The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
3D TRANSFER I H.ll BOARD OF GOVERNOR^' OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM '-I8KAR1 • • te.?L .6 ?? fiftMRTMENT li TMqnth of •Nov..,20.Nov .2.7. D e c , 4 Dec .11 Dec,16 October + 8 + 7 - 6 , .i>. - >+ 3 • v+ 3 + 3 + 8 + 2 + 7 + 5 + 7 +10 +10 - 7 •••rJL. -11 ' - 4 - 5 -10 - 1 -13, - 6 + 6 +11 '+ 5 +11 •+ 5 +11 + 3 • +10 "• + 5 +19 +12 +11 + 9 UNITED STATES ' : STORE SALES, BY CITIES Percentage change-; .from corresponding . : -.rRYE 8AS Federal Reserve idi'staMct • city • • +11 + 7 Y 'Bo'ston District' J - New Haven Boston Springfield Providence New York District Newark "Buffalo New York ' "Rochester 'Syracuse Conn. • Mass. R.I. N. J. N. Y. • ' Philadelphia District Pa. Philadelphia Pa. +10 ' + 8 + 8 + 9 +13 +10 + 9 Richmond" District ' Washington Baltimore D . C, iid ii. + 7 ' + 5 + 3 Atlanta District Birmingham Miami Atlanta New Orleans Nashville Ala. Fla. Ga. La. Tetin, +14 + 7 + 8 +14 .:+ 8 .. Chicago District Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee 111. Ind, iuich. Wis, +. 8 + 6 + 5 + 9 +12 Cleveland' District Akron ' Cincinnati Cleveland " Columbus * Toledo Pittsburgh — T December 24, 1948 . Ohio • • • , . +12 : +11 +10 • +13 , +16 +17 +10 +10 +10 + 9 •11 +13 + 7 +14 + 8 + 7 + 7 + T + 8 + 8 +10 1 iJ. - 9 + — 3 • 9, - 3. . — 3 . - 5 •••- 5; y o - 2 - T - 40 - 4 V - 2 . > - 1 +' 3 ' ; - 2 - 0 6 --•6. : : r .6 3 ' • - 5 4 2; .-••3. r+ 3 > 3 -4' 7 -• 6 " • ' + 3 - 3 4 - 1 0 7 - 5; • r - 1 . r+ 2." :n + 4 + 4 — 3 - 4 - 2 + 3 4 2 6 * - 8 - 7 - 8 . - 3 - 3 + - 4 , " - 1 • - 2 . 0 + 1 - 9- -' 3 7 5 4 2 1 2 _ _ - 1 + 4 - 2 - 8 ZJL 0 - 7 + 4 -14 - 8 T 8 - 2 ; • •.- 4 -10 . - I. : - 4 - 3 8 4 3 l l 6 7 > 7 - 4 - 6 + 3 . • 4 " + ,+ 3 ' * 3 . + 6 + 1 : . - 9 r+:2+ 6 . 0 - 5 -~5* -12 - 3 • 0 - 5 r+ 3 + 6 - 4 + 1 r+ -9. r- 6 + - r __0 , - 4 + 4 + 2 + 2 45 1 4 1 + 2 + + + t l 3 1 7 1 + 1 + 4 - 3 - 4 . * - 4 - 4 - 2 + 2 +- 6 + 4 + 5 H.ll - ' " " • D E P A R T M E N T S T O R E S A L E S , BY C I T I E S ' F e d e r a l R e s e r v e district'.;'"'. ' ______ and c i t y St". Louis .'District Little R o c k Louisville S t . Louis viiieciphis' Minneapolis District Minneapolis St. Paul Duluth-Superior Kansas City D i s t r i c t Denver . Wichita Kansas'City St. Joseph Oklahoma City -Tylsa Dallas D i s t r i c t •Dallas Fort W o r t h Houston San Antonio Ark. Ky. MoT Tentt. . . Colo. Kans. Mo. " s%t. '+10" +11 +12 + 9 . + 7 ' * Page 2 (Continued) M o n t h of N o v . 2 0 N'6v,27 D e c . 4 Dec .11 Dec .18 October. : • r • • + 7 , + 9 + 6 "+'6 + 7 + 8 + 4 • + 9 + 8 + 5 + 1 2 + + + + 5 6 9 1 . Tex. ; . 6 3 9 6 -10 - 3 - 5 0 - 5 + 1 ' + 8 • + 1 + 9 + 5 +10 + 3 + 4 • ZJL - 2 c+12 - 5 + 4 - 8 + i -13 -10 + 7 - 5 - 4 — 6 +10 + l - .4 - 7 0 0 - 1 - 1 +. 2 - 3 — • + i To +10 +29 - 3 .- 5 " o" 0 2 + - 1 1 ~ - 3 - 7 - 3 -10 - 2 - 5 + 1 - 1 + 3 + 4 (Not a v a i l a b l e for p u b l i c a t i o n ) + 2 +10 t'10 . ' - - 4 - 9 - 6 0 0 +10 +17 +12 '+'.6 Okla. - '4 +13 - 6 - 5 -12 +20 : + 7 + 4 ; +10 + 9 " San Francisco District Calif. Los A n g e l e s AreaOakland San Francisco Ore. Portland Utah Salt Lake C i t y Wash. •Seattle ' Percentage change from/corresponding p e r i o d a- y e a r a g o (value) Minn. 1 1 • "&7vis. . ' T -io -15 - 7 - 4 - 7 -13 - 9 - 7 - 6 • tio -15 — 9 - ,6 - 2 - 5 - 6 - 1 - 5 0" - 4 +11 - 4 - 4 - 4 . - 8 .c+1 - 4 0 - 4 - 3 + 8 + 1 - 8 -11 -12 "0 - 2 - 5 - 9' - 4 — 3 + 2 - 5 + 1 ;- 2 + 1 . - 0 + 7 - 4 - 1 . - 5 '+ 6 - 1 - 2 + 2 - 4 r+ + + 1 2 2 .6 + 5 - 8 + 6 r — R e v i s e d . c—Corrected, • * D a t a not. a v a i l a b l e . . : . N o t e : — S i n c e sales rise, s h a r p l y w i t h the a p p r o a c h of C h r i s t m a s , the fact that the c o r r e s p o n d i n g w e e k last y e a r .was t w o days n e a r e r C h r i s t i e s becomes i n c r e a s i n g l y significant in c o m p a r i n g w e e k l y d a t a . A l l o w a n c e should be m a d e for this c a l e n d a r . i r r e g u l a r i t y in e v a l u a t i n g the w;eekl-y p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e s f r o m a y e a r ago..'
