartz mills for crush ing and amalgamating ores ranges from $25 to $50 per ton. In California the price for the same work, in all the principal districts, is $4 to $5 per ton, at which rates it is a profitable business. An idea o f the value of the leads o f Western Utah, as compared with the generality of quartz leads in California, may be drawn from the fact that they can pay the .enormous rate there charged for reducing them, while the average yield o f the quartz leads o f Grass Valley, the oldest and one o f the richest districts in California, is only $20 per ton, and from this all the expenses o f getting out the rock and reducing it have to be deducted. Up to the close .of .the year but little had been done at Washoe in the way o f re ducing ores on the spot. But a number of the mining companies had been busily engaged in getting out ore, and had accumulated from a few hundred to two thousand tons each ready for crushing. O f the ores taken out those found to yield, by assay, over $300 per ton, have been sent to San Francisco, (at a cost of $120 per ton and upwards for freight,) and mostly shipped thence to Europe. The exports o f silver ore, during the year 1860, according to the San Francisco Custom-House records, were o f the value of $416,613. This is, however, no guide as to what the ores yielded. In addition to the ores exported, several hundred tons have been smelted at two establishments in San Francisco, yielding about $150,000. When it is considered that the Washoe mining district was a howling wilderness at the commencement o f 1860, and that every necessary of life, even the material for habitations, had to be transported across the Sierra Nevada on the backs of mules, it must be conceded that vast progress has been made in opening the mines, and without doubt .their product this year will ascend to millions. California Trade. 67 Although the injunction of the United States government restraining the owners o f the New-Almaden quicksilver mine from working it was not removed until the commencement o f 1861, still the quantity o f that metal exported in 1860 again rose to some importance. Three other mines were industriously worked under the impulse o f an active demand both for home and foreign consumption. The following figures show the yield o f these three mines during the year: Netc-Idria. Yield in I860,............. Enriquita. 4,618 flasks. .. 6,816 flasks. Gaudaloupe. .. 2,676 flasks. The ruling prices during the year was 60 cents for home consumption and 50 cents for export. The exports of agricultural produce from the State figure largely over those o f any former year. Breadstutfs increased 100 per cen t.; wool, 36 per cent., and hides 30 per cent. The following are tabular statements of the exports o f leading Califor nia products for several years past: E xports T of reasu re. Statement o f the Amounts and Destination o f Treasure Exported from San Francisco, during the year 1860. T o New-York. In “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ January,.............. February,........... March,................. ........ April.................... May,.................... ........ June,................... ......... July..................... ........ August,............... September.......... October,.............. November,.......... ......... December...................... Exported to— 2,177,395 2,905,028 3,709,755 1,969,435 2,982,704 4,119,814 25 77 67 88 ■in 01 05 47 59 19 78 31 New-York,................. New-Orleans,............. England,..................... China.......................... Japan,......................... Manilla........................ Panama,..................... Sandwich Islands,.. . Mexico,....................... Costa Rica,................. Vancouver Island,... 37 57,795 93 20 27 00 94 300,819 00 40,679 57 00 00 00 Total,................... Total,................ 28 37 Table exhibiting the Shipments o f Treasure from San Francisco to the 31s£ December, 1860, to all quarters, and also to N ew -York ; the R e ceipts o f Cold at the United States Mint and Branches, and the esti mated yield o f the Mines o f California, since 1848. Y ear. 1848........ 1849........ 1850........ 1851........ 1852........ 1853,___ 1854........ 1 8 5 5 ,.... 1856,___ 1857........ 1858,___ 1859........ 1860,___ Shipments to a ll quarters , as m anifested. ... • . . . 45,582,695 ___ 57,331,024 ___ 51,328,653 .. .. ___ 48,887,543 ___ 48,592.743 .. .. R eceip ts at M in t and Branches. Shipments to New- York. . . ,,.. .... .• . . .. .* . . . . .. 47.916,448 46,289,649 38,730,564 39,765,294 35,287,778 35,578,236 39,831,937 35,661,500 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... $5,232,249 28,206,226 57.13S,980 51,470,675 62,838,395 46,719,083 47,419,945 56,379,901 55,217,843 51,494,311 52,000,000 27,037,919 E stim a ted y ie ld o f C a liforn ia . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60,000 8,000,000 33,000,000 55,000,000 57,000,000 69,000,000 64,000,000 65,000,000 70,000,000 70,000,000 70,000,000 70,000,000 70,000,000 Annual Report. 68 E xports To New- York. F lask.. Years . 1853,. . . . 1854,___ 4855,----1 8 5 7 ;.... ___ 1 500 8^374 of To other Countries. Flasks. Q u ic k s il v e r . To other CountriesFlasks. To New- York. Flasks. Years. 18,800 1858,........ . . . 20,963 1859,........ 27.165 I860,......... 22,240 Total,__ .. . 18,888 3,559 250 400 14,083 .. 20,573 3,149 8,948 140,726 From the above it appears that the total amount o f quicksilver exported from the State during the past eight years was 154,809 flasks; there was consumed within the State, during the same period, 16,000 flasks, making a total production (almost entirely from the New-Almaden mine) o f 170,809 flasks of 75 lbs. each. The price ranged from 1853 to 1860 from 75c. to 50c. per lh. Table o f Exports o f leading articles o f California Produce to New- York f o r the last five years. A r t ic l e s . Barley,........ Hides,........... Quicksilver, . Skins,............ fi Salm on,__ _ Tallow ,........ W ool............. ...................lbs., W heat,........ 1856. 185T. 1858. 1859. 1860. 16,510 97,675 51,103 97,947 200,116 142,399 132,032 170,447 151,364 8,374 2,414 400 3,559 250 876 939 1,506 798 975 9,313 26,363 2,874 3,812 .. .. 212 1,112 256 906 250 826 194 888 618 3 600,000 1,100,000 1,428,351 2,378,250 2,981,000 — . . . . 12,054 203,528 — Exhibit o f the Exports o f a few leading articles o f California Produce to all countries in 1860. Barley,...................84 lb. sacks, 136,916 Beans......................50 “ “ 1,397 Flour,...................................bbls., 121,688 Hides.............................. number, 200,116 Hay,.......................... '.. . . b a l e s , 9,637 Lumber..........................M. feet, 3,976 76,590 Oats,...................... 55 lb. bags, Potatoes,...............110 “ “ 34,161 Skins........................... packages, 580 Tallow,....................... “ 2,181 Wheat................. 100 lb. sacks, 1,135,098 W ool..............................pounds, 3,060,000 The value of the exports o f California, other than treasure, during the last five years, has been as follows : 1856, .................................. 1857,..................................... 1858....................................... $ 4,270,260 4,369,758 4,770,163 1859, 1860, $ 5,533,411 8,532,489 D ry Goods Trade. DRY GOODS TRADE F ob the 69 OF N E W - Y O R K , 1860. year From the U. S. Economist and D ry Goods Reporter. O n pp. 154— 156 our readers -will find a detailed statement of the imports of dry goods at the port o f New-York for the closing year, as compared with the years 185*7, 1858 and 1859. The following table shows the comparative receipts for the last twelve years: I mports 1849,... .. 1850,... .. 1851,... . . . 1852,... .. 1853,... .. 1854.... .. 1855,... . . . 1856,... .. 1857,... .. 1858,... .. 1859,... I860,... .. Woollens. $ 11,9S3,279 16,565,016 15,252,028 16,172,991 28,204,146 21,884,346 19,157,015 26,185,825 24,938,403 21,124.303 34,532,922 . . . . . . . . . . . . of D r y G oods Cottons. $6,519,972 11,038,595 11,027,938 11,3S9,85S 16,808,353 15,610,143 11,274,221 10,901,135 17,480,962 13,567,943 27,781,264 17,721,725 into the Silks. . $ 15,295,753 . 20,2S1,034 . . 23,486,456 . 22,944,503 84,128,519 . . . 27,599,393 . 23,478,460 . 28,730,519 . 27,691,9S7 . 20,381,736 . 83,682,647 . 84,9SS,710 . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . U nited S tates. Flax. $ 4,756,561 7,562,941 6,749,818 7,103,887 8,790,135 7,258,052 6,924,635 8,772,822 6,938,737 7,008,636 11,120,484 7,914,152 Miscellaneous. Total. . $ 3,959,210 .. $ 45,514,775 58,329,828 .. 2,2S2,487 .. .. 4,110,163 .. 60,626,400 62,304,261 .. 4,644,017 . 93,499,086 .. 5,766,964 . .. 5,805,939 .. 78,157,S78 66,802,697 .. 5,968,365 . .. 7,208,592 .. 88,927,453 6,676,856 .. 82,676,523 .. 4,914,523 .. 69,093,765 .. 6,266,052 .. 112,970,944 . 6,574,497 .. 101,8SO,406 It will be observed, from the above statement, that the whole importa tion o f dry goods at this port for the past year amounts to $101,880,406. The amount, though considerable, is yet less than that of 1859 by $11,090,538, a decrease of about ten per cent. The only other year approaching this sum is 1853, when the receipts reached the then extra ordinary figure o f $93,500,000. It does not appear that the importation has been in excess of the wants of the country. Judging from the fact that during both the spring and fall seasons importers have been enabled to clear out their stocks quite satisfactorily, and that the general result of the year’ s business has been favorable, we should conclude that a hun dred million dollars worth o f dry goods may be safely imported yearly, when the general trade o f the country is in a wholesome condition. On comparing the amounts o f the several kinds o f manufactures with the corresponding items of previous years, some important fluctuations will be observed. Manufactures o f wool have not varied very materially from 1859, there having been a decrease under that head o f $2,796,119, which is about a due proportion of the total decrease on all kinds o f goods. In cotton goods, however, there has been a very significant decrease. In 1859 the receipts were $27,781,264 ; this year they have been $17,721,725 ; show ing a falling off of $10,059,539, or thirty-five per cent. This is a very important fluctuation, and would seem to be attributable less to the com petition of domestic goods than the reaction of an excessive supply dur ing last year. Large as is the decrease compared with 1859, yet the importation has been larger than during any other former year. In 1857 nearly an equal amount was imported; in 1856 the receipts were less D ry Goods Trade. 70 by $6,800,000; and in 1855 by $6,400,000; so that the importation for this year even exceeds an average. Silk manufactures show an increase on last year, although that was one of the largest years in the annals of the trade. The four years o f largest importations of silk goods since 1849 have been as follows : 1853..................................................................... $34,128,519 1856................................................................... 28,730,519 33,682,647 1859, .............................................................. 1860, .............................................................. 34,988,710 The receipts o f last year, therefore, exceeded those of all former periods. Few have been prepared to expect such a fa ct; for the heavy losses made on silk goods, of almost every class, in 1859, had produced an impression that a considerable reaction would appear this year. Thirty-five million dollars worth o f silk goods is certainly an enormous value for one year’ s consumption ; yet it appears to be no more than the people are prepared to buy, for the close o f the season finds importers with a lighter balance than they have held for several seasons. The fact that thirty-five per cent, of the entire value o f dry goods imported consists o f silk fabrics affords some idea of the freedom with which our population spend their money on costly articles of dress ; perhaps no other country in the world can show such a proportion of silk goods in its consumption o f textile fabrics. The importation of flax goods has been about equal to the average of late years, though much below that o f 1859. Last year the receipts were $11,120,484; this year they have been $7,914,152— showing a decrease of $3,206,332, or about twenty-seven per cent. When it is considered that last year’s imports were nearly twenty-five per cent, in excess of those o f any former year, it is apparent enough that such a balance of goods must have been brought over into the present year as to materially limit the requirements of the past twelve months. R e v ie w of the F o r e ig n D ry G oods T rade of N ew -Y ork. The year 1860 has been one o f varied fortunes with the dry goods im porter. The spring business was generally unsatisfactory in its results, whilst that of the fall has been equally favorable; although there ap pears to have been no sufficient cause why the former should not have been as satisfactory as the latter season. The experience of the spring trade shows how easily our importers may lose a few million dollars by bad management; and that o f the fall how great control over the value of their property they actually possess. The spring importation hap pened to be received earlier than usual, which naturally raised an expec tation early in the season that the market would be heavily stocked. On the 1st of January a larger amount o f stock was in bond than is usually held at that period ; during that month the receipts continued to increase on the previous year’ s until, at the beginning of February, the imports showed an excess over January o f 1859 amounting to $1,200,000 ; during February, also, the increase was maintained, so that the customs returns for the two months exhibited an aggregate gain on the same period of 1859 amounting to $3,360,000, or about fifteen per cent. This was the bugbear of the market. Importers took fright at the figures, and D ry Goods Trade. 71 losing all hope of their being reduced during succeeding weeks, they also ost confidence in their property, and threw themselves on the tender mercies of buyers, which of course proved to be “ cruel.” Buying com menced late, owing to the vacillation o f holders respecting prices, and, being late, was consequently o f a character unsatisfactory to the sellers. After the beginning of March, however, the receipts began to decline, and continued to do so steadily until at the beginning o f May the imports for the four months showed a slight decrease on the same period of 1859. This, of course, was too late to effect any material recovery in the tone of trade. During the mean time goods had been selling very heavily, and in many instances at ruinous prices. Jobbers, perceiving the fears of importers, were determined in bringing them to the auction room, which they effected without much difficulty, so that the public sales were un usually early, and large almost beyond precedent. Dress goods, shawls, and silks especially, were crowded rapidly upon the market, and buyers finding they were to have prices according to their own ordering, took advantage of the occasion, and bought the major portion o f their supplies at a heavy discount from the cost o f importation. Probably not less than 825,000,000 o f various kinds of goods was sold at auction, at an average loss o f from 15 @ 20 per cent., making a total loss to the importers o f not less than four million dollars. It was generally acknowledged by the trade that this ruinous procedure was very largely attributable to the unwise haste of sellers in resorting to public sale. Had a little more firmness been shown by holders, they could with per fect ease have made from 15 @ 20 per cent, more on their sales. There was nothing whatever in the state of the general trade of the country to shake the confidence of the market. The Southern jobbers commenced the season with heavy purchases, and good expectations were cherished respecting the W e s t; whilst every other section o f the country was in a fine condition for buying. In the prospect of the demand there was everything to encourage holders ; but because they had chanced to stock themselves a month earlier than usual, they threw overboard all their chances, and squandered their capital where they might have increased it. It is a most unfortunate circumstance that the importer should have so little control over the value of his property. It may be that, from the peculiarities o f the market, the importers could not have acted otherwise than as they did in the case in question ; it must be admitted, however, that if they are surrounded by such sensitive influences as render it dan gerous to make a liberal importation, the only wise policy for each mer chant is to carefully keep within the strictest moderation in making his importation. The lessons suggested by the experience o f the spring trade are— that the market is peculiarly subject to the control of sensations ; that a great sensation may be created out of very trivial causes ; that holders of goods are themselves the first to yield to an unfounded sensation, instead of being the last; that sensations tend to the auction room ; and that auc tions, under such circumstances, are disastrous to the importer. These costly lessons o f the spring business appear not to have been lost upon the importing interest, for the course of the fall trade has pre sented a perfect contrast in these points to that o f the spring. The early importation was moderate, so that the season opened with stocks as light as in spring they were heavy. On the 1st of August the imports of fall 72 D ry Goods Trade. goods were $6,000,000 less-than for the same period o f 1859, and this decrease upon the last year was steadily maintained lip to the close o f the season. The result was that business opened with a firm tone and an active movement. Jobbers came early into the market, and importers sold a large portion o f their stock during the early weeks at excellent profits. They were as late in their resort to public sale as in the spring they had been premature, and no general break down in prices was ex perienced throughout the season. The auctions commenced about a month later than usual, and the offerings being unfrequent and in many cases light, a scale o f prices was sustained throughout quite equal to those of private sales. About the middle of the season the receipts of French worsted goods increased considerably, owing to the abolition o f the ex port bounty on cotton and woollen fabrics by the French government; and this, causing a surplus of such stock to be offered at auction, pro duced a partial depreciation of its value. W ith that exception, however, the value o f property at public sale was as good at the close o f the season as at its commencement. These facts show the inspiriting tendency of a moderate importation. The general failure of the Southern demand appeared to have little effect on the feeling o f the market, although the volume o f trade with that section did not amount to more than one-half o f its usual extent— still further showing the sustaining tendency o f a safe importation. It is also worthy o f note, as showing the importance of a moderate aggregate o f imports, that a certain class o f goods have made handsome profits through the season, although the amount has been beyond all precedent. The receipts of silks for the fall o f 1859 were unusually heavy, causing importers to lose all confidence in such goods and sacrifice upon them very heavily. The importation of silk manufactures for the present fall have been, however, over two million dollars, or eleven per cent, larger than last year ; and yet, strange to say, silks have been the most desirable property of the season, and have sold down to a very low balance, ex cepting certain passe styles brought over from 1859. This difference between the results of the two seasons is not to be accounted for by the existence of any better demand this fall than last, especially considering that the South, which takes so many silks, has bought very sparingly this season ; it is undoubtedly the result o f the moderation o f the aggre gate importation having given confidence to holders generally. It will be seen from the above statement that the total importation for the twelve months is $101,880,406, against $112,970,944 for 1859. T he total entries at the poet toe The first six months were................... The second six months w e r e ............. 1859. $ 57,257,530 55,713,414 $ 112,970,944 1860. .... .... $ 50,595,474 51,284,932 $ 101,880,406 The general result o f the year’ s business has not been such as to add materially to the capital o f importers. The fall trade has been almost without exception satisfactory ; but it is doubtful whether its profits have been sufficient to cover the losses made during the spring. The panic consequent on the political crisis came too late to affect seriously the general result of the fall trade. The balance of stock on hand at the beginning of November was quite light, which enabled im D ry Goods Trade. 