View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY

REVIEW

BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS

WILLIAM W. HOXTON, CHAIRMAN AND FEDERAL RESERVE AGENT

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

JANUARY 31, 1927

S T A T IS T IC A L R EC O R D
Debits to Individual Accounts (23 C ities)__________________
Number of Commercial Failures, 5th District--------------------Liabilities Involved in Failures---------------------------------------Cotton Consumption, Fifth District Mills, B ales___________
Cotton Grown in Fifth District, B ales______________________
Tobacco Grown in Fifth District, Pounds___________________
Building Perm its for New W ork, 28 Cities__________________
Value of Perm its for New W ork, 28 Cities_________________
Contracts Actually Awarded, Fifth D istrict____ ______ _____
Costs of Contracts Awarded, Fifth D istrict__________________
Total Sales, 31 Department Stores_________________________
Total Sales, 84 Jobbers and W holesalers---------------------------Business in December in the Fifth Federal re­
serve district was good. Retail trade, as re­
flected by sales of thirty-one large department
and general stores, was approximately 2 per cent
above the volume of trade in December 1925, and
total debits to individual accounts figures for the
five weeks ended Jan u ary 12, 1927, exceeded by
6.3 per cent those for the preceding five weeks,
ended December 8, 1926. Business failures in
the Fifth district in December were slightly more
numerous than in December of the preceding
year, but the liabilities involved in last month’s
insolvencies w£re smaller. Labor is seasonally
employed at the wage levels of the past several
years, and increased bank deposits testify to the
continued large purchasing power of the bank­
ing public. Low er outstanding loans to custom­
ers of member banks and reduced rediscounts
at the Reserve bank show that sufficient credit
is available for legitimate needs of the district.
Building permits were fewer in number and less
in estimated valuation in December than for any
other recent December, but there is still a very
large volume of construction work under way.
Textile mills appear to be in a stronger position
at present than they were two or three months
ago, since the steady decline in cotton prices
appears to have been checked. Tobacco prices
continue high for Bright grades, which make up
the larger part of the district’s crop.
An examination of the statistical record of the
year 1926 shown at the top of this section indi­
cates that on the whole the year was a good one
in the Fifth reserve district. Debits to individual
accounts totals, a good indicator of the volume of
business done in the twrenty-three reporting
cities, exceeded the totals of 1925 by more than
half a billion dollars and were over two billion
dollars above the figures for 1924. Commercial



1926
$16,429,388,000
I4 4 1
$
28,741,221
2,768,596
2,335,000
620,352,000
20,984
$
168,521,274
11,649
$ 416,801,400
$
108,802,790
$
83,597,079

1925
$15,819,533,000
i j493
$
35,245,288
2>537>393
2,044,000
612,270,000
22,924
$ 175,616,198
I 3 >45 6
$ 411,046,400
$
105,674,102
$
83,744,992

failures-in the district were fewer in number and
lower in liabilities in 1926 than in 1925, although
bank failures increased considerably last year,
due in part to accumulated trouble dating back
to the years immediately following the World
War. Cotton consumption by Fifth district mills
increased nearly 15 per cent last year, and the
mills did a sufficiently large volume of hand to
mouth business to prevent the piling up of much
surplus stock. Building operations in the dis­
trict continued in very large volume during the
year, although both the number of permits issued
for new work and the estimated valuation fig­
ures were lower than in 1925. Retail sales in
1926 exceeded sales in 1925, and wholesale trade
was in fair volume. Agricultural yields were
excellent in the district as a whole, except in
certain sections that were disastrously effected
by extreme dry weather last summer. The to­
bacco crop of the district exceeded that of 1925,
and the 1926 prices for Bright tobacco averaged
much above those of the previous year. Cotton
production in the three cotton growing states
of the Fifth district was above that of 1925, but
the price was very low, and the cotton grow ers
and the sections chiefly dependent upon their
trade came to the end of 1926 in worse condition
than a year earlier. The coal mining industry in
W est Virginia enjoyed an exceptionally large
volume of business in 1926, due to the anthracite
strike during the opening months and to the
British coal strike the balance of the year. E x ­
cept for the unfavorable position of cotton grow ­
ers, conditions in the district were generally
satisfactory at the beginning of 1927. Inven­
tories are comparatively low and credit is avail­
able to meet any legitimate demands, and the at­
titude of the public toward the near future is
favorable.

CONDITION OF SIXTY-SEVEN REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
ITEM S
1. Total Loans and Discounts (including
all rediscounts) ....................................
2. Total Investments in Bonds and Securi­
ties ............................................................. 1
3. Reserve Balance with Federal Reserve
Bank .........................................................
4. Cash in V a u lts..............................................
5. Demand Deposits ........................................
6. Time Deposits ..............................................
7 Borrowed from Federal Reserve Bank.....

