View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Current Economic Conditions in the

Eighth Federal Reserve District
St. Louis Zone
March 19, 2010

Prepared by the

Center for Regional Economics—8th District (CRE8)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Eighth
Federal Reserve
District
ILL
IL
ILLINOIS
IILLIN
LINO
NO
OIS
S

IINDIANA
IN
N
NDIIA
ND
IA
AN
N
NA

Columbia
Jefferson City

St. Louis

MISS
ISSOURI
SSOUR
S UR
SO

Louisville-Jefferson County

Evansville
Owensboro

Elizabethtown

KENTU
KE
KEN
EN
NTU
N
NTU
UCKY
UC
C
CKY
KY

Springfield
Bowling Green

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
Jonesboro
Jackson

ARKAN
A
R
RK
KA
ANSAS
AN
AS
AS

TENNESSEE
T
TEN
EN
N ES
NNE
SS
SE
EE
E

Fort Smith

Memphis

Little Rock-North Little Rock
Hot Springs
Pine Bluff

Texarkana

MISS
M
IS
SS
SIS
SSIPPI
S PP
SIP
PI

This report (known as the Burgundy Book ) summarizes information on economic conditions in the St. Louis zone
of the Eighth Federal Reserve District (see map above), headquartered in St. Louis. Separate reports have also been
prepared for the Little Rock, Louisville, and Memphis zones and can be downloaded from the CRE8 website
(research.stlouisfed.org/regecon/).
The first section of this report summarizes information provided by various contacts within the District and is
similar to the type of information found in the Fed’s Beige Book (federalreserve.gov/fomc/beigebook/2009/).
The period covered by this section coincides roughly with the two Beige Book periods immediately preceding this
report. The second section includes government-provided data for the metro areas and states of the St. Louis zone.
These data are the most recent available at the time this report was assembled.
For more information, please contact the St. Louis office:
Joel James, 314-444-8963, joel.h.james@stls.frb.org
Economist:
Howard Wall, 314-444-8533, wall@stls.frb.org

St. Louis Zone Report—March 19, 2010
Economic activity in the St. Louis zone was mixed, with signs of improvement in certain sectors. A majority of general retailers
noted improved or steady sales compared with the same time last year. Auto dealers, on the other hand, reported an overall sales
decline. While activity in the manufacturing sector showed little change since our previous report, the service sector posted employment gains. Year-to-date home sales growth has been positive for the first time since early 2007, although building permits continued to fall. Lending activity was relatively unchanged, while crop prices mostly declined.

Consumer Spending

Banking and Finance

Retail sales reports for January and early February were mixed
among general retailers but mostly negative among car dealers
surveyed in the St. Louis zone. About 30 percent of the general
retailers and about 80 percent of the car dealers indicated that
sales were down compared with the same months in 2009.
Roughly 30 percent of the general retailers and the remaining
20 percent of car dealers reported increased sales. Almost half
of the car dealers reported more rejections of finance applications,
but around 35 percent reported more acceptances. The sales
outlook for March and April was mixed among the general
retailers and mostly optimistic among the car dealers, which
was an improvement for both groups from the outlook in the
previous zone report. Nearly half of the general retailers and a
large majority of the car dealers expect sales to increase over
2009 levels, but only about 30 percent of the general retailers
expect sales to decrease.

Overall lending activity was relatively unchanged from previous
reporting periods. Reports indicated little to no change in consumer lending activity. One banker noted a slight uptick in
demand for auto loans, but, on balance, demand for consumer
loans has not changed since the previous reporting period. Contacts reported a slight decrease in lending activity for commercial
loans. Several contacts indicated that loan applications remain
light as businesses continue to put capital spending plans on
hold. Residential mortgage lending was relatively unchanged.
Reports continue to indicate declining activity in commercial
real estate lending. One banker noted that lending standards
for commercial real estate loans continue to tighten despite
little to no change in lending standards across other loan categories. Most contacts reported an increase in deposits.

Manufacturing and Other Business Activity
Manufacturing activity in the St. Louis zone remained flat since
our previous report, with no contacts reporting significant
changes in employment or production. In contrast, the service
sector has improved, with firms in leisure and hospitality services hiring a large number of new employees. On balance, the
job gains in this sector appear to offset job losses reported by
contacts in the education services, transportation services,
business support services, and medical services industries.

