View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW
CREDIT, BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS

WILLIAM W. HOXTON,

C h a irm a n a n d F e d e r a l R e s e r v e A g e n t
__________________________FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND_____________________

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

APRIL 30, 1932

EASONAL improvement was
month. The textile industry in the
Fifth
reserve district held its own
FIFTH
FEDERAL
RESERVE
DISTRICT
registered in some lines of
in March in comparison with Febru­
trade in the Fifth Federal reserve
ary, and the mills consumed more
district in March, but on the whole
cotton than in March last year, in
the development was not up to that
contrast with a National decline in
of most years. Rediscounts at the
cotton consumption in March under
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
the March 1931 consumption. Build­
for member banks declined between
ing permits issued in leading cities
the middle of March and the middle
of the Fifth district in March pro­
of April, the third year in succes­
vided for only a little more than
sion in which an early spring move­
half as much work as was provided
ment of reserve bank credit has
for in March 1931 permits, and con­
moved contrary to a seasonal trend
tract award figures last month were
developed in earlier years. The
also materially lower than those for
volume of Federal reserve notes in
the corresponding month a year
actual circulation decreased by
ago. Retail trade as reflected by de­
about the usual amount between
March 15 and April 15, but on the latter date was partment store sales were very poor in March,
much larger than the volume of notes in circulation declining 17.3 per cent in comparison with sales
on April 15, 1931, indicating that hoarding of cur­ in March last year, in spite of the fact that all of
rency continues. Deposits in reporting member the Easter trade occurred in March 1932 and only
banks declined further during the past month, and a part of it in March 1931. Wholesale trade in
at the same time there was a decrease in outstand­ March registered seasonal gains over February
ing loans. Debits to individual accounts figures, business, but fell behind March 1931 business in
representing payments by check, were seasonally all lines for which figures are available. However,
larger during the five weeks ended April 13, 1932, most of the year's declines were about in line with
than during the preceding five weeks, ended March I the declines in wholesale prices, indicating rela9, due to income tax payments and quarterly settle­ I tively little decrease in the actual quantity of goods
ments in the later period, but were nearly 22 per I sold in March 1932 in comparison with March 1931.
cent less than debits in the corresponding five weeks j On the whole, winter and spring weather was favor­
in 1931. The decrease in debits during the past five able for grain crops and farm work, although March
weeks in comparison with the same period last year was cold and growth was materially retarded.
was the greatest decline reported for the cor­ Official reports indicate that Fifth district farmers
responding period in any year since debits records are planning to reduce acreage in money crops this
were begun, and was probably due chiefly to a year, while increasing the acreage planted in food
sharp drop in income tax payments on 1931 incomes. and feed crops. Spring sales of fertilizer have been
Employment conditions showed no real improve­ slow, and it appears that less commercial fertilizer
ment in March, and there was less seasonal demand will be used under 1932 crops than is normally used,
a reduction which is likely to lower production
for workers to do gardening, painting, etc., than further than would result from a smaller acreage
in most years. Coal production in March increased alone. In a great many cases farmers received so
over February production, probably due to unsea- little cash for their crops of the past two years that
sonally cold weather last month, but was less than they are unable to finance their 1932 operations on
the output in March 1931. W est Virginia continued the usual scale, and they are consequently being
to lead all states in bituminous coal production last forced to reduce acreage and the use of fertilizer.




