The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
57th C o n g r e s s , } HOUSE O F R E P R E S E N T A T IV E S ./D oc. No. 377, 1st Session. ) ( Part 5. BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. NO. 42—SEPTEMBER, 1902. ISSUED EVERY OTHER MONTH. W A S H IN G T O N : GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1902. EDITOR, CARROLL D. W RIG H T, COMMISSIONER. ASSOCIATE EDITORS, g : w . w . hanger , CHAS. H. V E R R ILL, G. A. W EBER. CONTENTS. Page. Statistics of cities...................................................................................................... 881-1055 Labor conditions in C u ba...................................................................................... 1056 Agreements between employers and em p loyees............................................. 1057-1068 Digest of recent reports of State bureaus of labor statistics: Louisiana........................................................................................................... 1069 Maryland........................................................................................................... 1070,1071 New Jersey....................................................................................................... 1071-1075 Reports of State boards of arbitration................................................................ 1075,1076 Digest of recent foreign statistical publications................................................. 1077-1093 Decisions of courts affecting la b o r ...................................................................... 1094-1126 Laws of various States relating to labor enacted since January 1,1896___ 1127-1146 in BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. No. 42. W ASH IN G TO N . Septem ber, 1902. STATISTICS OF CITIES. By an act o f Congress, which was approved and became law July 1, 1898, the Commissioner o f Labor was called upon to make an investi gation annually into the statistics o f the cities of the United States having over 30,000 population. The paragraph of the act referred to is as follows: The Commissioner o f Labor is authorized to compile and publish annually, as a part o f the Bulletin o f the Department o f Labor, an abstract o f the main features o f the official statistics o f the cities o f the United States having over 30,000 population. In accordance with this act a compilation was attempted from the printed reports o f various cities, but owing to lack o f uniformity in these reports, and in many cases to the lack o f reports themselves, it was found impossible to make such a classification o f the various items relating to the governmental, financial, and other conditions o f these cities as seemed necessary fo r a satisfactory comparison. A schedule o f inquiries was therefore prepared and the work taken up by the special agents o f the Department. This required personal visits to the various officials o f the cities coming within the scope o f the investi gation. These officials in many ways manifested the utmost interest in the investigation, and contributed freely o f their time and labor in compiling the data desired and in making the report a success. The results were printed in the Bulletin o f the Department o f Labor fo r September, 1899. A s will be seen by reference to the language o f the law'which has been quoted, provision is made fo r a similar inquiry each year. In the second report, which appeared in the Bulletin o f the Department o f Labor fo r September, 1900, an effort was made to enlarge somewhat upon the first, and to change slightly some o f the inquiries in order to 881 882 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. secure fuller information on the subjects covered. The third report o f the series was published in September, 1901, and while it was not thought necessary to repeat the investigation o f the preceding year relative to the nonmunicipal libraries, charities, etc., it was deemed desirable to increase somewhat the scope o f some o f the inquiries and m odify certain classifications in the interest o f a more ready compar ison from year to year o f the cities included in the report. The report for the present year has also been expanded to some extent by the inclusion o f additional data. In other respects, however, it is similar to the reports fo r previous years, and no difficulty will be found in making comparisons in regard to the subjects covered. The thanks o f the Department are due to the officials o f the various cities which were visited fo r their cordial cooperation in the effort to reduce the official records to such form as seemed necessary for satisfactory comparison. It is hoped that experience will render this task easier each year. The first report, contained in the Bulletin for September, 1899, included 140 cities, this being the number in the United States which were at that time believed to have a population o f 80,000 or over. The results o f the Twelfth Census regarding the population o f cities were not available when the data were collected for the second report, which appeared in the Bulletin fo r September, 1900, but according to the best estimates that could be secured the Department considered itself justified in including but 129 cities. Joliet, 111., however, was w rongly included, it being shown by the corrected census returns to have less than 80,000 population; while several cities, which were supposed, when the data for that report were collected, to have less than 80,000 population, were shown to have more than that number. This information, however, came too late to permit their inclusion in the report. The follow ing cities were thus omitted: Montgomery, A la .; Fitchburg and Newton, M ass.; Bayonne, N. J . ; Schenectady, N. Y ., and Chester and Y ork, Pa. The third report included 135 cities—all o f the cities shown by the results o f the Twelfth Census to have had a population o f over 30,000. In the report for the present year two cities have been added— East St. Louis and Joliet, 111.—as it is believed that their population now exceeds 30,000. These additions bring the number o f cities included in the present report up to 137. The titles o f the twenty-five tables embraced in the present report are as follows: T able I.— Incorporation, population, and area. T able II.— Dates of ending of years covered b y the investigation. T able I II.—Police, retail liquor saloons, and arrests, by causes. T able IV .— Firemen, fire equipment, and property loss from fires. T able V .—Marriages, divorces, and births. T able V I.—Deaths, by causes. T able V II.—Percentage of deaths from each specified cause. STATISTICS OF CITIES. 883 T able V III.—Death rate per 1,000 population, b y causes. T able I X .— Death rate per 1,000 population. T able X .—Area of public parks and miles of streets, sewers, and street railways. T able X I .—Care of streets, food and sanitary inspection, and disposal of garbage and other refuse. T able X I I .—Number and kind of street lights T able X I I I .—Public schools. T able X I V .— Public libraries. T a b l e X V .— Charities: Almshouses, orphan asylums, and hospitals. T able X V I .— Cost of water, gas, and electric-light plants owned and operated by cities. T able X V I I .—Building permits. T able X V I I I .—Debt and legal borrowing limit. T able X I X . —Basis of assessment, assessed valuation of property, and taxation T able X X . — Receipts from all sources. T able X X I .—Expenditures for construction and other capital outlay. T able X X I I .— Expenditures for maintenance and operation. T able X X I I I .—Summary of receipts and expenditures. T able X X I V .— Assets. T able X X V .— Per capita debt, assessed valuation of property, and expenditures for maintenance. These tables, which immediately follow the discussion o f the same, will be taken up in order and a short analysis and explanation o f each will be presented. A t the same time there will be given information as to the changes from last year which have been adopted in the preparation o f this year’s report. Table I — Incorporation, population, and area.— In this table, as in the remaining twenty-four tables, the 137 cities in the United States having a population o f 30,000 or over are presented in the order o f their population at the Twelfth Census, the largest being placed first. The latest date o f incorporation o f each o f the cities under the present limits o f territory is first given, followed by the population at the Twelfth United States Census, June 1, 1900. This census popula tion is used only as the basis fo r arrangement and is followed by the estimated population January 1, 1902. This estimate, which must be accepted as such, represents the closest approximation to the actual population that could be secured after consultation with city officers and investigation o f all available data. This table also pre sents information as to the area in acres o f each o f the cities, sub divided as to land and water wherever possible. Lack o f official records as to area rendered anything but an estimate impossible in some cities, but the greatest care has been exercised in such cases to have these estimates approximate accuracy as closely as possible. No subdivision o f the area o f cities into land and water was made in the first two annual reports on this subject. Table I I — Dates o f ending o f years covered by the investigation.— As regards the dates o f ending o f the years covered by the investigation, it is necessary to say that in most o f the cities investigated the various 884 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. departments o f the city government, such as fire, police, street, etc., made their reports for a different year, one department having Decem ber 31 as the end o f its statistical year, while the others had their years end on other dates. It was thought important, in connection with the study o f the data included in the various tables, to furnish a statement as to the dates o f ending o f the years for which the informa tion is given. W here but a single date is given under this heading all the various city departments close their year on the same day. Where the year o f the various departments ended on different dates all the necessary information as to the ending o f the same is furnished in this column. A ll data in the tables (with the exception of those which are noted) cover one year’s transactions, and that the last year for which the facts were obtainable. It is interesting to note in this connection that in but 11 o f the 137 cities included in this report have all o f the various departments o f city activity had their business year end on the same day. In all o f the other cities business years ending on two or more different dates have been used. Not only would the labor of collecting and com piling the data necessary to these reports be greatly lessened in each city by the adoption o f a uniform business year by all o f its departments, but it is believed that the accounts and transactions o f the city itself would be much simplified thereby. Table I I I — P olice, retail liquor saloons, and arrests, by causes.— This table shows the number o f policemen in each o f the cities, the number including not only patrolmen, but officers, such as sergeants, lieuten ants, etc. Persons employed as messengers, matrons, janitors, drivers, etc.., are not included. In this table is shown also the number o f licensed retail liquor saloons, together with the amount o f the license fee, and, immediately follow ing, the number o f arrests. The licensed retail liquor saloons reported do not include clubs, drug stores, etc. The arrests are classified according to the causes for which persons were arrested, as drunkenness, disturbing the peace, assault and bat tery, homicide, vagrancy, housebreaking, and larceny. The arrests fo r other causes are given under 66A ll other offenses,” which is followed by a column showing the total arrests for all offenses. It was found that there was no uniform classification o f offenses causing arrest in the various cities, different cities entering a different charge for a similar offense. Hence the follow ing statement is given to show what offenses were combined in each item o f the classification in the table: Drunk enness includes “ common drunk,” “ drunk and disorderly,” and all cases where drunkenness in any form was the primary cause o f arrest; disturbing the peace includes all cases o f disorderly conduct not attrib utable to drunkenness; assault and battery includes all cases o f assault; vagrancy includes arrest o f beggars, tramps, loafers, loiterers, and all persons without apparent means o f support; housebreaking includes burglary and all cases o f breaking and entering, and larceny includes pocket picking, robbery, and all cases o f theft. STATISTICS OF CITIES. 885 Table I V .— Firem en, fir e equipment, and property loss fro m fires. — The number o f firemen in each o f the cities is given in this table, classified as to whether they are regulars, call men, or volunteers. These numbers include the officers o f the fire department in the differ ent grades, as well as the actual firemen, but do not include messen gers, janitors, etc. This table also goes quite fully into the equipment o f the fire departments in the various cities, showing the number o f steam, hand, and chemical engines, and o f combination chemical en gines and hose wagons, and the number o f hand fire extinguishers, fire boats, hook and ladder trucks, hose reels and hose wagons, fire hydrants, water towers, horses, and fire-alarm boxes. In addition to this infor mation, data are also given as to the total length o f ladders and hose belonging to the various fire departments o f the cities investigated. The table closes with statements showing the number o f fire alarms, the number o f fires, and the total property loss from the same. The number o f fire alarms does not include duplicate alarms sent in from different points, and a first and second alarm fo r a single fire have been considered one alarm. It should also be stated that two or more buildings burned as a result o f one fire have been considered one fire. Table V.— M arriages, divorces, and births.— This table is similar to that used in the report fo r last year, with the addition o f a column showing the number o f divorces granted. The table shows the total number o f marriage licenses issued, number o f marriages, number o f divorces granted, number o f male and female births, the total births and birth rate per 1,000 population, and the number o f stillbirths. The figures showing the birth, rate per 1,000 population are based on the estimated population January 1, 1902, as shown in Table I. In bringing the figures for the various cities into comparison it will be noted that in some cities the number o f marriages is largely in excess o f what might naturally be expected. This in some cases is accounted for by the fact that the city is located near the border o f another State in which the marriage-license laws are more exacting, and that many persons consequently repair to the city for the purpose o f being married in order to secure the benefit o f the more liberal conditions offered there. The reverse o f these conditions accounts in some cases fo r the small number o f marriages in other cities. Table V I.— Deaths, by causes.— It was found during this investiga tion, by an examination o f the various city reports, that in almost every city a different classification o f the causes o f death was used in making the official statement o f deaths. It was apparent that these classifications, differing so widely, could not be used, inasmuch as the value o f the data concerning this feature o f city supervision consists mainly in the comparison afforded as to the number o f deaths from the same cause in each o f the cities investigated. In the first two reports on statistics o f cities a uniform classification was o f course adopted, 886 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. but as this was not entirely satisfactory for the purpose o f comparison with other collections o f statistics o f mortality, the Department last year adopted a modified form o f the Bertillon classification, which has been adhered to in the present report. This classification was officially approved and adopted b y the International Congress o f Hygiene and Demography in August, 1900, and is now being used by a number o f cities in this country and b y some States in the classification o f their mortality statistics. A s its more general adoption is probable, not only in this country, but abroad, it has been deemed wise to adopt this classification here. The full official nomenclature upon which the modified form is based has been published as a supplement to the Pub lic Health Reports (Vol. X V , No. 49, December 7, 1900) by the United States Marine-Hospital Service o f the Treasury Department. The proportionately large number o f deaths in some o f the Southern cities is undoubtedly accounted fo r by the fact that the population is largely made up o f colored people, among whom the death rate is much higher than among the white population. W hile no classification o f deaths has been made as between white and colored in Table V I, it has been found possible to do so in the follow ing series o f short tables covering a number o f cities having a large colored population. In these tables the figures fo r white and colored population upon which the results are based are computed on the basis o f the proportion of each shown at the date o f the Twelfth Census. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR. B A L T IM O R E , M B . [Population: White, 438,531; colored, 81,469; total, 520,000.] Colored. White. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. I ll 20 3 11 35 159 96 45 45 28 781 161 319 170 137 309 127 173 145 199 760 133 406 190 534 75 Cause of death. Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and. c r o u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis............................ Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years) .. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or o v e r ). Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. 0.25 .05 31 15 0.38 .18 142 35 0.27 .07 .61 .03 .08 .36 .22 .10 .10 .06 1.78 .37 .73 .39 .31 .70 .29 .39 .33 .45 1.73 .30 .93 .43 1.22 .17 28 12 32 4 6 13 357 89 39 35 27 85 53 59 28 95 387 42 127 60 192 13 I1 .34 .15 .39 .05 .07 .16 4.38 1.09 .48 .43 .33 1.04 .65 .72 .34 1.17 4.75 .52 1.56 .61 2.36 .16 3 11 63 171 128 49 61 41 1,138 250 358 205 164 394 180 232 173 294 147 175 533 240 726 88 .01 .02 .12 .33 .25 .09 .10 .08 2.19 .48 .69 .39 .31 .76 .35 .45 .33 .56 2.21 .34 1.02 .46 1.40 .17 Death rate per 1,000. 887 STATISTICS OF CITIES. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. B A L T IM O R E , MD.—Concluded. White. Colored. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis................................................ . Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases o f digestive system.......... Bright’s disease......................................... Other diseases o f genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system .................. Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other m alformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile d ebility............................................ S u icid e....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 79 39 49 261 461 138 44 47 24 18 Total.................................................. Cause of death. Total. Death rate per i .OOO Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. 0.18 .09 .11 .60 1.05 .32 .10 .11 .06 .04 11 9 8 46 149 44 11 24 9 5 0.14 .11 .10 .57 1.83 .54 .14 .30 .11 .06 90 48 57 307 610 182 55 71 33 23 0.17 .09 .11 .59 1 17 .35 .11 .14 .06 .04 15 645 328 53 381 102 .03 1.47 .75 .12 .87 .23 1 290 45 4 103 45 .01 3.56 .55 .05 1.27 .55 16 935 373 57 484 147 .03 1.80 .72 .11 .93 .28 7,856 17.91 2,623 32.20 10,479 20.15 N EW O RLEAN S, L A . [Population: White, 218,331; colored, 81,669; total, 300,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ......................... ................. Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping co u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and c ro u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicaemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis..................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system^___ Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system . Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other m alformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ Suicide......................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases..................................... Total.................................................. .24 .06 .16 .25 .25 .08 .18 2.09 .22 .j67 .44 .34 .82 .16 .13 .59 .32 1.21 .20 1.42 .44 .95 .33 .17 .08 .09 .68 1.23 .25 .10 .09 .06 .01 41 46 41 1 9 10 6 23 22 9 20 429 37 60 36 40 78 23 38 78 49 222 30 211 40 93 33 10 9 6 36 161 36 .10 10 10 4 0.50 .56 .50 .01 .11 .12 .07 .28 .27 .11 .25 5.25 .45 .74 .44 .49 .96 .28 .47 i 96 .60 2.72 .37 2.58 .49 1.14 .40 .12 .11 .07 .44 1.97 .44 .12 .12 .12 .05 141 116 52 1 62 22 41 77 76 27 60 886 85 206 133 115 257 58 67 207 119 485 74 520 137 300 106 48 26 25 185 429 91 31 30 23 6 0.47 .39 .17 .01 .21 .07 .14 .26 .25 .09 .20 2.95 .28 .69 .44 .38 .86 .19 .22 .69 .40 1.62 .25 1.73 .46 1.00 .35 .16 .08 .08 .62 1.43 .30 .10 .10 .07 .02 21 99 189 28 270 123 .10 .45 .87 .13 1.24 .56 11 50 96 4 158 105 .14 .61 1.18 .05 1.94 1.29 32 149 285 32 428 228 .11 .50 .95 .11 1.43 .76 4,037 18.49 2,441 29.89 6,478 1 21.59. 100 70 11 0.46 .32 .05 53 12 35 54 54 18 40 457 48 146 97 75 179 35 29 129 70 263 44 309 97 207 73 38 17 19 149 268 55 21 20 13 2 888 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT *OF LABOR. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. W ASH IN GTON , D. C. [Population: White, 197,223; colored, 89,777; total, 287,000.] White. Cause of death. Colored. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Typhoid fe v e r........................................... Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and cro u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis..................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases.........t............................ Senile d ebility..............I............................ Suicide......................................................... Accident..................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... I ll 21 Total.................................................. Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. 0.56 .11 82 27 0.91 .30 193 48 0.67 .17 11 7 26 57 119 15 16 11 395 &5 137 111 84 198 34 36 137 49 206 87 222 100 159 58 29 13 18 124 173 69 11 18 16 4 .06 .04 .13 .29 .60 .08 .08 .06 2.00 .18 .69 .56 .43 1.00 .17 .18 .69 .25 1.04 .44 1.13 .51 .81 .29 .15 .07 .09 .63 .88 .35 .06 .09 .08 .02 6 .07 48 29 62 17 7 8 476 27 57 34 23 108 17 57 46 66 291 50 167 45 211 12 11 10 9 58 108 68 8 18 15 13 .53 .32 .69 .19 .08 .09 5.30 .30 .64 .38 .26 1.20 .19 .64 .51 .74 3.24 .56 1.86 .50 2.35 .13 .12 .11 .10 .65 1.20 .76 .09 .20 .17 .15 17 7 74 86 181 32 23 19 871 62 194 145 107 306 51 93 183 115 497 137 389 145 370 70 40 23 27 182 281 137 19 36 31 17 .06 .02 .26 .30 .63 .11 .08 .07 3.03 .22 .68 .50 .37 1.07 .18 .32 .64 .40 1.73 .48 1.35 .50 1.29 .24 .14 .08 .09 .63 .98 .48 .07 .13 .11 .06 4 216 117 31 143 2 .02 1.09 .59 .16 .72 .01 4 205 60 7 83 7 .04 2.28 .67 .08 .92 .08 8 421 177 38 226 9 .03 1.47 .62 .13 .79 .03 3,430 17.39 2,657 29.60 6,087 21.21 121 15 2 2 3 6 53 50 37 8 5 423 39 109 64 89 121 105 82 56 95 332 0.56 .07 .01 .01 .01 .03 .25 .23 .17 .04 .02 1.97 .18 .51 .30 .41 .56 .49 .38 .26 .44 1.65 Death rate per 1,000. L O U ISV IL L E , K ¥ . [Population: White, 173,895; colored, 41,105; total, 215,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ........................... .......... Diphtheria and c r o u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis..................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ 86 8 1 1 3 2 43 32 27 7 4 310 24 91 45 68 100 78 60 38 65 229 0.49 .05 .01 .01 .02 .01 .25 .18 .16 .04 .02 1.78 .14 .52 .26 .39 .58 .45 .34 .22 .37 1.32 35 7 1 1 0.85 .17 .02 .02 4 10 18 10 1 1 113 15 18 19 21 21 27 22 18 30 103 .10 .24 .44 .24 .02 .02 2.75 .37 .44 .46 .51 .51 .66 .54 .44 .73 2.51 889 STATISTICS OF CITIES, DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. LO U ISV IL L E , K Y .—Concluded. Total. Colored. White. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases o f digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system.................. Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ S uicide....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 89 116 91 95 9 32 28 13 75 135 38 4 38 4 5 0.51 .67 .52 .55 .05 .18 .16 .07 .43 .78 .22 .02 .22 .02 .03 1 157 169 21 112 8 .01 .90 .97 .12 .64 .05 20 61 41 10 6 16 17 2 23 43 6 5 2 3 2 3 0.49 1.48 1.00 .24 .15 .39 .41 .05 .56 1.05 .15 .12 .05 .07 .05 .07 75 36 5 53 11 Total.................................................. 2,562 14.73 935 Cause of death. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 1.82 .88 .12 1.29 .27 109 177 132 105 15 48 45 15 98 178 44 9 40 7 7 3 1 232 205 26 165 19 0.61 .82 .61 .49 .07 .22 .21 .07 .46 .83 .21 .04 .19 .03 .03 .01 .01 1.08 .95 .12 .77 .09 22.75 3,497 16.27 44 121 11 0.41 1.13 .10 .06 .02 .05 .35 .36 .10 .25 2.22 .20 .33 .29 .36 .27 .20 .26 .22 .23 1.40 .20 .46 .14 .85 .38 .10 .29 .17 .32 1.20 .06 .17 .06 .03 .01 M E M P H IS , TENN. [Population: White, 55,032; colored, 52,468; total, 107,500.] Typhoid fever............................................. Malaria....................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria and c r o u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases o f nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................... Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years). . . Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction............ Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system.. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor svstem ................... Hydrocephalus.......... *.............................. Other m alformations................................ Infantile diseases...................................... Senile d ebility............................................ Suicide......................................................... A ccident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases..................................... 26 44 7 0.47 .80 .13 6 1 5 12 18 8 15 89 13 16 17 21 18 8 1 12 4 65 9 33 8 65 22 5 17 16 19 74 3 6 4 1 .11 .02 .09 .22 .33 .14 .27 1.62 .24 .29 .31 .38 .33 .14 .02 .22 .07 1.18 .16 .60 .14 1.18 .40 .09 .31 .29 .34 1.34 .06 .11 .07 .02 3 18 24 15 83 51 Total.................................................. 882 18 77 4 0.34 1.47 .08 1 .02 26 21 3 12 150 9 20 14 18 11 14 27 12 21 86 13 16 7 26 19 6 14 2 15 55 3 12 2 2 1 .49 .40 .06 .23 2.86 .17 .38 .27 .34 .21 .27 .51 .23 .40 1.64 .25 .31 .13 .49 .36 .11 .27 .04 .29 1.05 .06 .23 .04 .04 .02 6 2 5 38 39 11 27 239 22 36 31 39 29 22 28 24 25 151 22 49 15 91 41 11 31 18 34 129 6 18 6 3 1 .06 .33 .44 .27 1.51 .93 26 19 1 92 169 .49 .36 .02 1.75 3.22 3 44 43 16 175 220 .03 .41 .40 .15 1.63 2.05 16.03 1,044 19.90 1,926 17.92 890 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. AT LA N T A , G A . [Population: White, 56,574; colored, 37,426; total, 94,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ................................ ........... Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fev er............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and croup................................ Grippe.................... .* ................................. Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer................................... .................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 y ears).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases......................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ S uicid e....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases...........................•____ Total.................................................. Total. Colored. White. Cause of death. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 27 1 1 6 18 4 11 19 14 5 12 83 0.48 .02 .02 .11 .32 .07 .19 .34 .25 .09 .21 1.47 21 19 16 53 21 27 15 6 64 20 40 16 22 50 3 14 3 23 47 12 1 2 2 .37 .34 .28 .94 .37 .48 .26 .11 1.13 .35 .71 .28 .39 .88 .05 .25 .05 .41 .83 .21 .02 .03 .03 1 1 33 7 1 45 58 844 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 31 11 0.83 .29 12 2 11 13 18 13 4 13 135 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. .32 .05 .29 .35 .48 .35 .11 .35 3.61 58 12 1 18 20 15 24 37 27 9 25 218 0.62 .13 .01 .19 .21 .16 .26 .39 .29 .10 .27 2.32 .02 .02 .58 .12 .02 .80 1.02 13 28 17 19 39 36 13 23 179 8 52 22 49 38 8 12 1 31 17 11 1 3 1 1 1 1 50 10 1 41 98 .35 .75 .45 .51 1.04 .96 .35 .61 4.78 .21 1.39 .59 1.31 1.01 .21 .32 .03 .83 .45 .29 .03 .08 .03 .03 .03 .03 1.33 .27 .03 1.09 2.62 34 47 33 72 60 63 28 29 243 28 92 38 71 88 11 26 4 54 64 23 2 5 3 1 2 2 83 17 2 86 156 .36 .50 .35 .77 .64 .67 .30 .31 2.58 .30 .98 .40 .76 .94 .12 .28 .04 .57 .68 .24 .02 .05 .03 .01 .02 .02 .88 .18 .02 .91 1.66 14.92 1,087 29.04 1,931 20.54 0.29 .52 32 22 0.35 .24 35 11 44 19 14 16 161 111 47 32 36 76 63 42 53 42 185 84 103 .38 .12 .48 .21 .15 .17 1.75 1.21 .51 .35 .39 .83 .68 .46 .58 .46 2.01 .91 1.12 RICHM OND, V A . [Population: White, 57,112; colored, 34,888; total, 92,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria ana c ro u p .............................. G n ppe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... C a n ce r ...................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis..................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ 22 4 0.39 .07 10 18 7 11 8 8 7 9 75 49 28 19 26 41 23 7 28 16 84 25 50 .12 .19 .14 .14 .12 .16 1.31 .86 .49 .33 .46 .72 .40 .12 .49 .28 1.47 .44 .88 28 .80 36 11 7 7 86 62 19 13 10 35 40 35 25 26 101 69 53 1.03 .32 .20 .20 2.46 1.78 .54 .37 .29 1.00 1.15 1.00 .72 .74 2.89 1.69 1.52 891 STATISTICS OF CITIES. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. RICHMOND, V A .—Concluded. Colored. White. Cause of death. Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or o v e r). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ S uicid e....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 11 19 43 9 11 3 29 30 23 2 3 3 1 0.19 .33 .75 .16 .19 .05 .51 .53 .40 .03 .05 .05 .02 9 29 24 7 3 3 35 25 16 11 4 8 0.26 .83 .69 .20 .09 .09 1.00 .72 .46 .32 .11 .23 20 48 67 16 14 6 64 55 39 13 7 11 1 0.22 .52 .73 .17 .15 .06 .70 .60 .42 .14 .08 .12 .01 4 28 38 1 40 26 .07 .49 .67 .02 .70 .46 1 48 32 .03 1.38 .92 28 72 .80 2.06 5 76 70 1 68 98 .05 .83 .76 .01 .74 1.06 Total.................................................. 871 15.25 1,036 29.70 1,907 20.73 37 26 0.46 .32 11 7 12 31 28 3 10 221 23 40 35 23 62 30 60 39 31 175 31 108 14 75 38 10 22 1 38 48 6 4 8 1 .14 .09 .15 .38 .35 .04 .12 2.72 .28 .49 .43 .28 .76 .37 .74 .48 .38 2.15 .38 1.33 .17 .92 .47 .12 .27 .01 .47 .59 .07 .05 .10 .01 Death Deaths. 1rate per 1,000. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. N A SH V IL L E , TENN. [Population: White, 51,082; colored, 30,238; total, 81,320.] Typhoid fe v e r .............................. ......... Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria ana croup................................ Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis..................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion.and hemorrhage— Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions o f infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and ch ron ic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia — Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years). .. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. A pppindip.it,is................................ .............. Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. puerperal . .................... Other pperperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus ................................... . Other malformations............... .......... ...... Infantile diseases....................................... Senile d ebility............................................ ■Suicide............... ......................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases..................................... 20 9 0.39 .18 ii 4 11 13 16 2 2 94 11 27 21 12 36 17 26 26 14 68 14 41 11 36 18 8 8 1 19 36 2 4 1 1 .22 .08 .22 .25 .31 .04 .04 1.84 .22 .53 .41 .23 .70 .33 .51 .51 .27 1.33 .27 .80 .22 .70 .35 .16 .16 .02 .37 .70 .04 .08 .02 .02 1 72 22 3 30 9 Total................................................. «777 17 17 0.56 .56 3 1 18 12 1 8 127 12 13 14 11 26 13 34 13 17 107 17 67 3 39 20 2 14 .10 .03 .60 .40 .03 .26 4.20 .40 .43 .46 .36 .86 .43 1.12 .43 .56 3.54 .56 2.22 .10 1.29 .66 .07 .46 19 12 4 .63 .40 .13 7 .23 .02 1.41 .43 .06 .59 .18 70 26 3 28 15 2.32 .86 .10 .93 .50 1 142 48 6 58 24 .01 1.75 .59 .07 .71 .30 a 15.21 6810 626.79 c l, 587 C19.52 « Not including 76 deaths of nonresidents. 6 Not including 5 deaths of nonresidents. cNot including 81 deaths of nonresidents. 892 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. CH ARLESTO N , S. C. [ Population: White, 28,231; colored, 36,769; total, 65,000.} White. Cause of death. Death rate per 1, 000. Deaths. 0.60 .42 31 12 5 .18 5 24 4 4 5 46 .18 .85 .14 .14 .18 1.63 18 6 1 37 15 3 17 10 19 6 4 35 4 44 .64 .18 .04 1.31 .53 .11 .60 .35 .67 .21 .14 1.24 .14 1.56 .07 .04 .11 .71 2.05 .25 .04 .21 .07 .07 Deaths. Typhoid fe v e r ........................................... Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ...................................... Diphtheria ana croup................................ Grippe......................................................... Dysenterv.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases o f respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system.. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue. . Diseases of locomotor system................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile d ebility............................................ S u icid e....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... Total 17 2 1 3 20 58 7 1 6 2 2 10 2 .21 .53 .60 .04 .35 .07 493 17.46 6 15 17 1 Total. Colored. 5 17 13 7 7 159 9 15 26 12 38 16 25 64 13 97 11 46 19 17 108 5 6 4 49 147 12 3 8 12 2 3 43 60 28 1,232 Death rate per 1, 000. Deaths. 0.84 .98 48 48 0.74 .74 .03 6 .09 .14 .46 .35 .19 .19 4.32 .24 .41 .71 .33 1.03 .44 .68 1.74 .35 2.64 .30 1.25 .52 .46 2.94 .14 .16 10 .15 .63 .26 .17 .18 3.15 .14 .51 .48 .20 1.15 .48 .43 1.25 .35 1.78 .26 .77 .83 .33 2.34 .11 .11 .11 1.06 3.15 .29 .06 Death rate per 1 , 000. 41 17 11 12 205 31 13 75 31 28 81 23 116 17 50 54 21 1.14 .44 152 7 7 7 69 205 19 4 14 14 4 3 49 75 45 1 52 18 33.51 1,725 26.54 .08 .22 .05 .08 1.17 1.63 .76 .22 .22 .06 .05 .75 1.15 .69 .02 .80 .28 SAVAN N AH , G A. [Population: White, 29,842; colored, 32,158; total, 62,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malaria....................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and croup................................ Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms o f tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and ch ron ic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system ___ Organic heart disease................................ 4 29 0.13 .97 2 46 0.06 1.43 6 75 0.10 1.21 7 .24 3 .09 10 .16 3 14 6 .10 .47 .20 5 52 .17 1.74 16 12 12 30 12 3 8 6 40 19 29 .54 .40 .40 1.01 .40 .10 .27 .20 1.34 .64 .97 7 5 5 1 11 141 1 1 19 1 28 21 28 26 18 81 20 41 .22 .16 .16 .03 .34 4.39 .03 .03 .59 .03 .87 .65 .87 .81 .56 2.52 .62 1.28 10 19 11 1 16 193 1 17 31 13 58 33 31 34 24 121 39 70 .16 .31 .18 .02 .26 3.11 .02 .28 .50 .21 .93 .53 .50 .55 .39 1.95 .63 1.13 893 STATISTICS OF CITIES. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. S A V A N N A H , G A .-C on clu ded . White. Cause of death. Colored. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,0(X). 7 4 40 1 10 0.22 .13 1.24 .03 .31 Other diseases of circulatory system___ Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases......................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ S u icid e.............................: ........................ Accident..................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 13 3 24 1 4 4 28 41 5 2 3 4 0.44 .10 .81 .03 .13 .13 .94 1.37 .17 .07 .10 ;13 3 38 20 8 28 8 .10 1.27 .67 .27 .94 .27 30 44 2 4 12 3 1 2 3 48 32 1 37 106 Total.................................................. 544 18.23 893 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. .93 1.37 .06 .13 .37 .09 .03 .06 .09 1.49 1.00 .03 1.15 3.30 20 7 64 2 14 4 58 85 7 6 15 7 1 2 6 86 52 9 65 114 0.32 .11 1.03 .03 .23 .06 .93 1.37 .11 .10 .24 .11 .02 .03 .10 1.39 .84 .14 1.05 1.84 27.77 1,437 23.18 0.68 .60 .02 .02 .12 .10 .10 .58 L IT T L E R O C K , A R K . [Population: White, 25,656; colored, 15,944; total, 41,500.] Typhoid fe v e r ................ ........................ M alaria...................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fev er............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria and croup................................ firip pe......................... ............................... Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases............................. Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis............................. Other forma of tuberculosis...................... Cancer............ ............................................ Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis............ .............. ............... ...... Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions o f infants............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and c h ro n ic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or o v e r ). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................... ............ Appendicitis, ___, ____________________ Other diseases o f digestive system .......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system.. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases o f the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases o f locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations....... ......................... Infantile diseases...................................... Senile debility....... ............ ...................... Pnicide r. . TT. ............................................. Accident..................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... Total.................................................. 11 14 0.43 .55 5 1 2 13 6 12 50 13 5 14 23 5 17 11 1 1 .19 .04 .08 .51 1.07 .69 .06 .06 8 2 11 .19 .13 .69 28 25 1 1 5 4 4 24 .23 .47 1.96 2 2 70 .13 .13 4.39 8 14 120 .19 .34 2.89 3 g 4 9 7 5 5 5 40 9 9 11 11 22 4 2 .19 .51 .25 .56 .44 .31 .31 .31 2.51 .56 .56 .69 .69 1.38 .25 .13 7 7 1 .44 .44 .06 16 13 18 32 12 5 20 9 91 23 26 19 27 40 8 6 4 25 18 2 .39 .31 .43 .77 .29 .12 .48 .22 2.19 .55 .63 .46 .65 .96 .19 .14 .10 .60 .43 .05 2 .13 4 3 .10 .07 .51, .19 .55 .90 .19 15 4 51 14 17 8 16 18 4 4 4 18 11 1 .59 .16 1.99 .55 .66 .31 .63 .70 .16 .16 .16 .70 .43 .04 2 3 .08 .12 3 .12 1 .06 4 a 16 5 a. 63 .19 a5 5 a.3i .31 «21 10 18 25 .70 .98 28 33 1.76 2.07 46 58 1.11 1.40 a 431 «16.86 a 363 a 22.77 a 794 a 19.13 a Not including deaths from premature birth •9398— No. 42— 02----- 2 .10 abi .24 894 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. A U G U ST A , G A . [Population: White, 21,740; colored, 19,260; total, 41,000.] Total. Colored. White. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 9 29 1 2 2 2 3 12 6 2 2 84 1 10 29 10 20 17 11 15 5 58 13 23 12 17 40 1 11 2 26 12 8 4 1 2 2 0.47 1.51 .05 .10 .10 .10 .16 .62 .31 .10 .10 4.36 .05 .52 1.51 .52 1.04 .89 .57 .78 .26 3.01 .68 1.20 .62 .89 2.08 .05 .57 .10 1.35 .62 .42 .21 .05 .10 .10 .78 .05 1 47 6 12 31 .65 1.43 317 14.58 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Typhoid fever............................................. M alaria....................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fe v e r............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria and cro u p ................................ Grippe.................... t .................................. Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases............................. Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system ............ Bronchitis, acute and ch ron ic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases o f respiratory system ....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years) .. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction............ Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system... Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue .. Diseases of locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other m alformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ Suicide......................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 6 14 0.28 .64 3 8 1 8 7 4 4 3 29 .14 .37 .05 .37 .32 .18 .18 .14 1.33 8 10 .37 .46 9 13 1 13 5 16 14 4 5 6 27 .41 .60 .05 .60 .23 .74 .64 .18 .23 .28 1.24 4 1 9 17 2 .18 .05 .41 .78 .09 2 2 .09 .09 1 .05 17 1 Total.................................................. Cause of death. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. .05 2.44 .31 15 43 1 5 10 3 11 19 10 6 5 113 1 18 39 10 29 30 12 28 10 74 27 27 17 23 67 1 15 3 35 29 10 4 3 4 2 1 1 64 7 0.37 1.05 .03 .12 .24 .07 .27 .46 .24 .15 .12 2.76 .03 .44 .95 .24 .71 .73 .29 .68 .24 1.81 .66 .66 .41 .56 1.63 .03 .37 .07 .85 .71 .24 .10 .07 .10 .05 .03 .03 1.56 .17 11 31 .57 1.61 23 62 .56 1.51 600 31.15 917 22.37 B IR M IN G H A M , A L A . [Population: White, 23,301; colored, 17,699; total, 41,000.] Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malarias..................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria and croup...................... *........ G n pp e......................................................... Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and c h ro n ic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ 21 3 0.90 .13 17 3 0.96 .17 38 6 0.93 .15 1 11 .04 .47 2 .11 1 13 .02 .32 5 .22 8 .34 4 45 3 14 10 6 17 $ 1 8 5 70 .17 1.93 .13 .60 .43 .26 .73 .26 .04 .34 .22 3.00 4 4 10 2 5 85 2 6 1 6 11 3 7 12 8 110 .23 .23 .56 .11 .28 4.80 .11 .34 .06 .34 .62 .17 .40 .68 .45 6.22 9 4 18 2 9 130 5 20 11 12 28 9 8 20 13 180 .22 .10 .44 .05 .22 3.17 .12 .49 .27 .29 .68 .22 .20 .49 .32 4.39 895 STATISTICS OF CITIES. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. B IR M IN G H A M , A L A .- Concluded. Colored. White. Cause of death. Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 0.26 .73 .13 .13 .82 .04 .30 .13 .73 .82 .26 .13 .17 .09 .04 5 13 7 4 34 3 10 0.28 .73 .40 .23 1.92 .17 .56 15 4 9 2 7 2 .85 .23 .51 .11 .40 .11 .94 .30 30 8 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 6 17 3 3 19 1 7 3 17 19 6 3 4 2 1 22 7 Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years) .. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or o v e r). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases o f digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system . Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility........................................... S u icid e ...................................................... Accident..................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... 55 18 2.36 .77 Total.................................................. 451 19.36 Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 11 30 10 7 53 4 17 3 32 23 15 5 11 4 1 0.27 .73 .24 .17 1.29 .10 .41 .07 .78 .56 .37 .12 .27 .10 .02 1.69 .45 52 15 1.27 .37 62 44 3.50 2.49 117 62 2.85 1.51 557 31.47 1,008 24.59 28 26 3 0.72 .67 .08 7 1 3 9 8 7 14 157 1 26 17 1 35 18 39 49 11 51 13 51 8 11 29 6 13 2 28 83 9 3 9 3 .18 .03 .08 .23 .21 .18 .36 4.05 .03 .67 .44 .03 .90 .46 1.00 1.26 .28 1.31 .33 1.31 .21 .28 .75 .15 .33 .05 .72 2.14 .23 .08 .23 .08 T m o b i l e :, a l a . [Population; White, 21,586; colored, 17,214; total, 38,800.] Typhoid fe v e r............................................ Malaria....................................................... Sm allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping c o u g h ....................................... Diphtheria ana cro u p .............................. Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicaemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage . . . Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia— Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases o f circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Brighit’s disease......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia............................ . Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases o f locomotor systpm................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations__________ _______ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ fluicidfi __________________________ Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases................................... Total.................................................. 11 6 3 0.51 .28 .14 17 20 0.99 1.16 7 1 2 4 2 4 5 59 .33 .05 .09 .18 .09 .18 .23 2.73 1 .5 6 3 9 98 1 6 7 1 13 11 31 30 7 35 7 31 5 5 17 2 9 1 11 33 6 3 6 1 .06 .29 .35 .17 .52 5.69 .06 .35 .41 .06 .75 .64 1.80 1.74 .41 2.03 .41 1.80 .29 .29 .99 .12 .52 .06 .64 1.92 .35 .17 .35 .06 20 10 .93 .46 22 7 8 19 4 16 6 20 3 6 12 4 4 1 17 50 3 1.02 .33 .37 .88 .18 .74 .28 .93 .14 .28 .56 .18 .18 .05 .79 2.32 .14 3 2 .14 .09 1 .06 1 .03 14 14 3 19 10 .65 .65 .14 .88 .46 39 19 2.26 1.10 15 17 .87 .99 53 33 3 34 •27 1.37 .85 .08 .88 .70 401 18.58 529 30.73 930 23.97 896 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR—Continued. K N O X V IL L E , TENN. [Population: White, 26,721; colored, 7,779; total, 34,500.] Deaths. Typhoid fe v e r ............................................ Malaria....................................................... S m allpox.................................................... Measles....................................................... Scarlet fever............................................... Whooping cough........................................ Diphtheria and croup................................ Grippe......................................................... Dysentery.................................................... Other epidemic diseases........................... Purulent and septicsemic infection......... Pulmonary tuberculosis........................... Other forms of tuberculosis...................... Cancer......................................................... Other general diseases.............................. Meningitis.................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage___ Paralysis...................................................... Convulsions of infants.............................. Other diseases of nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and ch r o n ic ................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over).. Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system.. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases o f locomotor system ................... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases....................................... Senile debility............................................ Suicide......................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases..................................... 13 2 2 Total. Colored. White. Cause of death. Death rate per 1, 000. Deaths. Death rate per 1 , 000. Deaths. 18 0.49 .07 .07 0.64 .26 21 .61 8 7 .23 .20 .06 .03 .03 3.71 .12 .29 .58 .17 .32 .35 .64 4 4 6 1 .15 .23 .04 4 1 1 1 .51 .13 .13 .13 1 69 3 8 6 6 .04 2.58 .11 .30 .23 .23 .37 .15 .11 .34 .26 1.24 .15 .67 .26 .37 .23 59 1 2 14 7.58 .13 .26 1.80 i 8 4 2 1 18 3 5 5 4 .i§ 1.03 .51 .26 .13 2.31 .39 .64 .64 .51 1 2 .13 .26 6 4 2 3 .77 .51 .26 .39 6 4 18 15 .37 .15 .67 .56 3 .11 1 .04 16 10 1 15 17 .60 .37 .04 .56 .64 9 5 1 9 19 13.44 206 10 Total. 0.52 .06 5 17 4 3 9 7 33 4 18 7 10 A,000. 2 .51 10 Death rate per 2 4 2 1 1 128 4 10 20 6 11 12 7 11 8 51 7 23 .12 .20 2 6 .32 .23 1.48 .20 .67 .35 .40 .17 .03 .35 .12 .70 .55 .06 .17 1 .08 1.16 .64 .13 1.16 2.44 25 15 2 24 36 .72 .43 .06 .70 1.04 26.48 565 16.38 22 7 6 0.69 .22 .19 2 2 10 9 9 1 9 79 7 18 11 8 22 9 5 9 9 32 15 22 10 24 .06 .06 .31 .28 .28 .03 .28 2.47 .22 .56 .34 .25 .69 .28 .16 .28 .28 1.00 .47 .69 .31 .75 12 14 6 1 12 4 24 19 CHATTANOOGA, TENN. [Population: White, 18,075; colored, 13,925; total, 32,000.] Typhoid fever. Malaria.......... Sm allpox....... Scarlet fever.......................................... Whooping cou gh ............... ................. Diphtheria and croup........................... Grippe.................................................... Dysentery............................................... Other epidemic diseases...................... Purulent and septicaemic infection... Pulmonary tuberculosis...................... Other forms of tuberculosis................. Cancer.................................................... Other general diseases......................... Meningitis............................................ Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage.. .. Paraylsis...................................................... Convulsions o f infants.............................. Other diseases o f nervous system............ Bronchitis, acute and chronic................. Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia___ Other diseases of respiratory system....... Organic heart disease................................ Other diseases of circulatory system....... Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years).. 9 1 1 0.50 .05 .05 2 1 7 4 3 1 5 29 3 12 9 6 18 3 2 3 3 15 10 13 6 16 .11 .05 .39 .22 .17 .05 .28 1.61 .17 .66 .50 .33 1.00 .17 .11 .17 .17 .83 .55 .72 .'33 .89 13 6 5 , 0.93 .43 .36 1 3 5 6 .07 .22 .36 .43 4 50 4 6 2 2 4 6 3 6 6 17 5 9 4 8 .29 3.59 .29 .43 .14 .14 .29 .43 .22 .43 .43 1.22 .36 .65 .29 .57 897 STATISTICS OF CITIES. DEATHS AND DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSE AND COLOR-Concluded. CHATTANOOGA, TENN.—Concluded. Colored. White. Cause of death. Deaths. Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or ov er). Hernia and intestinal obstruction.......... Peritonitis.................................................. Appendicitis............................................... Other diseases of digestive system.......... Bright’s disease.......................................... Other diseases of genito-urinary system. Puerperal septicaemia................................ Other puerperal diseases........................... Diseases of the skin and cellular tissue.. Diseases of locomotor system ......... Hydrocephalus.......................................... Other malformations................................ Infantile diseases...................................... Senile debility........................................... S u icid e....................................................... Accident...................................................... Ill-defined diseases..................................... Total.................................................. Death rate per 1,000. Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. 3 .17 1 .07 4 .13 2 1 18 12 •1 2 1 1 .11 .05 1.00 .66 .05 .11 .05 .05 5 .36 11 12 2 .79 .86 .14 7 1 29 24 3 2 1 1 .22 .03 .91 .75 .09 .06 .03 .03 15 14 1 18 21 .83 .78 .05 1.00 1.16 24 3 1.72 .22 21 39 1.51 2.80 39 17 1 39 60 1.22 .53 .03 1.22 1.88 292 16.15 293 21.04 585 18.28 MON TGOM ERY, A liA . [Population: White, 13,600; colored, 17,900; total, 31,500.] Colored. White. Cause of death. Typhoid fe v e r .......................................... Malaria..................................................... Sm allpox.................................................. Measles...................................................... Scarlet fev er............................................. Whooping c o u g h ..................................... Diphtheria and croup.............................. Grippe....................................................... Dysentery.................................................. Other epidemic diseases......................... Purulent and septicsemic infection....... Pulmonary tuberculosis......................... Other forms o f tuberculosis.................... Cancer....................................................... Other general diseases............................. Meningitis................................................. Cerebral congestion and hemorrhage .. Paralysis.................................................... Convulsions of infants............................. Other diseases of nervous system .......... Bronchitis, acute and chronic............... Pneumonia and broncho-pneumonia__ Other diseases of respiratory system___ Organic heart disease.............................. Other diseases of circulatoxy system___ Diarrhea and enteritis (under 2 years) . Diarrhea and enteritis (2 years or over). Hernia and intestinal obstruction......... P eritonitis.:............................................. Appendicitis............................................. Other diseases o f digestive system......... Bright’s disease........................................ Other diseases o f genito-urinary system Puerperal septicaemia.............................. Other puerperal diseases......................... Diseases o f the skin and cellular tissue. Diseases o f locomotor system ................. Hydrocephalus........................................ Other m alformations.............................. Infantile diseases..................................... Senile debility.......................................... S u icid e ...................................................... Accident.................................................. Ill-defined diseases.............................. . Total. Deaths. Death rate per 1,000. Deaths. 0.29 Total. Death rate per 1,000. 0.22 .22 .39 .44 06 Deaths. 8 10 .22 .15 .22 .15 .06 .13 .19 2 48 .22 6 .15 .44 .22 .15 .81 .07 1.03 .07 1.32 61 .74 .81 .07 .16 .07 .96 .81 .74 8 3 175 22 2 3 2 22 19 10 .26 .48 .06 381 12.10 19 20 .22 206 11.51 .70 .48 .06 .10 .06 .70 .60 .32 2 8 15 .37 .15 .59 .06 1.52 .19 .16 .26 .13 .16 .22 .19 .60 .13 .95 .26 .92 .03 .06 11 .22 12.87 5 8 4 5 7 6 19 4 30 8 29 15 .07 2 0.26 .32 1 .07 3 5 Death rate per 1,000. 898 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, The following table summarizes the results as to the deaths o f white and colored persons in the cities investigated, so far as data were obtainable. The entire lack o f record as to the color o f decedents accounts fo r the omission o f many cities from this table. TOTAL DEATHS, BY COLOR. White. Cities. Colored. 27.46 1,927 New York, N. Y ........................................ 19.58 68,793 20.62 Chicago, 111................................................. 687 23,719 13.43 1,654 Philadelphia, Pa........................................ 17.72 25.03 22,483 St. Louis, M o ............................................. 1,173 31.63 9,428 16.90 Boston, Mass............................................... 292 19.64 11,008 22.29 Baltimore, M d ............................................ 2,623 32.20 7,856 17.91 121 Cleveland, O h io ........................................ 5,713 14.89 19.40 22.74 Buffalo, N. Y ............................................. 14.44 43 5,317 Cincinnati, Ohio........................................ 466 5,689 17.51 30.81 Pittsburg, JPa............................................. 485 6,107 19.35 27.20 New Orleans, La........................................ 2,441 4,037 18.49 29.89 Detroit, M ich ............................................. 14.94 97 4,416 22.37 Milwaukee, W is ........................................ 15 3,818 12.87 16.27 Washington, D. C....................................... 2,657 3,430 17.39 29.60 Newark, N. J ............... ............................. 194 26.89 4,612 18.61 Jersey City, N. J ........................................ 47 3,995 19.07 11.58 Louisville, K y ............................................ 935 2,562 22.75 14.73 15 9.02 Minneapolis, M in n ................................... 2,495 11.98 148 28.69 Providence. R. I ........................................ 3,296 19.07 Indianapolis, In d ....................................... 2,242 337 19.57 13.56 Kansas City, M o ........................................ 14.60 426 2,247 22.89 St. Paul, M inn............................................ 27 11.25 1,778 10.61 Rochester, N. Y .......................................... 7 2,460 14.53 10.90 Denver, Colo............................................... 2,652 80 19.56 18.00 Toledo, Ohio............................................... 1,672 41 11.30 20.68 Allegheny, P a ............................................ 119 2,306 17.80 34.75 Columbus, O h io ........................................ 11.15 166 19.12 1,381 Worcester, M ass........................................ 1,979 16.52 19 15.31 Syracuse, N. Y ............................................ 14.42 1,557 13.10 17 New Haven, Conn..................................... 55 1,920 17.63 17.75 Paterson, N. J ............................................ 1,775 33 16.71 24.59 Fall River, Mass........................................ 2,132 20.00 11 26.63 Omaha, N ebr............................................. 975 60 9.18 15.78 Los Angeles, Cal........................................ 1,869 116 17.75 24.58 Memphis, T enn.......................................... 1,044 882 16.03 19.90 Albany, N. Y ............................................. 1,736 23 17.58 18.21 Cambridge, M ass..................................... . 1,487 87 16.53 21.18 Atlanta, G a................................................ 844 14.92 1,087 29.04 Grand Rapids, M ich .................................. 1,134 12.02 6 9.02 Dayton, O h io............................................. 1,165 13.48 62 17.24 Richmond, V a ........................................... 15.25 1,036 871 29.70 Nashville, Tenn.......................................... <>810 <>26.79 5777 515.21 Hartford, C o n n .......................................... 1,154 14.50 44 21.38 Reading, Pa................................................ 1,341 16.47 18 31.69 Wilmington, Del........................................ 16.62 1,138 266 26.54 Camden, N .J ............................................. 1,236 16.69 120 20.17 Trenton, N. J ............................................... 1,177 16.17 54 24.46 Bridgeport, C o n n ....................................... 15.82 1,197 27 20.39 Lynn, M ass................................................. 1,002 14.49 18 20.76 Oakland, Cal............................................... 1,009 13.90 39 16.03 New Bedford, M ass................................... 1,186 18.51 50 26.15 Des Moines, I o w a ....................................... 713 10.47 27 14.28 Springfield, Mass........................................ 911 14.26 22 19.57 Somerville, Mass........................................ 829 13.10 2 9.35 Troy, N. Y .................................................... 1,644 22.06 18 34.29 Hoboken. N .J............................................. 1,154 18.97 3 17.75 Evansville, I n d .......................................... 610 11.61 135 17.59 Utica, N .Y .................................................. 1,020 17.66 11 43.48 Peoria, 111.................................................... 776 13.27 15 9.91 Charleston, S. C .......................................... 493 17.46 1,232 33.51 Savannah, Ga............................................. 544 18.23 893 27.77 Salt Lake City, Utah.......... 1..................... 688 11.98 18 32.32 San Antonio, T e x ....................................... 1,096 159 23.03 20.10 Duluth, M inn............................................. 12.94 719 6 13.45 Erie, P a ....................................................... 808 14.76 3 11.49 Elizabeth, N .J ............................................ 961 5 17.87 4.06 a Including 303 deaths occurring outside city limits. b Not including 76 deaths of nonresidents. c Not including 6 deaths of nonresidents. <*Not including 81 deaths of nonresidents. Total. Death Death Death Number. rate per Number. rate per Number. rate per 1,000. 1,000. 1,000. 70,720 24,406 24,137 10,601 11,300 10,479 5,834 5,360 6,155 6,592 6,478 «4,513 3,833 6,087 4,806 4,042 3,497 2,510 3,444 2,579 2,673 1,805 2,467 2,732 1,713 2,425 1,547 1,998 1,574 1,975 1,808 2,143 1,035 1,985 1,926 1,759 1,574 1,931 1,140 1,227 1,907 <*1,687 1,198 1,359 1,404 1,356 1,231 1,224 1,020 1,048 1,236 740 933 831 1,662 1,157 745 1,031 791 1,725 1,437 706 1,255 726 811 966 19.73 13.56 18.08 17.82 19.70 20.15 14.96 14.49 18.10 19.77 21.59 «15.04 12.88 21.21 18.85 18.93 16.27 11.95 19.35 14.13 15.50 10.62 14.51 19.51 11.42 18.23 11.68 16.51 13.12 17.63 16.81 20.03 9.41 18.05 17.92 17.59 16.73 20.54 12.00 13.63 20.73 <*19.52 14.68 16.57 17.89 16.95 16.41 15.90 14.57 13.97 18.73 10.67 14.35 13.09 22.14 18.97 12.38 17.78 13.18 26.54 23.18 12.17 22.61 12.95 14.75 17.56 899 STATISTICS OF CITIES, TOTAL DEATHS, BY COLOR-Concluded White. Cities. Colored. Total. Death Death Death Number. rate per Number. rate per Number. rate per 1,000. 1,000. 1,000. Kansas City, K an s..................................... Harrisburg, P a ........................................... Yonkers, N .Y ............................................. Norfolk, V a ................................................ Fort Wayne, I n d ........................................ Youngstown, O h io..................................... Houston, T e x ............................................. Covington. K y ........................................... Akron, Ohio................................................ Dallas, T ex .................................................. Saginaw, M ich........................................... Lancaster, P a ...................... ^..................... Lincoln, Nebr............................................. Brockton, M ass.......................................... Binghamton, N. Y ..................................... Augusta, Ga................................................ Pawtucket, R. I .......................................... Wheeling, W. V a ........................................ Mobile, A la ................................................. Birmingham, A la ...................................... Little Rock, A r k ........................................ Springfield, Ohio........................................ Galveston, T ex........................................... Tacoma, W ash........................................... Terre Haute, Ind ........................................ Dubuque, I o w a .......................................... Quincy, 111.................................................. South Bend, I n d ........................................ Johnstown, P a ............................................ Davenport, Iowa........................................ McKeesport, Pa.......................................... Springfield, 111............................................ Chelsea, Mass............................................. Chester, Pa.................................................. York, P a ...................................................... Malden, Mass............................................. Topeka, Kans............................................. Newton, Mass............................................. Knoxville, T enn........................................ Schenectady, N . Y ..................................... Fitchburg, Mass.......................................... Montgomery, A la ....................................... Auburn, N .Y ............................................... Chattanooga, T e n n ................................... East St. Louis, 111........................................ 682 679 a 786 468 628 684 503 963 471 628 607 582 390 517 749 317 662 650 401 451 431 383 403 464 667 441 557 493 647 519 618 554 560 465 449 474 505 429 359 603 468 175 412 292 411 14.33 13.45 a 15.76 15.07 12.39 13.97 14.98 23.51 10.60 15.95 13.60 14.31 9.37 12.27 18.50 14.58 16.38 16.71 18.58 19.36 16.86 10.77 18.48 12.00 17.40 11.80 15.53 11.74 16.32 14.42 16.85 16.47 16.25 15.28 12.42 13.87 17.08 12.01 13.44 16.16 14.67 12.87 11.98 16.15 12.51 176 40 22 607 3 17 359 84 8 244 4 10 16 6 6 600 5 33 529 557 363 75 172 10 30 3 52 10 10 11 34 68 17 70 15 12 109 5 206 3 1 206 14 293 28 25.49 8.85 19.59 25.34 9.01 16.50 21.87 33.11 14.41 22.96 10.72 12.64 17.90 15.87 11.49 31.15 23.92 29.86 30.73 31.47 22.77 16.85 27.77 7.58 18.01 24.79 24.33 14.22 27.78 21.61 41.31 28.89 21.04 15.34 17.54 24.74 22.07 8.21 26.48 16.48 10.75 11.51 22.88 21.04 13.08 858 719 808 1,075 631 5 701 862 1,047 479 872 611 592 406 523 755 917 667 683 930 1,008 5 794 458 575 5474 697 444 609 503 657 530 652 622 577 535 464 486 614 434 565 606 469 381 426 585 439 15.47 13.07 15.84 19.55 12.37 514.02 17.24 24.07 10.64 17.44 13.58 14.28 9.55 12.31 18.41 22.37 16.42 17.08 23.97 24.59 519.13 11.45 20.54 511.85 17.43 11.84 16.03 11.78 16.43 14.52 17.39 17.28 16.36 15.29 12.54 14.02 17.80 11.94 16.38 16.16 14.66 12.10 12.17 18.28 12.54 a Including 1 Chinese. 5 Not including deaths from premature birth. Table V II.— Percentage o f deaths fro m each specified cause.— This table is based on Table V I, and shows for each city what percentage o f the total deaths during the year was caused by typhoid fever, what by malaria, what by smallpox, and what by each o f the remaining causes enumerated in Table V I. Table V III.— D eath rate p er 1,000population, by com es.— This table is also based on Table V I, and shows fo r each city the number o f deaths per 1,000 population from each specified cause. Table I X .— D eath rate per 1,000 population.— This table is based partly on Table V I. The population o f each city as estimated by the health department, which furnishes the basis o f the calculation as to the official death rate, is given in the first column o f the table. This is followed b y a column showing the official death rate o f each city as calculated by the health officers o f the same. The estimated popula 900 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. tion January 1, 1902, is next brought forward from Table I, and immediately following this is given the death rate calculated on the basis o f these figures. In most cases these do not differ greatly from the figures used by the health officers themselves. Stillbirths are not included in the calculations o f death rates. A s stated in connection with Table Y I, the high death rate o f some Southern cities is explained by the fact that their population consists largely o f colored people, among whom the death rate is much higher than among whites, as shown b y the series o f short tables given there. Table X .— A rea o f pu blic panics and miles o f streets, sewers, and street railways.—In this table is shown the area o f all parks and gardens open fo r the free use o f the public, whether owned by the munici pality or by a private individual or corporation, and also the number of miles o f streets in each o f the cities paved with cobblestones, granite and belgian blocks, bricks, wooden blocks, asphalt and asphalt blocks, macadam, and gravel. The number o f miles o f all other kinds o f pavement is aggregated in a single column, and this is followed by the total miles o f streets paved in each city and the miles o f streets unpaved. There are also shown data relative to the number o f miles o f sewers in each city, classified as to whether constructed o f brick, tile, or other material, and the miles o f single track o f street railways, together with the number o f persons employed by the companies oper ating the same. Table X I — Care o f streets, fo o d <md sanitary inspection, and dis posal o f garbage and other refuse.— This table deals with the provision made by each city fo r the care o f its streets and the disposal o f its garbage. The table shows whether the streets are swept by hand, by machine, or by both hand and machine, and the number o f square yards o f streets swept per week. The figures given show the total amount o f sweeping done per week measured in square yards, and do not indicate, therefore, the total area swept, which would in most cases be considerably less, inasmuch as many o f the streets are swept more than once a week. Next follow columns showing the average number o f persons employed in sweeping and sprinkling the streets by the cities themselves and by contractors. The next two columns show the number o f food and sanitary inspectors employed by each city, while the two immediately follow ing show the tons o f ashes dis posed o f by the cities and by contractors. The table further shows the tons o f garbage, dead animals, and other refuse sold, burned, or otherwise disposed o f in these cities, the quantities disposed o f by the cities themselves and by contractors being given separately. These columns are followed by those in which are given the average number o f persons employed in the removal o f ashes, garbage, and other refuse. STATISTICS OF CITIES. 901 Table X I I —Number and kind o f street lights.—This table shows the number o f arc and incandescent electric lights, the number of Welsbach and other gas lights, and the number o f vapor lamps and oil lamps which are in use in the streets, alleys, and public parks o f the various cities. Lights inside public buildings are not included. Table X I I I — Public schools.—This table shows, first, the number o f buildings in each city in which public schools are conducted, classi fied as to whether owned or rented by the city. Next is shown the number o f schoolrooms—that is, the number o f rooms used for seat ing or recitation purposes— classified as to whether in owned or in rented buildings. The number o f high schools is next shown, and all such schools are included, whether conducted in a building used exclu sively fo r that purpose or in a building in connection with the other public-school grades. These data are followed by the number o f teach ers and the number and average daily attendance o f pupils, separately classified as to whether in high schools, in kindergartens, in other reg ular day schools, in night schools, or in other public schools. The number o f pupils as shown here means the total number o f different pupils registered during the year. A ll pupils that have been trans ferred from one school to another, and whose names consequently appear on two or more registers, have been counted but once. Table X I V .— Public libraries.— In this table are shown the facts relating to public libraries owned and controlled by the various cities, together with information as to the number o f volumes in the same, the number o f volumes added during the year, the number o f volumes withdrawn for home use, and the number withdrawn for use in the reading rooms o f the library during the period covered by the report. Libraries, the titles o f which are vested in self-perpetuating boards o f trustees, etc., and which are practically free city libraries, have been included. In the report fo r September, 1900, data were also given as to libraries under other than municipal ownership and control. It has not been thought necessary, however, to cover such institutions each year, and data relating to the same have not been secured fo r the suc ceeding reports. Table X V — Charities: Almshouses, orphan asylums, and hospitals.— In the first annual report on statistics o f cities data on this subject were presented fo r municipal institutions only; that is, those institu tions which were supported or controlled by the municipality itself. In many o f the cities which were included in the report, however, institutions o f a similar character were found under the control o f and supported by the town, county, or State, or by private contri butions. In some cases such institutions existed in cities which did not themselves provide such aid. In most cases these private or semi private institutions were open to those unable to support themselves or secure proper medical aid and other attention. In many cases 902 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. private institutions were found in which free service was given to those needing it, while in some instances a part o f the support o f each institution was contributed by the city as a condition to furnishing the necessary attention to its poor. In planning the second annual report it was determined, in view o f the public service rendered by these insti tutions, to secure data relating to them similar to that secured for the first report relating to strictly municipal institutions, and publish the same in connection with those data. This plan was carried out and that report contained data not only as to those institutions owned and controlled by the city, but also those owned and controlled by the county, town, or State, or by private enterprises, such as churches, benevolent associations, etc. It was the purpose o f the Department to include in that report all those institutions which admitted the general public or a specified class o f the public either free or partially free. It was not thought necessary, however, to duplicate that canvass for several years, and the present report, therefore, like that for last year, contains data relating to municipal institutions only. The table shows the number o f almshouses and orphan asylums, with the average number o f inmates, and the number o f hospitals, with the total number o f patients treated during the year. The column relating to the num ber o f hospitals includes in some instances smallpox hospitals or pesthouses, which are not strictly charitable institutions, but are operated by the cities fo r the protection o f the general public health. These are in all cases designated by footnotes. Table X Y I — Cost o f water, gas, and electric-light plants owned and operated by cities.— In this table it is shown whether the waterworks, gas works, and electric-light plants in the various cities are owned and operated by the municipality. W here these public utilities are municipally owned and operated further data are given as to the year in which they were built or acquired by the cities, and the cost o f the same. The figures fo r cost represent the cost up to the end o f the fiscal year covered by the report, and include amounts expended for extensions, etc., in addition to the original cost o f building and equip ping the plants. Additional columns show respectively the miles o f water, gas, and electric-light mains. Table X V I I .— B uilding perm its.— This table, which did not appear in previous reports, shows first the number o f permits granted for the construction o f new buildings and the amount o f proposed expend iture fo r same, being followed by the number o f permits granted for repairs and extensions to old buildings, together with the amount o f proposed expenditure. Table X V I I I .— D ebt and legal borrowing lim it.—This table shows first the amount o f the bonded, the floating, and the total debt o f the cities included in the report. In this classification temporary loans, unpaid warrants, etc;, have been regarded as a floating debt. The data as to debt are followed by those as to the amount o f the sinking STATISTICS OF CITIES. 903 fund o f the various cities, which deducted from the preceding column, showing the total debt, furnishes the figures fo r the next column, rep resenting the net debt o f each o f the cities. This is followed by a statement as to the legal borrowing limit. In several cities it was found that the bonded indebtedness as given in the reports o f the cities did not include some special bonds, such as school, park, or waterworks bonds, or bonds issued for street or sewer construction, etc. They were omitted b y the city officials because they were not considered a city debt proper, they having been issued for one or more o f the special purposes named, and charged, in some instances, against the property along the street or in the locality in which the expenditures were made. In such cases the city usually acts as an agent through a board or commission in issuing and redeeming the bonds, but disclaims all responsibility fo r their payment. A s most cities include all such bonds in their statements o f indebtedness, it has been deemed proper fo r purposes o f comparison to include them in these cases also. The fact should be noted in connection with this table that in some cases the debt as here given does not represent absolutely all o f the public obligations o f the property within the limits o f the city. In certain cases where it has been desired to make improvements for the benefit o f a territory larger than that o f the city, the State legislature has provided for the formation o f a board or commission and fo r bor rowing money fo r carrying out the desired improvements. This bor rowed money represents an obligation, not o f the cities as such, but o f the board or commission, although interest and principal as well as all expenses o f maintenance and operation must be met by taxation against the property within the limits o f the territory benefited. This method has in many cases been employed because the debt limit fixed by the State legislature prevented the necessary borrowing on the part o f the city directly, and as it is desired to retain a low debt limit, spe cific permission from the legislature is required for each issue o f bonds in excess o f that limit. W ell-known cases o f this sort are Chicago, with its drainage canal, and Boston, with its metropolitan park, sewer, and water commissions. In such cases as these no attempt has been made to apportion to the cities involved the proper proportion o f debt chargeable in each instance, as it was regarded as impracticable. Such definite information, however, as was available has been presented in the form o f footnotes to the table. W ith regard to the city’s share o f the county and State debt the same principle has been followed. The conditions in Washington are somewhat peculiar. Being the seat o f the Federal Government and the site o f the vast properties necessary to its central administration, Congress, which is the law making body o f the city, has established the rule that one-half the municipal expenses shall be paid by the Federal Government and onehalf raised by taxation. The act providing a permanent form o f gov 904 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. eminent for the District o f Columbia, approved June 11,1878, specifies that “ T o the extent to which Congress shall approve o f said estimates [of the annual expenses o f government fo r the District o f Columbia] Congress shall appropriate the amount o f fifty per centum thereof; and the remaining fifty per centum o f such approved estimates shall be levied and assessed upon the taxable property and privileges in said District o f Columbia other than the property o f the United States and o f the District o f Columbia.” The principle laid down in the forego ing act has, with very few exceptions, been followed by Congress in making the appropriations fo r the expenses o f the District o f Colum bia. In any study o f the financial statistics o f the city o f W ashing ton, whether in this or subsequent tables, this peculiarity should be borne in mind. Table X IX \ — B asis o f assessment, assessed valuation o f property, and taxation.— This table shows the basis o f assessment, represented in per cent o f the full value o f real and personal property. Two col umns are given showing the legal basis o f assessment. It has been found in some cities, however, that in practice the basis adopted is a much lower percentage than that provided by law. Two additional columns are therefore given showing the basis actually used in the assessment o f real and personal property. In passing, attention should be called to the possible, if not probable, inaccuracy in many cases o f the basis o f assessment in practice. In some instances it applies to the valuation at forced sale; in some to the market value as determined at private sale; while in others it applies to the asking price placed upon the property by the owners. Then follow three columns showing the assessed valuation o f the real, personal, and the total property in each o f the cities considered, while the remaining columns o f the table relate to the tax rates fo r various purposes levied on such property. In most cases a statement was secured as to the rate o f tax levied per $1,000 o f assessed valuation by or fo r the State, the county, and the city, and for other purposes. The value o f the data subdivided in this manner will be seen at once. Table X X .— R eceipts fro m all sources.— Practically no change has been made in this table from the form in use in the preceding report. The actual income is first given, classified as to the amounts received during the year from the property tax, from franchise tax, from liquor licenses, from other licenses, from fines and fees, from franchise grants, from special assessments, from trust funds, interest, and divi dends, from waterworks, from gas works, from electric-light plants, from docks and wharves, from ferries and bridges, from markets, from cemeteries, from bath houses and bathing pools and beaches, from all other sources, and the total actual income from all sources combined. This detail and total o f actual income is followed by a column show ing the cash on hand at the beginning o f the fiscal year, and another STATISTICS OF CITIES. 905 showing the amounts received as loans subdivided as to long-term bonds (2 years or over), and temporary loans and short-term bonds (less than 2 years). These items form no part o f the actual income o f cities, but a final column is given under the caption o f “ total receipts fo r fiscal year,” in which are combined the amounts given in the table as “ total actual income fo r fiscal year,” “ cash on hand at beginning o f fiscal year,” and “ loans.” The cash on hand at the beginning o f the fiscal year, as shown in this table, does not include the cash in the sinking fund, except where so noted. Table X X L — Expenditures f o r construction and other capital out lay.— This table, together with Table X X I I , deals with the expendi tures during the fiscal year covered by the report. Table X X I deals especially with those fo r construction and fo r the acquisition o f prop erty o f a permanent nature, and for other capital outlay. The items fo r which separate amounts are shown in this table are: Police depart ment; police courts, jails, workhouses, reformatories, etc.; fire depart ment; health department; hospitals, asylums, almshouses, and other charities; schools; libraries, art galleries, museums, etc.; parks; streets; sewers; waterworks; gas works; electric-light plants; docks and wharves; ferries and bridges; markets; cemeteries; bath houses and bathing pools and beaches; sinking fund; and fo r all other pur poses. The total o f these items follows. The next column shows the amount o f loans repaid, subdivided as to long-term bonds (2 years or over), and temporary loans and short-term bonds (less than 2 years), while the final column o f the table gives the total o f expenditures, including loans repaid. Table X X I I .— Expenditures f o r maintenance and operation.— This table is very similar in form to the preceding one, and shows the expenditures fo r the maintenance o f all the principal departments o f city work, together with the total expenditures fo r maintenance and operation. Table X X I I I .— Summary o f receipts and expenditures.— This table summarizes the results o f Tables X X , X X I , and X X I I , bringing into one presentation the total o f receipts and expenditures shown in those tables. A column showing cash on hand at the end o f the fiscal year is also given. Table X X I V .— Assets.— This table shows the estimated value o f all property, real and personal, owned by the city at the end o f its fiscal year, including cash in the treasury; uncollected taxes; cash and bonds in sinking fund; trust funds; and all lands, buildings, apparatus, and furniture belonging to it, fo r whatever purpose used, as the city hall, police and fire departments, schools, libraries, art galleries, museums, parks, jails, workhouses, reformatories, hospitals, asylums, almshouses, docks and wharves, ferries and bridges, markets, cemeteries, bath houses and bathing pools and beaches, waterworks, gas works, electric-light 906 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. plants, etc. The value o f streets and sewers, however, has not been included. Investigation revealed the fact that but few cities keep any record o f the value o f city property; hence the figures in this table are largely estimates based on the best judgment o f the various city officials who furnished this information. Table X X V .— P er capita debt, assessed valuation o f property, and expenditures f o r m aintenance.--This is the last table o f the series, and shows per capita the net debt, assessed valuation o f real and personal property, and certain o f the detailed expenditures for maintenance, together with the total fo r the same. Am ong these detailed expendi tures are shown the per capita expenditures for maintenance o f the police department, etc., the fire department, schools, municipal light ing, and streets except lighting. The per capita expenditures for all other items o f maintenance are combined in the next column, and the column showing the total per capita expenditure for maintenance is the final one in the table. It is deemed necessary in connection with the other explanations relating to the general tables to refer to unusual conditions found in some o f the cities covered. In Paterson, N. J ., the data in many respects differ considerably from those given in last year’s report. These differences are to be accounted fo r mainly by the fact that the fire o f February 9 and 10, 1902, which destroyed a large section o f the city, also destroyed many o f the records from which these data were secured. F or this reason the figures for the present year are in many instances estimates, but they are the most reliable that could be secured under the circumstances. In W heeling, W . Va., owing to a conflict in authority between certain o f the officials o f that city, it was difficult to secure reliable data relative to that city’s affairs. Estimates have been resorted to in many instances as the most reliable data obtainable. The population o f Galveston, T ex., was largely reduced by the deaths and departures on account o f the destructive flood which occurred there in September, 1900. It has been thought best, how ever, to include this city among the number considered in these reports. Some difficulty has been encountered in past years by readers o f these reports in not being able to refer readily to particular cities concerning which they were interested owing to the arrangement o f the data in the tables according to the size o f the cities included. The arrangement o f last year has been adhered to in the present report. It will be seen, however, by reference to the tables, that each city has been given a marginal number. These numbers, taken in connection with the follow ing table in which the 137 cities are arranged alphabetically, will obviate the difficulty experienced in con nection with previous reports. F or example, should the reader desire STATISTICS OF CITIES 907 to refer to the data in the tables relating to Lancaster, Pa., reference to the follow ing table in which Lancaster is shown, in its proper alphabetical position, furnishes the information that for this city the marginal number used in the tables is 90. Reference to that number in each o f the tables, I to X X V , will give the data fo r that city. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF CITIES AND THE MARGINAL NUMBER ASSIGNED TO EACH. Cities. Akron, O hio............ Albany, N . Y .......... Allegheny, P a ......... Allentown, P a ......... Altoona, Pa.............. Atlanta, Ga.............. Auburn, N. Y .......... Augusta, G a ............ Baltimore, Md......... Bayonne, N . J ......... Binghamton, N. Y .. Birmingham, A la ... Boston, M ass.......... Bridgeport, Conn. . . Brockton, Mass....... Buffalo, N .Y ............ Butte, M o n t............ Cambridge, Mass ... Camden, N .J .......... Canton, O h io.......... Charleston, S. C. . Chattanooga, T enn. Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a .............. Chicago, 111.............. Cincinnati, Ohio___ Cleveland, O h io___ Columbus, O h io ___ Covington, K y ......... Dallas, T e x .............. Davenport, Iowa . . . Dayton, O h io.......... Denver. C o lo .......... Des Moines, Iow a... Detroit, M ich.......... Dubuque, Iow a....... Duluth, Minn.......... East St.Louis,111.. . Elizabeth, N .J ......... Elmira, N .Y ............ Erie, Pa.................... Evansville, Ind ....... Fall River, Mass — Fitchburg, Mass___ Fort Wayne,Ind . . . Galveston, T e x ....... Grand Rapids, Mich Harrisburg, P a ....... Hartford, Conn....... Haverhill, Mass....... Hoboken, N .J ......... Holyoke, Mass......... Houston, T ex.......... Indianapolis, I n d ... Jersey City,N.J — Johnstown, Pa......... Joliet, 111................. Kansas City, Kans.. Kansas City, Mo — Knoxville,Tenn . . . Lancaster, Pa.......... Lawrence, Mass — Lincoln, N e b r......... Little Rock, Ark— Los Angeles, Cal— Louisville, K y ......... Lowell, M ass.......... Lynn, Mass.............. McKeesport, Pa — Marginal number used in tables. 87 40 27 113 96 43 134 94 6 124 5 54 92 8 132 41 52 131 68 135 117 118 2 10 7 28 86 88 114 45 25 59 13 107 72 136 74 112 73 64 33 127 83 102 44 77 49 104 63 82 85 21 17 111 137 76 22 125 90 57 91 100 36 18 39 55 115 Cities. Malden, Mass........................................ Manchester, N. H .................................. Memphis, Tenn..................................... Milwaukee, W is ................................... Minneapolis, Minn................................ Mobile, A la ........................................... Montgomery, A la................................. Nashville, T e n n ................................... Newark, N .J.......................................... New Bedford, M ass.............................. New Haven, Conn................................ New Orleans, La................................... Newton, Mass........................................ New York, N .Y ..................................... Norfolk, Y a........................................... Oakland, C a l........................................ Omaha, N ebr........................................ Paterson, N .J........................................ Pawtucket, R. I ..................................... Peoria, 111............................................. Philadelphia, P a .................................. Pittsburg, P a ........................................ Portland, M e ........................................ Portland, O r e g ..................................... Providence, R. I ................................... Quincy, 111............................................. Reading, P a .......................................... Richmond, V a ...................................... Rochester, N. Y ..................................... Rockford, 111.......................................... Saginaw, M ich...................................... St. Joseph, M o ....................................... St. Louis, Mo.......................................... St. Paul, M in n ...................................... Salem. M ass.......................................... Salt Lake City, Utah............................. San Antonio, T ex.................................. San Francisco, Cal................................ Savannah, Ga........................................ Schenectady, N. Y ................................ Scranton, Pa.......................................... Seattle, Wash........................................ Sioux City, I o w a ................................. Somerville, M ass.................................. South Bena, Ind ................................... Spokane, W ash..................................... Springfield, 111....................................... Springfield, Mass................................... Springfield, O h io .................................. Superior, W is........................................ Syracuse, N . Y ...................................... Tacoma, W ash...................................... Taunton, Mass....................................... Terre Haute,‘' I n d ................................. Toledo, Ohio.......................................... Topeka, Kans........................................ Trenton, N .J ........................................ Troy, N . Y ............................................. Utica, N .Y ............................................. Washington, D. C ................................. Waterbury, C onn................................. Wheeling, W. Va................................... Wilkesbarre, Pa......................... .......... Wilmington, Del................................... Worcester, M ass................................... Yonkers, N .Y ........................................ York, P a ................................................ Youngstown, Ohio................................ Marginal number used in tables. 120 65 37 14 19 98 133 47 16 58 31 12 122 1 80 56 35 32 95 67 8 11 78 42 20 108 50 46 24 129 89 34 4 23 110 70 71 9 69 126 38 48 123 61 109 105 116 60 101 128 30 103 130 106 26 121 53 62 66 15 81 97 75 51 29 79 119 84 908 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able I.—INCORPORATION, POPULATION, AND AREA. Mar ginal num ber. Population Estimated Incoi sorpo- at Twelfth population, ra1.ted. Census, June 1,1900. Jan. 1,1902. Cities. New York. N .Y ....... Chicago, 111.............. Philadelphia, P a ___ St. Lopis, M o ............ Boston, Mass............ Baltimore, Md.......... Cleveland, Ohio....... Buffalo, N .Y ............ San Francisco, C al.. Cincinnati, O h io___ Pittsburg, P a ............ New Orleans, L a ___ Detroit, M ich............ Milwaukee, W is....... Washington, D. C . . . Newark, N. J ............ Jersey City, N. J ....... Louisville, K y.......... Minneapolis, M inn.. Providence. R. I ....... Indianapolis, Ind . . . Kansas City, M o....... St. Paul, Minn.......... Rochester, N . Y ....... Denver, C olo............ Toledo, O h io............ Allegheny, Pa.......... Columbus, O h io....... Worcester, Mass....... Syracuse, N .Y .......... New Haven, C onn... Paterson, N. J .......... Fall River, Mass....... St. Joseph, Mo.......... Omaha, Nebr............ Los Angeles, Cal....... Memphis, Tenn......... Scranton, Pa.............. Lowell, M ass............ Albany, N. Y ............ Cambridge, M ass___ Portland, Oreg.......... Atlanta, Ga.................... Grand Rapids, M ich___ Dayton, O h io............... Richm ond,Ya.............. Nashville, T e n n .......... Seattle, W ash............... Hartford, Conn............ Reading, P a ................. Wilmington, D e l......... Camden, N .J ................ Trenton, N .J ................ Bridgeport, Conn......... Lynn, Mass................... Oakland, C al............... Lawrence, M ass.......... New Bedford, Mass___ Des Moines, Iowa......... Springfield, Mass......... Somerville, M ass......... Troy, N .Y .................... Hoboken, N .J .............. Evansville, In d ............ Manchester, N. H ......... Utica, N .Y .................... Peoria, 111..................... Charleston, S. C............ Savannah, G a .............. Salt Lake City, U tah... San Antonio, T e x ....... Duluth, M in n .............. Erie, P a ........................ Elizabeth, N. J ............ Wilkesbarre, P a .......... Kansas City, K a n s___ Harrisburg, P a ............ Portland, Me..... ......... 1902 1837 1887 1822 1822 1898 1836 1832 1900 1819 1816 1896 1883 1846 1791 1857 1871 1828 1867 1832 1891 1889 1854 1834 1893 1851 1840 1834 1848 1847 1784 1871 1854 1885 1857 1889 1879 1866 1836 1900 1846 1898 1874 1850 1840 1742 1883 1890 1784 1847 1832 1828 1874 1836 1850 1854 1853 1847 1867 1852 1872 1901 1855 1893 1846 1832 1892 1783 1789 1860 1870 1887 1851 1863 1871 1886 1860 1832 3,437,202 1,698,575 1,293,697 575,238 560,892 508,957 381,768 352,387 342,782 325,902 321,616 287,104 285,704 285,315 278.718 246,070 206,433 204,731 202.718 175,597 169,164 163,762 163,065 162,608 133,859 131,822 129,896 • 125,560 118,421 108,374 108,027 105,171 104,863 102,979 102,555 102,479 102,320 102,026 94.969 94,151 91,886 90,426 89,872 87,565 85,333 85,050 80,865 80,671 79,850 78,961 76,508 75,935 73,307 70,996 68,513 66,960 62,559 62,442 62,139 62,059 61,643 60,651 59,364 59,007 56,987 56,383 56,100 55,807 54,244 53,531 53,321 52.969 52,733 52,130 51,721 51,418 50,167 50,145 Area (acres). Land. 3,583,930 209.218.00 1,800,000 115.164.00 1,335,000 83,340.12 595.000 39.276.80 573,579 26.247.00 520.000 19,290.24 390.000 21.040.00 370.000 26,884.54 350.000 29.760.00 340.000 22.560.00 333.500 18,171.17 (a) 300.000 18,474.64 300.000 297.500 14,205.71 287.000 38,419.20 255.000 8,058.45 213,577 8.053.00 215.000 12.800.00 210.000 11,357.60 178.000 182.500 17.792.00 16.640.00 172.500 170.000 i l S s . oo 170.000 140.000 18.284.80 150.000 4.800.00 133.000 10.400.00 132.500 21.172.80 121.000 10.498.00 120,000 14.340.00 112,000 5.357.00 107,587 26.240.00 107.000 6.208.00 103.500 15.580.00 110.000 110,000 527,647.19 10.240.00 107.500 (a) 103.000 7.215.00 94,969 6,913.70 100.000 94,084 4.016.01 94.000 94.000 95.000 90.000 92.000 81,320 90.000 81,619 82.000 78.500 80,000 75.000 77.000 70.000 75.000 65.000 66.000 70.000 65.000 63.500 75,057 61.000 60,200 57,687 58.000 60.000 65.000 62.000 68,000 55.500 56.000 55.000 55.000 5.824.00 52.000 3,109.12 54.500 6.690.00 55.000 2,590.32 52.000 11,680.00 a Not reported. 6 Not including 3,015 acres Pf park outside City limits. Water. 7.076.00 1.593.00 1.004.00 964.48 150.00 5.715.00 47,760.00 1.247.00 (a) 225.36 213.49 5,900.80 3,898.30 2.370.00 348.00 320.00 (a) 332.00 (a) 19.20 400.00 1,827.20 309.00 100.00 49.50 746.00 282.90 166.47 (a) 350.00 400.00 107.00 2,050.00 110.00 1,029.00 555.00 670.00 300.00 >2.00 551.80 697.60 100.00 943.00 (a) 50.00 6.00 65.00 544.00 8 150.00 1,882.31 Total. a 122,240.00 84,933.12 39.276.80 27.251.00 20,254.72 21.190.00 32,599.54 77.520.00 22.560.00 19,418.17 122,240.00 18.700.00 14,419.20 44.320.00 11,956.75 10.423.00 12.800.00 34,227.58 11,705.60 18,112.00 16.640.00 35.483.30 11.635.00 30.208.00 18.304.00 5.200.00 10.400.00 23,000.00 10.807.00 14.340.00 5.357.00 26.240.00 6.208.00 15.680.00 527,696.69 10.240.00 12,333.26 7.961.00 7,196.60 4,182.48 25.600.00 7.040.00 11.200.00 6.880.00 3.926.00 6.092.00 21.237.80 , 11 102.00 3.965.00 6.514.00 5.029.00 4.481.30 8.576.00 7,251.20 4^77.00 12.373.00 35.264.00 24,661.30 2.700.80 6.767.00 (a) 3.840.00 21.700.00 6.400.00 5.303.00 3.276.80 4.320.00 32.896.00 23.040.00 40.960.00 4,426.69 5.824.00 3,109.12 6.740.00 4,472.63 11.680.00 STATISTICS OF 909 CITIES, T able I.—INCORPORATION, POPULATION, AND AREA—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Population Estimated at Twelfth copulation, Census, Junel,1900. ran. 1,1902. 1895 1845 1853 1873 1894 1868 1899 1834 1836 1899 1890 1818 1901 1881 1867 1798 1886 1867 1836 1897 1871 1875 1850 1901 1890 1870 1891 1899 1857 1895 1901 1836 1889 1864 1889 1851 1891 1840 1857 1901 1900 1882 1858 1873 1886 1872 1891 1798 1872 1889 1852 1864 1854 1888 1838 1848 1869 1863 1852 47,931 46,624 45,859 45,712 45,115 44,885 44,633 42,938 42,728 42,638 42.345 41,459 40,169 40,063 39,647 39,441 39,231 38,973 38,878 38.469 38.415 38,307 38.253 37,789 37,714 37,175 36,848 36,673 36,297 36,252 35,999 35,956 35,936 35,672 35.416 35.254 34,227 34,159 34,072 33,988 33,708 33,664 33,608 33,587 33,111 32,722 32,637 31,682 31,531 31,091 31,051 31,036 30,667 30.470 30.346 30,345 30,154 29,655 29,353 a Not reported. 9398—No. 42—02-----3 51.000 55.000 48,139 47,612 51.000 60.000 50.000 43.500 45.000 50.000 45.000 41,459 42.500 42.500 41.000 41.000 40,630 40.000 40.000 38,800 41.000 41.500 40.000 28.000 40.000 37,175 40.000 40.000 37.500 38.000 42,700 36,250 40.000 36.500 36.000 36.500 37.500 36.000 35,264 35.000 37.000 34,664 34.500 36,336 35.500 35.000 34.500 37.500 32.000 32.000 32.000 31,036 33.000 32.000 31.500 35.000 32.000 35.000 32.000 Area (acres). Land. 2.086.5 3,615.3 9,848.68 3.100.00 6.144.00 6.500.00 1.495.00 7.456.00 5.120.00 2,^60.00 5.144.00 13.764.00 6.210.00 2.364.00 6,721.60 1,662.31 2.698.00 3.125.00 4,053.30 7.328.00 5.760.00 7.494.00 19.439.00 20,431.15 3,^0.75 7.040.00 3,653.8~ 4.850.5 4.600.00 2,475.98 4.546.00 1,999.27 5.052.00 2.245.00 3.840.00 1.441.00 3,000.00 2.210.00 3.047.00 4.250.00 9.986.00 30.580.00 2.530.00 2.690.00 2.880.00 17.528.00 5,(<&.00 32,000.00 4.350.00 1.350.00 1.792.00 2,(472.00 3.840.00 2.472.00 Water. 615.32 200.00 .260.00 («) 60.00 190.00 196.00 47.00 2,000.00 325.00 640.00 160.00 48.85 (a) 640.00 134.00 217.35 201.00 82.00 32.00 25.00 1.534.00 140.00 1.240.00 10.00 120.00 200.00 (a) 100.00 48.00 Total. 13.400.00 2,396.57 3,615.33 10.464.00 3.300.00 6.144.00 5.760.00 1.495.00 7.456.00 5.120.00 7,891.20 2.560.00 5.144.00 13.824.00 6.400.00 2.560.00 5,721.60 1,662.31 2,745. 6,125. 4,053. 7.653. 5.760. 8,134. 19,599. 20,480. 12,960. 3.440. 7,680. 3.653. 4,984. (a) I8 8 88 88 88 8S 88 S S 3 8 S 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 79 Yonkers, N .Y ....... . 80 Norfolk, Y a .......... . 81 Waterbury, Conn .. 82 Holyoke, M ass___ 83 Fort Wayne, Ind ... 84 Youngstown, O h io. 85 Houston, T e x ........ 86 Covington, K y....... 87 Akron, Ohio............ 88 Dallas, T e x ............. 89 Saginaw, M ich....... 90 Lancaster, P a ........ 91 Lincoln, N ebr........ 92 Brockton, Mass....... 93 Binghamton, N. Y .. Augusta, G a............ Pawtucket, R. I ___ 96 Altoona, P a ............ 97 Wheeling, W. Y a ... Mobile, A l a ............ Birmingham, A la .. 100 Little Rock, Ark ... 101 Springfield, O h io... 102 Galveston, T ex ....... 103 Tacoma, W ash....... 104 Haverhill, Mass___ 105 Spokane, W ash....... 106 Terre Haute, I n d ... 107 Dubuque, I o w a __ 108 Quincy, 111............. 109 South Bend, Ind ... 110 Salem, Mass............ 111 Johnstown, P a ....... 112 Elmira, N .Y ........... 113 Allentown, Pa....... . 114 Davenport, Io w a ... 115 McKeesport, P a __ 116 Springfield, 111....... . 117 Chelsea, Mass.......... 118 Chester, Pa............. 119 York, Pa.................. 120 Malden, Mass.......... 121 Topeka, Kans.......... 122 Newton, Mass........ 123 Sioux City, Io w a ... 124 Bayonne, N. J ........ 125 Knoxville, Tenn ... 126 Schenectady, N. Y . . 127 Fitchburg, Mass— 128 Superior, W is.......... 129 Rockford, 111.......... 130 Taunton, M ass___ 131 Canton, Ohio.......... 132 Butte, M ont.......... . 133 Montgomery, A l a .. 134 Auburn, N. Y ....... . 135 Chattanooga, Tenn. 136 East St. Louis, 111... 137 Joliet, 111................. Inco] rate 2,693. 4,747. 2,081. 5,052. 2,277. 3.840. 1.441. 3.000. 2.250. 3,072. 4.250. 11,520. 30,720. 3,770. 2,600. 3.000. 17,728. 23,335. 5,184. 32,000. 4.350. 1.350. 1,792. 5.760. 2,696. 3.840. 2,520. 910 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able II.—DATES OF ENDING OF YEARS COVERED BY THE INVESTIGATION. Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Cities. Dates of ending of years covered by investigation. New York, N. Y .......... Schools, July 31,1901; libraries, June 30,1901, to Apr. 30,1902; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Chicago, 111................. Schools, June 30,1901; library, June 1,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31.1901. Philadelphia, P a ....... Dec. 31,1901. St. Louis, M o............... Health department, Dec. 31,1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; library, Apr. 30,1902; all other departments, Apr. 7,1902. Boston, M ass.............. Police department, Nov. 30,1901; liquor licenses, Apr. 30,1902; health department, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Jan. 31,1902. Baltimore, Md............ Dec. 31,1901. Cleveland^ O h io......... Divorces, July 1,1901; schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Buffalo, N .Y .............. Police and health departments, parks, streets, libraries, and public works, Dec. 31,1901;(a) all other departments, June 30,1901. San Francisco, Cal___ June 30,1901. Cincinnati, O h io ....... Divorces and library and library-fund items, June 30,1901; schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Pittsburg, P a .............. Fire and health departments, Dec. 31,1901; schools, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Jan. 31,1902. New Orleans, L a ....... Schools, June 30,1901; building permits, Aug. 31,1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. Detroit, M ich.............. Fire alarms, fires, property loss, street railways, and libraries, Dec. 31, 1901; all other departments, June 30,1901. Milwaukee, W is......... Police department, Mar. 31,1902; schools and library, Aug. 31,1901: all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Washington, D. C....... June 30,1901. Newark, N .J .............. Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Jersey City, N .J ......... Police, fire, and health departments, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Louisville, K y ............ Parks, Nov. 30,1901; schools, June 30,1901; school-fund items, public works, and sinking fund, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Aug. 31.1901. Minneapolis, Minn . . . Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Providence, R. I ......... Police, fire, and health departments, charities, and building permits, Dec. 31,1901; divorces, Sept. 21,1901; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Sept. 30,1901. Indianapolis, I n d ___ Divorces, schools, and library, and school and library fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Kansas City, M o ......... Health department, Dec. 31,1901; schools, and library and school fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Apr. 21,1902. St. Paul, M in n ............ Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Rochester, N .Y .......... Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Denver, C o lo .............. Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Toledo, Ohio............... Divorces, July 1,1901; schools, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31.1901. Allegheny, P a ............ Schools and school-fund items, June 1,1901; all other departments, Feb. 28.1902. Columbus, O h io ......... Marriages and births, Mar. 31,1901; divorces, June 30,1901; schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Worcester, M ass......... Liquor licenses, May 1,1902; divorces and health department, Dec. 31, 1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Syracuse, N .Y ............ Schools, July 31,1901; library, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. New Haven, Conn___ Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Paterson, N . J ............ Health department and schools and charities, Feb. 28,1902; library and library-fund items, Feb. 1,1902; all other departments, Mar. 20,1902. Fall River, Mass......... Dec. 31,1901. St. Joseph, M o ............ Police and health departments and charities, Apr. 15,1902; fire alarms, fires, and property loss, Dec. 31,1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30, 1901; library, Apr. 30,1902; all other departments, Apr. 21, 1901. Omaha, Nebr.............. Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Los Angeles, C a l....... Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; marriages and divorces, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Memphis, T e n n ......... Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; library, Nov. 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Scranton, P a ..............‘ Police department, Feb. 1,1902; health department and library, Dec. 31,1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other depart ments, Apr. 7,1902. Lowell, Mass.............. Police department and liquor licenses, June 1,1902; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. Albany, N. Y .............. Police, fire, and health departments and public works, Oct. 31,1901; liquor licenses, May 1,1902; schools, Aug. 31,1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. Cambridge, Mass....... Health department and schools, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. a Not including 1 library, June 30,1901. STATISTICS OF CITIES. 911 T able II.—DATES OP ENDING OF YEARS COVERED BY THE INVESTIGATION—Continued. Mar ginal num ber. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Cities. Dates of ending of years covered-by investigation. Portland, Oreg.......... Schools, June 30,1901; school-fund items, Jan. 10,1902; all other depart-* ments, Dec. 31,1901. Atlanta, G a ............... Schools, June 10,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Grand Rapids, M ich.. Marriages, Dec. 31,1901; schools and library, Aug. 31,1901; school and library fund items, Sept. 26,1901; financial statements, Apr. 19,1902; all other departments, Apr. 30,1902. Dayton, Ohio............. Divorces, June 30,1901; health department and public works, Dec. 31, 1901; schools and library, Aug. 81, 1901; all other departments, Feb. 28,1902. Richmond, V a .......... Schools, July 31, 1901; financial statements, Jan. 81, 1902; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Nashville, Tenn......... Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Seattle, W ash ............ Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Hartford, Conn.......... Liquor licenses, May 5,1902; divorces, June 30, 1901; health depart ment, Feb. 28,1902; parks, May 1,1901; schools, June 5 to 26,1901; (a) waterworks, Mar. 1,1902; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. Reading, Pa............... Police, fire, and health departments, and building permits, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, Feb. 23,1902; all other departments, Apr. 7,1902. Wilmington, D e l....... Fire department, May 15,1902; health department, parks, and water works, Dec. 31,1901; streets, sewers, and street railways, Jan. 31,1902; library, Feb. 28,1902; building permits, Apr. 30,1902; all other depart ments, June 30, 1901. Camden, N. J ............ Fire and health departments and library, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Jan. 31,1902. Trenton, N. J.............. Health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, Aug. 31,1902; school-fund items, June 30,1901; waterworks, Jan. 31,1902; all other departments, Feb. 28,1902. Bridgeport, Conn....... Liquor licenses, June 30,1902; divorces, July 1,1902; health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, July 14, 1902; library, June 1, 1902; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. Lynn, Mass................. Financial statements, Dec. 19,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Oakland, Cal.............. June 30,1901. Lawrence, Mass......... Liquor licenses, Apr. 30,1902; schools, June 30,1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. New Bedford, Mass... Police and fire departments and public works, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 30,1901: all other departments, Dec. 1,1901. Des Moines, I o w a ___ Health department and library, Dec. 81,1901; schools, June 2,1901; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. Springfield, Mass....... Health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 28,1901; all other de partments, Dec. 10,1901. Somerville, Mass....... Dec. 31,1901. Troy, N. Y ................... Liquor licenses, Apr. 30,1902; schools in Lansingburg district, July 31, 1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Hoboken, N. J .......... Police, fire, and health departments, parks, streets, library, and public works, Apr. 30,1902; schools, June 30, 1901; all other departments, May 5,1902. Evansville, I n d ......... Police, fire, and health departments, Mar. 31,1902; marriages, divorces, street railways, and library, Dec. 31,1901; schools, July 31,1901; all other departments, Aug. 31,1901. Manchester, N. H ___ Schools, June 24,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Utica, N. Y ................. Police and fire departments, and police and fire department fund items, Mar. 31,1902; health department, liquor licenses, parks, and streets, Dec. 31,1901; schools, July 31,1901; library, June, 30,1901; charities, and charity-fund items, Mar. 1,1902; all other departments, Oct. 1, 1901. Peoria, 111.................. Parks and library and park and library fund items, May 31, 1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Charleston, S. C ......... Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Savannah, G a ............ Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Salt Lake City, Utah . Schools and school-fund items, June 30, 1901; library, May 31, 1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. San Antonio, T e x ___ Schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31, 1901; all other departments, May 31,1901. Duluth, M in n ............ Schools, July 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Erie, P a ..................... Police and fire departments, and streets and parks, Mar. 31,1901; mar riages, divorces, street railways, health department, public works, ana water-fund items, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 26,1901; school and library fund items, June 3,1901; financial statements, Apr. 1,1901. Elizabeth, N. J .......... Health department- and building permits, Dec. 31,1901; all other de partments, June 30,1901. Wilkesbarre, P a......... Fire and health departments, marriages, divorces, and building permits, Dec. 31, 1901; schools and school-fund items, June 3,1901; all other departments, Apr. 7,1902. Kansas City, Kans___ Schools and school-fund items, June 30, 1901; all other departments, Mar. 31 1902. Harrisburg, Pa........... Schools, Junei, 1902; all other departments, Apr. 7,1902. a Not including high schools, Mar. 31,1902. 912 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Table IL—DATES OF ENDING OF YEARS COVERED BY THE INVESTIGATION—Continued. Mar ginal num ber. 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 Cities. Dates of ending of years covered by investigation. Portland, M e.............. Health department, Nov. 31,1902; marriages, births, and divorces, Jan. 1,1902; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Yonkers, N. Y ............ Health department and charities, Apr. 30,1902; schools, Aug. 31,1901; library, June 30,1901; waterworks, Nov. 30, 1901; all other depart ments, Feb. 28,1902. Norfolk, V a ............... Schools, July 31,1901; all other departments, June 30,1901. Waterbury, Conn....... Dec. 31,1901. Holyoke, M ass.......... Schools, June 30,1901; public works and water-fund items, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Fort Wayne, I n d ....... Marriages and divorces, June 30,1901; schools and school and library fund items, July 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Youngstown, O h io.. . Police, fire, and health departments, street railways, and charities, Dec. 31, 1901; divorces, July 1,1901; parks and streets, Feb. 28,1902; schools, Aug. 31,1901; waterworks, Mar. 31, 1902; all other depart ments, Mar. 17,1902. Houston, T e x ............ Police department, Apr. 30,1902; schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Covington, K y............ Marriages and divorces, Sept. 15,1901; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Akron, Ohio............... Fire department and marriages, Dec. 31,1901; health department, Mar. 31,1902; schools, Aug. 31,1901; all other departments, Mar. 20,1902. Dallas, T ex................. Schools, June 30.1901; all other departments, Apr. 30,1902. Saginaw, M ich.......... Marriages and births, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, June 30,1901. Lancaster, P a ............ Health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 1,1902; all other de partments, Feb. 28,1902. Lincoln, N ebr............ Births, June 30,1902; schools, June 30,1901; library, May 31,1902; ceme teries, Apr. 30,1902; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. Brockton, Mass.......... Schools, Sept., 1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Binghamton, N. Y . .. Police and health departments, charities, public works, and building permits, Dec. 31,1901; fire department, Jan. 31,1902; schools, July 31, 1901; all other departments, June 30,1901. Augusta, Ga............... Fire department and financial statements, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 15,1901; charities and public works, Nov. 30,1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 1,1901. Pawtucket, R. I ......... Divorces, Sept. 21,1901; health department, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Sept. 30,1901. Altoona, P a ............... Health department, Dec. 31,1901; schools, June 4,1901; all other de partments, Apr. 7,1902. Wheeling, W. Va....... Schools and school and library fund items, July 31,1901; library, Apr. 5, 1902; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Mobile, A l a ............... Schools, Aug. 31,1901; health department and charities, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Mar. 15,1902. Birmingham, A la ___ Police department, May 1, 1902; schools and libraries, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Little Rock, A r k ....... Park-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30, 1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Springfield, Ohio....... Fire department, Apr. 15,1902; divorces, June 30,1901; health depart ment, Dec. 31, 1901; schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31, 1901; • library, Apr. 30,1901; all other departments, Mar. 3,1902. Galveston, T ex.......... Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; financial statements, Feb. 28,1902; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Tacoma, Wash.......... Schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Haverhill, Mass........ Schools, June 30, 1901; waterworks, Nov. 30, 1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. Spokane, Wash.......... Police department and schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Terre Haute, I n d ....... Police department, Feb. 28,1902; schools and library, July 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Dubuque, Io w a .......... Schools, June 30,1901; school-fund items, Jan. 31,1902; all other depart ments, Feb. 28,1902. Quincy, 111.................. Schools, June 9,1902; library, May 31,1902; all other departments, Apr. 30,1902. South Bend, Ind......... Marriages and divorces, June 30,1901; schools and library and school and library fund items, July 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31, 1901. Salem, M ass............... Schools, June 30, 1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Johnstown, Pa............ Police, fire, and health departments, Dec. 31,1901: schools and schoolfund items, June 4,1901; all other departments, Apr. 1,1902. Elmira, N .Y ............... Liquor licenses, Apr. 30, 1902; health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, July 31,1901; all other departments, Feb. 3,1902. Allentown, P a ............ Liquor licenses, health department, and building permits, Dec. 31, 1901; schools and school-fund items, June 30,1901; all other depart ments, Apr. 7,1902. Davenport, I o w a ....... Parks and streets, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 30, 1901; school-fund items, Feb. 10,1902; all other departments, Feb. 28,1902. McKeesport, Pa.......... Health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 4,1901; all other de partments, Apr. 7,1902. Springfield, 111............ Schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; bonds and sinking fund, Sept. 30,1901; all other departments, Feb, 28,1902. STATISTICS OS' CITIES. 913 Table II.—DATES OF ENDING OF YEARS COVERED BY THE INVESTIGATION—Concluded; Mar ginal nmnber. Cities. 