The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 REC'D IN RECORDS SECTION (Corrected Copy) MAR-11962 To Federal Open Market Committee From Robert G. Rouse and John R. Farrell February 28 Subject: 1962 Suggested Revision in Procedure for Allocation of Participations in the System Open Market Account When the present allocation formula* based on total assets was adopted on September 1, 1953 one of the principal objectives was to avoid the frequent adjustments due to low reserve ratios which had proved troublesome under the earlier formula based on estimated expense and dividend requirements. The total asset formula served this purpose satisfactorily for a number of years as the reserve ratios were generally above 40 per cent when the new formula was adopted and have declined only gradually as the System Account grew. No adjustments were called for until the annual reallocations of April 1, 1960, and April 1, 1961. In each year two Banks were unable to accept their full participations. Sub- sequently interim adjustments were necessary, on November 22, 1961 at Minneapolis, and on December 29, 1961 at Boston. With the current low reserve ratio of about 35.6 for the System as a whole, and with the possibility of a worsening in the situation during the year to come, a reappraisal of the formula at this time is appropriate. Among the shortcomings of the present formula under prevailing conditions, are the unrealistic percentages referred to in the procedures relating to adjustments in participations because of a low reserve ratio. For example in paragraph 3 it is stated that no allocation shall be made which would reduce the reserve ratio of a Bank as of the next to the last business day of March below 35 per cent. Between December 19 and January 6, inclusive, the reserve ratio of the 12 Banks combined ranged between 33.9 and 34.9, and if on the reallocation date the combined ratio again should be below 35 per cent, the procedure described in paragraph 3 could not be carried out. Furthermore, the effect of the interim adjustments described in paragraph 5 could be, and in * See attached copy of "Procedures with Respect to Allocations of the System Open Market Account". Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 2 effect has been, to raise the reserve ratio of the affected Bank above the average ratio of all the Banks. Relief could be provided by reducing the per- centages mentioned in paragraph 3 and 5 from 35 and 30 to, let us say, 32 and 28, respectively, but a lack of flexibility in the existing procedures would remain. Adjustments to restore reserve ratios currently are made on the basis of a reserve position as of a single day, so that adjustments, which may turn out to be more or less permanent can result from a low ratio brought about by a distinctly temporary situation. This is well illustrated by the facts of the adjustment on December 29 caused by a low reserve ratio at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The reserve ratio at that Bank had dropped to 27.4 on December 28, the next to the last business day of the month. Accordingly Boston's participation in the System Account was reduced by an amount sufficient to raise its reserve ratio to 35.0 per cent, despite the fact that the ratio for the 12 Banks combined was only 33.9. By the following day the situation had been corrected and Boston's ratio climbed to 39.8. Boston's ratio has remained the highest in the System ever since, but in accordance with paragraph 5 of the pro- cedures it was not possible to restore its full participation without reducing its ratio below 35 per cent until February 20. Also, in the December 29 adjust- ment the securities taken from Boston were distributed to four other Federal Reserve Banks, a complication which appears unnecessary when the amounts involved are small. If the need for an adjustment because of a low ratio at another Reserve Bank had occurred while the Boston bank did not hold its normal participation, there would have been conflict in the rules as to whether the securities should have been transferred to Boston which has the highest ratio, or whether this would have constituted a reversal, or partial reversal, of the previous adjustment at Boston which is forbidden unless it can be done without reducing its Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 