MONTHLY REVIEW

2

Member Bank Statement

Reserve Bank Statement
ITEMS

000 omitted
April 15 March 15 April 15
1932
1932
1931

Rediscounts held_________ __ $ 29,153 $ 30,936
6,060
2,455
Open market paper_________
19,081
22,831
Government securities----------56.077
54,439
Total earning assets----------96,076 100,941
Circulation of Fed. Res. notes..
52,765
47,588
Members’ reserve deposits.......
98,776 101,600
Cash reserves............................
65.80
Reserve ratio______________
65.60

$ 14,475
104
16,983
31,562
78,483
62,075
118,223
82.41

Between March IS and April 15, 1932, rediscounts
for member banks at the Reserve Bank of Rich­
mond declined by $1,783,000, about the same amount
of decrease reported in the corresponding periods of
1931 and 1930, but contrary to a seasonal increase
which occurred in most years previous to 1930.
Holdings of open m arket paper declined by $3,604.000 during the past month, but the reserve bank
increased its holdings of Government securities by
$3,750,000. Total earning assets dropped $1,638,000
between March 15 and April 15. Federal reserve
notes in actual circulation continued a seasonal de­
crease during the month under review, declining by
$4,865,000. The seasonal decline in note circulation
since January 1 has been slightly greater than the
declines in 1931 and 1929, but is almost exactly the
same as the amount of decline in 1930. Member
bank reserve deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Richmond dropped $5,177,000 last month. The
several changes in the statement mentioned, with
others of less importance, reduced the cash reserves
of the Richmond bank by $2,824,000 during the
month and lowered the ratio of cash reserves to
note and deposit liabilities combined by one-fifth of
a point.
Comparison of the April IS, 1932, figures with
those of April 15, 1931, shows an increase of $22,877.000 in the reserve bank's total earning assets,
chiefly due to an increase of $14,678,000 in redis­
counts for member banks. The portfolio of open
market paper increased $2,351,000 during the year,
and holdings of Government securities rose by $5,848,000. The volume of Federal reserve notes in
actual circulation rose by $17,593,000 between April
15 last year and this, the increase being due in large
part to hoarding of currency. Member bank re­
serve deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of Rich­
mond decreased $14,487,000 during the year, a
smaller number of member banks and reduced de­
posits this year requiring lower reserve deposits.
Cash reserves of the Richmond bank declined $19,447.000 between April 15, 1931, and April 15, 1932,
and the ratio of cash reserves to note and deposit
liabilities combined declined 16.8 points during the
year.




ITEMS

000 omitted
April 13 March 9 April 15
1932
1932
1931

Loans on stocks and bonds (in­
cluding Governments)_____ $147,518 $147,288
All other loans........................... 214,968 219,559
Total loans and discounts___ 362,486 366,847
Investments in stocks and bonds 232,861 233,502
34,144
34,248
Reserve bal. with F. R. Bank_
Cash in vaults_____________
12,781
13,254
285,175 292,956
Demand deposits___________
Time deposits............................ 222,297 222,898
Borrowed from F. R. Bank ...
10,207
17,346

$161,826
262,266
424,092
222,909
38,263
13,777
331,198
259,033
3,720

The accompanying table shows figures compiled
from reports submitted by forty-nine member banks
in twelve leading Fifth district cities for three dates,
April 13 and March 9, 1932, and April 15, 1931, thus
affording opportunity for comparison of the latest
available figures with those for the corresponding
dates a month and a year earlier. It should be
understood that the figures in the table are not
necessarily the highest or lowest that occurred dur­
ing the periods under review, but reflect the condi­
tion of the banks on the reporting dates only.
There was a decrease of $4,361,000 in total loans
between March 9 and April 13, this year, and on the
latter date total loans were $61,606,000 less than
those of April 15, 1931. All of the decrease last
month and about three-fourths of the year's decline
occurred in all other loans, which are commercial,
agricultural and industrial in character. Invest­
ments in bonds and securities declined slightly last
month, but rose by $9,952,000 during the past year.
Aggregate reserve balance of the forty-nine re­
porting banks at the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond was approximately the same on April
13 as on March 9, but showed a decline of $4,015,000
from the April 15, 1931, figure. Cash in vaults dej creased by $473,000 during the past month and
• $996,000 during the year. Demand deposits dropped
$7,781,000 between March 9 and April 13, and on the
latter date totaled $46,023,000 less than on April
15 last year. Time deposits decreased slightly last
j month, and during the year dropped $36,736,000.
• These figures show a gross decline in deposits of
| $82,759,000 between April 15, 1931, and April 13,
! 1932, which accounts for the very low reserve dei posits. Rediscounts by the reporting member banks
at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond decreased
: $7,139,000 between March 9 and April 13, but on the
latter date totaled $6,487,000 more than the same
banks were rediscounting on April 15 last year.

