The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
F e d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k o f C h i c a g o Can the Midwest Maintain its M o m e n t u m ? T h e Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago is one of 12 regional Reserve Banks across the United States t h a t , together with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., serve as the nation's central bank. The role of the Federal Reserve System, since its establishment by an act of Congress passed in 1913, h a s been to foster a strong economy, supported by a stable financial system. To this end, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago participates in the formulation and implementation of national monetary policy, supervises and regulates banks and b a n k holding companies, and provides financial services to depository institutions and the U.S. government. Through its head office in Chicago, branch in Detroit, regional offices in Des Moines, Indianapolis and Milwaukee, and facility in Peoria, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago serves the Seventh Federal Reserve District, which includes major portions of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, plus all of Iowa. OUR VISION • Further the public interest by fostering a sound economy and stable financial system • Provide products and services of unmatched value to those we serve • Set the standard for excellence in the Federal Reserve System • Work together, communicate openly, be creative and fair • Live by our core values of integrity, respect, responsibility and excellence CONTENTS President's Message I Can the Midwest Maintain its Momentum? 2 1996 Highlights 16 Operations Volumes 17 Financial Statements 18 Directors and Advisory Councils 22 Officers 24 P r e s i d e n t ' s M e s s a g e From left: Chairman Robert Healey, Deputy Chairman Lester McKeever, President Michael Moskow, and First Vice President William Conrad. 1996 ^ ^ was a good year—a year of achievement for the economy, the banking system, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. The economy grew at a very respectable pace, with low inflation and high levels of employment. The Midwest, in particular, prospered as it continued to demolish its old image as the nation's "Rust Belt." The banking system also enjoyed another solid year, as indicated by steady loan growth and a healthy return on assets. The outlook for financial institutions nationally and in the Midwest remains quite positive. Like the economy and the banking sector, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago had another successful year. We made significant progress toward setting the standard of excellence in the Federal Reserve System, progress that will leave the Bank well-positioned to do even better Chicago board, and Charles Allen, John Forsyth, and William Odom from our Detroit board. In particular, I would like to extend my appreciation to Robert Healey, who served as chairman for two years and as deputy chairman for three years. He provided outstanding leadership and insight during his service on the board. Many of the Chicago Fed's initiatives during 1996 illustrate the Bank's efforts to prepare for future challenges. Perhaps the premier example is the Bank's comprehensive study of the regional economy, The Midwest Economy: Looking Back for the Future. The following article highlights the study, outlining some of the major findings and offering a variety of perspectives on how regional policymakers can help sustain the Midwest's momentum. Through such efforts, we hope we can contribute to a vibrant regional economy that is firmly positioned to thrive in the coming years. in the future. The Bank's many accomplishments during 1996 are the result of the outstanding efforts of our staff members. In addition, our directors in Chicago and Detroit provided invaluable guidance, unselfishly giving their time and expertise to the Bank. I would like to thank six individuals who completed their service on the board in 1996: David Michael H. Moskow President March 24, 1997 Fox, Robert Healey, and Charlene Sullivan from our I Can the Midwest Maintain its Momentum? Written off as the"""""RustBelt"""duringthe 1970s and 1980s, the Midwest has a distinctive has transformed productivity, new shine to it these days. The region itself into a lean and agile center of with unemployment industrial rates that are the envy of most of the U.S. The Midwest has made a remarkable comeback. But can the region maintain its momentum? At the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, we decided that question was worthy of a closer look. Working with a diverse group of experts, Chicago Fed economists in 1996 carried out a comprehensive study of the Midwestern economy. They focused on the states of the Seventh Federal District: Illinois, Indiana, 2 Iowa, Michigan, and Reserve Wisconsin. The goal of the study was to gain a clearer under- The key question is how the Midwest arrived at a standing of why the Midwest rebounded in order to world-class standard, and what it will take to maintain determine w h a t the region needs to do to continue its it. We examined this question in-depth during the course success. The study has a two-fold benefit: it will put of 1996, holding six individual seminars and a wrap-up regional policymakers in a better position to develop session to discuss the results. public policy to sustain the Midwest's momentum; and it The following pages summarize some of the study's will help the Chicago Fed contribute to national monetary important findings and offer related viewpoints of a policy, the most important responsibility of the Federal variety of conference participants. Also included are some Reserve System. strategic options for policymakers to consider as the To carry out the study, we brought together a wide Midwest positions itself for the future. The information variety of researchers, academics, government decision- is provided within the framework of six key questions: makers, and business, community, and labor leaders. • Is the work force prepared to sustain growth and Providing guidance was an advisory group, which included as honorary members the governors of the five states of the Seventh District. We examined the numerous forces that contributed to the region's success, studying changes — both inside and outside the Midwest — that affected the economy. We also attempted to build consensus on what policies will help keep the economy strong. As expected, we found that manufacturing and agriculture are still the driving forces within the Midwest economy. Those are the region's traditional strengths, and that has not changed. The difference is that the region is development? • How can the Midwest continue to improve industrial productivity? • Can the Midwest continue to prosper in the global economy? • What can state and local policy do to help sustain the