View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Burgundy Book
A report on economic conditions in the Little Rock zone
Second Quarter 2014
The Little Rock zone of the Federal Reserve comprises the majority of Arkansas,
except northeast Arkansas. The total population is approximately 2.5 million people,
including the 710,000 who live in the Little Rock MSA.

Economic Conditions Improve in the Little
Rock Zone

Data Snapshot
County unemployment rates (SA, Q1-14)

By Kevin L. Kliesen, Business Economist and Research Officer

6.8%

The near-term outlook for the Little Rock zone improved modestly
according to a May survey of business contacts. Roughly two-thirds
expect economic conditions in 2014 to be better or somewhat better
than they were in 2013.
The Little Rock zone’s unemployment rate averaged 6.8 percent in the
first quarter of 2014, down modestly from the previous quarter (7.2
percent). Two of the four MSAs in the Little Rock zone (Fayetteville
and Little Rock) had unemployment rates below the U.S. average (6.7
percent). The zone’s payroll employment growth was modestly
positive in the first quarter.

less than 5%
7% to 8%

5% to 6%
over 8%

6% to 7%

Nonfarm payroll employment by industry
Percent change from one year ago (Q1-14)

In contrast to the nation, manufacturing employment in the Little
Rock zone declined in the first quarter. However, activity in the
transportation sector appears to be ramping up, as reflected in a
sizable increase in job openings over the past several months.
Compared with a year earlier, house prices and single-family building
permits declined in the first quarter—although Fayetteville and
Texarkana were notable exceptions. Vacancy rates in Little Rock were
unchanged to slightly lower in the first quarter compared with the
previous quarter.
Households in the Little Rock zone continue to pare their mortgage
debt and credit card balances. However, auto loan debt—a proxy for
auto sales—increased at a healthy pace in the first quarter and by a
larger percentage than seen nationally.

-6

-4

-2

0

Total NonFarm (100%)
Government (21%)
Trade, Trans., and Utilities
(19%)
Education and Health (15%)
Prof. and Business Services
(13%)
Leisure and Hospitality
(9%)
Manufacturing (6%)
Financial Activities (6%)

Compared with the previous three months, Arkansas banks’ return on
assets and net interest margins increased slightly in the first quarter;
however, their nonperforming loan ratio was largely unchanged.

Nat. Res., Mining, and
Construction (5%)
Other Services (5%)

Arkansas farmers reduced their corn acreage in 2014, but boosted
their rice acreage sharply.

Information (2%)
Little Rock

This report is published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

US

2

4

6

Second Quarter 2014

How to read this report

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise noted, city names refer
to the metropolitan statistical areas
(MSAs), which are geographic areas that
include cities and their surrounding
suburbs, as defined by the Census Bureau.

Labor Markets ........................................................................... 3

Statistics for the Little Rock zone are
based on data availability and are calculated as weighted averages of either the 62
counties in the zone or the six MSAs. As of
2012, approximately 74 percent of the
zone’s labor force was located in an MSA.
Specifically: 29 percent in Little Rock, 20
percent in Fayetteville, 11 percent in Fort
Smith, 6 percent in Texarkana, 4 percent in
Pine Bluff, and 4 percent in Hot Springs; 26
percent of the zone’s labor force was
located in non-metropolitan areas.

Banking and Finance ................................................................. 7

Arrows in the tables are used to identify
significant trends in the data. The direction
of the arrow indicates the sign (up/down)
and the color indicates the economic
significance (green = good, red = poor).
Arrows appear only when the change from
the previous quarter is greater than 1
standard deviation. For example, the
standard deviation of the change in the US
unemployment rate is 0.4 percent. If the
US unemployment rate declined from 8.4
percent to 8.2 percent, no arrow would
appear; but if it declined from 8.4 percent
to 7.9 percent, a green down arrow would
appear in the table.
Selected variable definitions are located in
the appendix.

