View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

LIBRARY OF THE FEDERAL

TRANSFER

RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND
BOARD .OF GOVERNORS OF, THE FEDERAL.RESERVE.SYSTEM

H.ll

-

July 23, 1948

.
i DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES.
--Percentage- Chaise;<£rm--Corresponding Period a Yetir'Ago;

"

.

;/

... —

! Week ending
J a n . - Month of
% Apr", f May -- " June 19 June 26. July 3"* J u l y 10* July 1

Federal Reserve d i s t r i c t
a n d ' d i t y - •• "

Boston D i s t r i c t
New Haven
Boston
Springfield
Providence.
New York D i s t r i c t
Newark
Buffalo .
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

+ 7 •

— 5
- 1
- 5

+18
+ 8... •
+18
+29
+16

+ 1
+27
+11
-11 . *13:,, • - . * 1 6 . . .
+ i r : ,/'• +28
- 4
+14'
+23 > +27
,
;
+10 •
•+ 2 "
+16

+12"
+ 5'
+11

+r

+
+
+
+
+
-

+16, .
+20 '
*13. +17 "
+17
+ 5 '

+n
+7.

+ 5
"+7.

+17
+17.. /

^LO
+ 7;
+8
+11 .
+iil,-;1
+10
+ 7

+ 3 '•
+ 5 '
+ 1
+ 3
+ .8 .
+4
•+ 4

+23
+29
+10 .
+29
+15+ 2
+21
+19
+12 .
+ 3
+20
+26
+31; V +12t .; +50
+ *8" . +22
+26
+25
+14 , +37

+ 5

0
- 6
- 5'

+ 6 '

+ 5
- 5

+ 3 S

+ 2
*7
+ 2
<7
+ 1

Conn,
Mass
R. I .

- 4

+ £•
H. J . "
N. Y.

'

'

Philadelphia D i s t r i c t
¥ho. iadelphia
'•Pa.
Cleveland District.
Akron
Ohio
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus .
Toledo
Pittsburgh
' Pa.
Richmond D i s t r i c t
Washington
Baltimore

+21

+ 8

UNITED STATES

.

-

—

.2.
4 '
1
1
3
1

+11

D. c ;
M.

TT
+z

Atlanta D i s t r i c t
Birmingham
Miami
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville

Ala.
Fla-;*
Ga. "
La.
Tenn.

+ 8
+12
>7
+8
+13
+ 2

" .+32 ~
• +45
+21
+4
+28
+ 6 • +31 '
+ 3
+33

Chicago D i s t r i c t
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee

111.
Ind.
Liich.
Wis .

+l6' : +T
+""3
+12
+15

+ 1
+ 1
+ 5

•




"

+ 3
+11

+i

+ 1

+21
+22
+27
+13
+28

+28

r- 5

—>:-

+ 6
+

+29
W

7

+12
+4:3
+11
•+3
+17

-10 v... . + 7
r r
+13
+ 7
+ 7
+12

+ 8

t3.7.
'+31
+ 4- • '• +34
+10 - +38
+37
+12
- r ; - +36

+ 9

r- 2
-U
r - 6"
• r-U "
•

"

2

„

+11

..JR..

. - 4'. '
- 9
- 3
- 3
• +4
- 1
-10

'ill
+18
•K'6
+11
. +2&;:
+11
+12

+39
+48
• +29

r- 8
-11
- 2

+ 9
+7
+11

+ 3
+ 8
+ 6
+10

+29
+60
• +26
+22
+26
* +35

- 1
+ 2
: 9
r- 9
+ 6
-13

+10
+19
• 2
+18
' + 2"

+ 9.
71a

+26
+27

0"

+12

+28

8h« H8 8£ g
Ad»aan

0 '
* 0 '
- 7

ezinr

+10
+10
- 2
+13
+17

Page 2

H.ll
DEPARTMENT 'STORE SAIES, " Y CITIES'^(Continued)
B
Percentage Change from Corresponding Period a Year Ago
Federal Reserve d i s t r i c t
and c i t y
S t . Louis D i s t r i c t
L i t t l e Rock
Louisville
S t . Louis.
Memphis

_

+9

ATlt'jf':

-Ky
^Mo.
-Tenn.

Week ending
Month of
May
June 19 June 26 July 3* July 10^_ J u i y „ i 7

Apr

.

+8.
+ 5'

.1:. + 7
Minneapolis District^+
Minn.
Minneapolis
V
+ 3 . ..
StPaul
"&Wi.'s* +15 .
Duluth-Superi or
8

+ 8
+4
+ 9
+11
+ 1
+12
+17

Kansas City .District
Colo.
Qenver Kans ,
Wichita
, iio .
Kansas C.ity
S t . Joseph
Oklahoma City
.V. Okla.
Tulsa
Dallas D i s t r i c t
;
; Dallas
Port Y ^ o r t h
Houston
San Antonio

Tex,

3

+3
+13.

'

6

+ 8
+36

r- 3
-Ti
- 3
- 7

+14
+18
•+ 5 +15
+ 6

(Not available f o r publication.)
+22

+20
+20
+14
+17
+ 7
+22
+26

+19
+16
+25
+26
+31 '

0
- 3
+ 6
- 4*
• 1
+ 2
- 6

+ 3.
+18+ 7:

+38 -- T
+23"
+35
+59 +43 /

U.
- 8
+ 7
+34
- 3

.. ±22
+14
+17
+36
+26

+
+
+
+

+17
+10
+26
+25
+16

. + 1
- 5
. +10
+ 5
+ 5

• +23
v +15
+14
+21
+61

+ 9

+8
San Francisco D i s t r i c t
0
Los Angeles Area , C a l i f .
. +io
Oakland
+ 2
"
San Francisco
+10
Ore.
Portland
+6-. .
Salt Lake City ~ '4Jtah Wash. ' ' .
Seattle
•

-+5Q •

+ Br~

+

.

+19

' V +14
+44 ' '+I3
-+31—— - + ^
#+66, . #+18
+ 2
+29

TJ...

: Z12 •V
+ 7
+11 .
' +25 ; , +10

+

:>*

* '"2
+ 4
+ 1
+ 1
0

+ &

0 ,
+ 6
+20

r£-

+

5
1
3
3
4
6
1

** -

+21 .

- 1
+17
-11
+ 8
- 8
0
-12
r+11
+18 - .7
-10
-14
-14
- 8
. - 4

- 1 ' ^ +18

-17 .

+ 8
: + 5
+ 6
+8
+4
+15
+19
+14)
+4
+ 8
+39
+10
r+ 2
+ 2
+ 3
+ 7
+19
•"4

r—Revised,
.
* In using year ago comparisons for- the wepks ending.'July 3 and July-IO''ffllTJwatxc.e
should be made f o r the. f a c t t h a t in observance .of. Independence Day holiday
' store closings t h i s year occurred in the^ week ending July 1.0 whereas l a s y e a r
• they occurred i n ' t h e previous week. •' ..
#
** Dkta not a v a i l a b l e .
if The large increases shown f o r these weeks r e f l e c t in part the f a c t t h a t sales
l a s t year were, reduced.because., of a curtailment in public t r a n s p o r t a t i o n
service.
•




uNvW.V.O
*!NV8 3AtiBS3B !Vti3Q3d
nw W 9h 9
H

9Zin^

1