The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
# B04RD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM H. 11 September 16, 19U9 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES ' (Based on Dollar Amounts) Federal Reserve district ' and city June UNITED STATES Boston District New Haven Boston Springfield Providence New York District Newark Buffalo New York Rochester Syracuse Percentage change from corresponding period a year ago Month of Aug.13 Aug. 20 Aug. 27 Sept. 3iSept. 10 July - 1 - 5 . Conn, Mass. " R.I. N.J. N.Y. " -1U -15 -7 * + - -16 322 -12 -16 . -23 -20 315 -20 -22 -20 - 2 -12 -10 +23 +16 +37 . +2U • - 9 315 - 7 -20 -lU + + + - -17 -21 -13.. -18 -17 -13 -20 325 -20 -19 -26 -21 -11 - 6 -12 -12 - 7 + 7 r-7 TE . r3l0 + h r- 3 + 6 -6 +11 -10 - 6 +11 + 1 +~2 - 1 • , + 2 - 2 - h -13 -13 -18 -21 -8 - 3 T3 -22 3lB -21 -21 -1U -26 -2k -lU 3IH -lit -10 -16 - 9 -16 - 3 - 9 + + - 1 h 7 6 6 -12 - 7 - 7 - 3 -11 -10 -10 -10 - 7 -10 -10 - 9 .. -16 - 2 Tl: - 7 0 71 - 6 + 1 7% - U -.L -12 1 3 1 1 u - 7 + - I 8 7 6 - h - 5 Philadelphia District Philadelphia Pa. - h 3TJ Cleveland District "Akron Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Toledo Pittsburgh - 3 -16 Pa. - 5 - 2 0 - 2 - 2 -16 -16 -1U -13 -1U Richmond District Washington Baltimore D.C. Md. - 3 + 2 - 5 - 3 + 9 -13 -20 - 2 + 1 - 7 - 3 -lU -20 - 6 -17 - 9 -19 - 5 315 0. -13 + 9 -lit -27 + 8 - 6 - 3 + 2 317 - 3 + h r+11 r- 3 -17 315 -18 -19 -21 - 8 3T - 9 -12 -10 + 5 T5 + 8 + 2 + 1 + 2 - 3 0 Ohio Atlanta District Birmingham Miami Atlanta New Orleans Nashville Ala. Fla. Ga. La. Tenn. 1 3 - U t - U + 5 - 7 -10 "=13 - 6 -11 - 7 -13 Chicago District Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee 111. Ind. Mich. Ms. - 6 TTT - 2 - s - 7 -16 315 -12 -20 -lk - 9 - 1 - u 3 1 5 U 0 '+ 7 Tl -11 -17 - 6 - 3 0 - 8 - 5 + 6 Pa H. 11 Se 2 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued) Federal Reserve district and city . St. Louis District Little Rock, Louisville St. Louis Memphis Minneapolis District Minneapolis St. Paul Duluth-Superior - I t Ark. Ky. Mo. Tenn. Minn. "&Wis. Kansas City District Colo. Denver Kans. Wichita Mo. Kansas City " St. Joseph Okla. Oklahoma City Tulsa " Dallas District Dallas Fort 'forth Houston San Antonio Jan.June - 3 - 6 + 1 -11 -=3H -11 -10 -13 -1U -11 -17 -12 -17 -13 -2k -2h -11 ~-L2 -11 -ill -16 -11 -1h - 6 -17 - 3 - 9 + 6 z j + 5 - h - 9 y r- 2 - 3 - 6 - 1 -11 - u + l + l -13 -17 -16 -20 -13 -19 - 8 312 - 7 - 6 -10 - 8 -15 - 8 -111 - 9 - 6 - 3 + 1 -11 + 2 T3 - 8 + l i - I t - 1 0 zio - i - 8 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 3 - 5 - 8 -10 -12 - s -12 - h h + 2 + 1 -13 - 6 - 9 . -13 - 9 - 8 - 1 -10 - 9 - 6 -10 -11; - 6 - 8 - 7 -16 +3.5 ' -10 -111 - 5 - 7 -12 - 7 -10 - 3 - 1 - 8 - 6 - 1 -17 -11 - 8 -17 - 8 - 2 - 7 -10 - U - 8 - 5 -15 - 2 - 2 - 2 + 2 + 1 -13 - 3 - 5 -12 ^1D - 7 - 6 -10 - 9 -111 - 8 - 2 - 6 + - 1 9 8 9 8 -16 - lU i TH ~ - 3 - 6 -11 - 7 -lb r—Revised. * Data not available. r 1/ Figure based on reduced sample owing to work stoppages in certain stores. -11: + 3 -15 -12 o 71 - 6 " -12 -12 -12 -lU - 8 + L - 5 Tex. San Francisco District Calif. Los Angeles Area Oakland ' I San Francisco Ore. / Portland Utah Salt Lake City Wash. Seattle Percentage change from corresponding period- - year, ago a Month of Aug. 13 Aug. 20 Aug. 27 Sept. 3 Sept. 10 July v 1 +TT + rJ -12 * 5 +16 - 8 - 9 - 6