region's current economic momentum? • Will the Midwest's metropolitan areas be a source of strength or weakness? • Can rural areas sustain their turnaround? It's important to address these issues because regional operating much more efficiently — at a world-class economic advantage is fleeting. This is a window of oppor- level — by taking advantage of new technology and cutting- tunity for the Midwest to build on its success. The Chicago edge production methods such as lean manufacturing. Fed can help the Midwest maintain its momentum by This significant improvement in efficiency is the contributing a broad-based foundation of information single most important reason for the Midwest's turn- about the regional economy—information t h a t can around. It is true that the Midwest has benefited from a serve as a building block for the development of effective number of external trends such as falling energy prices, regional policy. Simply put, by studying the past, we can a depreciating dollar, and a shift in government ex- prepare ourselves for a prosperous future. penditures away from defense spending. Nevertheless, the region's h a r d - e a r n e d progress in increasing its efficiency is the driving force behind its success. 3 Is the region's w o r k force prepared t o sustain g r o w t h and development? Midwest workers are highly skilled and productive, but training methods and opportunities for certain segments of the work force need T h e productivity of the Midwest work force has clearly contributed to t h e region's t u r n a r o u n d . To m a i n t a i n this productivity, t h e to be improved. skills of all workers need to be continuously upgraded. Creating the highest-quality work force depends on giving individuals skills to be life-long learners. A key starting point is ensuring high-quality elementary and secondary education. For those already in t h e work force, new training methods t h a t better meet the needs of employers are necessary. Finally, improving training and employm e n t opportunities for t h e disadvantaged is also important to creating a work force t h a t will sustain growth and development. K e y C o n f e r e n c e F i n d i n g s BRINGING THE DISADVANTAGED INTO THE WORK FORCE The demand for skilled workers and the recent restructuring of welfare have intensified the need to develop better methods for bringing the disadvantaged into the MEETING THE work force. Toby Herr of the Erikson OF Institute discussed the Project Match NEEDS EMPLOYERS Bob Jones of the National Alliance of program, which places welfare recipients from Chicago's Cabrini Green housing Business discussed the need for policies project into jobs. This program has to match more closely the new realities achieved favorable results by providing of the labor market. There is no question participants with immediate exposure that the old model of one employer to the workplace, supported by ongoing and one career for life is gone forever. assistance to keep jobs, to advance to Workers must have the education and better jobs (often requiring a return training to adapt to new jobs within their to school), and to find re-employment company or their industry. They also must if new jobs are lost. This approach often have portable health care and pension shows more promise than traditional plans as well as industry-based, certifiable methods of providing the training before standards that give them recognized credentials that will make it easier to a client takes the job. adapt to changing labor markets. O p t i o n s • that Promote reflects efforts to continually the new market improve realities that the course of their • Establish industry-based certified skills to benefit and the firms hiring those both workers changing understanding by studying Develop better of how to bring the disadvantaged programs training during career. jobs information about can provide Increase skills, with are likely to change jobs workers. • • workers' workers that reflect "best labor market the skills needed into the work needs so that training by employers. force practices." PREPARING COLLEGE STUDENTS F O R T H E JOB M A R K E T Students entering the work force often need information about labor markets and career prospects. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's Phil Israilevich, in conjunction with the Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, is developing software that will allow students in the City Colleges of Chicago system to examine the earnings and growth potential for a wide range of careers in the Chicago area. The software also identifies college courses needed to enter these fields. programs H o w can the Midwest continue t o improve industrial productivity? Many Midwestern industries have become more competitive by improving their productivity. A key for the future will be facilitating the spread Much of the Midwest's resurgence is due to gains in two historically i m p o r t a n t sectors: m a n u f a c t u r i n g and agriculture. The region of productivity-enhancing continues to have a higher concentration than the rest of the nation in these economic sectors. New production methods and technology methods and technology have m a d e Midwest producers more competitive, enabling t h e region to t a k e a d v a n t a g e of t r a d e opportunities and reclaim its throughout the region. share of the domestic market. The Midwest economy will continue to improve if all types of industries and firms can share in these efficiency improvements. 6 K e y C o n f e r e n c e F i n d i n g s W h e r e are U.S. auto assembly plants located? Midwest - 31 53.4% MAINTAINING THE MANUFACTURING Elsewhere 46.6% MOMENTUM Don Smith of Carnegie Mellon University in the U.S. - 27 discussed high-performance manufacturing systems that maximize the flow of inRECLAIMING AUTO THE formation within companies and in their INDUSTRY dealings with suppliers. The manufacturing The auto industry's strong performance approach was brought to the Midwest by has been key to the region's turnaround. Japanese auto transplants. The Midwest is The auto industry reconcentrated in the well positioned to utilize these techniques Midwest, according to James Rubenstein as the best U.S., European, and Japanese of Miami University of Ohio. A total of manufacturers all have a presence in the 31 of 58 auto assembly plants nationally region. To sustain the Midwest's manufac- are in the Midwest. Although nine auto turing rebound, Smith suggested reducing plants closed in the region from 1979- intra-regional trade barriers and increasing 1996, 13 new plants opened, including a the efficient flow of information about number of foreign producers. The innova- new technology to help implement inno- tions introduced by foreign producers vative manufacturing techniques. Policy- have facilitated the development of new makers should also consider addressing production techniques. potential