Jan. 12, 1927

Dec. 8, 1926

Jan. 13, 1926

$519,291,000

$516,252,000

$527,812,000

132.834.000
---»----->----

131.624.000
---j”— ?----

131.447.000

41.373.000
14.844.000
392.966.000
211.895.000
6^310,000

40,573,000
16,284,000
385,158,000
206,244,000
8,116,000

40.014.000
14.941.000
387.163.000
201.710.000
18.064.000

i
i

The accompanying table shows totals for the principal items of condition reported by sixtyseven member banks of the Fifth Federal reserve district on three dates, Jan u ary 12, 1927, Decem­
ber 8, 1926, and Jan u ary 13, 1926. These data, which ordinarily afford an opportunity for m aking a
close comparison of the latest available figures with those of a month and a year earlier, are not
quite so comparable this month, due to a combination of two reporting banks in one of the reporting
cities with a third bank not hitherto included in the list of banks submitting their weekly figures
to the reserve bank.
Between December 8, 1926, and Jan u ary 12, 1927, total loans and discounts for customers at the
sixty-seven reporting banks increased $3,039,000 and investments in bonds and securities rose $1,210 ,000. Deposits also increased during the month, demand deposits rising $7,808,000 and time deposits
$5,651,000. The increases in loans and investments, and to a considerable extent in deposits, were due
to the m erger previously referred to. Increased deposits at the middle of Jan u ary necessitated higher
reserve deposits, and these rose $800,000 during the month. The passing of the holiday shopping sea­
son lessened the demand for currency, and the reporting banks lowered their cash in vaults by $ 1,440.000, A further liquidation of indebtedness to the reserve bank occurred during the period under
review, rediscounts for the sixty-seven reporting banks declining $1,806,000.
A comparison of the Jan u ary 12, 1927, figures with those of Jan u ary 13, 1926, shows a smaller
use of bank credit this year. Total loans and discounts for customers were $8,521,000 lower on the
later date, and the sixty-seven banks were themselves borrowing $11,754,000 less from the reserve
bank. Cash in vaults was practically the same on both the 1927 and 1926 dates. On the other hand,
investments in bonds and securities rose $1,387,000 during the year, demand deposits gained $5,803.000, and time deposits increased $10,185,000.

RESERVE BANK OPERATIONS—Member banks in the Fifth District continued to reduce their
indebtedness at the reserve bank during the month between December 15, 1926, and Jan u ary 15, 1927^
The volume of rediscounts held by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond declined during the period
under review from $27,643,000 to $21,860,000, and total bill holdings dropped from $39,895,000 to $35,607.000, the smaller decline in bill holdings on Jan u ary 15th being due to an increase of about $1,500,000
in bills purchased in the open market. Member bank reserve deposits at the reserve bank rose from
$69,940,000 on December 15th to $70,278,000 on Ja n u a ry 15th, the rise being only a daily fluctuation.
With the passing of the holiday shopping season, there began the usual return flow of Federal re­
serve notes to the reserve bank for retirement, and the volume of notes in actual circulation de­
clined from $85,704,000 to $78,689,000 between the middle of December and the middle of Janu ary.
Two or three days before Christmas the notes in circulation totaled approxim ately $91,000,000. The
changes in the several items mentioned herein lowered the cash reserves of the Richmond bank
from $120,879,000 on December 15th to $110,956,000 on Jan u ary 15th, and reduced the ratio of re­
serves to note and deposit liabilities combined from 76.78 per cent to 72.81 per cent.
In spite of unfavorable conditions in the cotton section of the Fifth District, a comparison of
the Jan u ary 15th figures this year with those of a year ago shows that reserve bank credit is being
used by the member banks of the district less this year. Rediscounts for member banks held by the
Richmond reserve bank declined during the year from $39,983,000 to $21,860,000, a decrease of $18,123.000, or 45.3 per cent. B y an increase in open m arket purchases of bankers acceptances the reserve
bank counterbalanced to some extent the decline in rediscounts, and total bill holdings of the reserve
bank dropped from $44,855,000 to $35,607,000 between the two dates, a decrease of only $9,248,000,
or 20.6 per cent. Member bank reserve deposits rose from $66,711,000 on Jan u ary 15th last year to
$70,278,000 on Jan u ary 15th this year, partly as a result of increased deposits which raised the reserve
requirements. Federal reserve notes in actual circulation were considerably lower on Jan u ary 15,
1927, than a year earlier, $78,689,000 outstanding this year comparing with $84,835,000 in circulation
at the middle of Jan u ary last year. The cash reserves of the Federal R eserve Bank of Richmond rose
from $104,545,000 last year to $110,956,000 this year, and the ratio of cash reserves to note and deposit
liabilities combined increased during the same period from 67.51 per cent to 72.81 per cent.




2

DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS
CITIES
Asheville, N. C...........
Baltimore, Md.............
Charleston, S. C.........
Charleston, W. V a.....
Charlotte, N. C............
Columbia, S. C............
Cumberland, Md.........
Danville, V a..................
Durham, N. C.............
Greensboro, N. C.........
Greenville, S. C............
Hagerstown, Md..........
Huntington, W. Va....
Lynchburg, V a............
Newport News, V a.....
Norfolk, V a..................
Raleigh, N. C...............
Richmond, V a..............
Roanoke, V a.................
Spartanburg, S. C.......
Washington, D. C.......
Wilmington, N. C.......
Winston-Salem, N. C..
Totals..

