View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

207

The Business Situation
Recent indicators of business activity have continued
to show a mixed pattern. Signs of a slowing in the rate
of expansion have apparently multiplied of late— although
the possibility that some of these reflect little more than
random movements must be kept in mind, especially in
summer months when seasonal adjustments are par­
ticularly difficult to make. In August, industrial production
recorded its first decline in a year, new orders for du­
rable goods fell, and housing starts and permits dropped
a bit further. Higher inventory-sales ratios among du­
rables manufacturers and retail merchants may have con­
tributed to the recent moderation of production. Retail
sales showed little buoyancy over the summer, and while
personal income gains have been sizable, this strength re­
sulted largely from special and nonrecurring factors.
Some easing of exceptionally tight labor market conditions
became apparent, as nonfarm employment continued to
show relatively little growth. The unemployment rate rose
sharply in September, though the rise was probably
swollen by special factors. On the other hand, recent sur­
veys of business spending plans indicate that the current
boom in capital outlays may well be sustained into 1970,
though at a less hectic pace than early this year. Also, a
phasing-out of the 10 percent income tax surcharge next
year, together with a proposed sizable increase in social
security benefits, is likely to provide considerable stimulus
to the private economy. Meanwhile, the price situation
remains very unsatisfactory. Consumers continue to be
faced with sizable price increases on a wide array of
goods and services, and industrial wholesale prices have
resumed their climb.
PRODUCTION, ORDERS, INVENTORIES,
AND RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION

The volume of industrial production declined in August,
as iron and steel output fell and activity in most other
industries remained about unchanged. The Federal R e­
serve Board’s index of industrial production edged down
0.3 percentage point to 174.3 percent of the 1957-59
average, the first drop since August 1968. A t the same
time, the July increase in production was revised down
substantially from the preliminary estimate. Physical out­
put in the iron and steel industry fell about V /i percent




in August, after leveling off in July. Moreover, the output
of raw steel— which accounts for about half the iron and
steel index— was up only slightly in September from the
August level. This apparent flattening of activity in the
iron and steel industry followed a very sharp uptrend in
the first half of 1969 when production expanded rapidly
in response to vigorous European demand and to the
surge in business capital spending.
Business equipment output remained unchanged in
August after many months of uninterrupted large gains.
Although the absence of a further rise in equipment pro­
duction may simply have been a random variation, there
is supporting evidence that capital spending may be enter­
ing a period of slower growth. Recent surveys of business
plans for plant and equipment suggest that capital spend­
ing outlays will rise more slowly in the current half year
than in the first six months of 1969, though the same
surveys also indicate that the uptrend will continue into
next year. In view of record borrowing costs, the squeeze
on profit margins, probable repeal of the investment tax
credit, and relatively low capacity utilization rates in man­
ufacturing, the planned further rise of plant and equip­
ment spending apparently rests on expectations of sharply
higher labor costs and robust product demand.
Consumer goods production continued to grow at a
modest pace in August, although output of automotive
products was about unchanged. On a seasonally adjusted
basis, auto assemblies remained at the very strong July
rate of 9 million units per year. That pace was maintained
in September, but industry production schedules point to
a cut in automobile assemblies in October to an 8 V2
million unit rate.
Recent movements in the volume of new orders re­
ceived by manufacturers of durable goods have been
dominated by wide swings in defense bookings, which
are a particularly volatile component of the orders series.
Perhaps reflecting timing factors related to the Federal
Government’s fiscal year, defense orders slackened toward
the end of fiscal 1969 but were quite strong in July,
the first month of the new fiscal year. Defense book­
ings fell back in August, giving rise to a $0.7 billion
decline in total new durables orders, to a level of $29.9
billion. The backlog of unfilled orders for durable goods
has also been affected by the erratic movements of de­

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

208

fense orders. Following a steady uptrend that lasted
about a year, the backlog of unfilled orders at durables
manufacturing establishments declined in June as orders
fell and shipments rose. There was a partial rebuilding of
the backlog in July, but it dropped again in August as
shipments volume, though lower than July, again exceeded
orders. Nevertheless, excluding the defense component, the
flow of durables orders remained above shipments, and the
backlog of nondefense orders expanded through August.
The inventory situation continued to appear relatively
well balanced during the summer, though there may have
been some involuntary accumulation (see Chart I ) . Total
business inventories rose by a sizable $1.3 billion in July.
While accumulation in the trade sector accounted for only
$0.4 billion of the increase, both wholesalers and retailers
experienced a decline in sales and a noticeable rise in
their inventory-sales ratio. The ratio in manufacturing also

Chart I

INVENTORY-SALES RATIOS
Months of sales

Se a s o n a lly ad justed

advanced in July, as durables inventories surged by $1.0
billion and total shipments m oved up by only $0.1 bil­
lion. In August, the ratio in manufacturing rose again as
inventories climbed by $0.5 billion and shipments fell.
Residential construction activity continues to be the
one distinctly weak part of the business picture. Private
nonfarm housing starts fell in August for the seventh
month in a row, although the decline was small, and the
number of building permits issued by local authorities
also edged down further. The reduced availability of mort­
gage credit for new-home purchase has clearly exerted a
restraining influence on home building this year. In August,
the national average rate on conventional new-home mort­
gages was over 8 percent. A t the same time, the prices of
both new and existing homes have climbed steeply, in­
creasing the amount of mortgage credit needed by the
typical purchaser. The rise in mortgage rates has also
resulted in problems with usury ceilings, which in twenty
states are at or below 8 percent. A further complication
in the housing industry has been the fact that builders
may have encountered difficulty obtaining loans from
commercial banks to finance construction operations.

Months of sales

EMPLOYMENT, PERSONAL INCOME,
AND RETAIL SALES

Note: The ratios for total business and trade are plotted through July. The ratios
for durables, nondurablos, and total manufacturing are plotted through August.
Source: United States Department of Commerce.




In the past two months, the labor market indicators
have shown signs of easing from the very tight conditions
which have prevailed most of this year. However, the eas­
ing may have been overstated as a result of special factors.
The timing of the automobile industry’s model changeover
brought an earlier return to full operating schedules than
in past years, thus raising August employment and lower­
ing September employment on a seasonally adjusted basis.
Employment outside the transportation industry changed
little in August and September. Difficulties with seasonal
adjustment apparently also played a role in the house­
hold survey of employment. The September rise in the
civilian labor force was mostly among persons aged 16 to
24, for whom seasonal adjustments are difficult to make
as the school year begins. The sizable advance in the
labor force, together with a small decline in total employ­
ment, resulted in a jump in the unemployment rate of 0.5
percentage point, the largest monthly change in nine years,
to 4.0 percent. Although the most dramatic m ove­
ment in the September data was in the younger age group,
the unemployment rate for those 25 and over rose sub­
stantially, moving up 0.2 percentage point to 2.5 percent.
Personal income rose in August by $5.2 billion to a
seasonally adjusted annual rate of $756.6 billion, follow­
ing a similar advance of $5.3 billion in July. The expan­

