View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ESSAYS ON ISSUES

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF CHICAGO

FEBRUARY 1997
NUMBER 114

Chicago Fed Letter
Building a house for the
21st century
While 1996 started off slowly, the economic engine accelerated in the
second quarter of the year, to the
point where many people were very
concerned about the economy overheating. These fears were mollified
in the third quarter as the economy’s
growth matched the slower growth of
the first quarter. In that setting, the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago held
its tenth annual Economic Outlook
Symposium on December 6, 1996.
More than 50 economists and analysts
from business, academia, and government attended the conference. The
sessions focused on the housing market and how its strength during 1996
would affect the economy in 1997.
Prior to the symposium, individuals
were asked to submit both annual and
quarterly 1997 forecasts for many of
the gross domestic product (GDP)
components, as well as several other
economic series. This Fed Letter will
review the accuracy of last year’s
conference forecast for 1996 and
summarize the 1997 Economic Outlook Symposium.
The economy in 1996—Forecast
and results
It is helpful to look back to the forecasts that were made a year ago and
analyze where the forecasts differed
from the actual outcome. One caveat
should be noted. Last year’s forecasts
were made late in 1995, prior to the
new chain-weighted revisions to GDP.
Consequently, the forecasts were based
upon the old fixed-weight measurements. During the 1990s, the new
chain-weighted real GDP averaged
–0.5% lower annualized growth than
the old fixed-weight measured real
GDP. The expectation at last year’s
Economic Outlook Symposium was for

growth in real GDP to average 2.6%
for the fourth quarter of 1995 through
the first three quarters of 1996, a reduction from the extremely strong 3.7%
pace of the prior four quarters. Correcting for the –0.5% lower growth in
the new data would reduce the forecast to 2.1%. Actual real GDP has averaged 2.0% growth over the past four

large difference for business fixed investment could possibly be due to the
new chain-weighting technique. The
largest forecast error in the GDP components occurred for residential fixed
investment, which was anticipated to increase by 1.7% but rose by 3.9%. The
consensus forecast was right on target for industrial production, while

1. Median forecasts from the 1997 Economic Outlook Symposium
1995
Real GDP
Personal consumption expenditures
Business fixed investment
Residential construction
Change in business inventories (billions)
Net exports of goods and
services (billions)
Government purchases of goods
and services
Industrial production
Car and light truck sales (millions)
Housing starts (millions)
Unemployment rate
Inflation rate (Consumer Price Index)
Prime rate
Federal Reserve trade-weighted dollar

1996

1997

2.0%
2.3%
9.5%
–2.3%
$33.2

2.3%
2.4%
7.1%
5.4%
$17.8

2.2%
2.1%
5.9%
0.5%
$22.7

–$107.6

–$120.4

–$124.6

0.0%
3.3%
14.7
1.36
5.6%
2.8%
8.83%
–7.7%

0.8%
3.1%
15.0
1.46
5.4%
2.9%
8.27%
3.5%

0.6%
2.7%
14.7
1.38
5.5%
2.8%
8.16%
0.7%

Note: Data are actual for 1995 and forecast for 1996 and 1997.
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; Federal Reserve Board of Governors, various releases;
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; U.S. Department of Labor, Monthly Labor Review,
various years; U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

quarters. So the corrected consensus
forecast was fairly accurate last year.
The consensus forecasts of the components of GDP were generally higher
than the realized revised components’
actual values. For personal consumption expenditures, change in business
inventories, net exports, and government purchases of goods and services,
the degree of overforecast was very
small. However, business fixed investment was expected to increase by 8.4%
but only grew by 6.5%. This relatively

the unemployment rate, inflation,
and the prime rate were slightly lower than the group expected. The consensus was a little low on light vehicle
sales, which turned out to be 300,000
units stronger than expected. The
trade-weighted dollar showed more
strength than the forecasters anticipated. Finally, housing starts were
anticipated to increase by 1.36 million
units but in fact rose by 1.46 million
units. This unexpected strength in
the housing sector was a prime reason
that the central topic for the 1997

2. 1997 forecast of real GDP
percent change, annual rate
6

Actual
3

0

Forecast range
-3
1991

’92

’93

’94

’95

’96

’97

Note: The dashed line represents the median of the consensus forecast.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Economic Outlook Symposium was,
following the presidential vision
theme, Building a House for the
21st Century.
Looking forward
In 1997, the forecasters are expecting a fairly boring year. Boring is not
necessarily bad considering that not
a single forecaster is expecting a recession over the next five quarters.
Figure 1 summarizes what the forecasters are expecting both in 1996
(fourth quarter numbers not known)
and in 1997. The typical forecaster is
expecting 1996 real GDP growth to
be 2.3%. The forecast for 1997 is for
real GDP growth to be 2.2%. This slight
decline of 0.1% is related to some anticipated softening in the growth rates
of personal consumption expenditures, business fixed investment, net
exports, and government purchases
of goods and services. A more severe
reduction is expected in residential
construction, which is forecast to ease
to 0.5% in 1997 from 1996’s rate of
5.4%. The only GDP component expected to be stronger in 1997 is the
change in business inventories.
With the slight slowing in real GDP
growth, industrial production is expected to slow from 3.1% to 2.7% in
1997. Car and light truck sales are expected to ease somewhat from their
fairly strong 15.0 million unit pace to
a relatively modest sales rate of 14.7
million units. Housing starts are expected to moderate to a 1.38 million
unit pace in 1997 following a very

strong 1.46 million unit
rate in 1996. The unemployment rate is
forecast to rise by a
tenth of a percent to
5.5%. Inflation is actually forecast to decline
by a tenth of a percent
to 2.8% in 1997. There
is an expectation that
the prime rate will experience a slight decline, falling by 11 basis
points next year. Finally, the trade-weighted
dollar is expected to
rise by 0.7%.