Manufacturing and Transportation ........................................... 4
Real Estate and Construction .................................................... 5
Household Sector ...................................................................... 6

Agriculture and Natural Resources ........................................... 8
Appendix ................................................................................... 9

Join Our Panel of Business Contacts
The anecdotal information in this report was provided by
our panel of business contacts, who were surveyed between
May 1 and May 15.
If you’re interested in becoming a member of our panel, follow this
link to complete a trial survey:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/outlooksurvey/

Selected quotes from business contacts
are generally verbatim, but some are
lightly edited to improve readability.

or email us at beigebook@stls.frb.org.

For more information contact the St.
Louis office:
Charles Gascon
charles.s.gascon@stls.frb.org
Media inquiries:
mediainquiries@stls.frb.org

Views expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions of
the Federal Reserve System.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

2

Labor Markets

Second Quarter 2014

Labor Markets Continue To Grow Modestly in Little Rock Zone
By E. K. Vermann, Senior Research Associate



The unemployment rate fell in all of the MSAs in
the Little Rock zone. In fact, Little Rock, Fort
Smith, and Texarkana all experienced significant
decreases in the unemployment rate. Despite
these changes, only Little Rock and Fayetteville
have unemployment rates lower than the
national average.



With the exception of Fayetteville, employment
growth in the nation continues to outpace that in
the Little Rock zone: Employment in Little Rock
and Fort Smith grew 0.1 and 0.5 percent, respectively. Employment in Texarkana, though continuing to fall, declined at a slower rate than the
previous quarter due to smaller declines in the
goods-producing and government sectors and a
small gain in the service-providing sector.



According to a survey of business contacts,
employment, hours, and wages in the Little Rock
zone are expected to remain the same in both the
second and third quarters.



“Managed IT services and… consulting projects are significantly higher in the short-term and [the pipeline of
committed development projects is] indicating higher
[hiring] for the long-term.”

Arkansas’ professional and business services
sector continues to grow. Though it accounts for
only 13 percent of the state’s total nonfarm
employment, it has grown 10 percent since 2010
(see figure). Anecdotal evidence suggests this
growth may be due to a increase in demand for IT
services, especially within the healthcare sector.

—Little Rock area IT consultant

“We continue to have trouble finding mechanics because very few training programs produce qualified
candidates.”
—Northwest Arkansas transportation executive

Professional and business services employment growth
outpaces nation since 2008
Professional and business services employment, SA (Index 2008=100)
115
110
105
100

95
90

AR

US

85
80

2008
2009
Source: BLS.

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Little Rock

Fort Smith

6.7

0.5

-1.3

▲

1.7

0.2

-0.3

-3.8

0.3

2.1

0.7

1.2

0.0

2.9

0.7

-7.0

5.3

7.0

Nonfarm employment (Q1-14)

0.1

1.9

-1.0

Private service-providing sector
Government sector

Goods-producing sector

US

▼

6.4

▼

Texarkana
7.0

Unemployment rate (Q1-14) (%)

▼

Fayetteville

1.5
▲

2.1
-0.1

Note: Unl es s otherwi s e noted, va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (± 1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on)
cha nge from the previ ous qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

3

Manufacturing and Transportation

Second Quarter 2014

Contacts Remain Optimistic Despite Recent Slowdown
By Yang Liu, Senior Research Associate

Online job openings as percent of employment, 3-month moving average
4.5
Manufacturing
4.0
Transportation
3.5
3.0
2.5

Transportation employment declined in Little
Rock and Fayetteville. Arkansas saw transportation employment move up slightly, but much
slower than the nation’s pace (see table).



The job vacancy rate in Little Rock’s manufacturing industry increased 0.2 percentage points in
the first four months in 2014. The job vacancy
rate in transportation surged from 3.1 percent to
4.3 percent (see figure). Job vacancy rates in both
industries are significantly higher than the
corresponding national averages.