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

sion in July and August was in line with the roughly 8 V2
percent annual rate of gain recorded over the first six
months of this year. However, income growth in both
those summer months was buoyed by the pay raise for
Federal Government employees, which first appeared in
July salaries and became fully effective in August. Fur­
thermore, the personal income estimate for August re­
ceived an extra boost from the timing of this year’s auto­
mobile model changeover. Excluding these nonrecurring
factors, income growth in July and August was at a rate
considerably less than in the first half of 1969.
Consumer demand showed no signs of strength in the
summer months, as monthly retail sales continued little
changed from the $29.4 billion level reached in April.
Also, a recent survey of consumer attitudes has found a
marked drop in optimism, suggesting that the current
sluggishness may continue. Retail sales in August recov­
ered a $0.3 billion dip in July, moving back to a seasonally
adjusted rate of $29.4 billion. Autom obile sales have
shared in the general weakness. For the first nine months
of 1969, sales of domestic cars averaged 8.4 mil­
lion units at a seasonally adjusted annual rate, down from
the 1968 total of 8.6 million units but still well above the
7.6 million units sold in 1967. While sales advanced in
September, the introduction of the 1970 models came too
late in the period for the month’s figure to be a reliable
indication of market acceptance of the new cars. The real
test for the 1970 models will be in the weeks following
introductory sales promotions and deliveries to fleet-buyers
and auto-leasing organizations. Sales of imported cars have
continued to rise this year, although the advance has been
distinctly smaller than the large gains of the last few years.
For the first eight months of 1969, sales of imports were
6 percent above the comparable period in 1968. Earlier,
imported car sales had been growing at about 25 percent
per year. This slowing may reflect fresh competition from
new low-priced models produced in this country, or it
may simply have stemmed from the absence of growth in
the demand for new cars generally.
RECENT PRICE DEVELOPMENTS

The price situation remains a major concern. A t both
the retail and wholesale levels, rates of increase have con­
tinued to be very large, threatening not only our fragile
balance-of-payments position but also the prospects for
orderly economic growth. The average July-August gain
in the consumer price index was at a 5 percent annual
rate— only slightly less than the 6 percent rate averaged
in the first six months of 1969 (see Chart I I ). To be
sure, much of the recent increase in the consumer index




209

r
Chart il

CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES

through September (preliminary).
Source: United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

can be attributed to a sharp run-up in food prices. Never­
theless, during the June-August period substantial in­
creases were also recorded in the nonfood components—
notably in housing and services— and the aggregate index
for all items except food rose at a AV2 percent annual rate.
A t wholesale, increases since June in the overall index
have been small only because declining agricultural prices
largely offset increases in prices of industrial commodities.
The index of farm and food products is, nevertheless, still
far above the levels of the first part of the year, despite
the recent declines. A lso, there has been a renewed up­
ward trend in industrial prices since June. During the
spring, the index of industrial wholesale prices had been
relatively stable, as sharp declines in lumber and wood
prices about offset other increases. The downtrend in lum­
ber moderated in the summer, and price increases else­
where— particularly in iron and steel— caused the indus­
trial index to rise once again. The industrial commodities
index rose a further 0.4 percent in September, reaching a
level of 113.2 percent of the 1957-59 average.

210

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

The Money and Bond Markets in September
The money and bond markets continued to feel the
effects of monetary restraint during September, as new
corporate issues provided record yields and rates on most
commercial paper and bankers’ acceptances also moved
higher. The effective rate on Federal funds again averaged
9 percent, but member bank borrowings declined during
the month as a result of an unusually large volume of re­
serves provided temporarily by Treasury operations.
A large Treasury refinancing, which included the pre­
refunding of a December maturity, attracted a good deal
of attention during the month. On September 17 the Trea­
sury announced that holders of $6.4 billion of Treasury
notes and bonds due on October 1 and almost $2.5 billion
of bonds maturing on December 15 would be offered
three issues in exchange. These were a 19 Vi-month note
offered at par to yield 8 percent, a 3-year 7 Vi -month
note with a 1 3A percent coupon also offered at par, and a
7 Vi percent note maturing in 6 years 10 Vi months and
priced to yield about 7.59 percent. These rates were the
highest on comparable Treasury issues in more than a cen­
tury, and the public gave the offering a very good recep­
tion. The attrition rate on the publicly held portion of
the maturing issues was 19.7 percent, considerably lower
than expected in the light of current market conditions.
Of the $8.9 billion being refunded, the public held $7.6
billion.
With the exception of some short-term bill and coupon
issues, prices of United States Government securities de­
clined during September. Some brief improvement oc­
curred from time to time in response to such factors as a
statement by Chairman Martin that interest rates might
have reached their highest level and optimistic speculation
associated with the cease-fire in Vietnam following the
death of H o Chi Minh. Such rallies were short-lived,
however, and the overall trend was downward. Concern
over the current and prospective volume of Federal
agency securities weighed heavily on the market toward
the end of the month.
Corporate bond prices also fell in September, and rec­
ord offering yields were set on many of the issues that
were marketed. The volume of new corporate issues was




the largest September total on record, and investor
resistance was at times quite pronounced. One prime-rated
Bell System issue, for example, received only a fair
initial reception despite a record yield of 8.25 percent.
In the municipal bond market, on the other hand, an
unusually light supply of new issues resulted in a decline
in yields during the month (see Chart I ) . Several sched­
uled municipal offerings were postponed because of statu­
tory interest ceilings and others withdrawn because of
unfavorable market conditions. Growing optimism about
the tax reforms that would eventually emerge from the
Congress relating to income from municipal securities also
contributed to the better tone in that market.
BANK RESERVES AND T H E MONEY MARKET

Money market conditions continued firm during Sep­
tember despite a large volume of reserves provided in the
week ended on September 10 by a rundown of Treasury
balances and the sale of $1,102 million of special Trea­
sury certificates to the Federal Reserve. The effective rate
on Federal funds averaged 9.1 percent for the month,
essentially unchanged from August, while rates on com ­
mercial paper and bankers’ acceptances were increased
during the month. Due primarily to the unexpectedly
large provision of reserves by Treasury operations, mem­
ber bank borrowings at the discount window in Septem­
ber— amounting to $1,026 million on a daily average
basis— were down $185 million from the preceding
month, while excess reserves averaged $88 million higher
than in August. N et borrowed reserves of member banks
averaged $766 million for September as a whole.
The basic reserve positions of both the eight major
New York City banks and the thirty-eight money center
banks outside New York showed a deterioration over the
month though their intramonthly patterns differed. The
New York City banks had a basic reserve surplus averag­
ing $285 million at the close of August but moved to a
deficit position in the week ended on September 3, pri­
marily as a result of a sizable decline in their borrowings
other than from their foreign branches. The thirty-eight