TOTAL DEBITS DURING THE FIVE WEEKS ENDED

Jan. 12, 1927

Dec. 8, 1926

Jan. 13, 1926

A N N U A L TOTALS
1926

1925

43.074.000
545.471.000
28.634.000
53.361.000
60.282.000
23^080,000
10.525.000
16.966.000
37.069.000
31.699.000
25.221.000
12.981.000
33.348.000
28.251.000
17.738.000
100.566.000
33.364.000
179.001.000
37.121.000
18.285.000
293.619.000
23.902.000
47.172.000

36.632.000
474.332.000
32.060.000
46.032.000
59.226.000
22.748.000
10.588.000
20.624.000
44.124.000
30.754.000
27.351.000
13.146.000
32.713.000
24.051.000
13.520.000
102.750.000
26.970.000
165.779.000
36.433.000
16.774.000
291.772.000
24.229.000
47.289.000

35.406.000
519.545.000
31.480.000
50.212.000
63.157.000
21.329.000
10.364.000
13.234.000
33.423.000
34.856.000
33.876.000
13.105.000
31.803.000
28.989.000
11.176.000
93.984.000
33.965.000
184.091.000
34.908.000
20.281.000
284.690.000
28.273.000
46.744.000

437.969.000
5.204.952.000
336.190.000
452.414.000
611.726.000
229.122.000
108.973.000
129.414.000
357.096.000
316.179.000
271.799.000
129.678.000
314.473.000
251.451.000
141.915.000
950.512.000
312.931.000
1.690.293.000
353.449.000
173.046.000
2.929.590.000
254.931.000
471.285.000

5 326,853,000
5.072.348.000
313.821.000
439.110.000
590.421.000
236.744.000
109.680.000
122.351.000
306.722.000
269.475.000
284.914.000
128.018.000
324.770.000
244.347.000
105.948.000
864.612.000
405.905.000
1.709.420.000
317.402.000
191.792.000
2.781.220.000
251.833.000
421,827^000

$ 1,700,730,000

$ 1,599,897,000

$ 1,658,891,000

$16,429,388,000

$15,819,533,000

The accompanying table shows debits to individual, firm and corporation accounts in the clearing
house banks of twenty-three trade centers in the Fifth Reserve District, three equal periods of five
weeks being given to allow for comparison of the latest available figures with those of the preceding
like period and the corresponding period last year. In addition, total debits are shown by cities and
the district for the calendar years 1926 and 1925.
During the five weeks ended Jan u ary 12, 1927, the twenty-three cities reported debits aggregating
$1,700,730,000, an increase of $100,833,000, or 6.3 per cent over the total of $1,599,897,000 reported for
the preceding five weeks, ended December 8, 1926. This increase was unusual, the period containing
the dull days between Christmas and New Y e a r’s generally showing lower figures than the preceding
period, but very large annual payments around Jan u ary 1st more than balanced the smaller pay­
ments of the last week in December. Fourteen of the twenty-three cities reported higher figures
for the period ended Jan u ary 12th.
In comparison with debits aggregating $1,658,891,000 during the five weeks ended Jan u ary 13,
1926, the total of $1,700,730,000 reported during the corresponding period this year shows an increase
of $41,839,000, or 2.5 per cent, a very satisfactory comparison in view of a generally lower price level
at present than a year ago, especially for cotton and dark tobacco, and for textile mill products.
Thirteen of the twenty-three cities show higher figures for the period ended Jan u ary 12th this year
than for the one ended Jan u ary 13, 1925.
In spite of the large debits figures of 1925, those for 1926 exceeded them by more than half a
billion dollars. A ggregate debits in the twenty-three cities in 1926 amounted to $16,429,388,000,
compared with a total of $15,819,533,000 reached in 1925. The past year thus shows an increase of
$609,855,000, or 3.9 per cent, over the debits reported for 1925. Sixteen of the reporting cities at­
tained higher figures in 1926 than in 1925, Asheville making the best showing with an increase of
36.1 per cent. Newport News gained 33.9 per cent, ranking second in improvement for the year,
and four other cities gained more than 10 per cent, these being Greensboro with an increase of 17.3
per cent, Durham with 16.4 per cent, W inston-Salem with 11.7 per cent, and Roanoke with 11.4 per
cent.

SAVINGS DEPOSITS— Mutual savings bank deposits in Baltimore, continuing their monthly
habit of reaching new high levels, totaled $159,964,776 at the end of December 1926, in comparison
with $158,178,254 reported by the same banks at the end of November 1926 and $152,148,807 reported
on December 31, 1925. Fourteen institutions reported, of which twelve showed higher figures at
the end of 1926 than at the end of 1925. Of the two that failed to show deposit gains during the
year, one is in process of liquidation and the decrease in the other one was very small. Time de­
posits in sixty-seven regularly reporting member banks, located in thirteen of the Fifth District cities,
totaled $211,895,000 on Jan u ary 12, 1927, in comparison with $201,710,000 on Jan u ary 13th a year ago.
BUSINESS FAILURES—Dun's Review of Jan u ary 8, 1927, in reviewing business m ortality sta­
tistics for 1926, says that the distinguishing feature of the insolvency record for the year is the con­
siderable reduction in the liabilities of commercial failure in the United States. With 21,773 defaults,




