View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

I:3 i3

ri

Federal ileserve Danft of Chicago

•

4tri

S.DEPE-OFc
A Rtb I.

August 23, 1968

1 Ar.4,0

PRODUCTION ITEMS used in agriculture have increased
sharply in recent years. Much of the increase can be attributed
to greater use of machinery, equipment, and fertilizer. The
amount of labor used in farm production has declined, however.
Farm inputs remained fairly constant year to year until 1965. Since then, however, the index of farm production inputs has risen almost 5 percent. The increase probably
reflects the generally higher net farm income of the mid-1960s,
especially the record peak of 1966 and optimism created by
the "feed the world" concept popular in 1965-66. While this
concept has since waned in the face of booming world food
production, it may have encouraged farmers to increase their
investment in production items.

CURRENT SE(

t ra
tter
Number 975

... and the Trend Toward More Purchased
Capital Input Continues
Percent, 1957=100
240 im
220
200

Fertilizer

180 sib

Total Production Items Used Increase ..

160 imis
Percent, 1957=100
130"
I
120

140

Tractor horsepower

MO

.000°.4.61
.010.0
"orio+
woo.

120 ma
NM
.050010

100

Purchased inputs

wpm=

onsift
.

111111%..

• 110

Cropland

80

NM

Total

•0001.1.1.1.6

ellummm,
fataffaib Ilimmo.

.
60 ra.
100

I
Non-purchased inputs

1957

90

80 4..

I.
1957

'59

'61

'63

'65

'67

Labor has been moving out of agriculture for years,
trend paced by the adoption of labor saving inputs and techniques. In the last decade, for example, the manpower devoted to agricultural production has decreased almost 33
percent, while the amount of tractor horsepower used has
increased almost 36 percent. While crop acreage has been
reduced by acreage diversion programs, the increased use
of fertilizer has allowed farmers to produce more on less acreage. Farmers have increased the use of fertilizer more than
130 percent since 1957, while the cropland harvested has declined 4 percent, and crop production increased about a fourth
over the same period.
Changes in the composition of production items are related to, and have partly reinforced the trend toward increased
farm size and specialization. Farmers have become more dependent on other sectors of the economy as sources of production items. And with the increase in purchased production
items has come a decline in items that are not paid for, such
as family labor and equity capital. In the last decade, the index
of purchased inputs increased almost 28 percent while the
index of "non-purchased" inputs declined 20 percent.

•

WIMP

Labor

I

1

'59

'61

'63

'65

'67

The shift in production items has been the result of
economic factors. There have been a number of changes in
technology that reduce unit costs of production. Also, the
relative prices of production items have changed. Prices of
resources for which industry and agriculture compete have
increased. Farm wages, for example, have increased more than
50 percent in the last ten years, reflecting the strong pull of
nonagricultural employment. During that time, however,
prices of fertilizer, which is used almost exclusively by agriculture, have been practically constant. New ways of obtaining plant nutrients have, of course, increased fertilizer supplies
and helped keep prices of fertilizer down relative to other farm
inputs.
Rapidly increasing productivity and a lagging demand for
farm products relative to the demand for nonfarm products
combine to put farmers in a cost-price squeeze. The prices
farmers pay for inputs have increased steadily-23 percent in
the last decade—while prices they receive have fluctuated
widely.
Current trends toward less labor, more purchased capital
inputs, and increasing size and specialization of farms will no
doubt continue until a better balance is reached between resources for farm and nonfarm uses.
Dennis B. Sharpe.
Agricultural Economist

FARM BUSINESS CONDITIONS

•

May 1968 with Comparisons
1968

•
I T_E M S

,

.•

PRICES:
Received by farmers (1957-59=100)
Paid by farmers (1957-59=100)
Parity price ratio (1910-14=100)
Wholesale, all commodities (1957-59=100) ..
Paid by consumers (1957-59=100)
Wheat, No. 2 red winter, Chicago (dol. per bu.)..
Corn, No. 2 yellow, Chicago (dol. per bu.)
Oats, No. 2 white, Chicago (dol. per bu.)
Soybeans, No. 1 yellow, Chicago (dol. per bu.)
Hogs, barrows and gilts, Chicago (dol. per cwt.)..
Beef steers, choice grade, Chicago (dol. per cwt.)...
Milk, wholesale, U. S. (dol. per cwt.) .-..........
. Butterfat, local markets, U. S. (dol. per lb.) •
)
Chickens, local markets, U. S. (dol. per lb.
Eggs, local markets, U. S. (dol. per doz)
Milk cows, U. S. (dol. per head)

-

May

April

May

108
121
73
108.4P
.,.......
1.38
. 1.19
.81
2.74
19.10
27.16
5.02
.67
.14
.27
272

107
121
73
108
120
1.41
1.16
.80
2.71
19.23
27.149
5.03
.67
• .14
.29
270

101i
116
74
106
116
1.67
1.39
.76
2.87
22.33
25.46
4.74
.65
.13
.29
252

63.50
. 118.4

-113.81

163
53

- 156
107

.

.......
Farm labor, U.S.(dol. per week without board)
Factory labor, U. S. (dol. earned per week) ....... . 122.29
PRODUCTION:
Industrial, physical volume (1957-59=100)
Farm marketings, physical volume (1957-59=100).

164
98

INCOME PAYMENTS:
Total personal income, U. S. (annual rate, bil. of dol.)
Cash farm income, U. S.1 (annual rate, bil. of dol.) ..

678.3
145.0

EMPLOYMENT:
Farm (millions)
Nonagricultural (millions).................

' 4.0
, 71.9

FINANCIAL (District member banks):
Demand deposits:
Agricultural banks (1957-59=100)
Nonagricultural banks (1957-59=100)
Time deposits:
Agricultural banks (1957-9=100)
Nonagricultural banks (1957-59=100)
1

,
Based on estimated monthly income.

•

1214.9
123.9
292.1
305.14

*Revised.

1967

.

•

•

672.7
45.4*
•

620.6

3.9
71.0

3.8
.69.8

125.7
121.3

118.1
118.9

289.0
303.

.
PPreliminary.

•

256.8 •
278.8

.

.......

,
•Compiled from official sources by the Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.