73 porters to hold their property at about the same prices as were obtained earlier in the season. The woollen trade was generally unsatisfactory during the spring months. The clothing houses bought sparingly throughout the season, providing only for immediate wants ; whilst the jobbers, having imported on their own account more freely than usual, wanted but little from the regular importers. The importation o f fancy cassimeres was especially abundant, large amounts having been sold from samples previous to arrivals. Low and medium grades sold at very low rates, and in order to be pushed off had to be sold on terms much beyond the usual date. Fine French styles, however, were in fair demand throughout the season, and generally brought good prices. The general result of the season’s trade in cassi meres showed that our own manufacturers are gaining very rapidly upon foreign goods in the estimation o f buyers, and the probability is that their spring experience has taught importers that they must look to the further exclusion o f foreign styles from the market. Some exception to these remarks should be made in the case of silk mixtures, in which the German fabricants undoubtedly excel our own, both as respects the make, color and price o f the goods. The importation o f German cloths and doeskins was very considerable, which caused holders to press their stock on buyers to the ruin of prices ; and the consequence was, that although the demand throughout the season was steady, yet prices were in many cases below cost. The experience of the fall business has been in contrast with that of the spring. Importers began the season with moderate stocks, and the jobbers, having been induced by the adverse result of their spring impor tations to buy less direct than then, were early in the market, giving a good tone to the beginning transactions. Prices opened at fair rates, and have been sustained throughout the season, having in some cases advanced. The trade in British woollens, though somewhat better than for the same period of last year, has not been generally satisfactory. The lower grades o f coatings, which have hitherto been chiefly supplied from the West Riding of Yorkshire, are now being largely produced by our own manufacturers, whose goods are preferred by many clothiers in con sequence of their reputed superior strength and honesty. As the season advanced, and finer grades came more into demand, there was an im proved request for beavers, pilots, &c., of British make, but even then importers were not able to make much profit on their transactions. The importation o f sealskins and mohairs was considerable, and the demand for them good through the season ; but prices were generally below those o f the previous fall, though sufficient to leave a fair profit. German tri cots, beavers and heavy cloths have sold well since the middle o f the sea son, the demand from the cloaking trade having been well sustained. The year closes with a light stock o f foreign woollens generally. W e apprehend that importers have been taught a lesson o f caution to be ex ercised in their future importations of goods competing with American styles. The following are the comparative importations o f woollen manu factures for the years 1858, 1859 and 1860 : 1858. $ 18,73,6075 1859. .... $37,329,041 1860. .... $34,532,922 FOREIGN DRY GOODS TRADE OF NEW-YORK. F rom the U. S. E conom ist and D r y Goods R ep orter. V alue of F o r e ig n D ry G oods entered for C o n s u m p t io n Manufactures of at the P ort "Wool. of N ew -Y ork M anufactures d u r in g of th e Y ears 1S57, 1858, 1859 M anufactures Cotton. and of 1860. Silk . M onths. 1857. 1858. S eptem ber,................................................ O ctober,...................................................... N ovem ber,................................................. D ecem ber,.................................................. 3,(>43,502 1,696,756 278,922 144,604 147,305 1859, I8 6 0 . 1857. 1858. 1859. I8 6 0 . 1857. $336,153 $2,290,857 $2,442,249 $2,449,134 $ 383,621 $3,061,040 $2,406,778 $3,964,953 1,043,010 2,559,022 3,719,387 3,457.673 1,128,149 2,570,029 2,680,686 3,402,231 1,070,923 3,200,832 2,718,762 1,818,3S8 881,079 2,546,872 1,628,745 2,124,550 584,216 2,391,302 1,581,097 1,439,689 512.671 1,668,878 687,423 1,520,543 777,719 2,514,299 1,901,549 400,579 507,070 1,26S,69S 661,329 , 369,272 1,163,790 8,251,242 1,640,773 192,32S 407.672 1,773,100 120,118670,849 3,110,4S3 4,911,808 4,700,030 2,456,703 1,198,971 2,961,195 1,504,437 1 5,398,241 4,312,916 5,250,619 5,295,056 1,297,361 1,789,745 2,154,909 1,607,259 ; 3,619,076 1,910,232 2,005,381 2,431,129 1,010,655 881,692 832,065 746.431 1,535,628 529,125 1,008,6S6 1,421,850 1,452,145 130,442 774,620 482,349 171,636 397,054 694,251 1,830,208 1,465,422 65,9S8 939,067 448.431 85,441 1,449,920 2,063,605 250,106 1,451,797 1,851,515 702,9S0 343,149 169,962 T o ta l, .............................................. 19,728,183 16,463,299 33,691,020 30,050,579 M anufactures of 14,469,046 10,068,646 22,431,488 13,867,416 F lax . 1858. 22,481,651 17,099,931 M iscellaneous. 1859. I860. $ 533,080 $ 3,071,082 $4,554,648 1,631,268 3,358,547 5,004,487 2,597,933 2,028,145 2,729,037 1,336,628 722,704 2,345,015 1,422,900 662,449 1,440,232 1,816,948 1,027,537 2,573,986 4,426,960 2,516,772 5,095,323 5,329,700 3,526,725 4,864,855 2,033,271 2,077,643 1,998,329 1,364,921 1,789,298 1,155,513 675,034 1,406,922 1,441,427 771,404 1,333,672 2,428,619 32,467,460 32,525,604 T otal. M onths. 1857. J anuary,................................................ February,............................................. March,.................................................... April,...................................................... May,....................................................... June,...................................................... July,...................................................... A ugust,................................................. October,...’ ............................................ November,............................................. D ecem ber,............................................ Total,............................................. 1858. 1859. | 1860. 1857. 1858. 1859. $ 569,296 739,409 583,420 464,360 251,864 133,544 510,912 932,431 518,268 241,175 367,220 335,696 $ 904,019 1,146,547 497,409 569,163 102,221 40,509 947,988 566,026 420,464 87.374 71,150 69,064 $ 1S3,3S3 $1,035,455 $ 735,256 358,950 956,645 1,004,431 361,387 1,119,172 844,030 239,784 814,360 432,S32 212,915 709,901 414,364 183,092 685,016 274,791 627,050 1,156,373 421,291 839,921 997,540 757,000 404,768 614,930 544,315 415,830 625,S38 415,214 674,649 405,2S3 279,432 7S3,248 166,538 746,540 $ 960,761 947,115 707,600 543,193 124,596 68,S40 1,069,192 694,871 405,016 103,649 70,364 94,652 $ 160,681 342,942 352,779 191,644 140,876 166,256 466,023 614,826 301,912 226,528 197,616 391,926 5,421,984 4,853,057 10,173,172 5,789,869 8,564,009 1 5,647,595 6,415,345 I860. 1857. 1858. $ 480,340 10,456,749 $1,596,923 695,839 11.316,224 4,514,319 529,953 5.953,S76 4,694,813 225,875 5,364,813 2,251,019 292,099 1,354,456 2,301,029 356,792 5S8,777 2,94S,837 740,867 16,025,754 7,919,299 980,597 9,820,836 11,084,183 5,068,519 5,576,247 512,969 474,404 772,023 3,545,090 435.265 437,547 2,243,887 157.265 731,0S9 5,373,S55 5,912,265 | 1859. $10,027,730 10,183,652 10,17S,833 7,6S4,363 6,184,994 8,416,888 14,635,606 14,000,354 5,990,973 4,218,996 5,21 S,066 7,462,683 I860. 10,619,271 13,104,780 8,319,423 4.213,855 4,692,241 4,760,153 11,793,585 13,969,612 6,268,115 4,613,410 4,195,828 2,171,336 67,890,663 54,047,951 104,202,138 88,721,609 D ry Goods Trade. J a n u a r y , ............................................... $2,177,882 2,362,658 F e b ru a r y ,.................................................. M arch,......................................................... 1,305,929 A p ril,......................................... .................. 1,292,225 357,7S8 M a y , ........................................................... J u n e , .......................................................... 166,982 J u ly ,............................................................ 6,153,630 VA LU E OF FOREIGN D RY GOODS W IT H D R A W N M anufactures of W ool. FROM W AREH OU SE M anufactures of DURING THE Cotton. SAME PERIOD M anufactures of Silk . M onths. January,................................................ February,.............................................. March,................................................... April,..................................................... M ay,...................................................... J u n e ,............................................... .. July,....................................................... A ugust,................................................. September,........................................... October,................................................. November,............................................ D ecem ber,........................................... 1857. 1858. 1859. I8 6 0 . 1857. 1858. 1859. I8 6 0 . 1857. 1858. $189,805 214,038 217,535 168,384 173,168 86,016 2,298,839 1,001,855 441,131 63,809 117,098 238,542 $ 414,023 497,543 552,770 288,775 227,533 218,504 456,073 911,951 484,900 300,9S0 159,762 148,190 $ 196,123 174,617 158,687 130,156 83,070 87,544 441,207 9S9,517 317,469 147,508 123,385 90,736 $ 252,225 284,256 259,623 223,577 143,628 115,300 48S,655 677,418 451,803 198,458 100,809 49,507 $ 581,305 598,144 378,284 124,526 74,142 48,479 559,SS7 263,738 130,728 18,787 51,769 181,727 $ 594,622 865,250 779,075 296,142 174,548 105,722 148,404 204,568 128,765 64,094 63,557 94,550 $ 404,310 357,320 192,028 40,8S1 27,175 41,497 57,071 188,039 96,581 57,924 43,090 62,707 $ 575,227 465,690 336,788 162,159 78,664 43,179 175,232 250,799 161,113 51,308 40,219 44,049 $ 324,6S6 269,274 270,066 151,287 142,422 42,963 1,838,006 628,167 193,865 31,660 111,508 206,432 $ 616,369 722,697 550,331 188,442 147,293 164,492 215,8S1 305,353 178,458 54,498 51,159 86,832 1859. $ 126,117 156,965 66,119 30,722 10,635 49,5S1 136,717 142,475 76,672 28,843 47,650 60,967 I8 6 0 . $ 331,376 219,243 106,413 55,834 98,051 91,761 133,646 252,843 134,334 38,677 42,338 17,882 933,463 1,522,398 32,467,460 32,525,604 Total thrown upon the market,___ 24,938,403 21,124,303 36,631,039 33,295,838 17,480,562 13,567,943 24,020,111 16,241,843 26,691,987 20,381,736 33,400,923 34,048,002 M anufactures of F la x . M iscellaneous. T otal . ... ___ Months. 1857. 1858. 1859. January,...................................................... F e b ru a r y ,.................................................. M arch ,......................................................... A p ril,........................................................... M a y ,........................................................... J u n e , .......................................................... J u ly ,............................................................ A u gust,....................................................... Septem ber,................................................ O ctob er,..................................................... N ovem ber,................................................. D e c e m b e r ,................................................ $ 161,293 185,897 170,564 139,531 51,448 37,267 858,981 191,500 112,155 8,759 24,942 79,466 $ 325,455 393,729 801,2S5 165,205 151,298 118,842 114,473 202,568 121,410 72,534 98,795 89,985 $ 175,573 177,328 122,261 41,081 46,516 56,496 87,679 113,755 109,614 38,240 74,563 89,959 T o ta l,...................................................... A d d entered for consum ption,............ 1,516,803 5,421,934 2,155,579 1,033,065 4,853,057 10,173,127 T otal thrown upon the m ark et,. . . . 6,938,737 1857. 1858. ________ ... 1857. 1858. 1859. I860. $ 146,615 123,332 91,029 57,806 50,782 27,828 40,700 114,279 76,925 43,081 29,094 38,027 $ 95,010 69,826 103,805 57,205 16,311 12,294 233,564 49,366 81,462 24,583 30,788 112,773 $ 161,681 227,937 22S,655 141,547 33,367 60,119 106,953 82,816 111,745 75,730 79,603 120,361 $ 56,592 70,5S0 62,536 14,339 11,025 15,954 40,124 42,720 40,596 29,516 53,693 50,828 $ 76,584 $1,352,099 $2,112,150 85,225 1,387,179 2,707,156 72,803 1,140,251 2,412,116 80,830 640,931 1,080,111 42,461 457,491 733,936 19,893 227,019 665,399 14,924 5,289,277 1,041,784 57,012 2,134,626 1,707,256 959,341 1,025,276 51,458 19,599 142,598 567,836 23,322 336,105 452,976 10,822 539,918 818,940 $ 958,715 $ 1,381,827 936,810 1,177,746 866,656 601,631 580,206 257,179 413,586 178,421 297,961 251,072 712,798 853,157 1,476,506 1,352,351 640,932 845,633 302,031 351,123 235,782 342,381 805,197 160,287 S39,488 6,415,345 S86,987 5,789,869 1,430,514 3,564,009 488,503 5,647,595 554,933 14,835,860 15,015,814 5,912,265 67,890,663 54,047,951 6,963,673 8,516,315 104,202,138 88,721,609 7,008,636 11,206,192 | 7,254,833 6,676,856 4,994,523 6,136,098 6,467,198 82,726,523 69,063,765 1 111,165,811 97,237,924 | 1880. 1859. I860. 'ry Goods Trade. Total,................................................. 5,210,220 4,661,004 2,940,019 3,245,259 3,011,516 3,499,297 1,588,623 2,374,427 4,210,336 3,281,805 Add entered for consumption,........... 19,728,183 16,463,299 33,691,020 30,050,579 14,469,046 10,068,646 22,431,488 13,867,416 22,481,651 17,099,931 •** si S VA LU E OF FOEEIGN D RY GOODS M anufactu res EN TERED of W FOE “W A B E H O U S I N G ool. M anufactu res of D UEIN G THE Cotton. SAME PEEIOD. M an u factu res of Si l k . M on th s. 1857. 1858. 1859. I860. 1857. 1858. 1859. I860. 1857. 1858. January,................................................ February,.............................................. March,.................................................... April,...................................................... May,....................................................... J u n e ,..................................................... July,....................................................... A ugust,................................................. September,............................................ October,................................................. N ovem ber,............................................ December,............................................. $ 1 9 3 ,2 2 0 2 3 9 ,5 7 7 2 7 2 ,4 1 3 1 ,1 7 7 ,9 2 9 7 3 1 ,0 9 3 1 ,4 1 4 ,2 7 0 1 ,3 7 0 ,8 5 9 4 2 4 ,3 6 8 8 2 2 ,8 7 5 7 7 6 ,9 5 2 4 8 2 ,0 8 4 2 8 6 ,3 2 8 $ 2 1 5 ,8 6 6 2 1 5 ,0 3 1 2 0 9 ,S59 1 2 2 ,8 9 9 1 6 3 ,2 0 8 1 9 4 ,4 0 8 4 2 2 ,7 3 9 2 3 9 ,7 3 4 1 7 8 ,1 5 0 9 4,0 22 9 9 ,1 1 6 1 1 7 ,7 4 4 $ 1 2 2 ,3 2 6 1 0 6 ,1 7 9 1 3 2 ,7 2 3 1 9 6 ,3 7 1 3 7 7 ,5 7 6 6 1 3 ,2 7 8 7 7 1 ,6 6 0 3 8 0 ,1 2 0 1 8 5 ,8 1 2 1 5 4 ,1 3 2 8 4 8 ,0 2 8 2 4 9 ,S16 $ 4 1 0 ,3 5 7 2 4 5 ,1 1 8 2 2 4 ,1 5 4 2 0 7 ,4 8 4 4 1 9 ,8 4 8 3 8 7 ,2 1 3 4 4 7 ,2 3 2 4 2 2 ,6 5 4 1 6 0 ,1 5 0 3 3 0 ,9 0 3 3 4 5 ,9 1 1 8 8 1 ,3 1 9 $ 4 1 7 ,8 2 3 3 9 0 ,0 7 6 2 0 1 ,2 7 7 2 7 0 ,0 0 4 2 6 7 ,9S3 4 9 9 ,0 2 3 4 2 3 ,1 1 8 1 4 7 ,7 3 7 3 5 7 ,8 5 0 5 2 0 ,9S8 5 7 5 ,0 2 6 7 0 7 ,5 1 0 $ 4 2 3 ,7 7 2 4 9 2 ,8 0 5 2 5 4 ,1 0 5 6 9 ,8 2 6 7 1 ,7 4 9 5 1 ,1 7 9 6 6 ,5 6 0 1 0 5 ,6 7 9 1 0 0 ,4 9 2 7 8,7 61 1 5 2 ,3 8 2 1 6 8 ,0 6 8 $ 2 5 2 ,6 7 5 8 7 ,3 8 7 1 3 4 ,5 3 8 5 4 ,2 4 9 7 2 ,5 0 2 1 4 6 ,1 7 9 1 6 4 ,4 9 2 2 3 6 ,6 2 7 1 1 5 ,4 6 0 1 1 9 ,8 9 9 3 4 9 ,1 6 8 6 1 6 ,6 0 0 $ 3 6 8 ,9 5 0 2 5 3 ,S30 1 8 2 ,6 5 4 1 7 9 ,5 2 6 1 8 8 ,2 7 3 1 5 3 ,6 9 6 1 7 8 ,7 0 9 3 5 6 ,8 7 6 1 7 6 ,7 0 4 1 9 9 ,8 7 1 5 4 3 ,8 4 3 1 ,0 7 1 ,3 7 7 $ 3 0 7 , S92 2 9 4 ,1 2 6 2S 8,3 93 8 4 6 ,5 2 1 5 1 3 ,4 3 3 9 2 7 ,1 5 9 7 0 2 ,7 9 2 3 0 0 ,4 1 6 3 5 3 ,3 1 2 9 1 5 ,2 7 2 4 6 5 ,4 0 8 3 6 4 ,3 9 6 $ 4 2 5 ,4 4 4 1 2 7 ,8 2 2 1 3 3 ,5 2 9 7 8 ,8 2 3 4 1 ,0 8 4 3 7 ,1 9 8 7 8 ,7 1 5 7 3 ,2 4 3 4 4 ,4 6 6 4 0 ,2 1 6 6 5 ,0 5 5 8 6 ,7 8 4 $ 1 0 4 ,2 6 4 5 2,4 3 1 2 8 ,4 1 3 1 7 ,9 5 1 4 8 ,4 4 7 1 4 0 ,6 4 3 1 3 3 ,3 4 9 1 4 1 ,5 4 9 6 7 ,4 4 6 5 3 ,0 5 1 1 5 0 ,6S0 2 7 6 ,9 6 3 $ 2 4 9 ,8 7 5 1 5 2 ,9 7 0 1 1 2 ,3 5 4 1 4 0 ,2 7 8 1 6 1 ,8 9 3 1 3 8 ,2 2 0 1 8 2 ,2 2 7 1 2 7 ,8 8 1 4 6 ,4 6 9 6 4 ,2 7 5 2 4 2 ,4 2 8 8 4 4 ,2 3 6 T otal,............................................. Add entered for consumption,........... 8 ,1 9 1 ,9 6 4 1 9 ,7 2 S ,1 8 3 2 ,2 7 2 ,7 7 6 3 ,6 3 8 ,0 2 1 4 ,4 8 2 ,3 4 3 1 6 ,4 6 3 ,2 9 9 3 3 ,6 9 1 ,0 2 0 3 0 ,0 5 0 ,5 7 9 4 ,7 7 8 ,4 1 5 1 4 ,4 6 9 ,0 4 6 2 ,0 3 5 ,3 7 8 2 ,3 4 9 ,7 7 6 3 ,8 5 4 ,3 0 9 1 0 ,0 6 8 ,6 4 6 2 2 ,4 3 1 ,4 8 8 1 3 ,8 6 7 ,4 1 6 6 ,2 7 9 ,1 0 0 2 2 ,4 8 1 ,6 5 1 1 ,2 3 2 ,3 7 9 1 7 ,0 9 9 ,9 3 1 1 ,2 1 5 ,1 8 7 3 2 ,4 6 7 ,4 6 0 2 ,4 6 3 ,1 0 6 3 2 ,5 2 5 ,6 0 4 3 4 ,5 3 2 ,9 2 2 1 9 ,2 4 7 ,4 6 1 1 2 ,1 0 4 ,0 2 4 2 4 ,7 8 1 ,2 6 4 1 7 ,7 2 1 ,7 2 5 2 8 ,7 6 0 ,7 5 1 118,382,810 3 3 ,6 8 2 ,6 4 7 3 4 ,9 8 8 ,7 1 0 2 7 ,9 2 0 ,1 4 7 118,736,075 3 7 ,3 2 9 ,0 4 1 M M on th s. anufactu res of M is c e l l a n e o u s . F lax. 1857. 1858. 180d. I860. 1857, 1858. January,.................. ............................. February,............................................. March,................................................... April,..................................................... M ay,....................................................... J u n e ,..................................................... July,....................................................... August,................................................. September,............................................ October,................................................. November,............................................. December,............................................. $ 1 5 8 ,4 0 7 1 9 9 ,0 5 0 1 2 7 ,3 4 0 4 2 6 ,9 3 6 2 0 7 ,2 7 6 1 6 7 ,0 1 7 1 3 3 ,7 2 0 1 0 6 ,5 6 2 3 7 5 ,2 4 2 3 4 1 ,9 3 5 3 0 2 ,4 1 3 1 8 8 ,0 4 3 $ 1 1 5 ,1 4 1 1 2 6 ,3 9 5 1 3 7 ,7 7 4 5 3 ,1 9 6 5 9 ,9 3 6 4 7 ,0 6 6 6 3 ,2 2 4 5 4 ,2 7 0 7 9 ,0 4 3 8 0,5 06 3 5 ,8 0 3 5 7 ,3 9 1 $ 5 8 ,8 0 1 4 0 ,8 5 6 5 1 ,4 5 7 6 2 ,2 6 7 7 4 ,4 3 7 7 0 ,3 2 8 7 9 ,4 4 6 1 2 1 ,6 5 5 1 3 0 ,0 8 8 1 1 0 ,9 6 6 80,6 41 6 6,4 20 $ 6 7 ,4 9 2 5 9 ,2 8 5 6 0 ,3 0 4 7 7 ,3 0 7 4 3 ,1 3 4 9 ,9 4 5 7 5 ,0 7 9 7 2 ,3 4 7 4 8 ,3 2 9 6 6,0 70 3 5 3 ,2 4 7 5 6 6 ,2 6 8 $ 6 2 ,1 2 3 6 7,5 68 7 6 ,7 3 3 1 3 8 ,0 1 2 1 6 0 ,1 3 4 2 8 0 ,4 0 7 2 44 ,12 1 1 4 9 ,8 3 4 2 2 8 ,2 1 2 2 22 ,06 1 2 0 2 ,1 5 7 1 8 9 ,7 7 7 Total,.............................................. Add entered for cousumption,........... 2 ,7 3 2 ,1 4 1 5 ,4 2 1 ,9 3 4 9 0 9 ,7 4 5 9 4 7 ,3 5 7 4 ,8 5 3 ,0 5 7 1 0 ,1 7 3 ,1 2 7 1 ,4 0 8 ,8 0 7 6 ,4 1 5 ,3 4 5 8 ,1 5 4 ,0 7 5 1 5,7G 2,S 02 1 1 ,1 2 0 ,4 8 4 7 ,9 1 4 ,1 5 2 Total entered at the port,............. I860. T otal. 1859. 1860. $ 8 8 ,9 9 8 76,S 31 8 9 ,2 1 6 6 1 ,9 1 8 3 8 ,0 5 7 2 0 ,2 4 3 4 5 ,0 6 7 1 8 ,9 7 1 4 6 ,6 0 7 5 1 ,2 6 6 4 4 ,1 3 2 3 S ,0 1 8 $ 1 0,8 11 4 5 ,9 0 0 3 6 ,1 0 3 2 5,4 59 5 3 ,8 1 6 7 0 ,3 6 3 3 3 ,5 3 8 6 6,6 02 3 S ,3 0 7 5 5,7 49 9 7 ,3 8 5 8 4,4 24 $ 5 4 ,0 6 0 6 6 ,7 0 0 1 2 3 ,5 1 4 46,6S 1 7 8 ,3 9 3 2 5 ,8 1 5 3 0 ,2 4 2 4 0 ,1 7 4 8 4 ,4 1 9 5 3 ,4 3 8 1 1 6 ,2 5 2 1 9 2 ,5 4 4 2 ,0 2 1 ,1 3 9 5 ,7 8 9 ,8 6 9 6 1 9 ,3 2 4 3 ,5 6 4 ,0 0 9 6 1 S,4 5 7 5 ,6 4 7 ,5 9 5 7 ,8 1 1 ,0 0 8 4 ,1 8 3 ,3 3 3 6 ,2 6 6 ,0 5 2 1857. 1858. 1859. I860. $ 5 4 8 ,8 7 7 3 3 3 ,7 5 3 3 S 3 ,2 3 4 3 5 6 ,3 0 5 6 2 6 ,7 7 8 1 ,0 4 0 ,7 8 6 1 ,1 8 2 ,4 8 5 9 4 6 ,5 5 3 5 3 7 ,1 1 3 4 9 3 ,7 9 7 1 ,0 2 5 ,9 0 2 1 ,2 9 4 ,2 2 3 $ 1 ,1 5 0 ,7 3 4 7 7 5 ,9 0 3 7 0 2 ,9 8 0 6 5 1 .2 7 6 8 9 li5 4 1 7 1 4 ,8 8 9 9 1 3 ,4 8 9 1 ,0 1 9 ,9 3 2 4 6 6 ,0 7 1 7 1 4 ,5 5 7 1 ,6 0 1 ,6 8 1 3 ,5 5 5 ,7 4 4 6 62 ,23 2 5 ,9 1 2 ,2 6 5 2 5 ,0 0 4 ,5 8 1 7 ,0 9 1 ,5 9 5 8 ,7 6 8 ,8 0 6 6 7 ,8 9 0 ,6 6 3 5 4 ,0 4 7 ,9 5 1 1 0 4 ,2 0 2 ,1 3 8 1 3 ,1 5 8 ,7 9 7 8 8 ,7 2 1 ,6 0 9 6 ,5 7 4 ,4 9 7 9 2 ,8 9 5 ,2 4 4 6 1 ,1 3 9 ,5 4 6 1 1 2 ,9 7 0 ,9 4 4 1 0 1 ,8 8 0 ,4 0 6 $ 1 ,1 3 9 ,4 6 5 $ 1 ,2 6 9 ,2 2 1 1 ,1 9 0 ,3 0 7 1 ,0 3 8 ,8 3 3 9 6 6 ,1 5 6 8 2 4 ,4 8 2 3 8 6 ,6 6 2 2 ,8 5 9 ,4 0 2 1 ,8 7 9 ,9 1 9 3 7 4 ,0 2 7 3 5 0 ,0 9 4 3 ,2 S 7 ,S 7 6 6 7 6 ,3 0 5 2 ,8 7 4 ,6 1 0 4 9 1 ,8 9 9 1 ,1 2 8 ,9 1 3 2 ,1 3 7 ,4 9 1 4 4 8 ,7 5 8 2 ,7 7 7 ,2 0 8 3 4 8 ,7 7 1 2 ,0 2 7 ,0 8 8 3 9 6 ,4 8 8 1 ,7 3 6 ,0 5 4 4 6 8 ,0 0 5 D r y Goods Trade. Total entered at the port............ 1859. Real and Personal Property in New-York. 77 R E A L AND P E R S O N A L P R O P E R T Y IN N E W - Y O R K . Tabular Statement o f the aggregate assessed value o f Real Property in the City o f NewYork, each year, 1826— 1860. II. Value o f Personal Estate. III. Aggregate value o f real and Personal Property. IV. Amount o f Taxes raised each Year. V. Pop ulation o f the City, according to the Census, and estimated Population at the inter mediate periods. VI. Rate o f Taxation to aggregate Property. V II. Population o f United States, 1 8 2 6 — 1 8 6 0 . Y ear. T o ta l R e a l a n d P e r s o n a l. V a lu e o f P e r s o n a l E sta te. V a lu e o f R e a l E s ta te . Popu la tio n . A m o u n t ra is ed by T ax. $ 4 2 ,4 3 4 ,9 8 1 .. . $ 3 S 3,7 59 7 2 ,6 1 7 ,7 7 0 . . 3 9 ,5 9 4 ,1 5 6 .. 1 1 2 ,2 1 1 ,9 2 6 . 4 3 7 ,6 9 2 1828, 7 7 ,1 3 8 ,8 S 0 . . 3 6 ,8 7 9 ,6 5 3 .. 1 1 4 ,0 1 9 ,5 3 3 . 4 8 5 ,7 5 1 . . . 1 8 2 ,0 0 0 1829, 7 6 ,1 3 0 ,4 3 0 3 5 ,6 7 2 ,6 3 6 .. 1 1 1 ,8 0 3 ,0 6 6 . 5 0 7 ,1 0 7 ... 1 9 2 ,0 0 0 $ 6 4 ,8 0 4 ,0 5 0 .. $ 1 0 7 ,2 3 8 ,9 3 1 . . .. 1827, 1826, P e r e en ta y e T o ta l o f T a x a tio n P o p u la tio n o f to P r o p e r t y . U . S ta tes. 1 6 3 ,0 0 0 .. . .3 6 .. 1 1 ,3 8 3 ,0 0 0 . . . 1 7 2 ,0 0 0 .. . .3 9 .. 