View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

THE ECONOMIC STAGE
and the

BANKER’S ROLE

ADDRESS BY

Charles E. Mitchell
President
THE NATIONAL CITY BANK
OF NEW YORK
THE NATIONAL CITY COMPANY

Chairman of the Board
INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION

Before the
AMERICAN BANKERS’ ASSOCIATION CONVENTION


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

ATLANTIC CITY

Tuesday3 September 25, 1923


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The Economic Stage
and the Banker’s Role
HE American Bankers’ Association convenes
this year with business conditions of the moment
the most favorable the country has known since our
entry into the great war, and I do not except the
periods during or those immediately following the
war. Everyone of business judgment recognizes and
in fact knew at the time, that the conditions of those
years were abnormal, that we were not on a sound
and permanent basis, and that sooner or later a settle­
ment day was coming. The crisis of 1920 and 1921
was severe—in fact, perhaps, the most severe in the
history of the business world, because practically all
the world had shared in the conditions that led up to
it and was involved in the collapse. In our own coun­
try the fall of prices was without a precedent, because
the state of inflation had been more general and the
disorganization of world trade and industry greater
than ever before known. As the war temporarily
increased the dependence of Europe upon this
country, so the expansion of our production to meet
the temporary needs of Europe made us more
dependent upon European markets than we had been
before, and the ordeal of readjustment was inevitable.
The manner in which the United States passed
through this ordeal, put its losses behind it, and
regained prosperity is something over which we may
feel profound satisfaction. Our productive powers

T


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

3

are intact; they are functioning efficiently; and our
banking and financial system is equal to any demands
that may be laid upon it.
If we look for the explanation of this wonderful
demonstration of the inherent strength and recupera­
tive powers of the United States, we will find at least
ninety per cent, within our own borders. The growth
of our population, the natural, irresistible impulse of
our people to business and to progress, and the
diversity of our resources which makes us so nearly
self-supporting, account for the revival of industry
and trade. We are wont to pass over too lightly the
tendency in this country towards growth and
improvement. Who would have thought when the
war ended, for instance, but that the enlargement of
our iron and steel industries, built up to supply war
demands, would have been far more than sufficient
to meet the requirements of our country for a decade
to come? Yet, iron and steel production this year
has been practically at capacity. Generally speaking,
our leading lines of manufacture have been surpass­
ing the records of war time production. The fact is
that our industries are so diversified that they sup­
port each other, forming a great circle of exchanges
within themselves, and if kept in balance, there is
almost no limit to their development.
Increasing Economic Independence.

In the past five years we have been gradually break­
ing away from economic dependence upon the outside
world. Before the war, we were largely dependent
upon Europe for a market for our agricultural prod­
ucts, but our margin of surplus in these products is
now comparatively small. We no longer depend upon


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

4

Europe for capital, but are able to supply capital to
them and other countries, and in so doing, markets
are opened for our manufactures. We have
bemoaned the fact that farm prices were low as
against higher commodity prices. The economic law
is gradually taking care of this discrepancy. Our
industrial growth means the growth of an industrial
population and an increasing consumption of farm
products at home. The demand for labor in the mills,
mines, and factories draws upon the farms so long as
farm prices are lower than in the industrial field, cuts
down farm production, and at the same time increases
the demand for products from the farm, and gradu­
ally, but assuredly, the restoration of the balance
between agriculture and industry asserts itself.
The time has come to take account of the ability of
this country to establish an equilibrium, with the
center of gravity within itself.
Adjustments Come Quickly.

We continue to have a reasonable amount of export
trade. • The opportunities for trade outside of the
disturbed areas of Europe are so great that our
dependence upon the latter is comparatively slight,
and yet business with those disturbed areas continues
in moderate volume. We take from them little that
is essential to us, but what they take from us is vital
to them. The disturbance of European trade results
in developments elsewhere in the world. If Germany,
for example, imports less of raw materials, it follows
that she will export less of finished goods and that
other countries, the United States among them, will
manufacture and export more. The cutting out of
any country, in whole or in part, from the circle of