Time and Savings Deposits

Time deposits in forty-nine regularly reporting
member banks and aggregate deposits in twelve
mutual savings banks in Baltimore totaled $434,961,000 at the end of March 1932, a decline from
time and savings deposits totaling $435,037,000 at
the end of February this year and $463,360,000 at
the end of March last year.

MONTHLY REVIEW

Employment

Debits to Individual Accounts
CITIES

ooo omitted
Total debits, five weeks ended
April 15,
March 9,
April 13,
1931
1932
1932

Asheville, N. C.-----Baltimore, Md------Charleston, S. C ------Charleston, W. Va...
Charlotte, N. G----Columbia, S. C.-------Cumberland, \Md.---Danville, Va---------Durham, N. C------Greensboro, N. C.——
Greenville, S. C.------Hagerstown, Md----Huntington, W. Va..
Lynchburg, Va-----Newport News, Va..
Norfolk, Va---------Portsmouth, Va-----Raleigh, N. C_______
Richmond, Va.---------Roanoke, Va----------Spartanburg, S. C.-----Washington, D. C—
Wilmington, N. C __
Winston-Salem, N. C..

$ 10,296
329,245
13,954
36,428
42,228
18,200
6,801
5,092
16,519
11,592
12,751
6,987
13,156
15,360
8,386
39,966
3,929
18,836
125,679
23,282
7,822
245,063
9,580
44,131

$ 9,390
333,246
12,926
31,998
38,905
18,160
6,815
5,422
16,297
12,312
14,227
6,590
13,033
13,231
8,850
39,482
4,026
14,782
118,891
22,931
7,254
226,557
8,674
29,003

$ 14,693
428,394
20,901
43,043
55,193
28,966
9,070

District Totals____

$1,065,283

$1.013,002

$1,362,392

6,888

28,650
22,487
19,001
10,435
18,756
19,320
12,119
54,290
4,979
23,201
142,501
29,268
11,699
290,882
15,209
52,447

Aggregate payments by checks drawn on clearing
house banks in twenty-four cities of the Fifth
Federal reserve district are shown in the accom­
panying table for three equal periods of five weeks,
thus affording opportunity for comparison of the
latest figures, for the five weeks ended April 13,
1932, with those for the preceding like period this
year and the corresponding period a year ago.
Total debits in the reporting cities in the five
weeks ended April 13 showed an increase of $52,281,000, or 5.2 per cent, over total debits in the
preceding five weeks, ended March 9. The increase
was seasonal, and was due chiefly to income tax
payments on March 15 and quarterly settlements
on April 1, both of these important dates falling in
the later five weeks. The increase in debits in the
later period was slightly larger in percentage than
last year, but was smaller than in other recent
years. Seventeen of the twenty-four cities reported
larger totals for the April 13 period, but seven
cities failed to show the usual increases. All of the
larger centers except Baltimore reported higher
figures for the later five weeks. Winston-Salem
made the greatest percentage increase, with Raleigh
and Lynchburg second and third, respectively.
A comparison of the debits figures for the five
weeks ended April 13 this year with the figures of
the corresponding period ended April 15, 1931,
shows a decrease this year of $297,109,000, or 21.8
per cent, the largest decline shown in any cor­
responding period for several years. Every one of
the twenty-four reporting cities showed lower
totals for the 1932 five weeks than for the same
period last year.