Multiple contacts suggest that qualified truck
drivers and mechanics have been very hard to
find in Arkansas. Limited labor supply has led to a
capacity shortage in the truck loading sector and
an increase in service prices.
The durable goods manufacturing sector in
Arkansas grew modestly, but the nondurable
goods sector continued to contract, resulting in a
0.3 percent decline in overall manufacturing
employment (see table).



Demand for transportation jobs surges in Little Rock

Manufacturing employment in Little Rock,
Fayetteville, and Arkansas has declined slightly in
the first quarter, while national manufacturing
employment increased (see table).



“Manufacturing activity has picked up in recent months;
however there are indications that the expansion is slowing to moderate in the summer and fall.”
— Northwest Arkansas transportation executive





“[We expect] the business to grow substantially in the
next five to six years. We plan to invest significantly on
new equipment to add capacity for the new demand.”
– Northern Arkansas manufacturer

In contrast to the nation’s 1.1 percent growth,
Arkansas’s manufacturing exports dropped 17.1
percent compared with one year ago (see table).
Declines in exports of transportation equipment
and primary metal were the main drivers.

2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5

0.0
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Source: Conference Board a nd BLS.

Little Rock

Fayetteville

Arkansas

US

Transportation employment (Q1-14)

-2.1

-1.3

0.2

2.1

Manufacturing employment (Q1-14)

-0.7

-1.0

-0.3

0.6

Durable goods

--

--

0.8

0.9

Nondurable goods

--

--

-1.5

0.2

--

--

-17.1

1.1

Manufacturing exports (Q1-14)

Note: Values are percent change from one year ago. Arrows indicate a significant (± 1 standard deviation) change from the previous quarter; see
appendix for notes and sources.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

4

Real Estate and Construction

Second Quarter 2014

Residential Real Estate and Construction Off to a Rocky Start
By Diana Cooke, Research Associate



Residential construction worsened in the first
quarter of 2014. Single-family building permits
continued to display negative yearly growth rates
in the majority of MSAs. This decline was significant in Little Rock, Hot Springs, and Pine Bluff.



The sales of new and existing homes in Little Rock
reached its lowest point in the first quarter of
2014 compared with all quarters in the past year.
Contacts noted that weather was a likely factor.
Home prices in Little Rock fell by 1.6 percent from
one year ago.



The multi-family housing market remains stable.
The vacancy rate fell by 40 basis points from the
previous quarter (see top table). Contacts report
that developers continue to look for new sites for
apartment complexes.



Office market vacancy rates in Little Rock continue
to fall. Vacancy rates in the central business
district (CBD), midtown, and the suburbs show
signs of convergence (see figure). The spread
between office vacancy rates in the CBD and the
suburbs has decreased by 4 percentage points in
the past two years.



“Wood product sales prices and volumes are low due to
slow new home construction.”

There continue to be a few construction projects
planned in the industrial market around Little
Rock, including a steel mill that will break ground
in late June.

— Southern Arkansas timber company executive
“There is a lack of available lots for residential construction.”
— Little Rock area banker

Office vacancy rates across the Little Rock MSA converge
Percent
18
16
14
12

10
8

CBD

Midtown
Suburbs

6
Q1-10

Q1-11

Q1-12

Q1-13

Q1-14

Source: Reis.com.

Non-residential market (Little Rock, Q1-14)

Apartment

Office

Retail

Industrial

7.0

11.7

11.9

8.4

1.6

0.6

1.1

-0.6

Vacancy rate (%)
Asking rent

Percent change from one year ago
Note: Apa rtment, offi ce, a nd reta i l va l ues a re from Rei s .com. Indus tri a l va l ues a re es ti ma tes from Ca s s i dy Turl ey.

