View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

l l★K

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
2200 N. PEARL ST.
DALLAS, TX 75201-2272

July 20, 2004

Notice 04-44

TO: The Chief Executive Officer of each
financial institution and others concerned
in the Eleventh Federal Reserve District

SUBJECT
Proposed Regulations to Implement
Affiliate Marketing Provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
DETAILS
The Board of Governors, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Office of Thrift Supervision, and National Credit Union Administration
are seeking public comment on proposed regulations to implement the affiliate marketing
provisions in section 214 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, which
amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The proposed regulations generally prohibit a person from
using information received from an affiliate to make a solicitation for marketing purposes to a
consumer, unless the consumer is given notice and an opportunity and simple method to opt out
of the making of such solicitations.
The Board must receive comments by August 16, 2004. Please address comments to
Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street
and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20551. Also, you may mail comments electronically to regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. All comments should refer to Docket No.
R-1203.
The public can also view and submit comments on proposals by the Board and other
federal agencies from the www.regulations.gov web site.

For additional copies, bankers and others are encouraged to use one of the following toll-free numbers in contacting the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas: Dallas Office (800) 333-4460; El Paso Branch Intrastate (800) 592-1631, Interstate (800) 351-1012;
Houston Branch Intrastate (800) 392-4162, Interstate (800) 221-0363; San Antonio Branch Intrastate (800) 292-5810.

-2ATTACHMENT
A copy of the Board’s notice as it appears on pages 42502–42, Vol. 69, No. 135 of the
Federal Register dated July 15, 2004, is attached.
MORE INFORMATION
For more information, please contact Eugene Coy, (214) 922-6201, or Diane van
Gelder, (214) 922-6282, Banking Supervision Department. Paper copies of this notice or previous Federal Reserve Bank notices can be printed from our web site at www.dallasfed.org/
banking/notices/index.html.

42502

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 41
[Docket No. 04–16]
RIN 1557–AC88

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 222
[Regulation V; Docket No. R–1203]

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 334
RIN 3064–AC73

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 571
[No. 2004–31]
RIN 1550–AB90

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 717
Fair Credit Reporting Affiliate
Marketing Regulations
Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency, Treasury (OCC); Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board); Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Office of
Thrift Supervision, Treasury (OTS); and
National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCIES:

SUMMARY: The OCC, Board, FDIC, OTS,
and NCUA (Agencies) are publishing for
comment proposed regulations to
implement the affiliate marketing
provisions in section 214 of the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of
2003, which amends the Fair Credit
Reporting Act. The proposed regulations
generally prohibit a person from using
information received from an affiliate to
make a solicitation for marketing
purposes to a consumer, unless the
consumer is given notice and an
opportunity and simple method to opt
out of the making of such solicitations.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 16, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
directed to:

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

OCC: You should include OCC and
Docket Number 04–16 in your comment.
You may submit comments by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• OCC Web site: http://
www.occ.treas.gov. Click on ‘‘Contact
the OCC,’’ scroll down and click on
‘‘Comments on Proposed Regulations.’’
• E-mail address:
regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
• Fax: (202) 874–4448.
• Mail: Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Mail
Stop 1–5, Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 250 E
Street, SW., Attn: Public Information
Room, Mail Stop 1–5, Washington, DC
20219.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name (OCC)
and docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
notice of proposed rulemaking. In
general, OCC will enter all comments
received into the docket without
change, including any business or
personal information that you provide.
You may review comments and other
related materials by any of the following
methods:
• Viewing Comments Personally: You
may personally inspect and photocopy
comments at the OCC’s Public
Information Room, 250 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. You can make an
appointment to inspect comments by
calling (202) 874–5043.
• Viewing Comments Electronically:
You may request e-mail or CD–ROM
copies of comments that the OCC has
received by contacting the OCC’s Public
Information Room at
regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
• Docket: You may also request
available background documents and
project summaries using the methods
described above.
Board: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. R–1203, by any
of the following methods:
• Agency Web site: http://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
http://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include docket number in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary,
Board of Governors of the Federal

PO 00000

Frm 00002

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/
foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
except as necessary for technical
reasons. Accordingly, your comments
will not be edited to remove any
identifying or contact information.
Public comments may also be viewed
electronically or in paper in Room MP–
500 of the Board’s Martin Building (20th
and C Streets, NW.) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. on weekdays.
FDIC: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number 3064–AC73
by any of the following methods:
• Agency Web site: http://
www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/
propose.html. Follow instructions for
submitting comments on the Agency
Web site.
• E-Mail: Comments@FDIC.gov.
Include the RIN number in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street
Building (located on F Street) on
business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and RIN
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html including any
personal information provided.
OTS: You may submit comments,
identified by number 2004–31, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail address:
regs.comments@ots.treas.gov. Please
include number 2004–31 in the subject
line of the message and include your
name and telephone number in the
message.
• Fax: (202) 906–6518.
• Mail: Regulation Comments, Chief
Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552, Attention: No.
2004–31.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard’s
Desk, East Lobby Entrance, 1700 G
Street, NW., from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on
business days, Attention: Regulation
Comments, Chief Counsel’s Office,
Attention: No. 2004–31.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to the OTS
Internet Site at http://www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1,
including any personal information
provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to http://
www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1. In
addition, you may inspect comments at
the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street,
NW., by appointment. To make an
appointment for access, call (202) 906–
5922, send an e-mail to
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a
facsimile transmission to (202) 906–
7755. (Prior notice identifying the
materials you will be requesting will
assist us in serving you.) We schedule
appointments on business days between
10 a.m. and 4 p.m. In most cases,
appointments will be available the next
business day following the date we
receive a request.
NCUA: You may submit comments by
any of the following methods. (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web site: http://
www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule Part
717, Fair Credit Reporting—Affiliate
Marketing’’ in the e-mail subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Address to
Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration.
Deliver to guard station in the lobby of
1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314–3428, on business days between
8 a.m and 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Amy Friend, Assistant Chief
Counsel, (202) 874–5200; Michael
Bylsma, Director, or Stephen Van Meter,
Assistant Director, Community and
Consumer Law, (202) 874–5750; Patrick
T. Tierney, Attorney, Legislative and
Regulatory Activities Division, (202)
874–5090; or Carol Turner, Compliance
Specialist, Compliance Department,

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(202) 874–4858, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.
Board: David A. Stein, Counsel;
Minh-Duc T. Le, Ky Tran-Trong, or
Krista P. DeLargy, Senior Attorneys,
Division of Consumer and Community
Affairs, (202) 452–3667 or (202) 452–
2412; or Thomas E. Scanlon, Counsel,
Legal Division, (202) 452–3594, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets, NW.,
Washington, DC 20551. For users of a
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202) 263–4869.
FDIC: Ruth R. Amberg, Senior
Counsel, (202) 898–3736, Robert A.
Patrick, Counsel, (202) 898–3757, or
Richard M. Schwartz, Counsel, Legal
Division, (202) 898–7424; April
Breslaw, Chief, Compliance Section,
(202) 898–6609; David P. Lafleur, Policy
Analyst, Division of Supervision and
Consumer Protection, (202) 898–6569,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20429.
OTS: Cindy Baltierra, Program
Analyst (Compliance), Compliance
Policy, (202) 906–6540; Richard
Bennett, Counsel (Banking and
Finance), (202) 906–7409; or Paul
Robin, Special Counsel, Regulations and
Legislation Division, (202) 906–6648,
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
NCUA: Chrisanthy J. Loizos, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel,
(703) 518–6540, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA
or Act), which was enacted in 1970, sets
standards for the collection,
communication, and use of information
bearing on a consumer’s credit
worthiness, credit standing, credit
capacity, character, general reputation,
personal characteristics, or mode of
living. 15 U.S.C. 1681–1681x. In 1996,
the Consumer Credit Reporting Reform
Act extensively amended the FCRA.
Pub. L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3009.
The FCRA, as amended, provides that
a person may communicate to an
affiliate or a non-affiliated third party
information solely as to transactions or
experiences between the consumer and
the person without becoming a
consumer reporting agency.1 In
addition, the communication of such
1 The FCRA creates substantial obligations for a
person that meets the definition of a ‘‘consumer
reporting agency’’ in section 603(f) of the statute.

PO 00000

Frm 00003

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42503

transaction or experience information
among affiliates will not result in any
affiliate becoming a consumer reporting
agency. See FCRA 603(d)(2)(A)(i) and
(ii).
Section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the FCRA
provides that a person may
communicate ‘‘other’’ information—that
is, information that is not transaction or
experience information—among its
affiliates without becoming a consumer
reporting agency if the person has given
the consumer a clear and conspicuous
notice that such information may be
communicated among affiliates and an
opportunity to ‘‘opt out’’ or direct that
the information not be communicated,
and the consumer has not opted out.
The notice and opt out provided in
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the FCRA
limits the sharing of information among
affiliates and was the subject of the
October 20, 2000 proposal by the
Federal banking agencies and NCUA.
See 65 FR 63120 (Oct. 20, 2000); 65 FR
64168 (Oct. 26, 2000) (the October 2000
proposal).
The current proposal addresses a new
notice and opt out provision that
applies to a person’s use of certain
information that it receives from an
affiliate to market its products and
services to consumers. Although there is
a certain degree of overlap between the
two opt outs, the two opt outs are
distinct and serve different purposes.
Therefore, nothing in this proposal
regarding the opt out for affiliate
marketing supersedes or replaces the
affiliate sharing opt out contained in
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act.
The Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003
The Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act)
was signed into law on December 4,
2003. Pub. L. 108–159, 117 Stat. 1952.
In general, the FACT Act amends the
FCRA to enhance the ability of
consumers to combat identity theft, to
increase the accuracy of consumer
reports, and to allow consumers to
exercise greater control regarding the
type and amount of solicitations they
receive. The FACT Act also restricts the
use and disclosure of sensitive medical
information. To bolster efforts to
improve financial literacy among
consumers, the FACT Act creates a new
Financial Literacy and Education
Commission empowered to take
appropriate actions to improve the
financial literacy and education
programs, grants, and materials of the
Federal government. Lastly, to promote
increasingly efficient national credit
markets, the FACT Act establishes
uniform national standards in key areas

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42504

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

of regulation regarding consumer report
information.
Section 214 of the FACT Act adds a
new section 624 of the FCRA. This new
provision gives consumers the right to
restrict a person from using certain
information about a consumer obtained
from an affiliate to make solicitations to
that consumer. That section also
requires the Agencies, in consultation
and coordination with each other, to
issue regulations in final form
implementing section 214 not later than
9 months after the date of enactment.2
These rules must become effective not
later than 6 months after the date on
which they are issued in final form.
II. Explanation of the Proposed
Regulations
New section 624 of the FCRA
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. Section 624
governs the use of information by an
affiliate, not the sharing of information
with or among affiliates. As such, the
new opt out right contained in section
624 is distinct from the existing FCRA
opt out right for affiliate sharing under
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii), although these
opt out rights and the information
subject to these two opt outs overlap to
some extent. As noted above, the FCRA
allows some information (transaction or
experience information) to be shared
without giving the consumer notice and
an opportunity to opt out, and provides
that ‘‘other’’ information may not be
shared among affiliates without giving
the consumer notice and an opportunity
to opt out. The new opt out right for
affiliate marketing generally applies to
both transaction or experience
information and ‘‘other’’ information.
The Agencies seek comment on these
proposed regulations implementing
section 624 of the FCRA, including in
particular the matters discussed below.
Responsibility for Providing Notice and
an Opportunity To Opt Out
Section 624 does not specify which
affiliate must give the consumer notice
and an opportunity to opt out of the use
21 The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are also
required to issue regulations under new section 624
in consultation and coordination with the Agencies.
The FTC published its proposed rule on June 15,
2004 (69 FR 33,324). The SEC proposal will also be
published in a separate Federal Register notice.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

of the information by an affiliate for
marketing purposes. Under one view,
the person that receives certain
consumer information from its affiliate
and wants to use that information to
make or send solicitations to the
consumer could be responsible for
giving the notice because the statute is
drafted as a prohibition on the affiliate
that receives the information from using
such information to send solicitations,
rather than as an affirmative duty
imposed on the affiliate that sends or
communicates that information. On the
other hand, section 624(a)(1)(A)
provides that the disclosure must state
that the information ‘‘may be
communicated’’ among affiliates for
purposes of making solicitations,
suggesting that the affiliate that sends or
communicates information about a
consumer should be responsible for
providing the notice. In addition,
section 214(b)(3) of the FACT Act
requires the Agencies to consider
existing affiliate sharing notification
practices and provide for coordinated
and consolidated notices. Similarly,
section 214 allows for the combination
of affiliate marketing opt out notices
with other notices required by law,
which may include Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act (GLB Act) privacy notices. Thus, the
provisions of section 214 suggest that
the person communicating information
about a consumer to its affiliate should
give the notice because that is the
person that would likely provide the
affiliate sharing opt out notice under
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the FCRA
and other disclosures required by law.
The Agencies have proposed that the
person communicating information
about a consumer to its affiliate should
be responsible for satisfying the notice
requirement, if applicable. A rule of
construction provides flexibility to
allow the notice to be given by the
person that communicates information
to its affiliate, by the person’s agent, or
through a joint notice with one or more
other affiliates. This approach provides
flexibility and facilitates the use of a
single notice. At the same time, it
ensures that the notice is not provided
solely by the affiliate that receives and
uses the information to make or send
solicitations, which may be a person
from which the consumer would not
expect to receive important notices
regarding the consumer’s opt out rights.
The Agencies invite comment on
whether the affiliate receiving the
information should be permitted to give
the notice solely on its own behalf. The
Agencies specifically solicit comment
on whether a receiving affiliate could
provide notice without making or

PO 00000

Frm 00004

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

sending any solicitations at the time of
the notice and on whether such a notice
would be effective.
Scope of Coverage
The statute specifies certain
circumstances, which are included in
the proposed regulations, when the
requirements do not apply. New section
624(a)(4) provides that the requirements
and prohibitions of that section do not
apply, for example, when: (1) The
affiliate receiving the information has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer; (2) the information is
used to perform services for another
affiliate (subject to certain conditions);
(3) the information is used in response
to a communication initiated by the
consumer; or (4) the information is used
to make a solicitation that has been
authorized or requested by the
consumer. The Agencies have
incorporated each of these statutory
exceptions into the proposed rule.
In defining the circumstances when
the regulatory provisions apply, the
proposal focuses on the communication
of eligibility information among
affiliates. Under the proposal,
‘‘eligibility information’’ is defined to
mean any information the
communication of which would be a
‘‘consumer report’’ if the statutory
exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the FCRA for transaction
or experience information and for
‘‘other’’ information that is subject to
the affiliate-sharing opt out did not
apply. Under section 603(d)(1) of the
FCRA, a ‘‘consumer report’’ means any
written, oral, or other communication of
any information by a consumer
reporting agency bearing on the
consumer’s credit worthiness, credit
standing, credit capacity, character,
general reputation, personal
characteristics, or mode of living which
is used or expected to be used or
collected in whole or in part for the
purpose of serving as a factor in
establishing the consumer’s eligibility
for credit or insurance to be used
primarily for personal, family, or
household purposes, employment
purposes, or any other purpose
authorized in section 604 of the FCRA.
The Agencies invite comment on
whether the term ‘‘eligibility
information,’’ as defined, appropriately
reflects the scope of coverage, or
whether the regulation should track the
more complicated language of the
statute regarding the communication of
information that would be a consumer
report, but for clauses (i), (ii), and (iii)
of section 603(d)(2)(A) of the FCRA.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
Duration of Opt Out

III. Section-by-Section Analysis

Section 624 provides that a
consumer’s election to prohibit
marketing based on shared information
shall be effective for at least 5 years.
Accordingly, the proposal provides that
a consumer’s opt out election is valid
for a period of at least 5 years (the opt
out period), beginning as soon as
reasonably practicable after the
consumer’s opt out election is received,
unless the consumer revokes the
election in writing, or if the consumer
agrees, electronically, before the opt out
period has expired. When a consumer
opts out, an affiliate that receives
eligibility information about that
consumer from another affiliate may not
make or send solicitations to the
consumer during the opt out period
based on that information, unless an
exception applies or the opt out is
revoked.
To avoid the cost and burden of
tracking consumer opt outs over 5-year
periods with varying start and end dates
and sending out extension notices in 5year cycles, some companies may
choose to treat the consumer’s opt out
election as effective for a period longer
than 5 years, including in perpetuity,
unless revoked by the consumer. An
institution that chooses to honor a
consumer’s opt out election for more
than 5 years would not violate the
proposed regulations.

Section l.1 Purpose, Scope, and
Effective Dates
Proposed § ll.1 sets forth the
purpose and scope of each agency’s
regulations.

Key Definitions
Section 624 allows eligibility
information shared with an affiliate to
be used by that affiliate in making
solicitations in certain circumstances,
including where the affiliate has a preexisting business relationship with the
consumer. The terms ‘‘solicitation’’ and
‘‘pre-existing business relationship’’ are
defined in the statute and the proposed
regulation, and discussed in detail
below in the Section-by-Section
Analysis. The Agencies have the
authority to prescribe by regulation
circumstances other than those
specified in the statute that would
constitute a ‘‘pre-existing business
relationship’’ or would not constitute a
‘‘solicitation.’’ The Agencies seek
comment on whether there are
additional circumstances that should be
deemed a ‘‘pre-existing business
relationship’’ or other types of
communications that should not be
deemed a ‘‘solicitation.’’
The Agencies solicit comment on all
aspects of the proposal, including but
not limited to items discussed in the
Section-by-Section Analysis below.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

Section l.2 Examples
Proposed § ll.2 describes the use of
examples in the proposed regulations.
In particular, the examples in this part
are not exclusive. However, compliance
with an example, to the extent
applicable, constitutes compliance with
this part. Examples in a paragraph
illustrate only the issue described in the
paragraph and do not illustrate any
other issue that may arise in this part.
Section l.3 Definitions
Proposed § ll.3 contains definitions
for the following terms: ‘‘affiliate’’ (as
well as the related terms ‘‘company’’
and ‘‘control’’); ‘‘clear and
conspicuous’’; ‘‘communication’’;
‘‘consumer’’; ‘‘eligibility information’’;
‘‘person’’; ‘‘pre-existing business
relationship’’; and ‘‘solicitation.’’
Affiliate
Several FCRA provisions apply to
information sharing with persons
‘‘related by common ownership or
affiliated by corporate control,’’ ‘‘related
by common ownership or affiliated by
common corporate control,’’ or
‘‘affiliated by common ownership or
common corporate control.’’ E.g., FCRA,
sections 603(d)(2), 615(b)(2), and
624(b)(2). Section 2 of the FACT Act
defines the term ‘‘affiliate’’ to mean
‘‘persons that are related by common
ownership or affiliated by corporate
control.’’
The FCRA, the FACT Act, and the
GLB Act contain a variety of definitions
of ‘‘affiliate.’’ Proposed paragraph (b)
simplifies the various FCRA and FACT
Act formulations by defining ‘‘affiliate’’
to mean any person that is related by
common ownership or common
corporate control with another person.3
The Agencies believe it is important to
harmonize the various definitions of
affiliate as much as possible and
construe the various FCRA and FACT
Act definitions to mean the same thing.
Comment is solicited on whether there
is any meaningful difference between
the various FCRA, FACT Act, and GLB
Act definitions. In addition, the
proposal uses a definition of ‘‘control’’
3 For purposes of this regulation, an ‘‘affiliate’’ of
a bank or savings association includes an operating
subsidiary of such bank or savings association. An
affiliate of a credit union includes a credit union
service organization that is controlled by a Federal
credit union.

PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42505

that applies exclusively to the control of
a ‘‘company,’’ and defines ‘‘company’’
to include any corporation, limited
liability company, business trust,
general or limited partnership,
association, or similar organization. See
proposed paragraphs (d) (‘‘company’’)
and (i) (‘‘control’’).4
Clear and Conspicuous
Proposed paragraph (c) defines the
term ‘‘clear and conspicuous’’ to mean
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented. Institutions retain flexibility
in determining how best to meet the
clear and conspicuous standard.
Institutions may wish to consider a
number of practices to make their
notices clear and conspicuous. A notice
or disclosure may be made reasonably
understandable through methods that
include but are not limited to: using
clear and concise sentences, paragraphs,
and sections; using short explanatory
sentences; using bullet lists; using
definite, concrete, everyday words;
using active voice; avoiding multiple
negatives; avoiding legal and highly
technical business terminology; and
avoiding explanations that are imprecise
and are readily subject to different
interpretations. Various methods may
also be used to design a notice or
disclosure to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information in it,
including but not limited to: using a
plain-language heading; using a typeface
and type size that are easy to read; using
wide margins and ample line spacing;
using boldface or italics for key words.
Institutions that provide the notice on a
Web page may use text or visual cues to
encourage scrolling down the page if
necessary to view the entire notice, and
take steps to ensure that other elements
on the Web site (such as text, graphics,
hyperlinks, or sound) do not distract
attention from the notice.
When a notice or disclosure is
combined with other information,
methods for designing the notice or
disclosure to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information in it
may include using distinctive type
sizes, styles, fonts, paragraphs,
headings, graphic devices, and
groupings or other devices. It is
unnecessary, however, to use distinctive
features, such as distinctive type sizes,
styles, or fonts, to differentiate an
affiliate marketing opt out notice from
other components of a required
4 For purposes of the proposed regulation, NCUA
will presume a Federal credit union has a
controlling influence over the management or
policies of a credit union service organization if it
is 67 percent owned by credit unions.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42506

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

disclosure, for example, where a privacy
notice under the GLB Act includes
several opt out disclosures in a single
notice. Nothing in the clear and
conspicuous standard requires the
segregation of an affiliate marketing opt
out notice when it is combined with a
privacy notice under the GLB Act or
other required disclosures.
It may not be feasible to incorporate
all of the methods described above all
the time. For example, an institution
may have to use legal terminology,
rather than everyday words, in certain
circumstances to provide a precise
explanation. Institutions are
encouraged, but not required, to
consider the practices described above
in designing their notices or disclosures,
as well as using readability testing to
devise notices that are understandable
to consumers.
Consumer
Proposed paragraph (e) defines the
term ‘‘consumer’’ to mean an
individual, which follows the statutory
definition in section 603(c) of the FCRA.
For purposes of this definition, an
individual acting through a legal
representative qualifies as a consumer.
Eligibility Information
Under proposed paragraph (j), the
term ‘‘eligibility information’’ means
any information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the FCRA did not apply.
Eligibility information may include a
person’s own transaction or experience
information, such as information about
a consumer’s account history with that
person, and other information, such as
information from credit bureau reports
or applications.
Person
Proposed paragraph (l) defines the
term ‘‘person’’ to mean any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity. A person may act through
an agent, such as a licensed agent (in the
case of an insurance company), a trustee
(in the case of a trust), or any other
agent. For purposes of this part, actions
taken by an agent on behalf of a person
that are within the scope of the agency
relationship will be treated as actions of
that person.
Pre-Existing Business Relationship
Proposed paragraph (m) defines this
term to mean a relationship between a
person and a consumer based on the
following: (1) A financial contract

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

between the person and the consumer
that is in force; (2) the purchase, rental,
or lease by the consumer of that
person’s goods or services, or a financial
transaction (including holding an active
account or a policy in force or having
another continuing relationship)
between the consumer and that person,
during the 18-month period
immediately preceding the date on
which a solicitation covered by subpart
C is made or sent to the consumer; or
(3) an inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the 3month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C is made or sent to the
consumer. The proposed definition
generally tracks the statutory definition
contained in section 624 of the Act,
with certain revisions for clarity.
The Agencies have the statutory
authority to define in the regulations
other circumstances that qualify as a
pre-existing business relationship. The
Agencies have not proposed to exercise
this authority to expand the definition
of ‘‘pre-existing business relationship’’
beyond the circumstances set forth in
the statute. Comment is solicited,
however, on whether there are other
circumstances that the Agencies should
include within the definition of ‘‘preexisting business relationship.’’
Solicitation
Proposed paragraph (n) defines this
term to mean marketing initiated by a
person to a particular consumer that is
based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate and is intended to encourage
the consumer to purchase a product or
service. A communication, such as a
telemarketing solicitation, direct mail,
or e-mail, is a solicitation if it is directed
to a specific consumer based on
eligibility information. The proposed
definition of solicitation does not,
however, include communications that
are directed at the general public
without regard to eligibility information,
even if those communications are
intended to encourage consumers to
purchase products and services from the
person initiating the communications.
The proposed definition tracks the
statutory definition contained in section
624 of the Act, with certain revisions for
clarity.
The Agencies have the statutory
authority to determine by regulation
that other communications do not
constitute a solicitation. The Agencies
have not proposed to exercise this
authority to specify other
communications that would not be
deemed ‘‘solicitations’’ beyond the

