View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A revie w b y th e Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago

Business
Conditions
1 9 5 9 December

Contents
Business expands abroad

4

Further decline in farm income

8

Government financial aid plays
big role in private housing

11

The Trend of Business

2-4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

OF
^Em ploym ent and production in most du­
rable goods lines appears poised for a strong
rise in the months ahead now that steel out­
put has returned to near-capacity levels. The
short-term outlook has brightened because
of the speed with which the steel industry
has re-achieved the rates of operation of the
pre-strike months. Also, the problems in­
volved in allocation of the first supplies and
in obtaining sufficient rail and truck trans­
port seem to have been somewhat less trou­
blesome than had been anticipated. Never­
theless, it will take another month— even
longer in the case of some users— for the
flow of steel to proceed “normally.” These

Substantial inventory liquidation by
durable goods producers since midyear
change in inventories
billion dollars

+6 r

2

-6

1958




quarterly

1959

BUSINESS

prospects for the months ahead assume a
settlement of the dispute during the 80-day
injunction period.
Earlier expectations in some quarters that
the upswing, which began in the spring of
1958 and continued through mid-1959,
would have lost momentum early in 1960
have been largely dissipated. The advance in
activity had been propelled in the main by
developments in three major sectors: a rise
in residential housing activity, an increase in
Federal Government expenditures and a
shift from inventory liquidation to inventory
accumulation, mainly in durable goods lines.
At midyear, further increases in general ac­
tivity were expected to depend more upon
consumer spending and business outlays on
plant and equipment which were giving
promise of providing additional push.
Since midyear, spending by the Federal
Government has leveled off, reflecting the
stabilization of military spending and de­
clines in recession-induced outlays for un­
employment compensation and mortgage
purchases. The surge in housing expendi­
tures came to a halt at about the same time,
in part because of reduced availability of
credit. Even had there been no steel strike,
the rise in business inventories probably
would have slowed markedly.
Spending by the Federal Government in
1960 is indicated to continue at about the
recent rate. Residential construction activity
has declined from the levels of last spring
and may decline further next year. The big

Business Conditions, December 1959

change since midyear is in the inventory
sector. Here, the clock has been turned back
by the steel strike.
In the first seven months of 1959, total
business inventories, seasonally adjusted,
had risen by 4.7 billion dollars—about 5.5
per cent. The lion’s share, 3.9 billion, was
accounted for by durable goods firms. In
August and September, durable goods in­
ventories dropped by 1.2 billion dollars. The
decline probably continued in October and
November, and possibly in December as
well. By year end, a large portion of the in­
ventory rise of the first seven months will
have been wiped out. In many individual
lines, both materials and finished goods will
be at levels lower than those reached in the
1957-58 recession. Rebuilding will be neces­
sary and this will strengthen demand.
A u to s th e m ain lo se r

The major casualty among the steel users
has been the automobile industry. It now ap­
pears that fourth-quarter production will
total less than two-thirds as many cars as
the 1.9 million originally scheduled. Truck
production in November was less than 50,000 compared with 92,000 in October. Sales
of cars and trucks had continued at a high
level through October. It was obvious that
production curtailments would soon be
translated into lost or deferred sales.
Interestingly, the auto industry was
thought to be one major steel user having
“adequate” inventories to weather almost
any length of strike which was likely to oc­
cur. This would have been true if the strike
had not lasted more than two months—the
longest previous work stoppage. However, a
strike of three and one-half months has
meant layoffs for over 200,000 auto workers.
Heavy construction, too, has been ad­
versely affected by the steel strike. But in



Steel strike temporarily reverses
uptrend in activity measures
per cent, 1956 * 100

this case, the impact on activity still lies
largely in the future. Construction contract
awards, tabulated by the F. W. Dodge Cor­
poration, in the first seven months of 1959,
exceeded the same months of 1958 by 11
per cent nationally. In August, September
and October, there was a decline of 7 per
cent. In part, this was because awards were
especially high in these months last year, but
the comparison is influenced strongly by
awards for heavy engineering construction
which were 30 per cent below last year in
the August-October period. The Midwest
experience has been very similar to the na­
tional totals. Contractors are reluctant to
bid on jobs requiring definite prices and
completion dates when the availability and
cost of steel are highly uncertain.
In fla tio n a ry o r d e fla tio n a ry ?

