The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
FEDERAL * RESERVE AND G.6 s t crt i sTt i c a t BANK DEBITS DEPOSiT f U R N O Vi *r e I e a s For Immediate release February 24, 1967 Notice—These data r e f l e c t the application of improved, adjustment factors f o r seasonal variation and for the number of business days in the month. The new f a c t o r s were determined predominantly from monthly data for the years 1964; 1965 and 1966 reported f o r the nev Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) s e r i e s . The previous factors had "been based almost e n t i r e l y on data from the older city center s e r i e s . The adjustment procedure is described in detail in an article in the March 1965 Federal Reserve B u l l e t i n . Hev data f o r eight additional SMSA's are now included in the l i s t of reporting Areas and in the summary f i g u r e s below. seriesj lew York City and 6 others, were not a f f e c t e d . The added Areas are marked ( * ) for t h i s publication. The leading centers Revised monthly data f o r 1964, 196$ and 1966 r e f l e c t i n g the revised f a c t o r s and including new centers w i l l be published in the format of the annual d e b i t s releases (C*5). Lrglnnlng with data f o r January 1967 a new monthly s e r i e s has been innaugurated. The new release shows seasonally adjusted Dank d e b i t s , d e r o s i t z , sad deposit turnover f o r the same 233 SMSA's as are show i n t h i s r e l e a s e . Persons d e s i r i n g a sample copy of the new r e l e a s e should * r l t e ^ to*the Publications Section, Division of Administrative Services, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D. C. 20551, and ask f o r the G. 11 r e l e a s e , "Debits, Demand Deposits, and Turnover." Bank d e b i t s to demand deposit accounts (except interbank and U. S. Government accounts) for the month of January of banks i n 233 Standard Metropolitan S t a t i s t i c a l Areas and other centers were $6,409.1 b i l l i o n at a seasonally adjusted annual r a t e . This was higher than the previous month and 15.3 per cent higher than January 1966. Few York area banks repeated a s l i g h t increase from the preceding month and an Increase of 23.8 per cent over January a year ago. Month ago comparisons showed a 3 . 1 per cent decrease in the 6 Other Centers; 232 Centers showed l i t t l e change; end the 226 Centers increased 2 . 