View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Defense expenditures are expected to be a major factor raising
Gross National Product to a record high level in 1966.

FEDERAL



RE SE RVE

BANK

OF

RICHMOND

FEBRUARY

1966

6th YEAR
The recent forecasting season was an unusually
turbulent one. M ajor economic and financial de­
velopments plus several revisions of basic economic
data created treacherous footing for the forecaster.
Since most of the news was on the expansionary
side, the late bloomers were considerably more op ­
timistic than the trail blazers. As a result, predic­
tions of gross national product for 1966 ranged from
less than $700 billion to more than $720 billion.
This brief article summarizes the more readily
available forecasts. As in previous years, the dis­
cussion attempts to convey the general tone and pat­
tern of the predictions, which this year number over
50, including several group efforts.

The views and opinions set forth here are those
of the various forecasters. No agreement or endorse­
ment by this Bank is implied.
THE ECONOMIC BACKGROUND
Generally, 1965 was a very good business year.
Almost all sectors of the economy operated at higher
levels of activity than had been expected or predicted.
G N P rose by about 7.5% instead of the typically
predicted 5.7% . The improvement in employment
was especially striking, with total civilian employ­
ment rising by about 1.7 million. The average rate
of unemployment for the year declined to about 4.6% ,
whereas almost all the forecasters a year ago expected
it to remain well above 5% .
A year ago the economy as a whole was expected
to show strong gains in the first half of 1965, followed
by somewhat smaller gains in the second half, largely
because of gyrations in the steel industry. A s it
turned out, the economy absorbed the impact of the
steel slowdown with little trouble and the closing
months showed some of the best gains of the year.
The decline in steel production was brief, due in con­
siderable part to the high rates of steel consumption
in the automobile and business equipment industries,
which provided much of the impetus responsible for
the high-level performance of the whole economy.
Automobile production and sales bettered their 1964
Digitized for
2 FRASER


OF

GROWTH IN 66

records by wide margins, with domestic production
of about 9.3 million units and sales of approximately
8.7 million. In addition, about 550,000 foreign cars
were sold. Expenditures for new plant and equip­
ment showed increasing strength as the year ad­
vanced and amounted to $51.8 billion for the year,
some 15% above 1964 and nearly 8 % above pre­
dictions.
Personal income and personal consumption ex­
penditures showed strength throughout the year, and
especially in the last four months.
Income was
boosted by the high level of employment, a longer
than average workweek in manufacturing, and wage
and salary increases, including increases in military
and civil service pay by the Federal Government.
In addition, social security payments were raised.
New construction showed only a modest gain for
the year and even that improvement slowed during
the latter part of the year.
Prices moved upward during the year. The in­
crease in consumer prices was somewhat more than
the average for recent years despite the reduction in
excise taxes which should have lowered the index by
about 0.3% . After seven years of remarkable stability,
wholesale prices moved up appreciably, and by year
end the index was up 3.4% over a year earlier.
Corporate profits continued their growth for the
fifth successive year. The published amounts were
increased substantially by conceptual changes in the
method of computation used by the Department of
Commerce. Much the greater part of the 1965 in­
crease was recorded in the first quarter; increases
thereafter were quite modest. The high level of
corporate profits in recent years has been a major
factor in stimulating the demand for new plant and
equipment, and has provided a large part of the funds
to finance their acquisition.
Contrary to the experience of 1964, tensions in the
international area eased somewhat and difficulties
with our balance of payments declined as the year
advanced. T w o important reasons for this were the
voluntary foreign credit restraint program and the

gradual improvement in the position of sterling.
Three developments which occurred in early De­
cember, after most of the forecasts were prepared,
may influence economic activity in 1966. They w ere:
(1 ) announcement by the Treasury Department of
higher Federal expenditures and a larger deficit in
the current fiscal year; (2 ) a sharp upward revision
in the estimates of past and future expenditures for
new plant and equipment; and (3 ) an increase by
Federal Reserve Banks in the discount rate from
4% to 4 ^ % and a concurrent increase by the Board
of Governors in maximum rates payable on time de­
posits. The latter moves were followed by sharp
upward adjustments in interest rates.
THE FORECASTS IN BRIEF
The forecasts are unanimous in predicting that
economic activity generally will be distinctly higher
in 1966. The amount of the expected improvement
varies but in a great majority of cases it falls between
5% and 7 % . Only an occasional forecaster makes a
qualified prediction that activity in some particular
sector, such as steel or automobiles, might be a little
lower. Generally, there is no discernible pattern or
time table for variations in rates of growth, although
a few forecasts call for a slightly slower growth rate
in the first quarter because of the liquidation of steel
inventories and the impact of higher payroll taxes.
Gross National Product T h e forecasts for 1966
G N P in current dollars are heavily concentrated in
the area between $710 billion and $720 billion. The
mid-point of this range— $715 billion— would rep­
resent an increase of 5.8% , and would be slightly less
than the percentage gains actually realized in 1964
and 1965. After allowance for expected price in­
creases, the increase in “ real” G N P would be about
4.1% contrasted with increases of 5.0% in 1964 and
5.5% in 1965.
The forecasters are in essential agreement that
three factors will provide most of the impetus for im­
provement in 1966. The first is sharply higher Gov­
ernment spending, especially for defense, although the
increase in state and local spending is also ex­
pected to pick up somewhat. Total Government ex­
penditures for goods and services are expected to
approximate $147 billion— an increase of nearly 9 %
over 1965. The second factor is a continuation of
large business investment expenditures, mainly for
new plant and equipment.