Any strike has both inflationary and de­
flationary effects. The reduction in the sup­
ply of goods tends to force prices up. At the
same time, the loss of income to the firms
and individuals involved would, other things

3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

being equal, tend to reduce demand and
prices. In the present case, the dominant ef­
fect of the strike appears to be somewhat in­
flationary, on balance, even aside from the
terms of any settlement which may result.
Exhaustion of user inventories of steel
often results in costly substitutions in an at­
tempt to maintain production. Manufactur­
ing costs are increased also by the curtailed
volume. But the most important impact
comes through the reduction in the supply
of goods available for sale. Although par­
ticular types of goods cease to be available,
the effect is more subtle for the most part.
As inventories decline, dealers are able to
move merchandise at higher net markups,
often in the form of lesser “discounts from
list.” It does not follow, of course, that deal­
ers’ total profits rise since total sales may be
affected adversely. These results would be
expected when strikes occur during a period
characterized by rising demand and bouyant
expectations.
Em ploym ent and unem ploym ent

Through the month of October there was
surprisingly little rise in unemployment com­
pensation claims in Midwest centers. For
the five states combined, the number of new

claims was less than last year despite the fact
that employment was rising in the fall of
1958. Moreover, many of the persons filing
initial claims recently did not report back
a second time to receive checks, indicating
that they were able to obtain employment.
As a result, there was little increase in the
number of persons receiving unemployment
compensation through October.
Seasonal influences have helped to miti­
gate the impact of the steel slowdown. Oc­
tober is typically the low month in the year
for unemployment. But the major effects of
the secondary layoffs were far more impor­
tant in November than had been the case up
to that time.
Abstracting from strike effects, the em­
ployment situation of Midwest cities as a
group currently is stronger than that of the
rest of the nation taken as a whole. In the
early fall, the Department of Labor classi­
fied ten District cities as having less than 3
per cent unemployed, eleven as having be­
tween 3 and 6 per cent and only three as
having more than 6 per cent. The latter
group included Detroit, Flint and Terre
Haute. In the spring of 1958, sixteen Dis­
trict centers had more than 6 per cent
unemployed.

Business expands abroad

4

JEconom ic activity in the major industrial
nations abroad has shown a strong advance
in 1959, following a slowing pace during
late 1957 and 1958. This gain in activity
has tended to boost demand for United
States exports in recent months and, if it




continues, could help to strengthen this
country’s trade balance. During the first nine
months of 1959, United States merchandise
exports, adjusted for seasonal movements,
totaled 12 billion dollars, 600 million more
than imports. About 400 million of that ex­

Business Conditions, December 1959

port surplus resulted from trade in the third
quarter of the year.
Industrial production throughout Western
Europe is now at a record high. During the
second quarter of 1959, the latest period
for which comprehensive data are available,
output of factories and mines in Western
Europe was 7 per cent above the low of the
spring and summer of 1958. A recent re­
port of the European Economic Commu­
nity forecast that industrial production dur­
ing the final three months of the year in its
six member nations—France, West Ger­
many, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and
Luxemburg—will continue to register gains
averaging about 7 per cent from the closing
quarter of last year.
Britain has experienced a strong surge in
activity in 1959. After rising gradually in
the first quarter of the year, business picked
up at an increasing pace. By midsummer,
industrial production was 7 per cent above
the corresponding period in 1958. In
August, employment moved ahead of the
year-ago level, and, by the end of the sum­
mer, the number of unfilled vacancies—a
commonly used indicator of the employment
situation in Great Britain—was 40 per cent
greater than in the summer of 1958.
The rise in activity in Great Britain is
largely the result of increased domestic
spending by consumers and government,
and higher exports. Consumer instalment
credit controls were relaxed in 1958, and
commercial banks have greatly increased
loans to individuals for the purchase of con­
sumer durables.
The experience in 1959 is in contrast to
the 1955-57 boom. During the earlier pe­
riod, business investment was a key factor in
the rise in activity. Capital outlays by busi­
ness firms in Great Britain during 1957 were
60 per cent above the 1954 level. Since



1957, the rate of increase of investment in
plant and equipment has slowed, and capital
spending this year is indicated to be only
slightly above 1958. A Board of Trade sur­
vey of manufacturers’ intentions had indi­
cated a decline in such expenditures was in
prospect for 1960. But the expansion in ac­
tivity has brought an upward revision in
plans by at least some firms.
Great Britain’s holdings of gold and dol­
lars in 1959 continued an increase which
had been under way for almost two years.
At the end of December 1957, Britishowned gold and United States securities to­
taled 3.1 billion dollars. In June of this year,
the aggregate had increased by a billion
dollars.
In view of the improvement in gold and
dollar holdings, Great Britain chose to make
an advance repayment this fall of 250 mil­
lion dollars in outstanding borrowing from
the Export-Import Bank. The loan was orig­
inally scheduled to be repaid over a fiveyear period.
That country, in addition, has further re­
laxed restrictions on currency convertibility
and controls on imports. In recent months,
discriminatory import quotas were lifted on
most United States industrial exports, in­
cluding autos, trucks, machinery and indus­
trial equipment, textiles and clothing, sports
equipment and jewelry. However, imports of
some of these items had been below amounts
permitted by the quotas. Applicable tariffs
have not been changed.
Western Germany is now in the midst of
a full-scale boom, although the current rise
in activity has been under way less than a
year. In January, industrial output was
about equal to early 1958. By August, how­
ever, output of factories and mines in West­
ern Germany was 8 per cent above the yearearlier level.

