View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Burgundy Book
A report on economic conditions in the Memphis zone
Second Quarter 2013
The Memphis zone of the Federal Reserve comprises northern Mississippi, northeastern Arkansas, and western Tennessee and a total population of approximately 3.1
million people, including the 1.3 million who live in the Memphis MSA.

Businesses express modest improvement
in outlook for local conditions

Data Snapshot
County unemployment rates (SA, Q1-13)

By Kevin L. Kliesen, Business Economist and Research Officer

A majority of business contacts surveyed expect local business
conditions to improve slightly during the next three months. Some
skepticism remains: One-quarter of business contacts continue to
expect local conditions to worsen.
Compared with the nation, the Memphis zone saw weaker payroll
employment growth in the first quarter. Employment gains were
quite strong in the education and health and in the natural resources,
mining, and construction industries. However, employment growth
was comparatively weak in trade, transportation, and utilities, which
is the Memphis MSA’s largest industry. In addition, unemployment
rates in most areas of the Memphis zone exceeded the national rate
in the first quarter.
Manufacturing employment rose at a healthy rate over the first four
months of 2013; gains were especially strong statewide in Tennessee.
Residential real estate activity was vibrant in the first quarter, though
the pace of home price increases lagged that of the nation. Office
vacancy rates rose sharply in the first quarter, but retail asking rates
increased.
Consumer auto debt advanced at a robust pace, while households,
like most areas of the District, continued to reduce their mortgage
debt balances in the first quarter.

9.9%

less than 5 %
7% to 8%

5% to 6%
over 8%

6% to 7%

Nonfarm payroll employment by industry
Percent change from one year ago (Q1-13)
-4

-2

0

Total NonFarm (100%)
Trade, Trans, and Utilities
(27%)
Education and Health (15%)

Government (14%)
Prof. and Business Services
(14%)

Leisure and Hospitality
(10%)
Manufacturing (7%)

Bank profitability in the first quarter varied greatly in the Memphis
zone, with Tennessee and Mississippi banks underperforming their
peers in Arkansas and in the nation.

Financial Activities (5%)

Other Services (4%)

Farmers in the Memphis zone intend to reduce their planned cotton
and rice acreage in 2013, while increasing the number of acres
devoted to corn production.

Nat. Res, Mining, and
Construction (3%)
Information (1%)
Memphis

This Report is published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

US

2

4

Second Quarter 2013

How to read this report

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise noted, city names refer
to the metropolitan statistical areas
(MSAs), which are geographic areas that
include cities and their surrounding
suburbs, as defined by the Census Bureau.

Labor Markets ........................................................................... 3

Statistics for the Memphis zone are based
on data availability and are calculated as
weighted averages of either the 73
counties in the zone or the three MSAs. As
of 2012, approximately 53 percent of the
zone’s labor force was located in an MSA.
Specifically: 44 percent in Memphis, 4
percent in Jackson, and 4 percent in
Jonesboro; 47 percent of the zone’s labor
force was located in non-metropolitan
areas.

Banking and Finance ................................................................. 7

Arrows in the tables are used to identify
significant trends in the data. The direction of the arrow indicates the sign (up/
down) and the color indicates the economic significance (green = good, red = poor).
Arrows appear only when the change from
the previous quarter is greater than 1
standard deviation. For example, the
standard deviation of the change in the
U.S. unemployment rate is 0.4 percent. If
the U.S. unemployment rate declined from
8.4 percent to 8.2 percent, no arrow would
appear; but if it declined from 8.4 percent
to 7.9 percent, a green down arrow would
appear in the table.
Selected variable definitions are located in
the appendix.

Manufacturing........................................................................... 4
Real Estate and Construction .................................................... 5
Household Sector ...................................................................... 6

Agriculture and Natural Resources ........................................... 8
Appendix ................................................................................... 9

Join our Panel of Business Contacts
The anecdotal information in this report was provided by
our panel of business contacts, who were surveyed between
May 1 and May 15.
If you’re interested in becoming a member of our panel, follow this
link to complete a trial survey:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/beigebooksurvey/

Selected quotes from business contacts
are generally verbatim, but some are
lightly edited to improve readability.