Finally, the consumer is

expected to provide solid support for the uptrend by
increasing his expenditures in the amount of some
$24 billion, which would raise the total to $450-$455
billion and be an increase of about 5.6% over 1965.



Larger social security benefits and higher pay scales
for military and civil service personnel are mentioned
as factors which may encourage larger consumer
outlays.
Gross private investment, another major com­
ponent of G N P, is expected to rise from about $105
billion to near $108 billion. Included in this is an
increase in inventories which is expected to amount
to only about $5 billion compared to $7 billion in
1965. Thus, the forecasters definitely do not antici­
pate a speculative buildup of inventories; as one
writer put it, they will be a “ neutral rather than a
disturbing factor.”
Employment and Unemployment F or the first
time in a number of years, several forecasters show
some concern about a tightening labor market. As
one expressed it, American industry is now “ press­
ing against its manpower ceiling” and further em­
ployment gains “ will be from the ranks of mar­
ginal labor,” which is likely to result in higher
unit labor costs. Another forecaster gave the arith­
metic of the situation in simple terms. In 1965 em­
ployment rose by 1.7 million while the labor force
was rising by only 1.3 million. Unemployment was
down by 425,000. In 1966 the labor force should
grow by about 1.4 million of which the armed forces
may take some 275,000, leaving an increase in the
civilian labor force of a little more than 1.1 million.
If employment should increase as much in 1966 as
it did in 1965, some 600,000 would have to come
from the ranks of the unemployed, which would bring
“ powerful upward pressure on wages and prices.”
This was in line with a recent statement of the Chair­
man of the Council of Economic Advisers, who said
that “ the difference between 5 ^ % and 6 % unem­
ployment has little importance for price levels, while
the difference between 3 ^ % and 4 % may be quite
significant.”
O f the forecasters who gave figures, only a few pre­
dicted a rate of unemployment below 4 % for 1966.
The others gave figures varying from 4.1% to 4.7% ,
which would average somewhat above the rate pre­
vailing at the end of 1965. The arithmetic in the
preceding paragraph would give a figure of about
3.7% . It would appear that in many cases the esti­
mates of employment and unemployment have not
been closely integrated with the other elements of
the forecasts.
Industrial Production Industrial production is
expected to increase somewhat less in 1966 than in
1965. From a 1965 average of 143 and a year-end
figure of 148, most forecasters expect a rise to about
148-150 on the Federal Reserve index. This would

3

be an average increase of six points compared with
an increase of eleven points in 1965. Production of
steel, automobiles, and business equipment engage
most of the forecasters’ attention. The output of
business equipment will almost certainly rise sub­
stantially but there are questions about the other two.
Production of passenger automobiles in 1965 was
about 9.3 million units, due in part to low inventories
at the beginning of the year. Sales of domestic cars
were about 8.7 million units, nearly 1.1 million above
1964. W ith inventories generally adequate at the
beginning of the year, sales in 1966 would have to
rise by some 600,000 units to support production
equal to that of 1965. A few forecasters see the
possiblity of some decline in sales; none predicts any
significant increase in production.
Despite the sharp slowdown after September 1,
steel production set a record of more than 131 million
tons in 1965. Large excess inventories were ac­
cumulated as a strike hedge in the first eight months
of the year and some part of them probably was
carried over into 1966. In view of these remnants
and with little, if any, increase in automobile pro­
duction likely, forecasters generally see no increase
in steel production and a few predict small declines.
New Plant and Equipment E xpenditures for new
plant and equipment have been rising steadily and
rapidly for nearly three years, reaching a total of
nearly $52 billion in 1965.
Concurrently, capital
appropriations were increasing even more rapidly,
producing a backlog of unspent appropriations at
the end of September 1965 of more than $18 billion.
In early December, data for past and estimated future
expenditures were revised sharply upward by about
$1 billion at an annual rate. This revision largely in­
validated most of the forecasts on this sector since
they were made before the revised data were available.
Several of the forecasts predicted increases of 8%
to 12% instead of giving absolute figures. Even
before the new figures were released, most fore­
casters were looking to these expenditures as a major
factor to lead the economy upward in 1966. Of
course, they assume even greater importance now.