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

5

world trade, occasions a shock and a temporary break
in the circulation of products—just as the loss of a
limb from the human body causes a shock to the
entire system—but just as blood circulation will
again establish itself, so world trade will be resumed
through new connections and eventually be as vigor­
ous as before. Thus, for instance, we see that while
in 1913 the share of the United States in all the
imports of Latin-America was 25 per cent—in 1921,
the latest year for which figures are available, it was
45 per cent, and in the seven months of this year
ending with July, our exports to Latin-American
countries increased over what they were in the corre­
sponding months of 1922 by a gain of 21 per cent.
In those seven months our total exports to countries
outside of Europe aggregated $1,172,000,000; and,
mark you, there was little difficulty in paying for
those products, for their exports to us in the same
months aggregated $1,680,000,000; that is, they sold
to us $500,000,000 worth of products in excess of
what we sold to them. Moreover, those importations
were only in small part manufactures; they were raw
material or food products, either non-competitive
with our products or required in addition thereto.
It has long been our custom to settle adverse
balances in South America, Asia, and elsewhere by
means of our credit balances in Europe, the latter
making payment for the most part in manufactures.
With the decline of European trade, we have been
doing more business with the rest of the world direct.
We are enjoying in this country today a real state
of prosperity, and we should be cognizant of it and
instill so far as we are able a spirit of confidence
throughout Business America that will extend the


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

6

life of the prosperous period. I am not arguing that
permanent prosperity is assured to us. That can no
more be true of any people than of any individual.
I would urge, however, a recognition that we have
emerged from the earthquake of war and the tidal
wave of depression that inevitably followed. So far
as American business as a whole is concerned, the
war is over and is paid for. The great body of
indebtedness owing on that account from foreign
countries represents commodities sold years ago, and
while I am not advocating the wiping out of that
indebtedness, I say that if we never got a penny of
it, we would be no worse off than now. All that is
behind us. Let us appreciate and enjoy and prolong
as we can the prosperity of the present.
Efficiency Will Overcome Competition.

But while we do enjoy the present, let us not be
unmindful of the difficulties American business must
meet in the next few years when conditions the world
over, and especially in Europe, become stabilized and
their business and trade become active. Our prob­
lems of the future will arise, not from a diminishing
trade by other countries, but from their recovery and
reappearance as competitors, and we need to prepare
ourselves for the inevitable competition of other coun­
tries, and especially European countries, in all
markets of the world, including our own. Foreign
competition is not altogether without its benefits, for
it acts to stabilize the price level, to restrain the ten­
dency to inflation, and to keep industry in touch with
production costs abroad, but, to say the least, it is
trying. I am not afraid of the ability of this country
to compete in the long run and to secure an ample


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

7

share of world trade, provided that we now recognize
that that competition is coming, that it is going to
be vigorous, and that to meet it we must loosen every
restraint to American industrial development to the
end that in this country there may be an efficiency
which will overcome a higher standard of living and
still make us able to do business on the world’s price
level.
We want enterprise relieved of the fearful penalties
to which it is now subjected.
We want a revision of the present income surtaxes
that dam the natural flow of wealth in the channels
of wealth producing enterprise and divert it into tax
exempt investments that mean state and municipal
non-productive development and waste.
We want economy in Government expenditures
that will bring relief from taxation as fast as it can
be given.
•
We want the oppressive hand of the Government
taken off of business, and freedom given to individual
enterprise.
We want the Government out of the shipping busi­
ness where, at enormous cost it has been proven, at
least, that such oppressive measures as the Seamen’s
Act prevent any profitable operation of an American
merchant marine—and we want the Government out
of every other business because every experiment in
Government management demonstrates its disqualifi­
cations in that field. •
We want to see a chance given to our railroads,
which constitute the very arteries through which
commerce must flow. We want recognition given to
the fact that these railroads, although laboring under
great difficulties, have been handling the largest vol-


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

8

ume of traffic in the history of the country in a most
efficient manner. You and I know that the railroads
cannot go on indefinitely financing for the purchase
of equipment and the improvement of their service
through borrowing 98% cents of their requirements
and obtaining 1% cents from stockholders, which is
the record of the past four and one-half years. You
and I know that railroad credit must be so restored
that a portion of new capital requirements may
always be met by the sale of stock, and to do this
railroads must be allowed to earn profits that will
give their stocks a standing high enough to attract
new money in a competitive market. I view it as
one of the most important conditions for the future
that the guarantees contained in the Esch-Cummins
Railroad Act shall be maintained.
We want, above all, an ever increasing economic
understanding of the difficulties we must overcome.
■

Our Gold Stock.

