View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

338.13
/\46
1824

•

WAITE MEMORIAL BOOK COLLECTION
DEPT. OF AG, AND APPLIED ECONOMICS
1994 BUFORD AVE. - 232 COB
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL, MN 55108 U.S.A.

AGR/CtILTURAL LETTER

FRB CHICAGO

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO
Number 1824

January, 1992
Pork production continues on the upswing
The USDA's latest quarterly survey found that hog farmers
continue to expand production, albeit at a slower rate
than previously indicated. The survey showed that the
December 1 inventory of hogs and pigs on farms nationwide was up more than 4.5 percent from a year earlier.
Moreover, it suggested that producers intend to farrow 4
percent more sows during the six months ending with
May. The gains imply that pork production in 1992 will
rise about 5 percent, reaching-on a per capita basis-the
highest level since 1981. The expansion, combined with
further growth in poultry and beef production, will weigh
heavily on hog prices in the months ahead.
The pace of expansion indicated by the latest survey,
while sizable, was noticeably less than most analysts had
expected. For instance, the fall pig crop (the number of
pigs born and raised during the three months ending with
November) was reported to be up less than 5 percent from
the same period the year before. Most analysts had expected a gain of 7 or 8 percent, based on the growth in
the June-August pig crop and the fall-quarter farrowing
intentions as reported last September.

•

•

The smaller-than-expected pig crop trimmed the gain in
the inventory of hogs on farms. Market hogs numbered
47.8 million head as of December 1, up 4.5 percent from
a year ago. Hogs held for breeding purposes numbered
7.3 million head, up a little over 5 percent but well short
of the gain most observers expected. The updated reading
on the intentions of hog farmers imply that sow farrowings
during the winter (December-February) quarter will be
up 7 percent, unchanged from the intentions reported
last September. For the spring (March-May) quarter,
however, producers intend to limit the year-over-year gain
to 1 percent.
The latest tabulations on hog numbers and producer intentions for District states are mixed. Hog numbers in
Iowa are up 7 percent from a year ago, paced by a rise of
more than 12 percent in the inventory of hogs held for
breeding purposes. Hog numbers in the other four District
states range from up 2 or 3 percent in Illinois, Indiana, and
Michigan to down 2 percent in Wisconsin. Producer
farrowing intentions throughout the District states parallel
the nationwide pattern of a large increase this winter,
followed by a marked scaling-back during the spring quarter. The spring-quarter farrowing intentions among hog

farmers in three District states (Indiana, Michigan, and
Wisconsin) point to declines from a year ago. Hog farmers in Illinois plan to hold spring farrowings unchanged
from last year while Iowa farmers plan a 6 percent gain.
The structure of hog farms has changed dramatically over
the years. The number of hogs on farms is virtually the
same as eight years ago. But the number of operations
with hogs has shrunk by nearly half. Over two-thirds of
the nation's hogs are held on operations that house 500
head or more. These large farms account for only 12
percent of all hog farms. In 1983, such farms accounted
for 6 percent of all hog farms and just over half of all hogs
on farms. In the three major hog-producing states of the
Seventh Federal Reserve District (Illinois, Indiana, and
Iowa), the share of all hog farms that have 500 head or
more has risen from 15 percent in 1983 to 25 percent.
These large farms now account for nearly 70 percent of
the hogs in these three states, up from 55 percent in 1983.
The current cyclical upturn in pork production became
evident in the second quarter of last year and will likely
extend through all of this year. Pork production for all of
1991 was up a little over 4 percent, paced by a fourthquarter rise of 8 percent. Hog slaughter and pork production during the first half of this year is likely to be 6 to 7
percent above the same period in 1991, with the gain
during the winter months slightly exceeding that for the
spring quarter. Hog slaughter during the second half of
Recent and prospective trends in hog production
Iowa
Mil.
head

Other District
states'

U.S.

Mil.

