View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM c c

DEPARTMENT; STORETSmS, BY CITIES •
(Based on Dollar Amounts)
Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago

Federal Reserve d i s t r i c t
and c i t y
UNITED STATES
Boston D i s t r i c t
New Haven
Boston
^Springfield
Providence
New York D i s t r i c t
Newark
Buffalo
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

jMA°CTSt

jST
- 6

- 8

R.I.
N.J.
N.Y.

+
+
+
•
+

"

1
9
8
7

z4

Cleveland D i s t r i c t
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Toledo
Pittsburgh

Pa.

- u
rn
- 7
- k
- 2
- u
- 3

- 8
- 8
-9
• - 5
-li

Richmond D i s t r i c t
Washington
Baltimore

D.C.
Md.

•±1
•+ 3
- 6

- 3
- 1
- 7

Atlanta D i s t r i c t
3xr .ningham
r'darai
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville

Ala.
Fla.
Ga.
La.
Tenn.

Chicago D i s t r i c t
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee

111.
Ind.
Mich.
Wis.




-h

- h

- 7

- 8

- 9
%13
- 7
-20
-lU

+ 3
+. 1
+ 5
- h
0

- h
- 2
- 8
-12

-10
-12
-11
-19
-15

0
1
2
a

- 5
• r z
- 6
r- U
* 8
+ U

^10
-12
-13
+ 1

- 8
TT

+ 6
+ 7

rz_9
r- 7

- 8
-10

- 9
-12
- 7
- 7
- 3
-11

-10
-10
-10
- 7
-10
-10
- 9

r-12
-17
r-15
- 8
-11
- 8
-.10

-11
-12
-13
-13
-15

• 0
T3
- 6

• 0
TZ
- h

- 3
- 1

-12
r z
-18

+ 2
-12
-17 ,
-10
- 3
+.U - -10
+11
-17
- 6
- 3

r-18
-21
- 9
-16
-19
-12

- 1
.r-ff
+Ui
-12
- 2
- u

- 2

- 6
T3
- 7
- 8
-11

H
+ h
+ 6
+11
+11

- h
.- u
-10

,

+
-

U
5
3
8

- 5
^C5
- 7
* 3
+ 3
- 6

r
-

7
z
3
8
8

- 7
TH
- 3
- 6
- 8

%
%

- 5

>23
+16
+37

l
3
U
0
1

Philadelphia D i s t r i c t
Philadelphia
Pa.
Ohio

- 1

: - 6
TT
- h
- 6
.r 8
r- U

-

if

" g - 2 7 | s e p t ' 3 [Sept, 10 [sept.17 [ s e p t . 2h

- 5

- 3
T3
0
- 3
- 7

Conn.
Mass.

A

h
-•
+
+

i
u
7
6

- 6

2
- 7
4 .
-27

+ 8

-

6

- 3
H
+ 8
+ 2

+ 1

- 7
-10
- 3
- 6
-10
- 6

- 1
+ 2
-3
0

+ 1
—

•
+
-

- 3
0
- 8
- 5
+ 6

0
* 3
+ 5

-11

-13

Page T
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, B CITIES (Continued)
Y
Federal Reserve d i s t r i c t
and c i t y
St. Louis D i s t r i c t
L i t t l e Rock
Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis
Minneapolis D i s t r i c t
Minneapolis
St. Paul
Duluth-Superior
Kansas. City D i s t r i c t
Denver
. Wichita
Kansas City
St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Dallas D i s t r i c t
Dallas
Fort I orth
/ Houston
San Antonio

Ark.
Ky.
Mo. .
Tenn.
Minn.
"to'fis.
Colo.
Kans.
Mo.
"

Okla.
"

Tex.

"

San Francisco D i s t r i c t
Los Angeles Area
Calif.
Oakland
San Francisco
Ore.
Portland
S a l t Lake City
Utah
Wash.
Seattle

July
n
-

5
h
7
1

- 6
- 9
- u
- 7
0
-10
- 9
- 9
- 9

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
(Month of Aug. 27 Sept. 3 Sept. 10 Sept.17 S p t . 2h
e
1 August
- 2

• - 5
TT
- 3
- U
- 3

- 3
7%
+ 5
- u
- 9

- 5
+ 1
-19
- 2

y • o
71
+ 1

+ l

- 6
-11
- 5
- 8
- U
- U
-12

- 8
- 9
- 6
* 3
+ 1
-11

+ 2
71
- 8
4- h
- ii
- 1
0

-10

- 6
- 1
-11

-13
+ 3
-15
-12

1 If - 0
nr
7T

- 8
- 9
-12
- 7
-11

:
•

-13
6.
< 3

•
.

-13

+ 7
+17
- 6
- U

-

- 7
-10
- 1
8
- 6
- 7
- 8

- 1
71
0
- 6
+ 9
- 2
+ h

ZJL

- 6

-10

-1L

^ 2 .
T~8"
0 .
-iu
•
+ 1 1

- 6
r-g
-h
- 6
T 7
-

- 5
7"?
- 2
- 9
- 1

- 6
-10
-Ik

--7
+16
+15

r- 7
- 7
-12

r- 6
-25
-1U

- 8
-11
- U
- 2"
- 9
- 6
- 2

- h
r~H
- I
- 1
- 9
- u
- 2

-12
-33
- 7
- 6
-10
- 9
-1U

- 7
- 7
- 3
- 6
-11
- 7
-lli

- 6
-12
- 5
+16
- 8
- 9
- 6

- 9
ZIC
-111
- u
- h
- 1
- 8

—Revised.
Data not a v a i l a b l e .
1 / Figure based on reduced sample ov.dng to v-ork stoppages i n c e r t a i n s t o r e s .




- 6
—

6
li
9 '
U ^

- 7
+ .8
- 2

• -10
-12
-17
-11
-15
- U
- 6

'

\
'
•
•
;