3 ratio below 35 per cent. (See paragraph 5 of "Procedures with Respect to Allocations of the System Open Market Account" attached.) Similar aberrations could take place if a bank were unable to take its full participation in an annual reallocation. Under the present procedure no reversal of the adjust- ment would be permissible until the next general reallocation, even though unusual circumstances caused the ratio of that bank to be low only on the day of the annual reallocation. Suggested below is a plan designed to minimize the likelihood of adjustments, but which, if adjustments should be necessary, would simplify the calculations and reduce the inequities caused by the inflexibility of existing procedures. This plan adopts the principle of adjusting participations at stated intervals to equalize more nearly the reserve ratios of the various Banks. Such adjustments would be calculated on averages of gold reserves and note and deposit liabilities over a recent period, rather than as of a specific day. Quarterly reallocations on this basis are suggested, but they could be more or less frequent as experience dictates. The averages could cover the first 85 days of the preceding quarter (in order to allow time comfortably to make the calculations). The periodic reallocations would tend to conform the Banks' par- ticipations to the basic trends in gold reserves and note and deposit liabilities. Because of temporary conditions which may reduce a Bank's ratio below 30 per cent*, occasional adjustments may still be necessary. Such adjustments would be designed to raise the Bank's reserve ratio to the average ratio of the 12 Banks combined. order to keep to a minimum the number of Banks involved in In adjustment, * it is proposed that the the Banks to which the securities are to be Further deterioration in the combined reserve ratio of the twelve Banks in time may force a lowering of this guidepost. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 4 reallocated will be selected in the order of their ability to absorb the largest additional amount of securities without reducing their reserve ratios below the ratio of the 12 Banks combined. Thus if the amount to be reallocated is larger than any one Bank can absorb without reducing its reserve ratio below the System average, the excess beyond that point would be allocated to the Bank which is in a position to take the next largest amount. Because the interim adjustments pre- sumably would arise from temporary conditions, the plan proposes full reversal on the first succeeding Thursday when it can be accomplished without reducing the Bank's reserve ratio below 30 per cent. The foregoing plan should provide an equitable method of participating the System's holdings. Distribution of the securities would be based on each Bank's ability to carry its share. Quarterly, rather than annual, reallocations are recommended in order to adjust to changing trends. By the use of averages and early reversal of adjustments, an effort has been made to avoid the more or less permanent adjustments which have developed under the present plan due to temporary situations prevailing on the specific dates. Keeping to a minimum the number of Banks asked to absorb the securities taken from the Bank with a low ratio would reduce the number of changes in the accounting records that have to be made when adjustments occur, and would mean less delay in advising the other Banks as to their participations in the System Account on the day the adjust- ment takes place. A suggested statement of procedures for approval of the Federal Open Market Committee is attached. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 5 Also attached are tables giving the pro forma reallocations of securities in the System Open Market Account assuming the proposed new formula had been in effect since April 1, 1961. Robert G. Rouse John R. Farrell Attachments: Procedures with respect to allocations of the System Open Market Account adopted September 1, 1953. Proposed procedures with respect to allocations. Tables X-1, X-2, X-3 and X-4. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 Procedures with Respect to Allocations of the System Open Market Account (Adopted September 1, 1953) The following procedures contained in a memorandum from Messrs. R. G. Rouse and R. F. Leonard, dated July 14, 1953, were approved by the Executive Committee of the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting August 4, 1953, and reaffirmed at its meeting on August 25, 1953 and at subsequent annual meetings. Amendments to the procedures were approved at its meetings of March 1, 1960 and March 7, 1961. "1. Securities in the System Open Market Account shall be reallocated on September 1, 1953, on the basis of the ratio of each Bank's total assets to the total assets for all Reserve Banks combined. Such ratios shall be on the basis of daily averages for the 12-month period ending July 31, 1953. 2. Securities in the Account shall be reallocated April 1 of each year on the basis of daily averages of total assets for the 12 months ending with the last day of February. 3. No allocation shall be made which would reduce the reserve ratio of a Bank as of the next to the last business day of March below 35 per cent. If, because of the provisions of this paragraph, a Bank is unable to take its pro rata share based on total assets, the amount which it is unable to take without reducing its reserve ratio below 35 per cent shall be allocated to the Bank or Banks having the highest reserve ratios in such a manner that the ratio of the Bank or Banks to which securities are reallocated will not be reduced below the ratio of any other Bank. Regardless of possible subsequent improvement in reserve ratios, no reversal of these adjustments shall take place pending the next general reallocation. 4. The Account shall be apportioned during the ensuing twelve months on the basis of the total assets ratios computed for the latest general reallocation after allowing for any adjustments as provided for in Paragraph 3, unless there shall be further adjustments described in Paragraphs 5 or 6. 5. If a Bank's reserve ratio falls below 30 per cent on the next to the last business day (as observed by the Agent Bank) of a statement week or month, sufficient of its holdings as of the close of business that day to raise its reserve ratio to 35 per cent shall be reallocated by an adjustment the following day, unless such day is a general Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 2 reallocation date. Such securities shall be allocated to the Bank or Banks having the highest reserve ratios. (NOTE: This procedure does not contemplate partial reversal of these adjustments. However, full reversal of these adjustments will be made when a Bank's reserve position improves to the extent that the full amount of its participation allocated to other Banks under the provisions of this paragraph can be restored without reducing the Bank's reserve ratio below 35 per cent.) 6. If a Bank's reserve ratio should fall below 30 per cent on any other day, of if a Bank anticipates that its reserve ratio will fall below that figure, it may arrange with the Manager of the Open Market Account to make an adjustment similar to those provided for in paragraph No. 5 so as to increase the Bank's reserve ratio to 35 per cent. 7. Profits and losses on the sale of securities from the Account shall be allocated on the basis of each Bank's current holdings at the opening of business on the date of delivery of the securities sold." Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 Proposed Procedures with Respect to Allocations of the System Open Market Account 1. Securities in the System Open Market Account shall be reallocated on the first business day of February, May, August and November of each year by means of adjustments proportionate to the adjustments that would have been required to equalize the average ratios of the 12 Reserve Banks over the first 85 days 2. of the preceding three calendar months. If a Bank's reserve ratio should be reduced below 30 per cent as a result of the reallocation, or should fall below 30 per cent on the next to the last business day (as observed by the Agent Bank) of a statement week or month, its holdings as of the close of business that day shall be adjusted the following day by an amount sufficient to raise its reserve ratio to the average reserve ratio of the 12 Banks combined on the preceding day. Such securities shall be allocated to the Bank in a position to absorb the largest additional amount without reducing its reserve ratio below the ratio of the 12 Banks combined. If