Or email us at beigebook@stls.frb.org.

For more information contact the St.
Louis office:
Charles Gascon
charles.s.gascon@stls.frb.org
Media inquiries:
mediainquiries@stls.frb.org

Views expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions of
the Federal Reserve System.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

2

Labor Markets

Second Quarter 2013

Slow and Steady Growth in Memphis and Jackson; Jonesboro Shows Improvement
By Charles S. Gascon, Regional Economist

“I think things will get better but this recovery is very
fragile.”



Nonfarm payroll employment growth in Memphis
continued its slow and steady climb; increasing by
just under 1 percent from a year ago. Virtually no
growth occurred in the retail trade sector, which
comprises about 13 percent of the local employment (see figure).



Anecdotal reports suggest that businesses remain
cautiously optimistic about the reminder of the
year, and some reports indicate increasing
payrolls throughout the course of the year.
However, there is a reluctance to hire beyond
immediate needs, possibly using part-time
workers to meet seasonal demands.



Tepid consumer demand is the likely cause for
slow growth in the retail sector. Between 2008
and 2011, average hourly earnings growth for the
metro area has been negative, and only in the
past two quarters has growth exceeded the CPI
inflation rate.



Unemployment rates around the Memphis zone
remain elevated compared with the nation. In
Memphis the unemployment rate ticked up 0.3
percentage points during the first quarter after
steady decline throughout the second half of
2011 and all of 2012.



Jonesboro continues to be the bright spot in the
region, where nonfarm employment growth was
faster than the national rate; the unemployment
rate is below 7 percent and continues to decline.

— Memphis area auto dealer

“The folks I speak with around here in Memphis generally continue to say that they do not see the local economy as getting better or worse, but rather going sideways.”
— Memphis area lawyer

Stalling local retail sector drags on Memphis employment
Payroll employment, (Index 2006=100)
105

100
95
90

85

Private (US)
Retail Trade (US)
Private (Memphis)
Retail Trade (Memphis)

80
2006
2007
Source: BLS.

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Memphis

Jackson

Jonesboro, AR

US

Unemployment rate (Q1-13) (%)

9.1

8.2

6.8

7.7

Nonfarm employment (Q1-13)

0.9

1.7

2.2

1.5

Goods-producing sector

1.6

1.5

5.0

1.4

Private service-providing sector

1.0

2.2

1.5

2.0

-0.4

0.3

1.9

-0.4

Government sector

Note: Unl es s otherwi s e noted, va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (± 1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on)
cha nge from the previ ous qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

3

Manufacturing

Second Quarter 2013

Manufacturing Sector in Memphis Continues to Expand
By Yang Liu, Senior Research Associate

“Plant expansions and modifications completed in
2012 have enabled the manufacturers to handle the
increase in production and sales without any more
capital expenditures.”



Manufacturing conditions in Memphis improved
significantly. Through April, the manufacturing
sector has added 1,700 jobs in 2013 (see figure).
This more than offsets losses in other sectors and
resulting in a net increase of 700 jobs for the
private sector.



According to anecdotal information, most
manufacturers remain cautiously optimistic about
the remainder of 2013 and they are increasing
their employment numbers. A noticeable amount
of businesses have announced plans to expand
operations.



The March 2013 benchmark employment revision
indicates that the 2011 and 2012 manufacturing
payrolls in Memphis were marginally lower than
initially reported (see figure). The data revision
also shows that Memphis suffered moderate
contractions in manufacturing during the fall of
2011 and 2012.



Mississippi’s durable goods payroll employment
growth dropped significantly from the previous
quarter; although it remained unchanged on a
year-over-year basis.



Tennessee’s and Mississippi’s nondurable goods
earnings growth both topped 3 percent in the
fourth quarter of 2012, faster than the national
pace.