centrated and where housing demand has been weak,
will be especially benefited. The rate of family for­
mation is expected to pick up in the near future but
not soon enough to have any significant effect in
1966. Interest rates on mortgages have been stable
and comparatively low throughout this upswing,
but most forecasters expect them to be somewhat
higher this year. A new element in the govern­
mental assistance program is the Housing and Urban
Development A ct of 1965, but it is generally ex­
pected that it will be some months yet before its
effects will be felt. A s a result of all these considera­
tions, the predictions for private nonfarm housing
starts in 1966 range between 1,500,000 and 1,565,000,
which would be a modest gain over 1965.
In the industrial and commercial sector of con­
struction— covering such things as factories, ware­
houses, office buildings, and utility plants— the
volume of activity is about $10 billion per year. It
is expected to rise moderately in 1966, perhaps by
about 3 % . The large public construction sector in­
cludes such items as hospitals, schools, highways and
streets, and water and sewer facilities. The general
expectation is that activity in this area will continue
to move up at about the same rate as in recent years,
which is about 5% . For all sectors combined, ex­
penditures for new construction in 1966 are esti­
mated at about $72 billion, which would be an in­
crease of approximately 6 % over the $68 billion
for 1965.
Corporate Profits T h e forecasters expect a sharp
reduction in the growtli rate of corporate profits in
1966 and a few even mention the possibility of an
absolute decline. The figures for corporate profits
discussed here are quite different from the figures
used in previous years.

During the past summer the

Department of Commerce made substantial revisions
in its methods of computing G N P and its major
components.

The combined

definitional and sta­

tistical revisions in methods of computing corporate
profits before taxes had the effect of increasing the
figure for 1964 by $7.2 billion, or

12.5%.

For

profits after taxes the increase was $5.4 billion, or
Construction F or the large construction sector
of the economy, the forecasters anticipate continued
moderate growth in 1966. For residential housing,
the analysts see four major factors which will largely
determine the rate of activity. They a re : income,
the rate of family formation, credit terms, and gov­
ernmental assistance. Income is expected to remain
favorable. In this connection, one observer notes
that if defense outlays rise sharply, the states of the
Far West, where defense industries are heavily con­
Digitized for
4 FRASER


17.0%.

These changes do not affect the comparisons

made here since revised data are used throughout
but the level of profits is considerably higher than it
would have been on the old basis.
In 1965 corporate profits before taxes not only
scored their fifth successive annual increase, but they
registered the largest gain, by a considerable margin,
for any year in the upswing.

The gain probably

was between $9 billion and $10 billion. Such a large

RESULTS FOR 1965 A N D EXPECTATIONS FOR 1966
Unit or Base
..... .......
... ___
Gross national product
Personal consumption expenditures _________ ___
Government purchases of goods and services ___
Gross private domestic investment __________ ___
Net exports of goods and services ___________ ___
Index of industrial production _________________
New construction put in place ____________ ___ ___
New plant and equipment expenditures _______ ___
Change in business inventories ________________ ___
Corporate profits before taxes ____________ . ... ___
Rate of unemployment _________ _____________ ___
Wholesale price index _____ ________ ___________
Consumer price index _________________________

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Billions
Billions
Billions
Billions
Billions
1957-59
Billions
Billions
Billions
Billions
Per cent
1957-59
1957-59

1965*
676
429
135
105
7
142
68
52
+7
74
4.6
102.5
109.8

1966* *
710
450
146
107
6.0
148
71
56
-j-4.5
76
4.1
103.5
111.5

720
to
to
455
to
148
109
to
to
7.0
150
to
73
to
59
to
to + 5 -5
78
to
to
4.7
to 105.0
to 112.5

*E stim ated figu res.
**F igu res are rough approxim ations of the typical forecast for 1966.