1 1 ,7 2 9 ,0 0 0 .. .4 3 .. 1 2 ,0 9 2 ,0 0 0 .. .4 5 .. 1 2 ,4 7 1 ,0 0 0 1830, 8 7 ,6 0 3 ,5 8 0 . . 3 7 ,6 8 4 ,9 3 8 . . 1 2 5 ,2 8 8 ,5 1 8 . 5 0 9 ,1 7 8 . . , 2 0 2 ,5 8 9 .. . .4 1 .. 1 2 ,8 6 6 ,0 2 0 1831, 9 5 ,5 9 4 ,8 3 5 . . 4 1 ,9 6 6 ,1 9 4 .. 1 3 7 ,5 6 0 ,2 5 9 . 5 7 2 ,1 0 4 ... 2 1 2 ,0 0 0 .. .4 2 .. 1 3 ,2 4 1 ,0 0 0 1832, 1 0 4 ,1 6 0 ,6 0 5 . . 4 0 ,7 4 1 ,7 2 3 .. 1 4 4 ,9 0 2 ,3 2 3 . 6 6 5 ,3 8 5 ... 2 2 2 ,0 0 0 .. .4 6 . . 1 3 ,6 2 5 ,0 0 0 1833, 1 1 4 ,1 2 4 ,5 6 6 . . 5 2 ,3 6 6 ,9 7 6 . . 1 6 6 ,4 9 1 ,5 4 2 . 9 7 1 ,8 5 4 . . 2 3 2 ,0 0 0 .. .5 8 . . 1 4 ,0 2 0 ,0 0 0 1834, 1 2 3 ,2 4 9 ,2 S 0 . . 6 3 ,2 9 9 ,2 3 1 1 S 6 ,5 4 8 ,5 1 1 . 8 3 5 ,6 0 5 . . 2 4 3 ,0 0 0 . . .4 5 . . 1 4 ,4 2 5 ,0 0 0 1835, 1 4 3 ,7 4 2 ,4 2 5 . . 7 4 ,9 9 1 ,2 7 8 . . 9 6 5 ,6 0 2 . . 2 5 4 ,0 0 0 .. .4 4 .. 1 4 ,8 4 1 ,0 0 0 .. 2 1 8 ,7 2 3 ,7 0 3 . 1836, 2 3 3 ,7 8 2 ,3 0 3 . . 7 5 ,7 5 8 ,6 1 7 .. 3 0 9 ,5 0 0 ,9 2 0 . . 1 ,0 8 5 ,1 3 0 . . 2 6 5 ,0 0 0 .. .8 5 .. 1 5 ,2 6 6 ,0 0 0 1837, 1 9 6 ,4 5 0 ,1 0 9 6 7 ,2 9 7 ,2 4 1 .. 2 6 3 ,7 4 7 ,3 5 0 . . 1 ,2 4 4 ,9 7 2 . . 2 7 6 ,0 0 0 .. .4 7 . . 1 5 ,7 0 2 ,0 0 0 1838, 1 9 4 ,5 4 3 ,3 5 9 . . 6 9 ,6 0 9 ,5 8 2 . . 2 6 4 ,1 5 2 ,9 4 1 1 ,4 8 6 ,9 9 3 . . 2 8 8 ,0 0 0 . . .5 6 . . 1 6 ,1 4 7 ,0 0 0 1839, 1 9 6 ,9 4 0 ,1 3 4 . . 7 3 ,9 2 0 ,S S 5 . . 2 7 0 ,8 6 9 ,0 1 9 . . 1 ,3 5 2 ,8 2 6 . . 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 .5 0 1 6 ,6 0 3 ,0 0 0 1840, 1 8 7 ,2 2 1 ,7 1 4 .. 6 5 ,0 1 1 ,8 0 1 .. 2 5 2 ,2 3 3 ,5 1 5 . . 1 ,3 5 4 ,8 3 5 . . 3 1 2 ,7 1 0 . . .5 4 . . 1 7 ,0 6 9 ,4 5 3 1841, 1 8 6 ,3 5 9 ,9 4 8 .. 6 4 ,8 4 3 ,9 7 2 . . 2 5 1 ,1 9 4 ,9 2 0 . . 1 ,3 9 4 ,1 3 6 . . 3 2 5 ,0 0 0 . . .5 6 .. 1 7 ,5 4 0 ,0 0 0 1842, 1 7 6 ,5 1 3 ,0 9 2 . . 6 1 ,2 9 2 ,5 5 9 .. 2 3 7 ,8 0 5 ,6 5 1 . 2 ,0 3 1 ,3 8 2 . . 3 3 9 ,0 0 0 .8 5 1843, 1 6 4 ,9 5 5 ,3 1 4 . . 6 4 ,2 7 4 ,7 6 5 . . 2 2 9 ,2 2 9 ,0 7 9 .. 1 ,7 4 7 ,5 1 6 . . 3 5 4 ,0 0 0 . . 1844, 1 7 1 ,9 3 7 ,5 9 1 .. 6 4 ,7 8 9 ,5 5 2 . . 2 3 6 ,7 2 7 ,1 4 3 ., . 1 ,9 8 8 ,8 1 8 1845, 1 7 7 ,2 0 7 ,9 9 0 . . 6 2 ,7 8 7 ,5 2 7 . . 2 3 9 ,9 9 5 ,5 1 7 .,. 2 ,0 9 6 ,1 9 1 1846, 1 8 3 ,4 S 0 ,5 3 4 . . 6 1 ,4 7 1 ,4 7 0 .. 2 4 4 ,9 5 2 ,0 0 4 . 2 ,5 2 6 ,1 4 6 . . 4 1 1 ,0 0 0 . . 1 .0 3 .. 2 0 ,3 6 6 ,0 0 0 1847, 1 8 7 ,3 1 5 ,3 8 6 . . 5 9 ,8 3 7 ,9 1 3 .. 2 4 7 ,1 5 8 ,2 9 9 .. 2 ,5 8 1 ,7 7 6 . . 4 3 4 ,0 0 0 . . 1 .0 5 . . 2 1 ,0 2 6 ,0 0 0 1848, 1 9 3 ,0 2 9 ,0 7 6 . . 6 1 ,1 6 4 ,4 4 7 .. 2 5 4 ,1 6 3 ,5 2 3 .. 2 ,7 1 5 ,5 1 0 . . 4 5 9 ,0 0 0 1849, 1 9 7 ,7 4 1 ,9 1 9 5 8 ,4 5 5 ,2 2 4 .. 2 5 6 ,1 9 7 ,1 4 3 ,. . 3 ,0 0 5 ,7 6 2 1850, 2 0 7 ,1 4 2 ,5 7 6 . . 7 8 ,9 1 9 ,2 4 0 . . 2 S 6 ,0 6 1 ,S 1 6 .,. 3 ,2 3 0 ,0 8 5 . . 5 1 5 ,5 4 7 . . 1 .1 3 .. 2 3 ,1 9 1 ,8 7 6 1851, 2 2 7 ,0 1 5 ,8 5 6 .. 9 3 ,0 9 5 ,0 0 1 .. 3 2 0 ,1 1 0 ,8 5 7 2 ,9 2 4 ,4 5 5 . . 5 4 3 ,0 0 0 .. .9 1 .. 2 3 ,9 5 1 ,0 0 0 1 85 2 , 2 5 3 ,2 7 8 ,3 8 4 . . 9 8 ,4 9 0 ,0 4 2 .. 3 5 1 ,7 6 3 ,4 2 6 3 ,3 8 0 ,5 1 1 . . 5 7 1 ,0 0 0 .. .9 6 . . , 2 4 ,7 2 0 ,0 0 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 8 ,0 4 3 ,0 0 0 .7 6 . . 1 8 ,5 7 7 ,0 0 0 . . 3 7 1 ,0 0 0 . . .8 4 . . 1 9 ,1 4 2 ,0 0 0 . . 3 9 0 ,0 0 0 . . .8 7 . . 1 9 ,7 3 8 ,0 0 0 .. 2 1 ,7 1 6 ,0 0 0 . . 4 8 7 ,0 0 0 . . 1 .1 7 . . . . 1 .0 7 2 2 ,4 3 8 ,0 0 0 1858, 2 9 4 ,6 3 7 ,2 9 6 . . 1 1 8 ,9 9 4 ,1 3 7 .. 4 1 3 ,6 3 1 ,3 8 2 .. 5 ,0 6 6 ,6 9 8 . . 5 9 9 ,0 0 0 1854, 3 3 0 ,3 0 0 ,3 9 6 . . 1 3 1 ,7 2 1 ,3 3 8 .. 4 6 2 ,0 2 1 ,7 3 4 .. 4 ,8 4 5 ,3 8 6 . . 6 2 7 ,0 0 0 . . 1855, 3 3 6 ,9 7 5 ,8 6 6 . . 1 5 0 ,0 2 2 ,3 1 2 .. 4 S 6 ,9 9 S ,2 7 8 1856, 3 4 0 ,9 7 2 ,0 9 8 . . 1 7 0 ,7 7 4 ,3 9 3 . . 5 1 1 ,7 4 0 ,4 9 1 1857, 3 5 2 ,9 5 8 ,S03 . . 1 6 S ,2 1 6 ,4 4 9 . . 5 2 1 ,1 7 5 ,2 5 2 1858, 3 6 8 ,3 4 6 ,2 9 6 . . 1 6 2 ,8 4 7 ,9 9 4 . . 5 3 1 ,1 9 4 ,2 9 0 1859, 3 7 8 ,9 5 4 ,9 3 0 . . 1 7 2 ,9 6 8 ,1 9 2 . . 5 5 1 ,9 2 3 ,1 2 2 1860, 3 9 8 ,5 3 3 ,6 1 9 . . 1 7 8 ,6 9 7 ,6 3 7 . . 5 7 7 ,2 3 0 ,6 5 6 5 ,8 4 3 ,8 2 2 ... 6 55 ,00 0 .. .. 1 .2 3 . . , 2 5 ,4 9 9 ,0 0 0 1 .0 5 . . 2 6 ,2 8 8 ,0 0 0 . . 1 .2 0 . . , 2 7 ,OSS,0 00 . . , 2 7 ,8 9 7 ,0 0 0 7 ,0 7 5 ,4 2 5 . . 6 8 4 ,0 0 0 . . 1 .3 8 8 ,1 1 1 ,7 5 8 ,, . 7 13 ,00 0 .. 1 .5 6 . . 2 8 ,7 1 6 ,0 0 0 8 ,6 2 1 ,0 9 1 . . 7 42 ,00 0 . . 1 .6 2 . . , 2 9 ,5 4 5 ,0 0 0 9 ,8 6 0 ,9 2 6 .. . 7 71 ,00 0 . . 1 .7 9 . . 3 0 ,3 8 4 ,0 0 0 9 ,7 5 8 ,5 0 7 .. . 8 1 3 ,6 6 8 . . 1 .6 9 ... 3 1 ,6 4 1 ,9 7 7 $ 101,664,694 Table showing the Population o f New- York County, State o f New- York, as returned by the Eighth Census, taken June ls£, 1860.— {Official.) N ew -Y ork C ity. P op u la tion . 1 s t W a r d , ........................................................ 2 d W a r d , ....................................................... 3 d W a r d , ....................................................... 4 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 5 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 6 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 7 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 8 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 9 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 0 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 1 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 2 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 3 t h W a r d , .............................................. . . . 1 4 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 5 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 6 t h W a r d , ....................................................... 1 7 ,3 7 3 2 ,5 0 7 3 ,7 5 7 2 1 ,9 9 4 2 2 ,3 3 6 2 6 ,6 9 6 3 9 ,9 8 2 3 9 ,4 0 6 4 4 ,3 8 5 2 9 ,0 0 4 5 9 ,5 7 0 2 7 ,9 5 8 3 2 ,9 1 7 2 8,0 80 2 7 ,5 8 5 4 5 ,1 7 7 N ew -Y ork City. 1 7 th IS th 1 9 th 2 0 th 21st 22d P op ula tion . W a r d , ....................................................... W a r d , ....................................................... W a r d , ....................................................... W a r d , ....................................................... W a r d , .............. ........................................ W a r d , ....................................................... 7 2 ,9 5 3 5 7 ,4 6 2 2 8 ,2 5 4 6 7,5 19 4 9 ,0 1 7 6 1 ,7 2 5 P o p u l a t i o n o f N e w - Y o r k C i t y , . . . . 8 0 5 ,6 5 7 B l a c k w e l l ’ s I s l a n d , .................................... 4 ,5S 1 W a r d ’ s I s l a n d , .............................................. 772 B e d l o e ’ s I s l a n d , ........................................... 4 E l l i s ’ I s l a n d , .................................................. 5 G o v e r n o r ’ s I s l a n d , ...................................... 6 96 l i a n d a l l ’ s I s l a n d , ......................................... 1 ,9 5 3 P o p u la tio n o f N e w - Y o r k C o u n t y ,. . . 8 1 3 ,6 6 8 POPULATION OF T I I E S T A T E OF N E W - Y O R K . T h e f o l l o w i n g t a b l e r e p r e s e n t s t h e a g g r e g a t e p o p u l a t i o n o f e a c h C o u n t y o f t h e S ta te o f N e w - Y o r k , a c c o r d i n g t o e a c h S ta te c e n s u s a n d e a c h U . S . c e n s u s , f r o m 1 7 9 0 to I8 6 0 . Counties. A l b a n y , .............. 1 S0 0 . 1790. 7 5 ,7 8 6 . . 1810. 3 4 ,0 4 3 . . 3 4 ,6 6 1 T h e S ta te c e n s u s w a s t a k e n i n t h e y e a r s 1 S 2 5 ,1 S 3 5 ,1 8 4 5 a n d 1 85 5 : 1S2 0 . 1814. .. 3 3 ,8 8 5 .. 4 2 ,8 2 1 1 83 5. 1830. 1 82 5. 3 8 ,1 1 6 . . .. 5 3 ,5 2 0 1840. 1 84 5. 1860. 1855. 1 S 50. .. 5 9 ,7 6 2 . . 6 8 ,5 9 3 . . 7 7 ,2 6 3 . . 9 3 ,2 7 9 .. 1 0 3 ,6 8 1 1 1 3 ,9 1 9 4 1 ,8 8 2 A l l e g h a n y .......... ............... 1 ,9 4 2 . . 8 ,8 3 4 . . 9 ,3 3 0 .. 1 8 ,1 6 4 . . 2 6 ,2 7 6 . . 8 5 ,2 1 4 . . 4 0 ,9 7 5 . . 4 0 ,0 8 4 . . 3 7 ,SOS . . 4 2 ,9 1 0 .. B r o o m e , ............ ............... 8 ,1 3 0 9 ,5 8 1 . . 1 4 ,3 4 3 .. 1 3 ,8 9 3 .. 1 7 ,5 7 9 . . 2 0 ,1 9 0 .. 2 2 .3 3 3 . . 2 5 ,8 0 3 . . 3 0 ,6 6 0 . . 3 6 ,6 5 0 .. 3 5 ,9 1 0 C a t t a r a u g u s ,.. . ............... 8 ,6 4 3 . . 1 6 ,7 2 4 . . 2 4 ,9 S 6 . . 2 8 ,8 7 2 . . 3 0 ,1 6 9 3 3 ,9 5 0 3 9 ,5 3 0 . . 4 3 .8 9 7 C a y u g a , ............... 1 5 ,8 7 1 C b a u ta u q u e ,... .. .. 4 ,0 9 0 . . 453 . . 2 9 .S 4 3 . . 3 7 ,3 1 8 . . C l i n t o n , ............... 1 ,6 1 4 . . C o l u m b i a , .......... 2 7 ,7 3 2 . . 4 2 ,7 4 3 . . 4 7 ,9 4 8 . . 4 9 ,2 0 2 . . 5 0 ,3 3 8 . . 4 9 ,6 6 3 .. 5 5 ,4 5 8 .. 53,5 7 1 .. 5 5 ,7 6 9 2 0 ,6 1 0 . . 3 4 ,6 7 1 .. 4 4 ,S 6 9 . . 4 7 ,9 7 5 . . 4 6 ,5 4 8 .. 5 0 ,4 9 3 .. 5 3 ,3 8 0 . . 5 8 ,3 5 4 2 0 ,7 3 2 . . 2 3 ,6 S 9 . . 2 8 821 . . 2 7 .2 3 8 . . 2 6 ,9 1 7 3 4 ,2 1 5 . . 3 7 ,2 3 8 . . 4 0 ,7 6 2 . . 4 0 ,7 8 5 . . 3 9 ,9 0 0 .. 4 0 ,3 1 1 . . 3 9 ,9 1 5 . . 4 0 ,9 3 6 1 4,4 S 6 . . 1 9 ,3 4 4 2 0 ,7 4 2 . . 2 S ,1 5 7 . . 3 1 ,2 7 3 .. 4 0 ,0 4 7 . . 4 2 ,4 8 2 . . 4 5 ,7 3 6 4 7 ,2 5 0 ............... ............... 1 5 ,6 6 6 . . 2 1 ,7 0 4 . . 2 4 ,2 2 1 . . 3 1 ,2 1 5 . . 8 ,5 1 4 . . 8 ,0 0 2 . . 7 ,7 6 4 . . 1 2,0 70 . . C h e m u n g ........... C h e n a n g o , ____ 8 8 .8 9 7 . . 4 ,2 5 9 . . 2 ,3 8 1 .. 1 2 ,5 6 3 .. ............... .. .. .. .. 8 3 ,9 7 9 . . 3 8 ,3 3 0 .. 3 7 ,9 7 0 . . 3 9 ,9 0 7 . . 4 0 ,7 4 6 .. 4 3 ,2 5 2 . . 4 1 ,9 7 6 . . 4 3 ,0 7 3 . . 4 4 ,3 9 1 C o r t la n d t ,........... ............... 8 ,8 6 9 . . 1 0 ,8 9 3 . . 1 6 ,5 0 7 . . 2 0 ,2 7 1 . . 2 3 ,7 9 1 .. 2 4 ,1 6 8 . . 2 4 ,6 0 7 . . 2 5 ,0 8 1 2 5 ,1 4 0 . . 2 4 ,5 7 5 . . 2 6 ,2 9 6 D e la w a r e ,.. . . . 1 0 ,2 2 8 . . 2 0 ,3 0 3 . . 2 1 ,2 9 0 . . 2 6 ,5 8 7 . . 2 9 ,5 6 5 . . 3 3 ,0 2 4 . . 3 4 ,1 9 2 . . 3 5 ,3 9 6 . . 3 6 .9 9 0 . . 8 9 ,8 3 4 3 9 ,7 4 9 . . 4 2 ,4 6 7 4 9 ,7 7 5 . . 5 1 ,3 6 3 . . 4 3 ,7 0 8 . . 4 6 ,6 1 5 . . 4 6 ,6 9 8 . . 5 0 ,9 2 6 . . 5 0 ,7 0 4 . . 5 2 ,3 9 8 . . 5 5 ,1 2 4 . 5 8 ,9 9 2 . . 2 4 ,3 1 6 . . 3 5 ,7 1 9 5 7 ,5 9 4 . . 6 2 ,4 6 5 . . 7 8 ,6 3 5 . . 1 0 0 ,9 9 3 . . D u t c h e s s , ........... 4 5 ,2 6 6 .. 3 5 ,3 2 2 .. 3 2 ,3 9 0 E r i e , ..................... * E s s e x , ................... .. .. .. 9 ,4 7 7 . . 9 ,9 4 9 . . 1 2 .S 11 . . 1 5 ,9 9 3 . . 1 9 ,2 8 7 . . 2 0 ,6 9 9 . . 2 3 ,6 3 4 . . 2 5 .1 0 2 ............... 2 ,6 1 7 . . 2 ,5 6 8 . . 4 ,4 3 9 . . 7 ,9 7 8 . . 1 1 ,3 1 2 . . 1 2 ,5 0 1 1 6 ,5 1 8 . . 1 8 ,6 9 2 . . 1 8 ,0 4 9 . . 1 8 ,5 7 9 G e n e s e e , ............ ............... 1 2 ,5 8 3 . . 2 3 ,9 7 5 . . 5 8 ,0 9 3 . . 4 0 .9 0 5 . . 5 2 ,1 4 7 . . 5 8 ,5 8 3 . . 5 9 ,5 8 7 2 8 ,8 4 5 G r e e n e , ............... 1 2 ,5 8 4 . . 1 9 ,5 3 6 . . 2 0 ,2 1 1 . . 2 2 ,9 9 6 . . 2 6 ,2 2 9 . . 2 9 ,5 2 5 . . 3 0 ,1 7 3 F r a n k l i n , ............ F u l t o n , ................. ............... H e r k i m e r , .......... ............... 1 4 ,4 7 9 4 ,4 9 5 . . 5 ,7 4 0 J e f f e r s o n , .......... K i n g s , .................. ............... ............................... .. H a m i l t o n , .......... L e w i s , .................. .. 1 .2 5 1 . . .. 2 2 ,0 4 6 . . 2 0 ,8 3 7 . . ............... 1 5 ,1 4 0 . . 3 1 ,0 1 7 . . M a d i s o n , ............ ............... M o n t g o m e r y ,. . .. 1 ,8 2 5 . . 3 3 ,0 4 0 . . 3 5 ,8 7 0 . . 1 8 ,5 6 4 . . 8 2 ,9 5 2 . . 4 1 ,6 5 0 . . 4 3 .4 9 3 8 ,3 0 3 .. 7 ,6 5 5 . . 1 1 ,1 8 7 . . 1 4 ,6 7 9 2 0 ,5 3 5 . . ............... 6 ,4 3 3 .. 6 ,3 4 8 . . 9 ,2 2 7 . . ............... .... 2 8 ,8 4 8 . . + .. L iv in g s t o n ,.. . . M o n r o e , .............. .. 2 1 ,7 0 0 . . 2 5 ,1 4 4 .. 2 6 ,2 7 6 .. 3 2 ,2 0 S .. ............... 4 1 ,2 1 4 . . 4 0 ,6 4 0 . . 3 7 ,5 6 9 . . .. .. .. .. 2 8 ,5 3 9 . . 2 8 ,2 1 4 3 0 ,8 3 6 .. 2 0 ,1 7 1 .. 2 3 ,2 8 4 . . 2 4 ,1 6 2 .. 2 S ,4 S 8 . . 8 1 ,0 3 4 . . 3 2 ,1 8 9 3 1 ,1 3 7 . . 3 1 ,9 3 0 8 1 ,9 5 7 . . 3 3 ,1 2 6 . . 1 ,9 0 7 . . 1 ,8 8 2 . . 2 ,I S 8 . . .. 3 7 ,4 7 7 . . 3 7 ,4 2 4 . . 8 8 ,2 4 4 . . 53 033 . . 6 0 ,9 3 4 . . 6 4 ,9 9 9 . . 3 2 ,0 5 7 4 7 ,6 1 3 7 8 ,6 9 1 .. 6 4 ,9 3 9 1 4 1 ,9 7 3 2 5 ,4 7 7 . . 3 0 ,4 4 6 . . .. .. .. 3 1 ,1 4 8 .. 3 6.2 01 6 0 ,6 3 5 . . 1 3 2 ,8 3 1 2 5 .1 0 2 . . .. .. t .. .. 6 8 ,1 5 3 . . 1 3S ,8 82 . . 2 ,5 4 3 .. 3 ,0 2 4 3 S ,5 6 6 . . 4 0 ,5 6 0 6 5 ,4 2 0 . . 2 1 6 ,2 2 9 .. 6 9 ,8 2 3 2 7 9 ,1 2 5 1 1 ,6 6 9 . . 1 5 ,2 3 9 . . 1 6 ,0 9 3 . . 1 7 ,8 3 0 . . 2 0 ,2 1 8 . . 2 4 ,5 6 4 . . 2 5 ,2 2 9 .. 2 S .5 8 1 2 3 ,8 6 0 2 7 ,7 2 9 3 1 ,0 9 2 . . 8 5 ,1 4 0 . . 8 3 ,1 9 3 4 0 ,8 7 5 . . 3 7 ,9 4 3 .. 3 9 ,5 4 ^ .. 3 5 ,6 4 6 . . .. .. 4 0 ,0 0 8 . . 4 0 ,9 8 7 . . 4 3 ,0 7 2 .. 4 3 ,6 S 7 .. 4 3 ,5 8 6 3 9 ,1 0 3 . . 4 9 ,S 5 5 . . 5 S ,0 8 5 . . 0 4 ,9 0 2 . . 7 0 ,8 9 9 .. 8 7 ,6 5 0 . . 9 6 ,3 2 4 .. 1 0 0 ,6 5 9 4 0 ,9 0 2 4 3 ,7 1 5 . . 4 S .3 5 9 . 3 5 ,8 1 8 . . 2 9 ,6 4 3 . . 3 1 ,9 9 2 . . 3 0 ,S 0 8 . . 8 0 ,8 6 7 .. 3 9 ,0 3 8 . . 4 1 ,7 4 1 .. Population o f the State o f New-Yorlc. .. 8 8 ,1 3 1 6 0 ,4 S 9 .. . 9 6 ,3 7 3 9 5 ,5 1 9 . . 1 2 3 ,7 0 6 . . 1 9 7 ,1 1 2 2 7 0 ,0 8 9 . . 8 1 2 ,7 1 0 3 7 1 ,2 2 3 .,. 5 1 5 ,5 4 7 . 8,971 7 .4 7 7 . . 2 2 ,9 9 0 . . 1 4 ,0 6 9 . 1 8 ,4 5 2 2 6 ,4 9 0 . 3 1 ,1 3 2 8 4 ,5 5 0 . 4 2 ,2 7 6 4 8 ,2 8 2 . 2 2 ,0 4 7 . . 8 3,7 92 4 5 ,2 2 8 . . 5 0 ,9 9 7 . . 5 7,= 47 . 7 1 ,3 2 6 7 7 ,5 1 8 . 8 5 ,3 1 0 8 4 ,7 7 6 . 9 9 ,5 6 6 1 0 7 ,7 4 9 . . 7 406 . . 25.9S 7 3 0 ,8 0 1 4 1 ,4 6 7 . . 4 8 ,4 3 5 . 5 8 ,9 7 3 6 0 .9 0 8 . 6 7 911 7 0 .1 7 5 . 8 5.8 90 8 6 ,5 7 5 . 9 0 ,6 S 7 4 4 .5 6 6 .. 1 6 6 ,0 8 6 .. 6 2 9 ,9 0 4 . 8 1 3 ,6 6 8 5 0 ,3 9 9 1 0 5 ,2 0 1 1 ,0 7 5 1 5 ,2 1 8 . . 4 2 .0 3 2 5 6 ,8 9 2 . . 8 8 ,2 6 7 . . 3 7 ,4 2 2 . 4 0 ,2 S 8 4 0,S 7 0 . . 4 3 ,5 0 1 4 2 ,5 9 2 . 4 3 ,9 2 9 4 2 ,6 7 2 1 8 ,4 9 2 2 9 ,3 4 5 . . 3 4 ,3 4 7 3 4 ,9 0 8 . . 4 1 ,2 1 3 . . 4 1 ,7 3 2 . . 4 5 .3 6 6 4 5 .0 9 6 . 5 0 ,7 3 9 5 2 .2 2 7 . 5 7 ,1 4 5 6 0 ,8 6 8 . 6 3 ,8 1 4 1 4 ,4 6 0 . . 1 7 ,7 3 2 2 2 ,8 9 3 . 2 5 ,1 2 7 2 5 ,8 4 5 . 2 S ,5 0 l 2 3 ,4 3 5 . 2 8 ,7 1 7 2 1 ,6 3 6 . . 3 8 ,S 0 2 4 0 ,5 8 7 . . 1 6 ,8 9 3 ... 1 9 ,3 3 6 1 9 ,2 6 9 8 0 ,4 4 2 . . 3 6 ,3 0 9 8 6 ,S 3 3 . . 9 ,3 5 3 . . 1 6 ,0 1 4 8 ,8 3 5 4 ,5 6 3 ... 6 ,3 5 3 . . 2 4 ,4 5 3 9 ,8 0 8 1 ,7 8 8 2 9,3 97 5 ,5 0 2 . . 7 ,7 5 8 7 ,8 1 7 . . 7 ,S S 5 . 8 ,2 5 2 . . 2 4 ,0 0 3 Total,........... 840,120 1 7 ,8 7 5 . . 2 7 .1 19 . 3 8 ,2 4 5 . 4 3 ,6 1 9 4 8 ,4 4 1 . 6 2 .1 9 8 6 9 .8 9 8 . 7 5 .9 6 0 4 7 ,8 9 8 . . 5 1 ,3 7 2 5 0 ,4 2 8 . 4 9 ,6 2 8 5 0 ,5 0 9 . 4 8 .6 3 8 4 9 ,7 3 5 . 5 0 ,1 6 6 1 1 ,2 6 8 . . 11,866 .. 1 2 ,6 2 8 1 1 ,5 5 1 . 1 2 ,8 2 5 1 3 ,2 5 3 . . 1 4 ,1 3 8 1 3 ,9 3 4 . 1 4 .0 0 2 2 1 ,5 1 9 . . 2 0,3 31 .. 2 2 ,4 6 0 2 5 ,1 3 0 . 3 0 ,3 2 4 3 1 ,8 4 9 3 6 883 4 6 ,2 6 6 . 5 7 ,3 9 1 4 0 ,1 5 3 .. 4 4 ,0 6 5 . . 4 9 ,4 2 4 5 5 ,5 1 5 . 6 0,2 59 6 2 ,3 8 8 . 7 3 ,3 6 3 7 9 ,2 3 4 . 8 6 ,3 2 5 6 ,1 3 5 . . 5 ,9 3 2 . . 7 .0 8 2 1 0 .9 6 5 1 3 ,6 7 3 . 15.0 61 2 1 .3 S 9 . 2 5 ,4 9 3 . 9 ,6 9 6 ., 1 1 ,9 7 5 1 3 ,7 4 1 . 1 6 ,9 6 2 1 9 .5 1 1 . 2 2 ,4 9 2 .. 2 7 ,5 9 5 . . 3 6 ,3 5 4 , 4 2 ,0 4 7 . . 5 6 ,7 0 6 6 2 .3 5 4 .. 6 8 ,6 1 7 74 977 . 9 0 ,4 2 8 8,S 37 . . 1 6,0 37 7 ,6 9 1 . 8 ,0 1 6 . . 9 ,3 8 8 33147 . 3 1 ,1 3 9 . . 8 6 ,0 5 2 . . 3 6 ,2 9 5 . . 3 8 ,6 7 9 3 8 ,0 1 2 4 0 .5 5 3 4 1 ,4 7 7 . 4 5 ,6 4 6 4 9 ,3 7 9 . 5 1 ,7 3 2 . 1 0,2 01 . 1 1 ,2 0 3 . . 1 3 ,0 S 1 . . 1 2 ,8 7 6 . . 1 2 ,3 4 7 1 6 ,2 3 0 . 1 7,3 S 7 1 6 ,6 3 0 . 2 0 ,0 5 4 1 9 ,5 7 2 . 20,002 1 8 ,9 4 5 . 1 9 ,3 2 3 . . 2 3 ,1 5 4 . . 2 5 ,9 2 6 . . 2 7 ,9 0 2 2 8 ,3 0 8 ., 8 2 ,3 5 8 3 2 ,4 8 8 . 3 3 ,5 4 8 3 3 ,5 1 9 . 3 4 .4 6 9 ... 1 6 ,6 ° 9 ... 7 ,2 4 6 1 9 ,4 6 4 .,. 2 1 ,1 1 3 2 1 ,4 0 1 . . 2 3 ,6 1 9 .. 11,121 . . 21,868 . . 2 1 ,9 8 9 .. 2 4 ,2 7 2 . . 2 0 ,1 6 9 .. 21041 . 2 2 ,6 2 7 .. 2 4 ,8 7 9 2 4 ,9 7 2 . 25,4 41 1 8 ,7 7 7 . 1 8 .S 4 0 2 5 ,8 5 8 . 2 8 ,1 3 9 2 9 ,2 4 5 . . 8 3,8 51 4 1 .4 3 5 . 4 6 ,1 3 8 5 1 ,6 7 9 . 63,7 71 6 2 ,9 6 5 . 6 6 ,6 8 9 2 3 ,6 9 5 .. 2 6 ,7 8 0 2 8 ,2 7 4 ., 3 2 ,4 6 9 3 4 .5 7 9 . 3 6 ,9 2 2 4 0 ,9 0 6 . 4 3 ,2 7 6 3 2 ,3 8 5 . 6 ,10S 6 ,2 3 3 . . 8 ,9 0 0 . . 1 0 ,3 7 3 . . 1 2 ,3 6 4 1 3 ,7 5 5 . 1 5 ,6 2 9 1 8 ,7 2 7 . 2 5,0 83 2 9 ,4 8 7 6 ,8S 9 ... 7 ,8 9 9 1 0 ,4 3 8 . . 1 9 ,9 7 1 . . 1 9 ,9 5 1 .. 2 7 ,6 9 0 3 3 .9 9 9 . 2 0 ,5 2 7 2 2 .4 5 6 . 2 4.8 S 0 2 6 ,9 6 2 . 2 8 ,7 3 9 2 0 ,6 8 1 8 2 ,9 0 8 . . 3 6 ,5 4 5 8 8 ,0 0 3 ., 3 7 ,9 4 8 8 8 ,1 6 8 ., 8 8 .7 4 6 3 1 ,5 1 6 3 1 ,4 1 1 3 2 ,0 1 5 2 4 ,8 5 5 . . 2 6 ,4 2 8 . . 2 6 ,5 7 6 7,S 3 S . . 1 4 ,0 4 2 1 2 ,8 7 4 . . 4 4 ,8 5 6 . . .., . 1 6 ,4 4 0 5 ,3 4 7 . .. . S 5 ,5 7 4 . . . 2 7 ,4 2 S . . . 4 4 ,2 8 9 . 3 0 ,2 7 2 . 3 6 ,3 5 9 .. 2 6 ,3 6 7 . . .. 8 0 ,9 3 4 . . 9 6 1 ,8 8 8 1 ,0 8 5 ,9 1 0 . .. 3 6 ,5 5 0 8 9 ,9 6 0 . , 4 5 ,S 2 2 4 9 ,9 0 7 . 5 9 ,3 8 4 6 7 ,9 3 6 . 7 6 ,3 7 9 9 ,4 5 3 .. 1 0 ,9 0 6 . . 1 1 ,7 9 6 1 2 ,0 8 4 . . 1 3 ,4 2 2 , 1 4 ,9 0 8 ., 1 7 ,1 9 9 1 9 ,6 6 9 . 2 1 ,4 3 4 3 8 ,8 3 1 .. 3 9 ,2 S 0 . . 4 2 ,6 3 5 , 3 9 ,3 2 6 . . 4 1 ,0 8 0 , 4 0 ,5 5 4 ., 4 4 ,7 5 0 4 4 ,4 0 5 . 4 5 ,9 0 9 2 6 ,7 6 1 3 3 ,6 4 3 3 7 ,7 8 8 . . 4 2 ,0 5 7 4 2 ,5 1 5 . . 4 4 ,9 5 3 4 6 ,7 6 0 . . 4 7 ,7 6 2 3 6 ,4 5 6 . 3 3 ,7 9 0 . . 4 S ,6 S 6 . 9 9 ,4 5 7 3 2 ,6 3 8 . . .. 3 3 ,1 3 1 . . 1 3 ,2 1 4 . . 5 8 8 ,6 0 3 . 1 ,8 7 2 ,8 1 2 1 ,6 1 4 ,4 5 6 * Reported with Clinton, 1 9 ,0 0 9 . 1 ,9 1 8 ,1 8 1 2 0 ,4 4 4 . 1 9 ,7 9 6 . . 2 ,1 7 4 ,5 1 7 2 ,4 2 8 ,9 2 1 t Reported with Montgomery. 4 7 ,5 7 8 . . 5S 263 8 0 ,6 7 S . . 2 7 ,2 0 5 . . 3 1 ,9 8 1 3 2 ,1 4 0 . . 3 1 .9 6 7 2 0 ,7 7 7 2 0 ,5 9 0 , 1 9 ,S 1 2 . . 2 0,2 91 2 ,6 0 4 ,4 9 5 .. 3 ,0 9 7 ,3 9 4 8 ,4 6 6 ,2 1 2 Population o f the State o f New-York. N ew -Y ork ,.... Niagara,......... Oneida............. Onondaga,. . . . Ontario,........... Orange,........... Orleans,.......... Oswego, ......... Otsego,............ Putnam ,......... Queens,........... Rensselaer,. . . . R ichm ond ,.... Rockland,....... St. Lawrence,.. Saratoga,......... Schenectady,.. Schoharie,....... Schuyler,......... Seneca,........... Steuben,......... Suffolk,........... Sullivan,......... Tioga............... Tom pkins,. . . . Ulster,............. Warren,.......... Washington, .. W ayne,........... Westchester,... Wyoming,....... Yates,.............. 8 ,8 8 7 ,5 4 2 -^r o The Progress o f Banking in New-York. 80 THE P R O G R E S S OF B A N K I N G I N N E W - Y O R K . Summary Statement, showing the progress o f Bank Capital, Circulation, Individual Deposits, Loans and Specie o f the Banks o f the State o f New-York, in the years 1848— 1860. Capital. June, 1 84 8,........... ......... tt 1 84 9,.......... “ tt 1S50,........... 1 8 5 1 ,........... “ $ 43,755,000 44,929,000 Circulation. . $ 20,SS8,000 . Deposits. $27,554,000 . Loans. $73,497,000 . Specie. $6,851,000 . 21,912,000 . 85,604,000 . . 85,335,000 . . 10,571,000 . 24,214,000 . 46,691,000 . 93,480,000 . 11,653,000 55,5SO,000 . 27,511,000 . 54,467,000 . 115,677,000 . 8,978,000 1S52,............ ......... 59,705,000 . 27,940,000 . 65,034,000 . . 127,245,000 . 13,304,000 M a r c h , 1S 53 ,........... ......... 67,623,000 . 80,063,000 . 81,316,000 . 147,687,000 . 10,059,000 June, 73.1 S3,000 . 80,065,000 . 79,996,000 . 151,206,000 . 13,384,000 76,692,075 . 32,762,650 . . 77,167,075 . . 157,455,9S7 . . 12,909,240 79,018,9S0 . 32,573,189 . 78,060,490 . 153,118,468 . 14,149,760 . 32,371,206 . 81,140,877 . 154,742,164 . 11,553,778 S e p t ., D e c ., tt ......... a M a r c h , 1 8 5 4 ,............ June, u S e p t ., tt D e c ., tt S3,773,2S3 M a r c h , 1 8 5 5 ,........... June, ti S ep t, tt D e c ., tt ......... ____ M a r c h , 1 8 5 6 ,............. . . . . 85,032,000 . 81,266,000 . 82,637,000 . 153,875,000 . 10,792,000 . 81,507,7S0 . 81,069,103 . 163,752,237 . 13,661,565 . 28,220,000 . 71,096,000 . 141,604,000 . 13,470,000 . 27,909,000 . 79,727,000 . 152,181,000 . 1 7 .9 4 6 /0 0 . 2S,562,000 . 83,537,000 . 165,106,000 . 15,921,000 85,589,000 . . 31,340,000 . 85,610,000 . 166,002,000 . 10,910,000 86,890,000 . 31,990,000 . 85,644,000 . . 165,1S6,000 . 11,541,000 89,779,SSS . . 30,579,902 . 91,297,476 . 171,310,779 . 15,988,693 92,334,000 . 18,510,000 June, it 30,705,000 . 96,267,000 . 174,141,000 . S e p t ., tt . 34,019,633 . 96,907,970 . 183,888,670 . 12,898,771 •t . 83,590,000 . 94,872,000 . , 183,557,000 . 11,893,000 D e c ., M a r c h , 1 8 5 7 ,........... June, tt S e p t ., tt D e c ., tt .... .... 102.505,000 107,449,000 . 82,510,000 . 100,641,000 . . 18S,OS8,000 . 11,973,000 . 82,395,000 . 104,850,000 . 190,803,000 . 14,379,000 . 27,122,000 . 83,539,000 . 170,846,000 . 14,321,000 . 23,899,000 . 81,12S,000 . . 154,210,000 . 29,314,000 . 22,710,000 . 92,63S,000 . 161,S57,000 . 35,071,000 June, tt ......... 103,340,000 . . 24,079,000 . 98,921,000 . . 178,853,000 . 33,597,000 S e p t ., tt ......... 109,996,550 . 26,605,407 . 101,213,691 . 1S6,187,S99 . 29,905,295 D e c ., it . 28,507,000 . 108,170,000 . 192,150,000 . 2S,335,000 . 27,979,000 . 109,240,000 . 190,428,000 . 26,514,000 110,605,000 . . 26,759,000 . 99,597,000 . 185,027,000 . 22,267,000 . 27,970,000 . 103,106,000 . . 182,420,000 . 22,026,000 20,921,000 M a r c h , 185 S ,........... M a r c h , 1S59,........... S e p t ., “ tt D e c ., tt June, ........... .... . 29,959,000 . 102,109,000 . . 191,162,000 . 111,161,418 . . 29,441,159 . 109,SS9,87l . 195,2S8,S48 . 24,620,528 .... 111,494 393 . 28,839,194 . 110,465,548 . . 196,908,063 . 24,582.219 .... 111,834,000 . . 31,759,000 . 116,190,000 . 200,11 3,OGO . 21,710,000 . 2S,239,000 . 110,664,000 . 202,241,000 . 