5

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

6

In contrast to Great Britain, the steam
behind the current rise is generated largely
by construction, business outlays for new
plants and equipment and additions to busi­
ness inventories. The rise in investment re­
flects both a strong demand for new housing
and the need to add new capacity and to
modernize existing manufacturing facilities.
The shortage of labor has become increas­
ingly severe, intensified in part by the short­
ening of the normal work week to 45 hours.
With output approaching capacity in many
lines, the German central bank, in early
September, raised the discount rate from
23A to 3 per cent, the first increase in more
than three years. Then, in late October, the
rate was raised again, this time to 4 per cent.
In addition, reserve requirements on com­
mercial banks have been increased and the
maximum amount that the commercial
banks can borrow from the central bank has
been reduced.
Prices in Western Germany have re­
mained stable from early 1958 to August
1959, with the cost of living index showing
a variation of less than 1 per cent. Rising
prices for agricultural commodities caused
the index to rise in September. Wage rates
as measured by hourly earnings are about 5
per cent above the year-earlier level.
In France, the current expansion in busi­
ness did not get under way until early 1959.
Nevertheless, industrial output by midyear
was setting new records. The increase in ac­
tivity has been reflected in higher employ­
ment and reduced unemployment. The auto,
steel and chemical industries have shown
strong gains in output. Construction also has
been proceeding at a vigorous pace.
Prices in France have increased some­
what over the past year. As of midsummer,
consumer prices were about 4 per cent above
the corresponding 1958 period. The rise,




however, is less than might have been an­
ticipated in view of the devaluation of the
franc in December 1958. The effect of the
15 per cent devaluation, of course, was to
reduce imports by making foreign products
more expensive and, at the same time, to
increase the foreign demand for French
products by reducing prices to buyers in
other countries. The devaluation, together
with the modestness of the rise of domestic
prices, has resulted in a dramatic shift in
France’s balance of trade. In October, ex­
ports exceeded imports by 97 million dol­
lars, the ninth consecutive month showing
an export surplus.
The improvement in France’s trade bal­
ance has led to a rapid rise in gold and
foreign exchange holdings. At the end of
September, combined holdings totaled 1.9
billion dollars, compared with 1.0 billion 12
months earlier. As a result, France has taken
steps to relax controls on foreign trade.
The Government deficit was substantially
reduced in 1958 and 1959 and was financed
without borrowing from the central bank.
The budget presented to the legislature in
October anticipates a deficit of less than 600
billion francs (1.2 billion dollars) and will
be the third successive budget to be financed
by a noninflationary means.
These recent developments in both for­
eign trade and domestic fiscal policy have
helped promote increased confidence in
France’s future economic stability. The fact
that, for the first time in ten years, a cor­
porate bond issue was floated bearing a
coupon rate as low as 5 per cent and with
no clause tying the value of the obligation to
changes in prices is one indication of this
improved confidence.
Japan, an industrial nation on the other
side of the world, is also experiencing an
expansion in business activity. Industrial

Business Conditions, December 1959

production this summer was more
In the merchandise sector, export surplus
than 25 per cent higher than the
reappears in third quarter, after imports
year-earlier level, and gross na­
matched exports in second quarter
tional product for the year end­
billion dollars
ing March 1960 is officially esti­
mated to show an 11 per cent
rise. Employment this fall Was 8
per cent above year earlier. Man­
ufacturing output was at 80 per
cent of capacity, compared with
68 per cent a year ago.
As in Great Britain, the ex­
pansion in output is largely the
result of increased consumer de­
mand and exports. This has been
supplemented recently by in­
creasing outlays for new plants
and equipment, now estimated to
show a rise of at least 7 per cent
for the current fiscal year.
The Japanese monetary au­
thorities have recently taken ac­
tion to restrain credit expansion and price
thousand, 35 per cent above the previous
increases. The Bank of Japan has been sell­
year and a record. In 1959, home construc­
ing securities under re-purchase agreements
tion has declined but personal consumption
to absorb liquidity in the economy. Stock
expenditures have increased. Expenditures
margin requirements were raised and reserve
by individuals in the first half of 1959 were
requirements on commercial banks were in­
10 per cent above consumer expenditures in
creased somewhat.
the first half of 1958.
Canada experienced a milder recession in
In the third quarter, the pace of business
1957-58 than did the United States. Their
growth in Canada slackened somewhat, due
recession seems to have had a “double bot­
mainly to strikes and early auto changeovers. Thus, industrial production in July
tom,” however, with the seasonal and sus­
tained pickup in industrial production not
was almost 2 per cent below the April level.
getting under way until September 1958. In
Production began to rise again in August,
December 1958, industrial production in
however, and it is generally believed that the
Canada was 5 per cent above the low
third quarter easing represents only a pause
reached in December 1957 and rose another
in Canada’s cyclical upswing. A recent sur­
5 per cent in the first half of this year.
vey indicates that winter unemployment will
be smaller than usual this year. Recent op­
The limited extent of the decline in ac­
tivity has been attributed to extensive gov­
timistic forecasts of exports to Europe and
ernmental assistance to residential construc­
the United States and indications of a pickup
tion. Housing starts in 1958 totaled 165
in private capital expenditures add to the



Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

favorable outlook in Canada for 1960.
Since August and September, Canada’s
credit markets have taken on an easier tone.
R ates on th ree -m o n th T reasu ry b ills
dropped to 4.8 per cent in early November,
a decline of 1.4 percentage points within
three months. Yields on long-term Canadian
Government obligations have also eased
slightly. Bill rates in Canada are now only
about one-half of 1 percentage point above
those in the United States compared with a
3 percentage point gap in mid-August. The
chartered banks have recently been impor­
tant purchasers of Treasury bills in an at­
tempt to build up their liquidity, and this has
been a factor in the decline in yields in short­
term securities.
U n ite d S ta te s e x p o rts stim ulated?