3

or an increase of about 2 ^ per cent over the number for 1925, the indebtedness for last year de­
creased nearly 8 per cent, to $409,232,278. These compare with 2 1,2 14 failures and liabilities totaling
$443,744,272 in 1925, the liabilities being the smallest since 1920, but the number of insolvencies in
1926 exceeding all other years since 1922. The South Atlantic States, in which insolvencies de­
creased approxim ately 4 per cent and liabilities 8 per cent in 1926 in comparison with 1925, was the
only geographical division of the country in which failures declined in number. Few er insolvencies
occurred in Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and liabilities were lower in
W est Virginia, Virginia and the two Carolinas. Failures in the Fifth district in 1926 numbered 1,441,
with aggregate liabilities of $28,741,221, compared with 1,493 failures and $35,245,288 in liabilities in
1925. L ast yea r’s liabilities were the lowest since 1920, but the number of insolvencies exceeded
those of 1924 by one failure and were considerably above the 1,206 failures reported in 1923.
In December 1926, bankruptcies in the United States totaled 2,069, with liabilities amounting to
$45,619,578, compared with 1,878 bankruptcies and $36,528,160 in December 1925. In the Fifth reserve
district, December 1926 insolvencies numbered 125, with liabilities of $3,179,434, compared with 106
insolvencies and liabilities of $3,596,748 in December 1925.

LABOR—Labor is seasonally employed. There is some unemployment among both skilled and
unskilled workers, but idleness does not appear to be more extensive than is normal at this season
of the year, when unfavorable weather retards all kinds of out door construction work. In the build­
ing trades there is somewhat more unemployment than a year ago, the volume of new work under­
taken in the past few months having fallen below the total of new projects started in the fall of 1925,
but a considerable volume of work is still under way, and the unemployment situation is not serious.
The settlement of the British coal strike has lessened the demand for bituminous coal in this country
to some extent, and the W est Virginia coal industry is therefore not in quite as favorable a position
as it was a year ago, when the anthracite strike w as under way. W orkers in the m anufacturing
plants of the district are fully employed, and the prospects for continued employment in these lines
appear good. As we pointed out last month, local unemployment problems may arise here and there
during the next few months, but at present there are no signs that appear to indicate any general
surplus of workers in the near future.
BUILDING OPERATIONS FOR THE MONTHS OF DECEMBER 1926 AND 1925.
Permits Issued

0

CITIES

Z

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 j
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

Baltimore, Md.
Cumberland, Md...
Frederick, Md. .
Hagerstown, Md...
Danville Va..........
Lynchburg, Va....
Norfolk, Va.
Petersburg, Va.....
Richmond, Va.
Roanoke, Va. ....
Bluefield, W. Va...
Charleston, W. Va.
Clarksburg, W. Va
Huntington, W.Va.
Parkersburg,W.Va
Asheville, N. C.....
Charlotte, N. C.....
Durham, N. C.
Greensboro, N. C.
High Point, N. C...
Raleigh, N. C.
Salisbury, N. C.....
Wilmington, N. C.

New

Repairs

1926 1925

1926 | 1925

9
210

465
19
4
14
10
7
67
4
98
60
6
24
12
54
19
37
32
30
73
51
26
5
10
71
11
12
11
7
122

706
3
1
2
7
18
71
0
54
13
1
9
7
4
3
51
5
3
38
7
15
5
5
35
15
27
12
15
264

Totals.......... 1,252

1,361

1396

Winston-Salem, N. C.

Charleston, S. C ...
Columbia, S. C.....
Greenville, S. C....
Spartanburg, S. C.
Washington, D. C.

New Construction

436
6
6
12
4
21
24
7
80
44
2
15
16
31
19
22
43
36
32
35
24
11
6
70
15
14

2

1925

1926

9001$ 2,377,920 $ 1,709,160
5
350,500
8,790
3
8,372
10,900
5
; 17,765
6,860
12
58,210
1,605
15
12,530
36,750
34
104,655
74,525
2
5,200
32,300
58
1,112,850
655,655
144,495
16
180,410
35,500
2
350
9
36,050
23,705
5,210
7
30,953
5
97,725
49,027
67,250
2
97,150
45
452,845
261,136
9
312,720
256,300
6
165,825
211,950
14
1,298,265
154,090
8
300,950
142.6*5
207,525
8
78,325
3
40,750
2,525
4
27,700
9,800
26
151,225
133,775
16
6,480
9,685
38,942
25
47,550
51,800
7
7,800
18
17,990
200,000
251
3,451,400
2,628,600
$10,251,327

1,515 $ 7,789,663

Alterations
1926
$ 325,680 $
1,103
4,000
800
10,380
5,963
46,099
0
24,299
2,660
25,000
6,150
32,708
4,100
1.150
21,000
6,850
1,250
41,992
30,400
10,350
3,800
43,050
98,610
4,065
1,155
1,085
4,815
217,740
$ 976,254

1925

Increase or Per Cent
Decrease
of
of
Increase 0
Total
or
Z
Valuation Decrease

497,640 $
496,800
22.5%
2,545 — 343,152 — 97.2
10,425 —
8,953 — 42.0
36,760 — 46,865 — 86.0
60,000 — 106,225 — 89.9
11,392
18,791
78.6
43,310 — 27,341 — 18.5
250
26,850 492.7
129,474 — 562,370 — 45.3
17,445
21,130
13.0
535 — 10,685 — 29.7
4,430
14,065
50.0
3,375
55,076 641.5
6,272 — 50,870 — 48.9
2,800
28,250
40.3
12,427 — 183,136 — 39.4
3,635 — 53,205 — 16.8
16,700
50,675
27.8
16,400 —1,118,583 — 85.1
171,585
17,100
107.4
4,158 — 123,008 — 58.1
2,200
39,825 842.9
9,600
15,550
22.2
110,695
5,365
79.6
6,235 —
5,375 — 33.8
11,882 —
2,119 — 4.2
1,260 — 44,175 — 83.3
5,450 — 182,645 — 88.9
169,230 — 774,290 — 21.4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

$1,114,245 —$2,599,655 — 22.9%

—Denotes decrease
NOTE-- The figures in the above table reflect the amount of work provided for in the corporation limits of the several
cities, but take no account of suburban developments.