that Bank is unable to take the entire amount, the excess shall be allocated to the Bank which can absorb the next largest amount without reducing its reserve ratio below the average for the System. Any such adjustment will be reversed on the first succeeding Thursday (before the next quarterly reallocation) when reducing the Bank's is a it can be accomplished without reserve ratio below 30 per cent, except that if the Thursday holiday or the last business day of a month the reversal will be made the following business day. A reversal will restore individual Bank holdings to their established participation percentages before the adjustment occurred, except to the the interim. extent that a Bank may have been involved in another adjustment in Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 2 3. If a Bank's reserve ratio should fall below 30 per cent on any other day, or if a Bank anticipates that its reserve ratio will fall below that figure, it may arrange with the Manager of the System Open Market Account for an adjustment similar to those provided for in paragraph No. 2 so as to increase the Bank's reserve ratio to the average of the 12 Banks combined. 4. The Account shall be apportioned during the succeeding quarter on the basis of the ratios determined in Paragraph 1, after allowing for any adjustments as provided for in Paragraphs 2 and 3. 5. Profits and losses on the sale of securities from the Account shall be allocated on the day of delivery of the securities sold on the basis of each Bank's current holdings at the opening of business on that day. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 PRO FORMA REALLOCATION OF U. S. GOVERNMENTSECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKETACCOUNT, AS OF APRIL 1, 1961 (opening of business), ASSUMING PROPOSED NEW FORMULA Table x-1 r r Boston System - base figures for period January 1 - March 26, 1961: Deposit and F- R. note 1. liabilities a. Aggregates b. Averages Gold certificate reserves 2. a. Aggregates b. Averages 3. Average reserve ratio (per cent) .B Difference (B.t A.2.b-) D. SOMA security holdings, opening of business, April 1, 1961: 1. Actual allocation 2. Reallocation (D.i. ± C., with sign reversed) E- F. f Per actual reallocation April 1, 1960, Richmond Atlanta V I Chicago St. Louis 41 + r Dallas Minneapolis Kansas City -V{H+ San Francisco H 973,182 11,419 222,557 2,618 322,636 3,796 245,697 2,889 214,184 2,520 660,387 7,769 157,598 1,854 88,103 1,037 170,898 2, 01 155,852 1,458,388 17,158 68,672 808 366, 139 4,310 85, 640 1,007 120,482 1, 418 91, 316 1,071 76,769 905 250, 556 2,948 58,643 690 32, C10 378 66,969 788 59,971' 705 180, 888 37.7232 (34.7377) (37.6452) (38.4615) (37.3551) (37.1755) (35.9127) (37.9457) (36.4513) (39.1845) (38.1406) (39.5250) 391 759 13 29 877 17,15 Reserve ratios, opening of business, April 1, 1961: 1. Actual 2. Adjusted for reallocation (30.0 per cent, or higher) Cleveland Philadelphia I r , 197,697 2,326 + SOMAsecurity holdings ratio (per cent of participation), cpening of business, April 1, 1961: 1. Actual holdings ratio (E.2., previous 3 months, unless interim adjustment) Jf 2. New holdings ratio, computed on basis of D.2. above E.2.) 3Difference (E-1. New York I r 3,866,138 45,484 Average gold certificate reserves adjusted to conform with System average reserve ratio (System A.3. x A.1.b.) C. (Dollar amounts in millions) r * 176 + 69 + 4, 319 987 9 20 + 1,432 1,090 14 16 951 + (37.2168) 699 2,931 46 17 + 9 + 457,347 1,834 - 5,381 2, 127 692 2,030 13 97 26,688 1,434 6,657 1, 528 2, 293 1,689 1,463 4,568 1,079 619 1,145 1,076 3,137 26,688 1,365 6,648 1,548 2,279 1,673 1,417 4,585 1,070 606 1,174 1,089 3,234 100.0 5.3740 24-9432 5.7256 8-5917 6.3295 5.4831 17.1158 4.0417 2.3205 4-2921 4.0300 11.7528 5.ll47 24.9101 .0331 5.8003 -0747 8.5394 .0523 6.2687 .0608 5-3095 .1736 17.1800 + .0642 4.0093 .0324 2.2707 .0498 4.3990 .1069 4.0805 .0505 100.0 .6613 - .2593 + + + + 121.78 .3650 37.9 34.1 37.4 39.1 333.3 38.0 36.7 38.6 36.8 33.8 37-4 37.4 41.0 37.9 37.1 37.5 38.3 333.7 38-5 38.5 38.4 37-3 35.0 35.9 36.7 39.2 on basis in effect since September 1, 1953. BOARD OF GOWENORS OF THE FEIERAL RESERE SYSTM D1VISIC OF BANK OPERATIONS February 16, 1962 - Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 PRO FORMAREALLOCATION OF U. Si.GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKETACCOUNT, AS