Many observers had expected the rise in
business activity abroad to provide some
stimulus to United States exports. During
the first half of the year, however, exports
averaged 4 per cent below the first half of
1958 and more than 20 per cent under the
peak rate in the first half of 1957 when a

surge in overseas shipments was precipitated
following the Suez crisis in late 1956.
This summer, total United States exports
increased significantly for the first time since
1957. In the third quarter, exports were
about 10 per cent above the second quarter,
seasonally adjusted. Exports to Canada had
been increasing since mid-1958, and this
summer exports to Europe began to pick up.
There were large increases in chemicals, tex­
tiles and automotive products. Also, ma­
chinery and aircraft exports began to rise
this past summer, followed by a sharp in­
crease in cotton in the fall. Orders for ma­
chine tools have increased sharply and in
September were within 10 per cent of the
four-year high set in July.
Experience in a brief period, of course,
does not provide conclusive evidence that
the long awaited rise in exports has begun.
Yet, a continued surge in activity in the
major industrial countries would almost cer­
tainly be accompanied by increased pur­
chases of both raw materials and manufac­
tured commodities from the United States.
Recent evidence on this score is encouraging.

Further decline in farm income

Income

8

in the agricultural sector of the
economy has fluctuated in opposite direc­
tions from the rest of the economy the past
two years. In 1958, net farm income climbed
19 per cent while national income showed a
small decline. So far in 1959, net farm in­
come has declined 15 per cent from last
year, in contrast to vigorous growth in most
other sectors and a rise of around 7 per cent




in national income. The experience of the
past two years should not lead to the con­
clusion that agriculture is inherently a contracyclical sector of the United States econ­
omy. The large increase in net farm income
in 1958 resulted from a number of essen­
tially fortuitous factors largely unrelated to
the general business picture. Thus, in a
sense, the decline in farm income in the

Business Conditions, December 1959

current year represents merely a return to
the pre-1958 situation. But that doesn’t ex­
plain the further decline now believed to be
in prospect for 1960.
Most of the annual gyrations in net farm
income in the past ten years or so can be
traced to changes in production of farm
commodities and the related effects on
prices. Governmental price supports, of
course, have played an important role, es­
pecially for a few commodities, in blunting
these price effects.
Demand and supply are always important
in price changes, for both agricultural and
nonagricultural commodities. But demand,
taken by itself, for farm commodities has
been strong most of the time since 1940.
Consumer incomes have been generally high
and rising. Population has increased rap­
idly. Except for short periods of mild reces­
sion, employment has been high. And ex­
ports of farm commodities since World War
II have been at a high level, albeit with
liberal Government assistance.
But much of the time since World War II,
supplies of agricultural commodities have
been so burdensome that prices have not re­
sponded to the very favorable basic demand
situation. Farm output has grown faster than
the market for farm commodities. The re­
sult has been a downward drift in agricul­
tural prices and farm income, indicating that
too many resources are engaged in agricul­
ture. It is within this general setting that the
experience in 1959 and the prospects for
1960 must be assessed.
1 9 5 9 in re v ie w

Prices received by farmers in 1959 have
averaged 3 Vi per cent below a year earlier,
as the physical volume of farm marketings
slightly exceeded last year’s record. Substan­
tially lower prices for hogs, poultry and eggs



Declining farm population, rising
income from nonfarm sources
maintain income per person on farms
per cent, 1947-49 =100

have been largely responsible. Lower farm
prices, combined with higher production
costs and a substantial reduction in soil bank
payments following elimination of the acre­
age reserve program, have been the major
cause of the decline in net farm income in
the current year.
Income from livestock has been in the
forefront of the decline. Hog production
expanded cyclically through the year, and
prices were more than one-fourth below last
year’s levels. Production of eggs and poultry
increased further in 1959 from the high
levels of the previous year. As a result,
prices of these commodities declined in the
spring to the lowest figures since prewar.
Prices received for all livestock and prod­
ucts through September averaged 5 per cent
lower than in the corresponding period in
1958; the volume of marketings showed a
small increase and cash receipts from these
commodities were off about 4 per cent.
Income from sales of crops also shows
some decline. Crop production in 1959