3

During the past month there has been some in­
crease in outside work, chiefly for painting, garden­
ing, etc., and all of a seasonal nature, but otherwise
there has been no improvement in employment con­
ditions in the Fifth Federal Reserve district. Con­
struction work now under way or planned for early
starting is in smaller volume than in any Spring
since the World War, and therefore workers in
building trades are nearly all without employment.
Practically all building permits in most of the Fifth
district towns and smaller cities are for repairs, and
few workers are hired for this type of construction.
No improvement in industrial conditions has been
noted in recent months, but on the contrary some
of the plants which held their business longer than
others have begun to feel the depression and have
reduced forces to some extent. The textile in­
dustry is holding up to the level of operations of
the past two years, but tobacco manufacturing has
been gradually declining since the first of this year.

Coal Production

Production of bituminous coal in the United
States during the month of March amounted to
32,250,000 net tons as against 28,013,000 tons mined
in February 1932 and 33,870,000 tons in March 1931.
The increase in tonnage last month over February
tonnage was due in part to the longer month, but
daily average production also increased, by 5.7 per
cent, probably because of the long period of unseasonally cold weather in March. Total production
of soft coal during the present calendar year to
April 9 (approximately 85 working days) amounts
to 93,988,000 net tons, a materially smaller amount
than for any other year during the past five. Coal
shipped by w ater through Hampton Roads, Balti­
more and Charleston in February 1932 total 1,671,086 tons, or 68.6 per cent of total tidewater ship­
ments during the month.
The March 26 report of the Bureau of Mines,
Department of Commerce, showed production
figures by states for February. W est Virginia with
an output of 6,956,000 net tons led all states, Penn­
sylvania with 6,187,000 tons ranking second. The
three coal producing states of the Fifth district,
West Virginia, Virginia and Maryland, dug ap­
proximately 28 per cent of all soft coal mined in
February, the same percentage of the total that
the district showed in both February 1931 and
February 1930.

Textiles
Conditions in the textile industry remained un­
changed during March, daily consumption of cotton
by Fifth district mills during the month being prac­
tically the same as daily consumption in February.
Fifth district mills consumed 233,171 bales of cotton
in March this year, of which North Carolina mills
used 117,881 bales, South Carolina mills used 103,597 bales, and Virginia mills 11,693 bales. In Febru­
ary 1932 Fifth district mills consumed 216,061 bales

4

MONTHLY REVIEW

and in March 1931 they used 220,902 bales. Con­
sumption in the Fifth district was 47.7 per cent of
National consumption in March 1932, a slightly
lower figure than 48.0 per cent in February this
year, but higher than 45.0 per cent in March 1931.
The higher percentage this year indicates the Fifth
district mills held their own somewhat better dur­
ing the past year than mills in some other sections
of the country.

Cotton Statistics

Spot cotton prices on ten Southern markets slowly
declined during the past month, dropping gradually
from an average of 6.43 cents per pound, upland
middling basis, on March 18 to 5.74 cents on April
8, and then recovering slightly and rising to 5.96
cents on April 15, the latest date for which figures
are available. The latest figure quoted shows a de­
cline of about $18 a bale under the mid-April 1931
price, and is $65 a bale lower than the price at the
middle of April in 1929, before the business de­
pression began.
Cotton consumption in the United States in March
1932 totaled 488,655 bales, compared with 450,018
bales used in February this year and 490,509 bales
in March 1931. Total consumption for the eight
months of the present cotton year—August 1 to
March 31—amounted to 3,569,945 bales, compared
with 3,384,135 bales consumed in the corresponding
period ended March 31,1931. Manufacturing estab­
lishments held 1,566,205 bales on March 31, com­
pared with 1,633,380 bales held on February 29 this
year and 1,478,120 bales on March 31, 1931. Public
warehouses and compresses held 8,766,979 bales in
storage at the end of March this year, compared
with 9,510,690 bales so held a month earlier and
6,657,807 bales on March 31 last year. March ex­
ports totaled 927,127 bales, compared with 970,419
bales sent abroad in February this year and 605,461
bales exported in March last year. Exports during
the eight months of this cotton year totaled 6,854,050 bales, compared with 5,517,798 bales shipped
over seas during the corresponding eight months
ended March 31, 1931. Spindles active in March
numbered 24,818,008, compared with 25,189,748 in
February this year and 26,504,132 in March 1931.
Cotton growing States consumed 398,021 bales in
March 1932, compared with 365,075 bales used in
February and 383,766 bales in March 1931. Last
month's consumption in the cotton growing states
amounted to 81.5 per cent of National consumption,
compared with 78.2 per cent of National consump­
tion used in the cotton growing states in March
last year. Of the 398,021 bales of cotton consumed
in cotton growing states in March, the Fifth district
mills used 233,171 bales, or 58.6 per cent, compared
with 57.6 per cent of Southern consumption a t­
tained in the district in March last year.

