The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee Public Meeting Tuesday, February 28, 2012, 9:00 AM United State Mint Headquarters 801 9th Street NW, Conference Room A Washington, D.C. In attendance: Michael Bugeja Erik Jansen Michael Moran Gary Marks (Chair) Michael Olson Michael Ross Donald Scarinci Heidi Wastweet 1. Chairperson Marks called the meeting to order at 9:23 A.M. 2. The letter and minutes of the November 29, 2011 meeting were corrected (a) to show that Design MH-02 honoring White Mountain National Forest in New Hampshire, as part of the American the Beautiful Quarter Dollar Program, did not earn the Committee’s recommendation, but was rather the highest scoring design through the Committee’s design evaluation process; and (b) to change the word “reverses” appearing on the second to the last line in paragraph 11 to “obverses”. On a motion by Mr. Jansen, and seconded by Mr. Bugeja, the minutes were approved unanimously, as corrected. 3. Ron Harrigal of the United States Mint presented the candidate reverse designs for the 2013 America the Beautiful Quarters Program, inclusive of coins honoring Perry’s Victory and International Peace Memorial in Ohio and Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in Maryland. 4. After each member had commented on the candidate designs, Committee members rated proposed designs by assigning 0, 1, 2, or 3 points to each, with higher points reflecting more favorable evaluations. With eight (8) members voting, the maximum possible point total was 24. The committee’s scores for the Perry’s Victory and Fort McHenry designs for the 2013 America the Beautiful Quarters Program were: Perry’s Victory and International Peace Memorial: OH-01: 0 OH-02: 14 (Recommended design) OH-03: 6 OH-04: 0 OH-05: OH-06: OH-07: OH-08: 0 8 8 3 Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine: MD-01: 3 MD-02: 2 MD-03: 16 (Recommended design) MD-04: 0 MD-05: 6 MD-06: 0 MD-07: 1 MD-08: 11 MD-09: 0 MD-10: 1 MD-11: 0 5. Ron Harrigal of the United States Mint presented the candidate obverse and reverse designs for the Montford Point Marines Congressional Gold Medal. 6. After each member had commented on the candidate designs, Committee members rated proposed designs by assigning 0, 1, 2, or 3 points to each, with higher points reflecting more favorable evaluations. With eight (8) members voting, the maximum possible point total was 24. The committee’s scores for the obverse and reverse designs for the Montford Point Marines Congressional Gold Medal were: Obverse: MP-O-01: MP-O-02: MP-O-03: MP-O-04: MP-O-05: MP-O-06: 1 7 0 6 21 (Recommended design) 0 Reverse: MP-R-01: MP-R-02: MP-R-03: MP-R-04: MP-R-05: MP-R-06: 0 9 1 12 16 (Recommended design) 0 7. The Committee recessed for lunch at 11:57 p.m. and reconvened at 1:38 p.m. 8. Ron Harrigal of the United States Mint presented the candidate obverse and reverse designs for Code Talkers Congressional Gold Medal (Round 1). 9. Committee discussion on the Code Talkers medals was temporarily set aside to allow consideration of the Professor Yunus Congressional Gold Medal. 10. Ron Harrigal of the United States Mint presented the candidate obverse and reverse designs for the Professor Yunus Congressional Gold Medal. 11. After each member had commented on the candidate designs, Committee members rated proposed designs by assigning 0, 1, 2, or 3 points to each, with higher points reflecting more favorable evaluations. With eight (8) members voting, the maximum possible point total was 24. The committee’s scores for the obverse and reverse designs for the Professor Yunus Congressional Gold Medal were: Obverse: MY-O-01: MY-O-02: MY-O-03: MY-O-04: MY-O-05: MY-O-06: MY-O-07: MY-O-08: MY-O-09: MY-O-10: MY-O-11: MY-O-12: 1 1 24 (Recommended design) 6 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 Reverse: MY-R-01: MY-R-02: MY-R-03: MY-R-04: MY-R-05: MY-R-06: MY-R-07: MY-R-08: 15 (Recommended design) 0 0 11 2 12 8 0 12. The Committee discussed general design aspects of the Code Talkers Congressional Gold Medal series. Committee members commented that the proposed designs lacked a unifying design template or pattern that would result in a cohesive series of medals honoring the various tribes and nations in an equitable fashion. A motion was made by Ms. Wastweet, and seconded by Mr. Moran, to table consideration of the candidate designs. The motion was approved on a vote of seven (7) ayes and one (1) abstention. After further discussion about potential approaches to establishing a design template or pattern for the medal series, a motion was made by Mr. Scarinci, and seconded by Ms. Wastweet, to recommend that the Mint prepare new designs for the Code Talker Congressional Gold Medal series that would provide individual designs, obverse and reverse, for each tribe or nation to be honored, based on the pattern established with the 2000 Navajo Code Talker medal. The motion was unanimously approved. (Note: The 2000 Navajo Code Talker Congressional Gold Medal contains an original obverse design depicting Navajo Code Talkers while the reverse shows a symbol or seal significant to the Navajo Tribe.) 13. A motion was made by Mr. Ross, and seconded by Mr. Olson, to table discussion of the 2013 First Spouse Research Backgrounder and to consider such materials at the Committee’s next meeting (presumed to occur in April, 2012). The motion was approved on a unanimous vote. Committee members noted the reason for tabling consideration of the backgrounder was due to the fact that materials were not received by members far enough in advance of the meeting to allow sufficient time for review. 14. There being no further business, Chairperson Marks adjourned the meeting at 4:05 p.m.