0 per cent. Compared t o a year ago, d e b i t s a t 6 Other Centers were up 9-6 per cent and at 226 Centers d e b i t s were up 9*1 per cent. Demand deposit turnover at banks i n 233 reporting centers increased i n January t o a new high of 57*2 with banks In New York City reporting the l a r g e s t Increase. Turnover r a t e s l a 6 other leading centers declizAd t o the lowest Kate since mid-1966, while increasing s l i g h t l y i n the 226 other reporting centers. TOTAL 233 CENTERS DEBITS TO DEMAND EEPOSIT ACCOUNTS H BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TOTAL 232 LEADING CENTERS fmrnrjmRS NYl TURNOVER OF DEMAND DEPOSITS 22 OTHER TOTAL LEADING CENTERS & nrnnma* TOTAL 232 OTHER CENTERS (yYf!T.unsfl NY) £HSTOBS SEASONALLY ADJUSTED AHHUAL RATES 1966 DECEMBER 6.065.4 6.078.5 6,406.5 2.299.4 2.375.6 2.411.7 2.501.5 2,513-5 2,494.1 2,394.1 2,597-0 2,559.1 2.551.8 2.566.6 2,844.6 JANUARY 6,409=1 2,847.3 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER 5,557-8 5,673.0 5,784.6 5,858.0 5.909.2 5.908.3 5.868.3 6.092.4 6,105.2 1,243-1 1,265.1 1,313.6 1,281.6 1,326.8 1.327.0 1,343.6 1,357-1 1,387.3 1,364.9 1,373.8 1.405.1 * BOSTON, PHILADELPHIA, CHICAGO, 3,358*4 3.297.4 3,372.9 3.356.5 3,395.7 3,414.2 3,474.2 3,495.4 3,546.1 3.513.6 3,511.9 3,561.9 2,015.3 2,032.3 2,059.3 2,074.9 2,068.9 2,087.2 2,130.6 2,138.3 2,158.9 2,11)8.7 2,138.1 2,156.8 2,199-6 50.7 50.6 51.3 52.7 52.6 52.2 52.9 54.0 54.2 54.0 54.6 56.9 104.1 105.2 106.0 111.8 109.5 107.3 106.9 111.9 111.4 111.2 111.3 121.8 47.4 41.5 48.5 47.9 49.7 50.4 51.3 51.5 52.1 52.2 52.5 53-2 124.7 50.9 EEEROTT, SAH KRAHCISCO-QAKLAKD, AND LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH SMSA'5 37-1 36.8 37.6 37-6 37.8 38.3 39.1 39-0 39-4 39.6 39-6 40.0 32.9 32.5 32.9 33.2 32.8 33.1 34.0 33.9 34.3 34.3 33.9 34.2 BANK DEBITS - JANUARY 1967 (IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) nICTttICT | J | f\ | V# 1 NO. If W #1 JL- BOSTON UU 1 DEBITS TO DEMAND DEPOSITS PER CENT CHANGE FROM JANUARY 1967 MONTH AGO 1 YEAR AGO m SEASONALLY Al)JUSTED ANNUAL RATES 31,929.6 7,301.4 1,814.5 3,457.9 -2.9 •2.5 -8.9 • 3.6 • 6.0 • 1.6 -15.2 • 18.3 969.2 914.8 3,393.3 •8.9 •8.9 •4.0 • 14.7 • 20.4 • 11.4 147,474.3 1,765.6 1,202.9 2,270.7 1,752.5 •6.2 • 6.6 •4.7 •6.9 • 1.8 • 13.5 • 7. 1 • 7. 5 • 6. 8 • 7.6 NEW BEDFORD PITTSFIELD SPRINGFIELO-CHJCOPEE-HGLYOKE WORCESTER 1,635.4 1,257.0 8,272.9 6,215.5 • 12.5 -1.9 • .2 — 3.5 • 9.1 • 19.8 • 3. 1 • 12.1 NEW HAMPSHIRE CONCORD* MANCHESTER 702.4 1,817.3 •9.7 -4.4 — 8. 0 • 8.4 RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE-PAWTUCKET 17,598.1 •8.5 • 11.3 VERMONT BURLINGTON* 1,411.3 • 1.2 •24.3 243,156.8 •4.1 • 11.0 7,759.0 4,352.7 •3.8 • 5.9 •5.5 • 15. 7 16,447.7 57,893.0 21,292.8 • 10.3 -.4 - .3 • 30.6 • 9. 3 • 7. 