OF JULY 1, 1961 (opening of business), ASSUMINGPROPOSED NEW FORMULA Table X-2 (ICllar amounts in millions) B. Forrula base figures for period April 1 - June 24, 1961: 1. Deposit and F- R. note liabilities a. Aggregates b. Averages 2. Gold certificate reserves -Aggregatea 1 a. b. Averages 1 3. Average reserve ratio (per cent) C. Difference D. SojA security holdings, opening of business, July 1, 1961: 1. Actual allocation 2/ 2. Reallocation (D.1. t C., with sign reversed) E. F. lf 2 (B. SOMA security holdings ratio (per cent of participation), opening of business, July 1, 1961: 1. Actual holdings ratio (E.2., previous 3 months, unless interim adjustment) 2. New h-ldings ratio, computed on basis of D.2. above 3. Difference (E.1. t E.2.) Reserve ratios, opening of business, July 1, 1961; 1. Actual 1/ 2. Adjusted for reallocation (30.0 per cent, or higher) St. Louis Chicago Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francis( 169,248 1,991 153,822 1,810 462,250 5,438 33,295 392 63,580 748 58,120 684 180,648 2,125 (38.2066) (37.5691) (37.7901) (39.0769) New York 3,823,049 44,977 195,876 2,304 955,388 11,240 220,82. 2,59EJ 318,571 3,748 243,226 2,861 211,381 2,487 651,066 7,660 154,199 1,814 87,201 1,026 1,454,220 17,108 76,929 905 359,871 4,234 85,185. 1,002 121,078 1,424 91,987 1,082 80,331 945 244,986 2,882 58,210 685 38.0372 (39.2795) (37.6690) (38.5681.) (37.9936) (37.8189) (37.9976) (37.6240) (37.7619) 17,108 876 Average gold certificate reserves adjusted to conform with System average reserve ratio (System A-3- x A.1.b. ) t A.2.b.) Atlanta Boston System A. t ± 101 - 29 Philarelphia 988 4,275 + 41 - 14 Richmond Cleveland 1,426 + 2 946 1,088 + 6 + 1 2,914 + 32 690 + 5 757 390 - 2 + 9 2, 069 689 + 5 - 56 27,253 1,394 6,789 1,581 2,327 1,708 1,447 4,682 1,093 619 1,199 1,112 3,302 27,253 1,423 6,748 1,595 2,325 1,702 1,446 4,650 1,088 621 1,190 1,107 3,358 100.0 5.1147 24.9101 5.8003 8.5394 6.2687 5.3095 17.1800 4.0093 2.2707 4.3990 4.0805 12.1178 100.0 .3708 + 5.2214 .1067 24.7606 .1495 5.8526 .0523 8.5312 .0082 6.2452 -0235 - 5.3058 -0037 17.0623 -1177 3.9922 -0171 2.2787 .0080 4.3665 .0325 4.0619 .0186 + - - - + - - + 12.3216 .2038 37.9 38.5 38.2 38.3 37.5 37.2 36.1 38.3 38.5 34.1 37.5 37.4 38.9 37.9 37.2 38.6 37.7 37.5 37.4 36.1 38.7 38.7 33.9 37-9 37.6 37-9 Adjusted for change indicated by Item C. in Table X-1, and for reversal of effect of regular annual reallocation, April 3 as of April 1, 1961. E.1. multiplied by System D. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF TEE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSlEM DIVISION OF BANK OPERATIONS February 16, 1962 Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 PRO FORMA REALLOCATION OF U. S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKETACCOUNT, AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1961 (opening of business), ASSUMING PROPOSED NEWFORMULA Table X-3 (Dollar amounts in millions) System A. Formula. base figures for periox July 1 - September 23, 1961: 1. Deposit and F. R. note liabilities a. Aggregates b. Averages 2. Gold certificate reserves Aggregates 1 a. b. Averages 1 3. Average reserve ratio (per cent) B. Ave-age gold certificate reserves adjusted to conform with System average reserve ratio (systen A.3- x A.l.-) C. Dfrence (B. -A-2.b.) D. SC!-A security holdings, opening of business, Cctbcer 1, 1961: 1. Actual allocation 2 2. Reallocation (D.1. ± C., with sign reversed) E. F SO-A security holdings ratio (per cent of participation), opening of business,Cetecer 1, 1961: 1. Actual holdings ratio (3.2., previous 3 months, unless interim adjustment) 2- New holdings ratio, computed spuove n basts of 0.23. Difference (3.1. ± E.2.) Reserve ratios, opening of business, C,ober 1, 1961: 1. Actual j 2. Adusted for reallocation (3C.0 per cent, or high-r) Boston New York 3,887,403 45,734 201,514 2,371 965,517 11,359 1,466,196 17,249 75,699 891 362,531 4,265 t ± 37.7159 (37.5791) 17,249 894 7 1I+ 3 Philadelphia 19 222,516 2,618 324,484 3,817 250,564 2,948 213,501 2,512 661,199 7,779 155,656 1,831 87,748 1,032 173,122 2,037 155,890 1,634 475,692 82,032 965 124,048 1,459 96,743 1,138 80,592 948 248,935 2,929 58,524 689 31,1407 369 66,274 780 59,088 695 180,323 2,121 (38.2237) (38.6024) (37.6527) (37.6297) (35.7558) 987 4,284 + Richmond (36.8602) (37.5473) + j