gain coming so late in the period of expansion, was
indeed surprising. Several factors contributed to i t :
(1 ) the remittance of profits from abroad by foreign
subsidiaries; (2 ) the high and rising volume of busi­
ness; (3 ) comparatively stable unit labor costs; and
(4 ) in some lines, small price increases. For profits
after taxes there was added the two percentage point
reduction in the rate of the Federal income tax.
Most of the 1965 gain was realized in the first
quarter. Profits before taxes rose from an annual
rate of $65.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 1964 to
$73.1 billion in the first quarter of 1965. The com­
parable increase in profits after taxes was from
$37.8 billion to $44.0 billion. Increases in the second
and third quarters were quite small.
Forecasters looked at the very large gain made in
1965 and were unable to see any repetition in 1966.
Remittances from abroad are not likely to show any
further gain. Unit labor costs have risen some and
are likely to rise more. Prices of many industrial
materials have risen sharply, while several factors
discourage producers from raising the prices of their
products. Depreciation charges are rising steadily
and rapidly on an ever-growing plant investment.
Employers’ payroll taxes will rise by more than $2
billion in 1966; it may not be possible or feasible to
pass on all of the increase. Profits after taxes will
not be boosted by any further reduction in the income
tax rate. In the light of all these considerations, the
few forecasters who make specific predictions see
only modest gains in the order of $2 billion to $3
billion in corporate profits in 1966.



Prices T h ose forecasters w ho deal with the point
are unanimous in predicting greater price increases
in 1966 than in 1965. The reasons assigned include
a tighter labor market, higher wages, slower growth
in productivity, higher payroll taxes, and a con­
siderably expanded program of military procurement.
Generally, the predictions are for only modest in­
creases on the order of 2 % — none foresees any rapid
inflationary buildup. The venturesome few who set
down absolute figures quoted 103.5-105.0 for the
wholesale price index and 111.5-112.5 for the con­
sumer index.
Summary In sum m ary, the consensus of fore­
casters is that 1966 will see a gain in economic ac­
tivity slightly less than that realized in 1965. The
principal factors which are expected to provide the
impetus are increased defense expenditures, a strong
program of business investment, and vigorous con­
sumer spending, sustained by higher social security
benefits and rising wages and salaries.

Construction

is expected to sustain but not stimulate the rise.

A

considerably slower growth of corporate profits is
predicted.

It is anticipated that both wholesale and

consumer prices will rise somewhat more than in
recent years but not enough to create serious prob­
lems of inflation.

A compilation of forecasts with names of fore­
casters and details of estimates may be obtained from
the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

5

rovvA

ROAD

%

IN COBPORATEB

T H E G O V E R N O R ’ S P A L A C E — Built about 1720, the
Governor’s Palace was the official residence o f the K ing’ s
representative to the Virginia Colony.

T H E C A P I T O L — T he Capitol was built in 1699 and
served as the meeting place for the H ouse of Burgesses,
America’s first representative assembly.

I

1J 2 2
and once Capital of the Colony of

V lR G lN i

fhowing certain of the Building/ and
Site/ of Intereft.

t r

T H E B O O K B I N D E R — A popular artisan in W illiamsburg, the bookbinder
binds 18th century books with fine handtooled leather, using tools and
methods of colonial days.




Colonial Williamsburg is one of the nation’s
foremost tourist attractions- Since its restoration
was begun in 1926, more than 13,000,000 visitors
have found their way to this unique colonial city
situated on the historic Virginia peninsula between
the York and James Rivers, making tourism the
area’s chief industry. Last year more than a mil­
lion tourists visited the restored city, with over
600,000 admissions to exhibition buildings. This i
ample evidence of the popularity of this colonial
city whose restoration to its 18th century atmos­
phere was made possible through the generosity of
the late Mr. John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
The restoration is organized into two corpora­
tions. Colonial Williamsburg, Inc. is a non-profit
educational organization, devoted to the historical
and educational aspects of the restoration. It
operates an Information Center, the Exhibition
Buildings, the craft shops, and an extensive educa­
tional program. In 1964 the corporation’s expenses
totaled $3.8 million, while its income was only $2.7
million, leaving an operating deficit of $1.1 million.

This deficit was financed from investment income
of $2,705,673 collected as interest on the endowment
fund of the corporation, most of which was made
available to Colonial Williamsburg through the
personal generosity of Mr. Rockefeller. The $1.6
million remainder of investment income, after meet­
ing the operating deficit, was used to finance the
continuing capital program which includes the pure and restoration of historic buildings and other
projects.
The second corporation— Williamsburg Res­
toration, Inc.— is a profit-oriented organization
which operates commercial and other business
properties outside the Historic Area.
Included
are hotels, restaurants, and a merchandising pro­
gram. In 1964 the corporation’s gross income was
$10,059,616 and operating expenses were $9,278,107,
leaving an operating profit of $781,509.
Colonial Williamsburg has about 2,000 em­
ployees and paid out $7,096,528 in wages and
salaries during 1964. The combined budget for the
two corporations totaled more than $13,000,000.