117 118 119 Chelsea, Mass. Chester, P a ... York, P a....... . 120 M alden, Mass. 121 Topeka, Kans. 122 123 Newton, Mass__ Sioux City, Iowa. 124 Bayonne, N. J. 126 K noxville, Tenn......... 126 Schenectady, N. Y ___ 127 Fitchburg, Mass 128 Superior, Wis 129 R ockford, 111.., 130 Taunton, Mass. 131 Canton, Ohio .. 132 Butte, M on t............... 133 134 M ontgomery, A la....... Auburn, N. Y .............. 135 Chattanooga, T enn. . . 136 East St. Louis, 111....... 137 Joliet, 111.................... Dates o f ending of years covered by investigation. Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Schools, June 4,1901; all other departments, Apr. 1,1902. Police, fire, ana health departments, Dec. 31,1901; liquor licenses, Jan. 21, 1902; schools and school-fund items, June 1, 1901; all other de partments, Apr. 8,1902. Dec. 31,1901. Schools ana school-fund items, June 30, 1901; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Schools, June 8, 1901; library, Dec. 31, 1901; all other departments, Mar. 31,1902. P olice and health departments, parks, streets, and public works, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 30, 1901; library, July 31, 1901; all other de partments, Apr. 30,1902. Schools, June 30,1901; all other departments, Jan. 22,1902. Liquor licenses, May 1, 1902; schools, June 20,1901; all other depart ments, Dec. 31,1901. Health department, Dec. 31, 1901; schools, June 30, 1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. P olice and health departments, parks, streets, and charities, Dec. 31, 1901; schools and library, June 30,1901; all other departments, Sept. 30,1901. Schools, June 30, 1901; library, June 1, 1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Health department and schools, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Nov. 30,1901. Fire department and waterworks, Mar. 1,1902; marriages and street railways, Dec. 31, 1901; divorces, July 10, 1901; health department, Feb. 28,1902; schools, Aug. 31,1901; charities, Feb. 28,1902; all other departments.Mar. 17,1902. Schools and school-fund items, Aug. 31,1901; library, Mar. 30,1902; all other departments, Apr. 30,1902. Sept. 30,1901. P olice department, Nov. 30,1901; schools and school-fund items, July 31,1901; all other departments, Dec. 31,1901. Schools and charities, June 30, 1901; building permits and financial statements, Dec. 31,1901; all other departments, Sept. 30,1901. Fire department, Dec. 31,1901; schools and school-fund items, July 12, 1901; library, May. 31,1902; all other departments, Feb. 28,1902. Apr. 30,1902. 914 BULLETIN OB' THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able III.—POLICE, RETAIL LIQUOR SALOONS, AND ARRESTS, BY CAUSES. [In this table drunkenness includes “ com m on drunk,” “ drunk and disorderly,” and all cases where drunkenness in any form was the prim ary cause o f arrest; disturbing the peace includes all cases o f disorderly conduct not attributable to drunkenness; assault and battery includes all cases o f assault; vagrancy includes arrests o f beggars, tramps, loafers, loiterers, and all persons w ithout apparent means of support; housebreaking includes burglary and all cases o f breaking and entering, and larceny includes pocket picking, robbery, and all cases o f theft.] Mar gin al num ber. Cities. Licensed retail liquor saloons. Po lice Drunk men. en Num Amt. ness. ber. of li cense. Arrests fo r Dis turb ing the peace As sault Hom Va House Lar and icide. gran break ceny. ing. bat cy. tery. All Total other ar of rests. fen ses. New York, N. Y .. 7,233 10,821 71,573 28,515 10,338 629 6,976 1,896 10,403 3,419 138,749 Chicago, 111......... 62,974 6,740 032,482 (d) 6,020 819 1,831 6,776 21,844 69,809 37 Philadelphia, P a . 2,822 1,737 1,100 30,428 7,818 3,540 213 4,933 8,825 61,189 60 5,372 St. Louis, M o.. 1,264 2,253 500 4,068 6,395 609 61 1,805 228 1,753 8,747 23,666 Boston, M ass.. 980 («) 19,511 1,245 915 2,503 32 311 617 2,921 7,690 34,500 Baltimore, Md 250 10,225 5,220 3,910 947 2,095 21 351 1292,708 8,859 31,423 Cleveland, O h io.. /361 1,820 350 10,192 221 796 1,076 31 231 1,612 5,060 19,219 Buffalo, N. Y 500 11,289 4,113 1,100 0732 2,570 19 2,824 238 2,006 3,468 25,057 San Francisco, Cal. 586 8,052 84 14,742 1,907 1,300 55 2,127 246 957 6,028 27,362 Cincinnati, Ohio . 486 1,676 73 705 5,292 12,913 550 39 2,795 350 1,928 1,531 Pittsburg, Pa 572 1,100 15,040 1,319 497 194 25 1,370 28 229 4,862 23,067 New Orleans, La . 271 1,496 (A) 5,157 4,692 35 577 3,883 17,221 47 2,154 676 Detroit, M ich 492 1,252 61 799 2,114 7,795 622 5 259 500 2,043 1,892 M ilwaukee, W is.. 314 1,869 51 408 200 1,901 1,207 481 5 883 824 5,260 492 W ashington, D. C. 607 12 2,196 400 4,072 5,647 3,383 179 2,485 *8,088 *26,062 Newark, N. J ....... 240 238 583 1,485 6.399 360 1,283 250 1,630 1,648 548 27 Jersey City, N. J .. 357 1,0 2 1 217 654 1,128 7,343 13 285 250 3,197 625 1,224 887 Louisville. K y___ 44 232 274 681 1,882 7,396 339 168 155 1,360 2,755 M inneapolis,M inn 212 351 1,000 2,090 241 2 70 423 1,391 5,292 579 496 Providence, R. I . 72 596 2,100 9,025 310 461 4 122 300 270 400 5,561 Indianapolis, Ind. 165 525 125 1,101 13 961 901 2,761 7,033 350 1,085 86 Kansas City, M o.. 222 162 933 3,877 16,230 475 20 4,549 290 250 1,333 5,066 St. Paul, Minn . . . 314 1,000 1,614 177 45 336 823 3,881 199 327 536 1 Rochester, N. Y .. 193 506 500 V ) (/) (J) U ) W (i) Denver, C olo. 85 361 18 1,640 $ 3 8 % 2,702 7,678 880 151 600 1,621 Toledo, O h io. 130 659 343 5 111 31 285 2,143 3,437 350 360 159 A llegheny, Pa 123 190 1,100 5 94 14 965 1,596 37 608 3,372 53 Columbus, O h io.. *136 533 655 237 5 372 21 241 1,718 3,968 350 719 W orcester, M ass.. 136 90 3,524 ' 115 317 6 62 58 272 647 5,001 Syracuse, N. Y . . . 394 % 1,321 129 51 517 1,234 3,676 362 147 1 43 New Haven,Conn. 162 405 2,544 68 442 1,193 6,229 6 5 198 773 Paterson, N. J ___ 98 481 (J) (J) V ) ( ') Fall R iver, M ass.. 120 98 (w) 64 96 % $50 % % 857 t t . St. Joseph, M o___ 63 155 1,000 704 612 43 230 106 3 248 970 2,916 Omaha, Nebr....... 93 220 1,000 69 363 2,598 7,615 2,559 459 376 3 1,188 Los Angeles, C al.. 93 200 223 6 525 61 261 1,261 5,898 555 600 3,006 Memphis, Tenn .. 94 646 770 322 113 476 1,774 4,734 610 26 643 Scranton, Pa P55 196 i % P i, 423 P191 P 37 P2 P113 Pl8 P62 P427 P 2,273 121 . 91 Low ell, M ass. 62 247 1 4,079 227 91 27 666 5.400 Albany, N. Y 158 413 (Uo 1,005 571 257 61 246 451 2,954 3 360 Cambridge, Mass. 110 1 1,620 176 101 406 8 268 687 3,267 Portland, O reg. . . 59 269 400 1,419 137 239 4 23 274 1,340 3,803 367 a From $100 to $800. 6 Not including data relating to sanitary district of Chicago. o Including arrests for disturbing the peace. d Included in arrests for drunkenness. e Innkeepers, $2,000; com m on victualers, $1,100; com m on victualers, second and third classes, $500. /N o t including 24 park policem en. f/N ot including 75 em ployed for 6 m onths. h From $100 to $1,000, according to am ount o f sales of preceding year. *Including 137 arrests for insanity. /N o t reported. * Including 8 detailed as sanitary inspectors. * Innkeepers, $1,500; first-class saloons, $2,000; second-class saloons, $500. >»For sale o f beer only, $200. wInnkeepers, $2,500; first-class saloons, $1,800; fourth-class saloons, $1,500. o Saloons, $50; in connection with other business, $35. p For 9 m onths only. a Innkeepers, $2,000; com m on victualers, $1,800. 915 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able III.—POLICE, RETAIL LIQUOR SALOONS, AND ARRESTS, BY CAUSES—Continued. [In this table drunkenness includes,**com m on drunk,” “ drunk and disorderly,” and all cases where drunkenness in any form was the prim ary cause o f arrest; disturbing the peace includes all cases o f disorderly conduct not attributable to drunkenness; assault and battery includes all cases o f assault; vagrancy includes arrests o f beggars, tramps, loafers, loiterers, and all persons without apparent means o f support; housebreaking includes burglary and all cases o f breaking and entering, ana larceny includes pocket picking, robbery, and all cases o f theft.] Mar gin al num ber. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 Cities. Po licemen. Atlanta, Ga.......... «161 Grand Rapids, M ich ................. 83 Dayton, O hio....... o89 Richm ond, Va . . . 100 Nashville, T en n .. 105 Seattle, Wash — 77 Hartford, C on n ... 98 46 Reading, Pa......... W ilm ington, D e l. 87 Camden, N. J....... 99 Trenton, N. J ....... 88 Bridgeport, Conn. 62 Lynn, Mass.......... 083 Oakland, C al....... 61 Lawrence, M ass.. 62 New Bedford, Mass................... ft 85 Des Moines, Iow a. 59 Springfield, Mass. 69 Som erville, M ass. 55 Troy N, V ___ 124 92 Hoboken, N. J — Evansville, In d ... 63 Manchester N. H 44 Utica, N. Y .......... 43 65 Peoria, 111............ Charleston, S. C .. 103 Savannah, Ga — m o Salt Lake City, U tah ................. 33 San A ntonio, T ex. 45 Duluth, M in n ___ 53 Erie, P a ............... 40 Elizabeth,N . J .. . 66 W ilkesbarre, P a .. 46 KansasCity,Kans. «65 Harrisburg, P a ... 37 Portland, M e .(c). 55 65 Yonkers, N. Y .... 75 N orfolk, Y a.......... Waterbury, Conn. 39 47 H olyoke, Mass— Arrests for— Licensed retail liquor saloons. Dis Drunk turb en ing Num Amt. the ber. o f li ness. peace cense. 23 2 2,439 211 37 1,081 1,344 258 475 (d) 1,360 799 1,144 72 2,136 1,958 1,433 600 1,020 1,797 153 /450 2,602 405 254 500 497 102 39 300 1,346 989 351 500 1,146 488 186 815 719 208 350 /450 1,036 159 454 1,500 2,904 155 263 400 1,333 156 119 2,500 1,321 115 197 82 2 348 1 9 162 20 2,405 8 1,139 149 1 122 136 3 3 10 190 2 65 2 17 3 60 25 119 ft$l,000 180 418 297 232 268 171 170 178 206 283 298 68 218 62 As sault Hom Va House Lar and icide. gran break ceny. ing. cy. bat tery. 4,163 8,642 510 350 58 78 54 (<) 1,200 289 362 292 500 250 75 246 210 500 500 223 200 (i) 116 1,200 264 (m) 168 1,000 550 137 250 220 550 144 60 550 199 141 203 45 350 P250 / 450 (*) 1,197 139 1,669 348 1,494 52 739 33 536 572 861 473 345 121 1,085 16 1,045 13 920 395 624 923 1,217 2,088 214 109 93 127 212 197 382 40 133 237 271 349 145 928 61 474 561 811 1,014 147 240 493 145 684 116 394 204 100 610 407 194 960 574 252 105 711 22 65 1,165 433 195 245 2,173 1,322 1,348 618 212 73 133 835 15 42 9 8 1 2 8 25 306 236 426 412 36 11 23 17 76 67 63 1 3 3 3 161 466 110 298 129 80 647 50 29 102 290 30 44 33 20 11 31 30 10 22 5 26 22 100 22 10 2 2 1 10 7 3 1 212 1,763 17,286 304 1,917 12 188 46 307 3,439 6,218 120 519 1,024 5,137 172 1,232 1,104 10,460 59 306 *5,315 *9,797 557 4,231 20 244 75 298 1,143 9 448 3,623 27 323 36 199 229 2,287 62 187 539 2,730 40 243 580 2,579 665 4,230 46 178 803 2,609 16 119 512 2,397 37 190 24 339 65 17 142 32 132 5 8 1 1 A ll Total other ar of rests. fen ses. 22 42 49 24 325 2,063 137 126 2,474 5,115 411 2,321 156 352 1,376 83 109 417 1,988 158 407 2,173 798 2,097 300 91 le 674 fcl,929 430 2,168 223 170 649 2,685 395 1,388 4,002 669 430 5,253 104 1,101 812 50 213 848 106 233 83 441 49 50 362 796 237 58 225 367 628 175 891 1,745 125 394 118 247 2,534 3,197 2,586 1,993 1,397 1,308 3,457 1,418 1,900 1,810 7,876 1,477 1,403 « Not including 22 supernumeraries. b For sale of beer only, $250. c Including 3 detailed as sanitary inspectors. d First-class saloons, $250; second-class saloons, $150; third-class saloons, $100; fourth-class saloons, $50. e Including technical arrests o f inmates of houses o f prostitution. / For sale o f beer only, $200. gN ot including 11 special policem en, ftNot including 20 special policem en. i Innkeepers, $1,500; saloons, $1,100 to $1,400. j Innkeepers, $1,800; others, $1,500. ft Including 535 technical arrests o f saloon keepers. i Including 24 paid by steamship companies. m$25 for m alt, $150 for alcoholic liquors. n Including 7 detailed as sanitary inspectors. ©Data are for 10months. , _ p And 5 per cent additional on rental value of buildings occupied; m alt liquors only, $300. 916 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able III.—POLICE, RETAIL LIQUOR SALOONS, AND ARRESTS, BY CAUSES—Continued. tn this table drunkenness includes “ comm on drunk,” “ drunk and disorderly,” and all cases £ ere drunkenness in any form was the primary cause of arrest; disturbing the peace includes all cases o f disorderly conduct not attributable to drunkenness; assault and battery includes all cases o f assault; vagrancy includes arrests o f beggars, tramps, loafers, loiterers, and all persons without apparent means o f support; housebreaking includes burglary and all cases o f breaking and entering, and larceny includes pocket picking, robbery, and all cases of theft.] Marginal num ber. Cities. 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 Fort W ayne, Ind. Youngstown,Ohio Houston, T e x ___ Covington, K y . . . Akron, O hio......... Dallas, T ex.......... Saginaw, M ich . . . Lancaster, Pa....... L incoln, Nebr___ Brockton, M ass... Binghamton, N. Y . Augusta, Ga......... Pawtucket, R. I .. Altoona, P a ......... W heeling, W. Va. M obile, A la ......... Birmingham, A la. Little R ock, A rk . Springfield, O hio. Galveston, T e x ... Tacoma, Wash . . . H averhill, M ass.. Spokane, W ash... Terre Haute, I n d . Dubuque, Iow a ... Quincy, 111............ South Bend, In d .. Salem, M ass......... Johnstown, Pa___ Elmira, N. Y ......... A llentow n, Pa___ Davenport, Io w a . M cKeesport, Pa .. Springfield, 111___ Cnelsea, Mass....... Chester, P a .......... York, Pa............... M alden, Mass....... Topeka, Kans....... Newton, M ass___ Sioux City, Iow a .. Bayonne, N .J....... K noxville, T enn.. Licensed retail liquor saloons. Po Dis liceDrunk turb men. Num Amt. en ing ber. o f li ness. the cense. peace 207 37 250 40 51 253 185 48 165 45 46 208 147 43 c 21 78 35 15 34'_____ 121 36 67 76 9 44 130 42 18 38 130 53 175 j 51 102 36 68 38 151 260 39 45 105 37 29 34 130 163 o 37 39 140 130 27 136 28 35 55 23 38 157 18 77 35 180 72 38 153 31 27 29 53 32 30 28 29 63 22 76 36 160 30 65 $200 350 (a) 100 350 («) 500 550 1,500 350 200 (*) m 650 (0 fc500 360 350 (a) 600 1,800 500 250 600 500 200 500 350 500 610 550 502 500 550 Arrests for— As sault Hom Va House Lar and icide. gran break ceny bat ing. cy. tery. 282 88 39 2,707 691 120 746 954 862 194 228 73 747 165 169 1,449 580 638 687 97 90 <*565 <*249 <*627 42 480 107 62 638 84 722 73 59 64 («) /3,680 921 146 99 623 131 35 511 468 121 585 1,578 138 /3,649 861 ( e\ 914 1,098 118 407 258 187 418 581 519 1,050 390 39 1,094 43 201 1,237 355 76 144 658 154 63 546 49 164 188 18 424 3 150 528 29 73 752 210 98 84 489 47 413 35 71 33 268 124 1,376 37 17 722 1,537 205 342 13 92 549 153 326 244 14 12 290 51 31 644 229 129 59 458 63 840 873 74 118 832 267 855 318 243 i 21 1 10 4 1 2 1 5 4 20 3 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 3 1 2 5 3 115 49 850 20 233 956 76 <*178 340 6 69 77 178 68 79 1,258 1,042 22 609 335 406 10 884 109 87 88 38 7 63 100 116 258jj 34 311 34 25 A ll Total other ar of rests. fen ses. 9 50 232 815 4 133 1,574 5,279 203 287 1,356 5,279 17 41 61,211 61,785 8 86 305 1 713 98 302 1,616 5,649 19 124 413 1,506 d 22 <*595<*1,093 <*3,329 31 125 567 1,696 6 78 315 1 189 19 137 257 1,337 40 323 1,182 5,368 25 97 147 1,613 1 36 179 1,074 11 71 718 1,984 46 247 1,470 5,326 143 1,277 3,487 10,479 15 193 2,666 6,029 28 137 531 2,158 41 158 380 2,435 24 70 *3,139 *5,118 30 129 325 1,834 44 185 1,361 4,145 13 127 0*1,552 w 2,759 8 41 25 819 16 15 76 566 25 63 763 1,466 5 64 118 825 9 120 44 1,296 15 94 170 1,002 19 257 910 494 1,315 9 128 38 221 1,725 30 37 930 3,777 48 101 310 906 15 162 292 1,534 24 71 390 9 43 202 626 23 170 1,320 2,671 8 52 148 800 13 178 195 2,392 29 144 205 1,657 25 465 280 2,410 8 153 2 10 900 2 217 1 250 61 2 222 200 a $25 for m alt, $150 for alcoholic liquors. 6 Including 509 pool-room cases. e Not including 6 special policem en. d Including alderm en’s cases. « Included in arrests for disturbing the peace. /In clu d in g arrests for drunkenness. fl'Not including 20 special policem en. h First-class saloons, $500; second-class saloons, $850. 2From $25 to $125. j Not including 6 supernumeraries. fcFor sale o f beer only, $260. * Including 1,515 technical arrests of inmates of houses of prostitution and 1,100 of gamblers, m Including 580 technical arrests o f persons applying for lodging. 911 STATISTICS Off CITIES, T able III.—POLICE RETAIL LIQUOR SALOONS, AND ARRESTS, BY CAUSES—Concluded. [In this table drunkenness includes “ comm on drunk,” “ drunk and disorderly,” and all cases where drunkenness in any form was the primary cause o f arrest; disturbing the peace includes all cases o f disorderly conduct not attributable to drunkenness; assault and battery includes all cases o f assault; vagrancy includes arrests of beggars, tramps, loafers, loiterers, and all persons without rent means o f support; housebreaking includes burglary and all cases of breaking and entering, arceny includes pocket picking, robbery, and all cases of theft.] K Mar gin al num ber. Cities. Licensed retail liquor saloons. Dis Po Drunk turb liceing men. Num Amt. en the ber. of li ness. peace cense. Schenectady, N. Y Fitchburg, M ass.. Superior, W is....... Rockford, 111......... Taunton, Mass___ Canton, O h io....... Butte, M on t........ M ontgomery, A la. Auburn, N. Y ....... Chattanooga, Tenn ............... 136 East St. Louis, 111. 137 Joliet, 111.............. 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 a 22 34 30 19 34 30 44 35 20 42 39 33 Arrests for— As A ll Total sault Hom Va House Lar other ar and icide. gran break ceny of rests. fen bat ing. cy. tery. ses. 140 500 48 1,000 31 (&) 350 128 171 900 45 (d) 350 106 625 127 564 56 76 929 277 217 12 939 798 126 690 705 («) /l , 176 453 76 108 42 41 49 64 87 197 285 37 84 200 500 160 105 1,000 1,121 647 1,310 280 161 41 168 $350 804 337 226 2 2 2 1 1 2 5 14 110 8 330 67 20 124 318 457 45 20 29 2 4 53 30 2 169 333 1,488 234 50 954 132 658 2,188 58 333 1,030 59 193 1,289 52 168 1,359 139 02,466 0 4,570 695 2,'925 281 67 73 754 213 141 411 11 23 33 280 873 162 1,165 38 207 Not including 8 special policem en. Beer saloons, $650; others, $1,600 to $2,300. Including 1,698 technical arrests o f inm ates of houses of prostitution. d$401 within and $201 outside o f fire lim its; for sale o f beer only, $76. e Included in arrests for disturbing the peace. f Including arrests for drunkenness. a b o 3,584 2,641 2,266 918 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OE LABOR. T able IV .—FIREMEN, FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES. Equipm ent. Firemen. Fire engines. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 1 New Y ork, N .Y ......... 2 Chicago, 111............... 3 Philadelphia, P a ___ 4 St. L ou isjM o............ 5 Boston, M ass............ 6 Baltim ore, M d.......... 7 Cleveland, O h io....... 8 Buffalo, N .Y ............ 9 San Francisco, C al... 10 Cincinnati, O h io___ 11 Pittsburg, P a ............ 12 New Orleans, La....... 13 Detroit, M ich............ 14 M ilwaukee, W is....... 15 W ashington, D. C___ 16 Newark, N .J ............ 17 Jersey City, N. J ....... 18 Louisville, K y .......... 19 M inneapolis, M inn.. 20 Providence, R. I ....... 21 Indianapolis, In d ___ 22 Kansas City, M o.'___ 23 St. Paul, M inn........... 24 Rochester, N. Y ......... 25 Denver, C o lo ............ 26 Toledo, O h io ............ 27 A llegheny, P a .......... 28 Columbus, O h io....... 29 W orcester, M ass....... 30 Syracuse, N .Y .......... 31 New Haven, C onn ... 32 Paterson, N .J .......... 33 Fall River, Mass....... 34 St. Joseph, M o.......... 35 Omaha, N ebr............ 36 Los Angeles, Cal....... 37 Memphis, Tenn......... 38 Scranton, Pa.............. 39 Low ell, M ass............ 40 A lbany, N .Y ............ 41 Cambridge, M ass___ 42 Portland, O reg ......... 43 Atlanta, G a............... 44 Grand Rapids, M ich. 45 Dayton, O h io............ 46 Richm ond, V a.......... 47 N ashville, T en n ....... 48 Seattle, W ash............ 49 Hartford, C onn......... 50 Reading, P a .............. 51 W ilm ington, D e l___ 52 Camden, N .J ............ 53 Trenton, N .J ............ 54 Bridgeport, C onn___ 55 Limn, M ass............... 56 Oakland, C a l............ Combi Hand Hook nation fireexchem Fire and Regu Call Volun tin- boats. ladder lars. men. teers. Steam. Hand. Chem ical en guishtrucks. gines ical. ers. and hose wagons. 2,555 1,157 844 516 707 408 426 (7486 457 334 416 302 495 ' 837 252 234 190 241 306 246 196 194 198 200 122 135 110 188 122 138 #120 103 94 60 119 120 90 64 78 113 57 56 b b 108 128 108 68 drl 85 83 64 26 16 72 72 36 66 48 3,950 59 167 102 50 48 83 52 27 32 33 i 52 .......... 1 31 1 32 ii 28 .......... 28 23 16 22 15 18 22 9 11 8 15 8 8 80 8 H 14 7 107 9 11 9 6 97 2 4 13 9 6 71 6 97 11 60 8 68 82 180 *10 5 9 6 8 52 8 7 15 71 10 3,300 10 8 465 5 7 83 7 7 103 81 9 5 4 11 17 6 1 13 8 3 7 9 1 4 13 6 8 3 3 3 1 10 3 1 4 2 1 i ! 1 ! i 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 10 44 28 12 «26 2 4 1 6 1 8 2 2 10 3 8 9 2 1 1 3 10 1 5 1 3 3 1 2 10 1 2 a?2 8 7 11 3 3 2 2 9 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 ee 4 3 ee 1 3 1 1 c 580 23 149 70 142 46 27 76 50 40 170 6 74 50 «66 62 33 35 24 67 50 68 20 30 31 12 34 26 38 23 40 28 34 14 22 36 4 16 16 44 26 32 24 14 36 25 8 28 27 22 6 18 21 29 26 8 5 5 5 2 1 2 3 j 2 2 3 , 1 15 21 /I I 9 11 10 16 9 8 13 9 7 8 7 5 7 10 8 qS i........ ......... 1 a Also 117 cisterns. b Including 1,380 p olice boxes. e Including 64 furnished by fire department to 32 police patrol wagons, 2 on each wagon. d Including 3 reserve trucks stationed outside city lim its. e Including 3 com bination chem ical engines and hook and ladder trucks. /N o t including 3 com bination chem ical engines and hook and ladder trucks. a Not including 119 substitutes em ployed 2 months, ft Not reported. i Also 4 m onitor batteries, i Owned and m aintained by State. k Also 305 cisterns. * Also 80 fire w ells. m Also 661 cisterns. «N ot including 50 Johnson hand force pumps. ©Also 670 cisterns. p Also 164 cisterns. Q Including 2 com bination hook and ladder trucks and hose wagons. 83 34 dVJ 8 7 4 5 4 6 4 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 1 2 1/4 4 3 6 3 4 4 8 2 4 3 3 2 3 // 3 2 gg 4 // 2 919 STATISTICS OE CITIES, T able IV.—FIREMEN, FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES. Equipm ent. Fire hydrants. Feet of lad ders. 24,731 11,153 3,750 4,170 7,904 4,008 2,955 3,960 3,170 3,401 2,038 1,461 3,602 3,000 3,023 24,000 1,711 1,248 1,891 2,800 2,020 1,030 2,500 1,800 926 1,400 765 1,915 1,324 1,049 1,240 783 1,372 787 1,141 652 462 432 1,324 1,258 985 1,000 600 1,119 1,828 768 799 958 650 516 508 485 390 700 1,465 700 Hose Fire reels Wa Fire- alarms. Fires. and Feet of Not ter Horses. alarm hose. Owned owned hose Total. tow boxes. ers. by city. by wag.ons. city. Property loss. 411,700 20,230 1,127 21,357 4 981 2,372 9,327 8,424 89,816,365 8,094 6,136 202,695 al9,324 «19,324 2 481 b 2,788 4,296,433 2,657,099 105,000 13,000 1 1,239 326 3,191 3,049 185 13,185 7,764 2,572 2,363 97,650 7,676 2 2,932,268 976 247 88 7,638 7,958 2 2,225 2,076 121,611 374 1,830,719 633 315 2,673 2,673 1,498 1,443 74,969 2 447 188 1,464,120 6,462 6,462 1,499 1,400 46,050 1,032,723 1 876 165 (h ) 1 96,250 4,853 1,083 1,039 1,576,128 258 572 (*) (ft) 1,114 1,070 79,500 3,798 2 8,767 285 523,265 31 65,000 *2,695 *2,695 1 174 503 1,342 1,302 1,277,424 106,480 3,058 1,269,932 1 183 506 1,211 1,167 95 3,153 542 1 614 35,823 153 933,827 250 *1,706 1 1,706 899 76,360 m3,561 1 984 201 436 586,693 12 m3,573 (*) 1,154 62,375 1,403 736,874 2,545 1 175 387 (*) 57,000 628 2,031 1 251 710 285,677 138 55 2,086 676 543 38,000 253 359,700 2,202 109 40 2,242 25,929 639 567 2,236 2,236 77 136 422,527 30,050 821 0363 386 858 342,508 o363 1 107 (ft) 42,876 3,312 3,312 1 169 346 1,195 471,488 (ft) 33,000 362 791 1,941 738 344,596 1 90 w 1 42,000 1,055 1,010 296,000 106 237 Pi, 846 P i , 846 30,200 150 1,501 1,458 711,248 2,220 2 81 2,220 50,200 754 192 783 420,734 2,346 119 2,346 1 35,200 434 418 2,853 85 208 30 2,883 ('0 17,000 164 595 573 364,131 67 3,300 1 3,300 588 547 441,115 32,000 263 i, 145 73 111 1,256 1 314 31,500 344 541 499,650 1,661 69 1,661 27,800 s i ,400 164 594 571 137,359 88 40 81,440 1 27,200 607 111,991 1,829 72 620 125 1,954 167 334 18,950 66 169 375 421,911 2,680 2,680 1 (ft) 23,734 121,930 59 «211 297 285 963 w «142 396 7,200,000 15,000 1,187 52 380 1,187 (h ) (ft) 152 146 26,347 25,450 58 160 991 314 269 196,992 12,500 35 726 726 i 39 i 413 256,058 19,803 48 103 469 1,578 1,578 368 319 54 151,190 19,000 77 210 607 661 404 384,597 15,981 65 w m 51 69 493 w 801 l 205 75,096 8,000 562 52 99 188 540 22 398 28,150 1,106 125 186 248,230 75 54 1,181 i 13,500 651 153,959 838 57 161 651 823 15 291 286 76,438 14,250 978 19 997 37 126 204 254,704 22,900 aa 555 «a555 61 176 261 582 44 528 640,113 20,000 ocl,231 89 10 cc1,241 466 394 202,597 25,405 135 58 1,361 1,361 133,495 33,200 1,242 1,242 56 183 516 465 l 961,714 16,000 599 172 410 45 473 35 634 333 54 307 130,423 12,450 670 700 111 30 358 44 66 377 200,178 606 22,000 606 116 186 186 59,362 19,000 950 900 50 47 65,332 760 760 55 74 89 87 16,610 98 93 160,302 14,800 779 69 779 36 166 166 46,269 12,000 784 937 31 69 153 635 95 181 178 94,842 15,050 620 15 30 i 28,372 166 12,000 580 627 36 130 130 47 359 115 355 134,006 27,850 781 8 789 M l 50 (ft) 184 153 44,120 524 47 19,450 524 r Not including 2 com bination hook and ladder trucks and hose wagons. s Also 52 cisterns. t Not including 48 substitutes. u Including 39 private fire-alarm boxes. v Including 31 private fire-alarm boxes. w Also 51 cisterns. x Com bination chem ical engines and hook and ladder trucks. i/N ot including 2 com bination chem ical engines and hook and ladder trucks. z Also 1 battery, aa Also 82 cisterns. b b Not in cluding 6 supernumeraries. c c Also 23 cisterns. <ft*Not including 8 substitutes. e e Combination chem ical engine and hook and ladder truck. //N o t including 1 com bination chem ical engine and hook and ladder truck. 9 Q Not including 1 com bination hook and ladder truck and water tower. M i Com bination hook and ladder truck and water tower. 170 115 14 25 48 18 32 30 56 45 26 27 19 23 19 10 15 17 18 12 21 r l7 18 13 14 9 17 11 17 7 8 9 12 14 12 10 8 12 13 13 7 11 9 12 3 6 9 9 8 7 7 7 7 9 11 11 Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 920 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able IY.-FIREM EN , FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES—Continued. Equipm ent. Firemen. Fire engines. Mar ginal num ber. 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 73 74 75 76 77 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 Cities. Lawrence, M ass....... New Bedford, Mass.. Des Moines, Iow a___ Springfield, M ass___ Som erville, M ass___ Troy, N. Y ................. Hoboken, N. J .......... Evansville, In d ........ Manchester, N. H ___ Utica, N .Y ............... Peoria, 111................. Charleston, S. C......... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah. San Antonio, Tex .. . Duluth, M inn.......... Erie, P a .................... Elizabeth, N. J ......... W ilksbarre, P a ......... Kansas City, Kans .. Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, M e.(ff)___ Yonkers, N. Y .......... N orfolk, Y a .............. Waterbury, Conn___ H olyoke, M ass......... Fort W ayne, In d ___ Youngstown, O h io.. Houston, T ex............ Covington, K y ......... Akron, Ohio.............. Dallas, T ex............... Saginaw, M ich ......... Lancaster, P a .......... Lincoln, N ebr.......... Brockton, M ass....... Binghamton, N. Y . . . Augusta, G a.............. Pawtucket, R. I ....... Altoona, P a .............. W heeling, W. V a ___ M obile, A la .............. Birmingham, A la . . . Little Rock, A r k ___ Springfield, O hio___ Galveston, T ex ......... Tacoma, W ash......... H averhill, M ass....... Spokane, W ash......... Terre Haute, In d ___ Dubuque, Iow a......... Quincy, 111............... South Bend, In d ___ Salem, Mass.............. Johnstown, P a ......... Elmira, N. Y ............ Allentow n, Pa.......... Davenport, Iow a ___ M cKeesport, P a....... Combi Hand Hook nation fire ex Fire and chem Regu Call V olun ladder tinlars. men. teers. Steam. Hand. Chem ical en guish- boats. trucks. ical. gines ers. and hose wagons. 34 44 74 73 31 56 65 63 33 65 57 45 5 81 38 54 87 44 32 176 26 / 45 13 39 42 50 23 39 57 37 63 33 40 53 33 14 90 17 60 36 23 36 26 46 31 32 52 47 25 63 51 37 28 42 18 015 40 25 35 27 105 83 6 g 10 7 940 4 127 38 9 54 75 20 28 163 2 36 94 460 1,500 6 3 9 5 5 7 5 3 10 7 2 4 5 6 7 5 1 5 7 725 5 2 6 7 1 7 3 6 4 1 6 3 5 2 7 2 3 4 3 4 3 2 2 6 5 4 2 3 5 101 18 14 34 43 4 628 20 24 2 3 84 14 89 1 550 904 r 4 8 6 6 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 3 2 1 3 2 c2 1 1 1 4 2 2 51 5 c3 1 1 4 2 4 1 3 1 1 6 3 1 6 i 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 4 2 1 20 16 6 26 20 17 12 14 15 13 8 16 22 5 3 14 18 16 14 16 d 2 26 25 2 1 4 1 2 2 2 1 <*4 5 12 d 2 12 8 26 2 12 18 6 13 8 4 4 8 24 2 14 20 18 10 2 12 4 4 6 9 9 6 12 5 12 13 13 r8 a Not reported. b Not including 6 supernumeraries. c Including 1 com bination chem ical engine and hook and ladder trucx. dN ot including 1 com bination chem ical engine and hook and ladder truck. e Owned by members o f fire department. /N o t including 4 substitutes. 0 Data are for 9 months. h Com bination chem ical engine and hook and ladder truck. 1 Including 1 com bination hook and ladder truck and hose wagon. JN ot including 1 com bination hook and ladder truck and hose wagon. 3 3 3 6 3 3 2 2 4 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 i 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 r 1 2 1 2 2 921 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able IV.—FIREMEN, FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES—Continued. Equipment. Fire hydrants. Hose Fire Wa Fire- alarms. Fires. Feet reels ter Horses. alarm and Feet of Not of lad hose Owned owned Total. tow ders. wag hose. by boxes. ers. city. by city. ons. 1,300 1,020 530 1,599 1,284 763 580 414 925 844 572 631 650 450 265 1,000 471 480 425 290 277 1,498 1,100 462 516 546 541 402 623 660 644 555 375 285 519 700 550 407 695 430 265 378 313 250 668 528 311 1,200 387 317 429 225 728 697 r 222 475 276 394 308 4 7 6 10 6 11 4 10 6 3 9 10' 10 4 6 10 8 7 4 5 9 12 14 6 5 6 8 2 5 5 J2 6 9 5 3 5 6 6 1 7 5 4 6 7 6 7 9 3 7 4 5 6 5 r l4 1 5 6 4 18,000 18,000 15,950 24,000 9,350 23,200 8,450 12,000 25,450 14,000 23,163 9,207 17,365 11,150 10^000 20,650 19,450 5,000 17,500 11,400 10,500 32,000 18,200 10,000 9,700 23,300 13,450 7,250 13,450 4,000 6,850 10,000 21,300 5,000 6,950 12,340 7,500 8,300 14,400 8,000 7,800 8,000 8,000 4,200 9,000 9,200 15,600 16,825 11,700 9,000 7,300 7,000 12,725 19,250 *•15,900 8,150 9,650 8,605 7,500 584 750 1,040 '964 926 959 237 580 753 764 604 975 497 632 300 242 639 599 858 247 301 536 698 588 330 fc350 432 750 543 463 650 726 675 566 452 442 654 277 516 485 391 o341 528 342 474 476 129 450 310 s342 173 (a) 91 43 59 25 (a) 65 1,067 '525 878 395 25 5 (a) 757 (a) 1,040 1,055 969 1,018 262 580 1 (a) 829 1,067 525 604 975 878 497 632 300 242 395 664 604 (a) l 37 45 43 63 38 37 22 33 41 32 33 30 42 21 30 49 41 o 26 27 22 27 38 27 30 18 37 42 16 32 14 23 33 26 17 23 35 21 26 21 22 26 13 24 20 25 24 33 30 30 28 21 28 21 28 *•34 20 30 19 12 61 93 55 137 98 105 45 67 68 98 145 104 79 55 77 110 87 60 • 71 40 110 86 41 65 112 81 53 64 54 98 110 63 48 40 78 56 l 77 w96 58 71 57 56 35 112 54 59 62 42 70 53 169 193 455 236 246 290 157 246 197 156 373 151 263 154 165 225 180 109 107 346 84 168 193 219 124 195 203 230 306 180 167 356 269 48 153 222 106 169 127 266 230 224 335 «241 209 178 229 238 230 229 233 140 181 138 72 173 49 165 183 256 406 750 710 606 567 330 fc 390 40 432 750 543 463 656 1 6 734 8 675 (a) («) 500 48 442 937 283 284 7 316 316 516 485 391 5 o346 528 779 779 342 309 309 (P) 134 608 1 75 499 23 90 12 141 57 456 6 17 325 15 1 51 571 571 52 15 s357 56 k Also 19 cisterns. i Including 19 private fire-alarm boxes. m Including 27 private fire-alarm boxes. n Including 3 outside city lim its, o Also 16 reservoirs. p Telephone system, a Paid by volunteer fire company. r Owned by volunteer fire com pany, s A lso 1 reservoir. 9 105 214 12 18 567 161 193 435 231 246 290 157 173 193 148 365 121 193 153 162 203 177 56 101 332 80 168 188 212 116 182 193 207 297 104 149 334 199 48 144 162 62 162 101 244 228 221 286 232 183 172 173 151 125 202 227 119 165 121 56 173 46 149 147 Property loss. $13,738 30,861 415,184 96,409 66,774 125,108 138,629 209,105 34,379 233,170 125,819 66,810 61,744 310,870 500,000 186,429 161,671 235,316 124,234 199,245 153,031 261,164 126,087 32,387 18,951 33,491 49,241 90,305 253,672 49,040 68,213 507,802 50,752 19,032 46,135 21,108 79,257 176,876 30,275 32,575 87,368 253,590 136,519 58,700 406,682 (a) 44,918 59,626 84,188 89,368 (a) 300,000 110,278 78,020 10,514 85,341 21,038 612,076 30,280 Mar ginal num ber. 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 922 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able IV.—FIREMEN, FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES—Concluded. Firemen. Equipment. Fire engines. Mar ginal num ber. 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Springfield, 111....... Cnelsea, M ass......... Chester, Pa.............. York, P a ................. M alden, M ass......... Topeka, K ans......... Newton, M ass......... Sioux City, Iow a . . . Bayonne, N. J ......... K n oxville, T en n . . . Schenectady, N. Y . Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior. W is.......... R ockford, 111.......... Taunton, M ass....... Canton, O hio.......... Butte, M ont___. . . . M ontgomery, A la .. Auburn, N. Y . Chattanooga, Tenn. East St. Louis, 111.. Joliet, 111................. Combi Hand nation fireexHook Regu Call Volun chem Fire and tin- boats. lars. men. teers. Steam. ladder Chem ical en guishHand. ical. trucks. gines ers. and hose wagons. 57 395 900 38 63 20 600 4 219 78 55 1 88 38 48 4 3 3 6 2 1 3 1 7 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 13 6 3 1 5 1 1 1 2 3 a b Also 8 cisterns. 18 hired as needed. 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1.......... 4* 1 1 1 4 2 1 14 7 4 14 12 27 18 10 12 12 21 16 14 6 17 9 12 16 6 10 5 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 923 STATISTICS OP CITIES. T able IV .—FIREMEN, FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY LOSS FROM FIRES—Concluded. Equipment. Fire hydrants. Feet o f lad ders. 375 460 197 400 650 173 675 431 392 262 385 1,189 503 311 950 500 360 547 356 385 204 180 Hose Fire Wa reels Fire- alarms. Fires. ter Horses. alarm Not and Feet of hose hose. Owned owned Total. tow boxes. by city. by ers. wag city. ons. 4 6 3 2 3 6 8 5 10 4 4 5 7 1 8 5 4 5 4 2 4 5 7,500 10,100 6,000 8,500 12,350 8,000 17,589 9,700 6,000 5,450 8,400 14,000 11,950 6,350 14,100 7,000 8,250 6,300 6,350 9,000 7,550 8,100 305 263 320 400 946 257 339 c 544 428 391 794 340 292 488 232 243 18 14 151 13 18 a 322 25 12 15 252 15 84 585 (<*) 30 397 59 68 7 332 323 277 151 333 418 a 322 971 269 354 252 c559 512 585 391 (d) 370 397 351 556 239 332 243 30 18 14 22 22 18 38 21 (») 14 14 20 24 19 26 20 15 16 12 23 11 22 c Also 9 cisterns. dN ot reported. 83 72 49 90 47 142 37 33 46 31 69 110 52 89 65 54 34 38 58 29 97 1 212 152 87 55 103 190 172 179 57 167 121 102 108 144 127 133 140 152 75 230 150 176 190 150 86 55 101 184 152 162 57 152 115 65 97 136 120 124 138 140 63 225 142 127 Property loss. $63,306 21,864 30,000 24,473 37,878 19,380 74,814 162,808 75,000 60,876 54,892 15,274 32,492 10,356 66,859' 45,312 62,415 70,168 15,953 71,724 225,100 62,350 Mar ginal num ber. 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able V.—MARRIAGES, DIVORCES, AND BIRTHS. Larnal lin er. Di Mar Mar vorces riage licenses riages. grant issued. ed. Cities. 1 New York, N .Y ............ 2 Chicago 111................... 3 Philadelphia, P a ......... 4 St. Louis, M o................. 5 Boston, M ass............... 6 Baltim ore, M d.............. 7 Cleveland, O h io.......... 8 Buffalo, N .Y ................. 9 San Francisco, Cal....... 10 Cincinnati, O hio.......... 11 Pittsburg, P a ............... 12 New Orleans, L a.......... 13 Detroit, M ich ............... 14 M ilwaukee, W is.......... 15 W ashington, D. C ......... 16 Newark, N .J ............... 17 Jersey City, N .J .......... 18 Louisville, K y .............. 19 M inneapolis, M in n ___ 20 Providence, R. I .......... 21 Indianapolis, In d ......... 22 Kansas City, M o.......... 23 St. Paul, M inn.............. 24 Rochester, N. Y ............ 25 Denver, C o lo ............... 26 Toledo, O h io ............... 27 A llegheny, P a .............. 28 Columbus, O h io .......... 29 W orcester, M ass.......... 30 Syracuse, N. Y .............. 31 New Haven, Conn....... 32 Paterson, N .J............... 33 F all R iver, Mass.......... 34 St. Joseph, M o .............. 35 Omaha, N ebr............... 36 Los Angeles, Cal.......... 37 Memphis, T enn............ 38 Scranton, Pa................. 39 Low ell, M ass............... 40 Albanv, N. Y ............... 41 Cambridge, Mass......... 42 Portland, O reg............ 43 Atlanta, Ga................... 44 Grand Rapids, M ich ... 45 Dayton, O hio............... 46 Richm ond, V a.............. 47 Nashville, T enn.......... 48 Seattle, Wash............... 49 Hartford, Conn............ 50 Reading, P a................. 51 W ilm ington, D e l......... 52 Camden, N. J............... 53 Trenton, N. J ............... 54 Bridgeport, Conn......... 55 Lynn, Mass................... 56 Oakland, C al............... 57 Lawrence, M ass.......... 58 New Bedford, Mass___ 59 Des Moines, Iow a......... 60 Springfield, M ass......... 61 Somerville, M ass......... 62 Troy, N. Y .................... 63 Hoboken, N .J .............. 64 Evansville, In d ............ 65 Manchester, N. H ......... 66 Utica, N. Y ................... 67 Peoria, 111.................... 68 Charleston, S. C .......... 69 Savannah, Ga............... Births. Male. Fe male. Birth rate per 000 popTotal. l,ulation. 33,447 817 41,096 39,639 80,735 a 18,312 016,684 ol,808 13,980 13,015 26,995 9,912 492 14,534 13,681 28,215 11,887 5,959 573 5,503 5,193 c l O , 705 (b ) 6,312 7,009 446 7,954 7,654 15,608 4,902 4,890 170 4,509 8,795 4,286 454 4,122 3,204 3,199 3,915 8,037 3,448 a 88 3,323 6,924 3,601 3,716 3,656 846 2,527 2,346 <*4,875 3,539 3,518 o405 2,733 2,358 5,091 7,624 «7 ,910 3,443 o l 86 3,949 3,675 2,119 2,104 151 6,639 3,351 3,288 2,786 2,681 297 1,510 2,818 1,308 0225 7,415 «2,805 2,460 3,749 3,666 3,334 3,183 168 2,335 2,196 4,531 2,441 3,175 2,837 / 6,016 ( e) ib ) 2,062 4,462 2,330 2,132 (b ) («) 174 1,683 1,559 3,800 1,933 1,867 a2,172 ol80 2,221 1,883 9 4 ,105 (b ) 1,875 1,979 327 2,484- 2,212 4,696 02,653 o2,608 o471 1,747 1,625 *3,377 a2,164 ol,704 o420 1,372 *2,989 1,595 ol94 ol,491 ol,478 1,638 1,589 3,227 1,492 ol56 1,744 2,914 1,170 ol62 01,937 al,918 (b ) (*>) (b Y 1,114 1,102 0191 476 487 963 o7,910 970 o l 86 757 686 1,443 al,572 01,572 0148 o953 o875 ol,828 1,247 1,297 57 1,602 1,669 3,271 a 47 588 724 679 1,403 918 92 1,441 937 1,360 2,801 962 125 1,896 (b ) («) (b ) 1,124 54 2,090 1,152 2,138 4,228 « 867 110 a 893 280 327 /611 1,006 1,003 206 857 822 1,679 al,917 al,818 o405 818 754 1,572 ol,991 al,838 a290 (*>) (&) (&) o 1,801 320 o45 512 450 962 1,022 1,044 1,431 1,339 2,770 (b ) 535 39 664 1,299 635 1,075 1,107 283 1,418 1,355 2 ,773 a 977 a999 al44 610 546 1,156 1,535 1,489 J53 487 434 921 1,043 1,041 180 663 627 1,290 ol,218 ol,216 ol35 806 793 1,599 752 816 53 376 353 729 ol95 ol,423 ol,352 804 736 1,540 ol,379 ol,351 o323 470 449 919 790 748 82 932 891 1,823 812 914 105 875 826 1,701 950 924 29 625 561 1,186 1,352 647 627 1,274 (e) (b ) 676 60 400 375 775 \e ) 677 642 38 963 877 1,840 807 829 39 820 837 1,657 ol,396 o 1,340 ol43 534 954 420 818 816 1,093 799 1,892 (b ) 738 776 36 1,398 1,067 2,465 o 1,075 a 1,000 ol33 454 862 408 626 642 84 736 695 1,431 671 693 808 743 1,551 475 23 343 316 659 884 40 855 805 1,660 (®) 695 671 120 498 486 984 617 611 49 829 834 1,663 317 066 568 530 1,098 o 120 0968 o967 (*>) % % 492 <*1,078 9l9 57 831 761 672 *1,436 a Data are lor county. t>Not reported. o Including 9 births, sex not reported. ^Including 2 births, sex not reported. «N o license required except for nonresidents of State, /In clu d in g 4 births, sex not reported. 9 Including 1 birth, sex not reported. * Including 5 births, sex not reported. £Including 22 births, sex not reported. /N o t including 4 lim ited divorces, ft Including 3 births, sex not reported. 22.53 15.00 21.13 17.99 27.21 16.91 20.61 18.71 13.93 14.97 22.86 22.13 9.39 24.92 15.79 23.59 20.89 17.67 19.55 26.38 18.50 17.33 18.98 17.14 (b ) 6.42 10.85 013.80 27.03 11.69 25.01 17.62 39.51 5.90 15.26 14.29 (b ) 9.34 29.17 12.99 29! 47 12.30 9 80 13! 58 17.77 7.92 18.94 10.21 22.34 20.74 15.11 15.93 10.33 23.90 23.67 12.72 29.11 37.35 12.31 22.02 24.43 8.78 27.21 16.35 28.83 18.93 (b ) 16.58 23.16 L- • IS. ,750 ,674 ,288 686 576 672 328 387 264 425 505 442 365 328 524 324 285 249 259 216 112 119 102 158 98 204 172 45 136 58 135 123 193 21 67 48 156 94 142 118 111 39 210 56 85 210 131 66 62 68 73 80 67 72 55 41 80 75 19 49 62 82 90 45 86 57 47 192 187 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able V.—MARRIAGES, DIVORCES, AND BIRTHS—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Mar Di Mar vorces riage licenses riages. grant ed. issued. Cities. Salt Lake City, Utah .. San A ntonio, T e x ....... Duluth, M inn.............. Erie, P a ....................... Elizabeth, N. J ............ W ilkesbarre, P a .......... Kansas City, K ans...... Harrisburg, P a ............ Portland, M e............... Yonkers, N. Y .............. N orfolk, Va................... W aterbury, Conn......... H olyoke, Mass.............. Fort Wayne, In d .......... Youngstown, Ohio....... Houston, T e x .............. Covington, K y.............. Akron, Ohio................. Dallas, T ex.................. Saginaw, M ich ............ Lancaster, Pa............... Lincoln, N ebr.............. Brockton, Mass............ Binghamton, N. Y ....... Augusta, Ga................. Pawtucket, R. I .......... Altoona, P a ................. W heeling, W. V a......... M obile, A la................... Birmingham, A la ....... Little R ock, A rk.......... Springfield, O h io......... Galveston, T ex............ Tacoma, Wash.............. H averhill, Mass.......... Spokane, W ash............ Terre Haute, In d ......... Dubuque, Iow a............ Quincy, 111.................. South Bend, Ind.......... Salem, Mass................. Johnstown, P a ............ Elmira, N. Y ............... Allentow n, P a ............ Davenport, Iow a......... McKeesport, P a .......... Springfield, 111............ Cnelsea, M ass.............. Chester, Pa.................. York, P a ...................... Malden, Mass............... Topeka, K ans.............. Newton. M ass.............. Sioux City, Iow a ......... Bayonne, N. J ............. K noxville, Tenn ....... Schenectady, N. Y ___ Fitchburg, Mass.......... Superior, Wis............... Rockford, 111............... Taunton, M ass............ Canton, O hio............... Butte, M ont................. M ontgomery, A la ....... Auburn, N. Y ............... Chattanooga, Tenn___ East St. Louis, 111......... Joliet, 111...................... a 1,172 «1,164 a 982 a 954 «1,038 (&) 540 519 321 («) a 2,479 <*2,479 a 1,060 <*1,027 468 463 434 449 408 543 522 /440 /440 452 452 a 674 a 654 438 411 a 931 a 913 a 881 a 874 490 517 a 1,841 a 1,291 487 480 330 330 468 451 492 484 585 630 503 420 454 338 (*>) <*753 a 699 <*724 am a 2,287 <*2,210 a 1,220 <*1,216 490 490 <*561 <*549 a 755 a 691 389 320 a 781 a 720 472 466 a 500 a 412 a 308 a 269 <*600 a 589 382 288 412 ( &) 437 <*950 210 <*592 am a 7,910 186 a 814 a 818 439 448 224 240 411 396 392 363 « 624 a 606 345 355 a 617 a 566 259 (*>) a 900 a 923 269 318 338 a 298 (* ) 267 267 322 306 321 315 <*610 a 610 <*904 a 970 213 <*597 a 558 <*1,305 a 1,301 295 256 a 166 <*183 a 75 a 76 (&) <*44 <*154 (&) 53 9 30 / 39 14 a 119 a 57 a 215 «28 ol64 o 210 o 87 30 a 107 15 o 30 54 48 Births. Male. 587 1,213 521 241 1,137 551 1,204 565 455 911 984 478 235 <*484 907 463 655 1,176 1,155 606 e810 410 /549 /1,275 813 1,698 692 334 472 960 242 505 658 297 466 ft 986 % % ( &) (&) (* ) (&) 280 523 566 258 431 566 462 318 389 (&) 350 395 338 355 344 (■b ) (b) ( b) (* ) ( &) 254 471 487 257 411 568 450 256 354 428 149 418 8 254 452 437 252 404 552 480 277 322 458 142 386 10.10 15.13 21.91 (&) 22.53 13.58 8.89 21.65 13.12 (*>) ( &) ( &) (b) w ( (b) ( ) 904 914 528 729 616 779 660 646 623 *539 923 924 509 815 1,120 (*) 930533 676 886 291 804 23.48 28.30 23.30 22.29 12.72 18.23 15.40 20.95 16.50 16.15 16.61 b) 12.62 25.46 23.10 13.95 22.64 b 29.87 (b) 26.37 15.23 18.27 25.56 8.43 22.13 (b) (» ) ( b) (b) ( a 108 3 (*) (* ) (*>) ( b) (b) ( &) ( ) (&) (b) ( (b ) ( (& ( 10 596 348 492 260 10 a 29 38 17 ol03 o89 a52 «30 o 103 70 47 ( 440 417 280 277 (*>) (b) l b) 510 325 480 264 400 385 229 216 (6) (b ) 1,106 673 972 524 840 b) 802 509 493 b) b) a Data are for county, ftNot reported. cN o license required except for nonresidents of State. a Including 11 births, sex not reported, e Including 1 birth, sex not reported. /In clu d in g data for township. 0 Including premature births, ftIncluding 4 births, sex not reported. * Including 31 births, sex not reported. 9398— N o. 42— 02------ 4 8.88 16.49 22.62 22.65 14.73 / 26.49 35.66' 13.57 19.20 (&) 210 340 (b) 266 384 322 291 279 18.66 9.39 20.30 21.89 16.56 18.92 ( &) 954 1,132 452 (») 33 7 «114 9 1,014 563 378 920 538 % % ( o l 86 o ll6 52 ( &) 304 180 259 198 10 b) a 21 a 51 ( b) Birth rate p e r , pop Total. 1,000 ulation. 626 280 586 639 456 506 238 444 521 549 399 / 726 885 358 488 263 361 516 (b) a 24 91 ol65 ol94 60 o 103 a 99 34 ol49 145 a 47 o41 ol25 Fe m ale. b) b) 31.60 17.95 30.38 16.38 b 27.07 (b) 25.06 16.16 14.09 b) (b) ( b 49 39 46 43 48 34 49 44 48 75 84 52 15 '66 47 28 37 30 28 59 20 46 31 77 53 45 27 L14 82 '51 34 24 '36 55 32 27 22 24 57* 32 32 41 39 19 41 30 39 11 32 31 22 33 22 51 123 25 29 23 7 29 12 35 46 29 47 25 926 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (1). Number of deaths from— Mar ginal numher. Cities. Other Diph Dys epi Whoop theria Ty Small Mea Scar Grippe en dem ic ing phoid Mala* let and pox. ria. sles. tery. dis tever. fever. cough. croup. eases. i 1 New York, N. Y .... 727 856 289 2,068 410 449 1,162 195 (a) (a ) (a) 2 Chicago, 111............ («) («) 662 444 3 Philadelphia, P a . .. % 261 19 % {% 220 4 St. Louis, M o.......... 81 307 198 80 9 81 34 69 5 Boston, M ass.......... 142 166 353 74 65 210 1 103 6 Baltimore, M d ....... 142 128 35 171 11 63 3 7 Cleveland, O hio___ 140 6 11 216 20 10 34 8 Buffalo, N. Y .......... 36 2 22 64 143 45 9 San Francisco, C a l. 14 57 97 70 61 3 27 13 109 20 Cincinnati, Ohio . . . 182 69 15 45 17 1 24 112 11 Pittsburg, P a .......... 4 165 416 3 66 115 117 12 New Orleans, La___ 141 77 52 22 41 116 62 1 17 13 Detroit, M ich.......... 62 47 11 1 15 10 49 14 M ilwaukee, W is___ 75 1 21 100 17 16 15 W ashington, D. C .. 74 181 48 193 17 86 7 16 Newark, N. J .......... 10 71 25 57 13 29 103 23 17 Jersey City, N. J — 4 13 35 11 14 120 31 28 15 121 18 Louisville, K y......... 2 50 2 6 53 3 121 19 M inneapolis, M inn. 24 12 15 190 10 20 Providence, R. I . . . 2 2 47 87 64 3 13 9 Indianapolis, Ind .. 2 17 50 5 36 39 5 10 Kansas City, M o___ 17 74 6 40 39 3 28 23 St. Paul, M inn......... 52 24 14 1 6 3 18 24 Rochester, N. Y ___ 7 4 6 22 31 15 25 Denver, C olo.......... 1 67 23 3 3 46 6 54 26 Toledo, O h io.......... 62 3 5 45 15 23 10 27 Allegheny, Pa........ 134 53 3 i 18 27 29 25 28 Columbus, O h io___ 6 5 47 10 38 20 29 W orcester, Mass___ 4 3 2 12 26 17 13 13 Syracuse, N. Y ....... 1 18 7 1 23 3 3 New Haven, Conn . 103 12 10 22 61 30 6 Paterson, N. J ......... 2 1 29 5 1 20 13 11 33 Fall R ivi r, Mass___ 21 1 3 7 8 2 9 23 34 St. Joseph, M o......... 20 10 12 3 5 5 5 5 Omaha, Nebr.......... 24 4 12 15 9 10 1 36 Los Angeles, Cal___ 6 4 32 28 20 37 Memphis, T enn....... 11 44 121 38 6 2 5 38 Scranton, Pa............ 31 1 42 8 27 5 12 39 Low ell, M ass.......... 18 2 17 14 26 3 117 40 Albany, N. Y .......... 24 1 6 43 30 8 4 41 Cambridge, M ass. . . 3 10 1 10 8 59 49 11 42 Portland, O reg ....... 3 4 23 26 34 43 Atlanta, Ga.............. 12 1 58 18 24 20 15 37 44 Grand Rapids,M ich. 6 33 1 7 5 1 18 45 Dayton, O n io.......... 1 23 1 3 2 18 8 46 Richm ond, V a .. . . . . 22 32 11 44 35 47 N ashville, T en n ___ 11 7 26 37 12 31 48 Seattle, W ash.......... 22 3 3 7 2 13 3 49 Hartford, C onn....... 25 6 3 35 13 12 1 50 Reading, P a ............ 1 35 1 22 58 19 15 51 W ilm ington, D e l. . . 33 3 3 9 39 20 52 Camden, N. J .......... 13 1 6 7 60 11 53 Trenton, N. J .......... 14 2 1 2 ! * 10 12 10 54 Bridgeport, C onn. . . 13 10 4 1 14 12 20 30 55 Lynn, M ass.............. 10 1 8 34 9 56 Oakland, C a l.......... 10 1 2 2 1 11 10 57 Lawrence, M ass___ 1 1 12 16 11 58 New Bedford, Mass. 19 6 2 10 14 6 59 Des Moines, Io w a ... 1 13 1 1 7 33 17 Springfield, M ass. . . 16 4 1 2 5 13 13 61 Som erville, Mass . . . 3 5 6 12 28 14 62 Troy, N. Y ............... 43 8 19 10 26 50 H oboken, N. J ......... 14 6 6 10 1 30 64 Evansville, In d ....... 1 4 16 4 8 7 65 Manchester, N. H ... 11 1 9 8 8 8 66 Utica, N .Y ............... 3 2 9 25 10 10 67 Peoria, 111............... 15 4 1 5 2 6 14 Charleston, S. C....... 48 48 6 10 41 Savannah, G a ......... 75 10 10 19 70 SaltLake City, Utah. 20 4 2 22 2 46 i 15 a Data not obtainable. 6 Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. e Including deaths from hydrocephalus. 348 («) 68 (&) 28 49 21 37 16 49 26 76 3 32 26 22 37 1 19 209 (<*) 79 51 4 51 27 18 50 1 139 27 29 23 19 15 8 48 20 6 11 14 6 10 3 6 20 12 10 3 35 17 25 3 5 7 7 17 3 34 7 10 4 20 1 210 1 6 3 5 39 11 11 4 2 6 27 9 25 19 28 4 1 4 5 7 10 10 9 7 2 14 3 6 9 3 8 2 3 4 2 8 1 2 1 2 5 5 2 6 1 3 5 8 6 9 8 5 3 3 1 4 6 8 1 1 8 3 7 11 11 1 17 5 4 927 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (1). Number of deaths from— Puru Pul Other Cere lent Other bral mo forms and gen Men conges Pa Can nary of septi- tuber tion raly tuber cer. eral in caemic culo culo dis gitis. and sis. in fec sis. eases. hemor sis. tion. rhage. 55 («) 200 53 98 41 52 1 68 35 40 60 37 14 19 6 9 5 17 4 34 50 18 1 38 26 19 14 1 16 3 11 13 7 20 8 27 16 1 27 10 18 25 5 14 16 10 9 12 7 4 4 6 8 11 10 9 4 6 7 6 1 12 16 7 8,135 Other dis Bron Con eases chitis, vul of acute sions nerv and of in ous chron fants. sys ic. tem. Pneu m onia and bronchopneumonia. Other dis eases of respir atory system. 1,254 2,463 1,554 1,163 9,168 814 243 805 981 2,152 2,540 (a) (a) (a) (a) («) f a 2,577 2,946 775 a 302 751 380 385 942 f t % l% 1,128 345 995 ol47 139 <*160 373 286 197 /485 196 (*) 1,309 1,099 205 368 496 201 219 301 116 97 460 109 1,147 1,138 294 250 358 205 175 164 232 - 173 394 180 433 211 105 204 614 99 122 50 134 110 335 475 23 274 153 149 539 81 47 96 198 73 186 944 168 398 326 246 161 691 138 123 1 239 58 742 80 228 104 210 633 102 121 115 80 266 223 142 360 175 361 87 775 83 166 167 33 171 123 886 85 485 206 133 74 115 58 207 119 257 67 330 27 180 465 163 108 108 79 85 160 158 216 400 73 206 326 48 128 93 124 57 160 9 176 871 62 194 145 497 107 137 51 183 115 306 93 421 581 49 74 180 82 159 32 240 115 56 157 467 32 96 391 70 65 136 14 72 166 133 193 423 332 109 39 109 82 64 121 105 56 95 89 262 214 60 133 74 6 35 42 31 68 93 60 384 88 44 143 281 59 55 166 21 102 27 56 224 23 85 142 224 40 72 20 52 86 38 57 306 42 74 82 256 23 59 51 47 47 44 39 212 21 25 41 157 80 64 42 43 9 50 14 263 14 214 150 124 27 64 84 71 5 55 89 51 547 92 323 76 24 75 77 65 26 30 73 142 34 139 24 75 45 59 10 49 35 43 43 312 42 148 98 48 61 69 13 68 56 65 53 21 206 13 71 32 11 139 34 58 33 30 55 242 19 274 10 67 32 113 92 55 11 38 43 124 40 160 15 74 24 32 30 31 87 38 23 110 11 146 30 79 55 6 151 57 30 59 31 215 43 72 177 5 71 44 67 13 55 20 75 182 157 112 225 43 13 50 18 23 100 67 79 65 65 13 12 2 14 6 18 14 23 14 15 78 42 113 31 8 38 14 14 18 31 35 10 347 42 82 166 98 30 34 24 53 42 107 6 22 239 22 25 151 36 29 22 28 24 31 39 112 228 63 6 52 74 40 24 109 25 55 33 22 150 67 243 20 57 32 75 37 41 67 17 217 32 106 143 28 9 40 28 147 19 23 36 184 30 24 174 92 22 12 10 37 8 24 148 11 126 112 27 15 77 12 38 27 19 5 72 28 218 34 28 29 243 47 60 63 33 40 76 53 24 33 81 20 76 34 30 18 13 12 130 11 17 115 26 8 73 35 66 13 58 42 185 84 161 76 42 111 32 63 47 36 53 221 62 31 175 31 30 60 39 23 40 35 23 32 10 100 11 86 32 22 17 14 23 41 10 3 125 30 30 123 59 14 19 67 27 36 122 17 18 113 63 21 29 7 21 90 37 31 141 22 54 21 149 53 11 8 23 28 48 33 154 21 127 33 52 29 11 43 85 33 8 16 21 104 27 133 12 32 39 30 37 20 93 43 12 40 127 17 143 31 47 26 24 37 13 41 3 11 12 120 142 25 13 17 55 25 32 33 21 21 13 119 151 14 25 32 53 15 10 56 9 20 21 28 126 42 27 20 37 108 15 57 54 17 14 99 34 25 23 139 14 51 26 48 15 11 93 18 63 5 11 26 8 10 17 17 5 16 78 27 101 21 12 37 12 40 18 22 85 92 44 * 22 11 35 7 39 22 7 26 39 21 27 233 245 42 104 4 68 33 19 33 132 17 12 149 64 34 31 1 27 28 58 11 11 11 9 6 5 54 23 28 19 118 30 16 30 26 38 105 26 104 8 55 33 16 43 23 22 18 112 137 12 21 51 19 31 29 33 9 9 52 24 20 27 90 28 32 19 19 13 23 116 17 23 205 81 9 33 31 13 75 31 28 121 39 34 24 1 33 31 193 17 58 31 13 14 10 53 14 35 12 3 20 15 24 18 8 d Including deaths from encephalitis. « Included in deaths from other diseases of nervous system. f Including deaths from paralysis, but not including deaths from encephalitis. Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 928 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (2). Number o f deaths from — Mar ginal num ber. Diarrh eaand ente]ritis. Cities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Her Other Other nia dis dis Organ eases and Peri Appen eases of of Bright’s ic heart circula Under 2 intesti toni dicitis. digest disease. years disease. tory nal ob tis. 2 ive or struc system. years. over. system. tion. New York, N. Y ......... 4,626 737 5,796 439 4,813 977 478 1,838 118 (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Chicago, 111............... Philadelphia, P a ....... 1,898 128 1,147 130 502 195 409 % St. Louis, M o.............. c m 427 <*786 15 /182 (*) («) («) Boston, M ass.............. 871 104 273 610 102 123 86 110 228 Baltimore, M d .......... 533 240 610 726 88 307 90 48 57 Cleveland, O hio......... 214 * 339 238 271 153 44 131 («) Buffalo, N. Y .............. 290 136 54 399 51 223 44 34 169 San Francisco, C a l. . . 260 42 529 302 49 194 42 271 38 Cincinnati, O h io....... 312 205 33 297 244 251 108 51 43 Pittsburg, P a .............. 154 205 209 503 67 41 62 38 220 New Orleans, L a ....... 137 25 520 300 106 185 429 48 26 Detroit, M ich.............. 275 83 61 35 183 290 169 30 76 M ilwaukee, W is......... 197 46 132 301 18 51 28 35 127 W ashington, D. C ___ 389 145 27 182 370 70 40 281 23 Newark, N, J .............. 165 20 256 203 231 60 145 46 30 Jersey City, N. J ......... 169 107 137 254 41 16 133 57 40 Louisville, K y............ 132 177 178 105 15 15 98 48 45 M inneapolis, M in n ... 137 48 32 63 24 76 70 23 53 20 Providence. R. I ....... 251 30 202 50 194 273 76 38 17 21 Indianapolis, I n d ___ 52 57 9 85 220 89 9 115 1 22 Kansas City, M o......... 86 72 82 102 108 31 11 87 15 23 St. Paul, M inn............ 58 21 26 50 105 108 4 13 104 24 Rochester, N. Y ......... 22 45 119 260 78 59 40 14 43 25 Denver, C olo.............. 73 26 110 74 100 64 25 24 38 26 Toledo, O h io.............. 107 36 94 9 69 51 23 10 31 27 Allegheny, Pa............ 31 125 4 60 195 35 51 81 19 28 Columbus, O h io......... 72 20 5 130 72 16 57 11 17 29 W orcester, M ass......... 191 7 20 31 96 119 9 15 30 30 Syracuse, N. Y .......... 78 1 87 128 48 38 27 13 48 31 New Haven, Conn___ 37 12 4 107 126 156 12 13 58 32 Paterson, N. J ............ 26 122 47 38 135 20 27 9 33 Fall River, M ass....... 12 22 4 42 38 67 30 20 7 34 St. Joseph, M o............ 21 22 8 38 30 13 4 11 3 35 Omaha, N ebr.............. 7 13 56 18 23 11 26 6 6 36 Los Angeles, Cal......... 74 112 97 4 43 14 66 13 31 37 Memphis, T e n n ......... 15 91 49 41 11 18 34 129 31 38 Scranton, P a .............. 42 62 38 29 48 59 59 10 9 39 Low ell, M ass.............. 24 41 37 197 185 15 6 41 18 40 Albany, N .Y .............. 141 74 22 46 19 15 45 144 8 41 Cambridge, M ass....... 32 18 130 56 18 35 6 6 3 42 Portland, O re g .......... 37 35 85 10 34 19 24 29 46 43 Atlanta, Ga................. 38 92 71 88 4 54 26 64 11 44 Grand Rapids, M ich.. 31 87 35 13 52 17 7 38 8 45 Dayton, O hio.............. 35 113 43 10 85 11 5 11 3 46 Richm ond, Y a............ 20 48 67 103 16 14 64 55 6 47 Nashville, T en n ......... 14 75 108 38 22 48 10 1 38 48 Seattle, W ash.............. 20 67 18 14 21 7 24 39 29 49 Hartford, Conn.......... 6 101 47 6 42 84 23 10 50 Reading, P a ............... 15 65 57 15 8 16 5 38 40 51 W ilm ington, D e l....... 41 90 87 3 6 17 1 39 47 52 Camden, N. J .............. 22 102 36 7 14 2 18 25 83 53 Trenton, N. J .............. 42 77 64 -31 6 9 38 19 Bridgeport, Conn....... 88 37 113 45 10 10 7 77 Lynn, M ass................. 38 89 35 4 11 18 31 22 6 56 Oakland, C a l.............. 118 35 12 * 19 7 5 36 47 («) 57 Lawrence, M ass......... 71 30 8 12 38 6 1 14 28 58 New Bedford, M ass. . . 112 24 48 95 14 11 2 14 1 59 Des Moines, Iow a....... 17 26 12 .19 10 6 2 40 32 60 Springfield, M ass....... 105 19 38 7 4 9 6 13 87 61 Som erville, M ass....... 74 10 21 18 2 10 5 30 23 62 Troy, N .Y ................... 32 110 24 77 15 14 5 44 80 63 Hoboken, N. J ............ 74 25 65 23 1 3 3 30 55 64 Evansville, In d .......... 32 31 18 31 18 6 3 20 23 65 Manchester, N. H ....... 28 70 119 28 14 5 35 46 66 Utica, N .Y ................... 26 71 21 33 23 4 42 52 7 67 Peoria, 111................... 52 20 22 5 1 13 9 19 41 68 Charleston, S. C.......... 64 50 21 152 7 7 7 69 205 69 Savannah, G a ............ 70 20 64 7 2 14 4 58 85 70 Salt Lake City, U tah.. 12 47 4 20 8 6 7 15 29 «D ata not obtainable. b Included in deaths from other diseases of circulatory system. c Including deaths from organic heart disease. d Including deaths from dysentery, diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over, peritonitis, and gastritis. e Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. /N o t including deaths from gastritis, o Included in deaths from other forms of tuberculosis. STATISTICS OF CITIES, 929 T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (2). Number of deaths from— Other dis eases ofgen itourinary sys tem. Puer peral septi cae mia. Dis Dis Other oeases f the eases puer skin of peral and loco dis cellu m otor eases. lar sys tissue. tem. MarHy- Other Infan Senile Ill-de Total ginal num deaths Sui A cci fined dro- mal tile ber. ceph- form a dis debil dis ity. cide. dent. eases. alus. tions. eases. 1 1,822 1,231 713 4,152 2,230 70,720 (a) (a) (a) 2 («) 24,406 («) 3 823 152 24,137 146 1,275 1,831 4 734 580 143 17 10,601 30 16 *1,126 (9) w 5 584 834 323 87 *38 48 18 117 11,300 W 6 484 16 373 57 147 10,479 71 33 935 7 7 15 16 606 289 56 281 181 5,834 8 334 12 39 309 5 5,360 65 9 206 53 9 4 18 2 6 302 191 3 7,008 43 150 416 262 2 6,155 10 46 13 250 296 17 7 73 11 43 5 11 25 266 63 6,592 10 70 636 45 12 285 32 30 23 32 228 6,478 149 6 428 22 60 w4,513 13 199 12 6 260 33 207 78 1 14 2 115 14 3,833 6 290 21 19 59 170 15 9 6,087 8 177 36 31 17 226 421 38 16 119 61 4,806 24 21 15 350 68 331 8 10 85 17 14 329 291 39 4,042 20 3 3 9 33 18 232 205 19 3,497 3 1 26 165 40 7 7 4 9 74 15 2,510 19 106 140 20 19 34 3,444 36 114 79 186 20 28 14 3 15 122 21 4 6 18 184 238 24 2,579 27 22 1 236 107 2,673 59 24 250 7 19 2 2 23 179 49 110 14 1,805 17 2 1 19 1 24 2 158 118 6 2,467 7 3 160 11 27 44 2,732 25 2 3 5 65 136 6 83 1 71 26 14 1,713 6 64 118 119 2 1 16 10 27 2 4 9 63 138 30 2,425 18 1 108 24 28 73 72 77 11 1,547 8 1 1 23 3 1,998 29 90 85 4 6 4 136 15 30 4 72 5 80 8 83 71 1,574 10 31 56 96 35 1,975 2 2 2 1 14 18 119 32 33 1,808 5 7 43 6 105 20 156 1 33 50 6 3 47 23 2,143 315 1 64 34 672 2 2 8 56 20 1 7 1 11 35 55 104 18 1,035 10 8 3 3 59 3 9 5 2 62 82 36 48 1,985 101 19 18 10 i 175 37 44 1 43 220 1,926 3 18 6 3 16 38 2 13 171 68 1,732 2 119 8 1 10 1 1 39 32 2,038 7 2 2 9 71 3 8 205 40 40 86 5 2 50 25 8 1,759 9 10 1 1 56 41 59 4 42 34 10 8 3 1 98 1,574 7 1 42 52 118 2 6 1 1 8 1,172 50 43 5 2 86 2 1 2 2 17 156 1,931 3 83 44 4 55 5 1 2 50 16 19 1,140 3 83 45 2 42 7 60 4 1 1 85 23 1,227 7 46 68 98 1,907 7 11 1 76 70 1 13 5 1 1 8 47 142 48 6 58 24 wl,587 4 1 1 48 3 21 876 4 61 36 16 19 49 9 8 46 53 26 1,198 92 2 6 114 1,359 50 112 75 1 1 3 29 51 102 54 1,404 4 31 4 3 1 113 6 16 52 4 58 47 1,356 3 6 147 8 30 3 3 2 22 1,231 5 94 74 53 9 8 27 5 3 1 7 15 7 54 7 68 50 3 1,224 6 6 3 55 4 48 2 47 37 27 1,020 1 4 2 56 34 46 3 1,048 60 3 16 57 6 4 2 35 1,118 1 204 7 29 37 3 13 58 4 31 12 1,236 1 2 2 116 2 50 6 34 740 59 6 1 1 3 55 24 6 55 3 1 933 60 2 2 42 4 50 15 5 6 73 3 61 21 5 6 7 831 3 3 47 27 62 35 1,662 2 2 27 11 7 5 66 55 6 9 7 17 22 11 1,157 63 50 26 88 11 1 1 745 64 3 59 13 40 17 3 65 3 2 5 33 1,131 3 3 15 35 8 101 2 31 27 1,031 66 6 10 2 27 8 2 55 4 11 21 6 2 2 57 48 791 67 31 3 4 14 14 52 68 4 45 18 1,725 3 49 1 75 114 1,437 6 15 7 2 52 65 69 9 1 6 86 706 4 39 9 70 9 3 10 49 3 1 53 h Included in deaths from infantile diseases. i Including deaths from other m alform ations. J Included in deaths from other m alformations. * Including deaths from hydrocephalus. i Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over. m Including 303 deaths occurring outside city lim its. « Not including 81 deaths of nonresidents. 1,299 (a) 1,174 370 483 182 18 109 156 165 41 91 54 64 137 88 98 44 68 117 26 32 6 27 60 31 24 10 15 8 25 40 64 13 33 42 6 11 58 13 65 22 23 24 18 39 6 5 7 18 24 14 45 9 32 19 15 69 6 9 30 24 2 35 10 15 5 19 7 26 244 («) 23 15 31 55 21 58 21 29 32 31 22 28 19 27 27 9 13 11 1 2 2 5 2 6 7 6 18 8 13 1 192 404 % % 431 («) 140 (a )2 6 6 23 % 930 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able V I —DEATHS,BY CAUSES (1)—Concluded. Number o f deaths from — Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 71 San A ntonio, T e x .. 72 Duluth, M in n ......... 73 Erie, P a ................... 74 Elizabeth, N. J ....... 75 W ilkesbarre, P a ___ 76 Kansas City, Kans. 77 Harrisburg, P a ....... 78 Portland, M e.......... 79 Yonkers, N. Y ......... 80 N orfolk, V a ............ 81 Waterbury, Conn. (a) 82 H olyoke, M ass....... 83 Fort Wayne, In d . . . 84 Youngstown, O h io. 85 Houston, T e x ......... 86 Covington, K y ....... 87 Akroru O h io .'......... 88 Dallas, T ex.............. 89 Saginaw, M ich ....... 90 Lancaster, P a ......... 91 Lincoln, N ebr......... 92 Brockton, Mass....... 93 Bingham ton, N. Y .. 94 Augusta, Ga............ 95 Pawtucket, R. I ___ 96 A ltoona, P a ............ 97 W heeling, W . V a ... 98 M obile, A la ............ 99 Birmingham, A la .. 100 Little Rock, Ark . . . 101 Springfield, O hio. . . 102 Galveston, T e x ....... 103 Tacoma, W ash....... 104 H averhill, M ass___ 105 Spokane, W ash....... 106 Terre Haute, I n d ... 107 Dubuque, Iow a....... 108 Quincy, 111.............. 109 South Bend, In d . . . 110 Salem, M ass............ 111 Johnstown, P a ....... 112 Elmira, N. Y .......... 113 Allentow n, Pa......... 114 Davenport, Iow a .. . 115 M cKeesport, P a ___ 116 Springfield, 111....... 117 Chelsea, M ass......... 118 Chester, P a .............. 119 York, P a ................. 120 M alden, M ass......... 121 Topeka, K an s......... 122 Newton, M ass......... 123 Sioux City, Iow a . . . 124 Bayonne, N. J ......... 125 K noxville, Tenn . . . 126 Schenectady, N .Y .. 127 Fitchburg, M ass___ 128 Superior, W is.......... 129 Rockford, 111.......... 130 Taunton, M ass....... 131 Canton, O hio.......... 132 Butte, M ont............ 133 Montgomery, Ala .. 134 Auburn, N. Y ......... 135 Chattanooga, Tenn. 136 East St. Louis, 111 .. 137 Joliet, 111................. Other Ty Scar W hoop Diph Dys epi phoid Mala Small Mea let ing theria Grippe en dem ic ria. pox. sles. and fever. fever. cough. croup. tery. dis eases. 23 41 43 1 8 l! 15 18 43 1 7 2 21 2 2 2 21 1 10 13 6 32 15 7 16 59 26 17 3 1 1 17 13 10 12 6 2 2 23 15 6 11 38 28 38 28 8 10 11 10 19 27 7 23 19 4 40 1 3 5 60 5 5 33 5 12 9 40 43 3 1 26 ___ 2 7 10 1 1 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 3 5 i 6 25 1 8 6 1 1 1 3 2 2 5 2 22 19 6 6 2 2 1 22 7 14 14 9 15 1 4 1 3 5 3 1 3 6 1 1 6 1 7 2 18 13 7 14 2 6 4 9 8 8 22 14 7 1 2 6 6 4 1 9 l 1 2 3 3 4 9 5 10 1 6 12 2 2 1 1 7 4 3 6 2 1 15 26 16 5 10 11 12 2 23 11 13 9 4 16 19 18 11 21 11 21 20 1 5 3 8 11 2 2 1 -1 0 1 14 5 13 8 2 1 16 6 1 4 2 1 1 17 5 14 1 3 5 1 2 3 1 2 1 8 1 1 4 3 7 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 11 3 Including data for township. 2 2 6 12 23 18 15 6 16 25 18 18 11 11 4 11 2 1 4 19 7 2 2 6 24 3 9 4 13 7 13 5 4 1 10 4 3 3 3 i 2 2 4 2 2 2 1 2 13 3 8 4 , 13 4 16 45 1 i 2 23 19 2 21 1 11 12 13 17 i 1 3 1 2 1 6 5 3 4 17 8 3 6 2 8 11 23 5 5 1 29 20 27 9 5 1 1 10 1 19 4 2 1 7 3 4 9 18 4 1 6 6 2 12 1 1 7 24 4 4 9 27 2 10 11 17 9 4 24 7 3 4 19 7 17 4 2 11 13 2 19 4 5 8 8 4 8 3 2 5 4 18 2 10 1 2 3 2 1 5 7 6 1 7 5 5 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 6 3 1 i 4 4 4 5 3 ii i 6 1 2 7 2 8 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 13 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 2 1 4 2 12 8 8 1 2 2 6 4 6 1 6 2 7 4 4 4 9 7 3 7 2 4 29 3 3 8 2 8 3 10 10 3 6 2 2 2 6 1 6 6 12 2 12 10 4 9 2 12 10 19 16 11 8 12 5 6 3 5 3 1 1 9 1 1 2 1 931 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VI.—DEATHS BY CAUSES (1)—Concluded. Number of deaths from— Other Pneu Puru Pul Other Cere dis Bron m Con eases onia Other bral lent chitis, and mo forms vul gen Men Pa conges and nary Can eral in of acute bronof raly tion sions septi- tuber cer. and chosis. of in nerv csemic culo tuber dis gitis. and culo ous chron pneufants. sys hemor eases. infec sis. sis. ic. m onia. rhage. tion. tem. 11 10 7 2 11 1 6 1 1 7 4 10 8 6 5 13 7 2 6 2 5 3 5 14 9 14 9 11 10 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 5 4 6 ii 4 1 2 4 2 8 2 2 9 2 292 66 57 113 46 100 76 118 95 136 70 87 63 43 118 105 29 112 50 46 29 59 54 113 67 46 55 157 130 120 39 46 48 74 51 60 37 59 54 65 46 44 54 53 35 78 60 48 36 45 62 i 42 I 38 56 128 58 38 26 43 60 33 20 48 46 79 28 39 21 18 12 23 5 3 18 4 11 8 2 6 41 4 3 3 5 3 8 1 8 9 1 5 2 3 1 16 1 3 2 8 6 35 1 9 7 1 17 4 6 10 5 2 6 10 5 4 3 2 11 3 4 6 3 7 5 1 26 29 28 23 21 28 26 37 23 24 10 26 32 16 26 13 22 19 25 22 24 21 33 18 22 17 31 26 20 16 19 21 18 28 30 26 26 23 17 24 14 25 13 24 16 13 24 13 16 22 11 22 17 13 10 13 26 13 17 10 12 8 5 17 18 8 8 13 12 29 17 11 13 17 21 12 39 34 27 16 18 20 40 12 25 12 7 8 15 18 39 5 17 12 17 11 13 12 7 17 12 21 21 8 23 13 17 12 17 15 14 8 20 16 9 11 7 11 12 12 3 20 13 9 9 21 15 3 8 8 13 11 7 2 27 35 7 22 11 25 12 41 34 14 17 51 10 23 7j 38 10 6 7 6 11 16 4 10 24 20 18 1 12 18 10 10 9 12 18 14 17 12 6 19 35 12 13 6 15 8 17 12 7 10 5 10 15 19 6 14 11 15 29 9 7 11 4 9 8 10 18 21 39 42 42 21 36 62 40 52 31 15 23 17 17 23 22 17 16 51 21 6 42 29 38 20 25 35 28 32 34 18 16 27 9 18 21 28 13 27 8 26 55 25 6 12 17 21 30 25 11 38 20 24 11 32 14 10 9 38 15 6 5 37 22 8 9 15 5 18 6 6 13 15 28 4 28 6 10 19 14 17 15 12 16 18 3 18 4 19 30 8 18 16 18 9 12 2 10 5 13 11 8 9 10 8 7 10 9 6 16 7 15 20 7 19 5 31 4 12 4 8 2 15 32 12 3 7 9 7 5 18 17 17 29 25 9 14 9 13 40 10 14 8 21 18 17 20 5 20 18 10 6 12 5 32 7 39 8 5 10 6 8 6 6 2 15 5 12 4 29 6 17 19 41 14 12 14 9 8 7 5 5 19 7 11 4 11 7 8 4. 6 6 3 5 4 9 32 2 23 11 14 24 16 12 9 17 7 15 12 13 24 25 11 16 14 7 11 20 83 28 7 10 5 49 20 20 5 20 9 19 4 19 13 29 3 30 8 7 7 13 2 17 24 9 7 18 42 10 8 5 11 8 5 7 11 29 11 6 19 6 9 5 15 21 19 21 18 13 11 7 11 25 17 54 31 19 16 7 27 8 18 15 11 2 8 10 10 23 14 13 11 13 9 20 7 3 5 14 7 10 14 13 14 14 9 7 17 16 14 14 4 8 13 1 9 12 10 8 12 11 14 13 12 1 6 4 6 9 16 6 58 57 73 88 88 105 50 58 91 72 99 82 45 84 56 86 39 99 54 72 33 68 77 74 74 75 64 51 180 91 41 26 37 48 35 46 22 55 28 62 49 64 55 '20 94 39 35 50 54 60 47 37 37 79 51 71 47 40 46 50 33 70 30 41 32 94 46 Other dis eases of respir atory system. 8 9 11 16 15 10 9 13 19 7 20 17 24 2 13 18 6 10 20 5 4 20 5 27 7 15 12 13 11 23 7 6 7 5 4 7 3 18 17 31 8 5 8 12 5 4 4 6 10 6 6 7 22 7 19 2 3 2 12 5 8 8 9 15 5 Mar ginal num ber. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 932 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (2)—Concluded. Number o f deaths from — Diarrh eaand ente ritis. Other dis Organ eases of ic heart 2 Under years disease. circula tory 2 or system. years. over. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 San Antonio, T e x ___ Duluth, M in n ............ Erie, P a ...................... Elizabeth, N .J............ W ilkesbarre, P a ......... Kansas City, Kans___ Harrisburg, P a .......... Portland, M e.............. Yonkers, N. Y ............ N orfolk, Y a................. W aterbury, Conn. (« ). H olyoke, Mass............ Port Wayne, I n d ....... Youngstown, Ohio___ Houston, T ex.............. Covington. K y............ Akron, O h io............... Dallas, T e x ................. Saginaw, M ich .......... Lancaster, Pa.............. Lincoln, N eb r............ Brockton, Mass.......... Binghamton, N. Y ___ Augusta, G a............... Pawtucket, R. I .......... Altoona, Pa................. W heeling. W .V a ....... M obile, A la................. Birmingham, A la ___ Little R ock, A rk......... Springfield, O h io....... Galveston, T e x .......... Tacoma, Wash............ H averhill, M ass......... Spokane, W ash.......... Terre Haute, In d ....... Dubuque, Iow a.......... Quincy, 111................. South Bend, I n d ....... Salem, M ass............... Johnstown, P a .......... Elmira, N .Y ............... Allentow n, Pa............ Davenport, Io w a ....... M cKeesport, P a ......... Springfield, 111............ Chelsea, Mass.............. Chester, P a................. York, Pa...................... M alden, Mass.............. Topeka, K an s............ Newton, M ass............ Sioux City, Iow a......... Bayonne, N .J.............. K noxville, Tenn......... Schenectady, N. Y ___ Fitchburg, M ass......... Superior, W is.............. R ockford, 111.............. Taunton, Mass............ Canton, O h io.............. Butte, M on t............... Montgomery, A la....... Auburn, N. Y .............. Chattanooga, T enn. . . East St. Louis, 111....... Joliet, 111.................... a b 38 23 52 48 43 39 52 81 44 76 27 - 26 17 55 35 65 38 23 53 46 15 41 35 27 72 23 46 51 30 26 30 27 63 36 36 46 33 19 14 40 47 39 39 39 18 21 70 33 23 43 26 32 27 4 23 23 55 17 19 37 31 16 29 27 22 9 11 28 17 11 44 4 27 6 10 31 13 23 12 18 7 11 44 4 16 6 14 6 8 13 17 6 21 9 8 10 19 1 5 11 10 9 10 11 9 16 26 8 15 4 14 6 4 20 12 16 14 9 10 4 17 12 12 7 3 12 6 2 2 6 10 6 1 92 66 49 85 46 9 39 28 45 41 79 84 19 35 49 29 16 29 21 16 10 9 13 23 47 22 c 30 11 7 27 7 21 4 29 12 30 17 24 31 12 42 20 12 21 39 17 6 37 35 17 16 26 14 49 14 45 31 46 18 42 11 24 22 14 24 11 23 15 5 10 14 3 19 4 11 63 11 10 5 9 15 7 3 12 5 22 3 13 1 67 13 13 (<*) 29 53 40 3 14 5 4 6 6 1 5 3 28 25 5 6 32 9 31 4 10 10 6 5 8 8 6 9 6 3 3 11 15 10 4 3 3 Other Hernia dis and Peri- Appen eases intesti •toniof Bright’s nal ob tis. dicitis. digest disease. ive struc system. tion. 1 6 10 5 6 4 6 3 7 15 11 5 2 5 4 4 3 5 11 4 4 2 1 6 2 11 6 4 8 1 3 2 5 4 11 2 6 2 3 6 3 6 5 6 5 10 2 2 7 5 4 1 10 1 4 6 5 4 4 2 1 8 4 10 11 9 6 13 18 7 12 7 10 2 8 17 6 7 15 7 7 12 2 3 5 12 15 1 9 7 13 17 6 6 4 8 3 11 16 7 8 9 4 7 6 5 6 18 9 5 6 3 4 6 3 11 8 12 10 7 4 4 5 3 7 3 8 7 4 4 Including data for township. Not including deaths from premature birth. 8 9 9 1 4 5 5 4 7 8 5 6 2 4 3 1 11 9 3 2 3 11 3 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 6 6 2 10 5 3 4 2 3 6 5 3 6 2 7 1 2 13 2 3 4 3 6 6 4 2 6 2 4 1 2 1 44 13 26 17 16 26 22 18 25 41 24 31 26 21 42 27 14 47 26 17 15 28 20 35 21 19 35 28 32 25 10 24 8 9 19 26 18 21 15 16 13 20 14 11 20 27 16 17 13 10 24 10 16 23 24 10 11 6 14 6 11 11 22 17 29 7 6 52 31 33 51 36 31 22 76 44 34 33 22 33 33 29 21 25 20 22 13 8 32 29 28 25 21 83 23 18 40 66 17 20 17 10 20 23 19 9 15 36 26 13 6 30 21 10 15 14 8 12 10 23 19 18 5 12 3 18 13 27 19 22 24 8 13 933 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VI.—DEATHS, BY CAUSES (2)—Concluded. Number o f deaths from— Other dis eases ofgen itourinary sys tem. 8 2 10 15 1 13 14 13 24 28 22 14 21 18 3 74 4 4 9 7 3 20 19 10 9 3 23 9 15 2 3 13 4 14 4 17 4 12 11 15 9 24 1 6 7 9 19 1 14 16 20 15 9 2 14 11 2 6 15 1 13 10 7 3 3 7 Puer peral septi cae mia. 7 5 9 4 3 6 6 3 2 11 1 3 1 5 6 4 1 2 4 2 7 3 3 6 1 1 Dis Dis Other eases eases Hy- Other f the puer oskin of dro- mal peral and loco cepha motor alus. form dis tions. eases. cellu sys lar tem. tissue. 6 2 4 6 3 6 3 4 5 2 2 4 1 2 14 2 4 4 2 5 3 5 1 2 9 11 4 1 3 3 8 5 1 7 1 2 1 1 3 2 5 1 1 5 4 6 4 2 1 1 3 1 1 6 2 1 6 3 5 2 5 6 2 3 1 3 3 6 1 3 3 1 6 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 4 2 2 1 8 2 6 5 1 2 3 2 5 3 2 1 4 1 5 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 4 ! 1 ! 1 2 4 2 4 1 3 3 1 ; 2 i 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 2 4 3 4 3 1 1 4 4 2 5 3 3 4 2 8 3 5 1 3 2 5 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 i 3 3 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 i 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 i 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 7 1 2 1 2 5 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 c d 8 1 2 1 1 1 Mar Ill-de Total ginal Infan Senile fined deaths num Sui tile A cci ber. cide. dent. dis dis debil ity. eases. eases. 64 26 66 80 59 40 72 49 48 86 82 88 37 635 50 57 39 49 39 45 22 30 33 64 58 49 28 53 52 6 21 34 35 6 26 26 23 69 33 29 58 23 59 32 49 22 39 19 40 39 31 39 5 23 30 44 25 34 67 48 25 38 14 33 8 43 39 19 30 28 16 25 25 33 20 39 45 12 15 18 17 26 24 20 51 13 16 34 32 12 19 45 7 22 41 27 33 15 10 38 14 11 21 19 57 36 48 19 17 16 17 14 44 9 48 23 17 18 14 35 21 9 6 15 15 28 23 19 41 17 11 15 20 17 15 16 12 11 8 7 6 3 1 2 3 1 1 6 6 8 6 12 1 8 3 2 7 3 6 5 6 5 3 2 2 11 9 10 8 5 9 2 2 4 6 4 8 5 4 2 1 2 3 6 3 4 2 1 2 3 5 6 10 2 2 1 3 69 80 38 . 68 67 59 55 39 44 50 41 38 41 63 76 52 40 72 35 22 30 6 38 23 23 37 46 34 117 46 18 44 44 27 29 42 26 39 25 13 61 29 21 30 74 34 20 57 22 16 49 23 40 46 24 45 24 57 15 16 10 62 19 21 39 61 28 Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over. included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. 39 1,255 725 12 7 811 966 17 746 36 858 60 719 23 878 13 11 808 16 1,075 31 895 22 876 631 17 23 6 701 862 32 13 1,047 479 36 872 90 4 611 7 592 406 29 9 523 755 53 62 917 667 3 12 628 1 683 930 27 62 1,008 58 &794 10 458 575 60 17 6474 3 547 476 8 7 697 444 5 27 609 18 503 10 630 15 657 1 568 39 530 16 530 44 652 622 71 677 13 14 535 19 464 4 486 614 112 7 434 17 446 21 581 36 565 37 606 2 469 21 475 422 23 5 560 288 9 486 36 20 381 8 426 585 60 35 439 365 26 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 934 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (1). Mar ginal number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Cities. New York, N. Y ....... Chicago, 111.............. Philadelphia , I n ... St. Louis, M o............ Boston, M ass.......... Baltim ore, M d........ Cleveland, O h io___ Buffalo, N .Y ............ San Francisco, C al.. Cincinnati, O hio___ Pittsburg, P a .......... New Orleans, La___ Detroit, M ich.......... M ilwaukee, W is___ W asnington, D. C ... Newark, N .J .......... Jersey C ity,N .J — Louisville, K y ......... M inneapolis, M in n . Pnm aence, R. I ___ Indianapolis, In d ... Kansas C ty M o___ St Paul, M inn....... Rochester, N. Y ....... Denver C o lo .......... Toledo Ohio............ A llegheny, P a ......... Coiumbus, O h io ___ Worcester, M ass---Syracuse, N. Y ........ New Haven, C onn.. Paterson, N .J.......... Fall River, M ass___ St. Joseph, M o ......... Omaha, N ebr.......... Los Angeles, Cal___ Memphis, Tenn....... Scranton, Pa........... Low ell, M ass.......... Albany, N .Y .......... Cambridge, M ass... Portland, O reg....... Atlanta, G a ............ Grand Rapids, M ich. Dayton, Ohio.......... Richm ond, V a......... N ashville, T enn___ Seattle, W ash......... Hartford, Conn....... Reading, Pa............ W ilm ington, D e l. . . Camden, N .J ......... Trenton, N .J .......... Bridgeport, C onn... Lynn, Mass.............. Oakland, Cal.......... Lawrence, Mass___ New Bedford, Mass. Des Moines, Iow a .. Springfield, M ass... Som erville, M ass.. . Troy, N. Y ............... Hoboken, N .J ......... Evansville, I n d ___ Manchester, N. H .. Utica, N. Y .............. Peoria, 111............... Charleston,^. C ___ Savannah, G a......... SaltLakeCity,U tah. Ty W hoop Small Mea Scar phoid Mala ing let fever. ria. pox. sles. fever. cough. 1.03 0.28 («) («) 1.84 .08 1.87 .75 1.26 .01 1.36 .33 2.40 .10 1.85 1.00 .20 2.96 .24 6.31 .06 2.18 1.79 1.04 .24 1.64 3.17 .79 .21 1.19 .87 .32 3.46 .43 4.82 1.36 .06 1.94 .66 2.77 .(54 1.33 1.26 2.45 .04 2.63 .17 5.53 .12 3.04 .32 1.30 .15 1.14 .06 5.21 .51 1.60 .05 .98 .14 2.98 .45 2.32 1.61 2.28 6.28 1.79 .06 .88 .10 1.38 .11 .64 .06 1.96 .62 3.00 2.89 .53 1.87 .08 1.68 1.15 2.33 1.64 2.51 2.08 .50 2.58 .07 .21 2.35 .96 1.14 *\*i6* 1.06 .82 .98 .10 .95 ~ .10 1.07 1.54 1.76 .13 1.72 .43 1.44 2.59 1.21 .54 2.15 .97 .09 .87 .51 1.90 2.78 2.78 .42 5.22 2.83 .. 0.58 0.63 (a) (a) .65 .09 .65 .34 .04 .04 .02 .05 .80 .02 .03 1.48 .10 .06 .06 .08 .22 .06 .11 .04 .20 .11 .05 1.49 .39 .57 .19 .05 .34 .07 .08 .11 .32 .91 .03 .17 .41 .38 .73 1.00 .02 1.09 .44 .28 .27 .27 .06 .40 .09 .19 .33 .28 .22 .29 1.11 .10 .06 .61 .05 .33 .74 .05 .46 .83 .34 .64 .34 .93 .09 .08 .34 .25 .07 ... .i<j .33 .52 .19 .09 .16 .13 .11 .36 1.14 .52 .13 .29 .63 .49 .13 ... . 1.64 («) .91 .65 1.86 .10 .58 .84 .19 .39 1.77 .96 .33 .42 .11 .48 .69 .09 .48 .26 .39 1.05 1.00 .16 1.98 .58 1.20 1.29 .65 .19 .30 .61 .09 .74 .97 .30 .31 .29 .15 .45 .51 .26 1.04 .61 .24 .69 .80 1.09 1.62 .21 .44 1.14 .78 .19 .81 .95 .21 .60 .48 .86 .13 .80 .19 .25 .35 .70 3.12 0.41 (a) 1.08 .76 .57 .60 .19 1.19 .87 .28 1.74 .34 .22 .55 1.21 .60 .35 .17 .60 .38 .19 .11 .17 .24 .11 .88 1.03 .39 .60 .19 1.11 .72 .42 .74 .87 .20 .10 .69 .69 .23 .70 .78 .09 .16 1.84 .44 .23 .08 1.40 .64 .52 .81 .98 .10 .09 .54 .72 .60 .09 .54 .71 .97 .... Other Diph epi theria Grippe. Dys en dem ic and tery. dis croup. eases. 2.92 («) 2.74 2.90 3.12 1.63 3.70 2.67 1.38 1.12 2.50 .63 1.37 2.61 1.41 2.14 2.97 1.52 7.57 2.53 1.40 1.50 2.88 .89 1.68 3.62 2.19 .65 .85 1.46 1.52 1.11 1.07 1.79 1.16 1.01 .26 2.42 5.74 2.44 3.75 2.22 1.24 1.58 1.47 .58 .76 1.48 2.92 4.27 2.78 4.42 .81 1.63 3.33 1.05 1.43 1.13 4.46 1.39 3.37 1.57 2.59 1.07 .71 2.43 .76 .58 .70 6.52 *57 * *28 28* a Data not obtainable. b Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. o Including deaths from hydrocephalus. 1.21 (a) .81 .76 1.47 1.22 .67 .81 1.77 1.70 1.19 .38 1.96 2.97 .52 .77 1.43 .96 1.86 1.51 1.46 .78 .61 .84 1.34 .74 2.46 .65 .45 3.09 .28 .37 .74 1.45 1.41 1.97 1.56 1.27 1.71 3.11 2.90 1.92 .44 .65 2.31 1.95 .34 1.00 1.10 1.42 .81 .97 2.45 .88 .95 .98 .49 2.30 1.39 1.69 3.01 .94 .71 .97 1.77 2.38 1.32 2.12 0.49 % % .47 .36 .69 .23 .80 .39 1.17 .08 .53 .54 .54 1.06 .04 .55 .77 .22 .78 .41 .11 .35 .83 .78 .50 .19 1.77 .94 1.17 .45 .48 .30 2.03 .63 .20 .13 .51 1.40 .79 2.04 1.00 1.76 .46 .08 .29 .57 .37 .41 .29 .38 .18 .49 .13 .32 .60 .48 .52 1.21 .71 .49 1.01 .99 .76 .71 0.30 («) .33 .48 .04 .49 .46 .34 .71 .02 2.11 .42 .64 .38 .39 .37 .23 1.91 .43 .26 .33 .28 .62 .17 1.40 .45 .50 .25 1.01 .05 9.80 .15 .29 .25 .57 .29 .34 .40 .64 .85.47 .61 .16 .73 .19 .69 .75 .22 .14 .22 .16 .25 .10 .19 .09 .16 .41 .11 .48 .30 .26 .13 .09 .29 .89 .64 .07 .57 935 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (1). Other Pneu Puru Pul Other Cere dis Bron m Con eases onia Other lent bral chitis, and m o form s Men and gen Pa vul conges acute bronnary Can eral in of of septi- tuber tion raly sions nerv and cer. tuber csemic sis. o f in ous chron chodis gitis. and culo pneufants. sys eases. hemor in fec culo ic. sis. sis. m onia. tion. rhage. tem. Other dis eases of respir atory system. 12.96 1.15 3.04 1.39 3.48 2.20 1.64 1.14 3.59 0.34 (a) (a) (a) («) («) («) 10.68 1.60 & ft 3.21 1.60 3.11 3.90 ft ft ift 3.52 9.39 2.70 1.86 /4.58 10.64 c l. 39 3.25 1.31 <*1.51 1.85 (e) 1.03 9.73 1.94 2.66 1.81 3.26 4.39 1.78 .96 .86 11.58 4.07 10.95 1.67 2.81 2.21 1.65 10.86 2.39 3.42 1.96 1.56 3.76 1.72 10.52 1.70 5.74 1.89 .86 7.42 3.62 1.80 3.50 2.30 2.09 10.06 1.51 3.69 1.36 1.79 8.86 .43 5.11 2.86 2.78 .88 3.47 9.86 1.97 3.51 2.30 13.47 3.41 .83 2.40 5.68 4.65 1.75 .01 1.66 10.28 4.32 1.97 12.05 1.30 3.70 1.69 3.41 3.62 1.30 1.87 1.26 11.76 2.52 2.59 1.87 5.46 2.65 2.15 5.48 1.32 .50 2.53 1.14 7.49 1.84 1.03 1.31 3.18 2.05 1.77 3.20 13.68 3.97 .90 1.88 10.30 4.79 3.50 .60 3.99 3.61 2.39 3.55 2.39 1.75 7.31 1.25 8.50 3.23 4.59 10.44 1.90 5.37 3.34 2.43 1.49 4.17 .23 2.25 8.16 1.89 1.53 1.02 3.19 2.38 1.76 5.03 .84 3.01 14.31 1.54 8.76 1.02 3.74 1.71 3.31 2.39 3.27 1.16 12.09 4.99 .67 1.73 9.67 3.29 11.55 .79 2.38 1.61 3.36, 4.78 4.11 1.78 .35 2.34 2.72 9.49 3.12 1.12 3.12 1.83 2.54 1.60 3.46 3.00 12.10 8.52 1.23 1.39 2.39 10.44 1.67 2.39 5.30 2.95 2.71 3.70 .24 1.28 8.16 .78 2.96 2.55 4.15 1.71 1.60 1.63 11.15 4.82 .61 8.68 3.33 2.21 1.47 2.02 8.68 .89 3.30 1.55 2.79 5.51 .77 9.58 1.57 1.91 1.65 1.46 11.45 .86 2.77 2.21 1.76 3.07 1.76 1.16 8.70 2.33 11.74 1.38 4.43 2.27 2.38 .78 3.55 .50 2.77 8.68 1.09 2.88 2.23 3.61 10.66 .57 6.08 2.60 3.41 5.03 .20 11.82 2.78 .88 20.02 1.10 2.67 1.87 3.37 2.75 2.82 .95 2.38 8.29 1.99 .58 2.86 2.04 2.51 1.40 4.38 2.63 2.51 3.44 8.11 1.73 12.87 2.80 6.10 4.04 1.98 2.52 2.31 .54 2.68 2.19 2.85 8.99 1.36 1.94 13.32 .84 4.59 2.20 3.56 .71 3.75 2.07 2.13 .50 13.71 2.15 .55 1.90 4.61 12.11 .95 3.35 1.60 2.75 5.66 7.88 2.54 2.41 1.46 .95 4.70 1.91 1.97 2.03 5.53 1.53 10.17 7.39 1.52 5.57 7.65 2.89 .56 4.00 2.78 1.52 .30 1.57 2.99 9.79 2.38 .72 3.04 2.43 11.89 .28 3.98 3.93 4.15 1.11 3.70 7.32 10.50 5.22 8.49 .84 3.69 4.66 3.13 2.01 2.33 .61 1.07 9.67 1.93 2.08 9.67 .89 2.68 2.08 2.23 3.42 1.79 .30 2.08 10.92 2.99 1.74 .97 7.54 4.06 1.35 3.38 .77 3.67 2.99 4.25 8.36 2.12 1.21 17.48 .30 1.71 5.39 1.51 4.13 4.94 2.67 2.12 7.84 1.14 1.25 1.30 12.41 1.14 1.87 1.61 2.03 1.45 1.51 1.14 13.16 3.64 4.27 1.44 6.47 .35 2.31 1.39 3.18 3.00 1.91 6.29 11.92 1.08 3.29 .98 2.80 1.57 3.29 3.68 1.82 .83 7.36 2.01 1.59 8.13 1.59 12.34 1.82 6.03 1.31 2.05 1.08 8.36 .51 2.27 11.05 1.91 2.35 1.52 11.69 1.52 5.85 1.40 .76 .64 9.40 .51 9.56 2.30 .43* 10.75 1.28 6.57 1.02 3.24 .94 2.30 1.62 12.58 1.45 1.45 11.29 1.50 1.76 2.43 1.71 3.73 3.11 * 3.26 7.11 3.51 1.14 2.89 2.63 6.67 ***i.*75 6.67 2.98 1.58 4.65 2.11 .98 9.37 1.39 2.85 .90 2.12 5.38 1.06 4.73 .65 5.95 10.60 4.40 9.70 5.82 2.46 1.68 1.89 2.20 2.78 2.20 8.44 3.99 3.30 11.03 1.95 2.46 1.95 1.45 2.52 2.21 1.45 3.78 13.93 3.91 1.89 11.42 1.26 1.14 1.14 1.60 9.82 3.65 1.94 2.63 4.68 3.65 2.51 .25 10.27 2.50 5.59 2.25 3.01 1.59 2.50 4.93 1.17 10.43 8.98 1.33 6.62 1.25 4.64 1.55 2.13 .88* 8.32 **“ .*52' 2.72 1.55 2.28 10.04 1.57 2.35 1.50 3.85 3.78 .78 .50 10.61 .57 1.64 1.99 3.42 9.37 2.43 2.43 1.55 .81 6.27 2.14 .30 11.36 .59 3.17 1.18 3.83 8.45 2.19 2.44 1.71 3.17 .33 10.80 .97 3.01 1.62 2.60 7.55 3.49 10.38 1.39 3.35 3.27 2.53 3.84 2.12 1.96 3.02 1.06 .98 .49 11.68 1.18 11.76 1.08 1.27 1.67 .29 5.39 2.45 3.14 3.23 2.45 13.92 11.35 2.00 .95 1.24 2.00 1.34 5.34 2.39 3.05 .76 14.41 5.06 1.43 11.27 1.79 2.50 .80 1.34 3.31 1.88 3.76 5.10 2.42 1.79 9.66 8.01 1.38 2.02 4.37 1.13 4.13 2.10 3.88 2.75 1.13 1.86 .89 11.25 12.57 2.43 1.35 1.49 .68 2.30 1.49 2.30 1.35 8.51 3.51 1.08 2.03 8.36 2.89 1.72 1.29 2.25 4.29 1.93 1.29 3.97 .54 .96 10.83 2.65 4.21 10.23 .84 1.32 .84 4.69 3.13 2.65 5.30 2.65 11.07 1.14 14.02 1.99 6.26 1.26 1.63 .24 14.74 1.14 4.09 1.99 2.53 .24 11.41 1.47 2.94 1.04 2.68 .52 12.88 .09 2.33 2.42 5.53 .95 5.01 7.25 3.09 .80 1.48 .67 15.84 1.48 4.03 2.15 1.21 3.76 2.55 2.65 9.28 1.41 3.36 .62 2.92 2.30 2.30 .71 3.80 2.03 4.86 9.20 13.29 1.75 .87 4.95 1.84 3.01 2.13 .58 10.86 1.16 3.20 2.04 2.81 1.14 1.64 11.38 2.53 3.41 3.54 4.05 2.91 2.40 .13 6.57 3.03 2.40 6.72 .99 1.62 4.70 1.33 .52 1.91 1.80 75 4.35 1.80 .70 11.88 8.42 2.71 1.67 .07 1.18 .90 2.16 2.37 13.43 2.16 4.04 2.30 1.11 7.51 1.98 1.98 1.42 .99 1.70 4.96 .43 2.83 2.12 3.40 2.55 1.13 d Including deaths from encephalitis. e Included in deaths irom other diseases of nervous system. /In clu d in g deaths irom paralysis, but not including deaths from encephalitis. 0.08 («) .83 .50 .87 .39 .89 .02 .97 .57 .01 .93 .82 .37 .31 .12 .22 .14 .68 .12 1.32 1.87 1.00 .04 1.39 1.52 .78 .91 .05 1.02 .15 .61 .61 1.04 1.93 .40 1.40 .92 .05 1.54 .64 1.54 1.30 .44 1.14 .84 .63 1.03 11.50 1.77 % Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 •39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 61 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 936 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able V II.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (2). Mar ginal number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 •40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Cities. New York, N. Y ......... Chicago, 111................. Philadelphia, P a ....... St. Louis, M o.............. Boston, M ass.............. Baltimore, M d............ Cleveland, O hio......... Buffalo, N .Y ............... San Francisco, Cal___ Cincinnati, O h io ....... Pittsburg, P a .............. New Orleans, La......... Detroit, M ien.............. M ilwaukee, W is......... W ashington, D. C....... Newark, N. J .............. Jersey City, N. J ......... Louisville, K y ............ M inneapolis, M in n ... Providence, R .J ........ Indianapolis, I n d ___ Kansas City, M o......... St. Paul, M inn............ Rochester, N. Y .......... Denver, C olo.............. Toledo, O h io ............. A llegheny, Pa............ Columbus, O hio......... W orcester, M ass......... Syracuse, N .Y ............ New Haven, Conn— Paterson, N. J ............ Fall River, Mass......... St. Joseph, M o............ Omaha, N ebr.............. Los Angeles, Cal......... Memphis, T e n n ......... Scranton, Pa............... Low ell, M ass.............. Albany, N .Y .............. Cambridge, M ass....... Portland, O reg .......... Atlanta, Ga....... ......... Grand Rapids, M ich.. Dayton, O h io.............. Richm ond, Y a............ N ashville, T en n ......... Seattle, Wash.............. Hartford, C onn.......... Reading, P a ............... W ilm ington, D e l....... Camden, N. J .............. Trenton, N. J .............. Bridgeport, Conn....... Lynn, Mass................. Oakland, C a l.............. Lawrence, M ass......... New Bedford, M ass... Des Moines, Io w a ___ Springfield, M ass....... Som erville, M ass....... Troy, N .Y ................... H oboken, N. J ............ Evansville, In d.......... Manchester, N. H ....... Utica, N .Y ................. Peoria, 111................... Charleston, S. C.......... Savannah, G a ............ Salt Lake City, U tah.. Diarrhea and Her enteritis. Other Other nia dis dis Organ eases and Peri Appen eases o f of Bright’s ic heart circula intesti toni dicitis. digest 2 disease. Under disease. tory nal ob tis. years iv e 2 struc system. years. or system. over. tion. 6.54 1.04 (?) 7.71 5.09 4.65 5.41 7.55 5.07 3.11 8.03 6.09 5.14 6.39 4.22 4.18 5.06 5.46 7.29 8.53 4.04 5.98 10.54 4.03 6.25 5.15 8.40 9.56 8.13 6.38 7.47 3.13 5.66 5.41 4.89 2.55 3.41 9.67 8.02 8.26 7.25 4.76 7.63 9.21 5.40 6.81 7.65 8.43 4.78 6.41 7.52 6.26 7.19 8.73 11.26 6.35 9.06 3.51 11.25 8.91 6.62 6.39 4.16 6.19 6.89 2.53 2.90 4.87 6.66 0 6 .98 % 2.42 2.29 3.67 2.64 3.71 3.33 2.34 2.11 1.84 1.20 2.38 3.43 2.65 3.77 1.91 1.45 2.21 3.22 3.21 1.83 2.67 2.10 1.28 1.29 .35 4.96 1.87 1.44 .56 1.19 .68 3.73 .78 2.42 1.18 4.21 1.14 3.16 1.97 2.72 2.85 1.05 .88 2.28 .50 1.10 2.92 1.62 3.41 3.02 3.73 3.34 2.68 1.94 2.30 2.04 1.20 1.93 2.16 4.30 2.48 2.52 6.57 3.13 1.39 1.70 8.20 1.38 ft ft tf7.41 5.40 6.93 15.81 7.44 .70 4.08 7.63 4.63 6.43 7.85 6.08 4.81 6.28 3.00 2.79 7.93 3.45 1.16 5.76 2.39 2.34 5.49 8.04 4.65 5.96 3.05 7.90 6.75 1.40 4.47 1.74 .20 4.73 3.00 9.08 2.62 3.56 .85 3.68 3.07 3.50 2.52 4.73 2.05 3.92 4.19 6.20 2.66 5.20 9.23 3.43 H.81 3.40 7.69 2.57 4.07 2.17 4.63 5.62 2.42 10.52 3.20 2.78 1.22 .49 2.83 («) .76 .84 («) .95 2.77 1.75 1.02 1.64 1.35 .47 1.15 1.25 1.41 .43 .96 2.21 .35 3.25 .22 1.62 .91 1.34 3.34 .71 .45 2.41 .61 1.49 .93 1.93 .58 2.17 2.13 2.19 1.82 1.25 2.03 2.99 4.56 1.14 .90 3.51 2.39 2.40 .50 1.10 .2 i .52 2.52 3.68 .39 («) .72 3.88 1.35 .75 2.53 1.44 1.99 4.16 2.48 2.04 .13 8.81 4.45 .57 0.68 .90 .8 6 .75 .82 .54 .70 .62 .74 .67 .91 .66 .96 .99 1.37 .91 1.10 .04 .56 .72 .57 .88 .58 .78 1.10 .75 1.72 .61 .50 .33 .60 .58 .65 .57 .58 .74 .45 .38 2.05 .57 .70 .41 .84 .63 .80 .59 .43 1.33 .49 .82 1.08 .67 .54 1.13 .81 .43 .24 .84 .26 .80 .44 .68 1.64 .41 .14 .71 0.17 («) 1.25 (e) .97 .46 2.25 .64 .60 .83 .94 .40 1.68 1.33 .38 .62 1.01 1.29 2.11 .49 4.46 2.69 1.16 1.74 1.39 1.81 1.44 1.03 1.50 .83 .66 2.10 1.03 1.64 2.22 1.56 1.61 1.67 .88 1.08 1.14 2.90 1.35 1.49 .90 .73 1.39 2.74 1.92 1.18 1.21 1.03 .73 i.76 1.15 1.07 .89 1.62 .96 1.20 .90 .09 2.42 1.24 2.23 .63 .41 .97 1.13 0.62 % .14 .92 .54 1.01 .60 .54 .58 .39 .78 .73 .44 .42 .40 .43 1.27 .87 .35 .41 1.44 .89 .95 .53 .17 .32 1.00 .06 .20 .19 .45 1.06 .71 .93 .52 .29 .85 .19 1.62 .21 .61 .24 .31 .06 1.60 .84 .37 .07 .15 .57 .59 .48 .09 .16 .27 .64 .60 .30 .26 .40 .39 1.14 .41 .28 .99 2.60 («) 1.69 /1 .7 2 2.02 2.93 2.62 3.15 4.31 3.96 3.34 2.86 3.74 3.31 2.99 3.02 3.29 2.80 2.51 6.86 2.02 3.07 2.77 3.16 2.71 4.03 2.47 3.68 1.55 3.05 2.94 1.11 1.96 3.13 2.51 3.33 1.77 2.77 2.01 2.56 2.22 2.47 2.80 4.56 .82 3.36 2.39 3.31 3.51 2.80 3.35 1.84 1.54 .82 3.04 3.44 2.50 1.13 5.41 1.39 3.61 2.65 2.59 2.68 8.09 4.07 2.40 4.00 4.04 2.12 6.81 (a) 4.04 4.03 1.09 5.82 4.08 4.16 3.87 4.82 3.17 6.62 4.06 3.44 4.62 5.33 3.39 5.09 3.03 5.63 3.30 3.81 5.82 4.82 3.66 2.98 2.10 4.65 4.81 3.53 5.42 2.60 1.77 3.27 1.26 5.64 6.70 3.41 2.01 8.19 .38 3.92 3.31 3.33 6.93 2.88 3.03 4.45 7.01 2.94 2.78 6.12 3.09 6.29 2.16 4.48 1.25 .08 4.33 9.33 2.77 4.81 4.75 3.09 4.07 5.04 6.18 11.88 5.91 4.11 «Data not obtainable. ^Included in deaths from other diseases of circulatory system. c Including deaths from organic heart disease. d Including deaths from dysentery, diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over, peritonitis, and gastritis. €Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. /N o t including deaths from gastritis, a Included in deaths from other form s o f tuberculosis. STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (2). Included in deaths from infantile diseases. Including deaths from other malformations. J Included in deaths from other malformations, fcIncluding deaths from hydrocephalus. l Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over. m Including 303 deaths occurring outside city limits, n Not including 81 deaths of nonresidents. h i 937 938 BULLETIN OF THE DEPAKTMENT OF LABOB. T able VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (1)—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 71 72 78 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. San Antonio, T ex . . . Duluth, Minn.......... Erie, P a ................... Elizabeth, N. J......... Wilkesbarre, P a ___ Kansas City,' Kans.. Harrisburg, Pa Portland, M e ___ Yonkers, N. Y ......... Norfolk, Va.............. Waterbury.Conn (a) Holyoke, Maes......... Fort Wayne, Ind . . . Youngstown, Ohio.. Houston, T ex.......... Covington TTy. Akroih Ohio /_......... Dallas, T e x .............. Saginaw, Mir»h Lancaster, Pa.......... Lincoln, Nebr __ .. Brockton, Mass....... Binghamton, N. Y .. Augusta, G a ............ |! Pawtucket, R. I ....... Altoona, Pa..............1 W heeling,W .Ya ... 1 Mobile, Ala.............. Birmingham, A la ... Little Rock, Ark___ Springfield, O h io __ Galveston, T e x ....... Tacoma^ Wash......... Haverhill, M ass___ Spokane, W ash....... Terre Haute, In d ... Dubuque, Iowa....... Quinev, 111.............. South Bend, In d ___ Salem, Mass............ Johnstown, Pa. __ Elmira, N. Y . Allentown Pa. Davenport, I o w a ... McKeesport, Pa Springfield, 111......... Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a .............. York, Pa................... Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, K a n s......... Newton, Mass.......... Sioux City, Iowa___ Bayonne, N. J ........ Knoxville, Tenn___ Schenectady, N. Y . . Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, Wis Rockfom, 111.......... Taunton, Mass____ Canton, Ohio.......... Butte, M ont............ Montgomery, A la ... Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, Tenn. East St. Louis, 111. . . Joliet, 111................. Other Diph epi Dys Ty Whoop theria Small Mea Scar en phoid Mala let ing demic Grippe and tery. dis fever. ria. pox. sles. fever. cough. croup. eases. 1.83 3.43 0.14 5.65 .1.2 .99 1.55 .10 2.41 .82 .23 5.01 2.92 .28 1.48 .23 .11 .74 .25 1.24 2.98 1.95 .34 1.68 .80 .11 .32 2.54 .16 8.42 .71 3.02 6.96 .81 1.62 .48 2.51 1.04 1.95 3.78 2.13 .82 .1.6 1.69 .49 2.96 .38 1.15 3.05 .11 1.64 4.69 .45 .90 1.75 .15 .15 5.56 .32 3.01 2.80 .59 3.77 .13 3.53 3.15 1.75 1.04 1.74 1.39 2.32 .18 1.83 .42 3.99 3.87 **.*86 .45 .45 1.58 .33 3.78 .20 3.78 .79 .63 6.09 1.76 3.21 .19 2.08 .. 4.45 .16 1.29 .48 1.21 2.62 .56 .19 3.02 .21 1.85 .98 2.44 .23 1.38 .23 1.57 .67 .17 .34 .34 .35 .71 3.19 .16 2.15 I .21 1.49 2.95 .47 .36 1.07 .35 1.39 1.85 2.10 2.63 .26 1.88 1.02 3.76 1.20 3.19 .91 .46 .82 1.92 0.72 0.96 .14 .37 .41 1.21 2.10 .56 ... 4.93 .10 .40 1.17 .14 .11 0.56 .14 2.34 .21 .35 .83 .80 .12 2.05 1.45 1.94 .32 .25 .28 .11 *’ *.*67* .23 .11 .79 .32 .43 .57 .12 .46 .10 .86 .10 .42 .12 .46 .34 .16 .33 .51 .51 .99 .74 i.72* .19 .66 .53 .66 1.09 .33 .54 .15 .15 .96 .16 1.76 .88 .73 .75 .11 1.29 .10 .63 .50 .13 .22 .22 .87 .17 *i. 27* 1.05 ’ * *63* .37 ... .37 .84 .21 1.15 .43 1.43 .45 .22 .83 .20 .40 .20 2.54 .16 .16 1 1.22 .15 .18 !_____ 2.99 .76 .15 .80 .52 i I | 1 .94 ■ 2.15 .16 .52 .94 .15 .32 .52 .19 .43 1.44 .49 .22 .21 ! .21 1 1.30 .23 i.*35 j .22 ’ *‘ *.*45* .69 1.03 .17 ' 3.72 .i.6 i .49 .1.6 .64 .42 .42 .21 .24 .71 .71 .18 .69 3.91 .62 1.84 .23 .23 *23 .34 .34 2.51 .46 .46 .82 .55 1.10 o Including data for township. 1.03 0.48 1.59 1.83 3.72 .28 .96 .69 .25 1.11 .25 .25 .52 .21 2.28 .73 .54 2.55 .80 .13 1.28 .70 .23 1.81 1.67 .28 2.62 .34 .34 .46 .12 2.35 .37 1.49 .56 .28 1.40 .56 1.79 .67 2.90 5.14 1.14 .23 .34 1.27 .79 1.74 .16 3.28 1.71 .29 .12 1.28 1.39 .81 1.24 .95 .38 2.29 1.88 .83 .83 .46 1.38 .46 .46 .82 2.62 .49 1.47 1.01 3.21 4.56 .51 .49 4.43 .49 2.10 .38 1.91 2.68 2.78 1.46 .40 .13 1.20 2.07 1.09 .66 3.15 .60 .15 2.40 .32 1.27 3.18 3.51 2.49 .29 .29 .32 .75 .97 .86 .89 .20 .40 • 1.78 3.02 1.01 .50 2.84 .22 1.53 .44 1.39 .52 .52 1.74 2.32 .21 .84 .21 2.56 .37 3.47 .21 1.05 .42 1.47 1.87 2.44 .43 .68 .45 .45 .90 .33 .16 .33 ' .16 1.19 .99 .40 2.19 1.91 2.06 2.06 1.11 3.50 .91 .30 .15 3.17 3.34 .18 2.83 .75 .38 1.13 .57 .94 .94 2.45 .77 .31 4.02 .64 .64 3.12 .35 1.39 .35 3.36 1.49 .37 2.37 .86 .43 .65 2.26 1.64 .41 .21 .65 .49 .16 2.54 .69 .90 **‘ .*67* ... *’ .45* 1.89' 1.03 .52 1.42 1.24 .18 .35 4.79 .66 .33 2.56 .85 .43 1.90 2.53 .42 1.05 1.90 .24 1.42 1.07 1.43 .54 .54 .35 2.08 .35 2.47 .41 .21 .52 1.05 i.58 .71 1.41 .23 1.71 1.54 .17 1.54 2.28 1.59 .23 .82 .27 1.37 .55 939 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (1)—Concluded. Puru Pul Other Cere lent Other bral mo forms and gen Men conges Pa nary Can of tion raly septi- tuber tuber cer. eral in sis. dis gitis. and caemic culo culo hemor eases. infec sis. sis. tion. rhage. 1.67 23.27 2.48 9.10 1.48 7.03 2.38 11.70 .67 6.17 .35 1.28 11.65 10.57 .... . i i 13.44 2.23 .74 11.76 .37 .09 12.65 7.82 1.23 .11 .91 9.93 .80 .32 9.98 .63 6.13 1.43 .70 .93 13.69 3.92 .57 10.03 .83 6.06 1.04 .34 1.49 12.84 .49 8.18 1.15 .84 7.77 .34 .74 7.14 1.48 1.53 .38 11.28 7.15 . * " ’ .*54* 12.32 ”’. ’ii* 1.20 .45 10.04 7.33 8.05 *’ i.*32* *’ *’ .’ 73 .11 1.51 16.88 .50 .89 12.90 1.76 15.11 .... .44 8.52 1.96 .52 1.92 8.00 .21 2.11 10.13 2.92 .18 13.53 .21 .42 10.72 .43 .14 8.61 .45 .90 8.33 1.31 9.69 ‘”’*66’ 10.73 1.19 5.56 10.32 .15 .15 7.00 1.58 .18 7.75 .57 10.19 1.32* .19 10.00 .15 5.37 12.54 2.73 .69 .17 10.40 1.12 8.97 2.15 7.76 1.08 9.26 1.03 .82 .33 .98 10.10 9.68 1.38 8.52 2.24 2.47 9.64 .86 .69 .71 .18 22.65 .49 .33 9.57 .43 8.10 2.32 .84 5.47 .71 10.19 10.71 .... ” ’ ’ *69’ 11.46 4.12 ” ” ’ 82’ 1.65 .52 12.60 1.58 .71 .47 10.80 1.20 1.54 13.50 1.14 6.38 .46 .... 10.69 .... 0.88 1.38 .86 .21 2.07 4.00 3.45 2.38 2.82 3.26 3.62 4.21 2.85 2.23 1.12 2.97 5.07 2.28 3.02 1.24 4.59 2.18 4.09 3.72 5.91 4.02 4.37 1.96 3.30 2.71 4.54 2.80 1.98 2.02 4.15 3.65 3.80 5.12 6.31 3.73 5.86 3.78 3.38 3.81 2.13 4.40 2.45 4.53 2.45 2.09 4.16 2.43 3.45 4.53 1.79 5.07 3.81 2.24 1.77 2.15 5.54 2.74 4.03 1.79 4.17 1.65 1.31 3.99 3.08 1.82 2.19 1.03 1.65 3.57 1.76 1.48 1.52 2.37 2.39 1.48 3.63 3.80 3.09 2.54 2.57 2.32 3.82 2.51 2.87 1.96 1.18 1.97 2.87 2.38 4.25 .75 2.71 1.76 1.83 1.09 1.64 2.62 1.22 3.59 2.19 4.41 3.01 1.80 3.78 2.58 2.70 1.83 2.99 2.83 2.64 1.23 3.22 2.77 1.68 2.37 1.44 1.79 2.77 2.69 .52 3.54 2.15 1.92 1.90 4.98 2.68 1.04 1.65 2.10 3.05 1.88 1.59 .55 2.15 4.83 .86 2.28 1.48 2.91 1.67 4.67 4.21 1.30 1.90 5.82 1.59 3.28 .81 3.63 2.09 .69 1.15 1.01 2.71 3.06 .53 1.09 3.60 3.18 2.64 .11 1.19 2.27 2.18 1.74 1.90 2.19 3.78 2.01 3.83 1.97 1.19 3.02 5.33 2.11 2.45 1.13 2.30 1.29 2.95 2.24 1.51 2.06 .81 2.30 3.36 3.27 1.06 2.31 2.34 3.16 6.87 1.61 2.43 2.26 1.05 2.11 1.37 1.59 2.74 1.43 2.90 4.81 4.35 5.63 2.45 5.01 7.06 4.95 4.84 3.46 1.71 3.65 2.43 1.97 2.20 4.59 1.95 2.62 8.61 5.17 1.15 5.56 3.16 5.70 3.18 3.66 3.76 2.78 4.03 7.42 1.39 3.38 4.94 1.89 2.58 4.73 4.60 2.58 4.29 1.22 4.58 10.38 4.72 .92 1.93 2.95 3.92 6.47 5.14 1.79 8.76 4.49 4.13 1.95 5.28 2.99 2.11 2.13 6.79 5.21 1.23 1.31 8.69 3.76 1.82 2.47 1.19 .69 2.22 .62 .80 1.52 2.09 3.19 .49 2.60 .67 1.14 3.01 2.00 1.97 1.43 2.51 1.83 2.95 .51 4.43 .77 2.52 3.27 1.20 2.87 2.34 1.94 .89 1.51 .44 1.74 1.05 2.38 2.31 1.15 2.03 1.64 1.59 1.11 1.52 1.58 1.13 3.02 1.07 2.41 3.47 1.31 4.09 1.03 5.05 .90 .. 2.12 .66 1.71 .42 3.55 5.71 4.17 .62 1.84 i.64* 1.59 1.37 Other Pneu Other dis Bron monia Con dis chitis, and vul eases acute of of sions nerv and bron- eases respir of in cho- atory chron ous pneufants. sys ic. monia. system. tem. 1.43 2.34 2.10 3.00 3.35 1.05 1.95 1.02 1.61 3.72 1.12 1.60 1.27 3.00 2.09 1.62 4.18 .57 3.27 3.04 2.46 1.15 2.55 .28 2.84 1.14 1.88 2.80 2.23 1.37 1.12 1.58 .78 1.71 1.90 1.85 2.78 2.39 2.30 1.83 2.29 1.18 2.71 3.82 10.99 1.31 3.05 .75 1.05 5.10 1.59 1.02 .73 4.19 5.27 .79 1.98 2.52 .63 2.18 1.09 1.04 3.48 1.90 1.69 3.47 1.10 .84 1.26 .29 2.73 2.93 3.38 .82 4.43 2.39 .60 4.76 .63 4.41 1.22 1.06 1.23 1.32 3.21 2.45 3.59 .31 6.29 2.73 2.25 2.08 4.16 2.62. 1.68 1.94 1.51 1.64 3.70 1.14 6.84 2.30 1.15 1.12 1.79 3.27 .86 1.95 1.24 1.32 1.82 .85 1.07 2.32 1.47 1.66 2.61 1.43 5.18 3.82 1.39 1.23 1.23 1.58 4,99 .71 1.41 .85 1.54 .91 1.14 2.47 4.11 1.67 2.62 2.59 1.86 1.74 1.28 .97 1.25 3.09 1.58 6.03 3.54 3.01 2.28 .81 2.58 1.67 2.06 2.46 1.86 .49 1.53 1.33 1.09 3.45 2.23 1.90 1.18 1.29 1.13 4.37 1.22 .63 .91 2.94 1.00 2.25 2.30 2.58 2.22 2.13 1.58 1.32 3.21 2.45 2.25 2.43 .75 1.72 2.67 .16 2.08 2.69 1.72 1.42 1.98 2.34 2.95 3.08 2.14 .35 1.23 1.05 1.41 1.54 3.64 1.65 4.62 7.86 9.00 9.11 11.80 12.24 6.95 6.61 11.26 6.70 11.06 9.36 7.13 11.98 6.50 8.21 8.14 11.35 8.84 12.16 8.13 13.00 10.20 8.07 11.09 11.94 9.37 5.48 17.86 11.46 8.95 4.52 7.81 8.78 7.36 6.60 4.95 9.03 5.57 8.25 7.46 11.27 10.38 3.77 14.42 6.27 6.06 9.35 11.64 12.35 7.65 8.53 8.30 13.60 9.03 11.72 10.02 8.42 10.90 8.93 11.46 14.40 7.87 9.62 5.47 21.41 12.60 0.64 1.24 1.36 1.66 2.01 1.17 1.25 1.48 2.35 .65 2.23 1.94 3.80 .29 1.51 1.72 1.25 1.15 3.27 .84 .99 3.82 .66 2.94 1.05 2.39 1.76 1.40 1.09 2.90 1.53 1.04 1.48 .91 .84 1.00 .68 2.96 3.38 4.92 1.22 .88 1.51 2.27 .77 .64 .69 1.12 2.06 .98 1.38 1.57 3.79 1.24 3.14 .43 .63 .47 2.14 1.74 1.65 2.10 2.11 2.56 1.37 Mar ginal num ber. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 940 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE (2)—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Diarrhea and Her enteritis. Other Other nia dis dis )rgan- eases Peri Appen eases and of of Bright’s heart circula intesti toni dicitis. digest 2 disease. isease. tory Under years nal ob tis. ive 2 struc or system. years. system. over. tion. Cities. San Antonio,Tex ... Duluth, Minn.......... . Erie, Pa...................... Elizabeth, N. J .......... Wilkesbarre, P a ....... Kansas City, Kans... Harrisburg, P a ........ Portland, M e .......... . Yonkers, N .Y ............ Norfolk, V a............... Waterbury, Conn, (a) Holyoke, Mass.......... Fort Wayne, In d ....... Youngstown, O hio... Houston, T e x .......... . CovingtonjKy.......... Akron, O h io............. Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ic h ........ Lancaster, Pa............ Lincoln, N e b r .......... Brockton, Mass........ Binghamton, N .Y ... Augusta, G a ............ . Pawtucket, R. I ....... . Altoona, Pa............... Wheeling, W .V a___ Mobile, A la............... Birmingham, Ala— Little Rock, A rk___ Springfield, O h io __ Galveston, T e x ....... . Tacoma, Wash......... Haverhill, M ass___ Spokane, W ash....... . Terre Haute, I n d __ Dubuque, Io w a ....... . Quincy, 111............... . South Bend, I n d ___ Salem, Mass............ . Johnstown, P a ....... . Elmira, N .Y ............ . Allentown, P a.......... Davenport, I o w a __ McKeesport, Pa....... Springfield, 111......... Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a .............. York, P a................... Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, Kans.......... Newton. Mass.......... Sioux City, Iow a___ Bayonne, N. J .......... Knoxville, Tenn___ Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass......... Canton, O h io.......... . Butte, M o n t............ . Montgomery, A la ... Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, T enn. East St. Louis, 111__ Joliet, 111................. 3.03 2.23 7.33 3.17 2.34 9.10 6.41 1.36 6.04 4.97 4.55 8.80 5.76 .54 6.17 4.54 3.15 1.05 7.23 .83 5.42 9.23 1.14 3.19 5.45 3.84 5.57 7.07 1.21 3.81 3.02 2.57 8.83 2.97 1.37 9.59 2.69 2.85 3.01 7.85 1.00 4.99 4.06 1.28 5.68 6.21 4.20 2.77 7.93 .83 3.34 2.64 1.83 3.33 8.67 .98 3.44 7.77 2.36 2.70 3.69 1.48 2.46 7.84 1.72 1.53 4.64 1.72 1.72 2.94 1.85 2.51 10.79 .90 7.04 3.66 3.34 3.50 6.74 1.32 c4.39 5.48 .86 1.18 2.98 .99 .69 3.27 2.39 3.40 6.55 .22 1.53 4.70 .87 3.65 13.29 2.32 .84 6.58 1.83 5.30 7.57 1.89 2.52 6.60 1.43 4.30 7.43 2.48 3.83 1.64 1.31 3.94 2.78 3.18 6.16 6.35 4.13 1.91 7.15 1.22 6.39 6.87 2.64 3.52 7.36 .75 2.26 7.36 2.64 3.96 2.76 .92 5.98 3.38 .64 2.73 12.13 3.47 1.04 6.17 2.24 6.92 4.96 3.45 7.54 8.85 2.88 3.50 4.23 1.47 2.61 7.38 2.30 5.99 6.06 .90 3.14 .69 2.93 8.43 4.07 2.12 2.48 3.80 1.98 7.43 11.73 1.49 6.61 3.58 .63 9.68 4.50 2.84 4.27 6.61 1.07 7.50 10.76 .69 3.82 3.29 .41 4.94 7.61 5.77 6.34 ” *i.’ 4i* 3.29 3.76 1.71 4.10 2.05 1.37 2.51 3.01 .27 6.30 1.19 .69 1.23 1.45 .40 2.21 .56 1.36 5.86 1.23 1.14 .79 1.28 1.71 .o7 .63 1.38 .82 3.72 .74 2.49 .13 7.31 1.95 2.07 (<*) 3.12 5.26 5.04 .65 2.44 1.05 .73 1.26 .86 .22 .49 .60 4.44 3.81 .94 1.13 4.91 1.45 5.37 .75 2.15 2.06 .98 1.15 1.79 1.38 1.06 1.48 1.28 .63 1.04 2.26 3.94 2.35 .68 .68 .82 0.08 .83 1.23 .52 .80 .47 .83 .34 .87 1.40 1.23 .57 .32 .71 .46 .38 .63 .57 1.80 .68 .99 .38 .11 .90 .32 1.61 .65 .40 1.01 .22 .52 .42 .91 .84 1.58 .45 i.i9 .32 .46 1.06 .57 1.13 .77 .96 .87 1.87 .43 .41 1.61 1.12 .69 .18 1.65 .21 .84 1.19 .89 1.39 .82 .52 .23 1.82 1.10 0.80 1.52 1.11 .62 1.74 2.10 .97 1.37 .87 .93 .22 .91 2.69 .86 .81 1.43 1.46 .80 1.96 .34 .74 .96 1.59 1.64 .15 1.43 1.02 1.40 1.69 .76 1.31 .70 1.69 .55 2.31 2.30 1.58 1.31 1.79 .63 1.07 1.06 .94 1.13 2.76 1.45 .87 1.12 .65 .82 .98 .69 2.47 1.38 2.12 1.65 1.49 .84 .95 .89 1.04 1.44 .79 1.88 1.20 .91 1.10 Including data for township. 5 Not including deaths from premature birth. a 0.64 1.24 1.11 .10 .54 .58 .70 .46 .87 .74 .56 .69 .32 .46 .29 .21 1.26 1.47 .51 .49 .57 1.46 .33 .30 .32 .59 .21 .30 .50 .65 1.04 1.27 .37 2.10 .72 .68 .66 .40 .48 .91 .88 .57 1.13 .31 1.13 .17 .41 2.12 .46 .67 .71 .49 1.26 1.42 .71 .69 1.23 .62 .94 .17 .46 .27 3.51 1.79 3.21 1.76 2.14 3.03 3.06 2.05 3.09 3.81 2.68 3.54 4.12 3.00 4.87 2.58 2.92 5.39 4.26 2.87 3.69 5.36 2.65 3.82 3.15 3.03 5.12 3.01 3.17 3.15 2.18 4.18 1.69 1.64 3.99 3.73 4.05 3.12 2.98 2.54 1.98 3.52 2.64 2.08 3.07 4.34 2.77 3.18 2.80 2.06 3.91 2.30 3.59 3.96 4.25 1.65 2.34 1.26 3.32 1.07 3.82 2.26 5.77 3.99 4.96 1.59 1.65 4.14 4.28 4.07 5.28 4.83 3.61 3.06 8.66 5.45 3.16 3.69 2.51 5.23 3.83 2.77 4.39 2.87 3.27 3.72 3.20 1.63 4.24 3.16 4.20 3.98 3.07 8.92 2.28 2.27 8.73 11.48 3.59 3.66 3.57 1.43 4.50 3.78 3.78 1.43 2.28 6.34 4.91 2.45 .92 4.82 3.64 1.87 3.23 2.88 .49 2.77 2.24 3.96 3.36 2.97 1.07 2.53 .71 3.21 4.51 5.56 4.99 5.16 4.10 1.82 3.56 941 STATISTICS OF CITIES. Table VII.—PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS FROM EACH SPECIFIED CAUSE ( 2)—Concluded. Other dis eases ofgenitourinary sys tem. 0.64 .28 1.23 1.65 .13 1.62 1.95 1.48 2.97 2.60 2.46 1.60 8.33 2.57 .35 7.07 .83 .46 1.47 1.18 .74 3.82 2.52 1.09 1.35 .48 3.37 .97 1.49 .25 .65 2.26 .84 2.56 .84 2.44 .90 1.97 2.19 2.38 1.37 4.22 .19 1.13 1.07 1.45 1.21 3.55 .22 2.88 2.61 4.61 3.36 1.55 .35 2.31 2.34 .42 1.42 2.68 .35 2.68 2.63 1.64 .51 .68 1.92 Puer peral septi cae mia. 0.56 .69 1.11 .41 .40 .83 .68 .37 .19 1.23 .11 .48 .14 .58 .57 .46 ....... .25 .38 .44 .30 1.11 .44 .32 .50 .22 .17 Dis Dis eases eases Other of the Hy- Other Infan Mar Ill-de puer skin of dro- mal tile Senile Sui Acci fined Total ginal peral and loco cephdebil cide. forma dis dent. num dis deaths. dis motor alus. tions. eases. ity. eases. ber. eases. cellu sys lar tem. tissue. 0.48 .28 .49 .62 .40 .70 .34, .49 .47 .22 .23 .63 .14 .23 1.34 .42 .46 .66 .49 .66 .33 .75 .16 .29 .97 1.09 .50 .22 .52 .55 1.68 .72 .22 1.15 .20 .32 .15 .18 .55 .42 .72 .22 .16 .99 .63 1.13 .61 .32 .19 .15 .56 .52 1.12 .22 .21 .16 1.38 .45 .17 1.06 .49 1.07 .42 1.19 1.07 .53 .49* .69 .22 1.03 .33 .21 .95 .35 .41 .34 .68 .27 .17 .23 0.32 .28 .25 .10 1.07 .23 .831 .571 .12 .19 .34 .23 .79 .43 0.64 .14 .38 .19 .10 .23 .23 .14 .11 .25 .34 .45 .11 .14 ___ ___ .46 .16 .51 .74 .13 .44 0.16 .14 .12 .23 .10 .21 .12 .25 .38 .17 .25 .38 .22 .11 ___ ___ .32 .59 .32 .40 *’ \io* .38 .22 ’ **.*44* .17 .84 .73 .37 .42 .72 .29 .22 .68 .49 .40 .79 .32 ... ... 1.22 .15 .53 .53 .19 .11 .46 .67 .34 .21 .42 .47 .18 .47 .17 .55 .19 .43 \ i6 .22 .52 .18 .16 .25 .11 .34 .32 .14 .34 .49 .17 .25 .96 .11 .32 .15 .50 .17 .21 .17 .42 .18 .45 .14 .68 .79 .40 ... .19 .19 .61 .77 .16 .56 .43 1.03 0.32 .14 .62 .21 .27 .’ is .35 .2i .16 .22 .17 .42 .46 .45 1.21 .21 .18 .69 .26 .52 .27 .35 .21 .23* 5.10 3.59 8.14 8.28 7.91 4.66 10.01 5.58 5.94 8.00 9.16 10.05 5.86 64.99 5.80 5.44 8.14 5.62 6.38 7.60 5.42 5.74 4.37 6.98 8.69 7.80 4.10 5.70 5.16 62.65 7.42 6.09 6 5.49 4.75 4.83 9.90 7.43 4.11 11.53 3.65 8.98 5.63 9.25 4.15 6.98 3.06 6.93 7.29 6.68 8.02 .81 5.30 6.73 7.57 4.42 5.61 14.29 10.11 5.92 6.79 4.86 6.79 2.10 10.09 6.67 4.33 8.22 2.23 2.21 3.08 2.59 4.42 2.33 5.42 5.13 1.48 1.40 2.01 1.94 4.12 3.42 2.32 4.87 2.71 1.83 5.57 5.40 2.96 3.63 5.96 .76 3.30 6.53 3.95 3.55 1.49 1.26 8.30 2.44 2.32 3.84 3.99 8.18 8.11 7.88 3.78 2.70 2.44 2.99 2.64 8.30 1.38 7.72 3.98 3.18 3.88 2.88 5.70 4.84 2.02 1.03 2.65 2.48 5.97 4.84 4.50 7.32 5.90 2.26 3.94 4.70 2.91 3.42 4.38 0.96 1.52 .99 .73 .80 .35 .14 .23 .37 .09 .11 .69 .95 1.14 .70 1.15 .21 .92 .49 .34 1.72 .57 .80 .75 .96 .73 .32 .44 .35 2.32 1.64 2.10 1.15 1.13 1.48 .40 .32 .61 1.06 .75 1.51 .77 .64 .35 .19 .43 .62 .98 .67 .69 .35 .16 .43 .63 1.19 1.07 2.06 .52 .47 .17 .82 5.50 11.03 4.68 7.04 8.98 6.88 7.65 4.44 5.45 4.65 4.58 4.34 6.50 8.99 8.82 4.97 8.35 8.26 5.73 3.72 7.39 1.15 5.03 2.51 3.45 5.89 6.74 3.66 11.61 5.79 3.93 7.65 9.28 4.94 6.09 6.03 5.86 5.42 4.97 2.06 9.29 5.10 3.96 5.66 11.35 5.47 3.47 10.65 4.74 3.29 7.98 5.30 8.97 7.92 4.25 7.43 5.12 12.00 3.55 2.86 3.47 12.76 4.99 4.93 6.67 13.90 7.67 3.11 100.00 1.65 100.00 .86 100.00 1.76 100.00 4.83 100.00 6.99 100.00 3.20 100.00 1.48 100.00 1.36 100.00 1.49 100.00 3.46 100.00 2.51 100.00 2.69 100.00 3.28 5100.00 3.71 100.00 1.24 100.00 7.52 100.00 10.32 100.00 .66 100.00 1.18 100.00 7.14 100.00 1.72 100.00 7.02 100.00 6.76 100.00 .45 100.00 1.91 100.00 .15 *100.00 2.90 100.00 6.15 100.00 7.30 5100.00 2.18 100.00 10.44 100.00 3.59 5100.00 .55 100.00 1.68 100.00 1.00 100.00 1.13 100.00 8.87 100.00 3.58 100.00 1.59 100.00 2.28 100.00 .18 100.00 7.36 100.00 3.02 100.00 6.75 100.00 11.42 100.00 2.25 100.00 2.62 100.00 4.09 100.00 .82 100.00 18.24 100.00 1.61 100.00 3.81 100.00 3.61 100.00 6.37 100.00 6.11 100.00 .43 100.00 4.42 100.00 5.45 100.00 .89 100.00 3.13 100.00 7.41 100.00 5.25 100.00 1.88 100.00 10.26 100.00 7.97 100.00 7.12 100.00 c Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or oyer. Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. d 9398— N o. 42— 02------ 5 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 942 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Table Mar ginal num ber. vm.—DEATH Cities. New York, N .Y .... Chicago, 111............ Philadelphia, Pa .. St. Louis, Mo.......... Boston, M ass......... Baltimore, Md....... Cleveland, O h io. . . Buffalo, N .Y .......... San Francisco, Cal. Cincinnati, O hio... Pittsburg, P a ......... New Orleans, L a ... Detroit, M ich......... Milwaukee, W is. . . Washington, D. C .. Newark, N .J ......... Jersey City, N. J . . . Louisville, K y ....... Minneapolis, Minn Providence, R. I . . . Indianapolis, In d .. Kansas City, M o... St. Paul, M inn....... Rochester, N. Y ___ Denver, C o lo ......... Toledo, O h io ......... Allegheny, P a ....... Columbus, Ohio ... Worcester, Mass. . . Syracuse, N .Y ....... New Haven, Conn. Paterson, N. J ....... Fall River, Mass... St. Joseph, M o ....... Omaha, Nebr......... Los Angeles, C al... Memphis,Tenn . . . Scranton, Pa.......... Lowell, M ass......... Albany, N . Y ......... Cambridge, Mass.. Portland, Oreg....... Atlanta, Ga............ Grand Rapids, Mich Dayton, O h io......... Richmond, Va....... Nashville, Tenn . . . Seattle, Wash......... Hartford, Conn___ Reading, P a .......... Wilmington, Del .. Camden, N. J ......... Trenton, N .J ......... Bridgeport, Conn.. Lynn, Mass............ Oakland, C a l......... Lawrence, Mass . . . New Bedford, Mass Des Moines, Iow a .. Springfield, Mass.. Somerville, Mass.. Troy, N .Y .............. Hoboken, N .J ....... Evansville, Ind___ Manchester, N. H .. Utica, N .Y .............. Peoria, 111.............. Charleston, S. C___ Savannah, G a ....... 70 Salt Lake City,Utah RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (1). Other Diph Dys epi Whoop theria Ty Small Mea Scar en demic Grippe. ing phoid Mala let and tery. dis fever. ria. pox. sles. fever. cough. croup. eases. 0.203 0.054 (a) («) .014 .134 .248 .002 .273 .067 .359 .015 .268 .200 .040 .535 .044 1.247 .012 .470 .387 .157 .037 .212 .673 .167 .224 .164 .061 .563 .070 .576 .264 .011 .274 .429 .141 .182 .479 .007 .300 .020 1.008 .023 .355 .038 .215 .025 .150 .008 .920 .089 .270 .009 .196 .028 .193 .029 .218 .291 .409 1.126 .301 .010 .189 .02J .240 .020 .106 .011 .245 .617 .128 .347 .063 .256 .011 .348 .239 .455 .320 .244 .306 .073 .427 .012 .420 .162 .187 .026 .169 .130 .143 .014 .133 .013 .185 .288 .186 .014 .246 .189 .573 .230 .266 .066 .191 .017 .155 .250 .067 .738 .738 .097 1.210 .345 0.125 (a) .019 .057 .015 .180 .129 .006 .051 .026 .059 .005 .077 .009 .132 .003 .198 .009 .003 .173 .163 .003 .057 .003 .059 ‘ .*278* .051 .019 .051 .009 .009 .048 .017 .011 .027 .011 .035 .006 .041 .043 .021 0.324 (a) .165 .116 .366 .021 .087 .122 .037 .071 .351 .207 .050 .054 .024 .090 .131 .014 .057 .051 .055 .162 .106 .024 .007 .203 .033 .017 .008 .107 .009 .065 .048 .218 .151 .107 .025 .054 .102 .019 .048 .091 .054 .056 .049 0.114 % .019 .009 .097 .102 .011 .009 .078 .179 .060 .106 .043 .191 .010 .011 .033 .037 .012 .012 .013 .091 .014 .016 .026 .052 .027 .015 .030 .014 .015 .047 .253 .052 .034 .085 .032 .213 .074 .033 .136 .078 .159 .268 .038 .075 .182 .114 .027 .152 .100 .031 .079 .107 .164 .017 .156 .035 .033 .092 .161 .379 0.081 («) .196 .136 .113 .121 .028 .173 .174 .050 .345 .073 .033 .071 .258 .114 .066 .028 .071 .073 .027 .017 .018 .035 .021 .100 .188 .045 .099 .025 .196 .121 .084 .048 .082 .036 .019 .116 .147 .040 .117 0.577 % .516 .615 .329 .554 .386 .277 .203 .495 .137 .207 .336 .300 .404 .562 .247 .905 .489 .197 .232 .306 .129 .329 .413 .398 .075 .141 .192 .268 .186 .215 .116 .109 .182 .046 .408 1.232 .430 .627 .277 ” .’ i60* .255 .189 .010 .022 .200 .120 .380 .148 .086 .144 .022 .429 .012 .232 .707 .115 .497 .760 .087 .133 .133 .260 .156 .486 .147 .246 .015 .212 .471 .200 .077 .441 .095 .133 .346 .492 .016 .066 .133 .139 .139 .172 .431 .100 .154 .161 .793 *’.*6i3* a Data not obtainable. 6 Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. c Including deaths from hydrocephalus. 0.239 0.097 0.058 (a) ! o59 .147 .136 (|>) .086 .289 .049 .007 .246 .094 .098 .054 .069 .097 .100 .049 .163 .046 .143 .321 .144 .003 .336 .078 .417 .257 .253 .090 .057 .097 .252 .010 .631 .112 . .080 .098 .102 .074 .145 .103 .070 .233 .172 .037 .114 .005 .229 .360 .107 •••• .214 .110 .060 .226 .035 .041 .082 .082 .035 .088 .059 .041 .164 .021 .122 .153 .040 .020 .135 .150 .256 .287 .091 .053 .107 .083 .083 .058 .025 .033 .545 .312 .179 .046 .158 .009 .075 .234 1.963 .048 .029 .010 .136 .045 .027 .255 .054 .045 .353 .363 .102 .262 .107 .049 .274 .042 .074 .300 .070 .521 .021 .106 .362 .064 .106 .394 .287 .096 .053 .095 .074 .089 .278 .022 .152 .478 .207 .381 .344 .037 .033 .044 .067 .147 .012 .110 .183 .049 .037 .255 .102 .025 .137 .062 .037 .160 .067 .026 .390 .039 .129 .043 .014 .133 .053 .027 .169 .031 .015 .091 .091 .030 .243 .014 .043 .200 .046 .015 .221 .079 .063 .666 .107 .067 .098 .049 .116 .149 .017 .139 .139 .017 .172 .086 .052 .233 .133 .117 .631 .262 .169 .307 .177 .016 .259 .086 .069 943 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table VIII.—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (1). Puru PulCere lent Other bral Con mo- Other and forms gen Men Pa vul conges nary Can eral in septi- tuber of raly tion sions csemic culo tuber cer. dis gitis. and sis. of in culo infec eases. hemor fants. sis. tion. sis. rhage. 0.015 (a) .150 .089 .171 .079 .133 .003 .194 .103 .120 .200 .123 .047 .066 .024 .042 .023 .081 .022 .186 .290 .106 .006 .271 .173 .143 .106 .008 .133 .027 .102 .122 .068 .182 .073 .251 .155 .010 .270 .106 .191 .266 .053 .156 .174 .123 .100 .146 .089 .050 .053 .078 .107 .167 .143 .138 .053 .098 .121 .103 .016 .185 .258 .121 2.270 Other dis eases of nerv ous sys tem. Bron chitis, acute and chron ic. Pneu monia Other dis and of bron- eases respir choatory pneumonia. system. 0.350 0.687 0.434 0.325 0.709 0.068 0.225 0.274 0.600 0.227 2.558 (a) (a) (a) (a) («) .020 A .292 A % .226 .288 % 1.930 A % c.247 .580 .234 <*.269 .627 .329 («) .331 /.815 1.672 .481 .357 .642 .865 .350 .802 .190 .625 .382 .202 .169 1.916 .481 .688 .394 .315 .565 .337 .758 .346 2.206 .333 .... .541 .269 .523 .344 .313 .446 .282 .859 .128 1.574 .254 .062 .740 .413 .403 .197 .535 .503 .127 .259 1.457 .219 .480 1.137 .931 .351 .460 .683 .003 .166 1.974 .394 .703 .235 .671 .306 .618 .782 1.862 .656 .235 .356 .300 .338 .525 .426 1.082 .261 .498 .501 .099 .513 2.324 .369 .249 .283 .687 .443 .383 .397 .857 .193 .223 .690 1.617 .247 .090 .600 .543 .360 .720 .533 .360 .527 .283 .263 1.550 .245 .692 .430 .313 .592 .538 .030 .417 .192 1.096 .161 .216 .676 .505 .373 .401 1.732 1.066 .178 .324 .638 .477 .192 .706 .322 .624 .941 .125 .616 .451 .220 1.651 .290 .150 .449 .304 .637 .904 .066 .623 .777 .337 .328 1.831 .181 .507 .298 .414 .442 .563 .488 1.544 .507 .381 .260 .286 .633 .352 .324 .443 .029 .286 .148 .167 .200 1.019 .494 .803 .331 .309 .247 .933 .118 .152 .573 .315 1.579 .126 .466 .219 .395 .312 .778 .110 .208 .285 1.227 .471 .133 .429 .342 .272 .244 .475 .272 .255 .226 1.484 .296 .147 .471 .241 .253 .082 .247 .124 .924 .376 .053 .294 .082 .882 .377 .494 .418 .729 .029 .324 .524 .159 1.259 .364 .657 .536 .550 .464 .186 .522 .171 .214 2.307 .543 .160 .500 .300 .287 .233 .227 .393 .066 .327 .287 .947 .737 .361 .459 .421 .511 .519 .098 .398 2.346 .316 .489 .098 .536 .257 .415 .083 .158 .438 .241 .226 1.049 .249 .157 .554 .264 .455 .355 .934 .091 .314 .760 2.264 .083 .125 .617 .250 .258 .317 .333 .725 .200 .267 .192 1.033 .098 .705 .491 .268 .509 .527 .054 .277 1.348 1.304 .268 .046 .669 .660 .697 .511 .186 .409 1.645 .400 .623 .121 .402 .467 .168 .738 .122 .215 .935 .626 1.047 2.103 1.467 .135 .058 .174 .135 .145 .222 ,116 .019 .135 .628 .126 .073 .345 .282 .400 .164 .382 .127 .091 1.027 .282 .318 .745 .891 .482 .382 .054 .218 .309 .382 .973 .273 1.509 .205 .335 .288 .363 .233 .270 .205 .260 1.405 .223 .205 .058 .388 .233 .534 .718 .505 .320 1.058 .243 2.214 .612 .210 .600 .337 .706 .432 .705 .790 .390 .179 2.559 .232 .320 1.060 .230 .360 .280 1.470 .090 .400 .190 1.430 .280 .255 .978 .234 .085 .393 .128 .106 .255 1.573 1.850 .319 .160 .819 .128 .404 .287 .202 .117 .063 1.192 .287 .... .362 .500 .351 .670 .766 .638 .308 .298 2.585 .298 .211 .800 .358 .189 .3^7 .558 .253 .137 .316 .8o3 .421 .289 .733 .144 .644 .122 .189 .089 .811 .389 1.278 .133 1.207 .511 .348 .391 .456 .826 .685 .456 .576 2.011 .913 .283 .492 .431 .283 .763 .369 .381 2. lo2 .738 .480 .381 .256 .456 .356 .244 .111 .356 .189 .111 .156 .122 1.111 .821 .331 .441 .233 .723 .172 .368 1.507 .368 .037 .085 .451 .256 .378 .207 .768 .256 1.098 .354 1.488 .2x9 .102 .293 .357 .611 .268 .688 .675 .420 .140 1.796 .280 .137 .100 .538 .200 .650 1.063 .363 1.588 .413 .263 .413 .280 .160 .493 .267 .427 1.240 .573 .520 .400 1.387 .360 .403 .610 .338 .312 .519 .480 .169 .532 .156 1.649 .221 .043 .786 .357 .457 .157 .243 .471 .357 .186 1.714 .171 .187 .747 .333 .427 .280 .707 .200 .133 .173 1.587 .280 .138 .646 .231 .877 .415 .308 .569 .431 .323 1.939 .308 .212 .773 .394 .727 .818 .515 .212 .379 .348 1.500 .258 .071 .243 .157 .243 .371 .114 .157 .143 .214 1.329 .257 .323 .615 .277 .185 .569 .077 .185 .246 .415 1.200 .110 .614 .409 .346 .693 .346 .110 .173 .551 1.339 .346 .253 .906 .440 .559 1.386 .053 .440 .280 .360 3.104 .253 .016 .443 .459 1.049 .951 .180 .557 .197 .508 2.164 .279 .183 .498 .266 .149 .100 .183 .083 .465 .316 .382 .897 .139 .745 .399 .953 .572 .451 .451 .277 .659 1.820 .520 2,362 .207 .569 .362 .500' .534 .379 .879 .328 .155 .310 .467 .534 .383 .317 .217 .333 .450 .400 .317 1.500 .150 .138 .508 .477 .200 .354 1.154 .477 .431 1.246 .262 1.785 .016 .274 .500 .210 .387 1.952 .935 .532 .500 .548 .629 .052 .345 .259 .414 .172 .310 .138 .241 .914 .207 .241 d Including deaths from encephalitis. e Included in deaths from other diseases of nervous system. /In clu din g deaths from paralysis, hut not including deaths from encephalitis. 2 .^ 1.896 2.282 2.189 1.110 1.284 2.697 2.182 1.079 2.953 1.100 1.344 3.035 2.278 2.187 1.967 1.248 2.157 1.227 1.774 1.247 1.547 3.907 .927 1.113 1.555 2.000 1.333 .982 1.998 1.701 .628 .709 3.155 2.223 1.087 1.579 2.170 1.956 1.340 2.319 .800 1.445 1.750 2.718 .956 1.531 1.378 1.898 1.925 1.774 1.857 2.029 2.014 1.662 2.106 .900 1.554 1.449 3.264 2.443 1.960 1.803 1.931 .867 3.154 3.113 .604 Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 944 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T abus Mar ginal num ber. VIII.—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (2). Cities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Diarrhea and Her enteritis. Other Other nia dis dis Organ eases and Peri Appen eases of of Bright’s ic heart circula intesti toni dicitis. digest 2 disease. Under disease. tory nal ob tis. years ive 2 struc or system. years. system. over. tion. New York, N .Y .......... 1.291 0.123 1.343 0.206 1.617 0.273 0.513 0.133 0.033 (a) (a) (a) Chicago, 111................. («) Philadelphia, P a ....... 1.422 .097 % % .306 % % .146 % (b) («) St. Louis. Mo............... c l. 244 cf1.321 .025 /.306 .718 Boston, M ass.............. 1.519 .214 .181 .476 1.064 .192 .398 !l50 .178 Baltimore, M d............ 1.025 .462 1.396 .110 1.173 .092 .690 .169 .173 Cleveland, O h io......... .695 .610 .549 l. 869 ( c) .392 .113 .336 .784 Buffalo, N .Y ............... .146 .603 .368 1.078 .092 .138 .157 .119 San Francisco, Cal___ 1.511 .774 .743 .120 .554 .120 .140 .109 .863 Cincinnati, Ohio......... .918 .873 .603 .097 .150 .738 .318 .718 .126 Pittsburg, P a .............. .614 .114 .626 .462 1.508 .201 .123 .186 .659 New Orleans, La......... 1.733 .457 1.000 .083 1.430 .353 .160 .087 .617 .917 Detroit, M ich.............. .277 .117 .610 .967 .100 .253 .563 .203 Milwaukee, W is......... .662 .155 1.012 .094 .444 .118 .171 .427 .060 Washington, D. C....... 1.355 .505 1.289 .094 .979 .139 .080 .634 .244 Newark, N .J .............. .796 .647 .078 1.004 .906 .180 .118 .569 .235 Jersey City, N .J ......... .791 .641 .501 1.189 .075 .187 .192 .267 .623 Louisville, K y ............ .823 614 .828 .070 .488 .070 .223 .209 .456 .652 Minneapolis, M in n . . . .162 .362 .229 .114 .109 .333 .252 .300 Providence, R. I ......... 1.410 .281 1.534 .169 1.090 .427 .213 .095 1.135 Indianapolis, I n d ___ 1.206 .312 .049 .466 .488 .049 .006 .630 .285 Kansas City, M o......... .626 .499 .064 .591 .180 .504 .087 .417 .475 St. Paul, M inn............ .635 .341 .612 .153 .618 .024 .076 .124 .294 Rochester, N. Y .......... 