26,427,000 .... M a r c h , 1 86 0,............. . . . . June, tt S e p t ., tt D e c ., it 111,441,000 The number o f banks, banking associations and individual bankers actually doing business in this State, on the 30th day o f September last, was 306, and 37 were either closing their own affairs or are insolvent, and their business is being closed by this department, leaving 343 open bank accounts upon the books of this office. The entire emission o f bank notes from the Bank Department, in cluding that o f incorporated banks, banking associations and individual bankers, is $38,034,800, against $36,581,276 in 1859, being an increase during the past fiscal year of $1,453,524. Chambers o f Commerce and Boards o f Trade. 81 CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND BOARDS OF TRADE. I. N ew -Y oek . II. B oston. III. M ontreal . Monthly Meeting o f the Chamber o f Commerce o f the State o f NewY ork, Thursday, June 6 th. Election o f New Members— Medals fo r the Officers and Men who Garrisoned Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens— Flax in place o f Cotton— Improvements o f Fortifica tions in the Harbor o f New-York— Resolutions in relation to the Heath o f Mr. H offm an, & c . The regular monthly meeting o f the Chamber o f Commerce was held at their rooms Thursday, June 6th, at one o’clock P. M., the President, Pelatiah Perit, Esq., in the chair. The following gentlemen, proposed at the last monthly meeting, were elected members o f the Chamber: Josiah S. B ennet, 125 Front-street. S. D e W . B loodgood, 110 B ’ way. Charles B utler, 12 Wall-street. Thomas N. D ale, 18 Warren-street, Samuel Jaudon, 54 Wall-street. W illiam P. Jones, 109 Wall-street. H enry G. Reeve, 231 Front-street. Livingston Satterlee, 56 Wall-st. Geo. G. Spencer, 106 Front-street. H enry F. V ail, 29 Nassau-street. Samuel W etmore, 59 Pine-street. W m. A ug. W hite, 63 Broadway. On motion o f P rosper M. W etmore, the proposed amendments to the by-laws relating to the election, on the 2d May last, o f a committee of arbitration, to whom all mercantile disputes should be referred, the proceedings were confirmed as the action o f the Chamber. In connec tion with this subject Mr. Opdyke, the chairman o f the Arbitration Com mittee, announced that the committee was organized and prepared to transact any business that might be referred to them. Mr. Royal Phelps, in rising to introduce a subject, which he said did not properly come within the line o f business for which the Chamber was created to consider, wished first to apologize for bringing forward a matter which, in reality, was irrelevant. But he had been requested by a distinguished gentleman, whom they all knew well, to bring before the Chamber the propriety o f doing something to commemorate the gallantry of the garrison at Fort Sumter, particularly o f the men. The idea which had been thus suggested to him harmonized so entirely with his own sen timents that he had concluded to present it, and he had no doubt they would take up the question, although it was strictly outside the usual occupation of the Chamber. He proposed the following resolution: Resolved, That the Executive Committee o f this Chamber, after consul tation with and subject to the approval o f Colonel A nderson or his second in command, cause to be prepared a suitable medal fo r each o f the soldiers and non-commissioned officers o f the late garrison o f F ort Sumter, and to have them presented to them at as early a day as possible, at the expense o f this Chamber. In presenting some remarks explaining the reasons why he offered the VOL. xlv.— no. i. 6 82 Chambers o f Commerce and Boards o f Trade. resolution, Mr. Phelps said it would be observed that he had taken no notice of the officers; but his principal object was that notice should he taken of the soldiers, without whose cheerful acquiescence in the wishes of the officers it would have been impossible that so much honor should have been reflected upon our flag in the manner in which it was sur rendered. Another reason was, that the soldiers in the service o f our country, republican and democratic as it is, have a less opportunity for distinction open to them than the soldiers o f any other country in the world. Our officers were always called from the higher classes o f society, and educated at public expense. There were few instances wherein a soldier in the regular army rose to the distinction o f an officer. A dif ferent state o f things exists in the French and English armies, where brave men were taken out o f the ranks, rewarded with promotion and decorated hy their sovereigns. Reward in our service was made only through an act o f Congress, which was a cumbersome mode. He knew there was a deep sympathy felt by the merchants and every class o f peo ple in the country with the soldiers, and when conduct like that o f the garrison of Fort Sumter, who stood at their posts when there was almost a forlorn hope, and who, when the national flag was stricken down, brought it tenderly in their arms, as it were, to this city, ho thought something should be done to reward them. He made a distinction be tween the men and the officers, not because he wished to disparage the conduct of the latter, but because while the officers had received many attentions which showed that their services were appreciated, the men had n o t; therefore he hoped the resolution would he adopted without the amendment, and that the style and price of the medals would be left entirely to the judgment of the Executive Committee. Mr. George W . B lunt seconded the resolution, moving an amend ment that the garrison o f Fort Pickens, which was under command of Lieutenant Slemmer, be added to the list. Mr. George Opdyke thought it would be an indirect censure upon the officers to leave them out, and he moved that they bo included. This suggestion was accepted by Mr. B lunt. Mr. P helps was sorry, he said, to be compelled to object to the amend ment. He saw no good reason to include the command of Lieut. Slem mer, particularly as it would destroy the distinctive point which he wished to establish in rewarding the garrison of Fort Sumter. The defence of Fort Sumter, and the attention which that garrison attracted from the people of the United States, required some special recognition. It was the first firing upon any important post at the flag o f their country, bv our very mistaken and very rash brethren at the South. That act pro duced such a revolution in sentiment as had never before been experienced in this country. It had united men o f the North who had different party preferences, and brought them to the sustainment o f the govern ment in its efforts to put down this rebellion at the South. It was the gallant conduct of that garrison which produced that result. Fort Sum ter was spoken o f all over the world. From there went forth the electric spark which was to save the honor o f the constitution; and he wanted to confine his motion specially to Fort Sumter on that account. He hoped Mr. B lunt would withdraw his amendment. Mr. D enning D uer said he hoped it would not be withdrawn, for if it should be, he would renew it. New-York. 83 The resolution was modified so as to include the officers and garrison which were under command of Major A nderson at Fort Sumter, and Lieutenant Slemmer at Fort Pickens, and as amended was adopted, viz.: Resolved, That the Executive Committee o f the Chamber cause to be prepared a suitable medal fo r each o f the officers and soldiers o f the late garrison o f Fort Sumter, under command o f Major R obert A nderson, and o f Fort Pickens, under command o f Lieutenant A dam J. Slemmer, and that the same be presented to them at the earliest day possible, at the expense o f the Chamber. Mr. Samuel B. Ruggles presented the following resolution for the consideration o f the Chamber: Resolved, That it be referred to a committee o f ---------- members o f the Chamber o f Commerce o f New- York, to inquire and report as to the pro gress made in chemical, mechanical or other processes fo r substituting the fiber o f flax fo r that o f cotton. Mr. George W . B lunt seconded the resolution. (Specimens o f hats, hosiery and felt cloth, manufactured from the fiber o f flax, were exhibit ed to the members.) Mr. R uggles in moving the resolution, said that the subject o f in quiry which it proposed was o f importance, not only in an industrial and commercial point o f view, but had recently acquired a vastly increased interest in its national and high political bearings. It is not merely a question, large as that might be, o f the employment o f millions o f acres o f our lands, and hundreds o f thousands o f our rural population in a new branch of prosperous industry, nor yet o f the increased stimulus to manufactures and commerce, in the fabrication and transportation o f a material, as yet nearly unknown. The great question really is, to dis cover, if possible, the means o f commercial and political emancipation from the dominion of that virtual monopoly in the production of cotton, by a comparatively small section o f our republic, which has not only in volved it in civil war, but is now greatly endangering the peace o f the civilized world. It is to determine whether we shall or shall not submit, without a struggle, to a giant monopoly, which emboldens its possessor to dictate, not only law and government, but morals and manners to all mankind. W e need not dwell on the dangerous and galling character o f this pretension. It is already sufficiently manifest, both in commerce and politics, leading at once to the most energetic efforts by Great Britain and its subjects, to penetrate every region of the globe, to discover and develop such new sources o f supply as shall free them from their present dependence on the cotton regions o f our North American continent. These efforts have been so far successful as to induce the belief, that within a moderate period adequate supplies will be forthcoming for the use of the world. It need hardly be urged that this great effort for the commercial emancipation o f the civilized nations o f the earth would be materially aided by the discovery and cheap production o f any material which could take the place o f cotton to any considerable extent. It is, therefore, to this subject, that the attention o f the Chamber o f Com merce is now respectfully requested, as a proper subject o f attention and thorough inquiry. Without pretending in any way to prejudge the re sults of such an examination, it may safely be asserted that the facts al ready ascertained, in respect to the progress made in this country to sub 84 Chambers o f Commerce and Boards o f Trade. stitute the fiber o f flax for that o f cotton, will entitle the subject to a full examination by a committee o f this body. The idea o f substituting the fiber o f flax for that o f cotton is by no means anew one. It was proposed in England as early as the year 1775, and with partial success, and repeatedly afterwards in Germany, Bohemia and other parts o f Europe, by various processes suggested in the years 1780, 1801, 1803 and 1816. It was in the year 1850 that the Cheva lier Claussen obtained his patent in England for extricating the fiber o f flax by means of chemical agencies, in lieu of the former tedious, waste ful and unhealthy process o f rotting by dew or standing water. The importance o f the suggestion excited at once the attention o f our highly intelligent and patriotic fellow-countryman, Mr. A bbott Lawrence, then in London as American minister, and at his instance the subject was carefully examined in the year 1851, by a committee o f the legislature o f Massachusetts. The chemical process o f Claussen, improved, as is said, by subsequent discoverers, after the delays incident to all new in ventions, has proved so far successful, that the flax fiber thus extracted and prepared is now successfully manufactured in considerable quantities in various parts of New-England. The precise details, and the character, value and cost of the fabric will necessarily form the subject of the careful scrutiny of the committee. In addition to these chemical agencies for extricating the fiber, mainly by solutions o f acids and alkalies, another very interesting process o f a mechanical character has lately been proposed, and proved to be very successful, by employing condensed steam as a disintegrating agent. It deserves the most attentive examination, it being claimed by the inven tors that the flax fiber may be thereby prepared with great expedition and economy, so that it can be afforded in large quantities for a price not exceeding eight cents per pound. It is further stated, that an acre of flax land will yield a sufficient quantity to afford the material for a bale of fiber o f about 400 pounds. It should be distinctly understood that the fiber of flax is not identical with that o f cotton, in a botanical and physiological sense, but that they are greatly alike in color, weight and durability. It is by no means expected that it will wholly take the place of cotton, in all its varieties of fabric, but, according to present in dications, it is claimed that it fairly promises to prove as a substitute for at least a portion of the coarser fabrics. Should it prove to be a substi tute to any considerable extent, it must materially influence or hasten the solution of that great problem o f the supply o f cotton which is now agi tating the various governments of the civilized world. Mr. Richard Lathers hoped the resolution would not pass. He thought that the Chamber, which was devoted more especially to com mercial interests, should not fritter away its energies upon subjects of that kind. He did not think the arguments presented in favor of the resolution were as happy as they might be. Mr. L athers had travelled extensively in the South recently, and he found, he said, in nearly all cases, that the people o f the South whose interests were connected with cotton, while they yielded to the storm which was blowing over them, yet cherished a strong affection for the Union. Therefore he deprecated any action that would be calculated to throw firebrands in the midst o f the Union-loving people of the South, and oppose our government in effecting the establishing o f the bond o f Union throughout the country. The New-York. 85 government of the United States, he thought, was desirous o f fostering legitimate industry in the South as well as in the North. He wanted us to show these Southern Union men that we did not want to put down their institution, but to put down this revolt. When the argument which had just been advanced by the preceding speaker should be read in the South, the idea it would convey would be, that instead o f afford ing them protection and peace, we were anxious to destroy their indus try. It was not true that the production and handling o f cotton tended to divide this country; but, on the contrary, it tended to hold the sec tions together. He gloried in the sentiments enunciated by the Sec retary of State, that the Union was not to be dissolved peaceably or otherwise. He was sorry there was not more Union sentiment in the South; but what did exist there was like leaven, and its influence would be felt. He was glad o f the power the South commanded by her cotton, and the effect which the prospect o f a short supply was producing upon England, for he regarded that staple not as the capital of the South, but the capital o f the whole country. W e had no intention of looking to a separation ; but that resolution looked very much to a separation. The Southern demagogues had taught their people to hate every thing that came from New-England; but he hoped that a similar spirit would not be engendered by the North against the South. He hoped the resolu tion would not be adopted. Mr. R oyal P helps hoped that the debate would close, and that the resolution would not prevail. Mr. D u e r spoke briefly in favor o f its adoption; for he saw no reason why King Flax should not have as fair a trial as King Cotton. Mr. R uggles distinctly disclaimed any intention o f disloyalty to the Union, and said he was surprised to hear such an intimation, when they knew that through the whole course of his life he had cherished the idea that, as cotton was providentially placed, the country must o f necessity be held together. After a few remarks from Mr. Opdyke, in support o f the measure, the resolution, on motion of Mr. Phelps, was laid on the table, to be taken up at a future day. Air. B lunt offered a resolution to the effect, that as other governments were building iron-plated steamships, calculated to resist the most im proved guns now in use, the Chamber urge the government of the United States to build a number o f those iron-plated steamships, and to complete the fortifications in the harbor o f New-York, especially the one at Sandy Hook. It was stated by several members that the fortifications at Sandy Hook were the most important of all, and should be immediately completed. The P resident suggested that several distinct measures might be re quired in relation to these fortifications, and thought that it would be better for the subject to go to a committee. Mr. P rosper M. W etmore entirely concurred in this view, and thought we might soon be involved in a war with Continental Europe, for which it was our duty to prepare. Finally the subject was disposed of, for the present, by the adoption o f the following resolution : Resolved, That a committee he appointed to inquire into the present state o f the defences o f this port, and, i f found defective, to prepare a 86 Chambers o f Commerce and Boards o f Trade. memorial to government on the subject, to be submitted to the Chamber fo r its action. Messrs. Opdyke, B lunt, Marshall, D uer and N ye were named as the committee. Mr. P helps presented the following resolutions, which were adopted : Resolved, That the Chamber o f Commerce and merchants o f NewYork, representing the unanimous sense o f their body, record with sincere grief, and with high respect fo r his virtues, the death o f B i n d l e y M u r r a y H offman, a member o f this Chamber fo r many years past, who departed this life yesterday. Resolved, That as a merchant, his industry, his systematic attention to business, his unwavering good faith and fidelity, his unspotted honor and unstained integrity, entitle him to a lasting good name in the commercial annals o f our country. Resolved, That we equally declare our high esteem fo r his virtues as a man, fo r his kindness o f heart, his liberality in useful public enterprises, and his activity in works o f charity ; fo r his modesty, and also fo r his elevated Christian spirit; and fo r the unostentatious simplicity and blameless purity o f his private life. Resolved, That in common with the whole commercial community o f this city, by whom he has been so long known and esteemed, we respect fu lly tender our sympathy to his mourning relatives and friends, and, that these resolutions be communicated to them as a last mark o f our respect. Resolved, That a copy o f these resolutions be transmitted by the Secre tary to the fam ily o f the deceased member. The Secretary reported that the Annual Report of the Chamber for the past year had been completed, and copies were now ready for dis tribution for the use o f the members. The following nominations were made June 6th, for election July 3d, 1861 : Nominated by H ugh N. Camp, 149 Pearl-street, Samuel Colgate, 4 Dutch-street, Charles D imon, 73 South-street, John Eadie, 40 Wall-street, W illiam Lyell, 34 Cedar-street, Thomas Richardson, 15 Broadway, James A. Roosevelt, 94 Maiden Lane, Theodore Roosevelt, 94 Maiden Lane, B arnet L. Solomon, 369 Broadway, B enjamin H. Field. E gisto P. Fabbri. Caleb B arstow. Caleb F. Lindsley. J. Smith H omans. D aniel O gden. J. Lee Smith. J. Lee Smith. John H. Lyell. As the first Thursday in July will fall on the anniversary o f our national independence, the Chamber adjourned to meet on Wednesday, the 3d day of July. Monthly Meeting o f the Boston Board o f Trade. A t a meeting of the government at the rooms o f the Board, No. 55 Merchants’ Exchange, on Monday, June 3,1861, Vice-President Richard Boston Board o f Trade. 