View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Bo
o

PERSPECTIVES




ECONOMIC

,( S i r ( § ( 2 .

F o re ig n c u r r e n c y fu tu re s:
so m e fu rth e r a s p e c t s
In d e x fo r 1 9 8 3
T h ro u g h th e s e v e n t ie s and b ey o n d

ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
November-December 1983

C on ten ts

Volume VIII, Issue 6

Foreign currency futures:
some further aspects

E ditorial C o m m ittee

Harvey Rosenblum, lice president and

Centered in Chicago, currency fu tu res trading
is a rapidly grow ing, highly tnsible, a n d
increasingly useful adjunct o f the
international interbank currency market.

economic adtisor
Randall C, Merris, research economist
Edward G, Nash, editor
Roger Thryselius, graphics
Nancy Ahlstrom, typesetting
Gloria Hull, editorial assistant

Index for 1983
Through the seventies and beyond
D uring a turbulent ten years, OPEC altered
the w orld’s econom ic o rder a n d the U.S,
reu ro te the rules o f the banking gam e.

E c o n o m i c P e r s p e c t i v e s is
pu b lish ed by th e R e s e a rc h D e p a rtm e n t o f
th e F ed eral R eserv e Bank o f C h ica g o , T h e
v iew s e x p r e s s e d a r e th e a u th o r s ’ an d d o
n o t n e ce ssa rily re fle c t th e view s o f th e
m a n a g e m e n t o f th e F e d e ra l R ese rv e Bank
o f C h ica g o o r th e F e d e ra l R eserv e System .
S in gle-cop y s u b sc rip tio n s a r e avail­
able fre e o f c h a rg e . P lease sen d r e q u e s ts
fo r single- and m u ltip le -co p y s u b sc rip ­
tio n s, b ack issues, an d a d d re ss c h a n g e s to
P u b lic In fo rm atio n C e n te r, F ed eral
R eserv e Bank o f C h ica g o , P.O. B o x 8 3 4 ,
C h ica g o , Illin ois 6 0 6 9 0 , o r te le p h o n e
( 3 1 2 ) 3 2 2 -5 1 1 1 .
A rticle s m ay b e re p r in te d p ro v id ed
s o u r c e is c r e d ite d an d P u b lic In fo rm atio n
C e n te r is p ro v id e d w ith a c o p y o f th e

V.

pu b lish ed m aterial.




J

Foreign currency futures:
some further aspects
Henry N. Goldstein
. . . it is n o t th e c a s e th a t th e J a p a n e s e m o n e ta ry
a u th o r itie s hav e e n o u g h in flu en ce to c o n tr o l e x ­
c h a n g e ra te s. W h a t th e y have b e e n d o in g is, at m o st,
m itig atin g flu c tu a tio n s in c u r r e n c y m ark ets w h ic h are
c a u s e d largely by C h ica g o s p e c u la to rs.
O xfo rd

T. M atsu m o to

F r o m a le t te r in The E co n o m ist, M arch 5, 1 9 8 3 . p 4 .

The basic mechanics of buying and selling
foreign currency futures on the International
Monetary' Market ( IMM, the division of the Chi­
cago Mercantile Exchange on which financial
futures are traded) were described in an earlier
article in this review.1That article explained the
nature of currency futures contracts and showed
how such contracts could be used to hedge
exchange rate risks arising from commitments
to receive or pay foreign currencies at future
dates. It also explained how such contracts typi­
cally provide enormous leverage for transactors
who deliberately seek to assume exchange rate
risk, i.e., to speculate on a change in the dollar
price of one or more leading foreign currencies,
including British pounds, Canadian dollars,
Deutsche marks, Japanese yen, Mexican pesos,
and Swiss francs.
This article describes the evolution of trad­
ing activity in these different currency futures
since 1977. It also examines the links between
the currency futures market and the broader
interbank market for spot and forward exchange
in which major banks in financial centers around
the world act as the main dealers. Finally, it

H e n ry N. G o ld ste in w as o n th e staff o f th e R e s e a rc h
D e p a rtm e n t o f th e F e d e ra l R ese rv e Bank o f C h ica g o w h e n
th is a r tic le w as w r itte n . O n leav e fro m th e U n iversity o f
O r e g o n , h e is c u r r e n tly an ad v iser to th e C en tral Bank o f
P a p u a -N ew G u in ea in P o rt M oresby. F o r useful in fo rm atio n
an d c r i tic is m , h e is in d e b te d to S c o tt G o rd o n , Paul L. K asriel,
D avid A. Kass, P a tric ia K uw ayam a, J a m e s D. L e a th e rb e rry ,
J o h n M ahan, an d J o h n W . M cP artlan d , Jr.
‘K arl V. C h alu p a, “ F o re ig n c u r r e n c y futures-, re d u c in g
fo re ig n e x c h a n g e risk ,” E co n o m ic P erspectives, W in te r 1 9 8 2 ,
F e d e ra l R ese rv e Bank o f C h ica g o , 3 -1 1 .

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




considers a number of special issues: ( 1 ) the
impact of IMM currency transactions on the
broader U.S. and world-wide interbank markets;
( 2 ) the chances that trading in currency futures
in other centers will come to rival trading on the
IMM; ( 3 ) some contrasting aspects of the newly
introduced market for
on currencies;
and ( 4 ) the relative concentration of open posi­
tions among “large traders.”

options

Market grow th, 1977-1982
Although futures contracts in eight curren­
cies are traded on the IMM (see Table 1), in
recent years active trading has been largely con­
fined to only five—the British pound, the Cana­
dian dollar, the Deutsche mark, the Japanese yen,
and the Swiss franc. The combined trading
volume in the other three traded currencies—
Mexican pesos, Dutch guilders, and French
francs—amounted to less than two percent of
total trading in all currency contracts on the
IMM during 1982.2 For all five currencies actively
traded on the IMM, an enormous growth in both
trading volume and the level of open positions
has occurred since 1977. The growth in trading
volume is shown in Figure 1; the growth in
open-interest positions in Figure 2.
As Figure 2 shows, the average month-end
open interest in Canadian dollars during 1981
• d ifferen t re a s o n s a c c o u n t fo r th e n e g lig ib le v o lu m e o f
tra d in g in th e s e t h r e e c u r r e n c i e s . T ra d in g in M e x ica n p e so s
h as b e e n d a m p e n e d by th e v e ry high initial m arg in re q u ire ­
m e n t im p o se d by th e E x c h a n g e , a m o u n tin g at r e c e n t e x ­
c h a n g e r a te s t o so m e th in g like tw o -th ird s o f th e d o lla r value
o f e a c h M e x ic a n p e s o c o n t r a c t . A t r e c e n t e x c h a n g e ra te s,
m a rg in s re q u ire d f o r th e o t h e r c u r r e n c i e s ra n g e fro m a b o u t
1.1 p e r c e n t fo r C a n a d ia n d o lla r c o n t r a c t s to 4 .1 p e r c e n t fo r
B ritish p o u n d c o n t r a c t s . ( T h e s e a r e m in im u m s; b ro k e rs m ay
r e q u ire c u s to m e r s to p o s t h ig h e r m a rg in s .) In activ ity in tr a d ­
ing in g u ild e r fu tu re s s e e m s to re fle c t th e c lo s e n e s s w ith
w h ic h th e d o lla r p r ic e o f th e g u ild e r v aries w ith th e DM:
tr a d e r s p r e f e r th e G e rm a n c u r r e n c y as a sp e cu la tiv e and
h e d g in g v e h ic le b e c a u s e th e DM m a rk e t h as m u ch g r e a te r
d e p th in in te rb a n k tra d in g . R e a so n s fo r in activity in F re n c h
fra n c fu tu re s a r e less a p p a re n t.

3

Table 1

positions in the five cur­
rencies as of the fourth
quarter of 1982.
Over the six years
Dollar value per
Currency_________
Contract size
contract (June delivery)
1 9 7 7 -1 9 8 2 , the rise in
average daily volume of
Sw iss franc
SF
$60,800
125,000
trading has been much
Mexican peso
MP
5,260
1,000,000
more substantial than the
Deutsche mark
DM
52,238
125,000
rise in open interest in
Canadian dollar
CD
81,710
100,000
all currencies except the
British pound
BP
36,750
25,000
Canadian d ollar.3 This
French franc
FF
33,888
250,000
Dutch guilder
47,625
DG
125,000
developm en t suggests
Japanese yen
JY
12,500,000
52,150
that the growth of “day­
trading” (in-and-out trad­
ing on the same day) has accounted for a signifi­
and 1982 was somewhat less than the open
cant part of the rise in trading volume.
interest in any of the other four actively traded
Interestingly, the Swiss franc, the most
currencies, when measured by the number of
actively traded currency on the IMM in 1982, is a
outstanding contracts. This measure is some­
currency in which U.S. residents have slight for­
what misleading, however, because the U.S. dol­
eign exchange exposure as a result of ordinary
lar value of the standard Canadian dollar con­
trade flows—U.S. trade with Switzerland is min­
tract (1 0 0 ,0 0 0 Canadian dollars) substantially
uscule relative to its trade with Germany, Japan,
exceeded the U.S. dollar value of a contract in
any of the other currencies. As a consequence,
when measured in U.S. dollar value terms, the
open position in Canadian dollars on the IMM
'T h is d ifferen tial in c r e a s e w a s p a r ticu la rly g r e a t fo r th e
Sw iss fra n c: in 1 9 7 7 , a v e ra g e daily tra d in g v o lu m e in Sw iss
actually exceeded that in any of the other
fra n cs a m o u n te d to 2 1 p e r c e n t o f th e a v e ra g e o p e n in te r e s t
actively traded currencies during 1981 and
in th a t c u r r e n c y ; by 1 9 8 2 , th is fig u re had r e a c h e d n e a rly 7 0
p e r c e n t.
1982. Table 2 gives the U.S. dollar values of open
IMM contract sizes and U .S. dollar value per contract
(for June contracts at rates prevailing on March 22, 1983)

Figure 1
Led by the S w iss franc, futures for the five
major trading currencies hit major highs on
the International Money Market in mid 1982.
thousands of contracts traded (daily)

Digitized for 4
FRASER


Figure 2
Open-interest levels grew less rapidly than
daily trading volume, suggesting an increase
of in-and-out "day trading."
thousands of contracts outstanding

Econom ic Perspectives

Table 2
Approximate U .S. dollar value of open
positions in five currencies on the IMM
during 4th quarter 1982
$1.2
$0.6
$0.8
$0.8
$1.0

Canadian dollars
British pounds
Japanese yen
German marks
Sw iss francs

billion
billion
billion
billion
billion

Britain, or Canada. The recent rapid growth of
trading in Swiss franc futures thus seems to
reflect mainly speculative motives.
The relative im portance o f IMM
transactions
Activity in IMM currency futures, whether
measured by trading volume or by open-position

r
Some differences in the two m arkets
The interbank market involves spot and for­
ward transactions among the major dealer banks
and among these banks and their corporate custom­
ers. Smaller business firms and individuals who
seek to buy and sell currencies at favorable rates for
forward delivery in relatively small amounts—i.e.,
less than 8500,000 for leading currencies—have
only limited access to the interbank market. In
contrast, the IMM produces ready hedging and
speculative opportunities to the small trader.
In the interbank market, contracts are tailored
to specific customer requirements both as to
amount and maturity date. In contrast, delivery
dates on IMM contracts are standardized on a regu­
lar cycle with delivery generally on the third Wed­
nesday of March, June, September, and December.
Contracts for each traded currency are also stan­
dardized by size, although contract values in terms
of U.S. dollars differ substantially across currencies.
Table 1 shows the set of standard IMM contract
sizes and the U.S. dollar value of June-delivery con­
tracts as of March 22, 1983.
Trading is done by telephone or telex in the
interbank markets and, at any given moment, buyand-sell quotations by different dealer banks may
vary slightly from one another. On the IMM, in
contrast, trading is through “open outcry” of bids,
offers, and amounts in a single arena. Thus, finding
the most favorable price at which to buy or sell may
sometimes prove more difficult in the interbank
market than in the futures market where bids and
offers are continuously revealed at a central place.
Trading is on a principal-to-principal basis in
the interbank market; participants always know the
party on the other side of the trade. On the IMM,
transactors deal through exchange members autho­
rized to do business on the floor; they neither
know nor care about the identity of the party on
the other side because the Exchange Clearing

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




House guarantees contract performance. Some
slight risk of non-performance thus exists in the
interbank market but not in the futures market
(assuming a zero probability that the Exchange
itself would “fail” ).
All participants on the IMM must post initial
cash margins but no such requirement is usually
made in the interbank market. Gains and losses on
position values are accrued to settlement date on
forward trades in the interbank market but are
settled daily ( “marked to market” ) on the IMM.*
To transact on the IMM, customers pay a
negotiated “round-trip” commission to broker
firms. This fee covers both the purchase of a con­
tract and its subsequent sale ( or the sale of a con­
tract and its subsequent liquidation). Except for
dealings through foreign exchange brokers, no
explicit commission is charged on the interbank
market, although dealers obtain an implicit com ­
mission through the spread between their buying
and selling rates.
No limit exists on the range of daily price
movements in the interbank market, but such
limits do exist for IMM contracts. This creates the
possibility that, on occasion, traders in futures con­
tracts may be unable to reverse their positions
readily, except by recourse to the interbank market,
which many traders may not possess.
* F o r e x a m p le , o n F e b ru a ry 8 , 1 9 8 3 , M r. J o n e s sells
o n e IMM fu tu re s c o n t r a c t fo r d e liv e ry o f 2 5 , 0 0 0 B ritish
p o u n d s fo r v a lu e S e p te m b e r 2 1 , 1 9 8 3 a t th e c lo s in g p r ic e
o f 8 1 . 5 2 7 0 p e r p o u n d . O n F e b ru a ry 9 , th is c o n t r a c t se ttle s
at th e h ig h e r d o lla r p r i c e o f 8 1 . 5 3 4 0 p e r p o u n d , giving
J o n e s a lo ss o f 8 1 7 5 o n h is c o n t r a c t (e q u a l t o 2 5 , 0 0 0
tim e s ( 1 . 5 3 4 0 - 1 , 5 2 7 0 ) ) . J o n e s m u st p o st th is additional
su m w ith h is b r o k e r w h o in tu rn w ill hav e t o p o st th e
sa m e a m o u n t w ith th e C le a rin g H o u se o n th e E x ch a n g e .
S im u ltan eo u sly , s o m e tr a d e r w ith an o p p o s ite p o sitio n
w ill b e e n title d t o h av e 8 1 7 5 p aid in to h is a c c o u n t by his
b r o k e r w h o w ill b e re ce iv in g fund s fro m th e C learin g
H ouse.