In terms of the quarterly pattern for GDP, the forecast group
is expecting a fairly flat quarterly outlook. GDP is anticipated to grow by
2.0% in each of the next three quarters, starting with the fourth quarter
of 1996, and then by 2.1% for the last
two quarters of 1997 (see figure 2).
This flat growth pattern for 1997 is
reflected in the growth outlook for
personal consumption expenditures,
business fixed investment, residential
investment, and government purchases
of goods and services. Some weakening is anticipated in change in business
inventories as the year progresses. Net
exports are anticipated to improve
over the course of 1997.
The quarterly patterns for the other
series forecast—industrial production,
inflation, the prime rate, and the
trade-weighted dollar—are expected
to grow at the same pace that they
have been experiencing recently.
Car and light truck sales and housing
starts (see figure 3) are expected to
decline over the forecast horizon,
while there is a slight pickup anticipated in the unemployment rate as
1997 draws to a close.
The macroeconomic outlook
An economist from the Economic
Cycle Research Institute, Inc., argued
that while consensus forecasts do a
fairly good job during a time of expansion or contraction, they do a terrible
job at predicting a turning point in
the economy. So using consensus
forecasts alone will not allow one to

properly anticipate a change in the
direction of the economy. According
to the work done at the Institute, the
current pattern of information is consistent with the beginning of a recession. However, this is best interpreted
not as a prediction but as a note of
caution. The prediction by this economist is that the economy is entering
a period of slower growth and is more
vulnerable to some exogenous shock
that could push it into a recession.
The Institute expects inflation to be
benign over the coming year. This
economist concluded with an outlook for international growth. The
economies of Japan and France are
expected to experience anemic
growth. Germany’s economy is expected to fare somewhat better, but
not much. The United Kingdom and
Canada are forecast to have reasonable growth. The economic recoveries abroad are considered fragile and
will be heavily dependent on economic
conditions in the United States.
A chief economist from an investment
firm believes that the economy will
most likely continue to expand, but
that there is risk of a recession. Real
disposable income growth should be
able to sustain continued consumer
spending. Debt service payments as a
percent of disposable income are
high and rising. There is a risk to the
forecast that consumer delinquencies
will increase and cause lenders to cut
back on lending, leading to an economic slowdown. The housing market
should continue to do well in 1997
for several reasons. Out of pocket expenses for housing have been declining as a share of household income.
Consumer confidence levels are very
high, consistent with a good housing
market. Credit quality spreads, which
often widen when recession/credit
quality problems begin to surface,
have not widened. Corporate balance
sheets remain solid. This investment
economist was concerned about the
quality spreads for foreign bonds.
Interest rates for Russia and Southeast Asia are viewed as being too low,
not reflecting the true risk of the investment. Meanwhile Latin America
probably is facing interest rates that
are too high due to overestimated
investment risk.

sales will set a record,
and new home sales
were good. Home apmillions of units
1.6
preciation during this
past year has been the
best of the 1990s. The
1.4
outlook for the future is
Actual
mixed for the housing
1.2
industry. Certain demographics do not work
in the favor of housing.
1.0
Individuals in the 25 to
Forecast range
44 year-old category,
prime first-time home
0.8
buyers, are expected to
1991
’92
’93
’94
’95
’96
’97
fall by 5% in the first
Note: The dashed line represents the median of the consensus forecast.
decade of the next cenSource: U.S. Department of Commerce, Department of the Census.
tury, so there will be less
need for homes. However, the estiA consultant to consumer industries
mated population growth for the
expects the current expansion to con1990s has been revised to over 25
tinue through 1997, although there is
million people, the largest decade
less of a recession cushion than in past
increase since the 1950s.
cycles. The level of growth in service
spending by consumers is much lower
While population growth is up, housethan prior expansions as a result of
hold formation in the second half of
demographics. The result is that the
the 1990s is expected to reach the
service spending cushion has shrunk
lowest levels in the last quarter of a
to around 2%. Overall, consumer
century. Household formations are the
spending is clearly growing in a range
driving force behind the demand for
that is consistent with continued exhousing. Immigration to some extent
pansion. The strong housing market
can be viewed as a white knight for
in 1996 has provided good durable
the housing industry. The number of
spending growth. This consultant beindividuals legally emigrating to the
lieves that the strength from the conU.S. during the 1990s is expected to
sumer side for continued expansion
be the largest number in this century.
has to come from nondurable spendStatistics show that after 15 years in
ing. Currently, nondurable spending
the U.S., immigrants have the same
growth is rebounding, but not too
home ownership rates as the general
strongly. Consumer spending on light
population, and after 20 years immivehicles is not out of line with past exgrant ownership rates are actually
pansions. While consumer spending
higher than among the general popon furniture and household applianculation. There was a large influx of
es is fairly moderate, the force behind
immigrants approximately 15 years
durable spending is computer, video,
ago, so the impact of this group on
and audio spending. Apparel has done
the housing market should begin to
well and should continue to add to
be felt.
growth in 1997. Credit growth has been
slowing and will not be the boost to the
Looking at home ownership by age
consumer that it has been. Despite
category over time, two points stand
many newspaper reports, real disposout. The first is that home ownership
able income growth can support contin- rates increase with age. The second
ued consumer expenditures.
point is that for all groups under the
age of 65, home ownership rates have
An economist from a government
either stayed the same over time or
lending institution presented the
have fallen. Home ownership rates
long-term outlook for housing and
fell from around 65.5% in the early
mortgage finance markets. The year
1980s to around 64% by 1985 and
1996 was one of the best in the houshad been holding steady at 64%
ing industry’s history. Existing homes
3. 1997 forecast of housing starts