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

211

Chart I

SELECTED INTEREST RATES
MONEY MARKET RATES

July

August

July-September 1969

September

BOND MARKET YIELDS

July

August

September

Note: Data are shown for business d a ys only.
M O N EY M ARKET RATES Q UO TED: D aily ran ge of rates posted by major New York C ity banks
on call loans (in Federal funds) secured by United States G overnm ent securities (a point
indicates the ab sen ce of any range); offering rates for directly p la ce d finance company pap er;

im m ediately after it has been released from syndicc5» restrictions); d a ily a v e ra g e s of yields
on seaso n ed A a a -ra tsd c o rporate b on d s; d a ily a v e ra g e s of yields on lon g-term G overnm ent
securities (bonds due or ca lla b le in ten ye ars or more) and on G overnm ent securities due in

the effective rate on Fed eral funds (the rate most representative of the transactions executed);
clo sing bid rates (quoted in terms of rate of discount) on newest outstanding three- and six-month
Treasury bills.
BO N D MARKET YIELDS QUOTED: Y ield s on new A a a - and A a-rate d pub lic utility bonds (arrows point
from underwriting syndicate reoffering yield on a given issue to market yield on the same issue

other money center banks, in contrast, showed a slight
improvement in their position.
In the week ended on September 10 the basic deficit
at the N ew York City banks increased by $1,085 million
and that at the other money center banks by $433 mil­
lion. A major factor contributing to the worsening in
New York was a rise of $722 million in loans to Govern­
ment securities dealers. That increase was to a large ex­
tent the counterpart of sizable matched sale-purchase
transactions by the System to offset the effects of the large
volume of reserves being supplied by Treasury opera­
tions. In addition, the Treasury made frequent calls on
its accounts at money center banks. A loss of private
deposits also contributed to the deterioration of the basic
position at both groups of banks. Despite the fact that




three to five years, computed on the b asis of closing bid p rices; Thursday a v e ra g e s of yields
on twenty .'.seasoned twenty-ye ar tax-exem pt bonds (carrying M oody’s ratings of A a a , A a,
A , and Baa).
Sources: F e d eral Reserve Bank of New York, Board of G overno rs of the Fed eral Reserve System,
M oody’s investors Service, and The W e e k ly Bond Buyer.

this was the week of quarterly corporate dividend pay­
ments as well as the sale of Alaskan oil leases, total
loans and investments, other than loans to dealers, de­
clined at the forty-six banks.
The major money center banks managed their reserve
positions aggressively in the week ended on September
17, accumulating sizable reserve deficiencies over the first
five days. A s a result, the more usual pattern of tightness
in the Federal funds market at the start of the week and
some easing at the close was reversed. The effective rate
on Federal funds was 8% percent on Thursday and
Friday but then began to rise, reaching 10 percent by
Tuesday as the money center banks attempted to settle
their reserve positions. The volume of float was less than
had been expected, and the System executed repurchase

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

212

agreements which helped to reduce the effective rate to
9Vi percent on the settlement date. Loans and invest­
ments at the major money center banks increased sharply
during this corporate tax payment week, and the basic
position of the thirty-eight banks outside N ew York City
worsened by $773 million. The deterioration in the basic
position of the eight N ew York City banks was consider­
ably less, however, as sizable gains in deposits and Euro­
dollar borrowings offset a large amount of the increase
in loans and investments.
The tone of the money market was quite firm during
the final statement week in September, and the effective
rate on Federal funds was above 9 percent throughout the
period. In a reversal of the pattern of two weeks earlier,
Treasury operations absorbed $1,796 million of reserves
on a daily average basis in the week ended on September
24, primarily in relation to tax collections. The redelivery
to the System of securities from matched sale-purchase
transactions executed in the previous week, and the pur­
chase of additional securities under repurchase agree­
ments, helped to alleviate the pressure on the banking sys­
tem. The basic reserve position of the forty-six banks
improved during the week (see Chart I I ), largely as a re-

Chart II

BASIC RESERVE POSITIONS OF
MAJOR MONEY MARKET BANKS
Billions of d ollars

THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MARKET
Billions of d ollars

Note: Calculation of the basic reserve position is illustrated in Table II.




suit of a decline in loans to Government securities dealers.
During the month of September, System open market
operations absorbed $735 million of reserves on a daily
average basis (see Table I ) . System operations during the
first and last weeks of the month supplied reserves of
$878 million on a daily average basis through repurchase
agreements, but $1,613 million of reserves was absorbed
during the second and third statement weeks, primarily
through the use of matched sale-purchase agreements of
varying maturities.
There was no change in the seasonally adjusted money
supply during September following a decline of 1.8 per­
cent (annual rate) in August. Over the third quarter as
a whole the money supply grew at a rate of only 0.2 per­
cent but at a rate of 2.9 percent for the first nine months
of 1969. Total member bank deposits subject to reserve
requirements (the bank credit proxy), plus banks’ liabili­
ties to their foreign branches, increased at a seasonally
adjusted rate of 3 percent in September, compared with
a decline of 2 percent over the first nine months as a
whole. Because of the proliferation of nondeposit means
of raising funds, this measure has become an increasingly
poor indicator of trends in bank credit, The latter, on the
basis of last-Wednesday-of-the-month figures, rose at a
seasonally adjusted rate of 2 percent over the first nine
months of the year. After adjustment for asset sales to
affiliates and foreign branches, the rate of growth in bank
credit increased to 3 percent.

The market for United States Government securities
was dominated in large part during September by the Trea­
sury’s October refunding, which included an issue com ­
ing due in December as well. Terms of the refunding were
announced after the close of business on September 17,
and subscription books were open September 22-24.
Attention in the market, particularly early in the month,
was also focused on the September 10 auction of North
Slope oil leases by the state of Alaska, from which some
reinvestment demand was anticipated.
The market also was affected by a sizable amount of
Federal agency borrowing during September. The gross
volume amounted to some $1,948 million, while net new
money totaled $573 million. By far the largest single
borrower was the Federal Hom e Loan Bank System, which
sold $650 million of consolidated notes due in July 1970
and $250 million of consolidated bonds due in April 1971.
Offered at par, the issues carried coupons of 8.40 percent
and 8.375 percent, respectively.
Prices of most Treasury securities eroded persistently

213

FEDERAL RESERVE RANK OF NEW YORK
Table I

Table II

FACTORS TENDING TO INCREASE OR DECREASE
MEMBER BANK RESERVES, SEPTEMBER 1969

RESERVE POSITIONS OF MAJOR RESERVE CITY BANKS

In m illion s o f dollars; ( + ) d en otes increase,
(— ) d ecrease in excess reserves

In m illio n s o f dollars

S E P T E M B E R 1969

1
!
j

Changes in daily averages—
weak ended on
Net
changes

Factors
Sept.
10

Sept.
3

Sept.
17

Daily averages-—week ended on

Averages of
four weeks
ended on
Sept. 24

Factors affecting
hasic reserve positions
Sept.

Sept.

Sept.

Sept.

^

10

17

24

!

Sept.
24

Eight banks in N e w York City

1
' ‘Market” factors
Member bank required reserves ....................
Operating transactions (subtotal) ................
Treasury operations* ...................................
G old and foreign a c c o u n t ..........................
Currency outside banks ...............................
Other Federal Reserve accounts ( ii e t ) t ..
Total “ market” factors ...........................

7
4 -1 4 8 —
— 256 + 1 ,3 9 5
— 108 + 365
- f 39 + 860
27
—
9 +
— 145 +
35
— 31 + 10G

—
+
+
—
—
—
+

— 108

+ 186

+ 1 ,3 8 8

142
328
175
18
2
72
246

—
25
— 620
+ 195
— 1,125
—
11
+ 218
+ 104

—
+
+
—
+
+
+

—

+ 821

645

26
847
627
244
5
36
425

R eserve ex cess or d eficien cy(—) * ......
L ess borrow ings from
R eserve B anks ...........................................
L ess net interbank F ed eral funds
p urchases or sa les(—) ...........................
G ro ss p u rch a ses ................................
G ro ss sa les ........................................
E q u als net b a sic reserve surplus
or d eficit(—) .............................................
N et loan s to G overnm ent
securities dealers ....................................
N et carry-over, excess or deficit(—) f ..