5

levels, has mushroomed in recent years. But has
it becom e large enough to have a significant
independent impact on the level of exchange
rates in the broader interbank market? In a shortrun sense, the answer would appear to be yes.
Although Mr. Matsumoto’s judgement, cited at
the beginning of this article, that “fluctuations in
currency markets . . . are caused largely by Chi­
cago speculators” seems an exaggeration, it is
indeed apparent that during the afternoon in the
United States—when trading in Europe has
ended—surges of net buying or selling pressure
on a given currency on the IMM do occasionally
occur. And as this pressure is transmitted to the
interbank market, rates there can be pushed
appreciably higher or lower in the immediate
short run. In a broader sense, however, the avail­
able volume figures suggest that the IMM plays a
generally subordinate role to the interbank
market. Table 3 shows comparative measures of
the volume of gross trading on the IMM relative
to gross trading in the U.S. interbank market
during March 1980, using special survey data for
that month collected by the Federal Reserve

Table 3
Relative trading volume in five currencies:
IMM vs. U.S.interbank

Currency______
British pounds
Canadian dollars
Deutsche marks
Japanese yen
Sw iss francs
All five currencies

IMM volume relative to
turnover by 90 banks in
the interbank market*
8.0%
16.5
3.8
4.6
10.0
7.5

S O U R C E S : Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Public
Information Release No. 1371 of June 23, 1980, Table C ; IMM
Statistical Department, Monthly Information Bulletin for March
1980.
•Turnover of the 90 banks includes the volume of their
outright spot and forward tran sactio n s— thus it excluded their
swap transactions, which are matched offsetting spot and for­
ward trades. The dollar value of IMM w as estimated by multiply­
ing foreign currency contract values by the daily average spot
exchange rate for the month.

6




Bank of New York from 90 banks. This Federal
Reserve survey also included data on outright
forward transactions by the 90 banks with arbi­
trage members of the IMM. Table 4 shows some
relevant ratios.
Table 3 suggests that IMM transactions dur­
ing March 1980, measured in gross volume
terms, were small compared with gross U.S.
interbank trading inclusive of spot transactions.
However, Table 4 suggests that the share of out­
right forward transactions in the U.S. market
done with IMM arbitragers was fairly substantial,
particularly in Swiss francs where it amounted to
43 percent.
Because they exclude interbank trading
outside the United States, the percentage figures
in Tables 3 and 4 undoubtedly exaggerate the
importance of IMM transactions in the determi­
nation of exchange rates. Trade and capital trans­
actions between U.S. and foreign residents are
more likely to require “settlement” in dollars
than in non-dollar currencies.4As a consequence,
the task of currency conversion more often rests
with foreign residents than U.S. residents. But
foreign residents needing to convert currencies
are more likely to deal with banks located in
their own financial centers than with banks
located in the United States. Thus foreign ex ­
change trading in centers abroad, and in particu­
lar trading which affects the dollar price of the
five currencies most actively traded on the IMM,
is likely to exceed trading in the U.S. interbank
market by a wide margin.
One rough clue to the world wide role
played by the IMM is provided by comparing
monthly open positions on the IMM for the five
actively traded currencies with the values of
exports-plus-imports of goods and services for
the countries in question. Table 5 shows the
ratio of month-end IMM positions (in dollar value term s) to average
exports plus
imports ( also in dollar-value terms ) of the rele-

monthly

4T ra d e b e t w e e n non-U .S. r e sid e n ts m ay also ca ll fo r
p a y m e n t in d o llars. A nd e v e n w h e n , fo r e x a m p le , a G e rm a n
im p o r te r is p ay in g s te rlin g in to th e a c c o u n t o f a B ritish
e x p o r t e r , th e banks h an d lin g th e a r ra n g e m e n ts a r e likely to
e x c h a n g e m ark s fo r d o l lars and d o lla rs fo r s te rlin g b e c a u s e o f
th e d o lla r’s sp e cia l ro le as a n in te rm e d ia ry c u r re n c y .

Econom ic Perspectives

T a b le 4
I M M a rb itra g e a s s h a r e of U .S . in te rb a n k fo rw a rd t r a d e s

Currency

As percent of
outright transactions
with customers

Deutsche marks
British pounds
Sw iss francs
Japanese yen
Canadian dollars
All five currencies

38.1
39.1
62.5
37.8
30.3
39.3

As percent of all
outright forward
transactions (including
interbank transactions)'
18.1
24.4
42.8
24.2
25.6
24.8

S O U R C E S : Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Public Information Release No. 1371 of June 23,
1980, Table C ; IMM Statistical Department, Monthly Information Bulletin for March 1980.
'O utrig ht forward transactions by the banks were only about one-fifth as large as their forward
transactions matched with offsetting spot trades in so-called "swap transactions."

vant five countries for 1981.s
These percentages are relatively small.
Moreover, enormous amounts of speculative and
interest-sensitive capital also generate currency
transactions in the interbank market. If anything,
therefore, the figures in Table 5 almost certainly
exaggerate the impact of IMM transactions on
T a b le 5

IMM open positions in national currencies
as fraction of national average
monthly trade flows
Canadian
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
Switzerland

4.6%
2.7
1.7
1.8
9.6

the balance of supply and demand for the cur­
rencies of these five countries. Despite their
impressive recent growth, IMM transactions as
yet amount to only a small fraction of total
’ D iv iding th e lev el o f IMM p o sitio n s by m o n th ly tra d e
fig u re s m ay su b stan tially o v e rs ta te th e in flu en ce o f IMM p o si­
tio n s. T h e level o f o p e n p o sitio n s at any g iv en tim e , in so far as
it is g e n e ra te d by h e d g in g o r s p e cu la tiv e tr a n s a c tio n s linked
t o tr a d e p a y m e n ts, p re s u m a b ly re la te s to tra d e flo w s s c h e d ­

demand and supply in the worldwide foreign
exchange markets.
More fundamentally, it may be misleading
even to ask whether the IMM market ever
“drives” the interbank market, or vice-versa.
Traders in both markets have access to essen­
tially the same information about the economic
fundamentals that presumably determine ex­
change-rate levels; accordingly, “news” that
makes them more optimistic or pessimistic
about a given currency should have a roughly
equivalent impact on their net positioning deci­
sions—regardless of whether these decisions are
effected through one channel or another.
How the futures m arket is linked to the
interbank m arket
Both the futures market and the interbank
market deal in contracts to receive or deliver
bank balances denominated in foreign curren­
cies at specified dates in the future. Hence,
prices in the two markets should move in close
tandem with each other through some arbitrage
mechanism whereby changes in the net demand
or supply pressure in one market are transmitted
almost instantaneously to the other market.6

u led fo r th e c o m in g th r e e to 12 m o n th s. A cco rd in g ly , it
m ig h t b e m o r e r e a so n a b le to c o m p a r e th e level o f o u ts ta n d ­

6A rb itrag e re fe r s to th e sim u lta n e o u s bu yin g and selling
o f an id e n tica l o r sim ila r g o o d t o tak e a d v an tag e o f k n o w n

in g c o n t r a c t s w ith g r o s s tr a d e flo w s fo r th e c o m in g th re e
m o n th s o r th e c o m in g y ear. S u ch c o m p a r is o n s w o u ld , o f

p r ic e d isc r e p a n cie s. In c o n t r a s t, sp e c u la tio n re fe rs to th e
b u yin g an d sellin g o f a c o m m o d ity to p ro fit fro m an ticip a te d

c o u r s e , g e n e r a te p e r c e n ta g e s ro u g h ly l / 3 r d to 1 / 1 2 th as
larg e as th o s e sh o w n in T ab le 5.

b u t u n c e rta in p r ic e d iffe re n ce s. A rb itra g e is a su re thing;
s p e c u la tio n a g a m b le .

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




7

In fact, soon after its inception in 1972, the
IMM took deliberate steps to create an effective
arbitrage mechanism by authorizing regular Class
A Clearing Members of the Exchange to create
special affiliates, known as “Class B Clearing
Firms.” Each such Class B affiliate is permitted to
deal with one specific commercial bank engaged
in active foreign exchange trading and with no
one else. The counterparty bank agrees to buy

and sell forward exchange with the Class B firm
on a continuous basis during the trading day—
and a direct telephone tieline promotes rapid
and repeated transactions whenever justified by
rate differentials in the two markets.
Every morning the Exchange provides each
counterparty7bank with a “hard copy” of the long
or short position in currency futures of each
Class B trader with whom it deals. Because the

How arbitrage links the two m arkets
The vertical axis in the figure below plots the
current futures rate on the Exchange for a specific
DM futures contract; the horizontal axis the quan­
tity of such futures demanded and supplied per
period. Distances on the horizontal axis to the
right of the origin denote a net demand for DM
futures by non-arbitrageurs; distances to the left, a
net supply.
F u t u r e s rate

For a given state of expectations regarding the
future level of spot exchange rates, the net excess
demand curve for DM futures demanded will be
greater at lower prices. Suppose, now, that the
initial net demand curve by non-arbitrageurs co r­
responds to the curve (D - S)Q. If no arbitrage
mechanism existed, the futures market would have
to clear “on its own.” In this event, the market­
clearing rate would be F j, where net excess
demand by non-arbitrageurs is zero. Now intro­
duce arbitrageurs, willing to absorb a large amount
of DM futures at a price just barely below F ^ , the
prevailing bid in the interbank forward market, and

8




to sell a large amount of DM futures at a price just
barely above F()^ er, the interbank offer rate. This
amounts to assuming that the interbank market has
much greater “depth” than the IMM market so
that—to a close approximation—the relevant ag­
gregate supply and demand curves are infinitely
elastic. (Relaxing this assumption would not
change the argument significantly.)
Given that the initial non-arbitrage excess
demand curve is (D - S)Q the relevant market
,
clearing price will be F^j^- At this price, non­
arbitrageurs will sell OqG of DM futures to arbitra­
geurs who, in turn, will sell OqQof DMs, either spot
or forward, on the interbank market. Now suppose
that the net demand curve for DM futures shifts
upward to (D - S )j. In the absence of arbitrage
possibilities, the market clearing rate would rise to
?2 But arbitrageurs are ready to sell a very7large
amount of futures at F0 ^ c r the futures rate cannot
exceed that level. Now, non-arbitrageurs buy Oq j
of DM futures from arbitrageurs who, in turn, buy
an equivalent amount of spot or forward DMs from
the interbank market.
This example assumes a significant increase in
non-arbitrage demand for DM futures (i.e., a
rightward shift in the net demand curve) even
though the forward rate in the interbank market
remains unchanged. In reality7 the same political
,
and economic developments that increase non­
arbitrage demand for DM futures are also likely to
stimulate demand for spot and forward DMs in the
broader interbank market. As regards the figure,
any significant shift in the ( D - S) curve would thus
generally be accompanied by a roughly corres­
ponding change in both F ^ and F0 fye r In this
event, a general rise (o r fall) in the dollar price of
the DM over all maturities in both the interbank
and futures markets would not necessarily lead to
any increase in arbitrage transactions.

Econom ic Perspectives

bank has its own record of forward contracts
with each trader, it can readily verify that the
firms it deals with are fully hedged (at least as of
the end of each day’s trading). Thus the bank
runs virtually no risk that a sharp exchange rate
fluctuation would affect the ability of its Class B
customers to honor their forward contracts.
The hedge achieved by the Class B arbitra­
geurs is, however, subject to one interesting
qualification. Suppose that a given currency per­
sistently rises or falls in value over a series of days
and that the net flow of non-arbitrage orders on
the Exchange is of a “trendriding” nature. For
example, assume that the Swiss franc rises in
price over a given period and that IMM traders,
exclusive of Class B arbitrageurs, are cumulative
net buyers of Swiss franc futures. In this event,
the Class B firms would, of necessity, be net
sellers of Swiss franc futures while buying a like
amount of forward Swiss francs from the inter­
bank market. As the Swiss franc rose in price, the
Class B firms would show ever-growing cumula­
tive gains on their forward contracts. But because
the Class B firms must “mark to market” daily,
they would have to settle their losses with the
Exchange day by day. Normally, they would
finance these payments by borrowing from the
counterparty banks at the prime rate or higher.
Such patterns have frequently occurred
during various periods since the IMM’s incep­
tion in May 1972. Exposure to such interest
costs introduces a certain amount of uncertainty7
into the Class B dealer operations. To some
extent, these firms are forced to make educated
guesses ( 1 ) as to how far the exchange rate
movement might go (providing a projection of
how much additional “variation settlement”
must be paid ) and ( 2 ) of the relevant prime rate
over the period during which their contracts are
likely to be outstanding. When their projections
indicate an increase in the probable cost of
maintaining arbitraged positions, Class B arbi­
trageurs can respond by widening the spread
between the prevailing quotes in the interbank
market and their offers to buy or sell futures on
the Exchange. In this rather subtle way, expecta­
tions of exchange rate and interest rate move­
ments in the future may affect the ruling spread
needed to induce arbitrage between the two