labor shortages in key areas due to the aging of the region's work force. O p t i o n s Study the best methods and models to all types Enhance efficiency by strengthening and the manufacturers relationships between who buy their products. Develop a better of for transferring technology businesses. suppliers understanding of how to apply such as lean new production methods, manufacturing. APPLYING N E W PRODUCTION METHODS — LEAN MANUFACTURING Increased use of lean manufacturing techniques is partly responsible for the region's recovery, according to the Chicago Fed's Thomas Klier. Lean manufacturing is a production system that emphasizes teamw o r k on the shop floor, just-in-time inventory, flexible production equipment, and close relationships with suppliers. These productivity-enhancing methods are being applied at all types of manufacturing firms — old and new. The challenge is transferring these methods to even more companies to ensure that both large and small operations can take advantage of them. 7 H o w can the Midwest continue t o prosper in the global economy? The region will prosper if Midwestern companies continue t o enhance T h e Midwest has benefited from an inflow of foreign investment and an expansion of international trade, which has been facilitated productivity and compete by reduced barriers. The product mix of Midwestern businesses is well suited to the needs of high-growth emerging markets through- aggressively overseas. out the world. Durable goods and agricultural products are in high demand, and t h a t h a s contributed to t h e region's recent strong performance. Additionally, foreign investment in the Midwest has brought the area new capital and in many cases new production methods. Overall, globalization has made Midwestern firms more competitive both at home and abroad. K e y C o n f e r e n c e F i n d i n g s OPPORTUNITIES IN THE N E W TRADE CLIMATE Midwestern firms are well positioned to benefit from the growing liberalization of world trade, particularly in emerging BENEFITING markets, according to David Walters of the TRADE Office of the U.S.Trade Representative. FROM AGREEMENTS W h o benefits from the North American Recent trade pacts have opened up new markets, offering an opportunity to Mid- Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the western firms. Evidence suggests that firms focus of a study by Chicago Fed's Michael that pursue these opportunities often Kouparitsas. Given NAFTA's short history, grow faster and pay higher wages. that's a difficult question to answer. But by using a sophisticated type of modeling to study the international trade agreement, Kouparitsas suggested that all three N o r t h American trading partners will make economic gains and that the Midwest will benefit from an expansion in durable goods manufacturing activity. O p t i o n s Develop a better understanding are most closely of which linked Distribute Investigate the effect of exchange rate movements of Midwestern domestic to Midwestern the critical on the competitive and international markets products. information that firms need to enter foreign markets. position firms. NEW TO APPROACHES UNDERSTANDING EXCHANGE RATES U.S. goods have been widely viewed as a better buy overseas because of a decline in the value of the dollar relative to key foreign currencies, such as the Japanese yen and the German mark. Chicago Fed economists Jack Hervey and Bill Strauss took a regional approach to examining the effect of exchange rates on exports. They found that while the value of the dollar has tended to depreciate in many countries since 1974, it has generally appreciated in those countries that are most likely to trade with the Midwest. This suggests that the renewed demand for Midwestern goods is not simply due to a price advantage resulting from changes in the value of the dollar. 9 H o w can state and local policy help t o sustain the region's momentum? State and local governments need t o continue pursuing innovative ways t o provide essential services while keeping State and local policymakers in the Midwest have received national attention for their creative approaches, devising programs ranging spending in check. from new welfare policies to changes in school funding. At the same time, prudent fiscal policies have restored the governments' financial stability, which is key to t h e well-being of the region's economy. As the federal government gives more responsibility to the states, these t r e n d s need to continue. 10 K e y C o n f e r e n c e F i n d i n g s W h e r e do metro Chicago exports go? Rest of U.S. 85.0% Rest of W o r l d ADJUSTING TAX T O SUPPORT SYSTEMS GROWTH 7.1% Mexico 0.8% Canada 7.1 A Many states have worked hard to reverse the Midwest's image as a region with high STRENGTHENING taxes. In particular, a number of regional FOR R E G I O N A L policymakers have introduced reforms to OPPORTUNITIES TRADE Although global trade is essential, it is revamp their tax structures. Joint work important to consider the links between by the Chicago Fed's Bill Testa and Tulane Midwestern firms and their domestic University's Bill Oakland suggests the need trading partners, said Geoff Hewings of for more long-term improvements in state the University of Illinois. The Chicago tax structures, such as taxing businesses metropolitan area, for example, sends based on the cost of the benefits they re- many more goods to other parts of the ceive from their state. This could prompt U.S. than to foreign countries. In some future economic growth by reducing the cases, differing rules and regulations in U.S. distortionary effect taxes have on the states may hamper such trade. Hewings choice of where to locate a business. suggested that barriers to intra-regional trade, such as varying occupational licenses and weight and length limits on trucks, should be examined t o ensure that they are necessary. O p t i o n s Continue to develop equitable and diversified on one primary • Continue prudent spending policies that support • sustainable Encourage information Examine intra-regional trade source tax systems that do not rely revenue. growth. the development to ensure barriers of that to ensure that <4 of a wide range policymakers they are of state and regional are fully informed when economic crafting policy. necessary. RESTORING FISCAL BALANCE Midwestern states have taken advantage of the resurgent regional economy to improve their fiscal position, according t o the Chicago Fed's Rick Mattoon. These states have avoided major tax increases throughout the 1990s, building substantial budget reserves and avoiding the creation of expensive new spending programs.Thisprudent fiscal policy leaves the region's governments in good shape to accept new responsibilities from the federal government. II W i l l the Midwest's metropolitan areas be a source of strength o r weakness? To be a source of strength, the region's metropolitan