— Northeast Arkansas banker
“Inventories and long lead-time commitments to receive product have been drawn down over the past 24
months. Sales growth appears to be driven, or at least
supported, by an ability to respond to short lead-time
product demand.”
— Northeast Arkansas manufacturer

Benchmark revision indicates marginally slower
manufacturing growth in Memphis
Manufacturing payroll employment, SA thousands
52
50
48
46
44

Post Revision
Pre Revision

42
2008
2009
Source: BLS.

2010

2011

2012

2013

Memphis
Manufacturing employment (Q1-13)

Tennessee

Mississippi

US

0.9

3.0

0.3

Durable goods

0.9

4.7

0.0

Nondurable goods

1.0

0.3

0.8

0.6

--

7.0

5.9

6.0

Durable goods

--

9.5

7.4

7.9

Nondurable goods

--

3.3

Manufacturing earnings (Q4-12)

▲

3.0

1.0
▼

▲

1.2

2.7

Note: Va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (± 1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on) cha nge from the
previ ous qua rter; s ee a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

4

Real Estate and Construction

Second Quarter 2013

2013 Continued with Moderate Gains in the Real Estate Market
By Li Li, Research Associate

“The apartment rental market remains tight with most
properties at a 95% occupancy.”



Residential real estate conditions improved at
varying rates across the zone in the first quarter of
2013. Local contacts in the Jonesboro and Paragould areas reported that home sales were
robust, while sales activity slowed down in
Memphis (see table). Jonesboro’s growth rate of
home prices also outperformed other MSAs (see
table).



The office real estate market in Memphis generally underperformed the nation: Office vacancy
rates in Memphis were 730 basis points higher,
and growth rates of asking rents were 140 basis
points lower.



The retail real estate market gained slightly in the
first quarter. On a year-over-year basis, vacancy
rates fell by 60 basis points to 12.6 percent, while
asking rents increased by 0.7 percent (see table),
inching to a level that was the highest since the
first quarter of 2008.



Commercial and industrial real estate construction
continued to show improvements. Several
projects for apartments and medical buildings
were announced in the first quarter. Reports also
note that a new speculative industrial building has
broken ground in Olive Branch, Mississippi, and
several other build-to-suit industrial buildings
were either planned or are under construction.

— Northeast Mississippi area contact
“What is interesting is [that] we have two-thirds of our
first quarter [home] sales volume already pending. It is
amazing.”
— Memphis area broker

Apartment properties continued to outperform other
segments in Memphis

Percent change
from one year ago
4

Percent
14
13

3

12

2

11

1

10

0

9

-1

8

Asking Rent (Right)

Q1-10
Source: Reis.com.

Q1-11

Vacancy Rate (Left)

-2

Q1-12

Q1-13

Non-residential market (Memphis, Q1-13)

Apartment

Vacancy rate (%)
Asking rent

Office

8.5

24.3

2.9

0.6

Retail
▲

Percent change from one year ago
Note: Apartment, office, and retail values are from Reis.com. Industrial values are from Cassidy Turley.

Residential market (Q1-13)

Memphis

Jackson

12.6

14.2
▲

0.7

Jonesboro

CoreLogic Home Price Index

1.3

-3.1

4.9

Single-family building permits

26.6

27.7

-62.3

New and existing home sales

2.4

--

--

▼

Industrial

2.7

US
9.8
▼

▲

25.7
10.3

Note: Values are percent change from one year ago. Arrows indicate a signficant (±1 standard deviation) change from previous quarter. See
appendix for notes and sources.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

5

Household Sector

Second Quarter 2013

Consumers Continue to Take On Auto Debt
By Bryan Noeth, Policy Analyst

“Consumers seem to have more confidence and are
willing to spend money, but it would not take much to
turn in the opposite direction.”
— Memphis area auto dealer
“Retail sales were up in the area, but most people I
spoke to think this was a direct result of individuals
receiving tax refunds.”



State per capita incomes in the zone grew at
about 4 percent, similar to that of the nation (see
table). The strong growth likely ebbed in the first
quarter of 2013 with the ending of the payroll tax
holiday.