Tobacco Marketing

Virginia farmers sold 3,259,233 pounds of leaf to­
bacco during March, at an average price of $5.01
per hundred pounds, according to a summary com­




piled from warehouse reports received by the Com­
missioner of Agriculture. Last year total sales for
the same month amounted to 1,615,802 pounds,
which sold for an average price of $4.89 per hun­
dred. The flue-cured markets completed sales for
the season during the latter part of February, but
the sun-cured and fire-cured markets remained open
for a week or more in April. Next month a sum­
mary of complete sales for the 1931-1932 season
will be available for Virginia. Fire-cured sales for
March amounted to 3,100,621 pounds at an average
of $4.98 per hundred, compared with 1,157,195
pounds for March lost year which sold for an aver­
age of $4.10 per hundred. Sun-cured sales during
the past month amounted to 158,612 pounds, com­
pared with 458,607 pounds sold during March last
year. The price in March this year was $5.48 per
hundred pounds, compared with $6.88 for March
1931. The quality of tobacco sold during March
was generally poor. According to warehousemen
the sales graded 11 per cent good, 36 per cent
medium, and 53 per cent common.
North Carolina markets, which have all closed, sold
521,796,116 pounds of growers’ tobacco from the
1931 crop, at an average price of $8.86 per hundred
pounds, compared with 563,327,005 pounds sold from
the 1930 crop at an average of $12.84 per hundred.
All North Carolina tobacco is flue-cured except
3,051,332 pounds of burley sold at Asheville this
year, this being the second season a burley market
has been open in the state. Greenville led all
markets in total sales this season with 66,154,756
pounds, Wilson and Winston-Salem ranking second
and third, respectively. In average price paid grow­
ers Lumberton was first with $11.89 per hundred,
followed by Whiteville with $11.67 and Fairmont
with $11.47. All of the three markets which paid
the highest prices are in the South Carolina belt.
The following figures show clearly how over pro­
duction of tobacco in recent years has affected in­
come received by farmers selling tobacco on North
Carolina markets.

Year

Total Sales

Receipts

1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931

380,165,000 lbs.
386,460,000 lbs.
485,419,400 lbs.
499,408,000 lbs.
502,600,000 lbs.
563,327,005 lbs.
521,796,116 lbs.

$ 87,438,000
96.615.000
108,248,526
95,886,336
91.473.000
72,331,187
46,231,134

Agricultural Notes
W eather in March was unusually cold for that
month, and growth of farm crops was checked, but
no serious damage appears to have resulted except
to truck crops and gardens. Peaches were some­
what hurt by the freeze, but apples appear unin­
jured. W inter grains came through the winter in
average condition. Farm work is well advanced
this season. The annual Spring “intentions to
plant” report was issued by the Department of
Agriculture on March 24, and Virginia farmers re­