Federal Reserve B ank o f Chicago




markets.7
In the early days of currency futures trading
on the IMM, the large foreign exchange banks
avoided active participation in the operations of
the Exchange ( aside from agreeing to enter into
arrangements with Class B arbitrageurs). For
one thing, the low volume of trading did not
suggest that such participation would be espe­
cially profitable. For another, many banks were
reluctant to promote trading on the Exchange
which, after all, might eat into their own market
share and foreign exchange profits, should the
volume in fact becom e significant. Most impor­
tant, perhaps, was the banks’ aversion to engag­
ing openly in a market that had such a specula­
tive aura.
Indeed, it appears that considerable persua­
sion was required by representatives of the
Exchange to induce banks to participate in the
Class B trading arrangments, although the large
foreign exchange banks in Chicago were rela­
tively willing to enter into such arrangements.
The Chicago banks had a long standing tradition
of financing transactions on the commodity
exchanges on behalf of commodity firms that
were now branching out into currency futures,
and they were quick to appreciate that they
could earn fees from issuing letters of credit to
Class B firms, and interest on loans that Class B
firms might need to finance cumulative margin
calls.
The banks’ reluctance to play more than a
relatively passive role in the arbitrage process
"C o n ce iv a b ly , th e a lte rn a tiv e s ce n a rio m igh t o c c u r . F o r
e x a m p le , th e Sw iss fra n c m ig h t e x p e r ie n c e a rising tre n d
w h ile th e n e t flo w o f n o n -a rb itra g e tra n s a c tio n s o n th e
E x c h a n g e is s u c h as t o re sist th is tre n d . In th is situ atio n , th e
C lass B a r b itra g e u rs w o u ld te n d to b e b u y e rs o f Sw iss fran c
fu tu re s o n th e E x c h a n g e and se lle rs o f Sw iss fra n c forw ard s in
th e in te rb a n k m a rk e t. A rb itra g e u rs w o u ld th e n b e g e ttin g
daily “ m a rk -to -m a rk e t” p a y m e n ts fro m th e E x c h a n g e bu t
w o u ld n o t hav e to s e ttl e th e a c c u m u la tin g lo sses o n th e ir
o ffse ttin g fo rw a rd c o n t r a c t s u n til th e y m a tu re d o r w e r e r e ­
v e rse d . In a d d itio n to o b ta in in g th e ir n o rm a l p o in t sp re a d o n
d is c r e p a n c ie s b e t w e e n c o n t r a c t ra te s in th e tw o m ark ets, th e
a rb itra g e u rs c o u ld n o w a lso e a rn in te r e s t o n th e ir in te rim
p a y m e n ts fro m th e E x c h a n g e p r io r to th e e x p ira tio n o r re v e r ­
sal o f th e ir o u ts ta n d in g c o n t r a c ts . By an d larg e, h o w e v e r, n et
b u y in g an d se llin g p r e s s u r e o n th e E x c h a n g e (f r o m all n o n ­
a r b it r a g e u r s ) h as te n d e d t o b e o f th e “ tre n d rid in g ” type.
A cco rd in g ly , C lass B a rb itra g e u rs have se ld o m b e e n able to
o b ta in e x t r a r e tu r n s fro m tak in g th e ir p ro fits e a rlie r th an
th e ir lo sses.

9

has recently disappeared. As the volume of trad­
ing on the Exchange has increased, the banks
have perceived that it would be profitable for
them to set up direct telephone facilities linking
their foreign exchange trading desks to their
own representatives on the floor of the exchange.
Their foreign exchange trading desks can then
on their own initiative take advantage of rate
discrepancies between rates in the futures and
interbank markets. Brokerage firms that were
members of the Exchange were willing to accom­
modate the banks with special phone facilities,
phone clerks, and other aids to efficient trading
because of the large volume of business ( and
hence fees) likely to result from such customers.
Since mid-1980, direct arbitrage participation by
the banks has markedly reduced the amount of
arbitrage done by Class B firms. And this trend is
expected to continue, with many banks likely to
become clearing members of the IMM.
Class B arbitrage has also been reduced
through the growing arbitrage business con­
ducted by certain nonbank Class A firms. Much
of this activity stemmed from large dealers in
precious metals whose conventional interna­
tional operations generated a frequent need to
buy and sell foreign currencies. These firms
acquired seats on the IMM to facilitate their own
currency transactions and, at a fairly early stage
after the market’s inception, found it profitable
to take advantage of rate differences between the
IMM and interbank market, often in more flexi­
ble ways than the “same-date arbitrage” permit­
ted to Class B firms.
As just noted, Class B firms are limited to
buying futures and selling forwards, or selling
futures and buying forwards, for exactly match­
ing delivery dates—namely the quarterly settle­
ment dates on outstanding futures contracts.
Banks arbitraging at their own initiative through
Class A firms, and Class A firms acting as arbitra­
geurs, are not confined to such simple “samedate” arbitrage. One leading type of “different
date” or indirect arbitrage occurs when a bank
(o r Class A arbitrageur) buys the foreign cur­
rency
as an offset to a sale of foreign cur­
rency futures or sells the foreign currency
as
an offset to a purchase of foreign currency
futures. Known as “spot-to-fiiture” arbitrage, this

spot

10




spot

practice is also referred to as “basis trading,”
where the “basis” refers to the difference be­
tween the spot and future rates. On average, the
bank will find it profitable to arbitrage in this way
whenever the interbank spot rate and IMM
futures rate differ by more than the amount indi­
cated by an algebraic formula that has, as a criti­
cal input, the spread between the relevant short­
term interest rates in the Euro-currency markets.
Rival m arkets
The enormous growth in the volume of
trading in currency futures on the IMM has stim­
ulated efforts by other exchanges to offer similar
contracts. In the past few years, similar contracts
have become available for trading in New York,
London, Canada, and Australia. The New York
Futures Exchange (NYFE, pronounced “knife”)
opened as a subsidiary of the New York Stock
Exchange in 1980. The London International
Financial Futures Exchange ( LIFFE, pronounced
“life”) opened in September 1982. So far the
volume of trading in currency futures on the rival
exchanges appears to have disappointed their
promoters. ( In fact, trading in currency futures
in New York appears to have virtually ceased.)
And, indeed, doubts have been expressed
whether activity in currency futures on any of
these competing exchanges will ever approach
activity in currency futures on the IMM.8
A principal reason advanced for the IMM’s
expected continued dominance in currency
futures trading is the presence in Chicago of a
broad group of “locals” or “scalpers”—traders
with a background in conventional commodi­
ties—willing to buy and sell currency futures in
response to small, short-term price movements
in a way that contributes greatly to the market’s
depth and pricing continuity. Futures markets in
other centers currently appear to suffer from
relative scarcity of such traders.9
8See "M a rk e ts in t o m o r r o w s ,” The E c o n o m ist , S e p te m ­
b e r 2 5 , 1 9 8 2 , pp. 9 9 - 1 0 0 .
"O v e r tim e , o f c o u r s e , a la rg e r b o d y o f s u ch tr a d e r s m ay
d e v e lo p in th e s e c e n te r s . In d e e d , b e c a u s e th e c o m p e ti tio n
th e r e is less k een , s o m e tr a d e r s m ay m o v e t o th e s e c e n t e r s
fro m C h ica g o . A nd, in fa ct, a n u m b e r o f le a d in g tra d in g firm s
w ith se a ts o n th e IMM have b o u g h t se a ts o n LIFFE, in p a rt to
e x p lo it a rb itra g e o p p o rtu n itie s b e tw e e n th e tw o m ark ets.

Econom ic Perspectives

Moreover, Chicago’s head start in trading
currency futures probably tends to restrain the
growth of rival markets. Brokers who accept
orders to buy or sell currency futures seek to
obtain the best price and quickest execution for
their customers. The IMM’s established reputa­
tion for efficient order execution is bound to
inhibit their going through other exchanges.
Some observers believe that other exchanges
would have a better chance of attracting more
business in currency futures if they offered con­
tracts that differ significantly from those on the
IMM. So far this has not happened. However, the
London and Australian exchanges do provide
one special feature: time-zone differences per­
mit their markets to be open when the IMM is
dosed. Eventually, this feature alone may lead to
substantial cu rren cy trading on these e x ­
changes—but perhaps more as a complement to
trading on the IMM than as a substitute.
Options on cu rren cies
One interesting new vehicle for speculation
and hedging in foreign currencies was intro­
duced on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange in
late 1982 —namely, options on foreign curren­
cies. Put and call options on three-, six-, and
nine-m onth cycles are available on British
pounds, Deutsche marks, Canadian dollars, Swiss
francs, and Japanese yen. (The put option gives
the owners the right to sell a given amount of the
specified foreign currency at a given price per
unit in U.S. dollars on or before a certain date; the
call option gives him the right to buy a given
amount at a specified price on or before a certain
date). Contract sizes in the Philadelphia options
market are one half the size of corresponding
futures contracts on the IMM.
The options vehicle should appeal to the
small transactor who wants to speculate on a
longer-run exchange-rate movement but limit
his downside risk should the spot exchange rate
move the “wrong way” in the interim. In combi­
nation with a forward or futures contract, an
option contract also provides a near perfect
hedge against exchange risk to a business firm
which must place a competitive bid to perform a
specific service abroad. If the bid is successful.

Federal Resen>e Bank o f Chicago




the dollar value of the firm’s foreign currency
receipts is fixed by the futures contract; if the bid
is unsuccessful, any loss on the futures contract
is largely cancelled out by a corresponding gain
on the option contract. As yet, however, it is
much too early to judge whether the Philadel­
phia market in foreign currency options will
attract anything like the investor interest that has
emerged for currency futures in Chicago.
C oncentration o f open positions am ong
large traders
All clearing members of the IMM are re­
quired to make daily reports to the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the U.S.
government agency charged with regulating all
futures markets. These reports show the open
futures positions of each “large trader,” defined
as someone holding 25 or more contracts in any
one currency future.10* The CFTC has recently
begun publishing a summary of these open posi­
tion reports as of month-end dates. In these
reports, trader positions are classified as either
“commercial” ( implying that they are used for
hedging pre-existing exchange rate risks) or as
“noncommercial” ( implying that they are specula­
tive in nature).1 Examination of data in the
1
report for January' 3 1 ,1 9 8 3 reveal the following:
• The number of large traders in the five
active currencies ranged from 85 large traders in
Canadian dollars to 159 large traders in Swiss
francs.
• Depending on the currency, large traders
held between 58 and 85 percent of all long
positions and between 60 and 85 percent of all
short positions.
• Across the five actively traded currencies,
the
held between 18 and 44
percent of total long positions and between 11

four largest holders

l0As o f J a n u a ry 3 1 , 1 9 8 3 , th e a p p ro x im a te d o lla r valu e o f
2 5 fu tu re s c o n t r a c t s in e a c h o f th e five m ain c u r re n c ie s
tra d e d w a s as follo w s: Sw iss fra n cs ( S I . 5 3 m illio n ); Ja p a n e se
yen ( $ 1 . 2 9 m illio n ); C an ad ian d o lla rs ( $ 2 . 0 2 m illio n ); B rit­
ish p o u n d s ( $ . 9 5 m illio n ); D M s ( $ 1 . 2 6 m illio n ). T hu s, at a
m in im u m , la rg e tr a d e r s h ad p o sitio n s ran g in g fro m ab o u t
o n e to tw o m illio n d o lla rs, a lth o u g h o n ly a sm all fra c tio n o f
th e se a m o u n ts n e e d e d to b e p u t up as cash .
" P o s i t i o n s h e ld by C lass B a rb itra g e u rs a re classified as
“c o m m e r c i a l."

11

and 56 percent of total short positions while the
held between 25 and 61
percent of total long positions and between 19
and 70 percent of total short positions.
• Among reporting large traders, specula­
tors held very unbalanced positions in the differ­
ent currencies as of January 31, 1983 By cur­
rency, the ratios of speculative long to short
positions on that date were roughly as follows:1
2
Swiss francs
4:1
Japanese yen
5:1
Canadian dollars
1:3
British pounds
1:2
German marks
1:2
Estimates of the average dollar values of the
positions taken by the four largest traders on the
side of market where speculation was predomi­
nant are instructive. These estimates, obtained
for January 31, 1983, were on the long side in
Swiss francs and yen and the short side in Cana­
dian dollars, British pounds, and German marks.
They presumably
positions of Class B
arbitrageurs who are likely to be the opposite
side of the market from the predominant speculative interest:

eight largest holders

exclude

Contract currency
Swiss francs
Japanese yen
Canadian dollars
British pounds
German marks

Estimated
dollar value
S I00.4
63 9
107.3
22.4
60.8

million
million
million
million
million

These estimates imply that some rather large
“players” take speculative positions through the
IMM. Such traders might be wealthy individuals,

