Full text of Agricultural Survey : Fourth Quarter 2005
The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
S T A T I S T I C A L R E L E A S E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F D A L L A S Agricultural Credit Conditions at Survey Banks in the Eleventh District Demand for Loans Demand for loans decreased, say 14 percent of bankers. Quarterly Sur vey of Agricultural Credit Conditions in the Eleventh Federal Reser ve District Percent 100 80 Fourth Quarter 2005 Quarterly Survey of Agricultural Credit Conditions is compiled from a survey of Eleventh District agricultural bankers. This publication is prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and is available without charge by writing to the Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box 655906, Dallas, TX 75265–5906, or by telephoning (214) 922-5254. It is available on the web at www.dallasfed.org. For questions regarding information in the release, contact Laila Assanie, (214) 922-5191. The Fourth Quarter Survey indicated concern in the agricultural community as extreme drought continued to grip the Eleventh District. Bankers reported that drought conditions have been hard on both District livestock and crop producers. Poor pasture conditions, along with short hay supplies, significantly increased supplemental feeding costs and forced some cattle producers to cull their herds. Meanwhile, sparse subsoil moisture discouraged farmers from prepping land for the 2006 crop. Other concerns are that sagging commodity prices and high input costs could considerably reduce profits. Overall, prospects for the 2006 production season are bleak. On a positive note, a record cotton crop was harvested for the second consecutive year. Revenues from the bumper crop are helping cotton farmers pay down their debt as well as invest in farm equipment. Here are additional details from the survey: • Respondents expect the volume of feeder cattle loans to increase in the next three months. Nineteen percent of bankers anticipate greater loan volume, a 3.5 percent increase from a year earlier. This is in large part due to the high price of cattle and the increased cost of supplemental feeding. • Farmland values continue to rise, albeit at a slow pace. Dryland, irrigated land and ranchland values edged up in the fourth quarter relative to the third quarter, increasing 0.4 percent, 1.0 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively. This is partly because farmland available for sale is scarce. • Cash receipts from a great cotton crop are enabling farmers to service their debt. Twelve percent of bankers reported improved loan repayment rates, a 4.3 percent increase from last quarter. Moreover, 12 percent of bankers expected demand for operating loans to be lower over coming months; this reflects a 5.2 percent increase of bankers with lower loans over fourth quarter 2004. 1 60 40 20 1 0 Q1:’99 Q1:’00 Q1:’01 Less Q1:’02 Q1:’03 Same Q1:’04 Q1:’05 Greater Funds Available for Additional Lending Eighty-two percent of respondents say funds available for lending have remained the same. Percent 100 80 60 40 20 1 0 Q1:’99 Q1:’00 Q1:’01 Less Q1:’02 Q1:’03 Same Q1:’04 Q1:’05 Greater Rate of Loan Repayment Excellent cotton crop yields in several regions improved loan repayment, as 12 percent of bankers report higher repayment rates. Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 Q1:’99 1 Q1:’00 Q1:’01 Less Q1:’02 Same Q1:’03 Q1:’04 Greater Q1:’05 S T A T I S T I C A L R E L E A S E Agricultural Credit Conditions at Survey Banks in the Eleventh District Renewals or Extensions of Loans Drought conditions possibly increased requests for renewals and extensions, as 12 percent of bankers report greater demand. Percent 100 Loan–Deposit Ratios at Survey Banks Average actual and desired ratios 80 Percent 70 60 65 60 40 55 20 50 45 0 Q1:’99 Q1:’00 Q1:’01 Q1:’02 Less Q1:’03 Same Q1:’04 Actual Ratio Q1:’05 40 35 Greater Desired Ratio Amount of Collateral Collateral requirements remain stable, report 91 percent of bankers. 2004:4 2005:1 2005:2 2005:3 2005:4 Percent 100 DISTRIBUTION OF LOAN – DEPOSIT RATIOS 80 Banks Reporting (Percent) 60 2005 Ratio 2006 Jan. 1 April 1 July 1 Oct. 1 Jan. 1 19 17 18 16 30 24 12 15 21 28 23 13 19 16 29 18 16 14 15 37 20 15 21 14 30 40 Less than 41% 41% to 50% 51% to 60% 61% to 70% More than 70% 20 1 0 Q1:’99 Q1:’00 Q1:’01 Q1:’02 Less Q1:’03 Same Q1:’04 Q1:’05 INTEREST RATE — FIXED Greater Average Rate (Percent) Total Agricultural Loans at Eleventh District Banks Agricultural lending continues to grow. 2005 Ratio 2006 Jan. 1 April 1 July 1 Oct. 1 Jan. 1 7.59 7.60 7.67 7.00 7.75 7.97 7.85 7.37 8.07 8.29 8.16 7.56 8.41 8.53 8.36 7.97 8.86 8.85 8.72 8.11 Millions of dollars (seasonally adjusted) Feeder cattle Other farm operating Intermediate term Long-term farm real estate 6,300 5,800 INTEREST RATE — VARIABLE 5,300 TW Average Rate (Percent) 4,800 2005 Ratio 2006 Jan. 1 April 1 July 1 Oct. 1 Jan. 1 7.12 7.22 7.10 6.59 7.25 7.50 7.41 6.94 7.83 8.06 7.89 7.42 8.19 8.33 8.18 7.81 8.27 8.37 8.20 7.79 4,300 3,800 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 Feeder cattle Other farm operating Intermediate term Long-term farm real estate ’05 Note: Some of the volatility observed in agricultural loan levels is due to the acquisition of several Eleventh District banks by banks headquartered in other Reserve Districts. 