View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BEYOND THE NUMBERS
A Qualitative Exploration of Affordability and Availability of Rental Housing in the Third Federal
Reserve District: 2015
June 2015

By Noelle Baldini*

ONLINE APPENDIX
Thank you to the organizations and companies that gave their time to provide insights and served as key informants for this research.

Interview Guide
The interview questions, which were developed in response to the quantitative trends presented in the original study, are listed
here. The system for coding the interviewees’ responses can be found in the table below.
1. The data suggest that in the Third District, 85 percent of extremely low-income (ELI) renters and 77 percent of very low-income
(VLI) renters were burdened by their housing costs in 2012 and that low-income (LI) renters earning 51 percent to 80 percent
of the average median income (AMI) became increasingly cost burdened during the study period. Did these findings surprise you?

2.

a.

If so, please elaborate.

b.

If not, what do you think has led to these higher levels of unaffordability?

Existing stock
a.

We’ve been talking about housing cost burdens for the general renter population, but do different populations have
different experiences in the rental market? Among those you serve, are there specific segments that have a particularly
challenging time affording units in good condition?

b.

What changes have you observed in the supply and cost of rental stock in recent years?

c.

What housing quality concerns are you seeing in the rental market generally?
i.

In what types of households are issues of quality most prevalent?

d.

Who are the owners of rental units in your community?

e.

Have you observed any changes in demand or cost since the foreclosure crisis?

f.

What is the role of the city/local government in the rental housing market? What is the city doing or not doing that has an
impact on the availability and affordability of rental housing?

3.

*

Looking forward
a.

What are the primary barriers to increasing the supply of low-cost rental units?

b.

Where do you see the rental housing market headed in the next five years?

c.

What do you see as potential short-term and/or long-term threats to the existing supply of affordable units?

d.

Thinking of these and other challenges, what policies or programs would you like to address?

The views expressed herein do not represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia or the Federal Reserve System. The author thanks Keith Wardrip, Eileen

Divringi, Sydney Taylor, Theresa Y. Singleton, Rosemary Frasso, and Allison Golinkoff for their comments, guidance, and collaboration.

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia • Community Development Studies & Education

CODE SYSTEM
Parent Codes and Individual Codes

When to Use
Actors
Specific players in the market

Owners of Units
Parent code for any
reference to unit owners

Developers

If developers are mentioned in the context of rental ownership

Out of Town

If discussed owners do not live in the general area

Local

If discussed owners live locally

Investors

When owners are referred to as investors

Mom and Pop

When owners are described as smaller owners, not large investors who own
many units

Nonprofit Developers

When discussing the actions of nonprofit developers

Private Developers

When discussing the actions of private (for-profit) developers

HUD

If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is mentioned

Housing Authorities

If the actions/roles of housing authorities are mentioned

Geography
Suburban

When discussing something unique to suburban areas

Larger Urban

When referring to Philadelphia only

Smaller Urban

When discussing something unique to smaller urban areas

Rural

When making a distinction as to why something is unique in rural areas

Types of Rental Housing
Market Rate

If market-rate rental housing is discussed

Manufactured Homes

If manufactured homes are discussed

Public Housing

If public housing is discussed

Undocumented Rental

When the “shadow market” is discussed; that is, when the interviewee refers to
rental units without licenses

Mixed-Income
Housing

When discussing housing that accommodates a variety of incomes

Income Restricted

When referring to housing units that require tenants to fall below a certain
income threshold to qualify

Single Family

If single-family housing units are discussed

Multifamily

If multifamily housing is discussed

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia • Community Development Studies & Education

Population Segments
Moderate Income

When referring to households with incomes between 80 percent and 140
percent of the median family income (MFI)

VLI

When referring to households with incomes between 31 percent and 50
percent of the MFI in their region

ELI

When referring to households with incomes that are less than 30 percent of
the MFI in their region

Mental Illness

When referring to people with mental illness

Family Size

When making an important distinction regarding family size

Formerly Incarcerated

When referring to people who had been incarcerated

Formerly Homeless

When discussing people who have experienced or are experiencing
homelessness

Single Parents

When referring to single parents

Veterans

When referring to veterans

People with Disabilities

When discussing people with physical disabilities

Seniors

When discussing elderly people or the senior population

Reasons for Increased Unaffordability
Increased Demand

When increases in demand for rental housing are discussed

Scarcity of Rental Units

When the scarcity of rental units is discussed

Renter Background

When credit history, criminal background checks, etc., are mentioned

Renter Income Level
When referring to renter
low-income level

Wealth/Income
Inequality

When income/wealth inequality is mentioned

Education

When the lack of quality education is discussed as a factor driving increased
unaffordability