12A lth ou gh th e ir validity is d ifficult to assess, e x p la n a ­
tio n s fo r th e s e d iv e rg e n t r a tio s a r e read ily available. T h u s, as
o f Ja n u a ry 1 9 8 3 , m a rk e t c o m m e n ta r ie s su g g e ste d th a t th e
yen and th e Sw iss f r a n c — b ased o n “e c o n o m i c fu n d am en ­
tals” — w e r e u n d e rv a lu e d re la tiv e t o th e d o lla r; th at th e C an a­
dian d o lla r w as v u ln e ra b le to s o m e fu rth e r w e a k e n in g d u rin g
1 9 8 3 in th e ligh t o f C a n a d a ’s p e rs is tin g in flation , w eak
m a rk e ts fo r c o m m o d ity e x p o r t s an d u n in viting p r o s p e c ts fo r
d ire c t fo reig n in v e stm e n t; th at ste rlin g w as w e a k b e c a u s e o f
c o n c e r n s o v e r th e im p a c t o f a p r o s p e c tiv e fall in oil p r ic e s ;
and th at th e DM w a s u n d e r p r e s s u re b e c a u s e o f u n c e rta in ty

narrowly held trading firms, or foreign or domes­
tic banks. But is is likely that many are commod­
ity funds which place some part of their pooled
shareholders funds in speculative positions
through the IMM.
Conclusions
Along with Chicago markets in a variety of
other financial futures, the markets for foreign
currency futures on the IMM, at least in five out
of the eight currencies traded, have experienced
impressive growth since 1977. Other financial
centers in the United States and elsewhere have
recently established markets with similar con­
tracts but the IMM will probably remain the
leading market in currency futures for some
years to come. Through both direct and indirect
arbitrage, price movements on IMM currency
futures are tightly linked with corresponding
movements in the world wide interbank market.
Despite their recent rapid growth, open posi­
tions taken through the IMM are probably small
relative to those assumed through the world­
wide interbank market.
Therefore, it seems unlikely that the IMM is
a significant independent source of supply or
demand in the worldwide currency markets,
although on occasion, a bunching of one-way
orders—particularly in the afternoon after the
European interbank market has closed—can
cause a significant movement in interbank ex ­
change rates. Smaller speculators in exchange
markets may be increasingly attracted to the new
options market in foreign currencies, which lim­
its the maximum loss that might be incurred.
Even though the IMM offers small- and
medium-sized traders in foreign currencies more

a b s e n c e o f e x c h a n g e m a rk e t in te rv e n tio n by th e c e n tr a l
banks, n o n e o f th e se e x p la n a tio n s w o u ld have b e e n v ery
c o n v in c in g . F o r th e n , th e e x c h a n g e r a te w o u ld itse lf p r e ­
su m ab ly m o v e to p re v e n t any m assiv e n e t sp e c u la tiv e p o si­
tio n in g ( m u c h as th e p r ic e o f a c o m m o n s to c k “im m e d ia te ly ”
adjusts to re fle c t n e w in fo rm a tio n , th e re b y p re v e n tin g any
“o b v io u s” b argain p r ic e fro m m a te ria liz in g ). B u t w ith th e
m o n e ta ry a u th o ritie s in te rv e n in g to “ lean against th e w in d .”
n e t p riv a te sp e c u la tiv e p o sitio n in g m igh t w e ll b e c o m e v ery
large, w ith s p e c u la to r s , o n b a la n ce , h o ld in g p o sitio n s just
o p p o site to th o s e o f th e c e n tr a l banks.

o v e r th e o u tc o m e o f s c h e d u le d g e n e ra l e le c tio n s . In th e

12




Econom ic Perspectives

favorable terms than does the larger interbank
market, the share of total open positions assumed
by “large traders” on the IMM is considerably
larger than that assumed by traders holding less
than 25 contracts. It is possible, however, that

some significant part of such large positions
represent the pooled investments of “small
traders”—the doctors, dentists, and lawyers from
Des Moines and Peoria who are often alleged to
play a key role in this market.

r
E C O N O M IC P E R S P E C T IV E S — In d e x fo r 1 9 8 2

B a n k in g , cre d it, and fin a n ce
Chicago: city of the big straddles ............................................
W hat is a bank? ........................................................................................
Banks and nonbanks: A run for the money .........................
F irst year experience: Illinois multibanks shop carefully
J u s tic e ’s M erger Guidelines:
Im plications for 7th D istrict banking ....................................

Pages
3-7
20-31
3-12
13-20

S e p /O ct

14-23

E c o n o m ic co n d itio n s
Econom ic events in 1982— a chronology ............................
Interest rate vo la tility in historical perspective ..............
Through the seven ties and beyond .........................................

Ja n /F e b
Ja n /F e b
N o v/D ec

8-9
10-19
14-31

In tern a tio n a l trad e and fin a n ce
B a n k e rs’ aceptances revisited
....................................................
Foreign currency futures: some further asp ects ...........

V.

Is s u e
Ja n /F e b
Ja n /F e b
M ay/Jun
M ay/Jun

M ay/Jun
N o v/D e c

21-31
3-13

M ar/Apr
Ju l/A u g

3-31
3-16

Ju l/A u g
S e p /O ct

17-23
3-13

M o n e y and m o n etary p o licy
The G arn -S t Germ ain D epo sitory Institutions
A ct of 1982 ..............................................................................................
Including th rifts in bank merger an alysis ...............................
Do yield curves normally slope up?
The term structure of interest rates, 1862-1982
Natural gas policy and the M idwest .......................................

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




J

13

Through the seventies and beyond
Business Conditions

Economic Perspectives

Early in 1974,
, the predecessor of
, published a chronol­
ogy of the econom ic events of 1973. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago has published a similar
listing each year since. In this issue we present an abridged account of the decade from 1973 to 1982.
The next issue will contain the annual chronology for 1983. selected as usual by the Chicago Fed’s
longtime business economist and vice president, George Cloos.
Technically, the 1970s began on January 1, 1971, and ended on December 31, 1980. But the
historical notion we call the “seventies” probably began later. The political, military, and social
upheavals of the “sixties” spilled over into the early years of the next decade, as a war ended and a
president resigned. In 1973, a balance tipped and the big news began to come on the economic
front—more so than in any decade since the thirties.
Short of war and catastrophic depression, no event in modem times so quickly and thoroughly
rewrote the rules of trade, finance, and economy as the Arab oil embargo of 1973 and OPEC’s
subsequent assumption of control over the price of the w orld’s energy. Some of the impact of these
events can be followed in the chronology as the United States struggled with an economy hit hard by
the end of cheap energy that had helped nurture the prosperous sixties.
On a less cosmic scale, the seventies saw a drawn-out dance of deregulation in the financial
services industry'. Sometimes leap-frogging each other, sometimes advancing in sidling crab-like
fashion, the regulated—banks, S&Ls, and other financial institutions—and their federal and state
regulators brought about the greatest set of changes in the industry- in half a century, Those changes,
keyed in color, can also be traced in the chronology-.
If the seventies began with an embargo, and the sixties with a presidential assassination, and the
forties with Pearl Harbor—all defensible cocktail party assertions—when did the eighties begin? We
don’t know, or at least, we can’t agree on a particular event. Perhaps the decade is not yet sufficiently
far along to focus our hindsight. Or perhaps the eighties began when nobody was noticing, like the
fifties.

1973
Jan 1 European Economic Community is expanded
to include Britain, Denmark, and Ireland.
Jan 11 The Dow industrial index closes at a record
1052.
Ja n 12 Phase III liberalizes wage and price
controls.
Jan 29 Peace in Vietnam announced.
— Officials see prospects for reduced inflation as
‘‘exceedingly favorable.”
Feb 5 Purchasing Managers Association reports
shortages of many materials and components.
Feb 12 The dollar is devalued by 10% relative to
other major currencies.
Mar 2 Foreign exchange markets closed because
of massive sales of dollars.

14




Mar 19 European exchange markets reopen with
EC currencies in “ joint float.”
— Atomic Energy Commission says nuclear power
is needed to avoid dependence on Middle East oil.
Mar 26 The Joint Economic Committee recom­
mends return to stricter wage/price controls.
Mar 29 Ceilings established on prices of beef,
pork, and lamb.
Apr 5 Mississippi floods worst in 30 years.
May 1 Treasury revises prospective deficit down­
ward because of higher receipts.
— U.S. oil import quotas ended.
May 16 Fed’s Regulation Q ceilings suspended for
all large CDs.
May 17 "Watergate Committee" begins hearings.

Econom ic Perspectives

Jun 4 July soybean futures hit $12 per bushel, up
from $3.50 a year earlier.

O ct 26 International trade surplus for the third
quarter was the largest since 1965.

Jun 13 Sixty-day price freeze announced, called
"Phase V/2 ."

Nov 1 Airlines reduce scheduled flights.

Jun 28 Export restrictions placed on soybeans,
oilseeds.
Jun 2 9 German mark is revalued by 5.5%.
Ju l 5 Interest rate ceilings raised for savings and
small-denomination time deposits, and suspended
for four-year, $1,000 minimum accounts.
Jul 13 Federal Reserve “ swap lines” with foreign
central banks reactivated and expanded.
Aug 12 General price freeze ends and Phase IV
begins.
Aug 17 Chicago branches of foreign banks autho­
rized by the Illinois Foreign Banking Office Act
(effective Oct 1).
Sep 10 Thirteen-week Treasury bills sold at 9.02 %,
for an investment yield of 9.35%.
O c t 2 M andatory allocations ordered on oil
products.
O ct 6 Egypt and Syria attack Israel.
O ct 15 New law requires interest ceilings on time
deposits of less than $100,000.
O ct 16 Posted price of Arab crude oil raised 70%.
O ct 17 Arab nations announce reductions in oil
shipments.

Nov 7 President outlines steps for fuel conservaion.
Nov 16 Alaskan pipeline bill signed.
D ec 5 The Dow industrials close at 788, low for
the year. (See Jan 11.)
D ec 10 Rates on U S. savings bonds raised from
5.5 to 6.0%.
D ec 12 Federal Energy Office announces regula­
tions for oil usage.
Dec 24 Arab nations announce an additional 100%
increase in posted prices for crude oil.
D ec 29 Large layoffs planned by auto firms, air­
lines.

1974
Jan 2 Nixon signs bill to reduce speed limit to 55
mph.
Jan 3 Federal Reserve Board reduces margin re­
quirements on stock purchases from 65 to 50%.
Jan 18 The Federal Energy Office says that the
Arab oil embargo is fully effective.
Jan 31 Independent truckers begin 11-day strike
to protest high fuel prices and reduced speed limit.

O ct 22 Cease fire arranged in Arab-lsraeli war.

Feb 28 Nixon says “ no gas rationing" despite
lines at gas stations.

O ct 25 Fertilizer industry exempted from price
controls.

Mar 13 The Dow industrials close at 892, the high
for the year. (See Dec 6.)
Mar 18 Arab oil embargo is lifted.

E n e rg y p ric e s doubled in 1973-1974,
then more than doubled again from
late 1978 by early 1981.
index, 1967=100

Apr 4 Shortages ranging from “ abrasives to zinc"
are reported.
Apr 12 The United Steel Workers agree to a
pattern-setting three-year pact providing for a 40%
increase in wages and benefits.
Apr 15 Thrift institutions report savings losses as
"disintermediation” returns.
Apr 3 0 The Economic Stabilization Act expires,
ending general price and wage control authority; the
Committee on Interest and Dividends expires.
Jun 4 Various electric utilities are reported to be
deferring expansion projects.
Jun 26 Germany's Bankhaus Herstatt collapses
with worldwide repercussions.
Jul 3 Major banks raise their prime rates to a
record 12%.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




15

Ju l 12 Usury ceiling on Illinois home mortgages is
raised from 8 to 9.5% until Ju l 1, 1975.

D ec 6 The Dow industrials close at 578, lowest
since Oct 1962. (See Mar 13.)

— Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control
Act of 1974 becomes law. (See Dec 1 1, 1974.)

— The Federal Reserve Board authorizes banks
to issue six-year investment certificates yielding up
to 7.5%.

Jul 16 The Labor Department reports more strikes
than at any time since World War II.
Jul 24 Citicorp sells $850 million of innovative
variable rate notes.
Aug 9 Gerald Ford becomes President as Nixon
resigns.
Aug 12 The Department of Agriculture says
drought will hurt the crops.
Aug 26 The Treasury sells 3-month bills at a
record 9.91% yield. (See Dec 20.)
Aug 28 The Bell System sells 40-year bonds at a
record 10%.
Sep 4 The Federal Reserve Board eliminates mar­
ginal reserve requirements on longer-term CDs.
Sep 9 Purchasing managers report no rise in new
orders in Aug, first time since Jan 1971.
Sep 10 FNMA auction of commitments produces
a record 10.6% yield.
Sep 18 Natural gas suppliers announce sharp cut­
backs to industrial users.
Sep 19 Builders report funds for residential and
commercial construction all but dried up.
Sep 23 A very early frost hits crops in the north­
ern Cornbelt.

D ec 9 The Comptroller of the Currency says 150
banks are under scrutiny.
D ec 9 Coal production resumes at some mines.
(See Nov 12.)
D ec 11 Congress exercises its new power over
Presidential impoundment of funds by rejecting
most proposed spending cuts.
D ec 19 Oil companies are reported to be cancel­
ling plans to expand refining capacity.
D ec 20 The Treasury sells 3-month bills to yield
6.96%. (See Aug 26.)
— Congress approves the Trade Reform Act per­
mitting new international trade negotiations.
D ec 31 American citizens can buy gold, first time
in 40 years.

1975
Jan 2 The Dow industrials close at 632, low for the
year. (See Jul 15.)
Jan 7 Chrysler offers rebates to new car buyers—
other makers follow.
Jan 8 New claims for unemployment compensa­
tion reach record level.

Oct 6 President Ford obtains cancellation of large
grain sales to U SSR.

Jan 17 Major countries propose a fund to aid par­
ticipating countries in financial difficulties caused
by high oil prices.

Oct 7 Voluntary export controls are placed on
grains and soybeans.

Jan 19 Chemical Bank acquires troubled Security
National Bank of Long Island.

Oct 8 The Comptroller of the Currency declares
the Franklin National Bank insolvent.

Jan 24 Prime rate is reduced to 9.5%.

— President Ford’s program to fight inflation
includes a 5% tax surcharge.
Nov 5 Elections give Democrats large majorities in
Congress.

Jan 30 Fidelity Mortgage Investors files under
Chapter 11, second sizable REIT to do so.
Feb 3 Administration budget shows fiscal 1975
deficit at $35 billion and fiscal 1976 deficit at $52
billion. (See May 30.)

Nov 12 The coal strike begins. (See Dec 9.)

Feb 5 Federal Reserve Board reduces discount
rate to 6.75%.

Nov 13 Federal Reserve Board approves a re­
structuring of reserve requirements to encourage
longer-term time deposits.

Feb 14 Multilateral Trade Negotiations to reduce
barriers to international trade begin.

Nov 2 0 Auto makers announce layoffs and capital
outlay reductions as sales slump.

Mar 7 Federal Reserve Board submits draft legis­
lation to establish federal chartering and control of
foreign banks operating in United States.