2 S T A T I S T I C A L R E L E A S E CROPLAND—DRYLAND Rural Real Estate Values December 31, 2005 Region Number of banks reporting land values. 2 Prices are dollars per acre, not adjusted for inflation. 3 Not adjusted for inflation. n.r.—Not reported due to insufficient responses. 1 Eleventh Federal Reserve District 1 Percent Changes3 in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year DISTRICT 150 836 0.4 7.2 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Timbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 139 21 18 12 11 12 22 7 18 7 n.r. 838 328 430 408 501 772 1,452 899 1,419 1,067 n.r. 0.4 –0.3 3.7 2.5 1.5 –2.1 –1.1 1.5 – 2.7 6.4 n.r. 7.2 6.9 9.9 11.1 3.8 8.0 8.0 3.7 3.0 3.8 n.r. 10 732 –1.7 8.3 7 4 886 300 1.1 –1.0 7.9 8.3 Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico 3 Average Value2 Banks1 Fourth Quarter 2005 12 N E W M E X I C O 2 4 CROPLAND—IRRIGATED L O U I S I A N A 5 13 6 7 T E X A S 11 Region 8 DISTRICT 9 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Timbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Timbers North Central Texas East Texas 8 9 10 11 12 13 Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau Southern New Mexico Northern Louisiana Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico Average Value2 Banks1 Fourth Quarter 2005 Percent Changes3 in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year 98 983 1.0 13.2 86 19 17 10 7 4 n.r. 3 11 4 n.r. 909 685 798 661 741 1,316 n.r. 976 2,079 1,216 n.r. 1.7 2.4 0.9 –0.7 –0.3 –1.7 n.r. –6.9 2.7 0.9 n.r. 12.3 14.5 6.0 9.6 0.7 4.8 n.r. –5.6 12.4 15.4 n.r. 8 1,619 2.3 19.9 7 5 1,163 1,653 3.2 –3.3 15.5 17.8 RANCHLAND Eleventh District Real Land Values Increase in sale of farmland for recreational use boosted dryland, irrigated land and ranchland values in fourth quarter 2005. Region 2000 dollars per acre 900 800 Irrigated 700 A G 600 Dryland 500 400 300 200 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 3 Percent Changes3 in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year DISTRICT 164 765 3.4 20.4 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Timbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 153 21 14 12 10 15 23 15 21 6 n.r. 939 261 234 320 486 974 1,562 1,213 2,072 950 n.r. 2.6 4.4 1.0 6.3 3.6 1.9 1.4 4.5 0.9 –0.3 n.r. 20.2 15.0 8.8 27.3 18.7 13.2 6.0 24.2 13.2 –2.6 n.r. 15 905 3.2 32.8 6 5 804 263 0.8 13.6 4.3 23.5 Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico Ranchland Average Value2 Banks1 Fourth Quarter 2005 S T A T I S T I C A L R E L E A S E Fourth Quarter Comments District bankers were asked for any additional comments concerning agricultural land values or credit conditions. These comments have been edited. Feeder cattle lines have been increased due to cattle prices. Recreational land use continues to drive land prices up. Dairy buyout will reduce dairy loan demand after the first of the year. Fuel prices and lack of rain are major concerns. Strong recreational land demands have continued to drive native pastureland and rangeland prices up. Native pastureland with good hunting is bringing from $500 to $800 per acre, well above its agricultural value. Region 1 — Northern High Plains quitting, as they are losing equity each year. If government payments are decreased or stopped, it is over for most farmers. Drought conditions persist, and reports indicate a shortage of hay available for cattle feed. Continued dry conditions could affect the cattle market, as producers may be forced to liquidate herds due to lack of inexpensive feed. Increased input costs are severely impacting profit margins. The base commodity price has not kept pace with input costs. Region 4 — Southern Low Plains Ideal moisture, growing conditions and harvest weather resulted in excellent crops for fall 2005. Farmers are ending a tremendous crop year, but 2006 looks dismal with no moisture and high energy costs. Feeder cattle loan demand is low due to minimal projected borrower profitability. 