PO 00000

Frm 00006

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

circumstances set forth in the statute.
Comment is solicited, however, on
whether there are other communications
that the Agencies should determine do
not meet the definition of ‘‘solicitation.’’
Comment is also requested on whether,
and to what extent, various tools used
in Internet marketing, such as pop-up
ads, may constitute solicitations as
opposed to communications directed at
the general public, and whether further
guidance is needed to address Internet
marketing.
Section ll.20 Use of Eligibility
Information by Affiliates for Marketing
Proposed § ll.20 establishes the
basic rules governing the requirement to
provide the consumer with notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of a
person’s use of eligibility information
that it obtains from an affiliate for the
purpose of making or sending
solicitations to the consumer. The
statute is ambiguous because it does not
specify which affiliate must provide the
opt out notice to the consumer. The
proposed regulation would resolve this
ambiguity by imposing certain duties on
the person that communicates the
eligibility information and certain
duties on the affiliate that receives the
information with the intent to use that
information to make or send
solicitations to consumers. These
bifurcated duties are set forth in
paragraphs (a) and (b).5
Paragraph (a) sets forth the duty of a
person that communicates eligibility
information to an affiliate. Under the
proposal, before an affiliate may use
eligibility information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer, the person
that communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to an
affiliate must provide a notice to the
consumer stating that such information
may be communicated to and used by
the affiliate to make or send solicitations
to the consumer regarding the affiliate’s
products and services, and must give
the consumer a reasonable opportunity
and a simple method to opt out.
Some organizations may choose to
share eligibility information among
affiliates but not allow the affiliates that
receive that information to use it for
marketing purposes. In that case,
proposed paragraph (a) would not apply
and an opt out notice would not be
required if none of the affiliates that
receive eligibility information use it to
make or send solicitations to consumers.
5 Because the proposed regulations generally
would impose duties on more than one person in
an affiliated group, different Agencies may have
enforcement authority over the different affiliates
involved in communicating and using eligibility
information to make or send solicitation.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
Under the proposal, paragraph (a)
would not apply if, for example, an
insurance company asks its affiliated
bank to include insurance company
marketing material in periodic
statements sent to consumers by the
bank without regard to eligibility
information. The Agencies invite
comment on whether, given the policy
objectives of section 214 of the FACT
Act, proposed paragraph (a) should
apply if affiliated companies seek to
avoid providing notice and opt out by
engaging in the ‘‘constructive sharing’’
of eligibility information to conduct
marketing. For example, the Agencies
request commenters to consider the
applicability of paragraph (a) in the
following circumstance. A consumer
has a relationship with a bank, and the
bank is affiliated with an insurance
company. The insurance company
provides the bank with specific
eligibility criteria, such as consumers
having combined deposit balances in
excess of $50,000, and average monthly
demand account deposits in excess of
$10,000, for the purpose of having the
bank make solicitations on behalf of the
insurance company to consumers that
meet those criteria. Additionally, the
consumer responses provide the
insurance company with discernible
eligibility information, such as a
response form that is coded to identify
the consumer as an individual who
meets the specific eligibility criteria.
Proposed paragraph (a) also contains
two rules of construction. The first rule
of construction provides that the notice
may be provided either in the name of
a person with which the consumer
currently does or previously has done
business or in one or more common
corporate names shared by members of
an affiliate group of companies that
includes the common corporate name
used by that person. The rule of
construction also provides alternatives
regarding the manner in which the
notice is given. A person that
communicates eligibility information to
an affiliate may provide the notice
directly to the consumer, or may use an
agent to provide the notice on the
person’s behalf. If the agent is the
person’s affiliate, the agent may not
include any solicitations other than
those of the person on or with the
notice, unless one of the exceptions in
paragraph (c) applies. Additionally, the
agent must provide the opt out notice in
the name of the person or a common
corporate name.6 If an agent is used, the
6 If the agent sending the notice is not an affiliate,
the agent would only be permitted to use the
information for limited purposes under the GLB Act
privacy regulations.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

person remains responsible for any
failure of the agent to fulfill its notice
obligations. Alternatively, a person may
provide a joint notice with one or more
of its affiliates as provided in
§ ll.24(c) and discussed more fully
below.
This rule of construction strikes a
balance between giving institutions
flexibility to allow different entities
within the affiliated group to provide
the notice while ensuring that the notice
provided to the consumer is meaningful
and designed to be effective. Thus, an
opt out notice provided to the consumer
solely in the name of an affiliate that
receives eligibility information but that
is not known or recognizable to the
consumer as an entity with which the
consumer does or has done business is
not likely to be an effective notice. For
example, if the consumer has a
relationship with the ABC affiliate, but
the opt out notice is provided solely in
the name of the XYZ affiliate, which
does not share a common name with the
ABC affiliate, then the notice is not
likely to be effective. Indeed, many
consumers may disregard a notice from
the XYZ affiliate on the assumption that
the notice is unsolicited junk mail. If,
however, the consumer has a
relationship with the ABC affiliate, and
the opt out notice is provided jointly in
the name of all affiliated companies that
share the ABC name and the XYZ name,
the notice is likely to be effective.
The second rule of construction
makes clear that it is not necessary for
each affiliate that communicates the
same eligibility information to provide
an opt out notice to the consumer, so
long as the notice provided by the
affiliate that initially communicated the
information is broad enough to cover
use of that information by each affiliate
that receives and uses it to make
solicitations. For example, if affiliate A
communicates eligibility information to
affiliate B, and affiliate B communicates
that same information to affiliate C,
affiliate B does not have to provide the
consumer with an opt out notice, so
long as affiliate A’s notice is broad
enough to cover both B’s and C’s use of
that information to make solicitations to
the consumer. Examples are provided to
illustrate how the rules of construction
work.
Paragraph (a) contemplates that the
opt out notice will be provided to the
consumer in writing or, if the consumer
agrees, electronically. Comment is
solicited on whether there are
circumstances in which it is necessary
and appropriate to allow oral notice and
opt out and how an oral notice can
satisfy the clear and conspicuous
standard in the statute. In this regard,

PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42507

the Agencies note that certain
exceptions to the notice and opt out
requirement may be triggered by an oral
communication from or with a
consumer. These exceptions are
contained in paragraph (c) and
discussed below.
Paragraph (b) sets forth the general
duties of an affiliate that receives
eligibility information (‘‘the receiving
affiliate’’). The receiving affiliate may
not use eligibility information it
receives from an affiliate to make
solicitations to the consumer unless,
prior to such use, the consumer has
been provided an opt out notice, as
described in paragraph (a), that applies
to that affiliate’s use of eligibility
information and a reasonable
opportunity and simple method to opt
out and the consumer did not opt out
of that use.
Paragraphs (a) and (b) focus on
whether the information communicated
to affiliates meets the definition of
‘‘eligibility information.’’ Section
624(a)(1) of the Act focuses on ‘‘a
communication of information that
would be a consumer report, but for
clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of section
603(d)(2)(A).’’ The Agencies have
proposed to define ‘‘eligibility
information’’ in a manner consistent
with the statutory definition. The
Agencies recognize, however, that there
are other exceptions to the statutory
definition of ‘‘consumer report,’’ such
that it may be burdensome for
institutions to determine and track
whether consumer report information is
eligibility information (to which the
marketing opt out provisions of section
624 apply) or information that may be
shared with affiliates under other
exceptions in the FCRA (to which the
marketing opt out provisions of section
624 do not apply). To minimize this
burden, the Agencies believe that
institutions may satisfy the
requirements of section 624 by
voluntarily offering consumers the
ability to opt out of marketing based on
consumer report information that is
shared under any of the exceptions in
section 603(d)(2) of the FCRA, not just
those in section 603(d)(2)(A), as
required by section 624.
Proposed § ll.20(c) contains
exceptions to the requirements of
subpart C. Paragraph (c) incorporates
each of the following statutory
exceptions to the affiliate marketing
notice and opt out requirements set
forth in section 624(a)(4) of the FCRA:
(1) Using the information to make a
solicitation to a consumer with whom
the affiliate has a pre-existing business
relationship; (2) using the information
to facilitate communications to an

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42508

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

individual for whose benefit the affiliate
provides employee benefit or other
services under a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of a
current employment relationship or an
individual’s status as a participant or
beneficiary of an employee benefit plan;
(3) using the information to perform
services for another affiliate, unless the
services involve sending solicitations on
behalf of the other affiliate and such
affiliate is not permitted to send such
solicitations itself as a result of the
consumer’s decision to opt out; (4) using
the information to make solicitations in
response to a communication initiated
by the consumer; (5) using the
information to make solicitations in
response to a consumer’s request or
authorization for a solicitation; or (6) if
compliance with the requirements of
section 624 by the affiliate would
prevent that affiliate from complying
with any provision of state insurance
laws pertaining to unfair discrimination
in a state where the affiliate is lawfully
doing business. See FCRA, section
624(a)(4). Several of these exceptions
are discussed below.
Proposed paragraph (c)(1) clarifies
that the provisions of this subpart do
not apply where the affiliate using the
information to make a solicitation to a
consumer has a pre-existing business
relationship with that consumer. As
noted above, a pre-existing business
relationship exists when: (1) There is a
financial contract in force between the
affiliate and the consumer; (2) the
consumer and the affiliate have engaged
in a financial transaction (including
holding an active account or a policy in
force or having another continuing
relationship) during the 18 months
immediately preceding the date of the
solicitation; (3) the consumer has
purchased, rented, or leased the
affiliate’s goods or services during the
18 months immediately preceding the
date of the solicitation; or (4) the
consumer has inquired about or applied
for a product or service offered by the
affiliate during the 3-month period
immediately preceding the date of the
solicitation.
The third and fourth elements of the
definition are substantially similar to
the definition of ‘‘established business
relationship’’ under the amended
Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) (16 CFR
310.2(n)). That definition was informed
by Congress’s intent that the
‘‘established business relationship’’
exemption to the ‘‘do not call’’
provisions of the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227 et seq.)
should be grounded on the reasonable

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

expectations of the consumer.7
Congress’s incorporation of similar
language in the definition of ‘‘preexisting business relationship’’ 8
suggests that it would be appropriate to
consider the reasonable expectations of
the consumer in determining the scope
of this exception. Thus, for purposes of
this regulation, an inquiry includes any
affirmative request by a consumer for
information, such that the consumer
would reasonably expect to receive
information from the affiliate about its
products or services.9 A consumer
would not reasonably expect to receive
information from the affiliate if the
consumer does not request information
or does not provide contact information
to the affiliate. Proposed paragraph
(d)(1) provides examples of the preexisting business relationship
exception.
Proposed paragraph (c)(3) clarifies
that the provisions of this subpart do
not apply where the information is used
to perform services for another affiliate,
except that the exception does not
permit the service provider to make or
send solicitations on behalf of itself or
an affiliate if the service provider or the
affiliate, as applicable, would not be
permitted to make or send such
solicitations as a result of the
consumer’s election to opt out. Thus,
when the notice has been provided to a
consumer and the consumer has optedout, an affiliate subject to the
consumer’s opt out election that has
received eligibility information from a
person that has a relationship with the
consumer may not circumvent the opt
out by instructing the person with the
consumer relationship or another
affiliate to make or send solicitations to
the consumer on its behalf.
Proposed paragraph (c)(4)
incorporates the statutory exception for
information used in response to a
communication initiated by the
consumer. The proposed rule clarifies
that this exception may be triggered by
an oral, electronic, or written
communication initiated by the
consumer. To be covered by the
proposed exception, use of eligibility
information must be responsive to the
communication initiated by the
consumer. For example, if a consumer
calls an affiliate to ask about retail
locations and hours, the affiliate may
not then use eligibility information to
make solicitations to the consumer
about specific products because those
7 H.R. Rep. No. 102–317, at 14–15 (1991). See also
68 FR 4580, 4591–94 (Jan. 29, 2003).
8 149 Cong. Rec. S13,980 (daily ed. Nov. 5, 2003)
(statement of Senator Feinstein).
9 See 68 FR at 4594.

PO 00000

Frm 00008

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

solicitations would not be responsive to
the consumer’s communication.
Conversely, if the consumer calls an
affiliate to ask about its products or
services, then solicitations related to
those products or services would be
responsive to the communication and
thus permitted under the exception. The
time period during which solicitations
remain responsive to the consumer’s
communication will depend on the facts
and circumstances. The proposal also
contemplates that a consumer has not
initiated a communication if an affiliate
makes the initial call and leaves a
message for the consumer to call back,
and the consumer responds. Proposed
paragraph (d)(2) provides examples of
the consumer-initiated communications
exception.
Proposed paragraph (c)(5) provides
that the provisions of this subpart do
not apply where the information is used
to make solicitations affirmatively
authorized or requested by the
consumer. This provision may be
triggered by an oral, electronic, or
written authorization or request by the
consumer. Under the proposal, a preselected check box or boilerplate
language in a disclosure or contract
would not constitute an affirmative
authorization or request.
The exception in paragraph (c)(5)
could be triggered, for example, if a
consumer obtains a mortgage from a
mortgage lender and authorizes or
requests to receive solicitations about
homeowner’s insurance from an
insurance affiliate of the mortgage
lender. Under this exception, the
consumer may provide the
authorization or make the request either
through the person with whom the
consumer has a business relationship or
directly to the affiliate that will make
the solicitation. In addition, the
duration of the authorization or request
will depend on the facts and
circumstances. Finally, nothing in this
exception supersedes the restrictions
contained in the Telemarketing Sales
Rule, including the ‘‘Do-Not-Call List’’
established by the FTC and the Federal
Communications Commission. Proposed
paragraph (d)(3) provides an example of
the affirmative authorization or request
exception.
The exceptions in proposed
paragraphs (c)(1), (4), and (5) described
above overlap in certain situations. For
example, if a consumer who has an
account with a bank makes a telephone
call to the bank’s securities affiliate and
requests information about brokerage
services or mutual funds, the securities
affiliate may use information about the
consumer it obtains from the bank to
make or send solicitations in response

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
to the telephone call initiated by the
consumer under the exception in
paragraph (c)(4) for responding to a
communication initiated by the
consumer. In addition, the consumer’s
request for information from the
securities affiliate triggers the
exceptions in paragraph (c)(1) for
inquiries by the consumer regarding a
product or service offered by the
securities affiliate under the statutory
definition of a ‘‘pre-existing business
relationship’’ as well as the exception in
paragraph (c)(5) for a use in response to
a solicitation requested by the
consumer.
Proposed paragraph (e) provides that
the provisions of this subpart do not
apply to eligibility information that was
received by an affiliate prior to the date
on which compliance with these
regulations is required. This
incorporates a limitation contained in
the statute. The mandatory compliance
date will be included in the final rule.
Comment is requested on what the
mandatory compliance date should be
and whether it should be different from
the effective date of the final
regulations.
Finally, proposed paragraph (f)
clarifies the relationship between the
affiliate sharing notice and opt out
under section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the
FCRA and the affiliate marketing notice
and opt out in new section 624 of the
Act. Specifically, paragraph (f) provides
that nothing in subpart C (the affiliate
marketing regulations) limits the
responsibility of a company to comply
with the notice and opt out provisions
of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
before it shares information other than
transaction or experience information
among affiliates to avoid becoming a
consumer reporting agency.
Section ll.21 Contents of Opt Out
Notice
Proposed § ll.21 addresses the
contents of the opt out notice. Proposed
paragraph (a) requires that the opt out
notice be clear, conspicuous, and
concise, and accurately disclose: (1)
That the consumer may elect to limit a
person’s affiliate from using eligibility
information about the consumer that it
obtains from that person to make or
send solicitations to the consumer; (2) if
applicable, that the consumer’s election
will apply for a specified period of time
and that the consumer will be allowed
to extend the election once that period
expires; and (3) a reasonable and simple
method for the consumer to opt out. Use
of a model form in Appendix A in
appropriate circumstances would
comply with paragraph (a), but is not
required. Paragraph (a) reflects the

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

intent of Congress, as expressed in
section 624(a)(2)(B) of the FCRA, that
the notice required by this subpart must
be ‘‘clear, conspicuous, and concise,’’
and that the method for opting out must
be ‘‘simple.’’
Proposed paragraph (b) defines the
term ‘‘concise’’ to mean a reasonably
brief expression or statement. Paragraph
(b) also provides that a notice required
by subpart C may be concise even if it
is combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by Federal or
State law. Such disclosures include, but
are not limited to, a notice under the
GLB Act, a notice under section
603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the FCRA, and other
similar consumer disclosures. Finally,
paragraph (b) clarifies that the
requirement for a concise notice would
be satisfied by the appropriate use of
one of the model forms contained in
Appendix A of this part, although use
of the model forms is not required.
Proposed paragraph (c) provides that
the notice may allow a consumer to
choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out, such as by selecting
certain types of affiliates, certain types
of information, or certain modes of
delivery from which to opt out, so long
as one of the alternatives gives the
consumer the opportunity to opt out
with respect to all affiliates, all
eligibility information, and all methods
of delivering solicitations.
Proposed paragraph (d) provides that,
where an institution elects to give
consumers a broader right to opt out of
marketing than is required by law, the
institution would have the ability to
modify the contents of the opt out
notice to reflect accurately the scope of
the opt out right it provides to
consumers. Appendix A provides Model
Form A–3 that may be helpful for
institutions that wish to allow
consumers to prevent all marketing from
the institution and its affiliates, but use
of the model form is not required.
Section ll.22 Reasonable
Opportunity To Opt Out
Proposed paragraph (a) provides that
before the affiliate uses the eligibility
information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer, the person
that communicates such eligibility
information to the affiliate must provide
the consumer with a reasonable
opportunity to opt out following
delivery of the opt out notice. Given the
variety of circumstances in which
institutions must provide a reasonable
opportunity to opt out, the Agencies
believe that a reasonable opportunity to
opt out should be construed as a general
test that avoids setting a mandatory
waiting period in all cases. A general

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42509

standard would provide flexibility to
allow affiliates to use eligibility
information received from another
affiliate to make or send solicitations at
an appropriate point in time which may
vary depending upon the circumstances,
while assuring that the consumer is
given a realistic opportunity to prevent
such use of this information. The
Agencies also believe that providing
examples for what constitutes a
reasonable opportunity to opt out may
be useful by illustrating how the opt out
might work in different situations and
by providing a safe harbor for opt out
periods of 30 days in certain situations.
Although 30 days is a safe harbor, a
person subject to this requirement may
decide, at its option, to give consumers
more than 30 days in which to decide
whether or not to opt out. Whether a
shorter waiting period would be
adequate in certain situations depends
on the circumstances.
Proposed paragraphs (b)(1) and (2)
contain examples of reasonable
opportunities to opt out by mail or by
electronic means. These examples are
consistent with examples used in the
GLB Act privacy rules.
The example of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out for notices given
by electronic means in paragraph (b)(2)
is triggered by the consumer’s
acknowledgement of receipt of the
electronic notice. Several commenters
on the October 2000 proposal sought
clarification of an identical
acknowledgement of receipt reference in
the electronic delivery example,
suggesting that such a reference would
be inconsistent with the E-Sign Act and
beyond the scope of the Agencies’
interpretive authority. The current
proposal retains the acknowledgement
reference. This reference is consistent
with an example in the GLB Act privacy
regulations and the Agencies’
determination that electronic delivery of
the FCRA affiliate-marketing opt out
notices would not require consumer
consent in accordance with E-Sign,
because nothing in section 624 of the
Act requires that the notice be provided
in writing. Moreover, this reference is
contained in an example. Thus,
affiliates subject to this rule retain
flexibility to determine the form of
consumer agreement.
Proposed paragraph (b)(3) would
provide an example of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out where, in a
transaction that is conducted
electronically, the consumer is required
to decide, as a necessary part of
proceeding with the transaction,
whether or not to opt out before
completing the transaction, so long as
the institution provides a simple

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42510

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

process at the Internet Web site that the
consumer may use at that time to opt
out. In this example, the opt out notice
would automatically be provided to the
consumer, such as through a nonbypassable link to an intermediate
Webpage, or ‘‘speedbump.’’ The
consumer would be given a choice of
either opting out or not opting out at
that time through a simple process
conducted at the Web site. For example,
the consumer could be required to
check a box right at the Internet Web
site in order to opt out or decline to opt
out before continuing with the
transaction. However, this example
would not cover a situation where the
consumer is required to send a separate
e-mail or visit a different Internet Web
site in order to opt out. The Agencies
seek comment on this example and
whether additional protections or
clarifications are needed.
Proposed paragraph (b)(4) illustrates
that including the affiliate marketing opt
out notice in a notice under the GLB Act
will satisfy the reasonable opportunity
standard. In such cases, the consumer
should be allowed to exercise the opt
out in the same manner and be given the
same amount of time to exercise the opt
out as is provided for any other opt out
provided in the GLB Act privacy notice.
This example is consistent with the
statutory requirement that the Agencies
consider methods for coordinating and
combining notices.
Proposed paragraph (b)(5) illustrates
how an ‘‘opt in’’ can meet the
requirement to provide a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. Specifically, if
an institution has a policy of not
allowing its affiliates to use eligibility
information to market to consumers
without the consumer’s affirmative
consent, providing the consumer with
an opportunity to ‘‘opt in’’ or
affirmatively consent to such use
constitutes a reasonable opportunity to
opt out. The consumer’s affirmative
consent must be documented, and a preselected check box is not evidence of
the consumer’s affirmative consent.
The proposed regulations do not
require institutions subject to this rule
to disclose in their opt out notices how
long a consumer has to respond to the
opt out notice before eligibility
information communicated to other
affiliates will be used to make or send
solicitations to the consumer.
Institutions, however, have the
flexibility to include such disclosures in
their notices. In this respect, the
proposed regulations are consistent with
the GLB Act privacy regulations.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

Section ll.23 Reasonable and
Simple Methods of Opting Out
Proposed paragraph (a) sets forth
reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. These examples generally
track the examples of reasonable opt out
means from section 7(a)(2)(ii) of the GLB
Act privacy regulations with certain
revisions to give effect to Congress’s
mandate that methods of opting out be
simple. For simplicity, the example in
paragraph (a)(2) contemplates including
a self-addressed envelope with the reply
form and opt out notice. In addition, the
Agencies contemplate that a toll-free
telephone number would be adequately
designed and staffed to enable
consumers to opt out in a single phone
call.
Proposed paragraph (b) sets forth
methods of opting out that are not
reasonable and simple. Such methods
include requiring the consumer to write
a letter to the institution or to call or
write to obtain an opt out form rather
than including it with the notice. In
addition, a consumer who agrees to
receive the opt out notice in electronic
form only, such as by electronic mail or
a process at a Web site, should be
allowed to opt out by the same or a
substantially similar electronic form and
should not be required to opt out solely
by telephone or paper mail.
Section ll.24
Notices

Delivery of Opt Out

Proposed paragraph (a) provides that
an institution must deliver an opt out
notice so that each consumer can
reasonably be expected to receive actual
notice. For opt out notices delivered
electronically, the notices may be
delivered either in accordance with the
electronic disclosure provisions in this
subpart or in accordance with the ESign Act. For example, the institution
may e-mail its notice to a consumer who
has agreed to the electronic delivery of
information or provide the notice on its
Internet Web site for the consumer who
obtains a product or service
electronically from that Web site.
As indicated by the examples
provided in proposed paragraph (b), the
standard described in paragraph (a) is a
lesser standard than actual notice. For
instance, if a person subject to the rule
mails a printed copy of its notice to the
last known mailing address of a
consumer, the person has met its
obligation even if the consumer has
changed addresses and never receives
the notice.
Several commenters on the October
2000 proposal sought clarification of the
acknowledgement of receipt reference in
the electronic delivery example in

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

proposed paragraph (b)(1)(iii),
suggesting that it would be inconsistent
with the E-Sign Act and beyond the
scope of the Agencies’ interpretive
authority. As discussed above with
respect to the requirement in proposed
§ ll.22 to provide a reasonable
opportunity to opt out, the current
proposal retains the acknowledgement
reference. This reference is consistent
with an example in the GLB Act privacy
regulations and the Agencies’
determination that electronic delivery of
the FCRA opt out notices would not
require consumer consent in accordance
with E-Sign, because nothing in section
624 of the Act requires that the notice
be provided in writing. Moreover, this
reference is contained in an example,
thus persons subject to the rule retain
flexibility to determine the method of
delivery that will provide a reasonable
expectation of actual notice.
Proposed paragraph (c) permits a
person subject to this rule to provide a
joint opt out notice with one or more of
its affiliates that are identified in the
notice, so long as the notice is accurate
with respect to each affiliate jointly
issuing the notice. A joint notice does
not have to list each affiliate
participating in the joint notice by its
name. If each affiliate shares a common
name, such as ‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint
notice may state that it applies to ‘‘all
institutions with the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all
affiliates in the ABC family of
companies.’’ If, however, an affiliate
does not have ABC in its name, then the
joint notice must separately identify
each family of companies with a
common name or the institution.
Proposed paragraph (d)(1) sets out
rules that apply when two or more
consumers jointly obtain a product or
service from a person subject to this rule
(referred to in the proposed regulation
as joint consumers), such as a joint
checking account. For example, a
person subject to this rule may provide
a single opt out notice to joint
accountholders. The notice must
indicate whether the person will
consider an opt out by a joint
accountholder as an opt out by all of the
associated accountholders, or whether
each accountholder may opt out
separately. The person may not require
all accountholders to opt out before
honoring an opt out direction by one of
the joint accountholders. Paragraph
(d)(2) gives examples of these rules.
Proposed paragraph (d)(1)(vii) and the
example in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) address
the situation where only one of two
joint consumers has opted out. Those
paragraphs are derived from similar
provisions in the GLB Act privacy
regulations. Because section 624 of the

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
FCRA deals with the use of information
for marketing by affiliates, rather than
the sharing of information among
affiliates, comment is requested on
whether information about a joint
account should be allowed to be used
for making solicitations to a joint
consumer who has not opted out.
Section ll.25 Duration and Effect of
Opt Out
Proposed § ll.25 addresses the
duration and effect of the consumer’s
opt out election. Proposed paragraph (a)
provides that the consumer’s election to
opt out shall be effective for the opt out
period, which is a period of at least 5
years, beginning as soon as reasonably
practicable after the consumer’s opt out
election is received. Nothing in this
paragraph limits the ability of affiliated
persons to set an opt out period longer
than 5 years, including an opt out
period that does not expire unless
revoked by the consumer. No opt out
period, however, may be less than 5
years. In addition, if a consumer elects
to opt out every year, a new opt out
period of at least 5 years begins upon
receipt of each successive opt out
election.
Proposed paragraph (b) provides that
a receiving affiliate may not make or
send solicitations to a consumer during
the opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ ll.20(c) or if the opt out is revoked
by the consumer. Under this paragraph,
the opt out is tied to the consumer, not
to the information. Thus, if a consumer
initially elects to opt out, but does not
extend the opt out upon expiration of
the opt out period, a receiving affiliate
may use all eligibility information it has
received about the consumer from its
affiliate, including eligibility
information that it received during the
opt out period. However, if the
consumer subsequently opts out again
some time after the initial opt out period
has lapsed, a receiving affiliate may not
use any eligibility information about the
consumer it has received from an
affiliate on or after the mandatory
compliance date for the regulations
under subpart C, including information
it received during the period in which
no opt out election was in effect.10
Proposed paragraph (c) clarifies that a
consumer may opt out at any time.
Thus, even if the consumer did not opt
10 Section 624(a)(5) of the FCRA contains a nonretroactivity provision, which provides that nothing
shall prohibit the use of information to send a
solicitation to a consumer if such information was
received prior to the date of which persons are
required to comply with the regualtions
implementing section 624.