C H R I S T I A N A C A M P B E L L ’ S T A V E R N — Christiana Campbell’s Tavern
was reconstructed on its original Sate and reopened in 1956 as a distinctive
18th century eating place.

A successful bank, like a winning football team,
is often the result of successful recruiting.

young people in banking in recent years.

Starting

W ith the

salaries, traditionally below those in other fields,

recent burgeoning of demand for clerical workers

have risen substantially and chances for steady pro­

and executives at all levels, the recruitment of capable

motion and raises are somewhat better than in most
of the alternatives.

men and women in sufficient numbers is becoming
increasingly difficult. The largest banks, with trained

The changes in salary scales are paralleled by

recruiters, training programs, and a wide range of

changes in the type of work expected of the bank em­

possible promotions for new employees may find the

ployee.

task less difficult than the smaller banks; but most of

ously for the privilege of selling an ever-increasing

Today’s typical bank is competing vigor­

the banks in the Fifth District, and in the nation,

variety of services, and is intensely aware of the im­

are relatively small.

portance of good public relations.

Small banks may also find the

The small bor­

problem intensified by the loss of some of their best

rower as well as the small saver is welcome in most

personnel to more attractive positions in larger banks,

banks, and in fact loans are actively solicited through

but the movement is not all in one direction. Larger

advertising and by sales-minded loan officers.

banks frequently help their smaller correspondents
fill key positions.
The relatively slow rate of growth in banking for
many years after the Depression of the thirties re­
tarded the hiring and training programs of most
banks.

Now, many of the management teams (and

other senior personnel)

acquired in the pre-war

years are retiring or moving out of active manage­
ment, and replacements for these men are often hard
to find, especially since the need arises at a time
when the demand for lower and middle echelon
management is also rising.

Many banks have been

forced to sell to holding companies or merge with
other banks as a result of management shortages.
In a recent study of reasons given for bank mergers
during the years 1955-60, a management succession
problem was given as the first reason by 48% of
the banks for which information was available, and
the first or second reason by 63% .
Greater Opportunities

In the Fifth D istrict, the

Room at the Top

Bank m anagem ent teams have

also been greatly enlarged.

A generation ago, many

banks, even some rather large ones, were operated
primarily by a small group consisting of the top two
or three officers.

Few other officers were called

upon for important management decisions. In today’s
complex and highly competitive business world, the
typical view of management responsibility is much
broader.

New markets, new tools, and a new bank­

ing environment have created a pressing need for
larger and more diversified management teams.

In ­

creased compensation of junior officers relative to
top management reflects the trend. Rapid geographic
dispersion of banking offices through mergers and
the establishment of new branches has also created
a need for

more

management personnel.

Each

branch, no matter how small, must have at least
one person capable of making limited management
decisions.
There was a time when most bankers acquired

number of banks has declined in the past decade,

their skills very slowly and gradually.

from over 1,000 in 1955 to less than 900 today; but

day’s top bank executives found the road to the top

the number of branches has more than doubled, rising
from less than 800 to almost 2,000. The combination
of numerous retirements and rapid expansion of the
industry has resulted in excellent opportunities for

to be very different from the route being followed


8


Many of to­

by most young bankers today. The typical future
bank executive of a generation ago began work for
his bank at a very early age, perhaps just out of high

He worked first as a messenger or office

operations when triggered by a single stimulus, in­

boy, then moved up the line through a variety of
clerical jobs until, after 20 or 25 years, he was

school.

stead of having to be fed additional information by
hand. In fact, much of the equipment is designed

elected an officer.
Changes in hiring and training policies through­
out the economy, plus rapid expansion in banking,

amounts of information in relatively little space, and

make it impossible for most new bankers to follow
the same route today.

Now, the ladder to the top

is usually much shorter.

around the ability of the machines to store large
to process and deliver the information as required.
Computers and other electronic devices are not,
in general, replacing present bank employees.

In-

Many new officers have

more formal education than was typical a few years
ago, but less practical experience.

A t some of the

larger banks, there are extensive training programs

WAGES AND SALARIES OF BANK EMPLOYEES
Fifth District
$ Mil.

designed to convert inexperienced young men and
women into capable bank officers in record time.
Automation

H igh er starting salaries, training

programs, and rapid promotions have helped fill the
executive ranks, but banks have been forced to turn
to other means to meet growing shortages of clerical
personnel.

Some banks have found handicapped

workers, unsuited to many types of manufacturing
and sales work, to be ideal for a variety of clerical
jobs.

Others have turned to part-time help, pri­

marily housewives and college students, to meet peak
seasonal or weekly demands.