MONTHLY REVIEW
ported increases in acreage to be planted to food
and feed crops, with material reductions in cash
crop acreage. Tobacco growers are planning to
set out about 34 per cent less tobacco than in 1931,
which would give Virginia its smallest tobacco
acreage since 1907. A reduction of 23 per cent in
early commercial potato acreage is planned, and
commercial sweet potatoes will be cut about 10 per
cent. Peanut growers plan a 10 per cent reduction,
and a slight reduction in corn acreage is also
planned, but oats, barley, hay, soybeans and cowpeas will all be increased in acreage. North Caro­
lina farmers report intended increases in acreage
for oats, barley, soybeans, cowpeas, sweet potatoes,
peanuts and hay crops, while decreases in acreage
are expected in corn, tobacco and early Irish pota­
toes. South Carolina expects to reduce acreage in
tobacco and Irish potatoes, but increases are in­
tended in corn, oats, sweet potatoes, hay and pea­
nuts. The “intentions to plant” report is forbidden
by law to give information on probable cotton acre­
age.

Construction.
Building permits issued in March in thirty-two Fifth
district cities provided for much less work than
permits issued in March 1931. Last month 2,403
permits were issued for all classes of work, com­
pared with 2,899 permits issued in March last year.
Total valuation figures for March 1932 amounted to
only $3,657,988, a decrease of $3,585,072, or 49.5 per
cent, under the total of $7,243,060 for permits issued
in March 1931. Only seven of the thirty-tw o cities
reported higher valuation figures for March this
year, and several of these increases were due to
unusually low figures in March last year rather
than to a large volume of work this year. Salis­
bury, Maryland, reported relatively large figures
for last month, but the three largest cities, Balti­
more, W ashington and Richmond, reported low
totals.




5

Contracts awarded for construction work in the
Fifth reserve district in March this year totaled
$12,235,023, including both urban and rural con­
struction, compared with $30,615,813 in contracts
awarded in March 1931 and $43,220,110 in March
1930, according to figures collected by the F. W.
Dodge Corporation. Of the March 1932 contracts,
$4,716,778 was for residential structures, compared
with $9,767,128 for residential work last year and
$10,356,810 in March 1930.
BniMing Permits Issued In March 1932 and 1931
CITIES
Baltimore, Md-------Cumberland, Md.-----Frederick, Md._____
Hagerstown, Md.---Salisbury, Md.-------Danville, Va---------Lynchburg, Va-------Norfolk, Va_______
Petersburg, Va-------Portsmouth, Va____
Richmond, Va._____
Roanoke, Va---------Bluefield, W. Va. «
Charleston, W. Va.__
Clarksburg, W. Va.....
Huntington, W. Va...
Asheville, N. C.____
Charlotte, N. C . ....
Durham, N. C.____
Greensboro. N. C.__
High Point, N. C __
Raleigh, N. C _____
Rocky Mount, N. C...
Salisbury, N. C ____
Wilmington, N. C.__
Winston-Salem, N. C.
Charleston, S. C.......
Columbia, S. G ____
Greenville, S. C.____
Rock Hill, S. C.......Spartanburg, S. !C.—
Washington, D. G....

Permits Issued
1932
1931

Total Valuation
1932
1931

927
10
5
6
24
10
31
95
6
28
80
40
7
63
13
28
19
51
19
33
8
12
7
6
11
51
36
36
23
8
23
687

1,203
21
12
16
24
14
28
128
3
36
135
54
10
25
24
27
31
71
12
63
17
20
11
4
17
60
44
52
34
22
21
660

$1,250,160
11,990
2,160
708
186,730
156,742
27,036
146,600
9,960
25,502
91,233
66,851
8,290
33,662
3,735
13,238
4,571
94,798
64,430
13,580
1,875
6,351
2,875
6,675
11,750
26,464
9,914
86,561
27,445
3,650
4,122
1,258,330

$2,366,760
137,214
13,020
33,535
33,925
13,997
143,781
102,941
4,225
34,806
450,874
100,335
2,108
76,720
61,430
50,000
14,996
162,398
26,556
43,593
35,365
39,209
18,900
11,525
67,200
77,431
23,088
59,500
72,993
31,330
278,915
2,654,390

