View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

12_80
F3i3
• Federal Reserve Danft of Chicago -

-

April 5, 1968
PORK PRODUCTION appears headed for a downturn
despite relatively favorable feed-price relationships in recent
months. The number of pigs farrowed during December
through February in the ten Corn Belt states was about equal
to a year ago,but the numbers intended to farrow in both the
March-May and June-August periods are expected to be
around 3 percent under the comparable periods last year, according to the Department of Agriculture. A December survey covering the entire nation indicated that farmers in states
outside the Corn Belt planned to increase spring (DecemberMay) farrowings about 4 percent from a year ago. These
states only account for about a fifth of total pork production,
but their expansion will tend to offset some of the decline
that is indicated in the Corn Belt area. Nevertheless, slightly
smaller farrowings are indicated for the nation.
This is in contrast to what had been expected by many
observers. It appeared that the record corn crop (large quantities of which were in poor condition for storage) and the
relatively favorable feed-price relationships would lead to some
further expansion in pork production during 1968. The indicated downturn apparently is in response to lower hog
prices. Certainly, returns to hog producers have declined
from the high levels of 1966 when prices for barrows and gilts
at eight markets averaged $23.50 per hundredweight. During
the final quarter of 1967, prices dropped to a low of less than
$18, nearly $3 below the previous year and more than $7.50
under the record levels two years earlier. But the record corn
crop caused corn prices to drop precipitously—about 30 cents
a bushel from the high levels of late 1966 and early 1967. As
a result, the ratio of hog-corn prices—one rough measure of
profitability—remained relatively favorable for expanded pork
production, averaging above 16 during the final quarter. This
compares with a ratio ofjust under 15 the year before and,except for .1965, was the highest average ratio for that time of
year since 1960. s
Slaughter of hogs under federal inspection ran about 2
percent above a year earlier in January and February. But this
was mostly because of the extra working day in each month.
Weekly slaughter rates were actually slightly under last year.
Average weekly slaughter in March, on the other hand, was
slightly larger than a year ago.
Prices of hogs have strengthened from the low reached
in December of last year. Prices of barrows and gilts at
Chicago are currently selling for around $19 per hundredweight—down slightly from February but about $2 above the
December level and about $1 above a year ago.

•

If farmers hold to their intentions and Department of
Agriculture estimates prove correct, the level of slaughter,
while declining seasonally during the next few months, will
likely continue close to the year-earlier levels. The number of

Number 955

slaughter hogs on farms in the ten Corn Belt states as of
March 1 numbered 1 percent more than a year ago. The slight
increase in number was fairly evenly distributed among the
various weight groups. The bulk of these hogs will be marketed within the next five to six months.
Prices Expected to Continue
Close to Year-ago Levels
Dollars per cwt
30
28 11= 1"1"...

\

1966 (monthly)

26

•••\

24 —
22
1967

1968

•

20 18
16

Barrows and gilts at Chicago.
Jan.

Mar.

May

July

Sept.

Nov.

Note: 1967 and 1968 data are plotted weekly.

Hog prices, therefore, are expected to hold close to yearago levels, except for temporary fluctuations, over the next
several months. Higher consumer incomes will tend to
strengthen the demand for pork in the coming months but
continued large supplies of competing meats along with sizable
cold storage stocks of pork are likely to limit any sharp price
advances. Prices may weaken slightly in the next few weeks
before rising seasonally to their summer peak. Also, the seasonal upswing probably will be more moderate and spread over
a longer period than last year when prices jumped nearly $5 in
May. Prices in the fall, although down from their summer
peak, are apt to run somewhat above those in the same period
last year. Hence the outlook for hog producers, while not
outstanding, could be considered moderately favorable.
Roby L. Sloan
Agricultural Economist