The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
CHICAGO, D ECEM BER 31, 1920 /C U R T A IL M E N T IN THE BU YIN G DEM AND AND THE A T T E N D A N T SLACKENing of manufacturing operations has resulted in improvement in fundamental banking conditions in the Middle West, although this is not reflected in the aggregate loans represent ing the borrowings of customers at the individual banks or rediscounts by member banks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Whatever improvement or liquidation of loans has taken place is traceable largely to the slowing down in manufacturing and in buying. The movement of agricultural products to the market is slow, and consequently the liquidation of loans for agricultural purposes has not been sufficient to offset the new demands springing up for agricultural and allied purposes. TR E N D OF AD VAN CES B Y TH E RESERVE BA N K FOR A G R ICU LTU R A L AN D O TH ER PURPOSES Individual banks continue to experience a heavy demand for accommodations. This is indicated by the course of aggregate loans other than those secured by war obligations and by stock market collateral. The peak of the loans in the individual banks was reached about the middle of October, according to the reports from the 108 selected banks in this District* including all member banks in Chicago and Detroit and representative banks in the principal cities. This item ran off some the first of December but increased again later. Net demand deposits of these individual member banks on which reserve is computed, while following closely the course of loans are decreasing a little more rapidly than loans are contracting. While the aggregate borrowings of member banks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago are below the peak reached October i, the contraction is compara tively slight. Borrowings for agricultural purposes are now practically at the high level for the year, the peak early in the fall being reached October 2 and the same level was approached again on December i. Borrowings by other than agricultural interests re flect noticeable liquidation. The course of all other loans has been downward in general since September 3, when they aggregated about S8,000,000 greater than the agricultural borrowings at that time. This total fell below the agricultural borrowing estimate a few days later, and while fluctuating sharply at times, the trend was downward, showing on Decem ber 15 the lowest point reached by aggregate borrow ings for other than agricultural purposes during the autumn. Compiled December 28, 1920 LIQU IDATION OF FARM PROD UCTION HOLDINGS SLOW Careful study of the accompanying chart will indi cate the yearly receipts of wheat, corn and oats at the principal grain centers or primary markets of the ■ country during the last seven years. These primary markets are: Chicago, Minneapolis, Duluth, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Omaha, Peoria, Detroit, Toledo and Indianapolis. RECEIPTS AT PRIMARY POINTS Wheat M IL L IO N S OF B U S H E L S 3 Q .. .Q -5 DO It will be noted that while the receipts of wheat at these markets for the eleven months of 1920 aggregate considerably less than those for 1919 and 1918, they are considerably larger than the receipts for 1917. Corn receipts so far this year are considerably be low those of 1918 but greater than 1919, the theory being, however, that there is still an accumulation of corn from the 1919 crop on the farms notwithstand ing the bumper crop of 1920 now just harvested. The receipts of oats in the last two years have fallen off decidedly, 1920 being slightly less than 1919, allowing for the normal December receipts. In mixed farm and industrial territory borrowings are somewhat less burdensome and liquidation in many quarters is in evidence. Owing to heavy inven tories, however, it is not progressing as rapidly as some of the borrowers themselves may desire. The view is expressed by bankers as well as business men that this impediment to business is being removed in a grad ual way and that such a course is avoiding the forcing of holdings upon the markets when consumption gen erally is at low ebb, thus avoiding demoralization due to a lack of absorptive power. * 192,0 R E C E I P T S ONLY TO D E G .1 8 IM P LE M E N T M AKER S STOCKS IN CREA SIN G So far there have been no marked changes in prices, either wholesale or retail, of agricultural implements. Implement manufacturers report an increase of about 25 per cent in stocks and a decline, which began earlier than usual this year, of about 50 per cent in sales, com pared with the same period of last year. The buying of materials by implement makers for 1921 production has been considerably restricted. The present manu facturing schedule for the coming season calls for about 50 per cent of that for 1920. This has a direct bearing on the agricultural situa tion because implement manufacturers will be in a position to take advantage of any decline in cost of materials and to lower the cost of implements thus aiding the farmer in offsetting his loss of purchasing power due to the sharp decline in market values of grain and live