View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF N E W YORK
r Circular No. 5 7 3 5 *1
L December 5, 1965 J

Increases in Discount Rates of this Bank
and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Increases in Maximum Interest Rates on Time Deposits
Under Regulation Q

To A ll M em ber Banks, and Others Concerned,
in the Second Federal R eserve D istrict:

Following is the text of a statement issued today by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System and released for publication in morning newspapers, Monday, December 6 :
The Federal Reserve announced today two complementary actions to reinforce efforts to maintain
price stability, and thus to foster balance in the economy’s continued growth and strength in the dollar’s
international standing.
The actions, intended not to cut back on the present pace of credit flows but to dampen mounting
demands on banks for still further credit extensions that might add to inflationary pressures, were as
follows:
1. The Board of Governors in Washington approved actions by the directors of the Federal
Reserve Banks of New York and Chicago increasing the discount rates of those banks from 4 to 4 %
per cent, effective December 6, 1965. The discount rate is the interest rate charged member banks for
borrowing from their District Reserve Banks.
2. Simultaneously, the Board increased the maximum rates that member banks are permitted to
pay their depositors to 5 % per cent on all time deposits and certificates of deposit having a maturity
of 30 days or more. This change is also effective Monday, December 6. Previously, the maximum rates
payable were 4 per cent for time deposits and certificates of 30 to 89 days, and 4^2 per cent on those
of 90 days or more. No change was made in the rate payable on savings deposits (4 per cent).
The increase in the rates that member banks are permitted to pay their depositors is intended to enable
the banks to attract and retain deposits of businesses and individuals and thus to make more effective use
of savings funds already available in the economy to finance their loan expansion.
The increase in discount rates is intended to moderate additional bank reliance on short-term borrow­
ings from thp Federal Reserve to meet intensifying loan demands.
The action contemplates, however, the continued provision of additional reserves to the banking sys­
tem, in amounts sufficient to meet seasonal pressures as well as the credit needs of an expanding economy
without promoting inflationary excesses, primarily through the Federal Reserve’s day-in and day-out
purchases of Government securities in the open market.
The changes in discount rates and the maximum rates that banks may pay depositors were the first in
either respect since November 24, 1964.




( over)

Since then, total borrowing by consumers, business, and state and local governments has risen
sharply, and interest rates at all maturities from the shortest to the longest have been rising under demand
pressures. In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve would be forced to increase bank reserves at an
accelerated pace if all demands for borrowing money at present rates were to be satisfied.
With slack in manpower and productive capacity now reduced to narrow proportions, with the economy
closer to full potential than at any time in nearly a decade, and with military demands on output and
manpower increasing, it was felt that excessive additions to money and credit availabilities in an effort
to hold present levels of interest rates would spill over into further price increases in goods and services.
Such price rises would endanger the sustainable nature of the present business expansion. Moreover,
increases in costs and prices would make it more difficult for American goods to compete in markets at
home and abroad.
In addition, a pattern of interest rates that is accepted by borrowers and lenders as fully reflecting
market forces should add assurance of a smooth flow of funds to all sectors of the economy. Discount rate
increases in 1963 and 1964 did not stop business or credit growth, but helped to keep the economy within
an expansion that was sustainable.
In sum, the actions taken should have the three-pronged impact of:
1. Backing up the Government’s efforts to prevent inflationary excesses from damaging an econ­
omy now carrying the added burden of military operations in Vietnam;
2. Bolstering the Government’s programs to overcome the persistent deficit in the U. S. balance
of payments; and
3. Demonstrating anew U. S. determination to maintain the international strength of the dollar.
Governors Robertson, Mitchell, and Maisel dissented from the discount rate action on the ground that
it was at least premature in the absence of more compelling evidence of inflationary dangers. Governor
Robertson also dissented from the action to increase the maximum rates on time deposits.
Copies of this Bank’s Operating Circular No. 13, setting forth this Bank’s new discount
rates, and of the Board of G overnors’ Supplement to Regulation Q, setting forth the maximum
rates o f interest payable on time and savings deposits by member banks, will be sent to you
tomorrow.




A

lfred

H

ayes,

President.