New construction work provided for by permits issued in twenty-nine Fifth District cities in De­
cember 1926 was considerably below the work provided for in December 1925 in both number of new




4

projects and estimated valuation. The twenty-nine cities issued 1,252 permits for new work in De­
cember 1926, with estimated valuation of $7,789,663, compared with 1,361 permits and a valuation
of $10,251,327 in December a year earlier. Figures for alterations and repairs in December 1926 also
were below those of the preceding December. In total valuation for all classes of work, December
1926 recorded $8,765,917, compared with $11,365,572 reported for December 1925, a decline of $2,599,655, or 22.9 per cent. Seventeen of the twenty-nine cities reported lower figures for the 1926
month. Four high percentages of increase were reported for December by Petersburg, Clarksburg,
High Point and Salisbury, but except in High Point the gains were due to very small totals in De­
cember 1925 rather than to any exceptionally large amount of work provided for last month.
Totals compiled from reports of twenty-eight cities for which statistics were available each
month since Jan u ary 1925 show that 1926 was not up to the 1925 level, either in number of permits
issued or in the total estimated valuation of the contemplated work. The twenty-eight cities issued
20,984 permits for new construction in 1926, compared with 22,924 permits issued in 1925, a decrease
last year of 1,940 permits, or 8.5 per cent. Estim ated valuation totaled $168,521,274 in 1926, com­
pared with $175,616,198 in 1925, a decrease during the later year of $7,094,924, or 4 per cent. A larger
number of permits and higher valuation figures w ere reported in March, August and September in
1926 than during the same months of 1925, but all other months showed higher figures during the
earlier year. Total valuation figures in 1926 were higher than for any other year except 1925, how­
ever, exceeding those of 1924 by approximately $10,000,000.
The F. W. Dodge Corporation reports actual contract awards in the Fifth Reserve district total­
ing 11,649 in 1926, at a total cost of $416,801,400, compared with 13,456 contracts to cost $411,046,400
actually awarded in 1925.
COAL— Production of bituminous coal in December totaled approxim ately 57,671,000 net tons,
compared with 52,522,000 tons mined in December 1925. Production in December declined from the
record output of November, but was above the figure for any previous December. Total production
of soft coal during 1926 is estimated by the Bureau of Mines of the Department of Commerce at 578,290,000 net tons, the highest annual production figure since 1918, when 579,385,000 tons were mined.
Coal exports during 1926 totaled 21,900,304 net tons, compared with 5,109,491 tons sent abroad in
1925. Coal shipped through Atlantic ports, including export, bunker, coastwise to New England, and
to other points, totaled 57,574,098 tons, of which 30,716,282 passed through Hampton Roads, 10,352,835 tons through Baltimore, and 721,721 tons through Charleston, S. C. Fifth District ports thus
handled 41,790,838 tons, or 72.6 per cent of all Atlantic port shipments.
TEXTILES—A t the beginning of 1927 the textile industry in the Fifth District is still operating
on a hand to mouth basis, but the consensus of opinion in the industry appears to be rather more op­
timistic than was the case two or three months ago. During the past month the decline in raw cot­
ton was checked, and prices turned slightly upward. Many observers believe that the low point
has been reached, and a considerable increase in orders is expected for early shipment when spring
business opens up. Stocks of textiles in both prim ary and secondary hands have been kept as low
as possible and any appreciable increase in demand from retailers must be passed back promptly to
the mills. During 1926 the mills experienced one o f the most difficult years on record. The year
opened with a promise of a good volume of business, due to fair returns to agriculture from the 1925
operations, but the year had hardly opened before raw material prices began to fall, and buyers be­
gan to shop around for bargains. During the summer many mills were forced to curtail operations,
and meanwhile cotton prices continued downward as it became increasingly evident that a large cot­
ton crop was in prospect. There was a large movement of cotton goods through retail channels, and
these goods were of course furnished by the mills, but the buying methods used were hard on the
mills and kept their profits unusually low for the total business they were doing. Fifth District mills
consumed 254,102 bales of cotton in December 1926, of which North Carolina mills used 138,260 bales,
South Carolina mills 105,793 bales, and Virginia mills 10,049 bales. In December 1925 the three states
consumed 229,242 bales. During the calendar year 1926, the three textile m anufacturing states in the
Fifth District consumed 2,768,596 bales of lint cotton, compared with 2,537,393 bales consumed in
1925, an increase last year of 231,203 bales, or 9.1 per cent. Cotton consumption in the District in
1926 exceeded the number of bales grown during that year in the District by nearly half a million
bales, thus showing the District to be an importer rather than an exporter of cotton.