1.530 .265 .082 .235 .253 .129 .700 .347 .459 .786 .522 Denver, C o lo .............. .714 .186 .457 .179 .271 .171 .529 .714 Toledo, O h io .............. .340 .240 .060 .627 .153 .066 .207 .460 Allegheny, P a............ .940 .233 1.466 .030 .383 .609 .143 .263 .451 Columbus, O h io ......... .981 .151 .038 .543 .121 .543 .083 .128 .430 Worcester, Mass......... 1.579 .058 .793 .074 .124 .165 .983 .248 .256 Syracuse, N .Y ............ 1.067 .650 .725 .008 .400 .317 .226 .108 .400 New Haven, Conn___ 1.125 .330 1.393 .955 .036 .107 .107 .116 .518 Paterson, N . J ............ 1.255 .242 1.134 .437 .251 .353 .186 084 Fall River, Mass......... .626 .112 .355 .187 .038 .280 .065 .206 .393 St. Joseph, M o ............ .367 .077 .213 .029 .290 .126 .106 .203 .039 Omaha, N ebr.............. .509 .064 .100 .118 .164 .056 .209 .236 .056 Los Angeles, C a l....... .882 .673 .127 1.018 .391 .118 .282 .600 .036 Memphis, T e n n ......... .456 .140 1.200 .381 .102 .167 .847 .288 .316 Scranton, P a .............. .573 .408 .573 .505 .369 .097 .282 .087 .466 Lowell, Mass.............. 2.074 .253 1.948 .432 .390 .063 .432 .158 .189 Albany, N. Y .............. 1.410 .740 .220 .190 .150 1.440 .460 .080 .450 Cambridge, Mass....... 1.382 .191 .032 .064 .064 .191 .372 .595 .340 Portland, Oreg.......... .904 .394 .372 .202 .362 .489 .106 .255 .309 Atlanta, G a ............... .979 .404 .681 .117 .755 .936 .277 .043 .574 Grand Rapids, Mich . .916 .326 .084 .137 .179 .074 .368 .547 .400 Dayton, Ohio.............. 1.256 .389 .122 .122 .944 .056 .033 .111 .478 Richmond, Y a............ 1.120 .217 .174 .728 .152 .065 .598 .522 .696 Nashville, Tenn......... 1.328 .172 .012 .922 .467 .123 .271 .590 .467 Seattle, W ash............ .745 .222 .233 .078 .267 .322 .200 .156 .433 Hartford, Conn.......... 1.237 .073 1.029 .073 .282 .123 .576 .515 Reading, Pa............... .793 .183 . 464 .183 .098 .195 .488 .695 .061 Wilmington, D e l....... 1.147 .522 1.108 .038 .076 .217 .013 .599 .497 Camden, N. J ............ 1.275 .275 .087 .225 .175 .025 .450 1.038 .313 Trenton, N. J .............. 1.027 .560 .853 .080 .120 .413 .253 .507 Bridgeport, C o n n ___ 1.143 .480 1.467 .584 .130 1.000 .091 .130 Lynn, Mass................. 1.271 .543 .057 .157 .257 .314 .500 .086 .443 Oakland, C al.............. 1.573 .467 *.253 (c) .093 .627 .160 .067 .480 Lawrence, Mass......... 1.092 .462 .123 .092 .215 .585 .185 .015 .431 New Bedford, Mass .. 1.697 .364 1.439 .727 .212 .167 .030 .015 .212 Des Moines, I o w a ___ .371 .243 .271 .171 .029 .457 .143 .086 .572 Springfield, Mass....... 1.616 .292 .108 .062 .092 1.339 .585 .138 .200 Somerville, Mass....... 1.165 .158 .362 .032 .284 .331 .158 .079 .472 Troy, N. Y ................... 1.465 .426 1.026 1.066 .320 .186 .200 .067 .586 Hoboken, N .J ............ 1.213 .410 1.066 .377 .902 .049 .016 .049 .491 Evansville, I n d ......... .515 .531 .382 .615 .299 .100 .299 .050 .332 Manchester, N. H ___ 1.213 .485 2.063 .485 .087 .797 .243 .607 Utica, N .Y ................. 1.224 .448 .362 .121 .569 .397 .069 .897 .724 Peoria, 111................... .333 .867 .367 .016 .217 .083 .150 .684 .317 Charleston, S. C ........ .769 .831 .323 2.338 .108 .108 .108 1.062 3.154 Savannah, G a............ 1.129 .323 .032 .113 1.032 .065 .226 .935 1.371 Salt Lake City, U tah. .810 .207 .345 .069 .086 .121 .138 .259 .500 o Data not obtainable. b Included in deaths from other diseases of circulatory system. c Including deaths from organic heart disease. d Including deaths from dysentery, diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over, peritonitis, and gastritis. e Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. / Not including deaths from gastritis. o Included in deaths from other forms of tuberculosis. STATISTICS OF CITIES, Included in deaths from infantile diseases. Including deaths from other malformations. Included in deaths from other malformations, fcIncluding deaths from hydrocephalus. I Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over. m Including 808 deaths occurring outside city limits. n Not including 81 deaths of nonresidents. h i j 945 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Table VIII.—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (1)—Cob larLnal nm- Cities. >er. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106' 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 San Antonio, Tex .. Duluth, M in n ......... Erie, P a ................... Elizabeth, N. J ....... Wilkesbarre, Pa___ Kansas City, Kans . Harrisburg, Pa........ Portland, Me.......... Yonkers, N. Y ......... Norfolk, V a ............ Waterbury, Conn (a) Holyoke, Mass......... Fort Wayne, Ind .. . Youngstown, O hio.. Houston, T e x ......... Covington, K y ....... Akron, Ohio............ Dallas, T ex.............. Saginaw, M ich ....... Lancaster, P a ......... Lincoln, N ebr......... Brockton, M ass___ Binghamton, N. Y .. Augusta, Ga............ Pawtucket, R. I ___ Altoona, P a ............ Wheeling, W. V a ... Mobile, A l a ............ Birmingham, A la .. Little Rock, Ark . . . Springfield, Ohio .. . Galveston, T ex....... Tacoma, Wash......... Haverhill, Mass___ Spokane, Wash....... Terre Haute, In d ... Dubuque, Iowa....... Quincy, 111.............. South Bend, Ind . . . Salem, Mass............ Johnstown, P a ....... Elmira, N. Y ............ Allentown, Pa......... Davenport, Io w a .. . McKeesport, P a ___ Springfield, 111....... Chelsea, M ass......... Chester, P a .............. York, P a ................. Malden, M ass......... Topeka, K an s......... Newton, Mass......... Sioux City, Io w a . . . Bayonne, N. J ......... Knoxville, T en n . . . Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass....... Canton, Ohio.......... Butte, M ont............ Montgomery, A la .. Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, Tenn. East St. Louis, 111... Joliet, 111................. Ty Whoop Diph Small Mea Scar phoid Mala let ing theria pox. ria. sles. and Grippe fever. fever. cough. croup. 0.415 0.775 0.162 0.216 .732 0.018 .018 .145 .018 .727 .055 .273 .018 .018 .073 .346 .058 .173 .789 .129 .037 .183 .330 .382 .036 .018 .073 .250 .038 .019 .019 .118 .039 .196 .039 .582 .382 .055 .312 .062 .021 .125 .147 .021 .021 .042 .314 .020 .039 .039 .098 1.180 .100 .080 .060 .520 1.200 .140 .080 .391 .115 .023 .023 .267 .111 .044 .340 .660 .060 .080 .289 .111 .022 .022 .241 .072 .282 .047 .071 .141 .047 .023 .212 .561 .122 .122 .366 1.049 .024 .122 .244 .148 .074 .025 .025 .275 .025 .150 .950 .025 .025 .125 .300 .722 .670 .077 .180 .927 . 146 .024 .317 .675 .602 .024 .024 .121 .200 .025 .100 .357 .286 .214 .036 .275 .150 .125 .269 .027 .054 .475 .050 .100 .675 .150 .075 .200 .187 .053 .053 .053 .605 .053 .132 .445 .023 .023 .023 .110 .138 .028 .441 1.000 .200 .274 .027 .472 .302 .027 .110 .137 .773 .027 .373 .222 .028 .083 .139 .028 .198 .085 .085 .400 .028 .086 .378 .027 .260 .029 .029 .029 .435 .174 .232 .165 .027 .027 .027 .197 .084 .169 .028 .057 .029 .057 .171 .114 .522 .058 .116 .609 .347 .026 .026 .080 .219 .031 .437 .063 .063 .062 .031 .193 .065 .129 .121 .030 .281 .594 .254 .317 .032 ,222 .229 .029 .029 .688 .219 .187 .062 .400 .114 .057 .057 .314 .219 .094 .062 .094 a Including data for township. 0.126 0.361 0.415 .018 .482 .089 .346 .164 .036 .036 .400 .091 .365 .116 .055 .202 .110 .109 .218 .036 .135 .442 .077 .020 .372 .400 .109 .273 .270 .332 .540 .357 .945 .210 .039 .157 .216 .460 .240 .020 .220 .140 .207 .299 .552 .200 .089 .020 .080 .080 .044 .356 .200 .072 .458 .651 .094 .424 .047 .259 .235 .098 .512 .268 .073 .268 .463 .517 .394 .500 .050 .iso .600 .425 .026 .077 .232 .219 .098 .096 .096 .578 .025 .325 .175 .286 .107 .075 .275 .100 .054 .377 .511 .025 .126 .175 >250 .325 .425 .027 .053 .107 .053 .053 .047 .141 .258 .028 .331 .359 .025 .575 .050 .466 .493 .521 .417 .111 .137 .164 .137 .027 .427 .056 .695 .111 .085 .510 .227 .028 .514 .229 .054 .297 .108 .202 .317 .231 .087 .116 .087 .303 .056 .113 .084 .029 .314 .171 .232 .203 .026 .774 .053 .094 .375 .125 .031 .281 .375 .094 .031 .250 .032 .193 .258 .182 .030 .061 .094 .375 .062 .064 .127 .029 .086 .171 .062 .313 .281 .057 .286 .200 .125 .156 .094 947 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able VIII.—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (1)—Concluded. Other Puru Pul Other Cere Pneu Other dis Bron monia lent Other Con eases bral mo forms chitis, and dis and gen Men vul Pa conges Can eral in nary of of acute bron- eases of septi- tuber tion raly sions nerv tuber cer. respir and csemie culo culo dis gitis. and sis. of in ous chron choatory infec sis. eases. hemor fants. sys pneu- system. sis. ic. monia. tion. rhage. tem. 0.198 5.261 0.378 0.469 .321 .518 .178 1.179 .218 .509 .127 1.036 .036 2.055 .418 .418 .885 .096 .404 .202 1.835 .055 .514 . 1.382 ___ .473 .712 .019 2.269 .353 .451 .118 1.863 .073 .436 .018 2.473 .228 .208 .021 1.454 .168 .546 .147 1.828 .039 .627 .078 1.235 .320 .200 .860 __ .120 .520 .160 2.360 .942 .299 .138 2.414 .089 .489 .111 .644 .060 .380 .260 2.240 .067 .556 .155 1.111 .121 .531 .048 1.110 .071 .565 .141 .682 .188 .494 .047 1.388 .805 1.317 .024 .439 2.756 .122 .197 .541 .074 1.649 .425 1.150 .225 .775 .125 1.375 .670 .026 .361 4.046 .122 .488 .219 3.171 .386 .337 2.892 .225 .975 *“ .050* .475 .107 .750 .393 1.643 .025 .450 .250 1.200 .430 .753 .027 1.990 .025 .750 .050 1.275 .075 .650 .025 1.500 .053 .693 .107 .987 .210 .605 .026 1.653 .141 .398 .070 1.265 .966 .662 1.793 .025 .350 .025 1.150 .247 .685 .027 1.206 .361 .083 1.500 .... .192* .658 .027 1.452 .027 .427 .933 .472 .361 2.167 .113 .681 .028 1.702 .171 .372 1.372 .270 .433 .135 .973 .144 .635 .115 1.298 .058 .319 .174 1.797 .165 .605 1.156 .282 .479 .310 1.071 .143 .371 .114 1.600 .116 .290 .029 3.710 .080 .347 .053 1.547 .062 .813 1.188 .344 .406 .125 .812 .094 .531 1.344 .322 1.933 .364 .061 1.000 .250 .625 ***.*1.25* .250 .190 .159 .064 1.524 .086 .486 .057 1.314 .219 .563 .281 2.469 .143 .229 .800 .057 1.219 .031 .250 0.234 .214 .527 .309 .212 .238 .309 .404 .235 .709 .706 .567 .314 .360 .400 .919 .267 .500 .267 .169 .188 .353 .439 .951 .123 .425 .300 .438 .268 .313 .300 .250 .425 .323 .525 .525 .213 .605 .304 .469 .300 .466 .417 .384 .213 .556 .454 .257 .297 .202 .319 .330 .338 .086 .580 .347 .281 .281 .656 .483 .091 .250 .254 .371 .344 .200 .062 0.487 .625 .127 .400 .212 .459 .218 .789 .667 .255 .353 1.071 .196 .460 .140 .874 .222 .120 .155 .145 .259 .376 .098 .244 .591 .500 .450 .026 .293 .434 .250 .357 .225 .323 .450 .350 .453 .316 .141 .524 .875 .329 .361 .164 .400 .222 .482 .343 .189 .288 .145 .275 .423 .543 .174 .373 .344 .469 .906 .290 .212 .344 .127 .257 .250 .200 .312 0.324 .375 .709 .764 .808 .385 .655 1.192 .784 .945 .644 .315 .451 .340 .340 .529 .489 .340 .356 1.230 .494 .141 1.024 .707 .935 .500 .625 .902 .683 .771 .850 .286 .400 .726 .225 .450 .560 .737 .304 .745 .200 .712 1.528 .685 .160 .333 .482 .600 .811 .721 .319 1.046 .564 .686 .319 .854 .438 .312 .281 1.225 .455 .187 .159 1.057 .688 .229 .281 0.270 0.324 0.577 0.378 .089 .303 .036 .339 .327 .309 .418 .382 .109 .527 .200 .327 .115 .481 .269 .250 .238 .165 .440 .202 .273 .255 .291 .127 .538 .173 .231 .212 .078 .255 .177 .490 .509 .727 .309 .309 .125 .208 .145 1.122 .210 .294 .315 .651 .373 .157 .235 .373 .280 .420 .260 .320 .340 .360 .480 .140 .345 .391 .575 .621 .267 .444 .244 .178 .320 .100 .320 .360 .400 .444 .311 .333 .072 .434 .169 .265 .424 .235 .259 .047 .094 .141 .471 .188 2.025 .244 .463 .732 .293 .683 .244 .197 .123 .172 .566 .450 .800 .250 .350 .400 .175 .125 .325 .464 1.005 1.263 .284 .219 .195 .488 .317 .289 .121 .482 .217 .050 .250 .125 .500 .357 .214 .714 .250 .125 .200 .225 .075 .350 .161 .511 .134 .275 .150 .100 .350 .200 .050 .475 .175 .240 .400 .347 .267 .263 .132 .763 .368 .187 .281 .070 .304 .193 .110 .828 .386 .250 .725 .200 .350 .247 .164 .192 .247 .167 .472 .195 .195 .439 .521 .356 .466 .187 1.093 .053 .427 .417 .389 .472 .389 .567 .340 .681 .397 .200 .400 .257 .114 .514 .243 .189 .216 .144 .231 .519 .375 .898 .203 1.217 .029 .138 .275 .248 .113 .141 -.225 .338 ...... .543 .143 .286 .348 .203 .319 .232 .107 .293 .213 .320 .250 .125 .156 .344 .063 .344 .219 .437 .469 .219 .344 .406 1.031 .258 .935 .387 .364 .121 .333 .030 .094 .187 .187 .187 .222 .190 .603 .127 .086 .171 .171 .281 .156 .281 .281 .200 .114 .143 .457 .156 .281 .469 .188 1.045 1.018 1.327 1.600 1.692 1.927 .909 1.116 1.784 1.309 2.057 1.722 .882 1.680 1.120 1.977 .867 1.980 1.200 1.737 .777 1.600 1.878 1.805 1.821 1.875 1.600 1.314 4.390 2.193 1.025 .929 .925 1.291 .875 1.150 .587 1.447 .656 1.435 1.225 1.753 1.528 .548 2.507 1.083 .993 1.429 1.460 1.731 1.362 1.018 1.042 2.257 1.478 1.894 1.469 1.250 1.438 1.611 1.000 2.188 .952 1.171 1.000 2.686 1.438 0.144 .161 .200 .291 .288 .183 .164 .250 .372 .127 .416 .357 .471 .040 .260 .414 .133 .200 .444 .121 .094 .471 .122 .659 .172 .375 .300 .335 .268 .554 .175 .214 .175 .134 .100 .175 .080 .474 .398 .855 .200 .137 .222 .329 .183 .111 .113 .171 .288 .174 .165 .197 .629 .203 .507 .062 .094 .062 .387 .152 .250 .254 .257 .469 .156 Mar ginal num ber. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 •110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 948 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. TABLE Mar ginal num ber. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 vm.—DEATH Diarrhea and enteritis. Her Other Other nia dis dis Peri Appen eases and Organ eases of Bright's of intesti toni dicitis. digest 2 ic heart circula Under disease. years nal ob- tis. disease. tory ive 2 strucor system. system. years. over. tion. Cities. San Antonio, T e x ___ Duluth, M in n ............ Erie, P a ...................... Elizabeth, N. J .......... Wilkesbarre, Pa......... Kansas City, Kans . . . Harrisburg, P a .......... Portland, Me.............. Yonkers, N. Y ............ Norfolk, Y a ............... Waterbury, Conn. (a). Holyoke, M ass.......... Fort Wayne, I n d ....... Houston, T e x ............ Covington, K y ............ Akron, Ohio............... Dallas, T e x ................. Saginaw, M ich .......... Lancaster, P a ............ Lincoln, N ebr............ Brockton, Mass.......... Binghamton, N. Y . . . Augusta, Ga............... Pawtucket, It. I ......... Altoona, P a ............... Wheeling, W. Y a....... Mobile, A l a ............... Birmingham, A la ---Little Rock, A r k ....... Springfield, Ohio....... Galveston, T ex .......... Tacoma, W ash.......... Haverhill, Mass......... Spokane, Wash.......... Terre Haute, I n d ....... Dubuque, Iowa.......... Quincy, 111................. South Bend, In d ......... Salem, M ass............... Johnstown, Pa............ Elmira, N. Y ............... Allentown, P a............ Davenport, I o w a ....... McKeesport, P a ......... Springfield, 111............ Chelsea, Mass.............. Chester, P a ................. York, Pa...................... Malden, Mass.............. Topeka, K a n s .................. Newtonj Mass.............. Sioux City, Iowa......... Bayonne, N. J.............. Knoxville, Tenn......... Schenectady, N. Y — Fitchburg, M ass......... Superior, W is.............. Rockford, 111............... Taunton, Mass............ Canton, O h io.............. Butte, M o n t............... Montgomery, A la....... Auburn, N .Y .............. Chattanooga, T en n ... East St. Louis, 111....... Joliet, 111.................... KATE PEE 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (2)—concluded. 0.685 .411 .946 .873 .827 .716 .946 1.558 .863 1.382 .561 .546 .333 i.ino !700 1.494 .844 .460 1.178 1.110 .353 .965 .854 .659 1.772 .575 1.150 1.314 .732 .627 .750 .964 1.575 .968 .900 1.150 .880 .500 .328 1.103 1.175 1.069 1.083 1.069 .480 .583 1.985 .943 .622 1.241 .753 .881 .761 .114 .666 .613 1.719 .531 .594 1.192 .939 .500 .921 .771 .688 .257 .344 0.505 .303 .200 .800 .077 .495 .109 .192 .608 .236 .478 .252 .353 . 140 .220 1.011 .089 .320 .133 .338 .141 .188 .317 .415 .148 .525 .226 .206 .244 .458 .025 .179 .275 .269 .225 .250 .293 .237 .375 .717 .200 .411 .111 .384 .160 .111 .567 .343 .433 .404 .261 .275 .113 .486 .348 .320 .219 .094 .375 .193 .061 .062 .171 .313 .171 .031 1.658 1.179 .891 1.546 .885 .165 .709 .538 .882 .745 1.641 1.765 .373 .700 .980 .666 .356 .580 .467 .386 .236 .212 .317 .561 1.157 .550 c.750 .284 .171 .651 .175 .750 .100 .780 .300 .750 .453 .632 .726 .331 1.050 .548 .333* .575 1.040 .472 .170 1.057 .946 .490 .464 .716 .394 1.400 .406 1.200 .969 1.437 .563 1.353 .333 .750 .698 .400 .750 .314 .719 0.270 .089 .182 .256 .058 .349 .073 .216 1.146 .228 .210 .098 .180 .300 .161 .067 .240 .111 .531 .071 .306 .024 1.634 .320 .325 (<*) .748 1.293 .964 .075 .500 .125 .108 .150 .150 .027 .132 .070 .772 .625 .139 .164 .853 .250 .879 .114 .270 .288 .174 .138 .225 .229 .174 .240 .187 .094 .09i .344 .476 .286 .125 .086 .094 0.018 .107 .182 .091 .115 .073 .109 .058 .137 .273 .228 .105 .039 .100 .080 .092 .067 .100 .244 .096 .094 .047 .024 .148 .050 .275 .156 .098 .193 .025 .107 .050 .134 .100 .275 .053 .iii .055 .075 .164 .083 .164 .133 .167 .142 .286 .054 .058 .193 .141 .114 .029 .267 .031 .125 .156 .161 .121 .125 .064 .029 .229 .125 0.180 .196 .164 .109 .250 .330 .127 .231 .137 .182 .041 .168 .333 .120 .140 .345 .155 .140 .267 .048 .071 .118 .293 .366 .025 .225 .175 .335 .415 .145 .150 .143 .200 .081 .275 .400 .187 .210 .211 .110 .175 .164 .139 .164 .480 .250 .142 .171 .081 .115 .174 .083 .310 .229 .348 .267 .219 .125 .125 .161 .091 .219 .095 .229 .219 .114 .125 alncluding data for township. &Not including deaths from premature birth. 0.144 .161 .164 .018 .077 .092 .091 .077 .137 .145 .104 .126 .039 .080 .069 .022 .220 .200 .072 .047 .071 .268 .073 .049 .050 .100 .052 .073 .096 .075 .214 .150 .054 .250 .125 .080 .105 .047 .088 .150 .137 .083 .164 .053 .194 .028 .058 .377 .055 .084 .il6 .080 .187 .188 .129 .061 .187 .064 .114 .031 .057 .031 0.793 .232 .473 .309 .308 .477 .400 .346 .490 .745 .499 .651 .510 .420 .840 .621 .311 .940 .578 .410 .353 .659 .488 .854 .517 .475 .875 .722 .780 .602 .250 .857 .200 .242 .475 .650 .480 .553 .351 .441 .325 .548 .389 .302 .533 .750 .454 .486 .851 .288 .696 .275 .451 .657 .695 .267 .344 .187 .437 .193 .333 .344 .698 .486 .906 .200 .188 0.937 .554 .600 .927 .692 .569 .400 1.462 .863 .618 .685 .462 .647 .660 .666 .467 .500 .444 .531 .306 .188 .781 .707 .689 .625 .525 2.139 .561 .434 1.000 2.357 .425 .538 .425 .250 .534 .605 .445 .248 .375 .986 .722 .356 .160 .833 .596 .286 .405 .404 .087 .330 .282 .657 .551 .480 .156 .375 .094 .580 .394 .844 .603 .628 .750 .229 .406 949 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table VIII.—DEATH BATE PER 1,000 POPULATION, BY CAUSES (2)—Concluded. Other dis eases ofgenitourinary sys tem. 0.144 .036 . 182 .273 .019 .238 .255 .250 .471 .509 .457 .294 .419 .360 .060 1.701 .089 .080 .200 .169 .071 .471 463 .244 .221 .075 .575 .232 .366 .048 .075 .464 .100 .377 100 .425 .107 .316 .258 .414 .225 .658 .028 .164 .187 .250 .198 .543 .027 .404 .464 .550 .423 .257 .058 .373 .344 .063 .188 .483 .030 .407 .317 .200 .094 .086 .219 Puer peral septi cae mia. Other puer peral dis eases. 0.126 .089 .164 .073 .058 0.108 .036 .073 .109 .058 .110 .109 .115 .059 .036 .228 .021 .069 .020 .100 .138 .080 .023 .047 .098 .049 .175 .075 .077 .122 .025 .036 .081 .200 .125 .027 .184 .023 .055 .025 .027 .058 .078 .091 .042 .042 .078 .020 .040 .322 .044 .080 .089 .047 .122 .073 .123 .025 .050 .232 .268 .096 .025 .107 .081 .050 .125 .027 .026 .117 .110 .082 .164 .107 .056 .027 .027 .086 .085 .171 ,027 .029 .029 .165 .056 .029 .174 .080 .156 .063 .156 .193 .087 .083 .028 .171 Dis eases of the skin and cellu lar tissue. 0.072 0.144 .036 .018 .036 .018 .164 .037 .037 .109 .038 .096 .020 .036 .062 .062 .042 _____ .098 .020 .060 .03i .028 .018 .018 .019 .039 .083 .021 .046 .080 .022 .072 .071 .020 .040 .023 .022 .020 .023 .047 .024 .023 .047 .049 .024 .024 .098 .050 .100 .077 .098 .072 .026 .036 .100 .108 .050 .125 .080 .079 .094 .055 .200 .082 .024 .050 .054 .050 .027 .026 .036 .025 .053 .047 .025 .082 .027 .086 .054 .144 .055 .084 .057 .031 .063 .062 .032 .057 .031 .062 0.072 .018 .091 .036 .038 .039 .021 .063 .039 .020 .060 .067 .024 .023 .118 .024 .050 .025 .096 .138 .036 .050 .027 .025 .080 .047 .025 .055 .027 .133 .028 .030 .062 .062 .086 .031 0.036 .018 .092 .053 .031 .125 Dis eases Hy- Other of mal loco dro- forma motor cephalus. tions. sys tem. .027 .107 .028 .054 .029 .028 .086 .029 .026 .029 .029 .028 .029 .063 .055 .056 .200 .031 .032 .061 .032 .031 .064 .030 .031 .029 Mar Infan Senile Ill-de tile Sui Acci fined Total ginal num dent. dis deaths. dis debil cide. ity. ber. eases. eases. 1.153 .464 1.200 1.455 1.135 .734 1.309 .942 .941 1.564 1.703 1.849 .726 6.700 1.000 1.310 .867 .980 .867 1.085 .518 .706 .805 1.561 1.427 1.225 .700 1.366 1.268 5.506 .850 1.250 5.650 .699 .575 1.725 .880 .763 1.358 .635 1.475 .877 1.361 .603 1.040 .528 1.134 1.115 .838 1.125 .145 .633 .845 1.257 .724 .907 2.094 1.500 .781 1.225 .424 1.032 .254 1.228 1.219 .543 .938 0.505 0.216 .286 .196 .455 .145 .455 .127 .635 .115 .367 .065 .709 .018 .866 .038 .235 .059 .273 .018 .374 .021 .357 .126 .510 .118 .480 .160 .400 .120 1.172 .276 .289 .022 .320 .160 .756 .067 .772 .048 .282 .165 .447 .071 1.098 .146 .171 .541 .123 1.025 .150 .675 .125 .861 .077 .366 .241 .950 .050 .500 .071 .275 .275 .565 .242 .475 .250 1.425 .200 .960 .133 1.263 .237 .445 .047 .469 .055 .400 .100 .466 .164 .389 .111 1.206 .219 .240 .133 1.333 .111 .652 .057 .486 .028 .487 .054 .404 .087 1.014 .174 .578 .254 .084 .171 .114 .435 .058 .400 .026 .875 .062 .719 .094 .594 .156 1.321 .193 .515 .344 .313 .476 .064 .571 .057 .531 .031 .429 .500 .094 1.243 1.429 .691 1.237 1.288 1.083 1.000 .750 .863 .909 .852 .798 .804 1.260 1.520 1.195 .889 1.440 .778 .531 .706 .141 .927 .561 .566 .925 1.150 ,876 2.854 1.108 .450 1.572 1.100 .726 .725 1.050 .693 1.026 .585 .359 1.525 .795 .583 .822 1.974 .945 .567 1.629 .595 .462 1.420 .633 1.127 1.314 .695 1.200 .750 1.781 .469 .516 .303 1.938 .603 .600 1.219 1.743 .875 0.703 22.613 12.946 .214 14.745 .127 17.564 .309 14.346 .692 1.101 15.743 13.073 .418 16.885 .250 15.843 .216 19.545 .291 18.592 .644 .462 18.399 .333 12.373 .460 614.020 17.240 .640 24.069 .299 10.644 .800 17.440 1.800 13.578 .089 14.279 .169 .682 9.553 12.306 .212 18.415 1.293 22.366 1.512 16.416 .074 15.700 .300 17.075 .025 23.969 .696 24.585 1.612 1.398 619.133 11.450 .250 20.536 2.143 .425 611.850 14.714 .081 11.900 .200 17.425 .175 11.840 .133 16.026 .711 .422 11.780 17.379 .276 16.425 .375 15.562 .027 14.722 1.083 14.521 .439 17.387 1.174 17.278 1.972 16.362 .369 15.286 .400 12.541 .514 .115 14.020 3.246 17.797 11.944 .193 12.563 .479 .600 16.600 1.043 16.377 .987 16.160 .062 14.656 14.844 .656 13.188 .719 18.044 .161 8.727 .273 15.188 1.125 12.095 .635 12.171 .229 18.281 1.875 12.543 1.000 .813 11.406 c Including deaths from diarrhea and enteritis 2 years or over. ^Included in deaths from diarrhea and enteritis under 2 years. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 no 111 112 113 114 116 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 181 132 133 134 135 136 137 950 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able IX .—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION. Mar ginal number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 Cities. Population Official death Estimated estimated by rate (not in population, health cluding still Jan. 1,1902. department. births). New York, N. Y ....... Chicago, 111............... Philadelphia, P a ___ St. Louis, M o ............ Boston, M ass............ Baltimore, M d ......... Cleveland, O hio....... Buffalo, N. Y ............ San Francisco, C a l.. Cincinnati, O h io ___ Pittsburg, P a ............ New Orleans, L a ___ Detroit, M ich............ Milwaukee, W is....... Washington, D. C ... Newark, N. J ............ Jersey City, N. J ....... Louisville, K y.......... Minneapolis, M inn.. Providence. R. I ....... Indianapolis, Ind ... Kansas City, Mo....... St. Paul, M inn.......... Rochester, N. Y ....... Denver, C olo............ Toledo, O h io ............ Allegheny, Pa.......... Columbus, O h io....... Worcester, Mass....... Syracuse, N. Y ........ New Haven, Conn .. Paterson, N. J .......... Fall River, M ass___ St. Joseph, Mo.......... Omaha, Nebr............ Los Angeles, Cal Memphis, T e n n ....... Scranton, P a ............ Lowell, Mass............ Albany, N. Y ............ Cambridge, Mass___ Portland, Oreg......... Atlanta, G a .............. Grand Rapids, Mich Dayton, O h io .......... Richmond, Y a ......... Nashville, Tenn....... Seattle, W ash.......... Hartford, C o n n ....... Reading, Pa.............. Wilmington, D e l___ Camden, N. J ............ Trenton, N. J ............ Bridgeport, Conn ... Lynn, Mass............... Oakland, Cal............ Lawrence, Mass....... New Bedford, Mass.. Des Moines, Iowa ... Springfield, Mass___ Somerville, Mass___ Troy, N .Y ................. Hoboken, N. J ......... Evansville, I n d ....... Manchester, N. H ... Utica, N. Y ............... Peoria, 111................. Charleston, S. C ....... Savannah, G a.......... 3,536,517 3,583,930 20.00 1,758,025 1,800,000 13.88 1,321,408 1,335,000 18.27 598,000 595,000 17.73 573,579 573,579 19.70 518,000 520,000 20.23 390,000 390,000 14.96 365,000 370,000 14.68 360,000 350,000 19.47 336,250 340,000 18.30 333,858 333,500 19.74 305,000 300,000 21.24 305,000 300,000 «13.80 295,000 297,500 12.99 278,880 287,000 21.83 250,000 255,000 19.22 211,177 213,577 19.14 215,000 215,000 16.27 215,000 210,000 11.67 178,000 178,000 19.35 185,000 182,500 13.94 200,000 172,500 13.37 170,000 170,000 10.62 162,608 170,000 *14.67 150,000 d 17.89 140,000 150,000 150,000 11.42 130,000 18.65 133,000 140,000 132,500 11.05 121,064 121,000 16.50 108,374 120,000 *14.25 112,000 112,000 17.63 107,857 107,587 16.76 107,000 107,000 20.03 105,000 103,500 6.40 110,000 9.41 110,000 120,000 /16.14 110,000 110,000 107,500 17.51 102,026 103,000 16.98 94,969 94,969 21.46 100,000 17.59 100,000 94,084 94,084 16.73 100,000 94,000 011.43 135,000 14.30 94,000 90,000 12.67 95,000 90,000 90,000 13.63 100,000 92,000 19.07 81,320 M9.52 81,320 110,000 90,000 7.96 80,000 81,619 14.98 82,000 82,000 16.57 77,000 78,500 18.23 80,000 80,000 16.95 75,000 16.41 75,000 72,000 77,000 17.00 70,000 14.57 70,000 75,000 *13.64 75,000 65,000 65,000 17.20 66,000 66,000 18.73 75,000 70,000 9.87 65,000 14.35 65,000 63,000 13.19 63,500 75,057 22.14 75,057 61,000 18.97 61,000 65,000 11.46 60,200 56,987 19.85 57,687 56,000 18.41 58,000 60,000 13.18 60,000 65,000 26.54 65,000 56,000 62,000 25.66 a Not including 303 deaths occurring outside city limits. 6 Including 303 deaths occurring outside city limits. cNot including 82 deaths from premature birth. <*Not including 49 deaths from premature birth. «N ot including 80 deaths from premature birth. /N o t including 48 deaths from premature birth. aNot including 29 deaths from premature birth. * Not including 81 deaths of nonresidents. i Not including 25 deaths from premature birth. Death rate on basis of esti mated popu lation, Jan.l, 1902 (not in cluding still births). 19.73 13.56 18.08 17.82 19.70 20.15 14.96 14.49 20.02 18.10 19.77 21.59 615.04 12.88 21.21 18.85 18.93 16.27 11.95 19.35 14.13 15.50 10.62 14.51 19.51 11.42 18.23 11.68 16.51 13.12 17.63 16.81 20.03 6.49 9.41 18.05 17.92 16.82 21.46 17.59 16.73 12.47 20.54 12.00 13.63 20.73 619.52 9.73 14.68 16.57 17.89 16.95 16.41 15.90 14.57 13.97 17.20 18.73 10.57 14.35 13.09 22.14 18.97 12.38 19.61 17.78 13.18 26.54 23.18 951 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able IX .—DEATH RATE PER 1,000 POPULATION—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Salt Lake City, Utah San Antonio, T ex___ Duluth, Minn............ Erie, P a .................... Elizabeth, N .J.......... Wilkesbarre, P a ....... Kansas City, Kans... Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, M e ............ Yonkers, N . Y .......... Norfolk, Y a............... Waterbury, Conn___ Holyoke, Mass.......... Fort Wayne, I n d ___ Youngstown, Ohio .. Houston, T ex............ Covington. K y.......... Akron, O hio.............. Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ic h ......... Lancaster, Pa............ Lincoln, N ebr........... Brockton, Mass......... Binghamton, N. Y . . . Augusta, G a .............. Pawtucket, R. I ......... Altoona, Pa............... Wheeling, W. V a ___ Mobile, Ala................ Birmingham, A la___ Little Rock, Ark....... Springfield, O h io___ Galveston, T e x ......... Tacoma, Wash.......... Haverhill, M ass....... Spokane, W ash......... Terre Haute, I n d ___ Dubuque, Iow a......... Quincy, 111................. South Bend, Ind....... Salem, Mass.............. Johnstown, Pa.......... Elmira, N .Y .............. Allentown, P a.......... Davenport, I o w a ___ McKeesport, Pa......... Springfield, 111........... uucxbcu, muss......... Chester, P a ............ York, Pa................. Malden, Mass......... Topeka, Kans......... Newton, Mass......... Sioux City, Io w a .. Bayonne, N .J......... Knoxville, T enn... Schenectady, N. Y . Fitchburg, Mass. . . Superior, W is......... Rockford, 111......... Taunton, Mass....... Canton, O h io ......... Butte, M o n t.......... Montgomery, A la .. Auburn, N .Y ......... Chattanooga, Tenn East St. Louis, H I.. Joliet, 111............... Death rate on basis of esti Population Official death Estimated mated popu estimated by rate (not in population, lation, Jan. 1, cluding still Jan. 1,1902. 1902 (not in health births). department. cluding still births). uo,om 60,000 54.500 53.500 51,721 60,000 55.000 50,145 50.000 55.000 48,139 45,712 50.000 54,428 50.000 43.500 47.000 65.000 45.000 41,459 43.000 40,063 39,647 40,441 40.630 40.000 38,878 38,469 38,415 40.000 40.000 28.000 50.000 37,175 48.000 40.000 37.500 40.000 41.000 36.000 39.000 36.500 36.000 38.000 36,000s 36.000 34,072 35.000 35.000 33,664 38.000 33,590 40.000 35.000 35.000 39,101 31.631 32.000 35.000 31,036 36.000 40.000 31.000 35.000 35.000 35.000 32.000 «9.01 22.69 12.08 14.88 18.06 14.42 14.30 13.07 17.51 16.16 19.55 b 18.59 19.16 12.62 cl2.88 17.24 24.07 d 9.83 13.42 13.58 14.28 9.44 13.05 19.04 22.68 16.42 15.70 *17.25 24.18 26.24 *19.85 11.45 20.54 *9.48 14.71 9.92 17.43 11.84 /15.83 12.27 17.50 16.85 15.56 14.72 13.95 18.11 17.28 16.93 15.29 13.26 14.44 16.16 12.92 11.15 16.60 16.15 15.50 14.87 14.84 /12.26 18.04 8.00 d ll. 73 12.29 a ll. 94 16.71 12.54 11.41 a Not including 30 deaths from premature birth. b Including data for township. * Not including deaths from premature birth. dNot including 17 deaths from premature birth. «N ot including 12 deaths from premature birth. /Inclu d in g stillbirths. a Not including 8 deaths from premature birth. 58,000 55,500 56,000 55,000 55,000 52,000 54,500 55,000 52,000 51,000 55,000 48,139 47,612 51,000 50,000 50,000 43,500 45,000 50,000 45,000 41,459 42,500 42,500 41,000 41,000 40,630 40,000 40,000 38,800 41,000 41,500 40,000 28,000 40,000 37,175 40,000 40,000 37,500 38,000 42,700 36,250 40,000 36,500 36,000 36,500 37,500 36,000 35,264 35,000 37,000 34,664 34,500 36,336 35,500 35,000 34,500 37,500 32,000 32,000 32,000 31,036 33,000 32,000 31,500 35,000 32,000 35,000 32,000 12.17 22.61 12.95 14.75 17.56 14,35 15.74 13,07 16 88 If. 84 19 55. &IS.. 69 18,40 12.87 *14,02 17.24 24.07 10.64 17.44 13.58 14.28 9.55 12.31 18.41 22.37 16.42 15.76 17.08 23.97 24.59 *19.13 11.45 20.54 *11.35 14.71 11.90 17.43 11.84 16.03 11.78 17.38 13.43 15.56 14.72 14.52 17.39 17.28 16.36 15.29 12.54 14.02 17.80 11.94 12.56 16.60 16.38 16.16 14.66 14.84 13.19 18.04 8.73 15.19 12.10 12.17 18.28 12.54 11.41 952 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X .—AREA OP PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OP STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS. Public parks (acres). Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Owned by city. New York, N .Y ......... Chicago, 111................. Philadelphia, P a ....... St. Louis, Mo............... Boston, M ass.............. Baltimore, M d............ Cleveland, O h io......... Buffalo, N .Y ............... San Francisco, Cal___ Cincinnati, Ohio......... Pittsburg, P a .............. New Orleans, La......... Detroit, M ich.............. Milwaukee, W is......... Washington, D. C ....... Newark, N .J .............. Jersey City.N. J ......... Louisville, K y ............ Minneapolis, M in n . . . Providence, R. I ......... Indianapolis, ln d ....... Kansas City, M o......... St. Paul, M inn............ Rochester, N. Y .......... Denver, C o lo .............. Toledo, O h io .............. Allegheny, P a ............ Columbus, O h io......... Worcester, Mass......... Syracuse, N .Y ............ New Haven, Conn___ Paterson, N . J ............ Fall River, Mass......... St. Joseph, M o ............ Omaha, Nebr.............. Los Angeles, C a l....... Memphis, T en n ......... Scranton, P a .............. Lowell, Mass.............. Albany, N. Y .............. Cambridge, Mass....... Portland, Oreg.......... Atlanta, G a ............... Grand Rapids, M ic h . Dayton, Ohio.............. Richmond, Y a .......... Nashville, Tenn......... Seattle, W ash ............ Hartford, Conn.......... Reading, Pa............... Wilmington, D e l....... Camden, N. J ............ Trenton, N .J ............ . Bridgeport, C o n n ___ Lynn, Mass................ Oakland, C al............. Other. Miles ol streets payed w ith- Granite Wood Asphalt and Cobble and Bricks. en stones. belgian blocks. asphalt blocks. blocks. 0.08 21.00 1.00 218.20 449.23 6,837.60 2,185.82 30.84 57.28 737.98 2.29 43.96 360.26 134.81 4,005.96 1.88 32.89 64.87 2,183.39 .22 .87 90.24 2,620.00 («) 2.34 .01 321.35 32.36 1,284.34 1.50 91.70 1,438.19 9.15 .01 99.84 1.049.00 .06 91.22 20.23 1,197.43 1,607.00 .60 40,00 539.00 47.00 69.00 95.30 39.20 910.00 6.95 220.00 25.93 38.19 522.66 24.85 222.64 85.36 1.14 2.05 1.199.00 3.20 48.45 8.34 503.00 .52 27.69 11.01 .98 3,596.27 4.45 312.50 49.53 12.50 19.99 .05 76.76 22.20 20.00 32.30 17.53 9.11 1.350.00 9.91 10.80 57.31 1.581.01 .42 30.12 4.70 640.00 26.54 15.77 '24*66 1.00 1.235.00 .52 37.85 2.24 J1,896.91 19.81 5.41 1,204.42 .71 7.35 30.87 670.50 2.29 521.00 12.72 26.20 57.67 809.00 27.38 13.37 360.00 16.63 912.00 75.88 8.69 9.48 196.00 .22 .02 11.88 386.89 7.94 274.26 1.71 4.16 5.85 .13 1.100.00 .84 6.70 1.14 96.42 .01 8.28 89.32 1.10 6.16 27.00 592.44 25.15 11.57 *i2.*65 1 3,720.04 1.28 .46 8.35 v 781.81 3.19 6.08 **i.*67 4.82 3.19 100.00 1.51 68.50 16.40 .20 19.87 267.66 30.98 18.35 .15 485.85 6.07 1.08 («) 1.70 4.20 206.02 .90 .30 ««155.00 2.00 50.71 5.04 10.43 .76 • 134.38 1.58 8.00 12.66 12.00 25.00 * 376.00 .10 3.64 8.40 2.34 682.40 .18 470.00 3.17 14.44 1,040.00 .57 .75 4.00 197.79 10.84 10.99 269.68 13.08 9.05 4.50 10.80 1.82 .55 63.55 6.00 7.78 288.63 1.24 1.45 2,463.75 3.50 .13 182.00 & 00 a Not reported. b Including 22 miles o f road outside city limits. c Including 31 miles of-road outside city limits. d Including road outside city limits, mileage not reported, e Including 14.05 miles of road outside city limits. /In clu d in g 98 miles of road outside city limits. a Including 7.78 miles of road outside city limits. ^Including 223.80 miles o f road outside city limits. i Including 105.14 miles of road outside city limits. /In clu d in g 65.97 miles of road outside city limits, fcIncluding 19.50 miles of road outside city limits. i Including 1,350 acres outside city limits, m Including 9.34 miles of road outside city limits. « Including 23.63 miles of road outside city limits, o Including 21.94 miles o f road outside city limits. 1?Not including road outside city limits. q Including 8 miles of road outside city limits. r Including 80 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 34.99 miles of road outside city limits. 298.71 109.18 321.27 12.47 19.17 17.00 12.61 224.91 82.70 26.50 92.47 26.27 24.39 17.55 140.97 47.25 14.83 18.85 13.04 4.61 43.59 106.77 17.40 45.87 19.41 25.28 27.67 17.82 .44 30.95 3.27 3.35 .13 7.6 33.92 12.02 11.80 2.20 9.53 3.13 3.29 6.87 17.42 .50 6.53 8.66 6.25 .26 17.09 3.30 1.49 6.50 953 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X .—AREA OF PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OF STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS. Miles of streets payed with— Total Miles of All other miles of streets un streets Mac kinds paved. paved. Brick. adam. Gravel. of pave ment. 760.34 403.95 226.12 249.53 295.26 .86 .73 3.51 176.42 192.00 10.32 12.73 237.73 45.88 10.80 17.33 77.65 8.16 150.46 4.04 37.70 11.58 25.26 5.57 15.29 5.62 39.44 62.57 61.98 30.00 33.00 1.92 4.10 .46 19.90 3.17 41.65 43.90 3.00 5.87 6.50 189.95 1.65 79.64 51.75 17.68 1.72 5.50 75.00 48.45 145.00 17.86 81.85 5.00 4.00 45.35 15.00 1.05 36.72 114.00 15.29 90.86 55.00 211.59 54.34 73.79 50.62 134.37 160.00 60.00 Miles of sewers. Tile. . OtheA Street railways. Total. MilesLof track. Mar Num ginal ber of num em ber. ploy ees. 1,765.42 761.99 1,543.32 1,236.68 25,692 4.88 1,346.40 2,816.71 58&?00 8W?00 ' $ 8 6 1,500.86 1,030.00 10,386 1,126.69 40.27 919.12 &480.00 413.31 919.12 7,381 93.74 445.38 12.30 432.66 228.44 263.47 4,982 c 321.00 (a) (a) 8.60 496.90 90.45 O/O. xo 213.68 5,000 («) 378.92 3.90 61.30 9.16 28.60 41.66 d 353.00 2,670 198.84 92.30 76.63 1.25 374.16 229.05 306.93 e 218.05 1,919 337.42 300.00 140.16 280.91 421.07 / 293.00 1,788' 23.00 370.63 383.00 110.97 175.90 309.87 0258.76 3,161 391.00 12.00 6.00 234.00 52.28 168.00 226.28 208.00 2,200 250.04 12.75 172.41 130.00 42.09 253.06 295.15 1,955 204.77 63.08 495.23 175.90 1,991 2.20 290.00 276.03 347.61 160.29 507.90 h 379.45 2,235 315.27 207.98 100.78 239.70 340.48 i 219.97 2,437 241.07 90.21 328.18 79.11 418.39 j 208.51 1,798 94.12 124.53 64.94 119.55 184.49 89.68 1,500 108.97 92.76 66.04 42.23 108.27 61.37 675 (a) (a) 166.65 10.16 59.50 99.45 817 122.00 («) 686.34 31.11 3.89 92.72 37.74 103.11 161.57 *131.00 984 .47 227.50 13.28 125.10 67.50 192.60 1,850 81.00 48.00 203.94 215.00 108.00 60.00 110.00 870 254.92 185.08 44.25 134.50 178.75 m 139.50 1,300 375.00 31.21 123.44 20.66 68.66 14.46 175.31 n 127.23 734 88.32 126.33 195.91 8.46 131.98 228.76 ol05.60 799 30.53 844.00 3.26 9.91 250.00 259.91 827 144.03 37.42 137.06 234.24 126.81 .05 164.28 782 102.00 70.62 85.05 91.60 .40 26.36 97.38 472 J>52.04 199.24 78.28 69.22 117.49 147.50 a90.00 503 142.86 35.42 118.69 42.61 3.38 157.49 r 140.00 1,000 32.05 61.36 40.60 246.00 89.28 182.69 8 99.72 570 .41 127.42 43.81 15.22 76.39 40.03 99.06 55.00 425 51.06 67.34 139.62 3.33 21.75 72.81 49.19 110 94.02 37.06 40.97 19.79 1.28 58.13 39.24 225 49.70 48.41 '".'50* 11.50 1.25 93.00 62.45 40.00 250 85.21 99.36 296.69 31.19 130.55 2 71.70 615 7.84 237.29 315.00 8.00 154.90 162.90 u 285.50 1,710 74.22 153.34 .13 1.37 168.84 .75 170.96 to 100.80 350 21.32 164.84 60.70 2.97 63.67 *76.66 589 86.04 .16 37.86 40.00 45.61 85.61 V 69.71 350 81.90 45.76 52.00 17.51 27.95 91.22 27.55 700 122.74 36.42 70.00 5.11 111.53 39.22 952 122.05 17.60 12.73 87.67 .36 /O. 9 0 100.76 * 119.00 570 79.62 137.00 4.09 63.39 14.01 93.63 bb 145.00 1,350 163.87 119.93 .53 23.48 108.94 1.73 134.15 cc 52.97 350 191.66 .75 40.00 21.00 107.00 128.75 72.00 543 92.10 25.00 28.30 27.00 3.00 55.00 bb 118.00 940 37.38 1.40 14.83 4.21 197.33 90.48 56.42 <**64.00 350 (a) (a) 12.00 23.53 116.50 73.90 cc 90.00 512 39.86 88.87 30.61 52.00 1.00 92.86 / / 76.51 315 62.42 10.00 72.58 70.56 185 («) 33.00 («) («) (a) (a) 39.02 54.28 1.43 (a) 0066.50 **62.00 233 .50 56.74 112.18 16.26 51.20 51.70 **67.00 428 23.61 .48 12.00 25.00 101.39 7.00 44.00 j j 39.30 260 5.10 64.90 79.18 69.28 70.00 **90.40 455 62.92 52.08 18.75 41.10 59.85 41.90 240 178.00 151.50 85.00 178.00 ** 130.00 700 t Including 3,015 acres outside city limits. u Including 128.50 miles of road outside city limits. v Including 594.81 acres outside city limits. w Including 30 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 43.16 miles of road outside city limits. v Including 32 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 35 miles of road outside city limits. a a Including 6 acres outside city limits. bb Including 25 miles of road outside city limits. cc Including 6.04 miles of road outside city limits. d d Including 17 miles of road outside city limits. ee Including 7 miles of road outside city limits. //In clu d in g 41.51 miles of road outside city limits. 00 Including 7.34 miles of private sewers used by city. ** Including 28.64 miles of road outside city limits. 4i Including 28 miles of road outside city limits. J j Including 15 miles of road outside city limits. ** Including 54.70 miles of road outside city limits, zt Including 70 miles of road outside city limits. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 954 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X .—AREA OF PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OF STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS—Continued. Miles of streets paved with— Public parks (acres). Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ' 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Lawrence, Mass......................... New Bedford, Mass _ .............. Des Moines, I o w a ...................... Springfield, Mass........................ Srmnerville, Mass....................... Troy, N. Y ................................... Hoboken, N. J ........................... Evansville, I n d ......................... Manchester, N. H ...................... Utica, N. Y .................................. Peoria, 111................................... Charleston, S. C ......................... Savannah, Gar............................. Salt Lake City, U tah................. San Antonio, T ex....................... Duluth, M in n ............................ Erie, Pa........................................ Elizabeth, N. J............................. Wilkesbarre, P a ......................... Kansas City, Kans...................... Harrisburg, P a ........................... Portland, M e .............................. Yonkers, N. Y ............................. Norfolk, V a.................................. Waterbury, Conn........................ Holyoke, Mass............................. Fort Wayne, I n d ........................ Youngstown, Ohio...................... Houston, T ex.............................. Covington, K y ............................. Akron, Ohio................................ Dallas, T e x .................................. Saginaw, M ich ........................... Lancaster, Pa.............................. Lincoln, N eb r............................. Brockton, Mass........................... Binghamton, N. Y ...................... Augusta, G a ................................ Pawtucket, R. I ........................... Altoona. Pa.................................. Wheeling. W .V a ........................ Mobile, A la.................................. Birmingham, Ala........................ Little Rock, Ark......................... Springfield, O h io........................ Galveston, T e x ........................... Tacoma, Wash............................. Haverhill, M ass......................... Spokane, W ash........................... Terre Haute, I n d ........................ Dubuque, Iowa........................... Quincy, 111.................................. South Bend, Ind......................... Salem, Mass................................ Owned by city. 129.33 .255.00 521.48 490.03 52.10 26.00 9.00 129.67 153.00 15.00 350.00 j 468.65 72.35 110.00 327.47 290.00 10.37 20.42 39.26 14.30 42.21 113.00 11.00 95.00 88.31 23.71 95.74 46.30 14.13 Other. 0.75 30.51 5.80 20.00 34.66 217.66 25.00 698.00 258.30 48.25 20.00 4.35 106.56 25.67 61.00 15.13 3.15 4.42 4.69 2.40 5.90 25.71 17.00 7.70 .70 115.00 5.73 (d) .15 .25 2.80 .82 4.45 7.81 6.93 .11 7.59 16.00 .92 6.80 .25 .71 .08 96.00 13.00 61.89 10.00 1.50 100.50 23.00 238.00 Asphalt Granite and Cobble and Bricks. Wood en stones. belgian blocks. asphalt blocks. blocks. .39 25.00 40.00 .13 6.00 16.10 1.70 .25 9.96 2.42 9.60 2.25 2.50 .38 .21 1.25 1.40 8.43 1.20 5.73 .94 3.60 42.66 46.00 94.23 .73 2.01 .75 .57 35.00 hh42.20 2.61 6.03 .33 16.66 2.07 (*>) .79 .13 14.66 Including 10 miles of road outside city limits. &Not reported. c Including 34.24 miles of road outside city limits d Included in unpaved streets. cNot including cobblestones and gravel. /In clu d in g cobblestones and gravel. g Including 128.22 miles of road outside city limits. h Including 18.63 miles of road outside city limits. i Including 16 miles of road outside city limits. 3 Including 442 acres outside city limits. Jc Including 12 miles of road outside city limits. l Including 2.50 miles of road outside city limits. m , Including 8 miles of road outside city limits. n Including 6 miles of road outside city limits. ©Including 272.46 miles of road outside city limits. p Including 58 miles of road outside city limits. q Including 3.60 miles of road outside city limits. »•Including 28 miles o f road outside city limits. « Including 5 miles of road outside city limits. t Including 40.15 miles of road outside city limits. a 60.88 3.37 .11 8.74 0.25 .09 24.55 .37 24.10 .12 3.28 .08 .97 9.24 .47 8.00 31.08 .54 .63 2.20 1.33 1.46 13.87 2.50 7.32 .70 16.52 .62 5.68 3.50 14.49 3.38 .57 .14 1.04 23.00 .25 1.64 2.10 6.99 .25 .60 .50 4.42 5.00 22.25 20.80 2.60 20.07 5.71 2.14 9.13 3.36 11.56 15.22 4.53 0.33 .48 1.57 .44 3.10 4.64 4.80 2.12 2.19 34.21 8.85 .73 5.72 Slo 11.57 1.85 8.38 11.21 3.99 6.07 8.60 .27 .76 10.16 9.03 3.60 3.34 2.42 2.43 6.82 1.00 1.59 5.03 .87 .06 6.49 2.50 .02 8.00 2.00 .25 .05 .91 .10 .50 1.64 5.50 3.64 3.93 1.70 955 STATISTICS OF CITIES. Table X .—AREA OF PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OF STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS—Continued. Miles of streets payed with— Miles of sewers. Total Miles of All of streets other miles streets un Mac kinds paved. paved. Brick. adam. Gravel. of pave ment. 19.50 58.64 .15 39.30 20.00 3.00 .10 4.00 15.63 .24 .96 2.50 70.42 23.61 38.14 58.00 85.00 10.00 (d) 3.00 6.79 3.24 55.72 .66 15.37 3.43 31.60 8.66 55.50 4.59 3.57 5.43 1.55 28.80 3.00 20.00 6.83 27.00 2.16 8.87 11.00 32.57 5.88 2.70 .52 1.50 8.31 24.00 12.85 66.54 .18 18.64 15.20 1.30 6.70 1.00 46.96 9.11 13.21 .06 8.30 61.44 .50 3.00 1.50 .37 .12 7.50 85.45 11.48 5.00 54.75 41.84 4.80 4.50 10.20 15.00 51.90 37.75 **42.00 .08 Tile. Other. 61.12 136.67 62.85 130.60 43.80 c 42.09 21.90 33.82 20.68 43.65 35.06 33.41 30.99 4.50 76.00 Street railways. Total. 54.85 35.35 30.88 19.50 64.41 (b ) (b ) (■b ) 47.62 68.94 21.32 450.00 31.22 40.80 96.40 13.00 24.38 80.08 30.00 23.00 50.08 49.14 / 57.91 (*>) (*>) (*) 2.00 14.00 8.90 12.00 12.50 22.50 97.00 10.00 56.94 6.00 162.73 8.97 71.91 43.45 77.37 64.00 27.47 6.45 50.60 70.80 115.00 20.20 33.44 56.98 23.54 35.04 55.91 68.51 115.18 12.60 31.00 38.00 7.00 275.00 60.50 72.00 348.00 11.50 56.95 47.57 10 1.10 9.38 210.46 56.32 44.89 27.74 77.90 11.43 46.62 59.74 40.27 55.48 13.12 86.32 25.67 67.25 2.14 84.18 19.52 30.75 48.11 111.89 11.23 19.27 25.00 38.30 36.13 19.03 2.91 39.96 58.39 19.54 100.46 15.52 11.26 22.19 37.16 42.44 64.62 3.70 46.00 46.00 44.80 38.20 31.35 .36 36.22 4.51 8.69 39.50 17.74 1.61 13.02 32.37 41.57 35.25 47.37 15.94 33.24 63.31 175.25 19.22 102.14 35.22 17.86 16.00 28.85 .44 21.92 173.82 3.41 32.70 32.84 24.00 10.00 (b) (*>) (b) 2.69 129.12 52.37 59.79 23.44 4.73 56.08 125.29 52.53 37.31 3.55 41.41 .10 62.69 167.86 21.18 43.25 17.50 27.50 56.75 51.00 10.00 41.32 38.50 2.82 22.01 150.00 25.50 22.50 88.00 20.00 3.00 27.04 35.59 8.41 8.55 116.59 45.83 20.50 25.33 29.95 60.08 38.96 46.68 7.72 52.39 82.69 33.32 46.81 13.49 10.40 76.33 30.80 34.00 3.20 31.20 38.70 67.70 67.70 10.25 90.00 53.07 65.06 50.71 115.17 11.99 17.88 17.88 66.71 171.79 8.94 54.74 2.87 11.81 63.13 5.85 8.11 2.26 12.81 130.19 69.55 .25 69.30 19.24 110.87 29.80 36.60 11.10 135.00 6.80 15.00 255.00 15.00 21.00 60.21 190.00 8.00 30.00 38.00 200.00 30.46 .34 34.80 4.00 91.29 56.87 5.82 20.98 26.80 33.73 94.10 19.97 30.35 10.38 25.85 35.03 40.03 1.00 **95.45 (» ) « Including 74.86 miles of road outside city limits. v Including 0.25 mile of road outside city limits. w including 37.70 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 66.62 miles of road outside city limits. y Including 3.64 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 9.90 miles of road outside city limits. cmIncluding 16.50 miles of road outside city limits. b b Including 9.08 miles of road outside city limits. cc Including 40.09 miles of road outside city limits. <**Including l i miles of road outside city limits. e e including 47 miles of road outside city limits. //In clu d in g 1 mile of road outside city limits. g g Including 8.10 miles of road outside city limits. M including 40 acres outside city limits. 4i Including 3.67 miles of road outside city limits. J J Including 35.04 miles of road outside city limits. ** Including unpaved streets. 1 1 Included in streets paved with gravel. 4.66 Miles of track. a 24.26 21.43 42.43 c 73.63 29.48 26.20 0 140.56 24.66 34.50 *29.97 *56.00 *40.00 54.00 81.00 1 4 5.17 m42.49 «28.00 o301.11 J>80.00 340.00 r51.00 29.84 * 26.77 29.00 10.00 17.40 *63.00 «101.92 o39.00 w 51.70 *95.25 #40.34 *34.10 13.55 <*40.00 35.00 <*<*41.69 b b 21.61 23.52 15.25 00 53.73 <**36.00 oc97.80 //22.00 38.70 35.35 67.00 9 9 29.70 35.00 16.60 i i 20.50 17.00 JJ50.00 18.50 Mar Num ginal ber of nu m em ber. ploy ees. 136 180 375 460 500 500 1,500 170 130 258 247 180 275 285 225 278 140 2,720 400 375 200 200 170 250 142 200 475 242 175 431 450 227 175 61 140 225 250 258 105 155 310 264 750 150 294 170 400 118 131 160 120 129 140 126 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 956 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X .—AREA OP PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OP STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS—Concluded. Public parks (acres). Mar ginal num ber. in 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Owned by city. Johnstown, P a ........................... Elmira, N .Y ................................ Allentown, P a ........................... Davenport, Iowa......................... McKeesDort. P a ......................... sp rin ^ e id iu : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Chelsea, Mass.............................. Chester, P a .................................. York, Pa...................................... Malden, Mass.............................. Topeka, K a n s............................. Newton. M ass............................. Sioux City, I o w a ........................ Bayonne, N. J ............................. Knoxville, T e n n ........................ fifthenectady, N. Y ...................... Fitchburg, Mass......................... Superior, Wis............................... Rockford, 111.............................. Taunton, Mass............................. Canton, O h io.............................. Butte, M on t................................ Montgomery, Ala........................ Auburn, N. Y .............................. Chattanooga, Tenn.................... East St. Louis, 111........................ Joliet, 111..................................... 23.00 99.69 3.00 46.00 8.50 33.00 34.00 81.84 18.00 49.80 102.91 160.00 25.70 15.00 1.00 3.00 121.60 22.80 8.00 7.50 136.00 50.00 .75 P14.00 6.00 s80.00 Other. Miles of streets paved with— Granite Wood Asphalt and Cobble and Bricks. en asphalt stones. belgian blocks. blocks. blocks. 8.50 1.28 5.63 7.30 1.00 30.32 60.30 33.50 119.00 300.00 5.00 30.00 1.19 2.37 4.19 .52 2.39 2.20 3.70 .48 1.00 3.92 .10 3.71 2.30 2.21 .60 2.21 2.00 Including 4 miles of road outside city limits. Including 4.50 miles of road outside city limits. Including 113.70 miles of road outside city limits. d Including 31 miles of road outside city limits. «N ot including road outside city limits. /N o t reported. a Including 18 miles of road outside city limits. h Including 8 miles of road outside city limits. i Including 17.16 miles of road outside city limits, i Including 7 miles of road outside city limits. a b e 9.01 2.95 .31 23.00 13.93 23.76 .25 2.73 2.25 1.93 1.14 5.00 5.86 1.00 12.92 .88 6.27 3.80 6.59 4.80 1.60 3.00 3.55 1.85 14.45 33.82 .03 1.98 17.10 4.65 1.00 3.98 18.00 3.29 .05 3.53 .61 3.61 957 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X .—AREA OF PUBLIC PARKS AND MILES OF STREETS, SEWERS, AND STREET RAILWAYS—Concluded. Miles of streets paved with— Miles of sewers. Total Miles of All of streets other miles streets un Mac kinds paved. paved. Brick. adam. Gravel. of pave ment. 0.33 5.16 10.73 20.62 .58 6.20’ 3.00 15.00 5.00 .44 71.01 .24 9.20 59.00 2.40 7.09 31.75 (/) .20 46.68 22.70 3.14 43.00 79.20 1.57 .50 9.00 (/) 30.00 5.72 45.00 2.95 4.00 18.28 7.77 1.00 .51 17.84 58.00 12.18 43.62 19.56 29.34 31.52 20.11 18.25 48.52 22.90 159.21 17.00 13.50 62.00 25.10 11.49 33.82 35.61 m3.81 47.30 2.30 12.58 46.65 20.95 25.00 25.79 48.10 62.16 80.00 84.00 102.00 85.00 (/) 54.99 47.75 49.00 170.00 38.59 612.00 64.10 54.00 32.00 118.59 62.07 94.65 170.00 39.00 42.00 30.25 35.35 59.05 65.00 46.61 1.62 6.39 3.74 3.74 3.02 43.18 10.00 24.68 .75 (/) 4.91 13.05 3.31 10.30 2.30 4.37 20.75 8.35 12.47 77 (/) 9.61 .50 21. Tile. 22.89 24.79 32.80 21.21 4.05 24.00 3.98 3.50 (/) 49.17 78.03 44.97 16.00 22.70 41.50 26.94 27.44 25.60 13.09 19.76 18.21 38.40 Other. 6.00 2.36 .75 (0 .62 1.10 .20 .13 2.45 (/) 25.50 18.00 5.66 Street railways. Total. 24.51 37.18 6.10 37.29 24.23 47.23 34.00 28.66 4.25 44.60 54.08 91.08 48.90 27.40 25.20 41.50 31.31 48.32 25.60 21.44 32.23 20.66 60.17 62.50 36.65 26.00 23.00 fc Including 24 miles of road outside city limits. * Including 14 miles of road outside city limits. Not including macadam and gravel, not reported. n Including 6 miles of road outside city limits. o Including 2.50 miles of road outside city limits. p Including 12 acres outside city limits. a Including 50 miles of road outside city limits. r Including 53 miles of road outside city limits, s Owned by city, outside city limits. t Including 25 miles of road outside city limits. m 9398— N o. 42— 02------ 6 Miles of tracK. a 23.10 625.50 126.99 <*55.00 e 14.25 32.00 11.17 17.00 g 29.25 13.75 6 28.50 *43.36 42.00 10.31 i2 5 .00 *35.00 16.00 26.50 *36.00 43.48 0 28.00 «2 5.00 «1 9.00 <>13.44 367.00 r72.60 *45.00 c Mar Num ginal ber of num ber. em ploy ees. 100 150 633 180 190 140 150 100 70 230 102 325 165 100 115 250 125 94 82 124 150 121 92 60 359 347 170 I ll 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 958 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X I.—CARE OF STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE. Inspectors. Streets. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Square yards swept per week. Swept hand or ma chine. By city. Average persons employed in sweep ing, sprink ling, etc. Food. Sanitary. By By con _By contractors. city. tract- T Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. Tons of ashes disposed of. By city. By contractors. 36 318 2,344,000 New York. N . Y ......... Both.. 154,684,828 9,659,500 4,358 «35 15 800 31 (d) 9b 47 469,213 56,847,000 Philadelphia, P a ....... B oth.. 865 41 225 1 22.500.000 200 Hand. St. Louis, Mo............... (*) (*) 2 Boston, M ass.............. B oth.. 10.500.000 425 <138 21 346,265 16,000 30 100,643 98,000 5 271 6 Baltimore, M d............ B oth .. 5,027,922 6,027,922 13 3 20 225 7 Cleveland, O h io......... Both.. 1,500,000 (h) m5 1 75 i25 30,513 7(9,}334 8 Buffalo, N .Y ............... Both.. 3,611,951 11,030,448 (h) 7 5 5,944,673 220 9 San Francisco, Cal___ Both.. (* 15 24 87,000 267 10 Cincinnati, Ohio......... Both.. 6.250.000 3 425 "(h ) ' 18 11 Pittsburg, P a .............. B oth.. 9.500.000 (*) 24 15 12 New Orleans, La......... Hand. 3,009,633 ol75 w 4 60,000 20 3318 13 Detroit, M ich.............. B oth.. 8.068.000 4 425 12 140,000 14 Milwaukee, W is......... Both.. 2,307,873 115 3 17 s 14,267 208 15 Washington, D. C ....... Both.. 7,957,020 4,824,837 21 1 16 Newark, N .J .............. B oth.. 2,191,030 300 (t) ’i,*566*666 100 ( 0 17 Jersey City, N .J ......... Both.. (3 (d ) 136 K ; 3 18 Louisville, K y ............ B oth.. 2,2 0 0 ,0 0 0 (h ) 2 412 8 19 Minneapolis, Minn .. . Both.. 9,023,076 (h) 1 1 87 20 Providence, R. I ......... Both.. 1,651,017 (h) 1 8 21 Indianapolis, Ind....... Both.. 2,573,888 137 (h) 2 8 22 Kansas City, M o......... Both.. 11,960,000 95 2 1,503 62 80 7 23 St. Paul, M in n ............ Both.. v 3,227,000 680,000 2 99,790 150 90 5 24 Rochester, N. Y .......... Both.. 4,083,500 (h ) 1 8 25 Denver, C o lo .............. Both.. 2,938,640 86 \h) 2 12 150 26 Toledo, Ohio............... Both.. 2,536,160 1 6 60 27 Allegheny, P a ............ Both.. 3.250.000 (h) 1 £C8 103 28 Columbus, O h io ......... Both.. 4.100.000 (h) 2 5 V 797,500 40 30 29 Worcester, M ass......... Both.. (h) 51,700 *41 3 i 135 1 30 Syracuse, N. Y ............ Both.. 4,120,671 4 625,979 7 31 New Haven, Conn___ Both.. 46 7*f <*} 1,000 32 Paterson, N .J.............. Both.. 600,000 120 1,050 1 415.000 30 33 Fall River, Mass......... Both.. 27 34 St. Joseph, M o ............ Hand. 330.000 1 (*) (h) 30 2 35 Omaha, N ebr.............. Both.. 1,548,518 1 ’W 6 2,800 2,025,870 65 135 3 36 Los Angeles, C a l....... Both.. (/) 27,413 750.000 43 aa 9 3 13 37 Memphis, T e n n ......... M ach. 6&62 2 1 38 Scranton, P a .............. Hand. 1,048,451 (h) "(h)" 24,842 4 325.000 75 1 39 Lowell, Mass.............. Both.. 4 26 1 65 40 Albany, N. Y .............. Both.. 1.500.000 "(h )" 41 aa 46 1 3 i^OOO 41 Cambridge, Mass....... Mach. 725.000 2 56 42 Portland, Oreg.......... Both.. 1,789,600 "(h )" (h) 2 6 24 43 Atlanta, G a ............... Mach. 1.710.000 If) 8 44 Grand Rapids, M ich.. Both.. 1, 0 00,000 ol00 2 lh) "(h )" 21,483 1 *3 39 45 Dayton, Ohio............. Hand. 1,623,840 4 5,000 46 Richmond, V a .......... Both.. 5,432,220 65 dd 95 28,175 3 6 47 Nashville, Tenn......... Both.. 683,600 aNot including 60 persons employed by New York Street Sprinkling Association and 60 other per sons who sprinkle streets by contract with adjoining property owners. b Including 30,000 tons removed under permit without cost to city. cNot including 80 persons who remove garbage under permit without cost to city. d Included in garbage. e Including ashes. / Not reported 9 Not including 4 State inspectors. h Disposed of by householders. i Employed in sweeping only. JTons not reported, 19,734 dead animals. h Employed for 5 months only. l Employed for 7 months only. m Not including 2 for 5 months and 5 plumbing inspectors. nTons not reported; 5,965 dead animals. o Sprinkling done by private persons. //Including ashes and dead animals and other refuse, a Including persons employed in removal of ashes. 1 2 Chicago, 111................. Both.. 10,000,000 3 4 5 959* STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X I.—CARE OP STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE. Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. Tons sold. By By con city. tract ors. Tons burned. Tons otherwise Tons sold. disposed of. 1 By By 1 concity. , tractj ors. 7,639 By city. (A) P ! 1,751 P (A) (A) (A) (A) (*) (A) (A) </) (*) 11,280 10,389 ('0 (*) 18 18 20,124 iof&oo (A) 165,642 b 105,000 1,114 c 644 18,000 6,523 500 (/) (A (/) (/) (/) 89 % 17,600 61,235 168 6,500 640 75 19,000 14,034 *>179 1 191 21,200 42,300 U) 125 30,320 123 67 8,500 17,500 123 (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) 64,000 % % 5,000 1,500 40 53,777 151 0d ) 350 (r) 18,497 45 135 225 30,359 9,816 24,769 463 148 e749,955 55,000 126 60 «30,000 00 88 90,666 («*) 3 (A) n,ooo 64 14,964 104 18,876 50 12,800 20 1,145 32 5,405 50 150 (/) (>) 240 2 (A) W 10,950 18 (<*) 9,000 ....... 290 31 275 26 24 9,828 (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) 90 9,920 64 5,720 16 (>) 750 75 32 1 3,744 31 20 $00 2 200 2 14 (/) (/) (/) (/) 1^992 (/)296 30 75 3 (cc) 5 445 42 65 2 (A) (A) 37 (/) (f) (/) (/) (/) (/) ccl44 2 135 120 198 cc22 6 48 34 3 100 34 4, ioi 750 (r) is (% <*) 18 4,500 <*) ccl4,180 40,208 ccl3,624 14,290 2,500 (/) S3 | (A) | $ (8 (8 18 Mar ginal num ber. By By con By con tract city. tract ors. ors. 2,313 225,770 17,000j 30,724 i (A) 4,603 45,000 Tons burned. By By By con By con By con By tract city. tract city. tract city. ors. ors. ors. e 666,960 252,238 (A) Average persons employed in removal of ashes, Tons other garbage, wise disposed and other of. refuse. Dead animals and other refuse. Garbage. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Included in persons employed in sweeping, sprinkling, etc. s For 11 months; disposed of by householders 1 month. t Six, each acting as both food and sanitary inspector. n Tons not reported; 1,755 dead animals. v For 7 months; no sweeping for 5 months. w Including dead animals and other refuse. * Policemen act as sanitarv inspectors. v For 8 months; no sweeping for 4 months. * Employed in sprinkling and flushing streets. o a Emploved in sprinkling only. b b No sprinkling done; streets flushed with hose. c c Removed by householders; burned by city. ^ In clu d in g persons employed in removing garbage, but not including chain gang, which averaged 27 persons. r 960 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X I.-C A R E OF STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE—Continued. Inspectors. Streets. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Seattle, W ash .......... Hartford, C o n n ....... Reading, Pa.............. Wilmington, D e l___ Camden, N. J .......... Trenton, N. J ............ Bridgeport, Conn___ Lynn, Mass............... Oakland, Cal............ Lawrence, Mass....... New Bedford, Mass.. Des Moines, I o w a __ Springfield, Mass___ Somerville, Mass___ Troy, N .Y ................. Hoboken, N. J .......... Evansville, I n d ....... Manchester, N. H . . . Utica, N. Y ............... Peoria, 111................. Charleston, S. C ....... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah San Antonio,Tex . .. Duluth, M in n .......... Erie, Pa...................... Elizabeth, N .J.......... Wilkesbarre, P a ....... Kansas City, Kans... Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, Me. (<) — Yonkers, N . Y .......... Norfolk, Va............... Waterbury, Conn___ Holyoke, Mass.......... Fort Wayne, I n d ___ Youngstown, O h io .. Houston, T ex............ Covington, K y.......... Akron, O hio.............. Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ic h ......... Lancaster, Pa............ Lincoln, N e b r.......... Brockton, Mass......... Binghamton, N. Y . .. Augusta, G a .............. Pawtucket, R. I ......... Average persons Square yards swept employed Tons of ashes per week. in sweep disposed of. Swept ing, sprink by ling, etc. Food. Sani hand tary. or ma chine. By By con con By city. By con By tract By city. tract tractors. city. ors. ors. Mach 2,420,437 Both. 945,058 Hand. Both.. 1,234,873 403,333 Both.. Both.. 1 , 000,000 375.000 Both.. 352.000 Both.. Mach. 150,000 100,000 Both.. 145.000 Both.. Both.. J 1,229,787 Both.. 1,133,793 350.000 Both.. Both.. 4,446,000 944.000 Both.. Both 670,000 Both.. 125,000 Both 3,209,680 Both.. 1.300.000 B oth.. 677,310 B oth.. 3,929,111 Mach. 539.000 645,372 B oth.. Both.. 1400.000 Both.. 450.000 Both.. 200.000 10 45 43 22 i 30 35 25 j 30 33 34 270 45 599,188 196,096 1, 200,000 930.000 151,492 959,473 387,200 290.000 0,000 (*) («). 2 26 14 28 51 20 110 18 25 28 30 (r ) (r)25 14 26 42 40 22 40 20 50 V 3 27 2 2 3 20 (r) Botli. B oth.. B oth.. Hand Both.. Both.. Both.. Both. Both.. <*>_ Hand. Hand Both. Both. Both.. Hand Hand. Both Both Both.. 4 3 1 4 3 /4 51 37 16 30 1 3 1 2 4 2 1 2 2 8 4 6 1 fl 4 5 5 3 1 s 7 2 1 4 4 1 1 4 to4 6 4 200,000 430.000 1,650,000 120.000 712,752 762,000 963,475 23 35 9 &&10 24 30 4 153,630 25 a Not reported. b Disposed of by householders. 0 Collected by contractor; burned by city. d Removed under permit without cost to city. eOne State inspector. /In clu d in g health officer who also acts as sanitary Inspector. 0 For 7 months only. h For 5 months only. 1 Employed in sprinkling only. J For 7 months; no sweeping for 5 months. * Removed by householders; burned by city. l Included in garbage otherwise disposed of. m Including dead animals and other refuse. n Including ashes and dead animals and other refuse. Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. 2 1 2 1 2 5 1 (*) (») 27.000 15.000 17,200 I^OOO $2 13.000 8,500 33,500 (*) 3,500 ( 6) (b) 8 10,000 15,000 (*>) 925 ! b) b) o) b) b) b) (*>) (o) 8 (*>) (6) 1 961 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X I.—CARE OF STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE—Continued. Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. otherwise Tons sold. Tons burned. Tons disposed of. Tons sold. By By con By city. tract city. ors. (*) (*) (*) O7,877 1,900 3,800 <*7,500 6,400 (*>) (b ) By con tract ors. By city. (b) (*) (*) 3,250 2,600 (a) (*) (*>) 2,248 <*150 (&) (*) (a) (a) (b) (6) w88,800 7,000 8 8 I 8 («) («) 6,552 (*) P 20^948 P 19,690!............ 5,067 8 8 8 7.000 2.000 («) (*> (a) (*) f t . (*) («) 100 86 m (b ) ( b) (») (*) 2*8^76 A I t ). it) it) («) («) («) ?) (*>) (b ) (*) (6) 400 2,6i6 5 14 $ (u) (*) (O)160 14,430 125 109 229 (b) rb ) (o) lb ) (5) (6) (M ) («) (a ) 15,750 (*) (&) (*) (*) (*) (*) 110 (*) 550 («a) <*) 3,307 ( 0) (*) ( b) ( b) (*) (*> ii! 8. (a) (6 )2 4 6 a 1 j l 15 | 7 7i 5 (*) 1 10 (*) («) % Included in garbage. Including ashes. AIncluding 2 for 3 m onths only. rB y property owners. s Policem en act as sanitary inspectors. * Data are for 9 months. mDisposed of by police department. v Included in ashes. wN ot including 2 em ployed tem porarily, a No sweeping done; streets flushed with hose. v Sprinkling done by private persons. * One acting as both food and sanitary inspector. o a Tons not reported; 500 dead animals. b b Not including citizens working in lieu o f payment of poll tax in cash. o p > 1 25 4 3 17 17 65 (b) $ 40 15 15 (&) ' *12 18 40 <>>2 9 15 2 17 18 40 69 20 2 8 20 4 27 3 39 24 10 20 («) (6) 53 9 18 (bL 24 it) it) 5 *12 ( 6) 8 lii L i 8 8 s u $ («) («) («) (*) 2 10 10 g 17 1,800 (i-) («) 2*6,500 7,095 *3,700 7,500 (o) («) w35,000 1 180 (a) (*) Ur it) it) it) 8 (6) 3,150 2*6,748 ?) (b ) By By con city. tract ors. («) <*8 20 1,750 w7,200 (a) (b ) By con tract ors. («) 13^500 <*7,000 2,750 350 (*>) 10,240 Tons burned. By By By con By con By con By tract city. tract city. tract city. ors. ors. ors. 4,650 (&) Average persons em ployed Mar in rem oval ginal o f ashes, num Tons other garbage, wise disposed and otner ber. of. refuse. Dead animals and other refuse. Garbage. % 10 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 67 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 8a 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 962 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X I.—CARE OF STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE—Concluded. Inspectors. Streets. Mar ginal num ber. 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 134 135 136 137 Cities. Altoona, Pa................. W heeling, W .V a ....... M obile, A la ................. Birmingham, A la....... Little R ock, A rk......... Springfield, O h io....... Galveston, T e x .......... Tacoma, W ash............ H averhill, M ass......... Spokane, W ash.......... Terre Haute, In d ....... Dubuque, Io w a ......... Quincy, 111................. South Bend, In d......... Salem, M ass............... Johnstown, P a .......... Elmira, N. Y .............. Allentown, Pa............ Davenport, Iow a....... M cKeesport, P a ......... Springfield, 111.......... Chelsea, M ass............ Chester, P a ..,............ York, P a .................... Malden, M ass............ Topeka, K a n s............ Newton. M ass............ Sioux City, Iow a ....... Bayonne, N. J ............ K n oxville, T en n ....... Schenectady, N. Y . . . Fitchburg, Mass......... Superior, W is.............. R ockford, H I.............. Taunton, M ass.......... Canton, Ohio.............. Butte, M ont............... M ontgomery, A la ___ Auburn, N. Y ............ Chattanooga, T en n ... East St. Louis, 111___ Joliet, 111.................... Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. Average persons Tons o f ashes Square yards swept em ployed per week. disposed of. in sweep Swept ing, sprink by Sani ling, etc. Food. hand tary. or ma chine. By By con By con By con By city. tract By city. tractors. city. tract ors. ors. B oth .. B oth .. Hand. B oth .. M ach. Hand. Hand. B oth .. B oth .. M ach. B oth .. Hand. B oth .. B oth .. Both. B oth .. B oth .. B oth .. B oth .. B oth .. Both. B oth .. B oth .. (**) M ach. B oth .. B oth .. B oth .. H and. H and. B oth .. B oth .. M ach. B oth .. B oth .. 415.000 50,100 169.000 558,474 66,880 289,569 647,280 * 20,000 270.000 204.000 834,512 176.000 140.000 462,684 284,700 228.000 *635,000 110,000 *589,948 165.000 *234,000 148.000 150.000 15.000 550.600 34.000 677,274 50,200 119,250 365.000 100.000 «« 75,000 670.000 40.000 (hh\ M ach. B oth .. H and. B oth .. B oth .. H and. 26,000 «c^ 4 0 0 1,686,341 125.000 376.600 300.000 466,210 a One acting as both food and sanitary inspector. 14 12 /3 0 16 k 6 30 17 10 47 16 41 18 6 J>30 8 8 *12 40 *38 («) (*) 8,350 («) (a) (b) (b) (°) (o) (6) (&) (*) 1,200 <•). 1 22 9 (*) (*) *16 12 46 r 22 16 45 aa 9 (cc) 24 21 ec43 //1 4 15 % 18 17 **14 15 //2 0 s v2 V 1/6 2 2 (m) u>l *21 (M) ( 6) r9 8 (*) a *12,750 (*) 1 6 1 1 1 1 dd 2 20,000 5,500 (*) (m) 400 2 5 ool (hh) (a) 1 1 1 4 w i 1 (*) "(b)" Disposed o f by householders, c Ten for 13 days; 1 for 22 days. Collected by contractor; burned by city; not including 1,094 tons rem oved by householders, e Removed by householders; burned by city. / Not including chain gang. 0 Included in garbage, ft Including ashes. *Including dead animals and other refuse. J Included in ashes. k Em ployed in cleaning only; sprinkling done by private persons; not including chain gang, which averages about 6 persons. 1 Sprinkling done by private persons. w N ot reported. « Including area flushed. ©Two, each acting as both food and sanitary inspector. P Sprinkling done by private persons; including persons em ployed in rem oving dead animals and other refuse. a Included in persons em ployed in street cleaning. b d 963 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able XI.—CARE OF STREETS, FOOD AND SANITARY INSPECTION, AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND OTHER REFUSE—Concluded. Ashes, garbage, and other refuse. otherwise Tons sold. Tons burned. Tons disposed of. Tons sold. By By By con city. tract city. ors. (b) (b) (b) By con tract ors. By city. (b) d 4 ,722 h 9,336 (b) (b) 1,295 (b) (b) (b) 1,914 (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) W (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) 1,160 (b) (b) (b) (m) 8,208 (b) (b) (b) $ ft ft 3,873 (*) (m) ft ft (m) ft (b) (m) (b) (b) 3,000 1,200 (b> ft $ ft (b) (b) (0) (m) 6,660 (b) ft ft (b) (b) 300 ?! ft ?! ft i I a , ft ?! ft (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (m) w i % 7 3 17 (b) ft (b) 12 24 (b) ft o o (\ (») w 1 w . (m) <») 1,060 9 (b) (b) <b) 45 <b> (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) ft (b) (b) ft ft (b) (b) (b) ft (b) (*)• (m) ?! (m) 9^008 (*b) (m) 5^020 (m) 100 (m) (m) ft ft (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) ft (b) (b) (b) (b) «196 (b) ?! 5,340 (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) ft (6f>20 ft 4 1 (w) 13 21 4 a . (b) 20 10 8 11 12 83 6619 2 (b) (b) 12 w . (b) (6) 6 H 3 2 m (b) (b) (mU (b) 2 (b) 225 ft (b) 1,034 (b) (b) 3,600 (4 )8 ft : (m) By con tract ors. 140 5,000 130 (b) (b) (b) (b) 6,500 (b) By con tract ors. (b) ft (b) (b) (b) 2,950 (b) h ft Tons burned. By By By con con By con By tract city. tract cUy. tract city. ors. ors. ors. (b) 2^25 Average persons em ployed Mar in rem oval ginal o f ashes, Tons other garbage, num wise disposed and otner ber. of. refuse. Dead animals and other refuse. Garbage. 30 16 15 % 10 : ( b) 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 334 135 136 137 r Employed in sprinkling only. s Health officer acts as both food and sanitary inspector. t For 40 weeks; no sweeping for 12 weeks. uFor 9 m onths; no sweeping for 3 m onths. v Including 1 for 3 m onths. w Not including secretary of board oM iealth, who also acts as sanitary inspector. x For 7 months; no sweeping for 5 months. ^Including 5 sanitary policem en. 2 Swept by volunteer fire department; paid for by householders. a a Also em ployed in rem oval o f ashes; not including 10 persons em ployed on Saturdays; sprinkling done by private persons. 66Including the 9 persons also em ployed in street cleaning. c o Included in sanitary inspectors. d d Including 1 who also acts as food inspector. ccF or 6 m onths; no sweeping for 6 months. //E m p lo y e d in cleaning only. 9 0 Policem en also act as inspectors. h h Paved streets flushed every 2 weeks by street laborers. a Em ployed in cleaning only; 2 extra persons em ployed during hottest weather for sprinkling. j j Small animals only, large anim als rem oved by soap factories. BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, table X II.—NUMBER AND KIND OP STREET LIGHTS. Number of lights. araal imer. 1 Cities. Arc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 67 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Incan descent. Welsbach. Other. 8,168 33,559 4,158 11, 11,000 13,224 6 20,573 Philadelphia, P a ....... 9, 10,086 1,354 733 St. Louis, M o............... 164 8,961 28 Boston, Mass.............. 3, 6,153 Baltim ore, M d.......... . 1, 2,650 3,117 Cleveland, O h io....... 158 21 5,660 B uffalo,N .Y .............. 4,698 San Francisco, C al... 1,222 877 Cincinnati, O hio....... . Pittsburg, P a ............ New Orleans, L a....... Detroit, M ich ............ 2,410 M ilwaukee, W is....... W ashington, D. C ___ «6,836 714 178 2,074 Newark, N. J .............. 9 100 Jersey City, N .J ....... Louisville, K y .......... M inneapolis, M inn .. Providence, R. I ....... 792 1,935 162 Indianapolis, In d ----2,065 Kansas City, M o....... St. Paul, M in n .......... 4,483 Rochester, N .Y ......... 142 Denver, C o lo .............. 1,082 Toledo, O hio.............. 1,450 A llegheny, P a .......... 877 Columbus, O h io ....... . 713 W orcester, M ass....... 479 1,264 Syracuse, N. Y .......... 540 New Haven, C on n .... 323 1,008 742 Paterson, N .J............ 437 723 Fall River, M ass....... 180 *420 St. Joseph, M o .......... . 335 Omaha, N ebr............ 950 946 25 Los Angeles, Cal....... 358 Memphis, T enn......... 684 Scranton, Pa.............. 501 160 1,111 Lowell, Mass.............. 670 Albany, N .Y ............ 550 449 Cambridge, M ass___ "*285” 740 635 Portland, Oreg.......... 740 445 Atlanta, G a............... 544 Grand Rapids, M ich . 431 Dayton, O h io............ 307 804 558 Richm ond, V a.......... . 565 382 N ashville, T en n ....... . 539 148 Seattle, W ash............ 1,300 787 Hartford, C onn......... Reading, P a .............. 540 481 272 534 W ilm ington, D el....... 519 510 198 Camden, N .J ............ 208 291 377 598 16 Trenton, N .J ............ 497 Bridgeport, C onn----136 289 Lynn, M ass............... 1,200 688 Oakland, C a l............ 322 Lawrence, M ass....... 210 46 New Bedford, Mass.. 675 358 Des Moines, Iow a___ 527 792 836 61 Springfield, M ass___ 449 410 Som erville, M ass___ 604 Troy, N .Y .................. 250 237 Hoboken, N .J .......... 71 270 468 Evansville, In d .......... Manchester, N. H ___ 488 73 692 Utica, N .Y ................. 569 Peoria, 111................... 113 Charleston, S. C ......... 878 512 Savannah, Ga............ 460 Salt Lake City, Utah. 332 San A ntonio,T ex . . . Duluth, M in n .......... . 317 449 Erie, P a .................... . 152 Elizabeth, N .J .......... 950 372 W ilkesbarre, P a ....... . 123 284 190 Kansas City, Kans__ 53 Harrisburg, P a .......... 417 a Not including 89 Collis lamps used to designate streets. New York, N .Y ......... 2 Chicago, 111............... . 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Gas. Electric. , Vapor lamps. 3,564 5,309 14,355 2,835 2,142 1,038 2,600 766 3,233 657 1,130 2,001 287 1,454 2,423 526 1,169 553 *882 400 *i03' 124 *295* 100 10 278 420 965 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X II.—NUMBER AND KIND OP STREET LIGHTS—Concluded. Number o f lights. Mar ginal num ber. 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Electric. Cities. Arc. Portland, M e.......... Yonkers, N. Y ........ N orfolk, V a............. W aterbury, C onn ... H olyoke, Mass........ Port W ayne, Ind ... Youngstown, O h io.. Houston, T ex.......... Covington, K y ....... Akron, O h io............ Dallas, T e x ............. Saginaw, M ich........ Lancaster, Pa.......... L incoln, N eb r......... Brockton, M ass....... Binghamton, N. Y .. Augusta, G a ............ Pawtucket, R. I ....... A ltoona, Pa.............. W heeling, W. Va . . . M obile, A la.............. Birmingham, Ala .. Little R ock, A rk___ Springfield, Ohio . . . Galveston, T e x ....... Tacoma. W ash......... H averhill, M ass___ Spokane, W ash....... Terre Haute, In d . .. Dubuque. Iow a....... Quincy, 111............... South Bend, In d ___ Salem, M ass............ Johnstown, Pa......... Elmira, N .Y ............ Allentow n, P a......... Davenport, Io w a . . . McKeesport, Pa....... Springfield, 111......... Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a .............. York, Pa................... Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, Kans.......... Newton, M ass......... Sioux City, Iow a— Bayonne, N. J.......... K noxville, Tenn— Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, M ass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass......... Canton, O h io.......... Butte, M on t............ M ontgomery, A la ... Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, T en n . East St. Louis, 111. . . Joliet, 111................. ' 1 1 1 1 | ' ! l ! ' I i ! 302 326 331 268 261 294 389 363 95 353 813 281 308 192 263 344 348 375 221 507 275 225 218 316 176 335 196 225 386 376 336 298 301 258 387 170 425 304 a 490 220 194 316 105 342 191 80 139 297 292 302 162 416 247 271 175 275 384 224 165 281 Gas. Incan descent. Welsbach. 641 597 343 1,592 40 6 8 Other. Vapor lamps. 126 432 609 25 811 150 267 203 161 143 117 97 # 450 3 663 218 308 9 1 287 516 387 208 419 8 1,028 1,044 772 210 948 886 62 9 50 20 31 71 420 490 47 6 a Including 30 lamps furnished by Chicago and Alton Railway Company. 33 27 231 54 Oil lamps. 60 966 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Table X III.—PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Public schools. Number of school buildings. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Number o f school rooms. Teachers. Num In In ber of In other build high Owned Rent In kin- regu ings Rent sch’ls. high derby lar ed. Total. owned ed. Total. city. sch’ls. garday by tens. sch’ls. city. 1 New York, N .Y ......... 567 « 415 171 10,589 656 a 471 «10,133 5428 ol0 ,561 19 2 Chicago, 111............... 354 177 5,681 346 679 4,449 15 333 346 4,795 3 Philadelphia, P a ___ 194 3,118 192 75 328 2,752 5 253 126 2,878 4 St. Louis, M o.............. 78 298 1,323 2 124 126 1,381 2 10 1,391 5 Boston, M ass............ (d) 224 157 1,620 218 47 265 1,726 (d) 12 6 Baltim ore, M d.......... 24 1,560 87 95 119 1,433 5 98 1,631 7 Cleveland, O h io....... 72 1 49 1,178 73 1,115 119 30 1,145 5 8 Buffalo, N .Y .............. 85 (d) 1,175 82 3 19 81 2 (<*) 1,215 9 San Francisco, C al... 72 823 72 52 747 36 4 783 10 Cincinnati, O hio....... 10 63 77 916 53 860 12 872 3 11 Pittsburg, P a ............ 85 931 85 994 63 49 994 3 12 New Orleans, La....... 62 8 663 70 702 40 37 43 3 745 13 Detroit, M ich ............ 111 773 70 70 48 831 831 3 14 M ilwaukee, W is....... 55 «81 «752 88 731 c81 c752 3 15 W ashington, D. C ___ 143 996 21 137 62 1,005 61 116 943 5 16 Newark, N .J ............ 4 47 701 49 » 53 777 18 103 1 795 17 Jersey City, N .J......... 562 29 21 29 512 4 512 1 18 Louisville', 'K y .......... 52 17 604 67 535 69 37 641 5 19 M inneapolis, M in n .. 2 103 747 68 60 968 5 973 4 20 Providence, R. I ....... 1 564 569 96 48 97 98 1 4 570 21 Indianapolis, In d ___ 3 88 604 578 57 60 5 609 2 22 Kansas City, M o....... 5 113 509 54 12 i5 49 550 562 4 23 St. Paul, M in n .......... 79 432 59 44 19 63 565 19 584 4 24 Rochester, N. Y ......... 42 583 3 40 81 37 600 6 606 1 25 Denver, C o lo ............ 560 88 51 54 5 59 550 15 565 6 26 Toledo, O h io ............ 15 442 41 40 470 40 470 2 27 A llegheny, P a .......... 376 23 18 30 30 450 450 1 28 Columbus, O h io....... 417 76 38 38 446 446 4 29 W orcester, M ass....... 486 26 73 550 101 73 550 / 4 30 Syracuse, N. Y .......... 42 28 399 39 8 12 47 386 398 1 31 New Haven, C onn ... 54 28 362 5 48 356 53 30 386 2 32 Paterson, N .J .......... 15 336 23 019 019 0 240 0240 1 33 Fall River, Mass....... 6 23 359 53 53 273 273 1 34 St. Joseph, M o.......... 190 24 3 28 215 5 31 220 2 35 Omaha, N ebr............ 811 55 50 52 52 369 369 1 36 Los Angeles, Cal....... i 376 J41 J S 3 56 448 56 448 2 37 Memphis, Tenn......... 14 201 3 185 i4 26 29 199 2 38 Scranton, Pa.............. 41 28 7 309 10 51 324 10 334 1 39 Lowell, M ass............ 25 1 54 278 1 30 249 53 279 1 40 Albany, N .Y ............ 21 21 304 28 21 258 304 1 41 Cambridge, M ass___ 60 25 328 326 39 39 326 3 42 Portland, O reg......... 4 21 29 29 315 277 319 1 43 Atlanta. Ga............... 22 204 205 24 2 3 26 207 2 44 Grand Rapids, M ich. 40 369 26 318 36 3 39 5 374 2 45 Dayton, Ohio............ 12 39 28 339 7 380 30 37 392 1 46 Richm ond, V a.......... 224 21 35 241 4 18 3 245 2 47 Nashville, T en n ....... 204 218 18 18 18 218 2 48 Seattle, W ash............ 12 23 2 239 23 3 239 26 251 1 49 Hartford, C onn......... 24 12 1 278 39 (*) 1269 290 25 1 50 Reading, P a .............. 322 20 302 322 47 47 2 51 W ilm ington, D e l___ 245 237 1 25 28 29 238 1 2 52 Camden, N .J ............ 314 4 14 3 290 29 4 33 318 1 53 Trenton, N .J ............ 200 210 4 32 16 28 8 208 1 54 Bridgeport, Conn___ 224 19 (*) 1 227 26 4 10 234 30 1 55 Lynn, Mass............... 249 29 232 46 46 249 2 56 Oakland, C al............ 39 205 19 1 19 261 261 2 57 Lawrence, M ass....... 24 235 32 195 5 29 200 3 1 58 New Bedford, M ass.. 6 230 209 16 25 25 209 / 2 59 Des Moines, Iow a___ 26 307 47 296 49 49 307 5 34 21 256 60 Springfield, M ass___ 38 318 13 33 331 2 1 42 61 Som erville, M ass. . . . 8 231 25 230 25 230 2 18 262 62 Troy, N .Y ................. 270 11 25 26 3 273 1 i 182 7 63 Hoboken, N .J .......... 14 151 17 168 9 7 7 1 64 Evansville, In d ......... 21 6 214 234 2 23 2 25 236 2 24 126 129 65 Manchester, N. H . . . . 24 129 16 1 24 186 66 Utica, N .Y ................. 22 26 219 10 17 4 229 1 21 67 Peoria, 111................. 265 265 18 18 230 1 a Including College o f City o f New York and Normal College. 5 Including College o f City of New York. c Including College of City of New Y ork and Normal College, but not including vacation schools. d Not reported. e Including 301-room m ovable houses. / Including 1 night school. 967 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X III.—PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Public schools. Teachers. Pupils. Number. Average attendance. In In all In In In In In all night other In all kin other In In kin- other In In other schools. public high der regular night public der- regular night other high schools. schools. garday schools. public schools. garday schools. schools. schools. tens. schools. tens. schools. 263 502 76 231 63 34 84 104 49 cl73 60 96 17 14 44 67 112 52 26 33 1 6 23 15 66 27 35 56 47 19 6 7 4 3 80 125 14 65 4 3 j 22 10 31 30 19,013 10,565 5,641 2,349 6,519 3,039 3,575 3,016 1,390 2,221 1,836 916 2,810 1,666 3,314 1,255 987 1,906 2,584 1,976 2,603 3,602 1,818 1,022 2,383 1,102 647 2,134 3,704 1,613 1,277 7*650 669 i 815 1,552 1.439 527 725 871 761 1,320 827 665 1.439 1,072 1,170 506 756 872 637 689 316 562 616 794 1,216 581 410 1,301 781 1,064 297 279 771 422 500 585 9,850 530,355 62,202 0 6,640 9.104 8,253 243,032 888 14,959 166,013 19,304 378 9,925 76,925 3,438 5,572 79,705 11,997 168 2,034 80,376 52,216 1,8 1,579 286 55.617 3.105 34,494 2,624 42,064 1,999 1,245 44,481 886 29.617 328 1,789 36,067 1,255 171 62 6,501 33,483 3,311 1,643 42,274 200 4,462 6,590 30.019 5,165 623 33,057 2,818 25,791 1,153 34.968 1,815 28,749 4,126 24,731 840 23,838 1,979 21,899 3,696 18,713 1,238 2,415 24,581 58 400 19,914 421 249 466 20,104 574 16,721 369 667 20.019 1,207 1,009 16,795 855 1,087 15,302 1,205 *7*900 7*17,130 7*2,500 7*56 209 15,801 3,737 49,724 7 222 2,036 15,387 409 2,419 17,505 285 10,413 131 1,684 250 15,128 3,434 779 11,042 575 1,107 11,028 313 13,859 1,479 *i, 059 11,847 322 10,836 126 13,095 1,< 1,165 11,545 219 70 10.969 11,717 100 87 11,232 711,310 2,324 1,459 (*) 13,698 411 10,330 95 12,411 9,278 1,069 710,398 352 32 (*) 9,356 1,217 50 10,395 595 6,943 1,451 188 8,793 2,543 1,068 11,463 90 823 9,970 1,527 396 11,039 804 404 8,150 78,878 14 7,610 219 6,386 388 1,047 7,318 172 8,664 12,439 9,218 4,327 1,781 5,096 1,856 3,080 2,525 1,022 1,970 1,762 788 2,152 1,329 2,691 1,108 558 1,506 2,388 1,630 1,996 2,880 1,566 901 1,925 914 551 1,837 2.123 1,232 1,067 7*450 588 655 1,253 1,184 446 704 770 627 1.123 687 562 1,106 970 827 439 . 611 729 551 504 275 485 551 675 1,001 557 322 1,025 657 947 264 221 577 354 409 501 3,602 381,887 3,996 194,076 5,320 123,365 5,597 58,128 3,258 63,250 50,784 1,400 42,738 455 40,053 27,027 34,723 926 33,732 553 23,437 799 27,913 3,323 27,008 914 32,875 3,155 23,989 156 21,851 19,269 28,740 784 18,135 19,341 408 17,798 1,545 17,743 1,659 15,618 3,170 16,204 265 15,966 373 15,282 13,861 410 15,259 918 13,510 676 12,575 7*600 7*13,500 104 12,048 6,661 1,170 12,358 1,203 13,351 7,552 205 12,123 347 8,609 566 9,027 509 11,: 9,110 9,230 1,124 10,179 662 9,692 9,064 9,176 8,266 7 8,713 <*) 9,661 7,972 7,r ~ 50 6,818 79,048 (*) 7, 35 7,454 6,513 6,588 532 8,434 348 7,841 147 8,256 198 6,503 76,755 (*) 136 6,135 3,773 619 5,884 6,751 20,376 0 5,673 792 4,771 372 9,713 1,926 144 4,358 1,684 246 850 1,305 1,929 1,129 1,434 2,330 840 592 1,990 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 306 15 127 351 154 667 396 420 7*650 2,101 79 124 78 67 1,168 1,844 136 561 110 64 128 286 7*40 273 *694 62 50 *309 105 1,181 648 67 396 130 1,006 1,214 50 552 271 200 189 69 Not including 3 buildings burned. 7*Records burned; the figures given are estimates. i Including transfers. j Not including 21 special teachers, whose tim e is divided among the different grades. * Included in other regular day schools. 7Including kindergartens. g 106 167 47 192 3,065 Mar ginal num ber. 12 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 80 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 968 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR* T able X III.—PUBLIC SCHOOLS—Concluded. Public schools. Number o f school buildings. Mar ginal num ber. 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 318 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Charleston, S. C......... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah. San A ntonio, T ex___ Duluth, M in n .......... Erie, P a .................... Elizabeth, N .J.......... W ilkesbarre, P a ....... Kansas City^Kans... Harrisburg' P a ......... Portland, M e............ Yonkers, N .Y .......... N orfolk, Y a............... W aterbury, Conn___ H olyoke, M ass.......... Fort Wayne, I n d ___ Youngstown, Ohio .. Houston, T ex............ Covington, K y.......... Akron, O hio.............. Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ich ......... Lancaster, Pa............ Lincoln, N eb r.......... Brockton, Mass......... Binghamton, N .Y ... Augusta, G a.............. Pawtucket, R. I ......... A ltoona, P a .............. W heeling,W .V a . . . . M obile, A la............... Birm ingham ,Ala . . . Little Rock, A rk....... Springfield, O h io___ Galveston, T e x ......... Tacoma, W ash.......... H averhill, M ass....... Spokane, w ash......... Terre Haute, In d ___ Dubuque, Iow a......... Quincy, 111............... South Bend, In d ....... Salem, M ass.............. Johnstown, P a ......... Elmira, N .Y .............. Allentown, Pa.......... Davenport, Io w a ___ McKeesport, P a ....... Springfield, 111......... Chelsea, Mass............ Chester, P a ............... York, Pa.................... M alden, Mass............ Topeka, Kans............ Newton. M ass.......... Sioux City, Io w a ___ Bayonne, N .J .......... K noxville, T e n n ___ Schenectady, N .Y ... Fitchburg, M ass....... Superior, W is............ Rockford, 111............ Taunton, M ass......... Canton, O h io............ Butte, M on t.............. Auburn, N .Y ............ Chattanooga, T en n .. East St. Louis, 11 1.... Joliet, H I................... Teachers. Num In In ber of In other build high In Owned Rent kinings Rent sch7ls. high der- regu by lar ed. Total. owned ed. Total. city. sch’ls. garday by tens. sch’is. city. 6 9 24 16 32 18 10 20 22 25 35 14 12 18 18 16 21 15 7 17 13 26 19 18 28 16 10 28 12 12 11 6 15 17 8 20 37 18 18 14 13 10 20 24 11 15 16 12 <U4 12 22 22 19 25 26 <124 8 13 7 19 11 17 33 15 7 7 14 7 12 24 a Not including 6 rooms not in use. 6 Including 1 night school. <*For 3 months only. Number o f school rooms. 3 3 5 1 1 i 1 7 6 1 3 2 3 5 2 ,3 1 i 2 8 2 4 6 12 27 21 32 19 10 20 22 25 35 15 12 18 19 17 21 22 13 17 13 26 19 19 28 16 13 28 12 12 11 8 15 17 8 20 37 18 21 19 13 12 20 24 11 15 16 15 <U5 12 22 22 20 25 26 <124 10 13 7 19 19 17 33 15 7 9 14 7 16 24 81 109 276 119 302 164 130 183 175 188 220 183 88 a 166 175 141 165 107 94 174 128 217 120 152 148 194 87 141 151 145 73 78 a 82 150 88 175 144 140 171 114 100 108 108 152 135 119 168 148 «118 116 124 146 151 160 148 /161 124 82 76 138 138 122 131 136 105 67 112 98 101 115 31 33 10 2 2 1 2 14 6 3 11 12 14 11 2 6 3 i 8 15 7 5 81 140 309 129 302 166 130 183 175 188 220 185 88 a 166 176 143 165 121 100 174 128 217 120 155 148 194 98 141 151 145 73 90 a 82 150 88 175 144 140 185 125 100 110 108 152 135 119 168 154 e 121 116 124 146 152 160 148 /161 132 82 76 138 153 122 131 136 105 64 112 98 106 116 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 62 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 13 9 24 9 20 19 19 17 19 22 28 16 8 18 22 11 15 19 6 22 9 29 14 32 21 22 8 22 10 12 11 10 9 18 9 19 18 18 23 14 9 12 17 10 16 10 16 8 17 20 13 12 22 20 28 16 8 12 12 24 13 16 12 19 19 7 12 *10 10 22 24 7 12 10 13 3 12 8 30 14 8 15 1 2 16 13 10 12 6 11 32 (0) 5 24 <fNot including 1 building not in use. e Not including 2 rooms not in use. /N o t including 1 room not in use. 2 2 85 128 277 127 232 184 125 159 159 179 193 166 78 169 154 140 151 116 88 160 112 180 106 119 164 166 91 129 146 133 67 85 78 147 73 176 139 135 153 114 109 102 .111 136 135 113 168 125 123 118 125 118 147 133 134 145 ft 143 78 76 79 120 130 126 124 99 57 109 J87 114 122 STATISTICS OP CITIES, g h Inciuded in other regular day schools. Including kindergartens. i j Not including 1 supernumerary. Not including 5 supernumeraries. 969 970 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able X IV .—PUBLIC LIBRARIES. Volumes. Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Cities. New Y ork, N .Y .................................. Philadelphia, Pa................................ St. Louis, M o ..................................... Boston, Mass....................................... Baltimore, M d................................... Cleveland^ O h io................................ Buffalo, N .Y ...................................... San Francisco, Cal............................ Cincinnati, Ohio................................ Pittsburg, P a ..................................... New Orleans, La................................ Detroit, M ich ..................................... M ilwaukee, W is.................................. W ashington, D. C.............................. Newark^ N. J ..................................... Jersey City, N. J ................................ Louisville* K y ................................... M inneapolis, M inn............................. Providence, R. I ................................ Indianapolis, In d .............................. Kansas City, M o................................ St. Paul, M inn................................... Rochester, N. Y .................................. Denver, Colo....................................... Toledo, Ohio....................................... A llegheny, P a ................................... Columbus, O h io................................ W orcester, M ass................................ Syracuse, N. Y ................................... New Haven, C onn............................. Paterson, N. J ................................... Fall River, M ass................................ St. Joseph, M o................................... Omaha, N ebr..................................... Los Angeles, Cal................................ Memphis, Tenn.................................. Scranton, Pa...................................... Low ell, M ass..................................... Albany, N. Y ..................................... Cambridge, M ass.............................. Portland, Oreg................................... Atlanta, G a........................................ Grand Rapids, M ich......................... Dayton, O h io..................................... Richm ond, Y a................................... N ashville, T en n ................................ Seattle, W ash..................................... Hartford, C onn.................................. Reading, P a ...................................... W ilm ington, D e l.............................. Camden, N. J ..................................... Trenton, N. J ..................................... Bridgeport, Conn.............................. Lynn, M ass........................................ Oakland, C a l..................................... Lawrence, M ass................................ New Bedford, Mass........................... Des Moines, Iow a.............................. Springfield, M ass.............................. Som erville, M ass.............................. Troy, N. Y .......................................... H oboken, N. J ................................... Evansville, In d .................................. Manchester, N. H ............................. Utica, N. Y ........................................ Peoria, 111.................................................. Charleston, S. C ................................ Savannah, G a ................................... Salt Lake City, Utah......................... San Antonio, T e x .............................. Duluth, M inn..................................... Erie, P a ............................................... Elizabeth, N .J ................................... « Not reported. Number of m unici pal libraries. Number. W ithdrawn. Number added use in during the For home For reading use. year. rooms. 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1,447,048 321,031 239,183 170,855 812,264 211,449 171,592 239,494 136,395 251,309 140,507 54,280 174,425 147,236 22,811 78,798 75,053 127,926 14,430 4,962 20,855 30,887 7,751 1,469 10,610 8,343 18,887 21,187 4,280 8,631 6,550 3,871 1,572 4,505 4,750,698 1,772,741 1,915,687 778,507 1,483,513 635,021 809,515 966,450 711,409 686,561 488,126 90,356 511,921 495,376 123,555 314,874 421,279 1 122,460 7,698 535,853 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 92,454 61,800 54,550 34,641 78.000 49,153 62,758 82,928 135,762 52,855 60.000 37,759 61,561 22,180 57,864 67,355 20,539 41,336 62,618 4,605 11,800 4,251 893 1,000 2,892 2,877 6,363 4,476 5,227 7,967 1,031 2,225 1,301 2,214 7,707 3,356 4,724 1,582 279,179 229,031 172,855 136,054 378,323 231,303 156,549 320,859 224,552 173,468 292,666 134,375 158,289 96,806 204,408 472,543 64,799 125,518 139,514 (a) (a) i 60,759 1,796 186,322 («) i i i 19,481 58,132 49,873 5,698 1,730 4,038 22,500 197,936 138,632 i i i i i i i i i i l l 20,684 70,200 11,717 49,028 6,811 16,281 38,140 62,041 31,868 52,745 77,700 30,001 10,406 6,187 2,076 5,738 1,096 8,281 1,927 3,223 2,348 1,560 2,406 2,475 118,777 218,700 79,718 203,890 5,300 i 52,157 5,019 264,227 i 24,410 1,797 114,011 12,710 i i i 47,278 31,666 78,911 1,415 3,223 5,000 72,298 133,955 174,945 28,404 i 15,822 2,448 73,349 i i 38,800 23,747 3,800 5,653 90,161 135,828 &Not including 2 libraries not reported. c 149,216 166,708 152,973 110,464 112,849 141,031 1,448,751 600,000 (a) 208,757 406,593 120,753 £39,488 231,514 (a) 461,563 7,160 654,293 (a) 1a ) (a) 69,534 (a) (a) 46,606 («) 18,000 181,056 46,798 65,140 364,008 119,131 (a) (a) . 35,000 38,619 191,296 (a) 3,201 15,356 35,200 5,490 52,946 (a) 3,500 («) (a) («) 22,696 94,963 497,437 28,463 (a) 28,745 16,762 ( a) («) 48,266 (a} \«)/ H eld in trust for city. 971 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X IV .—PUBLIC LIBRARIES—Concluded. Volumes. Mar ginal num ber. 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Cities. W ilkesbarre, Pa ................................................ Kansas City, K an s............................ Harrisburg" P a ................................. Portland, Me...................................... Yonkers, N. Y ..................................... N orfolk, V a ........................................ W aterbury, C on n .............................. H olyoke, M ass................................... Fort W ayne, In d ................................ Youngstown, O h io............................ Houston, T e x ..................................... Covington. K y ................................... Akron~ O hio. I..................................... D a l l a s , T ex.......................................... S a .g in a w , M ich ................................... T ia n e a s te r , P a . ..................................................... Lincoln, Nebr..................................................... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 19.91 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 A n g n a t a , G a . ....................................................... Pawtucket, R. I ................................. Altoona, P a ........................................ W heeling, W. V a................................ M obile, A la ........................................ Birmingham, A la .............................. Little Rock, A rk ................................ Springfield, Ohio................................ Galveston, T ex................................... Tacoma, W ash................................... H averhill, Mass................................. S p o k a n e Wash................................... Terre Haute, In d ................................ Dubuque, Io w a .................................. Quincy, 1 1 1............................................................ South Bend, In d ................................ Salem, Mass.......................................................... Number of m unici pal libraries. Number. W ithdrawn. Number added use in during the For home For reading use. year. rooms. 1 1 « 50,519 16,150 a1,217 1,259 <*68,4i2 69,627 1 11,728 737 45,646 1 1 2 20,357 11,000 20,583 1,623 11,000 822 59,530 c42,413 <*40,657 1 1 1 11,637 37,078 13,806 2,348 3,475 596 92,145 123,270 72,600 ol3,519 (*) (» ) (6 ) (b) 6,456 7.000 7.000 1 19,762 712 50,234 1 18,486 758 62,904 e2 9,600 (* ) (*) 1 1 1 1 1 1 19,453 7,000 22,000 70,000 7,600 18,275 965 72,615 2,864 5,000 89,736 146,529 62,641 64,103 (6 ) (6 ) (6 ) 1 1 26,950 9,450 41,994 1,137 552 1,771 57,389 34,584 111,099 1 1 49,131 17,503 4,079 906 103,423 74,498 98,793 5,824 i 1 1 1 1 1 5,820 39,913 20,993 61,423 15,297 11,040 529 2,780 3,642 2,034 1,094 399 9,976 135,387 82,476 160,935 56,612 43,545 (b ) 7,727 (*) 1 1 1 1 39,228 14,021 36,830 49,680 1,759 186 1,804 1,697 77,181 43,216 105,603 86,981 1 29,439 1,128 94,245 47,109 1 1 16,795 18,428 1,676 1,870 49,402 73,271 2,957 10,263 gi (*>) (*>) (*) 14,139 8,000 (*>) 6,720 5,Q17 (* ) 6,203 J o h n s to w n P a .................................................. Elmira, N. Y ........................................................ Allentown, P a ................................................... Davenport, Iow a................................ McKeesport, Pa.................................. Springfield, 11 1 ................................................... Cnelsea, M ass..................................... Chester, P a .......................................................... York, P a ................................................................. Malden, M ass..................................................... Topeka, K q n s ..................................................... Newton, Mass...................................................... Sioux City, Iow a .............................................. Bayonne, N. J ..................................................... K n o T r v iB c , T f l n n ............................................. S e h e n e .e t a .d y , N. Y .......... ............................... Fitchburg, M ass .............................................. Superior, W is ..................................................... R ockford, 111........................................................ Taunton, M ass................................... Canton, Ohio...................................... Butte, M ont........................................ iP) (6 ) 224 6,564 iP) 23,660 (*) M o n t g o m e r y , A l a . ........................................... Auburn, N. Y ..................................... C h a t t a n o o g a , T e n n ....................................... East St. Louis, 1 1 1 ............................................ Joliet, 111................................................................. Data are for 9 months. 6 Not reported. c D ata are for 6 months. d Data are for 10 months. a « School libraries open to public. Net loss, 150. f 0 Owned by library association, controlled by city. 972 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able X V .—CHARITIES: ALMSHOUSES, ORPHAN ASYLUMS, AND HOSPITALS. Almshouses. Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 61 62 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 Cities. New York, N. Y ............................. Chicago, 111................................... Philadelphia, P a ........................... St. Louis" M o.................................. Boston, M ass.................................. Baltimore, M d................................ Cleveland, Ohio............................. Buffalo, N. Y .................................. San Francisco, C a l........................ Cincinnati, O h io ........................... Pittsburg, P a .................................. New Orleans, L a ........................... Detroit, M id i.................................. M ilwaukee, W is............................. W ashington, D. C ......................... Newark7 N. J .................................. Jersey City, N. J............................. Louisville", K y................................ M inneapolis, "Minn........................ Providence. R. I ............................. Indianapolis, I n d ......................... Kansas City, M o............................. St. Paul, M inn................................ Rochester, N. Y ............................. Denver, C olo.................................. Toledo, O h io.................................. A llegheny, Pa................................ Columbus, O h io............................. W orcester, Mass............................. Syracuse, N. Y .............................. New Haven, Conn......................... Paterson, N. J ................................ Fall River, Mass............................. St. Joseph, M o................................ Omaha, N ebr.................................. Los Angeles, C al............................. Memphis, Tenn.............................. Scranton, Pa................................... Low ell, Mass................................... Albany, N .Y ................................... Cambridge, Mass............................. Portland, Oreg................................ Atlanta, Ga..................................... Grand Rapids, M ich...................... Dayton, O h io.................................. Richm ond, Y a ................................ Nashville, T e n n ............................. Seattle, W ash.................................. Hartford, C onn.............................. Reading, P a ................................... W ilm ington, D el............................. Camden, N. J .................................. Trenton, N. J .................................. Bridgeport, Conn........................... Lynn, M ass..................................... Oakland, C a l.................................. Lawrence, M ass............................. New Bedford, Mass........................ Des Moines, Iow a........................... Springfield, M ass........................... Som erville, M ass........................... Troy, N. Y ....................................... Hoboken, N. J ................................ Evansville, In d .............................. Manchester, N. H ........................... Utica, N .Y ....................................... Peoria, 111........................................ Hospitals. Average Number Average number Number. of pa Number. number of in Number. o f in tients treated. mates. mates. c 3 3,646 4 1 2 1 1 1,677 767 732 1,248 366 1 1 1 1 952 840 597 120 1 1 237 208 1 325 1 99 0l 108 1 382 1 238 1 1 1 375 185 173 1 429 1 83 a ll 61 2 <24 4 53,991 276 14,603 e 14,491 42,168 <23 1 / 5 1 61 1,658 56 15,723 5,475 81 6*i 2 <22 1 1 2 <22 iii 903 1,489 1,980 2,433 2,162 1,678 1 <22 <22 61 <22 1,657 2,971 2,319 20 730 61 <22 61 22 28 522 26 61 <22 1 61 22 1 137 600 557 165 il,34 0 2,393 61 24 194 29 2,305 93 6 840 1,530 ( l) k2 1 2 363 233 1 238 61 <22 61 1 2 1 61 61 1 1 1 52 187 103 61 61 2 «2 m44 8 1,773 212 1 1 225 85 1 61 250 37 1 1 163 37 61 40 1 a Including 2 idiot asylums. 6Hospital for contagious diseases. c Including 3 almshouses in charge o f overseers o f poor in old townships o f Germantown, R oxboro, and Lower Dublin. d Including 1 hospital for contagious diseases, e Including 1,084 insane persons. /In clu d in g 2 hospitals for contagious diseases. g Owned join tly by city and county. Orphan asylums. 8 61 61 1 61 194 331 60 h Rented hospital for contagious diseases. i One hospital for contagious diseases and 1 em ergency hospital in connection w ith the police department. /In clu d in g 1,278 em ergency cases. Jc Temporary contagious hospitals. l Not reported. wData are for 3 m onths. n Hospitals for contagious diseases. 973 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X V .—CHARITIES: ALMSHOUSES, ORPHAN ASYLUMS, AND HOSPITALS—Concluded. Almshouses. Mar ginal num ber. 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Charleston, S. C.............................. Savannah, G a ................................ Salt Lake City, Utah...................... San A ntonio,'T ex......................... Duluth, M in n ................................ Erie, P a .......................................... Elizabeth, N. J .............................. Wilkesbarre, P a ............................ Kansas City, Kans......................... Harrisburg, P a .............................. Portland, Me. ( c ) ........................... Yonkers, N. Y ................................ Norfolk, V a ................................... Waterbury, Conn........................... Holyoke, 'Mass.............................. Fort Wayne, I n d ........................... Youngstown, O h io ........................ Houston, T ex ................................. Covington, K y .............................. Akron, O h io .'................................ Dallas, T e x .................................... Saginaw, M ich .............................. Lancaster, P a ................................ Lincoln, N ebr................................ Brockton, Mass.............................. Binghamton, N. Y ......................... Augusta, Ga................................... Pawtucket, R. I ............................ Altoona, P a ................................... Wheeling, W. V a........................... Mobile, Ala..................................... Birmingham, A l a ......................... Little Rock, A r k ........................... Springfield, Ohio........................... Galveston, T ex.............................. Tacoma, W ash.............................. Haverhill, Mass............................. Spokane, Wash.............................. Terre Haute, Ind ........................... Dubuque, Iowa.............................. Quincy, 111..................................... South Bend, I n d ........................... Salem, Mass................................... Johnstown, P a .............................. Elmira, N. Y ................................. Allentown, P a .............................. Davenport, Iow a........................... McKeesport, P a ............................ Springfield, 111.............................. Chelsea, Mass................................ Chester, Pa..................................... York, P a ........................................ Malden, M ass.......... ..................... Topeka, K ans................................ Newton. Mass................................ Sioux City, Io w a . .*....................... Bayonne, N. J ................................ Knoxville, T e n n ........................... Schenectady, N . Y ........................ Fitchburg, Mass............................ Superior, Wis.................................. Rockford, 111.................................. Taunton, M ass.............................. Canton, Ohio................................. Bntte, M ont................................... Montgomery, A l a ......................... Auburn, N. Y ................................ Chattanooga, Tenn....................... East St. Louis, 111................................ Joliet, 111................................................ Hospitals. 2 144 1 2 1 «1 al 62 «1 1,205 160 191 850 421 58 al 10 152 ai 1 al al 124 147 48 80 1 95 1 135 1 245 ai 1 al 16 ai al b 2 1 1 44 1 26 1 1 87 114 32 1 22 i 57 1 45 120 2 296 1,368 27 ai 1 6i /442 1 1 1 al 576 349 1,039 30 al i47 ai 7 (*> 1 ai al 168 169 ft 2 112 62 al al 327 402 al 8 al 13 i2 644 742 al Hospital for contagious diseases. &Including 1 hospital for contagious diseases. cData are for 9 months. d Not reported. e Hospital for contagious diseases located at almshouse. /N o t including pay patients. (<*) (e) kj 1 63 al a 1 193 895 a1 91 a 9398— N o. 42— 02 Orphan asylums. Average Number Average number of pa Number. number of in Number. of in Number. tients mates. treated. mates. 9 Owned by city under private management; not including 1 new hospital not yet occupied. ft Including smallpox hospital, but not includ ing new hospital, completed and moved into April, 1902. i One hospital for contagious diseases and 1 hospital owned jointly by city and county. BULLETIN OE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. ble X V I.—COST OF WATER, GAS, AND ELECTRIC-LIGHT PLANTS OWN] OPERATED BY CITIES. Waterworks. irlal m- Cities. ir. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 New York, N .Y ....... Chicago. I ll.............. Philadelphia,Pa . . . St. Louis, M o............ Boston, Mass............ Baltimore, M d ......... Cleveland, O h io___ Buffalo, N .Y ............ San Francisco, Cal.. Cincinnati, Ohio----Pittsburg, P a .......... New Orleans, La— Detroit, M ich .......... Milwaukee, Wis — Washington, D. C . . . Newark, N . J .......... Jersey City,N.J — Louisville, K y ......... Minneapolis, M inn. Providence, R. I ----Indianapolis, In d ... Kansas City, Mo — St. Paul, M in n ......... Rochester, N .Y ....... Denver, C o lo .......... Toledo, Ohio............ Allegheny, P a ......... Columbus, O h io ----Worcester, Mass — Syracuse, N. Y ......... New Haven, Conn.. Paterson, N .J.......... Fall River, Mass---St. Joseph, M o ......... Omaha, N ebr........... Los Angeles, Cel— Memphis, Tenn....... Scranton, Pa............ Lowell, M ass.......... Albany, N .Y ............ Cambridge, Mass . . . Portland, Oreg......... Atlanta, Ga.............. Grand Rapids, Mich Dayton, O n io.......... Richmond, V a......... Nashville, Tenn — Seattle, Wash.......... Hartford, Conn....... Reading, P a ............ Wilmington, Del — Camden, N .J .......... Trenton, N .J .......... Bridgeport, Conn. .. Lynn, Mass.............. Oakland, C a l.......... Lawrence, Mass — New Bedford, Mass. Des Moines, Iow a... Springfield, Mass .. . Somerville, Mass .. . Troy, N .Y ............... Hoboken, N .J ......... Evansville, Ind....... Manchester, N. H . . . Utica, N .Y ............... Peoria, 111............... Owned and operated by city. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. N o ... Y es.. Y es.. N o ... Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. v (e) Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. N o ... N o ... Y e s.. N o ... N o ... N o ... N o ... N o ... Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y e s.. Y e s.. Y es.. N o ... Y es.. N o ... Y es.. Y es.. N o ... Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. Y es.. N o ... N o ... Year built. Year ac Miles of quired by city. mains. 1,668.43 8123,012,020 35,310,099 1.890.03 37,971,959 1.379.03 669.00 21,551,600 15,782,617 719.60 15,035,835 626.20 563.82 10,735,867 9,424,404 490.00 1801 1835 1848 1808 1857 1860 ” i840' 1872 (d) 571.53 359.98 / 421.28 304.50 212.62 244.00 273.12 329.09 “ i824 1872 1863 1890 1854 1860 1868 1871 1895 1874 1870 1873 1889 1873 1847 1871 1845 1829 1874 445.49 343.50 (d) 252.00 348.37 42.00 177.06 150.00 182.00 178.18 169.58 90.30 (<*) 1873 1799 1856 1857 1874 1874 1870 1830 1832 h <& 1865 1827 129.37 131.60 124.29 178.00 124.17 145.18 122.20 103.41 79.04 162.92 131.15 101.21 106.20 110.00 126.37 18< *’ i870 (<*) • m 131.81 *'i874 1866 (<*) *(“ )* 1868 1833 1857 1900 1873 o d) ) 146.30 84.50 d) 79.16 23.00 72.00 100.23 (d) i d) d) d) 80.41 94.89 Four plants: 1842,1852,1874,1897. Four plants: 1 acquired in 1857; 3 built by city. Slot reported. Built by city. 3wned by city, but leased to private company. including 18 miles of conduit and 21 miles of mains owned by United States Gove including 87,985,730 expended by United States Government, including 31 miles from source of supply to city limits. 975 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X VI.—COST OF WATER, GAS, AND ELECTRIC-LIGHT PLANTS OWNED AND OPERATED BY CITIES. Gas works. Owned and operated by city. No....... No....... M(*> No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Y es___ No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... N o ...., No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Y e s .... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Year built. 1836 1891 1850 Year ac Miles of quired by city. mains. Electric-light plants. Cost. Owned and operated by city. Year built. Year ac Miles of quired mains. by city. No....... ( d) Y es. . . . (<*) No....... No....... N o....... N o....... N o....... N o....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... ( d) Y e s .... 1895 N o....... N o....... N o....... N o....... N o....... N o....... No....... N o....... N o....... No....... No....... N o....... '(d) 1,150,000 No....... 93.00 (d) Y es___ 1890 (d) Y e s .... (c) No....... N o....... No....... No....... No....... Y e s .... 1889 (<*) No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... N o....... No....... N o....... N o....... Y es___ 1899 (<*) No....... 1851 994,132 N o....... 79.61 No____ No.......!.............. N o.......1.............. No.......1.............. No....... 1.............. No.......1.............. No.......1.............. No.......i________ No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... i No....... | No....... . . J .................... N o....... i Two plants: 1885,1900. iT w o plants: 1 acquired in 1889; 1 built by city. fcTwo plants: 1 in 1899; 1 not reported. l Two plants: 1 built by city; 1 acquired in 1870. m Including 19.03 miles outside city limits. « Three plants: 1864,1873,1890. o Three plants: 1 acquired in 1872; 2 built by city. ( d) 1,230.50 $37,402,821 850.00 Cost. $2,234,642 481.00 851,655 269.16 («) 406,812 68,911 109.00 98,752 101.70 193,309 Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 976 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X V I.—COST OP WATER, GAS, AND ELECTRIC-LIGHT PLANTS OWNED AND OPERATED BY CITIES—Concluded. Waterworks. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. N o....... Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... No....... N o....... Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... N o....... Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y es___ Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... N o....... N o....... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s .... Y e s___ Y e s .... N o....... Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... No....... Y es___ No....... Y es___ Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... N o....... Y e s .... N o....... Y e s .... Y e s .... (d) N o ..... Y e s .... Y e s .... N o....... Y e s .... Y es___ Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... N o....... Y e s .... Charleston, S.C......... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah. San Antonio, T e x ... Duluth, M in n .......... Erie, P a .................... Elizabeth, N. J ......... Wilkesbarre, P a........ Kansas City, Kans .. Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, Me............ Yonkers, N. Y .......... Norfolk, V a .............. Waterbury, Conn . 90 91 92 93 94 96 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 315 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Fort Wayne, I n d .. . Youngstown, O h io . Houston, T e x ......... Covington. K y ....... Akron, Ohio............ Dallas, T e x ............ Saginaw, M ich ....... Lancaster, Pa.......... Lincoln, N ebr......... Brockton, M ass___ Binghamton, N. Y . Augusta, Ga............ Pawtucket, R. I . . . . Altoona, P a ............ Wheeling, W. V a ... Mobile, Ala............. Birmingham, A la .. Little Rock, A r k . .. Springfield, O h io... Galveston, T ex....... Tacoma, W ash....... Haverhill, Mass — Spokane, Wash — Terre Haute, I n d ... Dubuque, Iow a....... Quincy, 111............. South Bend, Ind___ Salem, Mass............ Johnstown, P a ....... Elmira, N .Y ............ Allentown, Pa........ Davenport, Iowa ... McKeesport, P a ___ Springfield, 111........ Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a ............. York, Pa.................. Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, K a n s ........ Newton. M ass....... . Sioux Gity, Iowa ... Bayonne, N. J ........ Knoxville,Tenn ... Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass....... . Canton, O hio.......... Butte, M on t. Montgomery, Ala . Auburn, N .Y ........ Chattanooga, T enn. East St. Louis, 111. . . Joliet, 111................. Owned Year and operated built. by city. Cost. 1853 1874 83 60.44 150.00 31,061,110 4,403,572 1896 1868 1898 («) 49.22 110.63 1,784,126 1,821,099 1840 («) 46.14 713,248 1874 1872 1866 1873 1880 1872 (1873 (a) (a) 84.66 58.66 57.84 82.90 86.97 65.11 1,640,561 1,232,813 1,470,908 1,295,308 790,109 735,209 1869 («) 1878 1872 1836 1885 1880 1867 1859 1876 1860 1834 1899 1882 (a) (°) (a\ 188i 1894 1883 1891 1885 1872 1873 1869 1865 (aj (a) (a\ v*) (°i (a ) 1872 $ 8 1893 8 1900 ["1 i869 1882 1866 1867 (a) (a» 1869 (a ) 1876 1885 1884 (a ) 8 (e ) 1873 1875 1876 1869 8 44.00 1,212,653 203.00 86.00 87.30 53.01 68.75 74.75 55.26 148.62 558.25 42.00 97.21 1,287,259 909,895 872,022 411,103 943,516 771,644 834,902 1,866,445 697,865 803,092 658,350 60.50 49.05 68.04 76.81 70.60 707,577 1,656,688 1,243,623 1,376,519 1,326,761 62.00 556,953 57.97 65.00 457,974 1,925,869 46.93 426,374 45.75 62.50 38.45 445.000 852.000 488,204 81.54 1,093,881 137.90 60.04 34.83 2,089,285 463,587 299,757 45.17 67.65 1,236,610 437,775 62.75 79.21 63.00 642,468 1,288,129 646,472 1885 1865 1898 1894 54.28 67.00 596,539 584,122 1883 1889 34.50 325,000 Built by city. M ncludmg 11 miles outside city limits. o Not reported. a Year ac Miles of quired by city. mains. STATISTICS OP CITIES, COST OF WATER, GAS, AND ELECTRIC-LIGHT PLANTS OWNED AB OPERATED BY CITIES—Concluded. Cas works. Electric-light plants. Year ac Miles of quired by city. mains. 34.20 1875 40.00 Cost. Owned and operated by city. No....... No....... No....... No....... $1,780,971 No....... No....... No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... 409,716 Y e s .... No....... No....... Y e s .... No....... Y e s .... Y e s .... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Y e s .... No....... No....... No....... No....... Y e s .... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Y e s .... No....... No....... N o....... No....... No....... No....... No....... Year built. Year ac Miles of quired mains. by city. larnal im. er. 68 1892 («) 65.00 $135,221 1888 («) 43.00 35,557 1894 1887 1893 8 65,000 502,230 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 1890 1900 (*) («)* («) 66.00 77,800 1897 | («) 65.00 158,242 1888 i i dCity owns distributing system only. «T w o plants: 1871,1894. /T w o plants: 1 acquired in 1885; 1 built by city. Cost. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X VII.—BUILDING PERMITS. Building permits granted. arlal lm5r. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Cities. For new buildings. For repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. Proposed Proposed Number. Number. expenditure. expenditure. New York, N. Y ....... Chicago, 111............... Philadelphia, P a ___ St. Louis, M o............ Boston, Mass............ Baltimore, M d ......... Cleveland, O hio....... Buffalo, N. Y ............ San Francisco, C a l.. Cincinnati, O h io ___ Pittsburg, P a............ New Orleans, L a ___ Detroit, M ich............ Milwaukee, W is....... Washington, D. C ... Newark, N. J ............ Jersey City, N. J ....... Louisville, K y .......... Minneapolis, M inn.. Providence, R. I ....... Indianapolis, Ind ... Kansas City, M o....... St. Paul, Minn.......... Rochester, N. Y ....... Denver, C o lo............ Toledo, O h io ............ Allegheny, P a.......... Columbus, O h io....... Worcester, Mass....... Syracuse, N. Y ........ New Haven, C onn... Paterson, N. J .......... Fall River, Mass....... St. Joseph, M o.......... Omaha, Nebr............ Los Angeles, C a l___ Memphis, T e n n ....... Scranton, P a ............ Lowell,Mass.............. Albany, N. Y ............ Cambridge, Mass___ Portland, Oreg......... Atlanta, G a ............. Grand Rapids, Mich Dayton, Ohio............ Richmond, V a ........ Nashville, T enn....... Seattle, W ash.......... Hartford, Conn........ Reading, Pa............. Wilmington, D e l___ Camden, N. J .......... Trenton, N. J .......... . Bridgeport, Conn— Lynn, Mass............... Oakland, Cal............ Lawrence, Mass....... New Bedford, Mass.. 7,657 8136,051,679 34,962,075 6,053 54,273 c 22,880,730 2,713 11,420,657 1,332 1,304 4,^763,768 e 6,232,882 1,831 679 3,732,097 (a) 548 3,705 01,706 2,276 989 1,660 972 655 1,451 1,244 793 0 2,501 1,805 01,373 493 1,214 («) 0661 01,139 434 325 175 (a) 2,813,215 19,138,680 c 2,247.192 5,353,500 4,282,308 5,156,658 8,933,227 2,685,836 1,755,505 5,212,737 4,028,575 e 3,744,969 5,193,485 e 4,261,400 1,868,571 3,693,265 «1,^4,000 e l, 934,827 1,773,492 1,406,439 1,429,285 (a) 266 700 364 1,932 1,158 490 898,850 718,129 1,119,699 3,798,366 2,557,897 el, 776,768 5249 292 0746 1,030 484 01,006 213 04,741 3,566 728 627 237 250 268 331 233 246 262 238 («) 2,800,620 el, 538,095 2,553,720 1,058,180 149,100 847,323 4,218,449 2,370,900 905,075 585,902 §6,760 1,104,107 (3 1,082,800 976,125 6,005 6,863 52,597 1,103 2,117 563 1,205 379 (a ) 2,121 790 (*) 488 495 i 1,340 213 426 434 2,073 501 2%07 339 i296 401 85 («) 133 119 276 798 1,199 114 52,039 275 (A) 1,665 316 (A)262 (A) 2,303 134 319 231 281 105 64 244 330 69 208 314,020,960 (a) d 4,997,365 1,455,500 /) 606,484 («) 662,000 431,794 123,900 742,387 J868,230 191,700 203,818 137,410 808,230 860,575 (/) 949,153 (/) 336,773 318,681 i! 249,980 218,004 244,725 (a) 141,420 11,002 507,605 300,832 307,398 (/) {t528,160 %98,428 277,243 («) 15,000 120,805 351,279 120,600 («) 423,812 (a) 139,612 86,150 ©65,000 76,450 t reported. t including permits for heating apparatus, elevators, fire escapes, etc. t including $631,277 proposed expenditure for heating apparatus, elevators, fire escapes, etc. t including $1,010,338 proposed expenditure for heating apparatus, elevators, fire escapes, etc. iluding proposed expenditure for repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. jluded in proposed expenditure for new buildings. iluding permits for repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. iluded in permits for new buildings. t including 2,199 permits for minor repairs, awnings, fire escapes, and elevators, t including $169,182 proposed expenditure for minor repairs, awnings, fire escapes, and ele- 979 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able XVII.—BUILDING PERMITS—Continued. Building permits granted. Mar ginal number. 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 Cities. For new buildings. For repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. Proposed Proposed Number. expenditure. Number. expenditure. Des Moines, Io w a ............................................... a 676 681,658,987 Springfield, Mass................................................ (0 (0 969,530 Somerville, Mass................................................ 277 Troy, N. Y .......................................................... Hoboken, N. J .................................................... 200,000 21 111,935 Evansville, I n d .................................................. 107 Manchester, N. H . ............................................. 160 CO Utica, N. Y .......................................................... Peoria, 111............................................................ 411 997,983 Charleston, S. C .................................................. 177,280 70 Savannah, Ga..................................................... 396,750 176 944,800 Salt Lake City, Utah.......................................... 426 869,635 San Antonio, Tex. .......................................... 833 6955,864 Duluth, Minn....................................................... a 570 607,504 Erie, Pa................................................................. a 746 Elizabeth, N. J ..................................................... 705,701 163 Wilkesbarre, P a .................................................. 423,054 170 TTflOsaa City, Kans............................................... 297,680 176 Harrisburg, P a .................................................... 738,292 420 Portland, Me. ( g ) ................................................ 170 (f) . \ f) Yonkers, N .Y ....................................................... 245 Norfolk, Va.......................................................... * 520,000 308 Waterbury, Conn................................................ Holyoke, Mass..................................................... CO Fort Wayne, In d .................................................. 469,546 Youngstown, Ohio............................................... 61,428,925 a 545 Houston, T ex....................................................... 588,834 456 CovingtonsK y ................................................ . 6153,125 a44 a 685 Akron, O hio......................................................... if) 1,200,903 Dallas, T e x .......................................................... 732 311,787 Saginaw, M ic h .................................................... 96 Lancaster, Pa....................................................... 90 CO Tiineoln Nehr _________ ___________ 404,315 134 Brockton, Mass.................................................... 336,050 107 ( /) Binghamton, N. Y ............................................... 203 530,799 Augusta, G a ......................................................... 360 664,155 Pawtucket, R. I. { h ) ............................................. 500 6412,500 Altoona, Pa.......................................................... a 197 Wheeling, W. V a ................................................. £52,157 106 Mobile, A la.......................................................... Birmingham, Ala................................................ 1,297,500 538 9 75,200 Little Rock, Ark.................................................. (/) Springfield, O h io................................................. 56,200 Galveston, T e x .................................................... ( / ) 13 711,843 363 Tacoma, Wash..................................................... 208,000 Haverhill, M ass.................................................. 58 6624,570 Spokane, W ash.................................................... a 523 287,847 286 Terre Haute, Ind ................................................ Dubuque, Towa................................................... Quincy, 111............................................. 1........... (/) 434 ^753,500 South Bend, I n d ................................................ 160,343 71 Salem, Mass......................................................... (/) Johnstown, P a .................................................... (/J (/)2 Elmira, N. Y ....................................................... 760,000 A l l e n t o w n , Pa __.........„...................................... 236 DaV^P^U Tmya. .......... . ............ 1,082,730 178 (/) McKeesport, P a .................................................. / Springfield, 111.................................................... ( 'l (V) ' 69 Chelsea, Mass...................................................... 173,450 51 •Chester, Pa.......................................................... 428 York, P a .............................................................. if) 300,344 109 Malden, Mass..................................................... a Including permits for repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. b Including proposed expenditure for repairs, extensions, etc., to old c Included in permits for new buildings. d Included in proposed expenditure for new buildings. cN o permits issued except for plumbing. /N o t reported. g Data are for 9 months. h Data are for 6 months. (c) 89 (d) (e) 817,800 260 65 101 25,000 13,832 CO 558 212 421 130 1,052 (c) 69,493 102,000 219,720 130,025 117,155 (<*) 174,424 20,607 26,860 2,725 44,780 116 12 37 65 52 96 131 (0 1,118 (c) ^ 221 69 70 if ) if) 165,000 95,250 (<*) 85,494 (d) CO 256,341 20,652 if) 187,500 125 159 713 63 (*) 66,461 42,505 (<*) 106 251 26 53,660 111,544 26,240 333 60 (\ l 2 9 115,283 30,000 (<*) 64,008 % W187 ( / ) 98 80 ( / ) 36 (/) if) 72 40 62 141 buildings. if ) if) 85,275 57,930 if) if) if) if) \f) if) 33,125 if) 28,200 980 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X VII.—BUILDING PERMITS—Concluded. Building permits granted. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. For new buildings. For repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. Proposed Number. Proposed Number. expenditure. expenditure. 121 Topeka, Kans..................................................... 122 Newton. Mass..................................................... 123 Sioux City, Iow a ................................................ 124 Bayonne, N. J ..................................................... 125 Knoxville, T en n ................................................ 126 Schenectady, N. Y ............................................. 127 Fitchburg, M ass................................................. 128 Superior, Wis....................................................... 129 Rockford, 111....................................................... 130 Taunton, Mass.................................................... 131 Canton, Ohio....................................................... 132 Butte, Mont......................................................... 133 Montgomery, A la ............................................... 134 Auburn, N. Y ...................................................... 135 Chattanooga, T e n n ............................................ 136 East St. Louis, 111............................................... 137 Joliet, 111.............................................................. a b a 470 116 («> 119 («> (e) 98 (e) (e ) b $641,622 (e ) (e ) (C) 73 449,957 (•) (e )M («) 166,700 («) (e) (e ) (e ) a 410 a 354 79 5481,389 b 728,866 447,180 259 528 (e) 332,039 1,520,000 (•) 46 \e ) ( e) (c) « 305 700 (*) Including permits for repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. Including proposed expenditure for repairs, extensions, etc., to old buildings. c Included in permits for new buildings. Included in proposecLexpenditure for new buildings. « Not reported. m d Kj (e ) $40,312 («) 42,000 (e) (e ) M 89,173 177,524 («) 981 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able XVIII.—DEBT AND LEGAL BORROWING LIMIT. Mar ginal num ber. Debt. Cities. New York. N. Y ----Chicago, 111.............. Philadelphia. P a . . . St. Louis, M o.......... Boston, Mass.......... . Baltimore, M d......... Cleveland, Ohio___ Buffalo, N. Y .......... San Francisco, C al.. Cincinnati, Ohio . . . Pittsburg, P a.......... New Orleans, La . . . Detroit, M ich.......... Milwaukee, W is___ Washington, D. C .. Newark, N. J .......... Jersey City, N .J .. .. Louisville, K y......... Minneapolis, M inn. Providence, R. I . . . Indianapolis, I n d .. Kansas City, Mo— St. Paul, Minn......... Rochester, N. Y ___ Denver, C olo.......... Toledo, O h io .......... Allegheny, Pa......... Columbus, Ohio___ Worcester, Mass___ Syracuse, N. Y ......... New Haven, Conn.. Paterson, N. J ......... Fall River, Mass___ St. Joseph, Mo......... Omaha, Nebr.......... Los Angeles, Cal___ Memphis, Tenn....... Scranton, P a .......... Lowell, Mass.......... Albany, N .Y .......... Cambridge, Mass. . . Portland, O reg....... Atlanta, Ga............... Grand Rapids, Mich Dayton, Ohio.......... Richmond, Va......... Nashville, T en n ___ Bonded. Floating. Total. Sinking fund. borrow Net debt. Legal ing limit. $426, 174,823 $6,306,472 $432,481,295 $121, 340,920 $311,140,375 b 22, 459,692 14,478,182 b 36,937,874 534,341 b 36,403,533 59, 932,895 1,441,606 61,374,501 13, 615,842 47,758,659 18, 916,278 18,916,278 653,866 18,262,412 e 79, 954,972 « 79,954,972 /32, 802,887 (747,152,085 40, 164,683 40,164,683 9i 315,978 30,848,705 16, 511.550 1,391,353 17,902,903 3, 177,480 14,725,423 16, 874,302 1,475,192 18,349,494 612,466 17,737,028 517,776 738,394 488,394 220,618 250.000 *32, 494,511 *32,494,511 413,256 *27,081,255 23, 278,702 1,143,454 24,422,156 825,363 18,596,793 17,902,808 17, 344,510 558,298 17,902,808 4,885,024 6,946,102 2,061,078 15,000 6, 931,102 6,860,686 6,860,686 621,186 6, 239.500 15, 068,350 220,182 15,288,532 153,880 14,134,652 14,802,439 19.731.000 928,561 17, 585.000 2,146,000 19, 411,129 484,653 16,205,526 279,050 19,690,179 8,332,834 10, 057.000 394,000 10.451.000 118,166 6,683,897 8 561.000 8.561.000 877,103 291,615 14,029,846 497,461 17,321,461 16, 824.000 P 4,051,735 J>3, 855,735 196,000 P 4,051,735 a 6, 477,066 a 6,477,066 401,291 a 6,075,775 8,630,887 9.337.500 706,613 8, 001,100 1,336,400 8, 889.000 1,802,849 10,691,849 445,831 10,246,018 r 2, 017.300 25,682 r 2,042,982 153,890 r 1,889,092 7, 689,691 6,932,051 7,764,691 832,640 75,000 6,696,121 7, 853,733 157,612 7,853,733 5,410,635 7, 601.900 7,684,900 274,265 83,000 5,553,893 9, 859.000 174,936 10,033,936 480.043 9,136,896 9.187.792 50,896 6, 906.000 2,281,792 3,823,594 3.884.500 60,906 455.000 3, 429.500 3,922,673 715.000 4.050.500 127,827 3, 335.500 643,071 *3,719,267 5, 275.000 s 87,338 1 5,362,338 1,717,451 11,277 1,781,827 1, 770.550 64,376 6,588,349 6.638.792 5, 637.900 1,000,892 50,443 Ml, 389,175 «1, 389,175 243,852 Ml, 145,323 654 w 3,371,154 u>3, 370.500 131.043 w 3,240, 111 1,055,808 161,225 1,463,225 1, 302.000 407,417 3,108,626 21,939 3,777,929 669,303 3, 755,990 s 4, 660,600 s 4,660,600 492,041 * 3,168,559 6,374,916 8.374.500 999,584 8 374.500 aa 5, 722,618 98,854 «a 5,637,260 13,496 ao5,736,U4 3.545.500 3,369,749 175,751 175,000 3, 370.500 2 032.000 1,863,097 2.032.000 168,903 2,991,411 3,511,129 52,129 519,718 3, 459.000 6,610,582 7,227,423 7, 227,423 616,841 3,517,300 9,473 3,507,827 3, 517.300 , , , 10 per ct. (a) 5 per cent. 7 per cent. 5 per cent. 24 per ct. (*)' No limit. 7 per cent. (?) 10 per ct. (*) No limit. 7 per cent, (c) (*) 2 per cent, (a) 5perct. (m) No limit. No limit. 10 per ct. (a) 5 per cent, (o) 30 per ct. ( o ) 2 per cent, (c) 5 per cent. M No limit. 10 per ct. (i) 3 per cent, (a) No limit. 7 per cent, (e) No limit. 2| per ct. (ft) 10 per ct. (<) (*) 10 per ct. (c) 24 per ct. (ft) 5 per cent. ( c ) 10 per ct. (e) 15 per ct. (v) 2 per ct. (*) 24perct. (v) 10 per ct. (a) 24 per ct. (ft) (*) 7percent. ( o ) No limit. No limit. 18perct. (i) No limit. a Of assessed valuation, not including water debt. b Including $4,163,575 special assessment bonds, against private property, aOf assessed valuation. d Of assessed valuation; m aybe increased by vote of people. e Including $3,499,000 county bonds. /In clu din g county sinking fund. (/Including net county debt. ftOf average assessed valuation for 3 years. 4Of assessed valuation of real estate. J Controlled by vote of people, but not to exceed 15 per cent of assessed valuation. *Including $961,434 improvement bonds. I Controlled by legislation. m Of average assessed valuation for 5 years. » Controlled by Congress. oOf assessed valuation, plus sinking fund. Including $856,209 assessment bonds. ^Including $1,216,166 park certificates of indebtedness. »*Not including $1,660,365 bonds against private property. 8 Trust funds. t Including $87,338 trust funds carried by the city as a floating debt. wNot including bonds against private property for street improvement, amount not reported. v O t assessed valuation, but not to exceed $2,000,000, except for waterworks or sewers. w Including $60,000 market-house bonds, secured by mortgage on market house, and $250,000 park bonds, secured by mortgage on park property, a?Of assessed valuation; may be 7 per cent by vote of people. i/Of average assessed valuation for 3 years, not including water debt, z Including $674,600 certificates of indebtedness against private property aa Including $331,118 improvement bonds against private property. 982 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X VIII.—DEBT AND LEGAL BORROWING LIMIT-Continued. Mar ginal num ber. 48 49 50 51 -52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 Debt. Cities. Bonded. Floating. Total. Seattle, Wash.......... a$5,001,041 $1,250,000 a $6,251,041 4.791.000 5,276,635 Hartford, Conn....... 485,635 1.505.500 Reading, P a ............ 1.505.500 2,232,393 70,994 Wilmington, Del___ 2,161,399 2,812,375 Camden, N. J .......... 140,800 2,671,575 4,007,736 Trenton, N. J .......... 728,673 3,279,063 1,983,800 28,800 1.955.000 Bridgeport, Conn__ 4,809,450 4,309,450 Lynn, Mass.............. 500.000 /441,195 421.000 / 20,195 Oakland, Cal.......... 2,302,682 2.096.500 206,082 Lawrence, Mass___ 4.181.000 3.706.000 New Bedford, Mass. 475.000 9 1,171,500 9 103,348 9 1,274,848 Des Moines, Iow a... 2,907,921 Springfield, Mass. . . 53,021 2,854,900 Somerville, Mass___ 1.761.000 1.461.000 300.000 2,103,950 2,103,950 Troy, N. Y ............... Hoboken, N. J ......... 1.430.500 1.424.000 6,500 2.171.000 Evansville, Ind....... 2.155.000 16,000 1,860,709 Manchester, N. H . . . 1.845.000 15,709 412,126 664,085 Utica, N .Y ............... 251,959 j 762,800 j 968,964 Peoria, 111................ 206,164 3,799,150 3,799,150 Charleston, S. C....... Savannah, G a ......... 3,154,650 3,154,650 3,506,216 16,216 Salt Lake City, Utah 3.490.000 2,542,827 San Antonio, T e x .. 2.271.000 271,827 6,035,371 Duluth, M inn.......... 5,997,250 38,121 954,000 954.000 Erie, P a .................... 3,198,960 Elizabeth, N. J ....... 3,198,960 608,703 601,100 7,< Wilkesbarre, P a ___ 2,584,248 136,382 2,447,866 Kansas City, Kans . Harrisburg, P a ....... ol,284,800 7,000 ol,291,800 2,772,750 2,772,750 Portland, Me. («) . .. 3,881,843 Yonkers, N. Y ......... 3,857,123 24,720 4,812,745 Norfolk, Y a ............ 4,713,550 99,195 1.570.000 1.570.000 Waterbury, Conn .. 2.125.500 Holyoke, M ass....... 2.275.500 150,000 r 632,933 624,800 8,133 Fort Wayne, Ind .. . 745,914 712,914 33,000 Youngstown, O h io . Houston, T e x ......... 3,098,800 861,627 s3,160,427 2.081.000 Covington, K y ....... ' 2,095,550 14,550 637,972 10,272 627.700 Akron, Ohio............ 11,489 Dallas, T ex .............. 1,929,989 1.918.500 3,884 1,363,734 Saginaw, M ich ....... 1,359,850 Lancaster, P a ......... 1,269,958 1,269,958 294,845, 1,861,833 1,566,988 Lincoln, N ebr......... 270.000 Brockton, Mass....... 2,285,080 2,015,080 694.000 73,635 Binghamton, N. Y . 767,635 223.000 Augusta, G a............ 1,749,300 1,972,300 666,796 4,100,000 Pawtucket, R. I ___ 4,766,796 Altoona, P a ............ 12,075 1,088,575 1.076.500 569,054 Wheeling, W. Y a ... 483.700 85,354 Sinking fund. $597,593 84,632 155,843 1,451,899 343,973 1,336,535 401,290 925,653 73,438 711,033 25,416 97,934 53,975 350,899 195,000 950 350 91,775 138,629 234,425 477 15,689 149,366 1,414,873 361,498 443,670 74,877 630,571 18,738 11,509 14,374 80,816 200,523 65,832 565,000 49,407 360,696 50,000 666,022 116,153 borrow Net debt. Legal ing limit. a $6,251,041 4,679,042 1,420,868 2,232,393 2,656,532 2,555,837 1,639,827 3,472,915 / 441,195 1,901,292 3,255,347 9 1 , 201,410 2,196,888 1,761,000 2,078,534 1,332,566 2,117,025 1,509,810 664,085 J 773,964 3,798,200 3,154,650 3,505,866 2,451,052 5,896,742 719,575 3,198,483 593,014 2,584,248 ol,142,434 1,357,877 3,520,345 4,369,075 1,495,123 1,644,929 »*614,195 734,405 s3,160,427 2,081,176 557,156 1,729,466 1,297,902 704,958 1,812,426 1,924,384 717,635 1,972,300 4,100,774 972,422 569,054 1£ per ct. (b) No limit. 7 percent. (<*) (d) No limit. (d ) 2£ per ct. (e) 15perct. (o' 2£per ct. ( e 2£ perct. (o' 5 per cent, (c) 21 perct. (o) 21 perct. (e) 10 per ct. ( c ) (<*) 2 per cent, (c) 5 percent, (h) 10 per ct. ( t) 5 per cent, (c) 8 percent, (fc) 7 percent. \c) 4 percent. (G 8 per ct.(c) 5 p erct.(c) 21 per ct.(m) No limit. 2 per ct. (n) No limit. 7 per ct.(p) 5 per ct. (c) 10 per ct.(i) 20 per ct.(o) No limit. 21 per ct.(o) 2 per ct.(o) No limit. 21 per ct.(c) 10 per ct.(«) 7 per ct.(i) No limit. 7 per ct.(p) No limit. 21 per ct.(e) No limit. 7 per ct.fc) 3 per ct.(M) 7 per ct. M 5 per ct.(c) a Including $531,041 local improvement bonds against private property. &Of assessed valuation; 5 per cent by three-fifths vote of people; 5 per cent additional for water works and lighting plants. oOf assessed valuation. d Controlled by legislation. eOf average assessed valuation for 3 years. f Not including $25,584 in litigation. gNot including debt of 1 school district not reported. h Of assessed valuation, not including water debt. i Of assessed valuation of real estate. j Including $148,300 assessment bonds. fcOf assessed valuation; may be increased by vote of people. I Of assessed valuation, and 4 per cent additional for water, sewers, and light. mOf assessed valuation; may be 7 per cent by vote of people. »*0f assessed valuation of real estate; may be 7 per cent by vote of people for general city purposes, also an equal amount for school purposes. o Not including $43,100 street improvement bonds. pOf assessed valuation for general city purposes, also an equal amount for school purposes. <1Data are for 9 months. **Not including bonds against private property for street improvement, amount not reported. s Not including $118,000 in litigation. t Fixed by charter at $2,000,000. a Of assessed valuation, plus sinking fund. a Of assessed valuation of real estate for general city purposes, also an equal amount for school purposes. 983 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X VIII.—DEBT AND LEGAL BORROWING LIMIT—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Debt. ' Cities. Bonded. Floating. Total. Mobile, A l a .............. <**$876,500 a $876,500 Birmingham, A la . .. c 2,124,000 $27,113 <?2,151,113 Little Rock, A r k ___ d 212,407 d 118,000 94,407 Springfield, O h io___ 938,846 893,846 45,000 Galveston, T e x ........ 4,225,752 282,752 3,943,000 Tacoma, W ash......... / 4,256,494 215,433 / 4,471,927 Haverhill, Mass....... 1,881,563 1,857,200 24,363 Spokane, Wash......... i 2,178,389 J 662,386 Je 2,840,775 m351,000 m 345,000 Terre Haute, In d ___ 6,000 1,566,918 Dubuque, Iow a......... 1,312,615 254,303 1,071,300 24,329 1,095,629 Quincy, 111............... South Bend, I n d ___ 0 796,387 o769,090 27,297 Salem, Mass.............. 871,702 P 101,384 P 973,086 Johnstown, P a ......... 534,500 534,500 Elmira, N. Y ............ 1,132,855 19,855 1,113,000 Allentown, P a ......... 826,843 6,543 820,300 Davenport, Io w a ___ *<441,920 29,788 u 471,708 745,100 154.076 899,176 McKeesport, P a ....... 1,021,624 Springfield, 111......... 122; 924 898.700 1,639,200 Chelsea, M ass.......... 1,639,200 Chester, P a............... 812.700 901,200 88,500 York, P a ................... 8,159 460,659 452,500 1,644 800 Malden, M ass.......... 1,905,937 261,137 1,110,390 Topeka, Kang.......... l ,l l t 90 6,008,413 Newton, Mass.......... 5,611,, 76 396,637 Sioux City, Io w a ___ v 2,147,362 77,760 v 2,225,122 2,076,600 Bayonne, N. J .......... 1,964,600 112,000 Knoxville, T e n n ___ 1,421,673 1,391,500 30,173 Schenectady, N. Y .. 1,248,926 933,000 315,926 Fitchburg, Mass....... 1,877,200 1,677,200 200,000 Superior, Wis............ 1,549,023 1,546,623 2,400 Rockford, 111............ 291,800 204,163 495,963 Taunton, M ass......... 1,939,425 1,891,575 47,850 1,017,069 Canton, Ohio............ 969,189 47,880 Butte, M ont.............. w 260,000 351,267 u> 611,267 Montgomery, Ala . . . 01,974,865 64,638 02,039,503 649,772 Auburn, N. Y .......... 649,772 Chattanooga, T enn .. 101,520 932,520 831,000 a a 977,800 50.000 aa 1,027,800 East St. Louis, 111— Joliet, 111................... 196,800 184,800 12.000 Sinking fund. Net debt. <*$876,500 2,151,113 d 187,113 938,846 3,114,049 / 4,427,688 1,407,010 fc2,840,775 m 318,299 1,534,382 973,830 o751,558 P 676,914 439,174 1,132,855 728,330 u471,708 619,154 1,021,271 1,205,725 832,078 455,115 1,610,794 1,101,120 4,199,227 v 2,220,430 1,853,600 1,409,354 1,112,092 1,454,785 1,301,009 495,963 1,426,938 1,003,289 w 593,848 #2,039,603 649,772 931,553 aa 1,020,600 196,800 o $25,294 1,111,703 44,239 474,553 32,701 32,536 121,799 44,829 296,172 95,326 98,513 280,022 353 433,475 69,122 5,544 295,143 9,270 1,809,186 4,692 223,000 12,319 136,834 422,415 248,014 x 512,487 13,780 17,419 967 7,200 Legal borrow ing limit. 7 per ct.(6) 7 per ct.(o) (e) No limit. («) 5 per ct.(flr) 2i per ct.(A) 5 per ct .(I) 2 per ct. ( n j 5 per ct. ( n j 5 per ct. (nj 2 per ct. (w) 2£ per ct. (q ) 2 per ct. (r) 10 per ct. (&) 7 per ct. ( n 5 per ct. M 2 per ct. M 5 per ct. (n) 2 \ per ct. («) 2 per ct. (rl 2 per ct. (**) 2£ per ct. ( q ) No limit. 2£ per ct. (a) 5 per ct. (n ) 3 per ct. (w) No limit. 10 per ct. (nj 2 \ per ct. (a) 5 per ct. ( n j 5 per ct. (n) 2£ per ct. (q) No limit. 3 per ct. (nj 7 per ct. (6) lO perct. (zj (e ) 5 per ct. («) a Including $65,000 street improvement bonds, but not including $2,241,379 debt of old city placed in hands of trustee on reorganization of city. b Of assessed valuation, provided that there shall not be included in the limitation temporary loans not exceeding one-fourth of the general revenues, payable within 1 year; bonds to be issued for the purpose of acquiring, providing, or constructing schoolhouses, waterworks, and sewers; also bonds issued for street improvement where cost in whole or in part is assessed against the abutting property. 0 Not including $72,500 improvement bonds to be paid from improvement assessments. d Not including the bonded indebtedness of 22 special improvement districts for which no report is made to city. e Controlled by legislation. /In clu din g $123,494 local improvement bonds against private property. a Of assessed valuation; 5 per cent additional for waterworks ana 2 per cent additional for schools, ft Of average assessed valuation for 3 years, not including water debt. 1 Including $248,389 special assessment bonds against private property, i Including $1,287 special assessment warrants against private property. * Including $249,676 special assessment bonds and warrants against private property. l Of assessed valuation; 5 per cent additional for waterworks and lighting plants, by vote of people. wNot including $87,318 local improvement bonds, n Of assessed valuation. o Including $479,601 street and sewer improvement bonds against private property. pNot including $164,532 trust and endowment funds regarded as a liability by the city. q O i average assessed valuation for 3 years. r Of assessed valuation; may be 7 per cent by vote of people for general city purposes, also an equal amount for school purposes. sOf average assessed valuation of real estate for 3 years. t o t assessed valuation of real estate for general city purposes, also an equal amount for school purposes. wIncluding $83,920 improvement bonds against private property. v Including $291,724 improvement bonds against private property. w Including debt of school district extending beyond city limits. x Including sinking fund of school district extending beyond city limits. v Including $95,815 street paving bonds payable by property owners. z O t assessed valuation of real estate. a a Including $170,800 special assessment bonds. 984 BULLETIN OE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X IX .—BASIS OF ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND TAXA TION. Assessment of property. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Legal basis, per Basis inpractice,per cent of full value. cent o f full value. Real. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 New York, N . Y .............................................................. Chicago, 111...................................................................... Philadelphia, P a ............................................................ St. Louis,‘M o.................................................................... Boston, M ass................................................................... Baltimore, Md................................................................. Cleveland, O h io.............................................................. Buffalo, N .Y .................................................................... San Francisco, C a l......................................................... Cincinnati, O liio ............................................................ Pittsburg, P a ................................................................... New Orleans, La.............................................................. Detroit, M ich................................................................... Milwaukee, W is .............................................................. Washington, D.C............................................................ Newark, N. J ................................................................... Jersey City, N. J .............................................................. Louisville, K y ................................................................. MinneapoliSjMinn......................................................... Providence. It. I .............................................................. Indianapolis, I n d ........................................................... Kansas City, M o.............................................................. St. Paul, M i n n ....................................................................................... Rochester, N. Y ............................................................... Denver, C o lo ................................................................... Toledo, Ohio.................................................................... Allegheny, P a................................................................. Columbus, O h io .............................................................. Worcester, Mass.............................................................. Syracuse, N. Y ................................................................. New Haven, Conn.......................................................... Paterson, N. J ................................................................... Fall River, Mass.............................................................. St. Joseph, M o ................................................................. Omaha, N ebr................................................................... Los Angeles, Cal.............................................................. Memphis, Tenn............................................................... Scranton, Pa.................................................................... Lowell, Mass................................................................... Albany, N. Y ................................................................... Cambridge, Mass............................................................. Portland, Oreg................................................................. Atlanta, Ga...................................................................... Personal. (an 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 (V) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 20 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 (*) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 60 100 100 100 100 (* ) (* ) 100 20 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 (V ) K 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Real. 70. 20 80 66$ 100 80 50 100 60 60 (V) 100 70 60 75 100 70 80 60 100 66$ 40 60 80 100 60 (t,>60 100 100 100 100 100 50 40 50 60 33$ 100 100 100 30 66$ Personal. 100 20 100 66$ 100 60 50 100 60 60 100 100 70 60 100 100 70 60 60 100 66$ 40 60 80 100 60 90 50 100 100 100 30 100 50 40 50 60 33$ 100 100 100 30 100 a Including $1,157,400 liable for taxes for State purposes only, and $211,334,194 franchises. b Including $112,410,244 exempt from taxes for State purposes. 0 Including $1,157,400 liable for taxes for State purposes only, $112,410,244 exempt from taxes for State purposes, and $211,334,194 franchises. d Included in county. eIncluding State, varies in different boroughs from $2.79 to $3.37. /V aries in different boroughs from $20.38 to $22.01. a Varies in different boroughs from $23.17 to $25.38. h School, $21.38; sanitary district, $3.68; library, $0.55. 1 Not including park'hoafd tax of $2.82 to $5.20, except in Jefferson Township, lake-shore protective tax of $1.37 in North Chicago, and a boulevard and town-bond tax of $1.18 in West Chicago. $ City rate; suburban rate, $12.33; agricultural rate, $9.25. Not including State tax of $4 on mort gages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. * School, $4; library, $0.40. i School. m School, $3.07; court, $0.63; street opening, $0.06; sinking fund, $1.63; interest on debt, $3.10; police department, $3.33; city poor, $1.36. «City proper;, suburban districts, $6; securities, $3. oSchool, $8.10; library, $0.80. Plncludmg $13,396,848 special franchises, a Including State. r Lamp. a Included in city. t Including county. ^School, $3.93; library, $0.40. v City proper, 100; suburban districts, 66f; agricultural districts, 50. toNot including ward school tax of from $0.14 to $7, and State tax of $4 on mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. osNo legal basis. v Levee. * School, $3.60; police, $1.77; highway, $0.67. 985 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X IX .—BASIS OF ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND TAXA TION. Real. Personal. Total. a$3,237,778,261 *>$550,192,612 c$3,787,970,873 115,325,842 259,254,598 374,580,440 1,649,799 919,706,697 921,356,496 342,325,544 52,470,160 394,795,704 227,468,334 1,152,505,834 925,037,500 258,304,425 175,039,397 433,343,822 143,323,490 53,130,155 196,453,645 J>242,349,138 221,405,290 20,943,848 289,682,092 123,417,901 413,099,993 170,173,990 44,476,630 214,650,620 4,596,755 352,157,335 347,560,680 37,594,075 108,079,794 145,673,869 175,766,620 71,481,880 247,248,500 134,135,624 31,089,263 165,224,887 a a l2 567,084 aal92 901,725 180,334,641 129,832,105 28,753,530 158,685,635 86,241,745 9,360,817 95,602,562 90,200,000 33,900,000 124,100,000 80,129,845 22,082,661 102,212,506 151,533,940 41,267,920 192,801,860 94,935,180 34, °49,770 129,184,950 59,001,060 20,775,781 79,776,841 71,067,159 15,890,170 86,957,329 **107,303,311 9.145,662 116,448,973 134,364,115 (**) (**) 49,401,580 14,658,830 64,060,410 95,829,425 1,374,450 97,203,875 51,180,860 14,333,540 65,514,400 88,054,200 26,223,935 114,278,135 jpp8 1 , 045,860 6,058,243 87,104,103 88,175,138 11,327,480 99,502,618 40,960,583 8,141,402 49,101,985 46,198,000 28,356,380 74,554,380 16,696,460 8,650,280 25,346,740 29,244,215 7,129,971 36,374,186 62,300,365 11,077,565 73,377,930 32,714,389 37,872,757 5,158,368 21,818,895 1,535,151 23,354,046 56,248,745 15,425,843 71,674,688 W 61,360,400 8,108,838 69,469,238 78.568,300 96,216,875 17.648,575 43,360,537 (**) (**) 43,565,385 57,202,574 13,637,189 Mar ginal num ber. Tax rate, per $1,000. Assessed valuation of property. State. ( d) $5.00 2.50 .70 1.70 2.89 (<*) 4.80 2.89 6.00 2.43 3.59 (•) 4.25 1.60 1.65 2.97 2.50 2.83 1.03 4.10 2.89 2.89 .35 1.03 (ll) .25 2.50 7.38 6.01 3.50 («j 1.20 .51 10.96 3.34 County. («) $5.90 .90 3.51 £4.85 (•) 3.82 2.00 i.5 i 2.87 5.46 5.32 2.70 2.92 3.73 3.60 4.75 2.35 13.00 4.16 1.50 5.85 .78 2.42 (ll) 1.17 4.00 17.20 7.99 4.80 7.50 (*) 4.90 .93 3.54 6.06 City. Other. Total. (/) (?) *$52.61 $16.10 *$25.61 /18.50 /18.60 *4.40 19.50 12.60 *2.77 14.90 10.53 t»13.18 nl9.85 4.97 ©8.90 26.70 11.40 r. 73 23.72 18.14 15.56 U 0.76 24.82 13.78 «4.33 10I 7 .OO 15.00 id. 00 22.00 29.00 *6.04 19.64 9.66 13.33 12.67 22.46 *>*>15.00 *>*>15.00 £15.94 21.40 cc21.07 <**1.61 28.00 11.70 *3.30 21.95 16.52 ec8.82 29.86 9.75 //4 .6 0 16.00 7.50 ££5.30 19.50 11.00 **13.30 30.40 15.43 *3.89 26.90 //15.66 **19.04 mm32.40 15.30 *7.65 30.40 15.70 13.50 r m Z . 80 00 I 8 . 8O *6.60 28.50 13.16 15.27 16.40 24.76 21.30 9.75 *3.00 12.75 (ll) (ll) 25.00 16.78 18.20 29.50 15.00 18.00 58.58 27.50 16.50 rr26.50 ££12.50 (KU) (88 ) **6.70 13.40 tw16.50 mw37.40 18.60 a»18.60 21.00 14.90 16.90 **.76 14.70 28.00 7.00 aaa6.50 *2.10 24.00 12.50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 aoNot including $1,395,061 gross receipts of street railways taxed at the rate of 4 per cent. *>*>City rate; agricultural rate, $10; gross receipts street railways, $40. cc Including city schools, e s t a t e schools. ee School, $6.59; State university, $2.23. //In terest and sinking fund. o o School, $5.10; township, $0.20. h h School, $10; park district, $3; township, $0.30. a Including $4,339,436 franchises. //E x ce p t wards 15 and 16, where rate varies from $12.93 to $15.34. fcfcExcept wards 15 and 16, where rate varies from $16.31 to $18.72. l*Not reported. m m Not including district school tax rate of from $6 to $25. nwSchool, $3; county road, $0.50; sewer, $0.30. ooNot including ward school tax of from $0.60 to $5.60, and State tax of $4 on mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. jpp Including $3,146,100 franchises. m City proper; annexed districts, $10 and $10.30. rr city proper; annexed districts, $24 and $24.30. 8 8 $18.50 in 8 wards; $13.40 in 3 wards; $12.10 in 11 wards. t t School, $2.20; special sewer, $2.50; special street improvement, $2. « m$33.50 in 8 wards; $28.40 in 3 wards; $27.10 in 11 wards. vv School, $13; poor, $3.50. «no Not including State tax of $4 on mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. xx Including State and county. w Including $1,780,030 franchises. ** Metropolitan sewer. aaa School, $2.90; park, $0.20; library, $0.40; road, $1.50; port of Portland, $1.50. 986 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. T able X IX .—BASIS OP ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OP PROPERTY, AND TAXA TION—Continued. Assessment of property. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Legal basis, per Basis in practice, per cent of full value. cent of full value. Real. 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 67 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Grand Rapids, M ich....................................................... Dayton, Ohio................................................................... Richmond, V a................................................................. Nashville, T e n n .............................................................. Seattle, Wash................................................................... Hartford, Conn............................................................... Reading, P a.................................................................... Wilmington, D e l............................................................ Camden, N. J ................................................................... Trenton, N. J ................................................................... Bridgeport, Conn............................................................ Lynn, Mass...................................................................... Oakland, C al............................................... *.................. Lawrence, Mass.............................................................. New Bedford, Mass..............; ......................................... Des Moines, Iow a.. : ....................................................... Springfield, Mass............................................................ Somerville, Mass............................................................ Troy, N. Y ........................................................................ Hoboken, N. J ................................................................. Evansville, In d ............................................................... Manchester, N. H ............................................................ Utica, N . Y ...................................................................... Peoria, 111........................................................................ Charleston, S. C .............................................................. Savannah, G a ................................................................. Salt Lake Citv, Utah....................................................... San Antonio, T e x ........................................................... Duluth, Minn................................................................. Erie, P a ........................................................................... Elizabeth, N. J .............................................................. Wilkesbarre, P a ............................................................ Kansas City, K ans......................................................... Harrisburg, Pa................................................................ Portland, M e ................................................................. Yonkers, N. Y ................................................................ Norfolk, V a .................................................................... Waterbury, C on n .......................................................... Holyoke, Mass................................................................ Fort Wayne, Ind............................................................ Youngstown, O h io......................................................... Houston, l e x ................................................................. Covington K y................................................................ Akron, O h io................................................................... Dallas, T e x ..................................................................... Saginaw, M ich............................................................... Lancaster, PaJ................................................................. Lincoln, N e b r............................................................... Brockton, Mass.............................................................. Binghamton, N. Y ......................................................... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 70 100 20 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 80 33j 100 100 100 100 33* 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 100 100 100 Personal. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 (J) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 70 100 20 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 80 33i 100 100 100 100 331 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 100 100 100 Real. 100 65 75 80 60 75 100 100 100 66f 100 100 60 80 100 25 90 100 100 70 100 70 80 10 50 75 70 66f 60 75 100 50 331 66f 100 70 66| 331 100 70 40 664 66f 60 50 100 75 75 100 100 Personal. 100 65 100 80 60 75 100 (J) 100 50 100 100 60 80 100 25 100 100 100 50 100 70 80 10 50 75 70 66f 60 75 100 50 331 66f 100 70 66f 331 100 70 100 66| 66f 60 50 100 75 50 100 100 School. Not including $14.73 tax on bank stock. School, $2.50; turnpike, $1; interest and sinking fund, $1. dOld limits, $11; new limits, $10. e Old limits, $31; new limits, $30. / City rate; agricultural rate, $6; not including school district tax rate of from $1.75 to $5. firSinking fund. h Not reported. ^Not including State tax of $4 on mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. iN ot assessed. le Included in city. 1 Including State and county. m City proper; annexed districts, $10 and $10.83. n City proper; annexed districts, $22.50 and $23.33. o Park. pN ot including school tax, which varies in different districts from $18.60 to $33.60, not including rural districts. q Metropolitan sewer. r Including $1,179,100 franchises. s Varies in different districts from $12.30 to $18.58, including schools. t Varies indifferent districts from $17.56 to $23.84, including schools. wNew city, $14.20; old city, $15.90. «New city, $21.20; old city, $22.90. w School, $4.60; poor, $0.30 to $1.20. «From $27.50 to $28.40. v Including $964,350 franchises. * Including county. a b 0 987 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X IX .—BASIS OF ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND TAXATION—Continued. Assessed valuation of property. Real. $41,494,010 33,911,100 42,608,869 29,982,740 35,236,279 52,831,862 (*) 43,784,990 26,552,660 27,448,537 56,183,524 42,638,505 37,979,854 31,469,325 36,170,900 11,213,950 57,394,710 48,721,800 r 49,958,227 26,089,800 18,959,110 26,847,180 1/28,019,268 9,247,975 12,397,928 28,162,084 24,909,749 24,361,460 20,626,465 (*) 16,150,555 Personal. $18,462,719 11,453,200 28,508,738 8,803,100 7,744,645 7,021,954 (h ) 2,101,550 6,253,729 7,053,447 9,529,510 6,244,314 9,185,433 28,341,091 2,966,900 16,944,217 5,202,400 6,966,372 2,132,600 7,387,080 4,796,332 4,735,324 3,142,742 5,111,973 11,429,128 8,782,569 6,401,545 4,343,844 2,^038,342 (h) 8,514,390 27,000,000 31,981,350 35,124,400 24,861,200 (*) 29,658,610 18,482,865 13,948,220 21,698,215 17,512,825 14,493,770 17,448,625 12,911,800 00 3,^029,110 1,309,155 14,233,210 3,086,830 3,130,880 00 10,293,320 5,632,625 5,265,170 5,836,056 6,192,725 5,930,910 6,636,275 8,768,928 Total. $59,956,729 45,364,300 71,117,607 38,785,840 42,980,924 59,853,816 43,942,981 43,784,990 28,654,210 33,702,266 63,236,971 52,168,015 44,224,168 40,654,758 64,511,991 14,180,850 74,338,927 53,924,200 56,924,599 28,222,400 26,346,190 31,643,512 32,754,592 12,390,717 17,509,901 39,591,212 33,692,318 30,763,005 24,970,309 19,657,488 18,188,897 18,137,409 M il, 543,500 28,309,155 46,214,560 38,211,230 27,992,080 12,800,287 39,951,930 24,115,490 19,213,390 27,634,271 23,705,550 20,424,680 23,984,900 21,680,728 17,018,459 20,139,854 28,680,853 19,208,203 Mar ginal num ber. Tax rate, per $1,000. State. $2.56 2.89 4.00 3.50 7.87 i.60 1.61 (fc) .30 4.98 (*) .56 2.90 .41 .25 1.21 1.60 2.97 .09 ^7.60 5.00 5.00 5.44 8.00 3.47 2.83 2.71 5.88 (fc) 2.10 4.00 .31 2.97 2.89 3.43 4.75 2.89 3.47 2.76 County. $1.17 4.56 3.00 6.63 2.50 8.00 5.00 6.38 (fc) .43 7.52 <*) 1.42 9.20 .73 .70 4.05 5.40 6.83 .13 (aa) 10.00 1.50 3.25 7.20 6.03 3.07 2.50 5.53 4.75 8.92 4.00 (*) 3 .3 3 .70 4.73 6.91 6.00 6.00 3.91 4.60 2.43 3.50 17.60 1.05 w7.80 City. $7.54 11.00 14.00 15.00 (<*) /16.50 8.00 11.00 7.20 13.51 *13.90 17.07 m 11.70 1 15.60 15.42 37.30 12.86 14.18 Other. Total. a $6.05 <*8.35 b $17.32 c4.50 <*5.50 91.00 <*4.00 <*4.00 a 5.80 04.00 9.77 ( s) (u) (to) 12.80 19.58 17.45 24.00 bb 41.20 30.00 a 4.00 a 4.31 14.50 8.50 cc 8.50 14.70 <**2.50 18.00 <*6.00 13.50 e e S . O O 21.36 11.00 'ff 9.00 13.00 a 15.50 «6 .00 7.00 *18.00 12.69 05.59 **16.00 5 5 1.00 25.00 o l5 .00 15.19 10.0 0 H 4.10 10.40 mmlO. 20 20.00 03.25 16.75 10.40 a7.60 (0 0 ) ol.5 0 m (r r ) 26.80 18.00 26.00 («) /17.50 ^14.50 23.00 19.60 21.50 13.90 17.80 n 24.20 15.60 17.40 JP53.40 14.00 15.90 (*) («0 (x ) 19.80 25.05 80.20 40.50 27.50 32.20 26.70 29.90 *24.00 29.60 *24.75 43.30 *17.00 18.00 23.71 **21.00 40.00 16.20 21.80 30.40 29.43 30.75 24.80 (» ) (ss) (h) *17.50 o5.00 9.00 55.10 10.00 a 20.00 4,^119,504 16,020,350 7.50 tt .85 20.70 18.26 24,856,105 3,824,748 .54 (uw) 23.00 15.20 1,380,600 17,827,603 a a in eluded in State. bb School, $27.50: township, $1.70; town railroad, $0.30; bridge, $6; park, $5.70. c o School, $7.40; township, $1.10. <*<*School, $2; railroad subsidy, $0.50. e e School, $7.48; library, $0.52. f f School, $6.50; poor, $2.50. 00 Not including $766,500 railroad property, real and personal. h h Not including $766,500 railroad property. ** Except Atlantic City Ward, $12. 5 5 School, $0.50; sidewalk, $0.50; except Brambleton ward. k k city proper; Atlantic City Ward, $17; Brambleton Ward, $20. I I School, $3.70; township, $0.40. m m School, $9; township, $1.20. mmNot including sewer tax, which varies in different districts from $0.50 to $3 on assessed value property fronting the sewer laid. o o East Dallas, $14.50; old city, $15. l?pEast Dallas, $24.07; old city, $24.57. 3a East district, $8.86; west district, $11.01. ™*Road, $0.91; school, east district $5.73, west district $5.21. ss East district, $20,69; west district, $22.32. t t Overlay tax, $0.25; grade crossing, etc.,$0.60. tmIncluded in county. v o Including State. 91 92 93 of 988 BULLETIN OB' THE DEPARTMENT OB' LABOR. T able X IX .—BASIS OF ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PKOPERTY, AND TAXATION—Concluded. Assessment of property. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Legal basis, per Basis in practice,per cent of full value. cent of full value. Real. 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 116 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Augusta, Ga.................................................................... Pawtucket, R. I .............................................................. Altoona, P a .................................................................... Wheeling, W. V a............................................................ Mobile, A l a .................................................................... Birmingham, A l a .......................................................... Little Rock, A r k ............................................................ Springfield, Ohio............................................................ Galveston, T ex............................................................... Tacoma, W ash............................................................... Haverhill, Mass.............................................................. Spokane, Wash .............................................................. Terre Haute, I n d ............................................................ Dubuque, Iow a............................................................... Quincy, 111........................................................................ South Bend, Ind.............................................................. Salem, M ass.................................................................... Johnstown, Pa................................................................. Elmira, N .Y .................................................................... Allentown, P a ................................................................. Davenport, I o w a ............................................................ McKeesport, Pa............................................................... Springfield, 111................................................................. Chelsea, Mass................................................................... Chester, P a ...................................................................... York, Pa........................................................................... Malden, Mass................................................................... Topeka, Kans...................................... ........................... Newton. Mass................................................................... Sioux City, Iowa.............................................................. Bayonne, N. J ................................................................... Knoxville, Tenn.............................................................. Schenectady, N. Y .......................................................... Fitchburg, M ass.............................................................. Superior, W is................................................................... Rockford, 111.................................................................... Taunton, Mass................................................................. Canton, O h io.......... ....................................................... Butte, M o n t............ 7...................................................... Montgomery, Ala............................................................ Auburn, N. Y ................................................................... Chattanooga, T en n ......................................................... East St. Louis, 111............................................................ Joliet, 111......................................................................... 100 100 100 100 100 (e) (6) 60 («) 100 100 100 100 (mJoo 100 100 100 100 100 (r) 100 20 100 100 100 100 100 100 25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 20 100 Personal. 100 100 100 100 100 («) (e ) ' 100 (<0 100 100 100 100 (m) 100 100 100 100 100 100 (r) 100 20 100 («) 100 100 100 100 25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 20 100 Real. 75 100 75 66f 50 60 50 60 66§ •80 100 60 66f (*) 20 66| 100 66f 100 80 (r) 66f 20 100 66 75 100 331 100 25 66 60 80 100 60 20 100 60 60 66f 100 65 20 20 a School. &Not reported. cNot including State tax of $4 on mortgages, securities, stocks, bonds, etc. d School, $2; special, $7.60; Confederate relief, $1. eNo legal basis. /S chool, $1.50; Confederate relief, $1. 0 School, $6.25; township, $0.49. h First district, $14; second district, $12.20. 1 First district, $34.87; second district, $33.07. i Included in city. fc Including State and county. * School, $6.70; township, $0.20. mFor city tax, 100; county, 25. * City, 66f to 75. o School, $16.40; interest, $8.40; sinking fund, $10. p School, $6.40; poor, $0.20; library, $0.20. q Including $692,570 franchises. rFor city tax, 50; county, 25. Personal. 100 100 75 100 50 60 50 100 66f 80 100 60 66f (W)on 20 66f 100 66| 100 80 (r) 66f 20 100 <M) 75 100 331 100 25 10 60 100 100 60 20 100 60 60 m 100 65 20 20 989 STATISTICS OF CITIES. Table X IX .—BASIS OF ASSESSMENT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND TAXA TION—Concluded. Assessed valuation of property. Real. Personal. $13,709,383 29,732,240 (b ) 18,210,498 11,456,339 (*) 12,383,171 11,940,020 17,858,446 16,965,840 20,726,799 17,766,606 15,360,730 16,581,693 8,673,691 10,510,650 19,042,100 13,813,000 0 16,638,053 21,876,940 9,662,695 15,955,346 4,713,392 21,312,050 14,939,104 17,153,766 24,108,000 w 7,917,530 46,213,300 4,517,565 13,817,102 (b ) z 12,081,909 19,056,250 13,565,589 4,411,097 15,388,005 8,922,260 (b ) 9,288,070 //1 3 ,060,466 (b ) 4,644,814 2,853,523 $6,219,084 5,710,660 (b ) 6,148,484 5,005,584 ( b) 7,260,185 6,105,266 3,568,974 4,612,432 5,588,003 2,849,523 5,559,956 7,192,540 1,965,837 5,975,580 9,106,643 250,000 604,900 64,235 7,731,910 1,983,919 1,951,979 2,198,720 8i6,685 3,338,600 to 1,882,405 13,142,780 1,330,539 885,019 (*>) 1,826,476 4,977,239 1,919,794 1,754,887 6,917,175 3,772,120 ( b) 3,391,930 1,041,249 (b ) 769,105 967,500 Total. $19,928,467 35,442,900 17,350,000 24,358,982 16,461,923 17,695,690 19,643,356 18,045,286 21,427,420 21,578,272 26,314,802 20,616,129 20,920,685 23,774,233 6,629,528 16,486,230 28,148,743 14,063,000 17,242,953 21,941,175 17,394,605 17,939,265 6,665,371 23,610,770 14,939,104 17,970,451 27,446,600 *9,799,935 59,356,080 5,848,104 14,702,121 12,089,278 13,908,385 24,033,489 15,485,383 6,165,984 21,305,180 12,694,380 19,601,560 12,680,000 14,101,715 13,679,570 5,403,919 3,821,023 Mar ginal num ber. Tax rate, per $1,000. State. County. $5.44 1.80 $4.60 3.60 5.50 5.50 5.75 2.89 3.47 8.67 4.50 6.00 4.50 4.50 9.25 3.62 7.50 7.20 (J) 8.25 1.87 3.20 5.00 2.97 .27 .50 2.50 3.70 5.00 1.76 .27 5.20 .58 2.90 1.64 3.50 (<*<*) 1.13 2.60 5.00 .55 2.89 2.50 5.50 1.18 3.50 5.00 5.00 (J) 6.75 4.83 9.80 7.50 3.23 .54 3.00 4.50 4.00 6.80 4.00 7.50 3.50 4.75 .72 10.30 1.05 15.10 5.40 2.70 666.80 .63 10.20 6.30 2.00 6.01 5.00 5.00 7.82 5.50 7.50 5.00 City. Other. $12.50 <*$2.65 14.70 7.50 <*6.00 6.00 <*4.40 6.00 <*10.50 10.00 /2.50 6.00 <*5.00 06.74 9.85 15.00 <*2.00 <*5.00 (*) *17.40 13.00 <*7.00 10.80 *6.90 10.50 <*13.00 20.50 o 34.80 12.50 1*6.80 17.19 6.00 <*7.00 16.30 3.79 <*5.66 14.50 a 17.00 8.60 *9.50 20.00 *36.52 11.45 - <*4.60 10.00 <*6.00 7.00 <*5.00 9.80 *>6.61 17.00 016.50 15.17 31.70 023.30 19.76 13.00 06.60 13.20 17.44 13.14 o8.76 16.60 c c 22.66 15.85 12.00 <«8.40 12.00 06.50 11.25 **2.00 15.11 14.50 03.50 26.80 0033.30 29.00 * * 3 8 . 5 0 Total. $25.19 16.50 cl8 .00 18.90 26.50 22.50 26.00 23.10 27.97 (<) 17.40 35.00 24.40 36.50 67.80 25.50 18.00 o l6 .00 21.30 ol5.29 42.00 o22.00 69.02 17.80 ol9.50 016.75 17.30 48.00 16.80 73.00 26.80 25.80 20.00 19.20 34.70 50.56 18.40 29.30 26.00 23.75 24.11 27.00 72.60 77.50 s School, $4.80; sinking fund, $2.95; railroad, $1.75. t Including school, $18.70; park, $4.70; court-house, $1.50. «N ot assessed. v School, $5.75; metropolitan sewer, $0.76. wNot including $374,230 railroad property, real and personal. a Not including $374,230 railroad property. v School, $3; interest. $1; industrial school, $0.60; road, $1.50; sinking fund, $0.50. * Including $240,760 franchises. aa Included in county. V b Including State. c o School, $16.50; library, $1.16; road and bridge, $5. d d School, $8; township, $0.20; poor, $0.20. e e School, $1; Confederate relief, $1. / / Including $400,511 franchises. o o School, $26.80; interest, $6.50. h h School, $26; township, $6.50; road and bridge, $6. 93.98— N o. 42— 02------ 8 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (1). Actual income for fiscal year. araal im - Cities. er. 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Property tax. Fran chise tax. Liquor licenses. cen^ Trust Fines Fran Special funds, and chise assess interest, fees. grants. ments. and divi dends. $ $ * * % % f 5,048,788 4,151,709 New York, N. Y ......... 76,886,091 2,364,636 5,557,593 592,587 671,337 499,190 2,787,633 Chicago, 111............... 18,404,033 151,013 3,213,298 607,461 293,550 276,893 Philadelphia, P a ....... 18,317,731 291,696 1,742,175 355,539 558,710 St. Louis, M o.............. 6,480,602 205,109 1,051,969 655,175 280,104 415,720 124,249 Boston, M ass.............. 17,074,057 133,946 412,913 58,213 1,437,281 a 48,524 6245,362 Baltimore, M d ............ 5,857,230 304,159 408,798 79,467 121,503 36,432 77,437 601,028 Cleveland, Ohio......... 3,424,381 968,610 289,070 74,632 442.155 16,895 98,895 Buffalo, N. Y .............. 4,371,239 696,178 51,574 566,955 38,318 10,849 San Francisco, C a l. . . 7,695,559 3,295 9,463 266,557 193,843 182,734 Cincinnati, O h io....... 4,047,775 446,366 400,740 335,916 35,246 Pittsburg, P a.............. 5,051,954 988,732 778,767 515,723 100,037 45,677 New Orleans, L a ....... c3,359,393 1,127 15,708 151,500 269,547 67,451 Detroit, M ich.............. 3,876,175 119,121 337,916 28,125 273,889 16,520 26,317 Milwaukee, Wis......... 2,868,184 115,913 351,710 30,317 31,762 435,648 18,731 Washington, D. C ___ 2,958,719 118,300 239,493 106,385 30,132 Newark, N. J ............. 3,364,549 549,534 7,929 117,836 82,589 325,165 21,612 Jersey City, N. J ......... 2,473,112 267,832 7,382 34,937 111,404 2,328 253,079 Louisville, K y .......... 2,142,866 165,000 136,565 136,199 684 10,250 209,073 Minneapolis, M inn... 2,770,618 29,612 6,864 3,925 351.000 28,912 66,042 Providence, R. I ....... 3,049,578 117,509 d 120,826 52,307 33,743 110,170 55,261 Indianapolis, I n d ___ 1,482,142 537,649 57,045 177,988 67,014 12,686 Kansas City, M o......... 1,873,327 715,262 28,721 18,389 119,966 152,879 38,741 8t. Paul, M in n .......... 1,499,857 411,318 120,264 1,810 314.000 42,166 22,659 Rochester, N. Y ......... e2,008,750 81,421 9,882 690,539 1.692 6,553 182,751 (A Denver, C olo.............. 1,379,568 6,643 18,000 810,962 214,685 93,226 7,190 Toledo, O h io .............. 1,320,779 267,781 8,603 125,260 117.156 23,740 Allegheny, Pa............ 1,583,083 12,782 18,787 181,512 27,024 30,391 17,192 109,045 Columbus, Ohio......... 1,265,632 433,369 32,530 8,296 86,291 8,513 12,921 Worcester, Mass......... 1,958,941 8,474 171,364 31,654 137.000 65,880 375,750 Syracuse, N. Y ............ c2,402,783 413 31,275 67,408 6.693 14,872 133,660 (/> New Haven, Conn___ 1,443,567 26,308 7,684 150,288 14,171 19,413 Paterson, N. J ............ 1,199,467 51,702 385 4,447 128,230 11,140 8,572 3,091 Fall River, Mass......... 1,398,607 3,974 12,789 157,832 a Including $276 income of county. *>Including $144,659 income of county. « Including tax for school district extending beyond city limits. d For 7 months only. e Including income from franchise tax. / Included in income from property tax. 991 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (2). Actual income for fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. 1 Cities. Water works. Gas works. Elec Docks Ferries tricand and light bridges. wharves. plants. 62,571,584 6780,949 6309,520 4,874 14,874 10,439 38,138 30,828 65,182 1,325 245,182 84,999 614,683 69,396 36,063 432 2,276 27,605 35,765 51,672 New York, N . Y ......... $8,050,900 2 Chicago, 111................. 3,399,030 3 Philadelphia, P a ....... 3.290.565 a 6426,842 4 St. Louis, Mo............... 1.756.566 5 Boston, M ass.............. 2,252,780 6 Baltimore, Md............ 967,262 7 Cleveland, O hio......... 784,475 8 Buffalo, N .Y ............... 685,370 9 San Francisco, C a l. . . 10 Cincinnati, O h io ....... 832,218 11 Pittsburg, P a .............. 863,057 12 New Orleans, L a ....... 13 Detroit, M ich.............. &187,924 14 Milwaukee, W is......... 401,297 15 Washington, D .C ....... 440,276 16 Newark, N .J .............. 810,821 17 Jersey C ity,N ,J......... 913,544 18 Louisville, K y ............ 389,655 19 Minneapolis, M inn. . . 251,121 20 Providence^ R. I ......... 614,989 21 Indianapolis, I n d ___ 2,059 22 Kansas City, M o......... 494,468 301,938 23 St. Paul, M inn............ 24 Rochester, N .Y .......... 407,251 25 Denver, Colo............... 26 Toledo, O h io .............. 173.888 2,169 27 Allegheny, P a ............ 245,717 28 Columbus, O h io......... 195,050 29 Worcester, Mass......... 281.889 30 Syracuse, N. Y ............ 253,632 31 New Haven, Conn___ 32 Paterson, N .J............. 33 Fall River, Mass......... 1.68,034 a income from lease. Mar kets. Bath houses and Ceme bath ing teries. pools and beach es. 2,960 16,234 16,667 66,602 1,000 3,474 6,073 2,165 336 185 15 1,000 19,492 30,311 2,829 9,572 6,334 22,832 12,713 2,989 i, 268 b 1,478 17,476 42,342 3,227 229 4,225 15,260 200 12,689 51,536 193,616 8,459 67,684 2,906 For 6 months only. 24,977 219 41,119 9,850 24,823 12 ii,689 483 992 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Table X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (3). Actual income for fiscal year. Loans. Mar gin al num ber. Cities. Other. Total. Cash on hand at begin ning of fiscal year. Long term bonds (2 years or over). Tempo rary loans and short term bonds (less than 2 years). Total. Total re ceipts for fiscal year. $ 3 $ $ $ $ 1 New York. N .Y ... oil, 754,902 «118,740,596 611,416,077 42,694,313 76,333,100 119,027,413 c249,184,086 Chicago, 111.......... 1,189,467 30,841,316 6,228,625 500,000 5,745,336 6,245,336 43,315,277 3 Philadelphia, P a . d 1,730,761 d 26,762,596 11,400,088 9,025,000 1,200,000 10,225,000 d 48,387,684 4 St. Louis, M o........ 17,043,757 1,339,868 12,405,372 4,638,385 5 Boston, M ass....... «11.341,047 / 33.357,996 9 3,245,381 5,971,200 6,500,000 12,471,200 ft49,074,577 6 Baltimore, Md___ 210,000 *10,227,940 *381,361 *8,933,042 1,084,898 210,000 7 Cleveland, O hio.. 806,510 2,074,362 J13,809,910 J903,418 17,068,609 4,666,939 1,267,852 8 Buffalo, N . Y ....... 1,828,795 fc9,592,036 fc521,839 fc6,993,994 769,247 (0 (0 9 San Francisco, Cal m l, 222,947 m 9,574,398 n823,974 010,398,372 10 Cincinnati, Ohio . 2,376,789 1,475,998 11,355,612 8,491,699 1,387,915 1,475,998 11 Pittsburg, P a ....... 321,232 P 16,780,214 597,514 321,232 9,009,231 P 7,449,751 12 New Orleans, L a.. 145,141 3,614,641 9.9,544,183 457.005 a 4,533,492 1,396,050 3,469,500 15,000 285,259 *7,617,574 13 Detroit, M ich....... r 572,737 *•5,455,950 81,876,365 270,259 14 Milwaukee, W is.. . 934,926 6,653,722 14,181 934,926 4,267,743 451,053 220,183 w 10,669,221 15 Washington, D. C . u 4,772,604 «8,686,612 v 1,662,426 220,183 16 Newark, N . J ....... x 877,003 x 6,199,945 176,415 1,231,302 4,842,000 6,073,302 x 12,449,662 17 Jersey City, N.J .. 635,453 1,823,934 «« 7,257,365 V 670,886 1/4,738,729 z 694,702 1,188,481 217.000 18 Louisville, K y ___ 855.000 P 4,605,324 638,000 218,813 3,424,550 P325,774 19 Minneapolis,Minn 66181,913 663,690,007 290.000 *>54,580,645 290.000 600,638 20 Providence, R. I .. 5,560,472 658,461 1,048,461 390,000 140.833 ’ 4,320,408 191,603 21 Indianapolis, Ind. 3,321,845 235,053 828,160 66,219 2,422,294 693,107 71.391 22 Kansas City, M o.. 352,230 3,824,513 c c 883,190 164,081 164,081 3 d 5,789,478 4,603,532 23 St: Paul, Minn . . . 1,296,500 1,296,500 2,837,308 120,467 469,724 24 Rochester, N .Y ... ee 332,220 ee 3,762,178 f f l , 104,525 34.000 3,517,000 8.551.000 9 9 8,417,703 76,954 ftft 3,104,851 25 Denver, C o lo ....... 954 2,660,851 ftft 368,046 75.000 121.005 26 Toledo, O h io ....... 75,000 831,189 **3,383,448 **89,295 **2,144,855 407,404 756,189 27 Allegheny, P a ___ JJ 155,424 JJ 2,413,336 1,495,663 JJ 4,169,177 260,178 1,495,663 28 Columbus, O h io .. 303,916 624,816 2,854,041 121,064 51,846 320,900 2,177,379 29 Worcester, Mass.. 4,871,465 924,937 1,191,937 328,121 295,632 267,000 3,383,896 Me 6,753,797 30 Syracuse, N. Y ___ 3,061,662 M e 142,256 147,442 899,500 2,650,379 3,549,879 1.255.000 1.255.000 **3,299,205 31 New Haven,Conn. ** 78,412 **1,739,843 304,362 32 Paterson, N . J ___ 3,720,454 1,607,062 209,632 74.392 150,000 1.889.000 2.039.000 2,752,724 500,400 33 Fall River, Mass.. 809,909 1,832,147 66,291 110,668 309,509 a Including $1,285,821 received from State for schools. b Including $4,863,459 cash in sinking fund. c Including $1,285,821 received from State for schools and $4,863,459 cash in sinking fund. d Including $888,813 received from State for schools. « Including $88,979 received from county. /In clu d in g $233,814 received from county. (/Including cash in county treasury. ftIncluding $233,814 received from county and cash in county treasury. * Including $303,335 received from State for schools. J Including $154,357 received from State for schools, fc Including $162,978 received from State for schools. * Not reported. m Including $316,715 collected for State. « Including $167,669 cash in sinking fund and $6,625 cash in State fund. o Including $167,669 cash in sinking fund and $323,340 State funds. p Including cash in sinking fund. a Including tax for school district extending beyond city limits. r Including $163,847 received from State for schools. « Including $822,787 cash in sinking fund. * Including $163,847 received from State for schools and $822,787 cash in sinking fund. « Including $4,427,068 appropriated from funds of U. S. Treasury as explained on pages 903 and 904. v Including $348,756 trust funds. w Including $348,756 trust funds and $4,427,068 appropriated from funds of United States Treasury. x Including $164,494 received from State for schools. v Including $241,626 received from State for schools and $16,671 received from county for elections. z Including $72,306 cash in sinking fund. a a Including $241,626 received from State for schools, $16,671 received from county for elections, and $72,306 cash in sinking fund. b b Including $116,922 received from State for schools. c o Including $143,301 cash in sinking fund. dd Including $917,694 special tax property sales and $143,301 cash in sinking fund e e Including $82,108 received from State for schools. //In clu d in g $637,200 cash in sinking fund. 9 9 Including $82,108 received from State for schools and $637,200 cash in sinking fund, ftft Including $191,899 cash in sinking fund. ** Iucluding $51,934 received from State for schools. JJ Including $88,687 received from State for schools, fcfcIncluding $23,326 cash in sinking fund. ** Including $59,768 received from State for schools. 1 2 993 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (1)—Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. Larnal lin er. Cities. 34 St. Joseph, M o......... 35 Omaha, Nebr.......... 36 Los Angeles, Cal— 37 Memphis, Tenn....... 38 Scranton, Pa............ 39 Lowell, Mass............ 40 Albany, N .Y ............ 41 Cambridge, Mass . . . 42 Portland, Oreg......... 43 Atlanta, G a.............. 44 Grand Rapids, Mich 45 Dayton, O h io.......... 46 Richmond, V a......... 47 Nashville, Tenn — 48 Seattle, Wash.......... 49 Hartford, C onn....... 50 Reading, P a ............ 51 Wilmington, Del— 52 Camden, N. J .......... 53 Trenton, N .J .......... 54 Bridgeport, Conn. . . 55 Lynn, Mass.............. 56 Oakland, C a l.......... 57 Lawrence, Mass — 58 New Bedford,Mass. 59 Des Moines, Io w a ... 60 Springfield, Mass . . . 61 Somerville, Mass . . . 62 T r o y ,N .Y ............... 63 Hoboken, N .J ......... 64 Evansville, In d ....... 65 Manchester, N. H . . . 66 Utica, N, Y. (« )......... Property tax. Other Fines and li censes. $848,313 $500 $149,663 $22,950 1,228,115 13,243 239,000 27,538 919,225.............. 140.688 48,939 (a) 574,785 856,631............. 606,741............. 165,551 3,421 1,364,963 15,659 166,600 11,877 ’1,348,684 (d) 141,946 5,049 1,641,311 83,998 46 4,922 476,755.............. 115,150 59,950 777,080 .............. 88,063 98,690 805,376.............. 45,277 13,101 881,156 350 68,823 2,562 1,047,188............. 18,125 40,945 510,978 5,104 (a) 6102,311 578,531 8,128 125,010 41,751 1,328,518 10,550 75,180 3,124 553,886 .............. 67,660 2,430 520,861............................. 16,076 711,495.............. 113,774 4,563 831,554.............. 104,000 1,925 783,902.............. 126,000 13,578 988,029.............. 112,782 5,024 503,606 141 81,200 15,179 659,379 6,601 158,609 2,659 979,133 5,001 85,732 2,629 823,266 5,863 63,490 14,100 1,082,913 9,349 100,709 5,751 914,327.............. 31 4,138 c746,510 (d) 107,783 646 633,332 13,955 90,500 6,576 704,491 4,075 20,445 9,148 754,831............................. 4,721 *527,579 (d) 83,348 326 Trust Fran Special funds, chise assess interest, grants. ments. and divi dends. $147,540 $17,596 175,631 4,973 19,892 $36,300 23,827 10,000 188,966 103,771 12,681 39,326 10,231 3,111 161,851 3,167 20,689 12,269 259,843 15,551 77,051 55,027 236,842 4,214i 349,667 6,088 5,788 4,! 17,679 1,000 515,081 56,379 36,066 6,988 17,601 4,108 31,151 5,675 4,879 114,737 6,546 28,817 1,686 20,375 14,402 5,301 18,511 6,475 3,200 6,613 10,614 1,620 19,145 35,446 6,936 33,979 5,452 52,343 260 6,093 4,813 42,683 3,260 55,079 195,644 6,620 a Included in income from other licenses. b Including income from liquor licenses. e Including income from franchise tax. d Included in income from property tax. e Data are for 11 months. $8,846 7,774 2,077 16,068 71,991 30,819 11,705 2,973 4,528 28,184 7,550 1,813 29,074 200 3,243 19 44,857 4,530 22,115 323 17,853 3,726 2,852 13,172 100 3,460 2,297 2,594 1,087 994 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (2)—Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Cities. St. Joseph, M o .............. Omaha^Nebr............... Los Angeles, Cal.......... Memphis, Tenn............ Scranton, P a ............... Lowell, M ass............... Albany, N. Y ............... Cambridge, Mass......... Portland, O reg ............ Atlanta, Ga................... Grand Rapids, M ich ... Dayton, O h io............... Richmond, V a.............. Nashville, T enn.......... Seattle, Wash............... Hartford, Conn............ Reading, P a ................. Wilmington, D e l......... Camden, N. J ............... Trenton, N. J ............... Bridgeport, Conn......... Lynn, Mass................... Oakland, C al............... Lawrence, Mass.......... New Bedford, Mass___ Des Moines, Io w a ....... Springfield, Mass......... Somerville, M ass......... Troy, N. Y .................... Hoboken, N. J .............. Evansville, Ind ............ Manchester, N. H ......... Utica, N. Y, ( « ) ............ Water works. Gas works. Elec Docks Ferries tricand and light wharves. bridges plants. Mar kets. Bath houses and Ceme bath ing teries. pools and beach es. $2,937 2,468 7,255 $5,434 $201,122 287,717 335,347 281,233 140,288 109,554 92,872 153,245 150,820 227,361 258,857 172,962 194,330 168,307 128,006 $8,557 2,988 1,000 $390 6,732 21,415 17,505 10,589 $217,714 199,829 108,487 118,191 237,827 200,499 173,464 173,142 83,923 138,206 a Data are for 11 months. 944 1,494 2 500 1,444 152 100 7,725 2,859 204 9,188 15,179 12,624 27 28 2,485 $1,778 4,795 18,574 19,535 5,141 4,131 17,467 1,489 4,675 11,479 8,707 1,063 995 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X .—RECEIPTS PROM ALL SOURCES (3)— Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. Loans. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Other. Total. Cash on hand at begin ning of fiscal year. Long term bonds (2 years or over). Tempo rary loans and short term bonds Total. Total re ceipts for fiscal year. than 2 years). 8149,416 a 81,812,069 8255,012 8149,416 St. Joseph, M o ___ a $209,296 a $1,407,641 395,802 52,639,076 395,802 693,962 61,790,236 453,038 Omaha, Nebr....... c 2,396,559 c 634,272 ©1,803,861 a 592,698 Los Angeles, Cal.. 250,000 1,683,007 189,717 “ 250,'556 Memphis, T e n n .. 76,392 1,243,290 152,511 h 1,518,037 152,511 Scranton, P a ....... / 985,592 g 379,934 / 77,359 i 142,607 i 2,032,933 i 98,376 256,100 8925,000 1,181,100 fc 3,312,409 Lowell, Mass....... 498,325 1 2,868,064 498,325 1 2,072,202 Albany, N. Y ....... 297,537 1 85,870 3,960,636 550.000 1,183,000 633.000 255,699 392,015 2,521,937 Cambridge, Mass. 42,000 n 1,872,115 42,000 Portland, Oreg. . . w 226,280 m 1,437,735 d392,380 625,012 0 2,268,932 175.000 209,885 * *450,*01.2 <>188,513 ol,434,035 Atlanta, Ga.......... Grand Rapids, 153,933 q 2,017,841 153,933 M ich ................. J) 136,093 P i, 403,947 d 459,961 304,375 d 2,627,360 142,427 161,948 1,517,056 d 805,929 86,573 45 Dayton, Ohio....... 1,722,545 120,448 93,862 1,602,097 46 Richmond, Y a___ 255.000 >•1,314,088 118,721 ” 255,’ 666 r 940,367 *•137,106 47 Nashville, Tenn.. 223.000 8 2,380,718 73,000 150.000 371,549 8 229,621 81,786,169 48 Seattle, Wash....... 334,673 v 2,396,742 u 215,238 1 95,615 1 1,846,831 334,673 49 Hartford, C onn... 150,163 w 1,286,010 246,402 “ i50,*i63 w 889,445 w 70,596 50 Reading, P a......... 355,854 *1,214,907 105,566 250,288 46,189 *812,864 51 Wilmington, D e l. * 3 9 ,3 8 0 106,500 222,576 V 1,471,786 116,076 157,207 52 Camden, N. J ....... 2/88,966 1/1,092,003 z 1,896,647 357,250 2,000 355,250 138,330 * 169,442 z 1,401,067 53 Trenton, N. J ....... 422,015 oa 1,581,057 407,715 14,300 128,456 54 Bridgeport, Conn. « * 7 1 ,8 2 1 oa 1,030,586 607,792 552,186,887 503,792 104.000 63,896 55 Lynn, Mass.......... 66 13 3,10 8 661,515,199 c c 982,191 65,502 56 Oakland, C al....... oo 305,798 oo 916,689 1,707,914 607,000 540,000 50.910 “ *67,'666 1,050,004 57 Lawrence, Mass.. 62,215 58 New Bedford, 1,238,000 2,687,479 1,238,000 50.911 1,398,568 164,419 81,500 dd 1,279,532 81,500 224,877 59 Des Moines, Iowa. ^ 29,132 da 973,155 663,929 2,684,186 465, 198,929 326,664 1,693,593 201,490 60 Springfield, Mass. 896,000 2,269,546 750, 146,000 103,859 1,269,687 111,161 61 Somerville, Mass. 626,694 1,833,958 445, 55,614 181,694 1,151,650 67,156 62 Troy, N. Y ............ 204,409 eel, 347,109 197,909 55,207 6 63 Hoboken, N. J ___ ee 154,407 eo 1,087,493 1,004,242 9,555 9, 95,701 898,986 13,211 64 Evansville, In d ... 1,361,992 240,709 240, 145,516 975,767 11,629 65 Manchester, N .H . 539,682! era 1,466,521 78,422 461, 46,900 9 9 65,335 9 9 879,939 66 Utica, N.Y. ( // ) .. a Including $198,506 received from State for schools. 5 including $42,415 received from State for schools. 0 Including $468,165 received from State and county for schools, d Including cash in sinking fund. e Including $468,165 received from State and county for schools, and cash in sinking fund. /In clu din g $69,879 received from State for schools. g Including $239,537 cash in sinking fund. h Including $69,879 received from State for schools, and $239,537 cash in sinking fund. 1 Including $122,451 received from State. /In clu din g $25,346 cash in sinking fund. fcIncluding $122,451 received from State and $25,346 cash in sinking fund. I Including $65,379 received from State for schools and charitable purposes m Including $176,298 received from State and county for schools n Including $176,298 received from State and county for schools, and cash in sinking fund. ©Including $41,530 received from State for schools. P Including $79,205 received from State for schools. « Including $79,205 received from State for schools, and cash in sinking fund. r Including $117,897 received from State and county lor schools, s Including $128,134 received from State for schools. t Including $37,645 received from State for schools. mIncluding $102,003 cash in sinking fund. , s v Including $37,645 received from State for schools and $102,003 cash in sinking fund. w Including $65,103 received from State for schools. * Including $22,516 received from State for schools. v Including $84,348 received from State for schools. z Including $95,717 received from State for schools. a a Including $39,249 received irom State for schools. b b Including $24,336 received from State. cc Including $255,713 received from State and county for schools. d d Including $23,069 received from county for schools, cc Including $98,589 received from State. //D a ta are for 11 months. g g including $26,101 received from State for schools. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 , BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Table X X .—RECEIPTS PROM ALL SOURCES (1)-Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. narinal lum Cities. 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Peoria, 111................. Charleston, S.C......... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah. San Antonio, Tex . . . Duluth, M in n .......... Erie, P a .................... . Elizabeth,N.J.......... Wilkesbarre, P a ....... Kansas City, Kans... Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, Me. ( c ) ___ Yonkers, N . Y .......... Norfolk, V a .............. Waterbury, Conn___ Holyoke, Mass.......... Fort Wayne, Ind....... Youngstown, Ohio .. Houston, T ex ............ Covington. K y .......... Akron, Ohio.............. Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ic h ......... Lancaster, Pa............ Lincoln, N e b r.......... Brockton, Mass......... Binghamton, N. Y . .. Augusta, G a .............. Pawtucket, R . I ....... Altoona, Pa............... W heeling,W .Va . . . . Mobile, Ala............... Birmingham, Ala . . . Little Rock, Ark....... Springfield, O h io___ Galveston, T e x ......... Tacoma, Wash.......... ber. Property tax. 3600,351 515,724 501,125 697,518 356,115 660,762 390,188 546,422 307,959 427,201 340,067 816,757 860,649 447,684 363,241 656,752 326,095 324,367 401,256 401,894 343,956 ^350,537 405,812 227,141 318,974 679,534 333,585 246,680 . 561,952 236,816 282,457 95,809 211,106 120,835 315,851 ft437,149 407,570 Fran chise tax. Liquor Other li licenses. censes. Trust Fines Fran Special funds, and chise assess interest, fees. grants. ments. and divi dends. 35,729 39,037 3112,417 89,537 7,658 48,617 107,752 6,746 96.475 48,390 16,402 31,000 101,137 («) 529,584 6,395| 500 143,649 167,000 11,631 19,6271 101,576 54.476 2,070 5,653 43,129 57,356 120,287 460 4,402 58,400 6,719 15,063 5,133 34,346 70,371 115,178 11,821 46,211 2,490 20,000 1,545 5,400 3,603 123,447 35,343 48,477 1,554 2,341 35,059 125,551 853 2,473 55,684 1,118 5,977 25,994 70,625 3,544 2,507 3,281 4,308 20,700 8,580 1,253 188,505 42,096 <*5,253 91,489 18,075 2,985 25^289 146,000 18,045 10,643 5,793 15,884 5,500 30.428 146 4,505 69,410 525,256 14,057 *3*625 32,706 (/) 32,877 2,491 4,205 4,726 31,004 5,851 1,584 500 42,000 3,352 2,289 48,839 '6,564 200 7,476 10,095 29,887 2,639 5,771 21,564 11,667 6,775 15,350 49,511 10,861 1,670 927,426 6,587 8,821 12,781 2,170 2,332 13,454 16,549 760 6,432 6,924 38,936 10,450 63,044 420 7,873 53,414 92,351 30,659 4,311 24,480 28,065 37,534 25,672 1,208 2,581 32,973 526,982 2,012 (/) ►,400 12,242 a Included in income from other licenses. 5 Including income from liquor licenses. oData are for 9 months. d Including income from fines and fees. 'In clud ing income from franchise tax. /In clu ded in income from property tax. 9 For 7 months only. ftIncluding income from special assessments. A 35,992 3,860 2,513 1,119 187 3,450 1,516 43,405 15,195 637 18,108 25,010 1,654 5,880 3,230 2,438 6,435 2,311 9,812 696 35,776 48,413 997 STATISTICS OF CITIES Table X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (2)—Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Cities. Peoria, 111.................... Charleston, S. C............ Savannah, G a .............. Salt Lake City, Utah .. San Antonio, T ex......... Duluth, M in n .............. Erie, P a ........................ Elizabeth, N. J.............. Wilkesbarre, P a .......... Kansas City, Kans....... Harrisburg, P a ............ Portland, Me. (a )........ Yonkers, N. Y .............. Norfolk, Va................... Waterbury, C onn......... Holyoke, Mass.............. Fort Wayne, I n d ......... Youngstown,Ohio . . . . Houston, T ex............... Covington. K y .............. Akron, O hio................. Dallas, Tex . _ Saginaw, M ic h ............ Tjfl.ncaster. Pa............... Lincoln, N ehr.............. Rrnckton, Mass............ "Binghamton, N. Y ....... Angnsfa, ft a ............... Pawtucket., R. T Altoona, Pa................... Wheeling, W. Y a ......... Mobile, Ala................... Birmingham Ala Little Rock, Ark. ppringfield, Ohio Galveston. T e x ....... Tacoma, Wash.............. Water works. Gas works. 4,160 $65,941 47 ii8 ,393 481 662 $2,000 131,773 130,109 122,044 96,255 62,378 77,461 882 79,188 191 84,271 46,689 92,700 42,127 81,ill 106,929 59,434 200,919 74.230 130,378 41,160 $3,101 13,996 $5,512 $93,370 "78; 934 127,756 135,390 Elec Docks Ferries Mar tricand and light wharves. bridges. kets. plants. Bath houses and bath Ceme ing teries. pools and beach es. $2,596 10,004 1,350 942 25 34,399 9,168 6,669 900 2,166 103,505 739 45,644 66,529 i,365 $80,485 128,460 a Data are for 9 months. 1,500 11,885 1,680 300 204 4,516 $1,200 7,187 11,455 3,494 2,358 6,746 1,433 390 8,485 9,559 • 4,693 3,360 2,342 441 8,509 140 1,165 1,544 998 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (B)—Continued. Actual income for fiscal year. Loans. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 67 68 69 70 Other. Total. Cash on hand at begin ning of fiscal •year. Long term bonds (2 years or over). Tempo rary loans and short term bonds (less than 2 years). Total. Total re ceipts for fiscal year. Peoria, 111....... $31,498 $851,698 $68,780 $20,700 $55,164 $75,864 $996,342 Charleston, S .C ... 25,218 641,238 29,350 670,588 Savannah, G a ___ 78,091 857,805 14,311 872,116 Salt Lake City, U tah ................. 98,394 1,055,446 215, 952. 16,216 1,287,614 16,216 71 San Antonio, Tex. a 76,907 0618,660 32, 858 300.000 99,453 399,453 a 1,050,971 72 Duluth, M in n ___ 183,055 1,341,208 5391, 190 149.000 8,120 157,120 *1,889,518 c 53,025 73 Erie, P a ............... 0686,972 55, 193 33,415 c 775,580 33,415 74 Elizabeth, N. J___ <*72,935 <*803,643 115, 311 153,944 <*1,072,898 129,444 24,500 75 Wilkesbarre, P a .. c437,834 e 43,431 /94, 393. 3,509 9 53o, 736 3,509 *21,986 76 Kansas City, Kans *672,557 223, 324 351,559 351,559 *1,247,440 77 Harrisburg, Pa . . . *598,278 i 57,780 i 82, 118 75,010 *755,406 75,010 78 Portland,Me. (? ) . m141,838 m l, 048,947 77, 607 . 250.000 250.000 ***1,376,554 79 Yonkers,N .Y . . . . «40,580 *1.231,785 214, 946 223,955 571,728 795,683 *<2,242,414 80 Norfolk, Y a ......... o247,609 o1,005,712 194, 217 905.000 160,087 1,065,087 <>2,265,016 81 Water bury, Conn. P 647,659 i>55,493 76, 890 435.000 50,000 485.000 P 1,209,549 82 Holyoke, Mass___ 945,770 83,488 182, 497 . 525.000 1,653,267 525.000 83 Fort Wayne, I n d . 705,005 3195, 837 94,940 54,458 54,458 3955,300 84 Youngstown,Ohio **564,636 **23,970 280, 475 280,510 33.000 313,510 **1,158,621 «710,272 s 104,782 85 Houston, T e x ___ 193, 749 375,000 52.000 427.000 sl,331,021 41,165 86 Covington, K y ---581,483 151, 714 . 161,840 161,840 895,037 1 100,336 87 Akron, Ohio......... *548,781 *<162, 595 122,741 50.000 172,741 v884,117 88 Dallas, T e x .......... *o571,597 *»61,145 w 706,952 123, 866. 11,489 11,489 *546,165 *35,794 89 Saginaw, Mich . . . 42, 810; 104,140 2,906 107,046 *696,021 90 Lancaster, P a ___ 0397,148 031,122 58, 062 . 0455,210 91 Lincoln, N ebr___ ^539,223 *69,687 61, 380, 60,325 60,325 ^650,928 92 Brockton, Mass.. . 891,622 100,710 34, 743 535.000 126,353 661,353 1,587,718 93 Binghamton,N. Y. o«44,336 oo550,146 56,658 179, 606 24,697 81,355 «a 811,107 94 Augusta-, G a ......... 75,747 482,860 18, 561 323.000 889,421 65,000 388,000 95 Pawtucket, R .I ... 5523,079 55854,793 2, 279 . 319,924 319,924 6*1,176,996 96 Altoona, Pa.......... 0373,544 025,864 57, 489 . o431,033 97 Wheeling, W. Y a . 582,377 3,371 c c 82,476 45, 630. c c S 2,476 oo710,483 98 Mobile, A la.......... 248,375 15,367 126,500 378,781 126,500 3, 906 99 Birmingham, Ala. 441,389 46,188 183, 792 100,000 725,181 100,000 100 221,186 Little Rock, Ark . 6,097 19, 142. 24,969 24,969 265,297 101 18,566 451,445 Springfield, O h io. 130, 335 77,000 121,040 779,820 198,040 102 Galveston, T e x .. . <*<*166,376 <*<*736,129 428, 840. <**1,164,969 103 Tacoma, Wash___ ee 107,191 oo932,825 //126, 723. 331,059,548 a Including $51,278 received from State for schools. 6Including $131,776 cash in sinking fund, c Including $37,792 received from State for schools. <*Including $53,789 received from State for schools, e Including $34,488 received from State for schools. /In clu d in g $5,832 cash in sinking fund. {/Including $34,488 received from State for schools and $5,832 cash in sinking fund, in c lu d in g $12,715 received from State and county for schools. i Including $39,081 received from State for schools. 3 Including $6,555 cash in sinking fund. fcIncluding $39,081 received from State for schools and $6,555 cash in sinking fund. l Data are for 9 months. *» Including $39,821 received from State for schools, n Including $19,291 received from State for schools. ©Including amount received from State for schools, p Including $27,243 received from State for schools and library, gIncluding cash in sinking fund. r Including $18,447 received from State for schools, sIncluding $73,255 received from State and county for schools. t Including $16,389 received from State for schools. **Including $55,570 cash in sinking fund. Including $16,389 received from State for schools and $55,570 cash in sinking fund. *oIncluding amount received from State and county for schools. ^Including $28,634 received from State for schools and library. 0 lncluding $29,573 received from State for schools. ^Including $18,687 received from State for schools. <*«Including $23,291 received from State for schools. 66 Including $11,202 received from State for schools, cc including $19,368 orders in transition. d d Including $88,449 received from State for schools, cc Including $79,354 received from State for schools. //In clu d in g $1,131 cash in sinking fund. 9 9 Including $79,354 received from State for schools and $1,131 cash in sinking fund. STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X .—RECEIPTS F R O M /L L SOURCES (1)—Concluded. Actual income for fiscal year. VLarinal um ber. 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Property tax. Haverhill, Mass ... 8475, 832 455, 441 Spokane, W ash___ 390, 821 Terre Haute, I n d .. 337, 318 Dubuque, Iowa___ 308, 367 Quincy, 111............ 291, 540 South Bend, Ind 847 520, Salem, Mass............... 178, 758 Johnstown, P a .......... 941 Elmira, N. Y .............. 196; 508 Allentown, P a .......... Davenport, I o w a ....... McKeesport, P a ......... 261, 276, Springfield, 111.......... 439, Chelsea, Mass............ 224,754 Chester, Pa................. “ 208 York, P a .................... 479, Malden, Mass............ 313, Topeka, K ans............ 1,008, Newton, Mass............ 243, Sioux City, Io w a ....... 433, Bayonne, N. J ............ 153, Knoxville, T e n n ....... Schenectady, N. Y .. . 11 492, Fitchburg, Mass......... 488, Superior, Wis.............. 250, Rockford, 111.............. 435, Taunton, Mass.......... 245, Canton, Ohio.............. Butte, M ont............... a 465, 144, Montgomery, A la ___ 227, Auburn, N. Y ............ Chattanooga, T enn ... 200, East St. Louis, 111.. 227, Joliet, XU............... 224, . Fran chise tax. 814,681 1,750 6,813 1,649 1,403 21,064 17,741 4,302 285 3,313 4,673 6,052 ioo 1,807 Liquor Other li licenses. censes. 867,400 58,300 40,924 42,136 63,941 13,600 17 21,450 36,760 30,994 62,738 29,200 75,297 84,251 9,781 803 2,176 1,832 2,624 1,012 18,802 4,461 6,738 7,987 9,001 8,365 3,140 i.8,258 2,016 13,790 9,012 20 579 6,859 27 2,642 48,841 3,227 37,640 2,811 13,000 30,684 37,483 1,281 3,331 65,861 4,836 48,466 3,327 344 50,462 342 22,210 60,997 43,931 17,408 67,700 432 27,822 16,800 23,283 83,069 30,501 105,000 4,905 Fines and Fran Special chise assess grants. ments. 85,000 29,815 3,836 5,606 1,703 2,623 3,148 6,002 2,181 3,258 15,313 6,469 9,010 3,641 4,451 522 1,586 11,278 4,036 25,572 84,102 4,816 5,262 4,454 2,768 8,152 3,625 1,256 2,738 17,615 10,558 1,234 4,772 1,426 252 a Including school district extending beyond city limits. 810,547 109,184 33,407 48,369 9,828 179,985 4,444 53,003 92,769 53,553 12,498 2,158 25,289 46,027 96,152 15,894 183,904 79,305 146,300 4,675 27,899 2,288 50,782 43,993 26,285 204,068 52,547 1000 BULLETIN OP THE DEPABTMENT OP LABOR. T able X X .—RECEIPTS PROM. ALL SOURCES (2)—Concluded. Actual income lor fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Haverhill, M ass___ Spokane, W ash....... . Terre Haute, I n d .... Dubuque, Io w a ....... Quincy, 111............... South Bend, Ind Salem, Mass............ . Johnstown, P a ....... . Elmira, N. Y .......... . Allentown, Pa.......... Davenport, Io w a __ McKeesport, P a ___ Springfield, 111....... Chelsea, Mass.......... . Chester, P a.............. York, Pa................... Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, K an s......... Newton. Mass......... Sioux City, Iowa Bayonne, N. J ......... Knoxville, Tenn Schenectady, N. Y . Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior. Wis.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, M ass....... Canton, Ohio.......... Butte, M ont............ Montgomery, A la ... Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, Tenn. East St. Louis, 111... Joliet, 111................. Water works. Gas works. Elec Docks Ferries Mar tricand and light wharves. bridges. kets. plants. Bath houses and Ceme bath ing teries. pools and beach- 612. 6103,567 129,422 7,641. 6174 31,168 62,987 82,235 375 275 6500 68,084 61,645 320 59,261 64,531 2,394. 222. 4,592. 11,918. 17,560. 682 100,090 6,335. 116,233 60,270 116,837 569 93,302 67,659 61,607 50,072 70,302 73,353 27,874 503. 8,369 4,575. 629,747 2,172 . 964 *3,*52i 3,058. 1,378. 1001 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X .—RECEIPTS FROM ALL SOURCES (3)—Concluded. Actual income lor fiscal year. Loans. Mar ginal num ber. 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Other. Haverhill, Mass Spokane, Wash. Terre Haute, Ind Dubuque, Iow a. Quincy, 111......... South Bend, Ind Salem, M ass___ Johnstown, P a .. Elmira, N .Y .... Allentown, P a.. Davenport, Iowa McKeesport, Pa. Springfield, 111.. Chelsea, Mass. Chester, P a ... York, Pa........ Malden, Mass. Topeka, Kans. Newton, Mass .. Sioux City, Iowa Bayonne, N.J .. Knoxville, Tenn Schenectady, N. Y Fitchburg, Mass Superior. W is ... Rockford,111 . . . Taunton, Mass.. Canton, O h io ... Butte, M o n t___ Montgomery, Ala Auburn, N. Y ___ Chattanooga,Tenn East St. Louis, 111 Joliet, 111............ <**$66,226 <*76,266 3,101 63,049 5,724 /2 3 ,355 *122,428 /43,778 fclOO, 823 *36,445 o39,265 1?29,292 8,171 375,244 **30,655 •29,808 83,367 39,642 241,975 17,711 15,339 to57,154 22,198 *66,799 15,639 7,945 47,362 b b 16,291 co74,317 0025,877 M 91,235 **38,723 6,732 985 Total. Cash on hand at begin ning of fiscal year. Long term bonds (2 years or over). $35,000 <*3817,646 151,057 <*869,959 480,533 11,994 529,996 393,789 101,926 /566,936 34,038 *750,805 183,060 J273,140 68,127 *581,157 190,402 *345,465 113,150 o603,469 P457,793 473,594 178,666 3623,383 r 306,826 31,101 8237,154 62,500 749,263 140,270 467,727 213,300 1,415,543 ____ 577,301 135,021 690,377 *0267,989 9i,217 318,883 095,564 82,500 *708,601 583,328 ool78,789l 13,196 14,657 391,498 151,500 637,999 ! 101,300 66388,548 oc711,425 <6*97,156 ee 100,000 13,600 90,693 00368,777 66431,690 **284,464 40,454 553,310 417,408 Tempo rary loans and short term bonds (less than 2 years). $200,000 60.500 35.500 18,069 407,000 45.000 12.000 69,209 455.000 212,500 1,000 300.000 850,666 30,965 111,000 48,250 221,728 552,800 200,000 362,800 56,761 50.000 16,101 50.000 32,000 Total. Total re ceipts for fiscal year. $235,000 c$l,137,082 <*1,021,016 0629,177 662,540 72,494 481,818 35,500 6854,563 119,995 441,038 *1,205,578 J541,175 228,060 6783,032 80,127 **655,669 190,402 o869,510 113,150 1*581,733 607,812 69,209 633,000 31,379,202 **546,747 212.500 **309,849 32,101 1,177,789 362.500 v734,162 140,270 2,616,930 1,063,300 683,596 30,965 1,001,330 246,021 *0316,318 48,250 808,476 312,945 635,300 *1,439,465 <*0762,117 619,351 213,196 1,198,165 514,300 158,061 ee 100,000 //9 08,681 63,600 00523,070 16,101 66568,118 50.000 **349,449 692,083 40,454 557,751 32.000 o including $12,521 received from State. b Including $5,100 cash in sinking fund. o Including $12,521 received from State and $5,100 cash in sinking fund. d including $59,404 received from State for schools. e Including $30,435 cash in sinking fund. /In clu d in g $13,725 received from State for schools. 0 Including $36,332 cash in sinking fund. 6lncluding $13,725 received from State for schools and $36,332 cash in sinking fund. * Including $15,624 received from State. /Inclu din g $24,197 received from State for schools, fcIncluding $16,952 received from State for schools. * Including $24,430 received from State for schools. t n Including $57,937 cash.in sinking fund. **Including $24,430 received from State for schools and $57,937 cash in sinking fund, o Including $26,155 received from State for schools. P Including $25,683 received from State for schools. q Including $9,581 received from State. **Including $24,930 received from State for schools. * Including $26,816 received from State for schools. * Including $9,093 cash in sinking fund. mIncluding $26,816 received from State for schools and $9,093 cash in sinking fund. v Including $9,256 cash in sinking fund. **»Including $49,231 received from State and county for schools, scIncluding $41,519 received from State. v Including $95,331 cash in sinking fund. * Including $41,519 received from State and $95,331 cash in sinking fund. o a Including $36,332 cash in sinking fund. b b Including $13,859 received from State for schools. c c Including amount received from school district extending beyond city limits and $25,150 received from State for schools. . ... d d Including $1,405 cash in sinking fund and cash of school district extending beyond city limits, eeincluding income of school district extending beyond city limits. //In clu d in g income of school district extending beyond city limits, $25,150 received from State for schools, and$l,405 cash in sinking fund. 00 Including $8,724 received from State for schools. 66 Including $16,139 received from State for schools. <* Including $28,075 received from State and county for schools. 1002 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (1). Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Hospi Police tals,asy courts, Libraries, Health lums, jails, art gal alms Police workFire de houses, Parks. Schools. leries, depart part depart houses, museums, ment. reform ment. ment. and other etc. atories, chari etc. ties. Cities. New York, N .Y ............ #274,813 #292,208 #107, Chicago, Til__________ 204,759 5, Philadelphia, P a ......... 83,717 4,790 61, St. Louis, M o ............... 25,053 2, Boston, Mass................. 24,202 5234,912 79, Baltimore, Md.............. 500 36, Cleveland^ O h io.......... 65,083 877 108, Buffalo, N .Y ................. 108, San Francisco, Cal....... 30,347 39, Cincinnati, Ohio.......... 8,083 10,198 Pittsburg, P a ............... 82, New Orleans, La.......... 31,661 46, Detroit, M ich............... 28,158 137, 27, Milwaukee, W is.......... Washington, D. C ......... 15,897 23,212 72, Newark, N. J ............... 87,823 46, 2, Jersey City, N. J .......... 8,625 Louisville, K y .............. 22,253 5, Minneapolis, M inn___ 1,053 18, Providence. R. I .......... 32,044 83, Indianapolis, In d ......... 762 77, Kansas 6itv, Mo.......... St. Paul, Minn.............. 12,492 Rochester, N .Y ............ Denver, C o lo ............... Toledo, O h io ............... Allegheny, P a .............. 4,825 Columbus, O h io .......... 410 Worcester, Mass.......... 600 Syracuse, N .Y .............. New Haven, Conn....... 426 Paterson, N .J............... Fall River, Mass.......... St. Joseph, Mo.............. Omaha, N ebr............... Los Angeles, Cal.......... Memphis, Tenn............ #30,000 #299,205 3,978 97,833 14,843 259,772 24,102 11,334 4,336 20,378 119,804 10,808 46,879 310 79,860 78,945 550 *i8,*38i 39,080 “ 2*684 “ i'700 1,300 3,675 471,460 #1,043,956 #5,385,514 448,030 486,808 26,400 372,930 574,728 6,000 282,234 53,930 964,200 92,571 57,299 10,144 94,456 8,639 458,884 597.457 49,433 209,560 112,476 3,082 87,700 1,542 41,052 159,674 538,119 41,154 2,462 30,000 382,112 84,910 13,568 87,604 11,400 14,316 11,800 341.458 1,000 4,000 60,000 6,953 118,799 35,326 28,653 27,493 6,362 13,350 69,799 75,952 52,574 6,324 39,496 485,594 4,607 166,531 71,117 48,869 31,069 2,526 655 181,239 23,170 112,708 45,605 78,994 2,910 61,110 22,500 5,577 248,874 66,354 6,421 648 8,930 175,778 77,967 108,889 47,705 4,182 87,792 6,262 19,656 4,084 45,769 2,841 136,433 3,732 7,679 93,956 12,244 52,000 16,059 872 200,000 2,946 a Including #14,856 for College of City of New York. 5 Including #194,474 expended for county. 1003 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (2). Mar gin al num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Cities. Streets. Sew ers. Bath hous es Elec and Water Gas tric- Docks Ferries Mar Cem bath and and works. w’rks light kets. eter ing ies. pools pl’nts wharves bridges. and beach $ New Y o rk ,N .Y .... 8,109,494 815,051 3,450,870 Chicago, 111............ 1,000,540 614,123 238,499 Philadelphia, Pa .. 2,249,664 713,345 1,825,626 St. Louis, Mo.......... 496,270 12,213 697,500| Boston, Mass.......... «2,494,069 660,987 259,2291 Baltimore, Md....... 78,296 93,786 26,247 Cleveland, Ohio . .. 555,107 709,623 634,059 Buffalo, N .Y .......... 417,287 20,141 70,790 San Francisco, Cal. d 42,811 Cincinnati, Ohio... 300,489 96*792 721,118 Pittsburg, P a ......... 993.852 740,752 651,189 New Orleans, L a ... 109,733 (/) 9 661,328 Detroit, M ich......... 137,063 154,725 ft 74,9061 Milwaukee, Wis . . . 439.852 112,671 81,460 Washington, D. C .. 1,055,755 231,086 tt,107,733 148,740 Newark, N .J ......... 437,160 109,439 Jersey City, N .J .. . 9 172,265 («) Louisville, K y ....... 209,073 43,989 182,710' Minneapolis, Minn 217,870 94,323 138,514' Providence, R. I . . . 70,557 200,306 Indianapolis, In d .. 254,056 26,823 ft 489 Kansas City, M o .. . 2 4,787 75,618' St. Paul, M inn....... 34,565* 320,092 86,869 Rochester, N .Y ___ 51,218 296,532 35,939 Denver, C o lo ......... 186,637 76,915 Toledo, Ohio.......... 749,694 70,966 58,239 Allegheny, P a ....... 14,806 28,035 113,255 6,722 Columbus, Ohio . . . 60,060 72,724 Worcester, Mass 53,305 141,291 229,051 Syracuse, N. Y ....... 81,009 166,562 74,368 New Haven, Conn. 245,464 49,954 Paterson, N .J......... 151,043 75,836 51,024 Fall River,M ass... 29,010 St. Joseph, M o ....... 114,512 28,110 Omaha, N ebr......... 88,483 40,429 Los Angeles, C a l.. ™17,758 ( l) Memphis, T en n . . . 53,949 112,980 $ 3,322,938 4,458,739 215,242 4,584 361,789 $ $ 64,323 (*>) 2,354 22,330 3,350 65,914 382,214 5,760 119,382 c 24,933 83,432 . 25,147 $ 33,843 62,459 *2,327 205 1,869 70,021 118,930 24,198 7,762 635 900 31,684 34,174 697 3,445 1,050 300 *30,‘ 4i4 6,756 18,« 7,772 86 5,562 8,539 6,819 800 3,000 30,343 a Not including $68,260 expended by board of directors of trust funds. 6 Included in expenditures for ferries and bridges. c Including expenditures for docks and wharves. d Including expenditures for sewers, but not including $235,658 expended by property owners for streets and sewers. e Included in expenditures for streets. /In clu ded in expenditures for waterworks. g Including expenditures for sewers, ft For 6 months only. i Including expenditures by United States Government. iN ot including $180,643 expended by property owners, ft Not including $69,306 expended by property owners. l Paid for by property owners. wNot including amount expended by property owners. 1004 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (3). Loans repaid. Mar ginal mimber. Cities. Sinking fund. $ Other. Tempo Total, ex Long rary loans and clusive of term loans short (2 repaid. bonds term years or bonds over). (less than 2 years). Total. Total, in cluding loans repaid. 8 $ S $ $ <*20,365,757 <*53,451,000 16,506,532 68,528,100 85,034,632 0138,485,632 534,341 207,659 5,049,537 1,068,450 7,703,657 8,772,107 13,821,644 3 Philadelphia,Pa . . . 1,499,359 260,348 8,088,078 5630,000 2,352,237 62,982,237 611,070,315 4 St. Louis. M o .......... 421,591 574,037 2,663,087 2,663,087 6 Boston, M ass.......... c9,699,231 <*1,935,709 817,255,521 /17,000 6,500,000 p6, 6i7,666 623,772,521 6 Baltimore, Md......... 1,174,494 280,483 1,809,748 49,200 49,200 1,858,948 7 Cleveland, O h io___ 602,505 3,939,137 331,980 557,824 889,804 4,828,941 8 Buffalo, N . Y .......... 148,455 749,860 1,870,155 662,957 2,684,352 814,197 151,240 9 San Francisco, C al.. *2,465,492 i % 687,144 *’2,687,144 10 Cincinnati, Ohio___ 867,599 1,001,300 2,076,150 i,66i,36o 3,077,450 11 Pittsburg, P a .......... 848,192 4,217,261 852,938 13,438 839,500 5,070,199 12 New Orleans, La___ 30,000 2,905,102 304,387 1,941,847 963,255 1,637,460 13 Detroit, M ich.......... 460,594 21,379 1,521,830 270,544 34,882 235,662 1,792,374 14 Milwaukee, W is___ 14,402 909,017 571,750 571,750 1,480,767 15 Washington, D. C ... 1,219,970 i 4,278,826 14,278,826 16 Newark, N. J .......... 530,563 m2,163,719 m3,670,678 84,000 4,695,000 4.729.000 m8,399,678 17 Jersey City, N .J ___ 188,748 «744,248 ©1,277,826 833,618 1,472,876 <>2,750,702 639,258 18 Louisville, K y ......... 225,648 210,000 692,000 902,000 744,969 1,646,969 19 Minneapolis, M inn. 114,718 230,907 905,880 P51,000 336,456 P387,456 P i, 293,336 20 Providence, R. I ___ 463,711 3352,721 31,279,492 639,305 31,918,797 637,305 2,000 21 Indianapolis, I n d ... 844,184 501,497 433,825 410,359 1,345,681 22 Kansas City, M o___ 130,290 39,427 258,756 907,643 258,756 1,166,399 23 St. Paul, M inn......... 147,592 831,984 1,060,000 1.060.000 1,891,984 24 Rochester, N. Y ....... 83,162 6,000 364,000 3,468,858 3,832,858 657,971 4,490,829 25 Denver, C o lo .......... 28,019 408,621 462,921 54,300 604,768 967,689 26 Toledo, O h io .......... 239,562 145,912 145,912 1,269,968 1,415,880 27 Allegheny, P a ......... 368,124 326,287 326,287 870,486 1,196,773 28 Columbus, O h io___ 618,197 754,852 **320,900 220,916 **541,816 **1,296,668 29 Worcester, M ass___ 580,817 8320,689 sl,552,220 750,000 **750,000 v2,302,220 (*) 30 Syracuse, N. Y ......... 76,896 *» 300,346 w 990,586 *122,000 2,657,033 *2,779,033 03,769,619 31 New Haven, C onn.. 122,315 **39,702 s 581,972 1,000,000 1,000,000 *1,681,972 32 Paterson, N .J.......... 62,618 n 396,845 <*o718,070 19,000 1,670,000 1,689,000 <*o2,407,070 33 Fall River, Mass___ 212,580 55188,024 65533,479 cc46,500 500,400 cc546,900 <6*1,080,379 St. Joseph, M o ......... ee 412,180 ce711,398 ee711,398 Omaha, Nebr........... 20,931 288,700 256,210 149,186 437,886 694,096 36 Los Angeles, Cal___ 101,944 211,605 89,925 89.925 301,530 37 Memphis, Tenn....... 32,500 32,431 475,233 33475,233 m (//) ©Including $6,959,037 State tax. 5 Not including $3,387,600 paid out of sinking fund, c Including $43,403 expenditures for county. ^Including $632,240 State tax and $688 county fines, etc. eIncluding $632,240 State tax and $238,565 expenditures for county. /E xpen ded for county; not including $7,628,357 city loans paid out of city sinking fund. 3 Including $17,000 expended for county, but not including $7,628,357 city loans paid out of city sinking fund. ^Including $632,240 State tax and $255,565 expenditures for county, but not including $7,628,357 city loans paid out of city sinking fund. ^Including $2,337,988 State tax. i Including expenditures of United States Government for waterworks, fc$22,950paid out of sinking fund. *Including expenditures by United States Government for waterworks, but not including $22,950 paid out of sinking fund. mIncluding $792,567 State and county tax. «State and county tax. olncluding $744,248 State and county tax. PNot including $125,000 paid out of sinking fund. g. Including $311,442 Siace tax. **Not including $338,500 paid out of sinking fund, sIncluding $12*,597 county tax. *$130,000 paid out of sinking fund. "Not including $130,000 paid out of sinking fund. ^Including $124,597 county tax, but not including $130,000 paid out of sinking fund. va Including $289,417 State and county tax. *Not including $26,000 paid out of sinking fund. v Including $289,417 State and county tax, but not including $26,000 paid out of sinking fund. * Including $39,702 State and county tax. <*<*Including $396,845 State and county tax. b b Including $164,769 State and county tax. ccNot including $40,000 paid out of sinking fund. d d Including $164,769 State and county tax, but not including $40,000 paid out of sinking fund. e e Including $329,933 county tax. ‘ //$20,120 paid out of sinking fund. 33 Not including $20,120 paid out of sinking fund. 1 New York,N. Y . . . . 2 Chicago, 111.............. 1005 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (1)— Continued. Mar ginal num ber. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Cities. Hospi Police tals,asy courts, Libraries, lums, jails, Fire Health Police workalms art gal de houses, depart part depart houses, Schools. leries, ment. reform ment. ment. and museums, other etc. atories, chari etc. ties. Scranton, P a ............... $14,279 $3,153 Lowell, M ass............... $7,230 13,973 Albany, N . Y ............... Cambridge, Mass........ $10,000 Portland, Oreg.............. 16,974 Atlanta, Ga.................. Grand Rapids, M ich. .. 457 9,701 Dayton, Ohio............... 7,608 32,122 Richmond, V a.............. 1,000 1,482 $3,186 Nashville, T e n n .......... 7,000 32,510 Seattle, Wash............... 3,000 11,494 Hartford, Conn............ 56 9,260 10,441 Reading' P a _________ 2,257 Wilmington, D e l.........1............. Camden, N. J ............... 1............. 2,232 8,000 Trenton. N. .T________ !_______ 300 17,970 Bridgeport, Conn......... j 10,188 3,800 19,150 Lvnn. Mass.................. i Oakland, C a l............... 1............. 18,380 T.awren ne. Mass______ 1_______ ; 2,500 ' 512 New Bedford, Mass___ («) Des Moines, Iowa......... 4,791 Springfield, Mass......... 21,112 3,211 Somerville, M ass......... 737 26,851 Troy, N .Y .................... Hoboken, N. J .............. Evansville, Ind............ 150 Manchester, N. H ......... 1,098 Utica, N .Y .................... 4,215 10,430 5,164 Peoria, 111.................... 16,985 Charleston, S. C............ 6,600 1,700 5,200 Savannah, G a .............. 6,500 2,699 Salt Lake City, Utah... 400 a Supported by county. i> For 11 months only. t*Supported by State and county. 9398— N o. 42— 02------ 9 $88,686 $2,700 34,276 60.452 102,325!............... 47.22«i________ 17,689 54,041 5.239 4,360 37,360 17,254 10,201 17,441 116,486 139,922 2,320 30,324! 149,333 12,589 135, 111 69,936 65,324 20,414 3,814 17,587 54,292 18,537 1,409 119,969 3,436 98,5781 38,925 48,805 100,110 3,714 49,203 57,091 1,500 20,297 3,366 &2,307 &47,989 6,308 29,533 (c) 23,656 3,326 Parks. $2,266 2,876 33,130 136,270 1,500 5,294 605 1,000 10,000 37,756 17,118 19,158 1,856 2,500 1,728 28,000 26,288 1,337 14,322 9,874 26,152 2,240 1006 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (2)— Continued. Mar gin al um ber. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Cities. Streets. Sew ers. Water works. Bath hous es and Elec Ferries Mar Cem bath Gas tric- Docks eter and and w’rks light wharves ing bridges. kets. ies. pools pl’nts and beach es. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S $ Scranton, P a ......... 56,511 46,143 Lowell, Mass......... 43,832 58,274 49,960 Albany, N. Y ......... 26,585 477,150 9,590 11,678 2,265 188,986 Cambridge, Mass.. 32,199 39,015 9,740 Portland, Oreg___ 195,044 60,457 29,765 310 62,909 Atlanta, G a .......... 61,054 20,703 149,413 23,209 1,605 1,816 Grand Rapids, Mich 1,267 172,584 48,223 7,001 Dayton, Ohio......... 3,313 25,216 46,781 170,321 800'_____ Richmond. V a ___ 75,508 53,816 23,488 12,951 Nashville, T en n ... 49,141 12,454 125,877 7,506 i __________ Seattle, W ash....... a511,699 98,444 i __________ 8,862 18,768 Hartford, Conn___ 276 47,746 2^699 150,126 Reading, Pa.......... 8,054 33,019 58,989 .........|......... Wilmington, D e l.. 43,994 38,814 111,491 i Camden, N. J ....... 106,602 20,916 19,346 ..................... 1 Trenton, N. J ......... 20,160 10,914 31,856 Bridgeport, Conn . 105,156 1,941 40,647 26,443 21,084 Lynn, Mass............ 458 8,327 23,962 Oakland, Cal......... 4,586 12,132 Lawrence, Mass... 63,} 496 28^75 97,152 18,205 New Bedford, Mass 22,449 Des Moines, Io w a . 5,000 8,115 <*33,176 <*4,900 12,704 Springfield, Mass.. 137,363 88,448 914 19,206 Somerville, Mass.. 92,739 37,809 17,012 1,172 193,552 Troy, N. Y .............. 4,116 107 10,139 Hoboken, N. J ....... 3,000 18,930 840 Evansville, Ind . . . 69,465 38,545 6,100 Manchester, N. H . 20,194 16,539 29,326 4,516 Utica, N. Y ............ e3,227 e17,538 e8,523 Peoria, 111.............. 21,283 Charleston, S. C . . . 21,349 Savannah, G a ....... 2,445 103,498 76,291 Salt Lake City,Utah 290 23,725 19,977 131,780 a Including expenditures for sewers. &Included in expenditures for streets. c Paid for by property owners. <*Not including $90,000 expended by property owners under supervision of city. « For 11 months only. 1007 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (3)— Continued. Loans repaid. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Sinking fund. Other. Tempo rary Total, ex Long loans and clusive of term short loans (2 term repaid. bonds years or bonds over). (less than 2 years). Total. Total, in cluding loans repaid. #330,419 #216,124 #108,429 Scranton, P a ............ #5,866 #114,295 #2,386 Lowell, M ass............ 325,590 903,061 1,228,651 a 1,737,987 #43,300 a 255,615 a 509,336 e l, 119,557 d 189,000 Albany, N . Y ............ 69,293 5242,679 c 930,557 d 189,000 1,527,005 725,000 802,005 Cambridge, Mass___ 281,205 125,000 600,000 434,183 42,000 392,183 42,715 Portland, O re g ......... 42,000 335,716 Atlanta, Ga............... 335,716 20,138 2,000 507,164 348,164 159,000 Grand Rapids, M ich. 17,727 159,000 872,101 498,732 Dayton, O hio............ 163,232 373,369 45,683 335,500 273,804 273,804 11,045 Richmond, Va.......... 72,274 / 247,045 / 76,735 25,621 170,310 / 76,735 Nashville, T e n n ....... 775,232 775,232 Seattle, Wash............ 6,668 fir680,319 133,291 Hartford, Conn......... 133,291 63,519 g 34,597 fir 547,028 fc 194,901 J 11,000 Reading, P a .............. 47,439 51,499 i 183,901 J ll, 000 1 487,340 Wilmington, D e l ---77,159 l 96,709 390,631 1 19,550 29,881 P 520,910 Camden, N .J ............ 44,752 to184,023 « 398,460 ol9,450 103,000 ol22,450 (r ) 1 889,099 Trenton, N .J ............ 232,398 Q 325,396 3 863,199 25,900 s 25,900 «523,912 16,000 Bridgeport, Conn___ 23,500 «189,493 u 507,912 16,000 v 919,804 525.000 Lynn, Mass............... 204,709 y112,363 v 394,804 525,000 179 472 43,500 135,972 Oakland, C a l............ 43,500 38,449 494.000 w 871,779 Lawrence, M ass....... 34,043 tr 115,655 w 377,779 79.000 415.000 963.000 V 1,056,074 z 1,602,098 New Bedford, Mass.. 101,590 * 176,102 *546,024 V 93,074 224,369 54,369 Des Moines, Iowa___ 18.000 36,369 170,000 Springfield, Mass___ 465.000 b b 482,200 eel, 175,204 141,066 aa 184,653 aa 693,001 b b 17,200 1,208,495 963.000 Somerville, M ass___ 163.000 800.000 245,495 323,642 d d 46,182 Troy, N. Y ................. 40,153 445.000 dd 491,182 dd 814,824 198.000 ee 420,677 Hoboken, N .J .......... 20,142 »»178,265 ee 222,677 2,000 196.000 31,708 //362,896 7,212 m 180,545 / / 331,188 31,708 Evansville, Ind ......... 298.000 g g 578,789 Manchester, N. H ___ 40,000 258.000 45,425 to 160,325 33280,789 733,096 537,525 551,342 195,571 h h 71,667 h h 465,858 66 Utica, N .Y ................. 227,639 122,214 122,214 105,425 67 Peoria, 111................. 89,232 89,232 54,383 68 Charleston, S. C......... 41,700 ............... 41,700 i i 249,941 17,267 i i 208,241 69 Savannah, G a .......... 265,959 46,106 14,000................ 14,000 251,959 70 Salt Lake City, Utah. a Including #78,882 county tax. b County tax. c Including #242,679 county tax. dNot including #247,850 paid out of sinking fund. e Including #242,679 county tax, but not including #247,850 paid out of sinking fund. / Not including #565 paid out of sinking fund, firIncluding #19,638 county tax. h State tax. i Including #1,499 State tax. JNot including #114,500 paid out of sinking fund. fcIncluding #1,499 State tax, but not including #114,500 paid out of sinking fund. I Not including #29,900 paid out of sinking fund, w State and county tax. n Including #184,023 State and county tax. o Not including #11,242 paid out of sinking fund. P Including $184,023 State and county tax, but not including $11,242 paid out of sinking fund. q Including $2*6,911 State and county tax. **$97,300 paid out of sinking fund. sNot including $97,300 paid out of sinking fund. t Including $246,911 State and county tax, but not including $97,300 paid out of sinking fund. mIncluding $12,312 county tax. v Including $74,005 State and county tax. w Including $33,335 county tax. * Including $1j9,992 State and county tax. y Not including $19,926 paid out of sinking fund. z Including $119,992 State and county tax, but not including $19,926 paid out of sinking fund, aa Including $±21,354 State and county tax. 56Not including $45,000 paid out of sinking fund. c c Including $121,354 State and county tax, but not including $45,000 paid out of sinking fund, da Not including #39,724 paid out of sinking fund. ee Including $178,265 State and county tax. //In clu d in g $180,545 State and county tax. flrflrIncluding $160,325 State and county tax. W»For 11 months only. iiN ot including expenditures of State and county for schools. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 1008 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (1)— Continued. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Hospi Police tals,asy courts, Libraries, lums, jails, art gal Police workFire Health alms de houses, leries, depart houses, depart part Schools. museums, ment. reform ment. ment. and other etc. atories, chari etc. ties. Parks. i 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 San Antonio, T ex......... Duluth, M in n .............. Erie, Pa......................... Elizabeth, N. J .............. Wilkesbarre, P a .......... Kansas City, Kans....... Harrisburg, P a ............ Portland, Me. i « i ......... Yonkers, N. Y ............. Norfolk, V a.................. $7,121 Waterbury, Conn......... $6,442 Holyoke, Mass.............. Fort Wayne, J n d ......... Youngstown, Ohio....... Houston, T e x ............... Covington, K y .............. Akron, O hio................. Dallas, T e x ................... 28'............ 833'______ Saginaw, M ic h ............ 1 ........ Lancaster, Pa............... 890'.......... . Lincoln, N e b r.............. Brockton, Mass............ | Binghamton, N. Y ....... ! Augusta, G a ................. I Pawtucket, R. I ............ ! Altoona, Pa................... i Wheeling, W\ V a ......... ! Mobile, A la................... i Birmingham, Ala......... 1 Little Rock, Ark.......... i Springfield, O h io ......... 1 Galveston, T e x ............ ! _ Tacoma, Wash.............. Haverhill, M ass.......... 115 Spokane, W ash............ Terre Haute, I n d ......... ______ 1_______ Dubuque, Iowa............ 220 ............ Quincy, 111................... i South Bend, In d .......... | Salem, Mass................. . Johnstown, P a ............ Elmira, N .Y ................. 755'______ Allentown, Pa.......... >. Davenport, I o w a ......... 2,000 McKeesport, P a .......... Springfield, 111.............. 1,731 Chelsea, Mass............... $1,521 3,895 3,094 625 2,858 4,520 6,800 2,781 30,100 9,100 ! ............! ______ ! $i,ooo! 0,468: i , 3,000 .......... !............ ! .......... 1............ i ■ . ! ! 5,352 2,350 9,078 129 2,938 1,277 726 2,290 3,507 1,482 9,939 4,000 1,873 2,000 17,818 $8,718 $4,256 58,117 6,678 61,148 19,677 14 092 3lj 6741................ 3 ! non: ________ n . Kin1________ ' 82,248j 5,029 21,190 20,849 70,256 13,474 3,867 17,406 6,868 60,611 23,265 8,827 7,142 45,908 15,357 21,431 725 1,365 5,283 6,000 1,264 24,522 22,500 $1,500 9,047 17,494 « Data are for 9 months. &$23,733 expended by State and county, c $10,691 expended by State and county. 7,286 12,693 1,834 5,873 642 52,188 3,470 543 13,284 16,852 1,909 (0) 58,000 1,213 1,095 1,225 572 310 3,787 (b) 250 1,649 948 5,462 $4,461 4,000 45,808 10,430 53,464 563 12,047 57,648 2,936 36,863 38,063 6,598 63,950 22,865 5,400 17,038 5,136 703 1,500 30,925 927 600 2,446 1,259 8,000 4,000 28 3,965 72 i , 822 560 16,000 9,790 6,808 2,382 1,385 5,005 1009 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (2)— Continued. Mar gin al num ber. Cities. Streets. Sew ers. Elec Water Gas tricworks. w ’rks light pl’nts $ $ * 93,836 3,423 San Antonio, Tex .. Duluth, M in n ......... 105.297 20.926 Erie, P a ................... 33,234, 19,252 Elizabeth, N. J ....... 132,0371 26,486 Wilkesbarre, P a___ 18,451, 30,176 Kansas City, Kans.. 185,414! 55,289 Harrisburg, P a ....... 21,4541 6,143 62,585. 57,168 Portland, Me.(«) .. . Yonkers, N. Y ......... 113,215! 44,733 Norfolk, V a ............ 214, OOO! 5,436 Waterbury, C onn... 43,5 a 1 21,699 Holyoke, Mass....... 42,464! 6,858 99,666169,544 Fort Wayne, I n d ... Youngstown, O h io. 132,740! 17,793 6. 730 199.101 Houston, T e x ......... Covington, K y ....... 1 5,357 42. (>05! 76 914 Akron, Ohio............ 23.552 11.520 88 Dallas, T ex ............. 89 Saginaw, M ich ....... 51,296 8,327 16,847 16,048 90 Lancaster, P a ......... 33,718 91 Lincoln, N ebr......... 740 18.837 36.937 92 Brockton, Mass....... 39,744 14,694 93 Binghamton, N. Y . . 47.161 5.334 94 Augusta, G a............ 5,624 6,913 95 Pawtucket, R. I ___ 7,105 9,336 96 Altoona, P a ............ 97 Wheeling, W. Y a ... 3,510 98 Mobile, A l a ............ 99 Birmingham, A la .. (&) (ftj 5,441 100 Little Rock, Ark .. . 101 Springfield, O hio... 45,434 94,192 102 Galveston, T ex....... 19.357 47.741 103 Tacoma, Wash........ 104 Haverhill, M ass___ 7,767! 4,359 105 Spokane, Wash....... 102,184! 9,242 8,6511 19,432 106 Terre Haute, In d . . . 25 355 20.019 107 Dubuque, Iowa....... 2,000 218 108 Quincy, 111.............. 109 South Bend, Ind___ 158,832 25,734 1,474 1,604 110 Salem, M ass............ 19,631 4,909 111 Johnstown, Pa........ 41,469 5,366 112 Elmira, N. Y ............ 11,134 52,018 113 Allentown, P a......... 114 Davenport,Iowa ... 142,472 17,439 115 McKeesport, P a ___ 25,000 20,213 21,793 10,387 116 Springfield, 111........ 6,183 5,802 117 Chelsea, Mass.......... a Data are for 9 months. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 Bath hous es and Docks Ferries Mar Cem bath eter and and wharves bridges. kets. ies. ing pools and beach es. 9 $ S $ $ 9 3,579 30,564 $ 26,765 14,277 54,404 28,290 69,319 14,287 116,104 54,066 34,281 23,209 22,159 1,619 4,100 944 2,127 2,357 8,112 1,600 796 27,133 87,940 9,894 10,539 19,643 30,304 36,918 34,902 31.245 25,49b 45.246 17,067 26,815 2,233 28,164 79,260 62,890 600 ............. |......... 4,090 ! 2,105 !_______ 2,880 47 557 1,353 27,352 4 11,934 8,536 1,123 5,130 643 19,500 43,420 8,278 ii,297 26,i83 20,209 4,114 38 3,572 5,683 6 Paid for by property owners. 1010 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (3)— Continued. Loans repaid. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Sinking fund. Other. Tempo Total, ex Long rary clusive of loans and term loans short bonds (2 repaid. term years or bonds over). (less than 2 years). Total. Total, in cluding loans repaid. 71 San Antonio, T ex___ $143,649 $1,962 $291,713 $73,632 $73,632 $365,345 72 Duluth, M in n .......... 133,137 370,670 $ 86,000 43,258 499.928 129,258 73 Erie, P a .................... 67,465 8,161 253,436 10,000 263,436 10,000 74 Elizabeth, N. J .......... 70,851 «154,962 a 404,638 92,444 92,444 «497,082 75 Wilkesbarre, P a ....... 15,016 80,524 14,500 21,963 102,487 7,463 76 Kansas City, Kans... 55,621 335,828 97,708 124,015 26,307 459,843 77 Harrisburg’ P a ......... 65,246 31,814 162,747 c 162,747 (b) 78 Portland, Me.(d)....... 41,742 e 121,837 e 308,813 250.000 2 ^ 0 0 0 e 558,813 79 Yonkers, N . Y .......... 38,141 / 210,703 / 626,215 217,000 464.000 681,000 /1,307,215 80 Norfolk, Va............... 51,270 20,469 831,121 343,817 682,050 149,071 1,174,938 81 Waterbury, Conn___ 23,679 295,650 527,964 27,500 77,500 50.000 605,464 82 Holyoke, Mass.......... 79,500 20,306 286,162 7,500 525.000 532.500 818,662 83 Fort Wayne, I n d ___ 14,109 334,941 38,761 38,761 373,702 84 Youngstown, O hio... 112,601 311.035 0 95,573 28.000 0 123,573 0 434,608 85 Houston, T ex ............ 3,912 228,584 57,982 57,982 286,566 86 Covington. K y.......... 945 62,382 105.035 21,300 168,590 147,290 273,625 87 Akron, Ohio.............. 40,221 100,954 231,323 150,954 50,000 382,277 88 Dallas, T e x ............... 41,481 2,882 197,270 £5,042 5,042 £202,312 (*) 89 Saginaw, M ic h ......... 24,582 3,207 110,046 98, i 98,888 208,934 90 Lancaster, Pa............ 25,000 J 22,082 3 97,658 60,000 60,000 3 157,658 91 Lincoln, N ebr.......... 10,809 169,263 8,590 8,590 177,853 92 Brockton, Mass......... 33,213 *101,662 fc240,506 83,730 638,730 Tc 879,236 555.000 93 Binghamton, N. Y . . . 50,000 170,811 17,345 37,545 20,200 208,356 94 Augusta, G a .............. 1 92,904 65,500 345.500 1 438,404 280.000 95 Pawtucket, R. I ......... 135,358 »»56,088 m 249,994 260,000 m 509,994 260,000 96 Altoona, Pa............... 27,734 96,457 13,000 18,025 5,025 114,482 97 Wheeling, W. Va . . . . 52,250 163,252 163,252 215,502 98 Mobile, A la............... n 34,415 13,838 72,000 72,000 »106,415 99 Birmingham, Ala___ 105,059 183,757 4,630 188,387 4,1 100 Little Rock, Ark....... 7,050 15,000 29,354 0 24,331 0 24,331 o53,685 101 Springfield, O h io___ 81,724 64,589 185,629 121,040 267,353 102 Galveston, T e x ......... 130,185 227,963 2,000 66,966 64,966 294.929 103 Tacoma, Wash........... 191,109 191,109 104 Haverhill, M ass....... r 514,761 67,780 P i24,816 P 301,211 q 13,550 200,000 q 213,550 105 Spokane, W ash......... 3,968 241,882 79,955 79,955 321,837 106 Terre Haute, I n d ___ 40,238 30,146 40,238 70,384 107 Dubuque, Iow a......... 88,598 189,895 s 11,224 60.500 s71,724 8261,619 108 Quincy, 111................. 75,639 89,943 28,100 63,600 35.500 153.543 109 South Bend, Ind....... 3,168 1,918 t 73,330 299,637 1 73,330 1 372,967 110 Salem, M ass.............. 30,000 m97,587 w170,251 480,670 73,670 m650,921 407,000 111 Johnstown, Pa.......... 12,272 113,474 33,799 101,200 146,720 45,520 260,194 112 Elmira, N. Y .............. v 113,295 «177,394 58,200 68,200 v 245,594 10,000 113 Allentown, Pa.......... 3,500 9,592 150,881 106,500 106,500 257,381 114 Davenport, I o w a ___ 110,634 207,645 86,343 24,291 318,279 115 McKeesport, P a ....... 33,943 169,289 4,000 4,000 173,289 116 Springfield, 111.......... 81,874 97,669 81,874 179.543 117 Chelsea, Mass............ 92,822 440,000 47,439 150,000 290,000 532,822 a Including $135,316 State and county tax. b $57,700 paid out of sinking fund. c Not including $57,700 paid out of sinking fund. d Data are for 9 months, e Including $116,098 State and county tax. /In clu d in g $207,194 State and county tax. g Not including $100,000 paid out of sinking fund. *$54,000 paid out of sinking fund. i Not including $54,000 paid out of sinking fund. J Including $2,082 State tax. fcIncluding $67,1586tate and county tax. l Not including $23,733 expended by State and county for schools. m including $48,407 State tax. « Not including $10,691 expended by State and county for schools. ©Not including $7,050 paid out o f sinking fund. P Including $38,515 State and county tax. q Not including $70,000 paid out of sinking fund. r Including4$38,515 State and county tax, but not including $70,000 paid out of sinking fund, s Not including $60,167 paid out o f sinking fund. t Not including $3,168 paid out of sinking fund. mIncluding $41,811 State and county tax. v Including $112,725 State and county tax. STATISTICS OF CITIES, 5 X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTI Concluded. uar•inal lum Cities. ber. 118 119 120 121 122 128 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Chester, P a ............ York, Pa................. Malden, Mass......... Topeka, Kans......... Newton, Mass......... Sioux City, Iow a... Bayonne, N. J ......... Knoxville, T en n ... Schenectady, N. Y . Fitchburg, Mass . . . Superior, W is......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass....... Canton, O h io......... Butte, M o n t.......... Montgomery, A la .. Auburn, N. Y ......... Chattanooga, Tenn East St. Louis, 111.. Joliet, 111............... Hospi Police tals,asy courts, Libraries, lums, jails, Police workFire Health alms gal de houses, Schools. art depart houses, depart part leries, museums, ment. reform ment. ment. and etc. other atories, chari etc. ties. $15,934 972 443 3,797 4,904 7,170 35,834 15,556 5,558 $1,322 915 2,250 6,293 4,754 $436 $27,115 6,342 $75,002 26,776 15.541 28,200 26,549 2,556 8,846 $168 5,257 400 3,788 834 305 37,478 27,889 40,952 6,175 2,022 1,000 431 887 1,345 a 18,316 2,082 54,129 14,362 61,804 26.000 1,461 1,338 a Including expenditures of school district extending beyond city limits. 1012 BULLETIN OF THE "DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able XXI.-EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (2)— Concluded. Mar gin al num ber. Cities. 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Chester, P a .............. York, Pa.................. Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, K a n s......... Newton, M ass......... Sioux City, Iowa .. . Bayonne, N. J ......... Knoxville,Tenn . . . Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass......... Canton, O h io.......... Butte, M on t............ Montgomery, A la ... Auburn, N. Y .......... Chattanooga, T enn. East St. Louis, 111. . . Joliet, 111................. Streets. $40,928 2,950 10,527 142,826 56,647 9,575 26,831 6,096 91,672 64,276 56,370 108,800 30,297 50,124 Sew ers. Bath hous es and Elec Ferries Mar Cem bath Water Gas tric- Docks and eter ing and works. w’rks light wharves bridges. kets. ies. pools pl’nts and beach es $8,500 10,622 2,214 79,213 10,961 41,733 $29,498 35^049 9,983 4,509 753 66,444 10,565 6,809 1,528 3,885 36,610 8,000 6,474 176,560 52,125 14,104 $765 $1,018 60,ii6 5,494 9,757 18,111 19,469 23,301 $2,530 * 4,783 24,604 35,577 13,860 19,439 a Included in other street expenditures for maintenance and operation. 1013 STATISTICS OF CITIES. T able X X I.—EXPENDITURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER CAPITAL OUTLAY (S)— Concluded. Loans repaid. Mar ginal num ber. 113 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Chester, P a ............... York, Pa.................... Malden, Mass............ Topeka, ira n s.......... Newton, M ass.......... Sioux City, Iowa....... Bayonne, N. J .......... Knoxville, Tenn — Schenectady, N. Y . .. Fitchburg, Mass....... Superior, Wis............ Roek ford, T il............ Taunton, Mass.......... Canton, O h io............ Butte, M on t.............. Montgomery, Ala___ Auburn, N. Y ............ Chattanooga, T enn .. East St. Louis, 111___ Joliet, 111.................. Sinking fund. Other. Tempo rary Total, ex loans and clusive of Long term short loans (2 term repaid. bonds years or bonds over). (less than 2 years). Total. a $12,306 a $178,555 $124,000 C$124,000 (*) 1,000 32,000 $31,000 1,000 47,603 42,986 e105,732 e 229,446 / 50,025 300,000 / 350,025 14 46,883 33,845 46,883 217.460 128,305 *172,173 h 557,703 895,000 10,000, 885,000 73,017 1,590 111.461 *95,382 39,453 i 134,835 66,000 J 93,293 fc253,935 211,000 137,000, 74,000 (m) 837 1 13,275 45,250 n45,250 20,000 P 32,879 3290,817 179,518 13,000 166,518 49,978 r 122,569 r 300,273 128,900 502,800 631,700 71,202 67,861 59,402 11,800 119,311 700 228,000 241,000 82,996 13,000 s62,970 *321,062 165,136 u 354,000 v 354,000 (*) 64,779 159,554 13,638 61,446 3,333 14,345 13,000 80,903 « 91,744 67,903 17,985 30,385 V 81,607 12,400 15,800 63,907 1,500 95,091 48,107 12,728 57,000 57,000 53,275 293,100 62,430 11,000 51,430 126,866*i3 Total, in cluding loans repaid. $41,819 $302,555 79,603 579,471 264,343 1,452,703 i 246,296 *464,935 o 58,525 3470,335 r 931,973 190,513 323,996 675,062 224,333 as172,647 V 111,992 158,998 69,728 293,100 189,296 d g h Including $7,097 State tax. $5,000 paid out of sinking fund. c Not including $5,000 paid out of sinking fund. d Including $7,097 State tax, but not including $5,000 paid out of sinking fund. e Including State and county tax. /N o t including $10,000 paid out of sinking fund. g Including State and countv tax, but not including $10,000 paid out of sinking fund. * Including $97,221 State and county tax. i Not including $49,633 paid out of sinking fund. j State and county tax. k Including $93,293 State and county tax. l Not including expenditures for sewers included in other street expenditures for maintenance and operation. m $9,000 paid out of sinking fund. «Not including $9,000 paid out of sinking fund. o Not including expenditures for sewers included in expenditures for maintenance and operation and $9,000 paid out of sinking fund. P County tax. 3 Including $32,879 county tax. r Including $36,661 State and county tax. s Including $47,580 State and county tax. *$71,300 paid out of sinking fund. uNot including $1,000 paid out of sinking fund. «N ot including $72,300 paid out of sinking fund. w Including $47,580 State and county tax, but not including $72,300 paid out of sinking fund, a; Including expenditures for school district extending beyond city limits. v Including unpaid warrants which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. a b BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION Larnal raier. Cities. Police courts,iails, workPolice Fire de Health de department. houses, re partment. partment. forma tories, etc. New York, N. Y ___ $10,199,206 $1,310,411 $4,739,992 $1,162,256 Chicago, 111............ 3,685,982 1,647,676 190,302 258,369 Philadelphia, P a . .. 1,101,090 3,036,264 250,809 1,240,279 St. Louis, M o........... 769,272 1,602,182 113,632 154,925 Boston, Mass.......... 1,751,151 c l, 130,945 1,285,791 201,712 6 Baltimore, M d......... 509,763 967,823 94,715 122,431 487,383 7 Cleveland, Ohio___ 98,502 417,932 116,087 8 Buffalo, N. Y .......... 689,425 793,294 47,415 24,049 658,258 9 San Francisco, C a l. 789,251 161,965 65,089 472,388 10 Cincinnati, O h io . .. 43,016 555,185 133,370 559,299 85,976 11 Pittsburg, P a.......... 490,287 266,851 12 New Orleans, La___ 231,374 37,073 44,708 542,049 556,567 13 Detroit, M ich.......... 11,400 41,989 453,574 342,508 36,448 42,432 14 Milwaukee, Wis___ 687,922 266,900 15 Washington, D. C .. 275,649 70,893 428,495 319,408 16 Newark, N. J .......... 41,109 75,787 421,616 241,187 17 Jersey City, N. J ___ 8,465 230,036 273,615 106,475 18 Louisville, K y ......... 8,208 216,698 325,507 19 Minneapolis, Minn. 24,887 33,981 371,875 355,074 20 Providence, R. I .. . 4,957 25,445 159,579 21 Indianapolis, I n d .. 181,029 15,754 2,635 22 Kansas City, M o __ 255,850 248,344 25,212 31,551 St. Paul, M inn......... 184,539 199,915 36,208 10,624 23 240,644 24 Rochester, N. Y ___ 198,471 16,072 28,106 160,605 25 Denver, C olo........... 11,339 155,420 25,672 110,650 21,550 116,523 26 Toledo, O h io.......... 14,101 137,871 147,329 27 Allegheny, Pa......... 15,588 124,227 181,242 28 Columbus, O hio___ 34,275 19,341 149,699 29 Worcester, Mass___ 167,667 31,291 30 Syracuse, N. Y ....... 137,809 13,624 175,796 31,601 197,584 31 New Haven, Conn.. 21,267 143,573 7,874 124,335 32 Paterson, N. J ......... 3,495 120,196 8,291 139,364 122,971 33 Fall River, Mass .. . 25,655 34 St. Joseph, M o......... 61,500 9,062 61,561 1,800 91,290 35 Omaha, Nebr.......... 10,878 118,183 8,354 36 Los Angeles, Cal___ 123,376 7,560 124,928 13,303 n 101,670 37 Memphis, Tenn....... 100,337 Jc66,437 (°) 58,172 38 Scranton, Pa............ 3,741 57,143 8,519 136,500 39 Lowell, M ass.......... 119,075 12,191 156,481 40 Albany, N. Y .......... 6,524 142,048 16,816 n 128,459 41 Cambridge, Mass . . . 91,120 18,500 (°) 42 Portland, O r e g ....... 53,652 5,517 80,563 5,683 rt 141,600 43 Atlanta, Ga.............. 117,768 ” 98,887 (°) 44 Grand Rapids, Mich 84,796 13,678 122,518 16,646 45 Dayton, O hio........... 88,256 13,781 74,792 8,630 46 Richmond, V a......... 104,426 4,189 92,673 9,191 47 Nashville, T e n n ___ t 89,097 89,270 ” 4,860 13,328 48 Seattle, Wash.......... 85,691 9,429 97,377 14,702 49 Hartford, Conn....... 120,936 6,075 116,305 11,574 50 Reading, P a ............ 51,956 42,022 4,842 51 Wilmington,Del . . . 81,950 36,510 3,100 5,130 52 Camden, N. J .......... 92,163 6,064 86,298 7,000 53 Trenton, N. J .......... 87,800 2,800 72,900 6,700 54 Bridgeport, Conn... 68,721 8,196 75,614 4,785 55 Lynn, Mass.............. 80,557 96,740 11,839 66 Oakland, C a l.......... 65,367 7,702 76,575 14,335 57 Lawrence, M ass___ 65,113 59,536 14,720 (*) ( x) 58 New Bedford, Mass. 113,457 78,738 30,274 59 Des Moines, Iow a... 4,420 50,780 80,670 3,660 (X) 60 Springfield, Mass. . . 67,639 97,390 7,161 61 Somerville, Mass . . . ” 66,165 64,943 8,078 1°) 62 Troy, N. Y ............... 111,978 64,421 4,503 19,941 a In eluding $217,562 for College of City of New York and $185,411 for Normal College, b In eluding expenditures for street sprinkling, cln eluded in expenditures for street cleaning. <*N<)t including $160,000 expended by street-railway company and $14,110 expended pect 3rs of trust funds. e I n eluding $1,088,608 expended by county, /I n eluding $152,723 for University of Cincinnati. p F<>r drainage system, h P£id for by property owners. i N<>t including expenditures by United States Government for lighting of public parks i Jin eluding other street expenditures. fcli icluding expenditures for garbage removal, H n eluded in other street expenditures. 1 2 3 4 5 1015 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (1). Schools. a $19,731,629 8,203,493 3,319,604 1,526,140 3,043,640 1,417,392 1,257,345 1,161,834 1,166,763 / l , 126,631 843,648 478,025 869,713 764,968 1,182,916 830,081 500,332 512,947 736i 981 739,695 558,630 555,272 584,702 550,031 679,071 398,805 363,027 421,588 517,844 410,459 382,950 313,166 326,335 160,490 392,276 497,016 140,863 315,146 331,899 294,065 439,593 268,791 166,842 304,450 318,402 124,107 169,799 263,959 385,731 212,326 195,109 242,021 w 222,246 179,775 237,972 299,017 185,821 234,940 272,444 359,560 294,374 215,120 Libraries, art gal leries, museums, etc. $736,111 211,019 257,252 37,284 267,509 41,259 82,487 98,769 47,337 86,114 126,000 9,827 51,226 62,356 8,746 40,585 31,333 42,209 22,349 26,788 28,314 15,555 3,462 24,314 10,991 31,672 10,967 33,981 26,605 13,818 14,034 15,168 7,789 16,776 19,063 5,126 9,900 16,480 9,700 20,622 7,000 7,667 10,516 650 5,000 18,751 11,000 4,180 7,036 1,898 5,680 12,438 14,186 15,668 11,872 14,017 11,271 29,945 16,882 Parks. Sewers. Municipal lighting. Street cleaning. Street sprink ling. Other street expendi tures. Mar ginal num ber. $1,367,086 759,332 449,963 115,370 419,903 208,158 77,358 200,257 166,876 45,651 162,784 8,867 108,713 53,346 81,502 3,890 11,303 46,588 68,763 47,298 61,452 97,650 57,168 34,178 70,248 44,946 28,302 11,602 22,509 30,743 21,794 20,000 1,904 8,999 20,623 61,873 2,942 4,256 11,346 45,103 21,375 12,749 13,595 23,276 2,719 6,800 $423,104 283,321 273,825 97,839 394,408 40,815 49,134 11,516 63,167 32,496 44,329 037,893 36,848 95,909 137,181 71,238 21,255 15,010 20,915 72,430 10,602 22,426 16,667 3,716 19,941 12,689 12,564 9,658 232,985 ( l) 19,800 11,269 (*) 250 21,491 8,466 3,141 8,070 12,499 14,884 95,475 4,973 8,141 7,076 1,980 10,001 $2,734,276 475,687 1,234,236 585,900 770,425 327,600 259,228 351,154 254,577 340,463 306,374 216,281 $108,371 (c) (c) 150,691 164,259 606 $4,399,078 296,563 <*448,535 294,072 1,641,552 187,764 47,982 118,559 110,111 118,244 168,909 15,831 348,799 153,693 370,791 19,821 33,334 13,902 10,646 1,541 14,862 19,143 9,091 5,258 7,149 23,012 30,226 23,110 9,610 2,355 11,772 14,267 33,376 8,768 4,528 4,538 8,488 9,438 4,345 17,292 7,647 11,784 13,272 10,167 6,574 $2,906,767 5605,201 5320,224 130,892 356,446 207,728 562,263 5143,918 178,368 233,369 5253,531 104,981 161,441 110,228 176,633 i 139,228 *67,529 108,999 40,641 59,807 55,939 90,652 3 151,267 90,360 41,593 44,571 534,023 572,422 41,767 81,839 40,200 34,323 23,300 9,013 522,923 35,543 10,191 P 15,895 28,300 12,360 30,000 539,253 ( s) 43,770 18,446 34,400 (t>) 17,000 43,876 15,000 513,553 515,100 15,182 28,000 8,415 17,566 8,335 14,927 516,926 24,912 515,682 106,281 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 (*’) 210,276 1246,533 217,820 161,167 151,173 154,999 290,843 113,273 78,822 133,800 250,038 91,886 77,548 75,743 122,166 111,000 87,501 87,000 99,950 400 80,226 71,857 49,363 46,733 93,147 90,121 72,168 49,653 75,527 52,668 34,217 47,303 33,241 58,461 69,409 45,752 83,972 55,583 55,786 53,593 63,906 36,433 52,338 49,338 66,698 58,290 83,374 (c) M 14,380 (o ) (*) (*) 79,331 3,000 <*) (*) 112,450 (h) 41,639 9,897 27,535 39,941 44,260 (c) M 36,456 23,110 27,897 4,000 9,726 («) 55,926 20,853 («) 10,164 26,684 Is ) (*) 682 1,500 12,060 22,912 (A) (<0 (*) (h) 7,474 21,577 14,980 11,665 (h\ M 27,100 (?) 7,679 (c) 155,227 *148,598 64,881 231,835 27,196 61,426 («) 58,286 66,082 73,236 37,758 111,024 233,813 m76,378 81,095 40,958 m 124,968 60,538 44,509 101,764 97,839 50,715 54,389 66,211 159,969 10,519 93,848 12,486 19,011 65,508 51,560 30,935 122,563 42,220 37,368 28,938 15,244 54,715 79,693 22,876 30,267 56,129 10,490 81,648 83,554 11,180 m Including expenditures for sewers. n Including expenditures for police courts, jails, workhouses, reformatories, etc. o Included in expenditures for police department. P Including expenditures for flushing streets. a No sprinkling done; expenditures for flushing streets included in expenditures for street cleaning. r Including expenditures for street cleaning, street sprinkling, and garbage removal. s Included in expenditures for health department. t Including expenditures for police courts and jails. mExpenditures for police courts and jails included in expenditures for police department. v Included in expenditures for garbage removal. w For 16 months. * Supported by county. BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION arlal mir. 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Cities. Garbage removal. Interest on debt. Water works. Gas works. New York N. Y ........................................ $2,625,668 $13,693,155 $3,000,990 1,520,187 533,922 1,520,813 Chicago, 111....................................................... 1,412,668 Philadelphia Pa ........................................... 1,429,959 685,567 654,068 779.259 217,114 St. Louis* M o...................................................... 612,387 Boston, Mass .. .......................................... 623,000 a 3,388,528 394,736 1,547,410 165,647 ........................................... Baltimore, Md 274,051 712,575 Cleveland, Ohio................................................. 102,511 436,431 662.259 117,035 Buffalo, N. Y ...................................................... 14,730 San Franebco, C a l........................................... 480,058 1,737,285 Cincinnati, O h io ............................................... 26,583 231,821 948,462 Pittsburg, P a ..................................................... 93.890 799,720 . New Orleans, L a ............................................... 95,970 / 56,803 332,378 Detroit, Mich..................................................... 65.000 152,069 315,829 Milwaukee, W is................................................. 181,858 h 323,185 Washington, D. C ............................................. 121,807 (ff) 230,375 801,629 69,792 Newark^ N. J ...................................................... 554,867 993,846 Jersey City, N. J ................................................. 147,090 483,274 Louisville", K y .................................................... $1,166 133,785 376,400 135,996 639,335 28.890 3,000 . 128,527 41,795 Indianapolis, I n d ............................................. 187,323 , 325,075 19,192 Kansas City, Mo................................................. 98,751 ! 1 329,906 20,569 St. Paul, M in n ................................................... 102,507 Rochester, N. Y ................................................. 106,714 523,773 3,862 134,161 Denver, C olo...................................................... 67,457 326,055 12.000 Toledo, O h io...................................................... 208,827 256,600 28,000 Allegheny, Pa.................................................... (m) 124,005 15,800 Columbus, O h io................................................. 50,783 430,655 l.1, ‘36 Worcester, Mass................................................ 107,942 295,893 Syracuse, N. Y ................................................. (k , 000 161,268 New Haven, C o n n ............................................ 5,949 152,415 Paterson, N .J .................................................... 30,000 52,076 231,524 30,300 Fall River M ass............................................... 75,034 St. Joseph, M o.................................................... 3,120 259,611 2,947 Omaha, Nebr...................................................... 69,210 Los Angeles, Cal................................................. 12,225 160,921 Memphis, Tenn.................................................. (®) 56,516 Scranton, Pa....................................................... 94,332 175,116 Lowell, Mass...................................................... 33,500 123,534 217,887 Albany, N .Y ....................................................... 418 79,239 325,302 Cambridge, M ass...................... - ....................... 56,445 34,754 304,063 Portland, M e ...................................................... 4,529 112,162 143,425 Atlanta, Ga......................................................... (°) 59,402 Grand Rapids, M ich.......................................... 90,990 6,219 40,974 Dayton, O hio...................................................... 21,620 172,477 34,039 375,814 Richmond, V a.................................................... 20,300 59,595 161,088 Nashville, T e n n ................................................ P 35,537 64,929 275,632 Seattle, Wash..................................................... 1,027 76,265 187,816 Hartford, Conn.................................................. 24,850 44,474 17,188 61,466 Reading, Pa ....................................................... 56,016 Wilmington, Del................................................ 28,239 80,891 59,358 125,358 10,100 Camden, N .J ...................................................... 48,791 Trenton, N .J ...................................................... 18,459 145,385 71,753 26,507 Bridgeport, C onn............................................... 76,862 204,097 Lynn, Mass......................................................... 36,104 23,834 Oakland, C a l...................................................... 98,127 89,768 Lawrence, Mass.................................................. 30,000 36,108 155,545 23.972 New Bedford, Mass........................................... Des Moines, Iowa............................................... 1,000 51,0?8 43,776 140,217 23,173 Springfield, M ass............................................... 48,838 51,831 31.972 Somerville, M ass............................................... 77,195 82,648 I Troy, N .Y .......................................................... 29,730 luding $126,103 expended by county, biding $1,214,711 expended by comity, luding expenditures for ferries and bridges, luded in expenditures for docks and wharves. ; including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. •6 months only. 1,235 paid out of sinking fund. luding expenditures by United States Government. luding expenditures by United States Government for waterworks, but not includ of United States Government for lighting public parks and spaces and $574,235 g fund. 1017 STATISTICS OF CITIES. Table X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2). Electriclight plants. Docks and wharves. $330,716 $863,729 22,680 13,287 58,029 Ferries and bridges. $889,283 115,491 101,885 5,706 c 89,395 51,714 4,361 4,547 108,244 277 17,618 99 4,535 8,792 3,438 98,883 107 78 443,094 20,357 (rf) 7,943 6,695 35,545 23,374 45 7,985 60,860 13,472 3,828 25,075 30,193 5,563 6,394 42,763 23,264 24,583 617 1,306 21,112 14,322 Markets. Cemeteries. $72,688 4,000 7,310 6,675 13,071 29,941 20,707 14,370 $ 1,200 1,870 67,892 29,108 167 13,312 12,126 4,000 7,355 7,034 20,992 720 9,306 2,880 2,349 2,906 6,255 5,577 9,052 7,203 24*898 34,352 9,748 24,854 1,253 20,318 24,093 500 7,217 23,568 ................. . ........... 338 | 2,578 I !!!!!!!!!!!! 15,000 4,809 9,841 4,718 21,346 8,398 1,247 5,233 11,401 4,301 49 13,651 5,834 8,090 5,874 7,332 90 16,223 1,990 1,854 7,806 2,819 8,019 18,150 2,031 5,132 6,708 2,409 1,145 12,395 16,527 9,032 4,490 28,935 10,723 32,403 8,095 Bath houses and bathing pools and beaches. Other. Total. I $89,895 $27,137,298 $102,946,573 1,565,446 16,443 22,260,661 2,805,450 10,200 19,106,707 761,821 8,715,821 3,955,881 5 21,898,291 155,929 1,005,474 8,064 7,613,756 478,684 4,805,717 796,377 3,114 5,865,286 1,935,320 5,891,297 493,873 6,215,866 903,386 5,406,446 1,887,072 e4,297,808 692,591 e 4,055,966 579,127 11,275 3,733,315 1,003,163 & 5,387,271 2,543 388,445 e 3,812,511 4,580 397,204 e 3,598,464 467,997 ! 2,774,987. 4,908 469,784 2,944,208 313,769 * 3,465,201 1,076 225,328 1,706,434 ’ **405 663,409 2,751,935 431,933 1 2,368,991 2,870 i 844,475 3,238,368 323,741 1,889,983 199,624 1,574,315 1,639,540 155,038 208,722 «1,446,274 632 . 109,224 2,364,259 570,595 5,223 { 2,295,883 1,453,412 147,697 1,228,754 210,558 242,688 1,613,904 904,996 402.738 344,815 1,444,287 1,472,576 254,071 91,386 915,090 761,734 122,119 152,791 1,407,470 1,912 ! 175,074 1,452,016 2,370 2,157,086 407.739 959,856 72,364 1,164,751 112,463 178,787 c l, 034,506 943,194 60,097 154,462 1,261,816 822,682 58,115 1,120,302 164,895 2,152 121,339 1,457,939 77,974 e 691,480 *325 60,016 671,113 836,568 61,609 e 799,650 65,361 782,711 87,276 139,781 1,218,846 731,181 89,372 810,371 54,756 813 69,627 e l, 017,982 742,465 120,600 800 1,162,739 97,013 635 1,036,717 235,538 101,362 86 1,015,681 1,214 720 235 Included in expenditures for street cleaning. Included in other street expenditures. Not including $74,206 paid out of sinking fund. t» $342,547 paid out of sinking fund. wNot including $342,547 paid out of sinking fund. o Included in expenditures for health department. p Including expenditures for sewers and street cleaning. J Jc l j Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 1018 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (1)— Continued. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 63 Hoboken, N. J ............................. 64 Evansville, Ind........................... 65 Manchester, N. H ........................ 66 Utica, N .Y ................................... 67 Peoria, 111................................... 68 Charleston, S. C........................... 69 Savannah, G a ............................. 70 Salt. Lake City, U ta h _________ 71 San Antonio, "T e x ...................... 72 Duluth, Minn r........................... 73 Erie, P a ....................................... 74 Elizabeth, N. J ........................... 75 Wilkesbarre, Pa......................... 76 Kansas Cityj K an s.................... 77 Harrisburg" P a ........................... 78 Portland, Me. (« )........................ 79 Yonkers, N. Y ............................. 80 N orfolk ,V a................................ 81 Waterbury, C o n n ...................... 82 Holyoke, M ass........................... 83 Fort Wayne, I n d ........................ 84 Youngstown, O h io.................... 85 Houston, T e x ............................. 86 Covington, K y ........................... 87 Akron, Ohio................................ 88 Dallas, T ex.................................. 89 Saginaw, M ich ........................... 90 Lancaster, P a ............................. 91 Lincoln, Nebr............................. 92 Brockton, M ass......................... 93 Binghamton, N .Y ...................... 94 Augusta, Ga................................ 95 Pawtucket, R. I ......................... 96 Altoona, P a ................................ 97 Wheeling, W. Y a ....................... 98 Mobile, A l a ................................ 99 Birmingham, A la ...................... 100 Little Rock, A r k ....................... 101 Springfield, Ohio........................ 102 Galveston, T ex ........................... 103 Tacoma, Wash............................. 104 Haverhill, Mass......................... 105 Spokane, Wash........................... 106 Terre Haute, I n d ........................ 107 Dubuque, Iow a........................... 108 Quincv, 111.................................. 109 South Bend, In d ......................... 110 Salem, Mass................................ 111 Johnstown, P a ........................... 112 Elmira, N .Y ................................ 113 Allentown, P a......................___ 114 Davenport, I o w a ........................ 115 McKeesport, Pa........................... 116 Springfield, 111............................. 117 Chelsea, Mass.............................. Hospitals, Police asylums, courts,iails, alms work Fire de Health de Police department. houses. re partment. partment. houses, and other forma charities. tories, etc. 6108,321 51,539 45,646 41,490 63,370 89,773 87,443 40,422 i 47,140 41,407 30,842 53,431 35,110 52,427 30,609 42,346 80,303 61,505 41,401 48,409 31,968 44,643 i 52,918 38,719 32,021 39,053 33,018 16,046 15,736 41,437 28,975 57,983 46,686 17,497 36,852 38,595 45,081 i 30,933* 29,790 i 40,133 35,256 33,017 36,091 30,275 27,830 21,153 21,115 38,543 17,664 i 35,040 i 12,994 26,223 i 34,969 32,269 35,104 S3,400 1,649 2,751 2,385 15,006 36 5,621 V) 13,946 1,786 700 1,036 5,226 8,620 47 4,816 3,013 (i) 7,195 2,830 5,787 2,746 1,500 1,800 5,519 (w ) 691 6,232 1,116 14,195 (il 327 V) 2,767 6,037 1,000 5,464 600 682,856 60,406 88,791 75,665 62,419 48,200 76,812 43,051 43,973 87,775 62,752 25,688 35,937 40,251 20,039 60,815 48,657 46,411 34,777 73,330 55,811 35,324 63,749 33,530 40,505 50,071 30,131 15,297 29,039 54,665 26,512 52,973 38,430 24,058 42,347 23,914 38,345 28,742 27,645 51,724 46,934 48,953 67,185 39,983 32,361 28,499 33,648 35,305 10,200 54,343 18,744 25,046 33,498 44,617 34,408 66,712 2,210 12,931 c13,079 5,991 11,904 17,940 5,284 14,933 6,049 6,697 6,655 3,183 23,041 25,475 4,236 24,454 26,752 2,681 6,634 4,828 6,334 P 23,279 16,276 18 P 20,001 2,697 1,519 3,355 10,476 5,710 7,731 19,777 250 35,653 5,752 12,562 50,551 13,661 (9) 18,197 7,949 (9) 14,299 1,264 300 39,138 13,284 22,418 21,492 i.,945 4,193 2,303 1,983 9,927 3,495 5,823 1,928 7,945 3,457 9,689 bb 19,163 28,253 4,200 3,038 3,635 39,815 5,443 7,451 7,817 469 1,770 1,178 3,592 .......: ......... 676 14,739 47,484 1,107 10,260 7,651 1,833 P i, b ll 3,296 2,249 16,808 « Including expenditures for street sprinkling. &Included in expenditures for street cleaning. c For 11 months only. d Including expenditures for street sprinkling; for 11 months only. e Included in expenditures for street cleaning; for 11 months only. /In clu din g 61,000 contributed to Jacksonville fund. (/Not including 669,493 expended by State and county. h Supported by State and county. i Including expenditures for police courts, jails, workhouses, reformatories, etc. j Included in expenditures for police department. k Included in other street expenditures. l Including expenditures for parks, street cleaning, and street sprinkling. w Paid for by property owners. n Data are for 9 months. o Including expenditures for garbage removal. P Including expenditures for hospitals, asylums, almshouses, and other charities 615,402 2,274 20,682 17,105 22,805 /64,782 17,923 10,001 7,186 13,243 (9) 52,947 1019 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (1)—Continued. Schools. $186,560 175,229 125,929 c*169,149 199,306 fir7,950 Libraries, art gal leries, museums, etc. $8,473 5,279 c 6,136 11,046 500 (h ) 264,557 107,965 24lj 867 137,896 126,660 144,211 116,611 157,604 139,571 207,045 58,774 179,955 197,117 111,732 145,314 125,231 92,823 165,828 92,762 142,353 88,944 117,821 140,787 156,363 5,680 8,547 6,789 1,747 6,100 4,403 1,500 1,000 6,000 5,097 2,877 9,163 3,535 2,443 4,387 6,651 1,892 (V ) 134,843 88,699 94,545 (*) V 26,287 76,427 112,192 96,310 164,090 122,508 157,248 138,530 94,683 82,732 81,931 118,029 104,344 130,057 92,662 150,081 105,008 105,971 124,471 7,182 5,053 Parks. $4,500 1,698 5,264 c6,956 28,493 9,349 8,712 7,821 12,706 8,628 3,692 (fc) 468 1,284 3,460 <240 23,640 9,774 3,783 7,442 10,636 1,539 1,900 1,682 2,8S0 526 100 3,210 936 236 2,000 1,807 4,093 3,624 8,515 177 6,354 7,387 5,704 2,117 1,047 6,308 2,936 6,300 1,530 6,679 394 3,000 2,968 3,896 (cc) 1,425 (*j 4,114 1,375 5,106 11,114 3,070 8,418 4,337 4,583 7,413 7,399 Sewers. Municipal Lghiing. $5,718 3,999 4,179 c 3,821 5,229 7,222 4,865 3,465 3,359 8,649 $27,499 28,072 59,471 c 62,773 34,901 27,254 36,591 31,203 2,216 7,143 4,036 1,000 24^666 3,821 19,641 6,696 3.102 2,170 4,889 3,280 3,298 1,500 114 1,006 833 2,465 11,636 2,620 4,548 11,100 3,070 945 2,723 593 1,086 1,663 2,370 12,989 3,164 1,609 1,200 4,760 2,292 2,225 3,231 2,500 10,734 1,829 1,500 2,212 4,468 23,610 37,322 22,647 40,212 33,195 33,779 37,507 39,540 16,556 22,887 30,191 29,100 24,158 21,800 20,043 27,060 23,947 18,000 27,492 13,800 32,663 45,140 24,078 33,299 16,499 18,334 17,254 36,446 36,665 11,107 27,422 24,162 19,893 19,695 36,913 18,416 37,299 19,727 9,574 20,416 22,667 27,896 Street cleaning. a$16,010 15,499 8,639 d 23, 111 16,853 14,983 15,271 14,714 17,559 3,830 a 5,477 (fc) (m) a 13,510 3,395 18,995 16,867 0 35,755 9,750 8,455 10,537 20,216 (fc) 8,695 5,200 10,638 8,709 5,716 t 3,370 6,900 10,546 1,700 14,361 a 4,919 9,689 8 4,934 * <*) (fc) fc (<*) (fc) 4,607 5,132 12,473 13,770 4,155 18,972 5,813 a8,147 3,744 1,505 9,624 a 9,000 a 13,858 4,999 Street sprink ling. Other street expendi tures. Mar ginal num ber. (*>) $7,109 3,619 («) $1,695 5,326 46,378 c 7,225 18,833 16,635 40,953 20,160 71,694 39,802 12,444 1 26,838 38,158 16,200 36,086 47,513 24,377 43,259 15,245 15,877 8,976 9,249 r 58,664 s 27,709 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 1,500 1,200 25,067 4,828 7,507 (*) (fc) (m) (b) (m) 7,403 1,113 (» ) 9,115 145 5^447 2,894 (m) W 9,993 675 2,110 8,622 (6) (■ ) b (m) (m) 8,977 4,080 500 (m) (m) 4,134 (*) 8,779 (b) (*) 9,190 22,393 26,803 14,257 w6,709 80,006 20,048 5,695 24,356 13,132 1,023 26,471 r 29,805 *•11,727 o a 47,829 25,003 r 26,777 42,477 15,892 9,202 25,773 8,397 18,605 46,441 5,090 30,606 10,039 10,808 8,825 7,926 27,771 Included in expenditures for health department. Including expenditures for street cleaning. Including expenditures for street sprinkling and garbage removal. t Including expenditures for street sprinkling, but not including $3,500, value of work performed by citizens in lieu of payment of poll tax in cash. « Not including $2,287, value of work performed by citizens in lieu of payment of poll tax in cash. t>$94,060 expended by State and county, w*Supported by State. #$45,876 expended by State and county. Including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc., but not including $24,431 expended by State and county. * Included in expenditures for schools. a a Including expenditures for street cleaning and removal of ashes. Including expenditures for street cleaning and garbage removal, pc included in expenditures for waterworks. q r s BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ble X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2)—Continued. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Garbage removal. Interest on debt. Water works. Gas works. 63 Hoboken, N .J ......... $65,028 $160,379 $8,805 64 Evansville, In d ....... 57,452 104,082 5,000 65 Manchester, N. H __ 31,144 81,742 17,458 66 Utica, N. Y ............... a 33,120 a 22,898 67 Peoria, 111............... . 51,407 600 68 Charleston, S. C........ 155,793 23,650 69 Savannah, G a ......... 28,397 157,765 42,018 70 Salt Lake City, Utah. 168,344 37,415 10,142 71 San Antonio, T ex__ 13,958 (« ) 72 Duluth, M in n ........ . 36,466 $35,079 283,125 73 Erie, P a .................... 38,482 62,806 74 Elizabeth, N .J.......... 127,747 7,107 75 Wilkesbarre, P a ___ 24,395 76 Kansas City, Kans... 142,137 77 Harrisburg, P a ........ 57,511 600 28,856 78 P o rtla n d ,M e .(i).... 82,214 3,817 162,104 54,601 79 Yonkers, N. Y .......... 31,306 80 Norfolk, Va............... 248,405 63,490 (*) 81 Waterbury, C onn__ 61,422 17,424 16,000 82 Holyoke, Mass.......... 93,239 17,160 27,858 23, ‘ 07 83 Fort Wayne, I n d ___ 24,004 7,193 84 Youngstown, O hio... 32,990 25,691 1,270 151,183 85 Houston, T ex............ 18,508 (m) 86,824 86 Covington, K y .......... 40,710 21.387 87 Akron, O h io ............ . 108,709 32,876 88 Dallas, T e x ............... 1,693 56,540 25,614 89 Saginaw, M ic h ........ 308 24,686 25,854 6,230 90 Lancaster, Pa.......... . 87,812 24,049 91 Lincoln, N e b r.......... 480 16,201 92 Brockton, Mass....... . 8,016 91,885 29,165 93 Binghamton, N. Y ... 19,029 32,141 94 Augusta, G a ............. 99,838 176,718 59,945 3,600 95 Pawtucket, R. I ........ 21,062 37,808 96 Altoona, Pa............... 51,161 80,077 97 Wheeling, W .V a .... 8,593 26,293 23,044 37,185 98 Mobile, Ala............... (*) 16,635 119,450 99 Birmingham, Ala ... 5,550 100 Little Rock, A rk....... 101 Springfield, O h io___ 53,234 19,451 r2,662 29,502 102 Galveston, T e x ........ 91,025 (s) 32,806 103 Tacoma, Wash.......... 228,233 122,224 19,973 104 Haverhill, M ass....... 2,713 15,715 105 Spokane, W ash........ 144,596 106 Terre Haute, I n d ___ 5,331 21,276 1 40,780 19,385 107 Dubuque, Iow a........ 2,219 108 Quincy, 111................. 48,605 2,481 109 South Bend, In d ....... 37,020 27,889 no Salem, M ass............. 52,074 34,145 2,594 111 Johnstown, Pa.......... 28,574 112 Elmira, N .Y ............. 26,627 25,682 113 Allentown, Pa.......... 3,000 31,522 114 Davenport, I o w a ___ 4,723 17.388 115 McKeesport, P a ....... 29,801 30,964 1,539 116 Springfield, 111.......... 51,841 v 26,210 117 Chelsea, Mass............ 9,175 15,696 57,463 aFo •11 months only. 5 Im hiding $1,000 contributed to Jacksonville fund, but not including $69,493 expended by State and count r for schools. cNo ; including amount expended by State and county for schools. 3,964 paid out of sinking fund, a m cNc t including $118,964 paid out of sinking fund. f i n :luded in expenditures for ferries and bridges, aim hiding expenditures for docks and wharves. h No ; including expenditures for street cleaning and street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. i D a A are for 9 months. 3 No ; including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners, fclm luded in expenditures for street cleaning. Un< luding $44,099 expended for various purposes in Atlantic City and Brambleton wards, which Lt can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. 1021 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2)—Continued. Electriclight plants. Ferries and bridges. Docks and wharves. $1,526 $989 4,865 «11,236 7,709 $1,165 g ( / ) 725 673 i 23,217 551 494 1,717 1,585 300 24,356 33,220 117 4,694 1,096 2,789 2,870 1,200 9,866 5,746 2,452 7,675 6,975 £63 2,116 3,799 2,760 210 3,554 1,644 800 5,877 1,398 3,946 2,126 1,083 335 1,850 412 2,599 3,892 180 181 2,365 559 1,156 23,448 69,251 8,446 5,811 1,189 a 2,068 173 563 (/) 5,498 8,983 2,031 316 471 211 $1,500 756 8,085 85 9,215 1,902 3,370 1,814 $5,022 12,376 12,491 Bath houses and bathing pools and beaches. a 1,085 3,100 5,150 542 $22,771 Markets. Cemeteries. 788 133 643 200 5,044 979 1,695 6,542 8,433 4,852 10,805 Other. Total. $120,934 61,142 54,025 a 152,268 150,857 55,139 69,741 88,012 72,372 123,048 44,724 55,044 40,345 91,976 49,406 152,864 81,589 1 185,631 5,632 195,195 36,346 44,764 132,449 76,684 53,123 49,469 42,841 21,215 35,451 81,718 76,952 99,205 76,171 44,279 43,192 33,532 64,213 20,040 37,625 45,607 58,101 65,445 67,084 90,368 50,630 37,367 31,718 90,367 24,065 101,777 15,397 61,407 62,747 47,141 234,058 $828,814 598,742 631,284 649,502 694,825 6537,734 c 616,857 789,942 e 417,673 1,006,551 442,985 474,510 h 372,229 550,042 448,155 j 694,289 829,422 843,462 j 423,469 791,951 363,835 415,932 686,392 470,810 375,527 466,822 419,033 J 249,353 n350,259 635,042 443,110 o431,617 664,189 275,085 438,783 P 232,510 3 388,551 j 198,953 407,480 456,150 698,354 575,685 547,336 401,415 « 341,216 276,387 j 306,262 552,354 223,237 471,127 233,105 342,644 344,563 375,040 659,775 Mar ginal num ber. 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 m Included in other street expenditures. nNot including $2,287 value of work performed by citizens in street cleaning, street sprinkling, and other street expenditures, in lieu of poll tax in cash. oNot including $94,060 expended by State and county for schools. pN ot including $45,876 expended by State and county for schools. q Not including $24,431 expended by State and county for schools, and expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. »•Expenditures for removal of ashes included in other street expenditures, s Included in expenditures for health department. t Not including $23,873 paid out of sinking fund. u Not including $23,873 paid out of sinking fund, and expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. v Including expenditures for parks. 9398— N o. 42— 02------10 1022 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (1)—Concluded. Mar ginal num her. 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Chester, P a .................................. York, P a....................................... Malden, Mass.............................. Topeka, Kans.............................. Newton, Mass.............................. cSioux City, Iowa......................... Bayonne, N. J.............................. Knoxville, Tenn......................... Schenectady, N. Y ...................... Fitchburg, Mass......................... Superior, W is.............................. Rockford, 111.............................. Taunton, Mass............................ Canton, O h io.............................. Butte, M o n t................................ Auburn, N.^?.............................. Chattanooga, T en n .................... East St. Louis, 111........................ Joliet, 111..................................... Hospitals, Police asylums, courts,jails, alms workFire de Health de Police partment. houses, and department. houses, re partment. other forma charities. tories, etc. $25,000 20,851 34,027 25,269 70,520 22,873 41,548 *22,332 19,967 33,934 25,919 15,836 40,040 23,957 60,304 *39,616 20,000 *32,610 32,764 *28,516 $2,177 1,546 801 (0 1,050 2,303 1,546 1,029 2,864 7,692 (0 1,500 (<) 2,518 (0 $15,699 14,037 34,391 28,303 56,222 29,631 13,893 22,636 20,086 30,247 37,575 27,669 27,385 36,534 38,940 27,130 20,516 35,120 27,277 29,097 $4,500 2,948 6,842 9,556 18,617 *5,299 6,521 1,773 15,156 4,467 8,904 1,816 4,050 4,140 12,511 9,542 3,065 a14,261 *4,982 4,471 $300 39,964 1,715 44,274 (/) 3,361 9,130 7,088 45,075 13,722 1,096 33,159 3,276 1,599 16,438 »*7,700 (/) 2,000 a Including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc. 6 Included in expenditures for schools. c Included in other street expenditures. d Including expenditures for street cleaning. e Including expenditures for hospitals, asylums, almshouses, and other charities. /In clu d e d in expenditures for health department. a Paid for by property owners. * Including expenditures for police courts, jails, workhouses, reformatories, etc. i Included in expenditures for police department. j Including expenditures for sewers, street cleaning, street sprinkling, and garbage removal, and expenditures for construction and other capital outlay for sewers. 1023 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION <!)—Concluded. Schools. $93,196 77,146 160,233 102,479 197,442 123,345 138,535 51,293 54,617 108,551 119,514 100,306 115,683 110,293 ol78,046 35,506 80,309 47,254 80,223 65,705 a Libraries, art gal leries, museums, etc. (*>) $9,900 6,085 15,863 2,584 4,295 Parks. Sewers. Municipal lighting. $2,500 330 1,390 5,491 4,047 1,249 $2,000 395 2,622 2*960 4,958 1,788 3,473 3,461 6,956 294 6,790 4,276 6,112 5,779 2,391 12,147 681 1,100 2,391 2,000 550 5,837 3,794 4,207 5,348 727 1,372 4,245 7,397 2,500 (c ) 430 2,583 1,412 $22,500 23,367 30,067 57,769 17,454 31,560 24,669 23,233 30,839 12,075 20,078 8,066 25,762 22,924 19,177 30,000 8 6,382 16,108 16,335 Street cleaning. Street sprink ling. $1,000 («) 7,843 23,054 6,682 6,700 («) 4,860 4,782 *18,637 9,077 8,500 (m ) 10,700 *20,093 7,540 4,956 *39,507 6,805 Mar Other street ginal expendi num tures. ber. ii,854 $12,153 15,901 d62,551 24,753 129,959 35,540 5,647 j 17,332 14,040 41,636 (*) 17,331 32,668 n 2,184 33,805 0 !251 i>18,964 19,795 $9,596 210 14,646 (0 ) 1,840 (o) 1,000 4,229 (*) (S') (0 (l) 27,948 * Including expenditures for street sprinkling and other street expenditures. Included in expenditures for street cleaning. Expenditures for flushing streets included in other street expenditures. Including expenditures for flushing streets. o Including expenditures for school district extending beyond city limits. P Including expenditures for sewers, g Including expenditures for general medical aid. r Expenditures for general medical aid included in expenditures for health department. sFor 4 months only. i m n 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 182 133 134 135 136 137 1024 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X II.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2)—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Garbage removal. Cities. $2,000 14,852 10,400 600 10,550 8,262 6,423 (0 Chester, P a ......................................................... York, Pa. ................................................. Malden ATass _________ ________________ Topeka, Kans...................................................... Newton, Mass. ................................ ....................... Sioux City, Iowa................................................. Bayonne, N..T............................................_........ K noxville, Tenn .... ............................ ........_ _ Schenectady, N. Y ............................................. Fitchburg, Mass................................................. Superior, W is...................................................... Rockford, 111...................................................... Taunton, Mass.................................................... Canton, O h io...................................................... 2,719 1,745 1,040 Butte, M o n t ____________ ____________________ ___ Montgomery, Ala............................................... Auburn, N .Y ...................................................... Chattanooga, T enn............................................ ! East St. Louis, 111............................................... Joliet, 111............................................................ j 2,696 5,694 3,850 6,567 3,080 Interest on debt. c$18,616 19,868 49,083 51,770 264,726 c 24,411 98,430 73,508 33,721 80,535 91,783 23,183 80,806 41,112 Water works. Gas works. $35,291 17,955 23,729 11,522 34,275 30,236 27,783 23,641 34,721 J 3 4 , 171 106,730 21,824 48,453 42,500 8,097 53,133 19,547 14,828 a Not including $13,645 paid out of sinking fund. b Not including $13,645 paid out of sinking fund, but including $5,597 paid out of sinking fund, which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. cNot including $79,694 paid out of sinking fund. dNot including $79,694 paid out of sinking fund, and expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. e Included in other street expenditures. 1025 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X XII.—EXPENDITURES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION (2)—Concluded. Electriclight plants. Docks and wharves. Ferries and bridges. Markets. Cemeteries. $150 $13,169 Bath houses and bathing pools and beaches. $8,482 $376 259 412 10,524 $200 1,050 7,742 2,486 1,083 29,247 (/) 6,939 22 1,453 1,859 2,163 3,155 669 $452 Other. $39,680 14,903 77,218 42,320 112,579 39,926 115,179 9 34,648 31,953 40,256 69,752 19,343 44,539 34,111 86,896 23,094 40,659 34,333 58,544 20,414 Total. Mar ginal num ber. $238,844 204,653 570,162 323,487 1,043,179 d 360,864 488,955 h 257,321 265,451 485,567 408,734 278,158 i 462,356 330,714 j 512,980 *345,922 i 286,881 264,728 312,843 237,850 b / Included in other expenditures, p Including expenditures ior markets. h Including expenditures for construction and other capital outlay for sewers. i Not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. i Including expenditures for school district extending beyond city limits. fc Including unpaid warrants which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 1026 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES. Receipts. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Cash on Actual in at be come for the hand of fiscal year. ginning fiscal year. Loans. Total. «$118,740,596 b $11,416,077 $119,027,413 c$249,184,086 6,245,336 43,315,277 6,228,625 30,841,316 10,225,000 / 48,387,684 / 26,762,596 11,400,088 17,043,757 12,405,372 4,638,385 12,471,200 J 49,074,577 5 *3,245,381 h 33,357,996 Q 10,227,940 210,000 <18,933,042 6 1,084,898 2,074,362 r 13,809,910 7 4,666,939 r 7,068,609 1,828,795 s 9,592,036 8 s 6,993,994 769,247 v 10,398,372 9 «823,974 *9,574,398 11,355,612 10 1,387,915 1,475,998 8,491,699 321,232 V 16,780,214 11 9,009,231 V 7,449,751 * 9,544,183 12 3,614,641 1,396,050 z 4,533,492 (ta5,455,950 b b 1 876,365 285,259 cc7 617,574 13 5,653,722 14 934,926 451,053 4,267,743 e e 8,686,612 //1,662,426 15 220,183 9 9 10,569,221 6,073,302 wn12,449,662 mw6,199,945 16 176,415 34 694,702 1,823,934 rr 7,257,365 17 PP 4,738,729 V 4,605,324 855.000 18 V 325,774 3,424,550 290.000 im4,580,645 19 600,638 « m3,690,007 6,560,472 20 191,603 1,048,461 4,320,408 3,321,845 21 828,160 71.391 2,422,294 22 164,081 yy 5,789,478 a* 883,190 4,742,207 4,603,532 469,724 23 2,837,308 1,296,500 c c c 3,762,178 d d d 1,104,525 24 3.551.000 eee 8,417,703 75,954 0003,104,851 2,660,851 9 9 9 368,046 25 H i 2 , 144,855 831,189 ***3,383,448 407,404 26 j j j 2,413,336 27 1,495,663 j j j 4,169,177 260,178 2,854,041 28 621,816 2,177,379 51,846 4,871,465 29 295,632 3,383,896 1,191,937 30 3,649,879 q q q 6,753,797 3,061,662 333142,256 31 1.255.000 nuu 3 299,205 304,362 mum1,739,843 32 3,720,454 1,607,062 2.039.000 74.392 2,752,724 33 809,909 1,832,147 110,668 oaaa 1,407,641 34 149,416 aaaa 1,812,069 255,012 c c c c 1,790,236 35 395,802 c c c c 2,639,076 453,038 a Including $1,285,821 received from State for schools. b Including $4,863,459 cash in sinking fund. c Including $1,285,821 received from State for schools and $4,863,459 cash in sinking fund. d Including $6,959,037 State tax. e Including $3,941,440 cash in sinking fund. /In clu d in g $888,813 received from State for schools. 0Not including $3,387,600 paid out of sinking fund. h Including $233,814 received from county. * Including cash in county treasury. j Including $233,814 received from county and cash in county treasury, fc Including $632,240 State tax and $238,565 expenditures for county. * Including $17,000 paid for county, but not including $7,628,357 loans repaid out of sinking fund. m Including $632,240 State tax and $255,565 expenditures for county, but not including $7,628,357 loans repaid out of sinking fund. n Including $1,214,711 expended by county. o Including $632,240 State tax and $1,453,276 expended by county. P Including $632,240 State tax and $1,470,276 expended by county, but not including $7,628,357 loans repaid out of sinking fund. q Including $303,335 received from State for schools. r Including $154,357 received from State for schools. s Including $162,978 received from State for schools. t Including $316,715 collected for State purposes. wIncluding $167,669 cash in sinking fund and $6,625 cash in State fund. v Including $167,669 cash in sinking fund and $323,340 State funds. ™ Including $2,337,988 State tax. x Including $193,118 cash in sinking fund and $23,223 cash in State fund. v Including cash in sinking fund. * Including tax for school district extending beyond city limits. « « Including $163,847 received from State for schools. b b Including $822,787 cash in sinking fund. c c Including $163,847 received from State for schools, and $822,787 cash in sinking fund, dtf Including $648,976 cash in sinking fund. ee Including $4,427,068 appropriated from funds of U. S. Treasury, as explained on pages 903 and 904. / / Including $348,756 trust funds. 9 9 Including $348,756 trust funds and $4,427,068 appropriated from funds of United States Treasury. Including expenditures by United States Government for waterworks. **$22,950 paid out of sinking fund. j j Including expenditures by United States Government for waterworks, but not including $22,950 paid out of sinking fund. fcfcIncluding expenditures by U. S. Government for waterworks, but not including expenditures by U. S. Government for lighting of public parks and spaces, and $574,235 paid out of sinking fund. n Including expenditures by U. S. Government for waterworks, but not including expenditures by U. S. Government for lighting of public parks and spaces, and $597,185 paid out of sinking fund. m m Including $415,138 trust funds. 1 2 3 4 New Y o rk ,N .Y .... Chicago, 111............ Philadelphia, Pa .. St. Louis, Mo.......... Boston, Mass.......... Baltimore, M d....... Cleveland, Ohio . . . Buffalo, N. Y .......... San Francisco, Cal. Cincinnati, O hio... Pittsburg, P a ......... New Orleans, L a ... Detroit, M ich......... Milwaukee, W is. . . Washington, D. C .. Newark, N. J ......... Jersey City,N.J .. . Louisville, K y ....... Minneapolis, Minn Providence, R. I . . . Indianapolis, In d .. Kansas City, M o .. . St. Paul, M inn....... Rochester, N. Y ___ Denver, C o lo ......... Toledo, Ohio.......... Allegheny, P a ....... Columbus, Ohio ... Worcester, Mass ... Syracuse, N. Y ....... New Haven, Conn. Paterson, N .J........ Fall River, Mass... St. Joseph, M o ....... Omaha, N ebr........ 1027 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES. Expenditures. For construction and other capital outlay. Other than loans repaid. Loans repaid. Total. For mainte Total exclud Total includ ing loans ing loans nance and repaid. operation. repaid. Cash on hand at end of fiscal year. $53,451, GOO $85,034,632 d $138,485,632 $102,946,573 d $156,397,573 d $241,432,205 c$7,751,881 5,049,537 8,772,107 36,082,305 7,232,972 13,821,644 22,260,661 27,310,198 8,088,078 0 2,982,237 0 11,070,315 19,106,707 27,194,785 0 30,177,022 18,210,662 2,663,087 11,378,908 5,664,849 2,663,087 8,715,821 11,378,908 fe 17,255,621 1 6,517,000 m 23,772,521 0 39,153,812 P 45,670,812 i 3,403,765 n 21,898,291 9,472,704 1,809,748 755,236 49,200 1,858,948 7,613,756 9,423,504 3,939,137 889,804 4,828,941 9,634,658 4,175,252 4,805,717 8,744,854 1,870,155 8,549,638 814,197 1,042,398 2,684,352 5.865.286 7,735,441 w 2,687,144 w 2,687,144 w 8,578,441 x 1,819,931 5,891,297 w 8,578,441 2,076,150 1,001,300 9,293,316 3,077,450 6,215,866 2,062,296 8,292,016 10,476,645 V 6,303,569 4,217,261 852,938 5,070,199 5,406,446 9,623,707 963,255 1,941,847 2,905,102 7,202,910 4,297,808 2,341,273 5,261,063 1,521,830 270,544 1,792,374 5,848,340 d d 1,769,234 4,055,966 5,577,796 5,214,082 909,017 3.733.315 571,750 1,480,767 4,642,332 439,640 h h 4,278,826 j j 4,278,826 ** 5,387,271 **#, 666,097 119,666,097 m m 903,124 (« ) oo3,670,678 4.729.000 008 ,399,678 3,812,511 oo7,483,189 0012,212,189 237.473 s s 1 277,826 1,472,876 ss 2,750,702 3,598,464 ss 4,876,290 as 6,349,166 t t 908,199 1,646,969 4,421,956 744,969 902,000 V 183,368 3,519,956 2,774,987 w 1,293,336 w 387,456 905,880 2,944,208 3,850,088 w 4,237,544 343,101: w w 1,279,492 639,305 wtv 1,918,797 176.474 3,465,201 w w 4,744,693 w w 5,383,998 844,184 3,052,115 501,497 1,345,681 1,706,434 269,730j 2,207,931 907,643 258,756 1,166,399 2,751,935 3,659,578 z z 4,813,300 oaa 976,178, 831,984 1,891,984 6662,368,991 6663,200,975 6664,260,975 1.060.000 342,557 657,971 3,832,858 4,490,829 7,729,197 / / / 688,506' 3,238,368 3,896,339 462,921 2,857,672 h h h 247,179 504,768 967,689 1,889,983 2,394,751 145,912 2,990,195 1,269,968 393,253 1,415,880 2,844,283 1.574.315 2,836,313 1,196,773 1,332,864 870,486 326,287 1,639,540 2,510,026 754,852 ***541,816 kkJc 1,296,668 I I I 1,446,274 U Z2,201,126 m m m 2 , 742,942 111,0991 ooo 750,000 PEP2,302,220 mw» 1,552,220 204,986 2,364,259 n r n 3,916,479 PPP 4,666,479 r r r 990,586 sss 2,779,033 t t t 3,769,619 688,295 2,295,883 rrr 3,286,469 tt *6,065,502 w v 581,972 263,821 1,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 w v 1,581,972 1,453,412 wv 2,035,384 w v 3,035,384 ivuno 718,070 w w w 1,946,824 w w w 3,635,824 1,689,000 wane 2,407,070 84,630, 1,228,754 58,441' ***533,479 y y v 546,900 *** 1,080,379 1,613,904 033*2,147,383 z z z 2,694,283 b b b b 711,398 66661,616,364 195,705; 6556711,398 904,966 66661,616,364 2,138,383 500,693 1,700,497 256,210 437,886 694,096 1.444.287 d Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Including $164,494 received from State for schools. Including $792,567 State and county tax. Including $241,626 received from State for schools, and $16,671 received from county for elections. q q Including $72,306 cash in sinking fund. rr Including $241,626 received from State for schools, $16,671 received from county for elections, and $72,306 cash in sinking fund. a s Including $744,248 State and county tax tt Including $172,252 cash in sinking fun* m m Including $116,922 received from State for schools. w Not including $125,000 paid out of sinking fund. w w Including $311,442 State tax. as*Including $143,301 cash in sinking fund. y y Including $917,694 special tax-property sales, and $143,301 cash in sinking fund. z z Including $894,966 special tax-property sales refunded. oaa Including $109,291 cash in sinking fund. b b b Not including $74,206 paid out of sinking fund. coc Including $82,108 received from State for schools. d d d Including $637,200 cash in sinking fund. e e e Including $82,108 received from State for schools, and $637,200 cash in sinking fund. ///I n c lu d in g $445,831 cash in sinking fund. 0 9 0 Including $191,899 cash in sinking fund. h h h Including $153,890 cash in sinking fund. H i Including $51,934 received from State for schools. j j j Including $88,687 received from State for schools. k k k Not including $338,500 paid out of sinking fund. 1 1 1 Not including $342,547 paid out of sinking fund, wwm Not including $681,047 paid out of sinking fund. vnn Including $124,597 county tax. ooo Not including $130,000 paid out of sinking fund. p p p Including $124,597 county tax, but not including $130,000 paid out of sinking fund. q q q Including $23,326 cash in sinking fund. rrr Including $289,417 State and county tax. a s s Not including $26,000 paid out of sinking fund. t t t Including $289,417 State and county tax, but not including $26,000 paid out of sinking fund. m m m Including $59,758 received from State for schools. w v Including $39,702 State and county tax. w w w Including $396,845 State and county tax. x x x Including $164,769 State and county tax. y y v Not including $40,000 paid out of sinking fund. z z z Including $164,769 State and county tax, but not including $40,000 paid out of sinking fund. aaaa Including $198,506 received from State for schools. b b b b Including $329,933 county tax. occc Including $42,415 received from State for schools. nn oo pp 1028 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Continued. Receipts. Mar ginal number. Cities. Cash on Actual in at be come for the hand ginning of fiscal year. fiscal year. Loans. Total. c$2,396,559 &$592,698 « $803,861 1,683,007 $250,000 189,717 1,243,290 i 1,518,037 152,511 h 379,934 0 985,592 1,181,100 m3,312,409 198,376 fc2,032,933 P 2,868,064 498,325 P 2,072,202 297,537 3,960,636 1,183,000 255,699 2,521,937 Ml, 872,115 42,000 1 1,437,735 6392,380 w 2,268,932 625,012 209,885 w 1,434,035 * 2,017,841 153,933 6459,961 V 1,403,947 62,627,360 304,375 6805,929 1,517,056 1.722.545 120,448 1,602,097 c e 940,367 255.000 cc 1,314,088 118,721 223.000 ce 2,380,718 ce 1,786,169 371,549 334,673 662,396,742 g o 215,238 //1,846,831 150,163 k k 1,286,010 k k 889,445 246,402 355,854 o o 1,214,907 oo812,864 46,189 222,576 341,471,786 331,092,003 157,207 357,250 mi 1,896,647 m i 1,401,067 138,330 422,015 W 1,581,057 1/W1,030,586 128,456 607,792 aaa2,186,887 a m 1,515,199 63,896 ccc 982,191 c c c 916,689 65,502 1,707,914 607.000 50.910 1,050,004 2,687,479 1,238,000 50.911 1,398,568 Mfe 973,155 81,500 6661,279,532 224,877 2,684,186 663,929 326,664 1,693,593 2.269.546 896.000 103,859 1,269,687 1,833,958 626,694 55,614 1,151,650 204,409 mmml,347,109 rawml ,087,493 55,207 1,004,242 9,555 95,701 898,986 1,361,992 240,709 145,516 975,767 539,682 3331,466,521 46,900 q q q 879,939 996,342 75,864 68,780 851,698 670,588 68 29,350 641,238 872,116 69 14,311 857,805 1,287,614 16,216 215,952 70 1,055,446 a Including $468,165 received from State and county for schools. &Including cash in sinking fund. c Including $468,165 received from State and county for schools and cash in sinking fund. ^Including $243,852 cash in sinking fund. c$20,120 paid out of sinking fund. /N o t including $20,120 paid out of sinking fund. 0 Including $69,879 received from State for schools. 6 Including $239,537 cash in sinking fund. 1 Including $69,879 received from State for schools and $239,537 cash in sinking fund. /Including $242,417 cash in sinking fund. fcIncluding $122,451 received from State, i Including $25,346 cash in sinking fund. m lncluding $122,451 received from State and $25,346 cash in sinking fund. n Including $78,882 county tax. ©Including $45,047 cash in sinking fund. jpIncluding $65,379 received from State for schools and charitable purposes. 3 Including $242,679 county tax. »*Not including $247,850 paid out of sinking fund. ©Including $242,679 county tax, but not including $247,850 paid out of sinking fund, fIncluding $176,298 received from State and county for schools. Mlncluding $176,298 received from State and county for schools and cash in sinking fund. v Including $98,854 cash in sinking fund. w Including $41,530 received from State for schools. x Including $46,056 cash in sinking fund. v Including $79,205 received from State for schools. z Including $79,205 received from State for schools and cash in sinking fund. aa Including $61,780 cash in sinking fund. &&Including $403,008 cash in sinking fund. cc Including $117,897 received from State and county for schools. dd Not including $565 paid out of sinking fund. cc Including $128,134 received from State for schools. //In clu d in g $37,645 received from State for schools. ?3 Including $102,003 cash in sinking fund. M i Including $37,645 received from State for schools and $102,003 cash in sinking fund. i i Including $19,638 county tax. 5 5 Including $123,593 cash in sinking fund. k k Including $65,103 received from State for schools. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Los Angeles, C a l___ Memphis, T e n n ....... Scranton, P a ............ Lowell, Mass............ Albany, N. Y ............ Cambridge, Mass___ Portland, Oreg......... Atlanta, G a .............. Grand Rapids, Mich. Dayton, Ohio............ Richmond, V a ......... Nashville, Tenn....... Seattle, W a sh .......... Hartford, Conn......... Reading, Pa.............. Wilmington, D e l___ Camden, N. J............ Trenton, N. J ............ Bridgeport, Conn___ Lynn, Mass............... Oakland, Cal............ Lawrence, Mass....... New Bedford, Mass . Des Moines, Iowa . . . Springfield, Mass___ Somerville, Mass___ Troy, N. Y ............... Hoboken, N. J .......... Evansville, I n d ....... Manchester, N. H .. . Utica, N. Y ............... Peoria, 111................. Charleston, S. C ....... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah 1029 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Continued. Expenditures. For construction and other capital outlay. Other than loans repaid. Loans repaid. Total. For mainte Total exclud Total includ nance and ing loans ing loans repaid. operation. repaid. Cash on hand at end of fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. 8211,605 889,925 81,774,106 d8622,453 81,684,181 36 81,472,576 8301,530 475,233 292,684 /1,390,323 37 915,090 / 475,233 1.390.323 («) J 425,884 216,124 114,295 1,092,153 38 761,734 330,419 977,858 « 509,336 1,228,651 0166,952 r 3,145,457 39 w1,737,987 1,407,470 «1,916,806 r 189,000 s 2,571,573 296,491 q 930,557 s i, 119,557 40 1,452,016 q 2,382,573 802,005 276,545 41 725,000 1,527,005 2,959,091 3,684,091 2,157,086 r 478,076 392,183 42 42,000 434,183 1,394,039 959,856 1,352,039 x 768,465 335,716 43 1,500,467 335,716 1,164,751 1,500,467 607,164 44 348,164 159,000 1,541,670 cm 476,171 1,034,506 1,382,670 bb 812,065 498,732 373,369 943,194 1,815,295 45 872,101 1,316,563 273,804 273,804 1,535,620 186,925 46 1,261,816 1,535,620 dd 76,735 da 247,045 992,992 dd 1,069,727 244,361 170,310 822,682 47 775.232 1,895,534 775,232 1,895,534 485,184 48 1,120,302 i i 547,028 133,291 U 680,319 49 1,457,939 **2,004,967 i i 2,138,258 j j 258,484 mm 1 1 ,0 0 0 r m 194,901 mi 886,381 U 183,901 l l 875,381 399,629 50 691,480 PP 487,340 PP 96,709 1,061,744 PP 1,158,453 390,631 56,454 671,113 51 rr 398,460 t t 520,910 8 8 122,450 114,308 52 836,568 rr 1,235,028 t t 1,357,478 ww 25,900 v v 863,199 889,099 207,898 53 799,650 w 1,662,849 x x 1,688,749 z z 523,912 274,434 54 ** 507,912 16,000 782,711 ** 1,290,623 ««1,306,623 bbb 394,804 bbb 919,804 525.000 55 1,218,846 bbb 1,613,650 bbb 2,138,650 48,237 179,472 135,972 731,181 43,500 867,153 910,653 71,538 56 ddd 377 779 add 871,779 25,764 57 810,371 ddd 1,188,150 ddd 1,682,150 494.000 546,024 / / / l , 056,074 0 0 0 1,602,098 1,017,982 e e e 1,564,006 9 9 9 2,620,080 58 67,399 170,000 224,369 742,465 54,369 966,834 912,465 312,698 59 tit 693,004 J j j 482,200 IckJc 1,175,204 60 1,162,739 ***1,855,743 ***2,337,943 346,243 24,334 2,245,212 1,208,495 963.000 1,282,212 245,495 1,036,717 61 62 323,642 I I I 491,182 H I 814,824 3,453 1,015,681 1.339.323 I I I 1,830,505 r m n 420,677 828,814 m m 1,051,491 nnn 1,249,491 97,618 «w»222,677 198.000 63 ooo961,638 42,604 64 ooo331,188 598,742 .ooo362,896 31,708 ooo929,930 PPP 2 8 0 ,789 631,284 PPP 578,789 298.000 151,919 65 PPP 912,073 PPP 1,210,073 1,382,598 66 195,571 649,502 733,096 537,525 845,073 83,923 922,464 122,214 73,878 694,825 227,639 800,250 67 105,425 r r r 537,734 89.232 43,622 68 rrr 626,966 rrr 626,966 89,232. sss 866,798 s s s 208,241 sss 249,941 5,318 69 sss 616,857 41,700 sss 825,098 70 789,942 1,041,901 1,055,901 231,713 265,959 14,000 251,959 11 Including 81,499 State tax. mm. Not including 8114,500 paid out of sinking fund. r m Including 81,499 State tax, but not including 8114,500 paid out of sinking fund, oo Including 822,516 received from State for schools. jjpNot including 829,900 paid out of sinking fund. q q Including 884,348 received from State for schools, rr including 8184,023 State and county tax. 8 8 Not including 811,242 paid out of sinking fund. t t Including 8184,023 State and county tax, but not including 811,242 paid out of sinking fund. muincluding 895,717 received from State for schools. w Including 8246,911 State and county tax. mw Not including 897,300 paid out of sinking fund. s«c Including 8246,911 State and county tax, but not including 897,300 paid out of sinking fund. ^ In clu d in g 839,249 received from State for schools. ** Including 812,312 county tax. cumIncluding 824,336 received from State. bbb Including 8^4,005 State and county tax. ccc Including 8255,713received from State and county for schools. ddd Including 833,335 county tax. ccc Including 8119,992 State and county tax. ///N o t including 819,926 paid out of sinking fund. 9 0 9 Including 8119,992 State and county tax, but not including 819,926 paid out of sinking fund. hhh Including 823,069 received from county for schools. m Including 8121,354 State and county tax. j j j Not including 845,000 paid out of sinking fund. fcfcfcIncluding 8121,354 State and county tax, but not including 845,000 paid out of sinking fund. 1 1 1 Not including 839,724 paid out of sinking fund. mmm Including 898,589 received from State. w»mincluding 8178,265 State and county tax. o o o Including 8180,545 State and county tax. p p p Including 8160,325 State and county tax. q q q Including 826,101 received from State for schools. rrrincluding81,000contributed to the Jacksonville fund, but not including 869,493 expended by State and county for schools. s s s Not including amount expended by State and county for schools. 1030 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Continued. Receipts. Mar ginal number. Cities. Cash on Actual in at be come for the hand ginning of fiscal year. fiscal year. Loans. Total. $399,453 a $1,050,971 a 3618,660 $32,858 ol,889,518 o 391,190 157,120 1,341,208 c775,580 33,415 55,193 «686,972 /1,072,898 153,944 115,311 / 803,643 3 535,736 3,509 *94,393 h 437,834 223,324 351,559 m l, 247,440 m 672,557 D755,406 o82,118 75,010 *598,278 Ml, 376,554 250,000 77,607 « 1 ,048,947 *0 2,242,414 214,946 795,683 m>1,231,785 1/2,265,016 194,217 1,065,087 V 1,005,712 *1,209,549 76,890 485,000 *647,659 1,653,267 525,000 182,497 945,770 aa 955,300 aa 195,837 54,458 705,005 280,475 313,510 col,158,621 cc 564,636 e e 710,272 193,749 427,000 oe 1,331,021 895,037 151,714 161,840 581,483 M 884,117 0 0 162,595 172,741 //548,781 j j 706,952 123,866 11,489 j j 571,597 U 696,021 42,810 107,046 l l 546,165 mm 397,148 mm 455,210 58,062 oo650,928 53,380 60,325 oo539,223 1,587,718 34,743 661,353 891,622 179,606 aa 811,107 81,355 Q Q 550,146 889,421 18,561 388,000 482,860 2,279 319,924 mml 176,996 « m854,793 57,489 1/431,033 V 373,544 tom710,483 45,630 ww 82,476 582,377 378,781 248,375 3,906 126,500 183,792 725,181 441,389 100,000 19,*142 265,297 221,186 24,969 779,820 130,335 198,040 451,445 oool,164,969 428,840 cco736,129 e e e 126,723 d d d 932,825 ///1,059,548 M h 817,646 *U 84,436 235,000 3 3 3 1,137,082 oool,021,016 151,057 ooo869,959! a Including $51,278 received from State for schools, ft Not including $118,964 paid out of sinking fund, o Including $131,776 cash in sinking fund. d Including $138,629 cash in sinking fund. e Including $37,792 received from State for schools. /In clu d in g $53,789 received from State for schools. 0 Including $135,316 State and county tax. ft Including $34,488 received from State for schools. 1 Including $5,832 cash in sinking fund. 3 Including $S4,488 received from State for schools and $5,832 cash in sinking fund. fcNot including expenditures for street cleaning and sprinkling, paid for by property owners. l Including $3,689 cash in sinking fund. m including $12,715 received from State and county for schools. n Including $39,081 received from State for schools. ©Including $6,555 cash in sinking fund. P Including $39,081 received from State for schools and $6,555 cash in sinking fund. Q $57,700 paid out of sinking fund. *N ot including $57,700 paid out of sinking fund. ©Including $7,166 cash in sinking fund. t Data are for 9 months. mIncluding $39,821 received from State for schools. v Including $116,098 State and county tax. w Including $19,291 received from State for schools, a Including $207,194 State and county tax. v Including amount received from State for schools. * Including $27,243 received from State for schools and library. aa Including cash in sinking fund. bfi Including $18,738 cash in sinking fund. c o Including $18,447 received from State for schools. d d Not including $100,000 paid out of sinking fund. e e including $73,255 received from State and county for schools. J J Including $16,389 received from State for schools. g g Including $55,570 cash in sinking fund. Aft Including $16,389 received from State for schools and $55,570 cash in sinking fund. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 San Antonio, T e x .. Duluth, Minn........ Erie, Pa.................. Elizabeth, N. J ....... Wilkesbarre, Pa ... Kansas City, Kans. Harrisburg, P a ___ Portland, Me. (<).. Yonkers, N .Y ........ Norfolk, V a............ Waterbury, Conn.. Holyoke, Mass....... Fort Wayne, In d ... Youngstown, Ohio. Houston, T e x ....... . Covington, K y....... Akron, O h io.......... Dallas, T e x .......... . Saginaw, Mich___ 90 Lancaster, Pa....... . 91 Lincoln, N e b r....... 92 Brockton, Mass__ 93 Binghamton, N. Y 94 Augusta, G a .......... 95 Pawtucket, R. I ___ 96 Altoona, Pa............ 97 Wheeling, W .Y a... 98 Mobile, Ala............ 99 Birmingham, A la .. 100 Little Rock, A rk ... 101 Springfield, Ohio .. 102 Galveston, T e x ___ 103 Tacoma, Wash....... 104 Haverhill,Mass ... 105 Spokane, W ash__ STATISTICS OS1 CITIES, table 1031 X X III.—SUMMARY OP RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Continued. Expenditures. For construction and other capital outlay. Other than loans repaid. $291,713 370,670 253,436 0 404,638 80,524 335,828 162,747 v 308,813 *626,215 343,817 527,964 286,162 334,941 311,035 228,584 105,035 231,323 197,270 110,046 nn 97,658 169,263 PP 240,506 170,811 r r 92,904 v v 249,994 96,457 52,250 a* 34,415 183,757 29,354 81,724 227,963 191,109 kick 301,211 241,882 Loans repaid. $73,632 129,258 10,000 92,444 21,963 124,015 («) 250,000 681,000 831,121 77,500 532,500 38,761 dd 123,573 57,982 168,590 150,954 kk 5 ,0 4 2 98,888 60,000 8,590 638,730 37,545 345,500 260,000 18,025 163,252 72,000 4,630 55524,331 185,629 66,966 III 213,550 79,955 Total. $365,345 499,928 263,436 0497,082 102,487 459,843 r 162,747 v 558,813 *1,307,215 1,174,938 605,464 818,662 373,702 dd 434,608 286,566 273,625 382,277 kk 202,312 208,934 nn 157,658 177,853 PP 879,236 208,356 rr 438,404 w 509,994 114,482 215,502 ** 106,415 188,387 55553,685 267,353 294,929 191,109 m m m 514,761 321,837 Cash on hand at end of fiscal year. Mar ginal num ber. &$709,386 0 $783,018 $267,953 1,377,221 1,506,479 d 383,039 696,421 706,421 69,159 0879,148 0971,592 101,306 k 452,753 1 61,020 *474,716 885,870 1,009,885 237,555 610,902 r 610,902 s 144,504 v 1,003,102 v 1,253,102 123,452 *1,455,637 *2,136,637 105,777 1,187,279 2,018,400 246,616 951,433 1,028,933 180,616 1,078,113 1,610,613 42,654 698,776 737,537 bb 217,763 d d 850,540 726,967 308,081 972,958 914,976 358,063 575,845 744,435 150,602 757,804 i i 126,313 606,850 kk 669,134 664,092 37,818 529,079 627,967 68,054 i m 347, Oil nn 407, Oil 48,199 519,522 528,112 122,816 VP 875,548 PP 1,514,278 73,440 613,921 651,466 159,641 t t 624,521 t t 870,021 19,400 w 1,174,183 w 914,183 2,813 389,567 371,542 41,466 654,285 491,033 56,198 z z 338,925 z z 266,925 39,856 aaa 576,938 aaa 572,308 148,243 bbb 252,638 228,307 12,659 489,204 674,833 104,987 684,113 751,079 413,890 889,463 889,463 000170,085 nnn 46,636 kkk 876,896 m m m l 090,446 789,2181 869,173 151,843 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 For mainte Total exclud Total includ ing loans ing loans nance and repaid. repaid. operation. 5$417,673 1,006,551 442,985 474,510 k 372,229 550,042 448,155 694,289 829,422 843,462 423,469 791,951 363,835 415,932 686,392 470,810 375,527 466,822 419,033 249,353 350,259 635,042 443,110 ss 431,617 664,189 275,085 438,783 y y 232,510 aaa 388,551 198,953 407,480 456,150 698,354 575,685 547,336 a Including $80,816 cash in sinking fund. j j Including amount received from State and county for schools. ** Not including $54,000 paid out of sinking fund. U Including $28,634 received from State for schools and library. m m Including $29,573 received from State for schools, nn Including $2,082 State tax. o o Including $18,687 received from State for schools. l? P Including $67,158 State and county tax. q q Including $23,291 received from State for schools, rr Not including $23,733 expended by State and county for schools, ss Not including $94,060 expended by State and county for schools. 11 Not including $117,793 expended by State and county for schools. muincluding $11,202 received from State for schools. w Including $48,407 State tax. w w Including $19,368 orders in transition. a* Not including $10,691 expended by State and county for schools. y y Not including $45,876 expended by State and county for schools. z z Not including $56,567 expended by State and county for schools. a a a Not including $24,431 expended by State and county for schools. b b b Not including $7,050 paid out of sinking fund. c o c Including $88,449 received from State and county for schools. d d d Including $79,354 received from State for schools. e e e Including $1,131 cash in sinking fund. ///I n c lu d in g $79,354 received from State for schools and $1,131 cash in sinking fund. 000 Including $7,213 cash in sinking fund. h h h Including $12,521 received from State. m Including $5,100 cash in sinking fund. j j j Including $12,521 received from State and $5,100 cash in sinking fund. ickk Including $38,515 State and county tax. 111 Not including $70,000 paid out of sinking fund. m m m Including $38,515 State and county tax, but not including $70,000 paid out of sinking fund. mm Including $10,746 cash in sinking fund. o o o Including $59,404 received from State for schools. 1032 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X III.—SUMMAEY OP RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Concluded. Receipts. Mar ginal num ber. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Cash on Actual in at be come for the hand ginning of fiscal year. fiscal year. Terre Haute, I n d ..................................... Dubuque, Iow a........................................ Quincy, 111................................................ South Bend, Ind ....................................... Salem, M ass............................................. Johnstown, Pa.......................................... Elmira, N .Y ............................................. Allentown, Pa.......................................... Davenport, I o w a ..................................... McKeesport, P a ....................................... Springfield, 111.......................................... Chelsea, M ass.......................................... Chester, P a ............................................... York, Pa.................................................... Malden, Mass........................................... Topeka, K a n s.......................................... Newton, M ass.......................................... Sioux City, Iowa....................................... Bayonne, N .J .......................................... Knoxville, T e n n ..................................... Schenectady, N .Y ................................... Fitchburg, Mass....................................... Superior, W is............................................ Rockford, 111............................................ Taunton, M ass........................................ ! Canton, Ohio............................................ Butte, M o n t............................................. !| Montgomery, Ala.....................................1i Auburn, N .Y ............................................ I Chattanooga, T enn..................................1 East St. Louis, 111..................................... !' Joliet, 111.................................................. $480,533 529,996 393,789 / 566,936 ft 750,805 m 273,140 **581,157 P 345,465 *603,469 u 457,793 473,594 v 623,383 w 306,826 <**237,154 749,263 467,727 1,415,543 577,301 690,377 r r 267,989 318,883 OCX 708,601 583,328 391,498 637,999 k k k 388,548 ***711,425 ******368,777 ***431,690 n u u 284,464 553,310 417,408 <*$148,644 60,050 52,529 0 167,632 13,735 39,975 121,748 q 119,802 152,891 123,940 65,009 122,819 27,421 e e 40,594 66,026 ftft 126,165 138,087 75,330 64,932 79 176,648 V V 95,564 c c c 178,789 14,657 45,866 129,729 m m m 97,156 90,693 120,327 14,985 98,319 108,343 Loans. $72,494 35,500 119,995 441,038 228,060 80,127 190,402 113,150 69,209 633,000 212,500 32,101 362,500 140,270 1,063,300 30,965 246,021 48,250 312,945 635,300 nnn 213,196 514,300 158,061 100,000 63,600 16,101 50,000 40,454 32,000 Total. «$629,177 662,540 481,818 **854,563 ft 1,205,578 m541,175 * 783,032 r 655,669 *869.510 *<581,733 607,812 v 1,379,202 *<>546,747 //309,849 1,177,789 ftft 734,162 2,616,930 683,596 1,001,330 **<•316,318 808,476 «* 1,439,466 ccc 762,117 619,351 1,198,165 k k k 676,338 ooo908,581 r r r 523,070 ***568,118 mmm349,449 692,083 557,751 a Including $30,435 cash in sinking fund. Mncluding $32,701 cash in sinking fund. cNot including $60,167 paid out of sinking fund. <*Not including $23,873 paid out of sinking fund. «N ot including $84,040 paid out of sinking fund. /In clu d in g $13,725 received from State for schools. a Including $36,332 cash in sinking fund. ft Including $13,725 received from State for schools and $36,332 cash in sinking fund. * Not including $3,168 paid out of sinking fund. /Inclu din g $44,829 cash in sinking fund, ft Including $15,624 received from State. i Including $41,811 State and county tax. *» Including $24,197 received from State for schools. n Including $16,952 received from State for schools. 0 Including $112,725 State and county tax. j? Including $24,430 received from State for schools, a Including $57,937 cash in sinking fund. *’ Including $24,430 received from State for schools and $57,937 cash in sinking fund. &Including $57,813 cash in sinking fund. t Including $26,155 received from State for schools. mIncluding $25,683 received from State for schools. v Including $9,581 received from State. w Including $24,930 received from State for schools. « Including $7,097 State tax. v Not including $5,000 paid out of sinking fund. « Including $7,097 State tax, but not including $5,000 paid out of sinking fund. a a Not including $13,645 paid out of sinking fund, but including $5,597 paid out of sinking fund which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. W>Including $7,097 State tax and $5,597 paid out of sinking fund which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure, but not includiug $13,645 paid out of sinking fund. cc Including $7,097 State tax and $5,597 paid out of sinking fund which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure, but not including $18,645 paid out of sinking fund. d d Including $26,816 received from State for schools. e e Including $9,093 cash in sinking fund. //In clu d in g $26,816 received from State for schools and $9,093 cash in sinking fund. g g Including $2,944 cash in sinking fund, ftft Including State and county tax. 1 i Not including $10,000 paid out of sinking fund. //In clu d in g State and county tax, but not including $10,000 paid out of sinking fund, fcfcIncluding $9,256 cash in sinking fund. ** Including $9,270 cash in sinking fund. 1033 STATISTICS OF CITIES, Table X X III.—SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES—Concluded. Expenditures. For constnaction and ot her capital outlay. Other than loans repaid. $30,146 189,895 89,943 299,637 1 170,251 113,474 0177,394 150,881 207,645 169,289 97,669 92,822 x 178,555 47,603 h h 229,446 217,460 m m 557,703 111,461 q q 253,935 3 s 13,275 w w 290,817 aaa 300,273 119,311 82,996 e e e 321,062 159,554 P P P 91,744 3 8 8 81,607 95,091 12,728 293,100 126,866 Loans repaid. Total. $40,238 c71,724 63,600 i 73,330 480.670 146,720 68,200 106,500 110,634 4,000 81,874 440,000 1/124,000 32,000 i i 350,025 46,883 895,000 wn 134,835 211,000 ft 45,250 179,518 631,700 71,202 241,000 / / / 354,000 64,779 80,903 30,385 63,907 57,000 62,430 m $70,384 c 261,619 153,543 *' 372,967 l 650,921 260,194 o245,594 257,381 318,279 173,289 179,543 532,822 * 302,555 79,603 i i 579,471 264,343 m 1,452,703 mw246,296 q q 464,935 MM58,525 wm?470,335 aaa 931,973 190,513 323,996 g g g 675,062 224,333 P P P 172,647 8 3 8 111 992 158,998 69,728 293,100 189,296 For mainte Total exclud Total includ ing loans • nance and ing loans repaid. repaid. operation. $401,415 341,216 276,387 306,262 552,354 223,237 471,127 233,105 342,644 344,563 375,040 659,775 aa 238,844 204,653 570,162 323,487 1,043,179 oo360,864 488,955 v v 257,321 265,451 485,557 408,734 278,158 h h h 462,356 330,714 P P P 512,980 8 8 8 345,922 286,881 264,728 312,843 237,850 d $471,799 $431,561 e 602,835 531, 111 429,930 366,330 i 679,229 605,899 1 1,203,275 1722,605 483,431 336,711 716,721 o648,521 490,486 383,986 660,923 550,289 517,852 513,852 554,583 472,709 1,192,597 752,597 00541,399 b b 417,399 284,256 252,256 b h 799,608 i i 1,149,633 587,830 540,947 m 1,600,882 mm2,495,882 P P 607,160 oo472,325 q q 953,890 q q 742,890 tt 315,846 270,596 w w 735,786 toto 556,268 aaa 785,830 aaa 1,417,530 599,247 528,045 602,154 361,154 i i i 1,137,418 H i 783,418 555,047 490,268 P P P 685,627 P P P 604,724 e s s 457,914 3 8 8 427,529 445,879 381,972 334,456 277,456 605,943 605,943 427,146 364,716 d 0 m Cash on hand atend of fiscal year. $157,378 59,705 51,888 i 175,334 2,303 57,744 66,311 165,183 208,587 63,881 53,229 186,605 10,945 g g 25,593 28,156 t t 146,332 121,048 76,436 47,440 472 72,690 b b b 21,935 debt 162,870 17,197 60,747 121,291 q q q 222,954 89,764 122,239 14,993 86,140 130,605 b 8 Mar ginal num ber. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 mm Including $97,221 State and county tax. «n Not including $49,638 paid out of sinking fund. oo Not including $79,694 paid out of sinking fund. PPNot including $129,327 paid out of sinking fund. qq Including $93,293 State and county tax. r r Including $49,231 received from State and county for schools. S 3 Not including expenditures for sewers included in expenditures for maintenance and operation, ft Not including $9,000 paid out of sinking fund. muNot including expenditures for sewers included in expenditures for maintenance and opera tion and $9,000 paid out of sinking fund. v v Including expenditures for construction and other capital outlay for sewers, towIncluding $32,879 county tax. x x Including $41,519 received from State. w Including $95,331 cash in sinking fund. « « Including $41,519 received from State and $95,331 cash in sinking fund. aaa Including $36,661 State and county tax. b b b Including $1,315 cash in sinking fund. cco Including cash in sinking fund, deferIncluding $3,186 cash in sinking fund. eee Including $47,580 State and county tax. f f f Not including $72,300 paid out of sinking fund. ggg Including $47,580 State and county tax, but not including $72,300 paid out of sinking fund. h h h Not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. H i Including $47,580 State and county tax, but not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. j j j including $47,580 State and county tax, but not including $72,300 paid out of sinking fund and expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. k k k Including $13,859 received from State for scnools. I 1 1 Including $25,150 received from State for schools and income of school district extending beyond city limits. mmm Including $1,405 cash in sinking fund and cash of school district extending beyond city limits, nnnIncluding school district extending beyond city limits. ooo including $25,150 received from State for schools, $1,405 cash in sinking fund, and income of school district extending beyond city limits. . p p p Including expenditures for school district extending beyond city limits. q q q including $17,419 cash in sinking fund and cash of school district extending beyond city limits. r r r Including $8,724 received from State for schools. s s 8 including unpaid warrants which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. t t t including $16,139 received from State for schools. uuuincluding $28,075 received from State and county for schools. 1034 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X IV .—ASSETS (1). City hall. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 1 New York, N .Y......... 2 Chicago, 111............... 3 Philadelphia, P a ___ 4 St. Louis, Mo.............. 5 Boston, M ass............ 6 Baltimore, Md.......... 7 Cleveland, O h io....... 8 Buffalo, N .Y .............. 9 San Francisco, Cal.. 10 Cincinnati, Ohio....... 11 Pittsburg, P a ............ 12 New Orleans, La....... 13 Detroit, M ich............ 14 Milwaukee, W is....... 15 Washington, D. C___ 16 Newark, N .J ............ 17 Jersey City,N .J....... 18 Louisville, K y .......... 19 Minneapolis, M in n .. 20 Providence, R. I ....... 21 Indianapolis, Ind___ 22 Kansas City, M o ....... 23 St. Paul, M in n .......... 24 Rochester, N. Y ......... 25 Denver, C o lo ............ 26 Toledo, O h io ............ 27 Allegheny, P a .......... 28 Columbus, O h io ....... 29 Worcester, Mass....... 30 Syracuse, N. Y .......... 31 New Haven, C onn... 32 Paterson, N .J............ 33 Fall River, Mass....... 34 St. Joseph, M o .......... 35 Omaha, N ebr............ 36 Los Angeles, C al.___ 37 Memphis, Tenn......... 38 Scranton, P a ............ 39 Lowell, M ass............ 40 Albany, N . Y ............ 41 Cambridge, Mass---42 Portland, O reg......... 43 Atlanta, Ga............... 44 Grand Rapids, Mich. 45 Dayton, O h io............ 46 Richmond, Y a .......... 47 Nashville, T en n ....... 48 Seattle, Wash............ 49 Hartford, Conn......... 50 Reading, P a .............. 51 Wilmington, D e l___ 52 Camden, N .J ............ 53 Trenton, N .J ............ 54 Bridgeport, Conn— 55 Lynn, Mass............... Cash in treasury. Uncol lected Cash and bonds in sinking fund. Trust funds. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. $3,810,441 $63,380,438 $121,340,920 $4,079,549 $6,603,000 $1,500,000 $8,103,000 300,000 2,017,588 534,341 1,717,588 7,232,972 18,210,662 2,623,520 13,615,842 32,000,000 25,000,000 1,500,000 26,500,000 70,536 1,626,887 1,556,351 653,866 1,301,334 5,664,849 105,000 1,855,000 e3,403,765 3,280,177 32,802,887 1,977,924 1,750,000 2,271,135 250,000 2,021,135 9,315,978 1,190,101 755,236 1,611,821 48,000 48,000 3,177,480 344,441 4,175,252 h 1,693,080 30,342 /l , 693,080 612,466 (9) 1,042,398 1,432,057 i 7,500,000 220,618 150.000 1,603,590 (9) (0) 100,000 1,863,441 350,500 1,763,441 5,413,256 497,238 2,062,296 955.000 80,000 875.000 5,825,363 478,206 1,463,700 180.000 30.000 150.000 2,341,273 4,222,908 10.000 2,130,430 2,120,430 2,061,078 160.000 1,120,258 100,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 439,640 2,476,562 415,138 1,153,880 (9) (9) 594,674 487.986 571,152 50,000 521,152 11,300 4,928,561 237.473 1,038,324 750,000 25,000 725,000 3,484,653 735,947 4,273,650 530,000 75,000 455,000 2,118,166 178,538 1,274,516 fc1,306,122 1,306,122 1,877,103 561,813 (/) 343,101 50.000 1,170,780 3,291,615 432,403 1,120,780 25,522 176.474 9,440 9,440 286,534 269,730 15.000 1 390,000 1 375,000 401,291 26,139 866,887 fc750,000 750,000 706,613 428,927 342,557 (J) 50,000 385,000 335,000 445,831 242,675 2,421,827 25.000 q 250,000 <Z225,000 153,890 251,223 93,289 29,445 29,445 832,640 209,136 393,253 550,000 50.000 500,000 1,157,612 516,922 1,332,864 6,408 J>101,408 2,274,265 20,000 P95,000 49,261 111,099 38,000 628,000 590,000 4,480,043 399,680 322,436 204.986 Z453,500 n 17,000 8 470,500 50,896 688,295 1,692,601 18,000 258,755 240,755 60,906 338,743 574,770 263,821 445,700 23,700 422,000 127,827 84,630 1,387,895 13,500 423,500 410,000 1,643,071 87,338 287,735 58,441 2,500 *147,500 64,376 1,665 *145,000 95,832 195,705 634,675 42,000 592,'675 50,443 500,693 2,531,190 8,930 1/315,285 1/306,355 243,852 274,173 378,601 5.000 5,000 131,043 201,641 292,684 8.000 *258,000 *250,000 407,417 60,000 183,467 26,495 d 410,000 d 21,477 d 431,477 537,262 121,905 669,303 fc 470,000 1,492,041 470,000 141,104 296,491 (9) 29,800 301,800 272,000 1,999,584 25,000 474,554 276,545 a a 700,000 a a 675,000 25,000 98,854 379,222 110,477 30,000 71,365 41,365 175,751 112,394 722,409 25,000 325,000 300,000 168,903 371,087 414,391 40,000 66265,000 66225,000 519,718 64,271 409,057 1,401,650 616,841 (9) 78,368 186,925 15,000 *400,000 *3^,000 9,473 350,000 244,361 6,995 1 106,995 1 100,000 485,184 77,279 14,082 511,582 497,500 135,376 597,593 214,940 134,891 3,000 *38,000 *35,000 84,632 54,633 399,629 4,000 l 82,253 2,000 1 78,253 56,454 60,000 <*6,000 d 146,000 1,000 d 140,000 155,843 218,358 114,308 10,000 85,000 75,000 1,451,899 697,230 207,898 2,500 152,500 150,000 343,973 274,434 49,790 15,000 330,000 315,000 15,033 1,336,535 527,723 48,237 a Including $1,356,000, College of the City of New York, and $1,500,000, Normal College. 6 Including $204,000, College c f the City of New York, and $100,000, Normal College. 0 Including $1,559,000, College of the City of New York, and $1,600,000, Normal College. d Including jails. € Including cash in county treasury. /In clu d in g $803,700, investment of county. g Not reported. h Including $803,700, investment o f county, but not including apparatus, etc., not reported. 1 Including libraries, jails, hospitals, asylums, and hall of justice. /In clu ded in other assets. fcNot including apparatus, etc. I Including land and buildings for police department and jails. »»Included in land and buildings for city hall. n Including apparatus, etc., for jails. oNot including land and buildings, but including apparatus, etc., for jails. jpIncluding land and buildings for libraries. q Including land and buildings for jails and fire department headquarters, and quarters for 2 fire companies. STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (1). Police department. Land and build ings. Appa ratus, etc. Total. Schools. Fire department. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. i Total. ] 83,716,850 8970,000 $4,686,850 $10,654,650 $3,923,150 $14,577,800 a$56,590,172 6$2,733,314 c$59,323,486 958,970 2,006,345 21,370,537 3,287,920 24,658,457 <*884,520 <*426,372 <*1,310,892 1,047,375 500.000 10.425.600 9,925,600 735.900 3,588,603 4,324,503 925,600 3,386,720 4,312,320 6,338,352 266,500 6,071,852 887.280 415.200 183,574 35,053 472,080 218,627 600.000 13.072.600 657.000 2.332.000 12,472,600 900.000 112,000 1,012,000 1.675.000 3,243,697 375,459 2,868,238 800,997 418.499 382,498 372,797 103,500 476,297 5,140,659 287.300 4,853,359 887,560 408,116 479,444 458,400 503,030 3.880.024 503,617 3,376,407 648,08'" 1,110,724 462,637 426,505 357,025 5.415.200 422.000 4,993,200 1.756.000 100,000 (9) (9) 00 4,292,668 206.000 4,086.668 709,525 1,278,775 & ,250 201,000 160.000 41.000 4,469,170 60,000 4,409,170 <*203,382 <*13,900 <*217,282 789.674 242.500 1,032,174 1,300,654 110,000 1,190,654 165.000 409,009 244,009 14.500 7,500 7.000 3,560,765 3,430,275 130,490 631,660 1,177,221 1,808,881 325,452 20,859 346,311 3,216,596 187,952 3,028,644 539,153 1,037,337 498,184 <*132,227 <*110,000 <*242,227 4,963,632 317,066 4,646,566 497,146 191.201 305,945 164,692 144,667 20,025 2.632.900 200,000 2.432.900 840.000 175.000 665.000 150.000 100,000 50.000 1,692,811 116,961 1,575,850 312,935 171,035 141.900 150.000 118,000 32.000 1,413,193 110,000 1,303,193 498.280 283,2o0 215.000 35,493 25,493 10.000 &2,991,270 2,991,270 fc435,450 435,450 *93,052 93,052 V ) V ) V) 2,796,768 97,401 2,699,367 643,792 238,144 405,648 422,192 340,302 81,890 1,970,241 250,555 1,719,686 381.000 191.000 190.000 158,850 112,000 46,850 2,448,835 266,175 2,182,660 (m) 294.000 122.000 172.000 07.500 n7,500 2.663.200 352,200 2.311.000 635.000 237.000 69,492 398.000 52,492 17.000 Pi, 950,000 175.000 P i, 775,000 500.000 100.000 400.000 <*75,000 <*15,000 <*90,000 2,735,983 119,503 2,616,480 206,000 *834,000 *65,000 *128,000 n 65,000 1,552,898 428,160 1,124,738 332,741 162,066 170.675 <*158,080 <*46,080 d 112,000 2,570,688 125.000 2,445,688 272,850 87,850 185.000 26,383 5,383 21,000 2,481,154 168,774 2,312,380 499,736 192,079 307,657 <*52,000 <*8,203 <*60,203 2,731,881 373,016 2,358,865 550.703 154,232 396,471 <*83,949 <*17,225 <*101,174 1.569.900 185.000 1.384.900 274.000 (m) 95.000 179.000 28.000 *28,000 1,734,609 101.300 1,633,309 364,515 201,915 162,600 195.000 185.000 10,000 884,500 70.000 814.500 199.000 103.000 96,000 48.000 36.000 12,000 1,352,450 61,800 1,290,650 131,737 *131,737 u298,800 *20,047 *318,847 820,219 66,245 753,974 120.000 45.000 ( 75,000 40.000 38.000 2.000 2,050,415 95.000 1,955,415 166.704 73,704 93.000 <*50,000 <*13,00u <*63,000 1,314,326 80,880 1,233,446 253,380 126,350 127,030 <*118,489 <*3,807 <*122,296 468,348 18.000 450,348 211,672 82,672 129.000 <*50,000 <*8,866 <*58,866 1,745,384 135.000 1,610,384 143,857 (m) 91,787 52,070 o4,430 «4,430 1,723,259 72,259 1.651.000 397,209 121,709 275,500 107,577 75,500 32,077 1,136,186 115,186 1.021.000 405,573 157.600 247,973 76,300 57.000 19,300 1,938,865 138,565 1,800,300 248,309 78,509 169,800 <*22,100 <*16,948 <*39,048 1,178,800 41.000 1,137,800 355,750 150.000 205,750 <*25,000 <*5,000 <*30,000 784,489 65.000 719,489 253,600 65.000 188.600 157.000 125.000 32,000 1,198,639 60,890 1,137,749 219,249 104,144 115,105 87,980 66,457 21,523 1.406.024 58,311 1,347,713 452,100 172,100 280.000 *37,400 0 37,400 468,250 25,750 442.500 176,720 105,320 71,400 % 600 00 470,872 26.000 444,872 (c c ) 226,825 8 355,825 *4,000 8129.000 4,000 960.000 60,000 900.000 240,639 170,139 70,500 *12,955 ol2,955 286,700 2,845,700 2,559,000 271,820 145,420 126,400 <*101,000 d 9,060 d 110,060 1.010.200 50,800 959,400 205,000 105.000 100,000 * 1,200 1,200 931,985 144,468 787,517 *46,000 046.000 782.000 143.000 639.000 81.000 49,699 130,599 18,775 8,775 10.000 716,289 67,562 648,727 90.000 66,850 156,850 <*39,000 <*17,500 <*56,500 1,031,615 71,724 102,450 130,319 232,769 <*135,181 <*7,425 <*142,606 1,080,500 (9 ) 148,400 77,812 226,212(9) <*45.000 <*8,378 <*53,378 *N ot including headquarters and quarters for 2 fire companies, included in land and buildinj jity hall. s Including jails, and land and buildings for police department. * Not including land and buildings. « Including land and buildings for fire department. . v Including land and buildings for fire department, and apparatus, etc., for jails. w included in land and buildings for police department. x Including markets. v Including land and buildings for library. z Including land and buildings for police department. o a Including land and buildings for art galleries, museums, etc. b b including markets and land and buildings for police department and jails, cc included in land and buildings for fire department. $ tr ial mr. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (2). tr ial mjr. Art galleries, museums, etc. Libraries. Cities. 1 New York, N. Y ....... 2 Chicago, 111.............. 3 Philadelphia, P a ___ 4 St. Louis, M o............ 5 Boston, Mass............ 6 Baltimore, M d ......... 7 Cleveland, Ohio....... 8 Buffalo, N. Y ............ 9 San Francisco, C al.. 10 Cincinnati, O h io___ 11 Pittsburg, P a............ 12 New Orleans, L a ___ 13 Detroit, M ic h .......... 14 Milwaukee, Wis....... 15 Washington, D. C . . . 16 Newark, N. J ............ 17 Jersey City, N. J ___ 18 Louisville, K y.......... 19 Minneapolis, M inn.. 20 Providence, R. I ___ 21 Indianapolis, Ind ... 22 Kansas City, Mo — 23 St. Paul, M in n ......... 24 Rochester, N. Y ....... 25 Denver, C o lo ............ 26 Toledo, O h io............ 27 Allegheny, Pa.......... 28 Columbus, Ohio....... 29 Worcester, Mass....... 30 Syracuse, N. Y ........ 31 New Haven, Conn .. 32 Paterson, N. J .......... 33 Fall River, M ass___ 34 St. Joseph, M o.......... 35 Omaha, Nebr............ 36 Los Angeles, Cal___ 37 Memphis, Tenn........ 38 Scranton, Pa............ . 39 Lowell, M ass.......... . 40 Albany, N . Y .......... . 41 Cambridge, Mass__ 42 Portland, O reg ........ 43 Atlanta, Ga............... 44 Grand Rapids, Mich. 45 Dayton, O h io.......... 46 Richmond, Y a.......... 47 Nashville, T e n n ___ 48 Seattle, Wash.......... . 49 Hartford, Conn........ 50 Reading, P a ............ 51 Wilmington, D e l__ 52 Camden, N. J .......... 53 Trenton, N. J .......... 54 Bridgeport, Conn__ 55 Lynn, Mass.............. Land and Books, buildings. apparatus, etc. $4,050,000 2,076,076 233,839 3,194,800 350,000 44,485 560.000 cl, 200,771 65,000 373.000 1/800,000 418.000 268.000 351,626 Total. (0 843,265 283,265 c 160,000 cl, 360,771 117,500 52,500 551.000 178,000 220,813 0l, 020,813 25,000 25.000 505.000 87.000 354,630 86,630 (*) l 351,626 264,378 384,585 429.000 <35,000 <154,000 202,716 650.000 <60,974 278,935 <143,000 162.000 135.000 370.000 146,500 c 316,717 i 87,558 42,400 62,500 202,400 262,500 186,000 66,000 252,000 200,000 w 52,000 500,000 50,000 69,641 71,360 (r) s 98,000 130.000 500.000 175,935 s 63,000 110.000 100,000 300,000 106,500 c 162,985 (n) 160,000 200,000 37,090 x 250,000 121,641 571,360 CO 23,750 49,250 *5,000 115.000 200.000 250,000 10,000 30,500 40,000 184,113 aa 15,000 145,600 240,000 434,113 CO <147,187 30,000 15,700 45,700 (b) (b) (*) (/) (/) CO (») 10,000 37,090 25,500 CO 147,187 (*) a Included in police department. 5 Included in parks, c Including art galleries, museums, etc <<Not reported. e Included in city hall. /In clu d ed in libraries. {/Including land and buildings for art galleries, museums, etc. h Included in land and buildings for libraries. <Not including land and buildings. /Inclu ded in asylums, almshouses, etc. * Included in other assets. <Not including apparatus, etc. m Including bath houses and bathing pools and beaches. n Included in land and buildings for city hall. Total. $231,000 $4,281,000 $22,743,000 $1,890,000 $24,633,000 397,336 2,473,412 293,101 293,101 | ( &) (b ) (6 ) 133,800 367,639 I, 2,057,000 5,251,800 243,121 593,121 190,454 234,939 111,628 144,585 129.000 35.000 56.000 72,716 150.000 60,974 103.000 80.000 52.000 35.000 70.000 40.000 c 153,732 87,558 152,750 240.000 300.000 Land and | Apparabuildings. j tus, etc. <10,000 1087 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (2). Parks. Land and buildings. Appara tus, etc. Workhouses, reformatories, etc. Jails. Total. Land and Appara build tus, etc. ings. $306,035,025 $437,865 $306,472,890 $5,998,500 (a) 62,000,000 1,863,030 63,863,030 026,751,144 c 654,000 c 27,405,144 1,690,368 6,497 8,152,086 8,158,583 582.000 53.275.000 (<*) (<*) 22.153.000 18^000 21,968,000 150.000 7,936,884 7,916,884 20,000 3.829.312 3.817.312 12,000 (d) (d) 13,000,000 (d ) 1,021,070 1,019,570 1.500 3,647,009 3,637,509 9.500 243*000 50.000 3.708.000 3.658.000 6,298,622 6,233,622 65.000 2,629,219 10.000 2,619,219 311.800 ' 311.800 W 5,073,734 5,073,234 500 519,435 935 518.500 1,078,600 20,000 1,058,600 4,592,738 21,550 4,571,188 1,615,066 36,209 1,678,857 1.059.000 1.058.000 1,000 m 5,000 m 4,300,000 w 4,305,000. (») (d) 571.000 503.800 509.800 6,000 <*8,000 <•2,567,500 02,559,500 ( ) 2.292.313 4.000 2.288.313 («) 2,353,684 2,350,684 3.000 333,200 1,700 331.500 878.000 66,000 812,000 1,587,710 1,575,300 12,410 8 451.000 474.000 23.000 1.500 10,000 266.000 267.500 (d ) 474.500 40,000 (d ) 1.000 160,000 161.000 («) (d) 2,086,492 750.000 751.000 1,000 901.000 900.000 1,000 («) 200.000 11,000 210.000 10.000 507.500 1,200 506,300 (•) 1,280,579 11,133 1,269,446 3,832,405 3,828,905 3.500 727.000 732.000 5.000 20,000 1.050.000 1.070.000 343,294 350,710 7,416 640,600r. 1.000 639,600 (d) 862,470 (d ) 10,000 10,000 493,226 10,670 482,556 488,644 8,159 480,485 500.000 (d ) m 516,056 m 51^, 056 1,000 (") b b 95,000 b b 95,000 (<) 201.000 6,000 195.000 («) 453,856 2,000 451,856 358,328 23,828 334.500 Total. Total. $20,000 $6,018,500 $3,738,900 $130,000 $3,868,900 49,653 908.000 957,653 136,516 22^258 ., 915^626 800.000 936,516 7,408 3.500 368,420 375,828 585,500 1,380,000 1,006,000 («) (d ) (<*) 10,000 160,000 22,204 318,079 340,283 («) (d ) (a) (a) 150,000 393,000 (a) $ (-0 (o) (P) 877,000 24,000 901,000 43,500 175,000 5,000 70,000 48,500 245,000 364,374 150,000 8,000 35,500 372,374 185,500 550,000 186,955 25,000 (*) 575,000 U86,955 3,000 78,000 («) 75,000 (d ) 2 $ Land and Annflrfl_ build- tus, APPa^etc. ings. 50 10,050 HO, 000 (”) «) («) (d ) 30,000 5,000 35,000 *74,*781 *7,076 *8i,*857 v9,500 t>500 v 10,000 100,000 32,500 132,500 27,000 200 ‘ *27*200’ (a) 1 11,000 («) («) («) (3 <2> (p ) Kd ) (a) 5,000 («0 (p ) {a) Included in apparatus, etc., for police department Included in city hall and police department. « Included in hospitals. r Included in land and buildings for schools. s Land for site only. t Land for site, and books, apparatus, etc. « Included in workhouses, reformatories, etc. v Including jails. 10 Land for site only; library now located in city hall. x Land for site, and books, apparatus, etc.; library now located in city hall. y Included in land and buildings for fire department. z Buildings only; land included in land ana buildings for parks, aa Not including land. b b Including land for library. o p 9398— N o. 42— 02----- 11 Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 03: BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X XIV .—ASSETS (3). Asylums, almshouses, etc. Hospitals. arnal Lin er. Cities. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. 1 New York, N. Y . . ; . . . . 1.303.000 $585,000 $9,888,000 $4,205,025 $155,000 $4,360,025 2 Chicago, 111.................. 204,085 16,067 188,018 3 Philadelphia, P a ......... 270.000 180,000 1.450.000 1,883,000 192,200 2,075,200 4 St. Louis, M o ............... 199,487 413,140 246,605 390,000 23,140 47,118 («) 1,400,000 5 Boston, Mass............... 3.205.000 («) 6 Baltimore, Md.............. 25j)00 225,000 1 200,000 500,732 201,102 | 481,275 7 Cleveland, Ohio.......... 181,067 19,457 20,035 31,165 *8 Buffalo, N. Y ............... 31,165 («) (a) 9 San Francisco, C a l___ («) (<*) (« 430,000 350,000 80,000 10 Cincinnati, O h io......... ,210,000 48,400 1,25^400 74,500 696,623 11 Pittsburg, P a............... 622,123 86,000 7,500 78,500 12 New Orleans, L a ......... 5,000 90,000 85,000 30,000 13 Detroit, M ich............... 2,000 28,000 14 Milwaukee, Wis.......... 93,360 5.000 88,360 332,305 Ifir356,355 g 10,806 9 367,161 15 Washington, D. C ....... 311,942 20,363 25,000 380.000 I 150,000 175,000 16 Newark, N. J ............... 300.000 80,000 55,300 17 Jersey City, N. J .......... 5.000 50,300 295.000 110,000 20,000 130,000 18 Louisville, K y.............. 270.000 25-000 5 279,235 19 Minneapolis, Minn___ 279,235 (*) 20 Providence, R. I ......... *373,*894' *i5,’ io6' *388*994* 21 Indianapolis, I n d ....... 181,200 28,700 152,500 22 Kansas City, Mo.......... 56,000 11,000 67.000 (a) (a) (a) m 188,000 23 St. Paul, M in n ............ (a ) (*) 24 Rochester, N. Y .......... 1,500 1,500 32.000 25 Denver, C o lo............... 6,000 27,000 26 Toledo, O h io............... 452,292 27 Allegheny, P a.............. 2,000 7, 000 416,292 36,000 5,000 28 Columbus, O h io.......... 40,032 129,410 169,442 29,550 *49L 29 Worcester, Mass.......... 462,075 700 30 Syracuse, N. Y ............ 35,000 32,862 31 New Haven, Conn....... 243,913 276,775 32 Paterson, N. J .............. 10,500 1,000 28, 147,000 157,500 27.000 8,541 55,041 33 Fall River, Mass.......... 46,500 70.000 7,161 77, 34 St. Joseph. Mo.............. 500 5,000 5, 35 Omaha, Nebr............... 1,500 15, 13,500 (a) 36 Los Angeles, Cal.......... 1, 37 Memphis, Tenn............ 100,000 ,511 107, 38 Scranton, P a ............... 27,962 39 Lowell, M ass............... 227,962 200,000 40 Albany, N . Y ............... q 140,000 500 «140,000 (« 41 Cambridge, Mass......... r 10,000 19,750 59,750 s 10,000 40,000 8 42 Portland, O reg ............ 2,500 2,500 43 Atlanta, Ga................... 100,000 10,000 110,000 44 Grand Rapids, M ich ... 500 12,000 12.500 45 Dayton, O h io....... 10,000 500 45.500 1.500 45.000 11,500 46 Richmond, V a___ 2,500 45.500 37,500 2.500 40,000 43.000 47 Nashville, T e n n .. 20,000 60.000 80,000' 48 Seattle, Wash....... 3,000 3,000 (u) 49 Hartford, Conn__ v 127,000 v 16,000 v 143,000 («) (*) 50 Reading, P a ......... 51 Wilmington, D e l. 52 Camden, N. J ....... . 2,699 10,000 12,699 53 Trenton, N. J ....... . 300 4.000 5,000 40,000 4,300 35,000 54 Bridgeport, Conn. 2,000 10,249 100,549 10,500 90,300 8,500 55 Lynn, Mass.......... . 1,500 10,300 7,500 119,925 6.000 130,125 t reported. duding cash in county treasury. t including apparatus, etc., for city hall, not reported. duded in city hall. duded in ferries and bridges. duding docks and wharves. duding jails. stributing system only. duded in other assets. t including apparatus, etc. duding apparatus, etc., for city hall, police and fire departments, schools, libra s, reformatories, etc., and hospitals. 1039 STATISTICS OF CITIES. Table X X IV .—ASSETS (3). Ferries and bridges. Markets. $45,248,821 $8,556,900 6,340,242 18,000,000 162,000 644,600 546,600 2,089,800 2.500.000 1,000,000 4,909,382 169,312 1,944,551 583,240 100,000 746,850 1,000,600 2.560.000 1.156.000 250.000 1.500.000 375.000 300.000 118,600 / l , 281,450 113,383 3, COO, 000 500.000 , 1,447, 888 883, 40, 2,809, 1,000, 500, 652, 144, 322,700 75,000 34,174 10,000 500.000 400.000 96,400 32,800 410,000 70,000 tP) 215,170 230,342 416.000 625.000 1,745 140,000 530,621 648,500 330.000 140,159 520.000 170,000 86,605 ( P) 262,000 350,000 32,150 761,729 ( P) (*) 4,000 358,616 Bath houses and Ceme teries. bathing pools and beaches. Water works. Gas works. Electriclight plants. Other. Total $38,100 $387,985 $123,012,020 $27,890,218 $908,490,531 $2,234,642 6,493,978 155,712,996 50,013 35,310,099 2,000 95,000 37,971,959 $25,000,000 4,705,989 232,977,982 21,551,600 3,156,224 52,443,955 5,100,000 125,300 15,782,616 8,609,000 5158,000,069 42,300 15,035,835 15,154,172 77,128,690 302,327 279,351 40.338.101 4,000 10,735,867 225,865 23,870 224,350 c25,539,864 8,449,915 580,000 520,000 30,945,408 34,625,000 70,837,446 13,500,000 5,858,155 684,453 31,989,906 60,000 825,850 17,211,194 63,000 6,220, 721,862 16,180 602,965 26,627,383 69,778 5,068, 401,300 19,442,513 65,000 cl5,800,404 500 h 2 , 935, 15,500 30,000 15,000, 1,438,250 33,762,694 5,100, 3,670,532 21,199,893 25,000 6,184, 1,216,063 16,052,342 19,375,038 4,557, Jc 351,039 316,889 3,296, 1,334,564 16,852,350 5,853,823 27, 40.000 4,175, 50.000 13,609,237 (*) 6,513, o]15,000 16,255,280 350,000 15,410,762 16,000 7,463, 9,016,837 160, 1,709,952 1,912, 9,572,953 130,*666' 50,000 330,000 14,246,573 3,349, 406,812 9,652,864 2,381, 68,911 381,059 588.000 3,729, 6,086 1,701,139 17,406,475 102.000 6,000, 10,200 246,500 12.932.102 5,625,381 493,487 4,072,989 297,387 6,928 7,798,423 1,717,400 701,274 1,978,549 98,752 1,500 8,677,244 261,915 2,500 4.111.086 150.000 4,824,747 76,640 3,729,338 87,383 112,608 548,717 10,674,663 39,500 26,422 0 8,463,536 *64,*500* 1,633,692 *17,390,601 1,500 9,371,103 25.000 15,000 7,787,557 203 636 258,296 5.285.047 23,077 193,309 500.000 7,020,830 36.000 7,561,446 1,012,951 242,783 25.000 5,447,608 25,877 75.000 7,559,603 102,835 20,309 187,480 9.612.086 7,858 4,605,161 to 324,855 3.796.047 25.499 *(*)’ *' 20,000 4,330,532 120,950 200 6,070,166 62.500 1,941 3,438,149 40.000 85,000 154,342 7,274,397 2,487,371 Included in parks. Including workhouses, reformatories, etc., and asylums, almshouses, etc. Included in hospitals. ©Including apparatus, etc., for city hall. p Included in land and buildings for city hall, a Land only; buildings owned and almshouse controlled by county. r Land only. s Land only; not including apparatus, etc., not reported. * Not including apparatus, etc., for hospitals, not reported, wIncluded in asylums, almshouses, etc. v Including hospitals. w Including markets. « Included in land and buildings for parks. I m n Mar ginal num ber. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 1040 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (1)—Continued. City hall. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Cash in treasury. Uncol lected taxes. Cash and bonds in sinking fund. Trust funds. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. (a) (a) *$500,000 $39,450 $71,538 Oakland, C a l.......... 115,277 $4,000 $3,637 $111,277 256.814 25,764 $401,290 Lawrence, Mass----142,966 1.500 117,100 141,466 94; 034 925,653 New Bedford, Mass. 67.399 e 70,000 5.000 e 65,000 318,452 73,438 Des Moines, Iowa__ 312,698 131,789 13,789 118,000 196,426 Springfield, Mass . . . 711,033 346.243 72,250 10,000 5,000 62,250 342,008 24,334 Somerville, Mass 350.000 50.000 38,500 300.000 39,734 25,416 T ro y ,N .Y ............... 3,453 c 126,000 16.000 cllO, 000 Hoboken, N. J ......... 75,000 97,934 97,618 60,000 10,000 50.000 42,604 118,078 53,975 Evansville, Ind....... 174,149 4,149 170.000 Manchester, N. H ..., 67,524 350,899 151,919 158.000 30.000 128.000 81,618 83,923 Utica, N . Y .............. / 30,000 *259,500 0 229,500 195,000 73,878 Peoria, 111............... 60,000 10.000 50.000 43,622 10,579 Charleston, S. C........ 950 42.000 2.000 40.000 Savannah, G a ......... 9,597 5,318 50.000 *615,127 k 565,127 350 Salt Lake City, Utah 29,253 231,713 /7,641 *217,641 g 210,000 San Antonio, Tex 91,775 267,953 1,214,750 8,911 *108,911 1100,000 Duluth, M in n .......... 152,645 244,410 138,629 m 125,000 7,597 m 132,597 Erie, P a ................... 28,450 234,425 69,159 o45,000 / 5,000 P 50,000 477 Elizabeth, N .J......... 101,306 139,523 11,800 *141,800 *130,000 15,689 Wilkesbarre, P a ___ 57,331 11,813 22.000 20.000 2,000 Kansas City, Kans.. 475.000 237,555 6,000 6,000 27,400 149,366 Harrisburg, P a ....... 137,338 5.000 *205,000 113,547 *200,000 123,452 219,113 Portland, M e .......... 1,414,873 140.000 15.000 125,000 731,112 361,498 Yonkers, N . Y ......... 105,777 Norfolk, Va.............. 443,670 246.616 124,111 17^,000 (^,000 i$ ,o o o Waterbury, Conn 74,877 180.616 76,929 **454,000 »*12,000 t*466,000 630,571 42,654 156,443 Holyoke, Mass......... 7*95,000 7 *5 ,0 0 0 r 90,000 18,738 Fort Wayne, I n d __ 199,025 36,261 5,000 5.000 11,509 308,081 12,000 Youngstown, Ohio . 15.000 *415,000 s 400,000 Houston, T ex.......... 358,063 350.000 271.000 14,600 256.500 150,602 14,374 Covington. K y ......... 342,196 19.500 5.000 14,500 45,497 10,000 80,816 Akron, O hio............ 115,719 6,119 109,600 243,418 200,623 Dallas, T e x .............. 37,818 180.000 10.000 170.000 68,054 65,832 257,101 Saginaw, M ic h ....... 31.500 1.500 30.000 1,720 48,199 13,285 565,000 90 Lancaster, Pa.......... /5,000 *45,000 0 40.000 606,454 122,816 49,407 91 Lincoln, N e b r......... w 352,000 /15,000 x 367,000 282,190 360,696 73,440 92 Brockton, Mass....... . *175,000 *12,000 *187,000 159,641 7,030 50,000 93 Binghamton, N. Y .. 6.000 *16,000 16,744 *10,000 19.400 94 Augusta, G a ............ 52,774 21,609 31,165 666,022 19,156 24,466 2,813 95 Pawtucket, R. I ....... 4,800 *105,900 *101,100 85,674 116,153 41,466 96 Altoona, Pa.............. 100,000 5.000 95.000 66,198 39,058 97 W heeling,W .Va . . . j 2,690 2,690 39; 856 37,500 98 Mobile, Ala.............. aa 225,000 5*4,000 co 229,000 3,014 148.243 99 Birmingham, Ala .. 2.000 *27,000 *25,000 25,294 19,002 32,659 100 Little Rock, Ark— 15,000 d d 240,000 d d 225,000 104,987 11,143 101 Springfield, O h io ... ee 100,000 *61,500 //101,500 413,890 430,693 1,111,703 102 Galveston, T e x ....... /4,559 *349,980 fir345,421 44,239 162,872 368,756 103 Tacoma. Wash......... f 6 , 0 0 0 **116,000 51,730 g g 110,000 184,830 474,553 35,890 104 Haverhill, M ass----2,364 i i 126,364 a 124,000 510,164 151,843 105 Spokane, W ash....... 5.000 *37,500 132.500 32,701 Terre Haute, Ind_ _ 124,677 58,198 106 <*6,500 <*41,500 <*35,000 32,536 93,512 59,705 107 Dubuque, Iowa....... 5.000 *105,000 *100,000 121,799 79,235 51,888 108 Quincy, 111.............. 2.000 mml7,000 ** 15,000 44,829 130,505 13,963 109 South Bend, Ind <*94,000 <*9,000 <*85,000 164,532 296,172 185,991 2,303 Salem, Mass............ 110 a Not reported. * Including police department and jails, c Included in city hall. <*Including iails. e Including land and buildings for jails. /In clu d in g apparatus, etc., for jails. g Including land and buildings for police department and jails. * Including jails and land and buildings for police department. i Included in land and buildings for city hall. JNot including land and buildings. * Including land and buildings for library. i Including land and buildings for police department. m Including land and buildings for police department and headquarters for fire department. 71Not including headquarters, included in land and buildings for city hall. o Including markets and land and buildings for police department and jails. P Including jails, markets, and land and buildings for police department. q Included in other assets. t*Including police department. 8 Land only, building destroyed by fire; including land for markets. 1041 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (1)—Continued. Police department. Land and build ings. Appa ratus, etc. Total* (a) (« <*$47,000 <*$10,095 <*$57,095 82,410 71,376 11,034 21,000 / 5 , 000 / 26,000 94,552 78,600 15,952 57.000 3.000 54.000 82,400 80.000 2,400 28,350 3,350 25.000 <*30,000 <*4,000 <*34,000 75,750 7,250 68,500 40.000 30.000 10,000 3.000 i3,0Q0 (*) 60.000 50.000 10,000 65.000 50.000 15.000 <*734 <*22,734 <*22,000 (i i 1,363 1. 16,077 j 16,077 j 7,639 7,639 J 1,500 1.500 j 5,114 5,114 <*6,500 <*500 6,000 15.000 15.000 i 1,000 1.000 <*120,000 <*13,500 <*133,500 («) («) («) 12,000 19,500 7.500 <* 8,600 <*10,000 <*60,000 <*3,500 (a) («) 4.000 <*14,900 <*1,233 <*15,000 <*4,0^3 10,500 8.000 1.500 $►2,000 1,000 (*) 2,000 (*\ ,100 11,076 6,6o0 (*) 1,000 1.500 <*25,000 <*2,400 (<0 2,000 01,200 <*5,800 $ <*18,600 <*63,500 m12,000 4,000 <*16,133 <*19,073 18,500 Jl,500 53,000 Schools. Fire department. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. $54,900 110,400 141,965 150,144 189,543 154.000 260.000 81,000 80,000 145,548 61,700 106,000 46,900 50.000 55,768 41,050 139,700 m57,950 49.500 73,4^0 31.000 40.000 60.500 155,000 $77,820 76.050 85.050 70,590 140,596 82,549 104,400 51,970 85,150 104,092 96,411 64,600 87,285 123,595 26,672 54,074 106,500 82,377 51.000 65,710 28,183 28.000 119,650 85,000 $132,720 186,450 227,015 220,734 830,139 236,549 364,400 132,970 165.150 249,640 158,111 170.600 134,185 173,595 82,430 95,124 246,200 *140,327 100.500 139,180 59,183 68,000 180.150 240,000 ^ ,2 3 0 115,260 65,470 39,400 50.000 50.000 107,500 57,446 48.500 47,082 68,148 61,400 35,300 77,351 40,000 38,100 34,232 37,205 %5.500 _J, 267 65,726 40,000 41,123 66,319 39,592 72.500 10.250 55,878 24.500 40.250 50.250 88,874 58,925 50,973 35,352 42,045 32.500 38,605 46,283 132,312 183,408 126,870 74,700 127,351 90.000 145.600 91,678 85,705 73,924 67,767 119,876 131,790 83,692 157,631 86,576 122.500 36.250 105,878 30.000 106,250 92.250 174,537 137,275 A* 79,073 92,685 101,229 72,500 63,992 127,983 Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. Mar ginal num ber. $923,250 1,037,149 1,042,109 997,150 1,798,118 1,186,261 813,300 376,500 712.000 740,056 642,590 876.000 $46,100 28,120 77.000 51,563 158,490 105,101 43,033 75.000 50.000 37,049 41,574 28,500 $969,350 1,065, 1,119, 1,048, 1,956, 1,291, 856, 451, 762, 777, 684, 904, 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 1, 57,706 15,172 65,430 81,780 35.000 40.000 60.000 42,468 40,546 105,000 1,117, 331, 1,869, 954, ' 365, 590, 485, 819, 636, 996, («) 820, 955, 465, 754, 512, 226, 850, 354, v 705, 565, 473, 517, 1/480, 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 316,018 1,804,081 873,200 320.000 550.000 425.000 776,988 596,110 891,848 80,292 876,600 431,250 699,892 500.000 v 820.000 331,708 610,950 490,792 426,876 499,100 442,874 40,558 % 78,868 34,100 54,114 12,000 (s$,ooo 22,887 v 94,614 75.000 46,147 18.000 38,000 66 67 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 54,150 V 71,790 42,569 612, 38,870 573,647 91,312 541, 509,100 32.000 46,984 801, 786,909 15.000 50.000 26.000 v 318,500 r 302,000 v 16,500 50.000 362,479 29,237 333,242 5.500 J 2 , m 390.000 15.000 375.000 <*7,000 66.000 525.000 500.000 25.000 42.000 (°) 892,336 58,144 834,192 >,000 85,663 6,000 577,407 31,057 546,350 300 78,3o0 *7,550 5,2o0 738,746 48,676 690,070 /17,320 j j 17,320 **28,100 499,112 10,405 488,707 67,333 J2,500 2.500 380.000 24.000 356.000 59,184 3,000 4,500 1.500 355.000 15.000 340.000 40.000 j 1,000 1,000 (*) 443,750 405.000 38,750 25,387 9,266 540.000 494.000 46.000 11,244 81,700 10,000 1,244 t Not including buildings destroyed by fire, but including land for markets. mIncluding iails and workhouses, reformatories, etc. v Including libraries. w Including land and buildings for libraries and jails. x Including iails and land and buildings for libraries. v Including land and buildings for libraries. z Included in markets. a a Including land and buildings for police department and land for jails. b b Including apparatus, etc., for police department. co Including police department and land for jails. <*<*Including markets. e e Including markets and land and buildings for police department. //In clu d in g police department and markets. g g Including police headquarters and land and buildings for jails. b h Including jails and police headquarters. i i Including 1 fire station and land and buildings for police department, libraries, and jails. 