7 3,866.8 32,319.0 2,847,287.4 18,573.3 14,029.1 4,282.7 • 5.9 •7.0 + .1 -4.8 •6.1 • 10.3 • 10.1 • 17.9 + 23. 8 • 13.8 • 23.0 • 19.4 3,028,103.5 • .2 •23.2 42,204.8 -1.6 • 31.6 CONNECTICUT HARTFORD NEW HAVEN NEW LONDON-GROTON—NORWICH WATERBURY MAINE BANGOR* LEWIST0N-AU8URN PORTLAND MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON BROCKTON FALL RIVER LAWRENCE-HAVERHILL LOWELL DISTRICT NO. 1 TOTALS DISTRICT NO. 2 - NEW YORK CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT STAMFORD NEW JERSEY JERSEY CITY NEWARK PATERSON—C LIFTON—PASSAIC NEW YORK BINGHAMTON BUFFALO NEW YORK ROCHESTER SYRACUSE UTICA-ROME 01 STRICT NO. 2 TOTALS DISTRICT NO. 3 - PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE WILMINGTON NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC CITY TRENTON 2,427.3 9, 930.7 • .6 -30.5 •. 6 — 5. 9 P ENNS YL VAN IA AL TOONA HARRISBURG JOHNSTOWN LANCASTER LEBANON* LEHIGH VALLEY 1, 262.0 6,257.4 1,443.8 4,558.0 554.8 6,392.9 •.1 • 10.8 -1.0 •6.9 •4 .6 • 6.7 • 11.3 • 15. 1 •.1 • 10. 8 — 6. 6 • 5.7 PHILADELPHIA READING SCRANTON WI LKES-BARRE WILLIAMSPORT * YORK 169,514.1 4, 592.3 2,987.5 3,731.6 1,019.2 5,327.5 •5.2 • 5.2 •4.7 • 7.4 • 11.2 -1.9 • 8.1 -2. 9 • 3. 5 • 15.7 •21.0 • 22.5 262,203.9 •2.0 • 10.8 DISTRICT NO. 3 TOTALS * CITY ONLY BANK D E B I T S JANUARY 1 9 6 7 < I N M I L L I O N S OF D O L L A R S ) DEBITS JANUARY DISTRICT NO* 4 - SEASONALLY CLEVELAND KENTUCKY LE XI N G T O N OHIO AKRON CANTON CINCINNATI C L E V E LAND COLUMBUS DAYTON HAMILTON—MI DDLETOWN LIMA LORA1N-ELYRIA MANSFIELD* SPRINGFIELD STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON, W. VA. TOLEDO YOUNGSTOMN PENNSYLVANIA ERIE PITTSBURGH WEST WHEELING VIRGINIA DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 5 - NO. 4 TOTALS WASHINGTON MARYLAND BALTIMORE NORTH ASHEVILLE CHARLOTTE DURHAM FAYETTVI LLE* GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT RALEIGH WILMINGTON* WI N S T O N - S A L E M SOUTH CHARLESTON COLUMBIA GREENVILLE CAROLINA VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG NEWPORT NEWS-HAMPTON NORFOLK-PORTSMOUTH RICHMOND ROANOKE WEST CHARLESTON HUNTINGTON-ASHLANDT VIRGINIA DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 6 - ADJUSTED ANNUAL 3,441.9 + 15.2 15.148.4 4.983.1 37,354.3 77,933.8 30,450.1 13,769.0 2.488.3 +6. - 1 . •2. •4. 1.646.4 1,814.4 1,928.7 1.878.2 1,557.7 13.518.5 7, 1 9 8 . 7 RATES + 8.3 3 3 9 2 + 16.3 + 1.3 - 3 . 6 +7.1 +4.2 -.2 •9.8 — .6 + 8.8 + 10.0 +4.0 +2.8 + 8.8 +7.1 +4.8 + 3.7 +4.1 + 8.9 + 9. 0 - 7 . 8 + 11.3 3,716.7 111,201.7 +6.9 +6.7 + 16. 0 2,458.1 +7.0 + 14.4 332,488.1 +4.6 + 8.8 59,348.6 +6.5 - 7 . 9 49.346.6 +8.2 +2 4 . 