View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The Agricultural Newsletter
from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Number 1896

January 1998

AgLetter
UPTURN IN HOG PRODUCTION
The expansion among hog farmers that started last
spring continued at a rapid pace during the fall of 1997,
both here in the Midwest and elsewhere. That expansion plus the growth expected during the first half of
this year foreshadows an unusually large jump in pork
production for 1998. Domestic meat supplies will be
further buoyed by continued growth in poultry production
and by a slowing in meat exports. On a trade adjusted
per capita basis, production of all meats in 1998 is now
forecast to surpass the previous high set in 1994. These
prospects pulled hog prices sharply lower the last two
or three months, triggering operating losses among
many hog farmers.
The rapid expansion among hog farmers was especially apparent in the fall pig-crop, the number of pigs
born and raised during the three months ending with
November. That pig crop was recently estimated by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture to be more than 9 percent
larger than the year before and nearly equal to the highest
on record for that period. The expansion stemmed from
a modest buildup in the inventory of hogs held for
breeding purposes, more intensive use of the breeding
herd, and a continuing uptrend in the number of pigs
saved per litter. The inventory of hogs held for breeding
purposes as of September 1 was up only 2.6 percent from
the year before. But indicative of the more intensive use
of the breeding herd, the number of sows that farrowed
(gave birth) during the September-November period
was up 7.9 percent. The number of pigs saved per litter
was up 1.3 percent from the year before, slightly below
the trend rate of increase over the last five years.
The big increase in the fall pig crop helped push
the December 1 inventory of all hogs and pigs on farms
up to 59.9 million head. That marked a rise of nearly
7 percent from the shrinking inventory of a year ago and
it virtually matched the 1994 inventory as the highest for
that date since 1980. The upturn in hog numbers was
fairly widespread geographically. Among the five states
comprising the Seventh Federal Reserve District, only

Wisconsin registered a decline in hog numbers (down
9 percent). The largest gains were in Iowa (up 15 percent) and Illinois (up 8 percent). Hog numbers in Indiana
and Michigan recorded below-average gains (1 and 3 percent, respectively).
Other Midwest states that recorded comparatively
large gains included Minnesota (11 percent) and Ohio
(8 percent). Elsewhere, the expanding presence of hog
production on the western fringe of the Hog/Corn Belt
was apparent in year-over-year inventory gains of 81
percent in Utah, 25 percent in Colorado, 24 percent in
Oklahoma, 17 percent in Montana, and 16 percent in
Wyoming. Texas recorded a gain of 10 percent. The
growth in hog numbers in North Carolina was limited
to 4 percent, dampened by the moratorium on new and
expanded hog production facilities imposed in that state
early last year.
Although hog numbers turned up last year, and
despite another year of generally favorable earnings for
the industry, the number of hog farms continued its longstanding decline. Nationwide, there were fewer than
138,700 farms that had an inventory of at least one hog
sometime during 1997. That estimate is down 11 percent
from the year before and it is almost 50 percent below