Real Estate and Construction
December 2009 year-to-date home sales increased by 1 percent in St. Louis compared with the same period in 2008, while
year-to-date single-family housing permits decreased by 13
percent. The fourth-quarter 2009 industrial vacancy and suburban office vacancy rates declined over the previous quarter,
while the downtown office vacancy rate remained the same.
A contact in St. Louis noted that commercial real estate has
stalled.

Agricultural and Natural Resources
Total coal production in Illinois and Missouri for all of 2009
increased by 2 percent from its 2008 level. Between 2008 and
2009, the total value of field crops declined by 11 percent in
Illinois and by 2 percent in Missouri. Across crops, changes in
prices and production were mostly negative. The price and
production of corn in Illinois, sorghum in Missouri, and winter
wheat in both states decreased from 2008 to 2009. For sorghum
in Illinois and cotton in Missouri, the price increased but production decreased; the opposite occurred for corn, soybeans, and
rice in Missouri (the price decreased but production increased).
The price of soybeans in Illinois decreased but production was
unchanged.

Earlier estimates had indicated that St. Louis
employment had been contracting less sharply
than for the country as a whole. According to
revised data (see the last page of this report),
however, employment losses for the St. Louis
MSA tended to mirror the country since the
start of the recession. Most recently, over the
three-month period ending in December 2009,
St. Louis employment contracted at a 0.1
percent monthly rate, roughly in line with the
national experience.

Nonfarm Payroll Employment Growth
3-Month Average, SA, January 2001–January 2010
Percent
0.4
0.2
0.0
–0.2
–0.4
–0.6

United States
St. Louis MSA

–0.8
2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

According to revised data, between January
2009 and January 2010, total nonfarm
employment in the St. Louis MSA fell by 2.9
percent. Net job losses were the norm across
non-governmental sectors. The largest percentage declines were in natural resources,
mining, and construction (11 percent); manufacturing (9.5 percent); and professional and
business services (5.6 percent). On the other
hand, financial activities (0.6 percent) and
education and health services (0.7 percent)
saw small increases in employment over the
period.

St. Louis MSA Employment Growth by Sector
Year/Year Percent Change, January 2009–January 2010
Percent
4.0
2.0
0.0
–2.0
–4.0
–6.0
–8.0
–10.0
–12.0

Total
Nonfarm

Natural Manufacturing Trade, Information
Transportation,
Resources,
Mining, and
and Utilities
Construction

Financial Professional Education Leisure
Activities
and
and
and
Business
Health Hospitality
Services

Other Government
Services

St. Louis Zone—MSA Employment and Unemployment
Nonfarm payroll employment percent change,
January 2009–January 2010
Total
St. Louis
Columbia, Mo.
Jefferson City, Mo.
Springfield, Mo.
United States

–2.86
–1.67
–2.17
–2.44
–3.24

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Goods producing
–10.02
–5.48
–8.33
–11.59
–11.09

Service providing

Unemployment rate
December 2009

–1.67
–1.33
–1.31
–1.18
–1.89

10.3
6.4
7.9
8.7
10.0

St. Louis Zone—MSA Housing Activity
Total building permits,
units year-to-date
January 2010
St. Louis
Columbia, Mo.
Jefferson City, Mo.
Springfield, Mo.
United States

Percent change

House price index,
percent change,
2009:Q4/2008:Q4

23.5
–63.9
250.0
25.9
8.9

–3.48
–0.55
1.83
–2.02
–4.66

284
13
14
73
39,479

SOURCE: Bureau of the Census, Federal Housing Financing Authority.