Bankers’ acceptances ...............................

+ 237

—

935

— 678

4 - 155 ---1,276
—
1
—
+ 507
—

—

4-

+
+

890

+

641

+ 1 ,2 5 4

3

—
+ 154 — 661

—

— 735
— 757
_
4
—

Repurchase agreem ents:
Bankers’ acceptances ...............................
Federal agency obligations ....................
Member bank borrowings ...............................
Other loans, discounts, and advances.........
Total

................................................................

36

27
52 j
1
129 !
84
i
1,198 1 1,251
2,124
2,089
891
873 \

-

151
64
i
1,305 !
2,203 i
898

84
962
2,055
1,093

1,010

— 133 —1,218 - 1 ,3 7 9 - 1 ,3 0 8 ; !
1,083
466
505 ! 1,054
2 |
55 ! 28 !
i

777
22

7

Thirty-eight banks outside New York City

Direct Federal Reserve credit
transactions
Open market operations (subtotal) .............
Outright h oldin gs:

19
|
57
I
:
95
i 1,803
1,708

63

— 131
—
12
14 —
22
38 — 499
__

+
44-

6

50
7

+

40

+

8
89

4l
44
— 95

— 830

—

44
+ 277
__

4+
—

—

4 276

— 1,433

— 401

+

728

4 -1 6 8

—

— 215

+

83

45

22

9

—

135
2
R eserve excess or d eficien cy(—) * ......
L ess borrow ings from
39
289
R eserve B anks ...........................................
L ess n et interbank F ed era l funds
2,442
1,892
purchases or sa les(—) ..........................
4,599
4,025
G ro ss p u rch a ses .................................
2,133
2,157
G ro ss sa les ........................................
j
E quals net b asic reserve surplus
or deficit(—) ............................................. I —2,046 *—2,479
N e t loan s to G overnm ent
!
26
securities dealers ................................... ; — 203!
81
N et carry-over, ex cess or deficit(—) t
!4 !

8

8

34

!

329

306

241

i
i

i
2,915 |
4,447 |
1,532 \

2,377
4,320 !
2 >943

—

2,407
4,348
1,941

\ - 3 ,2 5 2 - 2 ,6 7 5 : - 2 ,6 1 3
1
|
422 53
48
2
!
26
26

N o te: B eca u se o f rounding, figures d o n ot n ecessarily add to totals.
* R eserves held after all adjustm ents ap plicab le to the reporting period less
required reserves and carry-over reserve deficiencies,
t N o t reflected in data ab ove.

Table in
Daily average levels

AVERAGE ISSUING RATES*
AT REGULAR TREASURY BILL AUCTIONS
In p ercent

Member bank:
Total reserves, including vault c a s h ...........
Required reserves ..............................................
Excess reserves .....................................................
Borrowings ..............................................................
Free, or net borrowed (— ), r e s e r v e s .........
Nonborrowed reserves ........................................
Net carry-over, excess or deficit (— ) § . . . .

26,929
26,549
380
1,239
— 859
25,690
80

26,891
26,556
335
740
— 405
26,151
169

26,818
26,698
120
1,017
— 897
25,801
166

26,926
26,723
203
1,106
— 903
25,820
70

26,891J
26.632+
260$

Weekly auction dates— September 1 9 6 9
Maturities

l,0 2 6 t
— 7661
25,8651:
121+

Sept.

Sept.
15

Sept.

Sept.

22

29

T hree-m onth

7.184

7.156

7.161

S ix -m o n th ........

7.408

7.329

7.362

;

7.106
7.340

Changes in Wednesday levels
Monthly auction dates— July-Septem ber 1 9 6 9
System account holdings of Government
securities maturing in:
Less than one year ..........................................
More than one year ..........................................
Total

................................................................

— 468
—
— 468

— 1,703

+

—
— 1,703

48
“

+

N ote: Because of rounding, figures do not necessarily add to totals.
* Includes changes in Treasury currency and cash,
t Includes assets denom inated in foreign currencies.
t Average for four weeks ended on September 24.
§ Not reflected in data above.




48

+ 1 ,1 6 4

July
24

— 959

~

_

+1,16-1

— 959

N in e-m o n th

7.407

O n e -y e a r .......

7.313

!

August

I

26

!

Sept.
23

7.387

7.357

7.340

7.350

* Interest rates on b ills are q u oted in term s o f a 360-day year, w ith the dis­
counts from par as th e return on th e fa ce am ount o f the b ills p ayable at
m aturity. B ond y ield eq u ivalents, related to the am ou nt actu ally invested,
w ould be slightly higher.

214

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

during the month of September. The largest declines were
in longer term bonds which were off by 31%e to 4 15A g
points, while intermediate-term issues due in three to
seven years for the most part fell by 2%6 to 315Ae points.
Treasury bills due within two months experienced some
improvement in September, but rates on all bills maturing
beyond November rose from 1 to 27 basis points.
There was a weak tone in the market for notes and
bonds during most of the first half of September. This
resulted from several factors. Investment demand was
quite light, and the growing congestion in the markets
for Federal agency securities and corporate bonds pro­
vided further competition for available investor funds.
Moreover, there was some concern over the approaching
Treasury refunding, and dealers attempted to lighten their
positions in the intermediate maturity area. A brief im­
provement occurred in response to the aforementioned
speculation concerning an extension of the Vietnam cease­
fire and to the remarks by Chairman Martin. Following
this, however, dealers began to mark down prices of out­
standing issues in anticipation of the terms of the Trea­
sury’s refunding. It also became gradually apparent that
no further investment demand was likely to stem from the
Alaska oil rights sale.
On September 18, the day following the announcement
of the refunding terms, prices of outstanding Government
notes and bonds moved sharply lower in adjustment to the
yields set on the new issues. Market response to the terms
was generally favorable, and the “when-issued” notes of
1971 and 1973 gained %2 on the day, while those of 1976
rose by %2. Heaviness developed as the month progressed,
however, and the three notes were down *%2 to W32 at the
close of the period.
With the exception of the shorter maturities which were
in thin supply, bill rates adjusted higher at the beginning
of September and then fluctuated in a narrow range. Early
in the month, activity was moderate and selling by foreign
investors as well as dealers led to an increase in bill
rates. This was tempered somewhat by the optimistic
speculation about a Vietnam cease-fire.
In the week ended on September 19, bill rates fluc­
tuated narrowly in fairly active trading, and the September
15 tax date presented no unusual pressures. Sizable in­
vestment demand from foreign central banks and consider­
able interest in the bills sold at the regular weekly auction
contributed to a decline in rates at the start of the week.
The trend was reversed on Wednesday afternoon, how­
ever, in the face of professional and investor selling, and
rates moved higher over the remainder of the week.
Foreign demand was again a factor in the bill market
in the week ended on September 26 and contributed to a




better tone at the start of the period. Demand emanating
from the refunding was less than participants had ex­
pected, however, and rates moved irregularly during the
next several days. On balance most rates increased over
the week, but some improvement occurred at the close
of the month.
A t the regular monthly auction on September 23, aver­
age issuing rates on the new nine- and twelve-month bills
were set at 7.357 percent and 7.350 percent, respectively,
down 3 and up 1 basis points from the comparable rates
set at the auction a month earlier (see Table III). A t the
final weekly auction on September 29, average issuing
rates for the new three- and six-month bills were set at
7.106 and 7.340 percent, respectively, 9 and 17 basis
points above the average rates established at the last
weekly auction in August.
OTHER SECURITIES MARKETS