Residential market (Q1-14)
CoreLogic Home Price Index

Little Rock Fayetteville Fort Smith Hot Springs Pine Bluff Texarkana
-1.6

5.7 ▲

-2.8 ▲

Single-family building permits -26.4 ▼

14.1

-23.1

5.9 ▼

--

--

New and existing home sales

-10.2
-27.3 ▼
--

-4.0

2.2

-75.0 ▼ 285.7 ▲
--

--

US
11.4
0.0 ▼
-6.4 ▼

Note: Va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gnfi ca nt (±1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on) cha nge from previ ous
qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

5

Household Sector

Second Quarter 2014

Northwest Arkansas Luxury Retailers Report Strong Sales
By Elise A. Marifian, Research Associate



Per capita personal income growth in Arkansas
slowed to a modest 0.3 percent in the fourth
quarter. This growth rate was below the national
rate of 0.6 percent (see table).



Households reduced their non-auto debt balances. Per capita credit card and mortgage debt
declined across the zone, although the Little Rock
MSA saw little decline in mortgage balances.

“Vehicles that are between $10,000 - $25,000 with the lowest mileage possible is the sweet spot for the market.”
– Central Arkansas auto dealer

“Recently introduced new, full-size trucks and sport utilities
are drawing more attention than their predecessors did in
the last year of their life cycle.”
– Northwest Arkansas auto dealer 

Consumers continue to borrow to purchase vehicles
Percent change in debt balances from one year ago
20

15

Mortgage
Auto
Credit

10
5



Luxury retailers in northwest Arkansas reported
positive sales growth. Other retailers reported a
slight increase in sales.



0

Fourth-quarter mortgage and credit card delinquency rates declined relative the previous
quarter, while auto loan delinquency rates ticked
up slightly.

-5
-10
-15

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Pa nel and Equifax.

Auto loan balances in the zone increased at a year
-over-year rate of 6.9 percent in the first quarter,
which was 1.8 percent higher than the previous
quarter’s growth rate. This is reflected by reports
of strong increases in auto sales in February and
March relative to last year. Anecdotal evidence
indicates that few consumers have been declined
for a car loan, and demand for used vehicles is
strong as individuals have been using tax refunds
to purchase used vehicles.

2013

2014

Little Rock Zone

Arkansas

Little Rock MSA
--

0.6

▼

-2.5

-0.6

-2.1

▲

-3.7

-3.6

-4.2

-4.9

6.9

6.7

6.8

4.8

Mortgage

2.1

2.1

2.1

3.3

Credit card

7.8

7.8

6.7

Auto loan

2.4

2.4

2.7

Per capita personal income (Q4-13)

--

0.3

Mortgage

-2.5

Credit card
Auto loan

▼

US

Per capita debt balances (Q1-14)

90+ day delinquency rates (%) (Q1-14)
▼

8.3

▼

3.2

Note: Unl es s otherwi s e noted, va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (±1 s tanda rd devi a tion)
cha nge from the previ ous qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

6

Banking and Finance

Second Quarter 2014

Banking Conditions Steady in Arkansas
By Michelle Neely, Economist

“Business practices and evaluation of credit worthiness
are more deliberate and disciplined than a few years
ago, hence less volume for both new and refinance
markets.”
—Little Rock area banker

Arkansas banks still outperforming national peers
Return on average assets at commercial banks, percent
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6



Return on average assets (ROA) dropped slightly
again at Arkansas banks in the first quarter to 1.20
percent. Nevertheless, the state’s average ROA
still significantly exceeded those of their District
and national peers. One year ago, ROA averaged
1.25 percent at Arkansas banks.



The small drop in ROA can be traced to a 7-basispoint decline in the state’s average net interest
margin (NIM) that more than offset a slight drop
in loan loss provisions. At 4.17 percent, however,
the average NIM for Arkansas banks is well above
national and District averages.



“We have a robust pipeline of loans. Our optimism is
due to a good solid business environment in northwest
Arkansas.”
—Northwest Arkansas banker

Nonperforming loans remain on the decline
across the state, District, and nation. The average
nonperforming loan ratio at Arkansas banks (2.01
percent) continues to exceed the District (1.66
percent) and national (1.75 percent) averages
because of mergers and acquisitions by Arkansas
institutions of failing banks.