stock. BAN K ER S EN D EAVO RIN G TO CA RE FOR L IV E STO CK NEEDS Leading Chicago cattle bankers say that they are making heroic efforts to care for their old clients but at an actual loss in many cases. One large firm figures that it actually loses a fraction of one per cent on its ninety day feed lot loans. There is no choice, however, as the solvency of many cattle men depends on their ability to finish cattle now in hand. A banking syndicate has been formed in Chicago, New York, and Boston during the last month to assist in meeting the problem. CH ICAGO H O LID AY T R A D E G R E A TE R BUT ELSEW H ERE NORM AL Christmas buying, this season, is regarded as an in dex of readjustment toward the prewar status. Mer chants entered the holiday period with many embarrass ing conditions to be faced; merchandise bought at higher prices, enforced liquidation in many lines of trade and consequently a downward trend of prices, and, the most serious of these factors, the disposition of the public to buy only at or near the price level of the armistice period, or at least cheaper than the peak of the spring of 1920. As a result of these conditions trade opinions regard ing holiday business are very contradictory. In Chi cago the facilities for quick turns in retailing enable merchants to avoid troubles that cannot be so easily sidestepped by dealers in rural districts. Hence there is a great difference between store reports from the District at large and those from downtown Chicago stores. The great metropolitan stores describe the holiday selling as “ tremendous” in volume of goods moved and satisfactory in money value. Although prices have fallen much below the holiday level of 1919, these stores have been able to maintain a fair percentage of profit in most lines and will come down to the December 31 “ stock taking” with less anxiety than they expected when the big slump in staples began. “ We explain the marked success of our 1920 holiday merchandising,” said an influential man on State Street, “ on the ground that Chicago retailers have learned to trade on the market as it is from day to day. Our merchants generally have learned that it is folly to fight the trend of prices. We try to antici pate the market, but whether we succeed or not we drive our selling to the utmost, at the ruling prices of the day’s market, taking losses if necessary, but avoid ing the evil of ‘frozen’ and nailed-on-shelf goods. Chicago moves the goods at the market.” Retailers throughout the Seventh District, exclusive of Chicago, report the money return from Christmas trade to date, about the same as for the same period last year. The volume of goods moved is considerably larger but at sharp reductions, so that the result in dollars is about the same as for the season of Decem ber, 1919. The “ weighted averages” of results from Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois and Iowa stores indicates 3.6 per cent gain over last year, which was at least 50 per cent greater than in 1918. Merchants note a great wave of “ necessity buying” and a falling off in high priced luxuries. Buyers are critical, scrut inizing quality. Returns from the leading Chicago retailers indicate 20 per cent gain in money volume of holiday sales to December 15, as compared with the like period of 1919. In “ yards and dozens” sold the gain over 1919 would be much more imposing, but it is not possible to tell what this percentage will be at the year end. The large money gain shown in Chicago is more significant than it appears because the comparison is made against 1919 Christmas trade, which ranged from 40 to 100 per cent greater in dollars than in 1918, and established a “ peak” for most stores. Again, the weather a year ago was hovering near zero, whereas the thermometer registered 58 degrees on December 13, 1920, with a warm April rain falling and no sug gestion in it that furs and woolens would ever be needed. Furs and heavy winter goods have been stagnant on account of the unseasonable weather. The read justment of prices in silks is generally regarded as finished. The more seasonable weather which set in around the middle of December, contributed to a cheerful selling outlook and stimulated the belief that the vol ume of business for the last month of the year, when the returns are all in will overrun the promises of the early part of December. Fifty one of the principal wholesalers of the Seventh District answering the questionnaire for November, 1920, show the following changes from November, 1919: Decrease o f Cancellations sales under Increase over Is Buying November Difficulty in Concerns 1919 1919 Delivery ? Cautious? D ry Good*........................................ 10 24.3% N ot a factor 100% “ N o” 100% “ Y e s” 100% “ Down” Shoes.................................................. 9 22.4 % 24% 100% “ N o” 100% “ Y es” 100% “ Down” Clothing............................................. 