Atlanta Cleveland 22 19 (37.7389) 947 1,112 1,440 - - 26 Chicago - 1 St. Louis 5 + 2 + 20 Dallas 12 5,596 (37.9021) 692 768 - San Francisco (37.8953) (38.2916) 389 691 2,934 + Minneapolis Kansas City - 3 2,111 - 10 27,788 1,451 6,881 1,626 2,371 1,736 1,474 4,741 1,109 633 1,213 1,129 3,424 27,788 1,448 6,862 1,604 2,390 1,762 1,475 4,736 1,107 613 1,225 1,132 3,434 100.0 5.2214 24.7606 5.8526 8.5312 6.2452 5-3058 17.0623 3.9922 2.2787 4-3665 4.0619 12-3216 100.0 -2575 - 5.2109 -0105 5.7723 .0803 + 8.6008 .0696 - 24.6941 .0665 - + 6.3409 .0957 5.3080 + .0022 - 17.0433 .0190 - 3-9837 -0085 - 2-2060 .0727 4.4084 + .0419 + 4.0737 .0118 + 12-3579 .0363 37.1 37.9 35.9 35.7 37.5 39.3 36.4 37.7 37.5 34.6 37.8 37.4 37.5 37.1 38.0 36-1 36.5 37.0 38.5 36.4 37-7 37.6 36.5 37.2 37.3 37.3 for net of changes indicated by Item C. in Tables X-1 and X-2, 1A M austed, B- .multiplied by Sysrem D. E and reversal of effect of regular annual reallocation, April 3 as of Apr:l 1, 1961. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERALRESERVE SYSTEM DIVISION OF BANK OPERATIONS February 16, 1962 Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020 PRO FORMAREALLOCATION OF U. S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKETACCOUNT, AS OF JANUARY1, 1962 (opening of business), ASSUMING PROPOSED NEW FORMULA Table x-4 Dollar amounts in m-n11 ons System A. Average gold certificate reserves adjusted to conform with System average reserve ratio (System A-3- x A.1.b.) C. Difference (B.~ A.2.b.) D. SCMA security holdings, opening of business, January 1, 1962: 1. Actual allocation 2. Reallocation (D.1.- C., with sign reversed) E. SaMA security holdings ratio (per cent of participation), opening of business, January 1, 1962: 1- Actual holdings ratio (E-2., previous 3 months, unless interim adjustment) New holdings ratio, computed 2. on basis of D-2.above 3. Difference (E.1.t E.2.) Feserve ratios, openinG of business, January 1, 1962: 1. Actual 3/ adjusted for reallocation 2. (30.0 per cent, or higher) New York I Formula base figures for period October 1 - December 24, 1961: 1. Deposit and F. R. note liabilities a. Aggregates b. Averages 2. Gold certificate reserves a. Aggregates 1 b. Averages 1 3. Average reserve ratio (per cent) B. Boston PhiladelphiaJ Cleveland Richmond I Atlanta Chicago St. Louis San Francisco Minneapolis ensas City I-F 1 3,974,179 46,755 205,662 2,420 975, 533 11,477 226,341 2,663 331, 541 3,900 264,645 3,113 219,278 2,580 62, 548 7,912 16" 377 1,910 88,786 1,045 175,600 2,066 1,436,076 16,895 74,038 871 347,763 80,874 951 120,268 1,415 100,144 1,178 50,398 946 '36,931 2,787 60,422 711 31,278 368 61,773 36.1352 (35.9917) (35.7116) (36.2821) (37.8413) (36(667) (35.2250) 16,895 875 962 1, 409 1,125 932 2,859 173 4 11 6 53 -4 72 28,722 1,497 7,093 1,658 2,470 1,821 525 4,895 1 144 634 1,266 1,170 3,549 2,476 1,874 1,539 4,823 1, 65 624 1,246 1,182 3,616 5.3080 17.0433 3.9837 2.2060 4.4084 4.0737 12.3579 5.3583 .0503 16.792C -2513 + 4.0561 .0724 2.1725 .c335 4.1153 .0416 12.5897 .2318 * + 4,091 (35.6452) 4,147 + 56 + - 28,722 1,493 7,037 1,647 100.0 5.2109 24.6941 5.7723 8 .6008 6.34c9 100.0 .5996 5-1981 .0128 24-5004 .1937 5.7343 .0380 6 .6206 ::198 6.5246 .1837 34.8 34.0 32.2 35.6 34.5 34.8 34.1 32.7 36.0 3 -4 - 6 38.1 t 36.7 36.5 (35.2153) 690 - 21 378 + 10 + - 491, 382 5,781 727 58,973 694 183,214 2,156 (35.1888) (36.7589 (37.2946) 747 682 2,089 20 4.3381-0703 - + 12, 67 34.8 36.3 33.8 36.1 33.6 36.7 35-7 35-3 34.7 37.1 33.0 35.6 dttusted for net of changes indicated by Item C.,Tables X-1, X-2, and x-3; reversal of effect of regular annual reallocation, Apri and reversal of effect of Minneapolis "Paragraph 5" adjustment on November 22, 1961 ($56 rillion). 2/ E.'2 multiplied by System D. Z/ Ajusted (see footnote 1) with added reversal of effect of Boston "Paragraph 5" adjustment on December 29, 1961 (w178 million). iadjustnent, not reflected in this table, would have been necessary to raise Boston's estimated reserve ratio of 28.7 per cent to the System average as of December 28, 1961. However, the Minneapolis adjustment as of Norember 21, 1961 not have peen necessary under the propo'ed formula. vould (37.2251) 160,4861 1,888 1 3 as of April 1, 1961; BOARDOF GOVERNORS OF THEFEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM DIVISION OF BANK OPERATIONS February 16, 1962