5 i Including apparatus, etc., for jails, but not including land and buildings included in city hall. fcfcNot including 1 fire station, included in land and buildings for city hall. **Land only. mm Not including buildings. *2,000 47,176 i6,650 2,500 <*27,400 («) flic BULLETIN 01? TfiE BEBARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X IV .—ASSETS (2)—Continued. aarinal um)er. 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Art galleries, museums, etc. Libraries. Cities. Land and Books, buildings. apparatus, Oakland, C a l.......... . Lawrence, M ass___ New Bedford, Mass.. Des Moines, Iowa__ Springfield, Mass___ Somerville, M ass__ Troy, N. Y ................. Hoboken, N .J ......... Evansville, Ind....... . Manchester, N. H __ Utica, N . Y ............... Peoria, 111 ................ Charleston, S. C........ Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City, Utah. San Antonio, T ex__ Duluth, M in n .......... Erie, Pa.................... Elizabeth, N .J.......... Wilkesbarre, P a ___ Kansas City, K ans... Harrisburg, P a ........ Portland, M e .......... . Yonkers, N . Y ......... Norfolk, Va.............. Waterbury, Conn__ Holyoke, Mass......... Fort Wayne, Ind ___ Youngstown, Ohio .. Houston, T ex .......... . Covington. K y .......... Akron, O hio............ . Dallas, T e x ............... Saginaw, M ic h ........ Lancaster, Pa.......... . Lincoln, N e b r.......... Brockton, Mass....... . Binghamton, N .Y ... Augusta, G a ............. Pawtucket, R. I ....... . Altoona, Pa............... Wheeling, W. Va . ... Mobile, Ala............... Birmingham,Ala ... Little Rock, Ark....... Springfield, Ohio — Galveston, T e x ........ Tacoma, Wash.......... Haverhill, M ass....... Spokane, W ash........ Terre Haute, I n d ___ Dubuque, Iowa........ Quincy, 111............... South Bend, Ind....... Salem, M ass............. $75,000 131,839 198,000 $40,000 40,891 61,497 54,000 Total. 25,000 67,000 75,000 50,000 125,000 65.000 50.000 86.000 30.000 42.000 115,000 95.000 92.000 201,000 (d) 25,500 * 25,500 94,000 *141,500 50,452 *32,378 144,452 *'173,878 91,000 (*) 26,413 20,000 117,413 * 20,000 14,000 15,000 29,000 60,000 16,834 6,500 (”) 66,500 (») 14.000 26,470 17.000 100,000 *26,470 *17,000 30,458 30,458 28,844 28,844 86,000 $ (n) loo,*666* a8,064 58,600 (<*) 6,000 s 46,925 43,500 44,750 (n) V ) (tt) 27,725 2,500 21,709 36,631 8,922 25,000 127,725 2,500 *•29,773 95,231 *8,922 31,000 s 46,925 8,500 45,424 52,000 90,174 a Not reported. * Included in city hall. c Included in police department. d Included in land and buildings for city hall. ^Included in apparatus, etc., for police department. /In clu d ed in city hall and police department. tfNot including apparatus, etc., not reported. * Not including land and buildings. i Including art galleries, museums, etc. Appara tus, etc. $115,000 40,891 193,336 252,000 42,000 { n) Land and buildings. (J ) Total. STATISTICS OP CITIES, T able X XIV .—ASSETS (2)—Continued. Parks. Land and buildings. $275,000 529,350 186,541 439,231 613,279 464.500 214.000 410.000 146.000 659,700 73,300 605.000 295.000 650.000 350,145 406,961 516,803 200.000 114.000 460.000 150.000 78.000 350.000 1 180,000 Apparatus, etc. $221 8,100 6,269 39,897 («) 700 1,000 354 60,000 5,000 775 800 5,000 1,580 108.500 237,286 60.000 175,000 33,750 («) 24.000 27,400 27,500 20.000 93,966 75.000 500.000 190.000 350.000 58.000 150.000 368.000 192.300 93,750 28.000 100.000 230,000 40,000 201.300 Total. $275,000 529,571 194,641 445.500 653,176 0 464.500 214.000 410,700 147.000 660,054 73,300 665,010 300.000 650,0C0 350,920 407,761 521,803 201,580 114.000 460,100 150.000 78,800 351.500 1 180.500 ( 70,000 158,830 111.000 237,786 61,500 (68,\)00 1,000 («) 176,000 34,740 25,000 1,000 500 1,350 1,000 427 250 21,000 1,000 500 100 506 2,500 307 1,000 1,000 1,000 16,000 Workhouses, reforr etc. Jails. Land and Appara build tus, etc. ings. (^i " (tff (a) ic ) («) Total. Pi (/) (<*) ic ) ( *) (b) (*0 («) (*>) Pi (*>) $15,000 («) (*) (» ) ib ) $600 ic ) (o) (m ) Land and Appara build tus, etc. ings. ip) $1,000 $50 40,000 2,0C0 («) (*) $15,600 (o) (m; n (a) («) 25.000 27,900 28,850 21.000 94,393 75.000 500,250 211,000 351.000 58,500 150,100 368,506 194,800 94,057 28.000 101.000 231,000 41,000 217,300 200 l 50,000 | 5,000 j Included in libraries. fcIncluded in land and buildings for parks. I Including land and buildings for libraries. m Included in other assets. n Included in schools. ©Included in land and buildings for schools. Buildings only; land included in land and buildings for city hall. q. Land for site only; library now located in city hall. »*Land for site, and books, apparatus, etc.; library located now in city ©Building in process of construction. iarnal lmer. 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 i>4 15 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (8)—Continued. Asylums, almshouses, etc. Hospitals. larnal nm>er. 56 57 68 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Cities. Oakland, C a l............... Lawrence, M ass.......... New Bedford, Mass___ Des Moines, Iow a......... Springfield, Mass......... Somerville, M ass......... Troy, N. Y .................... Hoboken, N. J .............. Evansville, Ind............ Manchester, N. H ......... Utica, N . Y ................... Peoria, 111.................... Charleston, S. C............ Savannah, G a .............. Salt Lake City, Utah. . . San Antonio, T e x ... Duluth, M in n ......... Erie, P a ................... Elizabeth, N .J......... Wilkesbarre, P a ___ Kansas City, K ans.. Harrisburg, P a ....... Portland, M e .......... Yonkers, N .Y .......... Norfolk, V a.............. Waterbury, Conn. . . Holyoke, Mass......... Fort Wayne, Ind . . . Youngstown, O h io.. Houston, T e x .......... Covington, JCy......... Akron, O h io............ Dallas, T e x .............. Saginaw, M ich......... Lancaster, Pa.......... Lincoln, N e b r......... Brockton, Mass....... Binghamton, N. Y .. Augusta, G a ............ Pawtucket, R .I ....... Altoona, Pa.............. W heeling,W .Va . . . Mobile, A la.............. Birmingham, A la ... Little Rock, Ark___ Springfield, Ohio .. . Galveston, T e x ....... Tacoma, Wash......... Haverhill, M ass___ Spokane, W ash....... Terre Haute, I n d .. . Dubuque, Iow a....... Quincy, 111.............. South Bend, Ind .. . Salem, Mass............ Land and build ings. $17,000' 2,500 Appara tus, etc. $1,000 1,850 Total. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. $18,000 4,350 $122,574 98,000 $17,500 10,170 $140,074 108,170 124,470 44,500 18,017 1,426 142,487 45,926 10,500 2,000 12,500 **5*666' *‘ *266* **5*266* 1,098 ft140,240 68,000 15,500 200,000 115,000 5.000 1,600 64,706 3.000 (/ 50.000 14.000 107,534 5.000 1.000 61.000 2,500 1,098 18,000 1,500 7,466 5,500 500 6,000 6,500 10,600 44,500 («) 1.500 3,405 1.500 («) 5,700 1,200 (c) 6,000 20,346 500 600 3,706 500 (*) 250 (o) 9,401 200 9 9,444 209,444 15,000 3,000 18,000 14,005 46,000 («) 30,000 24,500 54,500 5,700 *37*830' ’« 2*375 » 3 25,475 33,375 328,850 16,234 4,818 21,052 41,300 13,281 64,581 8,000 m («) («) 46*205 7.000 6.000 29,747 700 300 400 700 7^500 7,000 48^500 60,000 2,000 40,000 300 1,000 2,300 41,000 25.000 25.000 5.000 3.000 30.000 28.000 1,058 *3*308 1,500 («) *“ i,'450 4U()00 43,000 *2,*250 12,545 ft 152,785 1,500 7,200 ft 142,200 1,0 00 f/ 1,0 00 ^135,000 (/) Included in other assets, ft Including ferries and bridges. c Not reported. d Not including ferries and bridges, not reported. cNot including apparatus, etc., for parks, not reported. f Included in land and buildings for asylums, almhouses, etc. a Not including land and buildings. ft Including land and buildings for hospitals. i Included in city hall. j Not including other assets, not reported. a 1045 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (3)-Continued. Ferries and bridges. Markets. *300,000 <«) 500,000 (4 52,000 Bath houses and Ceme teries. bathing pools and beaches. Water works. $48,064 194,077 60,000 $1,500 1,600 1,938 $1,579,623 2,517,058 2,000 $40,000 63.000 25.000 12,000 8,000 20,000 200,000 2,005,411 785,690 1 , 000,000 260,000 2 , 000,000 1,524,999 335,986 65.000 25.000 261,040 10.000 2,000 60,000 127,699 12,500 5u, 000 Gas works. Electriclight plants. 125,000 116,370 56.000 365,000 65.000 225,900 154,500 52.000 64,914 37,500 496 (*) (a) 2,021,852 2,357 32,315 («) 302,200 2,875 15,000 138,796 75,000 2,065,300 $1,780,971 1,755,810 56,666 200 8,127 1,502,445 4,403,572 1,659,527 1,232,813 1,454,804 1,295,308 1,560,000 1 , 000,000 (o) 10,000 600 60,000 2 , 000,000 8,000 73,398 23,500 1 , 000,000 1,212,653 6,000 200,000 4,596 125,000 135,000 4,000 r 360,734 125,000 290,000 82,685 20,666 17,965 100,000 s 103,600 25,000 22,000 10,000 235,000 101,089 150.000 303.000 3.000 15.500 61.500 $ 2,834 5.000 3,325 36,225 20,000 6,130 62.400 20,300 6,390 79.400 909,895 895,000 943,515 1.500.000 1,034,902 1,866,445 1,340,166 803,092 1.017.000 410,000 $135,221 35,000 707,577 1,550.000 1,204; 830 1,377,575 970,988 556,953 457,973 1.925.869 65,000 450,000 Total $1,000 $2,134,058 4,861,959 92,640 6,160,589 119,671 52,837 3,382,310 220,260 <*6,802,624 362,150 « 3,753,769 3,186,436 1,846,772 8,700 29.300 3,733,157 322,278 5,200,226 1,544,016 27,900 88,800 2,643,778 370.000 1,323,780 2,972,955 325.000 625,710 7.684.210 2,951,841 68,585 7,583,409 249.000 3,838,054 17,343 1,055,914 169,608 9,442 1,552,069 1,804,438 4,000 3,479,612 83,400 J 3,667,593 («) 5,049,877 25.300 fc964,292 3,063,502 3,054,888 50.000 4,268,572 28,910 48,804 2,705,048 2,463,132 40.000 12.000 2.048.210 200.000 2,609,325 1,559,247 11,332 3,207,399 2,535,924 21,000 36,000 2,383,920 2,569,065 163,275 2,986,812 2,951,419 2,020,000 3,423,738 3,711,512 85,311 121,300 2,444,958 40,712 3,025,534 1,843,746 22,700 36.000 1,245,820 1,426,434 410,000 2,034,182 8,000 622,200 5,069,836 657,940 4,847,469 91,203 3,551,950 137,558 3,141,343 24,100 966,698 112,801 1,580,661 1,367,722 25.000 1,301,748 15,950 3,983,568 53.000 b 20,000 113,579 Other. Mar ginal num ber. 56 67 58 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Jc Including city hall, police department, fire department, schools, parks, jails, hospitals, asylums, almshouses, etc., markets, and cemeteries. l Included in apparatus, etc., for asylums, almshouses, etc. m Not including apparatus, etc. n including apparatus, etc., for hospitals. o Land for markets included in land for city hall. .PIncluded in asylums, almshouses, etc. a Including hospital for contagious diseases. Including $60,000 city’s share in viaduct, owned jointly by State, city, and railror s Including land and buildings for city hall. t Included in land and buildings for city hall. 1046 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (1)—Concluded. City hall. Mar ginal num ber. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Johnstown, P a ___ Elmira, N .Y ........... Allentown, Pa....... Davenport, Io w a .. McKeesport, P a . . . Springfield, 111___ Chelsea, Mass....... , Chester, Pa............ York, P a ............... Malden, Mass......... Topeka, K ans....... Newtonj Mass....... Sioux City, Iow a .. Bayonne, N. J ....... Knoxville, Tenn .. Schenectady, N .Y . Fitchburg, Mass... Superior, Wis......... Rockford, 111......... Taunton, Mass___ Canton, Ohio......... Butte, M ont.......... Montgomery, A la .. Auburn, N. Y ......... Chattanooga, Tenn East St. Louis, 111. Joliet, 111............... Cash in treasury. 857,744 66,311 107,370 208,587 63,881 53,229 186.605 10,945 22,649 28,156 137,062 121,048 76,436 47,440 472 72,690 20,620 159,684 17,197 60,747 121,291 5205,535 89,764 122,239 14,993 86,140 130.605 Uncol lected taxes. $24,586 42,776 75,977 122,735 46,088 37,548 179,524 50,334 19,500 194,255 22,536 412,628 75,000 450,000 27,056 177,018 138,580 736,742 41,205 11,216 3,933 43,159 4,583 138,*902 41,388 32,528 Cash and bonds in sinking fund. Trust funds. $95,326 $50,000 «150,000 o48,000 ft 75,000 " *95,*513 280,022 353 433,475 69,122 5,544 295,143 9,270 1,809,186 4,692 223,000 12,319 136,834 422,415 248,014 512,487 13,780 017,419 967 7,200 Land and build ings. $15,000 15,500 200 44,375 41,908 *65,000 100,000 *75,000 44.000 102,000 63,200 *100,000 « 55,000 *30,000 n35,000 60.000 ( ') Appara tus, etc. $10,000 $60,000 «17,964 a 167,964 <*3,000 c 51,000 ft 5,000 ft 80,000 5.000 5,000 10,000 *75,000 fc100,000 U ) 3.000 *78,000 825 825 5.000 49.000 7,250 109,250 4,400 67,600 20,000 *120,000 a 10,000 <*65,000 1.000 *31,000 n5,000 n 40,000 10,219 70,219 70.000 15,747 6,297 m 38,000 P 59,300 *100,000 c 26,500 35.000 250,000 a Including police department and jails, ft Included in city hall. e Including land and buildings for police department and jails. <*Including apparatus, etc., for jails. e Including jails and land and buildings for police department. /In clu d e d in land and buildings for city hall. o Not including land and buildings, ft Including iafls. * Including land and buildidgs for library. JNot reported. ft Not including apparatus, etc., not reported. * Including land and buildings for police department. Total. ( h U) 2,3( 2,369 10,000 80.000 2,000 m 40,000 <*3,000 362,300 <*3,500 m103,500 <*5,500 32,000 4,700 39,700 35,000 285,000 1047 STATISTICS OF CITIES Table X X IV .—ASSETS (1)—Concluded. Police department. Land and build ings. Appa ratus, etc. $600 (b) (P) 950 <r> $14,200 1,300 *20,000 *1.5,000 *24,000 *7,000 82,000 (J) 1,000 (f) 1,000 5,212 1,000 m 17,000 1,000 68,775 12,745 *40,000 *9,000 Total. $600 (*)0 950 15,500 *35,000 *31,000 *82,000 01,000 1,000 6,212 m 18,000 81,520 *49,000 Fire department. Land and build ings. $8,000 91,000 80,332 50,000 38,000 (J) 104,500 *2,463 (*)0500 (*) *45,463 41,400 100,774 64,000 162,800 35,500 83,000 *41,100 41,500 91,905 1,906 1,000 2,500 11,800 7,000 /) 500 </) 14,000 1,500 *20,000 *2,000 *7,000 *7,344 (-0 4,439 11,000 26,000 011,800 0 7,000 0 500 15,500 *22,000 *14,344 *33,149 150,000 20,000 r 47,500 v 14,000 34,325 40,050 60,000 30,000 (*>) /) (*) *43,000 V) 2,533 10,000 23,500 (/) (*)6oo (*) (J) (J) Appara tus, etc. Schools. Total. Land and build ings. $500,000 604,500 705,817 513,780 529,200 400,000 497,500 41,480 15,000 44,050 67,025 30,400 83,710 35,000 50,000 *37,000 30,000 52,472 $18,000 149,274 123,096 79,300 70,000 91,800 145,980 15,000 85,450 167,799 94,400 246,510 70,500 133,000 *78,100 71,500 144,377 i *37,201 21,782 71,250 43,078 17,000 23,882 55,000 15,000 42,000 * 70,350 171,782 91,250 r 90,578 v 31,000 58,207 95,050 75,000 72,000 $10,000 58,274 42,764 29,300 32,000 (J) (J) U) Appara tus, etc. $40,000 53,500 26,000 24,800 38,000 25,000 U ) 610,000 778,711 476,000 ■0 15,000 77,000 18,000 724,200 373,000 156,500 230,000 594,730 25,000 70,000 5,000 12,000 30,342 416,820 198,783 570,000 s 600,200 167,000 474,129 335,000 670,000 363,400 8,562 20,000 27,700 s 49,200 5,000 132,000 11,000 30,000 44,240 (J) V) (J) (J) (J) Total. $540,000 658,000 731,817 538,580 567,200 425,000 *497,500 575,000 i 625,000 855,711 494,000 1,005,000 749,200 443,000 161,500 242,000 625,072 I ll 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 U) 425,382 129 218,783 130 597,700 131 s 649,400 132 172,000 133 606,129 134 346,000 135 700,000 . 136 407,640 137 Including land and buildings for jails. Including police department. Including cash of school district extending beyond city limits. p Including 1 fire station and land and buildings for police department and jails. q Including jails, land and buildings for police department, and 1 fire station. rNot including 1 fire station, included in land and buildings for city hall. 8 Including property of school district extending beyond city limits. t Including 1 engine house, markets, and land and buildings for police department and jails, u Including jails, 1 engine house, markets, and land and buildings for police department. vNot including 1 engine house, included in land and buildings for city hall. m n o Mar ginal num ber. 1048 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X I V —ASSETS (2)—Concluded. Mar ginal num ber. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Art galleries, museums, etc. Libraries. Cities. Johnstown, P a ....... Elmira, N .Y ............ Allentown, P a......... Davenport, Iowa . .. McKeesport, P a ___ Springfield, 111......... Chelsea, Mass.......... Chester, P a .............. York, Pa................... Malden, Mass.......... Topeka, K a n s......... Newton. M ass......... Sioux City, Iowa .. . Bayonne, N .J ......... Knoxville,Tenn .. . Schenectady, N. Y .. Fitchburg, Mass___ Superior, W is.......... Rockford, 111.......... Taunton, Mass......... Canton, O h io.......... Butte, M o n t............ Montgomery, A la ... Auburn, N .Y .......... Chattanooga, T enn. East St. Louis, 111.. . Joliet, 111................. Land and Books, buildings. apparatus, etc. &330,000 55,000 Total. 35.000 57,500 16.000 5330,000 60,000 c 57,500 62,000 5,000 184,827 30,300 19.000 10,800 12.000 «5,000 315,827 5 60,300 79,500 dO, 800 26,600 94,400 W 51.668 (ff) 25,000 24,500 146,068 107,350 50,000 46,^000 (*) 131,000 J 30,000 60,500 i 4,600 t ” 25*666' ‘*85*666 (tf) 25,000 24,500 157,350 **25*666' 30.000 25.000 115,000 25,000 a Included in city hall. b Building in process of construction. c Included in police department. d Included in land and buildings for city hall. cNot including land and buildings. /In clu d ed in waterworks. ffNot reported. h Not including apparatus, etc., not reported. Land and buildings. Appara tus, etc. Total. (*) (*) (m) (o) (?) 1049 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (2)—Concluded. Parks. Land and buildings. Appara tus, etc. $80,000 il2 '250 45^000 80'000 40,000 $500 2,700 (f) 177,000 (g) 150,000 201,667 34,000 (g) 20,000 58,000 5,000 40,000 128,150 (00 20,000 71,750 51,500 40,000 8,000 110,000 30,000 100,000 Jails. Total. 4,000 2,000 (/) (flr) h (g) 33,000 (g) 1,000 (0) 100 125 (0) 1,300 1,200 500 5,000 h $80,500 114' 950 45' 00u 84j 00J 42,000 (/) 177,000 85,000 183,000 201,667 35,000 250,000 20,000 58,000 5,000 40,100 128,275 (0) 20,000 73,050 52,700 40,500 8,000 115,000 30,000 100,000 Land and build Appara tus, etc. ings. , (a) a (a) (c) (c) (a) (a) (a) (c) Total. (a) aj (a) c (c) (») (*) (°) (0) («) (c) a (a) (a) {P) (P) ( c) (c ) « \p ) (d) (a) (a) (a) $6,000 (c) \c) Workhouses, reformatories, etc. Mar ginal num Land and Appara ber. build tus, etc. Total. ings. |............... (00 ( P) $500 ( a) (a) (a) (00 { P) e$500 (a) (a) 170 (c ) (a) 6,170 (c) (c) (c) i Included in land and buildings for schools. j Including land and buildings for art galleries, museums, etc. fcIncluded in land and buildmgs for libraries. i Included in other assets. m included in libraries and other assets. "Included in land and buildings for police department. o Included in police department and other assets. P Included iu fire department. (0) Ill 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 12* 12) 131 131 332 131 331 135 136 137 1050 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (3)—Concluded. Asylums, almshouses, etc. Hospitals. Mar ginal num ber. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Cities. Land and build ings. Johnstown, P a ............ Elmira, N. Y ............... <4143,000 Allentown, Pa.............. Davenport, Io w a ......... McKeesport, P a .......... Springfield, 111............ Chelsea, Mass.............. 1,800 Chester, Pa................... Y:ork, P a ...................... Malden, Mass............... Topeka, K an s.............. 2,000 Newton. Mass.............. 25,000 Sioux City, Io w a ......... Bayonne, N. J .............. Knoxville, T e n n ......... 43,000 Schenectadv, N. Y ___ Fitchburg, Mass.......... 182,400 Superior, Wis............... (<0 Rockford, 111............... 1,335 Taunton, M ass............ Canton, Ohio............... 500 Butte, M ont................. Montgomery, A l a ....... 4,000 Auburn, N. Y .............. Chattanooga, Tenn___ 43,000 East St. Louis, 111......... 500 Joliet, 111...................... Appara tus, etc. • Total. Land and build ings. Appara tus, etc. Total. Docks and wharves. <4143,000 6133 (<0 640,000 4,000 i33 d 1,800 28,500 500 2,000 2,500 27,000 2,000 45,000 19,025 201,425 (<0 1,335 632,000 66,825 638,825 35,000 3,050 38,050 70,000 (c ) 150 650 500 4,500 10,000 200 53,000 700 39,500 (<0 5,980 (c ) 45,480 (o) 37,500 6,000 43,500 (c) 10,000 Property owned by city; management private. Including parks. Not reported. ^Not including apparatus, etc., not reported. cNot including apparatus, etc., for city hall, police department, schools, parks, and hospitals, not reported. a b c 1051 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X IV .—ASSETS (3)—Concluded. Ferries and bridges. Markets. $114,900 242,994 40.000 20.000 Bath houses and WaterCeme teries. bathing pools • works. and beaches. Gas works. Electriclight plants. $58,700 $426,374 $150,000 545,210 51,055,000 488,203 40,000 $103,500 i 1 6,300 7,500 152,500 300,000 100,000 75,700 («) 164,277 (*) 31,000 82,000 100,000 180,000 1,093,881 35,000 68,000 (<) $1,500 10,223 (<0 (•) 44,800 1,500 7,500 18,000 20,000 81,000 2,089,285 1,000,000 300,000 896,000 1,101,544 <«) 642,468 1,288,128 646,472 1,024,000 584,122 325,666 (c) (®) 158.242 Other. Total assets. $45,000 $1,036,656 1,693,615 49,646 1,698,497 1,400 1,228,702 10,000 287,374 2,155,908 7,500 1,977,430 339,561 e 2,708,648 30,079 942,980 27,700 991,168 169,424 / 3,451,100 012,300 1,143,618 25.000 6,304,502 146,500 2,482,128 35.000 1,851,040 51.521 812,468 155,139 1,831,281 140,997 3,358,366 (c ) 119)l57 1,491,974 55.521 2,800,992 41,528 1,680,384 36,750 h 1,235,065 76.000 1,608,923 1,000 1,541,780 45.000 870,282 10.000 1,492,428 20,000 1,307,117 /N o t including apparatus, etc., for parks, not reported. 0 Including apparatus, etc., for art galleries, museums, etc., and jails. h Including cash and property of school district extending beyond city limits. 1 Included in land and buildings for city hall. Mar ginal num ber. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 1052 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X V .—PER CAPITA DEBT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND EXPENDI TURES FOR MAINTENANCE. Expenditures for maintenance. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Police depart Assessed ment, in Street valuation cluding ex Mu All Fire Net of real police pendi debt. courts, de Schools. nici and tures, other pal pur Total, part jails, personal except light property. work- ment. ing. light poses. houses, ing. reform atories, etc. 1 New York, N. Y ....... $86.82 « $1,056.93 $3.21 $1.32 b $5.51 $0.76 $2.07 $15.85 $28.72 .50 .92 .26 2 Chicago, 111............... ©20.22 4.56 3.94 12.37 2.19 208.10 .82 .92 d.58 2.49 6.30 14.31 3.20 3 Philadelphia, P a ___ &5.77 690.15 .97 663.52 2.88 1.29 2.57 .99 5.95 14.65 4 St. Louis, M o ............ 30.69 3.77 g 20.49 *38.18 2.24 1.34 2,009.32 / 5.03 5.31 5 Boston, M ass............ ©82.21 .76 ' 7.45 14.64 .98 2.72 6 Baltimore, Md.......... 59.32 833.35 2.10 .63 .28 3.22 .67 1.37 1.25 7 Cleveland, Ohio....... 37.76 503.73 5.53 12.32 .95 .71 3.14 2.21 1.86 6.98 15.85 i 655.00 8 Buffalo, N. Y ............ 47.94 .86 2.72 3.33 .73 1.48 1,180.29 1.88 7.31 16.83 9 San Francisco, Cal .. 1.03 1.39 1.00 9.52 18.28 631.33 2.03 J3.31 10 Cincinnati, O h io ___ 79.65 .92 1.26 1,055.94 1.47 1.68 8.35 16.21 11 Pittsburg, P a ............ 55.76 2.53 .72 .40 12 New Orleans, L a ___ 59.68 .89 1.59 485.58 .90 9.83 14.33 *1.70 2.90 5.22 *13.52 1.86 13 Detroit, M ich............ 16.28 824.16 1.84 1.15 5.32 12.55 2.57 555.38 1.53 .71 14 Milwaukee, Wis....... 23.06 1.27 1.92 ©7.58 ol8.77 4.12 m . 86 1 672.13 3.36 .93 15 Washington, D. C___ 49.25 1.84 1.25 3.26 .85 *.55 16 Newark, N .J ............ 58.05 621.90 7.20 *14.95 17 Jersey City, N .J ....... 75.88 1.13 2.34 .76 J>1.04 q 9.61 *16.85 447.63 1.97 577.21 1.07 .70 ©1.20 35.78 12.91 18 Louisville, K y .......... 38.76 1.77 2.39 1.04 .74 1.55 3.51 19 Minneapolis, M inn.. 31.83 486.73 1.19 5.99 14.02 2.12 1.99 4.16 1.63 *1.64 20 Providence, R. I ....... 78.82 1,083.16 7.93 *19.47 .68 21 Indianapolis, Ind___ 22.20 .62 9.35 .99 3.06 3.11 707.86 .89 .94 3.22 22 Kansas City, Mo....... 8 3o. 22 1.44 .45 462.47 8.27 15.95 1.63 1.05 *6.18 * 13.91 3.44 .79 23 St. Paul, M inn.......... 50.77 511.51 1.30 1.18 1.42 1.47 1.11 10.56 19.05 24 Rochester, N. Y ......... 60.27 684.99 1.26 3.23 .66 1.08 1.11' 4.85 25 Denver, C o lo ............ 13.49 959.74 4.57 13.50 1.23 .52 .78 26 Toledo, O h io ............ 46.21 427.07 .78, 2.66 4.88 10.50 .88 1.11 1 2.73 .54 27 Allegheny, Pa.......... 50.35 1.04 6.91 12.33 730.86 1.39 ©3.21 w10.92 .57 28 Columbus, O h io....... 40.83 1.37, 3.18 494.45 1.20 2.58 1.24 1.38 1.01 29 Worcester, Mass....... 45.90 944.45 4.28 9.05 19.54 .93 ©1.51 w 10.55 19.13 30 Syracuse, N. Y .......... 76.14 725.87 1.46 3.42 1.26 1.33 3.42 .78 888.42 1.28 4.21 12.98 1.96 31 New Haven, C onn... 34.14 .73 32 Paterson, N .J .......... 36.46 1.12 1.19 2.91 .81 456.39 4.66 11.42 33 Fall River, Mass....... *34.76 1.15 3.05 .93 ©1.48 t©7.17 15.08 696.77 1.30 .60 1.55 34 St. Joseph, Mo.......... 16.59 .67 244.90 .68 5.24 8.74 .61 1.07! 3.57 35 Omaha, Nebr............ 59.89 330.67 .93 .73 6.22 13.13 36 Los Angeles, Cal....... 10.41 1.14 4.52 1.76 667.07 .65 1.19 4.13 13.39 1.20 37 Memphis, Tenn......... 1/30.14 .93 1.31 .46 352.30 .95 3.66 8.51 .65 226.74 .45 38 Scranton, P a ............ 10.25 .56 3.06 .60 2.08 7.40 0 Including $0.32 liable for taxes for State purposes only, $58.97 franchises, and $81.37 exempt from taxes for State purposes. b Including $0.06 for College of City of New York and $0.05 for Normal College. c Including $2.31 special assessment bonds against private property. dNot including $0.12 expended by street railway company and $0.01 expended by board of directors of trust funds. e Including net county debt. /Inclu din g $1.90 expended by county. (/Including $0.22 expended by county. h Including $2.12 expended by county. 1 Including $36.21 special franchises. i Including $0.45 for University of Cincinnati. * Not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. l Not including $4.86 gross receipts of street railways taxed at the rate of 4 per cent. wNot including expenditures by United States Government for lightingof public parks and spaces. nIncluding expenditures by United States Government for waterworks, but not including $2 paid out of sinking fund. ©Including expenditures by United States Government for waterworks, but not including expend itures by United States Government for lighting of public parks and spaces, and $2 paid out of sink ing fund. P Including expenditures for garbage removal, but not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. q Not including expenditures for garbage removal included in street expenditures. r Including expenditures for garbage removal. 8 Including $7.05 park certificates of indebtedness. t Not including $0.44 paid out of sinking fund. uNot including $2.59 paid out of sinking fund. ©Includiug expenditures for sewers. wNot including expenditures for sewers included in street expenditures. * Including $0.82 trust funds carried by city as floating debt. 1/Including $0.56 market-house bonds secured by mortgage on market house, and $2,33 park bonds secured by mortgage on park property. 1053 STATISTICS OF CITIES, T able X X V .— PER CAPITA DEBT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND EXPENDI TURES FOR MAINTENANCE—Continued. Expenditures for maintenance. Mar ginal num ber. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Cities. Net debt. Lowell, M ass............ Albany, N . Y ............ Cambridge, M ass___ Portland, O r e g ......... Atlanta, Ga............... Grand Rapids, Mich. Dayton, O h io............ Richmond, Va.......... Nashville, T e n n ....... Seattle, Wash............ Hartford, C onn......... Reading, P a .............. Wilmington, D e l ___ Camden, N. J ............ Trenton, N .J ............ Bridgeport, Conn___ Lynn, Mass............... Oakland, C a l............ Lawrence, M ass....... New Bedford, Mass. . Des Moines, Iowa___ Springfield, Mass___ Somerville, M ass___ Troy, N .Y ................. Hoboken, N .J .......... Evansville, Ind ......... Manchester, N. H ___ Utica, N .Y ................. Peoria, 111 .................. Charleston, S. C......... Savannah, G a .......... Salt Lake City,Utah. San Antonio, T ex ___ Duluth, Minn............ Erie, P a .................... Elizabeth, N .J.......... Wilkesbarre, P a ___ Kansas City, Kans. . . Harrisburg, P a ......... Portland, M e ............ Yonkers, N .Y ............ Norfolk, V a............... $32.73 «31.69 67.76 f t 59.97 35.85 19.61 33.24 71.85 43.14 ft69.46 57.33 17.33 28.44 33.21 34.08 21.30 49.61 J5.88 29.25 49.32 17.16 33.80 27.73 27.69 21.85 35.17 26.17 11.45 12.90 58.43 50.88 60.45 44.16 105.30 13.08 58.15 11.40 47.42 20.77 26.11 69.03 79.44 Police depart Assessed ment, in Street valuation cluding Mu ex of real police Fire All pendi nici and courts, de Schools. pal tures, other Total. personal pur jails, part light except poses. property. work- ment. ing. light houses, ing. reform atories, etc. $754.72 694.69 1,022.67 461.28 608.54 631.12 504.05 773.02 476.95 477.57 733.33 535.89 557.77 358.18 449.36 821.26 745.26 589.66 625.46 977.45 202.58 1,143.68 849.20 758.42 462.66 437.64 548.54 1 564.73 206.51 269.38 638.57 580.90 554.29 445.90 357.41 330.71 348.80 v 211.81 514.71 888.74 749.24 508.95 $1.44 1.63 1.37 .63 1.51 1.04 1.13 1.18 1.16 1.06 1.56: .631! 1.08 1.23 1.21 1.00 1.15 .97 ftl.00 1.72 .79 fcl. 04 1.04 1.55 1.83 .88 .84 .76 : 1.31 1 1.38| 1.41 .80 , .85 .99 .59 .99 .70 1.06 .56 .82 1.74 1.12 $1.25 1.42 .97 .85 1.25 1.29 .83 1.01 1.10 1.08 1.42 .51 .47 1.08 .97 .98 1.38 1.02 .92 1.19 1.15 1.50 1.02 .86 1.36 1.00 1.54 1.30 1.04 .74 1.24 .74 .79 1.57 .96 .47 .69 .74 .36 1.17 .95 .84 $3.49 « 2.94 4.67 2.86 1.77 3.20 3.54 1.35 2.09 2.93 4.72 2.59 2.49 3.03 t-2.96 2.34 3.40 3.99 2.86 3.56 3.89 5.53 4.64!1 2.86 3.06 2.91 1 2.18 2.92 3.32 m . 12, (P) 4.56 1.95 i 4.32 2.51 2.30 2.77 2.14 2.87 2.68 4.06 1.07 $0.98 $0.98 .79 .90 .77 2.30 .53 .53 .80 c*l. 00 e.59 .42 .59 .37 1.00 .58 / . 78 .37 .53 .72 2.32 .85 e.70 .65 .58 1.05 .55 .74 e .4 l 1.17 .73 1.57 .76 .74 .85 .77 .56 .79 «1.08 .39 .71 1.03 ; 2.06 .92 1.56 1.67 1.11 .45 .29 .47 *47 1.02 1.03 .52 1.08 .59 .58 .42 .51 .93 .59 .54 1.03 1 1.70 .42 .91 .32 .68 . .41 s.49 .77 .74 .54 .61 .72 .61 .72 <?1.28 .95 .78 j .30! u»1.46 $6.68 6.84 12.85 4.81 <*6.06 4.77 3.97 8.81 fir 4.41 6.48 7.12 3.15 3.28 3.52 4.37 3.95 9.15 2.18 6.36 7.08 3.68 6.73 7.15 5.48 6.60 4.22 4.33 4.62 4.74 «5 .10 5.78 5.95 r2.24 9.76 2.99 * 3.97 Ml. 49 5.00 3.03 6.68 7.78 .*10.55 $14.82 14.52 22.93 10.21 12.39 el0.89 10.48 13.72 10.12 12.45 10. e lO . 12. el5. 10. 17. 16. 9. 10. 11. 11. o 8. a 9. 7.16 10.09 8.15 e 13.35 16.26 15.34 a Including $6.75 certificates of indebtedness against private property, ftIncluding $3.52 improvement bonds against private property. c Not including expenditures for street cleaning ana sprinkling included in expenditures for all other purposes. d Including expenditures for street cleaning and sprinkling. eNot including expenditures for street sprinking paid for by property owners. / Not including expenditures for street cleaning included in expenditures for all other purposes. g Including expenditures for street cleaning. ft Including $5.90 local-improvement bonds against private property. *Data are for 16 months. iN ot including $0.34 in litigation. ft Not including police courts, jails, workhouses, reformatories, etc., supported by county, in c lu d in g $16.63 franchises. »»Not including $1.07 expended by State and county, nIncluding 80.02 contributed to Jacksonville fund. o Including $0.02 contributed to Jacksonville fund, but not including $1.07 expended by State and county for schools. p Supported by State and county. a Not including amount expended by State and county for schools, r Not including $2.14 paid out of sinking fund. s Including expenditures for parks. t Not including expenditures for parks, included in street expenditures. «N ot including expenditures for street cleaning and sprinkling, paid for by property owners. v Not including $14.06, railroad property. w1Including expenditures for garbage removal. a: Not including expenditures for garbage removal included in street expenditures, 9398— N o. 42 — 02------12 1054 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. T able X X V —PER CAPITA DEBT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND EXPENDI TURES FOR MAINTENANCE—Continued. Expenditures for maintenance. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. Net debt. Assessed valuation of real and personal property. Police depart ment, in Street cluding Mu ex All Fire police nici pendi de Schools. pal tures, other Total. courts, pur part jails, except poses. light work- ment. ing. light houses, ing. reform atories, etc. $265.90 $3.74 $0.48 «$0.52 $2.38 a $8.80 81 Waterbury, Conn___ $31.06 $0.96 $0.72 8.60 16.63 .70 .63 1.02 4.14 839.11 1.54 82 Holyoke, Mass.......... 34.55 7.13 2.27 .57 .38 472.85 2.19 .63 1.09 83 Fort Wayne, I n d ___ 612.04 8.32 2.68 .59 .48 384.27 2.91 .95 .71 84 Youngstown, Ohio .. 14.69 13.73 .44 1.17 7.28 550.69 2.50 1.06 1.28 85 Houston, T ex............ c 63.21 .46 d . 84 e5.56 10.82 544.96 1.06 2.13 .77 86 Covington, K y.......... 47.84 8.35 .24 2.15 453.88 .60 .77 3.69 .90 87 Akron, Ohio.............. 42.38 9.34 .72 4.39 479.70 1.85 .48 .90 1.00 88 Dallas, T ex ............... 34.59 9.31 3.50 .79 .40 481.79 3.16 .79 .67 89 Saginaw, M ich ......... 28.84 1.97 a 6.01 2.14 .66 a . 48 410.49 .39 .37 90 Lancaster, P a .......... 17.00 3.82 / 8.24 .32 / .24 473.88 .41 2.77 .68 91 Lincoln,Nebr............ 42.65 6.32 14.94 2.28 674.84 .77 3.31 .97 92 Brockton, Mass......... 45.28 1.29 3.73 10.81 .76 3.82 468.49 1.10 .75 .65 93 Binghamton, N. Y . .. 17.50 6.87 ft10.53 .23 .69 486.06 94 Augusta, Ga.............. 48.10 1.56 1.29 (flO 8.95 16.35 .82 »*!■•16 872.33 3.32 1.15 95 Pawtucket, R. I ....... 100.93 .95 6.88 2.74 .45 .41 433.75 2.22 .46 .60 96 Altoona, P a .............. 24.31 6.20 10.97 .27 608.97 1.08 1.06 2.36 97 Wheeling, W. V a....... 14.23 3.07 ft 5.99 424.28 1.02 .81 .62 .47 98 Mobile, Ala............... *22.59 (i) m .64 .42 a . 73 «5.31 o9.48 431.60 1.45 .93 99 Birmingham, Ala . . . *62.47 1.23 a 4.79 a . 28 1.84 473.33 .75 .69 100 Little Rock. A r k ___ JP4.51 451.13 .91 <*1.20 c3.73 10.19 .85 .69 2.81 101 Springfield, Ohio___ 23.47 a. 89 r 8.68 16.29 3.44 102 Galveston, T e x ......... 111.22 765.27 1.43 1.85 .67 10.56 17.46 539.46 .95 1.18 4.10 103 Tacoma, Wash.......... sllO. 69 7.49 15.49 1.51 .99 104 Haverhill, Mass....... 37.85 707.86 1.32 .89 3.29 6.11 13.68 .63 515.40 .28 105 Spokane, W ash......... t 71.02 1.05 1.68 3.93 3.65 10.04 .56 523.02 .69 106 Terre Haute, Ind ___ w7.96 .78 1.00 3.46 a9.10 3.27 .64 «1.06 633.98 .74 107 Dubuque, Iowa......... 40.92 2.53 .86 7.27 2.79 .33 .52 148.16 108 Quincy, 111............... 25.63 .70 .75 2.18 «7.17 2.63 386.09 1.92 .46 a . 88 .49 .79 109 South Bend, I n d ___ t’17.60 7.37 15.24 1.02 1.56 776.52 110 Salem, Mass.............. W18.67 .97 3.26 1.06 5.58 1.47 .33 .46 111 Johnstown, P a ......... 10.98 351.58 .46 .25 2.61 .94 4.93 12.91 x 472.41 1.02 112 Elmira, N. Y ............ 31.04 3.57 .96 1.49 6.48 2.15 .32 .55 609.48 .36 .52 2.58 113 Allentown, Pa.......... 20.23 9.39 2.81 .80 4.11 .26 .72 114 Davenport, Io w a ___ 1/12.92 476.56 .69 9.19 3.54 .48 .55 115 McKeesport, P a ....... 16.51 478.38 2.80 .93 .89 3.98 10.42 .61 185.15 2.94 .63 116 Springfield, 111......... 28.37 1.02 1.24 1.19 11.23 18.71 666.71 3.531 .79 117 Cnelsea, Mass.......... 34.19 .99 .98 a Not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. &Not including street-improvement bonds. e Not including $2.36 in litigation. d Including expenditures for garbage removal. cNot including expenditures for garbage removal included in street expenditures. /N o t including $0.14, value of work performed by citizens in lieu of payment of poll tax in cash. 0 $2.29 expended by State and county. ftNot including $2.29 expended by State and county for schools. 1Including $1.68 street-improvement bonds, but not including $57.77 debt of old city placed in hands of trustee on reorganization of city. j$1.18 expended by State and county. ft Not including $1.18 expended by State and county for schools. i Not including $1.77 improvement bonds to be paid from improvement assessments. m Not including $0.60 expended by State and county, but including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc. n Not including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc., included in expenditures for schools. oNot including $0.60 expended by State and county for schools and expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. jpNot including the bonded indebtedness of 22 special-improvement districts for which no report is made to the city. g Not including expenditures for street cleaning included in expenditures for all other purposes. r Including expenditures for street cleaning. * Including $3.09 local-improvement bonds against private property. t including $6.24 special-assessment bonds and warrants against private property. «N ot including $2.18, local-improvement bonds. v Including $11.23, street and sewer improvement bonds, held against private property. wNot including $4.64, trust and endowment funds, regarded as a liability by the city, a Including $18.97, franchises y Including $2.30, improvement bonds secured by abutting property. 1055 STATISTICS OP CITIES, T able X X V .—PER CAPITA DEBT, ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY, AND EXPENDI TURES FOR MAINTENANCE—Concluded. Expenditures for maintenance. Mar ginal num ber. Cities. 118 Chester, Pa................ 119 York, P a .................. 120 Malden, M ass.......... 121 Topeka, Kans.......... 122 Newton, Mass.......... 123 Sioux City, Io w a ___ 124 Bayonne, N. J .......... 125 Knoxville, T e n n ___ 126 Schenectady, N. Y .. 127 Fitchburg, Mass....... 128 Superior, Wis............ 129 Rockford, 111............ 130 Taunton, Mass......... 131 Canton, Ohio............ 132 Butte, M ont.............. 133 Montgomery, Ala . . . 134 Auburn, N. Y ............ 135 Chattanooga, T enn.. 136 East St. Louis, 111___ 137 Joliet, 111................... Police depart Assessed ment^ in Street valuation cluding Mu ex Net of real police Fire pendi debt. and courts, de Schools. nici pal tures, personal part jails, light except property. work- ment. ing. light houses, ing. reform atories, etc. $23.77 12.30 46.47 31.92 115.57 f62.55 52.96 40.85 29.66 45.46 40.66 15.50 45.98 30.40 ©*18.56 64.75 18.56 29.11 29.16 6.15 $426.83 485.69 791.79 c 284.06 1,633.53 164.74 420.06 350.41 370.89 751.05 483.92 192.69 686.47 384.68 612.55 402.54 P 402.91 427.49 154.40 119.41 $0.71 .56 .98 .80 1.94 .69 1.21 .65 .56 1.06 .88 .54 1.32 .81 2.12 1.26 .61 1.02 1.01 .89 $0.45 .38 .99 .82 1.55 .84 .40 .66 .53 .95 1.17 .86 .88 1.11 1.22 .86 .59 1.10 .78 .91 $2.66 ©2.09 4.62 2.97 5.43 3.47 3.96 1.49 1.46 3.39 3.74 3.13 3.73 3.34 ©5.56 1.12 2.29 1.47 2.29 2.05 $0.64 .63 .87 1.59 .49 .90 .71 .62 .96 .38 .63 .26 .78 .72 .61 .86 3.20 .46 .51 $0.38 .43 2.08 .95 4.62 31.19 .40 J. 50 .53 1.58 .58 .83 31.33 .07 1.76 .64 3.76 .78 1.13 1.09 All other Total pur poses. a$1.98 dl.44 6.91 3.84 13.58 ft3.49 7.10 *3.45 3.38 7.23 6.02 2.70 7.38 3.91 «4.65 6.49 3.09 3.70 3.27 1.98 5$6.82 5.53 16.45 9.38 28.71 i 10.17 13.97 1 7.46 7.08 15.17 12.77 8.69 314.90 10.02 w16.03 ©10.98 3 8.20 8.27 8.94 7.43 Not including $0.39 paid out of sinking fund. Not including $0.39 paid out of sinking fund, but including $0.16 paid out of sinking fund which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. c Including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc. dNot including expenditures for libraries, art galleries, museums, etc., included in expenditures for schools. e Not including $10.85, railroad property. /In clu d in g $8.22, improvement bonds secured by abutting property. i/Not including expenditures for street sprinkling, paid for by property owners. ftNot including $2.24 paid out of sinking fund. i Not including $2.24 paid out of sinking fund and expenditures for street sprinkling paid for by property owners. j Including expenditures for construction and other capital outlay for sewers; also expenditures for sewers and garbage removal. *Not including expenditures for sewers and garbage removal included in street expenditures. i Including expenditures for construction and other capital outlay for sewers. m Including debt of school district extending beyond city limits, n Including expenditures of school district extending beyond city limits. ©Including unpaid warrants which can not be traced to the various items of expenditure. P Including $11.44, franchises, a For 4 months only. a b LABOE CONDITIONS IN CUBA. N E W L A W R E L A T IN G TO R A IL R O A D EM PLO YEES. In connection with the article on “ Labor conditions in Cuba” in the last number o f the Bulletin, that fo r July, 1902, on pages 752 and 753, mention was made o f the railroad law promulgated in February, 1902, and two sections o f the law giving provisions which relate to railroad employees were quoted. This was the law in force at the time the article was prepared for the Bulletin by the author. On A pril 28, 1902, too late to come to the attention o f Dr. Clark, a new order was promulgated b y the military governor, General W ood, revoking that portion o f the law entitled “ Criminal Law Affecting Railroads,” which included the two sections referred to above as quoted, and in place thereof substituting provisions differing in many important particulars. The two sections o f the present law which relate especially to employees o f railroads are as follows: X I . Everyone is guilty o f a crime and liable to p rision correccional in its minimum degree (imprisonment from six months, one day to two years and four months), who by any act willfully obstructs or inter rupts, or causes to be obstructed or interrupted, the construction, maintenance or free use o f any railway or any part thereof, or any matter or thing appertaining thereto or connected therewith. But nothing in this order shall lim it the right o f employees either individ ually or collectively to leave the service o f the company except while in train service between stations as provided in article X V I I I o f this chapter. X V III . A ll railroad employees whose labor is essential to the oper ation o f railroads, who abandon their posts while on train service between stations, without notice and without giving sufficient time to have others substituted in their place and duties, shall be guilty o f a crime, punishable by arresto m ayor (imprisonment o f one month and one day to six months) and shall be liable fo r injuries occasioned by such act to the punishment prescribed in the Penal Code. 1056 AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. [It is the purpose of this Departm ent to publish from tim e to tim e im portant agreements made between large bodies o f em ployers and em ployees w ith regard to wages, hours of labor, etc. The Department would be pleased to receive copies of such agreements whenever m ade.] BITUM INOUS C O A L MINING. Indianapolis Interstate Agreem ent f o r Seale Tear B eginning A p ril 1, im . I n d ia n a p o l is , I n d ., February 8, 190%. In pursuance o f the instructions from the joint convention, we hereby reaffirm last year’s scale for the year beginning A pril 1,1902, and end ing A pril 1, 1903. Operators. M iners. THIN-VEIN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. G. O. W. Schluederberg. A . Blackburn. P. Dolan. William Dodds. OHIO. Jno. H. Winder. W . J. Mullins. W . H. Haskins. D. H. Sullivan. BLOCK DISTRICT OF INDIANA. J. H. McClelland. W . W . Risher. William Wilson. Harry W right. BITUMINOUS DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Jno. K. Seifert. Hugh Shirkie. W . D. Van Horn. J. H. Kennedy. ILLINOIS. H. N. Taylor. W . W . Keefer. W . R. Russell. W. D. Ryan. In behalf o f the United M ine Workers o f A m erica: Attest: W . B. W ilson, Secretary. John Mitchell. T. L. Lewis. W . B. Wilson. The follow ing is a copy o f the Indianapolis interstate agreement for the scale year ending A pril 1,1901, which is reaffirmed above: I t is hereby agreed: S e c t io n I. (a) That an advance o f fourteen (14) cents per ton o f two thousand (2,000) pounds for pick-mined screened coal shall take effect in western Pennsylvania thin vein, the H ocking, the basing district o f Ohio, and the block-coal district o f Indiana. 1057 1058 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. (b) That the Danville district, the basing point of Illinois, shall be continued on an absolute run-of-mine basis, and that an advance of nine (9) cents per ton over present prices be paid in the district named. (c) That the bituminous-coal district o f Indiana shall pay forty-nine (49) cents per ton fo r all mine-run coal loaded and shipped as such. A ll other coal mined in that district shall be passed over a regulation screen and be paid fo r at the rate o f eighty (80) cents per ton o f two thousand (2,000) pounds for screened lump. Sec. II. That the screen hereby adopted for the State o f Ohio, west ern Pennsylvania, and the bituminous district o f Indiana shall be uni form in size, six (6) feet wide by twelve (12) feet long, built o f flat or Akron-shaped bar, o f not less than five-eighths ( f ) o f an inch surface, with one and one-fourth (14) inches between bars, free from obstruc tions, and that such screens shall rest upon a sufficient number o f bear ings to hold the bars in proper position. Sec. III. That the block-coal district o f Indiana may continue the use o f the diamond-bar screen, the screen to be seventy-two (72) feet superficial area, o f uniform size, one and one-quarter (14 ) inches between the bars, free from obstruction, and that such screens shall rest upon a sufficient number of bearings to hold the bars in proper position. Sec. IY . That the differential between the thick and thin vein pick mines o f the Pittsburg district be referred to that district for settle ment. Sec. Y . (a) That the price o f machine mining in the bituminous dis trict o f Indiana shall be eighteen (18) cents per ton less than the pick mining rate fo r screened lump coal when punching machines are used, and twenty-one and one-half (214 ) cents per ton less than pick-mining rate when chain machines are used. W hen coal is paid for on run-of-mine basis the price shall be ten (10) cents per ton less than the pick-mining rate when punching machines are used, and twelve and one-half (124) cents per ton less than pick-mining rates when chain machines are used. (b) That the machine-mining rate in the Danville district, the bas ing point o f Illinois, on both punching and chain machines, be thirtynine (39) cents per ton. Sec. V I. That the mining rate in the thin vein o f the Pittsburg district, and the Hocking, the basing district of Ohio, for shooting, cutting, and loading, shall be advanced nine (9) cents per ton, and that the block-coal district o f Indiana shall be advanced eleven and one-half (114) cents per ton. Sec. V II. That the mining rates in the central district o f Pennsyl vania be referred to that district for adjustment. Sec. V III. That the advance on inside day labor be twenty per cent (20%), based on the present Hocking Valley scale, with the exception o f trappers, whose compensation shall be one dollar ($1.00) per day. Sec. IX . That all narrow dead work and room turning shall be paid a proportionate advance with the pick-mining rate. Sec. X . That internal differences in any o f the States or districts, both as to prices or conditions, shall be referred to the States or dis tricts affected fo r adjustment. Sec. X I . The above scale is based upon an eight (8) hour workday. The f oregoing scale, having been unanimously adopted by the Inter AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. 1059 state Convention o f Miners and Operators, at Indianapolis, Indiana, on February 2,1900, in witness hereof we hereto attach our signatures. In behalf o f operators: In behalf o f m iners: F or Pennsylvania— F. L . Robbins. W m. B. Rodgers. F or Ohio— J. S. Morton. W alter J. Mullins. F or bituminous district o f Indiana— J. Smith Talley. A . M. Ogle. For block-coal district o f Indiana— W . W . Risher. M. H. Johnson. F or Illinois— E. T. Bent. Chas. E. Hull. F or Pennsylvania— P. Dolan. Wm. Dodds. F or Ohio— W . H. Haskins. T. L. Lewis. For block-coal district of Indiana— W illiam Wilson. Barney Navin. For bituminous district of Indiana— W . D. Van Horn. J. H. Kennedy. F or Illinois— John M. Hunter. W. D. Ryan. In behalf o f the U. M . W. o f A .: John Mitchell, President. W . C. Pearce, Secretary. Illin o is State Agreem ent f o r Scale Year Ending M arch 31, 1903. Whereas a contract between the operators o f the competitive coal fields o f Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois and the United Mine W orkers o f America has been entered into at the city o f Indian apolis, Indiana, February 8,1902, by which the present scale o f prices at the basic points, as fixed by the agreement made in Indianapolis, Indiana, February 2, 1900, is continued in force and effect for one year from A pril 1, 1902, to March 31, 1903, inclusive; and Whereas this contract fixes the pick-mining price o f bituminous mine-run coal at Danville at forty-nine cents per ton of two thousand pounds: Therefore, be it Resol/oed, That the prices for pick-mined coal throughout the State for one year, beginning A pril 1, 1902, shall be as follows: FIRST DISTRICT. Streator, Cardiff, Clarke City, and associated mines, including Toluca thick v e in ___________________________ - ........... ....... $0. 58 Third vein and associated mines, including twenty-four inches o f b ru sh in g ........................ ......................... ................. ....................76 Wilmington and associated mines, including Cardiff long wall and Bloomington thin vein, including brushing__________ .81 Bloomington thick vein------------ ------------- -- -------------- ----------.71 Pontiac, including twenty-four inches o f b ru sh in g _________ .81 Pontiac top v e in ______________________________ __________ _ .58 Marseilles........ ......... ....................... ........................... - - ............... 1. 09 1060 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. (Rate at Marseilles to continue until September 1, 1902, at which time the conditions are to be investigated by Presi dent Russell and Commissioner Justi, and if conditions are changed, as now contemplated, an equitable adjustment shall be made.) Morris and Seneca (referred to a committee composed of Commissioner Justi and two operators and President Rus sell and two miners to fix mining prices, which shall become a part o f this contract; the same to be considered before May 1, 1902). (For settlement at Morris, see Morris local agreement.) Clarke City lower seam, brushing in coal___________________ $0. 66 SECOND DISTRICT. Danville, Westville, Grape Creek, and associated mines in Yermilion County_______ .49 THIRD DISTRICT. Springfield and associated mines__________ ____ ___________ Lincoln and N iantic_____ __________________________________ C o lfa x ___________ ______ ___ ______________ _________ _ . 497 .53 .53 FOURTH DISTRICT. Mines on C. & A. south o f Springfield, to and including Carlinville; including Taylorville, Pana, Litchfield, Hillsboro, W itt (Paisley), Divernon, and P aw nee________ _______ ___ Assumption long wall, under present regulations___________ Moweaqua room and pillar_________________________________ Mount Pulaski room and pillar_____________________________ Decatur, present conditions______________________ ___ . .49 . 65£ .53 .66 .64 FIFTH DISTRICT. Glen Carbon, Belleville, and associated mines, to and includ ing Pinckneyville, W illisville, and Nashville.__________ _ Coal five feet and u n d e r........................................ ................... . .49 .54 SIXTH DISTRICT. DuQuoin, Odin, Sandoval, Centralia, and associated mines __ Salem and Kim m undy........ ......... ........................... ............... ... _ .45 .50 SEVENTH DISTRICT. Mount Y ernon______________ Jackson C o u n t y ____________ (All coal five feet and under, five cents extra per ton; this not to apply to lower bench, nor rolls or horsebacks.) Lower bench, Jackson County, for shipping mines, miners to carry fourteen inches brushing. . ______ _______ ___________ Saline C o u n ty _______________________________ Williamson County_____ - . . . ___________ _____________ Gallatin County (price to be determined by Thomas Jeremiah and Commissioner Justi and become a part o f this contract). .50 .45 .58 .45 .42 AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. 1061 EIGHTH DISTRICT. Fulton and Peoria counties, thin or lower vein (third vein conditions)_____________ _ ___________ _____ _____________ $0. Fulton and Peoria counties, No. 5 vein...... .......................... .. Astoria, No. 5 vein (Fulton and Peoria counties conditions) _ _ Pekin (price o f sixty cents per ton continued under provisions similar to those in State agreement for year ending A pril 1, 1902, viz, price o f sixty cents per ton, with Fulton and Peoria counties conditions to be in force for ninety days from A pril 1, 1902, during which time a record is to be kept to determine cost o f removing dirt, etc. Should this rate be found to work a hardship, it shall be readjusted; if it transpires that it is equitable, it shall continue during the life o f this agreement. It is understood that the Pekin operators and delegates will determine by what method the readjustment shall be considered). Fulton and Peoria counties, No. 6 vein (referred to a com mittee composed o f Commissioner Justi and two operators and President Russell and two miners, to fix a mining price, which shall become a part o f this contract; the present rate o f fifty-nine cents per ton to continue in force pending adjustment by said committee. The same to be considered before May 1, 1902). Gilchrist, W anlock, Cable, Sherrard, and Silvis mines, sixty cents per ton, with last year’s conditions. In case o f defi cient work, where miner and mine manager can not agree as to compensation, the mine committee shall be called in; and if they can not agree, the dispute shall be carried up under the thirteenth clause o f the present scale. Kewanee and Etherley............ ....... ................... ............... ........... Pottstown, No. 1 seam, scale to be the same as Gilchrist and W anlock, except in the brushing o f the top, that shall be settled by the subdistrict. 76 .56 .56 .65 NINTH DISTRICT. Mount Olive, Staunton, Gillespie, Clyde, Sorento, and Coffeen, and mines on the Vandalia line as far east as and includ ing Smithboro, and on the B. and O. S. W . as far east as Breese ............ .. _ ______ __________ ___________ _________ __ _ .49 Coal five feet and u n d e r _______________ ___________ ____________ 54 First. The Indianapolis convention having adopted the mining and underground day labor scale in effect A pril 1, 1900, as the scale for the year beginning A pril 1, 1902, no changes or conditions shall be imposed in the Illinois scale fo r the coming year that increase the cost o f production o f coal in any district in the State, except as may be provided. Second. No scale o f wages shall be made by the United Mine W ork ers fo r mine manager, mine manager’s assistant, top foreman, com pany weighman, boss drivers, night boss, head machinist, head boiler maker, head carpenter, night watchman, hoisting engineers, it being understood that “ assistant” shall apply to such as are author ized to act in that capacity only. The authorit}7 to hire and discharge shall be vested in the mine manager, top foreman, and boss driver. 1062 BULLETIN of the department of labor. It is further understood and agreed that the night watchman shall be exempt when employed in that capacity only. Third. A n y operator paying the scale rate o f mining and day labor under this agreement snail at all times be at liberty to load any rail road cars whatever, regardless o f their ownership, with coal, and sell and deliver such coal in any market and to any person, firm, or cor poration that he may desire. Fourth. The scale o f prices for mining per ton of 2,000 pounds runof-mine coal herein provided for is understood in every case to be for coal free from slate, bone, and other impurities, loaded in cars at the face, weighed before screening; and that the practice o f pushing coal by the miners shall be prohibited. Fifth, (a) W hether the coal is shot after being undercut or sheared by pick or machine, or shot without undercutting or shearing, the miners must drill and blast the coal in accordance with the State min ing law o f Illinois, in order to protect the roof and timbers in the interest o f general safety. I f it can be shown that any miner persist ently violates the letter or spirit o f this clause he shall be discharged. (b) The system o f paying fo r coal before screening was intended to obviate the many contentions incident to the use o f screens, and was not intended to encourage unworkmanlike methods o f mining and blasting coal, or to decrease the proportion o f screened lump, and the operators are hereby guaranteed the hearty support and cooperation o i the United Mine W orkers o f America in disciplining any miner who, from ignorance or carelessness or other cause, fails to properly mine, shoot, and load his coal. Sixth. In case slate, bone, clay, sulphur, or other impurities are sent up with the coal by the miner, it shall be the duty o f whomever the company shall designate as inspector to report the same, with the estimated weight thereof, and the miner or miners so offending shall have such weight deducted from the established weight o f the car, and for the first offense in any given month shall be fined fifty cents; fo r the second offense in the same month he or they shall, at the option o f the operator, be fined two dollars or suspended for two working days; and fo r the third or any subsequent offense in the same month, or in malicious or aggravated cases fo r the first or any subse quent offense, the operator may indefinitely suspend or discharge. The company weighman shall post in a conspicuous place at the pit head the names o f all miners dealt with hereunder. The inspector designated by the operator shall be a member o f the U. M. W . o f A ., but in the discharge o f the duties herein specified shall not be subject to the jurisdiction o f the local union or president or pit committee, and against any miner or committeeman seeking in any way to embarrass the inspector in or because o f the discharge o f such duties the provisions o f the miners’ State constitution shall be invoked, and in addition he shall, at the option o f the operator, be suspended fo r two working days. In case it shall be alleged by either the local representatives o f the miners or by the operator that the inspector is not properly perform ing his duties hereunder, it shall be so reported to the miners’ sub district president, who shall, within forty-eight hours after the receipt o f notification, take it up with the superintendent o f the company for adjudication; and if it shall be found that the inspector is not faith fully perform ing such duties, he shall be discharged or transferred to other duties, as the operator may elect. AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. 1063 The proceeds o f all fines hereunder shall be paid to the miners5 sub district secretary-treasurer, and under no circumstances shall any such fine be remitted or refunded. Seventh. The miners o f the State o f Illinois are to be paid twice a month, the dates o f pay to be determined locally, but in no event shall more than one-half month’s pay be retained by the operator. When any number o f men at any mine so demand, statements will be issued to all employees not less than twenty-four hours prior to pay day. No commissions will be charged for money advanced between pay days, but any advances between pay days shall be at the option o f the operator. Eighth. The price fo r powder per keg shall be $1.75; the miners agree to purchase their powder from the operators, provided it is fur nished o f standard grade and quality, that to be determined by the operators and expert miners jointly where there is a difference. Ninth. The price fo r blacksmithing fo r pick mining shall be sixtenths o f a cent per ton for room and pillar work, and twelve and onehalf cents per pay per man, or twenty-five cents per month for long wall for pick and drill sharpening. Tenth. It is understood that there is no agreement as to the price o f oil. Eleventh. The inside day wage scale authorized by the present agreement—i. e., the Columbus scale o f 1898, plus an advance o f twenty per cent—shall be the scale under this agreement; but in no case snail less than $2.10 be paid for drivers. Twelfth. The above scale o f mining prices is based upon an eighthour workday, and it is definitely understood that this shall mean eight hours’ work at the face, exclusive o f noontime, six days a week, or forty-eight hours in the week, provided the operator desires the mine to work, and no local ruling shall in any way affect this agreement or impose conditions affecting the same. A ny class o f day labor may be paid, at the option of the operator, fo r the number o f hours and fractions thereof actually worked, at an hour rate based on one-eighth o f the scale rate per day. Provided, however, that when the men g o into the mine in the morning they shall be entitled to two hours’ pay, whether the mine hoists coal two hours or not, except in the event that they voluntarily leave their work dur ing this time without the consent o f the operator they shall forfeit such two hours’ pay. Provided, further, that overtime by day laborers, when necessary to supply railroad chutes with coal by night or Sunday, where no regular men therefor are exclusively employed, or when necessary in order not to impede the operation o f the mine the day follow ing, and fo r work which can not be performed or completed by the regular shift during regular hours without impeding the operation o f the mine, may be performed and paid for at the same rate per hour. Thirteenth, (a) The duties o f the pit committee shall be confined to the adjustment o f disputes between the pit boss and any o f the mem bers o f the United Mine W orkers o f America working in and around the mine, fo r whom a scale is made, arising out o f this agreement or any subdistrict agreement made in connection herewith, where the pit boss and said miner or mine laborers have failed to agree. (b) In case o f any local trouble arising at any shaft through such failure to agree between the pit boss ana any miner or mine laborer, the pit committee and the miners’ local president and the pit boss are empowered to adjust it; and in the case o f their disagreement it shall 1064 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. be referred to the superintendent o f the company and the president of the miners’ local executive board, where such exists, and shall they fail to adjust it, and in all other cases, it shall be referred to the superin tendent o f the company and the miners’ president of the subdistrict; and should they fail to adjust it, it shall be referred in writing to the officials o f the company concerned and the State officials o f the U. M. W . o f A . for adjustment; and in all such cases the miners and mine laborers and parties involved must continue at work, pending an investigation and adjustment, until a final decision is reached in the manner above set forth. (<?) I f any day men refuse to continue at work because o f a griev ance which has or has not been taken up for adjustment in the manner provided herein, and such action shall seem likely to impede the opera tion o f the mine, the pit committee shall immediately furnish a man or men to take such vacant place or places at the scale rate, in order that the mine may continue at w ork; and it shall be the duty o f any mem ber or members o f the United Mine W orkers who may be called upon by the pit boss or pit committee to immediately take the place or places assigned to him or them in pursuance hereof. (a) The pit committee in the discharge o f its duties shall under no circumstances g o around the mine for any cause whatever, unless called upon by the pit boss or by a miner or company man who may have a grievance that he can not settle with the boss; and as its duties are confined to the adjustment o f any such grievances, it is understood that its members shall not draw any compensation except while actively engaged in the discharge o f said duties. A ny pit committeeman who shall attempt to execute any local rule or proceeding in conflict with any provision o f this contract, or any other made in pursuance hereof, shall be forthwith deposed as committeeman. The foregoing shall not be construed to prohibit the pit committee from looking after the mat ter o f membership dues and initiations in any proper manner. (<e) Members o f the pit committee employed as day men shall not leave their places o f duty during working hours, except by permission o f the operator, or in cases involving the stoppage o f the mine. { f ) The right to hire and discharge, the management o f the mine, and the direction o f the working force are vested exclusively in the operator, and the U. M. W . o f A . shall not abridge this right. It is not the intention o f this provision to encourage the discharge o f employees, or the refusal o f employment to applicants because of personal prejudice or activity in matters affecting the U. M. W . o f A. I f any employee shall be suspended or discharged by the company and it is claimed that an injustice has been done him, an investigation to be conducted by the parties and in the manner set forth in paragraphs {a) and (b) o f this section shall be taken up promptly, and, if it i9 proven that an injustice has been done, the operator shall reinstate said employee and pay him full compensation for the time he has been suspended and out o f employment; provided, if no decision shall be rendered within five days, the case shall be considered closed in so far as compensation is concerned. Fourteenth. The wages now being paid outside day labor at the various mines in this State shall constitute the wage scale fo r that class o f labor during the life o f this agreement; provided, that no top man shall receive less than $1.80 per day. Fifteenth. In the event o f an instantaneous death by accident in AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. 1065 the mine, the miners and underground employees shall have the privi lege o f discontinuing work for the remainder o f that day, but work, at the option o f the operator, shall be resumed the day following, and continue thereafter. In case the operator elects to operate the mine on the day of the funeral o f the deceased, as above, or where death has resulted from an accident in the mine, individual miners and underground employees may, at their option, absent themselves from work fo r the purpose of attending such funeral, but not otherwise. And, in the event that the operator shall elect to operate the mine on the day o f such funeral, then, from the proceeds o f such day’s operation, each member o f the U. M. W . o f A . employed at the mine at which the deceased member was employed shall contribute fifty cents and the operator $25.00 for the benefit o f the family o f the deceased or his legal representatives, to be collected through the office of the company. Except in case o f fatal accidents, as above, the mine shall in no case be thrown idle because o f any death or funeral; but in the case o f the death o f any employee o f the company or mem ber o f his family, any individual miner may, at his option, absent himself from work for the sake o f attending such funeral, but not otherwise. Sixteenth, (a) The scale o f prices herein provided shall include, in ordinary conditions, the work required to load coal and properly timber the working places in the mine, and the operator shall be required to furnish the necessary props and timber in rooms or work ing face. And in long wall mines it shall include the proper mining o f the coal and the brushing and care o f the working places and road way according to the present method and rules relating thereto, which shall continue unchanged. (b) I f any miner shall fail to properly timber, shoot, and care for his working place, and such failure has entailed falls o f slate, rock, and the like, the miner whose fault has occasioned such damage shall repair the same without compensation, and if such miner fails to repair such damage he may be discharged. A ny dispute that may arise as to the responsibility under this clause shall be adjusted by the pit committee and mine foreman, and in case of their failure to agree, shall be taken up for settlement under the thirteenth section o f this agreement. In cases where the mine manager directs the placing o f cross-bars to permanently secure the roadway, then, and in such cases only, the miner shall be paid at the current price fo r each cross-bar when prop erly set. The above does not contemplate any change from the ordinary method o f timbering by the miner fo r his own safety. Seventeenth. The operators will recognize the pit committee in the discharge o f its duties as herein specified, but not otherwise, and agree to check off union dues, assessments, and fines from the miners and mine laborers, when desired, on proper individual or collective con tinuous order, and furnish to the miners’ representative a statement showing separately the total amount o f dues, assessments, and fines collected. When such collections are made, card days shall be abolished. In case any fine is imposed, the propriety o f which is questioned, the amount o f such fine shall be withheld by the operator until the question has been taken up for adjustment and a decision has been reached. 1066 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Eighteenth. The operators shall have the right, in cases o f emer gency work or ordinary repairs to the plant, to employ in connection therewith such men as in their judgment are best acquainted with and suited to the work to be performed, except where men are perma nently employed fo r such work. Blacksmiths and other skilled labor shall make any necessary repairs to machinery and boilers. Nineteenth. The erection o f head frames, buildings, scales, machin ery, railroad switches, etc., necessary fo r the completion of a plant to hoist coal, all being in the nature o f construction work, are to be excluded from the jurisdiction o f the United Mine W orkers o f Am er ica. Extensive repairs to or rebuilding the same class of work shall also be included in the same exception. The employees thereon to be excluded, as above, when employed on such work only. Twentieth. W hen any employee absents himself from his work for a period o f two days, unless through sickness or by first having noti fied the mine manager and obtained his consent, he may be discharged. Twenty-first, (a) Except at the basing point, Danville, the differen cial -fnr mardiinp. rmnino* thrrnicrh rn it t.ViP. State o f Illinois shall be Seven It being understood and ^ o 3lude the snubbing of coal either by powder or wedge and sledge, as conditions may warrant, where cnain machine is used; but it is understood that this condition shall not apply where two men have and work in one place only in the same shift, except at the option o f the miner; and it shall also be optional with the miner which system o f snubbing shall be followed. The division o f the machine mining rate shall be fixed in joint subdis trict meetings. (i) The established rates on shearing machines and air or electric drills as now existing shall remain unchanged during the ensuing year. Twenty-second. A ny underground employee not on hand so as to go down to his work before the hour fo r commencing work shall not be entitled to g o below except at the convenience o f the company. When an employee is sick or injured, he shall be given a cage at once. When a cage load o f men comes to the bottom o f the shaft, who have been prevented from working by reason o f falls or other things over which they have no control, they shall be given a cage at once. F or the accommodation o f individual employees, less than a cage load, who have been prevented from working as above, a cage shall be run mid forenoon, noon, and midafternoon o f each working day; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be permitted to enable men to leave their work for other than the reasons stated above. Twenty-third. This contract is in no case to be set aside because o f any rules o f the U. M. W . o f A. now in force or which may hereafter be adopted; nor is this contract to be set aside by reason o f any pro vision in their national, State, or local constitutions. Twenty-fourth. A ll classes o f day labor are to work full eight hours, and the going to and coming from the respective working places is to be done on the day hand’s own time. A ll company men shall perform whatever day labor the foreman may direct. A n eight-hour day means eight hours’ work in the mines at the usual working places, exclusive o f noon time, fo r all classes o f inside day labor. This shall be exclu sive o f the time required in reaching such working places in the morn ing and departing from same at night. AGREEMENTS BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES. 1067 Drivers shall take their mules to and from the stables, and the time required in so doing shall not include any part o f the day’s labor, their time beginning when they reach the change at which they receive empty cars— that is, the parting drivers at the shaft bottom and the inside drivers at the parting— and ending at the same places; but in no case shall a driver’s time be docked while he is waiting fo r such cars at the points named. The inside drivers, at their option, may either walk to and from their parting or take with them, without compensa tion, either loaded or empty cars, to enable them to ride. This provi sion, however, shall not prevent the inside driver from bringing to and taking from the bottom regular trips, if so directed by the opera tor, provided such work is done within the eight hours. The methods at present existing covering the harnessing, unharness ing, feeding, and caring fo r the mules shall be continued throughout the scale year beginning A pril 1, 1902; but in cases where any rievances exist in respect to same, they shall be referred to the subistrict meetings for adjustment. W hen the stables at which the mules are kept are located on the surface and the mules are taken in and out o f the mines daily by the drivers, the question o f additional compensation therefor, if any, is to be left to the subdistricts affected for adjustment, at their joint sub district meetings. Twenty-fifth. Mission Field scale is referred to Danville subdistrict fo r adjustment. Twenty-sixth. The company shall keep the mine in as dry condi tion as practicable by keeping the water off the roads and out o f the working places. Twenty-seventh. The operator shall keep sufficient blankets, oil, bandages, etc., and provide suitable ambulance or conveyances at all mines to properly convey injured persons to their homes after an accident. Twenty-eighth. The operator shall see that an equal turn is offered each miner, and that he be given a fair chance to obtain the same. The check-weighman shall keep a turn bulletin for the turn keeper’s guidance. The drivers shall be subject to whomever the mine man ager shall designate as turn keeper, in pursuance hereof. In mines where there is both hand and machine mining an equal turn shall mean approximately the same turn to each man in the machine part o f the mine, and approximately the same turn to each man doing hand work; but not necessarily the same to each hand miner as to each man working with the machines. Twenty-ninth. There shall be no demands made locally that are not specifically set forth in this agreement, except as agreed to in joint subdistrict meetings held prior to May 1, 1902. W here no sub districts exist, local grievances shall be referred to the United Mine Workers’ State executive board and the mine owners interested. T he U nited M ine W orkers of A merica, D istrict N o . 12. W . R. R ussell, President. T. J. R eynolds , Vice-President, W. D. R y a n , Secretary- Treasurer. f T he I llinois Coal O perators’ A ssociation. O. L. G arrison, President. E. T. B ent , Secretary. P eoria , M arch IS, 1902. 1068 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. The district and local agreements made between operators and miners in Illinois would require too much space to be published in this connection. Copies o f these agreements may be obtained by applying to Herman Justi, commissioner o f the Illinois Coal Operators’ Asso ciation, Chicago, 111. RECENT REPORTS OF STATE BUREAUS OF LABOR STATISTICS. LO U ISIA N A . F irst Annual R eport o f the Bureau o f Statistics o f Labor f o r the State o f Louisiana. 1901. Thomas Harrison, Commissioner. 267 pp. The law o f July 9, 1900, (a) being act 79 o f the acts o f the general assembly in its regular session o f that year, established a bureau o f statistics o f labor, with a provision that the commissioner o f said bureau should make annual reports to the governor o f the State, presenting statistical details relating to all departments o f labor in the State. In pursuance o f this duty the first annual report has been issued, covering the year 1901. The subjects presented are: Popula tion o f Louisiana, 35 pages; labor laws, 62 pages; laws o f various States creating bureaus o f labor, 34 pages; manufactures, 32 pages; labor on steam and street railways, 6 pages; labor organizations and industrial disputes, 10 pages; miscellaneous, .73 pages. The last chap ter presents facts as to exports, the port o f New Orleans, resources of the State, and addresses by Carroll D. W right, Calvin M. W oodward, and Francis E. Cook on certain educational phases of the industrial question. In appendixes are given the rules o f the Association o f Officials o f Bureaus o f Labor Statistics o f America and o f the Inter national Association for the Legal Protection o f Labor. M anufactures.— The bureau secured returns from 98 establish ments, giving capital invested, value o f materials and products, number and wages or salaries o f employees, hours o f labor, weeks in operation, etc. The returns were not complete in all instances, and no summaries are attempted. A series o f tables based on the reports o f the Twelfth and previous censuses is also given. L abor on Steam and Street R ailways .— Eight steam railroads and 5 street railways are reported on as to mileage, number of employees, total wages paid, hours o f labor, days of employment, etc. A s in the case o f manufactures, no totals are given. L abor O rganizations and I ndustrial D isputes.— Thirty-eight labor organizations answered the bureau’s inquiries. These related to date o f organization, membership, wages, hours o f labor, and benefit features. No occupations are reported, the organizations being des ignated only by schedule number. The number of members is 5,908, one union not reporting. The report on industrial disputes is in the form of brief accounts o f each o f the 15 demands or strikes reported to the bureau. Space is also given to a number o f suggestions as to desired legislation. <*For a copy of this law see Bulletin No. 33, page 366. 9398— N o. 42— 0 2 ----- 13 1069 1070 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. M ARYLAND. Tenth Annual R eport o f the Bureau o f Industrial Statistics o f M ar y Trnid, 1901. Thomas A. Smith, Chief, ix, 255 pp. The follow ing subjects are treated in this report, namely: Concilia tion and arbitration, 3 pages; prices and wages, 6 pages; strikes, 17 pages; labor organizations, 2 pages; employment bureaus, 16 pages; coal output for 1901,1 page; agriculture, 26 pages; canning and pack ing industries, 13 pages; manufactures, 47 pages; the clothing indus try, 40 pages; employment o f children, 4 pages; manual-training schools, 14 pages; immigration, 1 page; new incorporations, 15 pages; labor laws, 36 pages. C onciliation and A rbitration .—A fter brief introductory remarks there is presented a proposed bill for submission to the legislature, providing fo r investigation and mediation by the bureau in cases of labor disputes. P rices and W ages.— The data here given relate to conditions in the city o f Baltimore in 1901, with comparisons with figures for 1890 and 1895. The wages given are average fo r representative occupations; the prices are fo r 29 articles o f meats, vegetables, canned goods, and groceries. Income and itemized cost o f living are also given for each o f 11 workingmen. Strikes .— Sixteen strikes are reported as having occurred in 1901, 13 o f which were in Baltimore. Nine strikes were fo r increase o f wages, 6 for a shorter working day, and 1 to restrict production for the purpose o f maintaining prices. There were 9 strikes ordered by labor organizations, 4 o f which were successful, while o f the 7 under taken without organization 1 succeeded partly and the rest failed. The number o f strikers was 2,552, throwing 3,430 persons out o f employment. The wage loss is reported at $100,715, or $29.36 per employee. The loss to employers is estimated at $62,650. L abor O rganizations.— Returns were secured from but 22 organi zations, though the number in the State is placed at about 100. A directory and reports on trade conditions and wages and hours of labor make up the main part o f this section. E mployment B ureaus.— In this section is given a report o f an investigation o f employment bureaus in Baltimore, together with a statement o f the benefits o f free public employment offices and an account o f an experiment in that direction made by the commissioner without legislative direction. From the report it appears that 124 males and 14 females applied for work, and 53 males and 6 females were assisted in securing positions during 1901. There were 85 appli cations for male help and 304 for female help. Canning and P acking I ndustries.— This chapter gives a brief his tory o f these industries, with a more extended account o f present conditions. A table presents statistics taken from the .report of the REPORTS OF STATE BUREAUS OF LABOR---- MARYLAND. 1071 Twelfth Census; the bureau gives estimates for the year 1901. The oyster industry is treated separately. M anufactures.— Under this head is given a series o f tables based on the reports o f the Twelfth Census, and a brief text discussion. T he C lothing I ndustry .— Census statistics are here presented, followed by a report on sweat shops in Baltimore, giving their loca tion, details o f inspection, prices paid for work, and a table showing earnings and itemized expenses o f ten sweat-shop employees. Six coat-making shops pay sewing-machine operators from $9.75 to $15 per week; basters, $7.80 to $15; finishers, $1.50 to $7.25; fellers, $5 to $5.75; for pressing, 8 and 9 cents per coat; and for machine made buttonholes, 60 cents per hundred. Employment averages about eight months per year. E mployment of C hildren .— Under this head is a brief considera tion o f the subject, based partly on census returns and partly on inquiries made by the bureau. No tables are presented. M anual T raining Schools.—This chapter reports the present status o f manual training, following the recent legislative provisions for the same in the public schools o f the State. It appears that 2,218 pupils are receiving such training, and that 19 teachers devote their entire time to the work. These numbers relate to the State outside the city o f Baltimore, which has given such instruction for a number of years. A portion o f an address delivered by Prof. Calvin M. W oodward, o f St. Louis, before the late meeting o f the Officials of Bureaus o f Labor Statistics is also given in the report. N E W JE R SE Y . Twenty-third Annual R eport o f ths Bureau o f Statistics o f Labor and Industries o f New Jersey, f o r the year ending October 31, 1900. William Stainsby, Chief, vi, 329 pp. The subjects presented in this report are: Statistics of manufactures, 134 pages; movement o f wages and employment during 1899, 16 pages; cost o f living, 13 pages; trade unions, 47 pages; railroad transporta tion, 10 pages; street railways, 4 pages; the glass industry and com pany stores o f South Jersey, 20 pages; laws and court decisions affecting labor, 16 pages; Jewish colonies o f South Jersey, 26 pages; industrial chronology, 21 pages. Statistics of M anufactures.— Returns were secured from 1,681 establishments representing 88 general industries, and 57 establish ments classed as miscellaneous. The facts presented are grouped into 9 tables, as follow s: Number o f firms and corporations, partners and stockholders, by industries; capital invested and value o f materials and products; three tables showing smallest, greatest, and average number o f employees by industries, and aggregates by months; wages paid, and average yearly earnings; classified weekly wages; hours o f 1072 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. labor, days in operation, and proportion o f business done; and a sum mary o f the foregoing facts fo r 9 principal industries. Additional tables show fo r certain industries the amount and value o f specified materials used and o f specified goods made; also a series o f compari sons between identical establishments in 49 industries for the years 1898 and 1899. O f the 1,738 establishments reporting, 1,735 report capital invested, the total being $255,689,550; 1,728 report value o f materials used at $200,901,940, and o f products at $355,465,970. The average number o f employees in all industries was 176,954. O f the 1,738 establish ments, 934, or 53.74 per cent, were owned by private firms, and 804, or 46.26 per cent, by corporations. O f the capital reported, $48,767,189, or 19.07 per cent, was invested by private firms, and $206,922,361, or 80.93 per cent, by corporations. The per capita investment in private firms by 1,636 owners or partners averaged $29,809; 28,774 stockholders in corporations have an average investment o f $7,191 per capita. Twenty-nine industries are reported as having a product in 1899 of the value o f $3,000,000 or over. These 29 industries represent 73.69 per cent o f the capital invested, 78.82 per cent o f the total industry product o f the State as here shown, and give employment to 69.13 per cent o f the employees engaged in manufactures. The follow ing tables present the principal data for these industries: STATISTICS OF 29 LEADING INDUSTRIES, 1899. Industries. Per cent of Stock Hours Aver busi Estab age ness lish Part holders of Corpo ners in labor days in done of ments Firms. rations. in firms. corpo per opera maxi report mum rations. day. tion. ing. capac ity. Brew ing...................................................... Brick and terra cotta................................ Chemical p rod u cts................................... Cigars and to b a c c o ................................... Cotton goods............................................... Cotton goods, finishing and dyeing......... Electrical appliances................................ Fertilizers.................................................. Food products............................................ Foundries, iro n .......................................... Glass............................................................ Hats, f e l t .................................................... Jewelry....................................................... Lam ps......................................................... Leather....................................................... Machinery............................................. . Metal goods................................................. Oilcloth................................ ...................... O ils.............................................................. Paper........................................................... P ottery....................................................... Rubber goods............................................. Shoes........................................................... Silk d yein g ................................................. Silk w e a v in g ............................................. Smelting and refining.............................. Steel and iron, forg in g s........................... Steel and iron, structural......................... Woolen and worsted g o o d s...................... 81 66 42 22 32 18 16 12 15 32 23 51 65 8 55 89 51 7 14 36 30 33 48 23 109 7 11 19 28 8 39 13 18 22 7 4 5 8 17 6 36 50 2 29 41 20 2 5 12 10 2 26 . 9 57 1 4 8 13 23 27 29 4 10 11 12 7 7 15 17 15 15 6 26 48 31 5 9 24 20 31 22 14 52 6 7 11 15 12 57 27 25 33 12 6 14 16 28 12 62 113 3 49 59 33 2 10 26 24 4 46 12 124 2 4 12 31 534 507 1,171 566 112 72 560 364 68 603 109 98 72 484 318 637 460 32 3,550 415 548 356 182 58 407 68 181 144 286 Total.................................................. 993 474 519 858 12,962 9.96 9.87 9.71 8.81 9.81 9.22 9.93 10.00 10.06 9.84 8.91 9.51 9.67 8.62 9.85 9.82 9.92 10.00 9.28 9.80 9.60 9.97 9.52 9.65 9.82 10.87 9.90 9.58 10.00 310.00 237.72 319.07 250.86 286.34 290.00 301.62 282.50 293.46 290.40 251.74 271.76 288.73 261.87 292.20 297.12 293.53 343.71 271.50 285.47 296.20 280.27 277.18 292.00 290.01 332.71 297.54 303.95 292.43 70.03 76.19 84.10 84.77 89.40 85.66 84.75 67.08 83.13 82.34 82.39 74.90 81.15 70.62 75.74 74.07 76.47 91.43 66.07 88.05 82.83 81.97 75.52 71.17 80.45 90.71 70.45 77.90 88.32 REPORTS OF STATE BUREAUS OF LABOR— NEW JERSEY. 1073 STATISTICS OF 29 LEADING INDUSTRIES, 1899—Concluded. Value of material used. Capital invested. Industries. B rew ing............................................... $17,765,799 Brick and terra co tta ......................... 7,059,502 Chemical products.............................. 13,798,456 Cigars and tobacco.............................. 6,067,798 Cotton goods........................................ 3,910,597 Cotton goods, finishing and dyeing.. 4,453,903 7,304,211 Electrical appliances......................... 3,912,100 Fertilizers............................................. 2,138,243 Food products..................................... 2,924,147 Foundries, iron................................... 4,045,452 Glass..................................................... 2,165,283 Hats, felt............................................... 3,174,095 Jew elry................................................ 1,894,510 L am ps.................................................. 6,209,174 Leather................................................ 15,623,634 Machinery........................................... 5,302,217 Metal goods.......................................... 1,980,000 OiJcloth................................................ O ils....................................................... 17,342,953 3,110,290 Paper.................................................... 5,502,462 P ottery................................................ 6,700,548 Rubber goods...................................... 2,320,191 Shoes.................................................... 1,996,190 Silk d y e in g .......................................... Silk weaving........................................ 19,737,047 Smelting and refining........................ 5,660,000 2,763,206 Steel and iron, forgings...................... 5,614,970 Steel and iron, structural.................. 7,959,617 Woolen and worsted g o o d s............... Aver age em ploy ees. Value of product. $2,887,462 $11,691,016 4,931,848 1,384,955 8,104,981 13,800,362 3,622,701 7,016,231 4,854,826 2,303,279 8,286,900 5,385,571 3,895,152 1,835,468 2,732,775 4,128,436 6,917,669 8,191,961 2,829,841 5,923,189 1,416,693 4,936,726 3,750,012j 7,548,645 3,253,708 6,489,470 1,617,320 3,398,631 7,394,687 12,047,017 6,236,477 16,695,256 6,453,068 9,487,237 2,299,018 3,534,665 30,371,378 34,102,998 2,869,810 4,863,516 1,217,864 4,243,341 8,205,344 12,441,996 6,682,954 3,670,981 2,210,237 4,687,778 21,812,149 37,587,209 b 9,325,557 b 17,430,973 3,340,322 5,037,411 c 2,922,704 0 5,713,715 6,543,420 10,515,033 1,736 5,001 3,275 2,701 4,728 3,695 2,006 944 1,201 536 5,148 5,233 2,410 2,060 3,775 all, 648 4,061 855 2,682 1,804 3,535 4,034 4,718 3,574 21,672 2,527 2,156 4,961 6,656 Wages paid. Aver age yearly earn ings. $1,398,075 $805.34 2,013,843 402.68 1,572,793 480.24 834,042 308.79 1,333,739 282.09 1,511,761 409.13 1,081,470 539.11 456,569 483.65 525,678 437.70 1,860,871 526.26 2,438,246 473.63 2,559,917 489.18 1,364,846 566.32 759,612 368.74 1,781,478 471.91 a 6,753,362 0579.78 1,612,894 397.16 411,320 481.07 1,579,342 588.86 816,386 452.54 1,981,118 560.43 1,739,918 431.31 1,755,945 372.18 1,531,874 428.61 8,727,789 402.72 1,190,651 471.17 1,181,005 547.77 2,196,177 442.68 2,040,666 306.59 Total....................... .................... 188,426,595, <*162,915,451 <*280,164,492 a122,332 055,011,387 a Not including 45 establishments not reported. b Not including 2 establishments not reported. <?Not including 1 establishment not reported. d Not including 3 establishments not reported. The following table presents, by sex, the number and per cent o f persons employed in all industries (1,738 establishments) at the speci fied rates o f wages: EMPLOYEES IN ALL INDUSTRIES (1,738 ESTABLISHMENTS) RECEIVING CLASSIFIED RATES OF WAGES, BY SEX, 1899. Males. Weekly wages. Females. Total. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. Under $5..................................................... $5 or under $6............................................. $6 or under $7............................................. $7 or under $8............................................. $8 or under $9............................................. $9 or under $10........................................... $10 or under $12.......................................... $12 or under $15.......................................... $15. or under $20.......................................... $20 or o v e r .................................................. 15,933 6,487 8,781 14,501 13,492 18,542 19,757 21,172 19,206 8,110 10.92 4.44 6.02 9.93 9.24 12.70 13.53 14.50 13.16 5.56 18,431 8,969 8,142 5,568 3,516 2,348 2,260 1,339 379 51 36.14* 17.59 15.96 10.92 6.89 4.60 4.43 2.63 .74 .10 34,364 15,456 16,923 20,069 17,008 20,890 22,017 22,511 19,585 8,161 17.45 7.85 8.59 10.19 8.63 10.60 11.18 11.43 9.94 4.14 Total.................................................. 145,981 100.00 51,003 100.00 196,984 100.00 From this table it appears that more than one-third o f the females employed in the manufactures o f the State receive less than $5 per week, and that the per cents steadily diminish as the wage rate rises, more than one-half the whole number being found in the groups receiv ing less than $6. Nearly 11 per cent o f the males receive less than $5 1074 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. weekly, presumably largely boys. Beginning with the next rate the groups increase, with one exception, until the rate “ $9 or under $10” is reached. A bove this rate the groups include ranges o f $2, $3, and $5, so that the comparison can be carried no farther. A t a rate some what less than $10 is found the median wage for males, while females receiving $9 or more weekly comprise but 12.50 per cent o f the total number o f females employed. From the tables showing comparative statistics fo r 1898 and 1899 the follow ing summary is taken. The totals are for identical estab lishments in 49 industries: COMPARATIVE STATISTICS OF MANUFACTURES IN 1,010 ESTABLISHMENTS, 1898 AND 1899. Capital invested. Years. 1898........................................................................ $129,962,754 1899........................................................................ 148,439,113 a Cost Of material. Value of products. Wa^es paid. $117,263,364 140,791,108 $203,093,642 238,969,304 « $48,230,569 a 53,775,984 For 1,077 establishments. Aside from the growth o f business shown by these figures, the fact is worthy o f note that 22 establishments which are reported as owned by corporations in 1899 were reported as owned b y firms in the pre vious year. M ovement of W ages and E mployment .— Reports received from 454 establishments were sufficiently complete to enable a comparison as to the number o f employees in 1898 and 1899, and also to show the number o f employees receiving an increase o f wages in 1899. The number o f persons employed in these establishments was 57,472 in 1899 as against 46,896 in 1898, a gain o f 22.55 per cent. O f the 57,472 employees in 1899, 42,264 received an average increase in wages o f 9.8 per cent within the year. C ost of L iving .— This is a continuation o f the presentation o f pre vious years, and shows the retail prices o f 51 items o f food and other commodities in the principal markets in all counties o f the State in the month o f June, 1900. Summary comparisons with 1898 and 1899 are also given. T rade U nions.— Under this head are given 10 tables showing mem bership, rates o f wages, hours o f labor, and benefit features o f 53 labor organizations in the State, together with an extended analysis and general discussion. The membership o f these unions was 6,918. F orty-four unions had a total income o f $46,369, o f which 39 paid $13,604 to the national union. Benefits were paid by 31 unions to the amount o f $21,365. Eight (the whole number reporting) cigarmakers’ unions, a musicians’ union, and 7 o f the 12 carpenters’ unions report an eight-hour day. The longest day reported is eleven hours by 3 bakers’ unions and a retail clerks’ protective association. The reports REPORTS OF STATE BUREAUS OF LABOR— NEW JERSEY. 1075 show increase o f wages secured through organization in amounts varying from $0.20 to $2 per day in the different industries. Steam R ailroad T ransportation.—Tables are presented showing number, working time, and average wages o f railroad employees, in the aggregate, and for each o f the 7 roads operating in New Jersey. Street R ailways .— Reports were secured from but two compan ies—those which control the systems in and about Newark and Jersey City. The first-named employs 3,065 persons, at an average weekly wage o f $11.88. The largest groups o f employees are motormen, 1,017, whose average weekly earnings are $12.66; and conductors, 1,053, at an average wage o f $12.14 per week. These employees work ten to twelve hours per day fo r six and seven days per week. The second company pays 1,081 employees an average of $10.05 per week. Its 345 motormen and 352 conductors receive $10.25 and $10 per week, respectively, working ten hours daily, and six and seven days per week. T he G lass I ndustry and C ompany Stores of S outh J ersey . — This is a sketch presenting form er and present industrial conditions, with some account o f the different acts o f legislation intended to remedy certain abuses. These relate particularly to payment o f wages and company stores. The remedy seems to have been found by the parties concerned meeting by representative committees in a conference which agreed to rules as to wage scales and apprentices and abolished com pulsory trading at company stores and compulsory occupancy of company houses. T he J ewish C olonies of S outh J ersey .— There is here given a his torical account o f the establishment and growth of a number o f colonies planted to provide fo r a class o f immigrants who were practically exiles. The oldest colony was planted in 1882, since which time a num ber o f others have been attempted with varying success. Some o f them are quite prosperous and are o f especial interest as showing the possibility o f a class o f persons who usually flock into cities to become competitors in an overstocked labor market turning their attention to agriculture and succeeding. Those colonies whose object was entirely speculative have almost uniform ly failed. REPORTS OP STATE BOARDS OP ARBITRATION. ILLIN O IS. Sixth Annual R eport o f the State B oard o f A rbitration. 1901. J. McCan Davis, Secretary. 59 pp. March 1, This report is for the year ending March 31, 1901. Within this year two cases were submitted to the board and a third was acted upon at the request o f one party. In each instance the recommendations o f the board were adopted. The report presents the decisions and a synopsis o f the evidence in each case; also the evidence o f the secretary 1076 BULLETIN OF TfiR DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. o f the board before the United States Industrial Commission, and a copy o f the arbitration law o f the State and o f a circular o f informa tion prepared by the board relative to its powers and duties. M ASSACH USETTS. Sixteenth Annual R eport o f the State.Board o f Conciliation and A rb i tration, f o r the year ending December SI, 1901. B. F. Supple, Sec retary. 225 pp. In this report a brief review o f the year’s work o f the board is fo l lowed by a detailed account o f its proceedings in each o f 108 difficulties that came to its notice. An appendix contains the laws o f the United States and o f various States relating to the subjects o f arbitration and conciliation. Nine cases o f arbitration were referred to the board. In one of these the employer went out o f business before a conclusion was reached, so that but 8 decisions were rendered. There were 39 conciliations effected by the board, 26 other cases were found to be in process of mutual settlement, and in 16 cases the struggle was fought to an end, new employees being taken on in place o f those who had been dis satisfied. Eighteen disputes were abandoned by the board for various reasons. There were joint requests for the services o f the board in 37 instances, and by one o f the parties in 27. In the remaining 4A cases the board’s interposition was voluntary. In 95 cases the difficulty had taken the form o f a strike. Questions relating to wages occasioned 44 per cent o f the difficulties; hours and conditions o f labor, 39.2 per cent; and sentiment, as sym pathy, discharges, etc., 16.8 per cent. N E W YORK. Fourteenth A nnual Repw 't o f the B oard o f M ediation and A rbitration. January, 1901. Thos. A . Braniff, Secretary. 372 pp. This report contains an account o f the more important labor disputes within the State during the year 1900, and a statement of the proceed ings o f the board in a number o f the principal cases. The arbitration laws o f various States are also given. There were 547 strikes and lockouts in the State during the year, of which 335 were successful or compromised, while 212 failed. Ques tions relating to wages were responsible fo r 363 disputes, and union ism fo r 104, leaving but 80 for all other causes. It appears that considerably less than one-half o f thfese disputes came before the board. No summary o f results appears in the report. RECENT FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS. FRANCE. Statistique des Greves et des Hecours a la Conciliation et a VArbitrage Survenus Pendant TAnnee 1900. Direction du Travail, Ministere du Commerce, de PIndustrie, des Postes et des Telegraphes. xvi, 619 pp. The present volume is the tenth o f a series o f annual reports on strikes and conciliation and arbitration issued by the French labor bureau. The information is presented in form similar to that con tained in previous reports o f the bureau. Strikes .— During the year there were 902 strikes, involving 222,714 strikers. Eight hundred and ninety-nine strikes involved 10,253 establishments. The strikes resulted in an aggregate loss o f 3,760,577 working days, including 1,115,524 days lost by 26,757 employees who were not strikers. The average time lost per striker was 12 days. O f the strikers 180,591 were men, 29,753 were women, and 12,370 were young persons. The year 1900 had the largest number o f strikes, strikers, and days lost on account o f strikes o f any year since the publication o f strike data, there being an increase o f 162 strikes, 45,888 strikers, and 209,843 days lost over the preceding year. Only 1 lockout is reported, 1 establishment and 55 employees being affected by it. O f the 902 strikes reported in 1900, 552 were participated in by members o f labor organizations, and in 253 strikes the employers were organized. Twenty-three workingmen’s unions and 1 employ ers’ association were organized while strikes Were in progress or im mediately afterwards. In 42 strikes regular aid was given by labor organizations for the relief o f strikers. O f the 902 strikes reported, 631 involved but 1 establishment each, 91 involved from 2 to 5 establishments, 53 from 6 to 10 establishments, 73 from 11 to 25 establishments, 31 from 26 to 50 establishments, 15 from 51 to 100 establishments. O f the 8 remaining strikes, 7 involved from 110 to 812 establishments, and 1 involved 2,500 establishments. As regards the results o f the disputes in 1900, 205 strikes, involv ing 24,216 strikers, were successful; 360 strikes, involving 140,358 strikers, were partly successful, and 337 strikes, involving 58,140 strikers, failed. The two tables following show the number o f strikes, strikers, and establishments involved, according to the results o f strikes, also the number o f working days lost, and the proportion that the number o f strikers is to the total number o f working people in each o f 17 groups o f industries: 1077 1078 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. STRIKES BY INDUSTRIES, 1900. Industries. Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries............................. M ining.................................. Quarrying............................. Food products...................... Chemical industries............ Paper and printing.............. Hides and leather goods___ Textiles proper.................... Clothing, cleaning, and upholstery........................ W oodworking...................... Building trades (wood work) ................................ Metal refining...................... Metallic goods...................... Precious-metal w o rk .......... Stone, earthenware, and glass................................... Building trades (stone, tile, excavating, etc., w o r k ).. Transportation and hand ling ................................... T ota l........................... a b Total. Succeeded. Succeeded partly. Failed. EstabStrikes. lishments. Estab lish Strikes. ments. Estab lish Strikes. ments. Strikes. Estab lish ments. 3 4 1 6 5 3 10 65 «2 4 1 111 14 5 31 116 7 16 6 15 11 6 19 90 66 24 15 1,040 14 65 182 391 4 21 5 18 11 13 18 91 6 22 5 247 43 14 567 458 14 41 12 39 27 22 47 236 73 50 21 1,398 71 84 780 965 7 10 49 39 12 14 890 613 7 19 11 28 26 43 950 680 5 6 22 2 58 5 a 62 2 17 5 27 311 5 232 2 7 39 2 3 7 133 2 24 17 88 4 372 17 427 4 9 10 13 38 6 11 '28 59 24 140 37 480 45 183 106 803 34 a 116 65 3,246 29 137 128 3,499 765 360 7,612 337 1,876 902 10,253 205 b Not including establishments in 1 strike not reported. Not including establishments in 3 strikes not reported. STRIKERS AND DAYS OF WORK LOST BY ALL EMPLOYEES THROWN OUT OF WORK BY STRIKES IN 1900, BY INDUSTRIES. Strikers in strikes which— Industries. Suc ceeded. Suc ceeded partly. Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries......... M in in g ....................................................... Quarrying.................................................. Food products............................................ Chemical industries.................................. Paper and printing................................... Hides and leather goods........................... Textiles proper.......................................... Clothing, cleaning, and upholstery......... W oodw orking............................................ Building trades (w ood w ork)................... Metal refining............................................ Metallic goods........................................... Precious-metal work................. ............... Stone, earthenware, and glass................. Building trades (stone, tile, excavating, etc., w ork)............................................... Transportation and handling................... 161 803 20 207 467 118 321 7,104 651 673 155 392 3,151 83 611 1,707 33,384 1,378 3,847 5,015 689 3,121 29,724 9,777 3,214 2,188 856 7,844 1,681 7,615 Total.................................................. 24,216 a b c d Failed. Days of Strikers work lost by all em per 1,C00 Total ployees strikers. working people, thrown (a) out of work. 0.74 269.48 33.43 17.20 140.80 9.47 70.07 77.52 24.18 523.84 2,338 1,745 4,289 34 220 2,359 41,927 1,850 4,727 10,845 1,188 11,771 49,418 10,791 5,610 2,355 2,993 15,284 117 3,169 53.72 36.75 5.72 19.60 15,4$6 477,260 10,007 41,662 74,067 7,907 191,020 1,716,129 58,474 44,388 29,798 34,302 112,618 2,200 441,590 6,035 29,241 3,469 10,269 11,185 47,125 32.65 76.38 140,456 363,203 140,358 58,140 222,714 <*56.47 3,760,577 491 7,740 452 673 5,363 381 8,329 12,590 360 1,723 12 Figures in this column are according to the census of 1896. Including building trades (woodwork). Included in woodworking. Figures relate to all industrial working people in France. O f the different industries, the textiles furnished 236 strikes and 49,418 strikers; the building trades, 130 strikes and 13,540 strikers; transportation and handling, 128 strikes and 47,125 strikers; metals and metallic goods, 109 strikes and 18,394 strikers; mining, 41 strikes and 41,927 strikers; making 644 strikes and 170,404 strikers for these five groups o f industries, or nearly three-fourths o f the total number o f strikes and more than three-fourths o f the total number o f strikers. Considering the number o f persons actually engaged in the various FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS— FRANCE. 1079 industries according to the census o f 1896, it is shown that the rela tive prevalence o f strikes was greatest in the mining industry, 269.48 out o f every 1,000 employees having taken part in disputes during the year. The group o f chemical industries comes next, with 140.80 strik ers per 1,000 employees. In the two tables following the strike data are shown by causes: STRIKES, BY CAUSES, 1900. [A considerable number of strikes was due to two or more causes, and the facts in such cases have been tabulated under each cause; hence the totals for this table necessarily do not agree with those for the preceding tables.] Cause or object. Succeeded. Succeeded partly. Estab lish Strikes. ments. Estab Strikes. lish ments. For increase of wages.............. Against reduction of wages... For reduction of hours of la bor with present or in creased wages........................ Relating to time and method of payment of wages, etc___ For or against modification of conditions of w ork.......... Against piecework................... For or against modification of shop rules.............................. For abolition or reduction of fin es..................................... Against discharge of work men, foremen, or directors, or for their reinstatement.. For discharge Of workmen, foremen, or directors.......... Against employment of wom an ........................................... For limitation of number of apprentices ............. Relating to deduction from wages for support of insur ance and aid fu n d s.............. Other ........................................ Failed. Total. Strikes. Estab lish ments. Strikes. Estab lish ments. 113 32 722 63 249 21 6,966 94 218 13 1,726 37 580 66 9,414 194 44 1,324 24 3,214 32 615 100 5,153 25 102 12 349 20 66 57 517 14 6 100 84 7 3 143 143 21 17 25 911 42 26 268 1,138 15 15 12 24 15 39 42 78 13 13 8 8 16 16 37 37 24 28 11 18 54 75 89 121 32 32 11 11 61 102 104 145 1 1 2 71 3 72 1 1 1 1 39 43 326 168 29 22 257 76 i 1 3 ! 7 ! 14 66 7 14 55 26 STRIKERS AND DAYS OF WORK LOST BY ALL EMPLOYEES THROWN OUT OF WORK BY STRIKES IN 1900, BY CAUSES. [A considerable number of strikes was due to two or more causes, and the facts in such cases have been tabulated under each cause; hence the totals for this table necessarily do not agree with those for the preceding tables.] Strikers in strikes which— Cause or object. For increase of wages................................................ Against reduction of wages...................................... For reduction of hours of labor with present or increased wages....................................................... Relating to time and method of payment of wages, etc................................................................. For or against modification of conditions of work. Against piecew ork..................................................... For or against modification of shop rules............... For abolition or reduction of fines........................... Against discharge of workmen, foremen, or direct ors, or for their reinstatement.................... .......... For discharge of workmen, foremen, or directors.. Against employment of wom en................................ For limitation of number of apprentices................. Relating to deduction from wages for support of insurance and aid fu n d s........................................ Other............................................................................. Days of work lost by all em Total strikers. ployees thrown out of work. Suc ceeded. Suc ceeded partly. Failed. 37,893 4,046 92,070 6,697 48,894 2,403 178,857 13,146 3,223,806 295,643 23,925 35,448 19,139 78,612 1,590,169 4,769 6,810 859 1,803 2,730 2,919 29,902 585 4,268 1,621 3,978 3,201 14,664 3,203 3,688 11,666 39,913 16,108 9,274 8,039 531,422 644,679 108,892 583,280 75,581 13,958 3,234 13 40 4,430 3,254 6,430 7,738 5,040 24,818 14,226 5,053 40 139,212 120,714 37,574 80 8,775 15,633 100 1,071 5,519 1,574 14,394 18,278 151,977 543,599 1080 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Strikes due to wage disputes continued in 1§00, as in preceding years, to be the most numerous, 646 strikes, involving 192,003 strikers, being due to this cause alone. Nearly three-fourths o f the persons engaged in strikes on account o f wages were either successful or partly successful. O f the other causes o f strikes those relating to demands fo r discharge o f workmen, foremen, or directors and for reduction o f hours o f labor were most prevalent. O f the strikers who presented the form er demands more than one-half failed, while of those demand ing reduction o f working time more than three-fourths succeeded either wholly or in part. Those involved in strikes against piecework and against the employment o f women were nearly all unsuccessful. The next two tables show, respectively, the results o f strikes accord ing to their duration and according to the number o f strikers involved: STRIKES AND STRIKERS, BY DURATION OF STRIKES, 1900. Strikes. Days of duration. Strikers. Succeed Succeed Failed. ed. ed partly. Total. Succeed Succeed ed. ed partly. Failed. Total. 7 or u n d e r ............... 8 to 15........................ 161} 30...................... 31 to 100.................... 101 or ov e r............... 162 26 10 • 8 205 69 53 27 6 212 63 31 29 2 579 157 94 64 8 18,044 4,485 1,076 611 44,457 32,470 38,098 23,208 2,125 17,032 16,059 13,687 11,252 110 79,533 53,014 52,861 35,071 2,235 Total............... 205 360 337 902 24,216 140,358 58,140 222,714 DURATION AND RESULTS OF STRIKES, BY NUMBER OF STRIKERS INVOLVED, 1900. Days of duration. Strikes. Strikers involved. Suc Suc ceeded. ceeded partly. Failed. Total. 7 or under. 8 to 15. 16 to 30. 31 to 100. 101 or over. 25 or under............ 26 to 5 0 ............... 51 to 100................. 101 to 200 ............... 201 to 500 ............... 501 to 1,000.............. 1,001 or ov e r.......... 50 44 45 38 25 1 2 51 62 75 69 57 24 22 145 65 43 37 24 11 12 246 171 163 144 106 36 36 182 126 107 78 59 19 8 45 23 24 30 17 7 11 11 13 18 17 21 6 8 8 7 12 18 7 4 8 2 2 1 2 T ota l............ 205 360 337 902 579 157 94 64 8 1 As in the preceding year, the strikes were mostly o f short duration, 579 o f the 902 strikes lasting seven days or less, 157 lasting from eight to fifteen days, 94 from sixteen to thirty days, 64 from thirtyone to one hundred days, and 8 lasting more than one hundred days. M ore than one-half o f the strikes involved 100 strikers or less each. The smaller strikes, involving 25 strikers or less each, were mostly failures, while the majority o f the larger strikes were either wholly or partly successful. C onciliation and A rbitration .— During the year 1900 the law o f FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS— FRANCE. 1081 December 27, 1892, regarding conciliation and arbitration (a) in trade disputes was applied 362 times in 234 different disputes. The excess in the number o f applications o f the law oyer the number o f disputes is explained by the fact that some disputes extended over several cantons, and that in some instances the employees o f each establish ment affected, or even each class o f employees in the same establish ment, entered separate demands fo r conciliation. In only 9 o f the 234 disputes was the law applied before entire cessation o f work occurred. As the number o f strikes during the year was 902, the proportion of the number of disputes in which the law was applied o f the total num ber o f disputes was 25.94 per cent. The proportion for the seven preceding years, taken collectively, in which the law was applied, was 22.85 per cent. In 1900 the initiative in demanding the application of the law was taken by the employees 141 times, by the employers 6 times, by both employers and employees 8 times, and in 79 cases the initiative was taken through the intervention o f justices of the peace. A s regards the results o f the application o f the law, it was found that in 14 o f the 234 disputes work was resumed before committees of conciliation were constituted. In 96 o f the 220 cases remaining the demands for conciliation were refused in 88 cases by the employers, in 3 by the employees, and in 5 cases by both employers and employees. In 10 o f the 96 cases the dispute was ended, after the refusal o f the demand fo r conciliation, either by the complete abandonment o f their demands by employees or by their acceptance o f concessions pre viously offered, while in the other 86 cases strikes were declared or con tinued, but in 4 o f these cases the employers, after the strike had begun, consented to conciliation, thus raising to 128 the number o f disputes to be submitted to such method o f adjustment. O f the other 82 cases in which strikes were declared or continued 9 strikes were successful, 30 were partly successful, and 43 failed. F or the settlement o f the remaining 128 disputes 140 committees of conciliation were constituted, 2 disputes engaging 4 committees each, 2 engaging 3 each, and 2 engaging 2 each. O f these 128 disputes 60 were settled directly by the committees o f conciliation, 18 by arbitra tion, and 4 were adjusted by the parties themselves after having had recourse to committees o f conciliation. This leaves 46 cases in which the attempted conciliation and arbitration failed and strikes resulted or continued. These strikes succeeded in 5 cases, succeeded partly in 24, and failed in 17 cases. The follow ing statement gives a summary o f the cases in which recourse was had to the law o f 1892 regarding conciliation and arbi tration, together with the results o f such recourse during the year 1900 and fo r the preceding seven years collectively. « For a copy of this law see Bulletin No. 25, pp. 854-856. 