3 5 2 .1 % 100% “ N o” 100% “ Y es” 50% “ D ow n” 25 16 .4 % 16 .6 % 40% 16% No D ata 100% “ N o” 100% “ Y es” 100% “ Down” 100% “ N o” 100% “ Y es” 100% “ Down” Number Groceries........................................... Tailoring.................................................... November 4 Price Trend RETAILER S OF CONSUM ABLE GOODS A R E SLOW TO RESPOND So far the reductions made by retailers on consum assist in lowering the cost of living and thus relieve the consumer of unnecessary burden. able goods have not kept pace, even at bargain prices, with those now quoted on farm products, raw materials and goods at wholesale in the Middle West. Our returns fro m firms replying to the regular retail trade questionnaire indicate for November net sale (retail prices) an increase of 17.6 per cent over the same month of 1919 and from July 1 to date 24.2 per cent over the same five months of 1919. Retail stocks (valued at retail sales prices) are 40 per cent higher than a year ago but 5.9 per cent less than for October, 1920. Average stocks for the five months’ period July-November are 4L5 times the average monthly sales over the same period. Outstanding orders at the end of November equal 6.3 per cent of total 1919 purchases. Retail quotations on many of the foodstuffs, especially meats, are so much out of line that in Chicago steps are being taken to utilize the publication of what is termed a fair retail price as a guide to the consumer. This was first utilized very largely during the war period by the Illinois Food Administration and is now being taken up by the city government in the hope that the daily publication of such “ fair price list” will N et Sales November, 1920 over November, 1919.............................................. 17-6 % N et Sales July-Novem ber, 1920 over July-November, 1919........................... 24-2% Stocks November, 1920, over November, 1919 .................................................. 40.0% Stocks November, 1920, under October, 1920...................................................... 5 -9 % 43 2-i % Average stocks July-November, 1920 to average monthly sales same period Outstanding orders November, 1920, to total purchases during 1919 ........... 6 .3 % CLEARIN G M OVEM EN T SHOWS DECREASE Movement of credit, as indicated by the aggregate debits to individual accounts at the member banks of the twenty-four leading clearing houses in the Seventh Federal Reserve District, shows a decrease of about 5.25 per cent compared with the previous month. The total debits as of December 15, 1920, reported by two hundred one banks in twenty-four leading clear ing house centers, including Chicago were $1,116,222,000 a decrease of $62,112,000 over the corresponding week of November. CO M M O D ITY IN D E X P R ICE S OF SEVEN CO UN TRIES The comparison of the index prices of the seven leading countries of the world reveals the fact that the peak of prices in all countries was reached during the current year. In most instances the trend as 1920 closes, is downward. In France and Italy, how ever, after a downward trend, the index turned sharply upward. These indices are those of the United States Bureau of Labor (328 quotations); London Statist, United Kingdom (45 commodities); Bulletin de la Statistique Generale, France (45 commodities); Professor Bachi, Italy, (40 commodities); Sweden, Svenisk Handelstidning, (47 commodities): Canada, Depart ment of Labor, (272 quotations); Calcutta, India, Department of Statistics (75 commodities.) 1913 TO 1920 WORLD WAR PERIOD 700 Z 50 2)00 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 iOO CO LLECTIO NS PRON OUNCED AS_REASONABLY GOOD While collections in practically all lines of business have slowed down somewhat, still they are pro nounced as reasonably good. There is a manifesta tion of greater thrift as the wage earner begins to more fully appreciate the necessity of saving a part of his income. Dealers, however, report a tendency toward longer time in paying accounts. Slowness in collections seems to be manifesting itself more in the agricultural localities than in the mining and manufacturing districts. In the lumber trade, collections are slower than else where, but this is attributed to the stagnation in the building industry. Statistics relating to business defaults indicate 124 failures reported in the Seventh District by one of the large mercantile agencies, involving $3,647,520, as liabilities, compared with 74 defaults and $434,048 as liabilities for November, 1919. SU PPLY OF COAL NOW E X CE E D S D EM AN D A careful survey of the fuel situation reveals the fact that the supply of coal for all consuming territories now exceeds the demand. This is the first time that this condition has existed, with the exception of the spring months of 1919, in nearly four years. During the greater part of that four-year period there have been shortages either in all or certain sections of the country, due to insufficient facilities, government pri ority of orders, zone regulations and other factors. In four years the number of operating mines in creased from 6,500 to 10,000, with a producing capa city of 750,000 tons, an excess over consumption of about 200,000 tons. Now there are ample trans portation facilities, it is claimed, for all of these mines. The consumption of coal has been materially de- creased in consequence of the reduced operating