Mil.
change'

head

change'

head

change'

Pigs born & raised
June-Aug. 1991 6.16

9.8

5.58

6.6

24.4

7.4

Sept.-Nov. 1991

5.58

3.6

5.08

1.4

23.2

4.6

Dec. 1 inventory
All hogs & pigs

14.8

7.2

12.8

2.0

57.0

4.6

13.0

6.6

11.2

1.9

49.8

4.5

For breeding

1.8

12.5

1.6

2.5

7.2

5.2

Intended sow
farrowings
Dec.-Feb. 1992

0.72

11.5

0.64

5.8

2.90

7.0

0.90

5.9

0.73

-2.1

3.32

1.0

8.3

1.37

1.4

6.22

3.7

For market

Mar.-May 1992
Total

1.62

'Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
'From year earlier.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

1992 is likely be up 4 to 6 percent. The bulk of the second-half gain will occur in the summer quarter, with only
a modest fourth-quarter rise if producers stick with their
current farrowing intentions.

cessed fruits. The USDA predicts that food prices will
average 2 to 4 percent higher in 1992, with softening red
meat, poultry, and egg prices limiting the increase of food
prices in general.

Another modest rise for beef production and sustained
growth for poultry will augment pork's contribution to
what is expected to be the tenth consecutive new high in
annual per capita production of all meats. USDA analysts
are expecting a 1 percent rise in beef production this year,
with all of the gain coming in the first half. Poultry production is expected to grow nearly 4 percent. Following
a rise of nearly 3.5 percent last year, total meat production
is projected to increase another 3 percent this year. Two
consecutive years of such large gains in meat production
are rare when compared to the standards of the last two
decades.

Comparisons of annual averages tend to mask intra-year
trends in food prices. The bulk of last year's food price
gain occurred in the early part of the year, in part due to a
California freeze that disrupted fruit supplies. Food prices
then declined during the summer of 1991, helping to trim
the year-over-year rise in food prices to 1.9 percent for the
final quarter. Late in the year, however, the upward trend
resumed, in part because of the whitefly infestation in
California vegetables.

Hog prices fell sharply during the second half of last year
as evidence of the upturn in production began to unfold.
Monthly average barrow and gilt prices at major markets
in 1991 ranged from a high of $55.20 a hundredweight in
July to a low of $37.80 in November, the third lowest
average for any month in over 10 years. For the year as a
whole, hog prices averaged $48.90, down from $54.50
the previous year but still around $5 above the annual
averages recorded in 1988 and 1989. Prices are expected
to remain comparatively low for several more months.
Analysts believe hog prices during the winter and spring
quarters will range mostly from the high $30s to the mid
$40s per hundredweight. For the second half, prices
could again retreat to the upper $30s. While costs vary
widely among farmers, Iowa State University studies suggest that the break-even cost of production for a typical
farrow-to-finish producer is $43 to $44 per hundredweight. As such, many farmers suffered sizable losses on
hogs marketed in November and December. Less-efficient producers will experience continued losses for several more months. In time, the losses will become apparent in a scaling-back in hog production and more normal
returns to producers.
Gary L. Benjamin

The CPI for food is separated into two elements. The first
is food consumed away from home, which averaged 3.4
percent higher in 1991. The USDA has forecast this component to increase about 4 percent in 1992. The second
component is food consumed at home, which represents
grocery store purchases. Grocery food prices averaged
2.6 percent higher in 1991, and the 1992 increase is expected to be limited to about 2 percent. However, a look
at the year-over-year changes in retail food prices for December shows that prices for food consumed away from
home were about 3 percent higher than a year ago. In
contrast, the December, 1991 price index for food consumed at home showed a gain of slightly over 1 percent
from a year ago.
Three major factors influencing retail food prices are farmlevel prices, post-farm marketing costs, and consumer
demand. The farm share accounts for about 30 percent of
the retail dollar spent on domestically-produced food.
Annual food price increases
percent change
8