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

out in response to the initial opt out
notice or if the consumer’s election to
opt out is not prompted by an opt out
notice, a consumer may still opt out.
Regardless of when the consumer opts
out, the opt out period must be effective
for an opt out period of at least 5 years.
Proposed paragraph (d) describes how
the termination of a consumer
relationship affects the consumer’s opt
out. Specifically, if a consumer’s
relationship with an institution
terminates for any reason when a
consumer’s opt out election is in force,
the opt out will continue to apply
indefinitely, unless revoked by the
consumer.
Section ll.26 Extension of Opt Out
Proposed § ll.26 describes the
procedures for extension of an opt out.
Proposed paragraph (a) provides that a
receiving affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to the consumer after the
expiration of the opt out period based
on eligibility information it receives or
has received from an affiliate, unless the
person responsible for providing the
initial opt out notice, or its successor,
has given the consumer an extension
notice and a reasonable opportunity to
extend the opt out, and the consumer
does not extend the opt out. If an
extension notice is not provided to the
consumer, the opt out period continues
indefinitely. The requirement to provide
an extension notice also applies when a
consumer fails to opt out initially, but
at a subsequent point in time informs
the institution of his or her decision to
opt out, which would be effective for a
period of at least 5 years. The consumer
may extend the opt out at the expiration
of each successive opt out period.
Paragraph (b) also provides that each
opt out extension must comply with
§ ll.25(a), which means that it must
be effective for a period of at least 5
years.
Proposed paragraph (c) addresses the
contents of an extension notice. A
notice under paragraph (c) must be clear
and conspicuous, and concise.
Paragraph (c) provides some flexibility
in the design and contents of the notice.
Under one approach, the notice must
accurately disclose the same items
required to be disclosed in the initial
opt out notice under § ll.21(a), along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s prior opt out has expired or
is about to expire, as applicable, and
that if the consumer wishes to keep the
consumer’s opt out election in force, the
consumer must opt out again. Under
another approach, the extension notice
would provide: (1) That the consumer
previously elected to limit an affiliate
from using eligibility information about

PO 00000

Frm 00011

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42511

the consumer that it obtains from the
communicating affiliate to make or send
solicitations to the consumer; (2) that
the consumer’s election has expired or
is about to expire, as applicable; (3) that
the consumer may elect to extend the
consumer’s previous election; and (4) a
reasonable and simple method for the
consumer to opt out. The Agencies
propose to give institutions the
flexibility to decide which of these
notices best meets their needs.
Institutions do not need to provide
extension notices if they treat the
consumer’s opt out election as valid in
perpetuity, unless revoked by the
consumer. Comment is requested on
whether institutions plan to limit the
duration of the opt out or not, and on
the relative burdens and benefits of the
two approaches.
Proposed paragraph (d) addresses the
timing of the extension notice and
provides that an extension notice can be
given to the consumer either a
reasonable period of time before the
expiration of the opt out period, or any
time after the expiration of the opt out
period but before solicitations that
would have been prohibited by the
expired opt out are made to the
consumer. Providing the extension
notice a reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period is
appropriate to facilitate the smooth
transition of consumers that choose to
change their election.
An extension notice given too far in
advance of the expiration of the opt out
period, however, may be confusing to
consumers. The Agencies do not
propose to set a fixed time for what
would constitute a reasonable period of
time before the expiration of the opt out
period to send an extension notice,
because a reasonable period of time may
depend upon the amount of time
afforded to the consumer for a
reasonable opportunity to opt out, the
amount of time necessary to process opt
outs, and other factors. Nevertheless,
providing an extension notice on or
with the last annual privacy notice
required by the GLB Act privacy
provisions sent to the consumer before
the expiration of the opt out period shall
be deemed reasonable in all cases.
Proposed paragraph (e) makes clear that
sending an extension notice to the
consumer before the expiration of the
opt out period does not shorten the 5year opt out period.
Including an affiliate marketing opt
out notice or an extension notice on an
initial or annual notice under the GLB
Act raises special issues, because GLB
Act notices typically state that the
consumer does not need to opt out again
if the consumer previously opted out.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42512

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

This statement would be accurate if the
institution and its affiliates choose to
make the affiliate marketing opt out
effective in perpetuity. However, if the
opt out period is limited to a defined
period of 5 years or more, such a
statement would not be accurate with
respect to the extension notice, and the
notice would have to make clear to the
consumer the necessity of opting out
again in order to extend the opt out.
Section ll.27 Consolidated and
Equivalent Notices
Proposed § ll.27 implements
section 624(b) of the Act, and provides
that a notice required by this subpart
may be coordinated and consolidated
with any other notice or disclosure
required to be issued under any other
provision of law, including but not
limited to the notice described in
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act and
the notice required by title V of the GLB
Act. A notice or other disclosure that is
equivalent to the notice required by this
subpart, and that is provided to a
consumer together with disclosures
required by any other provision of law,
shall satisfy the requirements of this
subpart.
Comment is solicited on whether the
affiliate marketing notice will be
consolidated with the GLB Act privacy
notice or the affiliate sharing opt out
notice under section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of
the FCRA, whether the Agencies have
provided sufficient guidance on
consolidated notices, and whether
consolidation would be helpful to
consumers.
Effective Date
Consistent with the requirements of
section 624 of the FACT Act, the
proposed regulations will become
effective 6 months after the date on
which they are issued in final form.
Comment is requested on whether there
is any need to delay the compliance
date beyond the effective date to permit
institutions to incorporate the affiliate
marketing notice into their next annual
GLB Act privacy notice.
Appendix A
The Agencies are proposing model
forms to illustrate by way of example
how institutions may comply with the
notice and opt out requirements of
section 624 and the proposed
regulations. Appendix A includes three
proposed model forms. Model Form A–
1 is a proposed form of an initial opt out
notice. Model Form A–2 is a proposed
form of an extension notice; it may be
used when the consumer’s prior opt out
has expired or is about to expire. Model
Form A–3 is a proposed form that

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

institutions may use if they offer
consumers a broader right to opt out of
marketing than is required by law.
Use of the model forms is not
mandatory. Institutions have the
flexibility to use or not use the model
forms, or to modify the forms, so long
as the requirements of the regulation are
met. For example, although Model
Forms A–1 and A–2 use 5 years as the
duration of the opt out period,
institutions are free to choose an opt out
period of longer than 5 years and
substitute the longer time period in the
opt out notices. Alternatively,
institutions may choose to treat the
consumer’s opt out as effective in
perpetuity and thereby omit any
reference to the limited duration of the
opt out period or the right to extend the
opt out in the initial opt out notice.
Each of the proposed model forms is
designed as a stand-alone form. The
Agencies anticipate that some
institutions may want to combine the
opt out form with their GLB Act privacy
notice. If so combined, the Agencies
expect that institutions would integrate
the affiliate marketing opt out notice
with other required disclosures and
avoid repetition of certain information,
such as the methods for opting out.
Developing a model form that combines
various opt out notices, however, is
beyond the scope of this rulemaking.
The proposed model forms have been
designed to convey the necessary
information to consumers as simply as
possible. The Agencies have tested the
proposed model forms using two widely
available readability tests, the Flesch
reading ease test and the Flesch-Kincaid
grade level test, each of which generates
a score.11 Proposed Model Form A–1
has a Flesch reading ease score of 53.7
and a Flesch-Kincaid grade level score
of 9.9. Proposed Model Form A–2 has a
Flesch reading ease score of 57.5 and a
Flesch-Kincaid grade level score of 9.6.
Proposed Model Form A–3 has a Flesch
reading ease score of 69.9 and a FleschKincaid grade level score of 6.7. Ideally,
the Agencies would test the proposed
model forms both alone and in
conjunction with other opt out notices
under the FCRA and GLB Act.
Consumer testing may result in better,
more readable notices. However, such
testing is unlikely to be completed
before this rule is issued in final form.
The Agencies recognize the benefits of
working with communications experts
and conducting consumer testing in
11 The Flesch reading ease test generates a score
between zero and 100, where the higher score
correlates with improved readability. The FleschKincaid grade level test generates a numerical
assessment of the grade-level at which the text is
written.

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

developing appropriate language for a
consumer opt out notice. Comment is
solicited on the form and content of the
proposed model forms based on
commenters’ work with
communications experts and experience
with consumer testing. Comment is also
requested on whether institutions
would combine the affiliate marketing
notice with other opt out notices or
issue a separate affiliate marketing opt
out notice, and how those two
approaches may affect consumer
comprehension of the notices and their
rights. In developing a final rule, the
Agencies will carefully consider any
consumer testing that may suggest ways
to improve the proposed model forms,
including efforts by consumer groups
and industry, as well as the Agencies’
own initiative to consider alternative
forms of privacy notices under the GLB
Act. See 68 FR 75164 (Dec. 30, 2003).
IV. Regulatory Analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act
Request for Comment on Proposed
Information Collection
In accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
the Agencies may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The Agencies
are currently requesting OMB approval
of this information collection.
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the Agency’s functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the estimates of
the burden of the information
collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and
(e) Estimates of capital or start up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
At the end of the comment period, the
comments and recommendations
received will be analyzed to determine
whether the information collections
should be modified. Any material
modifications will be submitted to OMB

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
for review and approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record.
Comments should be addressed to:
OCC: Public Information Room, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250
E Street, SW., Mail stop 1–5, Attention:
Docket 04–16, Washington, DC 20219;
fax number (202) 874–4448; Internet
address: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
Due to delays in paper mail delivery in
the Washington area, commenters are
encouraged to submit their comments
by fax or e-mail. You can make an
appointment to inspect the comments at
the Public Information Room by calling
(202) 874–5043.
Board: Comments should refer to
Docket No. R–1203 and may be mailed
to Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551. However, because paper mail
in the Washington area and at the Board
of Governors is subject to delay, please
consider submitting your comments by
e-mail to
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov, or
faxing them to the Office of the
Secretary at (202) 452–3819 or (202)
452–3102. Members of the public may
inspect comments in Room MP–500
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays
pursuant to 261.12, except as provided
in 261.14, of the Board’s Rules
Regarding Availability of Information,
12 CFR 261.12 and 261.14.
FDIC: Leneta Gregorie, Legal Division,
Room MB–3064, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20429. All
comments should refer to the title of the
proposed collection. Comments may be
hand-delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 17th Street Building
(located on F Street), on business days
between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m., Attention:
Comments/Legal Division, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically through the FDIC’s Web
site, http://fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html, or by e-mail,
Comments@FDIC.gov.
OTS: Send comments, referring to the
collection by title of the proposal, to
Information Collection Comments, Chief
Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552; send a facsimile
transmission to (202) 906–6518; or send
an e-mail to
infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov.
OTS will post comments and the related
index on the OTS internet site at
www.ots.treas.gov. In addition,
interested persons may inspect the
comments at the Public Reading Room,

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To
make an appointment, call (202) 906–
5922, send an e-mail to
publicinfo@ots.treas.gov, or send a
facsimile transmission to (202) 906–
7755.
NCUA: Joseph F. Lackey, the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: Joseph F. Lackey, Room
10226, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503. Please send a
copy to the attention of Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board, at NCUA.
Title of Information Collection:
OCC: Comptroller’s Licensing Manual
(Formerly Comptroller’s Corporate
Manual).
Board: Information Collection
Requirements in Connection with
Regulation V (Fair Credit Reporting
Act).
FDIC: Affiliate Marketing Disclosures/
Consumer Opt-Out Notices.
OTS: Fair Credit Reporting Affiliate
Marketing Regulations.
NCUA: Information Collection
Requirements in Connection with Fair
Credit Reporting Act Regulations.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public:
OCC: National banks, Federal
branches and agencies of foreign banks,
and their respective operating
subsidiaries that are not functionally
regulated within the meaning of section
5(c)(5) of the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C.
1844(c)(5)).
Board: State member banks, branches
and agencies of foreign banks (other
than federal branches, Federal agencies,
and insured State branches of foreign
banks), commercial lending companies
owned or controlled by foreign banks,
Edge and agreement corporations, and
bank holding companies and affiliates of
such holding companies (other than
depository institutions and consumer
reporting agencies).
FDIC: Insured state nonmember
banks.
OTS: Savings associations and
Federal savings association operating
subsidiaries that are not functionally
regulated within the meaning of section
5(c)(5) of the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C.
1844(c)(5)).
NCUA: Federal credit unions with
CUSO affiliates.
Abstract: The information collections
in this proposal involve disclosure and
reporting requirements associated with
section 624 of the FCRA. This section
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate and the
affiliate intends to use that information
to make or send solicitations to the

PO 00000

Frm 00013

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42513

consumer about its products or services,
then the person must give the consumer
notice (§ ll.21(a)) and a reasonable
opportunity to opt out (§ ll.23) of
such use. A person’s obligations to
provide a consumer with a notice and
a right to opt out applies to the use of
‘‘eligibility information,’’ as defined in
the proposed rule. The consumer must
opt out in order to prevent an affiliate
from making solicitations based on such
information. If a consumer elects to opt
out and the person has notified the
consumer that the election is effective
for only five years or such longer period
as established by the person, then (prior
to the expiration of the opt out period
or any time after the expiration of the
opt out period but before any affiliate
makes or sends solicitations that would
have been prohibited by the consumer’s
prior decision to opt out) the person
must send the consumer an extension
notice and provide the consumer with a
reasonable opportunity to opt out
(§ ll.26(c)). At that time, the
consumer can again choose to opt out
and prohibit the use of ‘‘eligibility
information’’ for marketing solicitations.
In order to help minimize the
paperwork burden imposed on covered
institutions, the Agencies have provided
model disclosures in Appendix A that
would apply to some of the examples
mentioned in the proposed rule. The
proposed rule contains provisions that
would permit the use of coordinated
and consolidated notices between
affiliates, as provided under section 214.
The proposed rule also facilitates
compliance by allowing a covered entity
to combine its affiliate marketing optout notice with other notices required
by law, as provided under section 214.
Estimated Burden: The Agencies
estimate that the average amount of time
for a person to prepare an initial notice
as required under the proposal and
distribute the notice to consumers will
be approximately 18 hours. Although
the amount of time needed for any
particular person that actually would be
subject to the requirements as proposed
may be higher or lower, the Agencies
believe that this average figure is a
reasonable estimate for several reasons.
First, a significant number of persons do
not have affiliates, and are not covered
by section 214 of the FACT Act or the
proposed rule. Second, persons that do
have affiliates may choose not to engage
in the sharing of certain information or
marketing to consumers covered by
section 214 or the proposed rule, as
explained in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. Finally, in an effort
to minimize the compliance costs and
burdens for persons, particularly small
entities, the proposed rule contains

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42514

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

model disclosures and opt out notices
that may be used to satisfy the statutory
requirements. The proposed rule gives
covered persons flexibility to satisfy the
notice and opt out requirement by
sending the consumer a freestanding opt
out notice or by adding the opt out
notice to the privacy notices already
provided to consumers in accordance
with the provisions of title V of the GLB
Act. For covered persons that choose to
prepare a freestanding opt out notice,
the time necessary to prepare a
freestanding opt out notice would be
minimal, because those persons could
simply copy the model disclosure,
making minor adjustments as indicated
by the model disclosure. Similarly, for
covered persons that choose to
incorporate the opt out notice into their
GLB Act privacy notices, the time
necessary to integrate the model opt out
notice into their privacy notices would
be minimal.
The Agencies estimate that the
average consumer will take
approximately 5 minutes to respond to
the notice and opt out.
As mentioned above, persons that
limit the duration of the opt-out time
period must notify the consumer of the
upcoming expiration. The Agencies are
not estimating burden at this time for
the notices of opt out expiration because
the minimum effective time period for
the opt out is five years. The Agencies
will estimate the burden for this
requirement when they review the
information collection in three years.
OCC:
Number of Respondents: 2,115
National banks and 996,625 Consumers.
Estimated Time per Response: 18
hours, Notice to consumers and 5
minutes, Consumer response to opt out
notice.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
121,122 hours.
Board:
Number of Respondents: 6,738
Financial institutions and 1,598,450
Consumers.
Estimated Time per Response: 18
hours, Notice to consumers and 5
minutes, Consumer response to opt out
notice.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
253,955 hours.
FDIC:
Number of Respondents: 5,318
Financial institutions and 1,088,850
Consumers.
Estimated Time per Response: 18
hours, Notice to consumers and 5
minutes, Consumer response to opt out
notice.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
186,099 hours.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

OTS:
Number of Respondents: 916
Financial institutions and 235,200
Consumers.
Estimated Time per Response: 18
hours, Notice to consumers and 5
minutes, Consumer response to opt out
notice.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
36,010 hours.
NCUA:
Number of Respondents: 1,065
Financial institutions and 1,023,693
Consumers.
Estimated Time per Response: 18
hours, Notice to consumers and 5
minutes, Consumer response to opt out
notice.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
104,137 hours.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OCC: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612) (RFA) requires an
agency to either provide an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with a
proposed rule or certify that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (defined for
purposes of the RFA to include banks
with assets less than or equal to $150
million).
A. Reasons for Proposed Rule
Section 214 of the FACT Act adds a
new section 624 to the FCRA that gives
consumers a limited right to restrict a
person from using certain information,
about the consumer and that is obtained
from an affiliate, to make solicitations to
that consumer. The statute also requires
the OCC, in consultation and
coordination with the other financial
regulators, to issue regulations in final
form implementing section 214 not later
than nine months after the date of
enactment.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
The objectives of the proposed rule
are described in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. In sum, the
objectives are: (1) to implement the
general statutory provision giving
consumers the right to restrict a person
from using certain information, about
the consumer and that is obtained from
an affiliate, to make solicitations to that
consumer and (2) to fulfill the statutory
mandate to prescribe regulations to
implement section 214. The legal bases
for the proposed rule are the National
Bank Act found at 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq.,
24(Seventh), 481, and 484; the
Depository Institutions Deregulation
and Monetary Control Act of 1980 found

PO 00000

Frm 00014

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

at 12 U.S.C. 93a; the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act found at 12 U.S.C. 1818;
and the Fair Credit Reporting Act found
at 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.
C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Rule Will Apply
The proposed rule would apply to
1,220 national banks, Federal branches,
and Federal agencies of foreign banks
(which include operating subsidiaries
thereof that are not functionally
regulated within the meaning of section
5(c)(5) of the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956) each with assets of less
than or equal to $150 million.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping
and Other Compliance Requirements
Section 214 of the FACT Act generally
provides that, if a person shares certain
information about a consumer with an
affiliate, the affiliate may not use that
information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer about its
products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances such as when an
institution has a pre-existing
relationship with a consumer, uses a
consumer’s information in response to a
communication initiated by the
consumer; or uses a consumer’s
information in response to solicitations
authorized or requested by the
consumer.
The proposed rule sets forth the
duties on two groups of covered
institutions: (1) Institutions that
communicate their consumers’
eligibility information to their affiliates
for use in marketing; and (2) the
affiliates that receive such information
(‘‘the receiving affiliates’’). A person
that communicates eligibility
information to its affiliates and has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer will be responsible for
providing the consumer with an opt out
notice, as specified in the proposed rule.
The receiving affiliates must establish
systems to prevent solicitations from
being sent to consumers who have opted
out, as specified in the proposed rule. A
system must also be established to
ensure that receiving affiliates are
informed about consumer opt outs.
Affiliates that communicate or receive
eligibility information will likely need
the advice of legal counsel to ensure
that they comply with the proposed
rule, and may also require computer
programming changes and additional
staff training, which may entail some
training costs. Based on the annual

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
estimate of burden cost for the privacy
notices required by regulations
implementing title V of the GLB Act, the
OCC estimates that this proposed
regulation, which the FACT–ACT
requires to be issued, would have
associated implementation costs of $
3,998 for each small institution. This
estimate was calculated by the following
method:
Initial Notice to Consumers
Requirement: 1,220 small banks × 18
average hours per response = 21,960
burden hours.
Subsequent Notice to Customers
Requirement: 1,220 small banks × 1.6
average hours per response (divided by
5 to reflect the ability of a person under
the proposal to restrict the opt out to 5
years) = 1,952 burden hours.
Costs to Institutions to Record
Responses, including training, systems
changes, etc.: 96,390 consumer
respondents (481,950 consumer
respondents in privacy rules × .20
reflecting the number of these
consumers served by smaller
institutions) × .5 average hours per
response = 48,195.
Total Burden Hours: 72,107.
The OCC estimates the cost of the
hour burden (by wage rate category) for
small national banks to be as follows:
Clerical ($25/hour): 25% × 72,107 @
$25 = $ 450,669.
Managerial/Technical ($55/hour):
40% × 72,107 @ $55 = $ 1,586,354.
Senior Management ($100/hour): 25%
× 72,107 @ $100 = $ 1,802,675.
Legal Counsel ($144/hour): 10% ×
72,107 @ $144 = $ 1,038,341.
Total Costs: $ 4,878,039.
Total Costs/number of small national
banks = $ 4,878,039/1220 = $ 3,998 per
institution.
The OCC believes that the proposal’s
burden cost per small institution will
likely be lower because institutions that
are covered by the proposal have
implemented, and are already familiar
with, similar notice and opt out
procedures. Thus, we expect there to be
certain experience efficiencies with the
implementation process that will lower
the annual burden costs for small
institutions.
The OCC seeks information and
comment on any costs, such as training
costs, compliance requirements, or
changes in operating procedures arising
from the application of the proposed
rule in addition to, or which may differ
from, those arising from the application
of the statute generally.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
The OCC is unable to identify any
statutes or rules, which would overlap
or conflict with the proposed regulation.
The OCC seeks comment and
information about any such statutes or
rules, as well as any other State, local,
or industry rules or policies that require
a covered institution to implement
business practices that would comply
with the requirements of the proposed
rule.
F. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
Section 214 of the FACT Act generally
provides that, if a person shares certain
information about a consumer with an
affiliate, the affiliate may not use that
information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer about its
products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. Section 214
provides that the notice and opt out
provisions do not apply in certain
circumstances as discussed in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. As
required by the FACT Act, the proposed
rule applies to all covered institutions,
regardless of the size of the institution.
One approach to minimizing the burden
on small entities would be to provide a
specific exemption for small
institutions. The OCC has no authority
under section 214 of the FACT Act to
grant an exception that would remove
small institutions from the scope of the
rule.
The proposed rule does, however,
provide substantial flexibility so that
any bank, regardless of size, may tailor
its practices to its individual needs. For
example, to minimize the burden the
proposal would permit institutions to
coordinate and consolidate notice and
opt out communications to consumers
with any other notice that is required to
be issued by applicable law. In addition,
the Agencies have included model
forms for opt out notices that the
Agencies would deem to comply with
the requirements of the proposed
regulation and that institutions could
customize to suit their needs.
Furthermore, the proposal would permit
institutions to offer consumers a
permanent opt out from the sharing of
information for making or sending
solicitations among affiliates, which
would reduce institutional
recordkeeping requirements.
The OCC welcomes comments on any
significant alternatives, consistent with
the mandate in section 214 to restrict

PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42515

the use of certain information for
marketing purposes that would
minimize the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.
Board: Subject to certain exceptions,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) (RFA) requires an agency to
publish an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis with a proposed rule whenever
the agency is required to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
for a proposed rule. The Supplementary
Information above describes the reasons
why the regulation is being proposed
and the objectives and the legal basis of
the proposed rule. The SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section also describes the
compliance requirements of the
proposed rule and identifies other
relevant Federal rules which may
duplicate or overlap with the proposed
rule. The Board, in connection with its
initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
requests public comment in the
following areas.
A. Reasons for the Proposed Rule
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally prohibits a person from using
certain information received from an
affiliate to make a solicitation for
marketing purposes to a consumer,
unless the consumer is given notice and
an opportunity and simple method to
opt out of the making of such
solicitations. Section 214 also requires
the Agencies and the Federal Trade
Commission, in consultation and
coordination with each other, to issue
regulations implementing the section
that are as consistent and comparable as
possible.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
The Supplementary Information
above contains this information. The
legal basis for the proposed rule is
section 214 of the FACT Act.
C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Rule Applies
The proposed rule would apply to all
banks that are members of the Federal
Reserve System (other than national
banks), branches and Agencies of
foreign banks (other than Federal
branches, Federal Agencies, and insured
State branches of foreign banks),
commercial lending companies owned
or controlled by foreign banks,
organizations operating under section
25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 601 et seq., and 611 et seq.), bank
holding companies and affiliates (other
than depository institutions and
consumer reporting agencies) of such
holding companies. The Board’s

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42516

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

proposed rule will apply to the
following institutions (numbers
approximate): State member banks
(932), bank holding companies (5,152),
holding company non-bank subsidiaries
(2,131), U.S. branches and agencies of
foreign banks (289), Edge and agreement
corporations (75), for a total of
approximately 8,579 institutions. The
Board estimates that over 5,000 of these
institutions could be considered small
institutions with assets less than $150
million.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping
and Other Compliance Requirements
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances.
The proposed rule sets forth the
duties on two groups of covered
institutions: (1) Institutions that
communicate their consumers’
eligibility information to their affiliates
for use in marketing; and (2) the
affiliates that receive such information
(‘‘the receiving affiliates’’). A person
that communicates eligibility to its
affiliates about a consumer will be
responsible for providing the consumer
with an opt out notice, as specified in
the rule. The receiving affiliates must
not make or send solicitations to
consumers who have opted-out, as
specified in the rule. Affiliates that
communicate or receive eligibility
information will likely need the advice
of legal counsel to ensure that they
comply with the rule, and may also
require computer programming changes
and additional staff training.
As noted in the burden estimate
discussion in the Paperwork Reduction
Act section, the Board believes that the
costs of complying with the proposed
rule would be minimal. Small
institutions that do not have affiliates
would not have to comply with the
proposed rule. Small institutions that
have affiliates may choose not to engage
in any activity that would require
compliance with the proposed rule. For
small institutions required to comply
with the proposed rule, small
institutions may use the proposed
model disclosures and opt out notices to
minimize the cost of compliance.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