But many banks are

now meeting the challenge of rapid growth through
the use of electronic data processing. New electronic
equipment, including computers, differs significantly
from the adding machines, calculators, and billing
machines which have been used for many years. The
new machines may carry out an extended series of

55
Source:

BANK EMPLOYEES
Fifth District

'56

'57

'58

'59

'60

'61

'62

'63

'64

Fed eral Deposit Insurance Corp.

stead, they are being used to make possible a wider
range of services, sometimes at greater speed, and
to handle volumes of business which would require
much larger clerical staffs— if they could be found.
T o the extent that it affects personnel policies,
electronic data processing is primarily a tool for
coping with shortages of workers, rather than re­
placing existing employees.
Ten-Year Gains

T h e sustained rapid increase in

bank employment and wages and salaries paid by
banks in the Fifth District over the past decade are
shown in the accompanying charts. The total number
of bank employees rose from 31,000 in 1955 to
48,000 in 1964, a gain of more than 55% .
0 ——
'55
Source:

1
'56

,,1 iv. ;1
'57

'58

I t
'59

'60

1 t'61

'62

Fed eral Deposit Insurance Corp.




f.

—

'63

'64

By con­

trast, the total number of nonagricultural employees
in the Fifth District rose by only 20.7% in the same
period.

A s might be expected, the number of of-

9

NUMBER OF BANK EMPLOYEES, 1955 AND 1964

WAGE AND SALARY PAYMENTS TO
BANK EMPLOYEES, 1955 AND 1964
BY STATES

BY STATES
O fficers

Other Employees

1955

1964

1955

1964

1955

1964

D. C.

438

605

3,182

3,845

3,620

4,450

Md.

940

1,245

5,012

7,680

5,952

8,925

Va.

1,810

2,465

6,510

10,583

8,320

13,048

711

872

2,231

3,268

2,942

4,140

1,601

2,364

5,726

10,464

7,327

12,828

679

1,014

2,242

3,971

2,921

4,985

6,179

8,565

24,903

39,811

31,082

48,376

W. Va.

(thousands of dollars)

Total Em ployees

O fficers
1955

S.

C.
TOTAL

ficers increased somewhat less rapidly than the num­
ber of other employees.

One of the economies of

larger scale operation is that management can be

1964

1955

1964

Total Em ployees
1955

1964
24,641

D. C.

4,686

8,027

10,029

16,614

14,715

Md.

5,935

11,997

12,776

28,393

18,711

40,390

Va.

11,570

22,277

16,639

35,880

28,209

58,157

W. V a.
N. C.

O ther Em ployees

N. C.
S. C.
TOTAL

4,552

7,722

5,943

11,079

10,495

18,801

11,643

22,596

15,280

35,289

26,923

57,885

4,386

9,218

5,707

12,852

10,093

22,070

42,772

81,837

66,374

140,107

109,146

221,944

in banking, rose 36.8%
$5,200 in 1964.

from $3,800 in 1955 to

The rate of expansion in Fifth District bank em­

used more intensively; that is, it is not necessary

ployment varies widely from state to state.

to increase the size of the management team as

rently, the most important factor in the determination

rapidly as the size of the total operation.

The

Appa­

of the rate of growth in employment during the past

statistics show that Fifth District banks have taken

decade was the number of new offices opened.

advantage of that relationship.

The number of of­

ployment rose most rapidly in North and South

ficers increased from slightly over 6,000 in 1955 to

Carolina, both of which permitted statewide branch

8,500 in 1964, or about 39% , while the number of

banking over the entire decade.

other employees rose from 25,000 in 1955 to about

the total number of employees rose from 7,327 in

40,000 in 1964, a gain of 60% .

Em ­

In North Carolina,

1955 to 12,828 in 1964, a gain of more than 75% .

W ages and salaries paid to bank employees in the

The increase in South Carolina was almost 71% ,

Fifth District rose much more rapidly than the num­
ber of employees. The total rose over 103% during

from 2,921 to 4,985. In the District of Columbia,
where branching is limited by the boundaries of the

The

District, employment rose only about 2 3% , from

increase for officers was only 91% , up from $43 mil­

3,620 to 4,450; and in West Virginia, which pro­

lion to $82 million, but payments to other employees

hibits branch banking, the increase was only from
2,942 to 4,140, less than 41% .

the decade, from $109 million to $222 million.

totaled over $140 million in 1964, 111% higher than
the $66 million paid in 1955.
In discussions of salaries, averages may be very
misleading.

