View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

H7f
I
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
H. 11

April lU, 1950
''DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES
(Based on;-Dollar Amounts).

Federal Reserve district
and city-

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago-1/ "°Jan.

UNITED STATES

-

Boston District
New Haven
Boston
Springfield
Providence

Conn.
Mass,
"
R,I.

New York District
Newark
Buffalo
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

N.J.
N. Y.
"
"
"

Philadelphia District
Philadelphia
Pa.
Cleveland District
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Toledo
Erie
Pittsburgh

Ohio

Pa.

D.C.
Md.

Atlanta District
Birmingham
Miami
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville

Ala.
Fla.
Ga.
La.
Tenn.

Chicago District
Chicago
IndianapolisDetroit
Milwaukee

111.

Ind.
Mich.
Wis.




+ .1

h

- 1
T5
+: 2

-10
- 2

- 6

- 9

-

2

- 5

+ 7
+ 2
+ 5
o
+ 6

+ 7
+%9
+ k
+13
+10

-

+ 1

-5

H

- 6
- 6

- 6
- h

- 3

- 2

+ 5

- 6

+ U
+12

m

-T 6

- 6

2

:i

+. 2

- 5
+
-

2
3
7
9
5

-11

Richmond District
Washington
Baltimore

|™°Feb. °* |®r.ll jlfar.18 jtiar. 25 [Apr. ljApr.

- 3
-

2

- 5
- l
-13
o
+ 5
-

2

- 5
- 5
TH

- 5
+ h
-10

- 9
- 5
- 2
- 1

-10

+ 3

+ 1

. 0
+: 7

+11
- 6

+ 2
+ 2

- 3
- 8
- 5
-

2

- 1
- 2
+ 3
- 3

h

-

-10

- 2

3
3
7
7
0.

+

5

-10
- 9
+ 3 • -. l
- 3

- 7

-

+ l
o
- 5
+iU

+ 3
- 7
+ h
0

- 2
33
+ 3

+ 9
+19
+2$
+1U
+
+
+
.+
+

1
1
h
1
3

+
+
+

0
3
3
3 '
2

+ 2

. -33
+ 5.
+ 3
+ 3 . +10
+ 2
- 3
Z±
r- 2
- 5
r- U
r+ h
- 3

U
l
5
6
3
1

-

2

- 1

k
u
5
u
6

-

5
9
1
1
9
u
0

r- 2

0
+
+
+
+

-

+
+

-

2

rn
+ 3
-

2

-

9
5
2
1

+

2

-10

0
.

-

$.

+12
+13
+12
+13
+ 6

+12

+ 8
+11
+15
r+ 6
+ 7
r 0

+ 1

r- 1

- U

+ 2
+ 1
+ 6

- 2

+ u
- 5
+ h
+20
-12

+ 2
- 1

- S

DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued)

St. Louis District
Little Rock
- Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis
Minneapolis District
Minneapolis
St. Paul
Duluth-Superior

Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Tenn.
Minn,
"

"&17is.

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago 2/
Month of' Month of Mar. 11 Mar.18
Feb.
Jan,

|
I

Federal Reserve district
and city

- 3
%I2
- h
- h
+ 3

0
+11
- 3
- 2
+ 3

- 2
+ 2
+ 3
- 5
- 1

+ 2
+ 3
+12

~ 7
ru
- 8
— h

+ 5
TIB
+ 6
0

-111
-TZ
- 9
-18

- 1
0
- 2
r- 7

+ 2
+ 1
3
+ 9

r- 3
TH
+ 5
-19

r- 2

+ 2
+ 3
- 7
- 1
-1U
+ U
+12

r 0
+ 9
- 3
- 2
-12
. + 5
-lU

+ h
7-5
0
.- h

r+ 5
r+12
+ 6
- 6

+17
+19
+ 21
+ 7
+19

- 3

+. 2

- 3

- 6

- 1
+ 2
+ 2
+16
0

- U
- u
- 9
0
- 3

: - 8
-10
-12
+11
- 1

Dallas District
Dallas
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio

+ U
TT
+11
- 5
+ 2

-tr—

San Francisco District
Los Angeles Area
Calif.
Oakland
"
San Francisco
Ore.
Portland
Utah
Salt Lake City
Wash.
Seattle

0
9
3
1
2

- h
' + 1
- 9

Kansas City District
Colo.
Denver
Kans.
Wichita
Kansas-City
Mo.
/St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Okla.
Tulsa
"
Tex.

+ h

pr. 8

- 8
6
- 5
-18
- 6
-11

+

5
1
b
2
3

+

0
0
+ 8
-12
+ 7

•+ 2
+ 2
6
+ 2U

+ 8
T3
+ 8
- 3
+30

+ 2

- 1

0
a
6
9
9

+11
+ 8
- 1
- 7
- 1

.- 1
- 2
0
+ 3
- 5
-11
0

0
ru
+ h
+ 6
+12
0
0

+

7

—

+ 5
+ 2
+13'

+
. +
+
+

+
+
-

+
+
+
+
-

2
1
3
2
u
0
+ 6

- 3
+12
- 1
- 9
+ 8
+
+
+
-

1
1
3
6

+12
+ h

+ 7
+ 8
+13
0
+10
+11

r—Revised,
Data not available.
1/ Curing March'and April changes from a year ago reflect in part the fact that last
year Easter was on April 17 while this year it was on April 9. For this reason
it is estimated that in comparison with last year allowance should be made for
an increase in sales of about 2 per cent for the month of March as a whole and
for a corresponding decrease for the month of April as a whole.