Corporate bond prices moved steadily downward dur­
ing most of the month as the volume of new offerings
reached the highest total on record for September.
The market rallied briefly on September 10 in response to
Chairman Martin’s comments and to hope for an extension
of a cease-fire in Vietnam. Another short-lived rally oc­
curred around midmonth, when the first prime-rated elec­
tric utility issue ever to offer investors more than 8 percent
was marketed and a sizable scheduled issue of industrial
bonds was withdrawn from the calendar. With the excep­
tion of these two periods, the trend in the corporate
bond market was one of rising yields and successively
higher records set on new issues. In the municipal bond
market, the start of September saw7 a continuation of the
previous month’s deterioration, and on September 4 The
W eekly Bond Buyer's Thursday index of yields on twenty
municipal bonds jumped an additional 11 basis points to
a record 6.37 percent. The calendar of new issues sched­
uled for the month was light, however, and further post­
ponements, voluntary and involuntary, were continually
occurring. In this situation of a relatively scarce supply of
new issues, coupled with a more hopeful outlook on the
part of participants regarding the future tax status of
municipal bonds, yields on state and local government
securities moved down. By September 25 the Bond Buy­
er’s index stood at 6.08, a drop of 29 basis points from
September 4. Thereafter, yields again rose, reflecting
weakness in other markets.
The response of investors to new corporate bond offer­
ings during the early part of the month was somewhat
mixed despite the high level of returns. A n Aa-rated is­
sue of power company bonds yielding a record 8.20 per­

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

215

cent was a quick sellout, but an Aaa-rated $150 million successively higher record yields were required to achieve
issue of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company deben­ this. Moreover, investor response was not enthusiastic
tures received only a fair reception on its offering date, even at these levels.
Prices of state and local bonds fell sharply at the start
despite a record return for a Bell System issue of 8.14
percent. (On August 20 a similar offering provided in­ of September, and a mounting backlog of older issues
vestors with only a 7.75 percent return and was an im­ prompted underwriters to release several issues from price
mediate success.) The Southwestern Bell debentures did restrictions. The resulting upward yield adjustments ranged
sell out on the day following their initial marketing, as as high as 45 basis points. Postponements due to mar­
the market reacted favorably to optimism about a cease­ ket conditions and failures to receive bids because of
interest rate ceilings continued, thereby reducing the
fire and to Chairman Martin’s remarks.
The improved tone in the corporate bond market was already light calendar even further. The “Blue List” of
only temporary, however, and prices soon resumed their municipal dealers’ inventories declined by $56 million
downtrend. Then, on September 15, it was announced from $406 million on August 29 to $350 million on Sep­
that a $150 million issue scheduled for marketing on tember 30. Although there was still concern about the
September 17 was being withdrawn because of unfavor­ longer term outlook for the municipal markets, the imme­
able market conditions. Market participants responded diate situation of relatively few new issues provided a
positively to this sizable reduction in supply and to the respite, however temporary, and municipal bond yields
sale on the next day of a prime electric utility issue whose began a retreat. Despite the sharp drop in the Bond
yield marked the first offering of more than 8 percent on Buyer’s index of 29 basis points over the last three weeks
such an issue. Again, the improvement was brief and an of the month, the level of yields remains historically high.
Aa-rated offering of utility bonds which was aggressively This was underscored by the fact that on September 24
priced a few days later met with a poor reception from the Federal Housing Assistance Administration was un­
investors. When the syndicate managing this issue was able to sell $142 million of a $191 million offering of
terminated, the yield on the bonds adjusted up to 8.21 tax-exempt local housing authority bonds because of a
percent from the initial offering of 8.08 percent. Those 6 percent statutory ceiling. Earlier in the month the same
new issues which were attractively priced over the re­ restriction had resulted in less than half of two offerings of
mainder of the month were generally well received, but temporary housing and urban renewal notes being sold.




216

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

The Clearing Mechanism of the Latin American Free Trade Association*
A t a September 1965 meeting in M exico City, central
bank governors of the nine nations then belonging to
the Latin American Free Trade Association (L A F T A )1
agreed to establish a limited clearing mechanism for facil­
itating intraregional payments. The basic agreement pro­
vides for the negotiation of bilateral (and reciprocal)
credit agreements between each pair of participating
central banks and for the multilateral clearing of balances
which arise from each individual bilateral credit agreement
clearing. The mechanism went into operation in m id-19 66
among only six countries, but since then more countries
have joined and actively participated, while the number
and size of underlying bilateral credit arrangements have
been expanded. By reducing the magnitude and fre­
quency of cash transactions among countries, the clear­
ing facility has helped economize on their convertible
foreign exchange and has made payments easier and
less costly. L A F T A ’s clearing arrangement has become
an important step toward financial integration among
LA FTA countries. This article describes the evolution of
this mechanism and the ways in which it serves the par­
ticipating countries.

reluctant to extend such credit to intraregional deficit
countries. Under some proposals, creditor countries
within the region would not have been able to use their
regional surpluses to settle extra-regional deficits, and
this appeared to them as a backward step, away from
free convertibility. Furthermore, smaller and poorer sur­
plus countries felt it unreasonable that they be forced to
extend credit to larger and wealthier deficit countries,
and surplus countries did not always approve of the eco­
nomic policies of debtor countries.
The problem of Latin American payments was dis­
cussed at the first meeting of the United Nations E co­
nomic Commission for Latin America in 1948. A t that
time, bilateral agreements covered about half the area’s
intraregional trade as well as some extra-Latin American
trade. It was hoped that multilateral arrangements could
be developed to improve and eventually replace the net­
work of bilateral agreements. Discussions continued, and in
1958 a working group of central banks proposed an agree­
ment to create a multilateral clearing system for bilateral
balances. Although the draft scheme was rather similar to
the system now in force, it was not implemented at the time.
By 1960 the Latin American integration movements
were becoming institutionalized, as evidenced by the estab­
BACKGROUND
lishment of the Inter-American Development Bank,
For decades, Latin American governments, central LA FTA , and the Central American Common Market.
bankers, and regional organizations have been discussing Other regional organizations, such as the Center for Latin
possible means for achieving a greater degree of financial American Monetary Studies (C E M L A ) and various
integration within the region and have considered numer­ committees of the Organization of American States and
ous proposals for intraregional credit and clearing of the Alliance for Progress, actively studied the financial
balances. Establishment of intraregional clearing came aspects of integration. These aspects of clearing arrange­
slowly, however, because clearing proposals were com ­ ments received new emphasis, as ways were sought to
bined with automatic credit, and some countries were smooth out possible balance-of-payments difficulties arising
from the lowering of intraregional trade barriers. While
discussion proceeded, emphasis shifted again from this
objective to that of providing incentives to facilitate the
* M. Alberto Alvarez, Economist, Foreign Research Division, growth of intraregional trade. The example of the Central
had primary responsibility for the preparation of this article.
American Clearing House, which began operations in
1 The original signatories were the central banks of Argentina.
1961 as part of Central American integration efforts,
Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and
Uruguay. Bolivia and Venezuela joined later.
contributed to this shift. The Clearing House made intra-