The Board seeks information and
comment on any costs, compliance
requirements, or changes in operating
procedures arising from the application
of the proposed rule to small
institutions.
E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
With the exception of the opt out for
information other than transaction or
experience information in section
603(d)(2)(A)(iii), the Board is unable to
identify any federal statutes or
regulations that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed
rule. The overlap of the proposed rule
and section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) is discussed
in the Supplementary Information. The
Board seeks comment regarding any
other statues or regulations, including
State or local statutes or regulations,
that would duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
F. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances. The proposed
rule applies to all covered institutions
as specified in the rule, regardless of the
size of the institution.
The Board welcomes comments on
any significant alternatives, consistent
with the mandate in section 214 to
restrict the use of certain information for
marketing purposes, that would
minimize the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.
FDIC: Subject to certain exceptions,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) (RFA) requires an agency to
publish an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis with a proposed rule whenever
the agency is required to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
for a proposed rule. The Supplementary
Information above describes the reasons
why the regulation is being proposed
and the objectives and the legal basis of
the proposed rule. The SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section also describes the
compliance requirements of the
proposed rule and identifies other
relevant Federal rules which may
duplicate or overlap with the proposed
rule. The FDIC, in connection with its

PO 00000

Frm 00016

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
requests public comment in the
following areas.
A. Reasons for the Proposed Rule
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally prohibits a person from using
certain information received from an
affiliate to make a solicitation for
marketing purposes to a consumer,
unless the consumer is given notice and
an opportunity and simple method to
opt out of the making of such
solicitations. Section 214 also requires
the Agencies and the Federal Trade
Commission, in consultation and
coordination with each other, to issue
regulations implementing the section
that are as consistent and comparable as
possible.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
The Supplementary Information
above contains this information. The
legal basis for the proposed rule is
section 214 of the FACT Act.
C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Rule Applies
The proposed rule would apply to all
banks that are insured by the FDIC
(other than District Banks and members
of the Federal Reserve System) insured
State branches of foreign banks and any
subsidiaries and affiliates of such
entities; and other entities or persons
with respect to which the FDIC may
exercise its enforcement authority under
any provision of law. For purposes of
this proposed rule, a subsidiary does not
include a broker, dealer, person
providing insurance, investment
company, and investment advisor. The
proposed rule would apply to all State
non-member banks, approximately
3,700 of which are small entities as
defined by the RFA.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping
and Other Compliance Requirements
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances.
The proposed rule sets forth the
duties of two groups of covered
institutions: (1) Institutions that

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
communicate their consumers’
eligibility information to their affiliates
for use in marketing; and (2) the
affiliates that receive such information
(‘‘the receiving affiliates’’). A person
that communicates eligibility to its
affiliates about a consumer will be
responsible for providing the consumer
with an opt out notice, as specified in
the rule. The receiving affiliates must
not make or send solicitations to
consumers who have opted-out, as
specified in the rule. Affiliates that
communicate or receive eligibility
information will likely need the advice
of legal counsel to ensure that they
comply with the rule, and may also
require computer programming changes
and additional staff training.
The FDIC believes that the costs of
complying with the proposed rule
would be minimal. Small institutions
that do not have affiliates would not
have to comply with the proposed rule.
Small institutions that have affiliates
may choose not to engage in any activity
that would require compliance with the
proposed rule. Those small institutions
required to comply with the proposed
rule may use the proposed model
disclosures and opt out notices to
minimize the cost of compliance.
The FDIC seeks information and
comment on any costs, compliance
requirements, or changes in operating
procedures arising from the application
of the proposed rule to small
institutions.
E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
With the exception of the opt out for
information other than transaction or
experience information in section
603(d)(2)(A)(iii), the FDIC is unable to
identify any federal statutes or
regulations that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed
rule. The overlap of the proposed rule
and section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) is discussed
in the Supplementary Information. The
FDIC seeks comment regarding any
other statues or regulations, including
State or local statutes or regulations,
that would duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
F. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances. The proposed
rule applies to all covered institutions
as specified in the rule, regardless of the
size of the institution.
The FDIC welcomes comments on any
significant alternatives, consistent with
the mandate in section 214 to restrict
the use of certain information for
marketing purposes, that would
minimize the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.
OTS: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612) (RFA) requires an
agency to either provide an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with a
proposed rule or certify that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (defined for
purposes of the RFA to include savings
associations with assets of $150 million
or less).
A. Reasons for Proposed Rule
Section 214 of the FACT Act adds a
new section 624 to the FCRA that
generally prohibits a person from using
certain information received from an
affiliate to make a solicitation for
marketing purposes to a consumer,
unless the consumer is given notice of
the information sharing for marketing
purposes and a simple method to opt
out of the solicitations. Section 214
requires the Federal banking agencies,
the NCUA, the FTC, and the SEC, in
consultation and coordination with each
other, to issue implementing regulations
that, to the extent possible, are
consistent and comparable with the
regulations prescribed by each other
agency.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
The objectives of the proposed rule
are described in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. In sum, the
objectives are: (1) To implement the
general statutory provision giving
consumers the right to restrict a person
from using certain information about the
consumer that is obtained from an
affiliate to make solicitations to that
consumer and (2) to fulfill the statutory
mandate to prescribe regulations to
implement section 214. The legal bases
for the proposed rule are (1) the Home
Owners’ Loan Act found at 12 U.S.C.
1462a, 1463, 1464, and 1467a; (2) the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act found at
12 U.S.C. 1818; and (3) the Fair Credit
Reporting Act found at 15 U.S.C. 1681
et seq.

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42517

C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Rule Will Apply
The proposed rule would apply to all
savings associations. In accordance with
12 CFR 559.3(h)(1), it would apply to
Federal savings association operating
subsidiaries as well.
Small savings associations are
generally defined, for Regulatory
Flexibility Act purposes, as those with
assets of $150 million or less. 13 CFR
121.201 (2003). OTS calculates
(numbers approximate) that of the 917
savings associations, a maximum of 476
of these are small savings associations.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping,
and Other Compliance Requirements
Section 214 of the FACT Act generally
provides that, if a person shares certain
information about a consumer with an
affiliate, the affiliate may not use that
information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer about its
products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt-out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances such as when an
institution has a pre-existing
relationship with a consumer, uses a
consumer’s information in response to a
communication initiated by the
consumer, or uses a consumer’s
information in response to solicitations
authorized or requested by the
consumer.
The proposed rule sets forth the
duties on two groups of covered
institutions: (1) Institutions that
communicate their consumers’
eligibility information to their affiliates
for use in marketing and (2) the affiliates
that receive such information (‘‘the
receiving affiliates’’). A person that
communicates eligibility information to
its affiliates and has a pre-existing
business relationship with the consumer
will be responsible for providing the
consumer with an opt-out notice as
specified in the rule. The receiving
affiliates must establish systems to
prevent solicitations from being sent to
consumers who have opted out, as
specified in the proposed rule.
Implicitly, a system must exist to ensure
that receiving affiliates are informed of
any opt-outs.
Affiliates that communicate or receive
eligibility information will likely need
the advice of legal counsel to ensure
that they comply with the proposed rule
and may also require computer
programming changes and additional
staff training, which may entail some
training costs.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42518

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

Based in part on the annual estimate
of burden cost for the privacy notices
required by regulations implementing
title V of the GLB Act, OTS estimates
that this proposed regulation, which the
FACT Act requires to be issued, would
have associated implementation costs of
$2,286 for each small institution. This
estimate was calculated by the following
method:
Notice to consumers requirements:
476 small thrifts × 18 average hours per
response = 8,568 burden hours.
Subsequent notice to consumers with
expired opt-outs requirements: 476
small thrifts × 1.6 average hours per
responses (divided by 5 to reflect the
ability of a person under the proposal to
restrict the opt out to a minimum of 5
years) = 762 burden hours.
Costs to institutions to record
consumer responses, including training,
systems changes, etc.: 13,510 consumer
respondents (67,550 consumer
respondents in privacy rules × .20
reflecting the number of these
consumers served by smaller
institutions) × .5 average hours per
response = 6,755 burden hours.
Total Burden Hours: 16,085.
The OTS estimates the cost of the
hour burden (by wage rate category) for
small thrifts to be as follows:
Clerical ($25/hour): 25% × 16,085 @
$25 = $100,531.
Managerial/Technical ($55/hour):
40% × 16,085 @ $55 = $353,870.
Senior Management ($100/hour): 25%
× 16,085 @ $100 = $402,125.
Legal Counsel ($144/hour): 10% ×
16,085 @ $144 = $231,624.
Total Costs: $1,088,150.
Total Costs / # of small thrifts =
$1,088,150/476 = $2,286.
OTS believes that the proposal’s
burden cost per small institution will
likely be lower because institutions that
are covered by the proposal have
implemented, and are already familiar
with, similar notice and opt-out
procedures applicable under other
statutes and regulations such as the
privacy notices required by regulations
implementing title V of the GLB Act.
Thus we expect there to be certain
experience efficiencies with the
implementation process that will lower
the annual burden costs for small
institutions. Further, institutions can
reduce the burden of providing notices
every 5 years by allowing longer opt-out
periods or eliminate that burden
entirely by allowing opt-outs in
perpetuity.
OTS seeks information and comment
on any costs, such as training costs,
compliance requirements, or changes in
operating procedures arising from the

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

application of the proposed rule in
addition to, or which may differ from,
those arising from the application of the
statute generally.
E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
OTS is unable to identify any statutes
or rules that would overlap or conflict
with the proposed regulation. OTS
notes, however, as discussed in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section,
that section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the
FCRA provides that a person may
communicate ‘‘other’’ information—that
is, non-transaction or experience
information—among its affiliates
without becoming a consumer reporting
agency if the person has given the
consumer a clear and conspicuous
notice that such information may be
communicated among affiliates and an
opportunity to ‘‘opt out’’ or direct that
the information not be communicated,
and the consumer has not opted out.
The notice and opt-out provided in
section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the FCRA
limits the sharing of information among
affiliates and was the subject of an
October 20, 2000 proposal by the
Federal banking agencies. The current
proposal addresses a new notice and
opt-out provision that applies to the use
by affiliates of certain information that
they receive from another affiliate to
market their products and services to
consumers. Although there is a certain
degree of overlap between the two optouts, the two opt-outs are distinct and
serve different purposes. Therefore,
nothing in this proposal regarding the
opt-out for affiliate marketing
supercedes or replaces the affiliate
sharing opt-out contained in section
603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act.
OTS seeks comment and information
about any such statutes or rules, as well
as any other State, local, or industry
rules or policies that require a covered
institution to implement business
practices that would comply with the
requirements of the proposed rule.
F. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
Section 214 of the FACT Act generally
provides that, if a person shares certain
information about a consumer with an
affiliate, the affiliate may not use that
information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer about its
products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. Section 214
provides that the notice and opt-out
provisions do not apply in certain
circumstances as discussed in the

PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. As
required by the FACT Act, the proposed
rule applies to all covered institutions,
regardless of the size of the institution.
One approach to minimizing the
burden on small entities would be to
provide a specific exemption for small
institutions. OTS has no authority under
section 214 of the FACT Act to grant an
exemption that would remove small
institutions from the scope of the rule.
The proposed rule does, however,
provide substantial flexibility so that
any savings association, regardless of
size, may tailor its practices to its
individual needs. For instance, to
minimize the burden the proposal
would permit institutions to coordinate
and consolidate notice and opt-out
communications to consumers with any
other notice that applicable law
requires. In addition, the Agencies have
included model forms for opt-out
notices that the Agencies would deem to
comply with the requirements of the
proposed regulation and that
institutions could customize to suit
their needs. Furthermore, the proposal
would permit institutions to offer
consumers a permanent opt-out from
the sharing of information for making or
sending solicitations among affiliates,
which would reduce institutional
recordkeeping requirements.
OTS welcomes comments on any
significant alternatives, consistent with
the mandate in section 214 to restrict
the use of certain information for
marketing purposes, that would
minimize the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.
NCUA: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact any proposed regulation may
have on a substantial number of small
entities (those under $10 million in
assets). NCUA, in connection with its
initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
requests public comment in the
following areas.

A. Reasons for the Proposed Rule
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally prohibits a person from using
certain information received from an
affiliate to make a solicitation for
marketing purposes to a consumer,
unless the consumer is given notice and
an opportunity and simple method to
opt out of the making of such
solicitations. Section 214 also requires
the Agencies, the FTC, and the SEC in
consultation and coordination with each
other, to issue regulations implementing
that section.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
The Supplementary Information
above contains this information. The
legal basis for the proposed rule is
section 214 of the FACT Act.
C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Rule Applies
The proposed rule would apply to all
federally chartered credit unions that
have CUSO affiliates, which total
approximately 1,065. Approximately 84
of those Federal credit unions could be
considered small entities with assets
less than $10 million.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping
and Other Compliance Requirements
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances.
The proposed rule sets forth a Federal
credit union’s duties when either: (1)
The credit union communicates its
consumers’ eligibility information to an
affiliate for use in marketing
(‘‘communicating affiliate’’); or (2) the
credit union receives such information
from its affiliate (‘‘receiving affiliate’’).
Before an affiliate may use eligibility
information shared with it by a
communicating affiliate to provide
solicitations to a consumer, the
communicating affiliate must provide
the consumer with an opt out notice, as
specified in the rule. A receiving
affiliate may not use eligibility
information it receives from a
communicating affiliate to make
solicitations to the consumer unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as specified in the rule, and does
not opt out of that use. Federal credit
unions will likely need the advice of
legal counsel to ensure that they comply
with the rule, and may also require
computer programming changes and
additional staff training. NCUA does not
have a practicable or reliable basis for
quantifying the costs of the proposed
rule.
NCUA seeks information and
comment on any costs, compliance
requirements, or changes in operating
procedures arising from the application
of the proposed rule in addition to or

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

which may differ from those arising
from the application of the statute
generally.
E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
NCUA is unable to identify any
Federal statutes or regulations that
would duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with the proposed rule. NCUA seeks
comment regarding any statutes or
regulations, including State or local
statutes or regulations, that would
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed rule.
F. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
Section 214 of the FACT Act (which
adds a new section 624 to the FCRA)
generally provides that, if a person
shares certain information about a
consumer with an affiliate, the affiliate
may not use that information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer about
its products or services, unless the
consumer is given notice and a
reasonable opportunity to opt out of
such use of the information and the
consumer does not opt out. The notice
and opt out provisions do not apply in
certain circumstances. The proposed
rule applies to all Federal credit unions,
regardless of asset size.
NCUA welcomes comments on any
significant alternatives, consistent with
the mandate in section 214 to restrict
the use of certain information for
marketing purposes that would
minimize the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities.
OCC and OTS Executive Order 12866
Determination
The OCC and OTS each has
determined that its portion of the
proposed rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
OCC Executive Order 13132
Determination
The OCC has determined that this
proposal does not have any federalism
implications, as required by Executive
Order 13132.
NCUA Executive Order 13132
Determination
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
State and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles, the
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. The proposed rule applies only to
federally chartered credit unions and

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42519

would not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the connection
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The
NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule does not constitute a
policy that has federalism implications
for purposes of the executive order.
OCC and OTS Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 Determination
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–4 (Unfunded Mandates Act)
requires that an agency prepare a
budgetary impact statement before
promulgating a rule that includes a
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. If a budgetary impact
statement is required, section 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Act also requires
an agency to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives before promulgating a rule.
The OCC and OTS each has determined
that this proposed rule will not result in
expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Accordingly,
neither the OCC nor the OTS has
prepared a budgetary impact statement
or specifically addressed the regulatory
alternatives considered.
NCUA: The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999—
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
The NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule would not affect family
well-being within the meaning of
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999,
Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
NCUA: Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 87–2, as Amended by
IRPS 03–2
Under NCUA’s IRPS 87–2, as
amended by IRPS 03–2, the NCUA
Board’s general policy is to provide a
60-day comment period for a proposed
regulation. In this case, the NCUA Board
believes that a 30-day comment period
will be adequate and is appropriate
given that the statutory deadline for the
final rule is September 4, 2004. NCUA
IRPS 87–2, 52 FR 35231, Sept. 18, 1987,
as amended by IRPS 03–2, 68 FR 31949,
May 29, 2003.
Community Bank Comment Request
The Agencies invite your comments
on the impact of this proposal on

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42520

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

community banks. The Agencies
recognize that community banks operate
with more limited resources than larger
institutions and may present a different
risk profile. Thus, the Agencies
specifically request comment on the
impact of the proposal on community
banks’ current resources and available
personnel with the requisite expertise,
and whether the goals of the proposal
could be achieved, for community
banks, through an alternative approach.
V. Solicitation of Comments on Use of
Plain Language
Section 722 of the GLBA requires the
Federal banking agencies to use plain
language in all proposed and final rules
published after January 1, 2000. The
Federal banking agencies invite
comment on how to make this proposed
rule easier to understand. For example:
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs? If not, how could this
material be better organized?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated? If not, how could the rule
be more clearly stated?
• Do the regulations contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear? If
so, which language requires
clarification?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the regulation
easier to understand? If so, what
changes to the format would make the
regulation easier to understand?
• Would more, but shorter, sections
be better? If so, which sections should
be changed?
• What else could we do to make the
regulation easier to understand?
The Federal banking agencies solicit
comment on whether the inclusion of
examples in the regulation is
appropriate. Elevating the fact patterns
to safe harbors in the rule may generate
certain problems over time. For
example, changes in technology or
practices may ultimately impact the fact
patterns contained in the examples and
require changes to the regulation. Are
there alternative methods to offer
illustrative guidance of the concepts
portrayed by the examples?
NCUA Regulatory Goal
NCUA’s goal is to promulgate clear
and understandable regulations that
impose minimal regulatory burden. We
request your comments on whether the
proposed rule is understandable and
minimally instrusive if implemented as
proposed.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

§ 41.2

List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 41
Banks, banking, Consumer protection,
National banks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 222
Banks, Banking, Consumer protection,
Fair Credit Reporting Act, Holding
companies, Privacy, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, State
member banks.
12 CFR Part 334
Administrative practice and
procedure, Bank deposit insurance,
Banks, Banking, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety and
soundness.
12 CFR Part 571
Consumer protection, Credit, Fair
Credit Reporting Act, Privacy, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Savings associations.
12 CFR Part 717
Consumer protection, Credit unions,
Fair credit reporting, Privacy, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Chapter I

Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the OCC proposes to amend
part 41 (as proposed to be added at 69
FR 23394, April 28, 2004) of chapter I
of title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 41—FAIR CREDIT
1. The authority citation for part 41 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 24(Seventh),
93a, 481, 484, and 1818; 15 U.S.C. 1681a,
1681b, 1681s, and 1681t.

2. In § 41.1 paragraph (b) is
republished to read as follows:
§ 41.1

Purpose, scope, and effective dates.

(a) * * * * *
(b) Scope.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Institutions covered. Except as
otherwise provided in this part, these
regulations apply to national banks,
Federal branches and agencies of foreign
banks, and their respective operating
subsidiaries that are not functionally
regulated within the meaning of section
5(c)(5) of the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C.
1844(c)(5)).
3. Section 41.2 is republished to read
as follows:

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

Examples.

The examples in this part are not
exclusive. Compliance with an example,
to the extent applicable, constitutes
compliance with this part. Examples in
a paragraph illustrate only the issue
described in the paragraph and do not
illustrate any other issue that may arise
in this part.
4. Revise § 41.3 to read as follows:
§ 41.3

Definitions.

For purposes of this part, unless
explicitly stated otherwise:
(a) Act means the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(b) Affiliate means any person that is
related by common ownership or
common corporate control with another
person.
(c) Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented.
(d) Company means any corporation,
limited liability company, business
trust, general or limited partnership,
association, or similar organization.
(e) Consumer means an individual.
(f) [Reserved].
(g) [Reserved].
(h) [Reserved].
(i) Control means:
(1) Ownership, control, or power to
vote 25 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of any class of voting
security of the company, directly or
indirectly, or acting through one or
more other persons;
(2) Control in any manner over the
election of a majority of the directors,
trustees, or general partners (or
individuals exercising similar functions)
of the company; or
(3) The power to exercise, directly or
indirectly, a controlling influence over
the management or policies of the
company, as the OCC determines.
(j) Eligibility information means any
information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the Act did not apply.
(k) [Reserved].
(l) Person means any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity.
(m) Pre-existing business relationship
means a relationship between a person
and a consumer based on:
(1) A financial contract between the
person and the consumer, which is in
force on the date on which the
consumer is sent a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part;

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(2) The purchase, rental, or lease by
the consumer of the person’s goods or
services, or a financial transaction
(including holding an active account or
a policy in force or having another
continuing relationship) between the
consumer and the person, during the 18month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer; or
(3) An inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the threemonth period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer.
(n) Solicitation—(1) General.
Solicitation means marketing initiated
by a person to a particular consumer
that is:
(i) Based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate as described in subpart C of this
part; and
(ii) Intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase or obtain such
product or service.
(2) Exclusion of marketing directed at
the general public. A solicitation does
not include communications that are
directed at the general public and
distributed without the use of eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate. For example, television,
magazine, and billboard advertisements
do not constitute solicitations, even if
those communications are intended to
encourage consumers to purchase
products and services from the person
initiating the communications.
(3) Examples of solicitations. A
solicitation would include, for example,
a telemarketing call, direct mail, e-mail,
or other form of marketing
communication directed to a specific
consumer that is based on eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate.
5. A new Subpart C is added to read
as follows:
Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Eligibility
Information for Marketing
Sec.
41.20 Affiliate use of eligibility information
for marketing.
41.21 Contents of opt out notice.
41.22 Reasonable opportunity to opt out.
41.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.
41.24 Delivery of opt out notices.
41.25 Duration and effect of opt out.
41.26 Extension of opt out.
41.27 Consolidated and equivalent notices.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Eligibility
Information for Marketing
§ 41.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.

For purposes of this subpart, Bank
means national banks, Federal branches
and agencies of foreign banks, and their
respective operating subsidiaries that
are not functionally regulated within the
meaning of section 5(c)(5) of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(5)).
(a) General duties of a person
communicating eligibility information to
an affiliate—(1) Notice and opt out. If a
bank communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to its
affiliate, the bank’s affiliate may not use
the information to make or send
solicitations to the consumer, unless
prior to such use by the affiliate:
(i) The bank provides a clear and
conspicuous notice to the consumer
stating that the information may be
communicated to and used by the
bank’s affiliate to make or send
solicitations to the consumer about its
products and services;
(ii) The bank provides the consumer
a reasonable opportunity and a simple
method to ‘‘opt out’’ of such use of that
information by its affiliate; and
(iii) The consumer has not chosen to
opt out.
(2) Rules of construction—(i) General.
The notice required by this paragraph
(a) may be provided either in the name
of a person with which the consumer
currently does or previously has done
business or in one or more common
corporate names shared by members of
an affiliated group of companies that
includes the common corporate name
used by that person, and may be
provided in the following manner:
(A) A bank may provide the notice
directly to the consumer;
(B) A bank’s agent may provide the
notice on the bank’s behalf, so long as—
(1) The bank’s agent, if an affiliate of
the bank, does not include any
solicitation other than the bank’s on or
with the notice, unless it falls within
one of the exceptions in paragraph (c) of
this section; and
(2) The bank’s agent gives the notice
in the bank’s name or a common name
or names used by the family of
companies; or
(C) A bank may provide a joint notice
with one or more of the bank’s affiliates
or under a common name or names used
by the family of companies as provided
in § 41.24(c).
(ii) Avoiding duplicate notices. If
Affiliate A communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to
Affiliate B, and Affiliate B

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42521

communicates that same information to
Affiliate C, Affiliate B does not have to
give an opt out notice to the consumer
when it provides eligibility information
to Affiliate C, so long as Affiliate A’s
notice is broad enough to cover Affiliate
C’s use of the eligibility information to
make solicitations to the consumer.
(iii) Examples of rules of construction.
A, B, and C are affiliates. The consumer
currently has a business relationship
with affiliate A, but has never done
business with affiliates B or C. Affiliate
A communicates eligibility information
about the consumer to B for purposes of
making solicitations. B communicates
the information it received from A to C
for purposes of making solicitations. In
this circumstance, the rules of
construction would:
(A) Permit B to use the information to
make solicitations if:
(1) A has provided the opt out notice
directly to the consumer; or
(2) B or C has provided the opt out
notice on behalf of A.
(B) Permit B or C to use the
information to make solicitations if:
(1) A’s notice is broad enough to cover
both B’s and C’s use of the eligibility
information; or
(2) A, B, or C has provided a joint opt
out notice on behalf of the entire
affiliated group of companies.
(C) Not permit B or C to use the
information for marketing purposes if B
has provided the opt out notice only in
B’s own name, because no notice would
have been provided by or on behalf of
A.
(b) General duties of an affiliate
receiving eligibility information. If the
bank receives eligibility information
from an affiliate, the bank may not use
the information to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as described in paragraph (a) of
this section, that applies to the bank’s
use of eligibility information and the
consumer has not opted-out.
(c) Exceptions. The provisions of this
subpart C do not apply if a bank uses
eligibility information it receives from
an affiliate:
(1) To make or send a marketing
solicitation to a consumer with whom a
bank has a pre-existing business
relationship as defined in § 41.3(m);
(2) To facilitate communications to an
individual for whose benefit a bank
provides employee benefit or other
services pursuant to a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of
the current employment relationship or
status of the individual as a participant
or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan;

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42522

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

(3) To perform services on behalf of
an affiliate, except that this paragraph
shall not be construed as permitting a
bank to make or send solicitations on its
behalf or on behalf of an affiliate if the
bank or the affiliate, as applicable,
would not be permitted to make or send
the solicitation as a result of the election
of the consumer to opt out under this
subpart C;
(4) In response to a communication
initiated by the consumer orally,
electronically, or in writing;
(5) In response to an affirmative
authorization or request by the
consumer orally, electronically, or in
writing to receive a solicitation; or
(6) If a bank’s compliance with this
subpart C would prevent it from
complying with any provision of State
insurance laws pertaining to unfair
discrimination in any State in which the
bank is lawfully doing business.
(d) Examples of exceptions—(1)
Examples of pre-existing business
relationships. (i) If a consumer has an
insurance policy with a bank’s
insurance affiliate that is currently in
force, the bank’s insurance affiliate has
a pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer and can therefore use
eligibility information it has received
from the bank to make solicitations.
(ii) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with a bank’s insurance affiliate
that has lapsed, the bank’s insurance
affiliate has a pre-existing business
relationship with the consumer for 18
months after the date on which the
policy ceases to be in force and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from the bank to make
solicitations for 18 months after the date
on which the policy ceases to be in
force.
(iii) If a consumer applies to the
bank’s affiliate for a product or service,
or inquires about the affiliate’s products
or services and provides contact
information to the bank’s affiliate for
receipt of that information, the bank’s
affiliate has a pre-existing business
relationship with the consumer for three
months after the date of the inquiry or
application and can therefore use
eligibility information it has received
from the bank to make solicitations for
three months after the date of the
inquiry or application.
(iv) If a consumer makes a telephone
call to a centralized call center for an
affiliated group of companies to inquire
about the consumer’s bank account, the
call does not constitute an inquiry with
any affiliate other than the bank that
holds the consumer’s bank account and
does not establish a pre-existing
business relationship between the
consumer and any affiliate of the bank.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(2) Examples of consumer-initiated
communications. (i) If a consumer who
has an account with the bank initiates
a telephone call to the bank’s securities
affiliate to request information about
brokerage services or mutual funds and
provides contact information for
receiving that information, the bank’s
securities affiliate may use eligibility
information about the consumer it
obtains from the bank to make
solicitations in response to the
consumer-initiated call.
(ii) If the bank’s affiliate makes the
initial marketing call, leaves a message
for the consumer to call back, and the
consumer responds, the communication
is not initiated by the consumer, but by
the bank’s affiliate.
(iii) If the consumer calls the bank’s
affiliate to ask about the affiliate’s retail
locations and hours, but does not
request information about the bank’s
affiliate’s products or services,
solicitations by the bank’s affiliate using
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from the bank
would not be responsive to the
consumer-initiated communication.
(3) Example of consumer affirmative
authorization or request. If a consumer
who obtains a mortgage from a bank
requests or affirmatively authorizes
information about homeowner’s
insurance from the bank’s insurance
affiliate, such authorization or request,
whether given to the bank or to the
bank’s insurance affiliate, would permit
the bank’s insurance affiliate to use
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from the bank to
make solicitations about homeowner’s
insurance to the consumer. A preselected check box would not satisfy the
requirement for an affirmative
authorization or request.
(e) Prospective application. The
provisions of this subpart C shall not
prohibit a bank’s affiliate from using
eligibility information communicated by
the bank to make or send solicitations
to a consumer if such information was
received by the bank’s affiliate prior to
[Insert Mandatory Compliance Date].
(f) Relation to affiliate-sharing notice
and opt out. Nothing in this subpart C
limits the responsibility of a company to
comply with the notice and opt out
provisions of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of
the Act before it shares information
other than transaction or experience
information among affiliates to avoid
becoming a consumer reporting agency.
§ 41.21

Contents of opt out notice.