The number of pigs saved per litter was up again in 1997
number
9.0

8.5

8.0

7.5

7.0
1981

’85

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

’89

’93

’97

the number of hog farms that existed in 1990. For the
five District states combined, the number of hog farms
in 1997 was down 12.5 percent from the year before and
also down about 50 percent from 1990. While the number of hog farms has been declining for decades, the
rate of decline accelerated in recent years as the ongoing industry restructuring moved toward very large,
highly integrated operations. Reflecting that shift, 55
percent of the nation’s hogs are on farms with 2,000 or
more hogs. (About 35 percent of all hogs are on farms
with 5,000 or more hogs). Five years ago, farms with
2,000 or more hogs accounted for only 28 percent of
all hogs on farms.
A string of eight consecutive quarters of year-overyear declines in pork production ended about mid 1997.
The upturn started modestly with a 1 percent year-overyear gain in the third quarter and then ballooned to a
larger-than-expected gain of about 7 percent in the fourth
quarter. Labor problems at Canadian packing plants
apparently attracted more hog imports to U.S. packing
plants during the late fall and early winter months. Still
larger gains in pork production are likely during much
of this year. Based on the USDA’s latest hog inventory
estimates, and assuming a continuation of the trend rate
of increase in dressed weights, it appears the year-overyear gain in pork production could surpass 8 percent
in the first quarter of this year and be followed by an
11 percent gain in the second quarter.
Pork production in the second half of this year
will hinge mostly on the winter (December-February)
and spring (March-May) pig crop. The USDA’s latest
survey indicated that the December 1 inventory of hogs
held for breeding purposes was up nearly 5 percent.
However, the sow farrowing intentions of producers
were somewhat mixed. The intentions for the winter
quarter point to a 9 percent year-over-year gain in farrowings while those for the spring quarter signal a more
modest gain of 3.5 percent. The indicated second-quarter
slowing would be early by the standards of past hog
cycles. Alternatively, the urge to slow the expansion
could be reinforced by the recent and prospective operating
losses that will grip many hog producers. At face value,
these intentions suggest third quarter pork production
could be up 12 percent while fourth quarter pork production—although rising seasonally—may only register
a 3 or 4 percent gain.
The prospect for a large gain in pork production
this year coincides with the likelihood of larger supplies
of other meats and a growing disappointment over near-

The rate of decline in the number of hog farms has
accelerated in the most recent five-year period
five-year % change
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
1967-72

1972-77

1977-82

1982-87

1987-92

1992-97

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

term trade prospects for all meats. Following several
years of large gains, the growth in pork exports slowed
appreciably in 1997. USDA analysts now believe that
pork exports may decline this year, largely because of
developments in Asian countries. Preliminary tallies
show beef production exceeded year-earlier levels by
about 3 percent in both the third and fourth quarters of
1997. The gains stemmed from a stepped-up pace in fed
cattle marketings which more than offset the cutback in
the liquidation of the cow herd. The movement of feeder
cattle into feedlots slowed in late 1997. However, the
inventory of cattle in larger feedlots remains high (up 7.6
percent as of the USDA’s December 1 survey). This inventory will likely keep beef production above year-earlier
levels this winter and into the early spring. Thereafter,
beef production may hold close to, or somewhat below
year-earlier levels. Reflecting this view, USDA analysts
believe beef production for all of 1998 will decline a little
over 1.5 percent. However, the USDA analysts also foresee the possibility of growing beef imports and the possibility of a slight decline in beef exports for this year. The
adverse trade developments could offset the envisioned
decline in beef production, leaving domestically available
beef supplies virtually unchanged for the second year
in a row.
A slowing in export growth could also amplify
a projected rise in poultry production for 1998. Turkey
production was unchanged last year and, according
to USDA forecasts may hold steady again this year.
However, broiler production, after registering a belowtrend rate of growth of 3.6 percent in 1997, is projected
to register a more typical 5.5 percent rise this year.
Moreover, poultry exports may edge only marginally

1997 farm commodity prices in perspective
All Commodities

Corn

Soybeans

index, 1990-92=100
120

dollars per bushel
5.00

dollars per bushel
9.00

4.40

8.30

3.80

7.60

3.20

6.90

2.60

6.20

115
1996
110
105

1997

100
1991-95 avg.
95

2.00
J

M

M

J

S

N

5.50
J

M

M

J

S

N

J

Barrows and gilts

Choice steers

Milk

dollars per cwt.
60

dollars per cwt.
80

dollars per cwt.
16.50

75

15.50

70

14.50

65

13.50

60

12.50

M

M

J

S

N

M

M

J

S

N

1996
55
50
1997
45
1991-95 avg.
40
35

55
J

M

M

J

S

N

11.50
J

M

higher in 1998, falling well short of the 20 percent average gain of the last three years. On a trade-adjusted basis, the latest USDA projections suggest that the rise in
per capita poultry production this year may be the largest since 1989.
Prospects for a large rise in pork production and
another new high in per capita production of all meats
have weighed heavily on hog prices since last fall. During the first half of January, hog prices averaged about
$34 per hundredweight, down more than a third from
both the third quarter average and from a year ago.
Although hog prices may recover seasonally from recent
levels, they will likely range mostly in the upper $30s to
mid-$40s during much of the year. Based on Iowa State
University estimates of the cost of producing hogs, the
recent and prospective prices suggest that the operating
losses that began in late 1997 for many hog producers
will extend through much of this year. Those estimates
show that in December it cost the typical farrow-to-finish
hog producer in Iowa about $46 a hundredweight to get