Totals __________ 2,403

2,899

$3,657,988

$7,243,060

MONTHLY REVIEW

6

Retail Trade, 33 Department Stores____________
Richmond Baltimore Washington Other Cities District
March 1932 sales, compared with sales in March 1931:
—14.9
—19.4
—14.1
—23.6
—17.3
Total sales since January 1, 1932, compared with sales in Jan.March 1931:
—15.6
—18.0
—13.4
—21.3
—162
March 31, 1932, stocks, compared with stocks on March 31,
1931:
—13.7
—12.8
— 7.4
—19.5
—11.7
March 31, 1932, stocks, compared with stocks on February
20

+ 4.0

1032 •

' + 5.4
+ 5.6
+ 2.9
+ 5.1
Number of times stock was turned in March 1932:
.355
.329
.325
232
.319
Number of times stock was turned since January 1, 1932:
.869
.844
.867
.599
.827
Percentage of March 1, 1932, receivables collected in March:
292
23.4
28.9
25.6
26.1

Department store sales in the Fifth reserve dis­
trict in March were disappointing, the Easter trade
being very poor, partly on account of unusually
cold weather during most of the month. Sales in
thirty-three stores averaged 17.3 per cent less than
sales in March 1931, and combined sales in the first
quarter of this year fell 16.2 per cent behind sales
in the same stores in the first quarter of 1931. In
addition to lower prices and reduced purchasing
power this year, the weather has been unfavorable
for trade in recent months, and merchants there­
fore were relatively unsuccessful in moving their
w inter and spring merchandise.
Stocks on the shelves of the reporting depart­
ment stores rose an average of 5.1 per cent during
March, a seasonal increase, but on March 31 aver­
age stocks at retail prices were 11.7 per cent below
stocks on hand on March 31, 1931. Stocks were
turned .319 times in March this year, and during
the first quarter of 1932 stocks were turned .827
times, a lower figure than .872 times stocks were
turned in the first quarter of 1931.
Collections in March 1932 in thirty-one of the
thirty-three stores averaged 26.1 per cent of re­
ceivables outstanding on March 1, a poorer record
than that of March 1931, when 28.9 per cent of
outstanding receivables as of March 1 were col­
lected during the month.




Wholesale Trade, $3 Firms
22 #
9
6
14
12
Shoes Hardware Drugs
March 1932 sales, compared with sales in March 1931:
—122
—21.7
—12.9
—13.2
— 8.5
March 1932 sales, compared with sales in February 1932:
+11.1
+ 4.4
+29.6
+ 6.9
+12.5
Jan.-March 1932 sales, compared with sales in Jan.-March 1931:
—14.6
—21.5
—10.1
—16.3
—172
March 31, 1932, stocks, compared with March 31, 1931, stocks:
—17.3(8*) —17.5(4*) —16.3(5*) —14.9(7*) -------March 31, 1932, stocks, compared with Feb. 29, 1932, stocks:
— 2.1(8*) + 1 .9 (4 * ) — 2.0(5*) — 1.7(7*) -------Percentage of March 1, 1932, receivables collected in March:
57.3(13*) 31.4(6*) 33.5(6*) 29.6(11*) 51.7(8*)

Groceries Dry Goods

* Number of reporting firms.

Sixty-three wholesale firms in the Fifth reserve
district sold more goods in March 1932 than in
February this year, chiefly a seasonal increase, in
some lines the increases being perhaps greater than
in most years. In comparison with March 1931
sales, however, those for March 1932 were m aterial­
ly lower in dollar amount in all lines reported upon.
All five lines for which data are available report
lower total sales for the first quarter of 1932, in
comparison with sales in the first quarter of 1931.
Stocks of the reporting firms did not change ma­
terially during March this year, but on March 31
all lines showed smaller stocks than on the cor­
responding date a year ago, most of the decreases
corresponding rather closely to the year’s decline in
the wholesale price index.
Collections in all five lines were seasonally better
in March than in February this year, the percent­
ages of collections during the month to receivables
outstanding on March 1 being larger than the per­
centages for the earlier month. Shoe and hardware
collections in March 1932 were also better than
those for March 1931, but the percentages of col­
lections in groceries, dry goods and drugs were
lower last month than in the corresponding month a
year ago.