87 son in the chair, the committee on the present crisis presented their second report, as follows: On the 7th o f May your committee met H enry L. W hiting, Esq., o f the United States Coast Survey, at his request, to consider the subject o f fit ting out a fleet of fishing vessels to assist the blockading squadron on the Southern coast. Mr. W hiting, who was direct from Washington, exhibited a paper signed by Commodore P aulding, o f the United States Navy, and fol lowed in a verbal statement o f the views and suggestions of the Commo dore, in behalf, as was understood, o f the Navy Department. This inter view resulted in a second on the next day, when, by our invitation, several owners of fishing vessels and gentlemen engaged in business here and elsewhere were present. A t the meeting on the 8th ult. Mr. W hiting again stated the objects of the government, and was followed by Com mander Smith, o f the United States Navy, substantially in concurrence. After further discussion on the part o f our own citizens, voted, on mo tion o f A lbert G-. B rowne, Esq., that the chair appoint a committee of five to report the terms on which a fleet of from fifty to one hundred vessels of from fifty to one hundred tons burthen would be equipped for the proposed service. This committee performed the duty assigned before the adjournment, and a written agreement, signed by several highly responsible persons, was prepared at the instant and delivered to Mr. W hiting for the con sideration o f the Navy Department, which gave a specific answer to each question propounded by Com. Paulding. Having thus initiated the measure, your committee, as in the case of the “ Massachusetts Soldiers’ Fund,” left the further prosecution of it to others, and especially to the committee o f five. But, as Mr. B rowne, the chairman o f that committee, has placed in our hands a copy of Mr. W hiting’ s letter to him, after a conference with Com. Paulding at Wash ington, as well as a copy o f his reply, we may remark that no arrange ment has been made. Indeed, it seems by this correspondence that the Navy Department has abandoned the plan as concerns the present sea son, at least, to our regret, since we cannot but believe that a fleet of the kind suggested, composed o f vessels o f the most approved models, and manned by intelligent, energetic and brave seamen, who are thoroughly acquainted with every inlet and harbor between the Bay o f Chaleur and the Gulf o f Mexico, would prove o f immense importance to the steamers and other ships o f the navy in the existing blockade o f the ports o f the so-styled Confederate States. Respectfully submitted. John T. H eard, F. W . Lincoln, Jr., R. B. Forbes, Gardner B rewer. Office Rooms Board o f Trade, Boston, June 1, 1861. Annual Meeting o f the Montreal Board o f Trade. Report o f the Council o f the Montreal Board o f Trade f o r the year ending March 31,1861. The Council, in submitting their report, would beg to refer, as briefly as possible, to some o f the various matters which have engaged their at tention since the last annual meeting. The questions of assuming Lake St. Peter debt, and the abolition of 88 Montreal Board o f Trade. tonnage dues on sea-going vessels so frequently urged by their predeces sors, were again brought before tlio government and Parliament. The Council strongly represented, that the improvement of the river between Quebec and Montreal was a public and not a local work— that, from the deepening of the channel, a much larger class of ships could now ascend to Montreal from sea, and that in consequence, the rates o f freight in wards and outwards since the improvement had been made had gradu ally decreased, a result in which the producers and consumers o f the country were alike interested. The Council are glad to be able to say that the government, by an act o f last session, finally abolished all lake and river dues on shipping from sea, coming to Montreal, and assumed as a provincial debt the expense of deepening and improving the river and Lake St. Peter. A memorial, numerously signed by members o f the Board, in reference to a custom which has prevailed at this port, o f charging for every pack age taken to the examining warehouse, was placed before the Council, who, after a careful consideration o f all the facts, concurred in opinion that the practice (which does not prevail at other ports) should be abol ished. A memorial to this effect was forwarded to the finance minister, but no action has yet been taken thereon, and the Council would invite the attention of their successors to this matter. A bill having been introduced into Parliament, providing for a change in the law respecting the pilotage o f vessels below Quebec, the Council, assisted by the Quebec Board o f Trade, successfully opposed its obnoxious provisions. The Council, however, regret that notwithstanding their ear nest representations to the government, on the necessity o f a change be ing made in the system by which the pilots between Quebec and Montreal are now paid on the tonnage o f the ship instead of by the draft of water, no notice whatever has been taken o f the subject. The efforts made by the Trinity Board and the Harbor Commissioners have been attended with no better result. It must be remembered, that until a new system of remuneration shall compel pilots to become thoroughly acquainted with the new channel and improvements, the advantage o f the large outlay on these works is to a great extent lost From various facts brought before the attention o f the Council, it is apparent that the returns of produce received by canal and river have been most imperfect; and the Council have urged on the commissioner o f customs the necessity of obliging all vessels descending the river or canal, filing a duplicate manifest o f all cargo at the canal office. The serious losses and inconvenience which resulted from the robbery o f Canadian mails en route to the United States, induced the Council to open a correspondence with the post-office department, and to make some suggestions in reference to the future safe conduct o f this most im portant service. They have also lately addressed the Postmaster-Gene ral on the subject o f forwarding mails for New-York and Boston by the night express trains recently established, who concurred in opinion with the Council, that a great advantage would thereby be secured to the mercantile community; that he had entered into correspondence with the Postmaster-General of the United States on the subject, and that no ef fort of his would be wanting to carry out the proposed arrangement. The advantages which resulted from the construction of the Grand Montreal Board o f Trade. 89 Trunk Railway and from the Victoria Bridge to the commerce o f the province, and particularly to the trade of Montreal, are annually made more apparent; and the import trade in dry goods, hardware and gro ceries have advantages from the railway for distribution o f goods to all points that must more and more tend to make Montreal a place where stocks can be most profitably held. The Council, however, deem it their duty to notice the business arrangements of the company, under which produce and other property is carried from distant points in the United States to this place and to Portland at cheaper pro rata rates than the same produce and property is carried from one point in Canada to another. The Parliament, in granting the company an act o f incor poration, no doubt intended that the produce of the people o f Canada should at all times be carried at the same mileage as the produce or property of strangers. Whatever may be the rates which the Grand Trunk Company deem it necessary to charge for any service performed, let that charge be uniform, and paid by all its customers alike. Nor is it only from the cheaper rates at which produce is carried from foreign states that Canada trade suffers, for such has been the amount o f the foreign freight on the road that the company have been unable to do even a small portion o f the local produce trade. Although the efforts made last year by the Council o f the Board in conjunction with the corporation o f the city, the Grand Trunk Company and Harbor Commissioners were successful as to deciding on the best site for a passenger and local freight station for the Grand Trunk Com pany, nothing has yet been done in their construction. This is much to be regretted, as it is difficult to estimate the loss to the company and to the trade of the city, arising out o f the present means o f transacting bu siness at Point St. Charles. The Board being represented in the Harbor Commission, it is proper to state here, that the commissioners are pushing forward to completion the twenty feet channel at lowest water and lowest tide between this city and Quebec, and it is expected the same will be finished in 1863. In the harbor a channel from the foot o f the Lachine Canal to opposite St. Helen’s Island, of 300 feet wide and twenty feet deep at low water, is rapidly progressing and will probably be completed in 1863. A new wharf and basin, specially adapted for and capable o f berthing three ocean steamers, is completed. Several deep water-berths for sailing ves sels have been obtained by dredging below the island wharf, and a con tract has been given out by the commissioners for the construction o f a new wharf running down from the end o f the Victoria Pier. This wharf will be made accessible to vessels drawing twenty feet at lowest water, and will accommodate about ten large ships. Extensive as these improve ments may appear, the Council are o f opinion that the increase of the trade of the port warrants their construction, and there can be no ques tion that far greater outlay must yet be made, and important additional facilities be created, before all the advantages possessed by Montreal, as a receiving and distributing point, can be made apparent. The Council regret that no adequate measures have yet been adopted by government to enable the St. Lawrence route from the upper lakes to compete in cheapness with the route through the Erie Canal to NewYork and the New-England States. The means by which this desirable result might be accomplished have, since 1848, been constantly urged by 90 Montreal Board o f Trade. this Board on the attention o f the government, hut hitherto without effect, and when it is' considered that with our canals and railways com pleted, we fail to attract more than seven per cent, o f the trade o f Western Canada and the Western States down the St. Lawrence, and that ninetythree per cent, of that interior trade flows through the canals and over the rail-roads of New-York, such a statement ought to command the at tention of the country. Although the receipts at Montreal of flour, wheat, peas, corn, barley and oats have increased from equal to 3,793,90V bushels in 1859, to 6,558,245 in 1860; yet at New-York, equal to 52,787,190 bushels were received in 1860, against 28,224,340 in 1859, showing a larger proportionate increase, and indicating the magnitude of that business we have the opportunity to share. In view o f these facts the Council are o f opinion that without an en largement o f the Welland Canal, and the construction o f a canal into Lake Champlain, as so often urged by the Board, the trade o f Western Canada and the Western States must continue to flow as now through American channels, leaving our Canadian canals and railways compara tively deserted, and consequently unremunerative, while the interest in the capital invested in these public works has to be paid by excessive du ties on imports. The Council refer to this important matter because they desire to express their decided belief, that with the navigation im proved and perfected, and the facilities for water power at Montreal de veloped, this port would control an enormous trade in western produce as the most advantageous point for distribution, with reference to either home consumption or foreign demand, while the cheap return tonnage furnished would greatly benefit the St. Lawrence as a competing route for imports to the Western States. The subject o f a bankrupt law will probably engage the attention of the legislature at its present sitting, and this important question should at once receive the attention of the Board. The Council are, however, strongly of opinion that any such act should apply to both sections of the province; that it should be very simple in its provisions, defining clearly what are acts o f insolvency, affording speedy and inexpensive means for creditors becoming possessed of the debtors’ effects; and while protecting the honest, should provide means of signally punishing the fraudulent trader. Numerously signed memorials having been presented to the Council, asking for certain alterations o f the constitution, and for an improvement in the efficiency o f the Board of Arbitration, the mat ter was placed in the hands o f a committee, who reported in favor o f a new by-law extending the period of voting for office-bearers and making other suggestions which were prepared to be laid before the last quarterly meeting, but which, in consequence o f there being no quorum, must now be laid before the annual meeting. The retiring Council recommend to their successors’ attention the question o f securing inspection of grain at this port, and they would also urge the importance o f a Port Warden’s office being created, whose duties would be the survey o f vessels in loading and discharging, under such regulations as might be found in the custom o f other ports; there can be no doubt that rates o f insurance by the St. Lawrence might be there by considerably reduced. J o h n Y o u n g , President. Montreal, 23d March, 1861. 91 Nautical Intelligence. NAUTICAL INTELLIGENCE. NEW LIGHTS ESTABLISHED. I. S u r i n a m R i v e r . THE M O R E A .) II. T urk’ s Island. I I I . F ix e d R ed L ig h t at K I V . A u C AN AD A ISL A N D , (EAST COAST OF M A J O R C A .) atakolo, ( w est coast of V . C O RU N A, (S P A IN .) The following information is communicated through the Light-House Board at Washington for the information o f merchants: 1. Light-Vessel off mouth o f Surinam River.— Official information has been received, through the Department o f State, that the light-ship moored off the mouth of Surinam River is to be anchored in a different position on the first o f April, 1861, as follow s: In place o f being an chored outside of the buoys, (there being three,) it is to be placed at the second, in sixteen feet water, low tide, Bram’s Point bearing south 46° east. The burnt bush, south 81° east. The outer buoy, north west. The light is white, and can be seen about eight miles in clear weather. According to former advice, vessels making land to the windward, in the night, will do well to anchor till daylight. 2. Light-House at Turk's Island.— Official information has been re ceived, through the Department o f State, that a light-house has been erected on the north point o f Grand Turk Island, showing a white light, revolving every 27 seconds, with a continued dim light between intervals o f the strong flashes. The tower is 60 feet in height, painted white, and is situated 400 yards S. 50° W . of the extremity o f the point, with a focal plane elevated 110 feet above the mean level of the sea. The position o f the light is, latitude 21° 32' north. Longitude 71° 7' 40" west. The light is visible from all points, except where it is eclipsed by the Cays lying to the southward o f the Grand Turk. The fixed part o f the light will, under favorable conditions o f atmosphere, be visible from a height o f 10 feet above the level o f the sea at a distance o f 7 nautical miles, whilst the flash will be visible 15 nautical miles. Directions.— Vessels running for the Turk’s Island passage from the northward must endeavor to make the light on a bearing to the west ward o f south, as its range does not extend sufficiently far to guard against the dangers lying off Cape Comete, East Caicos. A reef runs off from the north point o f Grand Turk. Its extreme bears from the light N. E., (magnetic,) distant three miles, and from thence extends southerly, and runs parallel with the east side o f the Cay at the distance of two m iles; and, consequently, vessels, on making the light between the bearings o f S. W . and W . should (if intending to take the Turk’s Island passage) be careful to avoid that danger. On the bearing of south the light may be safely approached to within two miles, and have the passage open. This light cannot be seen from the dangers at the southern entrance o f Turk’s Island passage. 92 Nautical Intelligence. M e d it e r r a n e a n — W est C oast of M orea. 3. Fixed Red Light at Katakolo.— Official information lias been received, that on and after the 6th day of February, 1861, a light would be exhib ited from the extremity of the jetty in the course of construction at the port o f Katakolo, situated in the bay o f that name, on the east side of Cape Katakolo, on west coast o f the Morea. The light is a fixed red light, placed at an elevation o f 33 feet above the mean level of the sea, and should be seen in clear weather, from the deck o f a ship, at a distance of four miles. The light-house is of skeleton wood-work, at the end of the jetty, and at 240 yards from the shore. Its approximate position is given in lat. 37° 41' 30" N., long. 21° 24' 9" E., or by the admiralty charts, in 37° 39' 10" N., long. 21° 20' 50" east o f Greenwich. M ajorca, E ast C oast. 4. Fixed Light on Aucanada Island.— Official information has been re ceived, that on and after the 15th day o f May, 1861, a light will be ex hibited from a light-house recently erected on the east and highest part o f the island of Aucanada, in Alcudia Bay, east coast o f Majorca. The light will be a fixed white light, placed at an elevation of 77 feet above the mean level of the sea, and should be seen in clear weather, from the deck o f a ship, at a distance o f nine miles. The illuminating apparatus is dioptric, or by lenses, of the sixth order. The tower is circular, 49 feet high, painted white, and surmounted by a white lantern. It rises from the centre of the keeper’s dwelling, and its position is in lat. 39° 49' 50'' N., long. 3° 12' 24" east of Greenwich. A t l a n t ic — S p a in , N orth C oast. 5. Fixed Light at Coruna.— Official information has been received, that on and after the 15th day o f May, 1861, a light will be exhibited from a tower recently erected on the platform o f the castle o f St. Antonio, at the north side o f the entrance to Coruna. The light will be a white fixed light, placed at an elevation of 56 feet above the mean level o f the sea, and should be seen in clear weather, from the deck of a ship, at a distance of ten miles. The illuminating appara tus is dioptric, or by lenses, o f the fifth order. The tower is twenty feet high, painted green, and surmounted with a white lantern. It rises from the centre o f the keeper’s dwelling, which is also painted green, and stands in lat. 43° 22' N., long. 8° 23' 6" west of Greenwich. Position o f the Cartaya Light-house.— Also, that the position of the light at Cartaya, on the left bank at the entrance o f the river o f Las Piedras, on the southwest coast of Andalucia, should be lat. 37° 11' 50" N., long. 7° 1' 6" west of Greenwich. Commercial Regulations. COMMERCIAL 93 REGULATIONS. TRANSPORTATION IN BOND TO CERTAIN PORTS DISCONTINUED. The control o f the warehouses o f the government in the several States o f South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida and Texas, having been usurped under the alleged authority o f those States, and the officers of the customs acting under the authority o f the United States having been forcibly excluded from their proper functions in the custody of merchandise and superintendence o f the entries for warehousing and withdrawal, it has become impracticable to continue the privilege o f bonding for transportation to those ports. Collectors of the customs are accordingly hereby instructed that no entries for transportation in bond to those ports can be permitted until otherwise directed by this department. In the case of merchandise entered for transportation before the re ceipt by collectors of these instructions, transportation bonds to the ports o f South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida and Texas, will be cancelled on payment o f the duties at the collector’s office at the port from which the goods were shipped, on the collector being satisfied, by the affidavit of the party, to be filed with the bond, that the merchandise arrived at the port of destination after the United States officers at such port had ceased to issue the lawful cancelling certificate. CUSTOMS REGULATIONS IN BRAZIL. The London Times contains the following communication regarding the recent customs regulations adopted by the Brazilian government: “ Sir,— W ith reference to the obstructive policy on the part o f the Brazilian government about the clearances of vessels, I supply you with particulars o f its retrograde operation. The first vessel has just been cleared, after ten days’ tedious and continuous labor of nearly the entire staff o f an office. It is no great figure of speech to say that acres o f paper are required to clear a vessel. The vessel in question is a small craft, and, among other portions o f her cargo, has about twenty tons o f iron on board, which contain probably about five hundred bars in the whole. Now, the weight o f every bar must be specified. This might have done very well in the olden times o f Portuguese corruption, when ‘ rattage ’ was charged in every account of sale, not excepted from iron and bra ziers’ copper. The bills o f lading are covered with figures and writing, and how or where to endorse one nobody can tell. The manifest is nearly fifty feet in length, and three copies have to be made out before the ves sel can be cleared. The paper alone for the documents, exclusive of the bills of lading, actually cost 10s. Hitherto the conduct o f the Brazilian government has been one o f enlightenment and progress, and 'this sudden and unaccountable move o f ‘ backwardation’ has astonished and con founded all her best friends. Among other foolish and other impolitic measures is the imposition of an export duty on coffee, under the absurd 94 Commercial Regulations. notion that it will come out o f the foreigner’s pocket instead o f the plan ter’s. If Brazil were the only coffee-producing country, then it would come out of the foreigner’ s, and ultimately out o f the consumer’ s p ock et; but inasmuch as Brazil is only one out o f many coffee-producing coun tries which compete with her in foreign markets, it is clear it must be a tax on the Brazilian farmer, and cripple his means o f competition with other countries producing the article.” A meeting o f merchants and brokers connected with the Brazilian trade was recently held at the Cotton Sales-room, Liverpool, for the pur pose o f considering the propriety o f memorializing the Brazilian govern ment on the subject o f the vexatious detail in ships’ manifests required under the Brazilian tariff. Mr. W . C. M i l l e r occupied the chair, and eventually a committee was appointed to consider the advisability o f ap pealing directly to the Brazilian Minister, or through the Chamber of Commerce, or both conjointly. TRADE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. It is understood that the new commercial treaties between Turkey on the one part, and England and France on the other, came into operation on the 13th of March. The change is likely to prove highly beneficial, and all countries will equally participate in its advantages. Under the commercial treaty o f 1838 the import duties were fixed at five per cent., and the export duties at twelve per cent. B y the present treaty, which is for twenty-eight years, with right o f revisal in ten years, both the ex port and import duties are to be placed, in the first instance, at a uniform rate o f eight per cent, ad valorem, hut with the condition that the export duties shall be reduced one per cent, annually for seven years, when they will he brought down to one per cent., which will then be permanent. This will clear the way for a vast and steady augmentation o f trade, since the advance o f the import duties from five to eight per cent., which is considered absolutely necessary to provide for the revenue o f the country, will not, it is believed, even for the moment, have any appreciable effect in checking the consumption of foreign manufacturers ; while the reduction o f the export duties gradually, to a point at which they will be merely nominal, will enable buyers to obtain much larger supplies o f produce, the profits from which will lead the Turkish agriculturist to become, in a proportionate degree, a better customer in distant markets. Already the exports of Great Britain to Turkey are o f an amount nearly equal to those of France, and far superior to those o f Russia, the total last year being £4,408,000; while France, even under the operation o f the new treaty, did not take more than £5,249,000, and the amount to Russia was only £3,267,000. W ith regard to the prospect o f reforms in the interior fiscal adminis tration of Turkey, it appears from recent advices that the government has given assurances that a commencement shall at once be made— a project for the formation of a company to promote the growth o f cotton in Asia Minor, in the district opened up by the Smyrna and Aidin Railway, hav ing been entered into on that understanding. The new treaty embraces all parts of the Sultan’s dominions, including Egypt and the Danubian Principalities. Commercial Regulations. 