(a) General. A notice must be clear,
conspicuous, and concise, and must
accurately:

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

(1) Disclose that the consumer may
elect to limit a bank’s affiliate from
using eligibility information about the
consumer that it obtains from the bank
to make or send solicitations to the
consumer;
(2) Disclose if applicable, that the
consumer’s election will apply for a
specified period of time and that the
consumer will be allowed to extend the
election once that period expires; and
(3) Include a reasonable and simple
method for the consumer to opt out.
(b) Concise—(1) General. For
purposes of this subpart C, the term
‘‘concise’’ means a reasonably brief
expression or statement.
(2) Combination with other required
disclosures. A notice required by this
subpart C may be concise even if it is
combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by Federal or
State law.
(3) Use of model forms. The
requirement for a concise notice is
satisfied by use of a model form
contained in Appendix A to this part,
although use of a model form is not
required.
(c) Providing a menu of opt out
choices. With respect to the opt out
election, a bank may allow a consumer
to choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out of affiliate use of
eligibility information for marketing,
such as by selecting certain types of
affiliates, certain types of information,
or certain methods of delivery from
which to opt out, so long as the bank
offers as one of the alternatives the
opportunity to opt out with respect to
all affiliates, all eligibility information,
and all methods of delivery.
(d) Alternative contents. If a bank
provides the consumer with a broader
right to opt out of marketing than is
required by law, the bank satisfies the
requirements of this section by
providing the consumer with a clear,
conspicuous, and concise notice that
accurately discloses the consumer’s opt
out rights. A model notice is provided
in Appendix A of this part for guidance,
although use of the model notice is not
required.
§ 41.22

Reasonable opportunity to opt out.

(a) General. Before a bank’s affiliate
uses eligibility information
communicated by the bank to make or
send solicitations to a consumer, the
bank must provide the consumer with a
reasonable opportunity, following the
delivery of the opt out notice, to opt out
of such use by the bank’s affiliate.
(b) Examples of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. A bank provides
a consumer with a reasonable
opportunity to opt out if:

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(1) By mail. The bank mails the opt
out notice to a consumer and gives the
consumer 30 days from the date the
bank mailed the notice to elect to opt
out by any reasonable means.
(2) By electronic means. The bank
notifies the consumer electronically and
gives the consumer 30 days after the
date that the consumer acknowledges
receipt of the electronic notice to elect
to opt out by any reasonable means.
(3) At the time of an electronic
transaction. The bank provides the opt
out notice to the consumer at the time
of an electronic transaction, such as a
transaction conducted on a Web site,
and requests that the consumer decide,
as a necessary part of proceeding with
the transaction, whether to opt out
before completing the transaction, so
long as the bank provides a simple
process at the Internet Web site that the
consumer may use at that time to opt
out.
(4) By including in a privacy notice.
The bank includes the opt out notice in
a Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy
notice (12 CFR part 40, subpart A) and
allows the consumer to exercise the opt
out within a reasonable period of time
and in the same manner as the opt out
under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15
U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(5) By providing an opt in. If a bank
has a policy of not allowing an affiliate
to use eligibility information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer
unless the consumer affirmatively
consents, the bank gives the consumer
the opportunity to opt in by affirmative
consent to such use by the bank’s
affiliate. The bank must document the
consumer’s affirmative consent. A preselected check box does not constitute
evidence of the consumer’s affirmative
consent.
§ 41.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.

(a) Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. A bank provides a
reasonable and simple method for a
consumer to exercise a right to opt out
if it:
(1) Designates check-off boxes in a
prominent position on the relevant
forms included with the opt out notice
required by this subpart C;
(2) Includes a reply form and a selfaddressed envelope together with the
opt out notice required by this subpart
C;
(3) Provides an electronic means to
opt out, such as a form that can be
electronically mailed or processed at the
bank’s Web site, if the consumer agrees
to the electronic delivery of information;
or

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(4) Provides a toll-free telephone
number that consumers may call to opt
out.
(b) Methods of opting out that are not
reasonable or simple. A bank does not
provide a reasonable and simple method
for exercising an opt out right if it:
(1) Requires the consumer to write a
letter to the bank;
(2) Requires the consumer to call or
write the bank to obtain a form for
opting out, rather than including the
form with the notice; or
(3) Requires the consumer who agrees
to receive the opt out notice in
electronic form only, such as by
electronic mail or at the bank’s Web site,
to opt out solely by telephone or by
paper mail.
§ 41.24

Delivery of opt out notices.

(a) General. A bank must provide an
opt out notice so that each consumer
can reasonably be expected to receive
actual notice. For opt out notices the
bank provides electronically, it may
either comply with the electronic
disclosure provisions in this subpart C
or with the provisions in section 101 of
the Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq.
(b) Examples of expectation of actual
notice. (1) A bank may reasonably
expect that a consumer will receive
actual notice if it:
(i) Hand-delivers a printed copy of the
notice to the consumer;
(ii) Mails a printed copy of the notice
to the last known mailing address of the
consumer; or
(iii) For the consumer who obtains a
product or service from a bank
electronically, such as at an Internet
Web site, post the notice on the bank’s
electronic Web site and require the
consumer to acknowledge receipt of the
notice as a necessary step for obtaining
a particular product or service.
(2) A bank may not reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if it:
(i) Only posts a sign in its branch or
office or generally publishes
advertisements presenting the notice; or
(ii) Sends the notice via electronic
mail to a consumer who has not agreed
to the electronic delivery of information.
(c) Joint notice with affiliates—(1)
General. A bank may provide a joint
notice from it and one or more of the
bank’s affiliates, as identified in the
notice, so long as the notice is accurate
with respect to the bank and each
affiliate.
(2) Identification of affiliates. A bank
does not have to list each affiliate
providing the joint notice by its name.
If each affiliate shares a common name,

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42523

such as ‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint notice
may state that it applies to ‘‘all
institutions with the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all
affiliates in the ABC family of
companies.’’ If, however, an affiliate
does not have ABC in its name, then the
joint notice must separately identify
each family of companies with a
common name or the institution.
(d) Joint relationships—(1) General. If
two or more consumers jointly obtain a
product or service from a bank (joint
consumers), the following rules apply:
(i) The bank may provide a single opt
out notice.
(ii) Any of the joint consumers may
exercise the right to opt out.
(iii) The bank may either:
(A) Treat an opt out direction by a
joint consumer as applying to all of the
associated joint consumers; or
(B) Permit each joint consumer to opt
out separately.
(iv) If a bank permits each joint
consumer to opt out separately, the bank
must permit:
(A) One of the joint consumers to opt
out on behalf of all of the joint
consumers; and
(B) One or more joint consumers to
notify the bank of their opt out
directions in a single response.
(v) A bank must explain in its opt out
notice which of the policies in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section the
bank will follow, as well as the
information required by paragraph
(d)(1)(iv) of this section.
(vi) A bank may not require all joint
consumers to opt out before it
implements any opt out direction.
(vii) If a bank receives an opt out by
a particular joint consumer that does not
apply to the others, the bank may use
eligibility information about the others
as long as no eligibility information is
used about the consumer who opted
out.
(2) Example. If consumers A and B,
who have different addresses, have a
joint checking account with a bank and
arrange for the bank to send statements
to A’s address, the bank may do any of
the following, but the bank must explain
in the bank’s opt out notice which opt
out policy the bank will follow. The
bank may send a single opt out notice
to A’s address and:
(i) Treat an opt out direction by A as
applying to the entire account. If the
bank does so and A opts out, the bank
may not require B to opt out as well
before implementing A’s opt out
direction.
(ii) Treat A’s opt out direction as
applying to A only. If a bank does so,
it must also permit:
(A) A and B to opt out for each other;
and

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42524

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

(B) A and B to notify the bank of their
opt out directions in a single response
(such as on a single form) if they choose
to give separate opt out directions.
(iii) If A opts out only for A, and B
does not opt out, the bank’s affiliate may
use information only about B to send
solicitations to B, but may not use
information about A and B jointly to
send solicitations to B.
§ 41.25

Duration and effect of opt out.

(a) Duration of opt out. The election
of a consumer to opt out shall be
effective for the opt out period, which
is a period of at least five years
beginning as soon as reasonably
practicable after the consumer’s opt out
election is received. A bank may
establish an opt out period of more than
five years, including an opt out period
that does not expire unless the
consumer revokes it in writing, or if the
consumer agrees, electronically.
(b) Effect of opt out. A receiving
affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to a consumer during the
opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ 41.20(d) or if the opt out is revoked by
the consumer.
(c) Time of opt out. A consumer may
opt out at any time.
(d) Termination of relationship. If the
consumer’s relationship with a bank
terminates when a consumer’s opt out
election is in force, the opt out will
continue to apply indefinitely, unless
revoked by the consumer.
§ 41.26

Extension of opt out.

(a) General. For a consumer who has
opted out, a receiving affiliate may not
make or send solicitations to the
consumer after the expiration of the opt
out period based on eligibility
information it receives or has received
from an affiliate, unless the person
responsible for providing the initial opt
out notice, or its successor, has given
the consumer an extension notice and a
reasonable opportunity to extend the
opt out, and the consumer does not
extend the opt out.
(b) Duration of extension. Each opt
out extension shall comply with
§ 41.25(a).
(c) Contents of extension notice. The
notice provided at extension must be
clear, conspicuous, and concise, and
must accurately disclose either:
(1) The same contents specified in
§ 41.21(a) for the initial notice, along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s previous opt out has expired
or is about to expire, as applicable, and
that the consumer must opt out again if

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

the consumer wishes to keep the opt out
election in force; or
(2) Each of the following items:
(i) That the consumer previously
elected to limit a bank’s affiliate from
using information about the consumer
that it obtains from the bank to make or
send solicitations to the consumer;
(ii) That the consumer’s election has
expired or is about to expire, as
applicable;
(iii) That the consumer may elect to
extend the consumer’s previous
election; and
(iv) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(d) Timing of the extension notice—
(1) General. An extension notice may be
provided to the consumer either:
(i) A reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period; or
(ii) Any time after the expiration of
the opt out period but before any
affiliate makes or sends solicitations to
the consumer that would have been
prohibited by the expired opt out.
(2) Reasonable period of time before
expiration. Providing an extension
notice on or with the last annual privacy
notice required by the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., that
is provided to the consumer before
expiration of the opt out period shall be
deemed reasonable in all cases.
(e) No effect on opt out period. The
opt out period may not be shortened to
a period of less than five years by
sending an extension notice to the
consumer before expiration of the opt
out period.
§ 41.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

(a) Coordinated and consolidated
notices. A notice required by this
subpart C may be coordinated and
consolidated with any other notice or
disclosure required to be issued under
any other provision of law, including
but not limited to the notice described
in section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
privacy notice.
(b) Equivalent notices. A notice or
other disclosure that is equivalent to the
notice required by this subpart C, and
that a bank provides to a consumer
together with disclosures required by
any other provision of law, shall satisfy
the requirements of this subpart C.
6. Appendix A to part 41 is added to
read as follows:

based on information that we share with
them, such as your income, your account
history with us, and your credit score.
• [Include if applicable.] Your decision to
limit marketing offers from our affiliates will
apply for 5 years. Once that period expires,
you will be allowed to extend your decision.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To limit marketing offers [include all that
apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
l I do not want your affiliates to market
their products or services to me based on
information that you share with them.
A–2: Model Form for Extension Notice
Extending Your Choice to Limit Marketing
• You previously chose to limit our
affiliates from marketing their products or
services to you based on information that we
share with them, such as your income, your
account history with us, and your credit
score.
• Your choice has expired or is about to
expire.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To extend your choice for another 5 years
[include all that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
ll I want to extend my choice for another
5 years.
A–3: Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
Your Choice To Stop Marketing
• You may choose to stop all marketing
offers from us and our affiliates.
To stop all marketing offers [include all
that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box on the form below and
mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want you or your affiliates to send
me marketing offers.

Appendix A to 12 CFR Part 41—Model
Forms for Opt Out Notices

Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System

A–1: Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice

12 CFR Chapter II

Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You may limit our affiliates from
marketing their products or services to you

Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the joint
preamble, title 12, chapter II, of the

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 222—FAIR CREDIT REPORTING
(REGULATION V)
1. The authority citation for part 222
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681b and 1681s;
secs. 3, 214, and 217, Pub. L. 108–159, 117
Stat. 1952.

Subpart A—General Provisions
2. Section 222.1 is amended by
adding a new paragraph (a), and
paragraph (b)(2)(i) (as proposed to be
added at 69 FR 23397, April 28, 2004)
is revised to read as follows:
§ 222.1
dates.

Purpose, scope, and effective

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this part
is to implement the provisions of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act applicable to
the institutions listed in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section. This part generally
applies to institutions that obtain and
use information about consumers to
determine the consumer’s eligibility for
products, services, or employment,
share such information among affiliates,
and furnish such information to
consumer reporting agencies.
(b) * * *
(2) Institutions covered. (i) Except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, these regulations apply
to banks that are members of the Federal
Reserve System (other than national
banks), branches and Agencies of
foreign banks (other than Federal
branches, Federal Agencies, and insured
State branches of foreign banks),
commercial lending companies owned
or controlled by foreign banks,
organizations operating under section
25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 601 et seq., and 611 et seq.), and
bank holding companies and affiliates of
such holding companies (other than
depository institutions and consumer
reporting agencies).
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 222.2 (as proposed to be
added at 69 FR 23397, April 28, 2004)
is republished to read as follows:
§ 222.2

Examples.

The examples in this part are not
exclusive. Compliance with an example,
to the extent applicable, constitutes
compliance with this part. Examples in
a paragraph illustrate only the issue
described in the paragraph and do not
illustrate any other issue that may arise
in this part.
4. Section 222.3 (as proposed to be
added at 69 FR 23397, April 28, 2004)
is revised to read as follows:

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

§ 222.3

Definitions.

As used in this part, unless the
context requires otherwise:
(a) Act means the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(b) Affiliate means any person that is
related by common ownership or
common corporate control with another
person.
(c) Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented.
(d) Company means any corporation,
limited liability company, business
trust, general or limited partnership,
association, or similar organization.
(e) Consumer means an individual.
(f) [Reserved].
(g) [Reserved].
(h) [Reserved].
(i) Control of a company means:
(1) Ownership, control, or power to
vote 25 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of any class of voting
security of the company, directly or
indirectly, or acting through one or
more other persons;
(2) Control in any manner over the
election of a majority of the directors,
trustees, or general partners (or
individuals exercising similar functions)
of the company; or
(3) The power to exercise, directly or
indirectly, a controlling influence over
the management or policies of the
company, as the Board determines.
(j) Eligibility information means any
information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the Act did not apply.
(k) [Reserved].
(l) Person means any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity.
(m) Pre-existing business relationship
means a relationship between a person
and a consumer based on—
(1) A financial contract between the
person and the consumer which is in
force on the date on which the
consumer is sent a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part;
(2) The purchase, rental, or lease by
the consumer of the person’s goods or
services, or a financial transaction
(including holding an active account or
a policy in force or having another
continuing relationship) between the
consumer and the person, during the 18month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer; or

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42525

(3) An inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the 3month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer.
(n) Solicitation. (1) In general.
Solicitation means marketing initiated
by a person to a particular consumer
that is—
(i) Based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate as described in subpart C of this
part; and
(ii) Intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase or obtain such
product or service.
(2) Exclusion of marketing directed at
the general public. A solicitation does
not include communications that are
directed at the general public and
distributed without the use of eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate. For example, television,
magazine, and billboard advertisements
do not constitute solicitations, even if
those communications are intended to
encourage consumers to purchase
products and services from the person
initiating the communications.
(3) Examples of solicitations. A
solicitation would include, for example,
a telemarketing call, direct mail, e-mail,
or other form of marketing
communication directed to a specific
consumer that is based on eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate.
(o) You means member banks of the
Federal Reserve System (other than
national banks), branches and Agencies
of foreign banks (other than Federal
branches, Federal Agencies, and insured
State branches of foreign banks),
commercial lending companies owned
or controlled by foreign banks,
organizations operating under section
25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 601 et seq., and 611 et seq.), and
bank holding companies and affiliates of
such holding companies (other than
depository institutions and consumer
reporting agencies).
5. A new subpart C is added to part
222 to read as follows:
Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information for
Marketing
Sec.
222.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.
222.21 Contents of opt out notice.
222.22 Reasonable opportunity to opt out.
222.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.
222.24 Delivery of opt out notices.
222.25 Duration and effect of opt out.
222.26 Extension of opt out.
222.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42526

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information
for Marketing
§ 222.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.

(a) General duties of a person
communicating eligibility information to
an affiliate—(1) Notice and opt out. If
you communicate eligibility information
about a consumer to your affiliate, your
affiliate may not use the information to
make or send solicitations to the
consumer, unless prior to such use by
the affiliate—
(i) You provide a clear and
conspicuous notice to the consumer
stating that the information may be
communicated to and used by your
affiliate to make or send solicitations to
the consumer about its products and
services;
(ii) You provide the consumer a
reasonable opportunity and a simple
method to ‘‘opt out’’ of such use of that
information by your affiliate; and
(iii) The consumer has not chosen to
opt out.
(2) Rules of construction—(i) In
general. The notice required by this
paragraph may be provided either in the
name of a person with which the
consumer currently does or previously
has done business or in one or more
common corporate names shared by
members of an affiliated group of
companies that includes the common
corporate name used by that person, and
may be provided in the following
manner:
(A) You may provide the notice
directly to the consumer;
(B) Your agent may provide the notice
on your behalf, so long as—
(1) Your agent, if your affiliate, does
not include any solicitation other than
yours on or with the notice, unless it
falls within one of the exceptions in
paragraph (c) of this section; and
(2) Your agent gives the notice in your
name or a common name or names used
by the family of companies; or
(C) You may provide a joint notice
with one or more of your affiliates or
under a common corporate name or
names used by the family of companies
as provided in § 222.24(c).
(ii) Avoiding duplicate notices. If
Affiliate A communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to
Affiliate B, and Affiliate B
communicates that same information to
Affiliate C, Affiliate B does not have to
give an opt out notice to the consumer
when it provides eligibility information
to Affiliate C, so long as Affiliate A’s
notice is broad enough to cover Affiliate
C’s use of the eligibility information to
make solicitations to the consumer.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(iii) Examples of rules of construction.
A, B, and C are affiliates. The consumer
currently has a business relationship
with affiliate A, but has never done
business with affiliates B or C. Affiliate
A communicates eligibility information
about the consumer to B for purposes of
making solicitations. B communicates
the information it received from A to C
for purposes of making solicitations. In
this circumstance, the rules of
construction would—
(A) Permit B to use the information to
make solicitations if:
(1) A has provided the opt out notice
directly to the consumer; or
(2) B or C has provided the opt out
notice on behalf of A.
(B) Permit B or C to use the
information to make solicitations if:
(1) A’s notice is broad enough to cover
both B’s and C’s use of the eligibility
information; or
(2) A, B, or C has provided a joint opt
out notice on behalf of the entire
affiliated group of companies.
(C) Not permit B or C to use the
information for marketing purposes if B
has provided the opt out notice only in
B’s own name, because no notice would
have been provided by or on behalf of
A.
(b) General duties of an affiliate
receiving eligibility information. If you
receive eligibility information from an
affiliate, you may not use the
information to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as described in paragraph (a) of
this section, that applies to your use of
eligibility information and the consumer
has not opted-out.
(c) Exceptions. The provisions of this
subpart do not apply if you use
eligibility information you receive from
an affiliate:
(1) To make or send a marketing
solicitation to a consumer with whom
you have a pre-existing business
relationship as defined in § 222.3(m);
(2) To facilitate communications to an
individual for whose benefit you
provide employee benefit or other
services pursuant to a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of
the current employment relationship or
status of the individual as a participant
or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan;
(3) To perform services on behalf of
an affiliate, except that this
subparagraph shall not be construed as
permitting you to make or send
solicitations on your behalf or on behalf
of an affiliate if you or the affiliate, as
applicable, would not be permitted to
make or send the solicitation as a result

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

of the election of the consumer to opt
out under this subpart;
(4) In response to a communication
initiated by the consumer orally,
electronically, or in writing;
(5) In response to an affirmative
authorization or request by the
consumer orally, electronically, or in
writing to receive a solicitation; or
(6) If your compliance with this
subpart would prevent you from
complying with any provision of State
insurance laws pertaining to unfair
discrimination in any State in which
you are lawfully doing business.
(d) Examples of exceptions—(1)
Examples of pre-existing business
relationships. (i) If a consumer has an
insurance policy with your insurance
affiliate that is currently in force, your
insurance affiliate has a pre-existing
business relationship with the consumer
and can therefore use eligibility
information it has received from you to
make solicitations.
(ii) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with your insurance affiliate that
has lapsed, your insurance affiliate has
a pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 18 months after the
date on which the policy ceases to be in
force and can therefore use eligibility
information it has received from you to
make solicitations for 18 months after
the date on which the policy ceases to
be in force.
(iii) If a consumer applies to your
affiliate for a product or service, or
inquires about your affiliate’s products
or services and provides contact
information to your affiliate for receipt
of that information, your affiliate has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from you to make
solicitations for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application.
(iv) If a consumer makes a telephone
call to a centralized call center for an
affiliated group of companies to inquire
about the consumer’s bank account, the
call does not constitute an inquiry with
any affiliate other than the bank that
holds the consumer’s bank account and
does not establish a pre-existing
business relationship between the
consumer and any affiliate of the bank.
(2) Examples of consumer-initiated
communications. (i) If a consumer who
has an account with you initiates a
telephone call to your securities affiliate
to request information about brokerage
services or mutual funds and provides
contact information for receiving that
information, your securities affiliate
may use eligibility information about
the consumer it obtains from you to

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
make solicitations in response to the
consumer-initiated call.
(ii) If your affiliate makes the initial
marketing call, leaves a message for the
consumer to call back, and the
consumer responds, the communication
is not initiated by the consumer, but by
your affiliate.
(iii) If the consumer calls your affiliate
to ask about retail locations and hours,
but does not request information about
your affiliate’s products or services,
solicitations by your affiliate using
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from you would not
be responsive to the consumer-initiated
communication.
(3) Example of consumer affirmative
authorization or request. If a consumer
who obtains a mortgage from you
requests or affirmatively authorizes
information about homeowner’s
insurance from your insurance affiliate,
such authorization or request, whether
given to you or to your insurance
affiliate, would permit your insurance
affiliate to use eligibility information
about the consumer it obtains from you
to make solicitations about
homeowner’s insurance to the
consumer. A pre-selected check box
would not satisfy the requirement for an
affirmative authorization or request.
(e) Prospective application. The
provisions of this subpart shall not
prohibit your affiliate from using
eligibility information communicated by
you to make or send solicitations to a
consumer if such information was
received by your affiliate prior to [Insert
Mandatory Compliance Date].
(f) Relation to affiliate-sharing notice
and opt out. Nothing in this subpart
limits the responsibility of a company to
comply with the notice and opt out
provisions of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of
the Act before it shares information
other than transaction or experience
information among affiliates to avoid
becoming a consumer reporting agency.
§ 222.21

Contents of opt out notice.

