Full text of K.11 Holdover Float as Per Cent of Dollar Amounts Received : December 11, 1979

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

K.II
hULUUVt-B FLOAT A& PHU.F-N1 Of WULLAft AHOUHl KtLGiVtD
gfff :?TV
£UL M t t £

MWT

0*06
*»tf

o.os

2.12 i*

&9M

ULI 2 M L T

jl

NQV

NUV 14

1-MOV

huy.di
3%94

4$
12

U.C9

0.47

0*16

4.03

4.56

2.3*3

4.87

4.35
0.4?

7.90
IfflCA
MlUOfiUPHIA
CLEVELAND
CfMClHHAf I

0.?3

:t*a*

1.1*
0.8/

0.92

0,43

1.94

а . dZ

45
UGUikJQ

CHARLOTTE
tmiwiA

12

0.68

44

4 . 6 3

17

1.44

S7

22

4 . 3 9

19

4 . 9 4

29

7

2.04

i*2i

is

Juafi

O. 7 6

1.0a

1.45

OETROII
PES 0OXNE&

CITY

m
m
OKLAHOMA

QpAM*
DALLAS
EL

4 . 4 3

20

T.3D

30

iuiit

PASO

HOUSTON
SAN FRANCISCO

4.80

24
la

OVERALL SYSIEN




C*6-6

6.66

4

1
44

. 29
11

17.60
22.66
4.56
. +,5T
7.70

2

2 4 . 2 9

i
19

2 4 . 9 8

IS

5

2-10

25

2 . 9 *

25

4.27
1.30
6.43

13
41
6

4.68
0.41
0.17
5.68
1.61
5.57
0.92

16
46
47
11
35
22
13
42

1.14

40

2 . 1 3

24

1.82

27

2-HO

PORTLAND
cai t i a*.E c i r r
SEATTLE

6.16
1.92
8.86
2.92

,.91

2.56
u*

0.J4
0,66

0.7V

0.92

1.9V

u #

11.21

21
8
26
2

3 . 9 3

«».4G

j^6?

7.77

1 .64

6.02

1.85

(*74

Q.SSL

b.Ui
4.JO

4 . 2 5

1.03

5.91

5.75

JU*O
CITY

0.81

3.68
0 .76

i . 9 0

LOUIS

KANSAS

__4&16_

/.38

1.9o

ZmII

2.88

INDIANAPOLIS

HELENA

0.40

3.96

<t*63

8.30
18.57
0.96

23

2.49

44.5*

6

MINNEAPOLIS

.

0 . 1 9

1.54

29

LOUISVILLE

1.00

u.82
fL.feO
43

£»M

HEW ORLEANS

s r .

1.19

_y*oy_ _&a

б . 2 5

1.46

NASHVILLE

Lfi

0.84

0 . 4 3

1.62
2*44
3.84

<uli

0.52

9 9 9 . 9 9

24.06

J
33

-Ji*&2

JmttL

0.28

41

1.17

*

2

31

Lti

U.9a
L0.1^

2

17.58

22.29

3

9.55

<3.07

4
41

42.48

X

5.19

3.13
4.f*
3.29

.15

1.45

4 0

1.15

6.24
2.43

11
32
33
9
42

9 . 5 3

6

0 . 3 0

44

1.22

O.OL

47

0.83

39

1.12

2.0E»

1#
25

2.51

16

10.GL

0 . 8 4

37

1.47

2 . 4 2
6 . 9 2

1.17

27

1.20

Z.j?

0 . 4 6

22

2.86

1>

8.58

0.00
, 3 . 03

12.12

J

1

26.15
6_.J»2
2 . 7*T
3.1>G

*>_

0 . 5 6

42

0.39

46
33

ti

.

7_
19

0.88

38

i.io

29

lf%4__

31

5.57

I

. *«56

7

TF.34

43

C.<*1

45

0.65

45

;.04

34

1.69

25

1.11

3>

1.42

3.15

1*
30

4.21

1/
19

3 . 8 4

14

3.13

18

1.89

J*9

4 . 8 9

11

26

0 . 0 9

46

13.61

5
30

15.96
1.85

3
30
17

4 . 0 4

4 . 5 9

17

22

4.91

14

3.^8

7

6.70

?