COTTON— During 1926, spot cotton prices gradually worked downward from an average of
19.64 cents per pound during the week ended Ja n u a ry 23rd to 1 1 .1 7 cents during the week ended
December n th , but at that point the price decline was checked, and an upward movement began.
During the past month the average price paid grow ers in the Carolinas for middling upland cotton,
of 7/8 inch staple, rose from the low point of n . 17 cents per pound during the week ended December
n th to an average of 12.22 cents per pound during the week ended Jan u ary 15th. Much of the cot­
ton offered for sale was of low grade, however, and brought considerably lower prices than those
quoted.
Cotton consumed in American mills during December totaled 605,217 bales, compared with 583,950 bales used in November 1926 and 576,216 bales in December 1925. Total consumption for the
present cotton year—August 1st through December 3 1s t—totaled 2,829,456 bales, in comparison with




5

2,598,119 bales used during the corresponding five months of 1925. According to the Census Bureau's
January 13th report, cotton on hand in consuming establishments amounted to 1,766,392 bales on Decem­
ber 31, 1926, compared with 1,497,844 bales on November 30th and 1,720,696 bales on December 3 1st a
year ago. W arehouses and compresses held 6,478,998 bales at the end of December, 6,517,565 bales at
the end of November, and 5,584,016 bales at the end of December 1925. December imports totaled
39,851 bales, compared with 41,441 bales imported in November and 34, 474 bales in December a year
ago. Exports in December totaled 1,531,297 bales, compared with 1,486,224 bales sent abroad in No­
vember and 984,061 bales in December 1925. Total exports during the live months of the present cot­
ton year totaled 5,573,220 bales, compared with 4,080,478 bales exported during the last five months of
1925. Active spindles numbered 32,496.250 in December 1926, compared with 32,586,770 in November
1926 and 32,951,136 in December 1925. Cotton consumption in grow ing states totaled 439,837 bales
in December, compared with 425,490 bales used in November and 400,590 bales in December 1925.

TOBACCO—V IR G IN IA leaf tobacco sales during the month of December were less than in No­
vember and the tobacco sold brought lower prices except for Sun-Cured. Total sales in December
of 25,623,736 pounds compared with 36,092,499 pounds sold in November and brought the total sales
for this season up to 81,335,692 pounds, which is approximately 58 per cent of the estimated production
for the year. The average price of Flue-Cured, or Bright, tobacco was $23,59
December, compared
with $26.35 in November 1926 and $15.45 in December 1925. Fire-Cured, or Dark, tobacco brought
an average of $7.72 in December, compared with $17.53 realized for this type in December a year ago.
Sun-Cured tobacco prices rose in December from those of November, chietly because of an improve­
ment in the grades offered, but the December average of $9.77 per hundred pounds was much below
the average of $17.37 paid in December 1925 for the same type. Danville sold 8,563,422 pounds of
Bright tobacco in December for an average of $26.50 per hundred pounds, leading the state markets
in both number of pounds and in price paid. Lynchburg 1led the Dark m arkets, selling 1,570,082
pounds, but in price several m arkets averaged higher. Richmond sold 1,538,795 pounds of Sun-Cured
for $9.77 per hundred, and Abingdon sold 1,247,614 pounds of Burley for an average of $14.79 Per hun­
dred.
NO RTH C A R O LIN A auction warehouses sold 45,213,494 pounds of producers' tobacco in Decem­
ber, at an average price of $23.67 per hundred, compared with 48,852,879 pounds sold in December
1925 at an average of $23.14 per hundred. Season sales to December 3 1st totaled 340,672,271 pounds,
compared with 303,158,756 pounds sold by the auction markets to December 3 1, 1925. Wilson led the
North Carolina markets in sales in December with 8,295,644 pounds, W inston-Salem with 7,178,660
pounds ranking second, but Mebane with an average of $29.43 and Farm ville with $27.27 per hundred
pounds ranked first and second in price.
AGRICULTURAL NOTES—The past month was an inactive one on farms. Cold weather dam­
aged truck crops somewhat during the first half o f Jan uary, but there has been little snow to delay
tobacco m arketing this season as was the case in 1926.
In order that our readers may have comparative figures of production in convenient form for the
states comprising the Fifth Federal reserve district, we are including a table herewith showing yields
of the principal crops in the several states, giving figures for both 1926 and 1925. The figures were
obtained from official sources, and are final estim ates.
Yrs.

Maryland

W . Virginia

Virginia

N. Carolina

S. Carolina

1926
1925
1926
Cotton (bales)
1925
1926
Tobacco (lbs.)
1925
1926
I. Potatoes (bus.)
1925
1926
S. Potatoes (bus.)
1925
1926
Oats (bus.)
1925
1926
Wheat (bus.)
1925
1926
Hay (tons)
1925
1926
Peanuts (lbs.)
1925
1926
Apples (bus.)
1925
1926
Apples (bbls.)
1925
(Commercial crop)
Sorghum Syrup (gals.) 1926
1925

22.049.000
24.930.000

16.467.000
18.980.000

28,800,000
24,690,000
3.690.000
3.701.000
1.815.000
1.161.000
1.706.000
1.760.000
11.960.000
10.395.000
516.000
577.000

8.500.000
6.975.000
4.982.000
4.089.000
330.000
276.000
5.796.000
5.076.000
2.352.000
1.809.000
1.015.000
1.005.000