9

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

10

matched last year’s record and would have
been higher except for a substantial reduc­
tion in wheat production due to unfavorable
weather and the wheat mosaic disease. The
decline in wheat production in the Great
Plains regions was largely offset by increases
in cotton production in the South and South­
west. Declines in production of oats, barley
and grain sorghums in the Corn Belt were
more than offset by increased production of
com. Winter fruit and vegetable production
was above the reduced supply last year when
severe weather in the winter damaged these
crops.
The large production of crops in 1959 has
been due primarily to more acres under cul­
tivation. The index of crop yields per acre is
about 6 per cent below last year’s record.
But this has been offset by an increase in
total acreage of crops, with the end of the
acreage reserve program and shifts to highyielding crops such as corn. Farmers’ cash
receipts from crop marketings and CCC
loans on crops in the first nine months of
1959 were the same as in the corresponding
period in 1958. However, Government pay­
ments to farmers declined about 500 mil­
lion dollars—largely the result of termina­
tion of the acreage reserve program in the
soil bank—and cash receipts from market­
ings of livestock and products declined more
than 500 million dollars.
In the Seventh Federal Reserve District,
cash receipts from farm marketings for the
first nine months have declined in all states.
Receipts were down 1 per cent from last year
in Michigan and 4 per cent in Wisconsin.
Farm prices of milk and butterfat have risen
slightly, while production in these states has
shown a smali decline. Cash receipts from
farm marketings in Iowa and Indiana have
been 6 per cent below last year and in Illi­
nois 2 per cent below. The large volume of




hog marketings has partially offset price de­
clines on hogs. Larger numbers of cattle be­
ing fattened on Corn Belt farms and higher
average prices for fat cattle have boosted
cash receipts from that source and main­
tained total cash receipts from livestock
close to last year’s level in these states. How­
ever, net income from livestock has been cut
because of low hog prices and higher prices
paid last fall for feeder cattle which were
marketed as fat cattle in 1959.
Prospe c ts: 1 9 6 0

The outlook next year, as appraised by
the United States Department of Agricul­
ture, is for farm prices and income to hold
about at the levels of the third quarter and to
average somewhat lower than 1959 as a
whole. With prices of both livestock and
crops expected to average somewhat lower
and with some increase in costs of produc­
tion, net farm income would decline perhaps
7 to 8 per cent. This decline would be half
as much as this year and would reduce farm
income to its lowest level since 1942.
Hog marketings are expected to continue
their cyclical increase through the first half
of 1960, though the second half may mark
the end to the current uptrend. Hog prices
would be expected to remain fairly close to
the level in recent months and to average
below 1959.
Larger marketings of cattle are expected
as a result of the increased number placed
on feed and anticipated larger marketings of
cattle and calves off farms and ranches.
However, at this stage of the cattle cycle,
any changes in marketings and prices would
be moderate, barring severe drought in the
important grazing areas. Prices of dairy
products may be somewhat higher during
1960, and poultry and egg prices are ex­
pected to improve the first half of next year

Business Conditions, December 1959

f

from the depressed 1959 levels.
Slightly lower prices for crops are ex­
pected in the coming year in response to
small downward adjustments in price sup­
ports authorized under the present legisla­
tion. Thus, income from crops would de­
pend largely on the influence of weather and
technology on yields per acre and, hence,
on total output. With “normal” weather,
some declines in yields and production
would be expected.
For the Midwest, a decline in farm in­
come similar to that projected for the na­
tion as a whole is indicated. However, the
decline in the dairy areas may be somewhat
smaller, and the decline in the livestock
areas somewhat larger, than the average for
the United States as a whole. In view of the
large feed supplies on hand and in prospect,
livestock production and, therefore, prices
and income, may be under pressure for some
time to come.
F a rm e rs7 purchases

Farmers’ purchases of farm machinery
and equipment, building materials, fertilizer
and farm supplies increased during 1959

both in response to the rise in farm income
in 1958 and to the increase in acreage
planted this year.
In the postwar period, purchases of farm
equipment and supplies have typically re­
sponded to farm income levels of the pre­
ceding year, so declines in sales to farmers
would be expected in the coming year. How­
ever, there are several factors which may
keep the reduction smaller than would be
indicated by the size of the income drop this
year: first, the continuing shift of agricul­
tural output to the larger and more special­
ized farms will tend to create demand for
additional machinery, equipment and other
production inputs; second, the larger cur­
rent stock of machinery and equipment on
farms may create greater replacement de­
mand; and, third, depreciation charges,
which are deducted in arriving at estimates
of net farm income but which represent
funds available for machinery purchases or
other uses will be higher. Nevertheless, pur­
chases of farm machinery and supplies in
the coming year appear to be headed for a
contracyclical decline similar to farm in­
come.

Government financial aid plays
big role in private housing
T h e silver anniversary of the Federal
Housing Administration which occurred
earlier this year and passage of the same
milestone two years before by the Federal
Home Loan Bank System were reminders



that financial participation by the Govern­
ment in the construction and sale of private
housing is by no means a new feature of the
economic landscape. Government’s role,
moreover, has assumed major dimensions.