In banking, average salaries for many

years have been relatively low, but large numbers
of part-time and semi-skilled workers give the sta­
tistics a downward bias which is quite unrealistic.
Also, many top bank officers, especially in smaller
banks, are substantial stockholders in their banks,
and take much of their pay in capital appreciation
instead of salary. Thus the average bank salary in the
District was approximately $3,500 in 1955, and rose
31.4% to $4,600 in 1964.

For officers, the increase

was from $6,900 to $9,500, a gain of 37.7%. Salaries
of other employees rose 29.6% , from $2,700 to
$3,500. By comparison, the average of all nonfarm
wages and salaries in the District, including those

10


Virginia, which has permitted limited branching
since

1947, revised its laws to permit statewide

branching through merger in 1962. Total bank em­
ployment in Virginia, which increased 57% over the
decade, from 8,320 to 13,048, continued at the highest
level in the District, but North Carolina had nar­
rowed the gap sharply to a difference of only 220
by 1964.
Although the percentage increases in bank employ­
ment and wages and salaries paid in banking over
the past decade have been substantial for the Fifth
District, in absolute terms the changes are small com ­
pared with those in many other industries. The key
role played by banking in economic development
means, however, that these changes represent a sig­
nificant contribution to the growth of the area’s
economy.

THE FIFTH DISTRICT
AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK FOR 1966
Agricultural market demand, both domestic and
foreign, will likely continue to expand in 1966. Farm
earnings are expected to be up. The production and
price outlook for livestock appears favorable, and the
Food and Agriculture A ct of 1965 will provide some
increase in crop income. Farmers’ total realized net
income (income above production expenses that has
not been adjusted for changes in inventories) is thus
expected to rise. Realized net income per farm and
per capita disposable income of the farm population
should also be better. This, in a nutshell, is the out­
look for the nation’s farmers in 1966 as viewed by
top analysts of the U. S. Department of Agriculture.
In appraising the agricultural outlook for the year
ahead, U S D A ’s economists assumed average growing
conditions and considerable participation in the new
farm program, especially as it relates to cotton, wheat,
and feed grains.
They also assumed a continued
advance in the Gross National Product, along with
increases in employment and in consumer incomes.
Farm Prices, Costs, and Income Crop prices in
1966 are expected to average lower than last year,
and cash receipts from crop marketings will probably
run somewhat below 1965 levels. W ith larger di­
rect Government payments to farmers participating
in the major farm programs, however, total crop re­
turns will likely be higher than in 1965. On the
livestock side, 1966 gives promise of being another
good year.
Farm costs are expected to continue their long­
term upward trend. The 1966 rise in production
expenses is not expected to be as large as in 1965,
however.

A number of important production items,

notably fertilizer and pesticides, will likely be more
costly.

And it appears highly probable that farmers’

expenditures for taxes, interest, insurance, and wages
will

increase.

Depreciation

and

other

overhead

costs will also rise further.
The nation’s realized gross farm income holds

of the anticipated gain in gross farm income. Total
realized net income thus may show an increase of
$/4 to %y2 billion over 1965’s $14 billion.
Supply and Demand Conditions The 1965-66 sup­
ply situation varies considerably depending upon the
commodity in question. Peanuts and soybeans are
at record levels, and cotton supplies are the largest
since 1956. Feed grains are up slightly, while sup­
plies of most kinds of tobacco continue large relative
to requirements. Wheat and red meat supplies, on
the other hand, are below year-ago levels. Canned
vegetable supplies are about the same as last year,
but those of frozen vegetables are moderately larger.
Total fruit supplies may remain about the same, but
some major fruit groups will differ significantly.
Strong demand conditions, both at home and
abroad, are expected for farm products in 1966.
Healthy general economic activity and rising con­
sumer incomes are indicated here and in foreign
markets. Domestically, the combination of a grow ­
ing population and the projected strong advance in
the business upswing is expected to spur spending.
Rising incomes may bring some shifts in demand
among foods, but per capita consumption will hold
about steady.
Larger expenditures for food will
likely result from increased services, more restaurant
meals, and greater military food procurement.
Exports of United States farm products in the
current fiscal year may total $6.2 billion— up from
$6.1 billion in each of the past two years.

But the

gain in volume may be greater than the gain in value.
A new record is in prospect for dollar sales.

Large

shipments of food to less developed countries under
Food-for-Peace

programs will continue.