(Compiled April 21, 1932)

MONTHLY REVIEW

7

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
(Compiled by the Federal Reserve Board)

Industrial activity was in smaller volume in March
than in February, although usually little change is re­
ported at this season, and the number of employees at
factories was also reduced, contrary to seasonal ten­
dency. Volume of reserve bank credit decreased in
March, but showed a considerable growth in the first
three weeks of April. Money rates continued to de­
cline.

Production and Employment.
Output of industrial products, as measured by the
Board’s seasonally adjusted index, declined from
80 per cent of the 1923-1925 average in February
to 68 per cent in March. Daily output at steel
mills and automobile factories decreased, contrary
to seasonal tendency, and activity at woolen mills
declined sharply to the lowest level in recent years.
Cotton consumption by domestic mills continued
at the February rate, although sales of cotton cloth
declined, and output of shoes increased consider­
ably; in both these industries production was at
about the same rate as a year ago. Activity in the
lumber industry, which recently has been at a level
about 45 per cent lower than last year, increased
by more than the usual seasonal amount. Output
of coal also increased considerably during March
but declined in early April. Volume of factory em­
ployment and payrolls decreased from February
to March, although an increase is usual at this sea­
son. There were substantial reductions in work­
ing forces in the steel, automobile, machinery and
furniture industries, as well as at woolen and silk
mills, while clothing and shoe factories showed ad­
ditions to their working forces. Value of building
contracts awarded, as reported by the F. W. Dodge
Corporation, showed some increase of a seasonal
character during March and the first half of April
and was approximately one third as large as last
year.

Distribution.
Rail shipments of merchandise, which ordinarily
increase in March, showed little change, and sales
at department stores in leading cities increased by
less than the estimated seasonal amount.




Wholesale Prices.
The general level of wholesale commodity prices
showed little change between February and March,
according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In
the first two weeks in March prices of many com­
modities including livestock and meats, advanced;
between the middle of March and the third week
in April, prices of cotton, silk, wool, hides, sugar,
silver and tin declined considerably, while prices
of coffee and petroleum increased. W heat prices
showed wide fluctuations but were at about the
same level in the week ending April 23 as in the
first half of March.

Bank Credit.
The Federal Reserve System’s holdings of United
States Government securities, after increasing con­
tinuously from early in March, totaled $1,078,000,000 on April 20, an increase of $338,000,000 since
the end of February. This increase has been accom­
panied by some further decline in the reserve banks’
holding of acceptances and a reduction of $264,000,000 in discounts. Member bank indebtedness to the
reserve banks showed a considerable reduction in
all of the Federal reserve districts. Total volume
of reserve bank credit outstanding, which had de­
clined in March reflecting a continued return of
money from circulation and an increase in the
country’s stock of monetary gold, increased by
$115,000,000 during the first three weeks of April.
This increase was accompanied by a substantial
growth in member bank reserve balances. Total
loans and investments of reporting member banks
in leading cities continued to decline during the
five weeks ending April 13. At banks in New York
City, however, there was an increase in investment
holdings both of United States Government securi­
ties and other securities, offsetting the decline in
loans, which continued until the middle of April.
Open market rates for Bankers’ acceptances show­
ed successive reductions and on April 21 the offer­
ing rate for 90 day bills was 7/8 of one per cent,
the same rate as prevailed between May and Sep­
tember 1931. Rates on commercial paper also de­
clined.