areas need t o continue their transformation t o centers of key business services and high-tech manufacturing, while seeking W h i l e metropolitan areas continue to expand, the growth is more dispersed. Economic activity h a s been spreading solutions t o serious social out toward the urban fringe, leaving redevelopment problems for the core city. As metropolitan areas re-invent themselves, and economic problems. it is important to investigate the causes of dispersed growth. There is a healthy debate as to whether this trend is a result of artificial subsidies and government policies or is being driven by technological changes. A key to the region's continued success will be developing a better understanding of how the relationship between cities and their suburbs affects economic growth. K e y C o n f e r e n c e F i n d i n g s LINKING METRO W O R K E R S T O JOBS A mismatch often exists in urban areas REDEVELOPING B R O W N FIELDS between where jobs are located and Charles Bartsch of the Northeast- where potential workers live. Davis Midwest Institute discussed policies Jenkins from the Great Cities Institute geared toward improving the redevelop- of the University of Illinois at Chicago ment prospects of environmentally suggests that programs such as the contaminated land, often referred to as Suburban Job-Link Corp., designed to brownfields. A number of factors affect transport urban workers to available the development prospects of brown-fields. The suburban jobs, is one promising ap- degree of environmental proach for addressing this mismatch. contamination is a key issue, but other factors such as size of available land parcels and related tax and regulatory burdens are also important. A number of policymakers at the state and federal levels are considering legislation t o establish a liability standard for both lenders and property owners, which would make it easier to determine the economic feasibility of redeveloping brownfields. O p t i o n s • Develop are realistic, a better understanding and how land availability development Investigate the different that promote ways that metropolitan fair and efficient areas grow and devise patterns Encourage of of what forms of urban and environmental conditions can affect opportunities. policies development. a better understanding of how technology of economic affects the A SERVICE Service Employment Growth for Selected Metropolitan Areas 1981 and location activity. CONVERTING (Percent of total employment development TO ECONOMY Urban areas have taken advantage of 1994) technology to convert from manufacturing to service economies, said Robert Atkinson of the U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. However, technological breakthroughs are now permitting some of these service jobs to move out of the central city. If metropolitan areas are to Chicago Detroit Indianapolis Milwaukee prosper, it is important to understand how technology and public policy affect the location of economic activity. 13 Can rural areas sustain t h e i r turnaround? Agriculture will continue t o dominate rural economies but will require fewer workers. To sustain growth, manufacturing and new industries will be needed to Midwestern rural areas have shaken off much of the ill-effects of the farm crisis of the early 1980s. New production methods supplement agriculture. and technologies have made farms highly productive, and growth in export markets has sparked demand for Midwestern agricultural products. As the agricultural economy improved, population growth in rural areas rebounded in the early 1990s, reversing the downturn of the 1980s. Still, for rural areas to sustain their recovery, new types of industries need to be identified. 14 NEW INDUSTRIES IN RURAL AREAS The movement of manufacturing to rural areas is a positive development, suggested NEW PRODUCTION Andrew Bernat of the U.S. Department ON THE METHODS of Commerce. Manufacturing growth in The Chicago Fed's Gary Benjamin provid- FARM rural areas has greatly exceeded that ed an example of how farm technology found in metropolitan areas in recent and production methods are changing the years, according to Bernat. Fraser Hart nature of hog production. A new entity, of the University of Minnesota said that the mega-farm, has emerged, significantly retirement and recreational services are increasing the size and scale of hog farms. also contributing to growth in rural areas The mega-farm has implications for where of the Midwest. The increasing diversity of hogs are raised, as states such as N o r t h rural economies provides new employ- Carolina have been more willing than many ment opportunities as farming continues Midwestern locations t o accept them. t o shed labor. To maintain its dominance in pork production, the Midwest will need to weigh the costs and benefits of mega-farms. O p t i o n s Encourage the development of industries such as food processing • Capitalize health on advances in telecommunications care, educational, and business to expand services • Promote declining Promote the Midwest's the quality in rural comparative highly productive complementary and agricultural to agriculture, services. of areas. education employment agricultural and retraining opportunities advantage of farm and rural due to productivity residents gains to in counter agriculture. due to its farmland. KEEPING THE SECTOR AGRICULTURE HUMMING Agriculture is a key ingredient in the Midwest success story. Farm productivity is up, as measured by higher crop yields and livestock production. The Chicago Fed's Mike Singer suggested this strong performance might be improved by increasing opportunities for industries, such as food processing, that complement the agricultural sector. 15 The Bank in 1996 • A project group began establishing a new unit to improve service for the Bank's customers. • The Bank fully recovered the cost of providing priced financial services. • Over $34 trillion worth of wire transfers —31/2times U.S. GDP — were completed at the Chicago Reserve Bank. 1996 HIGHLIGHTS • President Moskow and other senior officers outlined plans to transform the Bank's culture during a series of meetings attended by about 1,000 staff members. • Research activity included studies on risk management and its impact on bank behavior, fair lending regulations, macroeconomic shocks and their aggregate effects, and the financing sources for small business investment companies. • The Economic Research Department upgraded its index of Midwest manufacturing activity and distributed it on a regular basis in a new format. • The Bank hosted the 32nd annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, with the theme "Rethinking Bank Regulation: What Should Regulators Do?" • Economic Research staff had 43 papers published or accepted for publication in leading U.S. and international scholarly journals and presented 46 papers to professional groups. • The Chicago Fed