The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Research ggjgfepjfiSTpU?
H. 11
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES
(Based on Dollar Amounts)
Federal Reserve district
and cityUNITED STATES
-Conn.
Mass.
"
R.I.
New York District
Newark
Buffalo
New York
Rochester
Syracuse
N. J.
N.Y.
"
"
"
Philadelphia District
Philadelphia
Pa.
•ri
o
- 3
- 7
• n
- 9
- 8
- 7
Richmond District
Washington
Baltimore
D.C.
Md.
H
Atlanta District
Birmingham
Miami
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville
Ala.
Fla.
Ga.
La.
Tenn.
111.
Ind.
Mich.
Wis.
-h
- 7
H
r*
4-2
—
+ h
• 0
+ 1"
-20
-1U
- 7
-
-
h
h
- a
-10
- 7
- u
- 8
-
- 3
- 6
-10
- 6
2
- 6
- h
- 5
+ 3
- 3
- 8
- 9
- 5
-11
- 9
-12
- 7
- 7
- 3
-11
- 3
•0
- 7
- 6
W
+ 5
- U
o
+ i
+ 2
0
+ 1
- 2
- u
+ 6
- U
H
- u
- 3
Chicago District
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee
- 5
- 9
-33
- 7
-10
,"
Pa.
11
- 5
+ 1
- 6
Cleveland District
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Toledo
Pittsburgh '
Ohio
"
{
1
j
Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
Jan, - Month of
Sept. 3 Sept. 10 Sept. 17 Sept. 2U Oct.
July
August
- 6
Boston District
New Haven
Boston
Springfield
Providence
OCT10i949
FEDERAL l lSZfiVZ
BANK
G" R f u H iA O ,v;;;
'
-10
-10
-10
- 7
-10
-10
- 9
TZ
- 8
-12
r
*
.+
-12
Sri
"=17
-15
-ii
- 8
-11
- 8
-10
-12
.
-18
-21
-
- 8
- 5
+ 6
2
TF
- 7
-8
- 9
- 1
- 6
-11
-12
- 8
-11
-13
- 5
-13
-18
-17
- 7
-12
- 1
4
-
+ h
-18
-15
•3-
0
=- %7
+ 2
r-lU
r 0
Zlo
- U • . - 1
+ 2
- 3
0
-12
W
-12
- 3
- 7
r- 9
6
a
8
u
- 6
- 6
-11
r4
-17 -10
- 3
+ U
-10
+11
-17
- 6
- 3
- 7
- 3
+ 3
-10
-12
-11
- 9
-16
-19
2
0
- 3
+ 5
- 1
• X-ff
+Ul
-12
- 2
-11
- 3
+ 6
-11
- 6
- 7
- 8
-11
r-g
- 7
- 6
- 9
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued)
Federal Reserve district
and city
St. Louis District
Little Rock
Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis
Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Tenn.
Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
Jan. — Month of
Sept. 3 Sept. 10 Isept. 17Sept.2b Oct. 1
July
August
- 5
- 2
-13
- 7
- 1
- 3
- 3
- 6
- 1
-11
-12
- 6
4.
- 5
U
U
Minneapolis District
Minneapolis
Minn.
St. Paul
'
Duluth-Superior
Wis.
-
- 9
k
+ 1
-19
- 2
Kansas City District
Denver
Colo.
Wichita
Kans.
Kansas City
Mo.
"
St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Okla.
Tulsa
"
- 7 ^
zrs
0
-10
- 9
- 9
- 9
- 6
-11
- 5
- 8
- h
-12
Dallas District
Dallas
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio
- 6
--
Tex.
»
"
San Francisco District
Loo Angeles Area
Calif.
Oakland
"
San Francisco
Ore.
PortlandUtah
Salt Lake City
v
Seattle
-ash.
5
U
- U
- 6
- 7
- 5
- 7
- 2
- 9
' - 1
- 8
-11
- U
- 2
- 9
- 6
- 2
- U
r s
- 1
- 1
- 9
- U
- 2
V+1
'
TT
+ 3
-IS
y.
o
- 8
• - 9
-12
- 7
-11
+ 7
+17
-13
j- 6
+ 3
1
- 6
- 6
- U
- 6 <
-11
rn
-9
+ l
-13
- 6
- h
+ 2
- 7
- 1
- u
-12 V
- u
- 7
'i
-18 ,
- 1
0
- 7
- 8
0
6
9
2
U
+ 8
- 2
- 8 t
—11 • si
- 6
-10
- 7
-16
+15
- 7
- 7
-12
r-13
- 9
- 6
-25
-lh
r 0
7-ff
- 0
-lU
+ l
- 6
- 6
- 5
-11 ,
- 7
- 6
-12
- 5
+16
- 8
- 9
- 6
-9
^nr
-m
- h
- h
- 1
- 8
-10
-12
-17
-11
-15
- U
- 6
T3 -10
- 8
- 1
+ U '- 8
6
- U
- 3
- 6
-11
- 7
-1U
^
+
+
U
•
r—Revised
* Data not available.
if Figure based on reduced sample ovting to v;ork stoppages in certain stores.
-11
-20
- 8 ,
-11
- 8
r-J
"M
-9^
—
}
-16
-i2 \
- 6
- 6 <<
- 7 '
@FedFRASER