Nov 27 FDIC insurance coverage is raised from
$20,000 to $40,000.

Mar 10 Federal Reserve Board reduces discount
rate to 6.25%.

16




Economic Perspectives

Mar 29 Bill is approved to cut individual and cor­
porate income taxes by $22.8 billion.

— Usury rate of 9.5% on Illinois home mortgages is
extended to Jan 1, 1977.

Apr 7 Federal Reserve Board authorizes member
banks to permit phoned withdrawals or transfers
from savings accounts.

Jun 9 A New York bank reduces prime rate to 6.75%
— low for the year.

Apr 9 Federal Reserve Board announces a reduc­
tion from 8 to 4% in the reserve requirement on
foreign borrowings.
Apr 29 Saigon surrenders to Viet Cong, ending
30-year war.
May 1 Trading under SEC-ordered negotiated
broker fees begins on NYSE.

Jul 1 Social security payments are boosted 8% in
cost-of-living adjustment.
Ju l 15 The Dow industrials close at 882, high for
the year. (See Jan 2.)
Jul 17 U .S. grain companies announce large sales
to Russia.
Jul 18 “ Dumping” charges are filed with the U.S.
Treasury against foreign auto producers.

— Federal Reserve Board reports money-growth
targets for the coming 12 months to the Senate for
the first time.

Aug 11 Moratorium is placed on further grain
sales to Russia.

May 5 Ford requests additional $1 billion for the
rapidly expanding food stamp program.

Se p 2 Federal Reserve Board permits preautho­
rized transfers from savings accounts for any bill
payments.

May 14 Congress adopts first concurrent resolu­
tion specifying budget targets under the Congres­
sional Budget Act of 1974.

Sep 5 The IMF announces agreement on steps to
eliminate the role of gold in international finance.

May 16 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate to
6% .

Sep 12 New Illinois law permits NOW accounts
(Negotiable Orders of Withdrawal) at state S&Ls
effective Jan 1, 1976.

May 30 Midyear budget review projects fiscal
1975 deficit at $43 billion and fiscal 1976 deficit at
$60 billion. (See Feb 3.)

O ct 2 W.T. Grant Co. files bankruptcy proceed­
ings under Chapter 11.

Jun 4 Ford signs Securities Reform Act expanding
powers of the S E C .

O ct 15 Federal Reserve Board announces reduc­
tion in reserve requirements on deposits with origi­
nal maturities of four years or more.

Ju n 5 Suez Canal is opened to traffic for the first
time since the 1967 war.
Jun 6 U.S. unemployment rate hits 9.2% in May,
highest since 1941, but employment rose sub­
stantially.

O ct 22 American City National Bank (Milwaukee)
is declared insolvent.
O ct 28 Equal credit opportunity regulations be­
come effective.

T h e C P I more than doubled from
1973 to 1982. Major inflationary
pressures came from the big energy
price jumps in 1973-74 and 1979-80.

Nov 10 The Federal Reserve Board permits mem­
ber banks to offer business corporations savings
acounts up to $150,000.

index, 1967=100

D ec 8 Federal Home Loan Bank Board permits
S&Ls to offer variable rate mortgages on multifam­
ily and commercial properties.
D e c 12 Second concurrent Congressional resolu­
tion on the budget targets a deficit of $74 billion for
fiscal 1976.
D e c 15 Industrial Production Index rises in Nov
for the seventh straight month.
D e c 2 3 Last minute compromise bill extends 1975
tax cuts for six months.
D ec 26 Federal Reserve Board lowers reserve
requirements on time deposits with original maturi­
ties of 180 days to four years.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




17

1976

Jul 27 Treasury announces budget deficit was
$65.6 billion for fiscal 1976.

Jan 1 Minimum wage raised from $2.10 to $2.30
per hour; maximum income for Social Security taxes
raised from $14,100 to $15,300.

Aug 2 Prime rate reduced to 7% as downtrend
resumes.

— State S&Ls in Illinois allowed to offer nonin­
terest-bearing negotiable orders of withdrawal
(NOW accounts).
Jan 2 Dow industrial stock average closes at
859— proves to be low for the year. (See Sep 21.)
— Futures trading in Treasury bills begins on the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
Jan 19 Federal Reserve System reduces discount
rate from 6.0 to 5.5%.
Jan 21 Major banks reduce prime rate to 6.75%,
lowest in three years.
Jan 26 Council of Economic Advisers predicts 6%
inflation for 1976, 6 to 6.5% rise in real GNP, unem­
ployment to average 7.7%.
Feb 12 Court authorizes W. T. Grant to liquidate.
Mar 1 Federal Reserve Board amends Regulation
Q to allow member banks in New England states to
offer NOW accounts, implementing new federal law.
Mar 16 France withdraws franc from Economic
Community (EC ) ‘‘joint float,” following sharp drop
in the British pound.
May 14 Federal Trade Commission issues revi­
sion of the holder-in-due-course doctrine relating to
consumer credit.
May 20 New York State permits S&Ls and mutual
savings banks to offer checking accounts.

Aug 9 New Illinois law sets usury rate on home
mortgages at 2Vi% above yield on long-term federal
bonds.
Sep 1 Mexican peso drops sharply after govern­
ment withdraws support.
Sep 8 Chairman Mao Tse-tung of China dies at 82.
Sep 15 UAW strike begins at Ford Motor Co. (See
Oct 14.)
Sep 16 Congress agrees on federal spending tar­
get of $413.1 billion for fiscal year beginning Oct 1,
1976.
Sep 21 Dow industrial average closes at 1015,
highest since Jan 1973— proves to be high for the
year. (See Jan 2.)
Oct 4 Prime rate reduced to 6.75%.
— Supreme Court upholds ruling that electronic
terminals established by banks are branches; illegal
in Illinois.
O ct 7 The Bank of England raises its minimum
lending rate to a record 15%.
O ct 14 Milton Friedman awarded Nobel prize for
economics.
— Ford Motor Co. begins to reopen plants after
30-day strike. Compensation per hour to rise 13% in
first year. (See Sep 15.)
O ct 16 Currency values in EC joint float are
realigned.

May 26 New York Mercantile Exchange reports
heavy defaults on potato futures contracts.

Nov 1 Prime rate reduced to 6.5%.

J u n 1 Prim e ra te ra ise d to 7% , re ve rsin g
downtrend.

Nov 2 Carter elected President; Democrats retain
large majorities in Congress.

Jun 2 International Monetary Fund auctions gold
at $126 per ounce, first of a series.

Nov 5 Russia announces big grain crop.

Jun 7 Prime rate raised to 7.25%.
Jun 23 Marcor shareholders approve merger with
Mobil Corp.
Jun 28 Federal Reserve Board issues major revi­
sion of its Index of Industrial Production.
Jun 29 General Electric agrees to labor pact to
raise wages 33% over three years, assuming 6%
annual rise in consumer prices.

Nov 10 Department of Agriculture estimates 1976
corn crop at record 6.06 billion bushels.
Nov 19 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate
from 5.5 to 5.25%.
Nov 28 Australian dollar devalued.
D ec 1 Major steel companies raise prices of flatrolled products by 6%.

Jul 1 Social Security payments raised 6.4%.

D e c 2 New Aaa bond yields 7.9%, lowest in three
years.

Jul 20 London gold price drops to $105.50 per
ounce, 31-month low.

D ec 3 Employment rose in Nov, but jobless rate is
estimated at 8.1 %.

18




Econom ic Perspectives

D ec 5 Conference Board panel unanimously pre­
dicts uninterrupted economic growth in 1977.

Feb 14 Electronic banking system begins opera­
tion in Iowa, nation’s first statewide system.

D ec 10 Large New York bank reduces its prime
rate to 6%, lowest since Feb 1973.

Fe b 2 2 C a rte r proposes fisca l 1977 budget
changes raising deficit from $57 billion to $68
billion.

D e c 16 Most O PEC nations announce a 10% rise
in crude oil price effective Jan 1; Saudi Arabia
announces a 5% increase.
D ec 17 Federal Reserve Board reduces reserve
requirements on demand deposits of member banks.
— 91-day Treasury bills yield 4.38%, lowest in four
years.
D ec 20 Richard J. Daley dies at 74; mayor of Chi­
cago for 21 years.
D ec 29 Federal Reserve Board issues rules against
credit discrimination based on age, race, color, reli­
gion, or receipt of welfare— extension of rules on
sex and marital status.

— Federal Reserve Board rules that bank holding
com panies cannot acquire saving s and loan
associations.
Mar 2 3 Revised Regulation B to implement 1976
Amendments to Equal Credit Opportunity Act be­
comes effective.
Apr 4 Carter terminates natural gas emergency.
Apr 6 Federal Home Loan Bank Board lifts ban on
S&Ls having savings accounts at banks.
Apr 11 United Steelworkers agree to pact raising
compensation more than 30 percent in three years.

1977

Apr 19 Act gives federal credit unions broader
lending powers, including authority to make 30-year
mortgage loans.

Jan 3 Dow industrial stock average closes at
1,000, high for the year.

Apr 29 Carter unveils detailed proposed National
Energy Plan.

Jan 4 President Ford proposes tax cut, $ 10 billion
for individuals and $2.5 billion for business.

May 7 O fficials of major industrialized nations
meet in London to discuss mutual problems—
sluggish growth and high unemployment.

Jan 10 Prolonged cold requires sharp emergency
curtailments of natural gas to industrial users.
Jan 16 Chicago has its coldest day of the century
(to date), low of minus 19 and high of minus 7.
Feb 2 Carter addresses nation on energy prob­
lems after signing emergency law to allocate natural
gas.

May 13 Major bank raises prime rate from 6.25 to
6.5%.
May 27 Major bank raises prime rate from 6.5 to
6.75%.
Jun 20 Oil starts flowing into the Alaskan pipeline,
completed after four years at cost of $7.7 billion.

Feb 9 Chicago ends record string of 43 subfreez­
ing days.

Jul 1 Social Security and welfare payments are
increased 5.9%, based on escalation formula.

M a n u fa ctu rin g c a p a c ity utilization

Jul 15 Commonwealth Edison reports record load
of 13.9 million kilowatts as temperature hits 99
degrees in Chicago.

reflected the business declines and
subsequent recoveries of the '70s.
percent

Aug 3 Strip mining law requiring restoration of
excavations approved.
Aug 4 Act establishes Department of Energy.
Aug 19 Major steel companies announce layoffs
and plant shutdowns.
— Major bank increases prime rate from 6.75 to 7 %.
Aug 29 Administration announces 20% set-aside
of wheat acreage for 1978.
— Sweden withdraws from the “ snake” (interna­
tional arrangement for maintaining currency values)
because of its growing payments deficit.
Se p 13 Major bank raises prime rate from 7 to
7.25%.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




19

Sep 14 Congress approves revised fiscal 1978
budget targets with spending at $458 billion and
deficit at $61 billion.
Sep 26 Trading in 90-day commercial paper futures
begins on the Chicago Board of Trade.
Sep 29 Food and Agricultural Act of 1977 ap­
proved, boosting commodity support prices.
Oct 1 General pay increases boosts pay of fed­
eral, civilian, and military personnel by 7.05%.
Oct 4 Prime rate raised from 7.25 to 7.5%.
O ct 13 Carter pledges federal action to curb
“ dumping" of foreign steel.
Oct 21 Major bank raises prime rate from 7.5 to
7.75%.
Oct 24 Department of Energy expects no natural
gas shortage if winter is no more than 10 % colder
than normal.
O ct 26 Federal Reserve raises discount rate from
5.75 to 6%.
O ct 27 Treasury reports fiscal 1977 spending at
$402 billion and deficit of $45 billion, down from
$61 billion in fiscal 1976.
Oct 28 National Commission on Electronic Funds
Transfer issues final report recommending imple­
mentation with user safeguards.
Nov 1 Law approved raising minimum wage from
$2.30 to $2.65 on Jan 1, 1978, and to $3.35 by
1981.
Nov 2 Dow industrial stock average closes at 801,
low for the year.
Nov 11 Government reports record corn and soy­
bean crops.
Nov 16 Single-family home starts reported at 1.6
million rate for Oct, highest on record.
Nov 19 Egyptian president Sadat becomes first
head of an Arab state to visit Israel.
— Major auto producers announce reduction in
output schedules as sales lag.
Nov 29 East and Gulf Coast dockworkers end
two-month strike against container ships.
D ec 6 Soft coal strike begins idling 130,000 min­
ers, mainly in Eastern underground mines.

D ec 21 Consumer Price Index reported up 0.5% in
Nov, 6.7% above year ago.
— O PEC semiannual meeting adjourns without
changing oil price.
D ec 29 U.S. dollar hits historic low relative to
mark, yen, and other major foreign currencies.
D ec 31 U.S. ends year with trade deficit estimated
at $25 billion, a record (to that time).

1978
Jan 1 Minimum wage rises from $2.30 to $2.65.
— Pay base for Social Security rises from $ 16,500
to $17,700, and tax rate rises from 5.85 to 6.05 %.
Jan 4 Treasury and Federal Reserve intervene in
foreign exchange markets to moderate fluctuations
in the dollar.
Jan 6 Prime rate rises from 7.75 to 8%.
Jan 23 President Carter proposes $34 billion tax
cut.
Jan 27 Blizzard hampers industry and trade in
Midwest.
Feb 6 Major blizzard hits Midwest and East.
Feb 20 Indiana orders cutback in electricity usage
to conserve coal supplies depleted by strike in east­
ern mines.
Feb 27 ICC orders railroads to allocate freight
cars to speed grain shipments.
Feb 28 Dow stock average closes at 742, low for
the year.
Mar 13 Treasury and Federal Reserve announce
commitment of additional resources to stabilize the
dollar.
Mar 27 Coal strike ends after 111 days with threeyear pact boosting compensation 39%.
Apr 1 Majority of member nations ratify changes
in the articles of agreement of the IMF.
Apr 11 President urges 5.5% ceiling for price and
wage hikes.
— Volkswagen produces its first U.S.-built car at
New Stanton, Pennsylvania.