3.500.000
1.900.000
600,000
324,000

10,875,000
4,185,000
1,700,000
749,000
776.000
640.000

46.585.000
36.982.000
55.000
53.000
132.352.000
129.400.000
11.658.000
11.700.000
5.375.000
3.996.000
4.836.000
4.128.000
11,336,000
8,946,000
982.000
779.000
131.100.000
143.520.000
19,902,000
7,844,000
3.384.000
1.440.000
1,200,000
858,000

50.908.000
42.846.000
1,250,000
1JL02,000
393.190.000
380.165.000
7.400.000
4.524.000
7.560.000
7.040.000
6,820,000
4,902,000
6.303.000
4.466.000
764.000
529.000
190.120.000
212.750.000
5.986.000
3.192.000
345.000
160.000
4.004.000
1.904.000

22.103.000
19.483.000
1,030,000
889,000
57.510.000
71.040.000
3.219.000
2.400.000
4.160.000
2.860.000
10,483,000
7,182,000
800,000
506,000
202,000
57,000
6.500.000
4.730.000
647.000
386.000

Crops
Corn (bus.)




6

1,694,000
780,000

FIGURES ON RETAIL TRADE
As Indicated By Reports from Thirty Representative Department Stores for the Month of DECEMBER 1926
Percentage increase in December 1926 sales over sales in December 1925:

Baltimore
— .8

Richmond

Washington

Other Cities

District

5.6
3.5
2.4
1.8
Percentage increase in total sales during 1926 over total sales in 1925:
.6
5.5
5.1
3.2
3.0
Percentage increase in December sales over average December sales during the five years 1920-1924:
7.4
42.7
29.4
7.8
13.9
Percentage increase in stock on hand December 31, 1926, over stock on December 31, 1925:
— 2.9
5.2
2.2
2.3
.2
Percentage increase in stock on hand December 31, 1926, over stock on November 30, 1926:
— 19.5
— 17.1
— 18.6
— 24.0
— 19.5
Percentage of sales in December 1926 to average stock carried during that m onth:
45.5
51.3
54.0
41.1
48.7
Percentage of total sales during 1926 to average stock carried each month:
329.8
346.0
359.6
285.9
337.3
Percentage of outstanding orders on December 31st to total purchases of goods in 1925:
4.3
3.3
3.6
3.0
3.9
Percentage of collections in December to total accounts receivable on December 1st:
23.9
27.6
37.5
30.2
28.1
— Denotes decreased percentage.

Retail trade, as reflected in Department store sales, was fully up to seasonal average in December.
Sales reported by thirty leading stores in the F ifth reserve district exceeded November sales by 49
per cent, and also were 1.8 per cent above sales in in December 1925. A ggregate sales during the
year 1926 exceeded the total sales of 1925 by 3 per cent. December sales averaged 13.9 per cent
above average December sales during the five years 1920— 1924, inclusive.
Stocks on hand at the end of December were two-tenths of 1 per cent larger than stocks at the
of 1925, but were 19.5 below the level at the end of November 1926. Sales during December amount­
ed to 48.7 per cent of average stock carried during the month, and total sales during the calendar
year 1926 were 337.3 per cent of average stock on the shelves at the end of each of the twelve months.
This figure indicates an average turnover during the year of 3.37 times, the stores in W ashington
leading with approxim ately 3.6 times.
Outstanding orders at the end of 1926 totaled 3.9 per cent of total purchases of merchandise
during 1925, and collections during December equaled 28.1 per cent of total receivables outstanding
on December 1st.

WHOLESALE TRADE, DECEMBER 1926
Percentage increase in December 1926 sales, compared with sales in December 1925:
35 Groceries
12 Dry Goods
6 Shoes
16 Hardware .
5 Furniture
— 11.8
4.1
— 4.1
1.5
— 23.4
Percentage increase in December 1926 sales, compared with sales in November 1926:
— 11.2
— 18.5
— 47.9
— 14.7
— 52.8
Percentage increase in total sales during the year 1926, compared with sales in 1925:
— 3.6
— 1.6
9.9
3.4
— 5.7
Percentage increase in stock on December 31, 1926, compared with stock on December 31, 1925:
— 3.1(15)
— 20.8 (4)
30.4(4)
— 1.8(7)
Percentage increase in stock on December 31, 1926, compared with stock on November 30, 1926:
— 6.0(12)
— 4.1 (4) *
7.1(3)
.3(7)
Percentage of collections in December to accounts receivable on December 1, 1926:
67.1(22)____________ 36.5(8)______________33.9(5)_____________ 43.0(12)____________ 37.7(3)

10 Drugs
— 4.4
—

—

6.0

.1

55.5(6)

— Denotes decreased percentage.
N O T E : The number o f firms reporting stock and collection data in each group is shown immediately fo l­
lowing the percentages.

Wholesale trade in December, as indicated by reports from 84 firms in six leading lines, was in
smaller volume than in November, a regular seasonal development. In comparison with December
1925 sales, those made in December 1926 were greater in dry goods and hardware, but less in gro­
ceries, shoes, furniture and drugs. Total sales for 1926 exceeded 1925 sales in shoes and hardware,
but in the other four lines sales last year were below those of 1925, the decline in dry goods prob­
ably being due in large part to the lower prices on cotton goods.
Grocery and dry goods stocks declined in December, while stocks of shoes and hardware in­
creased. A t the end of the year stocks in three of the four lines for which information was available
were less than stocks on hand December 3 1, 1925* a very healthy condition in which to begin the new
year.
Collections in December were better than in November in all lines except groceries and shoes,
and the percentage for shoes was exactly the same for both months.