8 1.978.8 14,871.1 2.724.6 1.423.9 6,755.0 10.409.7 1,176.9 7, 6 8 4 . 6 +2.1 +2 . 9 —5 . 6 + 16.3 +.7 + 15.5 - 2 . 5 + 10.7 + 17.4 + 10.0 +21.8 +30.3 +3 . 1 +26.2 + 12.4 +7.4 3,387.9 6.425.5 4,948.8 +4.5 —4 . 0 +4.4 + 15.7 —3. 5 + 14.7 44.0 05.0 04.3 05.1 41.7 +2.1 - 7 . 5 +7.3 + 6.1 +7.7 - 1 . 5 +3.9 + 5.5 - 5 . 0 + 11.3 4.498.6 3.192.1 - 1 9 . 3 +3.9 + 10.9 - . 7 215,872.8 + 5.4 + 5.6 18,646.6 711.3 2,238.2 5, 5 4 2 . 1 3,795.4 1,135.4 +9.4 - 2 . 4 +3.2 - 3 . 3 +2.1 + .2 + 13.9 - 1 1 . 0 + 5.4 +2.4 + 15.4 - 3 . 3 7,458.4 16,626.1 25,598.4 6,601.4 2,257.6 1.587.8 15,241.4 4.942.9 +1.2 - 7 . 8 +4.2 +4.0 +9.5 +5.0 +4.6 +4.9 + 9.1 +2.4 +7.9 + 10.4 + 9.5 + 14.0 +2.4 +2.6 +9.7 + 5.0 + 11.1 +2.1 NO. 5 1 2 8 20 4 KY. TOTALS , . , , . 6 7 5 5 3 ATLANTA ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM GADSDEN HUNTSVI LLE MOBILE MONTGOMERY TUSCALOOSA FLORIDA FT. DEMAND D E P O S I T S P E R C E N T CHANGE FROM MONTH AGO I YEAR AGO RICHMOND D I S T R I C T OF COLUMBIA CAROLINA TO 1967 LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD JACKSONVILLE MIAMI ORLANDO PENSACOLA TALLAHASSEE* TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG WEST PALM BEACH BANK D E B I T S - J A N U A R Y 1 9 6 7 ( I N M I L L I O N S OF D O L L A R S ) D E B I T S TO JANUARY 1 9 6 7 DISTRICT NO. 6 - SEASONALLY CONTINUED - 3 . 2 - 1 . 2 +2.9 - 7 . 5 • 4 . 3 +4.0 +7.7 + 12.3 +10.1 +4.8 + 6.3 7 7 8 8 —.6 + 12.2 - 2 . 3 +. 1 + 19.7 +6. 0 +24.2 + 5.1 7,035.9 - 4 . 1 +3 . 0 6,468.6 5,457.9 17,718.5 - 2 . 0 +7.3 + 1.5 +3.7 + 10.0 + 14.3 253,780.2 +.5 +7.7 GEORGIA ALBANY ATLANTA AUGUSTA COLUMBUS MACON SAVANNAH 1,061.3 52,171.2 3.399.8 2.500.9 2,750.6 3,252.3 LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE LAFAYETTE LAKE C H A R L E S NEW O R L E A N S 7,0 1.5 1.7 29,2 MISSISSIPPI JACKSON TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA KNOXVILLE NASHVILLE DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 7 - NO. 6 TOTALS DEMAND D E P O S I T S P E R C E N T CHANGE FROM MONTH AGO 1 YEAR AGO ADJ I U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E S 2 0 6 8 2 3 5 7 . . . . +4.9 CHICAGO 1,598.9 1,907.1 439,523.0 2.416.6 5.937.7 6, 156.3 4,556.9 3.007.8 - 8 . 2 —8 . 6 - 1 0 . 9 - 5 . 8 +4.6 - 3 . 6 +8.9 - 4 . 8 - . 1 - 5 . 2 +5.8 —5. 7 - . 3 + 11.2 + 11.4 +3.3 F O R T WAYNE GARY—HAMMOND INDIANAPOLIS LAFAYETTE* MUNCIE SOUTH BEND TERRE HAUTE 6,628.6 6, 743.0 29,133.3 2,002.9 1,824.8 5,190.1 2,326.6 - . 9 - 8 . 9 - 1 . 8 - 5 . 0 —6.6 + 5.5 +8.9 + 8.1 + 5.9 + 11.0 - 1 . 8 +1.1 +. 6 + 11. 0 IOWA CEDAR R A P I D S DES MOINES DUBUQUE SIOUX CITY WATERLOO 3.140.2 17,220.6 1.342.0 2.979.3 2.200.1 +2.2 +21.9 - 7 . 