time of industries generally. This, together with the result ant additional transportation facilities, has made possible a greater increase in coal production. Those in the coal industry who have handled their business on a speculative basis, having bought the output of mines for a period of one year from last May and June now have the production of these mines with out disposition. In many cases they have had to sell the coal far below the cost to them or the cost of pro duction. This combination of circumstances, it is pointed out by expert coal men, has reduced the market price of coal that was handled on a speculative basis, from $8 to $2.50 per ton, and in some instances lower than that figure. PROD UCTION OF BITUM INOUS COAL Average daily production of Bituminous coal, ineluding coal coked, is shown in the chart below which is based on figures compiled by the U. S. Geological Survey. AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY MARKING TIME With the let-down in the buying of automobiles and the slowing down in manufacturing activities by automobile makers, the readjustment in that industry has presented some interesting features. Careful inquiry has been made to ascertain to what extent manufacturers have found themselves with surplus stocks of finished cars or parts on their hands and to what extent cars are being stored against future sales. Answers received from manufacturers generally indi cate that there is not a much greater storing of cars than a year ago, the difference being that the dealers have not been able, because of restricted credit, to take the number of cars they did during the closing months of 1919. This has resulted in some backing up at the factory. In the effort to check this accumula tion, plant operation has been curtailed all through the industry. Nearly all of the larger plants are operating at less than 50 per cent of capacity, while many others are much lower and some are closed. Those manufacturers who have figured that they could replace all their inventories at lower prices, so far are finding little encouragement in developments. One large automobile builder, for instance, has many months supply of pig iron on hand at a cost price of $29 per ton, whereas it could not now be replaced for £40 a ton. In some cases articles have been bought on a cost basis, and in view of lower production and increased freight rates, these articles now cost auto mobile factories more than they did before any re duction in the automobile selling price was seriously discussed. Manufacturers suggest that these things counter balance to a considerable degree the reduc tions offered by supply and parts manufacturers. From some of the smaller automobile centers come reports that wages actually have been reduced in some instances. The reduction in the volume of auto mobiles produced tends to increase the per car cost. From reports of at least two of the companies, there has been a disposition on the part of accessory and parts manufacturers to reduce prices, in order to distribute loss, even though old contracts exist. About 80 per cent of the 100 makes of cars on the market in this country are assembled, hence any attempt of the parts manufacturers to reduce prices in face of contracts in order to distribute losses, has an important bearing on the entire car manufacturing situation. Some December reports treating the automobile situation of the country in its entirety show signs of improvement; for instance, the Pacific Coast terri tory is doing better, while some of the Eastern auto mobile shows have stimulated trade. Shipments of automobiles during November aggregated consider ably smaller than in October. The final October fig ures showed 17,186 car loads shipped by rail, while the available November figures indicate 13,000 car loads. The complete statistics for October also show 14,101 automobiles driven away on their own power, and 2,519 automobiles shipped by boat from the factories, which are located largely in the Seventh Federal Reserve District, while the November available figures showed 6,000 cars driven away and 1,000 shipped by boat. The trend for the year follows: AU TOM OBILE SH IPM ENTS AN D PROD U CTION SE LE CTE D M EM BER B A N K ST A TIST IC S— SEVEN TH D IST R IC T (ooo’s omitted) Dec. 10, 1920 Number o f Banks R eporting.................... C H IC A G O N ov. 12, Dec. 12, 1920 1919 Dec. 10, 1920 D E T R O IT N ov. 12, Dec. 12, 1920 19 l 9 Other Selected Cities Dec. 10, N ov. 12, Dec. 12. 1920 1920 1919 12 12 12 45 45 45 146,693 193,446 $66,225 $60,139 $82,053 £49,976 ? 52,397 £6 i ,735 52,860 56,256 66,672 9> ° 47 11,039 10,724 12,737 13,478 1 5,944 other than U. S. securities................. 334,673 332,762 373,488 56,690 57,687 49,539 55,098 55,456 45,863 All other loans and investm ents........... 861,019 872,921 782,600 325,946 33 i , i 8o 284,798 309,833 317,99! 293,691 131,562 132,118 26,647 25,909 32,436 26,495 27,590 28,303 11,057 12,519 14,150 I 5> 1 39 16,474 15,026 230,128 224,731 119,949 *07,5 15 457 5,185 5i Total U. S. Securities.................................. ? 