11

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Of the 15 million or so new, privately
owned, nonfarm dwelling units built since
the war, more than 6 million, or 40 per cent,
have been financed by mortgage loans un­
derwritten by Federal agencies.
The past three decades have seen the
emergence of a sizable number of new Fed­
eral institutions and programs directly con­
cerned with housing. Some of these, bom
during the collapse of the Thirties or in the
course of the war, have since disappeared
from the scene. The Home Owners’ Loan
Corporation was organized in 1933 to re­
finance delinquent home mortgages. HOLC’s
lending authority, 4.75 billion dollars at its
peak, expired in 1936, but it was not until
1951 that the agency was liquidated. Limi­
tation of housing rentals, launched in war­
time as part of the program of price control
administered by OPA, lasted until about a
decade ago, or well beyond the end of hos­
tilities, but the scope of regulation had been
progressively restricted during the postwar

FHA-VA financing a major but
widely varying factor in postwar home
building; VA starts decline sharply since
1955 peak
per cent of nonfarm
private units started




stages. Surviving to the present, and by now
well-established participants in the financing
of private housing, are a series of programs
which fall into two broad categories:
—two institutions (the Federal Home
Loan Bank System and the Federal
National Mortgage Association or
“Fanny May”) which are designed
to facilitate the flow of credit into
private housing and, in the case of
Fanny May, in some instances to
provide the funds directly;
—Federally sponsored insurance (pro­
vided by the Federal Housing Ad­
ministration and the Veterans Ad­
ministration) of mortgage loans on
residential real estate.
C re d it fo r home le n d e rs

The Home Loan Bank System was estab­
lished in 1932, well after the onset of the
great depression and the demoralization of
the real estate market that was an important
feature of that period. Support for the crea­
tion of such an institution had been gather­
ing strength during the decade of the Twen­
ties. Thus, while the date of the system’s
establishment suggests that the objective was
to extend emergency aid to home financing,
it is possible that the depression simply
brought to a head a growing realization that
institutions in the field of home lending had
need for a means of providing additional
liquidity to individual institutions.
The Home Loan Bank System, patterned
somewhat after the older Federal Reserve
System, was designed to provide pools of
credit which could be drawn upon by in­
stitutions engaged in mortgage lending. In
practice, savings and loan associations have
made up almost the entire membership of
the system, although certain other classes of
savings institutions also are eligible to be-

Business Conditions, December 1959

long to it. Any mem­
ber association con­
More than half the home mortgage holdings of
fronted by unexpect­
mutual savings banks and life insurance companies
edly large withdrawals
underwritten by FHA and VA
of share account bal­
ances may borrow
G o v e rn m e n t- u n d e rw ritte n
from its Home Loan
T o ta l
C onven­
D e c . 3 1 , 1958
Bank as an alterna­
T o ta l
FH A
VA
( b illio n d o lla rs )
tive to curtailing mort­
gage loans or dispos­
Total outstanding . . . 130.7
40
17
23
60
ing of other assets.
Financial institutions . 108.2
42
24
18
58
The system has at its
Savings and loan
disposal the balances
a sso c ia tio ns.............
42.6
Life insurance
that member associa­
companies................
26.1
tions keep on deposit
Commercial banks . . .
18.6
with the eleven re­
Mutual savings banks .
20.9
gional Home Loan
A ll o th e r....................... 22.5
29
11
18
71
Banks, plus the pro­
Government agencies.
4.8
ceeds of stock sales to
Individuals and other .
17.7
the member associa­
t i o n s , an d t h e s e
sources of funds are
No such charge is made by VA, and the cost
augmented as needed by borrowing in the
of its guarantee program is met out of gen­
open market. At the end of last year, total
eral tax funds. Both plans provide means of
resources of the Home Loan Bank System
pooling risks and shifting some of the con­
were about 3 billion dollars. Member asso­
tingent liability involved in mortgage lend­
ciation borrowings stood at 1.3 billion dol­
ing from private investors to Government
lars. The active demand for mortgage funds
instrumentalities. The pooling of risk has
during the past season has been reflected in
tended to lessen the cost to eligible borrow­
a substantial rise in loans to members. The
ers of obtaining mortgage loans of given
total was more than 1.8 billion dollars at the
end of September.
amounts and maturities, to broaden the mar­
ket for mortgage loans and to stimulate the
U n d e rw ritin g p riv a te c redit
flow of funds into private housing (see ac­
companying chart and table).
Under the Federal Housing Administra­
Total liability of the Federal Government
tion and Veterans Administration plans,
under the FHA and VA home loan insur­
borrowers meeting certain standards as to
ance and guarantee plans currently is in ex­
income, veteran status and the like may se­
cess of 50 billion dollars. This is the amount
cure insurance or guarantee of their mort­
gage borrowings, provided the contracts and
of insurance in force and represents a con­
collateral comply with prescribed standards.
tingent liability. It is not a measure of the
FHA charges insured borrowers a premium
“cost” of the two programs. Costs—de­
of Vi of 1 per cent of principal outstanding.
frayed out of premiums in the case of FHA




tio n a l

( p e r c e n t)

