View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee
801 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20220

CCAC

February 2, 2015
The Honorable Jack Lew
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Secretary Lew:
A public meeting of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (Committee) was held on
Tuesday, January 27, 2015, at United States Mint Headquarters in Washington, D.C. The
Committee reviewed proposed obverse and reverse designs for the 2015 24-karat High Relief
Gold Coin and Silver Medal.
The Committee is unanimous in its position that this gold coin and silver medal program
represents an important advancement opportunity for the execution of modern Liberty-themed
coin and medal designs. The Committee also believes the program will be met with strong
support from the numismatic community provided the designs are attractive and lend
themselves well to production in high-relief.
Prior to the review of designs the Committee discussed and acted on a series of six (6) motions
the Committee believes will support and further program success. All six (6) motions received
unanimous support from the Committee and include,
•
•
•
•
•
•

Recommendation to use a 40.6 mm standard diameter planchet for the silver medal in
order to balance maximization of the palette for eye appeal with the requirement for a
one (1) ounce silver weight.
Recommendation that the relief measurement of the silver medal be maximized to the
fullest possible extent and in excess of the relief established for the obverse of the $1
American Silver Eagle.
Recommendation that the gold coin utilize the denomination “One Union” historically
envisioned to represent $100 on United States coinage.
Recommendation that the United States Mint’s two (2) numismatic production facilities
(i.e. San Francisco and West Point) be utilized to assure solid supply and interest for the
collecting community.
Recommendation that the edge of the silver proof medal be reeded to give the piece its
best presentation.
Recommendation that the Liberty-themed silver medal be an ongoing annual series in
order to satisfy the anticipated strong reception in the collector community and to allow

United States Mint artists to fully develop the multi-cultural aspects of the new, modern
Liberty.
For the gold coin and silver medal obverse design the Committee recommended design HR-O11. The design garnered a perfect score of 30 points through the Committee’s scoring process.
Committee members expressed strong support for the design and commented that the design is
appealing for both design and production considerations. From a design perspective, members
noted that Miss Liberty’s face is rendered with multi-cultural features and, thus, achieves a
major goal of the Committee in conveying a modern Liberty that is representative of the
diversity of the nation. It was also noted that the design carries a distinct modern feel with the
larger text for the word LIBERTY and with raised design elements (i.e. Miss Liberty and the
flag) that move to the edge of the coin and medal. Numerous comments were made that Miss
Liberty is presented as beautiful and elegant; which are important iconological attributes to
portray Liberty personified. Members also noted that the design is nicely balanced between
imagery and negative space. From a production perspective, comments and observations were
made that the Mint’s ability to maximize the relief depth for both the coin and medal would be
augmented due to the central placement of the vertical standing Liberty figure on the planchet
and the resulting expanse of the bowl, or negative space, of the design. These attributes would
allow more vertical metal flow upon striking and, thus, allow a deeper relief as compared to
other design candidates. The Committee’s unanimous support with this design, as reflected in
its perfect score of 30, emphasizes the strong recommendation members wish to convey
concerning this design.
The Committee was aware that the Commission on Fine Arts (CFA) made duel
recommendations for obverse designs, inclusive of HR-O-03 and HR-O-11. The Committee
joins its counterparts on the CFA in recommending HR-O-11 as detailed above. However,
Committee members expressed concerns regarding HR-O-03. While the Committee supports
the ethic depiction of Liberty in HR-O-03, members commented that the design’s balance
between the raised images and negative space would not lend itself as well to as a high-relief
design as compared to HR-O-11. With this design’s broader profile image the requirement for
medal flow upon striking would be much greater than necessary for HR-O-11 and, therefore,
would result in lower relief. Further, it was felt that the lack of comparable balance of images
and negative space from a visual perspective, the unusual shortening of Liberty’s neck and the
misplaced depiction of wheat stocks rather than the correct iconological image of olive
branches in Liberty’s hair argues against HR-O-03.
The Committee recommended that the inscriptions appearing on the obverse of the gold coin
be adjusted by reducing the font size of the date “2015” and moving “In God We Trust”
horizontally and stacked under the date.
For the reverse of the coin and medal the Committee recommended HR-R-01 by collectively
awarding the design with a perfect score of 30 points through the Committee’s scoring process.
Members expressed strong support for the image of the eagle with comments that it offered a
fresh depiction of the American Bald Eagle and that it would pair well with the recommended
obverse design, HR-O-11. Members commented that the eagle image, which represents the
concept of freedom in the established iconology of American coins and medals, was attractive,

bold and strong. The Committee conveys its strongest possible support for reverse design HRR-01.
The Committee recommended that the eagle on the silver medal be adjusted to match the rising
orientation of the eagle as it appears on the gold coin. The Committee further recommended
that the forward portion of the olive branch in the eagle talons be trimmed.
Members commented that the pairing of the Committee’s two recommended designs would
produce a distinctive coin and medal and would represent an important advancement in the
modern depiction of “Liberty” personified and “Freedom” as conveyed through the image of
an American Bald Eagle.

Sincerely,

Gary B. Marks
Chair

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee
801 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20220

CCAC

Feburary 2, 2015
The Honorable Jack Lew
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Secretary Lew:
A public meeting of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (Committee) was held on
Tuesday, January 27, 2015, at United States Mint Headquarters in Washington, D.C. The
Committee reviewed proposed obverse and reverse designs for the Jack Nicklaus
Congressional Gold Medal.
For the medal’s obverse design the Committee recommended design JN-CGM-O-04. The
design garnered a perfect score of 30 points through the Committee’s scoring process.
Committee members commented that the design provided an interesting and visually pleasing
depiction of Mr. Nicklaus.
For the reverse of the medal the Committee collectively assigned 29 of the possible 30 possible
scoring points to design JM-CGM-R-02. Members noted that this design was the preference of
Mr. Nicklaus and expressed support for his selection.
Sincerely,

Gary B. Marks
Chair