47>°33 5i 5° Loans— (exclusive of rediscounts) Secured bv U. S. war obligations......... Loans secured by stocks and bonds (exclusive o f rediscounts) Reserve Balance with Federal Reserve B a n k ...................................................... 126,533 36,466 39 ,75° 42,917 N et D e m a n d ............................................ 912,125 Cash in v a u lt................................................ 942,034 955,428 'Ti 0 0 0 191,498 L ri O C O Deposits— 2x9,404 T im e ........................................................... 302,603 294,757 251,940 220,412 223,808 193,936 121,521 1,016 1,172 2 i , i 55 640 822 12,087 176 G overnm ent.............................................. OPEN M A R K E T DISCOUNT AND IN TE R E ST RATES A T CHICAGO comparison of rates during the thirty-day periods ending November 15, 1920, and December 15, 1919, follows: The open market range of discount and interest rates prevailing in Chicago during the thirty-day period ending December 15, 1920, together with a D E C E M B E R , 1920 N O V E M B E R , 1920 D E C E M B E R , 1919 High Low Low Customary High Customary Low Customary 6 7 7 7 7 6 5M 533 @6 b. Running 4 to 6 months................................................... 7 6 7 2. Rates for prime commercial paper purchased in the open market: Not in M arket a . Running 30 to 90 days ................................................. 7 7 7 6 5 '^ 534 @6 High i. Rates of discount charged by banks to customers for prime commercial paper such as is now eligible under the Federal Reserve Act: a. Running 30, 60 and 90 days........................................ b. Running 4 to 6 months 7 8 8 8 6 5 33 533 @6 8 C C (< .............................................. 8 8 6 533 533 @6 7 7 6 533 5H @6 3. Rates charged on loans to other banks— secured by bills payable......................................................................................... 8 4. Rates for bankers’ acceptances of 60 to 90 days maturities: a . Endorsed..................................................................................... b. Unendorsed............................................................................... 7 7 Not in M arket “ 7 6M 6 6 5 4« 4 33@5 6M C « 6V s 6V s 5 4 ?£ 4^@ 5 7 7 5* 573 @6 « 5. Rates for demand paper secured by prime stock ex change collateral or other current collateral................. 7 6. Rates for time paper secured by collateral mentioned in No. 5: a . Running 3 months............................................................... 7 1». Running 3 to 6 months................................................... 7 7. Rates (when paper is current in city) for: a. Cattle loans..................................................... 7 b. Commodity paper secured by warehouse receipts, etc.................................................. 7 8 Rates for ordinary commercial loans running 30, 60 and 90 days, (not including loans to enable pur chase of bonds) secured by: a. Liberty bonds................................................. 7 b. Certificates of indebtedness............................ 6 6 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 533 573 @6 6 7 7 7 7 6 533 573 @6 7 7 7 7 7 6 5X 533@6 7 7 7 7 7 6 533 573@6 7 7 7 7 7 6 53a 573 (5,6 6 6 7 7 7 6 533 533@6 6 BUILDING INDUSTRY AT A STANDSTILL The common brick industry is prostrated. One Chicago concern has the equivalent of four miles of kilns representing several months of productive ca pacity of burned brick and virtually no outlet at any price, though this product was made at peak prices for fuel and labor. Illinois and Indiana firms report ing to the Common Brick Manufacturers Association show stocks of 1 12,000,000 brick, with nominal orders for only one-third that quantity and no possibility of anything but very trivial deliveries at the price in this market— about $ 1 6 per thousand against about $20 in October. Makers say that the fall in prices of structural material has had little or no beneficial effect. Labor costs remain high and the output per man is near the minimum, but the dominant factor is the im possibility of financing construction except at pro hibitive rates for money. Averages drawn from the replies to our November labor questionnaire show that the labor market is supplied in excess of the demand. A decline of 10.3 per cent from October this year shows the industrial effects of readjustment and falling prices. Compared with a year ago the decline in number employed is 23.6 per cent. About three-fourths of plant capacity is operating, against 80.7 per cent in October and 82.2 per cent in November, 1919. BU ILDIN G STATISTICS FOR TH E M ONTH OF N O VEM BER, 1920 CHICAGO DISTRICT (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Missouri and Portions of Eastern Kansas and Nebraska.) CONTEMPLATED PROJECTS No. of Projects Class CONTRACTS AWARDED N o. of Valuation Projects New Floor Space Sq. ft. Valuation Business Buildings................................................ ..................... 223 147 1,106,300 $8,745,100 Educational Buildings.......................................... ..................... 67 6,865,200 24 550,200 3 ,47 I ,3° ° Hospitals and Institutions................................... ..................... 