View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

02149
A%1/01
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago - -

•

May 31, 1957

FARM REAL ESTATE DEBT has increased in eac
year since 1945. In early 1957 it is estimated t total•'
9.7 billion dollars, more than double the 19
aAi°"drA.
• •
Data from life insurance companies and fr m membef
banks of the Federal Reserve System indicate hat fark-)
mortgage debt has continued to increase in ea 54,1957
though at a slower rate than the 2 per cent gain registered in the first quarter of 1956. Together, the
lenders hold about 40 per cent of the farm mortgage
it
(insurance companies account for 25 per cent of the total
and banks 15 per cent), while the land bank system holds
16 per cent, the Farmers' Home Administration, 3 per
cent, and individuals and other miscellaneous lenders
account for the remaining 41 per cent of the long-term
debt.
Despite the substantial increase in recent years and
prospects for a further gain in 1957, the mortgage debt
level is conservative as judged by past standards.

n Itural
tter
Number 407
The average ratio of debt to the value of mortgaged
farms is also considerably lower than in 1940. Whereas
the mortgage debt averaged about 25 per cent of the
value of mortgaged farms in both 1950 and 1956, in 1940
the ratio was 41 per cent. Ratios of about this magnitude were also indicated for District states, except
Wisconsin.
Farm mortgage debt —
per cent of value of mortgaged
farms, 1956
Illinois. .'• ...... • . •
I
Iowa
Michigan..... •
Wisconsin
ndiana. .. • . • • • • •

Currently, the mortgage debt is equal to about onethird of total annual cash receipts from farm marketings,
interest payments are equal to less than 2 per cent of the
total cash farm income. In several years during the
1920's and 1930's, when mortgage debt did assume
burdensome proportions, the amount outstanding surpassed cash receipts and interest payments amounted to
as much as 7 per cent of farm income.

•

Significant also in the mortgage debt picture are the
proportion of farms mortgaged and the ratio of the debt to
the value of the mortgaged farms.
A report issued jointly by the Departments of Agriculture and Commerce estimates that in 1956, 35 per
cent of the owner-operator farms in the U. S. were mortgaged. This is a higher portion than the approximately
30 per cent in 1945 and 1950, but it is a much smaller
proportion of the owner-operator farms than in the decade
prior to the war. Data show that from 42 to 45 per cent
of owner-operator farms were mortgaged in the years
1930, 1935 and 1940.
In District states virtually the same picture exists.
While the proportion of owner-operator farms mortgaged is
somewhat above the early postwar years, it is considerably smaller than in 1940.
Per cent of owner-operator
farms mortgaged
1956
Illinois. ..
Indiana...
Iowa
Michigan
Wisconsin.

... 29
.. 38
42
36
.. 45

1950

1940

27
36
39
33
42

43
51
63
49
60

• •

21
22
24
28
37

Average ratios of debt to farm value changed very
little or declined somewhat in most states between 1950
and 1956. In part, this reflects the fact that farm mortgage debts and real estate values increased by the same
relative amount in recent years. In Wisconsin, however,
farm mortgage debt increased 32 per cent since 1950
while land values rose by less than 15 per cent. As a
result, the average ratio of debt to farm value in Wisconsin increased from 34 per cent in 1950 to 37 per cent
in 1956.
Further evidence of the quality of the farm mortgage
debt is the high level of repayments and small number of
foreclosures. Repayments on farm real estate loans in
the latter half of 1956 compared favorably with the high
rates of repayments in other recent years, and data from
life insurance companies indicate that repayments were
running about 5 per cent above year ago in the early
months of 1957. Higher levels of farm income beginning
in late 1956 and so far in 1957 no doubt played some part
in maintaining repayments.
Despite the improved levels of income and the
lower demand for mortgage credit experienced by some
lenders, farm mortgage debt is likely to increase in the
year ahead though by a smaller amount than the 8-10 per
cent gains of recent years. There is a strong demand for
mortgage credit to finance the purchase of land for farm
enlargement purposes; a larger proportion of the real
estate transfers are credit-financed; and mortgage credit
is being used increasingly to finance expenditures for
purposes other than the purchase of land.
Research Department