Mortgage deleveraging continued at a modest
pace. Per capita mortgage levels were 3.1 percent
below the previous year in the zone compared
with 4.5 percent for the nation.



The percentage of mortgage balances in serious
delinquency continued to trend downward
throughout the zone and rates remained well
below the national average.



Retail auto sales grew significantly in 2012.
Accordingly, consumer auto debt in the zone was
up 9.7 percent, well above the national average.
Delinquencies continued to fall as well.



Student debt in the zone, as a percent of income,
was similar to the nation, with the exception of
Mississippi (see chart). Mississippi had higher
levels of student debt per borrower and a higher
proportion of borrowers. Additionally, Mississippi
and Arkansas both had much higher rates of
delinquency than the nation.

— Northwest Arkansas banker

Mississippi sees elevated student debt burden
Student debt as a percent of personal income
14%
12%

2006

2012

10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Arkansas
Mississippi
Tennessee
US
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel, Equifax and Haver Analytics.

Memphis Zone
Per capita personal income (Q4-12)

Arkansas

--

4.3

Mortgage

-3.1

Credit card
Auto loan

Mississippi
▲

Tennessee

US

4.3

4.3

4.2

-0.5

-2.6

-2.2

-4.5

-2.8

-3.5

-1.2

-3.8

-3.9

9.7

9.2

10.3

8.0

7.3

Mortgage

3.2

2.8

3.5

2.6

4.6

Credit card

9.7

8.7

8.5

8.8

9.8

Auto loan

4.6

2.6

5.1

3.7

3.7

▲

Per capita debt balances (Q1-13)

90+ day delinquency rates (Q1-13) (%)
▼

Note: Unless otherwise noted, values are percent change from one year ago. Arrows indicate a significant (±1 standard deviation) change from the
previous quarter. See appendix for notes and sources.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

6

Banking and Finance

Second Quarter 2013

Bank Performance Uneven in Memphis Zone
By Michelle Neely, Economist

“The Qualified Mortgage rule will wreak havoc in the
mortgage market in areas we serve as it relates to
balloon mortgages.”
—Memphis area banker



Bankers surveyed in the Memphis zone expect
loan demand to stay the same during the next
three months.



Profitability measures were uneven in the Memphis area in the first quarter. While return on
average assets (ROA) rose substantially for banks
in Arkansas (up 8 basis points), it was up a modest
3 basis points in Tennessee and down 5 basis
points in Mississippi from its year-end levels. Yearover-year, the disparity is more stark: ROA
jumped 25 basis points in Arkansas, but fell 8 basis
points in Tennessee and 7 basis points in Mississippi.



Net interest margins (NIM) fell across the zone in
the first quarter. The average NIM declined 12
basis points in Arkansas, 21 basis points in
Mississippi, and 7 basis points in Tennessee in the
first quarter. Arkansas and Tennessee banks were
able to eke out earnings improvements because
declines in loan loss provisions surpassed the
drops in net interest income.



Asset quality improved in the first quarter at
banks in Mississippi and Tennessee, but deteriorated somewhat in Arkansas. Nonperforming real
estate and consumer loans were down in Mississippi and Tennessee, but up in Arkansas, accounting for the different trends. Commercial and
industrial loan delinquency rates rose in all three
states, however.

“Net interest margins are contracting due to pressure
to reduce pricing of existing credits, low-yielding
investment opportunities, and little room to reduce
deposit expense.”
—Memphis area banker
“Farmers are now borrowing heavily. We were worried
that agricultural loan demand would be down because
of last year’s record-breaking crops.”
—Northwest Mississippi banker

The squeeze is on
Net interest margin at commercial banks, percent
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
US
TN
MS
AR

3.2
3.0

2.8
2.6
2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Source: FRED.