2.15

7.33
0.70

10

6.34

5

10.29

6

10.>1

5

47

0 . 8 5

37

2.25

<0

1 . 4 3

33

6 . 0 9

9

3 . 2 1

25

1 . 2 0

27

1.38

29

1.43

33

2.11

25

"" * *

1

L*

1.31
7 . 1 0

4 . 9 7

<4.78

.
3 . 74

3^,59

~4.BO~

-

__4,30

8.06

Z»*8
9il9

6
- ' Z

3II-I3;'

18

1.95

26

3 . 9 3

3
7
21

~

4.13

AiiU IVIV

^
•

-W

IV79

1979
K
I
S
A
6
U
ati.
48
1*

Ntitf

CL1
TKI
t L l
MMh
L0 .
- . , 5 . 1 3 - -14
.
3.6*
3 . 5 B .30
4 7
4b
0.06
0.04
0.05
47
f». u
li
12.b5
».07
il
6
iO.Dc
3
15.93
15.94
2
M
E
M Y
O
R
K
1
1.^1
36
28
u.a&_
35. '
35
„
a* l i t
6&IUL 43L.
1.63
m
U
E
F
A
L
U
. ....
4ti
0.56
4^
4
b
0.00
v. #0
8.46
2.86
28
JFCRICHO
au.79
..
-3.6-3—— 1 6 , —
15
JU5jf 3 9
2.27
iJyWBMti
1 *68— 1 3
32
42
1.19
1.31
32
38
1.37
41
1.36
l.al
UTICA
/>
3«*
i- w
%.?V
11
4ȣ
Mil inn PHI A
1 -14
*1
4!>
4t>
0.25
47
0.21> 4 7
C.2 2
46
i .23
0.68
C
L
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
5.3.8
5.-81— _i2
t>
_!%. #6
. a...
_h.
10.01
CINCINNATI.
999.99
41
6.0O
37
0.72
2.01
1
0.57
44
16
PITTSBURGH
. 3.63
a^&l
27
l l . t i O . . -4
21.
C
O
L
U
M
B
U
S
10.40
9
6
~
5.52
5.54
Id
4.5b
26
3.86
R
I
C
H
M
O
N
D
21
lw
lK
4- 1 k
M l T1 M
l tfi (9*36.
O.ob
39
1.40
31
4.89
41
~
1 . 6 9 ~ A2
22
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
Q..52
39
,
-0.A5
44__—.
1.15
1.91
43
JUib_ ai
C
O
L
U
M
B
I
A
4.dv
60
3
34
45.15
1.28
38
2.57
1.66
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
T
O
N
25
9
.
. .. i) » 7 H „ u 2
3.32
31
a. 99
.O.tifl
2*13
24 ,
A
T
k
A
M
I
A
4.86 2 3
36
63
6.42
24
5.55
14
1.93
BIRMINGHAM
6.02
HA
4L.96—44 ...
.37
33
—1.6 ft.
l . f j
1.6V 3 6
2.80
23
31
2.92
1.51
27
32
NASHVILLE
6.38
1.57
.26
Ji.
.
1.52
4 . 8 4 . 25
4.62. 2 2
2t>
30
35
1.31
32
2.27
1.79
2.11
35
l.JZ
M
I
A
M
I
1^-17
JLU^7'J
"
16.13
1*27
U
15.&9 „ 3
2
CtilCAiiQ—
9
4.69
9.O2
2.45
2 1 ~~
16
5.06
LO
7.82
12
DETROIT
b
.
2
9
5
.
2
0
1%
:o.ta
6.70
DFS MOLNT-S
9.17
H
..JUL.
30
4.«£fc
1
1.42
25
INDIANAPOLIS
10.05
3.25
5.42
19
6^
6.9<l 1 5
J L u 5 _ _ . _ ___5._. .
, . 3 . 4 i . . . 12
4 . 8 3 - 18
7 . 7 Z . 13
M
I
L
W
A
U
K
E
E
J.bO 2 y
1.05
37
39
43
2.6V 29
1.01
1.60
S T , LOUIS
4.24
26
JJL .
_9.36
1.31
.3.68 . - l i .
1 . - 10.88
4
LITTLE JtOCK
4
6.80
t>.4tt
14. 1 1
17
11
10
4.31
13
6 .12
LOUISVILLE
>
>7
2\t7
._2L ...
. 2 ^ 5 _ 3 2 - - .2.«,LL 3 8 —
MEMPHIS
—
25.44
2
4
.
3
3
4
1
2
1
2
.
0
0
7.71
lu
20.67
MINNEAPOLIS
5
2 . . 5 6 . . . 2 i i ... - t r t . 1 4
L_
lv.22
3
.
9.3%
7
10.* 7
H
E
L
E
N
A
0.65
23
39
3.60
20
20
5.31
K
A
N
S
A
S CITY
1.11 4 1
5.t3„
19
A-.Q2 . 2 4
i . a o 3 0 ... 5.2TI * 1
.. _JSL.31. _. 1 1
D
E
N
V
E
R
4.66 2 1
0.79
C. 7 1
4C
15
OKLAHOMA CITY
5.28
B.9C
10
fi-SQ
Q..99
4Z_
L. 12..
—1*34L 4 2
O
M
A
H
A
JO. i**
>.92
4.69
17
1.06
5
7
14
4.85
24
D
A
L
L
A
S
>d
2 . Q 1 L - 2H
i.be
0.3%
40
44l.
0.15
0.33
46
EL P
A
S
O
O.ftU
43
5.bc»
1.^6
29
1?
i4.3d
33
2.21
H
O
U
S
T
O
N
.
5.4+ 1 8
1.63
13
_1%?9
. . 2o33 . -25. .
S
A
N A
N
TU
N lu
L.9d , 2 9
35
4i
1.34
29
1.24
4A
D. 76
1.06
1.29
S
A
N FRANCISCO
44
I .?*
6.05 _16 _
a.l&_- 14.—
L
O
SA
N
G
E
L
E
S -— a . 4 ?
>
5.20
5.7 V 17
fr. 7 9
15
7.69
12
7.27
11
P
O
R
T
L
A
N
D
45
JlmBiL
. - X*
. . —3*5.9
0.91
1.57
.21
SALT L
A
K
E CITY . 2 * 0 0
2*1...
39
6
24
26
4.33 2 4
1.66
2.18
4.70
1.8B
34
SEATTLE
...
BOSTON
LEKISTON
wfwntnw i nr* c