1082 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. SUMMARY OF CASES IN WHICH RECOURSE ^VAS HAD TO CONCILIATION AND ARBITRA TION, 1893 TO 1899 AND 1900. Items. 1893 to 1899. 1900. Total number of strikes................................................................................................. Cases in w hich the law of 1892 was ap p lied ............................................................... 3,370 a 778 902 &362 Disputes settled— Before the creation of committees of conciliation............................................... After refusal of demands for conciliation............................................................ Directly by committees of conciliation................................................................. By arbitration........................................................................................................... Directly by parties after having had recourse to conciliation........................... 54 34 ol83 24 15 14 10 60 18 4 Total cases settled through the application of the la w ................................... 307 106 251 211 82 46 463 128 Strikes resulting or continuing: After refusal of demand for conciliation.............................................................. After failure of recourse to conciliation and arbitration................................... Total cases of failure after application of the la w ............................................ d The 778 cases of recourse to the law relate to 770 disputea. The 362 cases of recourse to the law relate to 234 disputes. There were but 180 disputes settled by committees of conciliation, 3 of them being counted twice, because 2 committees were formed in each of these 3 cases. d Figures here apparently should be 212; those given are. however, according to the original. a b c The above summary shows that o f 234 disputes considered in 1900, 106 were settled directly or indirectly through the application of the law o f 1892, and in the case o f 128 the recourse to the law proved fruitless. O f the 106 disputes settled 17 were favorable to the demands o f the employees, 76 resulted in a compromise, and 13 were unfavor able to the employees. In the 128 disputes which continued after the failure o f attempts at conciliation and arbitration the employees suc ceeded in 14, succeeded partly in 54, and failed in 60 cases. G E R M A N Y. Streiks und Aussperrungen im Jahre 1900. Streiks una Aussperrungen im Jahre 1901. Bearbeitet im Kaiserliehen Statistischen Amt. 329 p p .; 306 pp. These are the second and third annual reports on strikes and lock outs published bv the German imperial statistical bureau. The reports contain analyses and summaries o f the strikes and lockouts in 1900 and 1901, respectively, copies o f schedules o f inquiry, and tables show ing in detail, by locality and industry for each dispute, the duration, establishments affected, total number o f employees, strikers, and others thrown out o f employment, causes, results, manner of settlement, etc. The data relate to strikes ending iii 1900 and 1901, respectively. Strikes and L ockouts in 1900.— There were 1,433 strikes reported in 1900, affecting 7,740 establishments. The strikes in the case o f 6,038 o f these affected the entire establishment, while in the case o f 1,702 only certain branches or occupations were affected. Operations were completely suspended in 2,382 o f the form er and in 351 of the latter. There were, in 1900,122,803 strikers and 9,007 others thrown out of FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS---- GERMANY. 1083 employment on account o f strikes, making a total o f 131,810 employees affected. The follow ing table shows, by principal groups o f industries, the number and results o f strikes, the number o f establishments and strikers involved, and the number o f other employees thrown out o f work on account o f strikes during the year 1900: SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY GROUPS OF INDUSTRIES, 1900. [The column headed “ Strikers” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Total strikes. Industries. Gardening, florist, and nursery trades......... Mining, smelting, salt, and peat extraction. Stonework and earthenware......................... Metal w ork....................................................... Machinery, tools, and instruments............... Chemicals......................................................... Forestry products, lighting materials, and varnishes....................................................... Textiles............................................................ Paper................................................................. Tjftat.her............................................................ Wooden ware and carved goods.................... Food products............................ ..................... Clothing and cleaning................................... Building trades................................................ Printing and publishing................................ Painting, sculpture, decoration, and artistic work .............................................................. Commercial employment............................... Transportation................................................ T otal....................................................... 1 56 99 89 66 8 Estab lish Suc Suc ceeded Failed. ments. ceeded. partly. . Other em Strik ployees ers. thrown out of work. 3 23 8 11 1 1 26 27 27 19 4 27 49 54 36 3 1 103 179 329 200 8 20 14,735 5,395 3,945 7,395 559 8 73 20 44 197 77 73 496 16 1 12 2 9 34 16 16 121 3 25 7 19 71 28 37 158 2 4 36 11 16 92 33 20 217 14 8 138 90 225 2,232 310 636 2,869 16 507 6,928 3,362 2,462 21,257 3,014 7,584 33,074 307 5 47 58 1 9 8 2 17 32 2 21 18 6 147 243 127 3,016 9,116 58 726 1,433 275 505 653 7,740 122,803 9,007 631 283 1,047 207 15 1,053 14 237 15 375 4,329 17 O f the 18 groups o f industries, that o f building trades had the largest number of strikes, strikers, and establishments affected. Next in importance with regard to the number o f strikers involved are the groups o f wooden ware and carved goods and mining, smelting, etc. These three groups o f industries furnish 52 per cent o f all the strikes and 56 per cent o f all the strikers in 1900. The next two tables show, respectively, the results o f strikes accord ing to their duration and according to the number o f strikers involved: SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY DURATION, 1900. [The column headed “ Strikers” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Days of duration. Less than 1 ................................ 1 to 5 .......................................... 6 to 1 0 ........................................ 11 to 2 0 ...................................... 21 to 3 0 ...................................... 31 to 5 0 ....................................... 51 to 100..................................... 101 or over................................. T ota l................................ii Total strikes. 156 526 200 175 125 110 121 20 1,433 Suc ceeded partly. Failed. 32 133 33 33 . 22 14 8 22 164 80 79 58 52 41 9 102 229 87 63 45 44 72 11 275 505 653 Suc ceeded. Strikers. Other em ployees thrown out of work. 197 1,112 898 1,517 899 1,539 1,118 460 4,042 31,909 14,374 24,010 8,318 21,004 16,322 2,824 950 2,703 980 1,115 1,005 595 1,633 26 7,740 122,803 9,007 Estab lish ments. 1084 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY NUMBER OF STRIKERS INVOLVED, 1900.' [The column headed “ Strikers” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Strikers involved. Total strikes. .Suc ceeded. Suc ceeded partly. Failed. Estab lish ments. Other em ployees Strikers. thrown out of work. 2 to 5 .......................................... 6 to 10........................................ 11 to 20....................................... 21 to 30....................................... 31 to 50....................................... 51 to 100..................................... 101 to 200................................... 201 to 500................................... 501 or over.................................. 109 208 319 184 187 209 113 73 31 25 48 61 33 44 35 17 12 16 51 81 64 72 104 55 44 18 68 109 177 87 71 70 41 17 13 121 265 519 359 473 1,156 1,115 1,573 2,159 433 1,655 4,876 4,654 7,476 15,495 16,009 23,297 48,908 48 173 568 339 745 1,185 2,448 2,480 971 T ota l................................ 1,433 275 505 653 7,740 122,803 9,007 In the follow ing table, show ingthe causes and results o f strikes in Germany in 1900, the demand, and not the strike, is taken as the unit, and hence the figures do not agree with those in the preceding tables: STRIKES, BY CAUSES, 1900. [A considerable number of strikes was due to two or more causes, and the facts in such cases have been* tabulated under each cause; hence the totals for this table necessarily do not agree with those for the preceding tables.] Strikes which— Cause or object. Against reduction of wages......................................................... For increase of wages................................................................... For extra rate for overtime......................................................... For extra pay for secondary w ork............................................. For payment of wages before regular pay day......................... Other causes affecting w ages..................................................... Against increase of hours............................................................ For reduction of h o u rs............................................................... For abolition or limitation of overtime work........................... For reduction of hours on Saturday.......................................... Against introduction of overtime work..................................... For regular hours......................................................................... Other causes affecting hours of labor........................................ For change in method of paym ent........................................... Against change in method of payment.................................... For reinstatement of discharged employees........................... . For discharge or against employment of certain persons....... For discharge of foremen, e t c .................................................... Against being compelled to work on holidays......................... For better sanitary conditions, etc............................................. Against use of material from establishment in which strike was pending.............................................................................. For better treatm ent................................................................... For recognition of committee of em ployees............................ For posting of shop rules and adoption of fixed scale............ Other causes................................................................................. Total strikes. Succeed Suc ceeded. ed partly. Failed. 99 956 203 71 29 78 12 345 45 93 1 3 14 83 1 188 56 37 36 48 32 159 23 8 1 9 3 55 3 7 14 22 64 57 214 1 2 4 11 26 2 7 1 29 8 2 3 8 20 428 123 52 14 43 3 182 22 66 47 369 57 11 14 26 6 108 20 20 1 3 7 40 5 36 39 9 10 20 27 120 39 25 13 13 3 10 34 33 108 10 10 26 13 80 Thirty-eight lockouts were reported in 1900, o f which 35 ended during the year. The latter involved 607 establishments, of which 192 were entirely closed. There were 9,085 persons locked out, and 226 thrown out o f employment on account o f lockouts. Strikes and L ookouts in 1901.— During 1901 there were 1,056 strikes reported, affecting 4,561 establishments. The strikes in the case o f 3,525 o f these affected the entire establishment, while in the case o f 1,036 only certain branches or occupations were affected. Operations were completely suspended in 1,055 o f the former and in FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS— GERMANY. 1085 123 o f the latter. There were 55,262 strikers and 7,420 other employees thrown out o f work, making a total o f 62,682 persons affected. The following table shows, by principal groups of industries, the number and results o f strikes, the number o f establishments and strikers involved, and the number o f others thrown out of employment on account o f strikes during the year 1901: SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY GROUPS OF INDUSTRIES, 1901. [The column headed “ Strikers” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Total strikes. Industries. Gardening, florist, and nursery trades......... Mining, smelting, salt, and peat extraction. Stonework and earthenware......................... Metal work....................................................... Machinery, tools, and instruments............... Chemicals......................................................... Forestry products, lighting materials, and varnishes....................................................... Textiles............................................................ Paper................................................................. Leather ............................................................ Wooden ware and carved g o o d s ................... Food products.................................................. Clothing and clean in g................................... Building trades................................................ Printing and p ublishing................................ Painting, sculpture, decoration, and artis tic w ork ......................................................... Commercial em ploym ent.............................. Transportation................................................ Hotels, restaurants, etc................................... Other industries............................................... 2 58 11 43 113 69 67 378 8 T otal....................................................... 1,056 Estab lish Suc Suc ceeded Failed. ments. ceeded. partly. 4 ............ 21 3 102 21 98 13 38 5 4 ............ 4 18 14 1 11 12 27 10 12 77 2 4 8 15 19 14 1 18 4 11 28 19 24 111 4 66 66 38 25 174 594 54 4 126 2,118 8,201 3,201 5,042 227 2 29 7 3 83 164 187 303 991 1,860 8 250 3,085 172 1,764 2,491 3,554 4,593 18,971 184 29 760 373 27 94 10 19 3 20 58 40 31 190 2 n 3 4 3 2 4 12 8 3 5 35 14 1 7 200 285 571 4,561 3 Other emStrik- ployees ers. thrown out of work. 1 55,262 i 562 2,217 145 102 3 923 5 104 19 507 2, SOL 32 7,420 O f these groups o f industries, that o f building had, as in the preceding year, the largest number o f strikes, strikers, and estab lishments affected. Next in importance with regard to the number o f strikers involved were the groups o f stonework and earthenware and machinery, tools, and instruments, 58 per cent o f all the strikers in 1901 belonging to these three groups. The next two tables show, respectively, the results o f strikes in 1901 according to their duration and according to the number of strikers involved: SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY DURATION, 1901. [The column headed “ Strikers” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Days of duration. Total strikes. Succeded Failed. Suc ceeded. partly. Estab lish ments. Strikers. Other em ployees thrown out of work. Less than 1................................ l t o 5 .......................................... 6 to 10........................................ 11 to 20....................................... 21 to 30 ...................................... 31 to 50....................................... 51 to 100..................................... 101 or o v e r ................................ 114 379 132 115 77 93 108 38 22 99 29 20 14 9 4 3 21 93 45 35 21 27 28 15 71 187 58 60 42 57 76 20 158 657 663 423 285 1,353 815 207 3,111 15,162 5,423 5,226 3,004 6,335 11,093 5,908 416 3,086 356 315 186 405 2,018 638 T ota l................................ 1,056 200 285 571 4,561 55,262 7,420 9398— N o . 42 — 0 2 ------14 1086 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY NUMBER OF STRIKERS INVOLVED, 1901. [The column headed “ Strikers ” shows the maximum number of strikers at any time during strike.] Strikes which— Strikers involved. Total strikes. Suc ceeded. Suc ceeded partly. Failed. Estab lish ments. Strikers. Other em ployees thrown out of work. 2 to 5 .......................................... 6 to 1 0 ........................................ 11 to 2 0 ....................................... 21 to 8 0 ...................................... 31 to 5 0 ....................................... 51 to 100..................................... 101 to 200 ................................... 201 to 500 ................................... 501 or over.................................. 93 193 238 136 141 129 76 37 13 13 40 45 37 27 23 10 4 1 10 35 59 35 57 42 31 11 5 70 118 134 64 57 64 35 22 7 100 244 390 294 466 552 572 793 1,150 349 1,559 3,593 3,438 5,683 8,775 10,438 11,415 10,012 24 322 542 349 528 1,764 1,606 1,479 806 T ota l................................ 1,056 200 285 571 4,561 55,262 7,420 The follow ing table shows the causes and results of strikes in 1901, the demand and not the strike being taken as the unit: STRIKES, BY CAUSES, 1901. [A considerable number of strikes was due to two or more causes, and the facts in such cases have been tabulated under each cause; hence the totals for this table necessarily do not agree with those for the preceding tables.] Strikes which— Cause or object. Total strikes. Against reduction of wages......................................................... For increase of wages................................................................... For extra rate for overtime......................................................... For extra pay for secondary work............................................. Other causes affecting w ages..................................................... Against increase of h o u r s .......................................................... For reduction of hours................................................................. For abolition or limitation of overtime work........................... For reduction of hours on Saturday.......................................... For regular hours......................................................................... Other causes affecting hours of labor........................................ For change in method of payment............................................. Against change in method of payment..................................... For reinstatement of discharged employees............................. For discharge or against employment of certain persons....... For discharge of foremen, e t c .................................................... Against being compelled to work on holidays......................... For better sanitary conditions, e t c ............................................ Against use of material from establishment in which strike was pending.............................................................................. For better treatment.................................................................... For recognition of committee of employees............................. For posting of shop rules and adoption of fixed s ca le ............ Other causes.................................................................................. 170 499 72 42 85 12 146 26 45 7 13 32 13 147 70 22 12 28 1 19 51 57 134 Suc ceeded. 44 77 6 1 10 17 1 3 5 3 29 11 6 1 6 6 3 12 14 Suc ceeded partly. 41 193 42 30 37 1 78 12 26 4 7 9 Failed. 18 11 3 3 15 85 229 24 11 38 11 51 13 16 3 6 18 10 100 48 13 8 7 4 14 26 57 1 9 34 19 63 There were 38 lockouts reported in 1901, o f which 35 ended the same year. The latter affected 238 establishments, o f which 60 were entirely closed. A total o f 5,414 persons were locked out, and 95 others were thrown out o f employment on account o f lockouts. G R E A T BRITAIN . The Hmising Question in London. 1900. xvi, 381 pp. by the London County Council.) (Published This volume presents an account o f the work done by the municipal authorities during the period 1855 to 1900 in the way o f providing FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS---- GREAT BRITAIN. 1087 sanitary dwellings for the laboring classes, together with a summary o f the acts o f Parliament under which they have proceeded. The area considered is the Metropolis exclusive o f the old City o f London. Legislation began with the Laboring Classes Lodging Houses A ct of 1851. This act related to the indrease o f supply o f houses, with a view to the relief o f conditions o f overcrowding; but a supplemental bill o f the same date had the no less important purpose o f improving the sanita tion o f a certain class of lodging houses. Numerous bills and amend ments followed, enlarging the powers o f the municipal authorities, until in 1890 a consolidating act was passed, under which, with some subsequent amendments, the work o f improvement is now carried on. The Public Health (London) A ct o f 1891 and the London Building Acts o f 1894 and 1898 are also auxiliary to this work. The housing o f the working classes act o f 1890 prescribes in detail the mode o f procedure, providing first fo r a representation by the proper medical officer as to the insanitary condition o f the area or areas to be improved. I f this officer is derelict, two justices o f the peace or twelve or more ratepayers may take the initiative. Then follow provisions as to investigation, the determination o f costs, the preparation o f an improvement scheme, methods of condemnation and reimbursement, provision o f funds, etc. The term o f sinking funds is limited to sixty years. Early restrictions that were found to be impracticable or onerous provided that condemned residential areas must be rebuilt with dwellings, and that the new buildings must accommodate a population equal to that displaced. The first o f these was found to be poor financiering, as the site frequently had a much higher com mercial than residential value, and the second interfered at times with the object o f improved sanitation; they have, therefore, been modified by a grant o f discretionary powers. The results show, how ever, that the aggregate operations have provided for a considerably larger population than was found in the condemned structures. The conditions demanding remedy were not only those o f improperly constructed or dilapidated buildings, but also o f those so placed as to interfere with ventilation, etc. It frequently happened, therefore, that adjacent buildings must be removed for the sake o f making desired improvements, o f which fact the act takes due cognizance. Overcrowding might also take place when there was no fault to be found with the buildings themselves, so that a system o f registration and inspection has been provided for. A chapter devoted to this sub ject gives in brief the results o f various investigations since 1844, and shows the slow progress made and the continuing need o f legislation and law enforcement. W hat has been done in the way o f the reconstruction o f insanitary areas and the correction o f overcrowding has naturally occasioned something o f a redistribution o f population. This opens the question 1088 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. of workmen’ s trains, which is made the subject o f one o f the chapters o f this report. The Royal Commission on the Housing of the W ork ing Classes, 1885, investigated this phase o f the matter, and offered as suggestions that fares on the workmen’s trains should not exceed the difference between the rent o f their homes in the overcrowded dis tricts which required relief and the lower rents o f the suburbs, and that the hours o f running should be adapted to the needs o f the work ing people. Provision is now made in the charters o f some roads and voluntary action has been taken by others, so that in 1897 there were 318 cheap-rate trains arriving daily at London termini between the hours o f 3 a. m. and 8.42 a. m. A large part o f the report is taken up with detailed presentations of improvement schemes devised for particular areas, of which plates and brief specifications are given. From tables showing the results o f the work done from 1875 to 1900 by the Metropolitan Board o f W orks and its successor, the London County Council, under the Artisans’ Dwellings and Housing o f the W orking Classes Acts, the follow ing totals are taken, these totals including work in progress as well as that completed at the time of issuing the report (September, 1900): Area dealt with, 94| acres; per sons displaced, 49,375; cost o f clearances, £2,898,616 ($14,106,115); number o f persons provided for, 64,428; co3t o f dwellings (including land and incidentals), £1,248,754 ($6,077,061); gross annual rent receivable from occupied tenements, £36,692 ($178,562). IT A L Y . Statistica degli Scioperi avvenuti nelV Industria e nelV A gricoltura durante V cmno 1899. Ministero di Agricoltura, Industria e Commercio, Direzione Generale della Statistica. 1901. xxxix, 106 pp. This is the eighth o f the series o f annual reports published by the bureau o f statistics o f the department o f agriculture, industry, and commerce o f Italy. It relates to the manufacturing, mining, and agricultural industries. Strikes and L ockouts in 1899.— There were 268 strikes reported in 1899, o f which 9 were among agricultural employees and 259 in other industries. There were 11 shut-downs, o f which three were lockouts. In the summary tables given, strikes o f agricultural employees and shut-downs and lockouts are not included. The 259 strikes considered involved a total o f 43,194 strikers, and caused a loss o f 231,590 working days. O f the strikers 28,228 were men, 11,280 were women, and 3,686 were children 15 years o f age or under. The year 1899, like the preceding year, was not marked by any strikes o f exceptional magnitude. The largest strike was that o f FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS---- ITALY. 1089 railway employees in Turin, which involved 1,850 persons. Only 7 other strikes involved 1,000 or more strikers each. The total number o f strikes and strikers was greater in 1899 than in 1898, but the num ber o f days lost was smaller. The two follow ing tables show the causes and results o f strikes in 1899. CAUSES OF STRIKES, 1899. Strikes. Cause or object. Strikers. Number. Per cent. Number. Per cent. For increase of wages................................................................... Against reduction of wages......................................................... For reduction of hours................................................................. Against increase of hours............................................................ Other causes.................................................................................. 113 28 17 5 96 44 6 2 37 19,539 4,325 3,631 2,384 13,315 45 10 9 6 30 Total..................................................................................... 259 100 43,194 100 11 RESULTS OF STRIKES, BY CAUSES, 1899. Succeeded. Cause or object. Strikes. Num Per ber. cent. For increase of wages .............. Against reduc tion of wages.. For reduction of hours............... Against increase of h ou rs.......... Other causes....... T o ta l......... Succeeded partly. Strikers. Strikes. Num Per Num Per ber. cent. ber. cent. Failed. Strikers. Strikes. Num Per Num Per ber. cent. ber. cent. Strikers. Num Per ber. cent. 25 21 3,660 19 39 34 9,356 48 49 45 6,523 33 11 39 2,263 52 6 22 1,209 28 11 39 853 20 9 53 2,150 59 5 29 1,332 37 3 18 149 4 3 32 60 S3 484 5,649 20 42 19 20 4,646 35 2 45 40 47 1,900 3,020 80 23 80 31 14,206 33 69 27 16,543 38 110 42 12,445 29 O f the 259 strikes reported, 141, or 54 per cent, were due to wage disputes; 22, or 9 per cent, to disputes regarding hours o f labor, and 96, or 37 per cent, to other causes. O f the 43,194 strikers, 23,864, or 55 per cent, struck on account o f wage disputes; 6,015, or 14 per cent, on account o f hours o f labor, and 13,315, or 31 per cent, for other reasons. W ith regard to the results o f strikes in 1899, it is shown that 31 per cent succeeded, 27 per cent succeeded partly, and 42 per cent failed. O f the strikers involved, 33 per cent were in successful strikes, 38 per cent in partly successful strikes, and 29 per cent in strikes that failed. BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 1090 In the follow ing table the total strikes, strikers, and working days lost in 1899 are given by occupations: STRIKES, STRIKERS, AND WORKING DAYS LOST, BY OCCUPATIONS, 1899. Strikers. Occupations. Strikes. Adults. Males. Compositors and lithographers................. Day laborers................................................. Dyers, gilders, and varnishers................... Employees in food-product industries___ Founders...................................................... Glaziers and glass workers......................... Hack drivers and tramway employees___ Hatters......................................................... Longshoremen, coal handlers, etc............ Machinists and blacksmiths...................... Masons and stone cutters........................... Match factory employees................. ......... Miners and quarrymen.............................. Potters and kilnmen................................... Railway employees..................................... Shoemakers, tailors, and others in cloth ing industry............................................. Tanners......................................................... Tobacco workers.......................................... Weavers, e t c ................................................ Other occupations...................................... Total. ! Children ! 15 years age or Females. ofunder. 5 16 4 11 3 3 9 3 12 17 15 3 30 8 5 151 3,001 212 961 463 98 4,004 31 2,088 1,922 1,370 149 7,755 565 3,158 9 3 3 73 27 314 82 522 1,103 801 1,373 8,166 293 259 28,228 11,280 427 1 11 173 9 202 82 11 53 25 168 1,436 37 258 12 15 79 4 1,547 62 Total. Working days lost. 151 3,001 223 1,561 473 98 4,004 315 2,088 1,986 1,395 575 9,203 617 3,158 2,090 12,859 2,279 3,901 6,233 172 13.424 1,263 36,767 19,820 2,833 1,689 35.424 3,410 3,158 915 1,373 10,816 1,156 3,106 432 7,363 71,038 4,329 43,194 231,590 86 The 9 strikes o f agricultural laborers in 1899, which are not included in the above table, involved 1,895 strikers, o f whom 1,130 were men and 765 were women. Tw o o f these strikes were successful, 3 were partly successful, and 4 failed. Eleven cases were reported in 1899 where proprietors closed their establishments for the purpose o f accomplishing certain objects, but o f these shut downs only 3 were directed against employees and can properly be called lockouts. These 3 lockouts affected 372 persons, o f whom 368 were men and 4 were children. One o f these lockouts was successful, but for the other two the results were not reported. C ouncils of P rudhommes.— On December 31, 1899, there were 86 councils o f prudhommes, or councils fo r the conciliation and arbi tration o f labor disputes, instituted according to law. This was an increase o f 5 over the preceding year. Only 39 o f these performed their functions in 1899. Four cases were reported where they had occasion to intervene in the settlement o f strikes. FOREIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS— ITALY. 1091 Strikes D uring T wenty -O ne Y ears.— The following table gives a summary o f the more important facts published in relation to strikes in all but the agricultural industries in Italy during each o f the years 1879 to 1899: STRIKES, BY YEARS, 1879 TO 1899. Strikes which— Year. 1879....... 1880....... 1881....... 1882....... 1883....... 1884....... 1885....... 1886....... 1887....... 1888....... 1889....... 1890....... 1891....... 1892....... 1893....... 1894....... 1895....... 1896....... 1897....... 1898....... 1899....... Strikes for which Total strikers Suc strikes. Suc were ceeded. ceeded Failed. re partly. ported. 32 27 44 47 73 81 89 96 69 101 126 139 132 <U19 « 131 / 109 126 210 217 256 259 T ota l. (72,483 (a) (a) (a fa) fa) (a) («) (a) («) (a\ ( a) («) (a\ a ?a) «) («) M (a) (a) ( a) (a) (aj 159 24 34 35 41 79 70 70 80 u429 33 46 29 39 51 60 68 69 0 410 57 41 39 46 80 87 118 110 592 824 988 \a) • (a) (a) («) («) (a) o (a) («) (a) (a) h Strikes for which Aggre gate Chil days days of dren 15 lost work Women. years of Total. were lost. age or re under. ported. Men. (b ) ( b) ( 6) (&) (& h ) 4,011 5,900 8,272 5,854 12,900 23,967 34,166 16,951 25,027 28,974 23,322 38,402 34,733 30,800 32,109 27,595 19,307 96,051 76,570 35,705 43,194 28 21,896 26 91,899 38 95,578 45 25,119 65 111,697 78 149,215 82 244,393 95 56,772 218,612 66 95 191,204 123 215,880 129 167,657 123 258,059 114 216,907 122 234,323 103 323,261 126 125,968 210 1,152,503 217 1,113,535 239,292 256 259 231,590 2,436 *143,658 *102,632 *52,132 623,810 2,400 5,485,360 28 26 39 45 67 81 86 96 68 99 125 133 128 117 127 103 126 210 217 256 259 M W Strikers. (&) (&) (b) (&) (&) (b) (b) \b) (b) lb) \b) (ib) ( 6) ( 6) ( 6) (6) \b) \b) (b) (b ) (b) (6) (b) l b) (b) ( 6) Ib ) Ib ) (b) (b) (&) (6 ) ( 6) (&) 19,766 11,788 39,955 21,809 22,112 28,228 3,890 5,192 34,264 38,435 9,571 11,280 (b) (b ) (b) \b) \b ) 3,939 2,327 21,832 16,326 4,022 3,686 Included in results of strikes for 1891. &Not reported. 0 Including strikes occurring during the years 1879 to 1890, but not including 68 strikes the results of which were not reported. d Including 6 strikes the results of which were not reported, e Including 10 strikes the results of which were not reported. /In clu din g 6 strikes the results of which were not reported. 9 Including 79 strikes the results of which were not reported. h This total does not agree with the total in table showing strikes by number of strikers involved, page 1093; the computation is made, however, from figures in the original reports. 1 Not including figures for 1879 to 1893. a The follow ing table gives a comparison o f the proportionate results of strikes during a period o f years: RESULTS OF STRIKES 1879-91 TO 1899. Per cent of strikers. Per cent of strikes. Year. 1879-1891...................................................... 1892 ............................................................ 1893.............................................................. 1894.............................................................. 1895........................................ .................... 1896.............................................................. 1897.............................................................. 1898.............................................................. 1899.............................................................. Suc ceeded. 16 21 28 34 32 38 33 27 31 Suc ceeded partly. 43 29 38 28 31 24 27 27 27 Failed. Suc ceeded. 41 50 34 38 o7 38 40 46 42 25 29 29 19 33 49 23 27 33 Suc ceeded partly. 47 19 44 24 40 31 45 31 38 Failed. 28 ' 52 27 57 27 20 32 42 29 1092 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, The number and results o f strikes and the number o f strikers are shown by occupations for the eight years 1892 to 1899 in the follow ing table: SUMMARY OF STRIKES, BY OCCUPATIONS, FOR THE PERIOD 1892 TO 1899. Strikes which— Jotal strikes. Occupations. Strikes for which Total strikers Result Suc strikers. Suc were Failed. not ceeded. ceeded known. reported. partly. Bakers and pastry c o o k s...................... Carpenters and joiners......................... Compositors and lithographers............ Day laborers............................................ Drivers and teamsters........................... Dyers, gilders, and vam ishers.............. Employees in food-product industries other than bakeries........................... Founders................................................. Glaziers and glass workers................... Hack drivers and tramway employees. Hatters.................................................... Longshoremen, coal handlers, etc........ Machinists............................................. Masons and stonecutters...................... Miners and quarrymen......................... Potters and kilnm en............................. Railway em ployees.............................. Shoemakers, tailors, and others in clothing industry.............................. Tanners.................................................. Weavers, spinners, carders, e t c ............ Other occupations.................................. 20 16 34 113 16 19 10 6 11 30 7 3 5 4 7 30 5 6 5 6 16 53 3 10 29 35 10 38 24 36 57 89 202 52 12 6 4 4 6 10 11 15 32 85 19 2 7 7 3 19 8 10 9 31 36 20 8 15 24 3 13 6 15 33 25 73 13 2 55 50 412 108 14 14 117 27 12 13 130 25 29 22 164 48 T o ta l............................................. 1,427 433 395 678 20 16 34 112 15 19 4,638 1,153 1,739 22,943 2,097 2,168 29 35 10 38 24 36 57 87 195 52 12 3,114 2,385 438 14,173 84,704 7,601 5,528 12,284 75,937 4,144 7,909 1 1 8 55 50 412 107 6,964 3,608 81,139 16,665 21 1,415 361,331 1 1 1 8 More than one-half o f all the strikes during this eight-year period were those o f textile workers, miners and quarrymen, and day labor ers, the textile workers alone having participated in 412 o f the 1,427 strikes. O f 361,331 strikers who participated in 1,415 strikes reported, 84,704 were engaged in the hat-making industry, 81,139 in the textile industry, and 75,937 in mining and quarrying, making for the three industries a total o f 241,780, or more than two-thirds o f the entire number. The two follow ing tables show the strikes for the period, 1879 to 1891, and for each year, 1892 to 1899, classified according to their duration and the number o f strikers involved, respectively: STRIKES, BY DURATION, 1879-91 TO 1899. Days of duration. 3 or u n d er........................................ 4 to 10................................................. 11 to 30............................................... Over 3 0 ............................................. 1879-91. 1892. 1893. 1894. 1895. 1896. 1897. 1898. 1899. 633 256 112 16 60 36 19 1 67 39 11 8 52 33 12 7 61 44 19 2 Total........................................ «1,017 5116 cl25 <*104 126 91 70 42 7 104 56 37 19 153 57 33 13 161 70 23 5 1,382 6J1 308 78 210 c216 256 259 / 2,429 « Not including 39 strikes the duration of which was not reported. &Not including 3 strikes the duration of which was not reported. cNot including 6 strikes the duration of which was not reported. ^ Not including 5 strikes the duration of which was not reported. <?Not including 1 strike the duration of which was not reported. /N o t including 54 strikes the duration of which was not reported. Total. 1093 FOBEIGN STATISTICAL PUBLICATIONS— ITALY, STRIKES, BY NUMBER OF STRIKERS INVOLVED, 1879-91 TO 1899. Strikers involved. 1 to 49................................................ 50 to 99.............................................. 100 to 199........................................... 200 to 499........................................... 500 to 999........................................... 1,000or o v e r ..................................... 1879-91. 1892. 1893. 1894. 1895. 18%. 1897. 1898. 1899. 272 206 199 220 89 53 Total........................................ «1,039 27 18 26 27 11 8 117 28 24 70 52 44 31 14 92 55 63 35 2 54 35 46 52 14 9 126 210 217 40 16 18 18 5 7 39 34 127 «104 22 41 6 6 21 27 3 6 Total. 6 98 51 48 39 15 5 8 7‘10 491 487 490 163 104 256 259 a 2,455 a This total does not agree with the figures given in the general table of strikes, p. 1091; the figures are reproduced, however, as shown in the original report. The strikes were mostly o f short duration, 1,382 out o f 2,429 reported lasting three days or less. A bout one-half o f the strikes involved less than 100 strikers each. DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. [This subject, begun in Bulletin No. 2, has been continued in successive issues. A ll material parts of the decisions are reproduced in the words of the courts, indi cated when short b y quotation marks, and when long by being printed solid. In order to save space, matter needed simply by way of explanation is given in the words of the editorial reviser.] DECISIONS U NDER ST A T U T O R Y L A W . C ontract of E mployment— B reach — M erger of Corporations— Globe and R utgers F ire Insurance Compa/ny o f New York v. Jones, Supreme Court o f M ichigan, 89 Northwestern R eporter, page 580.— Action was brought in the circuit court o f W ayne County to recover from James A . Jones the sum o f $1,106.19 alleged to be due the com pany named. Jones had been agent fo r the Rutgers Fire Insurance Company under a contract for five years from March 1,1898. On the 20th day o f December, 1898, the Rutgers Fire Insurance Company and the Globe Fire Insurance Company, both corporations o f the State o f New Y ork, merged to form a new corporation under the style o f the Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company. A New York statute provides fo r such mergers, and that “ The new corporation shall suc ceed to all the obligations and liabilities o f the merging corporations, or either o f them.” Another clause provides that “ A ll the rights, franchises, and interests o f the merging corporations in and to every species o f property and things in action belonging to them, or either o f them, shall be deemed to be transferred to and vested in the new corporation.” Jones claimed that he first learned that the Rutgers had ceased to do business in Michigan in March, 1899, and learned about the same time o f the consolidation. A t that date he had on hand the sum named above as a balance due the Rutgers Company. He was offered the agency o f the new company, but declined it, declaring that he had objection to the men in control o f the Globe. The judge o f the court below had ruled that the consolidation o f the Rutgers with the Globe was a breach o f the form er’s contract with Jones, and that Jones was entitled to recover damages therefor to the amount o f the company’s claim against him, if the jury found that he had sustained that amount o f damages. The jury so found, and the company appealed, declaring that Jones’s con tract with the Rutgers was made with a knowledge o f the provisions of the New Y ork statute relating to merger, and subject to the same, 1094 DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1095 and that acts done in accordance with the statute could not be breach o f contract. Judge M oore, who announced the opinion o f the supreme court, affirmed the judgment o f the court below, using in part the following language: It will be noticed that by the terms o f the New Y ork statute the two corporations were merged in the corporation provided for in the agreement. This made a new corporation. (3 Cook, Corp. sec. 897; Smith v. Railway Co., 114 Mich. 460, 72 N. W . 328.) Is it true, as contended here, that, because one has contracted to render personal service fo r one corporation fo r a definite period o f time, his contract for personal service may pass to a new corporation, made up o f two or more corporations by virtue o f the merger o f the two or more companies? In 2 W ood, Mast. & St. sec. 91, it is said: 46When a person contracts to work fo r another for a term, the parties are treated as having contracted in reference to the personal qualities o f each other, and the master can not shift his liability by turning the servant over to another master before the term is ended, nor can the servant compel the master to accept the service^ o f another person in lieu o f his own. The consent ox the parties is essential to effect a substitution, and this is true even though the servant is ill, and unable to labor himself. [Cases cited.] Everyone knows that insurance companies, like individuals, differ in reputation and methods o f doing business. An insurance agent has a right to say for whom he will work, and under a contract to work for one company he can not be required to work fo r an entirely different company. Judgment is affirmed. C ourt of M ediation and A rbitration — C onstitutionality of S tatute — R ehearing — M andamus— Renaud et al. v. State B oard o f M ediation and A rbitration, Supreme Court o f M ichigan, 83 N orth western R eporter, page 620.— A ct No. 238, acts o f 1889 (sections 559568, Compiled Statutes o f Michigan, 1897), provides fo r the appoint ment by the governor o f 44three competent persons” who shall consti tute a 44State court o f mediation and arbitration,” the title o f the act being 44An act to provide for the amicable adjustment o f grievances and disputes that may arise between employers and employees and to authorize a State court o f mediation and arbitration.” Under the pro visions of this act, Pingree & Smith, manufacturers o f boots and shoes, and their employees, by Timothy O’Connor and E. A . Allen, submitted a question as to the prices to be paid by the employers for certain classes o f work. The case was heard and a decision arrived at, with which Pingree & Smith were dissatisfied, and they moved fo r a rehearing. The court granted such rehearing, whereupon Renaud and others asked o f the supreme court an appropriate writ to prevent the rehearing, claiming that in granting rehearing the court exceeded its powers. Pingree & Smith also attacked the court as being improp 1096 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. erly constituted, so that the supreme court passed upon the three ques tions o f the constitutionality o f the act establishing the court, its right to grant a rehearing, and the proper remedy to be sought if such rehearing was improperly allowed. The contention o f Pingree & Smith is first taken up by Judge M oore, who announced the opinion o f the court, concerning which he said: W e can not state their position more clearly than by quoting from brief o f counsel. “ By section 28 o f article 6 fof the constitution], the legislature may establish courts o f conciliation, with such powers and duties as shall be prescribed by law. The general scheme o f the constitution, as far as it relates to judicial officers, is for their elec tion, and not for their appointment. Section 23, art. 6, o f the con stitution provides for the establishment o f courts o f conciliation; and by 6courts’ , here, as well as elsewhere in the constitution, is meant a permanent organization fo r the administration o f justice, and not a special tribunal provided for by law. I f the administration o f justice embraces the enforcement o f the orders or decrees o f courts, the court o f mediation and arbitration, being deficient in authority given by the legislature to do this, is not such a court as is meant by section 23 o f article 6; for, by the act o f its creation, it can do nothing but render a decision on subjects submitted to it in a particular way, and file its decision with the county^ clerk. Under the act there is no authority given to the judges or members o f the court to compel the appearance o f either party, nor is there any method o f composing the differences or question in dispute by turning over the parties to a court with authority to enforce its decrees.” It is true that as to the members o f the supreme court, the circuit judges, judges o f probate, and justices o f the peace, the constitution provides that they shall be elected; but we think it is not open to question that, if the constitution did not require these judicial officers to be elected, but authorized the legislature to establish these courts and prescribe their powers and duties, it would be entirely competent for the legislature to do so. This is just what is done by section 23, article 6, of the constitution. The act does not fail because the legis lature, in creating the court, did not provide its members should be elected. * * * [The article referred to] reads, “ The legislature may establish courts o f conciliation with such powers and duties as shall be prescribed by law.” This language is simple and clear, and would seem to give the legislature abundant authority to create courts o f conciliation, and to clothe them with as little or as great power as to the legislature seemed proper. It is to be regretted that the law passed by the legislature is not a more perfect one, but we think it very clear that the power conferred upon the respondent, if exercised, is calculated to bring about conciliations between those employers and employed between whom differences have arisen, and that the law was enacted, as suggested by its title, to provide fo r the amicable adjust ment o f grievances and disputes that may arise between employers and employed. The act does not undertake to confer power or impose duties in relation to all classes o f civil cases, but such power as it does confer is within the constitutional right o f the legislature. DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1097 On the question o f rehearing, Judge Moore said: The law which called this court into existence is the limit o f its power. The act nowhere authorizes the court to grant a rehearing. When its decision has been rendered and filed, it has exhausted its power in a given case. As to the mode of preventing the rehearing, the court relied on section 191, Comp. Laws, which gives the supreme court general superin tending control over all inferior courts, and accordingly issued a writ o f mandamus vacating the order granting a rehearing. Court of M ediation and A rbitration — P ower — C onstruction Statute— Pingree et ah v. State Court o f M ediation and A rbitra tion, Supreme Court o f M ichigan, 89 Northwestern R eporter, page 948.— The questions here discussed are as to the scope o f the power o f the State court o f mediation and arbitration, and as to interpre tation o f the clause providing that the court’s decision shall be ren dered in prescribed form within ten days after the matter submitted has been fully heard. Pingree & Smith, manufacturers o f boots and shoes, having failed to reach an agreement with their employees as to the prices to be paid for certain classes o f work, the two parties submitted to the court a statement o f the points in issue, with the following introduc tory sentences: u Being unable to agree on prices o f the following work, we hereby jointly request an arbitration o f same by your hon orable board, agreeing to abide by your decision. Prices to remain in force until May 1, 1900.” This paper bore date o f December 16, 1899. The case had been fully heard on March 9,1900, and the decision was rendered on the 31st day o f the same month. From the remarks o f Judge M oore, who announced the conclusions o f the supreme court, the follow ing is quoted: of Pingree & Smith insist that, as a matter o f law, the finding o f the State court o f mediation and arbitration was erroneous, because said court did not confine itself to the terms o f said written submission. It is said by counsel: “ The decision o f this court o f mediation and arbitration makes a new contract between employers and employees, and substitutes it for the one existing at the time the submission was made. W ithout any authority under the submission or elsewhere so to do, the court o f arbitration said to the firm that the men who were engaged to work and who were working by the day or week must be considered or treated as if they had been engaged to work and were working by the piece.” It is, o f course, well settled that when arbi trators g o beyond the submission they exceed their jurisdiction, and the award may be set aside. The record shows that an attempt had been made to have the prices fixed by the piece, instead o f having the work done by the day or week, and that upon the hearing, without 1098 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. objection, testimony was given upon both sides, not only by local experts, but by witnesses from a distance, in relation to the scale o f wages by the piece as well as by the day. The terms o f submission were doubtless prepared in view o f the actual situation and the claims o f the respective parties, and, we think, are sufficiently broad to justify the court in saying the compensation should be by the piece, instead o f by the day or week. The court o f arbitration fixed July 26, 1899, as the date when the scale o f prices fixed by it should go into effect. To this the firm objected, maintaining that the submission contained nothing authoriz ing the fixing o f a date. From the records it appears that a new machine had been put into the factory on the date fixed by the court, and that it was the change in methods caused by the introduction o f this machine that was in part responsible fo r the dispute as to prices. A statement was made during the hearing by Mr. Pingree to the effect that the prices set would control from the time the machine was put in. Quoting this and other expressions o f similar intent, the court said: In view o f these statements, made during the progress o f the trial, we do not think the respondents can be heard to say the court erred in fixing the date it did when its decision should take effect. The contention that the decision was void because announced only after twenty-two days instead o f after ten days, as the law provides, was overruled by the court on the ground that such statute is directory and not strictly binding, citing Rawson v. Parsons, 6 Mich., 405, in support of this position. Judge M oore said o f the case in hand: Several complicated scales o f prices were introduced, and, if the testimony was to be intelligently considered and passed upon, some time would necessarily elapse. What little delay there was is not to be charged against the parties to the litigation, if to anybody; and the law ought not to be given such a construction as is contended for by the relators. The case is affirmed. From the above, Judge H ooker dissented, maintaining that the case was not properly in court and that the writ by which it was sought to be brought to its consideration should have been dismissed with costs. D eath of M inor U nlawfully E mployed — R ight of A ction— C onstruction of S tatute — Kansas and Texas Coal Company v. Gabsky et al., Supreme Court o f Arkansas, 66 Southwestern R eporter, page 915.— M ary Gabsky and others sued the above-named company in the circuit court o f Sebastian County to recover damages for the death o f John Gabsky, a minor, employed in the mines o f the company con trary to the provisions o f the law. DECISIONS OF COUNTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1099 Judgment was in favor o f the plaintiffs, from which the company appealed and secured a reversal o f the lower court, with instructions fo r a new trial. The statute under which suit was brought is section 5051 Sand. & H. D ig., which declares that “ No person under the age o f 14 years shall be permitted to enter any mine or to work therein.” Section 5058 provides that “ F or any injury to persons or property occasioned by willful violation o f this act, a right o f action shall accrue to the party injured for any direct damages sustained thereby.” John Gabsky was a son of the plaintiff and was 11 years o f age. He had been employed in the mine about four weeks when he was killed by a large rock falling upon him from the roof of the room in which he was. The company denied willful violation o f the law, as the boy’s age had been represented as being 15 years. The case did not rest on the evidence, however, in the supreme court, but solely on the con struction o f the statute. On this Chief Justice Bunn, after citing the sections quoted above, spoke as follows: The direct damages here referred to means damages fo r injury occasioned by the fact o f being permitted to work in the mines; and., the working in the mines under the prohibited age being shown, and to be willful in the legal sense, it is ordinarily conclusive upon the defendant, fo r the object o f the act was to prohibit the working o f children under 14 years o f age in coal mines at all. I f it is thought that an action fo r damages for the death o f a person, as in this case, survives in the next o f km, it should be asserted by a complaint based upon our statute o f survivorship, commonly known as “ Lord Camp bell’s A ct.” What should be shown in a case under that act we leave to the plaintiffs to determine. But, as the case was tried solely under the minors’ act, and a complaint made in strict conformity thereto, and no provision is made in that act fo r a survivorship o f the action, the demurrer set forth in the first and second paragraphs o f the answer [denying that the complaint stated sufficient facts to constitute a cause o f action] should have been sustained; and the judgment o f the court is reversed, and the cause is remanded fo r a new trial, with privilege to the plaintiff to amend her complaint, if she so desires to do. E mployees on P ublic W orks— Claims for Services — T ime of F iling — C ontractor and Surety — A ssignment of C ontract— Classes of W ork— French v. Pow ell et al., Supreme Court o f Cali fo rn ia , 68 P acific Reported', page 92.— This was an appeal from a judgment o f the superior court o f Los Angeles County, allowing M. H. French to recover certain sums from Charles L. Powell, a contractor, and a surety company. Powell had entered into a contract with the city o f Los Angeles for the construction o f a certain tunnel, and, in accordance with the act of March 27, 1897, had given bond with surety for the protection of material men or those furnishing labor “ o f any kind” in pursuance 1100 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. o f the w ork contracted for. A provision o f this law requires that claims fo r materials or services must be filed in due form “ within thirty days from the time such work is completed.” French’s complaint set forth three causes o f action. One was a claim fo r compensation for the work and services o f a man, team, and scraper, furnished by him at an agreed price per day, amounting to $514.75. The others were claims properly filed and assigned for labor done by one Clapham as a blacksmith, to the value o f $154, and by one French fo r one day’s service as superintendent o f work on the tunnel at the agreed price o f $2.50. The defendants controverted the allegations made and alleged fu r ther that the claims were not filed within the time required by the act. The trial court found that Powell had, on May 10, 1899, assigned all his interest in the contract in question to Swenson & Hill, which firm had in turn contracted with one Chaffey to do the excavating, grading, and filling required by said contract. Powell’s assignment to Swenson & Hill was “ with the knowledge and approval o f said municipal corporation, and all payments o f money by said contract provided to be made by said Powell have been made direct to Swen son & H ill by said corporation as said payments have come due under the contract.” It was also found that French, Clapham, and the superintendent had each rendered their services, the amount and value o f which were found to be as claimed, as employees or at the request o f the subcon tractor Chaffey, and that at the time o f the filing o f the claims and the trial o f the case the construction o f the tunnel was still in progress and not yet completed. The judgment o f the lower court was that Powell and his surety were liable, and this was affirmed by the supreme court, Judge Chipman announcing its conclusions. The first point taken up was the claim o f appellants that the suit had been prematurely brought, contending that the clause providing that claims must be filed “ within thirty days from the tim e’’ the work contracted for is completed, also set a date earlier than which no suit could be entertained; that is, that the entire work must first be completed, and argued from an analogy to statutes relating to mechanics’ liens. The court differed with appellants on this point, holding that the right o f plaintiff was not similar to the lien o f a mechanic, and concluded: W e can see no good reason why the act should receive the construc tion contended for by appellants, while there are reasons why this con struction should be rejected. Aside from the long delay which often attends the final completion o f public work, and the consequent hard ship entailed on laborers if compelled to wait so long, there is the clear right to sue the contractor at any time; and why should his DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1101 security, who has taken on himself in some measure the contractor’s burden, be in any better position? The statute makes him liable as soon as the contractor is liable, provided only that the creditor files his claim as the law directs. This we think he may do without wait ing the final completion o f the entire work. Continuing, the court said: The question next presented is as to who is liable to plaintiff on the claims the subject o f the action. Appellants contend that Powell is not liable, because the findings show that the services were rendered at the request o f Chaffey, who was subcontractor under Swenson & Hill, the assignees o f Powell. The bond refers to the contract entered into by Powell with the city, and makes it a part of the bond. The condition o f the bond is that “ the above-bounden principal [Powell] shall pay or cause to be paid for all work and labor done thereon, of any kind, and fo r all material and supplies furnished for the per formance o f said work; * * * if the said principal shall fail to pay for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon o f any kind, that the said sureties will pay the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum hereinbefore specified,” etc. The contract contains the follow ing provision (paragraph 7): “ The contractor will not be permitted to sublet any portion o f the work without the consent o f the city engineer, and, whenever such subletting is permitted, the party performing the work will be con sidered as the agent o f the contractor. The latter will be held respon sible fo r all indebtedness incurred by the said agent on account o f the w ork.” W e do not think that Powell or his surety could shift the burden o f their obligation— the form er by assigning the contract and the latter by consenting to the assignment,— without the consent o f the parties entitled to its benefits, and such consent was never given by plaintiff or his assignors. The finding that the labor was performed at the request o f Chaffey does not relieve Powell, for the contract made Chaffey Powell’s agent. Plaintiff looked to Powell, as is shown by the claims filed. The terms o f the bond are very broad. Payment was to be made “ for all work and labor done thereon [the tunnel] of any kind.” A s to the surety company, it expressly agreed to become liable for Swenson & H ill’s debts. It is next contended, as to the first cause o f action, that as plaintiff performed no labor, and as he furnished a teamster, two horses, and a scraper to Chaffey, the claim should have been made by the teamster, and not by plaintiff, and, as this was not done, there is no action against either Powell or the surety company. The engagement for the labor o f the teamster, horses, and scraper was with plaintiff, for which a gross sum per day was to be paid for the outfit. Plaintiff looked to Powell, ana not to Chaffey; and, as we have seen, the con tract and bond warranted this, and it was immaterial whether he did the work with his own hands. As to Clapham’s services as blacksmith, appellants claim that it was not the kind o f labor.contemplated by the act, and was not the kind o f labor for which a mechanic’s lien will be permitted. W e do not regard the claim o f Clapham as similar to a claim o f lien under the mechanic’s lien law. The bond and the con tract with the city are the source o f the obligation, and the obligors 9398— N o. 42— 02------ 15 1102 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. agreed to pay fo r “ any work o f any kind” done on the tunnel. Clapham furnished the labor, and it was labor such as the contract called for, and he filed the claim in his own name. Appellant admits that the claim o f French [the superintendent] is good, within the meaning of the act, but it is claimed that it is not good against Powell, because he did not incur the debt, and, being prematurely filed, is void for all purposes o f the action. F or reasons already given, the objections are not well taken. W e advise that the judgment be affirmed. E mployers’ L iability — L ogging R ailroad — F ellow -Servant A ct— C ontributory N egligence— Williams v. N orthern Lumber Company, United States Circuit Courts D istrict o f M innesota, 113 Federal R eporter, page 388.— The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages fo r the death o f her son who was employed by the Northern Lumber Company as conductor and brakeman on a logging train. The road on which deceased was employed was a private one, used only in connection with the business o f the lumber company. The injury causing the death o f Williams was the result o f logs falling from a loaded car and striking him. A fter the plaintiff’s evidence had been submitted, counsel for the lumber company asked that the court instruct the jury to bring in a verdict fo r the defendant on the grounds that the evidence showed no negligence on the part o f the company, that the death was the result o f the contributory negligence o f the deceased, and that if there was other negligence it was the negligence o f a fellow-servant. Whether or not the last reason given was a valid one depended on the effect to be given to what is known as the fellow-servant act, sec. 2701, Rev. St. o f M inn., which is as follows: Sec. 2701. Every railroad corporation owning or operating a rail road in this State shall be liable for all damages sustained by any agent or servant thereof bv reason o f the negligence o f any other agent or servant thereof, without contributory negligence on his part, when sustained within this State, and no contract, rule, or regulation between such corporation and any agent or servant shall impair or diminish such liability: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be so construed as to render any railroad company liable fo r damages sus tained by any employee, agent, or servant while engaged in the con struction o f a new road, or any part thereof, not open to public travel or use. A fter stating the general rules as to negligence and the duty o f the employer to provide a safe place to work, suitable appliances,, and competent fellow-servants, Judge Lochren, speaking for the court, discussed the bearing o f the statute quoted above, using in part the following language: DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING- LABOR. 1103 [This section] would include responsibility on the part o f a railroad corporation fo r negligence o f a fellow-servant, and it changes the law in that respect, but it does not change it with respect to the effect o f contributory negligence. This statute, as stated m several decisions, would be unconstitutional, as being in the nature o f class legislation, imposing a responsibility upon railroad corporations that is not imposed upon other employers o f labor, if it were not from a con sideration that it is a peculiar regulation with respect to quasi public corporations which have franchises from the State, granted for the reason that the public is interested in the business of these corpora tions, and fo r that reason the legality o f such regulation by the State is maintained as a proper regulation fo r the safety o f individuals and o f the public generally with respect to corporations o f this kind. So one question presented now is whether this statute applies to a rail road o f this kind, which is not a public railroad, used by the public, and which is not a common carrier; fo r no person has a right to require that he be carried upon it, or to have his private goods carried upon it. It is a private concern, belonging to individuals, or to a company which is not a railroad corporation, and therefore does not come within the category o f bodies who are invested with franchises for the use o f the public, which gives the State the right to make peculiar regu lations for public safety. It does not come within the language o f the statute, because it is not a railroad corporation; and the proviso in the statute indicates that the statute is intended to apply only to corporations o f the character to which 1 have referred, possessed of franchises, open to public travel or use, because the proviso is that they shall not be liable fo r damage during the construction o f a new road not open to public travel or use. It is said by counsel for defendant that it can not apply to a J^aiiroad o f this kind because there was no such railroad in operation at the time o f the passage o f the act in 1887, and therefore it could not have been considered by the legis lature. I do not know what the fact is as to that. M y impression is that counsel is right as to the fact that there was no such railroad in operation at the time in this State, but I am not sure, and will not assume, whether that is the fact or not. The language in this statute indicates that it was not intended to include roads of this kind. But, if it were the fact that these railroads were in existence in the State, as they are now, then the presumption would be still stronger that they were not intended to be included in that act, for the reason that the language o f the act would exclude them. I think it is true that an act may take effect upon business that was not carried on at the time when the act was' passed if the language o f the act is such that it will include that kina o f business, although the same was not known at the time. But it seems to me the language o f this statute does not include railroads o f this kind; therefore I feel constrained to hold that the ordinary doctrine with respect to negligence on the part of the fellow-servants applies in this case, and that such negligence is a part o f the risk taken by the employee, and can not be imputed to the employer. Taking up the question o f contributory negligence on the part of deceased, the court recited the testimony offered by plaintiff, which was to the effect that Williams had charge o f the making up o f the 1104 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. train and the direction o f the engineer; that it was his duty to see if the cars were properly loaded, and if they were not, to see that the logs were taken off and properly replaced, so that there should be no danger from them. Plaintiff claimed that the injury had been occa sioned by the improper loading o f the logs, but in view o f the above testimony as to W illiams’s duty, the court concluded: Here, he being negligent himself, and being the person that was injured by that negligence, it comes under the head o f contributory negligence, which would prevent a recovery. It seems to me, upon both o f these grounds, there is no evidence upon which the jury can lawfully find a verdict in favor o f the plaintiff. Gentlemen o f the jury, the court directs that your verdict be for the defendant. E mployers ’ L iability — L ogging R ailroad — F ellow -S ervant A ct— C ontributory N egligence — R elease — Schus v. Powers-Sim p son Company, Supreme Court o f M innesota, 89 Northwestern R eporter, page 68.— Jacob Schus was employed by the above-named company as a brakeman on a private railroad used only in connection with the lumbering business o f the company. For injuries received while effecting a coupling between cars on which the logs projected beyond the ends o f the same, Schus recovered damages in the district court o f Hennepin County. New trial being denied, the company appealed to the supreme court, in which the judgment o f the court below was affirmed. Four principal questions were considered by the supreme court as follows: (1) Whether the compan}^ defending the suit was a railroad corporation within the meaning of, or coming within the operation of, chapter 13, laws o f 1887 (G. S. 1894, sec. 2701) known as the FellowServant A ct; (2) whether the evidence established negligence on the part o f the company as the proximate cause o f the plaintiff’s injury; (3) whether or not Schus, who had to stoop in order to reach the couplings on account o f the projecting logs, was guilty of contributory negligence in attempting to make a coupling under the circumstances; (4) whether there had been a settlement and release subsequent to the accident occasioning the injury and prior to the bringing o f the suit. The statute considered is quoted at length in Williams v. Northern Lumber Company, above. On this point Judge Brown, speaking for the court, said: It is urged that the statute does not apply to defendant, for the reason that it was not organized as a railroad corporation, and for the further reason that it is not engaged as a common carrier of passen gers and freight; its railroad business being confined exclusively to its own private affairs. The statute has been before the court repeat DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1105 edly with respect to its validity and its application to particular serv ants and employees, and has been sustained, not as a law applying exclusively to railroad corporations as a class,— for, if that were its purpose, it would, as intimated by Judge Mitchell in Johnson v. Railroad Co., 13 Minn. 222, 45 N. W . 156, 8 L. R. A . 419, be uncon stitutional and void as class legislation,— but as applying to employers whose servants and employees are exposed to the peculiar hazards and dangers incident to the operation o f railroads. In that case the court said: u I f a distinction is to be made as to the liability o f employ ers to their employees, it must be based upon a difference in the nature o f the employment, and not o f the employers. One rule o f liability can not be established for railway companies, merely as such, and another rule fo r other employers, under like circumstances and condi tions.” Within the reasoning o f that decision, and other cases in this court (Smith v. Railroad Co., 44 Minn. 17, 46 N. W . 149; Lavallee v. Railway Co., 40 Minn. 249, 41 N. W . 974; Mikkelson v. Truesdale, 63 Minn. 137, 65 N. W . 260), the test in interpreting and construing this statute is not whether the corporation engaged in operating the railroad was organized as a railroad corporation, but whether the road being operated is a railroad, within the ordinary meaning o f the term, in and about the operation o f which employees are exposed to those dangers and risks against the consequences o f which the legislature intended to provide. In Suth. St. Const. 218, it is said to be indispensable to .the correct understanding o f a statute to inquire what is the subject o f it,— what object is intended to be accomplished by it. The subject-matter of the statute under consideration, and its intent and purpose, were to protect employees engaged in a dangerous and hazardous employment; and, within the decisions cited, the character o f the employer is not o f controlling importance. The statute is to be given, if not a liberal, at least a reasonable, interpretation, and one that will carry into effect the intent o f the legislature. Defendant was not organized as a railroad corporation, it is true; but it is conceded that it is operating a line o f railroad equipped with engines and cars, the operation o f which, so far as concerns the running o f its trains, is identical with ordinary railroads, except that it is in the interests o f its own private affairs. Every purpose intended to be subserved by the statute applies to it. The mere fact that it is called a “ logging railroad,” and came into existence since the passage o f that act, is by no means decisive o f the question. It is a general rule o f statutory construction that legislative enactments in general and comprehensive terms, prospective in opera tion, apply aliSe to all persons, subjects, and business within their general purview and scope coming into existence subsequent to their passage. (McAunich v. Railroad C o., 20 Iowa, 338.) And within this rule, even though defendant is engaged in operating a “ logging rail road” only, ana exclusively in the interests o f its private affairs, and though such railroads were not known at the time o f the passage of the statute, and consequently not then in the contemplation o f the leg islature, the operation o f its road, in respect to the dangers and hazards to which its employees are exposed, brings it squarely within the spirit and purpose o f the law; and it must, to effectuate fully the inten tion o f the legislature, be held to be within its scope and operation. Though the literal language thereof limits its operation to railroad cor porations, we hold that it applies to any corporation or person engaged in operating a line o f railroad, incident to which operation are the 1106 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. dangers and hazards to employees the legislature intended to provide against. A s to the second question considered, the syllabus by the court states clearly the evidence and the conclusions o f law. The portion o f the syllabus relating to this question is given herewith: In this action the evidence received on the trial tended to show that there was a general custom in respect to the operation o f the road fo r the engineer, when cars being coupled came together, to immediately stop his engine and hold it stationary until signaled to again move it by the brakeman making the coupling. It further tended to show that, on the occasion complained of, this custom was not observed by defendant’s engineer, in consequence o f which plain tiff was injured. It is held that the evidence was sufficient to require the submission o f the case to the jury, and to sustain their verdict to the effect that such custom existed, and that the engineer’s failure to follow and observe it at the time complained of was the proximate cause o f the plaintiff’s injury. On the third point Judge Brown spoke in part as follows: It is true, as a general rule, that, if a person by his own carelessness contributes to his injury, he can not recover. It is also true that a railroad employee assumes all the ordinary risks and dangers of his employment; but this assumption o f risks extends only to such as are, in point o f fact, ordinary risks o f the employment. He does not assume risks and dangers resulting from the negligence o f his fellowservants. The question o f plaintiff’s contributory negligence is dis posed of, we think, by the decision in Corbin v. Railroad Co., 64 Minn. 185, 66 N. W . 271,— a very similar case. There the car was loaded with iron rails, and, as here [with the logs], they projected over the end o f the car; and, in order to make the coupling, it was necessary that the brakeman stoop over in going between the cars for that purpose. He knew the situation, and the condition in which the cars were loaded; and the court held that he was not guilty o f contributory negligence, as a matter o f law, but that the question was one o f fact fo r the jury to determine. As to the point o f a release having been signed, it appeared that an agent o f the company visited Schus while he was in the hospital and gave him $75, securing his signature to a written release o f all further claims. Schus denied any knowledge o f the fact that the paper was a release, as he was unable to read the English language and relied on the agent’s statements, which he claimed were fraudulent. W ith refer ence to this, Judge Brown said: W e discover no reason, after a careful reading o f the evidence, for disturbing the finding o f the jury in this case, though there are some items o f evidence which tend strongly to corroborate defendant’s con tention, but it is by no means conclusive in its favor. There are cir cumstances, too, tending to corroborate plaintiff’s contention that the money was paid as a donation. I f defendant did not deem itself lia ble to plaintiff on account o f his injuries, no reason is apparent why it should donate to him any sum whatever; and, on the other hand, if, in DEOtslotfs OF c o u r t s a f f F c t ih g La b o r . 1107 its opinion, a liability in fact existed, and one which, in justice, it ought to settle, it is fair to assume, as the jury probably did, taking into consideration the nature and extent o f plaintiff’s injuries, that it would have offered him considerably more than the very nominal sum of $75. E mployers’ L iability —N egligence op Superintendent — C on S tatute — Canney v. Wallceine, United States Circuit Court o f Appeals, F irst Circuit, 113 Federal Reporter, page 66.— The plaintiff, a driller in defendant’s quarry, was struck by a rope which was being handled by the orders o f one Anderson, and was thereby thrown down and injured. On suit damages were awarded and an appeal taken, resulting in the judgment o f the lower court being affirmed. The case rested on a provision o f the Massachusetts employers’ lia bility act, which states that the employer is responsible for personal inju ries to an employee occurring6‘ by reason o f the negligence o f any person in the service o f the employer entrusted with and exercising superin tendence, whose sole or principal duty is that o f superintendence. From the evidence it appeared that Anderson had charge o f a derrick in the quarry; that he took instructions from his employer as to what kind o f stone was wanted and then marked off the ledge, gave orders to drillers, derrickman, engineer, tool boy, and signalman; that he had charge o f the stones from the time they were started in the pit until thay left the quarry, but that when not otherwise engaged he took his hammer and went to work with the rest o f the gang. It was maintained by the defendant that one who labors the most of the time with his hands is not a superintendent within the meaning of the statute, and that the meaning o f the word “ principal” in the statute means principal in point o f time and not in point o f impor tance, and he cited cases to support this position. A s to the status o f Anderson, Judge Putnam, speaking for the court, said: struction of The evidence leaves it entirely plain that, although the plaintiff worked with Anderson and Anderson worked with the plaintiff, they were not wholly employed in the same class o f labor, and that Ander son had under his charge men not engaged in drilling, and therefore men not engaged in precisely the same labor in which the plaintiff was engaged, although in the common work and in the same gang. The defendant’s view o f the statute had not been given to the jury in the instructions o f the trial judge and the instructions given were excepted to. Judge Putnam reviewed the cases cited by defendant and concluded: The result o f these decisions undoubtedly establishes as a general rule what is restated in Reynolds v. Barnard, 168 Mass. 228, 46 N. E. 1108 BULLETIN OP THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. 704,— that, when au employee works with his hands the greater portion o f the time, he can not superintend, within the purview o f the statute; but they do not compel us to the conclusion that this rule is absolute, and to be applied without qualification under exceptional circum stances. When the alleged superintendent is only a a mere laborer in charge o f the gang,” this general rule might well be applied, if not as a rule o f law, at least as a rule o f presumption o f fact so forcible that the court would not allow a jury to disregard it. To go further, how ever, than to state it ordinarily as illustrative for the guidance o f juries, would give an artificial construction to a statute which seems simple, plain on its face, and reasonable in its purpose; and it would also hold that the court could assume to know that a man can not work constantly with his hands, and yet exercise superintendence in such man ner that that is his principal duty. Such an assumption would be so forced as to exclude the possibility, which the common mind knows to exist— that not only may an employee be engaged at all times in labor with his hands, and yet exercise superintendence under such circum stances that that is his principal duty, but that, also, he may be so engaged under such peculiar circumstances that quite continuous labor ing with his hands is a necessary part o f the duty o f superintendence. Since none o f the decisions which have come to our observation were rendered under circumstances which brought to the attention o f the court the exceptional facts in support o f which the plaintiff produced evidence in the case at bar, and since, therefore, we are not concluded thereby with reference to such exceptional facts, and since, moreover, the defendant’s proposition would compel us to give an artificial and narrow construction to a remedial statute, contrary to the just and reasonable rules ordinarily applicable, and since, also, the alleged sup erintendent in this case was, as we have shown, u something more than a mere laborer in charge o f a gang,” we are unable to determine that the instructions given the jury were not suitable and sufficient. The judgment o f the circuit court is affirmed, with interest, and the defendant in error recovers the costs o f appeal. E mployers ’ L iability — R ailroad C ompanies— D uties of E mploy E mployees —L iability of Company U sing T racks of A nother Corporation for N egligence of L atter ’ s E mployees— T est of L iability — F ellow -S ervants— B rad y v. Chicago and Great Western R ailroad Company, United States Circuit Court o f Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 111^ Federal Reporter, page 100.— John J. Brady was foreman o f a switch crew in the employment o f the above-named company. Before day on the morning o f November 1,1896, he passed through the yards o f the St. Paul Union Depot Company, by the alleged negligence o f whose employees his death was caused, a switch having been left open so that the train o f which he had charge was without warning brought into collision with cars standing on a transfer track. Elizabeth Brady, as administratrix o f the estate of the deceased, appealed from a judgment in favor o f the railroad company, the judge o f the court below having instructed the jury that the plaintiff had ers and of DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1109 failed to make a case. The instruction was approved by the Circuit Court, Judge Caldwell dissenting. The defendant railroad company was one o f seven companies Avho held equal amounts o f stock o f the St. Paul Union Depot Company, and used its passenger depot and transfer yard under a contract which gave to the depot company the right to prescribe rules and regulations for the control o f the property used, and the exclusive right o f direc tion and command o f its switchmen employed in the transfer yard, and the individual railroad companies had no right to turn a switch or to direct that one be turned within the *said transfer yard. The rail road companies also agreed to indemnify the depot company for any claims for damages resulting from the operation of their engines and cars, or caused by the negligence o f the depot company’s employees while acting for o.r in the furtherance o f the business o f the railroad companies. Am ong the claims made by the plaintiff were: That the depot com pany was negligent in promulgating reasonable rules, in failing to employ a sufficient number o f switchmen, and in exercising control and supervision o f the operation o f its yard; that Brady and the employees o f the depot company were fellow-servants within the operation o f section 2701, St. Minn., 1894, which makes railroad com panies liable to an injured employee for the acts of his fellow-servants, if without contributory negligence on his part, and that the seven railroad companies holding the stock o f the depot company were part ners and were each liable for the torts o f all the servants o f the depot company. These and other propositions were argued at length by Judge Sanborn, who announced the opinion o f the court, and all were resolved unfavorably to the plaintiff. The following syllabus, prepared by the court, presents in brief its findings: 1. The duty o f so operating a safely constructed and equipped rail road, subject to the rules and general supervision o f the master, as to keep it reasonably safe fo r those employed upon it, is not a positive duty o f the master, but a primary duty o f the servant. 3. A railway company running its trains over another road by per mission is liable to its employees for the negligence o f the servants of the licensing corporation in the discharge o f the absolute duties of the master. 4. But such a railway company is not liable to its servants for the negligence o f the employees o f the licensing corporation in the dis charge o f their duties as servants. 5. The power o f the alleged master or principal to command or direct the alleged servant or agent is the test o f the liability o f the former for the acts o f the latter, under the maxim respondeat superior. I f the master or principal has no power to command or direct the alleged servant or agent, he is not responsible fo r his acts, because there is no superior to respond. 1110 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 6. The G. W . Ry. Co. was operating a train through the yards o f a depot corporation, under the customary contract for the use o f the yards and depot jointly with other companies having like contracts, when one o f its employees was killed by the alleged negligence o f the servants o f the depot company in failing to properly turn the switches, which were under the control o f the latter company. H eld the switch men o f the depot company were not the fellow-servants o f the employ ees o f the railway company, nor were they the agents or servants of that company, within the meaning o f the fellow-servant statute o f M in nesota (St. 1894, sec. 2701). 7. The ordinary contracts between a depot corporation and several railroad companies fo r the u3e o f a depot and transfer yards do not establish a partnership relation between the companies, nor make the depot corporation, the servant or agent o f the railroad companies, so that they become liable fo r the negligence o f its servants, under the maxim respondeat superior. E mployment A gencies— L icense— “ E migrant A gents5 A c t 55— C onstitutionality of Statute — State v. N apier, Supreme Court o f South Carolina, J±1 Southeastern R eporter, page IS.— J. W . Napier was convicted in the general sessions court o f Marlboro County o f a violation o f 22 St. at Large, p. 812, known as the Emigrant Agents5 A ct, from which judgment he appealed. The statute provides that “ No person shall carry on the business o f an emigrant agent in this State without first having obtained a license therefor from the State treasurer.55 Section 2 defines the term “ emigrant agent55 as meaning “ any person engaged in hiring laborers or soliciting emigrants in this State to be employed beyond the limits o f the same.55 The supreme court affirmed the judgment o f the court below. A fter disposing o f the question o f the form o f the indictment, which was held to be good if only stating the offense in terms of the act, without specifying particular instances o f hiring or soliciting, Judge Jones delivered the follow ing as the opinion o f the court on the sub ject o f the constitutionality o f the statute: It is contended that the act in question abridges the privileges o f the citizen in restraining his right to make contracts o f hiring, etc., and in restraining his right o f egress from the State. But we fail to see wherein the act so operates, unless it be in a very remote and inci dental way. The act, which is reported herewith, does not affect the right o f any citizen to leave the State fo r labor elsewhere whenever he pleases, and to make such contract fo r his labor as he chooses. The statute, as already stated, affects only those who carry on the business o f an emigrant agent, whose vocation is to hire laborers and solicit emigrants to be employed beyond the limits o f the State. It is easy to see that the business is o f such a nature that the legislature might well see fit to thus regulate it, not only fo r the protection o f the agri cultural and manufacturing interests o f the State, but for the protec tion o f the laborers themselves against the acts and solicitations o f designing and irresponsible persons, who may ply such a vocation in DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1111 order to levy contributions from the ignorant and allured laborers, and then not be found when the laborers, according to appointment, appear at the railroad station to take their departure with him to their fields o f labor. Payment o f the license fee, and the issuance o f the license by the proper authority, afford some guaranty or evidence o f good faith in the conduct o f such business. Nor is the statute discrimina tory, in any unlawful sense, by requiring a license for such business when the labor is to be performed out o f the State, and not requiring a license when the labor is to be performed within the State. The business which seeks to induce laborers to leave the State, and the business which promotes the employment o f laborers within the State, are so different in their tendencies fo r good or evil to general interest as to justify a different classification and treatment with respect to them. A ll persons falling within the class named in the statute are in all respects subject to the same requirements without any discrimi nation whatever. The clause in the Federal Constitution relating to interstate com merce (article 1, sec. 8) is not violated by the statute in question. The business o f procuring contracts for personal labor to be performed out o f the State is not a commodity o f commerce, and any transporta tion o f persons that might result from such contract is so remote and incidental as not to be deemed within the protection or meaning o f the law o f interstate commerce. The case o f Williams v. Fears, 179 U. S. 270, 21 Sup. Ct. 128, 45 L. Ed. 186, [see Bulletin 36 U. S. Department o f Labor, page 976], affirming the judgment o f the supreme court o f Georgia (35 S. E. 699), is conclusive on this point, as well as all other questions raised under the Federal Constitution. It is further contended that the statute in question violates article 10, sec. 1, o f the State constitution, relating to taxation, because the tax is not uniform. W e see no violation or the principle o f uni formity. The statute operates in every county in the State, and affects every person belonging to the class conducting the business described. The judgment o f the circuit court is affirmed. E nticing Servant — M inor — Contract of P arent — Construc Statute — State v. A ye, Supreme Court o f South Carolina, Jpl Southeastern R eporter, page 519.— Adam A y e was convicted o f enticing a servant, under section 291 o f the Criminal Statutes, which reads in part as follows: “ A n y person who shall entice or persuade by any means whatsoever any tenant, servant, or laborer under contract with another, duly entered into by the parties * * * shall be deemed guilty o f a misdemeanor * * An appeal to the supreme court resulted in a reversal of the lower court, Judge Pope dissenting. The facts were that A ye did entice W iley Adams, minor son o f W illis Adams, to leave the service o f one Goree, who had contracted with the said W illis Adams for the services o f himself and two minor children, W iley and John. tion of 1112 BULLETIN OE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Chief Justice M clver, in announcing the opinion of the court, said: It will be observed that the offense here charged has become a crim inal offense solely by virtue o f a statute, and to the words o f that statute we must resort in order to ascertain whether they cover the case under consideration. Now, what is meant by the words “ the parties,” in the statute? W h y, surely, the person contracting to serve and the person to be served. It is not, and can not be, pre tended that W iley Adams, the minor child o f W illis Adams, ever entered into any contract with the prosecutor, Goree, to serve him as a laborer or otherwise. It is difficult to comprehend how a person could violate a contract to which he was not a party, or how he could be enticed to violate such a contract; and that is the only charge brought against the appellant. W hile it is quite true that a father is entitled to the services o f his minor child, and may by contract trans fer that right to another, yet such contract would be the contract o f the father, and not the contract o f the minor. F actory I nspection— D elegation of L egislative A uthority — C onstitutionality of Statute — Schaezlein et al. v. Oabaniss, Judge, Supreme Court o f C alifornia, 67 P acific R eporter, page 755.— In the police court o f the city and county o f San Francisco, Robert Schaezlein and others were convicted o f a violation o f the State factory inspection laws. On appeal to the supreme court o f the State the judgment was reversed, the act under which conviction was had being declared uncon stitutional. The facts appear with sufficient fullness in the following quotations from the remarks o f the court: Petitioner was charged with violating the provisions o f “ An act to provide for the proper sanitary condition o f factories,” etc., approved February 6,1889. That act declares as follows: “ I f in any factory or workshop any process or work is carried on by which dust, filaments or injurious gases are generated or produced that are liable to be inhaled by the persons employed therein, and it appears to the com missioner o f the bureau o f labor statistics that such inhalation could, to a great extent, be prevented b y the use o f some mechanical con trivance, he shall direct that such contrivance shall be provided, and within a reasonable time it shall be so provided and used.” Section 6 o f the act makes it a misdemeanor fo r any person to violate any o f the provisions o f the act. (St. 1889, p. 3.) Petitioner was convicted o f hav ing unlawfully refused and neglected, after notice, to provide and use a suction exhauster with property attached pipes, hoods, etc., in a metal polishing shop, within a reasonable time after having been directed so to do. The ultimate question presented for consideration under this writ is that o f the constitutionality o f the act above quoted. That the legis lature may not delegate its lawmaking functions, excepting to such DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1113 agents and mandatories as are recognized by the constitution, is, of course, beyond controversy. Equally we think beyond controversy, however, is the right o f the State, in the exercise o f its police power, to pass reasonable laws for the protection o f the health o f employees in given vocations, and to make the violation o f those laws penal offenses. It is no invasion o f the right o f the employer freely to con tract with his employee to provide by general law that all employers shall furnish a reasonably safe place and reasonably wholesome sur roundings fo r their employees. The difficulty with the present Jaw, however, is that it does not so provide, but that it is an attempt to con fer upon a single person the right arbitrarily to determine, not only that the sanitary condition o f a workshop or factory is not reasonably good, but to say whether, even if reasonably good, in his judgment its condi tion could be improved by the use o f such appliances as he may desig nate, and then to make a penal offense o f the failure to install such appliances. The legislature, as we have said, may require the owners o f factories and workshops to put their buildings in proper condition as to sanitation, may require them to provide reasonable safeguards against danger for the operatives, but it may not leave the question as to whether and how these things shall be done or not done at the arbitrary disposition o f any individual. The manifest objection to this law is that upon the commissioner has been imposed, not the duty to enforce a law o f the legislature, but the power to make a law for the individual, and to enforce such rules of conduct as he may prescribe. It is thus arbitrary, special legislation, and violative o f the constitution. F ellow -S ervants— C onstruction of Statute— Jenkins v. M am moth M ining Company, Supreme Court o f Utah, 68 P acific R eporter, page 8I f . — Abram Jenkins, a miner employed by the above-named company, sued to recover damages fo r injuries received while so employed. Judgment was in his favor in the district court o f the fifth district, from which the company appealed. The supreme court affirmed the judgment o f the court below. It is sufficient to say that the case turned upon the construction o f section 1443 o f the revised statutes o f Utah, which relates to fellow-servants. The finding o f the court is stated in the follow ing sections o f the syllabus, which, though unofficial, is a concise and accurate statement as to these points. 1. Rev. St., sec. 1443, provides that all persons who, while in the service o f anyone, are in the same grade o f service, and are working together at the same time and place and to a common purpose, neither o f such persons being intrusted by such employer with any superin tendence or control over his fellow-employees, are fellow-servants with each other. H eld, that a miner is not a fellow-servant with one whose duty it is to manage and operate a cage by which the miners are con veyed in and out o f the mine. 1114 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 2. A miner is not a fellow-servant with one employed as a 64tool carrier,” whose only duty is to take sharpened tools into the mine and throw them off at the various levels, and bring up the dull ones. G arnishment— E xemption of W ages— F ailure of G arnishee A llege E xemption —E ffect of P ayment of J udgment— City o f Laurel v. Turner, Supreme Court o f M ississippi, SI Southern R eporter, page 965.— W . D. Turner was an employee of the city o f Laurel, against whom A. J. L yon & Co. obtained a judgment for about $90 in the court o f a justice o f the peace. Lyon & Co. then gar nisheed the city o f Laurel as a debtor o f Turner, to which the city entered the defense that a municipal board was not subject to such a proceeding. This plea was erroneously overruled, and a subsequent appeal, fo r some undisclosed reason, was dismissed. The city then paid Lyon & Co. the amount claimed and had the judgment assigned to itself and proceeded to withhold Turner’s wages for its own reimbursement. Turner thereupon sued in a court o f a justice o f the peace and obtained judgment against the city for wages due, which judgment was affirmed in the circuit court, when an appeal was taken to the supreme court o f the State, which, in its turn, affirmed the decision o f the courts below. Section 1963 o f the code exempts from execution the wages o f every person working for wages, being the head o f a family, to the amount o f $100. Section 2139 provides that any garnishee may defend by declaring that he believes that the party from whom recovery is sought will claim the debt or property, or some part thereof, as exempt, whereupon such debtor shall be notified to appear and assert his rights, pending the determination o f which proceedings shall be stayed. Judge Calhoon, speaking for the court, said: to Turner’s wages, under Code, sec. 1963, par. 10, cl. 44a,” were exempt from execution,— he being the head o f a large family; and the city should have set up the fact in its answer to the writ o f garnishment. By not doing so, it 44deprived the defendant o f the exemption which the law affords him,” if its silence were effective, which it is not. See case o f Railway Co. v. W hipsker (Tex.), 13 S. W . 639, 8 L. R. A . 321, 19 Am. St. Rep. 734, and its citations, quoted from in the brief o f counsel fo r appellee. Code, sec. 2139, marks out the course o f the garnisheed debtor; and, if he fails to observe it, he fails at his own peril. Exemptions are highly favored by the law, and their protection may not be defeated by the intention or negligence o f garnishees. DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1115 P rotection of E mployee A gainst A ssault— D eath R esulting B reach of Contract by E mployer —P ain and Suffering — M isjoinder of Causes of A ction—Lewis's Adm inistrator v. Taylor Coal Company o f Kentucky, Court o f Appeals o f K entucky, 66 South western R eporter,page 101^.— H. W . Lewis was a coal miner employed by the above-named company during the progress o f a strike at its mines. He was threatened with violence and appealed to the com pany for protection, which was promised but not furnished. Lewis was assaulted and severely beaten, and died some months later as a result o f wounds then received. F or the assault, pain, and suffering, and subsequent death, damages were sued for in the circuit court of Ohio County, judgment being rendered in favor of the coal company. Lewis’s administrator then appealed and the court o f appeals affirmed the judgment o f the court below. Section 241 o f the constitution of Kentucky provides that there may be a recovery o f damages where death is the result o f negligence or wrongful act. Section 6 o f the Kentucky statutes was enacted in accordance with this provision o f the constitution. A fter referring to these provisions o f law, Judge Paynter. who announced the opinion of the court, said: from A t common law the right o f action for the injury to the person abated on the death o f the party injured. Under K y. St. sec. 10, the cause o f action fo r personal injury, causing physical and mental suffering, does not abate on the death o f the injured person, except actions io r assault [and some others]. So, under the principles o f the common law, if appellee had, through its agent, inflicted the injury which resulted in physical pain and mental suffering and death, neither cause o f action would have survived. This court has held that the cause o f action fo r death can not be joined with the cause o f action fo r physical pain and mental suffering; that a recovery for one bars an action for the other. [Cases cited.] The master does not undertake to protect the servant from the criminal acts o f others. This is not a duty which the law imposes, or which arises from the relation o f master and servant. The law does not make one liable civilty or criminally for the criminal act o f another unless the positions o f the parties are such relatively that the act must be considered as having been, in contemplation o f law, advised or procured to be done by another. Actionable negligence arises from a duty imposed by law to use ordinary care under the con ditions in which a person upon whom a duty rests is placed. W ith these general observations, we come to the consideration of sections 6 and 10 o f the Kentucky statutes. The word “ negligence” is used in section 6 in its usual and ordinary sense. It was intended to make one liable for his own negligent act, or for that o f another for whose act he is responsible. The words “ wrongful act” are compre hensive enough to include negligent acts, but they were intended pri marily to cover cases where the act was wanton or was intentionally 1116 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. committed, or where one may have counseled or procured another to do it, when, in contemplation o f law, the act o f counseling or advising makes the wrongful act his own. It is not charged that under the law o f master and servant (nor could it have been correctly done) the appellee was bound to furnish a guard to protect the decedent from tne hands o f a mob. Therefore there was no breach o f duty imposed by law which would make it guilty o f negligence. It is not charged that the appellee inflicted the injury upon decedent, or counseled, advised, or procured others to do it. Therefore it is not charged, nor could it have been, that the appellee was guilty o f the wrongful act which resulted in the injury and death. Having reached the foregoing conclusion, it follows that an action fo r the death o f the intestate will not lie under section 241 o f the constitution, or section 6 of the Ken tucky statutes. I f appellee had been liable at common law for the assault and battery committed upon the person of the intestate, the cause o f action would not have survived to the personal representa tive, because the act complained o f was an assault, and an action therefor does not survive to the personal representative. [See pro vision o f sec. 10 K y. St., above]. This court has held in Anderson v. Arnold’s E x’ r., 79 K y. 370, that an action fo r an assault and battery does not survive. O f course, the court did not mean to hold that, when death has resulted from an assault, any cause o f action which was given under the statute for the death would not survive; neither do we want to be understood as holding a cause o f action given for the death o f a person, either by section 241 o f the constitution, or any section o f the statuses, is affected by section 10, although the death was the result o f an assault. W e simply hold that the cause o f action for the assault and battery does not survive. The action is really one in contract. The contract averred can not bring the case within the provisions o f section 241 o f the constitution and section 6 o f the statute; nor can it have the effect o f keeping alive a cause o f action, if it existed, which section 10 o f the statute declares does not survive. The judgment is affirmed. DECISIONS U NDER COMMON L A W . D ischarged E mployee —L etters of R ecommendation— New York, Chicago, and S t. Louis Railroad *Company v. Schaffer, Supreme Court o f Ohio, 62 Northeastern R eporter, page 1036.— Schaffer was a brakeman in the employment o f the above-named company, prior to the 1st o f January, 1895, at about which time he obtained leave o f absence, and when he reported for work on or about February 1, 1895, he was informed that he had been discharged. He brought suit in the circuit court o f Huron County to recover damages for his alleged unjust discharge and because the railroad company, in pursu ance o f an alleged conspiracy with other railroad companies, refused to give him any letter o f recommendation or clearance card which was necessary in order fo r him to secure employment on any road in the alleged agreement. It appeared on trial that Schaffer had been twice suspended for breach o f duty. Damages were awarded him and the company appealed, obtaining a reversal o f the judgment. DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1117 The following syllabus by the court presents the conclusions of law deciding the case: 1. A master is under no legal obligation to give to his discharged servant a statement o f his service, ana whether or not it was satisfac tory; and a discharged railroad employee can not maintain an action for damages against the company which discharged him, for refusal to furnish him with a clearance or statement o f the record of his serv ice, although he may have been unable to obtain other employment in consequence o f such refusal by the company. 2. It is the right o f every person, natural or artificial, to employ or refuse to employ in his business whomsoever he may wish; and he can not be called upon to answer fo r his judgment in th^t regard by the public or individuals, nor can the motives which prompt his action be considered. A railroad company may lawfully refuse to continue in its employ a person who has engaged in a strike affecting its interests, or who has shown himself to be negligent, incompetent, inefficient, or dishonest. E mployers’ L iability — Contract of I ndemnity — A dmission of E vidence — H errin et al. v. D aly, Supreme Court o f M ississippi, 31 Southern R eporter, page 790.— This was an action by John P. Daly to recover damages for injuries received while at work in the sawmill of Herrin, Lambert & Co. The judgment was in favor o f plaintiff and rested chiefly on the ju ry’s conclusion as to the application of the common-law rule o f fellow-servants. A point of some interest was the ruling o f the trial judge permitting the question to be asked as to any contract of indemnity that the firm might have with a guaranty company. Defendants objected to the question, but the objection was overruled, and the fact appeared that the company was indemnified to the extent o f $1,500. Verdict for Daly was rendered, awarding dam ages in the sum o f $1,500, and an appeal was taken to the supreme court, which reversed the court below and remanded the case for a new trial. Discussing this ruling, Judge Calhoon, speaking for the court said: On the cross-examination by appellee’s counsel o f Lambert, one of the defendants below, as a witness, he was asked if there was any one back o f his firm who would satisfy the j udgment if obtained. The court overruled an objection to this, and we think this action error. It could not conceivably throw any light on the issue, and could have no other tendency than to seduce a verdict on the ground that an insurance company, and not the defendants, would be affected. E mployers’ L iability — I nspection ligence — M ooney of Stone by B uilders — N eg v. B eattie, Supreme Judicial Court o f Massachu setts, 6% Northeastern R eporter, page 725.— In a suit in the superior court o f Bristol County, Mooney, a stonemason, obtained judgment for 9398— No. 42— 02----- 16 1118 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. injuries occasioned by the explosion o f a stone furnished by his employer, Beattie, and from this judgment Beattie appealed, securing a reversal. The stone had been purchased in ordinary course o f busi ness, and when thrown to the ground by M ooney’s assistant it ex ploded on account o f a charge o f dynamite remaining in it, which had failed to explode during the process o f quarrying. The question turned on the duty o f inspection, and on this point Judge Hammond, who delivered the opinion o f the court, summed up as follows: The whole testimony showed that the inspection was a general prac tice at the quarries, and all the expert witnesses, both quarrymen and contractors, testified that they never knew such an inspection to be made anywhere else. Not a single witness was called to show that the contractor ever inspected the stone purchased by him from quarrymen. Judging the conduct o f the defendants by the usual standard under the circumstances, we do not think that the defendants are shown to have exercised less than reasonable care and prudence in the discharge o f their duty to the plaintiff. The accident was the result o f an unforeseen and almost unprecedented combination of circumstances, fo r which the defendant can not reasonably be held responsible. L abor O rganizations— P rocuring D ischarge of M embers of R ival U nion — Strikes —N ational Protective Association o f Steam F it ters and H elpers et al. v. Camming et ah, Court o f Appeals o f New York, 63 Northeastern R eporter, page 369.