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

regional payments easier and reduced the use of scarce
foreign currency for such purposes without large mutual
credit facilities. It became evident that a payments or
credit system need not involve extension of sizable and
long-term credits, and support developed for an arrange­
ment whereby the maximum amount of such credit would
be specified in advance and its term would be held to
a very short period.
The decisive impetus to establish the present mechanism
was given at the first meeting of commercial bankers of
LA FT A . In their report of March 1965 to their central
banks, the commercial bankers suggested the signing of
a complementary agreement to the L A F T A treaty, estab­
lishing guarantees of free convertibility and the transfer­
ability of exchange used in transactions among LA FTA
countries. The bankers also recommended the creation
of correspondent relations among the commercial banks,
whose clearing payments would be expressed in United
States dollars and settled through arrangements made by
the central banks. In June the Advisory Commission on
Monetary Affairs of L A F T A drafted the documents, and
on September 22, 1965 the governors of the L A FT A
central banks signed a general agreement establishing the
clearing mechanism.
THE AGREEMENT

The preamble to the general agreement makes clear
that the system was conceived as the first step toward
the long-run goal of financial and monetary integration.
The more immediate aims, however, were to provide a
stimulus to financial and trade relations within the region
and to foster systematic consultations on monetary, ex­
change, and payments matters.
The agreement calls for the establishment of bilateral
(and reciprocal) lines of credit, expressed in United
States dollars, among all participating central banks.
The channeling of payments through the system is entirely
voluntary, thus allowing each country to maintain its trade
and exchange practices. (In reality most central banks
have made it compulsory for payments among addressees
of signatory countries to go through the mechanism.) Ar­
ticle 7, however, requires the central banks to guarantee
the convertibility of the currencies used in the final settle­
ments with each other, a feature reinforced by Article 8
which specifies that settlements must be made in United
States dollars.
The balances resulting from the utilization of the bilat­
eral lines of credit are to be cleared periodically and multilaterally. (Originally the period between settlements was
two months, now it is quarterly.) The agreement calls for




217

the immediate settlement of any balance exceeding the set
credit limit, but the central banks are allowed to negotiate
additional extraordinary credits. Furthermore, the agree­
ment requests the central banks to encourage intraregional
correspondent relationships among their commercial banks,
so that the latter may clear their net balances through
the system. The clearing operations, including the com­
putation of the net balances at the end of the period, are
carried out by an agent bank, a task which has been given
to the Central Reserve Bank of Peru.
The procedures are simple: on the bases of accounting
information cabled by each of the central banks within
forty-eight hours after the end of the last working day of
the settlement period, the agent determines the balances be­
tween each pair of central banks and also the net balance of
each central bank in relation to all the other banks to­
gether. By the following day the agent must notify every
central bank of its net position, and this information is
also sent to the designated common correspondent bank
— the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Within the next
twenty-four hours the debtor countries must make their
payments, in dollars, to the special L A FT A account of
the correspondent bank, which then proceeds to pay the
creditor banks. If a bank does not provide the required
information within the stipulated forty-eight hours, the
agent will compute the net balances among the other
banks, with which the tardy bank will have to settle its
accounts directly. Furthermore, if a debtor bank does not
pay the correspondent bank within twenty-four hours of
being notified, the agent will annul the clearing by order­
ing the correspondent bank to return the amounts received
and will proceed to settle the accounts again, excluding
the delinquent bank.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEM

Immediately after the system started operating, prob­
lems became evident. The central banks authorized every
payment, cabled payment orders were confirmed by air­
mail, and in some cases payment data were cabled daily.
There were serious questions as to how to treat expenses
and commissions regarding payments and how to resolve
conflicts of national holidays falling on settlement dates.
Credit limits in many cases were insufficient, frequently
making extraordinary settlements necessary— a problem
which plagued the system in its first years. In addition, as
any pair of participating banks could establish their own
operating techniques by setting them forth in a bilateral
agreement, until recently no two bilateral credit agree­
ments were completely alike. For example, there were
significant differences regarding the amount of documen­

218

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969
Table I
BILATERAL CREDITS
UNDER AGREEMENTS NEGOTIATED BY THE END OF MARCH 1969
In m illio n s o f d ollars
|
Country

Argentina

Bolivia

Brazil*

Chile

Colombia

Ecuador

Mexico

Paraguay

Peru

Uruguay*

A rgen tin a .........................

—

2.0

t

15.0

3.0

t

1.5

1.0

17.0

t

B o liv ia ...............................

2.0

—

t

.5

.1

B razil*...............................

t

t

—

5.0
—

C h ile..................................

15.0

.5

5.0

C o lo m b ia ........................

3.0

.1

f

E cu ad or.............................

f

M e x ic o ...............................

1.5

Paragu ay..........................

1.0

P e ru ................... .................

17.0

U ruguay*.........................

t

V en ezu ela ........................

.45

t

3.0

f

5.0

.2

4.5

.8

3.0

.75
—

|

3.0

5.0

t

,2

.8
3.0

.2
1.0

.5

1.0

.5
!

1.8

1

.5

.5
.2

—

i

4.5

3.0

3.25
11.00
1.8

1.0

—

-

1.0

.2

1

1.30
1.5

15.40

t

27.65

_

3.30

1.60
I

.50

|
1.5

33.25
8.65

j

.2

!
!

Total

39.50

.45

3.0

t

.75
t

.2

.2

Venezuela

f

|

* T h e agreem ents have b een sign ed but are n o t in op eration,
f A greem ents bein g negotiated.
S ource: Bolet'm M en su al (C E M L A , February 1 9 6 8 ), p age 102, (July 1 9 6 9 ), p a g e 318, and S'mtesis M en su a l (L A F T A , M ay 1 9 6 9 ), p age 188.

tary credits to be authorized, the limit at which excess
balances would require immediate settlement, the extent
of the guarantee to be given on currency convertibility and
transferability, and the option of channeling some or all
payments through the system.2 The general agreement,
however, sets forth simple provisions for revising the sys­
tem, and amendments soon solved many problems.
Last year most improvements were incorporated in a
uniform text for bilateral credit agreements and a tech­
nical procedures annex, drafted by L A F T A ’s Advisory
Commission on Monetary Affairs, to which all countries
adhere today.3 The uniform text provides that all pay­
ments between addressees of the two signatory countries
are allowed to go through the mechanism. Payments are to
be expressed in dollars, are subject to the foreign exchange
regulations of the countries, are to be effected under mostfavored-nation terms, and are to be made by the central
banks or their authorized institutions. Those payments
arising from trade in merchandise originating outside the