There are certain conditions often regarded as
favorable which will actually work to our disad­
vantage under the stress of competition. One of
them is our excessive accumulation of gold which is
. growing from month to month. Every banker is
familiar with the fact that any increase of gold re­
serves tends to increase the expansion of credit, that
a general expansion of credit produces higher prices,
and that higher prices will weaken our position in
world competition. The economists and financiers of
Europe, as you well know, are confidently waiting
for this influence to turn the balance of trade against
the United States, start a flow of gold from our cof­
fers to Europe, and produce the hoped-for industrial


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

9

revival over there. We have a very real problem on
our hands, gentlemen, in determining how to accom­
plish a redistribution of this gold without going
through the usual round of credit inflation, rise of
adverse trade balances, falling prices, and credit dis­
turbance. The symptoms of last spring were alarm­
ing, but the good sense of the business community
averted the danger for the time being. That danger
will, however, continue to over-hang as long as gold
continues to flow into our already abundant reserves.
We are in a position where, with such national debt
payments as are being made to us, favorable trade
balances have a real element of peril in them, and yet,
at the same time, we are not wanting unfavorable
balances that would signify industrial depression.
We are in a dilemma, the chief difficulty of which is
in maintaining price equilibrium and at the same time
maintaining trade equilibrium.
The discussions have been so widespread that I am
sure that there is no business man who does not
understand that the indebtedness of foreign govern­
ments to the Government of the United States, to the
extent that payments are made thereon, is a factor
having a bearing upon the trade situation. Every
payment involves the creation of credits in this coun­
try which can be accomplished only by shipping gold
or goods to us. The appearance of a government in
the exchange markets as a buyer of exchange on the
United States means competition for means of pay­
ment here, and involves higher exchange rates and
consequent higher prices on Ameircan products to
foreign customers. These conditions arising out of
unbalanced international relationships caused by the
war, serious as they are, constitute no reason why we


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

10

should not go on with regular business and with full
confidence, but they do call for the watchful attention
of bankers and business men. They emphasize the
importance of the development of a super-efficient
commercial condition throughout the country that
we may overcome the obstacles which American trade
must inevitably meet. They emphasize the need of a
greater degree of harmony in industry and a greater
understanding of the advantages to both the em­
ployer and wage-earner of that production efficiency
which is at once the guarantee of low costs, of com­
mand over markets, and of wages of high purchasing
power.
'
■

'

Banking Efficiency.

.

If weight be given to your words and mine as those
of bankers in urging this doctrine upon business men
and legislators, it is essential that we recognize that
“those who live in glass houses should not throw
stones,” by which I mean that while calling for a
higher efficiency elsewhere, we should see to it that
a higher efficiency exists in the banking structure of
the United States. It is our responsibility to place
the business of banking in this country upon a plane
paralleled by that in no other, and this can be accom­
plished only as you and I as executives in our indi­
vidual institutions administer with understanding,
with conservatism, and. with courage.
.
It is a great opportunity that we have each year in
these conventions, of exchanging views, of letting
each other know something of the problems that we
are individually meeting, and how we are answering
them, and if I may be permitted to do so, I would
like to take this opportunity of telling you some of


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

n

the things we have been thinking about lately in our
institution.
One of these is the question of reserves against
contingencies. The business of commercial banking
is, by its very character, a business of risk. There
is scarcely an operation that we perform in which
risk is not inherent and continuing, and so long as
this is so, it cannot be conservative to carry the oper­
ating profits of a month to the Surplus and Undivided
Profits accounts until some measure be taken of the
risk of that month’s business and a reserve directly
applied for it. It has been an interesting study to
us to measure that risk and to feel our way toward
obtaining a standard yardstick for it. Unlike the
insurance companies, we have no actuarial table to
turn to. The losses sustained by the banking institu­
tions of the country over a given period, even if this
information were available, would serve as no more
than an index because of the differential arising out
of dissimilar policies and management. But it has
seemed to us that under sound administration, *a
bank that is taking reasonable risks in its endeavor
to assist commercial development, will find that the
risk increases with the degree of inflation existing,
and decreases with the degree of deflation existing.
How, then, can one determine the measure of nor­
mality, and what yardstick can be applied to deter­
mine inflation or deflation? Now, in our institution,,
we have made an assumption which is subject to
change, for experience may show it to be very wrong,
that conditions are normal when the member banks
of the country are borrowing from or discounting at
the Federal Reserve Banks in the amount of $500,­
000,000, and that discounting above or below that


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

12

figure reflects a condition of inflation or deflation.
On the theory, then, that the risk of banking varies
as these borrowings increase or decrease, we are
establishing a reserve for losses or contingencies, set
aside monthly against current earnings, and based
upon the bank’s average commercial loans and dis­
counts, increasing our percentage so applied for each
unit of $100,000,000 increase or decrease above or
below the normal figure of member bank borrowings.
Now if it be a sound principle that the business of
commercial banking involves a risk that will inevit­
ably be met, I wonder if it is not an opportune ques­
tion for the division of the American Bankers’ Asso­
ciation having to do with taxation to raise with the
Federal authorities as to whether commercial banks
should be called upon to pay full taxes upon current
operating profits, or whether it is not in the iriterest
of conservatism that banks be allowed to set up cur­
rent reserves against current operations, paying their
taxes upon the net figure. It seems to me the Govern­
ment has it in its hands to thus foster a conservative
movement in bank operation.
Bank Buildings.

