View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was reconvened
in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
in Washington on April 4, 1937, at ll:15 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Harrison, Vice Chairman
Broderick
Szymczak

Mr. McKee
Mr. Ransom

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Davis
Sinclair
McKinney
Martin
Peyton (alternate for Mr. Day)

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Goldenweiser, Economist
Mr. Williams, Associate Economist
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Dreibelbis, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Burgess, Manager of the System Open
Market Account
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary of the

Board of Governors
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman of the Board of Governors
Chairman Eccles stated that an informal meeting of the members
of the executive committee of the Federal Open Market Committee was
held with the Secretary of the Treasury and members of his staff at
Mr. Morgenthau's home last night, where the problem under considera
tion was fully discussed, after which Secretary Morgenthau stated he
would be willing to hold in abeyance any action by the Treasury De
partment,

if

it

could be understood that the Federal Reserve System

would take action through open market operations looking toward ef
fetively preventing the recurrence of a disorderly market and that,

4/4/37
if

,2.

System action were not satisfactory, the Treasury Department would

then take such action as it

saw fit.

It

was made clear, Chairman Eccles

said, that the Secretary did not think that the market could or should
be "pegged" but that he felt

that the precipitous decline in the market,

which in his opinion was brought about by the increase in reserve re
quirements of member banks,

should be corrected by action which would

restore the market to an orderly condition.
Chairman Eccles expressed the feeling that the System should
increase excess reserves of member banks by as much as $250,000,000 if
necessary over the period of adjustment to the May first
reserve requirements and said that if

increase in

the Committee was not willing to

adopt that policy he would favor a cancellation of the May first
crease in

in

reserve requirements.

Mr. Harrison said that in the light of Chairman Eccles' posi
tion it

was important that before any action was taken by the Federal

Open Market Committee it

be advised what the Board proposed to do with

respect to the cancellation of the May first
quirements.

A canvass of the members of the Board indicated that there

were not four members in
May first

increase in reserve re

favor at that time of voting to rescind the

increase.
In connection with a consideration of the relative merits of

open market operations by the Federal Reserve System and a program
of desterilization of gold by the Treasury, Chairman Eccles expressed
the opinion that the problem was one of easing over the temporary
period of adjustment to the increased reserve requirements for member

-3-.

4/4/37
banks,

that it

should be met as a problem of credit management and

that the Federal Reserve System should take such action as would
preserve for the System its

leadership in this field.

The suggestion was made that each member of the Committee
should express himself on the question whether some action should be
taken and, if

in

his opinion action was necessary, whether it

be by way of cancellation of the May first
quirements,

should

increase in reserve re

open market operations, or desterilization of gold.

Mr. Martin said he had come to the conclusion that some action
should be taken, that it

should be by way of authorization to the exec

utive committee to engage in

open market operations according to its

judgment from day to day in the light of market developments, in order
to prevent disorderly conditions, and that the May first

increase in

reserve requirements should not be canceled.
Mr. Harrison said he saw no reason for any action at this time
other than to continue the policy of making shifts in maturities and
that he did not feel there was anything in

the situation at the pres

ent time which would justify the Federal Reserve System in taking
action to increase excess reserves.

He referred to the inflationary

tendencies which were developing in

certain fields and expressed the

opinion that any action taken to stabilize the bond market which would

increase excess reserves would be interpreted as encouraging the in
flationary movement.

He also felt that the Government securities

be
markets had not yet reached the point where the System would

4/4/37

-4

justified in taking the risks which would attend an increase in
excess reserves and that he would not be willing today to approve

an increase in the System's portfolio during the coming week re
gardless of the condition of the market, but that he would be agree
able to granting the executive committee authority to act in the
light of market conditions as they develop, to prevent a disorderly
market, without the requirement of the existence of an "emergency"
but with definite limitations under which the executive committee
would operate.

He also said that it appeared that the committee

was faced with a situation in which the Treasury had taken the posi
tion that, if

effective action were not taken by the Federal Reserve

System by way of increasing its

portfolio, the Treasury would take

separate action, that Secretary Morgenthau had made it

clear at the

conference last evening that, while he was requesting that action be
taken by the System,

if

a public statement were issued and the mar

ket did not continue to decline during the coming week it

would not

be expected that the System would take action to increase the System

account beyond a very nominal amount.
clear, Mr.

The Secretary had also made it

Harrison said, that if he were not satisfied with the re

sults of any action taken by the System action would be taken by the
Treasury, and,
it

in this situation, he (Mr.

