View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FE D E RA L R E SE R V E BANK
O F NEW YORK
Fiscal A g en t o f the U nited States

r Circular Xo. 4 8 8 7 " 1
L
May 6, 1960
J

Preliminary Figures on Treasury’s Current Exchange Offering

To A ll Banking Institutions, and Others Concerned,
in th e Second Federal R eserve D istrict:

The following statement was made public today by the Treasury
Department:
Prelim inary figures show that about $5,767 million o f the three issues
o f Treasury securities involved in the current refunding, aggregating $6,413
million, have been exchanged for the two new issues. Exchanges include
about $3,661 million fo r the new one-year 4 % percent certificates, and
$2,106 million fo r the new 5-year 4 % percent Treasury notes. A bou t $646
million o f the outstanding issues remain fo r cash redemption on May 16.
Final figures fo r the exchange will be announced after final reports
are received from the Federal Reserve Banks.




A

lfred

H

ayes,

President.

Federal Reserve

Ba n k

NEW YORK 4 5 ,
RECTOR

of

N ew York

N. Y.

2-5700

May 11, I960

LOANS FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXERCISING RESTRICTED STOCK OPTIONS

To All Banks in the Second Federal Reserve District:
In response to requests received during recent months, the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has reconsidered the question of
amending its Regulation U, Loans by Banks for the Purpose of Purchasing or
Carrying Registered Stocks, to provide more favorable treatment for loans
for the purpose of exercising restricted stock options which conform to the
applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 than is provided
for other loans for the purpose of purchasing or carrying stocks.
The Board has concluded that such an amendment would not be
desirable.

Following is a quote from the Board's letter to this Bank, dated

April 27, I960, relating to this question:
As on previous occasions when this matter has been
considered, the Board believes that proposals for special
treatment of loans for the purpose of exercising restricted
stock options relate primarily to executive compensation
rather than to credit regulation. In addition, it appears
that a large potential volume of stock market credit would
be involved in any proposal to accord such loans favored
treatment. After reexamining the question in detail, the
Board has again reached the conclusion that it would not
be desirable to amend Regulation U to provide for special
treatment of loans for the purpose of exercising restricted
stock options.




HOWARD D. CROSSE,
Vice President.