Banking performance (Q1-13 )

Tennessee

Mississippi

Arkansas
▲

8th District

Return on average assets

0.81

0.84

1.26

Net interest margin

3.82

3.82

4.07

3.71

Nonperforming loans / total loans

2.48

2.42

2.80

2.31

2.47

76.03

69.14

70.66

79.89

75.33

Loan loss reserve coverage ratio

▼

1.01

US Peer Banks
0.95

▼

3.77

Note: Va l ues a re percenta ge poi nts . Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt ( ± 1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on) cha nge from the previ ous qua rter. See
a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

7

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Second Quarter 2013

2013 Farm Season Off to Slow Start, Corn and Sorghum Acreage Up
By Lowell R. Ricketts, Senior Research Associate

“I’ve never seen anything that compares with this
spring. I’ve seen the Delta planted late but never the
whole state.”



In a continuing trend, farmers in the District’s
states plan on planting more corn and sorghum
crops in 2013 than they did in 2012 (see figure).
The rough pattern in corn and sorghum plantings
follows recent trends in commodity prices. See
the June 28 USDA report for final acreage planted.



The prospective cotton crop across all three states
in the Memphis zone will be significantly smaller
than the crop planted in 2012. Additional planting
of corn and sorghum likely crowded out cotton
planting as farmers seek greater returns.



Tennessee corn and pastureland is in better
condition than at the same time last year; 17
percent more of the corn crop and 30 percent
more of pastureland is in good or excellent
condition. In contrast, 13 percent less of the
Mississippi rice crop is in good or excellent
condition.



Agricultural bankers surveyed within the Memphis
zone expect loan repayments in the second
quarter to fall short of levels seen last year.



Arkansas and Mississippi coal production over the
first quarter of 2013 was slightly higher than
during the same time last year. In contrast, mining
and logging employment declined in both states.

 Mississippi agronomist
“Due to the rain I am three weeks behind in planting
my cotton and soybean. I’ve hired 30 additional
workers and offered all the whiskey and food they
need to work 24 hours around the clock. I am ready to
do whatever it takes to get the job done and get all the
acres planted.”
— Western Tennessee farmer

Corn and sorghum acreage move with commodity prices
Acreage planted (AR, TN, and MS) and commodity prices,
Index (2005=100)
400
350

300

Corn Acreage
Sorghum Acreage
S&P GS Commodity Index

250
200
150
100
50
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: NASS/USDA, Standard & Poor's .

2010

2011

2012

2013

Arkansas Mississippi Tennessee
Natural resources (Q1-13)
Mining and logging employment
Coal production

-12.2
7.5

Prospective Plantings (2013)
Corn
Cotton
Rice
Sorghum
Soybean

40.8
-54.6 ▼
-5.0
21.4
1.6

-1.8
2.8
28.0
-43.2
-7.7
-6.3
-1.0

---6.0
-6.7 ▼
-26.3
----7.9

US
2.0
-9.3
0.1
-18.6
-3.3
22.0
-0.1

Note: Va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (± 1
s tanda rd devi a tion) cha nge from the previ ous qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

Memphis zone Ag. bankers'
expections
Q2-13 vs. Q2-12
Loan demand
Available funds
Loan repayments
Farm income
Capital expenditure

100
100
78
100
100

Note: Va l ues reported us i ng a
di ffus i on i ndex. See a ppendi x
for notes a nd s ources .

8

Appendix
Cover Page
Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Unemployment rate, nonfarm payroll employment.

Labor Markets
Table Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Unemployment rate. Nonfarm employment and contributions
by sector.
Notes
Goods-producing sector comprises the manufacturing and natural
resources, mining, and construction sectors.
Private service providing sector includes the following sectors:
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities;
Professional and Business Services; Education and Health Services;
Leisure and Hospitality; and Other Services.
Unemployment rate data are seasonally adjusted.

Second Quarter 2013
In the contributions to employment chart, bars represent the
respective contribution of each sector to the area’s total employment
as a percent change from one year ago, while the line represents the
net percent change from one year ago in total employment.