95 THE FRENCH FISHERIES. The Moniteur contains a long report to the Emperor from M. C o s t e , of the Institute, “ On the Organization o f Fisheries, as regards the increase o f the naval force of France.” He begins by stating that the production of oysters on the plan recommended by him, has taken such a prodigious development, that in the lie de Re alone, more than 3,000 men, who have come from the interior, have already established 1,500 parks, which produce annually about 378,000,000 oysters, o f the value o f 6,000,000f. to 8,000,000f. These men have also formed themselves into associations for the defence of their common interests. Those associations and others like them, which could be formed on different parts o f the coast, might, instead o f confining themselves to the production o f oysters, establish parks for the production o f soles, ray, turbot, lobsters, crabs, &c. But the formation of the parks would not only cost considerable sums, but would necessitate the employment of vessels in which the men could go out to sea to fish; and that course again would necessitate further outlay. As the men have not the funds to do all this, M. C o s t e suggests that advances shall be made to them by what are called the Maritime Caisses de Retraites, subject to the condition o f their paying back three per cent, per month of the produce o f their fishing, in addition to the three per cent, which they are already bound to pay to the said Caisses, in order to obtain relief in sickness or in old age. He adds, that such a payment would not be in any way burdensome to them, and would besides in time make them proprietors of vessels, parks, &c., paid for by the means of the advances. As several millions are granted annually for the encour agement of the Newfoundland fisheries, M. C o s t e submits that there is nothing unreasonable in what he proposes, and he affirms that, if his suggestion be acted on, a vast increase would be made to the maritime population, which augmentation would naturally strengthen the Imperial navy. He likewise observes that the fishing associations which he wishes to see established would not only provide a large and constant supply of fish for the inland towns, and thereby create an important branch of trade, but might lead to obtaining fish, insects and plants in great quan tities for manure.— London Times. TRADE WITH JAPAN. The following communication has been received by the Manchester Chamber of Commerce from the Board o f T r a d e O f f i c e of Committee o f Privy Council for Trade, Whitehall, 8th April, 1861. Sir,— I am di rected by the Lords of the Committee o f Privy Council for Trade, to request that you will inform the Committee o f the Manchester Chamber o f Commerce that they have received, through the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, a copy of a despatch from Her Majesty’s Minister in Japan, together with enclosures, consisting o f a report, with patterns, chiefly of woven fabrics in cotton, specifying articles o f this description suitable for the Japanese markets. The report and specimens may be inspected on application at this office. I am, Sir, your obedient servant, J. E m. T e n n e n t . The Secretary o f Chamber of Commerce, Manchester. Commercial Regulations. 96 GREAT BRITAIN AND THE AMERICAN WAR. The following proclamation, dated May 13, 1861, has been issued : V i c t o r i a I.— Whereas, we are happily at peace with all Sovereigns, Powers and States, and whereas, hostilities have unhappily commenced between the government of the United States of America and certain States styling themselves the Confederate States of America, and whereas, we, being at peace with the government o f the United States, have de clared our royal determination to maintain a strict and impartial neutrality in the contest between the said contending parties: we, therefore, have thought fit, by and with the advice o f our Privy Council, to issue this our royal proclamation. [The provisions of the Foreign Enlistment A ct are here cited.] And we do hereby warn all our loving subjects, and all persons whatsoever entitled to our protection, that if any o f them shall presume, in contempt o f this our royal proclamation and o f our high displeasure, to do any acts in derogation o f their duty as subjects o f a neutral sovereign in the said contest, or in violation or in contravention o f the law of nations, as for example, more especially, by entering into the military service o f either of the said contending parties as commis sioned or non-commissioned officers or soldiers ; or by serving as officers, sailors or marines on board any ship or vessel of war or transport o f or in the service o f either o f the said contending parties; or by serving as officers, sailors or marines on board any privateer bearing letters o f marque of or from either of the said contending parties ; or by engaging to go or going to any place beyond the seas with intent to enlist or engage in any such services; or by procuring, or attempting to procure within her majesty’s dominions, at home or abroad, otherwise to do s o ; or by fitting out, arming or equiping any ship or vessel to be employed as a ship o f war or privateer or transport by either o f the said contending parties; or by breaking or endeavoring to break any blockade lawfully and actually established by or on behalf of either of the said contending parties ; or by carrying officers, soldiers, despatches, arms, military stores or materials, or any article or articles considered and deemed to be con traband o f war, according to the law or modern usage of nations, for the use or service of either o f the said contending parties. All persons so offending will incur and be liable to the several penalties and penal con sequences by the said statute or by the law o f nations in that behalf imposed and decreed. And we do hereby declare, that all our subjects and persons entitled to our protection, who may misconduct themselves in the premises, will do so at their peril and o f their own wrong, and that they will in nowise obtain any protection from us against any liabilities or penal consequences, but will, on the contrary, incur our high displeasure b y such misconduct. The D u ty on Coffee. 97 T I I E D U T Y ON C O F F E E . B oston, June 13th, 1861. To the Editors o f the Merchants' Magazine : c- A greeably to your request, at the time of our conversation about the effect of a duty on coffee, and the revenue to bo derived therefrom, I now give you my views in writing, and more in detail, in relation to the same. The first and most important point to consider is, I think, the rate o f duty that will give the most revenue at the least cost to the consumer and the country. In order to come at this, we have next to consider the extent of con sumption and the effect o f price upon it. W e have found the past year of 1860, that the range o f prices for good and best qualities o f Rio coffee, if 12 @ 11Y cents per lb., say is 15 @ 20 per cent, above the average of the two or three previous years, lias not decreased consumption to the extent o f the rise in price against an average sale or consumption, as commonly estimated, for several years previous, o f 220,000,000 @ 225,000,000 lbs. per year. W e have sold, last year, about 190,000,000 lbs. from first hands. The stock remaining in second and consumers’ hands, however, at the end of the year, being much smaller than usual, it follows that the actual consumption was more than 190,000,000 lbs. It is fair to assume, therefore, that, with a necessity for higher prices in the shape o f a duty, and when once familiar with it, 14 @ 16 cents even would not check consumption beyond 10 @ 15 per cent, probably, if that, after the first year, which might, from obvious reasons, be more, especially as the first effect o f a duty would be to raise the price more, probably, than it would rule at after supplies came regularly again from abroad. Looking at the ruling prices in Rio for the past few years, and in other producing countries, it is nearly certain, from past experience of the effect of duty on the cost in producing countries, that 5 cents duty could be borne without raising the price of Rio coffee here to over 14 @ 16 cents for good and best qualities, for an average o f several years, and probably less. Y ou will see by this that I assume that the producing country will pay one-third to one-half the duty, which has usually been found to be the case with any considerable duty, not to say invariably; and it is but reasonable and necessary that it should be so, more or less, as a little consideration will prove, viz.: The effect of duty is to check importa tions, and also consumption. This reduces the demand and competition to buy in the producing country, and thus reduces the cost. I think it is quite clear, therefore, that we should in all probability have coffee at not over 2-J- or 3 cents per lb. additional cost to the country, with a duty of 5 cents per lb., taking an average o f several years together. The pre sent duty in Great Britain is 3 @ 6 cents per lb., which is less than for merly, and, compared with tea, a low duty, as tea pays Is. 5d., or 33 to 34 cents per lb. The duty of 5 cents on coffee, I judge, would give nearly as much revenue as any higher duty at present, unless, from increase o f growth VOL. xlv.— no. i. 7 98 The D u ty on Coffee. or abundant crops, tbe price should fall so low as to bear a higher duty equally well. A lower rate o f duty, as it would effect consumption less, and offer less check to free importations, would, I conceive, be borne in a larger proportion by the consumer; so that, if the object is the most revenue at the least cost, about 5 cents, I should judge, at present range o f prices, would be nearest right. If a higher rate would give more, it would become onerous to many, or cut off many consumers ; whereas, at 2^ @ 3 cents additional cost per lb., as I have assumed, it is very little upon an average consumption o f 7 lbs. per head per annum for the total white population o f the country. Assuming that the consumption will range from 180,000,000 @ 200,000,000 lbs. per annum for some years, upon an average, which is very safe, I think, a duty of 5 cents will give $9,000,000 to $10,000,000 revenue, at a cost, actually, o f about $5,000,000 to $6,000,000 only to the country, probably. The same facts and reasoning applies to tea, sugar and molasses. The duty on tea, I should suppose, would not be in the same proportion to coffee as the English duty, which is nearly six times that o f coffee. The reason for this may be because England consumes very largely o f tea, viz., nearly double the number o f pounds o f tea that she does o f coffee, and with a view to obtaining the most revenue ; whereas, with us it is exactly opposite— we consume seven to eight times the amount o f coffee that we do o f tea. The average cost of tea is three to four times that of coffee ; and if three times be taken and 15 cents per lb. on tea be fixed upon as the duty, it would be a fair proportion, I should say, and give $4,000,000 @ $4,500,000 revenue, I judge. The present sugar duty o f f c. can be doubled, and not much exceed, if any, the previous duty o f 24 per cent, ad valorem. Upon these four leading articles we may estimate the revenue as follows, to take a low estimate, in quantities, for the whole country, as it has been : Coffee, 180,000,000 lbs. per year, at 5 cents duty per lb .,............... Tea, 30,000,000 “ “ “ 15 “ “ “ ............... Sugar, 700,000,000 “ “ foreign import, at H cents per lb., Molasses, 30,000,000 galls. “ at 4 cents per gall, duty,............. $9,000,000 4,500,000 10,500,000 1,200,000 Present sugar and molasses duty, one-lialf the above,............................... $25,200,000 5,850,000 $19,350,000 I f my data and reasoning are nearly correct, therefore, about $20,000,000 additional revenue can be easily raised upon these four articles, and at a cost to the country of about two-thirds that amount, the balance beingpaid by the cheaper cost in producing countries. I should have remarked, that the duty on sugar in England is 12s. to 13s. per cwt. on brown and yellow sugars, or nearly double the rate o f 1^- cents per lb. fixed upon above. This mode of raising money by duties is certainly not only a great saving to the country, compared with direct taxation, which is attended with additional expense in the collection, and objectionable on many accounts, but is especially free from the annoyance and irritation often to individuals, growing out of direct taxation. Yet, as nearly all con sume these articles, and more or less according to their means, the amount to each is very small, and equitably distributed. G. Foreign Correspondence. 99 FOREIGN CORRESPONDENCE OF THE MERCHANTS’ MAGAZINE AND COMMERCIAL REVIEW . L o n d o n , M ay 31st, 1861. To the Editors o f the Merchants' Magazine: P u b l i c attention has been intensely directed, during this month, to the straggle unfortunately pending in the United States; and the action o f the executive towards either party has been closely watched lest any disagree ment might occur on any point. And well may it be so, when we con sider how important are the relations of commerce with the United States; how dependent are our manufacturers on the supply o f cotton, the first of our raw materials, and how extensive is the American market for British manufactures. The proclamation issued by the British gov ernment warning British subjects from taking any part, or receiving any commission from either party, the same being illegal under the Foreign Enlistment Act, has been commented upon, as it seems to acknowledge the belligerent right o f the Confederate States to issue letters o f marque. But it is scarcely liable to such a construction. It is quite certain that by international law the State alone has power to commission national vessels to assist in carrying on the war; and that unless the privateer as sumes for the time a national character, it must be considered as a pirate. Are the Confederate States to be considered as sovereign States or as rebel provinces ? It is certainly premature for the British government to express an opinion on the subject, though it has been the policy o f this government to recognise any new arrangement as a matter of fact; on the reasons o f which it has no business to enter. It is much to be regretted that the United States government did not concur in the declaration of the European powers at the Congress o f Paris, in 1856, respecting pri vateering, though the demand that private property at sea should be respected in war was most just and proper. The British legislature has been for a considerable time engaged in discussing the Budget, and more especially the policy o f abolishing the paper duty. The debate was long and vigorous, but a majority o f fifteen saved the government, and the measure is safe. W e need not expect this year any untoward stoppages in the House o f Lords. Although their right to consider, accept, reject or alter all bills, whether financial or other wise, is incontestable, and they were glad to exercise such right last year, when the condition o f public finances really justified their interposition against the abandonment o f a large sum o f revenue, there is nothing this year that will in the least countenance such a course, and the bill will pass safely. I send you the bill as it now stands before the House. The bankruptcy bill, however, which has been remitted to a committee of the House of Lords, has undergone a searching scrutiny, and many o f the most important clauses have been struck out. The bill has just been laid before the House, as amended, but is not yet printed to en- 100 Foreign Correspondence. able me to send it to you. W hat may be the fate o f the measure it is difficult to say. The Chambers of Commerce and all public bodies were quite satisfied with it as it was, at least in its main features, and it will depend on the nature o f the changes made in it whether it will pass or not this session. The trade marks bill has passed the House o f Lords and is now be fore the House o f Commons. Considerable opposition has, however, been raised to it, principally by those who are in the habit o f using the trade marks of other manufacturers to give currency to their own goods. That such a practice must be stopped by making it criminal, is quite clear; and I sincerely hope the government may be strong enough to pass it. I send you this day several public documents of interest, such as the Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom, a paper full of commercial information of great value; the correspondence with the United States government respecting the blockade, and the reports on the conveyance of mail between Galway and America. From the last of these docu ments it appears that the Galway contract is to terminate, but Viscount Palmerston stated in Parliament that the British government are not ■unwilling to encourage the most direct communication between the United Kingdom and America, but any proposal must be founded on open competition. I send you also a return on the consumption o f tea, showing the won derful increase in the quantity consumed. The committee on the income and property taxes is still sitting. The bill on copyright in works of art has been remitted to a committee. There is a bill before the House of Commons to introduce into Ireland the same summary procedure on bills o f exchange as it now exists in England and Wales. Y ou will have observed that the value of the exports o f British pro duce and manufacture to the United States in the quarter ending 31st March, 1861, was £4,147,019, against £5,886,357 in the similar period in 1860, and £6,271,993 in 1859. A division is now made in the Board o f Trade accounts in our exports to the United States, v iz .: ports on the Atlantic, northern ; ports on the Atlantic, southern ; ports on the Pacific. The total exports in the four months ending 30th April, 1861, amounted to £38,574,462, against £41,834,347 in the similar period in 1860, and £41,851,524 in 1859. Among the important combinations lately formed to promote the im port of cotton from other countries into England, the following will show that secession has defeated its own object, i. e., the supremacy o f Southern commerce. 