D ec 15 Most iron ore miners end strike that began
Aug 1.

Apr 14 Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FH LBB)
reduces liquidity requirement for S&Ls from 7 to
6.5%

Dec 19 Milwaukee Road files for bankruptcy under
Section 77.

A pr 18 Senate approves treaty transferring
Panama Canal to Panama by year 2000.

Dec 20 Act approved raising Social Security tax
sharply starting in 1979.

Apr 20 Treasury announces additional sale of
gold to stabilize the dollar.

20




Econom ic Perspectives

May 1 Federal Reserve Board approves plan to
allow automatic transfers from savings to checking
accounts (A TS), starting Nov 1.
May 5 Prime rate rises to 8.25%.
May 7 Saudi Arabia and Iran overrule other OPEC
nations that want to boost oil prices.
May 25 Prime rate rises to 8.5%.
Jun 1 Change in Regulation Q permits banks and
S&Ls to tie rates paid on CD s to Treasury Bill rates.
Ju n 7 California voters overwhelmingly approve
Proposition 13, sharply limiting property taxes.
Ju n 16 Prime rate rises to 8.75%.
Ju n 3 0 Prime rate rises to 9%.
Ju l 7 Federal Reserve Board sends Congress
proposed changes in rules for membership in the
System.
Jul 16 Economic summit meeting convenes in Bonn
to discuss measures for dealing with world eco­
nomic problems.
Aug 24 Treasury announces increased gold sales.
Aug 28 Federal Reserve Board eliminates reserve
requirements on foreign borrowings.
Aug 3 0 Prime rate rises to 9.25%.
Sep 7 House upholds President’s veto of $37 bil­
lion arms bill.
Sep 8 Dow industrial average closes at 908, high
for year. (Identical peak is reached again on Sep 11.)
Sep 15 Prime rate rises to 9.5%.
Sep 17 International Banking Act provides for
federal regulation and supervision of foreign banks
in the United States.
. ,!

T h e u n e m p lo y m e n t ra te began 1973

below 5%. Ten years and three
recessions later, it was near 11%.

Sep 20 Energy Department officials report ade­
quate natural gas supplies for winter.
— Congress adopts Second Budget Resolution
setting fiscal 1979 outlays at $487.5 billion and
deficit at $38.8 billion.
Sep 28 Prime rate rises to 9.75%.
O ct 1 General pay increase boosts pay of federal
workers by 5.5% in addition to usual “ step"
increases.
Oct 4 Council on Wage and Price Stability (CW PS)
says underlying inflation rate is 7% against 6% in
1977.
O ct 12 Prime rate rises to 10%.
O ct 23 Prime rate rises to 10.25%.
O ct 24 President announces voluntary guidelines
for wage and price boosts.
O ct 27 Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act
(“ Humphrey-Hawkins” ) calls for achievement of 4%
unemployment and 3% inflation by 1983.
O ct 30 Treasury sells notes yielding a record
9.25%.
Nov 1 Commercial banks begin offering A TS
accounts.
— President announces plan to support sagging
dollar. Plan includes larger gold sales and increased
market intervention through acquisition of foreign
currencies. In coordinating actions, Federal Reserve
raises discount rate from 8.5 to 9.5% and increases
reserve requirements on large CDs.
— Prime rate rises to 10.5 percent.
Nov 2 Under Treasury tax and loan investment
program banks pay interest on Treasury note bal­
ances and receive fees for services.
Nov 3 Prime rate rises to 10.75%.
Nov 5 Iranian prime minister resigns as riots and
strikes disrupt economy and reduce oil output.
Nov 6 Community Reinvestment Act regulations
become effective, requiring financial institutions to
meet neighborhood credit needs.
Nov 7 Elections somewhat reduce large Democrat­
ic majorities in Congress.
Nov 9 Department of Agriculture reports record
corn and soybean harvests.
Nov 10 Financial Institutions Regulatory Act in­
creases supervisory power over financial institu­
tions.
Nov 13 Prime rate rises to 11%.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




21

Nov 17 Federal Reserve Board issues tentative
schedule for pricing check collection, clearing, and
settlement services.

Feb 18 China invades Vietnam border area.
Feb 22 DOE predicts serious gasoline shortage.

Nov 24 Prime rate rises to 11.5%.

Feb 2 6 Airlines reduce flights because of fuel
shortages.

Dec 1 Shell announces plan to ration gasoline to
dealers.

Feb 28 Major oil companies curtail fuel allocations.

Dec. 11 Supreme Court affirms Federal Reserve
Board’s power to set capital requirements for bank
subsidiaries of bank holding companies.
Dec 12 FHLBB reduces liquidity requirement for
S&Ls from 6.5 to 6%.
Dec 15 President announces formal recognition
of China, effective Jan 1, 1979.

Mar 13 Nuclear Regulatory Commission orders
five large East Coast nuclear power plants closed.
— European Monetary System goes into effect.
Mar 21 Rail transport of fresh foods deregulated.
Mar 22 Iran cancels $700 million in contracts with
U S.

Dec 16 Cleveland defaults on bank loans.

Mar 26 Egypt and Israel sign peace treaty in
Washington.

Dec 17 OPEC announces three-stage 14.5% boost
in crude oil prices for 1979.

Mar 27 O PEC votes 9% rise in base price for
crude oil.

Dec 20 Prime rate rises to 11.75%.

Mar 28 Accident closes nuclear plant at Three
Mile Island.

Dec 22 Consumer price index for Nov reported
9% above year-earlier level.
Dec 27 FNMA auctions commitments to buy gov­
ernment-backed mortgages at record 10.6%.
Dec 31 Heavy snows hit Midwest, followed by
severe cold.
— Year ends with widespread forecasts of a reces­
sion, but with employment, output, and retail trade
still vigorous.

1979
Jan 1 Minimum wage rises from $2.65 to $2.90.
— Social Security tax rate rises from 6.05 to 6.13%
and ta x a b le inco m e r is e s fro m $ 1 7 ,7 0 0
to $22,900.
— Mandatory private retirement age rises to 70.
Jan 3 Secretary Schlesinger urges energy con­
servation because of the cutoff of oil from Iran.
Jan 15 Chicago temperature falls to a record low
of minus 19 degrees; heavy snows in Midwest snarl
transportation.
Jan 16 The Shah leaves Iran.
Jan 24 Department of Energy (DO E) urges states
to encourage natural gas hookups to save oil.
Jan 31 Religious leader Khomeini returns to Iran.
Fob 5 Farmers in Washington, protest low farm
prices.
— Gold jumps to a record $246.50.
Feb 13 Iranians attack U.S. embassy in Tehran.

22




Apr 5 Carter proposes phase out of oil price con­
trols, along with a “ windfall" profits tax.
Apr 20 Federal court declares bank A TS accounts
illegal and sets Jan 1, 1980, deadline for Congres­
sional action.
Apr 30 Israeli ship passes through Suez Canal,
first since Israel was founded in 1948.
May 4 Margaret Thatcher becomes Britain's Prime
Minister.
— Long
stations.

lin e s

d e ve lo p

at C a lifo r n ia

gas

May 23 Crude oil sells in spot markets abroad at
over $30.
May 24 Strike ends at United Airlines after 55
days.
— Diesel fuel shortages slow truck traffic.
May 25 DC-10 crashes after takeoff at O ’Hare—
274 die in worst air disaster in U.S. history.
Jun 1 Long lines reported at gas stations on the
East Coast.
Jun 4 Independent truck drivers halt traffic, pro­
testing price and availability of diesel fuel.
Jun 15 United States and Russia sign SA LT pact
in Vienna.
Jun 17 United Nations projects world population
at 4.3 billion in 1980 and 6 billion in 2000.
Jun 27 O PEC raises basic oil price to $18, plus
surcharges.

Econom ic Perspectives

Ju l 1 Social Security and welfare payments rise
9.9%.
— Passbook savings rate ceiling raised to 5.5% at
thrifts and 5.25% at banks, four-year floating rate
certificate authorized, and other regulations are
eased.
Ju l 2 Circulation of Susan B. Anthony dollar coins
begins.
Ju l 16 Therm ostats in nonresidential buildings
ordered set at 78 in summer, 65 in winter.
Ju l 17 Treasury auctions gold at a record $296.
Ju l 19 G. William Miller, Federal Reserve Board
Chairman, named to replace Blumenthal as Secre­
tary of the Treasury.
— Federal Reserve announces increase in discount
rate from 9.5 to 10%.
Ju l 25 Paul Volcker named to succeed Miller as
Chairman of Federal Reserve Board.
Ju l 26 Legislation implements Multilateral Trade
Negotiations.
Aug 1 Chrysler reports large operating losses and
asks federal financial aid.
— RPs of less than $100,000, maturing in 90 days
or more, made subject to Regulation Q interest rate
ceilings.
Aug 16 Federal Reserve announces increase in
discount rate to a record 10.5%.
Aug 17 Price controls end for "heavy" crude oil.
Sep 12 Major bank raises prime rate to 13%.
S e p 14 General Motors agrees to boost compen­
sation 34% over three years, assuming 8% annual
inflation.
R e a l G N P ended the decade 23%

above its 1975 low, even after two
more recessions.
billions of 1972 dollars

Se p 18 Gold rises to $382 and silver rises to $16.
— Federal Reserve announces increase in discount
rate to 11%.
Sep 25 HUD raises ceiling on government-backed
residential mortgages to 10.5%.
S e p 27 Auto manufacturers again reduce assem­
bly schedules to cut inventories.
O ct 1 Federal workers receive general pay boost
of 7%, in addition to annual step increases.
— Panama's sovereignty extended over the Canal.
— Gold jumps to $416, double year-earlier price.
O ct 5 Dow industrial stock index closes at 898,
high for the year. (Low of 797 reached on Nov 7.)
O ct 6 Federal Reserve takes strong actions to
slow inflation: discount rate rises to 12%, marginal
reserve requirements are established on increases
in "managed lia b ilitie s," and monetary policy
emphasis is shifted to control of member bank
reserves.
O ct 15 Libya raises oil price to $26.27, exceeding
O P E C ’s $23.50 ceiling.
O ct 22 Treasury 90-day bills hit record 12.93%.
O ct 23 Major banks raise prime rate to 15%.
— Britain terminates
controls.

long-standing exchange

Nov 1 Britain's C onservative government an­
nounces sharp cuts in welfare outlays.
Nov 4 Iranian “ students" invade U.S. embassy in
Tehran and seize hostages.
Nov 5 Iranian Premier Bazargan resigns.
Nov 7 Prime rate rises to 15.5%.
Nov 8 Big Three auto makers announce further
layoffs.
— Illinois law suspends mortgage usury rate.
Nov 12 Carter bans oil imports from Iran; Iran
halts shipments to U.S.
Nov 14 U.S. freezes Iranian financial assets.
Nov 16 Prime rate rises to 15.75%.
Nov 19 Lane Kirkland is elected president of the
A FL/CIO , succeeding George Meany.
Nov 2 6 FNMA auctions conventional mortgage
funds at a record 13.35%.
— Major bank cuts prime rate to 15.5%.
D ec 5 IMF auctions gold at $426.
D ec 9 Brazil devalues cruzeiro by 30 percent.

Federal Resen>e Bank o f Chicago




23

Dec 13 Venezuela and Saudi Arabia raise basic oil
price from $18 to $24. (Spot price is $40.)
Dec 14 Financial authorities authorize banks and
S&Ls to issue 2 '/2 -year certificates with rates tied to
yields on Treasury bonds, and no minimum balance,
effective Jan 1.
— Major bank cuts prime rate to 15%.
D ec 20 Congress passes bill providing for a $1.5
billion loan guarantee for Chrysler, conditional on
other steps.
— O PEC nations adjourn meeting at Caracas with­
out agreement on a price for crude oil.
Dec 26 Gold closes in New York at $ 5 0 6 , first
time over $500.

D ec 28 Legislation temporarily overrides court
decision banning ATS accounts at banks, and sus­
pends state mortgage usury ceilings, etc.
D ec 3 0 Soviet troops invade Afghanistan.
Dec 31 Silver hits $35, up from $6 a year earlier.

1980
Jan 1 Minimum wage rises from $2.90 to $3.10.
— Social Security wage base rises from $22,900 to
$25,900. Tax rate stays at 6.13%.
— Regulatory authorities replace four-year floating
rate CD (established Jul 1, 1979) with 2!/2-year
"small saver” CD.
— Treasury Department starts issuing double-E
bonds yielding 7% over 11 years.
Jan 4 President Carter denounces Russian inva­
sion of Afghanistan. He embargoes shipments of
agricultural products to Russia.
Jan 23 State of Union message calls for draft
registration and 5% boost in real defense spending.
Jan 28 Saudi Arabia raises its basic oil price to
$26.
Feb 1 Trade agreement between the U.S. and the
Peoples Republic of China goes into effect.
Feb 6 IMF auctions 444,000 ounces of gold at
$712 per ounce, up from record $563 on Jan 2.
Feb 15 Algeria boosts oil price $3.00 per barrel to
$37.21.
— Federal Reserve raises discount rate from 12%
to a record 13%.
Feb 19 Federal Reserve announces money and
credit growth targets for 1980: M-1A, 3'/2-6%; M1B, 4-6'/2%; M-2, 6-9%; M-3, 6'/2-9'/2%; total bank
credit, 6-9%.