(a) In general. A notice must be clear,
conspicuous, and concise, and must
accurately disclose:
(1) That the consumer may elect to
limit your affiliate from using eligibility
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(2) If applicable, that the consumer’s
election will apply for a specified
period of time and that the consumer
will be allowed to extend the election
once that period expires; and
(3) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(b) Concise—(1) In general. For
purposes of this subpart, the term

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

‘‘concise’’ means a reasonably brief
expression or statement.
(2) Combination with other required
disclosures. A notice required by this
subpart may be concise even if it is
combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by Federal or
State law.
(3) Use of model form. The
requirement for a concise notice is
satisfied by use of a model form
contained in Appendix A of this part,
although use of the model form is not
required.
(c) Providing a menu of opt out
choices. With respect to the opt out
election, you may allow a consumer to
choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out of affiliate use of
eligibility information for marketing,
such as by selecting certain types of
affiliates, certain types of information,
or certain methods of delivery from
which to opt out, so long as you offer
as one of the alternatives the
opportunity to opt out with respect to
all affiliates, all eligibility information,
and all methods of delivery.
(d) Alternative contents. If you
provide the consumer with a broader
right to opt out of marketing than is
required by law, you satisfy the
requirements of this section by
providing the consumer with a clear,
conspicuous, and concise notice that
accurately discloses the consumer’s opt
out rights. A model notice is provided
in Appendix A of this part for guidance,
although use of the model notice is not
required.
§ 222.22
out.

Reasonable opportunity to opt

(a) In general. Before your affiliate
uses eligibility information
communicated by you to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, you must
provide the consumer with a reasonable
opportunity, following the delivery of
the opt out notice, to opt out of such use
by your affiliate.
(b) Examples of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. You provide a
consumer with a reasonable opportunity
to opt out if:
(1) By mail. You mail the opt out
notice to a consumer and give the
consumer 30 days from the date you
mailed the notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(2) By electronic means. You notify
the consumer electronically and give the
consumer 30 days after the date that the
consumer acknowledges receipt of the
electronic notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(3) At the time of an electronic
transaction. You provide the opt out
notice to the consumer at the time of an

PO 00000

Frm 00027

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42527

electronic transaction, such as a
transaction conducted on an Internet
Web site, and request that the consumer
decide, as a necessary part of
proceeding with the transaction,
whether to opt out before completing
the transaction, so long as you provide
a simple process at the Internet Web site
that the consumer may use at that time
to opt out.
(4) By including in a privacy notice.
You include the opt out notice in a
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy notice
and allow the consumer to exercise the
opt out within a reasonable period of
time and in the same manner as the opt
out under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,
15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
(5) By providing an ‘‘opt in’’. If you
have a policy of not allowing an affiliate
to use eligibility information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer
unless the consumer affirmatively
consents, you give the consumer the
opportunity to ‘‘opt in’’ by affirmative
consent to such use by your affiliate.
You must document the consumer’s
affirmative consent. A pre-selected
check box does not constitute evidence
of the consumer’s affirmative consent.
§ 222.23 Reasonable and simple methods
of opting out.

(a) Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. You provide a reasonable
and simple method for a consumer to
exercise a right to opt out if you—
(1) Designate check-off boxes in a
prominent position on the relevant
forms included with the opt out notice
required by this subpart;
(2) Include a reply form and a selfaddressed envelope together with the
opt out notice required by this subpart;
(3) Provide an electronic means to opt
out, such as a form that can be
electronically mailed or processed at
your Web site, if the consumer agrees to
the electronic delivery of information;
or
(4) Provide a toll-free telephone
number that consumers may call to opt
out.
(b) Methods of opting out that are not
reasonable or simple. You do not
provide a reasonable and simple method
for exercising an opt out right if you—
(1) Require the consumer to write his
or her own letter to you;
(2) Require the consumer to call or
write to you to obtain a form for opting
out, rather than including the form with
the notice; or
(3) Require the consumer who agrees
to receive the opt out notice in
electronic form only, such as by
electronic mail or at your Web site, to
opt out solely by telephone or by paper
mail.

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42528
§ 222.24

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
Delivery of opt out notices.

(a) In general. You must provide an
opt out notice so that each consumer
can reasonably be expected to receive
actual notice. For opt out notices you
provide electronically, you may either
comply with the electronic disclosure
provisions in this subpart or with the
provisions in section 101 of the
Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq.
(b) Examples of expectation of actual
notice. (1) You may reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Hand-deliver a printed copy of the
notice to the consumer;
(ii) Mail a printed copy of the notice
to the last known mailing address of the
consumer; or
(iii) For the consumer who obtains a
product or service from you
electronically, such as on an Internet
Web site, post the notice on your
electronic site and require the consumer
to acknowledge receipt of the notice as
a necessary step to obtaining a
particular product or service.
(2) You may not reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Only post a sign in your branch or
office or generally publish
advertisements presenting your notice;
or
(ii) Send the notice via electronic mail
to a consumer who has not agreed to the
electronic delivery of information.
(c) Joint notice with affiliates—(1) In
general. You may provide a joint notice
from you and one or more of your
affiliates, as identified in the notice, so
long as the notice is accurate with
respect to you and each affiliate.
(2) Identification of affiliates. You do
not have to list each affiliate providing
the joint notice by its name. If each
affiliate shares a common name, such as
‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint notice may state
that it applies to ‘‘all institutions with
the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all affiliates in the
ABC family of companies.’’ If, however,
an affiliate does not have ABC in its
name, then the joint notice must
separately identify each family of
companies with a common name or the
institution.
(d) Joint relationships—(1) In general.
If two or more consumers jointly obtain
a product or service from you (joint
consumers), the following rules apply:
(i) You may provide a single opt out
notice.
(ii) Any of the joint consumers may
exercise the right to opt out.
(iii) You may either—

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(A) Treat an opt out direction by a
joint consumer as applying to all of the
associated joint consumers; or
(B) Permit each joint consumer to opt
out separately.
(iv) If you permit each joint consumer
to opt out separately, you must permit:
(A) One of the joint consumers to opt
out on behalf of all of the joint
consumers; and
(B) One or more joint consumers to
notify you of their opt out directions in
a single response.
(v) You must explain in your opt out
notice which of the policies in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section you
will follow, as well as the information
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this
section.
(vi) You may not require all joint
consumers to opt out before you
implement any opt out direction.
(vii) If you receive an opt out by a
particular joint consumer that does not
apply to the others, you may use
eligibility information about the others
as long as no eligibility information is
used about the consumer who opted
out.
(2) Example. If consumers A and B,
who have different addresses, have a
joint checking account with you and
arrange for you to send statements to A’s
address, you may do any of the
following, but you must explain in your
opt out notice which opt out policy you
will follow. You may send a single opt
out notice to A’s address and:
(i) Treat an opt out direction by A as
applying to the entire account. If you do
so and A opts out, you may not require
B to opt out as well before
implementing A’s opt out direction.
(ii) Treat A’s opt out direction as
applying to A only. If you do so, you
must also permit:
(A) A and B to opt out for each other;
and
(B) A and B to notify you of their opt
out directions in a single response (such
as on a single form) if they choose to
give separate opt out directions.
(iii) If A opts out only for A, and B
does not opt out, your affiliate may use
information only about B to send
solicitations to B, but may not use
information about A and B jointly to
send solicitations to B.
§ 222.25

Duration and effect of opt out.

(a) Duration of opt out. The election
of a consumer to opt out shall be
effective for the opt out period, which
is a period of at least 5 years beginning
as soon as reasonably practicable after
the consumer’s opt out election is
received. You may establish an opt out
period of more than 5 years, including
an opt out period that does not expire

PO 00000

Frm 00028

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

unless the consumer revokes it in
writing, or if the consumer agrees,
electronically.
(b) Effect of opt out. A receiving
affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to a consumer during the
opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ 222.20(c) or if the opt out is revoked
by the consumer.
(c) Time of opt out. A consumer may
opt out at any time.
(d) Termination of relationship. If the
consumer’s relationship with you
terminates when a consumer’s opt out
election is in force, the opt out will
continue to apply indefinitely, unless
revoked by the consumer.
§ 222.26

Extension of opt out.

(a) In general. For a consumer who
has opted out, a receiving affiliate may
not make or send solicitations to the
consumer after the expiration of the opt
out period based on eligibility
information it receives or has received
from an affiliate, unless the person
responsible for providing the initial opt
out notice, or its successor, has given
the consumer an extension notice and a
reasonable opportunity to extend the
opt out, and the consumer does not
extend the opt out.
(b) Duration of extension. Each opt
out extension shall comply with
§ 222.25(a).
(c) Contents of extension notice. The
notice provided at extension must be
clear, conspicuous, and concise, and
must accurately disclose either:
(1) The same contents specified in
§ 222.21(a) for the initial notice, along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s previous opt out has expired
or is about to expire, as applicable, and
that the consumer must opt out again if
the consumer wishes to keep the opt out
election in force; or
(2) Each of the items listed below:
(i) That the consumer previously
elected to limit your affiliate from using
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(ii) That the consumer’s election has
expired or is about to expire, as
applicable;
(iii) That the consumer may elect to
extend the consumer’s previous
election; and
(iv) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(d) Timing of the extension notice—
(1) In general. An extension notice may
be provided to the consumer either’
(i) A reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period; or
(ii) Any time after the expiration of
the opt out period but before any

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
affiliate makes or sends solicitations to
the consumer that would have been
prohibited by the expired opt out.
(2) Reasonable period of time before
expiration. Providing an extension
notice on or with the last annual privacy
notice required by the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., that
is provided to the consumer before
expiration of the opt out period shall be
deemed reasonable in all cases.
(e) No effect on opt out period. The
opt out period may not be shortened to
a period of less than 5 years by sending
an extension notice to the consumer
before expiration of the opt out period.
§ 222.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

(a) Coordinated and consolidated
notices. A notice required by this
subpart may be coordinated and
consolidated with any other notice or
disclosure required to be issued under
any other provision of law, including
but not limited to the notice described
in section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
privacy notice.
(b) Equivalent notices. A notice or
other disclosure that is equivalent to the
notice required by this subpart, and that
you provide to a consumer together with
disclosures required by any other
provision of law, shall satisfy the
requirements of this subpart.
6. A new Appendix A to part 222 is
added to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 222—Model Forms
for Opt Out Notices
A–1 Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
A–2 Model Form for Extension Notice
A–3 Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
A–1—Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You may limit our affiliates from
marketing their products or services to you
based on information that we share with
them, such as your income, your account
history with us, and your credit score.
• [Include if applicable.] Your decision to
limit marketing offers from our affiliates will
apply for 5 years. Once that period expires,
you will be allowed to extend your decision.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To limit marketing offers [include all that
apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

l I do not want your affiliates to market
their products or services to me based on
information that you share with them.
A–2—Model Form for Extension Notice
Extending Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You previously chose to limit our
affiliates from marketing their products or
services to you based on information that we
share with them, such as your income, your
account history with us, and your credit
score.
• Your choice has expired or is about to
expire.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To extend your choice for another 5 years
[include all that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
l I want to extend my choice for another 5
years.
A–3—Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
Your Choice To Stop Marketing
• You may choose to stop all marketing
offers from us and our affiliates.
To stop all marketing offers [include all
that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box on the form below and
mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
l I do not want you or your affiliates to send
me marketing offers.

§ 334.1
dates.

42529

Purpose, scope, and effective

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this part
is to implement the provisions of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act applicable to
the institutions listed in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section. This part generally
applies to institutions that obtain and
use information about consumers to
determine the consumer’s eligibility for
products, services, or employment,
share such information among affiliates,
and furnish such information to
consumer reporting agencies.
(b) Scope.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Institutions covered. (i) Except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, these regulations apply
to banks insured by the FDIC (other than
District Banks and members of the
Federal Reserve System) and insured
State branches of foreign banks and any
subsidiaries and affiliates of such
entities; and other entities and persons
with respect to which the FDIC may
exercise its enforcement authority under
any provision of law. For purposes of
this definition, a subsidiary does not
include a broker, dealer, person
providing insurance, investment
company, and investment advisor.
3. Section 334.2 is republished to read
as follows:
§ 334.2

Examples.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

The examples in this part are not
exclusive. Compliance with an example,
to the extent applicable, constitutes
compliance with this part. Examples in
a paragraph illustrate only the issue
described in the paragraph and do not
illustrate any other issue that may arise
in this part.
4. Section 334.3 is revised to read as
follows:

12 CFR Chapter III

§ 334.3

Authority and Issuance

As used in this part, unless the
context requires otherwise:
(a) Act means the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(b) Affiliate means any person that is
related by common ownership or
common corporate control with another
person.
(c) Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented.
(d) Company means any corporation,
limited liability company, business
trust, general or limited partnership,
association, or similar organization.
(e) Consumer means an individual.
(f) [Reserved].
(g) [Reserved].
(h) [Reserved].

For the reasons set forth in the joint
preamble, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend part 334
(as proposed to be added at 69 FR
23399, April 28, 2004) of chapter III of
title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to read as follows:
PART 334—FAIR CREDIT REPORTING
1. The authority citation for part 334
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819 (Tenth) and
1818; 15 U.S.C. 1681b and 1681s.

Subpart A—General Provisions
2. Section 334.1 is revised to read as
follows:

PO 00000

Frm 00029

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

Definitions.

15JYP2

42530

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

(i) Control of a company means:
(1) Ownership, control, or power to
vote 25 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of any class of voting
security of the company, directly or
indirectly, or acting through one or
more other persons;
(2) Control in any manner over the
election of a majority of the directors,
trustees, or general partners (or
individuals exercising similar functions)
of the company; or
(3) The power to exercise, directly or
indirectly, a controlling influence over
the management or policies of the
company, as the FDIC determines.
(j) Eligibility information means any
information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the Act did not apply.
(k) [Reserved].
(l) Person means any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity.
(m) Pre-existing business relationship
means a relationship between a person
and a consumer based on—
(1) A financial contract between the
person and the consumer which is in
force on the date on which the
consumer is sent a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part;
(2) The purchase, rental, or lease by
the consumer of the person’s goods or
services, or a financial transaction
(including holding an active account or
a policy in force or having another
continuing relationship) between the
consumer and the person, during the 18month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer; or
(3) An inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the three
month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer.
(n) Solicitation—(1) In general.
Solicitation means marketing initiated
by a person to a particular consumer
that is—
(i) Based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate as described in subpart C of this
part; and
(ii) Intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase or obtain such
product or service.
(2) Exclusion of marketing directed at
the general public. A solicitation does
not include communications that are
directed at the general public and

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

distributed without the use of eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate. For example, television,
magazine, and billboard advertisements
do not constitute solicitations, even if
those communications are intended to
encourage consumers to purchase
products and services from the person
initiating the communications.
(3) Examples of solicitations. A
solicitation would include, for example,
a telemarketing call, direct mail, e-mail,
or other form of marketing
communication directed to a specific
consumer that is based on eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate.
(o) You means all banks that are
insured by the FDIC (other than District
Banks and members of the Federal
Reserve System); insured State branches
of foreign banks and any subsidiaries
and affiliates of such entities; and other
entities or persons with respect to
which the FDIC may exercise its
enforcement authority under any
provision of law. For purposes of this
definition, a subsidiary does not include
a broker, dealer, person providing
insurance, investment company, and
investment advisor.
5. Subpart C is added to read as
follows:
Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information for
Marketing
Sec.
334.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.
334.21 Contents of opt out notice.
334.22 Reasonable opportunity to opt out.
334.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.
334.24 Delivery of opt out notices.
334.25 Duration and effect of opt out.
334.26 Extension of opt out.
334.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information
for Marketing
§ 334.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.

(a) General duties of a person
communicating eligibility information to
an affiliate—(1) Notice and opt out. If
you communicate eligibility information
about a consumer to your affiliate, your
affiliate may not use the information to
make or send solicitations to the
consumer, unless prior to such use by
the affiliate—
(i) You provide a clear and
conspicuous notice to the consumer
stating that the information may be
communicated to and used by your
affiliate to make or send solicitations to
the consumer about its products and
services;

PO 00000

Frm 00030

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

(ii) You provide the consumer a
reasonable opportunity and a simple
method to ‘‘opt out’’ of such use of that
information by your affiliate; and
(iii) The consumer has not chosen to
opt out.
(2) Rules of construction—(i) In
general. The notice required by this
paragraph may be provided either in the
name of a person with which the
consumer currently does or previously
has done business or in one or more
common corporate names shared by
members of an affiliated group of
companies that includes the common
corporate name used by that person, and
may be provided in the following
manner:
(A) You may provide the notice
directly to the consumer;
(B) Your agent may provide the notice
on your behalf, so long as—
(1) Your agent, if your affiliate, does
not include any solicitation other than
yours on or with the notice, unless it
falls within one of the exceptions in
paragraph (c) of this section; and
(2) Your agent gives the notice in your
name or a common name or names used
by the family of companies; or
(C) You may provide a joint notice
with one or more of your affiliates or
under a common corporate name or
names used by the family of companies
as provided in § 334.24(c).
(ii) Avoiding duplicate notices. If
Affiliate A shares eligibility information
about a consumer with Affiliate B, and
Affiliate B shares that same information
with Affiliate C, Affiliate B does not
have to give an opt out notice to the
consumer when it provides eligibility
information to Affiliate C, so long as
Affiliate A’s notice is broad enough to
cover Affiliate C’s use of the eligibility
information to make solicitations to the
consumer.
(iii) Examples of rules of construction.
A, B, and C are affiliates. The consumer
currently has a business relationship
with affiliate A, but has never done
business with affiliates B or C. Affiliate
A communicates eligibility information
about the consumer to B for purposes of
making solicitations. B communicates
the information it received from A to C
for purposes of making solicitations. In
this circumstance, the rules of
construction would—
(A) Permit B to use the information to
make solicitations if:
(1) A has provided the opt out notice
directly to the consumer; or
(2) B or C has provided the opt out
notice on behalf of A.
(B) Permit B or C to use the
information to make solicitations if:

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(1) A’s notice is broad enough to cover
both B’s and C’s use of the eligibility
information; or
(2) A, B, or C has provided a joint opt
out notice on behalf of the entire
affiliated group of companies.
(C) Not permit B or C to use the
information for marketing purposes if B
has provided the opt out notice only in
B’s own name, because no notice would
be provided by or on behalf of A.
(b) General duties of an affiliate
receiving eligibility information. If you
receive eligibility information from an
affiliate, you may not use the
information to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as described in paragraph (a) of
this section, that applies to your use of
eligibility information and the consumer
has not opted-out.
(c) Exceptions. The provisions of this
subpart do not apply if you use
eligibility information you receive from
an affiliate:
(1) To make or send a marketing
solicitation to a consumer with whom
you have a pre-existing business
relationship as defined in § 334.3(m);
(2) To facilitate communications to an
individual for whose benefit you
provide employee benefit or other
services pursuant to a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of
the current employment relationship or
status of the individual as a participant
or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan;
(3) To perform services on behalf of
an affiliate, except that this
subparagraph shall not be construed as
permitting you to make or send
solicitations on your behalf or on behalf
of an affiliate if you or the affiliate, as
applicable, would not be permitted to
make or send the solicitation as a result
of the election of the consumer to opt
out under this subpart;
(4) In response to a communication
initiated by the consumer orally,
electronically, or in writing;
(5) In response to an affirmative
authorization or request by the
consumer orally, electronically, or in
writing to receive a solicitation; or
(6) If your compliance with this
subpart would prevent you from
complying with any provision of State
insurance laws pertaining to unfair
discrimination in any State in which
you are lawfully doing business.
(d) Examples of exceptions—(1)
Examples of pre-existing business
relationships. (i) If a consumer has an
insurance policy with your insurance
affiliate that is currently in force, your
insurance affiliate has a pre-existing
business relationship with the consumer

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

and can therefore use eligibility
information it has received from you to
make solicitations.
(ii) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with your insurance affiliate that
has lapsed, your insurance affiliate has
a pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 18 months after the
date on which the policy ceases to be in
force and can therefore use eligibility
information it has received from you to
make solicitations for 18 months after
the date on which the policy ceases to
be in force.
(iii) If a consumer applies to your
affiliate for a product or service, or
inquires about your affiliate’s products
or services and provides contact
information to your affiliate for receipt
of that information, your affiliate has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for three months after the
date of the inquiry or application and
can therefore use eligibility information
it has received from you to make
solicitations for three months after the
date of the inquiry or application.
(iv) If a consumer makes a telephone
call to a centralized call center for an
affiliated group of companies to inquire
about the consumer’s bank account, the
call does not constitute an inquiry with
any affiliate other than the bank that
holds the consumer’s bank account and
does not establish a pre-existing
business relationship between the
consumer and any affiliate of the bank.
(2) Examples of consumer-initiated
communications. (i) If a consumer who
has an account with you initiates a
telephone call to your securities affiliate
to request information about brokerage
services or mutual funds and provides
contact information for receiving that
information, your securities affiliate
may use eligibility information about
the consumer it obtains from you to
make solicitations in response to the
consumer-initiated call.
(ii) If your affiliate makes the initial
marketing call, leaves a message for the
consumer to call back, and the
consumer responds, the communication
is not initiated by the consumer, but by
your affiliate.
(iii) If the consumer calls your affiliate
to ask about retail locations and hours,
but does not request information about
your affiliate’s products or services,
solicitations by your affiliate using
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from you would not
be responsive to the consumer-initiated
communication.
(3) Example of consumer affirmative
authorization or request. If a consumer
who obtains a mortgage from you
requests or affirmatively authorizes
information about homeowner’s

PO 00000

Frm 00031

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42531

insurance from your insurance affiliate,
such authorization or request, whether
given to you or to your insurance
affiliate, would permit your insurance
affiliate to use eligibility information
about the consumer it obtains from you
to make solicitations about
homeowner’s insurance to the
consumer. A pre-selected check box
would not satisfy the requirement for an
affirmative authorization or request.
(e) Prospective application. The
provisions of this subpart shall not
prohibit your affiliate from using
eligibility information communicated by
you to make or send solicitations to a
consumer if such information was
received by your affiliate prior to [Insert
Mandatory Compliance Date].
(f) Relation to affiliate-sharing notice
and opt out. Nothing in this subpart
limits the responsibility of a company to
comply with the notice and opt out
provisions of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of
the Act before it shares information
other than transaction or experience
information among affiliates to avoid
becoming a consumer reporting agency.
§ 334.21

Contents of opt out notice.

(a) In general. A notice must be clear,
conspicuous, and concise, and must
accurately disclose:
(1) That the consumer may elect to
limit your affiliate from using eligibility
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(2) If applicable, that the consumer’s
election will apply for a specified
period of time and that the consumer
will be allowed to extend the election
once that period expires; and
(3) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(b) Concise—(1) In general. For
purposes of this subpart, the term
‘‘concise’’ means a reasonably brief
expression or statement.
(2) Combination with other required
disclosures. A notice required by this
subpart may be concise even if it is
combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by federal or
state law.
(3) Use of model form. The
requirement for a concise notice is
satisfied by use of a model form
contained in Appendix A of this part,
although use of the model form is not
required.
(c) Providing a menu of opt out
choices. With respect to the opt out
election, you may allow a consumer to
choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out of affiliate use of
eligibility information for marketing,
such as by selecting certain types of
affiliates, certain types of information,

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42532

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

or certain methods of delivery from
which to opt out, so long as you offer
as one of the alternatives the
opportunity to opt out with respect to
all affiliates, all eligibility information,
and all methods of delivery.
(d) Alternative contents. If you
provide the consumer with a broader
right to opt out of marketing than is
required by law, you satisfy the
requirements of this section by
providing the consumer with a clear,
conspicuous, and concise notice that
accurately discloses the consumer’s opt
out rights. A model notice is provided
in Appendix A of this part for guidance,
although use of the model notice is not
required.
§ 334.22
out.

Reasonable opportunity to opt

(a) In general. Before your affiliate
uses eligibility information
communicated by you to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, you must
provide the consumer with a reasonable
opportunity, following the delivery of
the opt out notice, to opt out of such use
by your affiliate.
(b) Examples of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. You provide a
consumer with a reasonable opportunity
to opt out if:
(1) By mail. You mail the opt out
notice to a consumer and give the
consumer 30 days from the date you
mailed the notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(2) By electronic means. You notify
the consumer electronically and give the
consumer 30 days after the date that the
consumer acknowledges receipt of the
electronic notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(3) At the time of an electronic
transaction. You provide the opt out
notice to the consumer at the time of an
electronic transaction, such as a
transaction conducted on an Internet
Web site, and request that the consumer
decide, as a necessary part of
proceeding with the transaction,
whether to opt out before completing
the transaction, so long as you provide
a simple process at the Internet web site
that the consumer may use at that time
to opt out.
(4) By including in a privacy notice.
You include the opt out notice in a
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy notice
and allow the consumer to exercise the
opt out within a reasonable period of
time and in the same manner as the opt
out under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
(5) By providing an ‘‘opt in’’. If you
have a policy of not allowing an affiliate
to use eligibility information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer
unless the consumer affirmatively

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

consents, you give the consumer the
opportunity to ‘‘opt in’’ by affirmative
consent to such use by your affiliate.
You must document the consumer’s
affirmative consent. A pre-selected
check box does not constitute evidence
of the consumer’s affirmative consent.
§ 334.23 Reasonable and simple methods
of opting out.

(a) Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. You provide a reasonable
and simple method for a consumer to
exercise a right to opt out if you—
(1) Designate check-off boxes in a
prominent position on the relevant
forms included with the opt out notice
required by this subpart;
(2) Include a reply form and a selfaddressed envelope together with the
opt out notice required by this subpart;
(3) Provide an electronic means to opt
out, such as a form that can be
electronically mailed or processed at
your Web site, if the consumer agrees to
the electronic delivery of information;
or
(4) Provide a toll-free telephone
number that consumers may call to opt
out.
(b) Methods of opting out that are not
reasonable or simple. You do not
provide a reasonable and simple method
for exercising an opt out right if you—
(1) Require the consumer to write his
or her own letter to you;
(2) Require the consumer to call or
write to you to obtain a form for opting
out, rather than including the form with
the notice; or
(3) Require the consumer who agrees
to receive the opt out notice in
electronic form only, such as by
electronic mail or at your Web site, to
opt out solely by telephone or by paper
mail.
§ 334.24

Delivery of opt out notices.