Arkansas
US
2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Source: FRED.

Arkansas

8th District

Return on average assets

1.20

1.02

0.97

Net interest margin

4.17

3.75

3.79

Nonperforming loans / total loans

2.01

1.66

1.75

87.56

79.89

Banking performance (Q1-14 )

Loan loss reserve coverage ratio

US Peer Banks

▼

92.00

Note: Al l va l ues a re percenta ge poi nts . Arrows i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt ( ± 1 s ta nda rd devi a ti on) cha nge from the previ ous qua rter.
See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

7

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Second Quarter 2014

Growth in Agricultural Land Values Slows
By Lowell R. Ricketts, Senior Research Associate



Agricultural bakers surveyed in the zone expect
slightly higher capital spending by farmers and
greater availability of loanable funds in the second
quarter of 2014 compared with the same period
in 2013 (see right table). At the same time,
bankers expect slightly lower loan demand over
the same period.



Farmers are pulling back from corn in response to
low commodity prices and the need to rotate
crops (see left table). Arkansas farmers will plant
280,000 fewer acres of corn in 2014 than they did
in 2013. In lieu of corn, plantings of all other
major crops listed are expected to grow. Rice
improved the most with 445,000 more acres
expected than last year.



Coal production in Arkansas jumped by almost
500 percent relative to production levels at the
same time last year (see left table). This should be
taken with a grain of salt as Arkansas’s production
scale is very small and subject to volatile swings.



“Corn has become more popular in eastern Arkansas.
Although people are pulling back, the trend is unlikely
to be long-term.”

Agricultural land values in Arkansas grew at a
slower rate over the past five years than the rate
seen in the early 2000s (see figure). National land
values grew at a faster rate during the same
period and will soon surpass Arkansas if the trend
persists.

— Central Arkansas farmer
“Low corn prices don’t really matter, I was going to
rotate to beans this year anyway.”
— Northwest Arkansas farmer
“Land prices are still going up but the rate is slowing.”
—Central Arkansas farmer

Rapid growth in Arkansas land values slows down
Average dollars per acre
3,000
2,500

2,000
1,500
Arkansas

1,000

US

500
1997
2002
2007
Source: USDA Census of Agriculture, s ee notes.

Arkansas
Natural resources (Q1-14)
Mining and logging employment
Coal production
Prospective plantings (2014)
Corn
Cotton
Rice
Sorghum
Soybeans

-1.4
499.7
-31.8 ▼
9.7 ▲
41.4 ▲
7.7
2.8

2012

US
4.1
-1.1
-3.9
6.7
15.6 ▲
-17.1 ▼
6.5

Note: Va l ues a re percent cha nge from one yea r a go. Arrows
i ndi ca te a s i gni fi ca nt (± 1 s ta nda rd devi a tion) cha nge from the
previ ous qua rter. See a ppendi x for notes a nd s ources .

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

Little Rock zone Ag. bankers' expectations
Q2-14 vs. Q2-13
Loan demand
Available funds
Loan repayments
Farm income
Capital spending

Lower Higher
17
0
0
17
0
0
20
20
20
40

Net
-17
17
0
0
20

Note: Percenta ge of res pons es . See a ppendi x for
notes a nd s ources .

8

Appendix
Cover Page
Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Unemployment rate, nonfarm payroll employment.

Labor Markets
Table Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Unemployment rate. Nonfarm employment and contributions
by sector.
Notes
Goods-producing sector comprises the manufacturing and natural
resources, mining, and construction sectors.
Private service-providing sector includes the following sectors:
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities;
Professional and Business Services; Education and Health Services;
Leisure and Hospitality; and Other Services.
Unemployment rate data are seasonally adjusted.