6

Retail food prices
The rate of increase in retail food prices slowed in 1991,
and the moderate pace is expected to continue into 1992.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for food averaged 2.9
percent higher in 1991, well below the gains of 5.8 percent for both 1989 and 1990. Moreover, for the first time
since 1985, last year's food price increase was less than
the rise for all other components of the CPI. The 1991
food price increase was led by fresh fruits, fats and oils,
and cereals and bakery products. A more moderating
effect came from poultry, eggs, dairy products, and pro-

4

2

0
1981 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92*
*Represents mid-point of USDA forecast.
SOURCE: USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Much of the remaining 70 percent is allocated to post-farm
marketing costs such as labor, packaging, transportation,
and energy. For the first three quarters of 1991, the
USDA's index of marketing costs averaged about 3 percent
over the year-earlier level. In contrast, the USDA's farmlevel price measure averaged about 2 percent lower in
1991. Consumer demand is difficult to quantify, but a
look at personal disposable income and employment figures provides insight regarding domestic food demand
during 1991. Both aggregate and per capita personal
disposable income, adjusted for inflation, lagged yearearlier levels during the first three quarters in 1991. In
addition, unemployment trended higher during the year.
These changes may have prompted consumers to tighten
their food budgets by reallocating grocery expenditures
towards cheaper items and by reducing the demand for
food consumed in restaurants.

•

Fresh fruit and vegetable prices increased 13.5 percent and
2.2 percent, respectively, during 1991. Citrus production
fell as California growers suffered a severe freeze in December, 1990. Fresh fruit prices responded by rising
sharply the following month, and stayed at the higher level
throughout the year. Fresh vegetable prices increased
during the second quarter of 1991 as California production
was hampered by late-winter rains and cold weather.
However, prices fell during the third quarter as fresh vegetable supplies rebounded, resulting in a moderate average
annual price increase. Processed fruit prices averaged 3.7
percent lower in 1991, largely on the strength of Florida's
recovery from the previous year's freeze. Processed vegetable prices showed an increase of less than 1 percent.
Assuming good weather in 1992, price increases for fresh
fruits and vegetables are expected to moderate. Processed
fruit and vegetable prices are expected to increase about 2
percent and 3 percent, respectively.
The retail price of cereals and bakery products increased
4.1 percent in 1991, while sugar and sweetener prices rose
3.7 percent. Each is expected to post slightly higher gains
in 1992. Prices for fats and oils averaged 4.3 percent
higher in 1991, and a more moderate increase is expected
in 1992.
Both retail egg and dairy prices declined during 1991.
Egg prices averaged about 2 percent lower as production
edged higher again in 1991 while per capita egg consumption continued to decline. Similar trends are expected to push egg prices 4 to 7 percent lower in 1992.
Retail dairy product prices declined slightly in 1991 after
increasing by an average of 8 percent for 1989 and 1990.
The 1991 price decline was due to sharply lower farmlevel milk prices early in the year and larger inventories of

Percent change in retail food prices
1990

1991

1992
forecast

Food

5.8

2.9

2 to 4

Food away from home

4.7

3.4

3 to 5

Food at home

6.5

2.6

1 to 3

8.0

2.8

-1 to 1

Beef and veal
Pork

14.7

3.3

-10 to -7

Poultry

-0.2

-0.8

-3 to 0

Fish and seafood

2.2

1.1

Eggs

4.7

-2.3

-7 to -4

Dairy products

9.4

-1.1

1 to 3

Fats and oils

4.2

4.3

1 to 3

Fresh fruits

12.1

13.5

-1 to 3
0 to 3

0 to 3

Fresh vegetables

5.6

2.2

Processed fruits

8.7

-3.7

1 to 3

Processed vegetables

2.7

0.8

2 to 4

Sugar and sweets

4.4

3.7

4 to 6

Cereal and bakery products

5.7

4.1

4 to 6

Nonalcoholic beverages

2.0

0.5

0 to 2

Other prepared foods

4.5

4.5

3 to 5

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics; forecast by USDA.