21

5

1 6

7 9

4 8

5 2

2 4

2 8

4 7

2 9

1 8

5 3

6 6

2 6

4 0

3 4

9 6

2 9

6 7

4

1 2

6

6

8 8

13

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

FNMA in recent years a big supplier
of mortgage money . . .
million dollars

600 r

400L

14

l l I
1952

I

I

I I I

I l l |
1954

I

I

I I
I I I I
1956
quarterly

I

I I I

I I I I
1958

loans have assumed a measure of
uniformity or homogeneity, re­
flecting the minimum standards
prerequisite to acceptance for in­
surance or guarantee. With re­
duced risk of capital loss, more­
over, lenders increasingly place
funds in loans secured by prop­
erty and negotiated by borrowers
far beyond their direct purview.
Large mutual savings banks lo­
cated principally in New England
and the Atlantic Seaboard states
have come to be important in­
vestors in FHA and VA mort­
gage funds throughout the coun­
try. Similarly, the major life
I I I I
insurance companies with head­
quarters in the East are active in
mortgage markets as far removed
from the home office as Southern California,
The life insurance companies, moreover,
are generally free to invest in out-of-state

—consist of administrative expense plus
claims paid, after allowance for recoveries.
The two Federal programs have been important contributors to the rise of
a national market for mortgages.
. . . net buying heaviest at times of
Inherently, lending to home
declining prices of long-term investments
builders and buyers is a highly
individualized process, owing to
million dollars
the wide variations in both bor­
rowers’ creditworthiness and their
loan collateral. A lender has a
strong incentive to make his own
estimate of the borrower’s quali­
fications and his own appraisal
of the property securing the loan.
Often he will feel obliged to
maintain close contact with the
borrower and the property dur­
ing the term of the loan. Home
lenders’ activities in earlier years
tended to be confined within a
limited geographic area. But with
Government backing, mortgage




per cent

Business Conditions, December 1959

conventional mortgages as well as the Gov­
ernment-underwritten varieties and do so on
a substantial scale. Local and regional mort­
gage company correspondents and, in some
cases, field offices of the companies them­
selves originate and service these loans, as
they do the FHA’s and VA’s. The vigorous
postwar growth of mortgage companies,
therefore, has also helped to create a na­
tional market in mortgages. These firms pro­
vide a service which makes it possible for
investors to deal with borrowers over great
distances. The tendency towards standardi­
zation of lending practices and terms in con­
ventional lending has also broadened the
market for the nonguaranteed and nonin­
sured home mortgages.
The reduction of barriers to the flow of
mortgage funds has opened the way to siz­
able, continuing shifts of funds from sav­
ings “surplus” areas, like New England, into
“deficit” communities on the West Coast
and in parts of the South and appears to
have lessened regional differentials in the
cost of housing credit. Differences in mort­
gage rates still remain substantial, however,
and there appears to be some tendency for
them to widen in times of especially vigor­
ous demand for long-term funds. During the
week ended September 11, for example, pre­
vailing rates on conventional home loans
were reported by House and Home maga­
zine as 514 per cent in the Boston market,
534 to 6 per cent in the Chicago area and
6 to 7.2 per cent in San Francisco. Mini­
mum down payment, 30-year, FHA, 514
per cent loans were quoted at par to 1 point
above in Boston, at 4 to 414 points below
par in Chicago and 614 points under par on
the West Coast.
In areas undergoing rapid development,
the demand for funds for investment in
mortgages characteristically exceeds the sup­



ply of savings provided locally. Importation
of capital becomes an indispensable requi­
site to sustained development. The ability
to export capital to deficit areas may be
advantageous from the standpoint of lenders
as well, inasmuch as it permits them to seek
out higher yields than those obtainable in
local markets.
FN M A — a w h o le sa le m a rk e t

The Federal National Mortgage Associa­
tion, newly chartered in 1954 but initially
established by a transfer of funds from the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation in
1938, performs a trio of functions. One of
these is the gradual liquidation of a port­
folio of home mortgages on hand at the time
of rechartering. Liquidation is effected by
sale in the market and, of course, the grad­
ual repayment of outstanding loans. Fanny
May’s other two duties fall under the head­
ings of its special assistance and secondary
market programs.
The special assistance program is de­
signed to provide funds for investment in
Government-underwritten mortgage loans
on particular types of property, e.g., urban
renewal projects, housing for elderly per­
sons, disaster area housing and low- and
moderate-priced veterans’ homes, which
otherwise might not attract the desired
amounts of funds.
The secondary market operation was es­
tablished to enhance the liquidity of FHA
and VA mortgage loans in the hands of
private investors. Under this program, the
agency buys and sells Government-under­
written loans at prices which are intended
to permit operation on a self-sustaining ba­
sis. Capital was provided initially by the
Treasury, which to date has purchased 143
million dollars in preferred stock in the as­
sociation. This capital, together with any ad-