1. The British Cotton Company, Manchester. 2. The Manchester Cotton Company, Manchester; capital $5,000,000 ; chairman, Thomas B arzley, Esq., M. P. from Manchester. Sphere o f operations, India and Australia, &e. 3. The East India Company; capital $1,250,000, London. 4. The Jamaica Cotton Company, London; capital $100,000; chairman, Samuel Gurnet, Esq., M. P. 5. The Coventry Cotton Company, Coventry; capital $250,000. These are among the first results o f the alarm now felt as to the cotton supply in England. There are, in addition to these, two societies with wide reach, which will soon tell powerfully upon the question. One is the Cotton Supply Association, of Manchester, which is now actually stimulating cotton production in India, Australia, Africa, the W est Indies Foreign Correspondence. 101 and other tropical regions. The other is the African A id Society, of London, formed to aid American free blacks to emigrate to Africa and the West Indies, where they may engage in the cotton culture. Its object is nearly identical with that o f the Colonization Societies, superadding the idea of-cotton culture as an immediate work for the free blacks. The chairman is Lord A lfred S. Churchill, M. P., and its officers compris ing Lord Caltliorpe, the Bishop o f Sierra Leone, Lord R ollo, Hon. W . A shley, Admiral Seymour, Sir C. E ardley and many other distin guished men. It has formed branches in Glasgow, Manchester, Birmingham and other towns, and bids fair to greatly aid in ameliorating the condition o f the negro race. The friends of that cause embrace many of the leading minds in Great Britain. The determination is to deliver England from dependence upon the South. African cotton can he delivered at Liverpool for 4^d., which is much cheaper than American, and o f an average quality. Let the merchants connected with the Southern trade not forget these facts. In any event of this war, secession has opened the eyes o f the British, and the South has lost the monopoly of the cotton trade. Lord John Russell has officially requested the British consuls to stimu late cotton culture throughout the British tropical dominions. Soon after Mr. Charles F. A dams, the new American Minister, landed at Liverpool, in May, he was waited upon by the Mayor and by a deputa tion from the American Chamber of Commerce, who presented to him an address. In reply his Excellency said: Mr. President and Gentlemen of the American Chamber o f Commerce: I heartily accept of your cordial greeting on my arrival in this great city. It is now more than forty years since I left these shores. I -was then a hoy, and now I am past the age o f middle life ; but the interval o f time has produced far greater changes in the relations between the country I now represent and the kingdom of Great Britain than any I can trace relatively in myself. As I watched the progress o f discharging the letter bags from the steamer in which I have just made my passage, and reflected how often the same process is now repeated by means of such admirable nautical despatch, I felt in its full force the ever-increasing magnitude o f the commercial relations between the two countries, and the importance o f aiding, by every practical method, in developing them to their fullest extent. The progress of your city, gentlemen, manifests the great expansion of the same ideas. Long may it continue, by cultivating the arts o f peace, to present the strongest in ducements to the preservation of harmony between the nations. I come here desirous only to develop the fraternal relations to which you have been pleased to allude in your address to me. Such I believe to be the wish of the government o f the United States, which has sent me, as well as o f a very large portion o f the people, irrespective o f any personal differences that may now unhappily prevail among them. Permit me here to concur with you in the hope and the trust, that time and trial will bring round a better state of feeling there, so that we may all once more unite and co-operate in the blessed work of promoting the prosperity of the civilized world. Not doubting that this would be joyfully hailed by you in your respective useful vocations on this side, I can only pledge to you all my individual efforts to contribute to the same result. 102 Journal o f Agriculture. J O U R N A L OF A G R I C U L T U R E . COTTON FLAX OR FIBRILIA. The objects sought to be attained in producing fibrilia are to bring out a practical substitute for cotton, which may be grown in the northern States, and which will have a tendency to connect and equalize the agri cultural with the mechanical and commercial interests of the North. The principal causes o f failure in times past, in bringing forward flax as a cheaper article o f manufacture suited to practical and universal use, have been, first— the great labor to the agriculturist in order to main tain a clean and even straw in bundles suitable for breaking. This could only be done by pulling and threshing by hand, and in the process of rotting the flax. The production o f flax for making flax cotton or fibrilia, as well as the manufacture o f it into cloth, is conducted upon a much more practical and economical scale. The flax or straw may be cut by a scythe, a mowing machine, or cradled. The seed may be threshed out by any or dinary threshing machine. The rotting process is dispensed with alto gether. There are flax mills now in use for breaking and cleaning the straw, which are capable o f dressing from two to five tons per day, and even going as high as ten tons in ten hours. The dressing o f flax is entirely different from the old method, as well as the manufacture of it into cloth. Machines have been perfected for dressing and preparing flax to be carded and spun on cotton machinery. The foundation is laid, and it is with us, the American people, to exhibit its permanent and practical value to the world. If any one of your readers will give his name and post-office address, I shall be happy to render him such information as I may be in possession o f in connection with this subject. Charles B each. P enn Y an, Y ates C o ., N. Y., 1861. In connection with the foregoing, we received a circular stating that in 1848 Mr. B each, together with his father and brother, invented and applied for, and took out letters patent for a machine to dress and prepare flax to be spun on cotton machinery. Mr. B each constructed a fullsized working machine, with which he dressed ten tons o f straw, produc ing five tons of flax cotton daily, with the aid of one man, and that the lint was in perfect condition. He has waited twelve years for a market for this lint, and would now be glad to know what is its market value, unbleached. Mr. B each is confident that if a demand will spring up, making the manufacture as profitable as any other branch o f agriculture, the want will be met fully and promptly.— E ds.— Rural New-Yorker. Journal o f Life Insurance. 103 J O U R N A L OF L I F E I N S U R A N C E . WAR RISKS OF LIFE INSURANCE— LETTER FROM ELIZUR WRIGHT. Elizur W right, Secretary o f the Massachusetts Board o f Insurance Commissioners, having been applied to for information concerning war risks in life insurance policies, makes the following reply. Office of the Massachusetts I nsurance Commissioners, Boston, A pril 21, 1861. My Dear S ir: My opinion, not mathematically a very positive one, as to the proper rate to be charged on northern lives for permission to engage in the military service o f the government in the present emer gency, was formed some time ago, after a careful consideration of the facts then within my reach, and thus far I have seen no reason to change it. The military statistics which we have, assuming their accuracy, throw but a feeble and flickering light on the question o f military risks. Taking modern wars o f first rate European powers along with our own military experience, the extra mortality varies all the way from 0 up to 20 per cent, per annum on the mean force. This extra mortality may he divided into three parts : First.— The enhancement o f ordinary diseases, which varies accord ing to circumstances of commissariat, medical arrangements, climate, fa tigue of marches, &c., &c. Second.— Deaths from casualties in action; the ratio o f these to the forces engaged in the service has varied greatly, but not so much as that o f the deaths by disease, and it is not nearly so large. In many very important wars it has been less than one per cent. Third.— The mortality which shows itself after the war, from disease or vicious habits contracted in the service. As to the amount o f this, we are left almost entirely to conjecture. It must be considerable for the mass, but would probably not be large for such lives as in times of peace resort to life insurance, and could be guarded against in some measure as to lives seeking insurance now by judicious selection. Men o f char acter may undergo great hardships with even a beneficial effect on their vitality. Allowing to blind fortune its full share in the government of mili tary matters, it is obvious enough that the ratio o f mortality in past wars has depended greatly on the palpable circumstances belonging to each, and that in predicting that which will rule in the present war we must carefully consider the relative position, strength and means of the parties. This war has really no precedent in the history of the world, either among foreign, civil or servile wars. 104 Journal o f Life Insurance. A government cordially supported by eighteen millions o f people, possessed o f ample means, inspired with a common enthusiasm, is called on to suppress a rebellion got up, amidst a population o f ten millions, more than one-third o f whom are slaves, by a small minority of the free population, and entirely in their interest. The country controlled by the conspirators has no navy, small manufactures, little available 'wealth at home, and no credit abroad. It appears to me, that while the war may cost the insurgents much blood, the government must be sadly deficient in both statesmanship and generalship, if it does not conquer a perma nent peace at a very moderate cost of life on its part. Whatever preju dices or predilections may be entertained at the North, a military neces sity now dictates that property in slaves, the cause o f rebellion, must he sacrificed for the salvation o f the country. Such sacrifice involves noth ing barbarous, wasteful o f life, or beyond the constitutional power of the government at such an emergency. It will necessarily take place by throwing upon southern soil at two or three commanding points sufficient force to ensure the protection of life, liberty and all other species of property to all the population who will stand by their allegiance to the government, or return to it. The peculiar institution o f the South renders it impossible for its extempo rized government to concentrate a force sufficient to parry a blow o f this sort, and it must necessarily make the best terms it can— among which will doubtless bo a stipulation for the extinguishment of that claim of property in man which caused the war. The Montgomery government, even if it had full time to organize, consolidate and avail itself o f all its possible resources, would only be strong for aggressive war on a weak people. If the British government, at the time o f our revolution, had had no slaves o f its own and only the slave States to subdue, I think the forces it landed on southern soil would have done the work without suffering an extra mortality of more than one per cent. And while our government can have two hundred thou sand troops for the arming, I do not believe it need sacrifice one per cent, of its army, or more than the time between this and July 4th, to end the question and seal the perpetuity o f the Union. There has been great danger that the conspiracy would gain some important advantage over our government while it was in a disorganized state; but that is passed. Now, I can liken the war only to that be tween the enraged bull and the locomotive. The natural brute is sure to get the worst of it, while, with caution and a cow-catcher, the artificial will convert its antagonist into harmless beef with no material damage to itself. From all these considerations I am inclined to think the chances are in favor of the companies not losing by granting military permits at two per cent. But their position is so strong that I think they can shoulder some loss, and their constituents would cheerfully justify them in doing it. True prudence seems to be just now in over-doing rather than under doing. The flag must be sustained, or our institutions sink into a com mon ruin. Yours truly, Elizur W right. 105 Commercial Chronicle and Review. C O M M E R C I A L C H R O N I C L E AND R E V I E W . T he month o f June has been marked with extreme dullness in com mercial circles. The failures among dry goods firms, grocers, in the leather trade, hardware trade, &c., within the two months past have been numerous and heavy. The entire cessation of remittances from the se ceding States, on account of indebtedness to New-York and other cities, has forced numerous houses, which were previously considered substan tial, to suspend payment. Activity has prevailed among those articles in demand for war purposes. Fire-arms, ammunition, ready-made cloth ing, blankets, heavy shoes, and a few other articles in immediate use for the troops, command good prices and find ready sale. The entries of foreign goods for consumption in May, 1861, were less than one-fifth of May, 1859. W e annex the summary for four years: V alue of I mports at N e w -Y ork from F oreign P orts for tiie month of M ay . 1858. 1 85 9. 186 0. ' 1861. Dutiable for consump., $6,574,612 . . $ 15,222,311 ..$10,515,411 . . $2,889,588 Foreign, free,............... 1,928,573 . . 3,462,285 . . 1 ,845,020.. 2,730,568 Entered for warehouse, 2,626,978 . . 4 ,7 4 6 ,6 1 4 .. 4 ,4 3 6 ,6 0 0 .. 5,842,313 Specie and bullion,. . . 324,540 . . 122,436 . . 96,060 . . 3,486,812 Total imports,.......... $ 11,454,703 . . $ 23,552,646 . . $ 16,893,091 . . $ 14,949,281 Withdrawn,.............. 2,665,573 . . 1,628,434 . . 2,475,067 . . 1,606,864 Total,.........................$ 14,120,276 . . $ 25,181,080 . . $ 19,368,158 . . $ 16,556,145 Those for May do not vary in their characteristics from those of each month since October last. An importation o f specie largely exceeding the export— in fact, reversing the usual course; a large exportation o f domestic products, double in value the corresponding month of the two previous years; a diminished importation, of which a large proportion is allowed to remain in bond, in the absence o f a market— these are the distinguishing features which have prevailed for seven months. The prospects of a revenue under the present tariff, while Treasury notes are received for duties, are by no means flattering. The revenue for May was lower than for any month since October, 1857, when it was reduced by the panic. The following statement gives the totals for the eleven months o f the fiscal year : E xports , E xclusive of S pecie , from N ew -Y ork to F oreign P orts for eleven MONTHS, ENDING W IT H M AY. 1858. Six months,.................. $ 34,702,441 . . $ January,....................... 4 ,6 8 9 ,7 3 9 .. February,..................... 4,1 73 ,5 7 7 .. March,........................... 5,180,860 . . A p r il,........................... 6,099,926 . . M a y ,............................. 4,606,578 . . 1859. 1860. 27,994,834 . . $ 36,371,058 . . $ 4 ,1 1 4 ,0 0 8 .. 6 ,022,462.. 3,7 35 ,6 3 3 .. 6 ,675,870.. 5,876,001 . . 8,128,754 . . 6,774,699 . . 7,375,913 . . 5,914,750 . . 6,370,381 . . 1861. 59,924,431 11,143,843 10,804,307 11,529,592 9,697,005 11,603,698 Total,.........................$ 59,453,121 . . $ 54,409,925 . . $ 70,944,438 . .$114,702,876 Specie for same time,. 33,727,897 . . 39,342,463 . . 4 9 ,26 5 ,5 6 6 .. 23,616,615 Total exports,...........$93,181,108 ..$93,752,388 ..$120,200,004 ..$138,319,491 106 Commercial Chronicle and Review. The exports of domestic produce for the month o f May are largely in excess o f those of last year, and also exceeding those of any month of the current year. W e annex details for four years : V alve of E xports from N ew -Y ork to F oreign P orts for the M onth of M at , 1858— 1861. 1858. 1859. 1 86 0. 1861. Domestic prod u ce,___ $4,262,789 . . $5,180,652 . . $5,812,190 .. $10,855,709 Foreign mdse., dutiable, 229,990. . 426,002 . . 248,270 .. 567,872 do. free, . . . 113,799. . 308,096 . . 309,921 . . 180,114 Total merchandise,. . Specie and bullion........ $4,606,578 . . $ 5,914,750 . . $6,370,381 .. $ 11,603,695 1,790,275.. 11,421,032 . . 5 ,529,936.. 128,900 Total exports,........... $ 6,396,853 ..$17,335,782 ..$11,900,317 .. $11,732,595 The imports for the fiscal year are nominally large, but in reality small. The importations warehoused form a large part o f the whole. The fol lowing is a summary for four years : F oreign I mports at N e w -Y ork for E leven M onths, ending M ay 31. 1858. 1859. Six months,___ $ 109,688,702 . . January,............ 8,105,719 . . February,.......... 9,209,043 . . March................ 11,729,702.. A p r il,............... 11,169,025 . . M a y ,................. 11,454,703 . . 1860. 1861. $ 91,082,433. . $ 116,000,642. . $ 19,447,962 . . 21,756,273 . . 18,848,370 . . 19,356,379 . . 20,820,456.. 23,580,126.. 22,425,629 . . 16,971,358 . . 23,552,646 . . 16,893,151 . . 120,542,384 26,827,411 16,341,707 18,204,351 14,886,393 14,949,281 Total 11 mos., $ 161,356,894 . . $ 196,177,486 . . $ 214,557,929 . . $ 211,751,527 The cash duties received at the port were, for the first six months of the fiscal year, higher than last year or the previous one, and are second only to the large revenues o f 1857. For the month o f April the duties were only one-half the average per month; and for May were less than one-third. Cash D uties received at N e w -Y ork. 1859. 1861. 1 86 0. Six months, ending Jan. 1, $ 15,387,618 49 . . $ 19,322,060 96 . . $17,637,802 21 2,059,202 33 In January,......................... 3,899,166 17 . 3,478,471 38 . 2,528,736 83 February,........................... 3,328,688 93 . 3,378,043 28 . March,................................. 2,489,926 25 3,164,011 25 . 3,477,545 74 . A p r i l ,.................................. 1,643,261 99 3,212,060 49 . 2,444,267 96 . 979,145 00 M a y ,.................................... 3,014,520 39 . 2,466,462 76 . Total eleven months, . . . $31,585,370 93 . . $34,987,546 87 . . $ 27,338,074 61 It is thought that an additional revenue o f twenty-five millions can be secured by duty on four articles, v iz .: C offee,............................ Tea, ............................... Foreign su gar,.............. . . . M o la sse s,...................... . 30,000,000 700,000,000 (t H 5 cents, 15 “ 2 “ 4 .. $ 9,000,000 4,500,000 14,000,000 1,200,000 The duties levied on tea from 1816 to 1832 were as follows 1816. Im perial, per lb........... Gunpowder, “ .... H yson, “ .... Ily so n Skin, “ ____ Souchong, “ .... Bohea, “ ___ 50 cents............. 50 “ ____ ____ 40 “ 28 “ ____ 25 “ ____ 12 “ ____ 1828. 1824. 50 cents. 50 “ 40 “ 28 “ 25 “ 12 “ .... 50 cents. 50 “ 40 “ 28 “ 25 “ 12 “ 1832. ____ .... ____ .... ____ .... Free. Free. Free. Free. Free. Free. Commercial Chronicle and Review. 107 The loans required for the general government form a prominent topic of discourse among merchants in this city. The present market rates for the five and six per cents are lower than for many years. The lowest price in the month o f May for the six per cents of 1868 was 80 ; and the highest, 95. For the five per cents, the range was 75^ @ 79. Some modifications of the tariff will be necessary in view o f the urgent wants of the treasury. Tea, coffee and sugar will probably be taxed. The highest duty yet levied upon coffee was five cents per pound, and on sugar also five cents per pound. On tea the duty has reached fifty cents per pound. Besides the proposed and probable loans to the general government, the States are in the market for several loans, v iz .: $ 3,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 400,000 Pennsylvania State five per cent, loan, taken,................. Indiana State six per cent, loan, June 2 2 ,....................... Illinois State six per cent, loan, June 25........................... Michigan State seven per cent, loan, repayable 1886,... Iowa State seven per cent, loan, repayable 1881,............ The exports o f breadstuff's to Europe continue large. W e annex a summary of the export to Great Britain and Ireland, from September 1, 1860: F rom Bbls. Flour. To Hew-York, New-Orleans, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Boston, Other ports, June 14, 1861, May 31, “ June 6, ti “ 6, “ “ 7, (( May 31, (( Bbls. C. Meal. 1,401,946 179,427 164,562 126,013 82,117 118,426 .. Total,................ 2,072,501 To about same period, 1860, 321,392 1859, 85,813 a a 1858, 1,027,899 .. To the 2,532 996 .. .. 48 106 .. .. 3,682 522 58 140 .. .. .. .. Bush. Corn. Bush. Wheat. 15,217,625 . . 5,951,478 66,767 . . 1,464,267 1,214,474 641,709 937,670 831,007 13,032 14,100 2,104,026 15,451 19,553,594 1,335,056 415,800 5,053,324 . . 8,918,012 1,601,131 332,714 3,165,533 . Bbls. Flour. Bush Wheat. Bush. Corn. Bush. Bye. Continent. From New*York, to June 4, 1861,.. From other ports, to latest dates,. . . 