though 1994. Since 1994, home
ownership rates have risen to nearly
their previous level of 65.5%. Thus, the
outlook for housing is generally positive, with the majority of anticipated assistance coming from immigrants.
Conclusion
After heating up in the second quarter of 1996, economic growth slowed
in the third quarter. The forecasting
participants are expecting slightly
slower growth in real GDP in 1997
than occurred in 1996. There was
very widespread support for continued slow growth. The range limits of
the forecasts (eliminating the two
extreme high and low values) were
1.4% and 2.6%. This slow economic
growth will be good news for inflation watchers, as price pressures on
the economy are not expected to be
very strong.
—William A. Strauss
Senior economist
Robert H. Schnorbus
Assistant vice president and
senior economist

Michael H. Moskow, President; William C. Hunter,
Senior Vice President and Director of Research;
Douglas Evanoff, Assistant Vice President, financial
studies; Charles Evans, Assistant Vice President,
macroeconomic policy research; Daniel Sullivan,
Assistant Vice President, microeconomic policy research;
William Testa, Assistant Vice President, regional
programs; Anne Weaver, Manager, administration;
Helen O’D. Koshy, Editor.
Chicago Fed Letter is published monthly by the
Research Department of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago. The views expressed are
the authors’ and are not necessarily those of
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the
Federal Reserve System. Articles may be
reprinted if the source is credited and the
Research Department is provided with copies
of the reprints.
Chicago Fed Letter is available without charge
from the Public Information Center, Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, P.O. Box 834,
Chicago, Illinois 60690-0834, tel. 312-322-5111
or fax 312-322-5515. Chicago Fed Letter is also
available on the World Wide Web at http://
www.frbchi.org.
ISSN 0895-0164

Tracking Midwest manufacturing activity
Manufacturing output indexes, 1987=100
135

Manufacturing output indexes
(1987=100)
CFMMI
IP

Nov.

Month ago

Year ago

129.5
130.4

129.5

125.6
124.5

129.4

CFMMI
125

IP

Motor vehicle production
(millions, seasonally adj. annual rate)
Nov.

Month ago

Year ago

6.3

5.5

6.1

Light trucks 5.6

5.4

5.3

Cars

115

Purchasing managers’ surveys:
net % reporting production growth
Dec.

Month ago

Year ago

MW

58.0

60.2

54.8

U.S.

58.4

57.5

46.9
105

The composite index for production, according to the Midwest purchasing
managers’ surveys, was 58 in December, consistent with expanding activity.
However, the pace of production activity in the region appears to have slowed
from its October rate, in contrast to the nation which showed a modest pickup.

1996

Sources: The Chicago Fed Midwest Manufacturing
Index (CFMMI) is a composite index of 16 industries,
based on monthly hours worked and kilowatt hours.
IP represents the Federal Reserve Board’s Industrial Production Index for the U.S. manufacturing
sector. Autos and light trucks are measured in annualized units, using seasonal adjustments developed by the Board. The purchasing managers’
survey data for the Midwest are weighted averages
of the seasonally adjusted production components
from the Chicago, Detroit, and Milwaukee Purchasing Managers’ Association surveys, with assistance
from Bishop Associates, Comerica, and the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.

Chicago Fed Letter

The CFMMI was flat in November, in contrast to a fairly strong gain in the
nation. Declines in its machinery sector were offset by gains in its resource sector
(primarily in food processing and petroleum products). The region’s auto and
steel sectors were flat, despite an increase in auto assemblies in the region and
the nation, following the production rebound from the GM strike. Reporting
problems with electrical power data used to generate the auto component of
the regional index may result in an upward revision next month.

1995

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO

1994

Public Information Center
P.O. Box 834
Chicago, Illinois 60690-0834
(312) 322-5111

1993

PRESORTED
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
ZIP + 4 BARCODED
U.S. POSTAGE PAID
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
PERMIT NO. 1942