— This case arose from the action o f Gumming, Nugent, and others, members and officers o f the Enterprise Association o f Steam Fitters and the Progress Association o f Steam Fitters and Helpers, in undertaking to procure the discharge o f McQueed and others, members o f the National Protective Association o f Steam Fitters and Helpers. McQueed had been instrumental in organizing the latter association after having been refused member ship in one o f the defendant associations on the ground that he had failed to pass the required* examination. A t a hearing in special term an injunction was granted restraining Cumming et al., according to the prayers o f the plaintiff, but an appeal to the appellate division procured a reversal o f the trial court’s judgment. An appeal was then taken by the National Protective Association to the Court of Appeals, resulting in an affirmation o f the order o f the appellate division. The facts, on which no question was raised at this hearing, were found by the trial judge to be as follows: That the defendant Cumming threatened to cause a general strike against the plaintiff association and against the plaintiff McQueed wherever he found them at work, and that he would not allow them to work at any job in the city o f New Y ork, except some small jobs DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1119 where the men o f the Enterprise Association were not employed, and that he and the defendant Nugent threatened to drive the plaintiff association out o f existence; that the defendants Cumming and Nugent, while acting in their capacity o f walking delegates for their respec tive associations, and members o f the board o f delegates, caused the plaintiff McQueed and other members o f the plaintiff association to be discharged by their employers from various places o f work upon buildings in the course o f erection by threatening the said employers that if they did not discharge the members o f the plaintiff association, and employ the members o f the Enterprise [and] Progress Associa tion^] in their stead, the said walking delegates would cause a general strike o f all men o f other trades employed on said buildings, and that the defendant Cumming, as such walking delegate, did cause strikes in order to prevent the members o f the plaintiff association from con tinuing with the work they were doing at the time the strike was ordered, and that the said employers, by reason of said threats and the acts o f the defendants Cumming and Nugent, discharged the members o f the plaintiff association, and employed the members o f the Enterprise and Progress associations in their stead. There was a minority opinion, drawn up by Judge Vann and con curred in by two others. The opinion o f the court was prepared by Chief Justice Parker, being concurred in by three others, and is in part as follows: The order o f the appellate division should be affirmed, on the ground that the facts found do not support the judgment of the special term. In the discussion o f that proposition, I shall assume that certain prin ciples o f law laid down in the opinion o f Judge Vann are correct, namely: “ It is not the duty o f one man to work for another unless he has agreed to, and if he has so agreed, but for no fixed period, either may end the contract whenever he chooses. The one may work or refuse to work at will, and the other may hire or discharge at will. The terms o f employment are subject to mutual agreement, without let or hindrance from anyone. I f the terms do not suit, or the employer does not please, the right to quit is absolute, and no one may demand a reason therefor. Whatever one man may do alone, he may do in combination with others, provided they have no unlawful object in view. Mere numbers do not ordinarily affect the quality o f the act. Workingmen have the right to organize for the purpose of securing higher wages, shorter hours o f labor, or improving their relations with their employers. They have the right to strike (that is, to cease working in a body by prearrangement until a grievance is redressed), provided the object is not to gratify malice or inflict injury upon others, but to secure better terms o f employment for them selves. A peaceable and orderly strike, not to harm others, but to improve their own condition, is not in violation of law.” Stated in other words, the propositions quoted recognize the right o f one man to refuse to work for another on any ground that he may regard as sufficient, and the employer has no right to demand a reason for it. But there is, I take it, no legal objection to the employee’s giving a reason, if he has one, and the fact that the reason given is that he refuses to work with another who is not a member o f his organization, 1120 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. whether stated to his employer or not, does not affect his right to stop, work; nor does it give a cause o f action to the workman to whom he objects, because the employer sees fit to discharge the man objected to, rather than lose the services of the objector. The same rule applies to a body o f men, who, having organized, fo r purposes deemed beneficial to themselves, refuse to work. Their reasons may seem inadequate to others, but, if it seems to be in their interest as members of an organization to refuse longer to work, it is their legal right to stop. The reason may no more be demanded, as a right, of the organ ization than o f an individual; but, if they elect to state the reason, their right to stop work is not cut off because the reason seems inade quate or selfish to the employer or to organized society. And if the conduct o f the members o f an organization is legal in itself, it does not become illegal because the organization directs one of its mem bers to state the reason fo r its conduct. The object o f such an organization is to benefit all its members, and it is their right to strike, if need be, in order to secure any lawful benefit to the several members o f the organization,— as, for instance, to secure the reemployment o f a member they regard as having been improp erly discharged, and to secure from an employer o f a number of them employment fo r other members o f their organization who may be out o f employment, although the effect will be to cause the discharge o f other employees who are not members. And whenever the courts can see that a refusal o f members o f an organization to work with nonmem bers may be in the interest o f the several members, it [they] will not assume, in the absence o f a finding to the contrary, that the object o f such refusal was solely to gratify malice, and to inflict injury upon such nonmembers. A number o f reasons fo r the action o f the organi zation will at once suggest themselves in a case like this. One reason apparent from the findings in this case, as I shall show later, is the desire o f the organization that its own members may do the work the nonmembers are performing. And another most important reason is suggested by the fact that these particular organizations, associations o f steam fitters, required every applicant for membership to pass an examination testing his competency. Now, one o f the objections sometimes urged against labor organizations is that unskillful work men receive as large compensation as those thoroughly competent. The examination required by the defendant associations tends to do away with the force o f that objection as to them. And again, their restriction o f membership to those who have stood a prescribed test must have the effect o f securing careful as well as skillful associates in their work, and that is a matter o f no small importance, in view o f the state o f the law, which absolves the master from liability for inju ries sustained by a workman through the carelessness o f a coemployee. I know it is said in another opinion in this case that “ workmen can not dictate to employers how they shall carry on their business, nor whom they shall or shall not em ploy;” but I dissent absolutely from that propo sition, and I assert that, so long as workmen must assume all the risk o f injury that may come to them through the carelessness of, coem ployees, they have the moral and legal right to say that they will not work with certain men, and the employer must accept their dictation or g o without their services. DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFFOTlKG- tABOR. Il2 l A fter reviewing the facts as found by the trial judge (see above), Judge Parker said: Now there is not a fact stated in that finding which is not lawful, within the rules which I have quoted supra. Those principles concede the right o f an association to strike in order to benefit its members; and one method o f benefiting them is to secure them employment,— a method conceded to be within the right o f an organization to employ. There is no pretense that the defendant associations or their walking delegates had any other motive than one which the law justifies,— of attempting to benefit their members by securing their employment. It is only where the sole purpose is to do injury to another, or the act is prompted by malice, that it is insisted that the act becomes illegal. No such motive is alleged in that finding. Judge Parker then reverted to the use o f the word “ threats” in the finding o f the trial judge, and after saying that what was so named was a “ simple notification o f their determination” to strike, he continued: But the sense in which the word was employed by the court is o f no consequence, fo r the defendant associations had the absolute right to threaten to do that which they had the right to do. Having the right to insist that plaintiff’s men be discharged, and defendant’s men put in their place, if the services o f the other members of the organi zation were to be retained, they also had the right to threaten that none o f their men would stay unless their members could have all the work there was to do. As to the finding that “ Gumming threatened to cause a general strike against the plaintiff association and against the plaintiff McQueed wherever he found them at work, and that he would not allow them to work at any job in the city o f New Y ork, except some small jobs where the men o f the Enterprise Association were not employed, and that he and defendant Nugent threatened to drive the plaintiff asso ciation out o f existence,” the court states that: It will be found that it fairly means no more than that the defend ant associations did not purpose to allow McQueed and the members o f his association to work upon any jobs where members o f defendant association were employed; that they were perfectly willing to allow them to have small jobs, fitted, perhaps, for men who were willing to work for small wages, but that the larger jobs, where they could afford to pay and would pay the rate o f wages demanded by defendant asso ciations, they intended to secure for their members alone,— a determi nation to which they had a perfect right to come, as is conceded by the rules which I have quoted. Having reached that conclusion, defend ants notified McQueed, who had organized an association when he failed to pass the defendant’s examination, that they would prevent him and the men o f his association from working on a certain class of jobs. They did not threaten to employ any illegal method to accomplish that result. Judge Yann, who prepared the minority opinion, which was con curred in by two other judges, first rehearsed the findings o f fact as 1122 BULLETIN 0E THE DEPARTMENT OP LABOR. already given and laid down certain general principles o f law, which were quoted in part by Chief Justice Parker (page 1119, supra). After stating, as there quoted, that “ a peaceable and orderly strike, not to harm others, but to improve their own condition, is not*in violation o f law,” Judge Vann continued: They have the right to go further, and to solicit and persuade others, who do not belong to their organization, and are employed for no fixed period, to quit work, also, unless the common employer o f all assents to lawful conditions, designed to improve their material welfare. They have no right, however, through the exercise o f coercion, to prevent others from working. When persuasion ends, and pressure begins, the law is violated; for that is a trespass upon the rights of others, and is expressly forbidden by statute. (Penal Code, sec. 168.) They have no right, by force, threats, or intimidation, to prevent members o f another labor organization from working, or a contractor from hiring them or continuing them in his employment. They may not threaten to cripple his business unless he will discharge them, for that infringes upon liberty o f action, and violates the right which every man has to conduct his business as he sees fit, or to work for whom and on what terms he pleases. Their labor is their property, to do with as they choose; but the labor o f others is their property, in turn, and is entitled to protection against wrongful interference. The defendant associations made their own rules and regulations, and the plaintiff corporation did the same. Neither was entitled to any exclu sive privilege, but both had equal rights according to law. Public policy requires that the wages o f labor should be regulated by the law o f competition and o f supply and demand, the same as the sale of food or clothing. A ny combination to restrain “ the free pursuit in this State o f any lawful business,” in order “ to create or maintain a m onopoly,” is expressly prohibited by statute, and an injunction is authorized to prevent it. A combination o f workmen to secure a lawful benefit to themselves should be distinguished from one to injure other workmen in their trade. Here we have a conspiracy to injure the plaintiffs in their business, as distinguished from a legitimate advancement of the defendant’s own interests. W hile they had the right by fair persua sion to get the work o f the plaintiff McQueed, for instance, they had no right, either by force or by threats, to prevent him from getting any work whatever, or to deprive him o f the right to earn his living by plying his trade. B y threatening to call a general strike o f the related trades, the defendants forced the contractor to discharge com petent workmen who wanted to work for him, and whom he wished to keep in his employment. They conspired to do harm to the contractor in order to compel him to do harm to the plaintiffs, and their acts in execution o f the conspiracy caused substantial damage to the mem bers o f the plaintiff corporation. While no physical force was used, the practical effect was that members o f one labor organization drove the members o f another labor organization out o f business, and deprived them o f the right to labor at their chosen vocation. The object was evil, for it was not to compete for employment by fair means, but to exclude rivals from employment altogether by unfair means. The law gives all men an equal chance to live by their own DECISIONS OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1123 labor, and does not permit one labor union to seize all the chances, by compelling employers to refuse employment to the members o f all other unions. The plaintiffs do not ask for protection against compe tition, but from “ malicious and oppressive interference” with their right to work at their trade. Judge Vann then recounted evidence given by employers during the trial as to the insistence o f the defendants on the discharge of the plaintiffs, the methods used to procure compliance with their demands and to the effect that the men discharged “ were good workmen, that their work was satisfactory, and that there was no reason for dis charging them, other than the threats made.” Continuing, he said: It may be argued that the employers were not obliged to yield to these threats, and this is true; but noncompliance meant ruin to them, for their work would be completely tied up and their business para lyzed. A threat, with ruin behind it, may be as coercive as physical force. W hen an association is so strong and its discipline so perfect that its orders to strike are equivalent to the commands of an absolute monarch, the effect is the same as the use o f physical force. (1 Tied. Cont. Prs. and P rop., p. 433; Erie, Trade Unions, 12,105.) The pur poses o f the defendants, as well as the methods pursued by them, were unlawful, and authorized the injunction granted by the trial court in order to prevent irreparable injury and a multiplicity of suits. This was conceded in Reynolds v. Everett, 144 N. Y. 189, 39 N. E. 72, and demonstrated in Davis v. Zimmerman, 91 Hun. 489, 36 N. Y. Supp. 303. The fact that a lawful strike inflicts injury upon the employer is not controlling. As was said by a recent writer upon the subject: “ The courts recognize the right o f workingmen to combine together for the purpose o f bettering their condition, and, in endeavor ing to attain their object, they may inflict more or less inconvenience and damages upon the employer; but a threat to strike unless their wages are advanced is something very different from a threat to strike unless workmen who are not members o f the combination are dis charged. W hile it may be argued that indirectly the discharge o f the nonunion employee will strengthen and benefit the union, and thereby indirectly benefit the union workmen, the benefit to the mem bers o f the combination is so remote, as compared to the direct and immediate injury inflicted upon the nonunion workmen, that the law does not look beyond the immediate loss and damage to the innocent parties, to the remote benefits that might result to the union.” (1 Eddy, Combns., 416.) The conclusions I have announced are supported by the weight of authority in this country and in England. The leading case in this State is controlling in principle, and requires a reversal of the order appealed from. (Curran v. Galen, 152 N. Y . 33, 46 N. E. 297.) [See Bulletin No. 11, U. S. Department of Labor, page 529.] The facts in this case were next reviewed, which are in brief that Curran had refused to join a branch o f the Knights of Labor, and had been dismissed from service by his employers in pursuance o f an agreement that they should employ none but members o f said organi zation. Curran complained o f “ malicious and false reports” prevent 1124 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. ing his employment. The defense was that all that was done was solely in pursuance o f the agreement referred to, and in accordance with the terms thereof, and without intent or purpose to injure the plaintiff in any way. This answer was held insufficient by both the trial court and the supreme court o f the State, and Curi’an obtained judgment. Judge Gray, in his memorandum concurring with the opinion prepared by Chief Justice Parker, distinguished between the present case and the case o f Curran v. Galen, holding that in the latter case malice was an element, while in the case in hand none appears. A fter presenting the above facts Judge Yann said: A ll the judges who sat in this court united with Judge Gray [in the case Curran v. Galen] in saying that: “ Public policy and the interests o f society favor the utmost freedom in the citizen to pursue his lawful trade or calling, and if the purpose o f an organization or combination o f workingmen be to hamper or to restrict that freedom, and, through contracts or arrangements with employers, to coerce other workingmen to become members o f the organization, and to come under its rules and conditions, under the penalty o f the loss o f their position and o f deprivation o f employment, then that purpose seems clearly unlawful.” Quotations were made from recent English opinions, and a large number o f cases were cited in support o f the views set forth. Judge Vann then concluded: I think that the action o f the defendants was unlawful and was properly restrained, but the injunction, in the form granted, is too broad and requires modification. It prevents the defendants “ from coercing or obtaining by command, threats, strikes, or otherwise, the dismissal or discharge by any employer, contractor, or owner, of the members o f the plaintiff corporation,” etc. This might prevent fair persuasion or solicitation, which the defendants may resort to. The order o f the appellate division, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, and the judgment o f the special term modified by strik ing out the words “ or otherwise” therefrom, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellants in all courts. R ailroad Companies— H ospital S ervice — L iability for R efus C ertificate of A dmission— M easure of D amages — Illin ois ing Central R ailroad Company v. Gheen, Court o f A ppeals o f Kentucky, 66 Southwestern R eporter, page 639.— T. W . Gheen sued in the circuit court o f Livingston County to recover damages from the above-named company for its refusal to admit him into a hospital. This hospital was under the supervision and control o f the railroad company, and each employee on a certain division who worked as much as four days in a month was required to contribute toward its support, the amount of such contribution being withheld by the company’s paymaster and by him turned into the hospital fund. DECISION'S OF COURTS AFFECTING LABOR. 1125 W hile in the employ o f the company, Gheen’s hand was injured and he made application to his foreman for a certificate entitling him to admission into the hospital, there to receive surgical treatment, board, etc., as well as to receive transportation from the place o f his employ ment to the city o f Paducah in which the hospital was located. This was denied, and Gheen was treated by the local surgeon o f the com pany, but not in such wise as to prevent the amputation o f three o f his fingers, which he claimed could have been prevented by prompt admission to the hospital. The trial resulted in a verdict fo r the plaintiff from which the company appealed, obtaining a reversal o f the judgment o f the court below with directions for a new trial. The railroad company denied all responsibility for the hospital management or liabilities, and also denied that Gheen was entitled to admission, or that he was injured or damaged by being refused admis sion earlier than he was. Gheen claimed nothing for the original injury, but only fo r the increased injury resulting from the delay o f the company in allowing him to enter the hospital, into which he was finally admitted and in which his fingers were amputated. As to the liability o f the railroad company for the management of the hospital, the court, after reciting the facts as to control and sup port given above, said: W e are o f opinion that these facts, proven without serious, if any, contradiction, would have authorized the court to instruct the jury peremptorily that, if appellee had been engaged more than four days, he was entitled to admission into the hospital, and if he was refused permission to enter, or certificate entitling him to transportation and entrance to the hospital, and was injured by such refusal, he was entitled to recover. The instruction o f the lower court as to measure of damages was in part as follows: The court says to the jury if, under the evidence and instructions, they find for plaintiff, they will find only such damages as will com pensate him fo r the excess o f pain and suffering, if any, that he endured over that which he would have endured if he had been treated in the hospital, and for the loss o f his fingers and power to earn money, and mental and physical suffering by reason thereof, provided the jury believe from the evidence that his fingers could and would have been saved if he had been permitted to enter said hospital when he first applied for admission. This instruction was excepted to by the appellant company, which exception was sustained by the court o f appeals. The court said: The general and universal rule o f law in regard to damages is that every person must do all that can reasonably be done to render the damage fo r any act or omission as light as possible. Under this rule, the appellee, when he was refused admission to the hospital, if such 1126 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. be the case, was bound to do all that he could to keep the consequent injury and damage as light as possible. To do so, he should have employed medical and surgical attention to cure his hand, or, at least, to arrest other and further injury. F or such services and attention, or the cost thereof, the appellant, if liable at all, would be required to pay. Appellee was entitled, if at all, to the skilled surgical atten tion he would have received at the hospital o f appellant, including board, transportation, and such accommodations and charges as the hospital would furnish its patients. I f appellant refused to furnish such, and was bound to do so, the appellee could and should have sought such attention elsewhere, and fo r the reasonable cost thereof appellant would be liable. The science o f medicine and surgery has not so far advanced that it could be said as a certain fact that if appel lee had been admitted into the hospital, and had received the very best attention there to be had, he would not have suffered pain and mental anxiety, and that surely he would not have lost his fingers. By the establishment o f the hospital, the appellant did not assume or under take to cure disease, or in all cases relieve from injuries. The under taking was to furnish medical and surgical attention, and to nurse and care for the patient who is admitted therein. I f appellant be liable under the proof, its liability is for failure to furnish these things, and the damage fo r such failure is the reasonable cost at which such care and attention, board, and medical and surgical skill could have been obtained, as well as cost o f transportation to the nearest suitable place where such attention could be had. LAWS OF VARIOUS STATES RELATING TO LABOR ENACTED SINCE JANUARY 1, 1896. [The Second Special Report of the Department contains all laws of the various States and Terri tories and of the United States relating to labor in force January 1, 1896. Later enactments are reproduced in successive issues of the Bulletin from time to time as published.] ARIZONA. ACTS OF 1901. L ia b ility o f em ployers fo r acts o f em ployees . Section 2767 (Civil Code). Sub-section 4. Every corporation doing business in the Territory of Arizona, shall be liable for all damages done to any employee in conse quence of any negligence of its agents or employees to any person sustaining such damage: P rovided , Such corporation has had previous notice of the incompetency, carelessness or negligence of such agent or employee. Took effect April 19, 1901. Creating unsafe am ount o f steam in boilers. Section 308 (Penal Code). Every engineer or other person having charge of any steam boiler, steam engine or other apparatus for generating or employing steam, used in any manufactory, railway or other mechanical works, who willfully or from ignorance or gross neglect creates, or allows to be created, such an undue quantity of steam as to burst or break the boiler or engine or apparatus, or cause any other accident whereby human life is endangered, is guilty of a felony. Took effect September 1, 1901. Offenses o f railroad em ployees. Section 330 (Penal Code). Every conductor, engineer, brakeman, switchman, or other person having charge, w holly or in part, of any railroad car, locomotive, or train, who willfully or negligently suffers or causes the same to collide with another ear, locomotive, or train, or with any" other object or thing whereby the death of a human being is produced, is punishable by imprisonment in the Territorial prison for not less than one nor more than ten years. S ec. 355 (Penal Code). Every person in charge of a locomotive engine, who, before crossing any traveled public way, omits to cause a bell to ring or steam-whistle to sound at the distance of at least eighty rods from the crossing, and up to it, is guilty of a misdemeanor. S ec. 358 (Penal Code). Every engineer, conductor, brakeman, switch-tender, or other officer, agent, or servant of any railroad company, who is guilty o f any willful violation or omission of his duty as such officer, agent or servant, whereby human life or safety is endangered, the punishment of which is not otherwise prescribed, or any person or corporation knowingly employing any such person, is guilty of a misdemeanor. S ec. 360 (Penal Code). Any engineer, conductor or other employee of any cor poration operating a railway in this Territory, who shall suffer or permit any loco motive or cars to be or remain upon the crossing of any public highway over such railway so as to obstruct travel over such crossing for a period exceeding fifteen min utes, is guilty of a misdemeanor, except in cases of unavoidable accident. Took effect September 1, 1901. P a ym en t o f wages. Section 615 (Penal Code). All corporations or individuals employing men shall pay wages due their employees at least once a month, in lawful money of the United States of America, or bank check of even date. 1127 1128 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Sec . 616 (Penal Code). Whenever an employee quits the service or is discharged therefrom, such employee shall be paid, whatever wrages are due him, in lawful money of the United States of America, or by check of even date, on a bank, and said wages shall be paid at once. Sec. 617 (Penal Code). Any person or persons violating any of the provisions of the two preceding sections are guilty of a misdemeanor. Took effect September 1, 1901. IDAHO. ACTS OF 1901. L a b or Com m ission. [Page 66.] Section . 1 There shall be and is hereby created, a commission to be composed of two electors of the State, which shall be designated the labor commission, and which shall be charged with the duties and vested with the powers hereinafter enumerated. S ec . 2. The members of said commission shall be appointed b y the governor, by and with advice and consent of the senate; and shall hold office for two years and until their successors shall have been appointed and qualified. One of said com missioners shall have been, for not less than six (6) years of his life, an employee, for wages, in some department of industry, in which it is usual to employ a number of persons, under single direction and control, and shall be, at the time of his appoint ment, affiliated with the labor interest as distinguished from the capitalist or employing interest. The other of said commissioners shall have been, for not less than six years, an employer of labor, for wages, in some department of industry in which it is usual to employ a number of persons, under single direction and control, and shall be, at the time of his appointment, affiliated with the employing interest, as distinguished from the labor interest. Neither of said commissioners shall be less than twenty-five years of age, and they shall not be members of the same political party. A political party under the meaning of this section, should be held to mean one or more parties supporting one ticket or member of a fusion; neither of them shall hold any other State, county or city office in Idaho, during the term of office for which they shall be appointed. Each of said commissioners shall take and subscribe an oath, to be endorsed upon his commission, to the effect that he will punctually, honestly and faithfully discharge his duties as such commissioner. S ec. 3. Such commission shall have a seal and shall not be required to leave their personal labor or business, except to perform the duties devolving upon them as members of the labor commission. W hen necessary, they may appoint a secretary, who shall be a skillful stenographer and typewriter, and wno shall receive a salary of four dollars per day and traveling expenses for every day spent in the discharge of duty under the direction of the commission. Sec. 4. It shall be the duty of said commissioners, upon receiving authentic infor mation, in any manner, of the existence of any strike, lockout, or other labor com plication in this State, effecting [affecting] the labor or employment of fifty persons or more, to go to the place where such complication exists, put themselves into com munication wTith the parties to the controversy, and offer them [their] services as mediators between them: P rovid ed , That in all cases where less than fifty persons are on strike or lockout, the commission may, in their discretion, act as though such number of strikers consisted of fifty or more persons. If they shall not succeed in effecting an amicable adjustment of the controversy in that way, they shall endeavor to induce the parties to submit their differences to arbitration, either under the pro visions of this act or otherwise as they may elect. Sec. 5. For the purpose of arbitration, under this act, the labor commissioners and the judge of the district court of the district in w hich the business in relation to which the controversy shall arise, shall have been carried on, shall constitute a board of arbitrators, to which shall be added, if the parties so agree, two other mem bers, one to be named by the employer, and the other by the employees in the arbi tration agreement. If the parties to the controversy are a railroad company, and the employees of the company engaged in the running of trains, any terminal within this State, of the road, or any division thereof, may be taken and treated as the loca tion of the business within the terms of this section, for the purpose of giving jurisdic tion to the judge of the district court, to act as a member of the board of arbitration. LABOR LAWS— IDAHO---- ACTS OF 1901, 1129 Sec. 6. An agreement to enter into arbitration under this act, shall be in writing and shall state the issue to be submitted and decided, and shall have the effect of an agreement, by the parties, to abide by, and perform the award. Such an agreement may be signed by the employer, as an individual firm, or cor poration, as the case may be, and execution o f the agreement, in the name of the employer, by any agent or representative of such employer, then and therefore in control or management of the business or department of business, in relation to which the controversy shall have arisen, shall bind the employer. On the part of the employees the agreement may be signed by them, in their own person, not less than two-thirds of those concerned in the controversy, signing, or it may be signed by a committee, by them appointed. Such committee may be created by election at a meeting of the employees concerned in the controversy, at which not less than two-thirds of such employees shall be present, which election, and the fact of the presence of the required number of employees at the meeting, shall be evidenced by the affidavit of the chairman and secretary of such meeting, attached to the arbitra tion agreement. If the employees, concerned in the controversy, or any of them shall be members of any labor union or working men’ s society, they may be repre sented in the execution of said arbitration agreement by officers or committeemen of the union or society designated by it, in any manner conformable to its usual methods of transacting business, and others of the employees, represented by com mittee as hereinbefore provided. Sec. 7. If upon any occasion calling for the presence and intervention of the labor commissioners, under this act, one of said commissioners shall be present and the other absent, the judge of the district court of the district in which the dispute shall have arisen, as defined in section 5, shall upon the application of the commissioners present, appoint a commissioner pro tern., in the place of the absent commissioner and such commissioner pro tern, shall exercise all the powers of a commissioner under this act, until the termination of the duties of the commission with respect to the particular controversy, upon the occasion of which the appointment shall have been made, and shall receive the same pay and allowances provided by this act, for the other commissioners. Such commissioner pro tern, shall represent and be affili ated with the same interests as the absent commissioner. Sec. 8. Before entering upon their duties, the arbitrators shall take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to the effect that they w ill honestly and impartially perform their duties as arbitrators, and a just and fair award render, to the best of their abil ity. The sitting of the arbitrators shall be in the court room of the district court or such other place as shall be provided by the county commissioners, of the county in which the hearing is had. The district judge shall be the presiding member of the board. He shall have power to issue subpoenas for witnesses who do not appear voluntarily, directed to the sheriff of the county, whose duty it shall be to serve the same, without delay. H e shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations to witnesses, enforce order, and direct and control the examinations. The proceedings shall be informal in character, but in general accordance with the practice governing the district courts in the trial of civil cases. All questions of prac tice, or questions relating to the admission of evidence, shall be decided b y the pre siding member of the board summarily and without extended argument. The sittings shall be open and public. If five members are sitting as such board, three members of the board, agreeing, shall have power to make an award, otherwise two. The sec retary of the commission shall attend the sitting and make a record of the proceed ings in shorthand, but shall transcribe so much thereof only as the commission shall direct. Sec. 9. The arbitrators shall make their award in writing and deliver the same with the arbitration agreement and their oath as arbitrators, to the clerk of the dis trict court of the judicial district in which the hearing was had, and deliver a copy of the award to the employer and a copy to the first signer of the arbitration agree ment on the part of the employees. A copy of all the papers shall be preserved by the commission. Sec. 10. The clerk of the district court shall record the papers, delivered to him, as directed in the last preceding section, in the order book of the district court. Any person, w ho was a party to the arbitration proceedings, may present to the district court of the county in which the hearing was had, or the judge thereof, in vacation, a verified petition referring to the proceedings and the record of them, in the order book, and showing that said award has not been complied with, stating by whom and in what respect it has been disobeyed. And thereupon, the court or judge thereof, in vacation, shall grant a rule against the party or parties so charged, to show cause within five days, why said award has not been obeyed, which shall be served by the sheriff as other process. Upon return made to the rule, the judge or court, if in session, shall hear and determine the ques 1130 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. tions presented and make such order or orders, directed to the parties before him, in personam, as shall give just effect to the award. Disobedience by any party to such proceedings of any order so made, shall be deemed a contempt of the court, and may be punished accordingly. But such punishment shall not extend to imprisonment except in case of willful disobedience. In all proceedings under this section, the award shall be regarded as presumptively binding upon the employer and all employ ees w ho were parties to the controversy submitted to arbitration, wThich presumption shall be overcome only by proof of dissent from the submission delivered to the arbi trators, or one of them, in writing, before the commencement of the hearing. Sec. 11. The labor commission with the advice and assistance of the attorney gen eral of the State, which he is hereby required to render, may make rules and regulations respecting proceedings in arbitration, under this act, not inconsistent with this act, or the law, including forms, and cause the same to be printed and furnished to all persons applying therefor, and all arbitration proceedings under this act shall there after conform to such rules and regulations. Sec. 12. Any employer and his employees, not less than twenty-five in number, between wThom differences exist which have not resulted in any open rupture or strike, may, of their own motion, apply to the labor commission, for arbitration of their differences, and upon the execution of an arbitration agreement, as herein before provided, a board of arbitrators shall be organized in the manner hereinbefore provided, and the arbitration shall take place and the award be rendered, recorded and enforced, in the same manner as in arbitrations under the provisions found in the preceding sections of this act. Sec. 13. In all cases arising under this act, requiring the attendance of a judge of the district court as a member of the arbitration board, such duty shall have prece dence over any other business pending in his court, and if necessary for prompt transaction of such other business, it shall be his duty to appoint the district judge of an adjoining district to sit in the district court in his place during the pendency of such arbitration, and such appointee shall receive the same compensation for his services as is now allowed by law to judges appointed to sit in case of change of judge in civil actions. In case the judge of the district court, whose duty it shall become under this act, to sit upon any board of arbitrators, shall be at the time actually engaged in a trial which can not be interrupted without loss and injury to the parties, ana which will, in his opinion, continue for more than three days to come, or is dis abled from acting by sickness or otherwise, it shall be the duty of such judge to call in and appoint the district judge of an adjoining district, to sit upon such board of arbitrators, and such appointed judge shall have the same power and perform the same duties as member of the board of arbitration as are by this act vested in and charged upon the district judge regularly sitting, and he shall receive the same com pensation, now provided by law, to a judge sitting by appointment, upon a change of judge in civil cases, to be paid in the same way. Sec. 14. If the parties to any such labor controversy as is defined in section 4 of this act, shall have failed at the end of five days, after the first communication of said labor commission to them, to adjust their differences amicably, or to agree to submit the same to arbitration, it shall be the duty of the labor commission to pro ceed at once to investigate the facts attending the disagreement. In this investigation, the commission shall be entitled, upon request, to the pres ence and assistance of the attorney general of the State, in person or by deputy, whose duty it is hereby made to attend, without delay, upon request, by letter or telegram, from the commission. For the purpose of such investigation, the com missioners shall have power to issue subpoenas and each of the commissioners shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations. Such subpoena shall be under seal of the commission, and signed by the secretary of the commission, or a member of it, and shall command the attendance of the person or persons named in it, at a time and place named, which subpoena may be served and returned as other process by any sheriff or constable in the State. In case of disobedience of any such subpoena or the refusal of any witness to testify, the district court having jurisdiction or the judge thereof, during vacation, shall, upon the application of the labor commission, grant a rule against the dis obeying person or persons or the person refusing to testify, to show cause, forth with w hy he or they should not obey such subpoena or testify as required by the commission, or be adjudged guilty of contempt, and in such proceedings, such court, or the judge thereof, in vacation, shall be empowered to compel obedience to such subpoena, as in the case of subpoena issued under the order of and by the authority of the court, or to compel a witness to testify as witnesses in court are compelled to testify. But no person shall be required to attend as a witness, at any place outside the county of his residence. Witnesses called by the labor commis sion, under this section, shall be paid $2 per diem fees out of the expense fund pro vided by this act, if such payment is claimed at the time of their examination. LABOR LAWS— IDAHO---- ACTS OF 1901. 1131 Sec. 15.. Upon the completion of the investigation authorized by the last preced ing section, the labor commission shall forthwith report the facts thereby disclosed, affecting the merits of the controversy, in a brief and condensed form to the governor. Sec. 16. Any employer shall be entitled, in his response to the inquiries made of him by the commission in the investigation provided for in the last two preceding sections, to submit in writing to the commissioner a statement of any facts material to the inquiry, the publication of which would be likely to be injurious to his busi ness, and the facts so stated shall be taken and held as confidential, and shall not be disclosed in the report or otherwise. Sec. 17. Said commissioners shall receive a compensation of six dollars each per diem, for the time actually expended, and actual and necessary traveling and hotel expenses, while absent from home in the performance of duty, and each of the two members of the board of arbitration, chosen b y the parties under the provisions of this act, shall receive the same compensation for the days occupied in service, upon the board. The attorney general or his deputy shall receive his necessary and actual traveling expenses while absent from home in the service of the commission. Such compensation and expenses shall be paid by the State treasurer upon warrants drawn by the auditor upon itemized and verified accounts of time spent and expenses paid. All such accounts, except those of the commissioners, shall be certified as correct by the commissioners, or one of them, and the accounts of the commissioners shall be certified by the secretary of the commission. It is hereby declared to be the policy of this act, that the arbitrations and investi gations provided for in it, shall be conducted with all reasonable promptness and dispatch, and no member of any board of arbitration shall be allowed payment for more than fifteen days’ service, in any one arbitration, and no commissioner shaH be allowed payment for more than ten days’ service in the making of the investiga tion provided for in section 14 and sections following. Sec. 18. For the payment of the salary of the secretary of the commission, the compensation of the commissioners and other arbitrators, the traveling and hotel expenses herein authorized to be paid, and for witness fees, printing, stationery, postage, telegrams and office expenses, there is hereby appropriated out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of three thousand dol lars for the year 1901, and three thousand dollars for the year 1902. Sec. 19. w ithin ten days after the members of the labor commission shall have been appointed, and said appointments ratified by the senate, they shall meet at the State capital for a period of not to exceed ten days, for the purpose of drafting rules and method of procedure in sessions of the commission, in accordance with section 11 of this act, and for such period the pay of the commissioners, and the secretary of the commission shall be the same as allowed them by this act, when serving as arbitrators or mediators. Sec. 20. All laws, in conflict with this act, are hereby repealed. Sec. 21. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage, an emergency existing therefor. Approved, March 12, 1901. E m ploym en t agencies. [Page 131.] Section 1. From and after the date of the passage of this act no person or persons shall carry on, hold, or keep any labor agency, or bureau of employment without first having obtained written permission of the county commissioners of the county wherein said agency or bureau is to be located. Sec. 2. Before any person or persons shall be permitted to open, keep, or conduct any labor agency or bureau of employment within the jurisdiction of said county, he shall furnish a bond with good and solvent security in favor of the chairman of said county commissioners in the full sum and amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000), conditioned that he shall well and truly carry out the purposes for which said agency shall have*been established, and that he shall pay all such damages which may result from his or their actions as such agent or agents, keeper or keepers of said bureau of employment and that anyone who may have been injured or dam aged by said agent or agents by any act done in furtherance of said business or by fraud or misrepresentations o f said agents or keepers, shall have a right to sue for the recovery of such damages before any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 3. Anyone violating the provisions of this act shall be subject to a fine of not more than $300, nor less than $100, and imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 90 days, nor less than 30 days. Sec. 4. Whereas an emergency exists, this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved March 11, 1901. 1132 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, INDIANA. ACTS OF 1901. Chapter 28.— Inspection o f fa ctories. Section 1. Section 19 of [ “ An act concerning labor, etc.,” approved March 2,1899, [shall] be amended so as to read as follows: Section 19. For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this act, a depart ment of inspection is hereby created, and the governor shall by and with the advice and consent of the senate, appoint a chief inspector to have charge of said depart ment. Said inspector shall hold and continue in office after the expiration ot his term of office until his successor shall have been appointed and qualified. The term of office of the chief inspector shall be for four years. The annual salary of such chief inspector shall be one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) and actual expenses when absent from home in the discharge of his official duties. Said chief inspector shall, by and with the consent of the governor, appoint a sufficient number of deputies to enforce the provisions of this act, not to exceed five (5) one of which shall be a chief deputy inspector, whose salary shall be one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) per annum and actual expenses when absent from home in the dis charge of his official duties. The salaries of such other deputies as may be appointed shall be one thousand dollars ($1,000) each per annum and actual expenses when absent from home in the discharge of their official duties. But said actual expenses for the department of inspection shall in no year exceed the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000), and the duties of the deputy inspectors shall be such as shall be assigned them b y the chief inspector. Said chief inspector shall also employ a stenographer at a salary not to exceed six hundred dollars ($600) per annum. The salary and actual expenses of said deputy inspectors and stenographer shall be paid monthly as due, on voucher duly attested before some officer authorized to administer oaths, and approved and signed b y the chief inspector, and the salary and actual expenses of the chief inspector shall be paid* in monthly installments, out of the treasury of the State, upon warrants of the auditor of state, and the total annual appropriations of ten thousand nine hundred dollars ($10,900) for such pay ments aforesaid, is hereby made out of any moneys in the Shite treasury not other wise appropriated: P rovid ed f That the auditor of state shall issue no warrant, except upon itemized bills, sworn to, and presented by the chief inspector provided for in this act. Approved February 26, 1901. C hapter 35.— Inspection o f bakeries, etc. Section 1. Every building, room basement or cellar occupied or used as a bakery or confectionery, canning, packing, pickling, or preserving establishment, or for the manufacture (for sale) of any food product shall be properly heated, lighted, drained, plumbed and ventilated and conducted with a strict regard to the health of the operatives and the purity and wholesomeness of the food articles produced. Sec. 2. The floors, side-walls, ceilings, fixtures, furniture and utensils of every establishment or place where food products are manufactured or stored, shall at all times be kept in a clean, healthful and sanitary condition. The side-walls and ceilings of every bake room or confectionery shall be well plas tered, wainscoted or ceiled with metal or lumber. Plastered walls and ceilings shall be oil painted or kept well lime washed and all interior woodwork in every bakery or confectionery shall be kept well oiled or painted with oil paint and kept washed clean with soap and water. And every building room, basement, or cellar occupied or used for the manufacture of any food products shall have, if deemed necessary by the chief inspector an impermeable floor made of cement or tile laid in cement. Sec. 3. The chief inspector or deputy inspector of the Department of Inspection or any health officer shall have the full power at all times to enter and inspect every build ing, room, basement, or cellar occupied or used as aforesaid and if such inspection shall disclose a noncompliance with the purpose and provisions of this act, the chief inspector shall require the execution of such lawful sanitary measures or alterations in or about such premises as will conform to the requirements of this act, and secure the production of the food products thereof in a clean and wholesome condition. Sec. 4. Flour and meal shall be stored in dry and wTell ventilated rooms only and no basement or cellar not now occupied or used as a bakery or confectionery shall hereafter be used as such except that the requirements of section 1 of this chapter shall have been first fully complied wTith. LABOR LAWS— INDIANA— ACTS OF 1901. 1133 Sec. 5. The sleeping place or places for the persons employed in a bake-shop shall be separate and apart from the bake room; and no person shall be allowed to sleep in a bake room or place where flour or meal or the products thereof are stored. No domestic animal except cats shall be permitted to remain in a bake room or place used for the storage o f flour or meal food products. Sec. 6. No employer shall knowingly require, permit or suffer any person to work in a bakery or confectionery w ho is affected with consumption of the lungs; or with scrofula, or with any venereal disease or with any communicable skin disease. Cus pidors shall be provided by the owner or operator for each workroom of every bak ery or confectionery, and no employee or other person shall expectorate on the floor or side-walls of any bakery or confectionery or place where the manufacture of any food product is conducted. Plain notices shall be posted in every place where food products of any kind are produced forbidding all persons expectorating on the floors of such establishment. Sec. 7. The door and window openings of every food producing establishment during fly season shall be fitted with self-closing wire screen doors and top outward tipping wire window screens. Sec. 8. Every bakery and confectionery shall be provided with washroom and watercloset or closets but separate and apart from the bake room or rooms where the manufacture of any food product is conducted. Sec. 9. A ny person w ho violates any of the provisions of this act or refuses to com ply with any lawful requirements, of the chief inspector, duly made in writing shall be guilty oi a misdemeanor and on conviction shall be punished for the first offense by a fine not less than ten dollars ($10) or more than fifty dollars ($50), for the second offense by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50) or more than one hundred dol lars ($100), and third offense not less than two hundred dollars ($200) or by impris onment for not more than sixty days or both fine and imprisonment. A copy of this act shall be conspicuously posted in each workroom of every estab lishment effected [affected] b y the provisipns of this act. Approved February 28, 1901. C h apter 1 2 2 .— R ate o f w ages on p u b lic w orks. 1. From and after the passage of this act, unskilled labor employed upon any public work of the State, counties, cities and towns, shall receive not less than twenty cents an hour for said labor, which may be enforced in a proper action, and in case a suit shall be necessary for the recovery of the compensation herein pro vided for, and where the compensation is recovered, the person suing shall recover also a reasonable attorney's fee, together with a penalty not exceeding double the amount of wages due: P rovid ed , That boards of commissioners, common councils of towns or cities are prohibited from making contracts with such laborers by the week or any definite length of time wherein a price is agreed upon at a rate less than as provided herein. Sec. 2. A n y contractor or other person in charge of public work of the State, counties, cities or towns, whose duty it is to contract with, employ and pay, the unskilled labor on such public work, w ho shall violate the provisions of section one of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding ten dollars, to w hich may be added imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding thirty days. Sec. 3. A ll laws and parts of laws in conflict with this act are hereby repealed. Approved March 9,1901. S e c t io n C h apter 165.— P rotection o f w ages o f laborers on p u b lic w orks— Contractors' bonds. S e c t i o n 1. Hereafter the common council of any city in the State of Indiana, not governed by special charter granted by the legislature", and the board of trustees of any incorporated town within such State, shall require all contractors for street, alley, sewer ana other public improvements, to give a good and sufficient bond, payable to the State of Indiana, at least two of the sureties on which bond shall be residents of the county in w hich such city or town is located, which bond shall guarantee the faithful performance of the work, and that the contractor so receiving said contract shall promptly pay all debts incurred in the prosecution of such work, including labor, materials furnished, and for boarding tne laborers thereon, where such con tractor agrees to be responsible for such board. Sec. 2. A ny laborer, material man or person furnishing board, labor or material to said contractor as in the preceding section provided, and having a claim against such contractor therefor shall after thirty days after the completion of said work have a 9398— N o. 42—02------------ 17 1134 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. right of action for same with attorney’ s fee thereon before any court of competent jurisdiction in the county where such city or town making such improvements is located. Sec. 3. A ll laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Sec. 4. An emergency existing for the immediate taking effect of this act, therefore the same shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved March 11, 1901. C h apter 225.— Contracts o f em ployees w aiving right to dam ages. . S e c t i o n 1 A ll contracts between employer and employee releasing the em ployer from liability for damages arising out of the negligence of the employer b y w hich the employee is injured, or in case of the employee’ s death, to his representatives, are against public policy, and hereby declared null and void. Sec. 2. All contracts between employer and employee releasing third persons, copartnerships or corporations from liability for damages arising out of the negli gence of such third persons, copartnerships or corporations by w hich the employee of such employer is injured, or in case of the death of such employee, to his repre sentatives, are against public policy and are hereby declared null and void. Sec. 3. All contracts between an employee and a third person, copartnership or corporation in which it is agreed that the employer of such employeeahall be released from liability for damages of such employee arising out of the negligence of the employer, or in case of the death of such employee, to his representatives, are against public policy and are hereby declared null and void: P rovid ed , That nothing in this act shall apply to voluntary relief departments, or associations organized for the purpose of insuring employees. Nothing in this act shall be construed to revert back to contracts made prior to the passage of this act. Nor shall this act affect pending litigation: P rovid ed , That nothing in any section of this act shall be so con strued as to affect or apply to any contract or agreement that may be made between the employer and employee, or in case of death, his next of kin or his representative after an injury to the employee has occurred, but the provisions of this act shall apply solely to contracts made prior to any injury. Sec. 4. Whereas an emergency exists for the immediate taking effect of this act therefore the same shall be in force from and after its passage. Approved March 11, 1901. C h apter 232.— In sp ection o f m ines. S e c t i o n 1 . Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 , of an act entitled “ An act abolishing the office of mine inspector in the State of Indiana, establishing the office of inspector of mines, providing the manner of appointment to such office, repealing all laws and parts of laws in conflict therewith, and declaring an emergency,” passed notwithstanding the governor’ s veto, March 4th, 1891, being sections 7452, 7453, 7454 and 7455 of Burns’ 1894 revisions of the Indiana statutes, [shall] be amended to read as follows: Section 3. The inspector of mines shall appoint two assistants, who shall each pass such examinations touching his qualifications for such position as may be prescribed by such inspector of mines. Such inspector of mines shall execute certificates of such appointment and deliver the same to each of such assistants, w ho shall there upon qualify b y each executing a bond and taking an oath in the manner and form provided by this act, and when so qualified, each such assistant is authorized and empowered to draw his salary and to perform all the duties of his office as prescribed b y this act. Each of such assistants shall be subject to the orders and directions of the inspector of mines, and, in pursuance of such orders and directions, is empowered to do any and all acts and to perform all the duties incumbent upon the inspector of mines. They shall each make a detailed and itemized report as often as required, to the inspector of mines, of the work performed b y him, and shall hold his office subject to removal at any time by such inspector of mines for cause. Sec. 2. Section 4 of said above entitled act [shall] be amended to read as follows: Section 4. The inspector of mines and his assistants shall be residents of the State of Indiana for at least five (5) years immediately preceding their appointment to office, and shall be practical miners of at least ten (10) years’ experience in actual mining, and no person shall be eligible to hold the office of inspector of mines or assistant inspector of mines w ho is or may be pecuniarily interested in any coal mine within this State, either directly or indirectly. The inspector of mines and his assistants, before entering upon the duties of their offices, shall each execute a bond payable to the State of Indiana, with good and sufficient surety, in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000), and shall take and subscribe to an oath to be endorsed upon the back of each bond for the faithful performance of the duties of the office, which bond shall be approved by and filed with the secretary of state. LABOR LAWS— INDIANA— ACTS OF 1901. 1135 Sec. 3. Section 5 of said above entitled act [shall] be amended to read as follows: Section 5. The inspector of mines and his assistants shall perform all the duties now required by law to be performed by the mine inspector, and such inspector of mines shall make an annual report to the State geologist of all matters now required b y law to be reported, w hich report shall be published with the report of the State geologist, and shall in every respect comply with the law pertaining to the inspec tion of mines. Sec. 4. Section 6 of said above entitled act [shall] be amended to read as follows: Section 6. The inspector of mines shall receive as compensation for his services the sum of one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) per annum, and each assist ant inspector of mines shall receive as compensation for his services the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) per annum, and for expenses, said inspector and his assistants shall receive the sum actually and necessarily expended for that purpose, in the discharge of their official duties, all to be paid quarterly by the State treasurer from the funds in the State treasury not otherwise appropriated. All expense bills shall be sworn to and shall show the items of expense in detail. Said inspector of mines may also appoint a secretary to assist him in the discharge of his duties, who shall receive a salary of six hundred dollars ($600) per annum. S e c . 5. A ll laws in conflict with any of the provisions of this act are hereby repealed so far as in conflict. S e c . 6. Whereas an emergency is hereby declared to exist for the immediate tak ing effect of this act, it shall, therefore, take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved March 11, 1901. C h apter 236.— M ine regulations— Use o f explosives. S e c t i o n 1. Whenever any workman is about to open a keg or b ox containing powder, or other explosives, he shall place and keep his lamp at least five feet dis tant from said explosive, and in such a position that the air current can not carry sparks to it; and no person shall approach nearer than five feet to any open box or keg containing powder or other explosive with a lighted lamp, pipe or any other thing containing fire. S e c . 2. In the process of charging and tamping a hole, no person shall use any iron or steel-pointed needle. The needle used in preparing the blast shall be made of copper, and the tamping bar shall be tipped with at least five inches of copper. No coal dust nor any material that is inflammable, or that may create a spark shall be used for tamping and some soft material shall be placed next to the cartridge or explosive. Sec. 3. Any person or persons violating any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and if found guilty, shall be fined not less than five dollars ($5) nor more than fifty dollars ($50) or six months in the county jail, at the discretion of the court. Approved March 11, 1901. C h apter 237.— P aym en t fa r assignm ent o f wages o f coal m ine em ployees in checks, tickets, etc. S e c t i o n 1. Whenever any merchant or dealer in goods or merchandise, or any other person, shall take from any employee or laborer for wages, who labors in or about any coal mine in this State, an assignment of such employee’ swages, earned or unearned, due or to become due, or shall take from such employee or laborer any order on his employer for any such wages, and shall issue or give to any such em ployee or laborer, in consideration of or in payment for any such assignment or transfer or order, any check, other than a check on a solvent bank, or any ticket, tok^n or device payable or redeemable or purporting to be payable or redeemable, or agreed to be payable or redeemable in goods, wares or merchandise or anything other than lawful money of the United States, such checks, tickets, token or device shall at once become due and payable in lawful money of the United States, for and to the extent of the full amount of the wages assigned or relinquished for it, and the holder of such check, ticket, token or device shall, after demand, have the right to collect the same, with reasonable attorney’ s fees, b y suit in any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 2. A ll laws and parts of laws in conflict with the provisions of this act are hereby repealed. Approved March 11, 1901. 1136 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. C hapter 264.— M arking and sale o f convict-m ade goods . S e c t i o n 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons or corporations to expose for sale within the State of Indiana, without first obtaining from the secretary of state a license to sell any convict-made goods, merchandise or wares, as hereinafter provided. S e c . 2. Every person, persons or corporation desiring to act as agent for or to deal in convict-made goods, merchandise or wares, before exposing such goods within the limits of the State of Indiana, shall make an application in writing to the secretary of state, setting forth his or their residence, or office, the class of goods he, they or it desires to deal in, the town, village or city, giving the street number at w hich he, they or it intends to locate, together with tne names of two or more responsible citi zens of the State of Indiana, w ho shall enter into a bond of not less than five thou sand dollars to guarantee that the said applicant w ill in all and every particular com ply with any and all laws of the Sta e of Indiana, regulating and presc—bing the sale of convict-made goods, wares and merchandise. S e c . 3. The secretary of state shall thereupon issue a license to such applicant for one year, except as hereinafter provided, w hich license shall set forth the name of the person, persons or corporation, and shall be kept conspicuously posted in his, their or its place of business. Sec. 4. Such person, persons or corporations shall annually, before the fifteenth day of January in each year, transmit to the secretary of state a verified statement setting forth: (1) The name of the person* persons or corporation. (2) His, their or its place of business. (3) The names of the persons, agents, warden or keepers of any prison, jail, penitentiary or reformatory, or establishment using convict labor, with whom he has done business, and the person, persons or corporation to whom he has sold goods, wares or merchandise, giving the State, city or town and street number of such purchaser or purchasers. (4) In general terms the amount paid to each of such agents, wardens or keepers, for goods, wares, or merchandise, and the character of goods, wares or merchandise so received. Sec. 5. Every person, persons or corporation shall pay annually, upon the issue of such license as hereinbefore provided, the sum of five hundred dollars to the secretary of state as a license fee, which amount shall be credited to the maintenance account of the State prison. S e c . 6. Licenses shall be for one year unless revoked as subsequently provided. S e c . 7. The secretary of state shall have the power to revoke the license of any person, persons or corporation upon satisfactory evidence or upon conviction for any violation of any law regulating the sale of convict-made goods, wares or mer chandise; but no such revocation shall be made until due notiee.to the person, per sons or corporation so complained of; and for the purpose of this section the said secretary of state, or his authorized agents, shall have power to administer oath and to compel the attendance of persons and the production of books, papers, et cetera. Sec. 8. A ll goods, wares or merchandise made or partly made by convict labor in any penitentiary, prison, reformatory or other establishment shall before being exposed for sale, be branded, labeled or marked as hereinafter provided, and it shall not be exposed for sale in any place within this State without such brand, label or mark. S e c . 9. The brand, label or mark hereby required shall contain at the head or top thereof the words “ Convict-made,” followed by the year and name of the peniten tiary, prison, reformatory or other establishment in which it was made, in plain English letters of the style known as Great Primer Roman capitals. The brand or mark shall in all cases, where the nature of the article will permit, be placed upon the same, and only where such branding or marking is impossible a label shall be used; and whence a label is used it shall be in the form of a paper tag, w hich shall be attached by wire to each article, where the nature of the article w ill permit, and placed securely upon the boxes, crates or other covering in w hich such goods, wares or merchandise may be packed, shipped or exposed for sale. Said brand, mark or label shall be placed upon the outside of, and upon the most conspicuous part o^the furnished [finished] article and its box, crate or covering. In case of manufactured clothing of any nature, such label shall be of linen and securely sewed upon each article of such clothing in a place where upon examination it may be easily discerned. S e c . 10. W hen upon complaint or otherwise [the] commissioner of labor statistics has reason to believe that this act is being violated, he shall advise the prosecuting attorney of the county in which such alleged violation has occurred of that fact, giving the information in support of his conclusions, and the prosecuting attorney shall at once institute the proper legal proceedings to compel compliances with this act. Any person offending against the provisions of this act shall be guilty of a mis LABOR LAWS— INDIANA— ACTS OF 1901. 1137 demeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding ten hundred dollars and not less than fifty dollars, or to be imprisoned for a term not exceeding twelve months nor less than ten days, or both. Sec. 11. It shall be lawful for any person, persons or corporation to furnish evi dence as to the violation upon the part of any person, persons or corporation, and upon the conviction of such person, persons or corporation one-half of the fine pro vided for by this act which shall be secured, shall be paid to the commissioner of labor statistics to be used by him in investigating and securing information regarding violations of this act and in paying expenses of securing conviction for violations thereof: P rovided , That this act shall not apply to outstanding or existing contracts. Sec. 12. A ll laws and parts of law’s in conflict with any of the provisions of this act are hereby repealed. Sec. 13. Whereas an emergency exists for the immediate taking effect of this act, the same shall be in force from and after its passage. Approved March 15, 1901. MICHIGAN. ACTS OF 1901. A ct N o. 113.— Inspection o f fa ctories , etc. Section 1. No male under the age of eighteen years and no female under the age of twenty-one years shall be employed in any manufacturing establishment in this State for any longer period than sixty hours* in one week unless for the purpose of making necessary repairs to machinery in order to avoid the stoppage of the ordi nary running of the establishments, and no male under the age of eighteen years and no female under the age of twenty-one years shall be employed in any store in this State employing more than ten persons for a longer period than sixty hours in one wreek: P rovid ed , That no more than ten hours shall be exacted from such male minors or females under twenty-one years on any day unless for the purpose of making a shorter workday on the last day of the week. Sec. 2. No child under the age of fourteen years shall be employed in any manu facturing establishment, hotel or store within this State. It shall be the duty of ’ every person employing children to keep a register, in w hich shall be recorded the name, birthplace, age and place of residence o f every person employed b y him under the age of sixteen years; and no child shall be employed between the hours of six o’ clock p. m. and seven o ’ clock a. m. in any manufacturing establishment or work shop in this State; and it shall be unlawful for any manufacturing establishment, hotel or store to hire or employ any child under tne age of sixteen years without there is first provided and placed on file a sworn statement made b y the parent or guardian, stating the age, date and place of birth of said child, and that the child can read and write. If said child have no parent or guardian, then such statement shall be made by the child, w hich statement shall be kept on file by the employer, and which said register and statement shall be produced for inspection on demand by any factory inspector appointed under this act: P rovid ed , That in the city of Detroit and the city of Grand Rapids all sworn statements must be made before a deputy factory inspector. Sec. 3. No child under the age of sixteen years shall be employed by any person, firm or corporation conducting any manufacturing establishment in this State, at employ ment whereby its life or lim b is endangered, or its health is likely to be injured, or its morals may be depraved, by such employment. No female under the age of twenty-one years and no male under the age of eighteen years shall be allowed to clean machinery while in motion. Sec. 4. Factory inspectors shall have power to demand a certificate of physical fitness from the county physician, who shall make such examination free of charge, in case of persons who seem physically unable to perform the labor at which they may be employed, and shall have power to prohibit the employment of any person that can not obtain such a certificate: P rovid ed, This section shall not apply except to children under sixteen years of age. Sec. 5. It shall be the duty of the owner, agent or lessee of any manufacturing establishment where hoisting shafts or well-holes are used, to cause the same to be properly enclosed and secured. It shall also be the duty of the owner, agent or lessee to provide or cause to be provided at all elevator openings in any manufactur ing establishment, workshop, hotel or store such proper trap or automatic doors or automatic gates, so constructed as to open or close by the action of elevators either ascending or descending. The factory inspector, assistant factory inspector, 1138 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. or deputy factory inspector, shall inspect the cables, gearing or other apparatus of elevators in manufacturing establishments, workshops, hotels and stores at least once in each year, and more frequently if necessary, and require that the same be kept in a safe condition. S e c . 6. Fire escapes shall be provided for all manufacturing establishments, hotels and stores, two or more stories in height, if in the opinion of the factory inspector it is necessary to insure the safety of the persons employed in such establishments; said fire escapes or means of egress, or as many thereof as may be deemed sufficient by the inspector, shall be provided, and where it is necessary to provide fire escapes on the outside of such establishments, they shall consist of landings or balconies at each floor above the first, to be built according to specifications approved by the fac tory inspector. The windows or doors leading to all fire escapes shall open out wardly, or upwardly when provided with a counterbalancing weight, said windows or doors to be not less than thirty-six inches in height and thirty inches in width. All fire escapes shall be located as far as possible, consistent with accessibility, from the stairways and elevator hatchways or openings; and the ladder thereof shall extend to the roof; stationary stairs or ladders shall be provided on the inside from the upper story to the roof, as a means of escape in case of fire. Signs indicating the way to fire escapes shall be placed in conspicuous places. Factory inspectors shall in writing notify the owner, agent or lessee of such manufacturing establishments, hotels ana stores, of the required location and specifications of such fire escapes as may be ordered. S e c . 7. Stairways with substantial hand rails shall be provided in manufacturing establishments, and where in the opinion of the factory inspector it is necessary, the steps of such stairs in all such establishments shall be substantially covered with rub ber, securely fastened thereon, for the better safety of persons employed in said establishments. The stairs shall be properly screened at sides and bottom where females are employed, and where practicable the doors of such establishments shall swing outwardly or slide, as ordered by said factory inspector, and shall be neither locked, bolted or fastened during working hours. S e c . 8. It shall also be the duty of the owner of any factory, or his agent, superin tendent or other person in charge of the same, to furnish or supplv, or cause to be furnished or supplied, in the discretion of the factory inspector, where machinery is in use, proper shifters or other mechanical contrivances for the purpose of throwing belts on or off pulleys. A ll gearing or belting shall be provided with proper safe guards, and wherever possible machinery shall be provided with loose pulleys. All vats, saws, pans, planers, cogs, set-screws, gearing and machinery of every descrip tion, shall be properly guarded when deemed necessary by the factory inspector. S e c . 9. Exhaust fans shall be provided for the purpose of carrying off dust from emery wheels and grindstones, and dust-creating machinery, wherever deemed neces sary by the factory inspector. S e c / 10. Every manufacturing establishment, workshop, hotel or store in which five or more persons are employed, and every such institution in w hich two or more children, young persons or women are employed, shall be supplied with proper wash and dressing rooms, and kept in a cleanly state and free from effluvia arising from any drain, privy, or other nuisance, and shall be provided within reasonable access with a sufficient number of proper water-closets, earth-closets or privies for the reasonable use of the persons employed therein, at least one of such closets for each twenty-five persons employed; and wherever two or more persons and one or more female persons are employed as aforesaid, a sufficient number of separate and distinct water-closets, earth-closets or privies shall be provided for the use of each sex, and plainly so designated, and no person shall be allowed to use any such closet or privy assigned to persons of the other sex. S e c . 11. Not less than forty-five minutes shall be allowed for the noonday meal in any manufacturing establishment in this State. Factory inspectors shall have power to issue written permits in special cases, allowing a shorter meal time at noon, and such permit must be conspicuously posted in the main entrance of the establish ment, and such permit may be revoked at any time the inspector deems necessary, and shall only^be given where good cause can be shown. S e c . 12. The commissioner o f labor and deputy commissioner of labor and deputy factory inspectors shall be factory inspectors in the meaning of this act. A t least one of w hich deputy factory inspectors shall be a woman. Said factory inspectors are hereby empowered to visit and inspect at all reasonable hours, as often as prac ticable or required, the factories, workshops and other manufacturing establishments in this State where the manufacture of goods is carried on, and all hotels where any person or persons are employed, also all stores employing ten or more persons. Deputy factory inspectors shall report to the commissioner of labor of this State at such time and manner as he may require. It shall also be the duty of the factory inspector to enforce all the provisions of this act and to prosecute for all violations of LABOR LAWS— MICHIGAN— ACTS OF 1901. 1139 the same before any magistrate or in any court of competent jurisdiction in this State. S e c . 13. Deputy factory inspectors shall make report to the commissioner of labor o f each factory, hotel ana store visited and inspected by them, which report shall be kept on file in the office of the commissioner, and a copy of said report shall be left with the owner or person in charge of the establishment visited and inspected. Deputy factory inspectors shall have the same power to administer oaths as is now given to notaries public, in cases wThere persons desire to verify documents connected with the proper enforcement of this act. Sec. 14. Sections one, two and three of this act shall not apply to canning factories or evaporating works, but shall apply to any other place where goods, wares or products are manufactured, repaired, cleaned or sorted, in whole or m part; but no other person, persons or [corporation] corporations employing less than five persons, or children, excepting in any of the cities of this State, shall be deemed a manufac turing establishment within the meaning of this act. S e c . 15. For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this act, the commissioner of labor is hereby authorized and required to cause at least an annual inspection of the manufacturing establishments, factories and hotels, also all stores employing ten or more persons, in this State. Such inspection may be b y the commissioner of labor, the deputy commissioner of labor, or such other person as may be appointed by the commissioner of labor for the purpose of making such inspection. Such persons shall be under the control and direction of the commissioner of labor, and are especially charged with the duties imposed, and shall receive such compensation as shall be fixed by the commissioner of labor, not to exceed three dollars a day, together with all necessary expenses. A ll compensation for services and expenses provided for in this act shall be paid b y the State treasurer upon the warrant of the auditor general: P rovided) That not more than twenty thousand dollars shall be expended in such inspection in any one year: A n d provid ed fu rth er , That the commissioner of labor shall present to the governor, on or before the first day of February of each year, a report of such inspection, with such recommendation as may be necessary: A n d p ro vided fu rth er y That in addition to the above amount allowed for expenses, there may be printed not to exceed one thousand copies of such reports for the use of the labor bureau for general distribution, and all printing, binding, blanks, stationery, supplies or map work shall be done under any contract which the State now has or shall have for similar work with any party or parties, and the expense thereof shall be audited and paid for in the same manner as other State printing. S e c . 16. The prosecuting attorney of any county of this State is hereby authorized and required upon the complaint on oath of the commissioner of labor or factory inspectors, to prosecute to termination before any court of competent jurisdiction, in the name of the people of the State, actions or proceedings against any person or persons reported to him to have violated the provisions of this act. S e c . 17. No room or apartment in any tenement or dwelling house shall be used for the manufacture of coats, vests, trousers, knee-pants, overalls, skirts, dresses, cloaks, hats, caps, suspenders, jerseys, blouses, waists, waist-bands, underwear, neck wear, furs, fur trimmings, fur garments, shirts, hosiery, purses, feathers, artificial flowers, cigarettes or cigars, and no person, firm or corporation shall hire or employ any persons to work in any room, apartment or in any building or parts of buildings, at making, in whole or in part, any of the articles mentioned in this section, without first obtaining a wTritten permit from the factory inspector, or one of his deputies, stating the maximum number of persons allowed to be employed therein and that the building or part of building intended to be used for such work or business is thoroughly cleaned, sanitary and fit for occupancy for such work or business. Such permit shall not be granted until an inspection of such premises is made b y the fac tory inspector or one of his deputies. Said permit may be revoked by the factory inspector at any time the health of the community or of those so employed may require it. It shall be framed and posted in a conspicuous place in the room, or in one of the rooms to which it relates. Every person, firm, company or corporation contracting for the manufacture of any of the articles mentioned in this section, or giving out the incomplete material from which they or any of them are to be made, or to be w holly or partially finished, shall, before contracting for the manufacture of any of said articles, or giving out said material from which they or any of them are to be made, require the production by such contractor, person or persons of said permit from the factory inspector, as required in this section, and shall keep a written register of the names and addresses of all persons to whom such work is given to be made, or with whom they may have contracted to do the same. Such register shall be produced for inspection and a copy thereof shall be furnished on demand made by the factory inspector or one of his deputies: P rovid ed, That nothing in this sec tion shall be so construed as to prevent the employment of a seamstress by any family 1140 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. for manufacturing articles for such family use. None of the work mentioned in this section shall be done in any room or apartment used for living or sleeping purposes, or w hich is connected with the room or rooms used for such purposes, and w hich has not a separate and distinct outside entrance, except b y members of the fam ily dwell ing therein. Not less than two hundred and fifty cubic feet of air space shall be allowed for each person employed, and ail work rooms shall be provided w ith suf ficient means of light, heat and ventiliation as may be prescribed by the chief factory inspector. It shall be the duty of local boards of health, health officers and physicians to report within twenty-four hours to the deputy factory inspector in their respective districts each and every case of contagious or infectious diseases coming officially to their knowledge. The chief factory inspector or any duly appointed deputy factory inspector shall have power to seize and take charge of all articles found that are being made or partially made, finished, cleaned or repaired in unhealthy or unsanitary places where there are contagious or infectious diseases, in violation of the law, and may proceed to disinfect, condemn or destroy the same as in .the opinion of the local board of health or health officer, the public health or safety may require. W henever it is reported to the chief factory inspector or to the State board of health, or to either of them, that any of the articles named in this section are being or have been shipped into this State, having previously been manufactured in whole or in part under un healthy conditions, said chief factory inspector shall examine said goods and the condition of their manufacture, and if upon such examination said goods or any o f them are found to contain vermin or to have been made in improper places or under unhealthy conditions, h^shall make report thereof to the state board of health, w hich board shall thereupon make such order or orders as the public health and safety may require. Sec. 18. A ny person w ho violates or omits to com ply with any of the foregoing provisions of this act, or w ho interferes in any manner with the factory inspector in the discharge of his duties, or who suffers or permits any child to be employed in violation of its provisions, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction shall be punished b y a fine of not less than five nor more than one hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than ninety days, or by both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court. S e c . 19. A ct one hundred eighty-four of the public acts of eighteen hundred ninetyfive, and all acts amendatory thereto, is hereby repealed. This act is ordered to take immediate effect. Approved May 13, 1901. . A ct No., 222.— E xa m in a tion , licensing, etc., o f plu m bers. Section 1 W ithin thirty days after this act shall take effect, it shall be the duty o f the local board of health, and if there be no local board of health then it shall be the duty of the mayor of each of the cities of this State to appoint a board for the examination of plumbers, to examine, license and register plumbers and formulate rules and regulations therefor subject to the approval of such boards of health. Such board shall consist of five persons, of whom one shall be an employing or master plumber of not less than ten years* experience in the business of plumbing, and one shall be a journeyman plumber of like experience, and the other members of such board shall be the officers in charge of the plumbing and drainage department of the board of health of such city, and the chief engineer having charge of sewers in such city, but in the event of there being no such officers in such city, then any other twoofficers having charge or supervision of the plumbing, drainage or sewerage, whom the mayor shall designate and appoint, or tw o members of the board of health o f such city having like duties or acting in like capacities. The term of office of the master and journeyman plumbers first appointed under the provisions o f this act shall be as follows, to wit: One shall be appointed and hold office from the time of such appointment until the first day of January, nineteen hundred two, and until his successor shall be appointed. One shall be appointed and hold office from th e time of such appointment until the first day of January, nineteen hundred three, and until his successor shall be appointed, their term of office to expire respectively on the first day of January, nineteen hundred two, the first day of January, nineteen hundred three, and the board of health, and if there be no such board of health it shall be the duty of the mayor in making the first appointments under this act, for each one so appointed to specify the duration of the term of office to which he makes said appointments, and annually thereafter, within ten days prior to the time of th e expiration of the term of office of any such member of the board, his successor shall be appointed by the board of health, and if there be no such board of health it shall be the duty of the mayor to appoint for the term of two years, or until a successor shall be appointed, and the Board of health, and if there be no such board, th e LABOE LAWS— MICHIGAN---- ACTS OF 1901. 1141 mayor shall have power to fill any vacancy caused in such board of examiners by the death, removal, inability to act, resignation or removal from the city of any member thereof, and such appointment shall be for the unexpired term. Such officer in charge of the plumbing and drainage department, and such chief engineer in charge of sewers, ortne officersholding equivalentpositions oractingin like capacities, desig nated or appointed by the board of health, and if there be no such board of health, by the mayor as herein provided, when they shall cease to hold the offices by reason or on account of which they were so designated or appointed, their successor shall act on the examining board in their stead. Sec. 2. The master and journeyman plumbers serving as members of such board shall severally be paid at the rate of four dollars per day for each day’s services when actually engaged in the performance of their duties pertaining to the office; but such compensation shall not exceed the sum of five dollars per month in cities of twenty-five thousand inhabitants or less, nor the sum of ten dollars per month in cities having a population of over twenty-five thousand and less than three hundred thousand, nor a sum of twenty dollars per month in cities having a population of over three hundred thousand. Sec. 3. All the members of such board shall be citizens and actual residents of the city in which they are appointed. Sec. 4. The several boards of examiners who shall be appointed under this act shall have power and it shall be their duty to meet at stated intervals in their respective citiesnot lessthanfourtimeseachyear; they shall also meet whenever the board of health of such city and if there be no such board of health, then when the mayor thereof, shall in writing request them to do so; to have jurisdiction over and to examine all persons desiring to engage in the trade, business or calling of plumb ing, either as journeymen or employing or master plumbers in the city in wT hich such board shall be appointed, with the power of examining all persons applying for a license as such journeyman or employing or master plumbers, or as inspectors of plumbing, to determine their fitness and qualifications for conducting the trade, calling or business of journeyman or of master plumbers, or to act as inspector of plumbing, and to issue licenses to all such persons who shall have submitted to and passed a satisfactory examination before such board, and shall be by it determined to be qualified for engaging in, carrying on or conducting the trade, calling or busi ness of journeyman or employing or master plumber, or competent to act as inspec tors of plumbing; to formulate, with the approval of the local board of health of the city in which it shall act, a code of rules regulating all plumbing and drainage work connected therewith in such city, including the proper materials, andworkmanship, and from time to time to add to, amend or alter the same; to charge and collect from each person applying for examination the sum of two dollars for each regular examination made by said board, and all money so collected shall be paid over by the board monthly to the treasurer of such city in which said board shall be appointed. Sec. 5. Any person desiring or intending to conduct the trade, business or calling of a plumber or of plumbing m any of the cities of this Stateasjourneyman, employ ing or master plumber, shall be required to submit to an examination before such board of examiners as to his experience and qualifications in such trade, business or calling: P rovid ed , That every person now engaged in the trade, business or calling of journeyman, master or employing plumber in any city of this State and who has; been engaged for a period of two years or more, and upon satisfactory proof made before, or filed with suchexamining boardof the truththereof, together with a state ment verified by his oath showing his name, place of business, postofficeaddress and length of time he actually served as a plumber, and upon the payment to said board of the sum of two dollars, shall be entitled to receive from said board a license with out further or other examination; all sums so collected shall be paid over to the treasurer, as in case of fees received for examination: P rovid ed fu rth er however, That any person coming into this State and desiring to engage in any city of this State in the trade, calling or business of plumbing, either as journeyman plumber, or employ-, ing plumber, or any person in this State desiring to engage in such trade, calling or business, if at a time when said board is not m session, upon satisfactory proofs made by him either by examination or otherwise to any two members of said board of his fitness and qualifications to engage in such trade, business or calling, shall be entitled to receive from said two members a temporary license, which shall entitle him to engage in and carry on such trade, calling of business until the next regular meeting of such board, when he shall be required to submit to the regular examina tion of such board; and after a period of sixty days from the time this act shall take effect it shall not be lawful m any city in this State for any person to conduct such trade, business or calling, unless he shall have first obtained a license from such board, or from two members thereof, as provided in the proviso last above set forth, 1142 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. of the city in which he conducts, or proposes to conduct, engage in or carry on such business, trade or calling. S e c . 6. Within ninety days after this act shall take effect every journeyman, employing or master plumber carrying on his trade, business or calling in any of the cities of this State, shall register his name and postoffice address at the office of the board of health of the city in which he shall carry on or conduct such trade, busi ness or calling, under such rules and regulations as the respective boards of health of each of the cities of this State shall respectively prescribe, and thereupon he shall be entitled to receive a certificate of such registration: P rovided how ever, That such journeyman, employing or master plumber shall at the time of applying for registra tion, hold a license from an examining board. And after a period of ninety days from the time this act shall take effect it shall not be lawful for any person to engage in, or carry on the trade, business or calling of journeyman, employing or master plumber in any of the cities of this State unless his name and postoffice address shall have been registered, as above provided. S e c . 12. Each of such boards of examiners shall have power to procure suitable quarters for the transaction of business, to provide the necessary furniture, books and stationery, and to employ a clerk whose duty it shall be to keep a detailed and accurate record of all acts and proceedings of such board. The board of estimates and the common council of every city in this State shall annually insert in their tax levy a sufficient sum to meet the expenditures incurred under the provisions of this act; and all expenses incurred by the several boards of examiners in the execution and performance of the duties imposed by this act, including the per diem of the board of examiners and compensation of the inspector or inspectors of plumbing and drainage as fixed by the board, commissioner or department making their appointments shall be a cliarge on the respective cities, and shall be audited, levied, collected and paid in the same manner as other city charges are audited, levied, collected and paid. Sec. 13. Any person violating any of the provisions of this act, or any of the rules and regulations of the board of examiners as approved by the board of health of any city in this State regulating the plumbing ana drainage work connected therewith of such city, shall upon conviction thereof be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and be punished by a fine of not exceeding $100 and the cost of prosecution, or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not exceeding ninety days, or both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court. S e c . 14. After the passage of this act the commissioner or the board of public works of any city, or the officer or officers acting in a like capacity in any of the cities of this State, and having chaise of the sewers and water mains, shall not issue a license to any one to connect with the sewers or with the water mains of such cities, unless such person has obtained and shall produce a certificate of registra tion, which is then in force, from the board of health of such city. S e c . 15. This act shall not apply to cities containing less than fifteen thousand inhabitants. S e c . 16. All acts or parts of acts in any way inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of this act are hereby repealed. Approved June 6, 1901. A ct N o . 235.—E xa m in a tion , licensing , etc., o f barbers. [This act was passed in the senate under a title which had been amended in that body. The secretary of the senate made a mistake and transmitted the bill to the house under the title as it stood before being amended, and it was passed there under such wrong title. On consideration by the supreme court, it was held that the act was invalid, having been passed in the two houses under different titles, and therefore Act No. 212, Public Acts of 1899 (see Bulletin of the Department ot Labor No. 28, pages 655, 656) remains in force.] MINNESOTA. ACTS OF 1901. Chapter 165.—R epaym ent o f advances m ade b y em ployers. Section 1. Every employee who, with intent to defraud, shall accept or receive transportation provided by or at the instance or expense of his employer, from any point in this State to or in the direction of the place where he has contracted to per LABOR LAWS— MINNESOTA— ACTS OF 1901. 1143 form labor for, or render services to such employer, or who shall knowingly, and with intent to defraud, accept or receive the benefit of any other pecuniaryadvance ments made by or at the instance and cost of his employer, under an agreement on the part of such employee to perform labor or render services in repayment of the cost of such transportation or of such other benefits, shall be deemed and adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor, if he shall neglect or refuse to render services or perform labor of an equal value to the full amount paid for such transportation or other ben efits; or shall neglect or refuseto paysuchemployerin moneythe amount paidthere for. The value of the services to be rendered, or labor to be performed, shall be determined by the price agreed to be paid therefor by such employer under his con tract with the employee. The failure or refusal of anysuch employee to perform suchlabor orto render such services in accordance with his contract, or to pay in money the amount paid for such transportation or other benefits, shall be pnma facie evidence of his intent to defraud. Sec. 2. Every person found guilty of such misdemeanor shall be punished by a fine not exceeding twenty-five dollars ($25) and by imprisonment of not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days. S e c . 3. All acts orparts of acts inconsistent with the provisions of this act arehereby repealed. S e c . 4. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved April 6,1901. Chapter Section 194.—A n ti-tru st act— L a bor organizations exem pt. 6. Labor organizations shall not be termed trusts under this act. Approved April 10,1901. Chapter 310.—H ou rs o f labor on p u blic w orks. Section 1. The service of all laborers, workmen and mechanics employed upon any public works of, or work done for the State of Minnesota, whether said work is done by contract or otherwise, shall be, and is hereby limited, and restricted to eight hours in any one calendar day; and it shall be unlawful for any officer of the State, or any person acting for or on behalf thereof, or any contractor or sub-contractor for any part of any public works of, or work done for such State, or any persons, corpo ration, or association whose duty it shall be to employ or to direct and control the services of such laborers, workmen or mechanics, or who has in fact the direction or control of the services of such laborers, workmen or mechanics to require or permit them or any of them to labor more than eight hours in any one calendar day and except in cases of extraordinary emergency caused by fire, flood or danger to life and property, and except to work upon public, military or naval works or defenses in time of war, except in cases of employment of labor in agricultural pursuits: P ro vid ed , That nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply to the employment of labor on work now in progress, whether contracted for or not. S e c . 2. Each and every contract to which the State of Minnesota is hereinafter a party, and every contract made for, or on behalf of the said State, wrhich contract may involve the employment of laborers, workmen or mechanics, shall contain a stipulationthat no laborer, workman ormechanics in the employ of the contractor or any sub-contractor doing or contracting to do any part of the work contemplated by the contract, shall be required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day, except in cases of extraordinary emergency caused by fire, flood or danger to life or property, and except to work upon public, military or naval work, or defenses in time of war, and except in cases of employment of labor in agri cultural pursuits, and each and every such contract shall stipulate a penalty for such violation of the stipulation directed by this act, of ten (10) dollars for each laborer, workman or mechanic, for each and every calendar day in which he shall labor more than eight hours, and the inspector or officer, or person whose duty it shall be to see that the provisions of any such contract are complied with, shall report to the proper officer of such State, all violations of the stipulation in this act, provided for m each and every such contract, and the amount of the penalties stipulated in any such contract shall be withheld by the officer or person whose duty it shall be to pay the moneys due under such contract, whether the violations for which such pen alties were imposed by contractor, his agents or employees, or any sub-contractor, his agents or employees, no person, on behalf of the State of Minnesota shall rebate or permit any penalty imposed under any stipulation hereinprovided for, unless upon a finding which he shall make up and certify that such penalty was imposed by 1144 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. reason of an error of fact. Nothing in this act shall be construed to authorize the collection of said penalty from the State. This act shall not apply to any contract work done for any town or county in this State. Sec. 3. Any officer of the State of Minnesota, or any person acting for, or on behalf thereof, who shall violate the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and be subject to a fine or imprisonment, or both, at the discretion of the court, the fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500), nor the imprison ment more than one year. Nothing in this act shall be construed to apply to work or labor in constructing or repairing roads or highways. Sec. 4. All acts and parts of acts inconsistent with this act are hereby repealed. Sec. 5. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage. Approved April 13, 1901. NEW HAMPSHIRE. ACTS OF 1901. Chapter 60.— E m p loym en t offices. Section 1. Whoever, without a license therefor, establishes or keeps an intelli gence office for the purpose of obtaining or giving information concerning places of employment for domestics, servants, or other laborers, or for the purpose of pro curing or giving information concerning such person for or to employers, or for the purpose of procuring or giving information concerning employment in business, shall pay a fine of ten dollars for each day such office is so kept. Sec. 2. The mayor and aldermen of any city, or the selectmen of any town, may, for the purposes mentioned in the preceding section, grant licenses to suitable per sons, subject to the provisions of sections 3 to 7, inclusive, and may revoke the same at pleasure. Sec. 3. Licenses granted to keepers of intelligence offices shall be signed by the. clerk of the city or town in which they are granted, and every such license shall be recorded by the clerk of the city or town in a book kept for that purpose, before being delivered to the licensee. Suchlicense shall set forth the name of the person licensed, the nature of the business, and the building or place in such city or town in which it is to be carried on, and shall continue in force until the first day of May next ensuing, unless sooner revoked. Sec. 4. The board issuing such a license shall receive for the use of the city or town for each license such sumnot less than two dollars as the board shall deem reasonable. Sec. 5. Such license may be granted during the month of April, to take effect on the first day of May then next ensuing. Sec. 6. No license issued as aforesaid shall be valid to protect the holder thereof in a building or place other than that designated in the license, unless consent to removal is granted by the mayor and aldermen or selectmen. Sec. 7. When such license is revoked, such clerk shall note the revocation upon the face of the record of the license, and shall give written notice to the holder of the license by delivering the same to him in person or leaving it at the place of business designated in the license. Sec. 8. This act shall take effect upon its passage. Approved March 7, 1901. Chapter 61.— E m ploym en t o f children. Section 1. Chapter 93 of the Public Statutes is hereby amended by striking out sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, and inserting the following instead thereof: Section 10. No child underthe age of twelve years shall be employed in any manu facturingestablishment. No child underthe age of fourteen years shall be employed in any manufacturing establishment, nor in any mechanical, mercantile, or other employment duringthe time in which the public schools are in session in the district in which he resides. Section 11. No child under the age of sixteen years shall be employed inanymanu facturing establishment, or in any mechanical, mercantile, or other employment, during the time in which the public schools are in session in the district in which he resides, without first presenting a statement of his age from his parent or guardian, sworn to before the superintendent of schools or, if there is no superintendent of schools, by some person authorized by the school board of the district in which such child is employed. LABOR LAWS— NEW HAMPSHIRE---- ACTS OF 1901. 1145 And no child under the age of sixteen years shall be employed as aforesaid during the time in which the public schools are in session in the district in which he resides without first presenting a certificate from the superintendent of schools or, if there is no superintendent of schools, some person authorized by the school board, that such child canreadatsightandwritelegiblysimple sentencesinthe English language. And any superintendent of schools or person authorized by the school board who certifies falsely as to matters prescribed by this section shall be fined not less than twenty nor more than fifty dollars for each offense. Section 12. No minor shall be employed in any manufacturingestablishment, or in any mechanical, mercantile, or other employment, who cannot readat sightandwrite legibly simple sentences in the English language, while a free public evening school is maintained in the district in which he resides, unless he is a regular attendant at sucheveningschool orat adayschool: P rovid ed, That uponpresentationbysuchminor of a certificate signedby a regular practicing physician, and satisfactoryto the super intendent of schools, or, wherethere is no superintendent of schools, the school board, showing that the physical condition of such minor would render such attendance in addition to daily labor prejudicial to his health, said superintendent of schools or school board shall issue a permit authorizingthe employment of such minorfor such period as said superintendent of schools or school board may determine. Said super intendent of schools or school board, orteachers acting under authoritythereof, may excuse any absence from such evening school arising from justifiable cause. Any parent, guardian, or custodian who permits to be employed any minor under his control in violation of the provisions of this sectionshall forfeit not more thantwenty dollars for the use of the evening schools of such town or city. Section 13. If any owner, agent, superintendent, or overseer of a manufacturing, mechanical, or mercantile establishment, orany other person, shall employ any child in violation of the provisions of either of the three preceding sections, he shall be fined not exceeding fifty dollars for each offense, for the use of the district. S e c . 2. This act shall take effect upon its passage. Approved March-7, 1901. C h apter 99.—E xa m in a tion , licensing, etc., o f plum bers. Section 1. Section 1 of chapter 55 of the Session Laws of 1899 is hereby amended so that the same shall read as follows: Section 1. No person, firm, or corporation engaged in or working at the business of plumbing in any city or town in this State as shall by vote adopt the provisions of this chapter, shall hereafter engage in or work at said business in this State, either as a master or employing plumber,, or as a journeyman plumber, unless such person or persons shall first obtain license or certificate so to do, in accordance with the provisions of this act. Sec. 2. Section 3 of said act is hereby amended so that said section shall read as follows: Section 3. Any such city or town in this State which shall by vote adopt the pro visions of this chapter, may by ordinance or by-law prescribe rules and regulations for the materials, construction, alteration, and inspection of all plumbing, house drainage, and sewer connections, creating a board for the examination of plumbers, fixing the length of term each member shall serve, and providing for an inspector of plumbing. Said board shall be appointed by the mayor or board of selectmen, ana shall consist of the following three persons: A member of the local board of health, the city or town engineer, or, in the absence of such officer, alocal physician in regular practice, and a journeyman plumber of not less than five years’ activeand continuous practical experience. Sec. 3. Section 4 of said act is hereby amended so that said section when amended shall read as follows: Section 4. The examining board when created as aforesaid shall examine and pass upon all applicants, whether as masters or employing plumbers, or journeyman plumbers, in their respective cities or towns, and alsoall persons who may apply for the office of plumbing inspector. They shall issue a license to such persons only as shall successfully pass the required written and practical examination; and they shall register in a book kept for that purpose the names and places of business of all persons to whom a plumber’s license has been granted. They shall not issue a license for more than one year, but the same shall be renewed from year to year upon proper application and upon the payment of a fee of fifty cents. Saidexamin ing board shall serve without compensation. Each applicant for examination for a plumber’s license or certificate shall pay the sum of one dollar, and all moneys so collected shall be paid into the treasury of the city or town where such application 1146 BULLETIN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. is made. The license or certificate provided for by this act shall be nontransferable; and said application and examination shall not be required of the same person more than once in the same city or town. Said license or certificate shall be valid throughout the State. S e c . 4. This act shall take effect on its passage. Approved March 22,1901. NEW MEXICO. ACTS OF 1901. C h apter 40.— H ou rs o f labor on pu blic highw ays. S e c t i o n 1. All able-bodied male persons in the Territory of New Mexico between the ages of twenty-one and sixty years, shall be required to perform labor upon the public roads and highways as herein provided, for any number of days required by the road supervisor of their respective precincts, not lessthantwo days nor to exceed five days of eight hours each in any one year. Approved March 18, 1901. LEADING ARTICLES IN PAST NUMBERS OF THE BULLETIN. No. 1. Private and public debt in the United States, by George K. Holmes. Employer and employee under the common law, by V. H. Olmsted and S. D. Fessenden. No. 2. The poor colonies of Holland, by J. Howard Gore, Ph. D. The industrial revolution in Japan, by William Eleroy Curtis. Notes concerning the money of the U. S. andother countries, by W. C. Hunt. The wealth and receipts and expenses of the U. S., by W. M. Steuart. No. 3. Industrial communities: Coal Mining Co. of Anzin, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 4. Industrial communities: Coal Mining Co. of Blanzy, by W. F. Willoughby. The sweating system, by Henry White. No. 5. Convict labor. Industrial communities: KruppIron and Steel Works, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 6. Industrial communities: Familistere Society of Guise, by W. F. Willoughby. Cooperative distribution, by Edward W. Bemis, Ph. D. No. 7. Industrial communities: Various communities, by W. F. Willoughby. Batesof wages paid under public and private contract, by Ethelbert Stewart. No. 8. Conciliation and arbitration in the boot and shoe industry, by T. A. Carroll. Bailway relief departments, by Emory B. Johnson, Ph. D. No. 9. The padrone system and padrone banks, by John Koren. The Dutch Society for General Welfare, by J. Howard Gore, Ph. D. No. 10. Condition of the Negro in various cities. Building and loan associations. No. 11. Workers at gainful occupations at censuses of 1870, 1880, and 1890, by W. C. Hunt. Public baths in Europe, by Edward Mussey Hartwell, Ph. D., M. D. No. 12. The inspectionof factories andworkshops in the U. S., by W. F. Willoughby. Mutual rights and duties of parents and children, guardianship, etc., under the law, by F. J. Stimson. The municipal or cooperative restaurant of Grenoble, France, by C. 0. Ward. No. 13. The anthracite mine laborers, by G. O. Virtue, Ph. D. No. 14. The Negroes of Farmville, Va.: A social study, by W. E. B. Du Bois, Ph. D. Incomes, wages, and rents in Montreal, by Herbert Brown Ames, B. A. No. 15. Boarding homes and clubs for working women, by Mary S. Fergusson. The trade-union label, by John Graham Brooks. No. 16. Alaskan gold fields and opportunities for capital and labor, by S. C. Dunham. No. 17. Brotherhood relief and insurance of railway employees, by E. B. Johnson, Ph. D. The nations of Antwerp, by J. Howard Gore, Ph. D. No. 18. Wages in the United States and Europe, 1870 to 1898. No. 19. Alaskan gold fields and opportunities for capital and labor, by S. C. Dunham. Mutual relief and benefit associations in the printing trade, by W. S. Waudby. No. 20. Condition of railway labor in Europe, by Walter E. Weyl, Ph. D. No. 21. Pawnbroking in Europe and the United States, by W. B. Patterson, Ph. D. No. 22. Benefit features of American trade unions, by Edward W. Bemis, Ph. D. The Negro in the black belt: Somesocial sketches, byW. E. B. DuBois, Ph. D. Wages m Lyon, France, 1870 to 1896. No. 23. Attitude of women’s clubs, etc., toward social economics, by Ellen M. Henrotin. The production of paper and pulp in the U. S. from Jan. 1 to June 30, 1898. No. 24. Statistics of cities. No. 25. Foreign labor laws: Great Britain and France, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 26. Protection of workmen in their employment, by Stephen D. Fessenden. Foreign labor laws: Belgium and Switzerland, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 27. Wholesale prices: 1890 to 1899, by Boland P. Falkner, Ph. D. Foreign labor laws: Germany, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 28. Voluntary conciliation and arbitration in Great Britain, by J. B. McPherson. System of adjusting wages, etc., in certain rolling mills, by J. H. Nutt. Foreign labor laws: Austria, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 29. Trusts and industrial combinations, by J. W. Jenks, Ph. D. The Yukon and Nome gold regions, by S. C. Dunham. Labor Day, by Miss M. C. de Graffenried. No. 30. Trend of wages from 1891 to 1900. Statistics of cities. Foreign labor laws: Various European countries, by W. F. Willoughby. No. 31. Betterment of industrial conditions, by V. H. Olmsted. Present status of employers’ liability in the TJ. S., by S. D. Fessenden. Condition of railway labor in Italy, by Dr. Luigi Einaudi. No. 32. Accidents to labor as regulated by law in the U. S., by W. F. Willoughby. Prices of commodities and rates of wages in Manila. The Negroes of Sandy Springs, Md.: A social study, by W. T. Thom, Ph. D. The British workmen’s compensation act and its operation, by A. M. Low. No. 33. Foreign labor laws: Australasia and Canada, by W. F. Willoughby. The British conspiracy and protection of property act and its operation, by A. M. Low. No. 34. Labor conditions in Porto Kico, by Azel Ames, M. D. Social economics at the Paris Exposition, by Prof. N. P. Gilman. The workmen’s compensation act of Holland. No. 35. Cooperative communities in the United States, by Rev. Alexander Kent. The Negro landholder of Georgia, by W. E. B. Du Bois, Ph. D. No. 36. Statistics of cities. Statistics of Honolulu, H. I. No. 37. Railway employees in the United States, by Samuel McCune Lindsay, Ph. D. The Negroes of Litwalton, Va.: A social study of the “ Oyster Negro,” by William Taylor Thom, Ph. D. No. 38. Labor conditions in Mexico, by Walter E. Weyl, Ph. D. The Negroes of Cinclare Central Factory and Calumet Plantation, La., by J. Bradford Laws. No. 39. Course of wholesale prices, 1890 to 1901. No. 40. Present condition of the hand-working and domestic industries of Germany, by Henry J. Harris, Ph. D. Workmen’s compensation acts of foreign countries, by Adna F. Weber. No. 41. Labor conditions in Cuba, by Victor S. Clark, Ph. D. Beef prices, by Fred C. Croxton.