43,363 . 7,792 . 1,077,626 . . 41,023 9,073 . . 3,042 . . 70,861 ................ From the monthly circular o f Messrs. Sawyer, W allace & Co., o f New-York, we extract the following summary o f current prices o f tobacco, compared with previous years : T obacco. 1861. 1860. Planters’ lugs,.................. 4 © 5* . . 4 Common to medium leaf, 6 @ 9 . . 5 Good to fine leaf,............. 9 @ 11 9 Choice selections,............ 1 1 @ 1 3 . . 10* M onthly Statement of •• 5* . . 6J .. 9 . . 11* Stock T obacco. Ky. & Mo. of @ @ @ @ 6 8* 11 12* Va. & N. C. Ohio. 4 .. 994 223 69 1,148 On hand, May 1st, 1 8 6 1 ,.... Received since,........................ Delivered since,....................... On hand, June 1st, 1 861,.__ 13,709 3,381 2,733 14,357 Stock in “ in “ in “ in “ in “ in Liverpool, June 1 ,.. London, May 1 , . . . . Bremen, May 1 , . . . . N. Orleans, May 25, Baltimore, May 25,.. New-York, June 1,... 17,140 18,913 8,856 17,937 12,728 15,508 .. .. .. .. .. .. 11,563 17,311 7,853 29,725 18,092 10,869 .. .. Hogsheads,............... 91,082 .. 95,413 .. 1861. 1858. 1859. @ 4* @ 8* @10 @ 12 ..7 .. 8 . . 104 . . 12 Total Hhds. 4,707 3,604 2,803 15,508 1 3 1859. 1860. .. .. 10,715 12,503 2,655 26,481 24,521 8,260 @ 7* @ 10 @ 12 @ 13 1858. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6,937 8,462 3,793 35,748 11,502 6,034 85,135 . . 72,476 108 The Book Trade. T H E BOOK T R A D E . 1. Commentaries upon International Law. B y R obert P hillmore , M. P., of the College o f Advocates and of the Middle Temple. Author of “ The Law of Domi cil.” 3 vols. 8vo. T. & J. W . J ohnson, Philadelphia. The subject of International Law has assumed fresh importance in the present year, in consequence of the new complications arising from the attempted secession of the Southern States. The foreign relations of the country are seriously disturbed b y the temporary and forcible obstruction of the laws of the general government at the South. The law of blockade, at all times, is one of the most interesting ques tions which affect the intercourse of maritime nations with each other. It is of peculiar importance at this moment, because it affects the foreign and domestic trade of the United States, and threatens to disturb the harmony hitherto existing between this government and European nations. The question of blockade, and the position assumed by the executive in our commercial intercourse with foreign countries, have given rise to animated debates in the British Parliament. Hence the fresh in terest felt in works on International Law. W e have had for some years the elaborate works of Chancellor K ent on American Law ; Mr. H enry W heaton’ s reliable Treatise on International L a w ; M c D aniel G ardner’ s Elements of American L a w ; the valuable Commentaries on International Law by President W oolsey, of Yale College— all of which claim a place in the public and private libraries of the country. The Commentaries by Mr. P hillimore cover more ground than either of the works named, in reference to the ancient and modern law of international intercourse, rights and obligations. The author is known to scholars as a member of the College of Advocates, and also of the Middle Temple, London; and as the author of a treatise on the Law of Domicil, lie says, very truly, that international jurisprudence has received, since the civilization of mankind, and especially since the introduction of Christianity, continued culture and improvement; “ and it has slowly acquired, in great measure and on many subjects, the certainty and precision of positive law.” The value of Mr. P hillimore’ s work is enhanced by a prefatory chapter on the state of International Law before the Christian E ra ; the Era of G rotius ; from the Peace of Westphalia, 1648, to the Treaty of Utrecht, 1713; the interval thence to the Treaty of Paris, 1763; thence to the French revolution, 1789; and again, up to the middle of the present century, with an elaborate history of international jurisprudence in England. He gives a critical review of the writings on international law of Z oucii, S towell , V alin , D omat, P othier, V attel, G rotius, B ynkersiioek, P uffendorf, II eineccius, L eibnitz , W olff, S tory , W heaton and K ent . The leading chapters of the work are devoted to— 1. Foundations of International Jurisprudence. II. Sources of International Law. III. Consent of Nations. IV. Subjects of International Law. V. Objects of International Law. VI. Rights of Independence and Equality. VII. Central America. VIII. Self-Preservation. IX . Free Development of National Resources b y Commerce. X . Slaves and Slave Trade. X I. Jurisdiction, Pirates, Extradition. X II. Principle of Intervention, Reprisals, Embargo, War, Neutrals, Colonial and Coasting Trade, Blockade, Contra band, Right of Search, Right of Capture, Tribunals of Prize. The appendix to the w'ork is very full of documents relating to England, France and Spain, Spanish American Provinces, branches of foreign municipal law, inter pretation of treaties, right of sovereigns, embassies, consuls. In fact, no public library, no professional library, would be complete without this elaborate and thor ough work of Mr. P hillimore. The references to American decisions and cases add to its high value. 2, General Index to the English Common Law Reports. Second Edition. 2 vols. By G eorge W. B iddle and R ichard C. M cM urtrie. Philadelphia: T. & J. W. J ohnson & Co., Publishers. W e are much pleased to see a second edition of this valuable work. The large number of volumes of the American reprint of the “ English Common Law Reports,” The Book Trade. 109 issued since the former edition of the Digest, have rendered these volumes extreme ly necessary. To every one a collection of decisions must be almost a sealed book for all practical purposes, until its pages are opened b y means of a carefully pre pared index of the points decided. This Digest thus opens to us, and furnishes the means of using, to advantage, the amount of learning contained in these Common Law Reports. We take especial pleasure, therefore, in calling attention to the work, believing this series of reports to be of the greatest value to all who would clearly understand the principles upon which all our laws are based. Even on points where our statutes have changed the common law, it is necessary for us to study English decisions, so that we may know the supposed evil the statute was intended to remedy ; for only thus can we appreciate fully the object and effect of the statute. 3. Annual o f Scientific Discovery ; or, Year Book o f Facts in Science and Art, fo r 1861, exhibiting the most important Discoveries and Improvements in Mechanics, Useful Arts, Natural Philosophy, Chemistry, Astronomy, Geology, Zoology, Botany, Mineralogy, Meteorology, Geography, Antiquities, dec. Together with Notes on the Progress o f Science during the year 1860 ; a list o f recent Scientific Publications ; Obituaries o f Eminent Scientific Men, dec. Edited b y D avid A. W ells, A. M. 1 vol. 12mo. pp. 424. Boston : G ould <fc L incoln. This is the twelfth successive issue of this Annual, each edited by Mr. W ells, and each published by Messrs. G ould & L incoln. The continued improvement and en largement of the work from year to year is evidently owing to that increased circu lation to which it is every way entitled; and the prosperous result of the enterprise reflects credit upon the ability and sagacity of both author and publishers. This issue is embellished with a portrait of A ugustus A. G ould, and presents a complete compend of the progress of science during the past year. The style and arrange ment of this work are excellent, inviting the business man, as well as student, to an examination and perusal of its pages. The articles are generally short, pithy, re lieved of unnecessary technical terms. The divisions of subjects are proportionate ; and there is a full index, which is too often omitted from such publications. 4. A History o f the Destruction o f Ilis Britannic Majesty's Schooner Gaspee, on Narragansett Bay, on the 10th June, 1772; accompanied by the Correspondence con nected therewith ; the Action o f the General Assembly o f Rhode Island thereon, and the Official Journal o f the Proceedings o f the Commission o f Inquiry, appointed by King G eorge the Third on the same. By J ohn R ussell B artlett, Secretary of State. 1861. Imp. 8vo. pp. 140. Providence: A. Crawford G reene, Printer to the State. 5. The Works o f F rancis B acon, Baron o f Vendam, Viscount St. Albans, arid Lord High Chancellor o f England. Collected and edited by J ames S pedding, M. A., Trinity College, Cambridge, R obert L eslie E llis, M. A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and D ouglas D enon H eath , Barrister at Law, late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Yol. 15; being Yol. 5 of the Literary and Pro fessional Works. 12mo. pp. 449. B rown & T aggard. 6. Quarterly Reviews. Messrs. L eonard, S cott & Co. have promptly republished the British Quarterly Reviews for April, 1861. The Edinburgh Review, No. 230. Contents.— I. D ixon ’ s Personal History of Lord B acon. II. The Republic of Andorre. III. Political Diaries— Lord A uckland and Lord C olchester. IV. Eton College. Y . Remains of A lexis de T ocqueville. VI. Essays and Reviews. VII. Autobiography and Letters of Mrs. P iozzi. VIII. Fables. IX . F orbes’ Iceland. X . Election of President L incoln, and its con sequences. 7. The Semi-Attached Couple. B y the Author of “ The Semi-Detached House.” 1 vol. 12mo. Boston: T. O. II. P. B urnham. One of the best novels we have had for a year. “ The Semi-Detached House” was an excellent one, but this is better. The new volume has many characteristics which particularly commend it. Among others it is a scholarly work as regards style and composition; another, it is intensely interesting, without being sensational or im probable ; a third, the author’s descriptions of English high life are evidently from actual experience and not romantic imagination; and finally, the characters are drawn with the hand of a master, the descriptions in many instances being a keen The Book Trade. 110 and telling satire upon life, society and people we meet at the present day every where. As a sketch of English life in the higher classes, it is admirable and correct. As a work of fiction, it is one which can be read with both profit and pleasure. 8. Considerations on Representative Government. P arker , S on & B ourn. 9. Ten Weeks in Japan. man, G reen, L ongman B y J ohn S tuart M ill. B y the Bishop of Victoria, (Hong Kong.) & London: London: L ong R oberts. 10. Free Trade in Gold; being a reply to the C obden-Chevalier treatise “ On the probable fa ll in the value o f Gold,” and an Exposition o f the French schemes on the Currency now maturing. R ichardson & Co., 23 Cornhill, London. 11. History o f the Shoddy Trade. Price Is. Being a lucid statement o f every part o f that wonderful trade to the present time. B y S. J ubb. London: H oulston & W right. Manchester: J. II eywood . 12. The Voyage o f the Novara round the World. First volume just ready. The Circumnavigation o f the World, by the Austrian ship Novara. English edition. * Containing an unpublished letter from Baron H umboldt. With 400 wood engrav ings. Dedicated, by special permission, to Sir R oderick M urchison. London: S aunders, O tley & Co., 50 Conduit-street. R ecent O f f ic ia l R eports R e c e iv e d a t t h e O f f ic e of th e M erch an ts’ M a g a z in e . Navy Register f o r 1861. Clerks’ Manual fo r the Regulation o f Business in the Assembly o f the State o f NewYork. B y A. H. S t o u t e n b u r g h . Copy o f Bills introduced into the Legislature o f New-York, Session o f 1861. B y A. H. S to utenburgh . Second Annual Report o f the Trustees o f the Cooper Union fo r the Advancement o f Science and A rt, 1861. Annual Report o f the Baltimore Board o f Trade f o r the year 1860-61. B y G e o r g e U . P o r t e r , Secretary. Report o f the Secretary o f the Treasury on Commerce and Navigation o f the United States, f o r the year ending June 30, 1860. B y S a l m o n P. C h a s e , Secretary. COMMERCE OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK. Third Annual Report o f the Chamber o f Commerce o f the State o f New- York, fo r the year 1860-’61. 8vo. pp. 340. Prepared b y the Secretary, Mr. J. Smith H omans. This volume is filled with statistical materials of value to all who feel an interest in the commerce of the City and State of Hew-York. The volume opens with the proceedings of the Chamber for the year 1860, with a list o f members at the close of the year, and a list of Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Secretaries and Treasurers from the establishment of the Chamber in 1768 to this date. Then follow elaborate tables of imports and exports of every article, of the port of New-York and of the United States. 2. Imports and exports of each State, each year, 1856— 1860. 3. Real and personal property of the City of New-York, and population, each year, 1826— 1860. 4. Comparative population of each County in the State by each census, 1790 to 1860. 5. Commercial treaties of the year with all nations. 6. The harbors and rivers of the United States. 7. Comparative tariffs of 1842, 1846, 1867, 1861. 8. Annual report on the harbor of New-York. Annual reports, with copious details, on A shes; Assay Office; Banks, Banking, Savings Banks ; Boot, Shoe, Hide and Leather Trade; Breadstuffs and Provisions; California Trade; Canals ; China and Tea T rade; Clearing House ; Coffee Trade ; Cotton; Currants; D ry G oods; D rugs; Emigration; Fire, Life and Marine Insur ance; Flour; Freights to Europe, die.; Fruits; Gold and Silver; Hemp and Jute; Molasses and Sugar ; Naval Stores; Rail-Roads of N ew -York; Rosin; Rice; Salt; Saltpetre; Tallow; T ar; Tobacco; Wines and Liquors; W ool and other subjects. *** A few extra copies have been printed beyond those wanted for the use of the members. These copies can be had at two dollars each. MERCHANTS’ MAGAZINE AND COMMERCIAL REVIEW. E s ta b lis h e d J u ly , 1 8 3 9 . EDITED B T i. SMITH HOMANS, (SECRETARY OF TIIR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE 8TATB OF N E W -Y O R K ,) A N D W IL L IA M B . D A N A , ATTORNEY A T L A W . VOLUME X L V . CONTENTS JULY, OF 1861. No. I., NUMBER I. VOL. XLV. ARTICLES. A rt. page I. COTTON AND COTTON M ANUFACTURE.—1. Value of British Cotton Goods in 1860. 2. Progress o f the Cotton Manufacture from 1836 to 1860. 8. Imports o f Cot ton into Great Britain, 1820-1859, from the United States, Brazil, Mediterranean, British East Indies, British West Indies, with the annual average prices o f United States Uplands, Brazil and Surat Cotton. 4. Cotton Trade o f Great Britain at six decennial periods, and weekly consumption since 1847. 5. Capacity o f the Cotton Bale. 6. Cotton Manufacture o f France. 7. Holland and the Netherlands. 8. Stock o f Cotton at Liverpool, 1844-1860. 9. The Chief Manufacturing Countries o f Europe compared with the United States. 10. Labor and Wages in England. 11. Spindles and Production in New-England,......................................................................................... 1 II. TIIE SOUTHERN HARBORS OF THE UNITED STATES.—The Southern Atlan tic and Gulf Coast, from Cape Henry to the mouth of the Rio Grande: By an Officer o f the United States Coast Survey.—1. Albemarle and Pamplico Sound. 2. Beaufort, N. C. 3. Wilmington, N. C. 4. Georgetown, S. C. 5. Bull’ s Bay. 6. Charleston, S. C. 7. Beaufort, S. C. 8. Savannah, Ga. 9. Brunswick, Ga. 10. Fernandina, Fla. 11. St. John’ s, Fla. 12. St. Augustine, Fla. 18. Key West, Fla. 14. Fort Jefferson, Fla. 15. Tampa Bay. 16. CedarlKeys. 17. St. Mark’ s, Fla. 18. St. George’ s Sound. 19. Pensacola, Fla. 20. Mobile, Ala. 21. Mouths o f the Mississippi. 22. Galveston, Texas. 23. Brazos River. 24. Matagorda Bay. 25. Brazos Santiago. 26. Mouth o f the Rio Grande. 27. Espiritu Santo Bay. 28. San Antonio Bay. 29. Missiofi Bay. 30. Hines B ay,............................................................................................... 17 III. JOU RNAL OF INSURANCE.—1. Marine Statistics o f the United States. 2. An nual Statements of the Marine Insurance Companies o f New-York. 3. Statement showing the comparative loss on Vessels and Freight, and on Cargoes, during the year 1860. 4. Proportion o f each class o f Disasters, 1859 and 1860,............................... 25 Contents o f July N o ., 1861 . 112 S T AT I S T I CS OF POPULATI ON, &c. 1. A ggregate Population o f the State and City o f N e w -Y o rk , from 1790 to 1860, w ith the in crease every five years, and per centage o f increase for each period. 2. Official Census o f the State o f Illin ois,......................................................................................................................................... J OURNAL OF 31 BANKI NG. D eposits o f each Savings Bank in the State o f N e w -Y o rk , 1857, 185S, 1859, 1860, 1861, and num ber o f D epositors,..................................................................................................................................... STATISTICS OF TRADE AND COMMERCE. 1. N e w -Y o r k Leather Market— Annual Report and Statistics. 2. Im ports o f H ides at the port o f N ew -Y ork , each month, 1S60. 3. R eview o f the Boot and Shoe Market, and statistics, year 1860. 4. R eview o f the W ine and Liquor Trade for 1860, w ith im portations o f W ines, Brandy, Gin, Rum , Champagne, Porter, A le, Cordials, W hiskey, Vinegar, Oils, Plum s and Prunes, Cherries, Mustard, Sardines, H errings, Anchovies, Sauce, P ickles, Capers, Pre served Fruit. 5. R eview o f the H em p Market for the year 1860, w ith statistics o f import, export, consum ption, &c. 6. R eview o f the T o b a cco Market for the year 1860, w ith statis tics o f production, consum ption, im port, export, prices, &c.; 1849-1860. 7. R eview o f the Currant Trade for the year 1860, w ith statistics o f imports, prices, &c., 1S51-1S60. 8. Annual R eview o f the California Trade— Tonnage, imports and exports o f leading articles— export o f treasure, (1848-1860)— M onthly fluctuations in freights, N e w -Y o rk to San Francisco. 9. Annual R eview o f the D ry G oods Trade o f N e w -Y o rk and the U nited States, w ith statis tics o f W oollens, Cottons, Silks, F lax, &c., each year, 1849-1860,.................................................... PROGRESS OF THE CI TY AND STATE OF C OMME RC E AND BOARDS OF OF NAUTICAL 81 INTELLIGENCE. N ew Lights Established.—1. Surinam R iver. 2. Turk’ s Island. 3. F ixed R ed Light at K atakolo, (west coast o f the M orea.) 4. A ucanada Island, (cast coast o f M ajorca.) 5. Coruna, (Spain,)................................................................................................................................................................. COMMERCI AL 77 TRADE. 1. Monthly M eeting o f the N e w -Y o rk Chamber o f Com m erce, June, 1861. 2. M onthly M eet ing o f the Boston Board o f Trade, June, 1861. 3. Annual M eeting o f the M ontreal Board o f Trade,................................................................................................................................................................... JOURNAL 35 OF NE W- Y OR K. 1. Tabular Statement o f the aggregate assessed value o f Real Property in the City o f N ew -Y ork, each year, 1826-1860.— V alue o f Personal Estate.— A ggregate value o f Real and Personal Property.— Am ount o f Taxes raised each Y ear.— Population o f the City, according to the Census, and estim ated Population at the interm ediate periods.— Rate o f T axation to aggre gate Property.— Population o f U nited States, 1826-1860. 2. Population o f each County o f the State o f N ew -Y ork , according to each State Census and each United States Census, from 1790 to 1860. 3. T he Progress o f Banking in N e w -Y o rk — Summary Statement, show ing the pro gress o f Bank Capital, Circulation, Individual D eposits, Loans and Specie o f the Banks o f the State o f N ew -Y o rk , in the years 1848-1860,...................................................................................... C H A MB E R S 34 91 REGULATIONS. 1. Transportation in B on d to certain ports discontinued. 2. Customs Regulations o f Brazil. 3. Trade o f the Ottoman Em pire. 4. T h e French Fisheries. 5. Trade betw een England and Japan. 6. Proclam ation o f the British Governm ent in reference to P rivateers,........................ 93 CORRESPONDENCE OF THE MERCHANTS’ MAGAZINE. 1. T h e D uty on Coffee. 2. L on don Letter, M ay, 1861,............................................................................ J OUR NA L 97 OF A G R I C U L T U R E . Cotton Flax or F ib rilia ,...................................................................................................................................... 102 J OURNAL OF L I F E I NS URANCE. W ar Risks of Life Insurance— Letter from E lizur W right, .......................................................... 103 C OMME R C I A L C HR O NI C L E AND R E V I E W . Im ports—Exports—D uties at N e w -Y o rk — D uties on Tea— State Loans,.......................................... 105 THE BOOK TRADE. N otices o f new Publications in the U nited States,.................................................................................... 108