Harrison) questioned whether

would not be preferable for the Treasury to take independent action

rather than to have the System take action solely for the purpose of
avoiding Treasury action.

4/4/37

-5
Mr.

Sinclair was opposed to any increase in the System account

which would not have a relation to preventing disorderly conditions in
the market, but said he would favor placing authority, within limita
tions but without using the word "emergency",

in

the executive commit

tee to take such action as might be desirable in an endeavor to keep
the market from becoming disorderly.

He felt that a substantial in

crease in the portfolio without regard to the condition of the market
would further unsettle the market and might result in additional sel
ling.

He concluded with the statement that he would not favor a can

cellation of the May first
in view of all

increase in reserve requirements and that,

the circumstances,

he felt

it

would be more desirable

to grant authority to the executive committee, with certain limita
tions,

than for the Treasury to take independent action through de

sterilization of gold.
Mr. Harrison said he would definitely prefer action through
open market operations to a cancellation of reserve requirements if
they were the only two alternatives and that while he did not favor
directing the executive committee to increase the portfolio regard
less of the condition of the market he would favor granting discre
tionary authority to the executive committee to take such action
within limitations which would be defined with the general purpose
of avoiding a disorderly market.

He felt that if

authority were

given to the executive committee to increase the portfolio the res
olution approved at the last meeting of the Federal Open Market

4/4/37

-6

Committee with respect to shifts of securities in the System account
should be changed to increase to $1,000,000,000 the amount of secur
ities with maturities within two years that must be maintained in the
account.
The meeting recessed at 1:30 p.m. and reconvened at 2:25 p.m.
with the same attendance as at the morning session.
Mr. McKinney said that he concurred in
cellation of the May first

the feeling that a can

increase in reserve requirements would be

a mistake, that he felt the System should cooperate in meeting the
existing problem, and that he would favor granting such authority to
the executive committee as would enable it,
judgment,

in the exercise of its

to demonstrate that the System intends to take definite

action toward preventing a disorderly market.
In engaging in open market operations, Mr. McKinney said,
the System would inject into the market only such amounts of funds
as the executive committee,

in the exercise of its

discretion, might

find necessary to attain the desired objective, whereas, the cancel
lation of the May 1st increase in reserve requirements would be an
arbitrary action and would not bear any direct relationship to the
amount of funds required.

Moreover, he said, by undertaking open

market operations (including both purchases and sales of securities)
an excellent opportunity would be presented to overcome the rigidity
of the System's portfolio which had existed since November,

1933,

and concerning which there had been much discussion during the last
two or three years.

4/4/37

-7
Mr. Peyton said he would favor giving the executive committee

authority to act, within limitations to be determined,

to prevent a

disorderly market and with due regard to encouraging investors to come
into the market so that the Government security holdings of member
banks may be placed in the hands of private investors.

He expressed

disapproval of the issuance of any public statement at this time be
cause of his feeling that it
which was desired.

would have an effect opposite to that

He added that, if

the results of open market oper

ations carried out under the authority granted to the executive com
mittee were not satisfactory to the Treasury, he would not object to
the Treasury desterilizing gold provided the System and the Treasury
were in

agreement and that agreement were made known to the public.

He did not feel that a cancellation of the May first
serve requirements would be effective in

increase in re

the present situation.

Mr. Ransom said that he would prefer that action be taken by
the Treasury, in
that, if

cooperation with the Board, to desterilize gold,

the Treasury would not take this course, his second choice

would be open market operations within certain limitations, and that
he would not favor cancellation of the May first

increase in

reserve

requirements.
Mr. Davis said that he favored action and that his first
would be to cancel the May 1 increase in

choice

reserve requirements; second,

to engage in open market purchases; and only as a last resort, Treasury

4/4/37

-8

action to desterilize gold.

He pointed out that the total increase

in excess reserves resulting from the combined proposed action of
the Treasury in desterilizing gold and the Reserve System through
open market purchases, if

carried out fully, would amount to

$650,000,000, or almost as much as the May 1 increase in reserve re
quirements, and expressed the opinion that cancellation of the final
increase was the most direct method of reaching the end sought.
Mr. Broderick said that he would not favor action at this
time, that he would be opposed to cancellation of the May first
crease in reserve requirements,

in

but that he would vote reluctantly

for a resolution authorizing the executive committee to increase the
System portfolio under specific limitations as to its

authority and

with the understanding that the committee would be expected to dis
continue such operations should it
an effect contrary to that desired.

appear that the action was having
He felt that in the long run a

natural adjustment in the market would be best for the country.
Mr. Szymczak said that he would prefer to take no action at
this time and to await further developments but that, if

the increase

in reserve requirements were thought by a majority of those present
to be the cause of the present condition, he would favor rescinding
the May first

increase in reserve requirements.