24




Feb 27 One-year Treasury bills sell at 15.3%
bond-equivalent yield, highest ever for any U.S.
security.
Feb 28 Nuclear Regulatory Commission lifts mora­
torium on new nuclear plants imposed after Three
Mile Island accident.
Mar 1 Regulatory authorities impose temporary
ceilings on "small saver” CDs, 11 V a % for banks,
12% for thrifts.
Mar 12 Chicago bank raises its mortgage rate to
16.25%.
Mar 13 President Carter endorses 7.5-9.5% wage
rise guidelines for 1980, up from 7% in 1979.
Mar 14 President Carter announces new anti­
inflation program, and activates Credit Control Act
of 1969.
— Federal Reserve Board announces 15% “ special
deposit” on growth of money market funds and
some types of consumer credit, a voluntary “ Special
Credit Restraint Program” to restrict business
credit, an increase in marginal reserves on managed
liabilities from 8 to 10%, and a 3-point "surcharge"
on frequent borrowings from Federal Reserve by
large banks. Banks are urged to limit loan growth to
6 to 9%.
Mar 21 Administration suspends “ trigger price
mechanism” intended to curb steel imports. (Mech­
anism is reinstated Oct 21.)
Mar 24 Bond-equivalent yield on three-month Trea­
sury bills jumps sharply to 17.5%.
Mar 25 Large Chicago S&L increases mortgage
rate to 17%.
Mar 27 Spot price of silver drops $5 to $10.80
per ounce. (Peak of $50 was reached in Jan.)
Mar 29 FmHA's Economic Emergency Loan Pro­
gram to aid financially distressed farmers is ex­
tended and expanded.
Mar 31 Depository Institutions Deregulation and
Monetary Control Act (Monetary Control Act) is
approved. Among its many provisions: all deposi­
tory institutions, member and nonmember, will be
phased in to the same new reserve requirements
over a period of years; Federal Reserve member
banks can no longer avoid reserve requirements by
withdrawing from the system; all institutions will
have full access to the Federal Reserve’s discount
window and services; Federal Reserve will establish
a pricing schedule for its services; all institutions
will be able to offer NOW accounts beginning Dec
31, 1980; interest rate ceilings on savings and time
deposits will be phased out in six years; thrift insti­
tutions will have expanded asset powers; state

Econom ic Perspectives

usury ceilings for mortgages and certain other loans
are overridden; FD IC /FSLIC insurance limits are
boosted from $40,000 to $100,000.
Apr 2 Major bank boosts prime rate to 20%.
— Act imposing “ windfall profits" (excise) tax on
domestic crude oil output is approved. Tax is retro­
active to Mar 1.
Apr 7 U .S. breaks diplomatic relations with Iran,
and cuts off all trade.
Apr 16 Major bank cuts its prime rate from 20 to
19.75%.
Apr 17 China replaces Taiwan as a member of the
International Monetary Fund.
Apr 21 Dow Jones industrial average closes at
759, low for the year. (See Nov 20.)
Apr 25 President Carter announces failure of air­
borne attempt to rescue U .S. hostages held in Iran.

May 29 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate
from 13 to 12%.
May 3 0 Aluminum workers win 42% boost over
three years, assuming 11% inflation rate.
Ju n 13 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate
from 12 to 11 %.
— Many banks reduce prime rate to 12%.
Jun 24 Chrysler obtains $500 million loan after
government board approves federal guarantee.
Jun 30 Synfuel act creates Synthetic Fuel Cor­
poration.
Ju l 1 Checks to 35.2 million Social Security recip­
ients rise 14.3% based on Cost of Living Adjustment
(C O LA ) formula.
— Motor Carrier Reform Act partially deregulates
trucking.

Apr 28 Secretary of State Vance is succeeded by
Senator Muskie.

— Department of Labor reports white-collar salar­
ies rose 9.1% on average in 12 months ending in
Mar.

May 14 Saudi Arabia raises its basic oil price from
$26 to $28.

Jul 3 Federal Reserve Board announces complete
phaseout of credit restraint program.

May 17 Unemployment compensation claims reach
a new high.

— Federal Home Loan Bank Board authorizes S&Ls
to issue credit cards and offer unsecured loans.

May 18 Mt. St. Helens erupts violently causing
extensive damage.

Ju l 7 Indefinite layoffs at Big Four auto makers hit
a record 246,000.

— National Guard moves to control rioting in
Miami.

Ju l 21 Major bank cuts prime rate from 11.5 to 11%.

May 22 National Association of Purchasing Agents
survey shows business “ dropped like a rock" in Apr
and May.
— Federal Reserve eases credit restraint program.
P e rso n a l incom e rose rapidly, partly
in response to inflation, moving from
an annual rate of about $1 trillion to
nearly $3 trillion.
billion dollars

Jul 27 The Shah of Iran dies in Cairo.
Aug 11 AT&T three-year labor contract gives 34.5%
pay boost over three years, assuming 9.5% rise in
CPI.
Aug 17 Polish factory workers strike demanding
pay hike, shorter week, more food, free speech, and
free church.
Aug 21 Import duty on small trucks rises from 4 to
25%.
Aug 22 Major banks boost prime rate to 11.25%,
first of a series of increases.
Aug 28 Federal Reserve publishes proposed pric­
ing schedule and pricing principles for its services.
Se p 1 Revised Regulation A, as required by Mone­
tary Control Act, gives all depository institutions
access to the discount window.
Sep 12 Military coup seizes power in Turkey.
Se p 17 Saudi Arabia boosts its oil price $2 to $30
per bbl.
Sep 22 Iran-lraq war begins over disputed border
waterway.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




25

Sep 26 Federal Reserve raises discount rate from
10 to 11%. Major banks boost prime rate to 13%.

D ec 19 Most major banks raise prime rate to
record 21.5%

Sep 29 Bond-equivalent yield on three-month Trea­
sury bills jumps a full point to 12%.

D ec 21 Iran demands $24 billion ransom to release
hostages.

Oct 1 Federal employees receive a 9.1% general
pay boost, in addition to annual step increases.

D ec 22 Major banks reduce prime rate from 21 to
20.5%.

O ct 2 Major bank leads boost in prime rate to
14%.

— Yields on Treasury bills drop sharply.

Oct 9 Regulatory authorities set 5Vi% ceiling on
NOW accounts, effective Dec 31.

D ec 23 Labor Department announces that Nov
Consumer Price Index was 12.7% above the level of
a year earlier.

Oct 14 Staggers Rail Act provides for gradual
deregulation.

D ec 29 Libya raises its oil price from $37 to $41,
O PEC maximum.

— Lawrence Klein wins Nobel prize in economics.

D e c 3 0 Agriculture Department calls Commodity
Credit Corporation loans on all corn in reserve
program.

Oct 20 Agriculture Department announces that
drought cut major crops— peanuts, 37%; soybeans,
23%; corn, 17%.
Oct 22 Agriculture Department announces fouryear agreement committing China to substantial
purchases of wheat and corn.
Nov 4 Spot oil prices on world market increase to
$37-40 range, $6-9 over official prices.
— Reagan wins the Presidency. GOP wins control
of the Senate, and makes gains in the House.
Nov 6 Major banks raise prime rate from 14.5 to
15.5%.
Nov 10 International Trade Commission turns
down request by Ford and UAW for quotas on
imports of cars and light trucks.
Nov 13 First phase of reserve requirement provi­
sions of Monetary Control Act becomes effective.
Nov 17 Federal Reserve raises discount rate from
11 to 12%, with 2 points added for $500 million
institutions that borrow frequently.
Nov 20 The Dow Jones index closes at 1000, high
for the year. (See Apr 21.)
Nov 24 New York legislature eliminates usury ceil­
ings on most loans.
D ec 5 Federal Reserve raises discount rate to
13%, equaling high of last spring, and raises sur­
charge to 3%.

D ec 31 Major S&L says high interest rates have
virtually shut down Chicago area residential real
estate markets.

1981
Jan 1 Minimum wage rises from $3.10 to $3.35. (It
remains unchanged on Jan 1, 1982.)
— Social Security wage base rises from $25,900 to
$29,700, and tax rate rises from 6.13% to 6.65%.
Jan 9 Bank prime lending rate reduced from 20.5
to 20%.
Jan 20 President Reagan inaugurated. He freezes
federal hiring.
— Iran releases 52 U.S. hostages held 444 days.
Jan 27 Remaining price controls on domestic crude
oil and allocation regulations on gasoline lifted.
Jan 29 President Reagan announces 60-day freeze
on new regulations.
— Federal Reserve begins charging for wire
transfers. Fees for other services are phased in over
subsequent months.
Feb 2 Chrysler workers agree to forego increases
in compensation.
Feb 10 Western coal miners accept 37% raise
over three years.

D ec 10 Auto makers extend holiday closings to
cut inventories.

Feb 25 Federal Reserve announces money growth
targets for 1981.

— Major banks raise prime rate from 19 to 20%.

Feb 27 Federal loan guarantee for Chrysler raised
to $1.2 billion.

Dec 15 Bond-equivalent yield on three-month Trea­
sury bills hits 17.64%, passing 17.5% high on Mar
24, 1980.
— Saudi Arabia raises its basic oil price from $30
to $32. Maximum O PEC price will be $41.

26




Mar 14 Ford’s steel workers agree to cut incen­
tive pay to prevent plant closing.
Mar 15 Two Chicago-area banks closed by exam­
iners.

Econom ic Perspectives

Mar 26 Treasury Secretary Regan elected chair­
man of Depository Institutions Deregulation Com­
mittee (D ID C). (Volcker elected vice chairman Jun
25.)
Mar 3 0 President Reagan and three others wound­
ed in assassination attempt.
Apr 9 Some exporters reduce posted prices for
crude oil.
Apr 10 Ford rejects merger offer from Chrysler.

May 22 Prime rate rises to 20.5%. Investment rate
at three-month Treasury bill auction rises to record
17.7%.
May 26 O PEC extends price freeze. (See Oct 29.)
J u n 3 Prime rate reduced from 20.5 to 20%.
Jun 6 Coal miners ratify 40-month contract rais­
ing compensation 38%, ending 72-day strike.
Jun 8 Israeli jets bomb nuclear reactors in Iraq.

Apr 14 Space shuttle lands after three-day orbit.

Jun 21 French Socialists win a solid majority in
assembly for five years. (See May 10.)

Apr 23 Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FH LBB)
gives federal S&Ls broad discretion on variable rate
mortgages (VRMs).

Ju n 30 Plan to trade bank CD futures approved by
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (C FTC ).

Apr 24 Prime rate rises from 17 to 17.5%.
Apr 27 Dow Jones industrial average closes at
1024, high for the year. (See Sep 25.)
May 1 Japan agrees to limit car exports to the
United States during the period Apr 1981 to Mar
1983.
— Rate on EE bonds rises from 8 to 9%.
May 5 Federal Reserve raises discount rate from
13 to 14%, and surcharge on frequent, large bor­
rowers from 3 to 4%.
May 7 Treasury 30-year bonds yield a record 14%.
May 10 Socialist Mitterand elected French presi­
dent. (See Jun 21.)
May 13 Pope John Paul II is wounded in assassi­
nation attempt.
May 19 FSLIC finances merger of troubled Chi­
cago S&L.
T h e Fed funds ra te — the interest
rate at which banks lend overnight
funds to each other— show the historic
high cost of credit in 1979 and 1980.
percent

Jul 1 Social security checks increase by 11.2%.
Ju l 2 Supreme Court upholds Montana's sever­
ance taxes on coal.
Ju l 3 Law signed permitting multibank holding
companies in Illinois beginning Jan 1, 1982.
Ju l 6 DuPont offers to purchase Conoco, biggest
merger ever.
— U .S. dollar hits new highs against European
currencies.
Ju l 7 Sandra O ’Connor is first woman named to
Supreme Court.
Ju l 8 Prime rate rises from 20 to 20.5%.
— DIDC adopts schedule for elimination of interest
rate ceilings. (See Jul 31.)
Ju l 14 FH LBB allows federal S&Ls to issue gradu­
ated payment adjustable mortgage loans.
Ju l 15 Midyear budget review projects deficits of
$56 billion for fiscal 1981 and $43 billion for fiscal
1982. (See Oct 28.)
Ju l 21 Federal Reserve announces lower money
growth targets for 1982.
Ju l 2 3 Chairman Pratt of FH LBB says S&L losses
are at record pace.
Ju l 31 Judge blocks DIDC's plan to lift ceiling on
CD s with maturities of four years or more.
— Canadian dollar closes at 80.9 U.S. cents, lowest
since 1931.
Aug 1 Below-market cap on 2'/2-year Small Saver
Certificates removed.
Aug 3 Air controllers (PATCO ) begin strike. (They
are terminated Aug 5.)
Aug 4 Warsaw populace protests food shortages.
Aug 5 Ten-year Treasury notes yield a record
15%.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




27

Aug 13 Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981
signed into law, cutting personal income tax rates
and providing investment incentives. Spending cuts
also become law.
Aug 20 Federal Reserve makes discount window
available to thrifts and all banks with severe liquidity
problems.
Aug 24 Six-month Treasury bills auctioned at a
record 17.5% investment yield.
Aug 25 Postal workers ratify three-year pact rais­
ing wages about 11% in first year.
Sep 1 Indiana Bell's AAA debentures yield record
17.1%.

O ct 29 O PEC agrees on unified oil base price of
$34 per barrel.
Nov 1 Ceiling on six-month money market certifi­
cates tied to higher of most recent bill auction or
four-week average.
Nov 2 Federal Reserve discount rate reduced to
13% .

Nov 5 Mergers of two large New York mutual sav­
ings banks arranged by FDIC.
Nov 12 USDA forecasts a record crop harvest,
with corn up 22% from the drought-reduced outturn
in 1980.

— FNMA conventional commitment yields jump
to record 18.7%.

Nov 13 FH LBB reports that commitment rates on
conventional mortgages reached a record 18.2% in
Oct.

Sep 8 FHLBB approves merger of two failing
S&Ls in the East with a California S&L.

Nov 16 Flood of corporate issues hits bond market
as rates ease.

Sep 15 Prime rate declines from 20.5 to 20%.

Nov 18 Housing starts in Oct reported at 15-year
low.

Sep 16 Federal Reserve reports that industrial
production declined in Aug, start of an extended
downturn.
Sep 24 Ceiling rate on Federal credit union depos­
its rises to 12% effective Oct 1.

