View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - -

•

November 3, 1961

tic It

ra

tt, r

FARM LAND VALUES rose during the summer
throughout most of the Seventh District according to a
recent survey of country bankers (see back of Letter).
In only three areas was the value of good farm land lower
on October 1 than on July 1—western Iowa and north and
west central Illinois.
tte

Michigan and Indiana bankers indicated values increased 3 per cent during the third quarter. In Wisconsin
the gain was 2 per cent and in Iowa 1 per cent. The
declines reported in northwestern and western Illinois
were barely offset by increases in central and northeastern Illinois.
The declines were in predominantly livestock areas
where cattle feeding is an important source of income.
Apparently the low returns on fed cattle sold during the
spring and summer affected the demand for land in those
areas.

•

In the remainder of the District, land values apparently have responded to the higher Government support
prices for dairy products and field crops. About 30 per
cent of the bankers in the three Corn Belt states—Illinois, Indiana and Iowa—thought farmers were seeking to
acquire additional land to offset the acreage retired under
the Government's feed grain program, while in the southern part of Wisconsin and Michigan, about one-fourth of
the bankers reported this development.
The current trend in the land values in most areas
is reported to be up. In the District about one banker in
six indicates land values are rising while fewer than one
in 11 estimates the trend to be down.
Only in southern Iowa, western Illinois and northern
Indiana do more bankers report the trend to be down than
those who report it to be up. In western Iowa more than
40 per cent of the bankers are of the opinion that land
values are rising.
IN THE NATION the U. S. Department of Agriculture reported the value of all farm land rose to a new
record on July 1-177 per cent of the 1947-49 level.
This was 1 per cent above the March level and 2 per
cent above the year-earlier level.

•

Values in the Corn Belt - 3se slightly during the
spring whereas they had been declining in recent periods. However, values were still well below July 1,
1960, values in most Corn Belt states.
The largest increase in land values was in Florida,
up 5 per cent from March to July and up 10 per cent in
the past year. With a value index of 286 per cent of the
1947-49 average, land prices in Florida have far outpaced those of any other state. The next largest gains

DEPT. OF tifIRICULTUU
tiPP
p fly
It

Number 631

tt

AI011

4 2 1961

t

Index of Farm Real Estate Value Per Acre
CECrIRDS
(1947-49=100)
July 1,
1960

-

March 1,
1961

July 1,
1961

Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Wisconsin

181
183
159
172
141

176
179
152
175
147

177
178
154
176
145

United States • • .

173

175

177

SOURCE: U. S. Department of Agriculture.
have been in Georgia and Louisiana where the index of
value per acre are 210 and 211 per cent, respectively.
Even in California with its rapidly expanding population
and substantial demand for housing subdivisions current
values are only double those of the late 1940's.
A large part of the increase in Florida land values
in the mid-1950's was because of purchase of land for
present or future subdivision and development. However,
about the time the speculative rise in land for potential
development seemed to be losing steam, land with potential for producing sugar cane came under strong demand.
This was an outgrowth of the ban on sugar imports from
our largest supplier, Cuba, coupled with removal of production restrictions in the United States. Louisiana land
values have also reflected the expansion of sugar cane
production.
With new sugar mills being constructed and large
additional acreage being planted to cane, values of land
in Florida suitable for sugar cane production are reported
to have doubled in recent years. However, this boom may
be short-lived. In spite of the fact that the Department
of Agriculture has just announced for 1962 that for the
third successive year no restrictions will be placed on
the acreage of sugar cane, the USDA indicates that the
rapid expansion of sugar cane production, especially in
Florida, may make restrictions necessary for the 1963
crop.
Research Department

Per cent change in dollar value per acre of "good" farms
July 1,1961 to October 1, 1961
TOP:
BOTTOM: October 1, 1960 to October 1, 1961
(based on reports of identical banks)

Illinois...........
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Wisconsin
SEVENTH DISTRICT........

July 1, 1961
to
October 1, 1961
0
+3
+1
+3
+2
+2

October 1, 1960
to
October 1, 1961
+1
+1
+1
+1
+5
+2

.
.
.,...
s't
t...
1

1

+1
+4

*Figures not reported due to limited number of replies.

Current trend in farm land values based on opinions of
country banks as reported in October 1961
Per cent of banks reporting trend is:
Up
TOP:
CENTER: Stable
BOTTOM: Down

II

43
47
10

Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Wisconsin
SEVENTH DISTRICT.......
MEI

Up
18
10
21
16
16
17

14
81
5
19
76
5
UI

Stable
70
77
72
77
82
74

IV

v

VIII
88

18
76
6

0
89
11
Down
12
13
7
7
2
9

XI

25
65
10

XVI

13
74
13

‘..,
%
)
I. ..,,
1

20
70
10