2006 demand for dairy loans is expected to be higher due to new construction of facilities relocating from California, Arizona and East Texas. Fuel prices will strain profitability of irrigated crops for the 2006 planting season. Moisture conditions are poor; winter wheat is under much stress. Region 2 — Southern High Plains We have had a good turnout on the cotton and peanut crops. Better commodity prices would help with the increases in input costs. Potentially the largest cotton crop ever is all but completely harvested and in modules. Customers are anticipating paying off their debt, with cash remaining. Excess funds will be used to update equipment and make land purchases. There is strong evidence of rising land values—especially for irrigated cropland. Land available for purchase is scarce. Region 3 — Northern Low Plains Crop yields have been above average, but increased production expenses have limited profits. Drought conditions have hampered the cow/calf and feeder operations with no wheat available for grazing. The cotton harvest is almost finished; it’s possibly the best yield this county has ever had. We have had excellent weather to harvest both the peanut and cotton crops. However, rain is needed to prepare the land for 2006 crops. Wheat crops are dying due to a lack of moisture. The cotton harvest is almost complete; we have another bumper crop. Prices are not adequate to provide a reasonable margin. Cattle prices are still good. We are in need of moisture. Region 7 — East Texas We had a record cotton crop this year. 2006 doesn’t look very good without any rain since October. We have had good cotton crops two years in a row. Cattle prices are high, and there is plenty of grass to eat. The 2005 cotton crop will be a bumper crop; grades are yielding in the 58 cent range. Demand for equipment and capital will be high, but loan demand will be lower. Oil and gas prices have had a negative effect on agriculture in this region. Our area is 4 inches below normal annual rainfall. 2005 was awesome for cattle and cotton. Farmers expect excess funds, which will be needed because of the current drought and no foreseeable precipitation. 2006 wheat and cotton crops look bleak. The cotton harvest is nearing completion, with expectations for a record crop. Wheat pastures are very dry; we need moisture for land preparation. Region 5 — Cross Timbers Land is being sold in smaller tracts for more money. Wheat grazing is poor due to a lack of moisture. Cattle prices are still good. We have had zero moisture in October and November following the record rainfalls in August and September. Wheat grazing is zero. Pastures are short on winter grass. Lack of moisture will delay crops, affecting the availability of commodities to be marketed. Livestock will be negatively affected as pastures cannot provide adequate grazing or water. Additionally, land values will be affected if crops have lower yields, reducing the cash flow available for servicing real estate debt. Overall, the market will be adversely affected as cattle inventory will be liquidated. Region 8 — Central Texas The continued drought has started to affect everyone. Lots of cattle are coming into local sale barns. Water and stored hay levels are low. There has been a recent surge in real estate sales (nonfarm) at the end of this year. A few rice farmers are quitting due to operating losses. An increase in the cash rice market in the next 120 days will result in increased acreage, while a flat or falling market will result in a substantial drop in rice acreage for 2006. Cattle ranchers had another good year. There are virtually no real estate transactions involving farmers or ranchers purchasing land for agricultural use; 95 percent of land sales are for investment purposes, recreational use or are being divided and sold in smaller plots. Low crop prices will result in losses for the second year in a row. Region 12 — Southern New Mexico Region 6 — North Central Texas It is hard to find land for sale. Hay prices are very high, and hay is scarce due to serious drought conditions. A rough winter and continued hay shortage should drive the cattle market down. Pasture conditions are poor, preventing wheat pasture grazing. Operating expenses have increased because of high fuel prices and the need to purchase hay. Agricultural credit conditions are not good. Crop yields are down and prices are at a low. Many older farmers are thinking about 4 The area is very dry. With high fuel and fertilizer costs, profitability will slip. Region 13 — Northern Louisiana The recovery efforts following Hurricane Rita are nearly complete. All things considered, the agricultural economy in our market areas sustained minimal impact. Crop production loans are being paid down or paid off at this time.