D ec 1 Ceiling-free IRA and Keogh accounts be­
come available. (Eligibility for these accounts is
broadened Jan 1, 1982.)
— Prime rate reduced to 15.75%.

Sep 25 Illinois law removes usury ceilings on all
loans to consumers.

D ec 3 U.S. banks authorized to establish Interna­
tional Banking Facilities.

— Dow Jones index closes at 824, low for the year.
(See Apr 27.)

D ec 4 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate to

Sep 3 0 FH LBB permits S&Ls to amortize losses
on sales of mortgages.
O ct 1 All Savers Certificates, with tax-exempt
yields tied to market rates, become available.
— Federal employees receive 4.8% general pay
boost, in addition to annual step increases. Military
pay rises 14.3%.
O ct 5 Sears Roebuck announces agreement to buy
Coldwell Banker. (Sears announces plan to buy
Dean Witter Reynolds on Oct 8.)
O ct 6 Egyptian president Sadat assassinated.
Oct 8 Two Chicago-area S&Ls merged by FSLIC .
O ct 14 James Tobin wins Nobel prize in eco­
nomics.
O ct 16 President Reagan says a “ light" recession
is underway.
Oct 19 DIDC postpones one-half percentage point
increase in passbook savings ceiling previously
scheduled for Nov 1.
O ct 2 8 Treasury announces fiscal 1981 budget
deficit was $57.9 billion. (See Jul 15.)

28




12 %.

— Jobless rate of 8.4% in Nov was highest since
1975. (It rises further in Dec.)
D ec 7 Press reports indicate that administration
projects $109 billion deficit in fiscal 1982, without
tax or spending changes.
D ec 9 Chicago Mercantile Exchange begins trade
in Euro-dollar futures.
— Saudi Arabia says $34 unified O PEC oil price
will continue through 1982.
D ec 10 Business Council expects recession to
end early in 1982, with interest rates lower and
inflation reduced.
D ec 13 Polish government institutes martial law
to quell political unrest.
D ec 14 Treasury bill yields increase sharply, re­
versing downtrend.
— Mortgage bankers report mortgage delinquen­
cies at record rate.
D ec 19 General Motors, following Ford, an­
nounces benefit cuts for salaried workers.

Econom ic Perspectives

D ec 21 UAW bargaining councils agree to discuss
concessions on contracts with Ford and GM.
D ec 23 President Reagan announces economic
sanctions against Poland’s government to protest
imposition of martial law.
D ec 24 Many durable goods producers will extend
holiday shutdowns into Jan.
D e c 29 President Reagan announces sanctions
against Russia for its role in Polish crisis.
D ec 31 Purchasing managers report that orders,
output, and employment continued to decline in Dec.

1982
Ja n 1 Social Security wage base rises from
$29,700 to $32,400. Tax rate rises from 6.65 to
6.7%.
Ja n 8 Justice Dept, drops 13-year antitrust suit
against IBM.
Ja n 10 Severe cold and heavy snows hit the
Midwest, disrupting activity. Chicago reports record
low 26 degrees below zero. (Jan 17 pattern is
similar.)
Jan 13 Commerce Dept, estimates real plant and
equipment spending by business will fall 0.5% in
1982. (See Dec 10.)
Ja n 20 UAW halts contract concession talks with
Ford and GM.
Ja n 26 State of the Union address calls for no tax
increases, higher defense spending, and transfer­
ring 40 social programs to the states.
Feb 1 Auto companies offer rebates to spur lag­
ging sales.
T h e D J IA began the decade above
1,000, and crossed that line twice
again before decisively surpassing
it in late 1982.
weighted average

Feb 6 President Reagan's fiscal 1983 budget pro­
jects decline in deficit to $92 billion from $99 billion,
5% rise in total outlays to $758 billion, led by
increased defense spending. (See Oct 26.)
Feb 9 20-year Treasury bonds (constant maturity)
yield 15.06%, high for the year. (See Nov 19.)
Feb 10 Council of Economic Advisers projects 5%
growth rate in the second half of 1982.
— Federal Reserve Chairman Volcker announces
monetary growth targets for 1982: M1, 2.5-5.5%;
M2, 6-9%; and M3, 6.5-9.5%. (See Jul 20.)
Feb 18 Mexico floats peso; it drops by 28% in
dollar terms.
Feb 22 Spot market price of Saudi light crude oil
reported below $30 per barrel, depressed by oil
glut. Official price is $34.
Feb 23 Most major banks reduce prime rates from
1982 high of 17 to 16.5%.
Feb 25 Congressional Budget Office projects defi­
cit at $111 billion in fiscal 1982 and $121 billion in
fiscal 1983. (See Sep 1.)
Feb 28 Ford workers approve new labor contract
containing some concessions. (GM workers approve
similar pact Apr 9.)
Mar 1 Teamsters approve 37-month national labor
contract with some concessions on wages and work
rules.
Mar 2 FHA and VA mortgage rates lowered to
15.5% from 1982 high of 16.5%. (See Nov 12.)
Mar 31 United States Gold Commission rejects
gold as basis for domestic or international monetary
systems.
Apr 1 Japan renews its ceiling of 1.68 million auto
exports to U.S.
Apr 2 Argentine forces seize Falkland Islands.
(See Jun 14.)
Apr 3 UK imposes economic sanctions on Argen­
tina in wake of seizure of the Falkland Islands.
Limited sanctions by other Western countries
follow.
Apr 8 S E C finds “ nonperforming" loans up sharply
at large banks.
May 1 Banks and thrifts begin to offer 91 -day CDs
with ceiling rates tied to Treasury bills, and 3 '/2 -year
CD s with no ceiling.
May 2 Exxon halts huge shale oil development in
Colorado.
May 31 Hughes Tool Co. reports the number of
active oil and gas drilling rigs in steepest decline
ever from record high in Dec.

Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago




29

Jun 2 Sales of new one-family homes in Apr
reported at lowest level ever in series starting in
1963.
Jun 5 Raw steel plant operating rate at 42.5% is
lowest since 1938. (It falls below 30% at year-end.)

Aug 2 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate to
11%. Major banks cut prime rates to 15%.
Aug 4 Federal Reserve requests comments on
planned priced services changes, including “ noon
presentment," originally scheduled for Aug imple­
mentation. (Revised plan announced Dec 27.)

Jun 6 Israeli troops invade Southern Lebanon to
attack PLO guerillas.

Aug 5 Mexico controls foreign currency accounts.

Jun 11 Commerce Dept, determines that imported
foreign steel receives government subsidies.

Aug 11 Dow Jones industrial stock index closes
at 777, low for the year. (See Dec 27.)

Jun 14 French franc devalued by 6% and Italian
lira by 3%.

— Agriculture Dept, forecasts record corn, soy­
bean crops.

Jun 14 Argentine forces in Falkland Islands sur­
render to British. (See Apr 2.)

Aug 12 Lombard-Wall, government securities
dealer, files for bankruptcy.

Jun 21 Initial estimate of second quarter GNP
shows small rise. Improvement in other statistics
raises hopes that recession may be ending. (See
Dec 21.)

Aug 16 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate to
10.5%. Treasury bill rates drop sharply to lowest
level in 2 years. Major banks reduce prime rates to
14.5%.

Jun 2 5 George P. Shultz succeeds Alexander Haig
as Secretary of State.

Aug 19 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
(TEFRA) raises taxes by cutting loopholes, elimi­
nates about one-third of 1981 corporate tax cuts.

Ju n 28 Supreme Court
clauses in mortgages.

upholds due-on-sale

— Federal Reserve Board votes in principle to
require contemporaneous reserve accounting for
banks and thrifts. (On Oct 5 the Board votes to
implement change starting Feb 1984.)
Jun 29 DIDC authorizes $20,000 minimum CD
with 7-31 day maturity and ceiling rates tied to
91-day T-bills, starting Sep 1.

Aug 20 New York Stock Exchange ends week with
record volume and record rise in stock prices.
Aug 22 Private bankers agree to 90-day rollover
of Mexican debt.
Aug 24 Federal court approves AT&T plan divid­
ing system into regional companies.
Aug 2 7 Federal Reserve cuts discount rate to
10 % .

Ju l 1 Ten percent personal income tax cut be­
comes effective. Social security checks rise by
7.4%.
Jul 5 Penn Square Bank of Oklahoma City, largescale originator of energy loans, closes after exam­
iners find it to be insolvent.

Sep 1 Mexico nationalizes banks, broadens ex­
change controls.

Jul 7 General Electric union settlement provides
estimated 28% pay increase over 3 years, assuming
7% inflation.

— Aluminum companies report primary output in
Jul fell below lowest rate of 1975 recession.

Jul 20 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate from
12 to 11.5%, first of seven cuts in 1982. (See Dec
14.)
— Federal Reserve retains the 2.5-5.5% growth
target for M1 in 1982, but faster growth will be
tolerated "for a time.” (See Feb 10.)

— Congressional Budget Office expects deficit in
fiscal 1982 of $ 112 billion, rising to $ 155 billion in
1983. (See Feb 25.)

S e p 13 ICC approves merger of Union Pacific,
Missouri Pacific, and Western Pacific. (Final legal
barrier lifted Dec 22.)
Sep 17 Commodity Credit Corporation authorizes
up to $1 billion in loan guarantees for sales of
agricultural commodities to Mexico.
S e p 19 Railway engineers begin 4-day national
strike to keep pay differential over other railway
workers.

Ju l 2 7 Federal court temporarily enjoins proposed
change in method of calculating "prevailing wages"
paid on federal construction under Davis-Bacon
Act. (Change later goes into effect.)

Se p 28 Federal Reserve Board approves acquisi­
tion of Fidelity S&L in Oakland, Calif., by Citicorp.

Jul 3 0 United Steelworkers conference rejects
industry-requested changes in existing labor con­
tract.

O ct 1 Federal employees receive 4% general pay
boost, in addition to annual step increases. Military
pay also rises 4%.

30




Econom ic Perspectives

— House rejects balanced budget amendment urged
by President Reagan and passed by the Senate.

Nov 19 20-year Treasury bonds (constant matur­
ity) yield 10.42%, low for the year. (See Feb 9.)

— UAW begins strike at Caterpillar Tractor, after
rejecting concessions.

Nov 2 2 Federal Reserve cuts discount rate to 9%.
Prime rate falls to 11.5%, the prevailing rate at
year-end.

— New one-year extension of U .S.-U SSR grain
pact begins.
O ct 8 Sept unemployment rate is estimated at
10.1%, highest since 1941. (Rate reaches 10.8% in
Dec.)
— Export Trading Company (ETC ) legislation signed
into law.
O ct 9 Chairman Volcker says Fed will temporarily
place less emphasis on M l in monetary policy,
because of distortions.
O ct 10 Sweden devalues krona by 16%.
O ct 12 Federal Reserve reduces discount rate to
9.5%.
O ct 13 Major banks cut prime rate from 13 to

12% .

O ct 15 Social Security will borrow in Nov for first
time.
— Far-reaching Garn-St Germain Depository Insti­
tutions Act widens lending powers of S&Ls, etc.
O ct 26 Treasury reports budget deficit for fiscal
1982 reached $111 billion, exceeding 1976 record
of $66 billion. (See Feb 6.)

Nov 2 9 GATT meetings end without resolving
U .S. protests on Common Market’s subsidization of
agricultural exports.
D ec 5 FHA reports record number of mortgage
loan applications in Nov. (Uptrend continues
through year-end.)
D ec 6 DIDC authorizes Super NOW accounts,
removes 7-31 day CD rate ceiling, and reduces
minimum for short-term CD s to $2,500, effective
Jan 5, 1983.
D e c 10 Commerce Dept, estimate shows 4.8%
decline in real plant and equipment spending in 1982.
(See Jan 13.)
D ec 14 Federal Reserve cuts discount rate to
8.5%, lowest since Oct 1978.
D ec 15 Industrial production estimated to have
dropped again in Nov to 12% below Jul 1981 peak.
D ec 16 Housing starts estimated at 1.4 million
annual rate in Nov, highest since Jan 1981.
D ec 2 0 Mexico devalues peso again.

Nov 1 "Voluntary” restrictions on steel exports
from the European Community to the U .S. go into
effect.

D ec 21 O PEC officials meeting in Vienna fail to
agree on oil production quotas for member nations.

Nov 3 Dow Jones industrial stock index closes at
1065, exceeding record set in Jan 1973.

— Commerce Dept, estimates real GNP decline in
fourth quarter. (See Jun 21.)

Nov 12 Yuri Andropov becomes Soviet leader,
succeeding Leonid Brezhnev who died Nov 10.

D ec 2 3 Congress passes 5 cent per gallon gas tax
hike to fund construction and repairs of highways,
bridges, and transit systems.

— FHA-VA ceiling mortgage rate cut to 12%, low­
est in over 2 years. (See Mar 2.)
Nov 15 DIDC authorizes banks and thrifts to offer
Money Market Deposit Account with no interest
ceiling, minimum balance of $2,500, and limited
checking, beginning Dec 14.
Nov 18 Ford plans to shut California auto assem­
bly operations due to import competition, virtually
ending West Coast auto output.

Federal Reserve B ank o f Chicago




D ec 27 Bethelem plans to end most steelmaking
at Lackawanna, New York, plant.
— Dow Jones industrial stock index closes at 1071,
all-time high. (See Aug 11.)
D e c 2 9 Administration predicts 3% rise in real
GNP to fourth quarter of 1983, following 1.2%
decline in past four quarters.

31

eco n o m ic ;

PERSPECTIVES
Public Information Center
Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago
P.O. Box 834
Chicago, Illinois 6 0 6 9 0

P le a se a tta c h a d d re s s lab el to c o r r e s p o n d e n c e
r e g a rd in g y o u r s u b scrip tio n .




B U L K R A TE
U S. PO STAG E
PAID
C H IC A G O , ILLIN O IS
PER M IT N O . 1 9 4 2