Manufacturing and Transportation
Table Sources
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Transportation employment: includes transportation and
warehousing industries.
Manufacturing employment: total, durable, and nondurable
goods.
World Institute for Strategic Economic Research
Manufacturing exports: dollar value.
Notes
Job vacancy rate is defined as the online job openings as percent of
total employment in an industry.
Transportation employment in Little Rock and Fayetteville covers
transportation, warehousing, and utility industries. About 90 percent
of the reported jobs are contributed by transportation and warehousing industries.
Manufacturing exports are defined as total dollar amount of exports
by the manufacturing industries.
Durable goods manufacturing sector is defined by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics as industries with a NAICS classification code of 321
(Wood Product Manufacturing); 327 (Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing); 331 (Primary Metal Manufacturing); 332 (Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing); 333 (Machinery Manufacturing); 334
(Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing); 335 (Electrical
Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing); 336
(Transportation Equipment Manufacturing); 337 (Furniture and
Related Product Manufacturing); and 339 (Misc. Manufacturing).

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

Second Quarter 2014
Nondurable goods manufacturing sector is defined by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics as industries with a NAICS classification code of 311
(Food Manufacturing); 312 (Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing); 313 (Textile Mills); 314 (Textile Product Mills); 315 (Apparel
Manufacturing); 316 (Leather and Allied Product Manufacturing); 322
(Paper Manufacturing); 323 (Printing and Related Support Activities);
324 (Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing); 325 (Chemical
Manufacturing); and 326 (Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing).

Real Estate and Construction
Table Sources
CoreLogic
Home price index, including distressed sales.
Census Bureau
Year-to-date single-family building permits.
Janet Jones Company Realtors
Year-to-date new and existing home sales.
Notes
Asking rent is the publicized asking rent price. Data are in current
dollars.
Vacancy rate is the percentage of total inventory physically vacant as
of the survey date, including direct vacant and sublease space.
New and existing home sales consist of single-family home sales.

Household Sector
Table Sources
Equifax based on authors’ calculations
All figures are based on a 5 percent sample of individual credit
reports. Balances are geographical averages of various debt
categories. The mortgage category includes first mortgages and
home equity installment loans, but home equity lines of credit
are omitted. Auto loans include those financed by finance
company or bank loans. Credit cards are revolving accounts at
banks, bankcard companies, national credit card companies,
credit unions, and savings and loan associations.
Haver Analytics
Per capita income.
Notes
Delinquency rates are calculated as the percentage of payments past
due by more than 90 days, weighted by the dollar value of the loan.

9

Appendix

Second Quarter 2014

Banking and Finance
Table Sources
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Return on average assets: USL15ROA. Net interest margin:
USL15NIM. Nonperforming loans: USL15NPTL. Loan loss reserve/
Total loans: USL15LLRTL. Net loan losses/Average total loans:
USL15LSTL.
Note: The data available in the table can be found in FRED.
Notes
Loan loss provisions are expenses banks set aside as an allowance for
bad loans.
Nonperforming loans are those loans managers classify as 90 days or
more past due or nonaccrual, which means they are more likely to
default.
Loan loss coverage ratio is loan loss reserves divided by nonperforming loans.
US peer banks are those commercial banks with assets of less than
$15 billion.
Due to the seasonal nature of bank return on average assets and net
interest margin, the arrows in the table denote significant changes
from one year ago.

Agriculture and Natural Resources
Table Sources
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Survey of Agricultural Credit
Conditions
Agriculture bankers’ expectations of loan demand, available
funds, loan repayment rates, farm income, and capital spending
are relative to one year ago. Respondents can answer
“increase,” “decrease,” or “no change.”
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Coal production.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Mining and logging employment.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Prospective plantings.
Agricultural land values taken from the Census of Agriculture.
The Census is conducted every five years; the last survey was in
2012. Consequently, land values shown in the figure are only
available at 5-year intervals and a linear trend was used for
interpolation of missing values. Land values include the value of
buildings located on the land.

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis—Little Rock Zone

10