(a) In general. You must provide an
opt out notice so that each consumer
can reasonably be expected to receive
actual notice. For opt out notices you
provide electronically, you may either
comply with the electronic disclosure
provisions in this subpart or with the
provisions in section 101 of the
Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq.
(b) Examples of expectation of actual
notice. (1) You may reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Hand-deliver a printed copy of the
notice to the consumer;
(ii) Mail a printed copy of the notice
to the last known mailing address of the
consumer; or
(iii) For the consumer who obtains a
product or service from you

PO 00000

Frm 00032

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

electronically, such as on an Internet
Web site, post the notice on your
electronic site and require the consumer
to acknowledge receipt of the notice as
a necessary step to obtaining a
particular product or service.
(2) You may not reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Only post a sign in your branch or
office or generally publish
advertisements presenting your notice;
or
(ii) Send the notice via electronic mail
to a consumer who has not agreed to the
electronic delivery of information.
(c) Joint notice with affiliates—(1) In
general. You may provide a joint notice
from you and one or more of your
affiliates, as identified in the notice, so
long as the notice is accurate with
respect to you and each affiliate.
(2) Identification of affiliates. You do
not have to list each affiliate providing
the joint notice by its name. If each
affiliate shares a common name, such as
‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint notice may state
that it applies to ‘‘all institutions with
the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all affiliates in the
ABC family of companies.’’ If, however,
an affiliate does not have ABC in its
name, then the joint notice must
separately identify each family of
companies with a common name or the
institution.
(d) Joint relationships—(1) In general.
If two or more consumers jointly obtain
a product or service from you (joint
consumers), the following rules apply:
(i) You may provide a single opt out
notice.
(ii) Any of the joint consumers may
exercise the right to opt out.
(iii) You may either—
(A) Treat an opt out direction by a
joint consumer as applying to all of the
associated joint consumers; or
(B) Permit each joint consumer to opt
out separately.
(iv) If you permit each joint consumer
to opt out separately, you must permit:
(A) One of the joint consumers to opt
out on behalf of all of the joint
consumers; and
(B) One or more joint consumers to
notify you of their opt out directions in
a single response.
(v) You must explain in your opt out
notice which of the policies in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section you
will follow, as well as the information
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this
section.
(vi) You may not require all joint
consumers to opt out before you
implement any opt out direction.
(vii) If you receive an opt out by a
particular joint consumer that does not
apply to the others, you may use

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
eligibility information about the others
as long as no eligibility information is
used about the consumer who opted
out.
(2) Example. If consumers A and B,
who have different addresses, have a
joint checking account with you and
arrange for you to send statements to A’s
address, you may do any of the
following, but you must explain in your
opt out notice which opt out policy you
will follow. You may send a single opt
out notice to A’s address and:
(i) Treat an opt out direction by A as
applying to the entire account. If you do
so and A opts out, you may not require
B to opt out as well before
implementing A’s opt out direction.
(ii) Treat A’s opt out direction as
applying to A only. If you do so, you
must also permit:
(A) A and B to opt out for each other;
and
(B) A and B to notify you of their opt
out directions in a single response (such
as on a single form) if they choose to
give separate opt out directions.
(iii) If A opts out only for A, and B
does not opt out, your affiliate may use
information only about B to send
solicitations to B, but may not use
information about A and B jointly to
send solicitations to B.
§ 334.25

Duration and effect of opt out.

(a) Duration of opt out. The election
of a consumer to opt out shall be
effective for the opt out period, which
is a period of at least 5 years beginning
as soon as reasonably practicable after
the consumer’s opt out election is
received. You may establish an opt out
period of more than 5 years, including
an opt out period that does not expire
unless the consumer revokes it in
writing, or if the consumer agrees,
electronically.
(b) Effect of opt out. A receiving
affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to a consumer during the
opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ 334.20(c) or if the opt out is revoked
by the consumer.
(c) Time of opt out. A consumer may
opt out at any time.
(d) Termination of relationship. If the
consumer’s relationship with you
terminates when a consumer’s opt out
election is in force, the opt out will
continue to apply indefinitely, unless
revoked by the consumer.
§ 334.26

Extension of opt out.

(a) In general. For a consumer who
has opted out, a receiving affiliate may
not make or send solicitations to the
consumer after the expiration of the opt

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

out period based on eligibility
information it receives or has received
from an affiliate, unless the person
responsible for providing the initial opt
out notice, or its successor, has given
the consumer an extension notice and a
reasonable opportunity to extend the
opt out, and the consumer does not
extend the opt out.
(b) Duration of extension. Each opt
out extension shall comply with
§ 334.25(a).
(c) Contents of extension notice. The
notice provided at extension must be
clear, conspicuous, and concise, and
must accurately disclose either:
(1) The same contents specified in
§ 334.21(a) for the initial notice, along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s previous opt out has expired
or is about to expire, as applicable, and
that the consumer must opt out again if
the consumer wishes to keep the opt out
election in force; or
(2) Each of the items listed below:
(i) That the consumer previously
elected to limit your affiliate from using
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(ii) That the consumer’s election has
expired or is about to expire, as
applicable;
(iii) That the consumer may elect to
extend the consumer’s previous
election; and
(iv) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(d) Timing of the extension notice—
(1) In general. An extension notice may
be provided to the consumer either—
(i) A reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period; or
(ii) Any time after the expiration of
the opt out period but before any
affiliate makes or sends solicitations to
the consumer that would have been
prohibited by the expired opt out.
(2) Reasonable period of time before
expiration. Providing an extension
notice on or with the last annual privacy
notice required by the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., that
is provided to the consumer before
expiration of the opt out period shall be
deemed reasonable in all cases.
(e) No effect on opt out period. The
opt out period may not be shortened to
a period of less than 5 years by sending
an extension notice to the consumer
before expiration of the opt out period.
§ 334.27
notices.

Consolidated and equivalent

(a) Coordinated and consolidated
notices. A notice required by this
subpart may be coordinated and
consolidated with any other notice or
disclosure required to be issued under

PO 00000

Frm 00033

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42533

any other provision of law, including
but not limited to the notice described
in section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
privacy notice.
(b) Equivalent notices. A notice or
other disclosure that is equivalent to the
notice required by this subpart, and that
you provide to a consumer together with
disclosures required by any other
provision of law, shall satisfy the
requirements of this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Appendix A to part 334 is added
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 334—Model Forms
for Opt Out Notices
A–1 Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
A–2 Model Form for Extension Notice
A–3 Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
A–1—Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You may limit our affiliates from
marketing their products or services to you
based on information that we share with
them, such as your income, your account
history with us, and your credit score.
• [Include if applicable.] Your decision to
limit marketing offers from our affiliates will
apply for 5 years. Once that period expires,
you will be allowed to extend your decision.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To limit marketing offers [include all that
apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want your affiliates to market their
products or services to me based on
information that you share with them.
A–2—Model Form for Extension Notice
Extending Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You previously chose to limit our
affiliates from marketing their products or
services to you based on information that we
share with them, such as your income, your
account history with us, and your credit
score.
• Your choice has expired or is about to
expire.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To extend your choice for another 5 years
[include all that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42534

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

[Company address].
lI want to extend my choice for another 5
years.

3. Amend § 571.3 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (o) and adding new
paragraphs (c), (j), (l), (m), and (n).

A–3—Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice

§ 571.3

Your Choice To Stop Marketing
• You may choose to stop all marketing
offers from us and our affiliates.
To stop all marketing offers [include all
that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box on the form below and
mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want you or your affiliates to send
me marketing offers.

Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Chapter V

Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the joint
preamble, the Office of Thrift
Supervision proposes to amend chapter
V of title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations by amending part 571 (as
proposed to be added at 69 FR 23402,
April 28, 2004), as follows:
PART 571—FAIR CREDIT REPORTING
1. The authority citation for part 571
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462a, 1463, 1464,
1467a, 1828, 1831p–1, 1881–1884; 15 U.S.C.
1681b, 1681s, and 1681w; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and
6805(b)(1); Sec. 214, Pub. L. 108–159, 117
Stat. 1952.

2. Amend § 571.1 by adding new
paragraphs (a) and (b)(2)(ii).
§ 571.1
dates.

Purpose, scope, and effective

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this part
is to implement the provisions of the
Fair Credit Reporting Act applicable to
the institutions listed in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section. This part generally
applies to institutions that obtain and
use information about consumers to
determine the consumer’s eligibility for
products, services, or employment,
share such information among affiliates,
and furnish such information to
consumer reporting agencies.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Subpart C of this part does not
apply to federal savings association
operating subsidiaries that are
functionally regulated within the
meaning of section 5(c)(5) of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(5)).
*
*
*
*
*

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

Definitions.

*

*
*
*
*
(b) Affiliate means any person that is
related by common ownership or
common corporate control with another
person.
(c) Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Eligibility information means any
information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the Act did not apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Person means any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity.
(m) Pre-existing business relationship
means a relationship between a person
and a consumer based on—
(1) A financial contract between the
person and the consumer which is in
force on the date on which the
consumer is sent a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part;
(2) The purchase, rental, or lease by
the consumer of the person’s goods or
services, or a financial transaction
(including holding an active account or
a policy in force or having another
continuing relationship) between the
consumer and the person, during the 18month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer; or
(3) An inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the 3month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer.
(n) Solicitation—(1) In general.
Solicitation means marketing initiated
by a person to a particular consumer
that is—
(i) Based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate as described in subpart C of this
part; and
(ii) Intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase or obtain such
product or service.
(2) Exclusion of marketing directed at
the general public. A solicitation does
not include communications that are

PO 00000

Frm 00034

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

directed at the general public and
distributed without the use of eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate. For example, television,
magazine, and billboard advertisements
do not constitute solicitations, even if
those communications are intended to
encourage consumers to purchase
products and services from the person
initiating the communications.
(3) Examples of solicitations. A
solicitation would include, for example,
a telemarketing call, direct mail, e-mail,
or other form of marketing
communication directed to a specific
consumer that is based on eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate.
(o) You means savings associations
whose deposits are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(and Federal savings association
operating subsidiaries in accordance
with § 559.3(h)(1) of this chapter). For
purposes of subpart C of this part,
‘‘You’’ does not include a Federal
savings association operating subsidiary
that is functionally regulated within the
meaning of section 5(c)(5) of the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(5)).
4. Add a new subpart C to part 571
to read as follows:
Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information for
Marketing
Sec.
571.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.
571.21 Contents of opt out notice.
571.22 Reasonable opportunity to opt out.
571.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.
571.24 Delivery of opt out notices.
571.25 Duration and effect of opt out.
571.26 Extension of opt out.
571.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information
for Marketing
§ 571.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.

(a) General duties of a person
communicating eligibility information to
an affiliate—(1) Notice and opt out. If
you communicate eligibility information
about a consumer to your affiliate, your
affiliate may not use the information to
make or send solicitations to the
consumer, unless prior to such use by
the affiliate—
(i) You provide a clear and
conspicuous notice to the consumer
stating that the information may be
communicated to and used by your
affiliate to make or send solicitations to
the consumer about its products and
services;

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(ii) You provide the consumer a
reasonable opportunity and a simple
method to ‘‘opt out’’ of such use of that
information by your affiliate; and
(iii) The consumer has not chosen to
opt out.
(2) Rules of construction—(i) In
general. The notice required by this
paragraph (a)(2) may be provided either
in the name of a person with which the
consumer currently does or previously
has done business or in one or more
common corporate names shared by
members of an affiliated group of
companies that includes the common
corporate name used by that person, and
may be provided in the following
manner:
(A) You may provide the notice
directly to the consumer;
(B) Your agent may provide the notice
on your behalf, so long as—
(1) Your agent, if your affiliate, does
not include any solicitation other than
yours on or with the notice, unless it
falls within one of the exceptions in
paragraph (c) of this section; and
(2) Your agent gives the notice in your
name or a common name or names used
by the family of companies; or
(C) You may provide a joint notice
with one or more of your affiliates or
under a common corporate name or
names used by the family of companies
as provided in § 571.24(c).
(ii) Avoid duplicating notices. If
Affiliate A communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to
Affiliate B, and Affiliate B
communicates that same information to
Affiliate C, Affiliate B does not have to
give an opt out notice to the consumer
when it provides eligibility information
to Affiliate C, so long as Affiliate A’s
notice is broad enough to cover Affiliate
C’s use of the eligibility information to
make solicitations to the consumer.
(iii) Examples of rules of construction.
A, B, and C are affiliates. The consumer
currently has a business relationship
with A, but has never done business
with B or C. A communicates eligibility
information about the consumer to B for
purposes of B making solicitations on
B’s behalf. B communicates the
information it received from A to C for
purposes of C making solicitations on
C’s behalf. In this circumstance, the
rules of construction would—
(A) Permit B to use the information to
make solicitations on B’s behalf if:
(1) A has provided the opt out notice
directly to the consumer; or
(2) B or C has provided the opt out
notice on behalf of A.
(B) Permit B or C to use the
information to make solicitations on B’s
and C’s behalf respectively if:

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

(1) A’s notice is broad enough to cover
both B’s and C’s use of the eligibility
information; or
(2) A, B, or C has provided a joint opt
out notice on behalf of the entire
affiliated group of companies.
(C) Not permit B or C to use the
information for marketing purposes if B
has provided the opt out notice only in
B’s own name, because no notice would
have been provided by or on behalf of
A.
(b) General duties of an affiliate
receiving eligibility information. If you
receive eligibility information from an
affiliate, you may not use the
information to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as described in paragraph (a) of
this section, that applies to your use of
eligibility information and the consumer
has not opted out.
(c) Exceptions. The provisions of this
subpart do not apply if you use
eligibility information you receive from
an affiliate:
(1) To make or send a marketing
solicitation to a consumer with whom
you have a pre-existing business
relationship as defined in § 571.3(m);
(2) To facilitate communications to an
individual for whose benefit you
provide employee benefit or other
services pursuant to a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of
the current employment relationship or
status of the individual as a participant
or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan;
(3) To perform services on behalf of
an affiliate, except that this paragraph
(c)(3) shall not be construed as
permitting you to make or send
solicitations on your behalf or on behalf
of an affiliate if you or the affiliate, as
applicable, would not be permitted to
make or send the solicitation as a result
of the election of the consumer to opt
out under this subpart;
(4) In response to a communication
initiated by the consumer orally,
electronically, or in writing;
(5) In response to an affirmative
authorization or request by the
consumer orally, electronically, or in
writing to receive a solicitation; or
(6) If your compliance with this
subpart would prevent you from
complying with any provision of State
insurance laws pertaining to unfair
discrimination in any State in which
you are lawfully doing business.
(d) Examples of exceptions—(1)
Examples of pre-existing business
relationships.
(i) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with your insurance affiliate that
is currently in force, your insurance

PO 00000

Frm 00035

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42535

affiliate has a pre-existing business
relationship with the consumer and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from you to make
solicitations.
(ii) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with your insurance affiliate that
has lapsed, your insurance affiliate has
a pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 18 months after the
date on which the policy ceases to be in
force and can therefore use eligibility
information it has received from you to
make solicitations for 18 months after
the date on which the policy ceases to
be in force.
(iii) If a consumer applies to your
affiliate for a product or service, or
inquires about your affiliate’s products
or services and provides contact
information to your affiliate for receipt
of that information, your affiliate has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from you to make
solicitations for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application.
(iv) If a consumer makes a telephone
call to a centralized call center for an
affiliated group of companies to inquire
about the consumer’s bank account, the
call does not constitute an inquiry with
any affiliate other than the bank that
holds the consumer’s bank account and
does not establish a pre-existing
business relationship between the
consumer and any affiliate of the bank.
(2) Examples of consumer-initiated
communications. (i) If a consumer who
has an account with you initiates a
telephone call to your securities affiliate
to request information about brokerage
services or mutual funds and provides
contact information for receiving that
information, your securities affiliate
may use eligibility information about
the consumer it obtains from you to
make solicitations in response to the
consumer-initiated call.
(ii) If your affiliate makes the initial
marketing call, leaves a message for the
consumer to call back, and the
consumer responds, the communication
is not initiated by the consumer, but by
your affiliate.
(iii) If the consumer calls your affiliate
to ask about retail locations and hours,
but does not request information about
your affiliate’s products or services,
solicitations by your affiliate using
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from you would not
be responsive to the consumer-initiated
communication.
(3) Example of consumer affirmative
authorization or request. If a consumer
who obtains a mortgage from you

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42536

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

requests or affirmatively authorizes
information about homeowner’s
insurance from your insurance affiliate,
such authorization or request, whether
given to you or to your insurance
affiliate, would permit your insurance
affiliate to use eligibility information
about the consumer it obtains from you
to make solicitations about
homeowner’s insurance to the
consumer. A pre-selected check box
would not satisfy the requirement for an
affirmative authorization or request.
(e) Prospective application. The
provisions of this subpart shall not
prohibit your affiliate from using
eligibility information communicated by
you to make or send solicitations to a
consumer if such information was
received by your affiliate prior to [Insert
Mandatory Compliance Date].
(f) Relation to affiliate-sharing notice
and opt out. Nothing in this subpart
limits the responsibility of a company to
comply with the notice and opt out
provisions of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of
the Act before it shares information
other than transaction or experience
information among affiliates to avoid
becoming a consumer reporting agency.
§ 571.21

Contents of opt out notice.

(a) In general. A notice must be clear,
conspicuous, and concise, and must
accurately disclose:
(1) That the consumer may elect to
limit your affiliate from using eligibility
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(2) If applicable, that the consumer’s
election will apply for a specified
period of time and that the consumer
will be allowed to extend the election
once that period expires; and
(3) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(b) Concise—(1) In general. For
purposes of this subpart, the term
‘‘concise’’ means a reasonably brief
expression or statement.
(2) Combination with other required
disclosures. A notice required by this
subpart may be concise even if it is
combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by Federal or
State law.
(3) Use of model form. The
requirement for a concise notice is
satisfied by use of a model form
contained in Appendix A of this part,
although use of the model form is not
required.
(c) Providing a menu of opt out
choices. With respect to the opt out
election, you may allow a consumer to
choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out of affiliate use of
eligibility information for marketing,

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

such as by selecting certain types of
affiliates, certain types of information,
or certain methods of delivery from
which to opt out, so long as you offer
as one of the alternatives the
opportunity to opt out with respect to
all affiliates, all eligibility information,
and all methods of delivery.
(d) Alternative contents. If you
provide the consumer with a broader
right to opt out of marketing than is
required by law, you satisfy the
requirements of this section by
providing the consumer with a clear,
conspicuous, and concise notice that
accurately discloses the consumer’s opt
out rights. A model notice is provided
in Appendix A–3 of this part for
guidance, although use of the model
notice is not required.
§ 571.22
out.

Reasonable opportunity to opt

(a) In general. Before your affiliate
uses eligibility information
communicated by you to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, you must
provide the consumer with a reasonable
opportunity, following the delivery of
the opt out notice, to opt out of such use
by your affiliate.
(b) Examples of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. You provide a
consumer with a reasonable opportunity
to opt out if:
(1) By mail. You mail the opt out
notice to a consumer and give the
consumer 30 days from the date you
mailed the notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(2) By electronic means. You notify
the consumer electronically and give the
consumer 30 days after the date that the
consumer acknowledges receipt of the
electronic notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(3) At the time of an electronic
transaction. You provide the opt out
notice to the consumer at the time of an
electronic transaction, such as a
transaction conducted on an Internet
Web site, and request that the consumer
decide, as a necessary part of
proceeding with the transaction,
whether to opt out before completing
the transaction, so long as you provide
a simple process at the Internet web site
that the consumer may use at that time
to opt out.
(4) By including in a privacy notice.
You include the opt out notice in a
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy notice
and allow the consumer to exercise the
opt out within a reasonable period of
time and in the same manner as the opt
out under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
(5) By providing an ‘‘opt in’’. If you
have a policy of not allowing an affiliate
to use eligibility information to make or

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

send solicitations to the consumer
unless the consumer affirmatively
consents, you give the consumer the
opportunity to ‘‘opt in’’ by affirmative
consent to such use by your affiliate.
You must document the consumer’s
affirmative consent. A pre-selected
check box does not constitute evidence
of the consumer’s affirmative consent.
§ 571.23 Reasonable and simple methods
of opting out.

(a) Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. You provide a reasonable
and simple method for a consumer to
exercise a right to opt out if you—
(1) Designate check-off boxes in a
prominent position on the relevant
forms included with the opt out notice
required by this subpart;
(2) Include a reply form and a selfaddressed envelope together with the
opt out notice required by this subpart;
(3) Provide an electronic means to opt
out, such as a form that can be
electronically mailed or processed at
your web site, if the consumer agrees to
the electronic delivery of information;
or
(4) Provide a toll-free telephone
number that consumers may call to opt
out.
(b) Methods of opting out that are not
reasonable or simple. You do not
provide a reasonable and simple method
for exercising an opt out right if you—
(1) Require the consumer to write his
or her own letter to you;
(2) Require the consumer to call or
write to you to obtain a form for opting
out, rather than including the form with
the notice; or
(3) Require the consumer who agrees
to receive the opt out notice in
electronic form only, such as by
electronic mail or at your web site, to
opt out solely by telephone or by paper
mail.
§ 571.24

Delivery of opt out notices.

(a) In general. You must provide an
opt out notice so that each consumer
can reasonably be expected to receive
actual notice. For opt out notices you
provide electronically, you may either
comply with the electronic disclosure
provisions in this subpart or with the
provisions in section 101 of the
Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq.
(b) Examples of expectation of actual
notice. (1) You may reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Hand-deliver a printed copy of the
notice to the consumer;
(ii) Mail a printed copy of the notice
to the last known mailing address of the
consumer; or

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(iii) For the consumer who obtains a
product or service from you
electronically, such as on an Internet
Web site, post the notice on your
electronic site and require the consumer
to acknowledge receipt of the notice as
a necessary step to obtaining a
particular product or service.
(2) You may not reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Only post a sign in your branch or
office or generally publish
advertisements presenting your notice;
or
(ii) Send the notice via electronic mail
to a consumer who has not agreed to the
electronic delivery of information.
(c) Joint notice with affiliates—(1) In
general. You may provide a joint notice
from you and one or more of your
affiliates, as identified in the notice, so
long as the notice is accurate with
respect to you and each affiliate.
(2) Identification of affiliates. You do
not have to list each affiliate providing
the joint notice by its name. If each
affiliate shares a common name, such as
‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint notice may state
that it applies to ‘‘all institutions with
the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all affiliates in the
ABC family of companies.’’ If, however,
an affiliate does not have ABC in its
name, then the joint notice must
separately identify each family of
companies with a common name or the
institution.
(d) Joint relationships—(1) In general.
If two or more consumers jointly obtain
a product or service from you (joint
consumers), the following rules apply:
(i) You may provide a single opt out
notice.
(ii) Any of the joint consumers may
exercise the right to opt out.
(iii) You may either—
(A) Treat an opt out direction by a
joint consumer as applying to all of the
associated joint consumers; or
(B) Permit each joint consumer to opt
out separately.
(iv) If you permit each joint consumer
to opt out separately, you must permit:
(A) One of the joint consumers to opt
out on behalf of all of the joint
consumers; and
(B) One or more joint consumers to
notify you of their opt out directions in
a single response.
(v) You must explain in your opt out
notice which of the policies in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section you
will follow, as well as the information
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this
section.
(vi) You may not require all joint
consumers to opt out before you
implement any opt out direction.
(vii) If you receive an opt out by a
particular joint consumer that does not

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

apply to the others, you may use
eligibility information about the others
as long as no eligibility information is
used about the consumer who opted
out.
(2) Example. If consumers A and B,
who have different addresses, have a
joint checking account with you and
arrange for you to send statements to A’s
address, you may do any of the
following, but you must explain in your
opt out notice which opt out policy you
will follow. You may send a single opt
out notice to A’s address and:
(i) Treat an opt out direction by A as
applying to the entire account. If you do
so and A opts out, you may not require
B to opt out as well before
implementing A’s opt out direction.
(ii) Treat A’s opt out direction as
applying to A only. If you do so, you
must also permit:
(A) A and B to opt out for each other;
and
(B) A and B to notify you of their opt
out directions in a single response (such
as on a single form) if they choose to
give separate opt out directions.
(iii) If A opts out only for A, and B
does not opt out, your affiliate may use
information only about B to send
solicitations to B, but may not use
information about A and B jointly to
send solicitations to B.
§ 571.25

Duration and effect of opt out.

(a) Duration of opt out. The election
of a consumer to opt out shall be
effective for the opt out period, which
is a period of at least 5 years beginning
as soon as reasonably practicable after
the consumer’s opt out election is
received. You may establish an opt out
period of more than 5 years, including
an opt out period that does not expire
unless the consumer revokes it in
writing, or if the consumer agrees,
electronically.
(b) Effect of opt out. A receiving
affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to a consumer during the
opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ 571.20(c) or if the opt out is revoked
by the consumer.
(c) Time of opt out. A consumer may
opt out at any time.
(d) Termination of relationship. If the
consumer’s relationship with you
terminates when a consumer’s opt out
election is in force, the opt out will
continue to apply indefinitely, unless
revoked by the consumer.
§ 571.26

Extension of opt out.

(a) In general. For a consumer who
has opted out, a receiving affiliate may
not make or send solicitations to the

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42537

consumer after the expiration of the opt
out period based on eligibility
information it receives or has received
from an affiliate, unless the person
responsible for providing the initial opt
out notice, or its successor, has given
the consumer an extension notice and a
reasonable opportunity to extend the
opt out, and the consumer does not
extend the opt out.
(b) Duration of extension. Each opt
out extension shall comply with
§ 571.25(a).
(c) Contents of extension notice. The
notice provided at extension must be
clear, conspicuous, and concise, and
must accurately disclose either:
(1) The same contents specified in
§ 571.21(a) for the initial notice, along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s previous opt out has expired
or is about to expire, as applicable, and
that the consumer must opt out again if
the consumer wishes to keep the opt out
election in force; or
(2) Each of the items listed below:
(i) That the consumer previously
elected to limit your affiliate from using
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(ii) That the consumer’s election has
expired or is about to expire, as
applicable;
(iii) That the consumer may elect to
extend the consumer’s previous
election; and
(iv) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(d) Timing of the extension notice—
(1) In general. An extension notice may
be provided to the consumer at either—
(i) A reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period; or
(ii) Any time after the expiration of
the opt out period but before any
affiliate makes or sends solicitations to
the consumer that would have been
prohibited by the expired opt out.
(2) Reasonable period of time before
expiration. Providing an extension
notice on or with the last annual privacy
notice required by the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., that
is provided to the consumer before
expiration of the opt out period shall be
deemed reasonable in all cases.
(e) No effect on opt out period. The
fact that you send an extension notice
to the consumer before expiration of the
opt out period and the consumer fails to
extend the opt out, does not shorten the
opt out period.
§ 571.27
notices.