2 For a more comprehensive description, see Appendix 1, “Caracteristicas Comunes y Aspectos Divergentes de los Convenios de
Credito Reciproco en ALALC”, in “Ampliation
perfeccionamiento de los mecanismos de compensation en America Latina”,
Bolet'm Mensual (CEMLA, April 1968), pages 195-99.
3 See Bolet'm Mensual (CEMLA, September 1968), pages 47882 for text of the bilateral agreements and technical procedures.




two countries, as well as services and capital transactions
with nonresidents, are excluded from the bilateral agree­
ments.
A major improvement in the system, which had been
discussed since 1966, is formalized in the uniform text by
a “payments guarantee” clause. Each central bank guaran­
tees the settlement of payments going through the agree­
ment. Most of these payments arise from the letters of
credit, documentary credits, certified drafts, and payment
orders drawn or issued by its own commercial banks, and
the guarantee provides that each commercial bank of the
other country must declare “in writing and under its abso­
lute responsibility” that it has made the payment accord­
ing to the instructions of the drawer bank. Prior to this
guarantee, commercial and financial transactions between
commercial banks were routed through the central banks;
now such transactions can be made directly between com­
mercial banks.
Two other major improvements, which were introduced
in May 1968 by the Council on Financial and Monetary
Policies of LA FT A , are incorporated in the uniform
text. First, interest is charged on debit balances at a
rate IV2 percentage points below the discount rate of
the Federal Reserve Bank of N ew York in effect at the
beginning of the settlement period. This makes the mecha­
nism more attractive to net creditor countries. Second, the
central banks are authorized to use multilaterally, with the
permission of all the parties concerned, the unused credits

219

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

percentages presently run from as low as 5 percent to as
high as 333.33 percent of the basic credits.) This pro­
vision regarding excess balances acts as a secondary line
of credit and was introduced with the objective of elim­
inating, as far as possible, settlements before the end of
the settlement period. It also gives the central banks time
to adopt measures to reduce excess balances and takes
into account legal restrictions on the granting of unlimited
credit by some central banks.
Increasing participation of signatory countries in the
system has been an important development. To be sure,
the central banks are far from having concluded all the
bilateral agreements possible, but it should be recalled
that they are not compelled to do so and, what is more
important, that some countries have virtually no trade

that are available to them bilaterally. This enhances the
usefulness of the system as a multilateral instrument. Until
recently, the credits were compartmentalized by the bi­
lateral agreements: a country could exhaust its credit with
one central bank and not be able to make use of the
credits available under the remaining individual bilateral
agreements. In August 1968 the new option was used
for the first time by Chile, which settled $1.5 million
with M exico by utilizing its credit balances with Colombia,
Peru, and Venezuela.
The uniform text provides for variations in the size
of the basic credit that can be extended under each
agreement (see Table I ) as well as in the percentage
of the basic credit to which balances may expand be­
fore immediate settlement of the excess is required. (These

Table n
LAFTA CLEARINGS
In m illio n s o f dollars
j1
Settlem ent date
(end of period)

Argentina

Ecuador

Colombia

Chile

Bolivia

Mexico

Paraguay

Peru

Venezuela

Total*

|
;

1966

-

1.8

J u n e ..................................................

.6

A u g u s t .........................................

.5

-

t

— 1.1

— .1

.2

_

f

— 1.1

— .8

1.1

1.9

7.1

—

.9

.1

3.4

1.2

— 5.2

13.2

—

t

4.0

1.2

-

14.7

-

.5

3.8

7

2.9

-

O c to b e r ................................... j

8.5

-

D e cem b er................................

9.4

— 10.2

F ebruary..................................

12.5

— 10.7

.6

A p r il................

16.0

- 10.1

.3

June

11.2

-

7.5

-

.5

A ugust

13.2

-

.1

-

-

1.9

-

1.8

f

2.6

1967

10.6

!

1

10.8

D ecem b er...............................

t";
OO

O cto b er....................................

-

9.8

- 3 .6

-

6.8

— 1.9

i

3.0

— .6

.9

.2

.1

3.4

_

!

t

_2

f

_

.4

3.7

-

— 6.0

17.3

-

8.3

19.2

-

5.6

14.3

— 5.3

14.3

.2

-

14.5

.1

— 5.3

1.1

14.3

i

1

1968
.2

2.6

— .3

— 10.4

.5

4.4

-

1.3

-

.9

5.8

1.1

— 6.2

-.2

.5

9.6

.5

-

8.9

— .1

— .4

4.3

.9

-

4.7

-

t

18.5

-

t

21.6

|

F eb ru ary ...................

22.1

— 11.0

|

-3 .1

A p r il....

21.2

-

.4

— 12.0

!

— 2.8

J u n e .............

16.8

-

.8

— 14.7

- 2 .8

Septem ber^.............................. I

25.4

.2

— 22.3

-4 .0

-

D ecem b er ...

13.3

— .5

— 8.9

- 4.0

|

^

24.9

8.7

|
j
i

25.7
24.7
35.7

1969
,

M a r c h .....
J u n e ......................

........

14.0

-

21.8

- 2 .3

.9

|

-

-

8.2

— 17.7

j

1.7

— .3

i

j

- 2 .1

7.6

-

.1

-

8.5

- 1 .4

7.3

-

.2

-

7.1

N o te : M inu s figures represent n et p aym ents; other figures are receip ts. B eca u se o f rounding, figures do n ot n ecessarily add to totals.
* T o tal receip ts and total paym ents,
t L ess than $50,000.
t Since July 1, the clearings h ave taken p lace quarterly.
S ource: S'mtesis M en su al, L A F T A .




" -1

29.1

220

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

relations with certain other L A F T A members. A ll things
considered, the growth in the number of agreements
signed and in the volume of final settlements has been
extremely rapid. In May 1966 the clearing mechanism
started operations with six central banks— out of nine
original signatories to the general agreement— and nine
bilateral agreements, totaling $17.8 million. At that time,
five other bilateral agreements totaling $5.6 million had
been signed, but balances were not cleared through the
mechanism. By December 1967, ten banks had signed
the general agreement, with seven taking part in the clear­
ing through sixteen bilateral agreements totaling $25.7
million. Venezuela, the new member, settled balances
under its two bilateral agreements outside the mechanism.
By the first quarter of 1969, eleven banks had signed the
general agreement, and nine of these were actively partic­
ipating in the system through twenty-three bilateral credit
agreements amounting to $61.2 million.4 Brazil and
Uruguay, original signatories of the general agreement,
have signed four bilateral agreements totaling $11.5
million, but they have yet to start operations. Thus, out
of a possible total of fifty-five bilateral agreements within
L A FT A , twenty-seven have been signed, eight are being
negotiated, and another twenty remain to be negotiated.
As a result of one early revision of the agreement allowing
the central banks of Latin American countries outside
L A FT A to participate in the clearing mechanism, the
Dominican Republic concluded a bilateral credit agree­
ment with Venezuela and apparently intends to negotiate
others in order to participate in the system.
Progress toward attaining other goals of the system
has been mixed. “Triangulation”— the utilization of the
services of a common correspondent commercial bank
outside the region, usually in the United States, to make
payments among commercial banks in the L A FT A coun­
tries— has been almost totally eliminated. Some banks,
however, find lines of credit in hard currencies with banks
outside the region, especially in the United States, to be
useful in the financing of intraregional transactions. The
development of correspondent relationships among com­
mercial banks has been uneven. While the more aggressive
L A FT A banking systems have been quite successful in
establishing correspondent relationships among themselves,
others are required to transact all foreign exchange oper­
ations through their central banks.

