View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee
801 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20220

CCAC

December 2, 2012
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Secretary Geithner:
A public meeting of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (Committee) was held on
Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at United States Mint Headquarters in Washington, DC. The
Committee reviewed proposed obverse and reverse designs for the Code Talkers Congressional
Gold Medal for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
The Committee recommended Obverse-02. The design garnered 19 of the possible 30 scoring
points. Subsequent to the scoring process, the Committee approved a motion affirming its
recommendation of Obverse-02 on a vote of seven (7) ayes and one (1) abstention. For the
reverse of the medal, the Committee recommended Reverse-01 on a vote of eight (8) ayes and
two (2) abstentions.
Sincerely,

Gary B. Marks
Chair

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee
801 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20220

CCAC

December 2, 2012
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Secretary Geithner:
A public meeting of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (Committee) was held on
Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at United States Mint Headquarters in Washington, DC. The
Committee reviewed proposed designs for the reverse of the 2013 American Eagle Platinum
Coin. The theme for this coin is “To Promote the General Welfare” and is the fifth in a six
year series of themes for American Eagle Platinum coins commemorating the core concepts of
American ideals highlighted in the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution.
The Committee strongly recommended design AEP-03 showing “Young America” symbolized
in the form of an elegant young woman contrasted against images of interlocking gears
emblematic of the unique workings of the state and federal governments of the United States in
promoting the general welfare of the nation. The design garnered 28 of the 30 possible points
through the Committee’s scoring process. Members commented on the well balanced
composition of the design, the successful balance of image and negative space and that it
would create a beautiful and fitting image for the reverse of the coin.
Sincerely,

Gary B. Marks
Chair

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee
801 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20220

CCAC

December 2, 2012
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Secretary Geithner:
A public meeting of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (Committee) was held on
Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at United States Mint Headquarters in Washington, DC. The
Committee reviewed proposed reverse designs for the 2014 America the Beautiful Quarters
Program honoring Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee, Shenandoah National
Park in Virginia, Arches National Park in Utah, Great Sand Dunes National Park in Colorado
and Everglades National Park in Florida.
For the quarter dollar reverse design honoring Great Smoky Mountains National Park in
Tennessee, the Committee was unable to provide a recommendation as none of the proposed
designs received the Committee’s 50 percent scoring threshold through the standard scoring
process. Generally, the Committee found that the designs would not produce well on a small
quarter dollar sized coin as they were too cluttered and lacked sufficient negative space.
Design TN-01 received the most support with 13 of 30 possible points, although it failed to
gain the Committee’s recommendation. The Committee approved a motion recommending the
U.S. Mint provide new designs for consideration with a specific request that artists strive for
more balance between images and negative space and less fine detail as suitable for a quarter
dollar sized coin.
For the quarter dollar honoring Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, the Committee
recommended design VA-05. The design garnered 17 of the 30 possible points through the
Committee’s scoring process. The Committee approved a motion recommending that the U.S.
Mint remove the top three rows of mountains appearing on the design as they tend to obscure
the focal point of the design; the top of Little Stony Man Mountain. Additionally, the motion
recommended that the tree and foliage near the image of the hiker be removed to provide a
stronger emphasis on the hiker.
Design UT-02 was strongly recommended by the Committee for the quarter dollar honoring
Arches National Park in Utah. The design garnered 28 of 30 possible points through the
Committee’s scoring process. Members commented that the design’s portrayal of Delicate
Arch was an iconic image for Arches National Park and that the design was well executed.

For the quarter dollar honoring Great Sand Dunes National Park in Colorado, the design
receiving the highest point total was CO-03 with 9 of 30 possible points. However, the design
was not recommended as its point total was well below the 50 percent scoring threshold
required to be recommended. Generally, the Committee found that the designs provided would
not produce well on a small quarter dollar sized coin as they were too cluttered and lacked
sufficient negative space. By motion, the Committee recommended the U.S. Mint provide new
designs for consideration with a specific request that artists strive for more balance between
images and negative space and provide less fine detail as suitable for a quarter dollar sized
coin.
Finally, the Committee recommended design FL-04 for the quarter dollar honoring Everglades
National Park in Florida. The design features an anhinga with outstretched wings and garnered
20 of 30 points through the scoring process. The Committee modified its selection of this
design with approval of a motion recommending elimination of the clouds appearing in the
upper portion of the image, elimination of the foliage appearing on the upper-most horizon and
to generally strive to approve the contrast between the anhinga and the negative space
surrounding it.
Sincerely,

Gary B. Marks
Chair