Consolidated and equivalent

(a) Coordinated and consolidated
notices. A notice required by this
subpart may be coordinated and

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42538

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

consolidated with any other notice or
disclosure required to be issued under
any other provision of law, including
but not limited to the notice described
in section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
privacy notice.
(b) Equivalent notices. A notice or
other disclosure that is equivalent to the
notice required by this subpart, and that
you provide to a consumer together with
disclosures required by any other
provision of law, shall satisfy the
requirements of this subpart C.
5. Add a new Appendix A to part 571
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 571—Model Forms
for Opt Out Notices
A–1 Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
A–2 Model Form for Extension Notice
A–3 Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
A–1—Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You may limit our affiliates from
marketing their products or services to you
based on information that we share with
them, such as your income, your account
history with us, and your credit score.
• [Include if applicable.] Your decision to
limit marketing offers from our affiliates will
apply for 5 years. Once that period expires,
you will be allowed to extend your decision.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To limit marketing offers [include all that
apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want your affiliates to market their
products or services to me based on
information that you share with them.
A–2—Model Form for Extension Notice
Extending Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You previously chose to limit our
affiliates from marketing their products or
services to you based on information that we
share with them, such as your income, your
account history with us, and your credit
score.
• Your choice has expired or is about to
expire.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To extend your choice for another 5 years
[include all that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

[Company name].
[Company address].
lI want to extend my choice for another 5
years.
A–3—Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
Your Choice To Stop Marketing
• You may choose to stop all marketing
offers from us and our affiliates.
To stop all marketing offers [include all
that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box on the form below and
mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want you or your affiliates to send
me marketing offers.

National Credit Union Administration
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the joint
preamble, NCUA proposes to amend
title 12, chapter VII, of the Code of
Federal Regulations by amending part
717 (as proposed to be added at 69 FR
23405, April 28, 2004) to read as
follows:
PART 717—FAIR CREDIT REPORTING
1. The authority citation for part 717
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681a, 1681b, 1681s,
1681w, 6801 and 6805(b).

Subpart A—General Provisions
2. Section 717.1 is revised by adding
a new paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 717.1
dates.

Purpose, scope, and effective

(a) Purpose. This part implements the
provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting
Act applicable to Federal credit unions.
This part applies to Federal credit
unions that obtain and use information
about consumers to determine the
consumer’s eligibility for products,
services, or employment, share such
information among affiliates, and
furnish such information to consumer
reporting agencies.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 717.2 is republished to read
as follows:
§ 717.2

Examples.

The examples in this part are not
exclusive. Compliance with an example,
to the extent applicable, constitutes
compliance with this part. Examples in
a paragraph illustrate only the issue
described in the paragraph and do not
illustrate any other issue that may arise
in this part.

PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

4. Section 717.3 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 717.3

Definitions.

As used in this part, unless the
context requires otherwise:
(a) Act means the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.).
(b) Affiliate means any person that is
related by common ownership or
common corporate control with another
person.
(c) Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance of the information
presented.
(d) Company means any corporation,
limited liability company, business
trust, general or limited partnership,
association, or similar organization.
(e) Consumer means an individual.
(f) [Reserved].
(g) [Reserved].
(h) [Reserved].
(i) Control of a company means:
(1) Ownership, control, or power to
vote 25 percent or more of the
outstanding shares of any class of voting
security of the company, directly or
indirectly, or acting through one or
more other persons;
(2) Control in any manner over the
election of a majority of the directors,
trustees, or general partners (or
individuals exercising similar functions)
of the company; or
(3) The power to exercise, directly or
indirectly, a controlling influence over
the management or policies of the
company, as the Board determines.
(4) Example. NCUA will presume a
credit union has a controlling influence
over the management or policies of a
CUSO, if the CUSO is 67% owned by
credit unions.
(j) Eligibility information means any
information the communication of
which would be a consumer report if
the exclusions from the definition of
‘‘consumer report’’ in section
603(d)(2)(A) of the Act did not apply.
(k) [Reserved].
(l) Person means any individual,
partnership, corporation, trust, estate,
cooperative, association, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, or
other entity.
(m) Pre-existing business relationship
means a relationship between a person
and a consumer based on—
(1) A financial contract between the
person and the consumer that is in force
on the date on which the consumer is
sent a solicitation covered by subpart C
of this part;
(2) The purchase, rental, or lease by
the consumer of the person’s goods or
services, or a financial transaction

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
(including holding an active account or
a policy in force or having another
continuing relationship) between the
consumer and the person, during the 18month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer; or
(3) An inquiry or application by the
consumer regarding a product or service
offered by that person during the 3month period immediately preceding
the date on which a solicitation covered
by subpart C of this part is made or sent
to the consumer.
(n) Solicitation—(1) In general.
Solicitation means marketing initiated
by a person to a particular consumer
that is—
(i) Based on eligibility information
communicated to that person by its
affiliate as described in subpart C of this
part; and
(ii) Intended to encourage the
consumer to purchase or obtain such
product or service.
(2) Exclusion of marketing directed at
the general public. A solicitation does
not include communications that are
directed at the general public and
distributed without the use of eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate. For example, television,
magazine, and billboard advertisements
do not constitute solicitations, even if
those communications are intended to
encourage consumers to purchase
products and services from the person
initiating the communications.
(3) Examples of solicitations. A
solicitation would include, for example,
a telemarketing call, direct mail, e-mail,
or other form of marketing
communication directed to a specific
consumer that is based on eligibility
information communicated by an
affiliate.
(o) You means a Federal credit union.
5. A new subpart C is added to part
717 to read as follows:
Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information for
Marketing
Sec.
717.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.
717.21 Contents of opt out notice.
717.22 Reasonable opportunity to opt out.
717.23 Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out.
717.24 Delivery of opt out notices.
717.25 Duration and effect of opt out.
717.26 Extension of opt out.
717.27 Consolidated and equivalent
notices.

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

Subpart C—Affiliate Use of Information
for Marketing
§ 717.20 Affiliate use of eligibility
information for marketing.

(a) General duties of a person
communicating eligibility information to
an affiliate—(1) Notice and opt out. If
you communicate eligibility information
about a consumer to your affiliate, your
affiliate may not use the information to
make or send solicitations to the
consumer, unless before such use by the
affiliate—
(i) You provide a clear and
conspicuous notice to the consumer
stating that the information may be
communicated to and used by your
affiliate to make or send solicitations to
the consumer about its products and
services;
(ii) You provide the consumer a
reasonable opportunity and a simple
method to ‘‘opt out’’ of such use of that
information by your affiliate; and
(iii) The consumer has not chosen to
opt out.
(2) Rules of construction—(i) In
general. The notice required by this
paragraph may be provided either in the
name of a person with which the
consumer currently does or previously
has done business or in one or more
common corporate names shared by
members of an affiliated group of
companies that includes the common
corporate name used by that person, and
may be provided in the following
manner:
(A) You may provide the notice
directly to the consumer;
(B) Your agent may provide the notice
on your behalf, so long as—
(1) Your agent, if your affiliate, does
not include any solicitation other than
yours on or with the notice, unless it
falls within one of the exceptions in
paragraph (c) of this section; and
(2) Your agent gives the notice in your
name or a common name or names used
by the family of companies; or
(C) You may provide a joint notice
with one or more of your affiliates or
under a common corporate name or
names used by the family of companies
as provided in § 717.24(c).
(ii) Avoiding duplicate notices. If
Affiliate X communicates eligibility
information about a consumer to
Affiliate Y, and Affiliate Y
communicates that same information to
Affiliate Z, Affiliate Y does not have to
give an opt out notice to the consumer
when it provides eligibility information
to Affiliate Z, so long as Affiliate X’s
notice is broad enough to cover Affiliate
Z’s use of the eligibility information to
make solicitations to the consumer.

PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42539

(iii) Examples of rules of construction.
X, Y, and Z are affiliates. The consumer
currently has a business relationship
with affiliate X, but has never done
business with affiliates Y or Z. Affiliate
X communicates eligibility information
about the consumer to Y for purposes of
making solicitations. Y communicates
the information it received from X to Z
for purposes of making solicitations. In
this circumstance, the rules of
construction would—
(A) Permit Y to use the information to
make solicitations if:
(1) X has provided the opt out notice
directly to the consumer; or
(2) Y or Z has provided the opt out
notice on behalf of X.
(B) Permit Y or Z to use the
information to make solicitations if:
(1) X’s notice is broad enough to cover
both Y’s and Z’s use of the eligibility
information; or
(2) X, Y, or Z has provided a joint opt
out notice on behalf of the entire
affiliated group of companies.
(C) Not permit Y or Z to use the
information for marketing purposes if Y
has provided the opt out notice only in
Y’s own name, because no notice would
have been provided by or on behalf of
X.
(b) General duties of an affiliate
receiving eligibility information. If you
receive eligibility information from an
affiliate, you may not use the
information to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, unless the
consumer has been provided an opt out
notice, as described in paragraph (a) of
this section, that applies to your use of
eligibility information and the consumer
has not opted-out.
(c) Exceptions. The provisions of this
subpart do not apply if you use
eligibility information you receive from
an affiliate:
(1) To make or send a marketing
solicitation to a consumer with whom
you have a pre-existing business
relationship as defined in § 717.3(m);
(2) To facilitate communications to an
individual for whose benefit you
provide employee benefit or other
services pursuant to a contract with an
employer related to and arising out of
the current employment relationship or
status of the individual as a participant
or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan;
(3) To perform services on behalf of
an affiliate, except that this
subparagraph will not be construed as
permitting you to make or send
solicitations on your behalf or on behalf
of an affiliate if you or the affiliate, as
applicable, would not be permitted to
make or send the solicitation as a result

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42540

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

of the election of the consumer to opt
out under this subpart;
(4) In response to a communication
initiated by the consumer orally,
electronically, or in writing;
(5) In response to an affirmative
authorization or request by the
consumer orally, electronically, or in
writing to receive a solicitation; or
(6) If your compliance with this
subpart would prevent you from
complying with any provision of state
insurance laws pertaining to unfair
discrimination in any state in which
you are lawfully doing business.
(d) Examples of exceptions.—(1)
Examples of pre-existing business
relationships. (i) If a consumer has an
insurance policy with your insurance
agency affiliate that is currently in force,
your insurance agency affiliate has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer and can therefore use
eligibility information it has received
from you to make solicitations.
(ii) If a consumer has an insurance
policy with your insurance agency
affiliate that has lapsed, your insurance
agency affiliate has a pre-existing
business relationship with the consumer
for 18 months after the date on which
the policy ceases to be in force and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from you to make
solicitations for 18 months after the date
on which the policy ceases to be in
force.
(iii) If a consumer applies to your
affiliate for a product or service, or
inquires about your affiliate’s products
or services and provides contact
information to your affiliate for receipt
of that information, your affiliate has a
pre-existing business relationship with
the consumer for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application and can
therefore use eligibility information it
has received from you to make
solicitations for 3 months after the date
of the inquiry or application.
(iv) If a consumer makes a telephone
call to a centralized call center for an
affiliated group of companies to inquire
about the consumer’s credit union
account, the call does not constitute an
inquiry with any affiliate other than the
credit union that holds the consumer’s
credit union account and does not
establish a pre-existing business
relationship between the consumer and
any affiliate of the credit union.
(2) Examples of consumer-initiated
communications. (i) If a consumer who
has an account with you initiates a
telephone call to your securities affiliate
to request information about brokerage
services or mutual funds and provides
contact information for receiving that
information, your securities affiliate

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

may use eligibility information about
the consumer it obtains from you to
make solicitations in response to the
consumer-initiated call.
(ii) If your affiliate makes the initial
marketing call, leaves a message for the
consumer to call back, and the
consumer responds, the communication
is not initiated by the consumer, but by
your affiliate.
(iii) If the consumer calls your affiliate
to ask about retail locations and hours,
but does not request information about
your affiliate’s products or services,
solicitations by your affiliate using
eligibility information about the
consumer it obtains from you would not
be responsive to the consumer-initiated
communication.
(3) Example of consumer affirmative
authorization or request. If a consumer
who obtains a mortgage from you
requests or affirmatively authorizes
information about homeowner’s
insurance from your insurance agency
affiliate, such authorization or request,
whether given to you or to your
insurance agency affiliate, would permit
your affiliate to use eligibility
information about the consumer it
obtains from you to make solicitations
about homeowner’s insurance to the
consumer. A pre-selected check box
would not satisfy the requirement for an
affirmative authorization or request.
(e) Prospective application. The
provisions of this subpart do not
prohibit your affiliate from using
eligibility information communicated by
you to make or send solicitations to a
consumer if such information was
received by your affiliate before [Insert
Mandatory Compliance Date].
(f) Relation to affiliate-sharing notice
and opt out. Nothing in this subpart
limits your responsibility to comply
with the notice and opt out provisions
of section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
before you share information other than
transaction or experience information
among affiliates to avoid becoming a
consumer reporting agency.
§ 717.21

Contents of opt out notice.

(a) In general. A notice must be clear,
conspicuous, and concise, and must
accurately disclose:
(1) That the consumer may elect to
limit your affiliate from using eligibility
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(2) If applicable, that the consumer’s
election applies for a specified period of
time and that the consumer can extend
the election once that period expires;
and
(3) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.

PO 00000

Frm 00040

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

(b) Concise—(1) In general. For
purposes of this subpart, the term
‘‘concise’’ means a reasonably brief
expression or statement.
(2) Combination with other required
disclosures. A notice required by this
subpart may be concise even if it is
combined with other disclosures
required or authorized by Federal or
State law.
(3) Use of model form. Use of a model
form contained in Appendix A of this
part satisfies the requirement for a
concise notice, although use of the
model form is not required.
(c) Providing a menu of opt out
choices. With respect to the opt out
election, you may allow a consumer to
choose from a menu of alternatives
when opting out of affiliate use of
eligibility information for marketing,
such as by selecting certain types of
affiliates, certain types of information,
or certain methods of delivery from
which to opt out, so long as you offer
as one of the alternatives the
opportunity to opt out with respect to
all affiliates, all eligibility information,
and all methods of delivery.
(d) Alternative contents. If you
provide the consumer with a broader
right to opt out of marketing than is
required by law, you satisfy the
requirements of this section by
providing the consumer with a clear,
conspicuous, and concise notice that
accurately discloses the consumer’s opt
out rights. A model notice is provided
in Appendix A–3 of this part for
guidance, although use of the model
notice is not required.
§ 717.22
out.

Reasonable opportunity to opt

(a) In general. Before your affiliate
uses eligibility information
communicated by you to make or send
solicitations to a consumer, you must
provide the consumer with a reasonable
opportunity, following the delivery of
the opt out notice, to opt out of such use
by your affiliate.
(b) Examples of a reasonable
opportunity to opt out. You provide a
consumer with a reasonable opportunity
to opt out if:
(1) By mail. You mail the opt out
notice to a consumer and give the
consumer 30 days from the date you
mailed the notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(2) By electronic means. You notify
the consumer electronically and give the
consumer 30 days after the date that the
consumer acknowledges receipt of the
electronic notice to elect to opt out by
any reasonable means.
(3) At the time of an electronic
transaction. You provide the opt out

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules
notice to the consumer at the time of an
electronic transaction, such as a
transaction conducted on an Internet
Web site, and request that the consumer
decide, as a necessary part of
proceeding with the transaction,
whether to opt out before completing
the transaction, so long as you provide
a simple process at the Internet web site
that the consumer may use at that time
to opt out.
(4) By including in a privacy notice.
You include the opt out notice in a
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy notice
and allow the consumer to exercise the
opt out within a reasonable period of
time and in the same manner as the opt
out under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,
15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
(5) By providing an ‘‘opt in.’’ If you
have a policy of not allowing an affiliate
to use eligibility information to make or
send solicitations to the consumer
unless the consumer affirmatively
consents, you give the consumer the
opportunity to ‘‘opt in’’ by affirmative
consent to such use by your affiliate.
You must document the consumer’s
affirmative consent. A pre-selected
check box does not constitute evidence
of the consumer’s affirmative consent.
§ 717.23 Reasonable and simple methods
of opting out.

(a) Reasonable and simple methods of
opting out. You provide a reasonable
and simple method for a consumer to
exercise a right to opt out if you—
(1) Designate check-off boxes in a
prominent position on the relevant
forms included with the opt out notice
required by this subpart;
(2) Include a reply form and a selfaddressed envelope together with the
opt out notice required by this subpart;
(3) Provide an electronic means to opt
out, such as a form that can be
electronically mailed or processed at
your Web site, if the consumer agrees to
the electronic delivery of information;
or
(4) Provide a toll-free telephone
number that consumers may call to opt
out.
(b) Methods of opting out that are not
reasonable or simple. You do not
provide a reasonable and simple method
for exercising an opt out right if you—
(1) Require the consumer to write his
or her own letter to you;
(2) Require the consumer to call or
write to you to obtain a form for opting
out, rather than including the form with
the notice; or
(3) Require the consumer who agrees
to receive the opt out notice in
electronic form only, such as by
electronic mail or at your Web site, to

VerDate jul<14>2003

15:22 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

opt out solely by telephone or by paper
mail.
§ 717.24

Delivery of opt out notices.

(a) In general. You must provide an
opt out notice so that each consumer
can reasonably be expected to receive
actual notice. For opt out notices you
provide electronically, you may either
comply with the electronic disclosure
provisions in this subpart or with the
provisions in section 101 of the
Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq.
(b) Examples of expectation of actual
notice. (1) You may reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Hand-deliver a printed copy of the
notice to the consumer;
(ii) Mail a printed copy of the notice
to the last known mailing address of the
consumer; or
(iii) For the consumer who obtains a
product or service from you
electronically, such as on an Internet
Web site, post the notice on your
electronic site and require the consumer
to acknowledge receipt of the notice as
a necessary step to obtaining a
particular product or service.
(2) You may not reasonably expect
that a consumer will receive actual
notice if you:
(i) Only post a sign in your branch or
office or generally publish
advertisements presenting your notice;
or
(ii) Send the notice via electronic mail
to a consumer who has not agreed to the
electronic delivery of information.
(c) Joint notice with affiliates—(1) In
general. You may provide a joint notice
from you and one or more of your
affiliates, as identified in the notice, so
long as the notice is accurate with
respect to you and each affiliate.
(2) Identification of affiliates. You do
not have to list each affiliate providing
the joint notice by its name. If each
affiliate shares a common name, such as
‘‘ABC,’’ then the joint notice may state
that it applies to ‘‘all institutions with
the ABC name’’ or ‘‘all affiliates in the
ABC family of companies.’’ If, however,
an affiliate does not have ABC in its
name, then the joint notice must
separately identify each family of
companies with a common name or the
institution.
(d) Joint relationships—(1) In general.
If two or more consumers jointly obtain
a product or service from you (joint
consumers), the following rules apply:
(i) You may provide a single opt out
notice.
(ii) Any of the joint consumers may
exercise the right to opt out.

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

42541

(iii) You may either—
(A) Treat an opt out direction by a
joint consumer as applying to all of the
associated joint consumers; or
(B) Permit each joint consumer to opt
out separately.
(iv) If you permit each joint consumer
to opt out separately, you must permit:
(A) One of the joint consumers to opt
out on behalf of all of the joint
consumers; and
(B) One or more joint consumers to
notify you of their opt out directions in
a single response.
(v) You must explain in your opt out
notice which of the policies in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section you
will follow, as well as the information
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this
section.
(vi) You may not require all joint
consumers to opt out before you
implement any opt out direction.
(vii) If you receive an opt out by a
particular joint consumer that does not
apply to the others, you may use
eligibility information about the others
as long as no eligibility information is
used about the consumer who opted
out.
(2) Example. If consumers X and Y,
who have different addresses, have a
joint checking account with you and
arrange for you to send statements to X’s
address, you may do any of the
following, but you must explain in your
opt out notice which opt out policy you
will follow. You may send a single opt
out notice to X’s address and:
(i) Treat an opt out direction by X as
applying to the entire account. If you do
so and X opts out, you may not require
Y to opt out as well before
implementing X’s opt out direction.
(ii) Treat X’s opt out direction as
applying to X only. If you do so, you
must also permit:
(A) X and Y to opt out for each other;
and
(B) X and Y to notify you of their opt
out directions in a single response (such
as on a single form) if they choose to
give separate opt out directions.
(iii) If X opts out only for X, and Y
does not opt out, your affiliate may use
information only about Y to send
solicitations to Y, but may not use
information about X and Y jointly to
send solicitations to Y.
§ 717.25

Duration and effect of opt out.

(a) Duration of opt out. A consumer’s
election to opt out is effective for the opt
out period, which is a period of at least
5 years beginning as soon as reasonably
practicable after the consumer’s opt out
election is received. You may establish
an opt out period of more than 5 years,
including an opt out period that does

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2

42542

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Proposed Rules

not expire unless the consumer revokes
it in writing, or if the consumer agrees,
electronically.
(b) Effect of opt out. A receiving
affiliate may not make or send
solicitations to a consumer during the
opt out period based on eligibility
information it receives from an affiliate,
except as provided in the exceptions in
§ 717.20(c) or if the consumer revokes
the opt out.
(c) Time of opt out. A consumer may
opt out at any time.
(d) Termination of relationship. If the
consumer’s relationship with you
terminates when a consumer’s opt out
election is in force, the opt out
continues to apply indefinitely, unless
revoked by the consumer.
§ 717.26

Extension of opt out.

(a) In general. For a consumer who
has opted out, a receiving affiliate may
not make or send solicitations to the
consumer after the expiration of the opt
out period based on eligibility
information it receives or has received
from an affiliate, unless the person
responsible for providing the initial opt
out notice, or its successor, has given
the consumer an extension notice and a
reasonable opportunity to extend the
opt out, and the consumer does not
extend the opt out.
(b) Duration of extension. Each opt
out extension must comply with
§ 717.25(a).
(c) Contents of extension notice. The
notice provided at extension must be
clear, conspicuous, and concise, and
must accurately disclose either:
(1) The same contents specified in
§ 717.21(a) for the initial notice, along
with a statement explaining that the
consumer’s previous opt out has expired
or is about to expire, as applicable, and
that the consumer must opt out again if
the consumer wishes to keep the opt out
election in force; or
(2) Each of the items listed below:
(i) That the consumer previously
elected to limit your affiliate from using
information about the consumer that it
obtains from you to make or send
solicitations to the consumer;
(ii) That the consumer’s election has
expired or is about to expire, as
applicable;
(iii) That the consumer may elect to
extend the consumer’s previous
election; and
(iv) A reasonable and simple method
for the consumer to opt out.
(d) Timing of the extension notice—
(1) In general. An extension notice may
be provided to the consumer either—
(i) A reasonable period of time before
the expiration of the opt out period; or
(ii) Any time after the expiration of
the opt out period but before any

VerDate jul<14>2003

17:46 Jul 14, 2004

Jkt 203001

affiliate makes or sends solicitations to
the consumer that would have been
prohibited by the expired opt out.
(2) Reasonable period of time before
expiration. Providing an extension
notice on or with the last annual privacy
notice required by the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq., that
is provided to the consumer before
expiration of the opt out period will be
deemed reasonable in all cases.
(e) No effect on opt out period. The
opt out period may not be shortened to
a period of less than 5 years by sending
an extension notice to the consumer
before expiration of the opt out period.
§ 717.27
notices.

Consolidated and equivalent

(a) Coordinated and consolidated
notices. A notice required by this
subpart may be coordinated and
consolidated with any other notice or
disclosure required to be issued under
any other provision of law, including
but not limited to the notice described
in section 603(d)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act
and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
privacy notice.
(b) Equivalent notices. A notice or
other disclosure that is equivalent to the
notice required by this subpart, and that
you provide to a consumer together with
disclosures required by any other
provision of law, satisfies the
requirements of this subpart.
6. A new Appendix A to part 717 is
added to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 717—Model Forms
for Opt Out Notices
A–1 Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
A–2 Model Form for Extension Notice
A–3 Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
A–1—Model Form for Initial Opt Out Notice
Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You may limit our affiliates from
marketing their products or services to you
based on information that we share with
them, such as your income, your account
history with us, and your credit score.
• [Include if applicable.] Your decision to
limit marketing offers from our affiliates will
apply for 5 years. Once that period expires,
you will be allowed to extend your decision.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To limit marketing offers [include all that
apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4702

l I do not want your affiliates to market
their products or services to me based on
information that you share with them.
A–2—Model Form for Extension Notice
Extending Your Choice To Limit Marketing
• You previously chose to limit our
affiliates from marketing their products or
services to you based on information that we
share with them, such as your income, your
account history with us, and your credit
score.
• Your choice has expired or is about to
expire.
• [Include if applicable.] This limitation
does not apply in certain circumstances, such
as if you currently do business with one of
our affiliates or if you ask to receive
information or offers from them.
To extend your choice for another 5 years
[include all that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box below and mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
l I want to extend my choice for another 5
years.
A–3—Model Form for Voluntary ‘‘No
Marketing’’ Notice
Your Choice To Stop Marketing
• You may choose to stop all marketing
offers from us and our affiliates.
To stop all marketing offers [include all
that apply]:
• Call us toll-free at 877–###–####; or
• Visit our Web site at
www.websiteaddress.com; or
• Check the box on the form below and
mail it to:
[Company name].
[Company address].
lI do not want you or your affiliates to send
me marketing offers.
Dated: June 18, 2004.
John D. Hawke, Jr.,
Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, July 1, 2004.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
June, 2004.
By order of the Board of Directors, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
Dated: May 26, 2004.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
James E. Gilleran,
Director.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on June 24, 2004.
Becky Baker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04–15950 Filed 7–14–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P; 6714–01–P;
6720–01–P; 7535–01–P

E:\FR\FM\15JYP2.SGM

15JYP2