15

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

ditional funds that may be furnished by the
Treasury under an outstanding authorization
to purchase a further 65 million dollars in
preferred, is slated to be repaid out of the
proceeds of interest earnings and pro rata
sales of common stock to those firms from
which mortgages are acquired. In the mean­
time, the Treasury is paid a service fee on
its investment in the form of dividends on
the preferred. Additional capital has been
provided by the sale of debentures in the
open market; at mid-1959, liability of the
secondary market program on this account
came to roughly 1.3 billion dollars.
Transactions are confined to FHA and
VA loans. Purchases and sales prices are
tailored to prevailing market conditions in
order to keep within the Congressional ceil­
ing on its portfolio holdings, to prevent ex­
cessive use of the association’s facilities and
to make the operations self-supporting.
Mortgage holdings of FNMA under all three
of its programs came to 4.8 billion dollars
on June 30, 1959, with a third of the total
accounted for by the secondary market
program.
Fed era l policy objectives va rie d

16

The immensely involved network of Fed­
eral programs and agencies dealing with
housing finance— and the present account
necessarily refers to only the major ones—
has taken shape gradually and often experi­
mentally. The motivations to Federal action
have been numerous and have reflected
widely varying shades of opinion.
Historically, popular sentiment and pub­
lic policy have favored wide diffusion of
property ownership. In the housing field, this
often has meant a bias in favor of home
ownership as against tenancy and a concern
for the ability of low- and moderate-income
families to own their homes. The FHA and




VA mortgage programs give expression to
this point of view in their primary focus on
single-family home financing and, within this
category, on units of moderate value. Still,
both programs, and particularly FHA, are
broad enough to provide Federal participa­
tion in the financing of rental dwellings.
This public policy recognizes that to some
families owner-occupancy of housing is an
expensive and inconvenient alternative to
tenancy.
The Home Loan Bank System and Fanny
May’s secondary market operations func­
tion essentially as lubricants of the private
home lending market. Although both agen­
cies were set up initially by the Federal
Government and remain Federal instrumen­
talities, and Fanny May continues to utilize
Government capital, both are designed to be
self-supporting adjuncts to the private lend­
ing institutions serving the housing market.
FNMA’s special assistance program, of
course, is something else. This is a direct
source of financing tailored to needs in spe­
cific segments of the market. The funds ap­
plied are repayable loans, but the presump­
tion is that the borrowers accommodated
would not otherwise be served, at least on
terms comparable to those on which the Fed­
eral National Mortgage Association makes
its credit available.

Busine ss C onditions is published monthly by

the federal reserve bank of Chicago. Sub­
scriptions are available to the public without
charge. For information concerning bulk mail­
ings to banks, business organizations and edu­
cational institutions, write: Research Depart­
ment, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Box
834, Chicago 90, Illinois. Articles may be re­
printed provided source is credited.

Business
Conditions
a review by the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

In d e x f o r th e y e a r 1 9 5 9

Banking
The changing mix of money,
January, 9-12.
Bank liquidity and rising business,
June, 7-11.
Banks have favorable experience with
consumer loans, June, 12-16.
Banks loaned up?, October, 4-8.
Business finance
A broader horizon for field warehousing,
February, 13-16.
Financing the business upsurge,
June, 4-7, 16.
Economic conditions, general
Employment gains in Midwest and na­
tion, May, 6-11.
The declining small town?, May, 11-16.
What is a dollar worth?, August, 5-8.
Metropolitan areas, additions to the fam­
ily, November, 10-12.
The trend of business, January, 2-4; Feb­
ruary, 2-5; March, 2-4; April, 2-5;
May, 2-5; June, 2-3; July, 2-5; August,
2-5; September, 2-4; October, 2-3; No­
vember, 2-4; December, 2-4.



Farm finance and agriculture
Agricultural exports at high level—but
slipping?, February, 5-8.
Corn, com and more corn, April, 16.
Credit flows into expanding cattle busi­
ness, July, 14-16.
A profile of the cattle cycle,
September, 12-16.
Shift in meat packing, November, 4-10.
Further decline in farm income,
December, 8-11.
Industry, trade and construction
Home building in strong upturn,
January, 5-9.
Cyclical changes in retail trade,
February, 8-13.
A new era in foreign trade?, March, 5-11.
Man-hours and electric power consump­
tion as output indicators, April, 6-10.
Retail trade at midyear, August, 8-10.
Housing in 1959: another 1950?,
August, 10-13.
Competition from abroad,
September, 7-11.
Autos in ’60, October, 8-12.
Business expands abroad, December, 4-8.

Public finance
The executive messages, March, 11-16.
New techniques in debt management,
April, 10-15.
Management of the public debt,
July, 5-10.
State legislatures boost taxes,
September, 4-7, 14-16.
Plateau in defense spending?,
November, 12-16.
Government financial aid plays big role
in private housing, December, 11-16.




Savings and investment
What’s behind recent changes in time de­
posits?, January, 12-16.
Consumer saving, debt and spending for
durables, July, 10-13.
Behind the rise in interest rates,
August, 14-16.
Investment in 1958: a profile,
October, 13-16.