St. Louis Area Coincident Economic Activity Index
Index (1992 = 100)
170
Illinois

165

Missouri
United States

160
155
150
145
140
135
130
2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

In terms of total residential building permits
issued in January 2010, three of the four zone
MSAs performed much better than the country
as a whole. St. Louis, Springfield, and Jefferson
City saw increases in permits over year-earlier
levels, but Columbia saw a 64 percent decrease
in permits. The house price index for St. Louis
and Springfield fell by 3.5 percent and 2 percent, respectively, between the fourth quarter
of 2008 and the fourth quarter of 2009,
whereas Jefferson City saw its index increase
by nearly 2 percent. On the whole, the housing
market of Jefferson City fared relatively well
over the period.
The Philadelphia Fed’s coincident index combines payroll employment, wages and salaries,
the unemployment rate, and hours worked
into a single index. According to this index,
Missouri and Illinois have both underperformed
the country as a whole since the recession
began in December 2007. The index has
reversed course for the United States in recent
months and for Missouri in the latest month,
but it has continued to decline for Illinois.
Between October 2009 and January 2010,
the index rose by 0.26 percent for the United
States, but fell by 0.74 percent and 0.26 percent for Illinois and Missouri, respectively.

2010

SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

St. Louis Area Real Personal Income Growth
Percent Change, Year/Year
Percent
7

Illinois

6

Missouri

5

United States

4
3
2
1
0
–1
–2
–3
2000

2001

2002

2003

SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

As illustrated by the figure, since the recession
began in the fourth quarter of 2007, personal
income growth in Missouri has tended to be
higher than in Illinois, where it tended to move
along with national personal income. Recent
performance has followed a similar pattern.
For the third quarter of 2009, the last period
for which data are available, personal income
in Missouri was 0.14 percent lower than it had
been a year earlier, while for Illinois it was 1
percent lower. For the nation as a whole,
personal income declined by about 1 percent
over the period.

Annual Revisions of the Metro Area Employment Data
December 2008–December 2009
Original estimate
as of January 2010
Thousands
Large Metro Areas
Little Rock-N. Little Rock, Ark.
–3.9
Louisville, Ky.-Ind.
–12.6
Memphis, Tenn.-Ark.-Miss.
–15.7
St. Louis, Mo.-Ill.
–33.8
Small and Medium Metro Areas
Fayetteville-Springfield-Rogers, Ark. –1.6
Fort Smith, Ark.-Okla.
–1.3
Texarkana, Tex.-Ark.
–1.2
Bowling Green, Ky.
–3.8
Evansville, Ind.-Ky.
–4.3
Jackson, Tenn.
–1.9
Columbia, Mo.
–0.9
Jefferson City, Mo.
–2.1
Springfield, Mo.
–0.9

Revised estimate
as of March 2010

Percent
change

Thousands

Percent
change

–1.1
–2.1
–2.5
–2.5

–10.1
–20.0
–31.5
–42.6

–2.9
–3.2
–5.0
–3.2

–0.8
–1.0
–2.0
–6.1
–2.5
–3.1
–1.0
–2.6
–0.5

–4.9
–6.7
–1.6
–3.1
–6.9
–3.7
–1.1
–1.6
–6.4

–2.4
–5.5
–2.8
–5.0
–3.9
–6.1
–1.2
–2.0
–3.2

December 2007–December 2008
Original estimate
as of January 2010

Revised estimate
as of March 2010

Percent
change

Thousands

Percent
change

–4.7
–16.9
–15.7
–19.8

–1.3
–2.7
–2.4
–1.4

–3.9
–15.2
–22.3
–34.2

–1.1
–2.4
–3.4
–2.5

–2.6
–1.4
0.9
–1.5
–4.6
–1.7
1.1
–0.7
–4.6

–1.2
–1.1
1.6
–2.4
–2.6
–2.7
1.2
–0.9
–2.3

–4.8
–3.2
–0.1
–2.2
–2.3
–1.5
0.0
–0.6
–5.5

–2.3
–2.5
–0.2
–3.4
–1.3
–2.4
0.0
–0.7
–2.7

Thousands

NOTE: In early March of each year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics carries out a benchmark revision of state and local payroll employment
data using information from the more-comprehensive Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). The payroll employment data
are revised going back 21 months and the new numbers sometimes show a dramatically different view of local employment experiences.
This year, most metro areas in the Eighth District saw large downward revisions for 2009, indicating that employment had been hit much
harder by the recession than was previously estimated. The revisions for the 2008 and 2009 calendar years are presented in the table.
Note that the data for 2009 are subject to revision again in March 2011.