And, again, in this regard, let me speak of the item
of bank buildings and fixtures, which item, as shown
by the reports of the Comptroller of the Currency
for the year 1922, for all national and state instituttions, runs to the enormous figure of $1,079,000,000,
an item equivalent to nearly one-sixth of the com­
bined items of capital, surplus, and undivided profits.
The bank buildings of the United States represent
probably the highest development in American archi­
tecture. They are costly structures. But it is sound


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

13

that the banks of this country should be housed in
buildings that psychologically stimulate the feeling
of strength and stability in the minds of the people
and lure thereby into channels of usefulness currency
that might otherwise go into hiding. The outlay is
justified. And yet, is it not slightly inconsistent that
banking institutions whose liabilities are quicker than
those of any other division of commerce should carry
with slow depreciation an item of this character, of
such unusual size, and which is recognizedly the
slowest of all assets? I am wondering whether we
should not all be depreciating our bank buildings
more rapidly and whether our Government should
not perhaps be fostering such a conservative develop­
ment by permitting, or, perhaps even forcing us,
through tax regulations, to a more rapid depreciation
plan than we are now following.
Another problem to which I personally feel there
may be directed profitable discussion is that of the
degree of liquidity properly to be maintained by our
banking institutions, and how to measure it. Cash,
discountable paper, Government obligations, and in
large measure, deposits with the Federal Reserve
Bank, are unquestionably liquid assets. Brokers’ de­
mand loans are quick, and a percentage, at least, of
the market value of the Bond Account is quick, and,
of course, a part, differing in every institution, of the
loans and discounts that are not eligible for re-dis­
count, are quick. But to what degree of liquidity
should we be working? I feel that each executive
should carefully analyze the situation of his own
institution in this regard, and that we should be help­
ful to one another in determining the ratios in respect
to this important subject that spell sound banking.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

14

Remuneration.

The subject of bank officers’ remuneration is one
that has been of marked interest to me. If the banking
profession is to prove inviting to the best commercial
minds of the country, it must obviously compete in
remuneration with the rewards that come to leaders
in other commercial enterprises. The opportunities of
gaining an insight into commercial developments and
of knowing something of the profitable nature there­
of, which are inherent in the bank executive’s posi­
tion, and the possibilities of becoming privately inter­
ested financially in profitable enterprises through
acquaintance, have presented an allurement to men
to enter the banking profession. But these very
opportunities, when exercised, have resulted in not a
few cases in a lowering of the standard of the profes­
sion, for personal interest is bound to cloud the judg­
ment of the bank executive. His interests should be
first and foremost those of his bank. His thought and
his every endeavor should be in the creation of the
height of economical administration and service to
his customers, regardless of personal interest. His
compensation should be through, rather than by vir­
tue of, his position. And so thinking, we have in our
institution established a plan by which, out of the
balance of current earnings, after establishing re­
serves covering the risk in current business, and after
allowing for liberal interest on the capital in use, as
represented in the items of capital, surplus and un­
divided profits, a percentage is each month set up in a
management fund for periodical distribution to those
officers who have contributed most effectively to the
bank’s development and profitable progress, and for
recognition of significant achievement. Our plan is


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

15

in its experimental stage, but I am confident that
while resulting in a direct benefit to the bank execu­
tives, it will react in the higher efficiency of the
institution and in larger returns to the shareholders.
I speak of these problems as samples of those that
we have pondered over in our institution and a free
discussion of which in such a convention as this, may
send us back home thinking more deeply on how to
increase the efficiency of banking in this country to
the point where our word on efficiency among our
clients may be more deeply respected, more rigidly
followed. The bankers of every country are regarded
as advisors. In one way or another, they meet and
wrestle with the problems of varied industries. They
see the economic picture in more completeness than
can the man in a single trade. They have a compre­
hensive view of the movement of goods. It is their
business to measure wealth. They will ever be
appealed to for advice. Let us, as bank executives,
deserve the confidence that the public will inevitably
place in us, and let us be so diligent in our study of
the times that our advice may be sane and sound.
And let us, as we return to our homes, impress upon
the many within our influence that we have emerged
from the eddies of the war into the calm harbor of
the moment through which we can safely sail with­
out fear of storm, but let us warn that we are headed
for the open sea where, if our ship would safely sail,
we must be prepared for the powerful rollers of world
competition, and that now, in this period of calm, is
the time for us to see that the ship is freed of bar­
nacles that retard its progress, that it is caulked and
made ready, and that the crew is trained for service.


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

16