hosted numerous programs for foreign visitors, including economists and senior officials from foreign central banks. • Research Statistics processed 244 applications and met more than 94,000 report deadlines. • The Supervision and Regulation Department performed over 800 inspections and examinations, one of the heaviest workloads in the System. • The Chicago Fed played a significant role in implementing the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System. • To encourage more efficient electronic alternatives, the Bank focused on expanding Fedline connections to customers, increasing electronic check processing, and encouraging the use of automated clearinghouse. • The Milwaukee Office tested the use of imaging technology to process checks more efficiently and meet customer demand. • The Detroit Branch installed FASTRAC, an automated tracking and adjustment resolution system, which increased productivity in check adjustment. • Electronic cash letter (ECL) deposits increased by 60 percent, bringing ECL volume to 25 percent of total check volume deposited. • The Detroit Branch's currency operation had the lowest unit cost in the Federal Reserve System. • The Bank completed consolidation of its return-item notification service for large dollar checks. • The Bank began distributing newly designed $100 bills. • The Chicago Fed worked with foreign bank regulators as part of a Systemwide effort to strengthen global supervision. • The Chicago Fed was named one of the System's processing sites for commercial tenders for purchasing government securities. • Supervision and Regulation introduced the Examiner Workstation, a new software application to help make examinations more efficient and risk-focused. • Human Resources Services developed a new paidtime-off policy. • The Bank provided significant input to the Board of Governors on regulatory changes, including revisions to Regulation Y, Bank Holding Companies, to help streamline the applications process. • Supervision and Regulation worked with industry groups to develop an understanding of non-traditional banking products and their possible effects on financial institutions. 16 • Commercial automated clearinghouse (ACH) volume increased 24 percent. Contributing to the jump in volume were two ACH price decreases implemented to encourage the use of electronic payments and meet the demands of the market. • A leadership development plan was initiated for managers. • The Bank conducted tours of its operations for more than 9,600 visitors. • A comprehensive assessment aimed at improving the efficiency of the Bank's support and overhead processes was completed by a review team. • Bank staff continued to play a leadership role through participation in many System groups. O p e r a t i o n s OPERATIONS V o l u m e s VOLUMES Dollar Number Amount 1996 1995 of Items 1996 1995 1.8 billion 1.7 billion Check & Electronic Payments Checks, N O W s , & share drafts processed 1.3 trillion 1.2 trillion Fine sort & packaged checks handled 111 billion 101.2 billion 152.8 million 217.2 million U.S. government checks processed 48.1 billion 49.5 billion 48.1 million 50.2 million Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) items processed* 2.2 trillion 2.5 trillion 657.9 million 626.3 million Transfer of funds 33.8 trillion 31.5 trillion 15.6 million 14.3 million Electronic checks processed 16.0 million 13.1 million 620.4 million 507.8 million 35.9 billion 32.7 billion 9.6 billion 7.7 billion Cash Operations Currency received and counted Unfit currency destroyed Coin received and counted 777.4 million 2.6 billion 801.9 million 836.2 million 5.8 billion 2.4 billion 958.3 million 6.7 billion Securities Services for Depository Institutions Safekeeping balance December 31: 1 1.7 billion Definitive securities Book-entry securities Purchase & sale Collection of securities & other noncash items 349.0 billion 406.7 billion 2.9 billion 4.0 billion 16.9 thousand - l2.7thousand 24.4 thousand - 14.6 thousand 232.2 thousand 194.7 thousand 7.1 trillion 7.1 trillion I.I million I.I million 3.1 billion 1.2 billion 1,270 855 1 10.2 million Book-entry government securities 13.3 billion 167.0 million The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's volume of operations during 1996 reflected the System's continuing efforts to improve efficiency and encourage the use of electronic payments. The volume of funds transfers and Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) transactions continued to rise. The volume of electronic checks processed also increased, due in part to marketing efforts to encourage efficiency through electronic processing methods. The number of paper checks processed increased slightly, reflecting service enhancements and lower prices. Loans to Depository Institutions Total loans made during year Services to U.S.Treasury and Government Agencies Redemptions of definitive government securities 189.3 million 366.3 million Government coupons paid 35.3 million 10I.I million Federal tax deposits processed 87.9 billion 99.3 billion 2.2 billion 2.3 billion Food stamps redeemed *A consolidation is calculated, been reported of processing prompted resulting in lower volume using the previous a change growth for in how ACH 1996 than 6.3 thousand 1 1.4 thousand 10.3 thousand 21.7 thousand 874.5 thousand 883.6 thousand 435.3 million 443.0 million volume would have method. 17 1 9 9 6 F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t s STATEMENT OF CONDITION (in millions) 12/31/96 12/31/95 Assets Year-to-year changes in Reserve Bank assets and liabilities largely reflect general economic developments and System monetary policy actions. By purchasing securities in the open market and making loans to depository institutions, the Federal Reserve increases reserves, providing a base for monetary and credit expansion in accord with the national economy's growth needs. In 1996, the Bank's total assets fell slightly as a large increase in currency outstanding was more than offset by a decline in deposits of depository institutions and day-today interdistrict fluctuations. Gold Certificates $ 1,140 $ 1,220 979 1,079 70 35 1,537 519 18 1 42,727 44,024 2,296 2,401 Accrued Interest Receivable 385 448 Interdistrict Settlement Account 157 0 Property and Equipment, N e t 149 149 76 1 12 Special Drawing Rights Certificates Coin Items in Process of Collection Loans to Depository Institutions U.S. Government and Federal Agency Securities, N e t Investments Denominated in Foreign Currencies Other Assets Total Assets $ 49,534 $ 49,988 $ 44,858 $ 41,758 Liabilities and Capital Liabilities: Federal Reserve Notes Outstanding, N e t Deposits: Depository Institutions 3,539 2,574 Other Deposits 69 103 Deferred Credit Items 808 463 Statutory Surplus Transfer Due U.S.Treasury Interest on Federal Reserve Notes Due U.S.Treasury Interdistrict Settlement Account Accrued Benefit Cost Other Liabilities Total Liabilities 68 