(Com piled January 2 0, 1 92 7)
7

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.
(Compiled by the Federal Reserve Board)

Index numbers of production of manufactures ft ainerals, adjusted
for seasonal variations (1923-25 average 100). Latest figures,
December, manufactures 104, minerals 117.

1925

1926

Indexes of U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1913 100). Latest
figures, December, all commodities 147.2, non-agricultural coo■odities 151.5, agricultural commodities 142.2.

Inde* of sales of 359 stores (1919 100}. Latest figures,
December, adjusted index 146, unadjusted index 23J.
BILLIONS Or DOLLARS
(

2

r ~

” i " .............

RESE RVE BANK CREDIT
1
,
Tofal
*
fReserve Bank I
Credit
7 1

1

/

s

_

I

/

Discot jntsfor
Membfir Banks

U.S.Seciirities
........V

\

/

\

A
v

. y

J
/

-

Acceptanoes
iI____

Monthly averages of daily figures for 12 federal Reserve BaiUs.
Latest figure* are averages of first 23 days in January.




PRODUCTION. In December fo r the third consecutive month
there was a decrease in industrial production, and the B oards new
index with adjustment for seasonal variations was 105 on the basis
o f the average fo r 1923, 1924 and 1925 as 100. This compares
with 113 in September, the high point o f the year, and with 108
a year ago. The decline since the recent high point has been en­
tirely in the manufacturing industries, as the output o f minerals
was at a record high level in November and showed only a slight
decline in December. By far the greatest recession o f recent months
has been in the automobile industry, output of passenger cars and
trucks in the United States decreasing from 425,000 in August to
165,000 in December. Reduction in the manufacture o f automo­
biles is usual at the end of the year, when plants close fo r inventory
taking and repairs, but in December 1926 the decline was consid­
erably larger than usual. Production o f iron and steel has also
been sharply reduced since the middle o f autumn, and activity in
the woolen and worsted and silk industries has been somewhat cur­
tailed. Production o f lumber, cement and other building materials
has reflected the usual winter decrease in demand. Cotton con­
sumption, on the other hand, was larger than in any previous De­
cember. Factory employment and payrolls declined further in
December, reflecting decreases in nearly all industries except cotton
goods, clothing, foundries and machine shops, printing and publish­
ing. The value of building contracts awarded in December, as in
November, was larger than in the corresponding period a year
earlier, but fo r the first three weeks o f January contracts were in
smaller volume than during the same weeks o f 1926. This decline
in January was largely concentrated in the New York and Atlanta
Federal reserve districts, where building was unusually active a year
ago. Residential contracts were smaller in December than a year
earlier in nearly all districts, the increase in the total fo r the month
being in other types o f building.
TRADE. Retail sales in December exceeded all previous
records.
Sales o f department stores were approximately 4 per
cent larger than in December o f last year, and sales o f mail order
houses, while slightly smaller than in 1925, were larger than in the
corresponding month o f any other year.
Sales at wholesale, on
the other hand, declined in December and were smaller than a year
ago in practically all leading lines except shoes. Merchandise stocks
carried by department stores were reduced slightly more than is
usual in December and were somewhat smaller at the end o f the
month than in 1925, and wholesale stocks were also slightly smaller
than a year ago. Freight car loadings showed about the usual sea­
sonal decline in December, with shipments o f all groups o f com­
modities except coal and merchandise in less than carload lots in
smaller volume than a year earlier.
PRICES. Wholesale prices declined further in December, and
the Bureau o f Labor Statistics index at 147 fo r that month was
at the lowest level since the middle o f 1924. Prices o f agricultural
products, which declined considerably in October and November,
increased slightly in December, owing to advances in the prices o f
grains and cotton. In the first three weeks o f January there were
further increases in grains, and advances also in cotton, hogs and
flour. Prices o f non-agricultural products declined in December,
owing chiefly to decreases in bituminous coal, clothing materials,
non-ferrous metals and building materials. In January, iron and
steel prices were slightly reduced and there were further declines
in bituminous coal and non-ferrous metals, while prices o f cotton
goods and coke advanced.
BANK CREDIT. A t the reserve banks during the fou r weeks
follow ing the peak o f the seasonal currency demand there was a
return flow o f Federal reserve notes and other cash from circulation
amounting in the aggregate to about $400,000,000. This return
flow o f currency was in about the same volume as a year ago, and
together with substantial gold imports, was reflected in a reduction
o f the volume o f reserve bank credit in use to a level on January
19 th lower than at any time since the summer o f 1925. Loans and
investments o f member banks in leading cities, after increasing to
a record level at the end o f the year, declined sharply in January.
Commercial loans, which had reached their seasonal peak in Novem­
ber, were in the middle of January about $200,000,000 below the
maximum figure, but were still more than $300,000,000 above the
level o f a year ago. Loans on securities at the reporting banks
also declined after the turn o f the year, follow ing a large increase
in December, and were slightly smaller than in January o f last year.
Easier money conditions prevailed in the money market in January,
and rates on prime commercial paper declined from 4 Y2 to 4%
per cent, and those on bankers’ acceptances from 3% to a range
o f 3 % — 3 % per cent.
8