27 3,980,000 *5 92,100 1,736,800 Industrial B uildings.............................................. ..................... 193 13, 533,500 122 3 ,1 53, 6oo 18,266,500 49,400 .. . 496,200 $ 9> , ioo 456 30,000 M ilitary and N aval Buildings............................ . .. Public B uildings.................................................... ..................... 25 438,800 9 Public Works and Public U tilities..................... ..................... 3g2 22,772,200 124 Religious and Memorial Buildings.................... ..................... 59 5,173,000 29 160,100 1,270,000 16,308,200 (b) 466 1,460,400 7, ” 3 , 5oo 7,768,600 21 252,500 2,325,000 S86.22C.6oo QCl Residential B uildings............................................ Social and Recreational B uildings..................... ..................... CONTRACTS awarded 54 (January 1 to 4,552,200 $47,976,600 December 1) 1920............................................. $768,274,000 1916. 1912.......... . $^3,950,000 1 9 1 9 ............................................. 816,086,000 1915. 1 9 1 1 .......... . 140,062,313 1918............................................. 474,609,000 1914. 1910.......... • 181,159,931 1 9 U ............ .............................. 573> ,ooo 762 I 9I3 . (a) 1,348 Buildings. (b) 598 Buildings. ... 1 73,3 ^9,000 BU ILD IN G P ER M ITS OF SEVEN TH FE D E R A L RE SE R VE D IST R IC T CIT IE S November, 1920 No. of Permits November, 1919 Estim ated Cost N o. of Estim ated Per Cent Cent Per Permits Cost Gain Loss Aurora............................................. O O C r» IL L IN O IS 27 202,700 96 Chicago........................................... 3,838,700 765 17,577,000 78 26 42 134,550 66 182,775 E vanston........................................ ..................... 31 68,055 V O V O D ecatur........................................... ..................... $ 3 I2, 732 78 Peoria.............................................. ..................... 76 54,305 56 89 L 475 93 Rockford......................................... ..................... 85 90,8 50 ” 5 25 2» 5 5I 64 Springfield...................................... ..................... ” 9 53,550 67 164,132 67 INDIANA Fort Wayne.................................. ............... Gary.............................................. .............. Hammond..................................... .............. Indianapolis.................................. .............. Richmond...................................... .............. South Bend................................... .............. Terre Haute.................................. .............. 56 115,800 51 229,525 49 49 i 64,555 44 219,230 25 17 75,8oo 39 454 601,436 472 305,433 600,718 75 I 24 34,200 17 65,750 157 1, 555,363 192 382,439 5° 33,525 38 83,350 59 43 48 307 IOWA Cedar Rapids................................ .............. 62 73,923 37 130,000 Davenport..................................... .............. Des Moines................................... ............. 29 41,895 126 194,265 78 51 127,585 383,750 67 18,263 91 10 75,090 75 ............. 44 34 ,3 18 45 63,675 46 Sioux City..................................... ............. 35 59,650 85 373,350 84 36 18,980 148 30,000 37 31 333,550 34 546,000 39 942 2,996,020 1,643 62 106,790 347 7,989,530 617,321 444,396 131 676,090 34 44 24,268 74 420,225 42 108,554 20 77 3 23 ,ooo 144 104,356 210,150 86 144,793 153 318,467 54 41 Dubuque....................................... Mason City................................... MICHIGAN Battle Creek.................................. ............. Bay C ity....................................... .............. Detroit........................................... ............. Flint.............................................. Grand Rapids................................ Jackson.......................................... ............. Kalamazoo........ ........................... ............. Lansing........................................... ............. Saginaw........................................... ............. 82 94 3 54 WISCONSIN Kenosha.......................................... 105,519 145 181,417 Madison.......................................... 69,070 527,850 87 Milwaukee....................................... L 444,276 29 270 3,244,451 55 67 88,749 Oshkosh .......................................... ............. Sheboygan....................................... ............. 