0 0 73 0 3,016 74 71 19 22 $ 48,473 $ 49,042 Capital Capital Paid-in 537 473 Surplus 524 473 Total Capital Total Liabilities and Capital 18 $ 1,061 $ 946 $ 49,534 $ 49,988 STATEMENT OF INCOME For the years ended Dec. 31, 1996 and Dec. 31, 1995 (in 1995 1996 millions) Interest I n c o m e : Interest on U.S. Government Securities $ Interest on Foreign Currencies 2,604 $ 2,721 53 89 1 1 Interest on Loans to Depository Institutions Total Interest $ Income 2,658 $ 2,811 O t h e r O p e r a t i n g Income: 99 Income from Services 96 17 16 Reimbursable Services to Government Agencies (199) Foreign Currency Gains (Losses), N e t 1 14 Government Securities Gains, N e t 4 1 Other Income 3 3 Total Other Operating Income (Loss) $ (77) $ 231 O p e r a t i n g Expense: 126 123 Occupancy Expense 19 19 Equipment Expense 18 18 Salaries and Other Benefits Cost of Unreimbursed Treasury Services Assessments by Board of Governors 4 60 89 Other Expense Total Operating 4 61 Expense $ 90 $ 2,264 Income Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change $ 314 2,728 (7) 0 Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle N e t Income Prior t o Distribution 317 A Reserve Bank's income is largely a by-product of monetary policy rather than the pursuit of profit. Most of the Bank's income is interest on its share of the System's Open Market Account portfolio of securities, and appropriately, the vast majority of this income is turned over to the U.S. Treasury each year. Current income decreased compared to 1995, primarily because of a decrease in interest received from government securities and a loss in foreign currency. Operating expenses rose very slightly, with the cost of increased personnel and centralized automation largely offset by expense reductions in various areas. 2,264 $ 31 $ 2,721 Distribution of N e t I n c o m e : Dividends Paid t o Member Banks $ Transferred t o Surplus 27 64 54 1,587 2,640 582 0 Payments to U.S. Treasury as Interest on Federal Reserve Notes Payments to U.S. Treasury as Required by Statute $ 2,264 $ 2,721 19 19 9 6 F i n a n c i a l S t a t e m e n t STATEMENT OF C H A N G E S For the years ended Dec. 31, 1996 IN CAPITAL and Dec. 31,1995 (in millions) Capital Paid-in Member banks in the Seventh Federal Reserve District are required to purchase capital stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, as prescribed by the Federal Reserve Act. Member banks are required to purchase an amount of stock equal to six percent of their capital and surplus. A six percent annual dividend is provided on the paid-in stock, as specified by law. The holding of stock does not carry with it the control and financial interest conveyed to holders of common stock in for-profit organizations. During 1996, the value of Bank capital increased because member banks carried larger amounts of capital and surplus, requiring them to hold additional shares of capital stock. Balance at December 31,1994 $ 419 $ 419 $ 838 (8,380,307 shares) 54 N e t Income Transferred to Surplus 54 N e t Change in Capital Stock Issued (Redeemed) 54 54 (1,074,008 shares) Balance at December 31, 1995 $ $ 473 473 $ 946 ( 9,454,3 15 shares) Net Income Transferred t o Surplus 64 64 (13) (13) Statutory Surplus Transferred to U.S.Treasury N e t Change in Capital Stock Issued (Redeemed) 64 (1,286,438 shares) Balance at December 31,1996 $ 64 537 $ $ 524 (10,740,753 shares) The statements management. available of income, condition, and changes Copies of full and final financial by contacting in bank capital statements, complete the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's P.O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690-0834, 20 Total Capital Surplus 312-322-5111. are prepared by Bank with footnotes, Public Information are Center, 1,061 E x e c u t i v e C h a n g e s DIRECTORS ADVISORY Members of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's board of directors are selected to represent a cross section of the Seventh District economy, including consumers, industry, agriculture, the service sector, labor, and commercial banks of various sizes. The nine-member board includes three bankers and three nonbankers, all elected by member banks. Three additional nonbankers are appointed by the Board of Governors, which also designates the Reserve Bank chairman and deputy chairman from among its three appointees. The Board of Governors also selects three nonbankers to serve on the seven-member board of the Bank's Detroit Branch. Four additional directors are selected by the Chicago Reserve Bank board. The Branch board selects its own chairman each year. All Reserve Bank and Branch directors serve three-year terms, with a two-term maximum. Director appointments and elections at the Chicago Reserve Bank and its Detroit Branch effective in 1996 were: • Robert M. Healey redesignated Chairman. • Lester H. McKeever, Jr. designated Deputy Chairman. • Arthur C. Martinez appointed to a three-year term as a director, replacing Richard G. Cline. • Florine Mark designated Branch Chair, replacing John D. Forsyth. • Richard M. Bell and Stephen R. Polk appointed to threeyear terms as Branch directors replacing Norman F. Rodgers and J. Michael Moore. At year-end 1996 the following appointments and elections to terms beginning in 1997 were announced: • Lester H. McKeever, Jr. designated Chairman. • Arthur C. Martinez designated Deputy Chairman. • Robert J. Darnall, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Inland Steel Industries, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; Verne G. Istock, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of First Chicago NBD Corporation, Chicago, Illinois; and Migdalia Rivera, Executive Director of the Latino Institute, Chicago, Illinois, appointed to three-year terms as directors replacing Robert M. Healey, David W. Fox, and A. Charlene Sullivan. • Florine Mark redesignated Branch Chair. • Irma B. Elder, President of Troy Motors, Troy, Michigan; Timothy D. Leuliette, President and Chief Operating Officer, Penske Corporation, Detroit, Michigan; and Denise Ilitch Lites, President, Olympia Development Inc., Detroit, Michigan, appointed to three-year terms as Branch directors, replacing Charles E. Allen, William E. Odom, and John D. Forsyth. The Federal Advisory Council, which meets quarterly to discuss business and financial conditions with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., is comprised of one member from each of the 12 Federal Reserve Districts. Each year the Chicago Reserve Bank's board of directors selects a representative to this group. Roger L. Fitzsimonds, who served as the Seventh District's representative in 1995 and 1996, was re-appointed to a third one-year term for 1997. Members of the Bank's two advisory councils, who are selected from nominations by Seventh District small business and agricultural organizations, served for a third year in 1996. The councils provide a vital