processed dairy products. Dairy product prices are expected to post a moderate increase in 1992 as total milk
production remains level.
Retail poultry prices fell about 1 percent in 1991 as production rose nearly 6 percent. Continued expansion may
push poultry prices lower again in 1992. Beef and pork
prices recorded moderate increases of 2.8 percent and 3.3
percent, respectively, during 1991. Pork prices are expected to average between 7 to 10 percent lower during
1992 due to higher production. Retail beef prices are
expected to show little change during 1992 as production
remains flat.
Mike A. Singer

AGRICULTURAL LETTER (ISSN 0002-1512) is published monthly
by the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
It is prepared by Gary L. Benjamin, economic adviser and vicepresident, Mike A. Singer, economist, and members of the Bank's
Research Department, and is distributed free of charge by the Bank's
Public Information Center. The information used in the preparation
of this publication is obtained from sources considered reliable, but
its use does not constitute an endorsement of its accuracy or intent
by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
To subscribe, please write or telephone:
Public Information Center
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
P.O. Box 834
Chicago, IL 60690
Tel. no. (312) 322-5111

Selected agricultural economic indicators
Percent change from
Latest
period

Value

Prior
period

Prices received by farmers (index, 1977=100)
Crops (index, 1977=100)
Corn ($ per bu.)
Hay ($ per ton)
Soybeans ($ per bu.)
Wheat ($ per bu.)
Livestock and products (index, 1977=100)
Barrows and gilts ($ per cwt.)
Steers and heifers ($ per cwt.)
Milk ($ per cwt.)
Eggs (0 per doz.)

December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December
December

138
121
2.33
68.40
5.39
3.46
154
39.60
71.20
13.90
71.8

-0.7
-2.4
1.3
-1.0
-1.6
6.5
0.0
2.9
-1.7
0.7
12.2

-3
0
5
-14
-6
44
-6
-18
-12
19
-6

-7
-5
3
-18
-4
-9
-9
-19
-6
-13
-13

Consumer prices (index, 1982-84=100)
Food

December
December

138
137

0.1
0.4

3
2

9
7

6,538
1,778
1,442
1.81
1.46
9.91

N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
-14.3
-5.1
-2.9

-6
6
-24
-2
6
-1

-8
10
1
-5
1
3

Production or stocks
Corn stocks (mil. bu.)
Soybean stocks (mil. bu.)
Wheat stocks (mil. bu.)
Beef production (bil. lb.)
Pork production (bil. lb.)
Milk production* (bil. lb.)

December 1
December 1
December 1
November
November
November

Year
ago

Two years
ago

Receipts from farm marketings (mil. dol.)
Crops**
Livestock
Government payments

August
August
August
August

13,046
5,845
7,137
64

7.4
10.2
5.5
-14.7

-4
-2
-8
N.A.

4
7
3
-51

Agricultural exports (mil. dol.)
Corn (mil. bu.)
Soybeans (mil. bu.)
Wheat (mil. bu.)

October
October
October
October

3,330
137
50
125

16.7
1.8
87.9
37.6

8
27
69
43

-2
-22
-32
34

December
December
December
December

4,739
2,225
2,514
880

27.9
13.6
43.9
-13.0

-31
-22
-37
-19

-13
-15
-11
-13

Farm machinery sales (units)
Tractors, over 40 HP
40 to 100 HP
100 HP or more
Combines
N.A. Not applicable
*21 selected states.
**Includes CCC loans.

1111""1"V"HIP"W114

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

ZTOT-80IGg NW

DNrcrune

'razz
st.mc

NO33

inevid Is
V664
331.dA0 WOONSS013 1E2!

awano allodne

03I1dd0 V araint$ do 1d30
NOZUW:1811 S3N131 asrr"ic'7

11.1.S-ZZ£ (Z1£)

*
* *

06909 spu!Ill 'oSeDI4D
17£8 xo£1'0'd
Jaluaj uopeuuolui Dgqnd

Lsveoz6j
rei3 1 3
I

i•

8
I
N • ,CMILILL1
t-.7-1.=::3Q3fl ti *sn

r ha

ODVDIHD JO >INVB 3A2I3S3211V213G3J

Hi1137 7V211117f1DINDV

"pp.