A major immediate objective of the clearing system
— the saving of foreign exchange— has been successfully
achieved. Foreign exchange transactions going through
the system have been curtailed by almost three fourths:
65 percent to 75 percent of the transactions are cleared
internally by the netting of claims against liabilities, and
only the remaining 25 percent to 35 percent are settled
in United States dollars. Thus, in June 1966, the first
clearing, covering balances totaling $6.3 million, was
settled by payments of only $1.8 million (see Table II).
Recent figures indicate that between $70 million and
$100 million in balances is now being cleared quarterly,
with final settlements averaging $26 million. Savings
have also resulted for the commercial banks. They can
keep smaller balances outside the region and do not
have to pay the commissions and cabling expenses
entailed in the clearing of transactions through third
countries.
While the system cannot claim to have increased
L A F T A ’s trade, it has clearly expedited payments and
lowered their costs.5 Formerly, payments delays of
over six months were not rare. Today, it is claimed that
these delays have been reduced substantially, while the
costs of bank commissions and fees have been consider­
ably reduced in most cases. Moreover, it is reported that
total payments going through the system exceed com­
modity trade payments, indicating the increased utiliza­
tion of the mechanism for nonmerchandise purposes.
For example, Argentina and Peru channel all payments
through the system; on the other hand, Chile and V ene­
zuela do not allow the payment of their main exports,
copper and petroleum, to go through the system.
While problems have not disappeared, the central banks
are gradually solving them. For example, some central
banks are having difficulties in receiving data on payments
from others, there are no uniform criteria as to the
effective date for applying interest rates on the central

5 Several studies have analyzed and evaluated the operations
and achievements of the clearing system. Enrique Angulo, “Los
acuerdos de creditos y compensacion en Centroamerica y en la
ALALC”, Bolet'm Mensual (CEMLA, August 1966), pages 36983, and “Integration financiera Latinoamericana en 1968”,
Bolet'm Mensual (CEMLA, July 1969), pages 311-23. Comite
Tecnico Especial sobre Mecanismos de Compensacion, “In­
forme”, Bolet'm Mensual (CEMLA, February 1968), pages 95-103.
CEMLA, “Ampliation y perfeccionamiento de los mecanismos
de compensacion en America Latina”, Bolet'm Mensual (April
1968), pages 188-200, (May 1968), pages 263-79, and (June
4 Part of the $61.2 million resulted from the extension of the 1968), pages 342-53. Felipe Pazos, “Mecanismos multilaterales
de pagos en America Latina”, Temas del BID (Inter-American
settlement period to three months and the subsequent increase in
Development Bank, September 1968), pages 1-18.
the amounts of the reciprocal credit agreements.




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

bank debits, and commercial banks still occasionally
forget some of the routine formalities embodied in the
technical procedures.
Despite these problems, the system’s immediate goals
have been, for the most part, achieved. Through their close
cooperation, the central banks have developed more un­
derstanding of each others’ difficulties, a stronger mutual
confidence, and a greater willingness to work together in
solving common financial problems. This new attitude has
been quite evident in the system’s rapid shift from very re­

stricted operations under detailed instructions to a more
relaxed, decentralized, and multilateral method of operating
under the bilateral credit agreements. It has also been
evident in the continuous efforts to strengthen the institu­
tions of financial integration. This strengthening was evi­
dent in September, when the Council on Financial and
Monetary Policies of L A FT A reportedly approved the
establishment of credits to cover balance-of-payments diffi­
culties— a further step toward the common utilization of
the area’s financial resources.

Subscriptions to the m o n t h l y r e v i e w are available to the public without charge. Additional
copies of any issue may be obtained from the Public Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank
of N ew York, 33 Liberty Street, N ew York, N .Y . 10045.




221

MONTHLY REVIEW, OCTOBER 1969

Publications of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
The following is a selected list of publications available from the Public Information Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of N ew York, 33 Liberty Street, New York, N .Y . 10045. Copies of charge pub­
lications are available at half price to educational institutions, unless otherwise noted.
1. c e n t r a l b a n k c o o p e h a t i o n : 1924-31 (1 9 6 7 ) by Stephen V. O. Clarke. 234 pages. D is­
cusses the efforts of American, British, French, and German central bankers to reestablish and maintain
international financial stability between 1924 and 1931. ($2 per copy)
2. e s s a y s i n m o n e y a n d c r e d i t (1 9 6 4 ) 76 pages. Contains articles on select subjects in bank­
ing and the money market. (4 0 cents per copy)
3. k e e p i n g o u r m o n e y h e a l t h y (1966) 16 pages. A n illustrated primer on how the Federal R e­
serve works to promote price stability, full employment, and economic growth. Designed mainly for sec­
ondary schools, but useful as an elementary introduction to the Federal Reserve. (First 100 copies free;
7 cents for each additional copy*)
4. m o n e y a n d e c o n o m i c b a l a n c e (1 9 6 8 ) 27 pages. A teacher’s supplement to K eeping Our
M oney H ealthy. Written for secondary schoolteachers and students of economics and banking. (First
100 copies free; 8 cents for each additional copy*)
5. m o n e y , b a n k i n g , a n d c r e d i t i n e a s t e r n e u r o p e (1 9 6 6 ) by George Garvy. 167 pages.
Reviews recent changes in the monetary systems of the seven communist countries in Eastern Europe and
the steps taken toward greater reliance on financial incentives. ($1.25 per copy; 65 cents per copy to edu­
cational institutions)
6. m o n e y : m a s t e r o r s e r v a n t ? (1 9 6 6 ) by Thomas O. Waage. 48 pages. Explains the role of
money and the Federal Reserve in the economy. Intended for students of economics and banking. (First
100 copies free; 13 cents for each additional copy*)
7. o p e n m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s (1 9 6 9 ) by Paul Meek. 48 pages. A basic explanation of how the
Federal Reserve uses purchases and sales of Government securities to influence the cost and availability of
money and credit. Recent monetary actions are discussed. Intended for college students. (First 100 copies
free; 10 cents for each additional copy*)
8. t h e n e w y o r k f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e m a r k e t (1 9 6 5 ) by Alan R. Holmes and Francis H.
Schott. 64 pages. Describes the organization and instruments of the foreign exchange market, the techniques
of exchange trading, and the relationship between spot and forward rates. (5 0 cents per copy)
9. t h e s t o r y o f c h e c k s (1 9 6 6 ) 20 pages. An illustrated description of the origin and develop­
ment of checks and the growth and automation of check collection. Primarily for secondary schools but
useful as a primer on check collection. (First 100 copies free; 4 cents for each additional copy*)
10. e s s a y s i n d o m e s t i c a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l f i n a n c e (1 9 6 9 ) 86 pages. A collection of nine
articles dealing with a few important past episodes in United States central banking, several facets of the
relationship between financial variables and business activity, and various aspects of domestic and inter­
national financial markets,. Intended for advanced students of economics and finance. (7 0 cents per copy)

* Unlimited number of copies available to educational institutions without charge.