communication link between the Bank and these important sectors. COUNCILS OFFICERS The Bank's board of directors acted on the following promotions during 1996: • James W. Nelson to vice president, Supervision and Regulation. • David E. Ritter to vice president and culture transformation team leader. • Yurii Skorin, to vice president and associate general counsel, Legal Department. • Jeffrey S. Anderson to assistant vice president, Check Services. • Guadalupe Garcia to assistant vice president, Cash Services. • Mary H. Sherburne to assistant vice president, Check Services. • Tyler K. Smith to assistant vice president, Support Services. New officers appointed by the board in 1996 were: • Thomas M. Matsumoto to assistant vice president, Automation Services. • Ellen J. Bromagen to accounting officer, Accounting Services. Thomas G. Ciesielski, vice president, Human Resource Services, served on the Management Committee during 1996. Franklin D. Dreyer, senior vice president, Supervision and Regulation and Loans, retired after 38 years of service to the Bank. Richard P. Bush, vice president, Accounting Services, retired after 25 years of service. 21 D i r e c t o r s and A d v i s o r y 1996 Robert Healey, C o u n c i l s Board of Directors, Lester McKeever, Donald Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, from left to Arthur Schneider, Martinez, Arnold Reserve Bank directors have a general governance responsibility for the management of operations, which includes approving budgets, expenditures, and official appointments. In addition, directors provide advice and counsel to the Reserve Bank president on the state of the economy and financial system. Reserve Bank directors also determine, subject to review by t h e Board of Governors, the Bank's discount rate. The Chicago Reserve Bank and Detroit Branch directors are selected to represent a variety of interests and activities within the District and bring to their diverse duties a broad range of expertise and experience. The Federal Advisory Council, consisting of one representative from each District, meets quarterly with the Board of Governors to discuss economic conditions. The Chicago Reserve Bank's advisory councils on small business and agriculture provide a vital communication link between the Bank and these important economic sectors. Stefan Anderson, Schultz, and Charlene Thomas BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESERVE BANK CHICAGO Chairman A r t h u r C. Martinez Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Sears, Roebuck and Co. Hoffman Estates, Illinois R o b e r t M. Healey D o n a l d J. S c h n e i d e r Member Illinois State Relations President Labor Schneider Board Chicago, Deputy National, Green Bay, Illinois Chairman Managing Partner Washington, & President, Chief Executive The Grundy Pittman Inc. Wisconsin A r n o l d C. Schultz Chairman, L e s t e r H . M c K e e v e r , Jr. Grundy and Officer National Center, Bank Iowa McKeever Chicago, Illinois A . C h a r l e n e Sullivan Associate Stefan S. A n d e r s o n Chairman, President, and Chief Executive First Merchants Muncie, of Corporation Indiana President Officer Dorr's Pine Grove Farm Co. Marcus, Iowa David W . Fox Retired Chairman Chief Executive The Northern Chicago, and Officer Trust Illinois Graduate Corporation School Management Purdue University West Lafayette, and Chief Executive of Professor Management Krannert Officer Thomas C. D o r r 22 Fox, Dorr. OF FEDERAL right: Sullivan, David Indiana 1 9 9 6 Board of Directors, William Charles Allen, and Stephen BOARD OF DETROIT DIRECTORS ADVISORY ON BRANCH COUNCIL AGRICULTURE Ray J. G r e e n Jacksonville, Indiana National Jefferson, Florine Mark Chief Executive The WW Farmington Hills, Greensburg, Michigan Milk and Graimark Officer Clinton, Realty Advisors, Detroit, Inc. Michigan R i c h a r d M . Bell President Officer The First National Wisconsin Fertilizer Chemical Association and Agri-Business Chairman Association Chief Executive Officer Credit Company Dearborn, Michigan S t e p h e n R. P o l k and Chief Executive Detroit, Association of Business Industry James B e r n s t e i n Lucius Murray,Jr. Sioux City, Iowa Detroit, Member-at-Large Booker T.Washington Michigan Business Chamber Illinois Latin American Commerce Chamber Commerce Milwaukee, Wisconsin Independent Business P Eric T u r n e r Association Gas City, Indiana Indiana Chamber Commerce Chicago, Illinois Member-at-Large Mondovi, Wisconsin Wisconsin Farm Bureau Crawfordsville, Northbrook, Sue Ling G i n Association G a r y Steiner Indiana of E d u a r d o Salse Indiana Hispanic of Illinois Illinois Corn Growers David W . G o o d r i c h Federation Indianapolis, National Officer Michigan Iowa Iowa Association and Michigan of Wisconsin Richard W a r d R. L Polk & Co. Association Thomas Gearing Iowa Wapella, Ford Motor Chairman Keystone, Vic Riddle and Kendig K. K n e e n Michigan of Iowa Pork Producers W i l l i a m E. O d o m Owners Chapter Ottumwa, Indiana T i m L. K a p u c i a n Michigan Business Detroit G a r y E. B a k e r Indianapolis, Michigan Michigan Ann Arbor, ofWomen Greater Michigan Association J o h n D. F o r s y t h Hospitals Hills, Association C h a r l e s J. G a r c i a Bay City, Director BUSINESS Association D o n a l d W . Gillings University of Michigan Farmington Ann Arbor, of Illinois Illinois Beef Michigan COUNCIL SMALL Small Business Bank Rivers Executive Economics Inc. Wisconsin Henry, Chief Executive Three Rivers, ON W i l l i a m D. E n g e l b r e c h t and of Three ADVISORY Services David D e L o n g Chief Executive Dealers Linda M. Jolicoeur Iowa Involved in Farm National Indiana Production of Indiana, C h a r l e s E. A l l e n President Ellsworth, George Crosby Inc. Illinois Automobile P a t r i c i a M.Yungclas Association Women Officer Group, Bell, pictured). Association Iowa Iowa Cattlemen's and right: Richard Polk (John Forsyth is not Kaye W h i t e h e a d Reginald J. C l a u s e President Branch, from left to Muncie, Member-at-Large Chair Detroit Odom, Charles Weeks, Florine Mark, of Independent Indiana Pork Producers Indiana Federation Business Association Kam Washburn C h a r l e s R. W e e k s Elsie, Chairman Citizens Flint, Michigan Michigan Banking Soybean Association Corporation Michigan 23 O f f i c e r s Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Management from left to right: Michael William Moskow, Gram, David Charles Committee, Ritter, CarlVanderWilt,William Furbee, William George Coe, and David Appointments to and promotions within the Federal Reserve Bank's official staff are made by the Bank's board of directors. The board appoints the Bank's president (chief executive officer) and first vice president (chief operating officer) to five-year terms subject to approval by the Board of Governors. The primary activities of the Chicago Reserve Bank are divided into nine functional areas overseen by senior vice presidents