Real Estate and Construction
Table Sources
CoreLogic
Home price index, including distressed sales.
Census Bureau
Year-to-date single-family building permits.
National Association of Realtors
Year-to-date new and existing home sales.
Notes
Asking rent is the publicized asking rent price. Data are in current
dollars.
Vacancy rate is the percentage of total inventory physically vacant as
of the survey date, including direct vacant and sublease space.
New and existing home sales consists of single-family home sales.

Manufacturing
Table Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Manufacturing employment: total, durable, and nondurable
goods.
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Manufacturing earnings: total, durable, and nondurable goods.
Notes
Durable goods manufacturing sector is defined by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics as industries with a NAICS classification code of 321
(Wood Product Manufacturing); 327 (Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing); 331 (Primary Metal Manufacturing); 332 (Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing); 333 (Machinery Manufacturing); 334
(Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing); 335 (Electrical
Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing); 336
(Transportation Equipment Manufacturing); 337 (Furniture and
Related Product Manufacturing); and 339 (Misc. Manufacturing).
Nondurable goods manufacturing sector is defined by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics as industries with a NAICS classification code of 311
(Food Manufacturing); 312 (Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing); 313 (Textile Mills); 314 (Textile Product Mills); 315 (Apparel
Manufacturing); 316 (Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing); 322
(Paper Manufacturing); 323 (Printing and Related Support Activities);
324 (Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing); 325 (Chemical
Manufacturing); and 326 (Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing).
Manufacturing earnings is the sum of wage and salary disbursements, supplements to wages and salaries, and proprietors’ income
less contributions for government social insurance.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

Household Sector
Table Sources
Equifax based on authors’ calculations
All figures are based on a 5 percent sample of individual credit
reports. Balances are geographical averages of various debt
categories. The mortgage category includes first mortgages and
home equity installment loans, but home equity lines of credit
are omitted. Auto loans include those financed by finance
company or bank loans. Credit cards are revolving accounts at
banks, bankcard companies, national credit card companies,
credit unions, and savings and loan associations.
Haver Analytics
Per capita income.
Census Bureau
Homeownership rates.
Notes
The CredAbility Index is a quarterly measure of the financial
condition of the average consumer. The scores are defined as
follows: 90-100 implies excellent or secure, 80-89 implies good or
stable, 70-79 implies weakening or at risk, 60-69 implies distressed or
unstable, and 59 or below implies emergency or crisis.
Delinquency rates are calculated as the percentage of payments past
due by more than 90 days, weighted by the dollar value of the loan.
Homeownership rates are the proportion of households in each area
that are owners. It is calculated by dividing the number of households
that are owners by the total number of occupied households.

9

Appendix

Second Quarter 2013

Banking and Finance
Table Sources
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Return on average assets: USL15ROA. Net interest margin:
USL15NIM. Nonperforming loans: USL15NPTL. Loan loss reserve/
Total loans: USL15LLRTL. Net loan losses/Average total loans:
USL15LSTL.
Note: The data available in the table can be found in FRED.
Notes
Loan loss provisions are expenses banks set aside as an allowance for
bad loans.
Nonperforming loans are those loans managers classify as 90 days or
more past due or nonaccrual, which means they are more likely to
default.
Loan loss coverage ratio is loan loss reserves divided by non
performing loans.
US peer banks are those commercial banks with assets of less than
$15 billion.
Due to the seasonal nature of bank return on average assets and net
interest margin, the arrows in the table denote significant changes
from one year ago.

Agriculture and Natural Resources
Table Sources
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Survey of Agricultural Credit
Conditions
Agriculture Bankers’ expectations of loan demand, available
funds, loan repayment rates, farm income, and capital expenditures are relative to one year ago. Respondents can answer
“increase,” “decrease,” or “no change.”
The diffusion index was created by subtracting the percent of
bankers that responded “decrease” from the percent that
responded “increase” and then adding 100. Index values from 0
to 99 indicate overall expectations of decreasing values; index
values from 101 to 200 indicate overall expectations of
increasing values; and an index value of 100 indicates an even
split.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Coal production.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Mining and logging employment.
USDA
Crop production.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis — Memphis Zone

10