9 —. 6 +4.8 + 1.7 +20.8 —• 7 - 4 . 8 + 10.4 MICHIGAN ANN A R B O R BAY C I T Y DETROIT FLINT GRAND R A P I D S 2,946.4 1,225.3 174,596.3 4,563.7 10,200. 1 +4.6 + 8.5 - 1 . 9 - 7 . 8 +1.1 + 15.2 +5.8 + 11.3 - 3 . 1 + 16.9 JACKSON KALAMAZOO LANSING MUSKEGON SAGINAW 2,119. 3,108. 4,439. 1,915. 3, 1 5 6 . 3 8 1 8 7 +.7 - 7 . 7 - 8 . 7 + 14.0 + .1 +4.4 —8 . 6 +. 0 + 13.2 - 1 . 2 GREEN BAY KENOSHA MADISON Ml LWAUKEE RACINE 2,343. 1,059. 4,640. 44,601. 2,531. 5 1 1 1 8 +2.5 +4.2 +.3 - . 3 +6.8 + 10.7 - 3 . 8 + 8.5 +4.6 +5.7 809,282.7 - 6 . 4 +7.2 ILLINOIS BLOOMING TON* CHAMPAIGN-URBANA CHICAGO DECATUR PEORIA QUAD C I T I E S ROCKFORD SPRINGFIELD INDIANA WISCONSIN DISTRICT NO. 7 TOTALS X BANK D E B I T S JANUARY 1 9 6 7 ( I N M I L L I O N S OF D O L L A R S ) D E B I T S TO JANUARY 1 9 6 7 4 DISTRICT NO. 8 JS T 1 .• - U I SJ mm EL DORADO* FORT SMITH HELENA* L I T T L E ROCK P I N E BLUFF TEXARKANA ARKANSAS 4 w LO LUUI SEASONALLY DEMAND D E P O S I T S P F R CENT CHANGE FROM MONTH AGO 1 YEAR A G O ADJUSTED ANNUA. RATES 590.4 2,090.0 321.6 6, 1 8 4 . 4 1,209.7 1,224.4 - 8 . 4 • 15.5 —7 . 4 +3.3 - 1 2 . 0 + 10.3 • 4 . 7 • 19.8 • 15.2 • 6.0 • 15.1 • 20.9 951.8 • 2.7 • 3.1 4,216.8 - 7 . 8 • 9 . 4 20,165.6 1,259.0 948.0 • 3 . 5 • 31.6 • 21.8 • 5 . 8 • 22.8 • 27.6 784.6 •3.6 • 17.1 ILLINOIS QUINCY* INDIANA EVANSVILLE KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE OWENSBORO* PADUCAH* MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE* MISSOURI CAPE G I R A R D E A U * HANNIBAL* ST. LOUIS SEDALIA* SPRINGFIELD 581.4 244.7 87,303.5 348.9 2,720.7 • 20.6 • 10.5 • 4 . 4 • 5 . 5 •7.1 • 37.5 • 1.0 • 16.7 • 12.0 • 19.0 TENNESSEE JACKSON* MEMPHI S 691.5 23,118.5 - 3 . 8 • 12.3 • 15.9 • 20.7 154,955.6 •5.2 • 15.1 3,709.5 84,058.4 • .7 - 1 . 5 • 8.1 • 21.3 1,623.1 1,630.1 - 5 . 0 • 2.3 • 2 . 4 • 9.8 2, 1 9 5 . 4 - 4 . 9 • 4.8 2,015.3 - 7 . 0 • 1.5 > DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 9 - NO. 8 TOTALS MINNEAPOLIS 4 A MINNESOTA DULUTH—SUPERIOR, MISC. MI N N E A P O L I S - S T . P A U L MONTANA BILLINGS GREAT F A L L S NORTH FARGO-MOORHEAD, DAKOTA SIOUX SOUTH DAKOTA t FALLS DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 10 - MINN. NO. 9 TOTALS COLORADO DENVER PUEBLO KANSAS TOPEKA WICHITA MISSOURI KANSAS C I T Y , ST. JOSEPH > NEBRASKA LINCOLN OMAHA, NEBRASKA—IOWA > NEW ALBUQUERQUE > MEXICO OKLAHOMA SPRINGS * CITY ONLY W I MISSOURI-KANSAS LAWTON OKLAHOMA C I T Y TULSA DISTRICT -I —1.6 • 19.3 2,446.0 34,165.0 1,410.0 •4.9 • 2.6 • 11.7 • 2.0 • 9.1 —. 2 5,419.0 8, 5 6 2 . 0 •5.7 •1.9 • 26.5 • 3.2 44,791.0 2,059.0 - 2 . 