Job Availability

When the lack of job availability is discussed as a factor driving increased
unaffordability

Utility Costs

When utility costs are mentioned as a factor driving increased unaffordability

Slow Economic
Recovery

When slow economic recovery or the Great Recession are mentioned as
factors driving increased unaffordability

Barriers to Increased Supply of Housing Stock
NIMBY
(“Not in My Backyard”)

If a neighborhood (i.e., residents, not elected officials) is described as being
apprehensive about renters

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia • Community Development Studies & Education

Competition

If competition is mentioned as a barrier to an increased supply of housing
stock

Cost of Land

If the cost of land is referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing
stock

Capacity/Scale

When capacity of housing stakeholders or the need for scale is referred to as
a barrier to an increased supply of housing stock

Lack of Political Will

When available and affordable rental housing is not a top priority and is
referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing stock

Program Inefficiencies
When federal or state
program inefficiencies
are referred to as barriers
to increased supply of
housing stock
Local Regulatory
Barriers
When local regulatory
barriers are referred to
as barriers to increased
supply of housing stock

Affordability
Requirements

When program affordability requirements are referred to as a barrier to an
increased supply of housing stock

Reporting
Requirements

When program reporting requirements are referred to as a barrier to an
increased supply of housing stock.

Municipal Fees

If municipal fees are referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing
stock

Land Assembly

If land assembly is referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing
stock

Code
Enforcement

If code enforcement is referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing stock

Processing Speed

When referring to processing speed of permits from local governments etc.;
not to be used when referencing federal programs

Lack of Funding

If lack of funding is referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of housing
stock

Development Costs

When development costs are referred to as a barrier to an increased supply of
housing stock

Impact of Foreclosure Crisis
Foreclosures
Homeownership
When the impact of
the foreclosure crisis
on homeownership is
discussed

If foreclosures are discussed
Lack of
Mortgage
Availability

If lack of mortgage availability is discussed

Housing Quality
Landlord Maintenance

When quality issues tied to landlord maintenance or lack thereof are
mentioned

Renter Maintenance

When quality issues tied to renter maintenance or lack thereof are mentioned

Threats to Existing Stock
Expiring Contracts

When expiring housing assistance payment contracts are discussed as a threat
to the existing housing stock

Aging Stock/Rehab
Need

When the aging housing stock or rehab needs are discussed as threats to the
existing housing stock

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia • Community Development Studies & Education

Policy Solutions/Successful Programs
Descriptions of potential solutions to the challenges of affordable and available rental units;
also for when a criticism provides meaningful insight into potential improvements

Federal Programs
When the successes,
failures, or suggested
improvements to federal
housing programs are
described

Section 8

If Section 8 or revisions to it are given as examples of potential policy
solutions or lessons that could be learned from past policy

NHTF

If the potential of the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF) is discussed

RAD

If successes, failures, or suggested improvements to Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) are discussed

HOME

If successes, failures, or suggested improvements to the HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) program are described

LIHTC

If the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is referred to as either a solution
that can be effective or that has been ineffective in the past

Inclusionary Housing
Requirements

When municipalities being required to provide some sort of affordable
housing in their community is discussed

Increased Wages

When increased wages are mentioned as a potential solution

PA Housing Trust Fund

When the Pennsylvania Housing Trust Fund is mentioned as a potential
solution

Cluster Approach

When focusing on an entire block versus one-offs is discussed

Homeownership
When homeownership is
discussed as a potential
solution to the challenges, not when describing
the current state of the
housing market

Financial Literacy

Only when financial literacy is referred to as a potential solution to the
challenges

Housing
Counseling

If housing counseling is suggested as a potential solution

Mortgage
Availability

When the availability of mortgages or decreased banking regulation
surrounding mortgage financing are suggested as potential solutions

Need for Collaboration/
Shared Voice

If the need for collaboration or a unified voice as a potential solution is
described

Mixed-Income Housing

When mixed-income housing is mentioned as a promising strategy — not
when mentioned in a descriptive way

New Development

When “new development” is referenced as part of a potential policy solution
— not as the state of what is currently happening

Tenant Rights/Code
Enforcement

If the need for increased code enforcement or tenant rights is mentioned

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STUDIES & EDUCATION

www.philadelphiafed.org/community-development