23 14,503 57 34 ,WI 13,410 8 61 FOREIGN EX CH AN G E MOVEMENT OF INDICES OF COMMODITY PRICES Wholesale prices in 1920 show a more rapid decline during the last half of the year than they showed in crease during the first half. All three indices show approximately the same rate of decline in the last three months. Farm products, textiles and food effectthe greatest decline. The wide difference in the ad vance and decline of the indices of the Bureau of Labor over both Bradstreet and the 12 basic com modities is due to: the difference in the number of articles selected and the time of market quotation. The Bureau of Labor includes 325 articles, covering a wide range of raw and manufactured products and uses in most cases an average quoted price for the month, while Bradstreet includes only 96 commodities and both Bradstreet and 12 basic commodities use a AN D P R IC E FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND COMMODITY PRICES The chart below draws a comparison between the United Kingdom, France, and Italy on the one hand and the United States on the other as regards the value of the currency of these countries. Above the 100% line are the commodity prices of these three countries of Europe, expressed in percen tage terms of the commodity price of the United States. The rise of these price curves gives evidence of a corresponding fall in the relative value of the European currency. Below the 100% line are the rates of foreign ex change expressed as per cent of the par value. The depreciation of currency as shown here runs fairly uni form with that indicated above. The rates of exchange used are the New York quo tations as of the first Thursday of each month, while the commodity prices are averages for these months. quoted price the first of the month. INDEX NUMBER IN D ICES P E R CENT CO M PARATIVE L IV E STO CK STA TISTICS Receipts of live stock at Chicago for the four weeks ending December n , 1920, compare with 1919 as follows: Year Cattle Calves Hogs Sheep 321,091 52,080 74^346 369>°57 19*9 ............................................................................................................ 393,886 68,884 903,244 447»659 16,804 160,898 78,60a 1920 ............................................................................................................ Decrease............................................................................................. 7 2,795 Receipts of live stock at the principal markets during November, and during the first eleven months of 1920 compared with the corresponding periods of the previous year, show the following changes: 1920 Cattle Calves N ovem ber........................................ 25 per cent Decrease Eleven months................................ Sheep and Lambs Hogs 19 per cent Decrease 18 per cent Decrease 6 per cent Decrease 18 per cent Decrease 8 per cent Decrease 14 per cent Decrease N o difference Receipts of hogs at the six principal markets during November, 1920, aggregated 1,625,545 head, against 2,434,354 in November, 1919. The average prices compared as follows per hundredweight: Cattle Choice Cattle Common Sheep Lambs $12.09 Novem ber 1 9 2 0 ......................................................... $17.62 $ 5.70 $11.72 $12.20 Hogs N ovem ber 1 9 1 9 ......................................................... 20.14 15.10 8.30 14.50 13.60 Eleven months— 1920.............................................. $16.86 $13.73 $ 9-85 $*5*77 $13.30 Eleven months— 1 9 1 9 ............................................. 18.94 *5-54 10.48 16.25 15.32 Cash lard in November 1920, ranged from $18.45 to $2°.° ° cwt. compared with $22.12 to $24.00 in November 1919. Cash ribs in November 1920, ranged from $14.25 to $16.00 cwt. compared with $23.50 to $27.50 in November 1919 R E C E IPT S AN D SH IPM ENTS OF IM PO R TA N T COM M ODITIES A T CHICAGO (ooo’s omitted) R E C E IP T S Novem ber 1920 S H IP M E N T S Novem ber October October 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 Flour, barrels............................................. 1,167 584 1,190 1920 1919 443 Wheat, bushels.......................................... 3,342 i ,534 9,191 940 797 4i 7 790 5,507 3,939 1,404 Corn, bushels............................................. ..................... 3.901 4 ,85 1 11,915 4,802 5,082 1,996 6,849 3,076 Oats, bushels.............................................. ..................... 4,473 5,515 6,561 9,385 3,588 6,761 3,235 7,863 270 443 439 105 308 785 105 980 942 1,010 456 324 47 i 527 R ye, bushels............................................... Barley, bushels.......................................... ..................... 1.535 Cured M eats, pounds............................... ..................... 4 , 9°4 12,402 6,657 10,160 106,012 111,423 108,801 104,012 Fresh M eats, pounds................................ ..................... 56,401 8 i ,4 9 I 53, 578 77,829 104,898 262,900 112,597 153,490 Lard, pounds.............................................. ..................... 5, 76o 11,166 6,898 7,232 40,259 58,033 51,804 55,686 Cheese, pounds.......................................... ..................... 15,572 W ,505 15,546 22,384 10,921 19,112 8,391 24,333 Butter, pounds........................................... ..................... 15,755 18,671 21,017 24,497 18,234 20,750 17,305 25,126 Eggs, cases.................................................. ..................... 97 117 233 236 312 303 282 379 2,010 2,344 2,889 664 688 618 1,432 17,101 Potatoes, bushels....................................... Hides, pounds............................................ Wool, pounds............................................. ..................... Lumber, thousand feet............................. 394 10,966 16,863 ” ,239 27,522 13,340 27,939 x, 37 8 1,281 L 393 3,715 6,283 4,169 5,553 176 196 208 57 7° 75 95