who report to the Bank's president and first vice president. An additional function, the Auditing Department, reports directly to the board of directors' Audit Committee. The Bank's senior officers form the Management Committee and determine the Chicago Reserve Bank's strategic direction. Hunter,John Conrad, Richard Anstee, Nancy Wixted, Goodman, Allardice. D a n i e l G . Sullivan Michael H. M o s k o w Senior Economist President Assistant William C. Conrad First Vice Vice and President James T. M o s e r President Senior Research Economist and Research CENTRAL BANK Paula R . W o r t h i n g t o n ACTIVITIES Economic and Research Programs Senior Vice President of Regional and M o n e t a r y Policy a n d Financial M a r k e t s Research Elijah B r e w e r III Assistant Vice Economist Officer Economic Programs G a r y L. B e n j a m i n Research Senior Economist Senior Research and Research William C. Hunter Director Officer Economic Advisor and Vice President R o b e r t H. Schnorbus Senior Economist and President Assistant Vice W i l l i a m A.Testa D o u g l a s D. E v a n o f f Senior Economist Senior Economist Assistant Assistant Vice and President C h a r l e s L. Evans Senior Economist Assistant Vice and President Senior Economist Vice Vice and President Philip R. I s r a i l e v i c h Senior Regional A n n e M a r i e L. G o n c z y Assistant and President and and Research Economist Officer Statistics Jean L V a l e r i u s Vice President President Loretta C.Ardaugh Kenneth N. Kuttner Senior Economist Assistant 24 Vice and President Statistical Reports Officer Supervision and Regulation John J.Wixted.Jr. Senior Vice President Regulation Vice President of Regulation President Vice President Yvonne H. Montgomery Vice President President Sheryn E. Bormann Vice President Maureen A. Cummings Assistant Vice Jerome F.John President Assistant Glen Brooks Vice Vice President James M. Rudny President William H.Lossie.Jr. Assistant Vice Brian D. Egan Operations Assistant Officer Patrick A. Garrean David R. Starin Vice Joseph R. O ' C o n n o r Assistant Assistant Ronald A. Rolighed Indianapolis Office Donna M.Yates Assistant Assistant Vice President Officer Assistant Carl R. Quinn Examining John A.Valenti Assistant Support of and Supervision President Geoffrey C. Rosean Vice President A. Raymond Bacon Assistant Vice President Vice President Vice President Vice President Associate Vice President President Stephen M. Pill Vice Assistant George E. Coe R. Steve Crain Vice Vice Vice and Assistant Assistant Vice President General Vice Auditor Robert M. Casey President Assistant Vice President Audit President General Auditor Joseph B. Green Officer Karen L. Rosenberg W h o l e s a l e , Cash, Fiscal, Facilities, and I n t e r s t a t e Marketing Assistant Richard R Anstee Assistant Senior Vice Vice President Information Security and Officer Anthony J.Tempelman Vice President S u p p o r t , Loans, and Risk M a n a g e m e n t Carl E.Vander W i l t SeniorVice President Chief Financial President C o m m u n i t y and I n f o r m a t i o n Services Assistant William A. Bonifield Nancy M. Goodman Ellen J. Bromagen Kathleen E. Benson Vice Senior Vice Accounting Assistant Guadalupe Garcia Vice President President Michael R.Jarrell Assistant Assistant Jerome D. Nicolas Vice President Vice Gay W. Whiting Assistant Assistant Lawrence J. Powaga Vice President Vice President Charles A.Jeffrey Assistant Examining C u s t o m e r Service Officer Vice President President Jeffrey A.Jensen Frank S. McKenna Examining Assistant Officer Vice President Facilities M a n a g e m e n t Wayne R. Baxter Vice President Assistant Vice President Tyler K. Smith Assistant Vice C o n s u m e r and C o m m u n i t y Affairs Alicia Williams Vice Assistant Vice President President G e n e r a l Services Kristi L. Zimmermann Assistant Vice A c c o u n t i n g Services Officer Loans and Risk Management Gerard J. Nick Vice President William J. O ' C o n n o r President John L. Bergstrom President Public Affairs James R. Holland Public Affairs Kenneth R. Berg President and Officer Cash and Fiscal Services President Counsel Office of t h e General Auditor Robert A. Bechaz Vice Counsel Anna M.Voytovich General Assistant President General Glenn C. Hansen President Thomas M. Matsumoto Assistant Counsel President President Kathleen H.Williams and General and Assistant Automation Support Assistant Secretary Elizabeth A. Knospe SUPPORT F U N C T I O N S A u t o m a t i o n and C o m m u n i c a t i o n s Services Assistant President, Counsel and Legal Services F.Alan Wells Senior Vice President Yurii Skorin Brenda D. Ladipo William A. Barouski Vice Vice SeniorVice General Retail P a y m e n t Services Barbara D. Benson Director President Officer Supervision Vice President Vice Peoria Facility Mary H.Sherburne Officer Information President Milwaukee Office Angelina S. Chin Philip G.Jackson Applications Vice President Vice Legal D e p a r t m e n t and Office of t h e S e c r e t a r y President Assistant Vice President William H. Gram Vice Regional Offices President Assistant President Cynthia L. Rasche Vice Angela D. Robinson Manager Assistant Assistant President President Valerie J.Van Meter President President David R.AIIardice Senior Vice Anne M. Phillips President Vice Vice Richard F. Opalinski Assistant Vice Thomas G. Ciesielski President Jeffrey S.Anderson Vice President D e t r o i t Branch Des Moines Office L. Edward Ketchmark Assistant Vice and Branch President David E. Ritter H u m a n Resource Services C h e c k Services James W. Nelson Vice Retail Services Assistant and Douglas J. Kasl Vice Culture Transformation Senior Vice David S. Epstein Vice W h o l e s a l e and Interstate Marketing Charles W. Furbee James A. Bluemle Director SERVICES T O D E P O S I T O R Y INSTITUTIONS Officer Assistant Vice President Robert A. Lyon Loans Officer M a n a g e m e n t Services Margaret K. Koenigs Assistant Vice President Jeffrey B. Marcus Assistant Vice President HEAD OFFICE 230 South LaSalle Street P.O. Box 834 Chicago, Illinois 60690-0834 312-322-5322 DETROIT BRANCH 160 West Fort Street RO. Box 1059 Detroit, Michigan 48231-1059 313-961-6880 DES M O I N E S OFFICE 616 Tenth Street RO. Box 1903 Des Moines, Iowa 50306-1903 515-284-8800 INDIANAPOLIS OFFICE 831 I N o r t h Perimeter Road RO. Box 2020 B Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-2020 3 17-244-7744 MILWAUKEE OFFICE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO 304 East State Street RO. Box 361 Milwaukee,Wisconsin 53201-0361 414-276-2323 PEORIA FACILITY 6100 West Dirksen Parkway P.O. Box 4318 Peoria, Illinois 61607-0318 309-633-5000 For additional copies of this annual report, or for more information on the Bank's study of the Midwest Economy, contact the Public Information Center, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, at 312-322-5111, or access the Bank's web site at http://www.frbchi.org.