M

J

S

N

J

a hog ready for market. Production costs may drift
somewhat lower this year but not enough to restore
favorable returns to most producers.
Gary L. Benjamin

AgLetter (ISSN 1080-8639) is published monthly by the Research
Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. It is prepared by
Gary L. Benjamin, economic adviser and vice president, Mike A. Singer,
economist, and members of the Bank’s Research Department, and is
distributed free of charge by the Bank’s Public Information Center. The
information used in the preparation of this publication is obtained from
sources considered reliable, but its use does not constitute an endorsement of its accuracy or intent by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
To subscribe, please write or telephone:
Public Information Center
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
P.O. Box 834
Chicago, IL 60690-0834
Tel. no. 312-322-5111
Fax no. 312-322-5515
Ag Letter is also available on the World Wide Web at
http://www.frbchi.org.

SELECTED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS

Percent change from
Latest
period

Value

Prior
period

Year
ago

Two years
ago

Prices received by farmers (index, 1990–92=100)
Crops (index, 1990–92=100)
Corn ($ per bu.)
Hay ($ per ton)
Soybeans ($ per bu.)
Wheat ($ per bu.)
Livestock and products (index, 1990–92=100)
Barrows and gilts ($ per cwt.)
Steers and heifers ($ per cwt.)
Milk ($ per cwt.)
Eggs (¢ per doz.)

December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December

104
110
2.48
97.70
6.68
3.40
97
43.00
67.50
14.50
78.7

–2.8
–3.5
18.1
–3.3
–2.5
–2.9
–1.0
–5.7
–0.7
–0.7
–2.4

–5
–5
–6
8
–3
–16
–6
–23
3
1
–10

–4
–8
–19
24
–1
–30
1
–3
4
4
–1

Consumer prices (index, 1982–84=100)
Food

December
December

161
159

–0.1
0.1

2
2

5
6

Production or stocks
Corn stocks (mil. bu.)
Soybean stocks (mil. bu.)
Wheat stocks (mil. bu.)
Beef production (bil. lb.)
Pork production (bil. lb.)
Milk production* (bil. lb.)

December 1
December 1
December 1
November
November
December

7,230
1,995
1,615
1.94
1.47
11.1

N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
–15.9
–10.9
4.8

5
9
32
–1
3
1

18
9
21
–8
–8
2

Receipts from farm marketings (mil. dol.)
Crops**
Livestock
Government payments

September
September
September
September

20,935
9,742
8,185
3,008

45.2
47.8
5.1
N.A.

–1
–7
2
11

25
2
13
N.A.

Agricultural exports (mil. dol.)
Corn (mil. bu.)
Soybeans (mil. bu.)
Wheat (mil. bu.)

October
October
October
October

5,534
118
170
92

23.3
–17.2
299.9
–24.7

6
–19
78
–9

8
–44
120
–23

Farm machinery sales (units)
Tractors, over 40 HP
40 to 100 HP
100 HP or more
Combines

December
December
December
December

6,226
3,313
2,913
1,316

–4.0
–6.6
–0.8
6.1

22
5
47
5

7
15
–1
27

N.A. Not applicable
*20 selected states.
**Includes net CCC loans.
AgLetter is printed on recycled paper
using soy-based inks

Return service requested
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Public Information Center
P.O. Box 834
Chicago, Illinois 60690-0834
312-322-5111

AgLetter

PRESORTED
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
ZIP + 4 BARCODED
U.S. POSTAGE PAID
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
PERMIT NO. 1942