He said that he would

be willing as a second choice to authorize the executive committee to
act to such extent as market conditions require.

4/4/37

.9
Mr.

McKee stated that he felt that some action was necessary

in order to correct the attitude of mind now existing towards the
Government bond market; that, while the cancellation of the May first
increase in reserve requirements would be his first

choice of action,

such a course seemed impossible of accomplishment in view of the prob
able lack of a majority of the members of the Board of Governors fav
oring such action; and that, therefore, he would next favor action in
the form of open market operations.

He further stated that, regard.

less of which action was taken, either by the Federal Open Market
Committee or the Board of Governors, he favored an immediate announce
ment to the press of the action decided upon in order that the entire
country might be advised simultaneously.
At this point a question was raised as to whether the action
of the Board in increasing reserve requirements was the major cause
of the unsettled condition in the market and all of the members,

with

the exception of Messrs. McKee and Davis, stated that they did not
think it

was the major cause and that the recession in

the Government

securities market probably would have taken place regardless of the
increase in

reserve requirements.

Mr. McKee felt it

was the major

cause and Mr. Davis felt that if not the major cause, it was the im
mediate cause.
Chairman Eccles stated that if

ilize gold it

the Treasury did not dester

would be under the necessity of borrowing approximately

$300,000,000 of additional funds between now and June, that, as the

4/4/37

-10

recent increase in

Treasury bill

rates was brought about largely by

the tightened credit situation resulting to some extent from the
action of the Board in increasing reserve requirements, he felt the
System should take action to prevent a further increase in the bill
rate and that, in order to accomplish this result and in view of the
fact that, contrary to the usual situation, the System account, be

cause of shifts from bills to bonds during the recent period, held
practically no bills which will mature on Monday,

April 5, he would

increase the System portfolio on Monday by the purchase of $5,000,000

or $10,000,000 of existing bills.
Mr. Harrison read a draft of a resolution prepared

by

him

which would authorize the executive committee to buy or sell up to
$250,000,000 of Government securities if

in

its

judgment conditions

in the money market over the period of adjustment in the reserve
position of member banks make such purchases desirable as a means
of using the System's influence toward avoiding drastic or sudden
movements of money rates either short or long term.
There followed a discussion of the question whether the
authority to be granted to the executive committee should be regarded
as a mandate to buy Government securities regardless of conditions in
the Government securities market or as a discretionary authority to
be exercised by the executive committee in the light of conditions as

they develop.

4/4/37

-11
Chairman Eccles submitted a draft of a resolution with the

statement that if

it

were approved and even if

the market were steady

tomorrow the executive committee, acting under the authority of the
resolution, would be required to buy some bills and that the present
policy of shifts would be coordinated with such purchases under an
authority to be granted to the executive committee to make shifts to
an extent which would not reduce below $1,000,000,000 the securities
in the account with maturities within two years.
The resolution submitted

by Chairman Eccles was considered

and changed to cover sales as well as purchases of securities with
a view to preserving an orderly market.

As amended,

the resolution

read as follows:
"The Federal Open Market Committee directs the ex
ecutive committee to make such purchases or sales of
United States Government securities, beginning April 5,
1957, as may be necessary with a view to preserving an
orderly market, but to make purchases of not less than

$25,000,000 during the week beginning April 5, 1937, pro
vided that the present aggregate amount of securities in
the System open market account shall not be increased or
decreased by more than $250,000,000 prior to the next
The char
meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee.
acter and maturities of the securities acquired or sold
shall be determined by the executive committee in the
light of current market developments."
Mr. Broderick moved that the resolution be
Mr. Brod
adopted in the form set forth above.
erick's motion was seconded by Mr. Peyton.
Mr. Harrison moved to amend the resolution
by striking out the requirement that a minimum
amount of securities be purchased during the
week beginning April 5, 1937, In this connec
tion he pointed out that he had proposed a res
olution granting discretionary authority to the

4/4/37

-12executive committee but without a clause pre
scribing a mandate to buy. Mr. Sinclair sec
onded Mr. Harrison's motion.
Mr. Harrison's motion was put by the chair
and lost, the members voting as follows:
"Aye" - Messrs. Harrison, Sinclair and Szymczak;
"No" - Messrs. Eccles, Broderick, McKee, Ransom,
Davis, McKinney, Martin and Peyton.
Mr. Broderick's motion was then put by the
chair and carried unanimously.
After some discussion Messrs. Ransom, Goldenweiser,

Wyatt and

Thurston were requested to prepare a draft of a press statement for
consideration by the Committee.