dAM
ZLL
cl.
4.4*
47
0.2O
<i- ?

- 2*56
0.04

.

&
W

..

O
V
E
R
A
L
LS
Y
S
T
E
M




4%80

6.94

7. o 4

5.00

M-NOV 14
KANK
hkL
5.44
19
4b
U . 1<£
>>
4-h A
16.b7
- 31
,
JUtl2
25.52
1
£jt2 i . . I X
1.46
32
U.7A
41
47
V.20
l*Zb.. — 1 4
4-t>
0.29
3 . 4 3 .- XLO
9.01
16
br
<•4
0 .64
-JtU.40.. . 4 5
35
1.29
JULaal
44
1.50
31
o4fl
1 .7b
27
1 .44
3d
1.17
JL5JU46
2.bU
66
%-KH
la
1.74
2b
l->- 1.56
0.94
3d
LdL^7b
JO
1 .o4
17.83
2
a.51. , ii
K
10.12
i . l d . . . 11
0.94
30
n.'/i
4/
0.69
16
4.36
. 23
3.00
64
9
Jl.3.2
29
1.71
lO - #4
7
9.31
10
1.43
3.4.
2>
2.88
7.05

Ekl
MSUSL
3.64
.68 .
o.ot
47
^ - 4U
xf
10.33
b
. d.Wu . 41
a . 71
11
3 .52
26.
1.37
35 s
1 -00
0.25
. 46
13.65 . _6
0.36
45
iu^6l.__ _ 2 4
3 . 6i
64

4 . J4
19
O.m.1^ - ..4:2
37
1.33
l.iuA,— JU
20
4 . 12
I.MR
*0
a.93
66
33
i . bL
1.39
34
z>l -Oi
9.76
10
V. VI
9
1.69
32
- .3.641
12
o. w
4b
- 1 & -15.30
5
I4.h-,
27.3b
1
.
6..03. . L>
4.9
3.11
3 . 1 6 . . _-23
35
1.37

6 . 71
2^0v
u.»v
25*42
i .16
o.*-l
11.99
. . .. 4 . b l
4.11

..

7.37

14
30.

38
IS
7
1 1 . .
21

£41
8.92
0.25

HANK
lu
__
47
4.K
7
35
16

10.91
lm36L_
6.65
- 3,@1
33 " ™
1.45
0.75
3V
0.26
46
-_5m31 . A b
0.56
44
Jt.J32_
1.78
31
-

C.52
45
—.0*69,
40
36
1.22
. JD.66 _
™
29
2.29
O.AS
12.07
6
iQ.7?
1.43
34
22.SQ__
7.92
12
9.23
%
1.96
30
32
0.94
3b
. 4.58, - 20.
13.89
4
>7
28.47
. . 2*92..
3.20
6.10
1.02

2
24
11
37

5.20
19
517.21
1
7.91
13
- 1 * 5 . 6 .. . 1 4
28
2.54
M.64
11
12*16
.
6.S3. . . 15
3.96
21
15.44

DATA ERROR EXCEPTION REPORT
OATA FOR THE O F F I C E S L I S T E D ON T H I S PAGE FOR THE STATEMENT WEEK B E G I N N I N G 7 9 / 1 1 / 2 2 ARE E I T H E R H I S S I N G OR I N C O R R E C T .
THE S T A T I S T I C S AND RANKINGS ON THE ACCOMPANYING P £ P O R T S ARE AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.

OFFICE CODE AND NAME
0*2

PITTSBURGH

A CHECK HAS BEEN MADE ONLY ON KEY DATA F I E L D S WHICH WOULD A F F E C T THE ACCOMPANYING RANKINGS FOR THE LATEST REPORTED WEEK
SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS SHOULD REVIEW P R E V I O U S E D I T REPORTS FOR WARNING MESSAGES AND ACCURACY OF REPORTED F I G U R E S .