7 • .1 • 2 . 9 • 1.9 3, 7 8 4 . 0 16,284.0 • 11.7 —1.8 • 10.7 • 4 . 0 4,808.0 • 5 . 2 • 4 . 4 763.0 17, 163.0 17,852.0 • 5 . 5 —2 . 6 - 5 . 1 • 9. 9 • 7.6 - . 9 159,506.0 - . 4 • 5.2 KANSAS CITY COLORADO % 95,231.9 NO. 10 TOTALS BANK D E B I T S - J A N U A R Y 1 9 6 7 ( I N M I L L I O N S OF D O L L A R S ) D E B I T S TO JANUARY 1 9 6 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 - DEMAND D E P O S I T S P E R C E N T CHANGE FROM MONTH AGO 1 YEAR AGO S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E S DALLAS ARIZONA TUCSON 4,129.6 •8.7 • 7.7 LOUISIANA MONROE SHREVEPORT 1,849.9 5,589.5 —4.1 • 6.4 - 2 . 3 • 11.3 NEW M E X I C O ROSWELL* 663.4 +3.1 - 1 . 8 TEXAS ABILENE AMARILLO AUSTIN B E A U M O N T - P O R T ARTHUR BROWNSVILLE—HARLINGEN-SAN BENITO —1.3 - 1 . 4 +. 6 - 1 . 7 - 3. 2 • 5.3 • .4 • .9 • 8.8 - 4 . 6 CORPUS C H R I S T I CORSICANA* DALLAS EL PASO F O R T WORTH 4,052.0 349.5 68,235.5 5,130.6 14,561.5 • • • • • 7.2 8.7 3.7 2.7 2.3 • 9.4 •4.1 • 12.7 • 13.4 • 8.4 GALVESTON-TEXAS CITY HOUSTON LAREDO LUBBOCK MC A L L E N - P H A R R — E D I N B U R G H •' MIDLAND 2,064.0 65,399.4 605.6 3,183.7 1,299.1 1,645.6 •6.8 • 5.6 - 3 . 3 •4.1 • 1.9 •1.6 •6.1 • 11.0 • 9.0 -12.2 • 23.7 • 3.0 ODESSA SAN A N G E L O SAN A N T O N I O TYLER WACO WICHITA FALLS 1,2 9 12,2 1,6 2,1 2,1 .7 .1 .8 .8 .3 .6 - 5 . 3 - 5 . 2 • 5.6 • .7 • 12.1 • 2.0 • . 0 •.5 6. 8 5. 8 8.9 8 . 9 216,535.0 • 3.9 • 9.3 16,123.2 - 2 . 3 •5.7 DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 12 - 1,890.2 4,193.0 4,566.5 5,392.8 1,391.4 NO. 11 TOTALS 2 0 5 5 9 0 4 6 3 8 3 5 • • • - SAN F R A N C I S C O ARIZONA PHOENIX CALIFORNIA A N A H E I M - S A N T A A N A - G A R D E N GROVE BAKERSFIELD FRESNO L O S A N G E L E S - L O N G BEACH OXNARD-VENTURA* SAN B E R N A R D ! N O - R I V E R S I D E - O N T A R I O 16,541.8 4,330.8 5,800.8 248,185.9 3,108.2 10,467.5 - 5 . 5 •7.0 •5.4 • 1.2 - . 7 - 2 . 6 • 8.4 - . 9 • 2.4 • 10.9 • 3. 0 —. 6 SAN D I E G O SAN F R A N C I S C O - O A K L A N D SAN J O S E SANTA BARBARA STOCKTON 18,544.2 182,917.0 15,115.2 3, 7 3 2 . 4 -10.9 - 2 . 9 -15.2 •6.6 •4.3 • 9.3 • 14.1 - 1 . 9 • 10.7 - 2 . 7 3,433.3 IDAHO BOISE 3,003.2 - . 2 • 10.2 NEVADA L A S VEGAS RENO 4,099.3 2,861.8 • 3.7 • 11.3 -1.7 - 2 . 7 OREGON EUGENE PORTLAND 2,794.2 25,446.5 •2.7 •6.1 - . 3 • 4.2 UTAH OGDEN S A L T LAKE 1,527.6 13,361.5 - 6 . 9 • 12.4 - 1 1 . 0 • 3. 7 43,662.3 5,352.6 7,541.6 - 1 . 2 - 1 . 9 • 19.4 • 12.7 •2.7 • 23.3 637,951.1 - . 7 • 10.1 WA S H I N G T O N CITY SEA T T L E - E V E R E T T SPOKANE TACOMA DISTRICT * N O T AN SMSA BUT REPORTED NO. 12 TOTALS ON A COUNTY BASIS.
@FedFRASER