Biggest

dollar earners in markets abroad are expected to be
soybeans and soybean oil, feed grains, wheat, and
tobacco.
Commodity Highlights

A capsule view of the

promise of chalking up a further gain in 1966, pos­

outlook for major District commodities shapes up

sibly going

in this manner:

slightly

above

compared with about $44 ^

the

$45-billion

billion in 1965.

mark
The

Poultry and E g gs :

The outlook for 1966 points

continued rise in farm costs, even though probably

to a large increase in the production of both broilers

not as great as the increase in 1965, will offset much

and turkeys but only a slight rise in the output of




11

eggs. Demand for broilers and turkeys is expected
to benefit from small red meat supplies into summer
and from rising consumer incomes. Increasing sup­
plies of pork later in the year and the substantially
larger output of broilers and turkeys will influence
prices considerably. Lower average prices to broiler
and turkey producers are a distinct possibility.
Turkey prices, however, may not fall below yearearlier levels until the second half of the year. On
the other hand, egg prices in the early part of the
year will probably run above the depressed level of
a year ago but for the year as a whole may average
about the same as in 1965.
Meat Animals : Focusing on the livestock picture,
it appears that the relatively favorable situation that
existed for most livestock farmers in 1965 will con­
tinue in 1966. Cattle, hog, and lamb prices seem
likely to average higher than in 1965. Cash receipts
are thus expected to show a further rise, despite the
possibility of slightly reduced marketings.
Feeder cattle prices will probably record a strong
seasonal rise this winter and remain relatively strong
throughout the year. Sustained price strength for
hogs through most of 1966 is indicated if hog
slaughter continues below year-ago levels through the
summer. The extent of the buildup in the spring and
fall pig crops may produce lower prices late in 1966
and in 1967, however.
Dairy Products: Prospects for dairy products in
1966 seem somewhat better on all fronts. Market­
ings will be slightly larger; commercial demand is
expected to increase moderately; and year-end stocks
are expected to hold at the 1965 level. Higher sup­
port levels and a slight increase in prices are an­
ticipated, and dairymen’s costs are expected to rise
less than income from sales of milk and cream.
Tobacco : The supply position of District to­
baccos varies considerably, but supplies of most types
are large in relation to demand. Flue-cured sup­
plies, down 4 % from last year’s record high, are
beginning to adjust to a better balance with re­
quirements.
The nation’s consumption and production of
cigarettes— chief outlet for flue-cured, burley, and
Maryland tobaccos— reached new highs last year, and
further modest gains appear likely as the smoking-age
population increases. The tobacco export situation
is somewhat cloudy in view of the political climate
in Rhodesia— the United States’ major flue-cured
competitor— and the economic sanctions that have
been, or may be, taken against it.
The 1966 flue-cured crop will be produced under
the acreage-poundage program for the second year,
with the national poundage quota, average yield

12


goal, and acreage allotment the same as in 1965.
Burley growers will hold a referendum March 10 to
determine whether or not acreage-poundage controls
will be in effect for their 1966, 1967, and 1968 cr o p s ;
Maryland farmers will vote February 25 to determine
whether their next three crops will be grown under
acreage controls. Allotments for most Virginia firecured and sun-cured farms will be about the same as
last year. Current indications are that 1966 price
support levels will be about 2 % above 1965’s.
Cotton : The nation’s supply-demand situation
for cotton in the current crop year is highlighted by
another large crop, a further buildup in stocks, and
an expected carry-over on August 1, 1966 of 16.5
million bales— an all-time high. Total disappearance,
estimated at 13.0 million bales, is slightly below last
year. Mill consumption is expected to account for
about 9.5 million bales, up from 9.2 million in 1964-65,
while exports will probably equal 3.5 million bales,
down from the 4.1 million exported a year ago. Manmade fibers will continue to provide severe com ­
petition for cotton, both at home and abroad.
New legislation, effective for the 1966 through
1969 crops of upland cotton, is a major factor in the
cotton outlook.

The new program, to be discussed

in detail in the March Review, retains a number of
features of the program effective for the 1964 and
1965 crops but differs in several respects. Prominent
among these differences are the strong incentives
provided to cut acreage and the dropping of price
supports below world price levels.

Soybeans and Peanuts :

Supplies of soybeans for

1965-66 are sharply above last year’s levels.

A new

high is expected in soybean usage, however, as some­
what lower soybean prices seem likely to stimulate
record high exports and crushings for oil.

But some

slight buildup in carry-over stocks at the end of the
current marketing year seems probable.
Peanut supplies for the 1965-66 marketing year
are at an all-time high, up 7% from a year earlier.
Total edible consumption may rise slightly, while
crushings are expected to continue heavy and may
show a slight increase over last year.

Some further

gain in exports also seems probable.

Peanut prices

are expected to average around 11.2 cents per pound,
roughly the same as last year.

PH O TO CREDITS
C over—U. S. M arine Corps Photo
liam sburg, Inc.

6. & 7. C olonial W il­

M ap—Colonial W illiam sb urg, Inc.