The individuals named withdrew from

the meeting and upon their return submitted a draft of statement
which was discussed and amended to read as follows:
"With a view (1) to exerting its influence toward ord
erly conditions in the money market and (2) to facilitating
the orderly adjustment of member banks to the increased re
serve requirements effective May 1, 1957, the Open Market
Committee of the Federal Reserve System is prepared to make
open market purchases of United States Government securities
for the account of the Federal reserve banks in such amounts
and at such times as may be desirable.
This purpose is in
conformity with the policy announced by the Board of Govern
ors of the Federal Reserve System in its statement on January
30, 1937, which declared, with reference to the increase in
reserve requirements, that by this action the System would

be placed in a position where such reduction or expansion of
member bank reserves as may be deemed in the public interest
may be effected through open market operations.,
Mr. Ransom moved that the statement as amended
be approved for immediate release.
Mr. Harrison raised a question whether any statement should be
issued at this time and all of the members,
Messrs.
be made.

Harrison and Peyton,

with the exception of

agreed that a public statement should

Mr. Peyton said he would have no objection to an explanation

4/4/37

-13

being given at the time of the publication of the weekly statement

of condition of Federal reserve banks of any change in the System
portfolio but that he felt a statement at this time would be misin
terpreted.
Mr. McKee moved as a substitute for Mr. Ransom's
motion that the following statement be released to
the press:
"The Federal Open Market Committee voted today to increase
its portfolio to assist in an orderly Government bond market."
The substitute motion was seconded by Mr. Davis.
The substitute motion was put by the chair and
lost, the members voting as follows: "Aye" - Messrs.
McKee and Davis; "No" - Messrs. Eccles, Harrison,
Broderick, Szymczak, Ransom, Sinclair, McKinney,

Martin and Peyton.
Mr. Ransom's motion was then put by the chair and
carried, Mr. McKee voting "no".

Upon motion duly made and seconded, and by unani
mous vote, the readjustment of the participations of
the Federal reserve banks in the System open market
account as of April 1, 1957, in accordance with the
plan and procedure previously followed, was approved,
ratified and confirmed.
Mr. Burgess stated that in

connection with the adjustment some

of the Federal reserve banks had called attention to the fact that the
readjusted participations showed some depreciation and that while it
was small at the present time they wished to serve notice that if

the

depreciation in the account increases they would wish to have a recon
sideration of the entire matter of readjustment of participations be
fore the next quarterly readjustment date.
During yesterday's session, Mr. Burgess, as manager of the
System open market account, had handed to the members of the Federal

4/4/37

-14

Open Market Committee a report prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York of open market operations since the meeting of the Com
mittee on January 26, 1937, which operations had been reported in
detail in

the usual weekly reports.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, and by unani
mous vote, the transactions referred to in the report
were ratified unanimously.

It

was suggested that, as the Committee had granted authority

to the executive committee to make such purchases or sales in the Sys
tem open market account as may be necessary with a view to preserving
an orderly market, and that, while authority should be given to replace
maturing securities and to make such shifts in

the account as may be

necessary in the proper administration of the account, it would be ad
visable not to authorize the reduction of the amount of securities
held in the account with maturities within two years to less than
$1,000,000,000. It was pointed out that the amount of securities in
the account at the present time with maturities within two years was
in excess of $1,100,000,000.

Upon motion duly made and seconded, and by unani
mous vote, the Committee instructed the executive com
mittee to direct the replacement of maturing securities
in the System open market account with other Government
securities and to make such shifts between maturities

in the account as may be necessary in the proper admin
istration of the account, provided that the amount of
securities maturing within two years be maintained at
not less than $1,000,000,000 and that the amount of
bonds having maturities in excess of five years be not

over $850,000,000 nor less than $500,000,000.
It was also agreed unanimously that, inasmuch as
authority had been granted to the executive committee
to increase or decrease the account, a renewal of the
authority granted at previous meetings of the Commit
tee to permit fluctuations in the account was not now
necessary.

4/4/37

-15
Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Appoved:
Chairman..